WEBVTT - Apple's Tough Start in China and TikTok's Bill

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart.

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed lud Love.

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyder Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York, and I'm.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Ed Lodlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Apple faces its worst start to the year in China

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 3>that since the COVID pandemic, as new reports shows sales

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 3>fell by nineteen percent in the first quarter.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Plus the Senate is set to consider the ninety five

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar aid package that could lead to a nationwide

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 4>ban on TikTok if not divested.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 5>We'll go on the ground to Washington and we.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Put your head to Tesla earnings after the Bella's investors

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>brace for Musk to nix the roll out of a

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>cheaper model and refocus on developing a robotax shares already

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>suffering their long routes is twenty twenty two. We'll discussed

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 3>that and so much more throughout this hour. But even

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>as we sit with much anticipation of the earnings to come,

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>we managed to see some risk appetite in the market today.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe the bad news is good news from a macro

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 3>perspective today, maybe some of that business activity actually cooling

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 3>off more than the market anticipated means well we decide

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>to go into equities as we think the Federals of

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe has more space to be cutting in the second

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 3>half of the year. Now's THATAK currently off up one

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent, but remember we've been beaten up,

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 3>particularly at the end of last week two year yield

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 3>big auction sixty nine billion dollars worth record amount coming

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 3>to the market, yet still yields managing to be falling today.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>That's so as we see money move into some of

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 3>the havens we're seeing four point ninety three there are thereabouts,

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 3>so interesting that we've got equities rallying and indeed Bob

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Market's rallying on this particular day. Stocks six hundred over

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 3>in Europe also having a stellar run. On the moment,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>we're up a percentage point, notably UK call out for

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>them the footsy one hundred crentyet a new record high.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's actually as we see some of the haven

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>stocks there actually do well amid some of the geopolitical tensions.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 3>We have a look overall at money moving into both

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 3>risk asset classes, and indeed it's a good old bitcoin,

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 3>but four ten percent at the moment, we're currently at

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>sixty eight hundred and forty nine, so well off. The

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 3>highs are still money coming in despite a relatively strong dollar.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 6>Ed.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 3>What for you've got coming up on the micro.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Are earnings and a lot of individual individual tech names.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Tesla's getting a boost ahead of earnings. After the bell,

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>we will play Oh get ready to play Tesla Bingo.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Tune in at the end of the show to find

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>out what I'm talking about. Spotify swing to profit, strong

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 4>sub subscriber growth, Bloomberg's actually Carmen's going to join us.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 4>This is a name that a lot of people watching.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Look at the big jump in the shares and then

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Adobe's higher. It's the one year anniversary since Firefly was released.

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 4>I think there's big questions about particularly text to video generation.

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 4>We have a key interview with an Adobe executive. Then

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 4>there's Apple, so Apple's interesting. We're now higher, maybe four

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 4>tens one percent in the session. We had open lower,

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 4>but basically we're trading at the same level on Apple

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 4>we were one year ago. It has been a difficult start.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 5>To the year.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Concern principally about China. Third party data Counterpoint Research shows

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 4>that iPhone sales in China down nineteen percent one nine.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 4>More interesting, perhaps, is the other data outside of Apple

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 4>showing domestic handset makers gaining market share. Apple has fallen

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 4>to third and it's on par with Huawei, which is

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of resurgent at the higher end of the smartphone market.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 5>The data doesn't seem to be worrying.

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Anyone right now.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 4>We continue to push higher in the session, but big

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 4>picture ahead of earnings later on next week, Apple in focus.

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk to none other than Bloomberg's chief Apple correspondent,

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Mark German. We stress third party data. It is not

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Apple telling us this, but there's a bit of concern

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 4>that China is still the key battleground and the iPhone

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 4>is losing ground mark.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 7>This is exactly what Wall Street and investors have been

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 7>bracing for another big decline in China. As you know,

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 7>Apple had its biggest decline in a cup of years

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 7>last quarter related to overall China sales, and now it

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 7>looks like you're going to see another decline in China

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 7>given this data from Counterpoint Research. Now, as I typically say,

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 7>these data points are typically not exactly on the money,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 7>but they're usually directionally correct. So if they're telling us

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 7>that iPhone sales in China are down by a fifth,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 7>I would believe that iPhone sales in China are down

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 7>quite considerably, not maybe as bad as nineteen percent, but

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.119
<v Speaker 7>in all likelihood they're going to be down, bringing down

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 7>of the overall picture in China. Now, why is that

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 7>partcurely interesting? Because even though China had about a two

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 7>billion dollar decline in the prior quarter, Tim Cook on

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 7>the earnings call said, that's not because of the iPhone,

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 7>it's because of Apple's other products that they sell in China. Well,

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 7>this timearound, it's likely because the iPhone. If these numbers

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 7>are to be believed to be.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Believed, let's talk about other products. Because we've kind of

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>got signaling on all of this before IDC another third

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 3>party data giving us a similar picture. What's new on

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>day mark? Is it?

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 3>May seventh, we've got a new event and it's all

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 3>around those new iPads.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, as I've been saying on here and on power

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 7>on the last several weeks, Apple is set to launch

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.679
<v Speaker 7>its biggest free damp to the iPad in over five years.

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 7>You're going to see new versions of the iPad air

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 7>in the iPad pro introduced on May seventh. They're going

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 7>to play a video on their website. They're trying something

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 7>new here, a video starting time of seven am versus

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 7>the usual ten am, and they're announcing this video well

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 7>in advance. They've been trying some different things lately. Their

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 7>usual cadence is to announce these things seven days in advance,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 7>So now we're getting a full two weeks, which is

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 7>quite interesting. Maybe they want a little bit more momentum

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 7>leading into that they're trying to see for these smaller

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 7>scale launches if more advanced notice brings in more people.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 7>So this is certainly going to look out for new

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 7>iPad pro, new iPad Air, new Apple pencil, new Magic keyboards,

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 7>all coming about one month before they announced their new

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 7>AA initiatives at the Worldwide Developers Conference in early June.

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 8>So this is going to be significant.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 7>In the hope, if you're on Wall Street or a

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 7>shareholder of the company, is that this is going to

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 7>boost iPad sales, which have been down quite considerably the

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 7>last several quarters due to a lack of any updates

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 7>across twenty twenty three.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 3>And they're in lines a lot of the issue, a

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 3>lack of update and certainly weakness in China. Mark German

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 3>always telling us as telling us at first reappreciate it. Meanwhile,

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 3>let's continue the conversation now on basically where you should

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 3>sit with Apple when you're an investor, Ioka, you're Yoshi Yoka. Sorry,

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 3>get my words out today, portfolio manager over at Wealth

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Enhancement Group in the house with us, Ioka. When you're

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 3>looking at Apple, when you've seen some of the weakness,

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 3>the worries about product updates, about perhaps behind the curve

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to AI, is this still such a

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 3>solid name that you cannot avoid but to remain allocated

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 3>to it, would you start to take some risk off?

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 9>It's a great question, Caroline. So you know, when we

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 9>look at Apple, it is a great company. It's got

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 9>a high quality balance sheet. There's so much cash on

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 9>their balance sheet and that allows them.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 3>To buy back a lot of stock.

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 9>It's a big position within the S and P five

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 9>hundred index, so it is difficult to not own it.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 9>And yet we do start to see some of these

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 9>issues with Apple in terms of innovation and then being

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 9>able to really bring new products that can continue to

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 9>grow at the pace that they have been growing over.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 3>The last several years. And I think this is some

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of the tension we're seeing across the so called Magnificent seven,

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 3>those that are deemed less than magnificent for some still

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>managing to do very well. When we're worried about a

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Tesla and Apple, which in many ways have very similar

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 3>issues China weakness, competition coming from China, worries about ultimately

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 3>a lack of an update from a product, is it more. Therefore,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>you have to look at valuations rather than trying to

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 3>see a narrative as to when you get the next product.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 9>I think it's the combination of both valuation and then

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 9>just future growth. I think both Apple and Tesla are

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 9>suffering from, you know, the issues that you talked about,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 9>and that's dampening their overall growth going forward, and so

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 9>valuation for that lower growth is a little bit higher

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 9>than everybody would like to.

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Pay the OCO. If the megacaps don't beat, what happens.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 9>You know, I think there could be a little bit

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 9>of another sort of sell off in the market. We

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 9>saw it last week and a half, you know. Ever

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 9>since the inflation print, and I think we do need

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 9>to see a lot of these larger names Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 9>They need to come out and show us that they

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 9>can continue to grow at the pace that they can grow,

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 9>and show that free cash flow growth so that people

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 9>can continue to rely on them for that quality growth.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Do you get this sense here?

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, this is the quarter where we look past the

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 4>AI height and we start again to look at fundamentals.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Did you have earnings growth? How is your free cash flow?

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 4>Boring things like that?

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 9>You know, I think it's going to be a combination

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 9>of both ed in terms of you know, you have

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 9>to produce those numbers. Those fundamentals are going to matter,

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 9>but everybody wants to look at the future and say, well,

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 9>can you continue to produce those quality numbers that we've seen.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 9>So AI continues to be, you know, a tailwind that

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 9>everybody wants to see production out of and further continuance

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 9>of that revenue and earnings growth.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 3>When you are seeing such a run up in big

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 3>tech of late, how much you thinking about the macro,

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the data that we got today.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, I think the macro always contributes to the overall

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 9>market narrative. You know, the larger cap names just tend

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 9>to be at the very top of the funnel, per se,

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 9>and they are technically those long duration assets that everybody

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 9>likes to talk about and are most impacted by higher

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 9>interest rates, and so they are a a crucial part

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 9>of how we look at the overall macro as well

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 9>as the individual stocks.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Let's do a case study, which is Spotify. It's an

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 4>interesting subscriber and ad based platform, profit and user growth.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 5>What does that tell you?

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 9>You know, Spotify has been on quite a tear over

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 9>the last year. They've really focused on managing costs and

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, as you know everybody's seen with the results,

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 9>those gross margin numbers were really eye popping, you know,

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 9>seeing those. The guidance for gross margin to continue higher

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 9>at twenty eight percent next quarter is definitely something that

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 9>we can continue to see with Spotify really, you know,

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 9>generating that revenue and the earnings growth and managing the

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 9>costs while they do that.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 4>The stock on track for its biggest jump since October

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty nineteen. Are you Yoshioka, portfolio manager a wealth enhancement group.

0:10:55.200 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Let's get back to Spotify earnings now. After the audio

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 4>streaming giants swung to profit in the first quarter. Bloomberg's

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 4>actually Carmens here with the details swung to profit and

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 4>subscriber growth?

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 5>What were behind those two things?

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Over the past year, Spotify has really changed its business

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>today and its earnings called Daniel like the CEO, called

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it the new Spotify. They reduced their costs significantly, particularly

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in their podcast business, which had been weighing on margins,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and they've reduced their costs. They unfortunately did have to

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>reduce their headcount quite a bit, but we're seeing that

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>play out in that first quarter earnings for sure.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, phenomenal move in shares Ashley, and yet still

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 3>some of the forecasts maybe behind where the market and anticipated.

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 3>Is this just such a feel good factor around profitability?

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Finally, Yeah, I think the investors are really thrilled to

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>see that they're still growing their user base and their subscribers,

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that profitability, and I mean it's worth noting that this

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is happening while they've reduced the number of people working

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>from them, as well as increasing prices around the world

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>with more price increases to come. So I think investors

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>are just feeling like there's a lot of opportunity here.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>For them to continue growing and squeezing more revenue out

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of their users.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 4>Something that happened in the current period was Taylor Swift happened?

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 4>I know, I listened to the entire thing on Friday.

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Did they talk about that?

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 8>They did not.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>They did not talk about Taylor Swift, though I wish.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 3>But more what they perhaps are talking about is their

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 3>focus on audio from the book's perspective. Sure, they've been

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 3>pulling back in podcasting, but they still kept their heavy hitters.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I think of Joe Rogan. But what then of the

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 3>ability to charge more for audiobooks in full Ashley That

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>seems to be working.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so we had reported this last week, but Daniel

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Eck also mentioned this on the call today that basically,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they introduced fifteen hours of audiobook listening to

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>subscribers in certain parts of the world, and of those

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>users who have had the ability to play audiobooks, twenty

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>five percent of them have taken advantage of their offering.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So what they're really seeing is adoption and what they

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>can do with that adoption. I mean, they could charge more,

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they can break out this audiobooks only tier which they launched.

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it's giving them a lot of room to

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially play with the different subscription tiers once again giving

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>them flexibility with their users and the revenue that they

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>can get from.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 3>Them as the opportunity. Investors love it. Ashley Carmen, thanks

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>so much coming on talking us through what is a

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 3>key mover today. Meanwhile, sticking with earnings and those that

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 3>are companies over in Europe, SAP says it's current cloud

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 3>backlog so as fastest growth on record. This comes as

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Europe's biggest software firm is actually seeking to my great

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 3>customers from its legacy on premise software to the cloud,

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 3>where of course it gets to offer business AI services too.

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Sweetened that deal. We spoke to the CFO a little

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 3>earlier today.

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 10>The advent of AI has clearly propelled the story of

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 10>the transformation to the cloud. To move our customers from

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 10>their on prem installations onto clouds are thing in an

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 10>uptick on a constant currency basis, and all that is

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 10>driven really by the core offering we have in the cloud,

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 10>which is called the cloud ear Peacewite. That offering has

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 10>actually generated in excess of thirty percent growth for nine

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 10>quarters in a row.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 11>Now time for talking tech first up, Elon Musk's social

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 11>network has been hit with an interim injunction by an

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 11>Australian court to remove footage of a recent terrorist attack

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 11>and hearing last night in Sydney, the Federal Court of

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 11>Australia ordered x to hide all recordings of the attack

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 11>until Wednesday.

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 4>The court will then convene for a second hearing at

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 4>a later date to determine the validity of a removal

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 4>notice by the country's e Safety Commissioner. Meanwhile, ASML is

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 4>weighing options to expand its presence in the Netherlands. The

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 4>move comes after the government committed two point seven billion

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 4>dollars to infrastructure and education spending in the region. The

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 4>company said it's signed a letter of intent and the

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 4>final decision is subject to ironing out a few crucial

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 4>points and Perplexity Ai has raised about sixty three million

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 4>dollars in a new funding round that values the company

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 4>and more than one billion dollars. Perplexity offers an AI

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 4>chatbot that summarizes search results, list citations for its answers,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 4>and helps users refine their queries to get the best responses.

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 4>The financing doubles perplexities valuation from just three months ago, Caroline.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 3>AI still so hot. Let's talk about AI in the

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 3>context of Adobe now, because it's bringing more generative AI

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 3>tools to Photoshop powered by it's Adobe Fileflight, Image three

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Foundation model. Joining us now from their Maps Creativity conference

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 3>over in London, David Wanjani, Adobe Digital Media President, Welcome,

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, how is this incentivizing clients to pay

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>more for Adobe? How are you seeing generative AI really

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 3>bring about a revenue increase for the business?

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 12>Great to be here, Caline, you know, I think we

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 12>have to put everything we're doing with generative AI in

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 12>the context of what we've been doing over the last year.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 12>We first introduced generative AI a year ago, and in

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 12>that period of time, we've added imaging model, a vector model,

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 12>which is another very important format for a creative professionals,

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 12>a design model. We've enabled customization of that content for

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 12>their specific design needs or their assets that they work on,

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 12>and we've exposed that in Photoshop at our creative cloud applications.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 12>We've exposed it in Adobe Express for marketers and creative

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 12>professionals and solentrepreneurs, and we've exposed it as APIs for

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 12>a broad base of automation workflows, And what this has

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 12>really done is it's supercharged content creation. If you're a

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 12>creative pro, you can produce that content much more effectively

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 12>and much more quickly. If you're trying to automate workflows,

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 12>you can do that with your existing environments that you have.

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 12>And if you're a marketer, you can react more quickly

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 12>to anything that's happening on social really empowered businesses to

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 12>operate at another level of scale.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk about scale and the difficulty ultimately

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 3>of feeding data into foundational models. At the moment, you've

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>just been unveiling sort of the new foundational model, and

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in is what's going in because what set

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>you apart, particularly in the narrative of Adobe, is that

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 3>you're safer because you are building basically upon your own data,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>your own well images that you own, your stock. But

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 3>then there was some reporting, some bloomberg ultimately that you're

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 3>having to use synthetic data which is sometimes used from

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 3>rival AI well image generators. Can you just tell us

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 3>about how clients are responding to really what your data

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 3>is being trained on right now?

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we are, I think, without a doubt, the most

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 12>responsible training model in the market. We've been very clear

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 12>that we have full license rights for everything that we've

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 12>trained on. We have a process that we internally call

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 12>ART which is about accountability, responsibility, and transparency. So everything

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 12>we generate and any model before its hips goes through

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 12>this process.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 13>We have.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 12>Basically a moderation system in place so that we make

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 12>sure any content that comes in does not have or

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 12>is not encumbered with any misappropriated IP rights. And so

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 12>customers have been very very clear with us is that

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 12>there's a lot of interesting work going on around the

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 12>industry around AI models, but when it comes to true

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 12>production systems, we're really at the top of the marks

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 12>in terms of the ability to actually use this to

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 12>create and ship content that's generated with these models.

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 4>David, there is only one single question that's being directed

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 4>at a Davy right now, which is when and in

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 4>what form will you have a text to video generation

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 4>platform akin to Sora.

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I don't know.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 12>If you had a chance to see the announcements that

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 12>we made last week at the National American Broadcast, there's

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 12>a video series we announced and we talked about how

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 12>we are We actually gave us sneak of our text

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 12>of video capabilities as part of that, we also announced

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 12>that we're working with Sora, that we're working with Runway

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 12>and with Pika, and together all of these capabilities are

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 12>going to be embedded in all of our creative applications.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 12>What's really exciting about all this text of video capability

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 12>is that we have the ability now to look at

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 12>this and say, all of this generative capabilities is analogous

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 12>to more cameras in the world, and the more content

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 12>that gets created, the more content comes into our systems

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 12>for editing. We've also been just as clear our technology

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 12>for video, the architecture and the research that's gone into

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 12>it is very similar to what we see out of

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 12>Sora and others, and that we expect to have our

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 12>model in market later this year.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 4>The strategy in Premier, and when I was at Generalism School,

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.959
<v Speaker 4>i trained Premiere, So it's interesting full circle. You are

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 4>going to use third party models, and so far Photoshop

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 4>has not had the extension of that strategy. Just explain

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 4>why and what you'll do going forward.

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 12>We are going to embrace all models. You know Photoshop

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 12>you will see again later this year.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 8>You will see.

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 12>Support for any model that can be integrated into Photoshop

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 12>will be integrated into Photoshop. But we also recognize that

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 12>each model has its own personality, and at any given moment,

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 12>what you generate in one model versus another model, there

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 12>might be be varying preferences. The one thing that we

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 12>know is that Firefly is going to be, you know,

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 12>synonymous with the best quality of content, with the best

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 12>detail of content, and with the most controllability of that

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 12>content that's generated in particular, and that means that whatever

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 12>we create with Firefly can get more deeply embedded in

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 12>our tools. As Caroline mentioned, we just had an enormous

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 12>set of announcements in terms of dozens of new capabilities

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 12>of AI generation embedded in our tools and workflows, and

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 12>it's because of the way we build Firefly, but we

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 12>are embracing third party models and we anticipate and expect

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 12>to integrate those in our tools as well.

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 4>David Worldwhinnie, Adobe Digital Media President, Great to have you on.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 4>We're marking one year, believe it or not, since Firefly,

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 4>appreciate it. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. Ed Ludlow in

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco.

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 3>Anan had anyw York. Let's get a quick check on

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 3>your markets, because oh I got a little bit of

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 3>money back into the tech sector after what has been

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 3>beaten up over the last few training days. Money one

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 3>point four percent higher on the Nasdaq one hundred. We

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 3>are all bracing for the earnings narrative that comes out

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 3>thick and fast for the rest of the week, and

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 3>so far we're seeing a little bit of buying the

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 3>dip that we've seen in some of the tech names

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 3>have been beaten up, certainly from Friday into Monday. Now Tuesday,

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 3>now's that one hundred higher. We're seeing the two year

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 3>yield auction. We're looking at two year ye'l currently down

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 3>by almost four basis points ahead of that all important

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 3>sixty nine billion dollar auction of two year bonds foot

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 3>instead of record high Europe having a good day to

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 3>moving on, have a look at some of the individual

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 3>movers as we do anticipate some big earnings narratives for

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 3>this week. Want to shine out on Nvidia. Yes, it

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 3>was down ten percent on Friday, but Monday got bought

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the dip. Tuesday they're buying the dip again. We're up

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 3>three point seven percent, so managing to whittle weigh some

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 3>of those losses that extended to more than two hundred

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars worth of market cap lost on Friday. I'm

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 3>looking also what's happening in Microsoft at one point four percent. Yes,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 3>we get their earnings later, but we also anticipating while

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 3>still they're focused on artificial intelligence of their own building,

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>They've got a smaller model that they've announced today, built

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 3>by Microsoft's own AI researchers, and that's going to be

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 3>able to be adopted. Finational model, use more on your

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 3>actual devices. What does that mean? It's an open source

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 3>model as well, so interesting as they continue to basically

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 3>create even with their close relationship with the likes of

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Mistra and indeed of course of open AI. I'm looking

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 3>what's happening on Instacart down heavily, down by more than

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 3>seven percent. This is, as we understand, Amazon is going

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>to be well getting into the world a grocery delivery.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 3>It's not always worked that well before ed, but still

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.239
<v Speaker 3>this is the bread and butter of Instacart. It is

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 3>feeling some of the competitive threat, even though amast say, look,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 3>there's room enough for more. A what if you've got

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 3>in the micro.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Away from some of the public names, is a private

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 4>name that is top of mind for everyone and that

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 4>is TikTok and the legislation involving TikTok, which would bar

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 4>the Social Platform from operating in the US if it's

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 4>China based owner doesn't sell its stake within a year.

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberos Kielyons is here from DC for more on the

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 4>bill on its way to the Senate. So my understanding

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 4>today that there's kind of a next procedural step.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Before the kind of main event what's going to happen.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's exactly right.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 14>This is the United States Senate and which procedure does

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 14>loom large. So what really needs to happen in order

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 14>to get to a final passage vote is first it

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 14>must pass the closure vote that will begin later this

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 14>afternoon votes beginning around one pm Eastern times. Sixty votes

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.239
<v Speaker 14>will be needed in order to advance this and then

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 14>it's going to be a question of how much debate

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 14>there is of this package, which yes, does include the

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 14>TikTok divestor band bill, but it's part of a much

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 14>wider bill that has ninety five billion dollars in four

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 14>and aid for US allies. So that is why a

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 14>lot of Senators may end up voting for this bill,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 14>whether or not. They've been advocates for this kind of

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 14>legislation around TikTok in the past. Keep in mind that

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 14>a very similar bill that didn't have TikTok included already

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 14>had passed the Senate by a vote of seventy four

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 14>months ago, so it's highly likely that this ultimately will

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 14>pass during final passage. It really is just a question

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 14>of when how much disruption we can see from the

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 14>likes of Republican Senator Ran Paul or even Democratic Senator

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 14>Bernie Sanders. But the way the procedure goes is once

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 14>this closure vote happens, there will be a maximum of

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 14>thirty hours of debate after that. So this is highly

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 14>likely to pass the Senate, if not today, by Wednesday

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 14>at the latest.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 3>It's worth keeping in mind that.

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 14>They are supposed to be on recess this week, so

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 14>it's likely that a lot of Senators are eager to

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 14>get out of Washington and to go actually take their

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 14>time off in their districts. But then, of course, it

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 14>becomes a question of what happens after this gets President

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 14>Biden's signature, because not only does this give TikTok potentially

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 14>a year to work on this divestiture. It also, we

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 14>understand plans to fight this in court. There is likely

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 14>to be a long legal battle that will play out,

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 14>and then a lot of remaining questions, including whether or

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 14>not China would actually sign off on any divestiture of

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 14>by Dance and the TikTok Us operation, what help happens

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 14>to the algorithm, who will be able to buy this

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 14>business without running into anti trust issues? A lot of

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 14>questions will still remain after today.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Caroline, Kaymie, and I therefore ask a question on the

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 3>sentiment you're hearing from the people you speak to on

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Capitol Hill about what this means for China in the US,

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 3>what this means for other Chinese businesses looking to will

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 3>continue to expand in the US. I think a PDD

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and TIMU.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, that's a very real concern, Caroline. Those who were

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 14>more opposed to this legislation when it first passed the

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 14>housekeeping in mind that initially it was a bill that

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 14>would see TikTok need to be invested within a six

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 14>month period. You did have some critics, including the chair

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 14>of the Senate Commerce Committee, Senator Maria campt Well, talking

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 14>about how that timeline seemed unrealistic, There were also others

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 14>who were calling attention to the fact that this is

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 14>a piece of legislation targeting a private business and what

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 14>kind of precedent that may set if the US is

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 14>suddenly pursuing that kind of policy. By and large, though,

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 14>it does seem that, especially among the intelligence and national

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 14>security community, they are much more concerned with those national

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 14>security issues around data privacy, the way in which the

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 14>Chinese government may be access user data from the well

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 14>over one hundred million Americans who are on this platform,

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 14>and also on the propagation of mis or disinformation that

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 14>could be on this platform in the run up to

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 14>the election. And it's worth keeping in mind with the

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 14>timeline that is set in this new piece of legislation,

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 14>which would be divestiture between nine months up to a

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 14>year should the President choose, that will take us well

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 14>beyond the vote in November.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Articularly put Katie lines with all the procedural events and

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 3>indeed what this has impact longer term. We thank you.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more of a deep dive on all of this.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 3>Doug Kelly US is with US. He's former chief of

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 3>staff to Senator Amy Klobashaw and now a fellow at

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 3>the Harvard Belfer Center, where he focuses on US tech policy,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 3>in particularly, you're thinking around thoughtful AI policy with Americans

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 3>responsible innovation, Doug. I'm interested is to the nuance here

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 3>of promoting innovation at the same time as promoting safety

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and will this ultimately see less social media competition here

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>in the US and what does that mean for innovation.

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 15>I think the TikTok is really a unique case. You know,

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 15>it's a case we're looking at. You know, most policymakers

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 15>want a foster competition. They also have great respect for

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 15>First Amendment rights of free expression. But on both sides

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 15>of the aisle, you've seen the argument me that TikTok

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 15>is a unique national security threat, and I think when

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 15>the intelligence community comes together and makes the case that

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 15>this is a step that needs to be taken for

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 15>national security policy makers, buy a largele listen. I also

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 15>think it's likely that this type of BAM or holt

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 15>up in the courts for that very reason.

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 8>But time will tell.

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 5>Doug.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 4>In the divestent ban, let's go with the band scenario.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 4>You are a student of US technology policy. You have

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 4>a CV that shows you understand the organs of government.

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 4>You explain to me how you get one hundred and

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 4>fifty million Americans to not use TikTok in a twelve

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 4>month timeline.

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 15>You know, the way that the legislation works, it wouldn't

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 15>be an immediate on off switch. You would have the

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 15>app store beyond able to update the app. And what

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 15>makes TikTok so great is that it's so user friendly,

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 15>so over time it would degrade and people wouldn't move

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 15>to other things. I agree that if there is no

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 15>divestiture and this moves to a ban, there'd be a

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 15>large public outcry, but I believe that Congress will be

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 15>able to make the case.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 8>Okay, we gave a full year of notice.

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 15>We made it so everything was in place for a divestiture,

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 15>and they've tried to make this painfully clear. And if

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 15>there isn't a divestiture, the question is why. I think

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 15>there will definitely be buyers. There may be anti trust concerns,

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 15>but I believe that anti trust regulators would be cognizant

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 15>of the fact that this is a forced sale and

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 15>really try to he can do to it to making

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 15>it had in. It seems likely that the Chinese government

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 15>has said that they are not going to be okay

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 15>with this, and they're going to stand in the way.

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 15>And if the Chinese Communist Party is standing in the

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 15>way of a divestiture, then I think that just makes

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 15>the case for the law even more clear, and Congress

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 15>really will have winter that's back in terms of public opinion.

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 8>But I agree it could be messy.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:22.479
<v Speaker 15>There are a lot of people who really rely on

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 15>TikTok for their livelihood and if there isn't a divestiture

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 15>and a band goes through, there's gonna be a lot

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 15>of pain. But there are other options, and I think

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 15>this is something that Congress beliefe is worth it in

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 15>the long run, even though it could be difficult.

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Doug talk to us about the other options and whether

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 3>there are enough of them. Some of the sudden question

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 3>marks about how swiftly a potential ban or divest would

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 3>go through was because former President Trump suddenly highlighting concerns

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 3>around Meta ultimately becoming more powerful in his mind's eye

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 3>without TikTok? Is that a concern for you? Do you

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 3>think there's enough competition out there? Do you think just

0:29:58.080 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 3>more will be bred?

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 8>That is a concern.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 15>I believe that with Instagram and with Facebook, you know,

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 15>Meta really does have you know, a major position here,

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 15>and they will be well poised to consolidate control if

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 15>TikTok is taken off the table. And I think that's

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 15>something that a lot of policymakers don't want to see.

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 15>But here because the national security concerns they're willing to

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 15>countenance not possibly happening. There are other also competitors in

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 15>the space. We could see things spring up. I think

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 15>that you know, TikTok's really became a phenomenon because its

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 15>algorithm is so good and it gave users what they wanted.

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 8>But that's not secret now.

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 15>I mean, the algorithm itself is secret, But what they're

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 15>using to try to drive engagement and really make it

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 15>fun and easy to use and very social are things

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 15>that other social platforms can copy. Now, and TikTok were

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 15>no longer a competitor than I think you would see

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 15>other apps spring up to try to do the same thing.

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Doug, finally, go back to your experience of advising a

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 4>senator put that hat on. What is the benefit to

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 4>a lawmaker going strong on the anti China rationale of

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 4>doing this if their constituents are saying, hey, I love TikTok.

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 4>I use TikTok.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 5>They have to then go back and.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Explain why they're doing this, all told ahead of an

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 4>election cycle.

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 15>He's right, that's difficult, and I think the reason it

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 15>works is because the leading lawmakers all held hands and said,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 15>this is something we really care about. The bill came

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 15>through the House committee unanimously with no one posing. That

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 15>almost never happens, and that shows how broad the support

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 15>it is. The vote in the House was very strong.

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 15>You had some members on the far right and the

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 15>far left to a pose, but most of them voted

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 15>for it.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 8>And you're going to see a similar thing here in

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 8>the Senate.

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 15>And you know, if there's one thing that lawmakers like,

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 15>it's political covering. And when they can actually hold hands

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 15>and do something difficult altogether, it makes it much easier

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 15>for each one of them go back to their district

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 15>and set of the constituents.

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 8>Is something that needed to be done.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 4>From the political to the tech policy. Doug, I think

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 4>you were well placed to explain all of that to us.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Stud kalidas part of a Belfa Center fellow, of course,

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 4>chief of staff for Amy Klovich previously Okay, coming up

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Apple sales in China slide in the country as the

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 4>company faces it's worst starts the year since COVID. That's

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 4>according to some third party data. We'll talk about that

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 4>again next character.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's just look at shares of other social media companies

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 3>right now, Trump Media and Technology in particular. Now we

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 3>understand the blank check deal has brought Donald Trump's media

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 3>startup Public is now going to give him another one

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 3>point three billion dollars in stock after meeting certain targets.

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Now these sources of weakness, they're common and as part

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 3>of the special purposition purpose acquisition companies the spack deals,

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 3>but ultimately with thirty six million in additional shares in

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 3>mark for him, bring a total position to nearly one

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifteen million shares, currently down by some nine

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 3>percent on Trump Media and Tech. This is Blue Medtechnology.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 5>Okay, let's get back to Apple.

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 4>I find sales fell in China by nineteen percent during

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 4>the March quarter, worst performance in that market since twenty twenty,

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 4>according to data from independent research firm Counterpoint Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 4>And this Amak Grana is here to give his thesis.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 4>I'd note that the stock actually even with the perceived

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 4>negative headline, isn't reacting negatively. I guess maybe that's because

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 4>it's a situation we've been aware of for a little while.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I know absolutely So.

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 13>One of the numbers I will you know, request you

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 13>to remember is IDC came out a little while ago,

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 13>a couple of weeks ago and said the global shipments

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 13>are down about ten percent for Apple. So I think

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 13>a lot of what we see today is already accounted

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 13>for in that big number. So it's going to be

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 13>fun to see what happens next week when Apple reports,

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 13>and our eyes are mostly on the guidance for three

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 13>Q or the next quarter more than what's happening in

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 13>the current quarter.

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, for the current quarter, just to remind our viewers,

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 3>we're expecting what a five percent decrease in overall revenues.

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 3>That's according to our earning expectations over at Bloomberg when

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 3>they consolidate all of the analysts. But for the next

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 3>quarter after that, there's going to be growth two percent

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 3>growth there or thereabouts.

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 3>What drives that is this the new unveiling of certain

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 3>iPads that we're likely to get May seventh.

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 13>So that's where we think there could be you know,

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 13>maybe a little bit of a risk in terms of

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 13>estimates coming down because when you look at estimates right now,

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 13>iPhone estimates for the current quarter or the results that's

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 13>coming out next to next week. Is iPhone revenue down

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 13>eleven percent? Now, we think if the shipments were down

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 13>ten percent, then the iPhone revenue may be slightly better

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.240
<v Speaker 13>than that in a sense that it could be down,

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 13>you know, eight nine percent or so, because we all

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 13>know that the Promax model is doing well and it

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 13>has higher price, so the ASP goes up for next quarter.

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 13>We are looking at iPhone, you done just two percent. Now,

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 13>if the stuff that's happening in China continues, then that

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 13>number could go down. I think that's weird, a little

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 13>bit of a riskers in terms of forward estimates for Apple.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 13>And that's going to be the biggest thing that we

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 13>follow is what is company going to say about the

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 13>reception of the phone in you know for the next quarter.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 3>May second love that you push us forward to that

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and the earnings after the boll Anna Agrana on Roomberg,

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence and all things Apple. We so appreciate his expertise.

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Quick news story Elon Musk's social platform x is launching

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 4>a TV app, pushing deeper into video as it takes

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 4>on the likes of YouTube. X didn't confirm a date

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 4>for the platform's released, but said it would be quote

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 4>coming soon to most smart TVs. The company also talks

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 4>about the ability to cast video from smartphones to bigger

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.479
<v Speaker 4>TV screens through the app, a move that, of course

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Google and Amazon have made in recent months as well.

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Carolyn, Yeah, let's stick on all things in a muster amendment.

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Is time for Tesla earnings Bingo card game from the

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Elon Inc. Podcast team over at Business Week and here

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 3>with us for more than other than Bloomberg Business Weeks,

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Max Chafkin, we're doing it again. You did it in

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 3>the previous earnings and there were all sorts of fun

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 3>things that you had to sort of shout Bingo. Whether

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 3>he's saying union, whether he's saying Tesla is an AI company,

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 3>whether he's saying dojo. This time, I'm pretty sure Robotaxi

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 3>is gonna be one of those keeping co works.

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 6>Robotaxi is there. We've got We've got a few others.

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 6>We've got Horse up there. I believe it's in oh one,

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 6>which is a reference to the fact that Elon said

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 6>owning a horse, sorry, owning a non ROBOTAXI will be

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 6>like owning a horse in fifteen years.

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if he says.

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 6>That on the earnings call, it should be you know,

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 6>it's obviously this is a huge earnings day for Tesla.

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 6>A lot of dark news going on, but we're trying to.

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Keep it light.

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:52.479
<v Speaker 5>Max.

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 4>I think we should be honest with the audience that

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 4>you and I have come in for a bit of

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 4>stick on social media about some of the selections we made.

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 4>That's okay, is specific to this earning school. You and

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 4>I have been trying to guess the likely outcome the row.

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 4>You're thinking right now, please, well, I.

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 5>Think you got to.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 2>You gotta look at the central square.

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 6>That's the free space, of course for for regular bingo players.

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 6>I think the in line going down looks pretty promising.

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 6>You've got interest rates obviously been a huge issue groc

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk has has mentioned the possibility of integrating Twitter's

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 6>AI assistant in the Tesla cars reasonably optimistic.

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 2>He says that all the time, and of course.

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 6>Advertising, which has been a big issue of for Tesla

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 6>late because they've had these demand challenges.

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's my pick your pick.

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I want to know how close anyone came

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 3>last time. It wasn't. It wasn't an out and out

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 3>win on some of the choices. Which ones are you

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more concerned than my not coming up?

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 2>We Yeah, we got pretty close last time.

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 6>I think in a good bingo game, you want some

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 6>You don't want it to be a gimme, you want

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 6>you want a little bit of tension, you know. I

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 6>think balls to the wall, which was Elon Musk's phrase

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 6>for how they're approaching Robotaxi.

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I would be surprised if that.

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 6>Appears during this earnest call, although Elon Musk loves these

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 6>kind of extremely hardcore, these metaphors that convey just how

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 6>hard he's pushing, so you never know. That would be

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 6>I five for those who are playing at home.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 4>By the way, okay, let's look at the bingo carda

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 4>final time. But there is a serious point to this

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 4>that actually investors have a lot of questions and there

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 4>is a lot of unknown you and I tried to

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 4>go over this on the Elon inc Podcast due out

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 4>this afternoon, and Robotaxi is at the heart of it.

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 4>I get the sense Max that Musk has been busy

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 4>for a few months. He's come back to Tesla, and

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 4>he's decided to focus having realized that things weren't to.

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 5>His liking at that company.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 6>You'll take please, yeah, absolutely, I think that is certainly

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 6>what's going on. I mean, just looking at his social

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 6>media handle, you can see that his attention has been elsewhere,

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 6>and it's you know, it's understandable that he'd come back

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.760
<v Speaker 6>or sort of snap in focus and see a company

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 6>that in many ways seems to be in crisis. You know,

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:08.479
<v Speaker 6>we've seen the stock fall pretty dramatically over the first

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 6>few months of the year. You know, these huge issues

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 6>with inventory piling up, questions about demand, so there are

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 6>things to worry about, and he is leaning into robotaxes,

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 6>as you said, ed, because of course that is this

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 6>kind of like huge bet which Elon Musk likes, that

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.959
<v Speaker 6>could potentially turn this whole thing around, that could really

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 6>separate Tesla from some of these other electric cars that

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 6>are coming to market right now and that you know,

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 6>people are getting excited about, are also getting good reviews.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 4>Max for our millions of Bloomberg Technology audience members around

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 4>the world make the case for why they should follow

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 4>us along during earnings and how they can follow along

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 4>this evening.

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 6>So you can follow along on the Bloomberg dot com

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 6>live blog on the terminal. Ed and I will be

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 6>playing this game, you know, like crazy on social and

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 6>hopefully offering, you know, while we have fun, offering some

0:39:57.680 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 6>you know, half decent commentary to help you.

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Is this because of course this is a huge company.

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 2>This is a big issue.

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:05.919
<v Speaker 6>This is one of the largest companies in the world

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 6>by market cap and where.

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk goes from here is going to affect us all.

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 2>So we'll be paying attention to that as well.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 3>Surning with share prices so well under pressure to say

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the very least, this year all important for those investors

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 3>being them. Business Week's master chef can making light of

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 3>what will be a very serious earnings called the Elon

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 3>in podcast drops later today. Go check it out with

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 3>our own Ed Ludlow on it. Meanwhile, some breaking news

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 3>from you coming regarding TikTok. This is about Ed the

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.240
<v Speaker 3>EU focus on TikTok.

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 3>EU had issued TikTok basically twenty four hours to be

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 3>able to send over a risk assessment for its new app.

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 3>That's TikTok Light, which it had issued in Spain and France.

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Now we understand that bike Dance says it has sent

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 3>a TikTok Light risk assessment report to the EU. All

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of this just highlighting the ongoing regulatory focus for this

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 3>particular social media company that opened a new probe the

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 3>EU had on Monday basically threatening fines of up to

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 3>light one percent of total annual income if they didn't

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 3>give a particular risk assessment for TikTok like they say,

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 3>it potentially violated the block's new content law when it

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 3>was launched. Overall, remember this is kind of like a

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 3>less heavy from a memory perspective version of TikTok, but

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 3>also it pays you to play, and there was some

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 3>addiction worries coming from Thierry Breton over in the EU.

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 3>So all eyes on TikTok later today here in the

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 3>United States as well. That olimportant discussion in the Senate.

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 3>But for now, that does it for this edition of

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Blue Meat Technology.

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 4>Yet, don't forget to recap on the podcast earning seasons

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 4>kicked off in Ernest. I know we're very excited about

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 4>the megacat names in Tesla, but Spotify my goodness, what

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 4>a great report from Ashley Carmen out in New York City.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 4>We're publishing the pod to Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and of

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 4>course all of the Bloomberg platforms from San Francisco and

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 4>New York City.

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology.