WEBVTT - Tracking Changes in Media: VCRs and CDs

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works and I Heart Radio and I love

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>all Things tech. And this is part four of a

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>multi part episode arc about technology and media and how

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the changes in technology change the very business of entertainment

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>as well as our relationship to entertainment. And in the

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>previous three episodes, I traced the origins of recorded media,

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>the birth of the radio, film, and television industries, and

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the humble audio cassette. And we've seen

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that entertainment was gradually transitioning from something you could only

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>experience in the moment, such as when a radio station

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>would play a song or a theater would show a film.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And now we're in an age in which you could

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you could own a permanent record of some of those things.

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Now I've covered music up through the cassette era, so

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>we're going to switch back over to television and film

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit and the birth of the video cassette. Now,

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the challenges in early television was how do

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you broadcast a television program to a national market, most

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>broadcasts were done live, and that limited your your options.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>The United States is a really big country, so if

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you did broadcast a show live, let's say that you've

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>worked out all the technical details, you still have time

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>as a factor. Because the two coasts of the United

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>States are in time zones, there are three hours apart

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>from each other, so prime time for one coast isn't

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>prime time for the other coast. Also, you were limited

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in transmission range, and in the days before massive cable

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>companies had connected different regions using cable and satellites, you

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>had limited options. So it would be better if you

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>could find a a to record a show and then

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>broadcast it at a different time slot for other markets.

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And most shows were being shot in New York, so

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to have a show in New York

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>air in Los Angeles, it made more sense to record

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the show in New York and then send that recording,

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even via cable, out to broadcast stations in Los Angeles,

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>which would then broadcast it. So you still have to

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to record the show you were

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>actually doing, and recording a show was easier said than done.

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Television cameras and monitor technology was best suited for live broadcast,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so you would use a camera to capture images, but

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>send that signal directly to a transmitter and blasted out

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>over radio waves, and then television sets all over the

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>region would pick up those transmissions and show the live

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>broadcast right then and there. Before the invention of videotape,

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>one work around for this was the kinescope. This was

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>not an ideal solution. Basically, you would take a film camera,

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the ones you would use to shoot

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a movie, and it was typically either a sixteen millimeter

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>or a thirty five millimeter film camera, and you would

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>put it behind a television monitor. You would point it

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>at the TV monitor, so you would be shooting a

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>program on television cameras, and the monitor would actually be

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>displaying the image live on it, and then you would

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>use a film camera to capture the image of that

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which was on the monitor screen. So viewers at home,

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at least outside the region that you're directly serving, would

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>actually be looking at a picture of a picture. It's

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>as if you were to play a YouTube video on

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>your computer and then you use your phone's camera to

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>stream that video to someone else. It's not ideal. One

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>other thing had to be done for this to work.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the cameras actually had to be synchronized

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to the monitors scanning rate. So you might remember I've

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about this in other episodes. Cathode ray tube monitors

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>paint screens line by line from the top to the bottom.

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So they paint a horizontal line, they move down, they

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>paint the next horizontal line. Technically they could paint every

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>other line and then do a second frame where they're

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>doing the other lines. So you do the all the

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>oddlines first, then all the even lines. But you get

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea. It's the sequence of painting lines. Now it's

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>done so quickly that our brains can't process this. We

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>just see unbroken moving images. We don't see a series

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of lines being painted on a screen. But if you

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>have a film camera that isn't synchronized with the scanning rate,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>then you can pick up an artifact. Typically we see

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this as sort of a rolling horizontal line moving across

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the television screen in regular cycles. If you've ever seen

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>any real cheap productions that especially like home videos or

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>something that are pointed at a TV screen and you

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>see this weird line scanning across the screen over and

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>over again. That's what we're seeing. You're seeing this, uh,

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the scan line or representa of that scan line. Because

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the cycle of the camera is different from the scan

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>cycle of the monitor. Synchronizing the film camera to the

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>monitor scanning rate eliminated that artifact. The pictures were still

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>not great. They were grainy, They left a lot to

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>be desired, They could be kind of dark, be hard

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to see what's going on. New York citizens typically got

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>a pretty darn good image because so much television production

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.119
<v Speaker 1>was happening in New York City. So if you happen

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to live near New York, you were getting the live

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>broadcast version. You were not getting the kiniscope version. But

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>if you lived in a different time zone, chances are

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you were watching a kiniscope of those programs, and that

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was pretty common in the nineteen forties and early nineteen fifties. Sadly,

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of kinscopes of early television programs have since

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>been lost. There wasn't much thought given to preserving television programs.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Early on TV studios were more concerned with churning out

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>content than keeping the stuff that they had. Are He

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>made and most stuff would just be broadcast live as

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.559
<v Speaker 1>it happened in its home region and then only used

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for rebroadcast for other time zones. It wasn't used for

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>any kind of rebroadcast of the original program, and once

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it was done, it was time to move on. So

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>there was no real thought to stuff like syndication, and

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the idea of home theater wasn't a thing for a

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of decades. No one was thinking about how can

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I watch the stuff at home on demand? So there's

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a ton of stuff that was shown that we know

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>about but that we have no known recordings of. Um.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>This isn't just to the United States. That's happened in

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>other places as well. In the United Kingdom, the BBC

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>was actually famous for not holding on to stuff that

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>future generations thought of as being historically important, but at

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the time no one was really thinking about that. Even

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in the days of videotape, once that became a thing,

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the BBC was known for saving money by taping over

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>old videotape. There are a lot of stories about different

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>shows that survived that fate simply by purchasing the tapes directly.

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Monty Pythons Flying Circus is one of those, Eric Idol

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>actually spent the money to buy the original tapes so

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that the BBC wouldn't tape over them anyway. There were

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a few exceptions to the kinescope approach. In n the

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>sitcom I Love Lucy broke new ground by filming every

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>episode using three film cameras, the classic three camera set

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>up for sitcoms, and they used those instead of television cameras,

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so they would have a live studio audience, but they

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>would be using film cameras to capture everything, and then

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the film was used to produce the episode for broadcast

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to all markets, which drastically improved the quality and the

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>production cost for the show. So it because it was

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>so expensive, it wasn't done for everything it was. I

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Love Lucy was kind of an exception because it was

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>high enough in demand for to justify by the expense.

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But in something else was also happening. A guy named

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Charles Ginsburg was hard at work trying to come up

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>with an alternative solution to this problem. Ginsburg had just

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>started working for a company called Ampex. That's the same

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>company that was instrumental in developing multitrack recorders for recording studios.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>That I mentioned in the previous episode. So Ginsburg was

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>working to make a practical video tape recorder or vt R.

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you listen to my last episode about cassettes,

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you heard me talking about magnetic tape and how it works.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to repeat all of that here.

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>If you have not heard that previous episode, I recommend

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you go check it out first, as the process for

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>recording audio to magnetic tape is pretty similar to recording

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>video to tape. Now, obviously video carries with it a

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more information than just audio, but the process is

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty similar. But here's here's a real super fast cliffs

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Notes version of this. An electrical impulse passes through an

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>electro magnet, which then generates a fluctuating magnetic field, and

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that magnetic field then magnetizes some sort of medium, and

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in the case of videotape, we're talking about a tape

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>coded with ferro magnetic particles. The ferro magnetic particles retain

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>their magnetic properties after they pass under the electro magnet,

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>so they maintain their magnetic orientation. You can think of

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it like that. And then if you run the tape

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>through a player, the reed head reverses this process. It

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>induces an electric current to flow through the player, which

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can then be used to regenerate the recorded video and audio.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Now Ginsburg hailed from San Francisco and he had studied

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>engineering in college and he had been working in the

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>radio industry since nineteen forty eight. He was mainly focused

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>on studio and transmitter engineering, but he got the call

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>from Ampex in nineteen fifty one to join their team

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to work on this problem. In fact, the founder of

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Ampex himself, Alexander M. Poniata, gave gave Ginsburg a call

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to bring him over, and Poniatov hope Ginsburg would be

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>able to help the company come up with the means

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>to record broadcast quality television to videotape, and there have

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>been some experiments with this, but the results had not

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>been really marketable. Promising but not marketable. So Ginsburg led

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a team to design a system. Ampex patented his design

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in nine two, and that same year Ray Dolby, whose

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>name should sound familiar if you're into sound, if you've

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>heard about Dolby Sound, he joined the project. He was

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen years old at the time, and his time with

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the project would get interrupted as he would be called

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>into military service for a few years uh and then

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he would rejoin the project anyway. This again is not

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to say that these are the first people to ever

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>work on this problem or even produce technology that could

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>do some form of video to tape. Shortly after World

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>War Two, engineers had been trying to find ways to

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>preserve television on magnetic tape. But the previous efforts used

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>audio tape recorders, and in order to store the same

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of information of video as you would with audio,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you had to run the recorders much faster. You had

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to dedicate a lot more tape to hold all that

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>extra information since you had video on top of audio,

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>which meant that you had to run these things at

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>incredible speeds to achieve a high frequency response suitable for

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>preserving television. And by incredible speeds, I mean the tape

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>would pass under the recording tape head at a speed

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of around two hundred forty or about six meters per second.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>At that speed, even a short program would need an

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of tape. And that was just one typical approach.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Being Crosby, he wanted to be able to tape essentially

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a month's worth of shows in a single week. That

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>way he would work for a week and then have

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the next three weeks off. Sounds like d ill, I

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>wish I could do that. I just I don't think

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I can physically record that many episodes in a week

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and then take another month off. But he worked with

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Ampex to use audio tape recorders, and with his approach

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Crosby's approach, they were actually running even faster. They were

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>running out of speed of three hundred sixty inches per second.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>That's nine meters per second of film or rather tape,

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>not film, but man super fast. So Ginsberg's team comes

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>up with a solution, but it wasn't easy. According to

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Ginsburg himself, the project took four years of research and

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>testing to come up with a viable way to get

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>around this problem, and along the way the project was

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>shelved twice. Rather than have the tape pass at this

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>incredible rate of speed over the recording head or under

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the recording head, the idea was build a rotating recording head.

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>The head would spin as tape passed underneath, and it

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>would record tracks of information in arcs and such as

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a stom is called an arcuate recorder and That's a

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>word I had never encountered before I did the research

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for this episode. In fact, the first time I saw

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it printed, I thought perhaps I was looking at a

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>typo and what they meant to say was an accurate recorder.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But no, that meant they meant arquate, and that the

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>information was being recorded in arcs onto the tape um.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>The recording head that Ginsburg's team built was actually the

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>initial one was actually three heads on a rotating drum,

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and it would scan tape that was about two inches

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in width or about five centimeters, and the tape would

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>move past the head at a relatively leisurely thirty inches

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>per second or seventy six point two centimeters per second,

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>which is still pretty fast, but nothing like the two

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>per second of the earlier method. What's more, the rotating

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>drums speed allowed Ginsburg to record the same amount of

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>information as he could if the tape were moving at

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a blistering two thousand, five hundred inches per second. He

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>could cramp far more information onto a shorter length of

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>tape using this methodology. Still, this early prototype produced recordings that,

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in Ginsberg's own words, produced and quote almost unrecognizable picture

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>end quote. The next prototype added another recording head, so

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>brought the total up to four on the drum, and

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>with some other technical changes that get a little too

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>complicated for me to go into in this episode. But

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this version had its own problems and at this stage

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the project was shelved. Technically, it was shelved for a

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>second time, and this happened around the summer of nineteen

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty three, and the project would not officially start up

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>again in earnest until August nine. However, in that off time,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Ginsburg and others on his team would continue kind of

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>working on specific problems on the SLY and so they

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>were able to solve some of the issues. While the

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>project was officially no longer on the books, Ginsburg was

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>able to secure approval from management for a small number

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of hours to be devoted to another prototype, and so

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he and his team built a device that got the

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>name the Mark one. On September one, nineteen fifty four,

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Ginsburg's team demonstrated the Mark one to executives and it

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>must have gone pretty well because Ampex authorized the project

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to get back into full swing officially, and the major

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>change was how the information was being laid down on

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the tape While the earlier prototypes were using that arquit approach,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in which each line of information moved in an arc

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>across the length of the tape, the new one laid

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>down the information in straight lines on the tape. Two

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>more years of refinements would follow until February ninety six.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>That's when Ginsburg's team would give a new demo to

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty Ampex executives, and in that demo, the team used

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a new system, this one called the Mark four, to

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>record a video sequence live at the event. So they

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>shot video for a couple of minutes. Um they actually

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>set up a camera and shot video of the people

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>attending the meeting. Then they rewound the tape and they

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>fed it through the playback system, and according to Ginsburg,

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>at the conclusion of the playback, the whole room erupted

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>with a celebration, so it must have gone pretty darn well.

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>They followed that up with a demonstration of the Mark

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>four at the National Association of Broadcasters conference, and it

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was a huge hit, and Ampex started to get orders

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for its technology, which would change TV production and preservation

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and lay the groundwork for home theaters. When we come back,

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>i'll talk more about that evolution and how the video

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>tape recorder made its transition to the video cassette recorder.

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But first, let's take a quick break. So the video

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>tape recorder or VTR got real start in n S.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>CBS would jump on board first, but other other networks

0:16:55.480 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>would join suit, and for about two decades that's where

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>videotape lived. In the production side, it was very rare

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to run into a consumer video tape machine. The systems

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>cost thousands of dollars when they first came out, like

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty thou dollars uh, and that was well beyond the

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>reach of consumers. And the tape was also really expensive

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was like three dollars a foot,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so it was prohibitively expensive for almost everyone. This was

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>not a consumer device, but a professional production machine. You

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have one in your own home unless you were

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>extravagantly wealthy and probably a little bit eccentric. So Ampex

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>would continue to improve its technology, but other companies also

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>got into the mix with their own video tape recorders,

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and the quest for a consumer device would take a

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>little longer. You had different companies UH experimenting with different

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>widths of videotape, different styles of recording heads. Uh, So

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of different companies all trying to

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>become the industry leader and to top Ampex. Meanwhile, you

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>had a company out of the UK called the Nottingham

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Electric Valve Company that marketed a device called the tail

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Cam in the early nineteen sixties, and this was technically

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the first, or at least one of the first home

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>video recording devices on record. This one was pretty limited.

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It could only record about twenty minutes of video per tape,

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was real to real tape. It was not

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.479
<v Speaker 1>a cassette, so you actually had to mount reels on

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this device like the old real to real audio recorders.

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>The quality of the recording wasn't terribly good. The device

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>itself was a bit of a chore to use, and

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>on top of it all, it was expensive. So Tellcan

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't really seem much success and it would fade away,

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't get market support. According to the website Inventricity,

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>only two tell Can units are known to exist today.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>One of them is in Nottingham and the other one

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is in San Francisco. Ampex introduced a real to real

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>recorder in nineteen sixty three in the United States called

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the Signature five, which used two inch tape, so it's

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 1>about five centimeters wide. The following year, Phillips would introduce

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a different reel to reel video recorder meant for semi

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>professional use or what we might refer to as the

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>pro sumer market. It could only record in black and white,

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and the tape of the reels measured one inch or

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>about two point five centimeters in width. And then Sony

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>introduced the CV twenty twenty, which was another reel to

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>reel video recorder that used half inch tape. And all

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of these were expensive units and the real to real

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>nature meant they weren't very user friendly. You know, you

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>still had to feed the tape through the machine and

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>then uh, get it attached to the secondary reel and

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>then feed it, you know, play it from there. That

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was not easy to do. So like the earlier tel Can,

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get a widespread adoption among consumers. If you

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>were technically savvy and you had a whole bunch of cash,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>then maybe you had one, but otherwise it probably passed

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you by. The real to real format had a lot

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.959
<v Speaker 1>of drawbacks because the tape, just like film could be

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>easily damaged by environmental forces. There was nothing protecting the

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tape from stuff like dust or fingers or dogs, and

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>so you could very easily damage the tape and ruin

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>your recording. Companies were working on prototypes of a form

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>factor that would greatly simplify the use of a tape,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and one of those was Sony, which had started working

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on video cassettes back in nineteen sixty nine and its

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>research and development department. In nine seventy, Sony, Panasonic, and

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>JVC arrived at an agreed upon standard for video cassettes,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ensuring that the different companies would create recording and playback

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>devices as well as cassettes that could work together across

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the different companies products. So if you bought a any

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>video cassette player, then you bought a cassette that was

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>made by j VC, you could be sure that the

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>two would work together. In Sony introduced the U Matic,

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>which is arguably the first video cassette recorder or VCR,

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but the name VCR actually comes from a different device,

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Phillips Video Cassette Recorder. That one came out a

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of months after Sony's. It didn't seem much consumer success,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but lower budget television stations relied on it to record

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>broadcasts to video and in fact in TV production. The

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you Matic would stick around until the nineteen nineties, so

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>while it didn't become a vague home device, it did

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>play a very important role in TV production behind the scenes.

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>A company called c t I introduced another cassette player

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>called the cartra Vision in nineteen seventy two. It became

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the first company to offer pre recorded films for purchase

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for the home. So this was the first time you

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>had a company not just produce a player, but also

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>make deals with production studios to get licensing for films

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>or television programs and then to offer them for sale.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So now people had the option to actually own a

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>copy of a film, making it possible to watch whenever

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.959
<v Speaker 1>they wanted. It was a huge, huge deal, right. This

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>was a breakthrough in approach, but the cart Revision as

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a format didn't last very long. It didn't take off,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>so while the concept was important, the actual implementation didn't work.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>All of those early devices were really expensive and that

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 1>contributed to their lack of tractions. So while we started

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to see the promise of this technology, it wasn't quite

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>at the level where it could be commercially viable for

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the home consumer. That changed in UH. Sony and j

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>VC had a little parting of the ways. Had worked

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>together to create the standard for you Matic, but now

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Sony was looking to develop its own proprietary approach for

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the home market UH, and so they were both trying

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>different proprietary approaches at the same time. Sony's version was

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the Beta Max format, which was smaller than the u

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Matic format. If you had a Pumatic cassette and a

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Beta Max cassette side by side, you'd see the Beta

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Max cassette was smaller, and it was able to produce

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>recordings of a comparable quality to you Matic. It wasn't

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>quite as good, but it was pretty good. It's really close.

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Then j v C would follow suit in nineteen seventy

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>six with the introduction of the VHS format, and thus

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>began one of the famous format wars that we talked

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>about in Tech Beta Max versus VHS. It's a story

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen play out lots of different times, and

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a story we're going to revisit in a future

0:23:55.720 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>episode with Blu Ray versus HD DVD Beta mat X

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>had the edge over VHS when it came to picture quality,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the quality was slightly better. The difference wasn't a dramatic one,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>but Beta Max could legitimately claim our picture has higher

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>resolution than VHS. However, VHS tapes could hold more content

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>than Beta Max tapes could. Early Beta Max tapes had

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a limit of about an hour's worth of material, so

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't even get a full movie on a single

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Beta Max cassette. In the early days, VHS could outperform

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in that space. With a VHS tape, even an early one,

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you could record a whole film onto one cassette. Later

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on you would be able to film to record multiple

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>films on a single cassette. The HS slowly got the

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>upper hand in the format wars, and by night one,

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the VHS format accounted for seventy five of the VCR market.

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>The Beta Max share would drop continuously at you know

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it was that twenty in nine. By night six it

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>was down to just seven point five percent of the market.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>So VHS dominated in the space. But while VHS and

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Beta Max were fighting for supremacy, there was another fight

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that was boiling regarding the practice of videotaping at home

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>at all. This one originated in Hollywood. So in nineteen

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy six, the same year that JVC would debut the

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>VHS format, the movie studio Universal Pictures filed a copyright

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:26.719
<v Speaker 1>infringement lawsuit against Sony. The argument Universal made was that

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>just by creating a device capable of recording video images

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>off of a television, Sony had violated copyright law. Akio Marita,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Sony's founder, had said that the Beta max device allowed

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for a time shift approach to television. That's something we'll

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about again. Upon the development of the digital video recorder,

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so the idea was no longer would you have audiences

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>being dependent upon the broadcast schedule of TV stations. I

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if all of you guys remember this. Some

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of you young ones may not have ever known a

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>world like this, but back in the day, we were

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>completely dependent upon the broadcast schedule of television stations. If

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you were not home at eight pm on a Thursday night,

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 1>you were not going to see that next episode of

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, cheers um, unless you had to have

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>happened to have a VCR where you could set it

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to record while you were away and then you could

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>time shift. You could watch the program whenever you wanted

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on your schedule. So it was kind of like an

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on demand kind of approach, except you had to actually

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>actively record the show first. But before there were VCRs

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that there was no option. You were either home to

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>watch it or you missed it and that was it.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So Marita's argument was, this is going to give the

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>consumer far more flexibility in the consumption of entertainment. So

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you could leave your home, you set your recorder to

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>capture a program or a film on television, and then

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>you can watch it whenever you wanted. It's something we

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>take for granted now, but this was a brand new

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>idea in the nineties seventies. It was revolutionary. But Lou

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Wasserman of m c A slash Universal had different plans. See,

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>he had an idea that his company was going to

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>partner with some other companies on developing a proprietary playback device.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh primarily they were going to partner with Phillips and

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>this device was called disco Vision and would later be

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>called the Laser Disc. And the plan was to release

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>content for this device and it would only be able

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to play that content back it couldn't record anything, It

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>could only play back prerecorded material, and that would give

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>Universal full control of its television and film libraries. They

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>could say, hey, do you want to see our movies,

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Well you can do that, but the only way you

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>can do it is to go through us, to buy

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>these proprietary discs that will run on this proprietary hardware

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and UH. That way they could have full control of

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the situation. Walt Disney Productions would join with Universal in

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>this lawsuit against uh UH, the Sony, and and they

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>sought to block all sales of Beta Max machines. Now,

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Sony argued that the Beta Max was similar to tape recorders,

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>which had been deemed a legal product all the way

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineteen sixties. So the U. S. District

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Court would hear the case in nineteen seventy nine, and

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>they ruled in favor of Sony. But then the case

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>went to an appeals court and the appeals court reversed

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the decision in nineteen one. However, at this point, the

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>VCR was really doing pretty well. VCR sales were picking up,

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and the VHS format, which wasn't even Beta Max, was

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>already ahead of the Sony beta max approach. So even

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>if the the court had argued that there needs to

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>be a block on beta max sales, VHS was already winning. However,

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the case would continue through the court system, finally making

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>its way all the way to the United States Supreme

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Court in four and the Supreme Court reversed the appeals

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>court decision and ruled in favor for Sony that settled

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the matter officially saying these devices do not violate copyright law.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>By half of all American households would own a VCR.

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>As for the movie studios well, Even as the case

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was making its way through the court, it became clear

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that video cassettes actually represented a new line of revenue

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>generation that it wasn't going to hurt the studios. It

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>could actually really help them. Studios could dive into their

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>back catalogs of movies and sell video cassettes to consumers

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>movies that would otherwise just sit in a storage facility,

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe like an old salt mine. They could actually earn money. Again.

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Even Walt Disney Productions would jump on board, though that

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was largely due to a change in leadership because a

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>guy named Michael Eisner became CEO of the company, and

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Eisner led the studio to release several of their classic

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>films on video cassette, and before long, Disney Movies captured

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>something like seven out of the top ten best selling

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>video tapes of all time, so it was a very

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>much a winning strategy for Walt Disney, even though earlier

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the company had opposed the technology. That same year was

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>when the videotape industry actually overtook the film industry in revenue,

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and it turned out the fears of piracy were largely misplaced.

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Just like audio cassettes, most VCRs can only record at

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the same speed as the playback of a source, so

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to tape a two hour movie, it

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>would take you two hours to tape it. It wasn't

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing that the average person could do

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to just churn out pirated copies of videos. Though if

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you got your hands on some semi professional equipment, you

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>could do it at a faster clip. You could reproduce

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>video tapes faster than your your you know, store brand VCR,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>but that was an investment most folks weren't able to make.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So it was possible to generate, you know, lots of

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of unlicensed copies of a film, but only if you

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>had access to this equipment. If you were just using

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>two VCRs at home, it was such a painstakingly long

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>process that it didn't make much sense now. In the

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>early days, prerecorded video cassettes were really expensive, like if

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to go out and buy a movie on

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>video cassette, you were showing out some big bucks. For example,

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>when Columbia Pictures made Ghostbusters, Ghostbusters available for purchase on VHS,

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>each copy costs the princely sum of eighty dollars. The

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>company sold more than four hundred thousand copies of the

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>film at that price, And if you want to adjust

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it for inflation in today's cash, that's nearly a hundred

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ninety dollars for a copy of a movie. And that's

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>just for one film. Yikes, switching gears for a second.

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>The birth of the video cassette also led to the

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>birth of another industry that a video rental. It's pretty

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>much agreed that the first, honest to goodness real video

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>rental store was created by George Atkinson in nineteen seventy

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>seven in Los Angeles, California. A guy named Andre Blair

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>had negotiated with studios to license the rights for a

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>few dozen films to be recorded to videotape for sale,

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and Atkinson bought up some copies of those films that

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that Blay had licensed, and then he started to offer

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>those up as rentals. Atkinson actually faced some opposition for

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this business, with entertainment companies threatening to sue him, but

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he researched copyright law and he saw that he had

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the right, as the owner of a copy of a

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>work to rent or resell his copy. He wasn't doing

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:40.479
<v Speaker 1>anything illegal, he wasn't duplicating the films, He was just

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>renting the copy he happened to own. Other video rental

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>stores opened in different parts of the country, and by

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>night one the owners of several of these stores or

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>small chains of stores got together to form an industry

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>organization they called the Video Software Dealers Association, and the

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>purpose of that organization was to help TechEd video rental

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>stores from litigation and changes to what is called the

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>first sale doctrine, as the concept that says a copyright

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>holder can't stop someone from lending out or reselling their

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>legally acquired copy of a copyrighted work without those protections.

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff like libraries would cease to exist because of legal challenges.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But because this doctrine is in place, I can do

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like by a VHS copy of Tron, and later

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>on I can sell it at a garage sale without

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>worrying about getting sued for it or whether if I

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>am sued for it, I'll win. Now, one thing that

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't do is I wouldn't be allowed to make

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>copies of that Tron tape and then sell those copies

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to other people. The right to reproduce a copyrighted work

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>falls to the owner of the copyright. The most I

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>could do is I can make a backup copy of

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Tron tape that I own myself, and I'm not

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>selling it. I'm not lending it out. I make a

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>backup copy and I put it away in a safe place,

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>just in case my original tape breaks or something else

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>goes wrong. Backup copies fall under the category of fair

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>use and copyright law, meaning it's a fair use of

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the copyrighted work. So there's some fine lines to walk

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>in this arena. And developments and technology are what made

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>these these ideas necessary, And the same thing holds true

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for record albums and other stuff. Like if I owned

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>a vinyl album, I would be allowed to transfer that

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to audio cassette in order for me to have a

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>backup copy of that vinyl album should something happen to it.

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>But I couldn't make copies of it over and over

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and over again and then give it away or sell

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it to friends. That would be a violation of copyright.

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>This is also going to become important when we move

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to digital music, and we'll see that in future episodes. So,

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the video cassette was changing the business of entertainment and

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it allowed for the establishment of video rental companies. The

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>men that filmmakers and entertainers had a new market they

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>could exploit. This is also when enterprising individuals started making

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 1>content specifically for the home video market. Some we're making

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 1>stuff like self help videos or exercise videos, or made

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.919
<v Speaker 1>for video films and shows. Stuff that couldn't get distribution

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in theaters or on television could find a home on

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>video cassette. And boy, if you've ever gone through the

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>bargain bins that have had video cassettes in them, you've

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>probably seen some examples of this stuff that you otherwise

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>never would have heard of. And the late nineteen eighties,

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>studios began to drop the price of prerecorded video cassettes,

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>with tapes dropping below thirty dollars a title, and the

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>video cassette era boomed, with VCRs becoming a common component

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in homes around the world. It would also set the

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>stage for future technologies like the DVD player and later

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>still the HD DVD player and the Blu ray player.

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Those technologies rely on a completely different approach to recording media,

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but the business side of selling and renting copies and

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the consumer relationship with the technology would be similar to

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that of the VCR and the video cassette. It also

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>helped establish practices and precedents that would be important upon

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the introduction of devices like digital video recorders. So for now,

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>let's shift not in time but in top So when

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we come back, I'll talk a bit about a different

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.720
<v Speaker 1>technology that would displace the audio cassette in the consumer

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>music world, the compact disc. But first let's take another

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>quick break. While the audio cassette, sometimes called the compact cassette,

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>was gearing up to take over the top spot in

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>consumer audio from the vinyl record album, its successor was

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.479
<v Speaker 1>already in development, the compact disc, which would be able

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to preserve music and a high fidelity much higher than

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>what audio cassettes could do at the time, and with

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>proper care, could last much longer than audio cassettes was

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to take shape. Interestingly, the compact disc kind of

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>rose out of a failure, namely that the aforementioned laser disc.

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So while magnetic tape stored information using magnetism, laser discs

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and later CDs and DVDs and blu rays and h

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>D DVDs used optical storage uh optical storage, meaning that

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it was all done with light. So a physicist named

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>James Russell pioneered this technology all the way back in

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties. He's a brilliant physicist and also a

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>lover of music. That led him kind of down this

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>pathway to determine how could he create a new form

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of storage media. He was wanting to make something that

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>would preserve music better than the vinyl form factor. See,

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>he was frustrated because the vinyl album methodology means you're

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be wearing out your records if you listen

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to them a lot, because you're using a physical stylus

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>or needle. It's making its way through the grooves on

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the record, and as it does so, it starts to

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>wear down those grooves a little bit. So if you

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>listen to the same vinyl album enough times, you're going

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to negatively affect the quality of the sound you get

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when you play it back. It just starts to wear down.

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So he said, we need some way to play back

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>music that doesn't require physical contact between the media and

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the playback device. There needs to be some way where

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:13.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever the sensor is that's picking up the information isn't

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>directly touching the actual surface that holds that information. He

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>determined that if you converted music into binary data. In

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>other words, if you encoded the music in zeros and

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>ones the information of computers in bits, and you did

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 1>that to describe everything about the music, you know, all

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the frequencies, all the volumes, you could store this music

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>digitally onto a medium. By the way, this is essentially

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Ada Lovelace had way back in the

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundreds when she was working with Charles Babbage. She

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>had suggested that mathematics could be used to represent all

0:38:56.120 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things, including music, and that's essentially what Russell

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was saying as well. He was specifically talking about binary

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>whereas uh Lovelace did not quite get to that point,

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but Russell was saying, no, we could. We could totally

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>describe music in bits and be able to encode it

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>in that way, and then using the proper decoding, you

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>could decipher the information and replicate the performance. So if

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>you use light to pick up this digital information, you

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't need physical contact with the recorded surface of a

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>piece of media. So he filed for a patent in

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty six for what he called the Digital to

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Optical Recording and Playback System, and he received the patent

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy. Russell used a photo sensitive platter and

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he programmed it by making alternating dark and light bits

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>measuring about a micron in size. So to play back

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>what was recorded on the platter, he used a laser

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to scan it, and the laser was register during the

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>tiny pits on the platter. Those pits represented the binary

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>patterns on the platter. So these pits were telling the

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>system whether it was a zero or one. And you

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>had some very nice mirrors to reflect any light that

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>was being picked up, and that was what was indicating

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it was a pit. Or just a

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>regular plateau on the platter. This became sort of the

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>basis for the laser disc. Universal and Phillips would license

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the pattern from Russell, but they departed from Russell's plan. See,

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Russell wanted to record in pure digital. He wanted to

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>convert everything into binary information. Everything was supposed to be bits.

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>The laser disc went a slightly different way. So the

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>laser disc would record information on a platter on a

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>disc in the form of little pits, just like Russell's vision,

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but the encoding was analog, not digital, so instead of

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it being a representation of zeros and ones, the shape

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and the length of the pits indicated the analog information

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that was encoded onto the disc. So you could argue

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the laser disc is mostly an analog format, which it

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 1>gets really confusing because you're using an optical approach, but

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it is technically, at least in some definitions, and analog medium. Now,

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to get into the real reasons why this is so

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>would require a much more in depth look at the

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>laser disc, and honestly, I don't have the time to

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>do that in this episode, so I'll save that for

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a future episode. I'll do a full episode just about

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the development of the laser disc in a future episode

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff, But it was a fundamentally different approach

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to what Russell was working on this. The pits on

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the laser disc look kind of like the ones you

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>would see on a c D or a DVD or

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a Blu ray if you had a microscope to really

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 1>look at them, but they didn't represent digital bits of

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>information in the same way. All right, So back to Russell.

0:41:57.680 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a second here to point out

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>that russ really was a genius still is. It's not

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 1>just that he came up with a new method of

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>storing data onto a medium. He was also able to

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to encode audio in binary data so

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that it could be decoded and played back, and it

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>took years of hard work and research to pull it

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>all off. Digital recording is different from analog, and I've

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>done episodes about this as well, so I'm not going

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to go into great detail, but I do want to

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of address this for a little bit. With analog,

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you've got a continuous input signal, right, It's like if

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you were to look at a wave, it's just a

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 1>steady wave that is unbroken. Binary is a little bit different.

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>With binary, you sample an incoming signal. UH sampling is

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of like taking snapshots of a signal, and the

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>more samples you take per given unit of time, the

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>greater the resolution of your recording. I'm going to give

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>you a quick analogy this. This is just a sort

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of visualize while I'm talking about. So let's say you're

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>standing outside of a room and the door to that

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>room is currently closed. It's a very heavy door. You

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>can open the door, but shortly after you open it,

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to let go and it'll slam shut. So

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 1>when you open the door, you can hear what's going

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on inside the room, but when the door is closed,

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't make out what's going on. And because the

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>door will slam shut shortly after you open it, you

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>only get a moment to hear something. So you open

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the door quickly and you hear a lot of people

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>being loud, but you only hear it for that instant

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 1>before the door shuts and you can't hear anything else.

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 1>And at that moment, you can't really draw any conclusions

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>about what you just heard. You just heard people being loud.

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You don't know if they're happy or they're angry, or

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they're scared, or they're just trying to talk over each other.

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So you open the door again. And the more times

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you're able to open the door, the better an idea

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you have of what's going on inside that room. And

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're able to open up the door very quickly,

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like right after it closes, it could be almost like

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing what's going on in the room uninterrupted. Of course,

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 1>from an outside observer, you would look like you were

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>quite eccentric as you kept on opening a door that

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.839
<v Speaker 1>kept shutting on you. Digital sampling is a little bit

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like that, though it gets much more technical as you

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>might imagine. But the digital nature of processing the sound

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:23.760
<v Speaker 1>opened up a new battleground between audio files and people

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>just wanted easy access to music. I'll touch on that

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit more in the next episode. The LaserDisc gathered

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a devoted audience of film lovers, but the expense of

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the devices and the limited video library meant and didn't

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>get widespread adoption the man, You know, LaserDiscs were pretty

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>darn neat. You typically had to flip them over to

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>watch a whole movie. One side might hold thirty or

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes worth of materials, so they had a limited capacity.

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But they also introduced other stuff that would become standard

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in future formats, stuff like extra features which you wouldn't

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>get in a typical VHS tape. You know, you buy

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a VHS tape of a movie, you get the movie.

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You buy a laser disc of the movie, you might

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>get some commentary, you might get extra scenes, you might

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of stuff, and you could jump around

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and watch different scenes through essentially the random access approach.

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But you couldn't do that with VHS. You had to

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>just watch at whatever point the tape was at. You

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.760
<v Speaker 1>could fast forward or rewind, but you couldn't just jump

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to a chapter or something. You could do that with

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>laser discs. So this was stuff that would carry over

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>into the DVD and Blu ray eras and it opened

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>up new opportunities and entertainment. So again we see how

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of technology would change the actual business of entertainment.

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Phillips initially was ready to say sayannara to the optical

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>storage format after the laser disc failed to win out

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>over the cassette based video formats that were already on

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 1>the market, but eventually the company, along with Sony came

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>around to the idea for audio discs, and the compact

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>disc was born. Phillips unveiled a prototype of the compact

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 1>disc in teen seventy nine, but it would be a

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>few years before the format was standardized. For one thing,

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Sony allegedly demanded that a single compact disc would need

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to be able to hold an entire performance of Beethoven's

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Ninth Symphony. So, if you've ever wondered why a standard

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 1>c D is four point seven inches or twelve centimeters

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 1>in diameter, allegedly it's because of Beethoven. The duration of

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Beethoven's symphony depends upon the arrangement, but typically the Ninth

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Symphony tends to last somewhere in the neighborhood of seventy minutes. However,

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they were looking for the longest version of the symphony

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>recorded to make that the standard, and it clocked in

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at around seventy four minutes. And to hold that much audio,

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the CD would have to be twelve centimeters in diameter,

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and there we have it. Phillips and Sony established the

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:51.839
<v Speaker 1>standards for CDs in nineteen eighty, with Phillips showing off

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the first production model meant for consumers two years later,

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and according to the BBC, the first two commercial c

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:02.240
<v Speaker 1>D presses ever were a recording of Strauss's Alpine Symphony

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and the immortal album The Visitors by Abba Super. When

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the CD got started in the early nineteen eighties, it

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really start to be a threat to the cassette

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>until the nineteen nineties. So in our next episode will

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>continue our look at the c D and its impact

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.839
<v Speaker 1>on the entertainment industry, including more about the audio file

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 1>objection I mentioned earlier. Will also look into the birth

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of DVDs and their successors and lay the ground for

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the digital file era. I hope you guys are enjoying

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>this series. I really like looking at this sort of

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>big picture stuff, this evolution of technology and how that

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>changed not just the business, but are very thoughts around entertainment,

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>how our attitudes about entertainment have changed as the technology

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:54.800
<v Speaker 1>has enabled different ways to consume that that entertainment um

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to me. This is what I love most about tech stuff,

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>is this relationship between technology industry and our our society.

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.399
<v Speaker 1>So I hope you guys are enjoying this, and if

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not, don't worry. Pretty soon we're gonna be off

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.720
<v Speaker 1>this topic and talking about all sorts of other stuff.

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:14.320
<v Speaker 1>If you have your own suggestions of what I should

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be covering next, why not send me an email the

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>addresses tech stuff at how stuff works dot com or

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pop on over to tech stuff podcast dot com. That's

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>our website where you'll find the archive of all of

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>our older episodes, plus you'll find links to our social

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>media presence. You can reach out to me on Facebook

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>or on Twitter and I'll be happy to hear your

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:37.399
<v Speaker 1>suggestions there as well. And also don't forget to head

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>on over to our store and if you purchase something

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>over there, it goes to help the show and we

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.760
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate it, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Hex Stuff is a production of I Heart Radio's How

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:48:57.719 --> 0:49:01.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows. Three