WEBVTT - Ep 207 Tear Gas: How can a chemical weapon be “humane”?

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Now tear gas canisters were plummeting everywhere behind the barricade

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>through the trees. A huge cloud of gas rolled over

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the barricade, and cops with gas masks on came over

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the barricade in an assault wave with shotguns and rifles,

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>using the butts as clubs on anyone in sight, knocking

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>people down and standing on them. Gas gas was the cry,

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as if poisonous snakes had been loosed in the area.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Thousands streamed across the park toward Clark Street, and panic

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>started headlong, running the sudden threat of being trampled by

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>your own people. The tear gas was catching up with us,

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>a sharp menthol sort of burning on the cheeks and

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>burning in the eyes, but though some people ran from it,

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>most of us kept on walking. Now the tear gas

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>began really burning, making the eyes twist tightly closed, and

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>if you rubbed it, the burning got worse, as if

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>your eyeballs were being rolled in fire. The medics were shouting,

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>keep your eyes open, let it tear away. Water, Wash

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>your eyes with water. The information on how to handle

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the tear your gas passed rapidly and with a warm feeling,

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>from one person to another. The gas drifted over Old

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Town and the citizens came out of their houses, coughing

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and gritting their eyes angrily.

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Oh. That was excerpted from a book that was

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 2>published in nineteen sixty nine called No One Was Killed

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 2>by John Schultz, and it's about the nineteen sixty eight

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 2>protests and the in Chicago at the Democratic Convention, the

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>National Democratic Convention, and in which police tear gas was

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 2>used extensively by police along with other forms of violence. Yeah,

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>so it.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Feels like it could be from any old day these days.

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Erin, it does it does.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Hi. I'm Aaron Welsh and I'm Erin Alman Updike.

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>And this is this podcast Will Kill You.

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And today we're talking about tear gas.

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about tear gas not just a timely topic,

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>a timely topic for any part of well almost the

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 2>entire twentieth century, twenty first century. Yeah, so we will

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>learn to Yeah, as we'll learn. We really wanted to

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of get into what it is we know about

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 2>tear gas and why men any countries allow its use

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 2>on its own citizens despite the fact that it is

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>banned in international warfare.

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so kind of a big deal.

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Kind of big deal. There's a lot to a lot

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>to care from. Yeah good, Yeah, well we'll get there.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>But first, but first it's time. What are we drinking

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>this week?

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 1>This week we're drinking the tear Jerker.

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 2>We are drinking the tear Jerker. It's got elderflower syrup,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>lemon juice, club soda, sprig of rosemary. It's pretty good.

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a nice little bev for a not nice topic.

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Yep, there sums up most of our quarantines. I think

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>that's so true. But you can find the quarantine on

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 2>our website, this podcast wikill you dot com on all

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>of our social media channels. Check us out if you're

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>not following us, We've got some great content. If you're like, hey,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 2>what are you doing? I missed an episode? What's going on? What?

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>What do you want?

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>There?

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>There?

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Do do that? What numer do you have?

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what touch we have, but we do

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have it on our website this podcast will kill you

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com along with Bloodmobile, who does the music for

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>all of our episodes, a bookshop dot org affiliate account,

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a good Reads list which Aaron curates and is phenomenal.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got transcripts from all of our episodes, we've got

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the sources first hand, account form, contact est form.

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 2>I will say I no longer curate the Goodreads list

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 2>because it stops the number of submissions that you're allowed

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 2>to add to a list. And so like years ago,

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>probably like three years at this point, I haven't been

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>like three years old.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So we need another good Reads list.

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 2>We need a good Reads list, or we need somebody

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 2>else to add to them. But if you want to

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>see like the full list, anytime that I read a

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>book or reference a book on the podcast in any

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 2>episode or for a book club episodes or whatever. Bookshop

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 2>dot org has a bunch of lists. It has the

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Kid's book Club TPWKY Kids book Club, So if you're

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 2>not following us on social media, you're missing out on that.

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't even know what we're talking about.

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>There our book our TPWKY book Club books. There's and

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>then there's like podcasts related books in general. So that

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 2>includes nonfiction, memoirs, fiction even so, but anyway, you should

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 2>check all that out. And I think that's it. Are

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>we ready to get started?

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it.

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it. Tear gas is prohibited in war, yet

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 2>many countries, including the United States permit tear gas to

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 2>be used against their own citizens.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like more countries than not.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 2>It was zinc surprisingly hard. I was googling, like tear

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 2>gas band and it you can't. No, yeah, there's not

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>like a curated list right all of the.

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>No, it's used like extensively across the globe for crowd

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>control purposes.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And proponents of tear gas claim that it is a

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>safe and more humane tool to control riots, while opponents

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>of tear gas question its alleged harmlessness and point towards

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the many instances where tear gas is deployed as a

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 2>weapon to quell legal and peaceful protests, not a tool

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 2>of de escalation, used as a last resort, but a

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 2>frontline weapon of political suppression, one that is not evenly

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 2>utilized across the political spectrum. So there are statistics I

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>found from the US Crisis Monitor that showed that in

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the early twenty twenties, can we say that yet? Yeah, yeah, okay,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>from like twenty I don't remember the exact years, but

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 2>in the early twenty twenties, police were three times more

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.799
<v Speaker 2>likely to use force in protests organized by left leaning

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 2>groups such as Abolish Ice and Black lives matter three

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 2>times more is more likely. And this is not just

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 2>about tear gas. This is just the use of force

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 2>in general, in general in general.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, huh uh.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>And also this uneven use, like we're going to call

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>out the US a lot throughout this, but this uneven

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>use is not restricted to the US alone. No, our

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>mental image of protest today is incomplete without a police

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>officer spraying a demonstrator in the face with pepper spray.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>That infamous image that they tried to get wiped from

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the internet, and it had the opposite effect to stressand

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>effect as it happens, or you know, these these images

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.679
<v Speaker 2>of launching a canister of tear gas into a crowd

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>of peacefully and legally assembled citizens, those thick, choking clouds

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 2>are chilling reminders that quote unquote peaceful assembly is in

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>the eye of the beholder.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, Aran, was.

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>This the intention of tear gas when it was invented?

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 2>If not, what was the claimed intention and why has

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 2>tear gas followed such a different trajectory than other agents

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>of chemical warfare. That's the story that I want to

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:12.119
<v Speaker 2>tell today.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, I can't wait.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Tear gas is not, in fact a gas. I know

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get into this in more detail later

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 2>on aaron, but and it's also not one thing at all.

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>It is an umbrella term that encompasses chemical compounds that

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>are lacrymatory agents, as in they produced tears, and historically

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 2>they were also referred to as harassing agents. And I'm

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>not going to go into the individual histories of each

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of the different compounds that make up this tear gas category,

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>but rather I want to take us through the overall

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>history of tear gas as one discrete unit and how

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>it's idealized image of a safe, non toxic tool to

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 2>protect citizens is rarely born out in reality.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just the idea of it being non toxic entirely.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Right to protect citizens is the other to protect kills me. Yeah.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 2>The history, this history begins in World War One, when

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>chemical weapons, including tear gas, chlorine, phosgene, mustard gas, and

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 2>others were first developed and used extensively. While chemical warfare

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 2>had been utilized as early as four hundred BCE in

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the Peloponnesian War between the Spartans and the Athenians.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh my god, four hundred.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 2>People have been trying us for ages, just like we'll

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>throw things or like what else can we do? Yeah,

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 2>But it was really only in the early twentieth century

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that the scientific and technological advancements made during the Industrial

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Revolution could actually be applied to war. So it's like,

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>let's use all this new scientific and technical knowledge to

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 2>better kill.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>People or harmon better kill people. Yeah, to kill people

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>more efficiently.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 2>To kill the more efficiently. And when chemical weapons were

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>introduced in the First World War, the reaction was one

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 2>of utter A military chaplain describes what he saw in

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>April nineteen fifteen during the first use of chlorine by

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>German troops in Epra, Belgium on French forces. Okay quote,

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>a greenish gray cloud had swept down upon them, turning

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 2>yellow as it traveled over the country, blasting everything it touched,

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 2>shriveling up the vegetation. No human courage could face such apparel.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 2>Then they're staggered into our midst French soldiers blinded, coughing,

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>chest heaving faces and ugly purple color lips, speechless with agony,

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and behind them in the gas choked trenches, we learned

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 2>that they had left hundreds of dead and dying comrades.

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 2>The impossible was only too true. It was the most fiendish,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>wicked thing I have ever seen. End quote. Oh yeah,

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's horrific. There are so many accounts. We really

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 2>should do some of these other gases day as well.

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 2>But like the accounts were like something out of a

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.559
<v Speaker 2>horror book. Like it was unsound, Like it was like unimaginable,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean at first unless I think so many people

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>until they saw it themselves or were part of it themselves,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 2>did not know the scale of I guess, just agony

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 2>and terror.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to I think, even imagine or conceptualize

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>when it's just that. I mean, it's it's everywhere, right,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you control where a gas or a

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>smoke or whatever goes when you when it's released. It's

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just everything in its path.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean. And that's a big part of like tear

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 2>gas today is that it's it's indiscriminately applied, and as

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 2>affected by it is also indiscriminate. It's the wind changes.

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll get there now.

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 2>The Ibrah gas attack with chlorine was the first to

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>garner widespread attention due to its extreme lethality, and it

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>prompted the development and distribution of protective equipment like gas masks.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 2>It would not be the last attack, nor would chlorine

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>be the only chemical agent deployed. Mustard gas and fog

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 2>gene also contributed to the ninety one thousand gas deaths

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in World War One. Wow, ninety ninety one thousand. It's

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and it's it's interesting, like there are so

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 2>many of these chemical warfare books that were published either

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen twenties or in during World War Two

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>period that were still like, we chemical warfare is the

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 2>best path forward. This statistic is positive for them. They're like, oh,

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>it caused twenty five percent of all of the casualties,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>all of the injuries, all of the things that kept

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 2>people from being able to be in battle. But it

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 2>only caused this many deaths.

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's just like it incapacitated, itepacitated and long term effects.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Forget about it. No one died, you know. It's like

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing.

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh God, okay.

0:12:55.760 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 2>But before there was chlorine, foggene or mustard gas, there

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>was tear gas before those. Before those. The first use

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 2>of gas in battle in World War One was in

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>August nineteen fourteen, when French troops fired tear gas grenades

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>into German trenches. Huh yeah uh. And apparently the amount

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of chemicals was so low that no one noticed. But

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>it set off an arms race where different countries sought

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>to outcompete each other in devising more and more deadly

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 2>gases and better protective equipment. It was just like all ripes.

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's yeah. Strictly speaking, the use of asphyxiating agents

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 2>like chlorine was against the Hague Conventions that had been

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>set in place in the late eighteen nineties. Tear gas

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 2>was not banned under this agreement.

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, only because it's like assiciating.

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, But these agreements were so vague as to

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 2>be taken as suggestions at best. Like the loophole was

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 2>absolutely enormous. It was just like, well, you could argue

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 2>your way out of any of it, right. And when

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>World War One concluded in November of nineteen eighteen, the

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>perception of chemical warfare was divided along two very different lines.

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 2>It was either the most humane form of weaponry ever

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>created or the least. Yeah, I just I know. The

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 2>argument is mental gymnastics at a.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Humane weaponry period, Like, uh, sorry, and that's that's what

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>really kills me about some of these arguments that people

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>made then and still make today, and they're like, listen,

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>if we're going.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 2>To have war, war is unavoidable, and you can't say

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 2>that one weapon is right, right, So that's like, first

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>of all, how many assumptions are you asking us to?

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So many? So we've already had to leap. Okay, the

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>start down the line.

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>It's all it's all inhumane. But yeah, anyway, so we've

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 2>got these two different camps. Chemical warfare is humane. Chemical

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>warfare is not humane. And those who experienced gas attacks firsthand,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>which was many veterans often more often fell into the

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>latter camp that it's the least humane weaponry. It's horrible,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>with some expressing that they were more afraid of gas

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 2>than of shell fire. The effective gas was not only physical,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 2>but it was hugely psychological. Caused widespread panic and chaos,

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 2>which often left troops more vulnerable to artillery fire. And

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>this was often again like a feature, not a bug.

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the intention, and this is later on it

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 2>was like, oh, but it's not harmful, and it's like, no,

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>but we you introduced tear gas to then.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Kill, to do harm in order to do harm.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, protective equipment didn't always live up to its promise either.

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 2>The unwieldy, awkward masks made it more difficult to maneuver.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 2>And then you've got something like mustard gas, which will

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>burn your skin through clothing. Yeah, it's awful, okay. Gas. Overall,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 2>gas weapons were designed to induce suffering, or at the

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 2>least harm for those who believed it to be the

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>most humane form of weaponry. These qualities were points in

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 2>favor of chemical warfare, and among these proponents was US

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 2>General Amos Freese, pro military, anti communist, xenophobic, racist, white supremacist,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 2>champion of the Chemical Warfare Service, and author of the

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenty one book Chemical Warfare, in which he played

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 2>to Thoks about it. Oh yeah, it's a really dark read.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a how to. It's like a oh, how you

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 2>want to try? Yeah, it's a little bit of a

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 2>persuasive argument. At the beginning, it's like, this is the

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>best thing that's ever happened. And then yeah, let's go

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 2>through them all, and how do you recognize them? I'm

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty sure it's that one. I read another book on

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>chemical warfare, or not all of it, but like I

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 2>found another book on chemical warfare from nineteen forty four.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 2>One of them has a poem that's supposed to help

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you remember how to detect the different.

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>The different types. Yeah, that's gross.

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>It's really grim. It's really grim. But anyway, So in

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Amos Freeze chemical warfare, he says at one point, quote

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>instead of gas warfare being the most horrible, it is

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 2>the most humane where both sides are prepared for it.

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 2>While against savage or unprepared peoples, it can be made

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 2>so humane that but very few casualties will result. End.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Quote there's a lot in that savage against Okay, yeah, okay.

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>It's cool to use it in war. Everyone's got a

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>gas mask, and it's cool to use it against.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 2>Against people not in war, even if they don't have

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a gas mask.

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Even if they don't have a gas mask. It's all good, right.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 2>The ends justify the means.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they always do right, right.

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>And so for Freeze and others in the pro gas camp,

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>chemical weapons presented the future of war, and the anti

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>gas sentiment that emerged after World War One threatened Freeze's

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>relevance and his career. Nevertheless, many world leaders disagreed, and

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 2>this was in alignment with the overall anti war sentiment

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 2>that prevailed throughout many countries after the horrific loss of

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 2>life from World War One. Discussions over the future use

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>of chemical and biological warfare in this interwar period led

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>eventually to the Geneva Protocol, which was signed in nineteen

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, and it prohibited the use of both biological

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and chemical weapons in international armed conflicts. Ok The language

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 2>here is kind of important, So I'm going to break

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 2>apart these a little bit so we understand what's being

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 2>prohibited and what's not. Okay, Okay. It prohibits, specifically, number one,

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the first use in war of quote, asphyxiating, poisonous or

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 2>other gases and of all analogous liquids, materials, or devices

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 2>end quote.

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 2>And number two the first use of bacteriological methods of warfare.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to pay attention to that in this episode.

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Still interesting bacteria, Okay, exactly.

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>That's one of the things I was like, hmm, But

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 2>what the Geneva Protocol, this this version of it, did

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>not do was prohibit the research, development, testing, or stockpiling

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 2>of such weapons chemical or biological, or the domestic use

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of tear gases or herbicides of course not, nor did

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 2>it prohibit things like concealment, smoke or incendiary weapons like napalm.

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Tear gas was a more contentious issue like did it

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 2>fall under other gases or analogous liquids, materials or devices?

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That's it, I mean yes, it could be.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Argued either way, right, like something, It just depends on

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 2>do you want to do you like tear gas or

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 2>do you not like your gas? So some said of

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 2>course it does. Others were like no, that's it needs

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 2>to be banned, right, or someone's like, yeah, I don't know,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't count. And so because there was such confusion

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>over this and just making sure that the precision in

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>language was there, in nineteen thirty a conference was convened

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 2>in which all but one country that attended, which I

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>think was like thirteen countries overall, all but one country

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 2>agreed that tear gases were covered by the ban because

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 2>it was difficult to draw a line between lethal and

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>incapacitating gases. Okay, So going back to the language of

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 2>that protocol, the protocol prohibits it forbade the first use

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 2>of these gases, and so that means that retaliation is permitted.

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>So if someone gases you, you can go ahead and

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>gas them, yep. But they were the ones who did

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong in the first place. But two rungs make it right.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 2>So two rungs make it right. All's fair and war

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>and war, yeah, and so and so like. They essentially

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of the countries who were like, no

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 2>tear gases also need to be banned were imagining a

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 2>scenario in which, let's say that a class out of

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>choking gas is released over a group of soldiers. They

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 2>are they don't know how to discern between tear despite

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the lovely little rhymes that are in credit and textbooks,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 2>but they don't know how to discern between tear gas

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 2>versus chlorine versus you know, it's not something that maybe

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 2>immediately you are able to you're able to tell it,

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 2>or just one of the band gases or not one

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 2>of the band gases, And so before you even find out,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>because you're allowed second year to retaliate, to retaliate, you

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 2>could then retaliate with a more lethal, deadly gas like

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 2>mustard gas chlorine, even if tear gas was the first

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 2>use one of the allowed gases allowed gases.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense where it's like if you don't know.

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Then it's just tit for tat, and you're going higher

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and higher each time.

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, Tear gas would easily escalate or start a conflict

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 2>in that way, Okay, And so that is why its

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 2>use is banned in war.

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>That is why that is why it's use is banned

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in war. Okay. Well that's an answer, at least.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>It's an answer. But you know how I said, all

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 2>but one country agreed to this. Guess who? Guess who objected?

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>How what a hard guess?

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 2>The United States? Yeah, Yeah, the.

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Country that likes to say no to all the things.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Mom tell me what to do, what to do?

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I can use two your guys if I want to.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's basically how I imagine the US, especially Ams Freeze,

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>who had campaigned very hard by this point, like by

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 2>the by nineteen twenty five, he had campaigned so hard

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to make tear gas acceptable. And so the US is.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm just imagining the slogans reco today.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there will be some slogans in here. But the

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 2>US's response was was was that they were unwilling to

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 2>bind themselves quote, to refrain from the use in war

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 2>against any enemy of agencies which had been adopted for

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>peacetime use against our own population agencies adopted on the

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 2>ground that while causing temporary inconvenience, they cause no real

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 2>suffering or permanent disability end quote.

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We're using it against the people.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 2>It's fine.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're already are using it's it's not funny.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 2>None of this is not None of this is funny.

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just I don't even know. Yeah, the fact that

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 2>like that, that's not the argument that you think it is.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You're missing the point.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 2>You're missing the point, you're yeah, yeah, So, but I

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 2>will say that, like, the discussion of whether domestic use

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 2>of tear gas should or should not be banned was

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>never on the table for this protocol, or or a

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 2>protocol like this. Really, it wouldn't be, from my understanding,

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 2>for a country to agree to external policing by another.

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 2>So, So to me, the question is not why didn't

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the Geneva Protocol also banned domestic use of tear gas,

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 2>but instead, why did these countries permit the use of

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>this chemical weapon against its own citizens in.

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>The first place.

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, as you just heard, By nineteen twenty five, the

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 2>US had already begun transforming tear gas from a war

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 2>weapon to one that police could wield against citizens in peacetime.

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 2>They were not alone in this. Many countries would have

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 2>not only also refused to ban domestic use from if

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 2>it had been on the table in these discussions, but

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 2>these countries also many countries continue to use tear gas

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>today against their citizens. As we said, it's harder to

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 2>find countries that have banned it than those who have not.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah period.

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 2>And in the US, leading the charge was General Freeze, who,

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 2>within months of the war ending, embarked on a campaign

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 2>to make over the reputation of tear gas, singling it

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 2>out as a safe and humane policing tool.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Tear gas was one of the earliest recipients of the

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 2>pr treatment, with public demonstrations, marketing campaigns, paid spokespeople like

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 2>doctors saying like I attest to the safety of this

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>tear gas.

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Why we can't have doctors promoting things okay, thank.

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 2>You, yeah, and smear tactics against those who questioned its safety,

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 2>who were like, uh, this is bad. I've experienced this firsthand,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and I this is not acceptable to use. So there's

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 2>a nineteen twenty one profile that was written about freeze,

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 2>and it described how he was quote firmly convinced that

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 2>as soon as officers of the law and colonial administrators

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 2>have familiarized themselves with gas as a means of maintaining

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 2>order and power, there will be such a diminution of

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>violent social disorders and savage uprising as to amount to

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 2>their disappearance. The tear gases appear to be admirably suited

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 2>to the purpose of isolating the individual from the mob

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 2>spirit grown into a condition in which he can think

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 2>of nothing but relieving his own distress. An advantage of

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the milder form of gas weapons in dealing with a

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 2>mob is that the responsible officer need not hesitate to

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>use his weapons.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>End quote Oh my god, Aaron like, not only do

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they just make it so clear that we will use

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this to shut up anyone who is fighting against us,

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>right any descent, who voices of any descent, we can

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>shut it down. And also we can just use our

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>weapons much more freely.

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 2>That because I feel like so much of the time

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the proponents of tear gas, whether you know, since the

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixties and beyond, tear gas has always been framed

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and today is framed as a weapon of last resort,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 2>of like a not even a weapon, a tool of

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 2>last resort, right, Like, it's not friendly when we are

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 2>worried about bodily harm. It's only we're worried about the

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 2>safety of our citizens and private property, natural property, property damage,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 2>private property. So it's only when these things are on

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 2>the table is tear gas ever used, And that has

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 2>never It's like it is literally that. This is what

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 2>he was pushing for, is that you don't have to

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 2>hesitate to use it. This is a frontline weapon to

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>be used.

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Rist. This is the first thing you can do.

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the first thing. Don't worry about.

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Won't do damage, Yeah, lasting damage, that's an air just listening. Yeah.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>There was pushback against the military the use of military

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 2>weapons against citizens, and many veterans strongly objected to the

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 2>characterization of any gas as humane, but they were dismissed

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 2>as liars or exaggerators. These were the people that Freeze

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 2>was like, smear campaigns, smear campaigns. Oh they just want benefits.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh they just do whatever. They don't know what they're

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 2>talking about.

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Freeze was strongly in favor of using military tactics to

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 2>quell dissent domestic but it was more than that. There

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>was a whole industry to consider, a purgeoning industry aaron.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were witnessing a

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 2>chemical revolution, not just in scientific knowledge but also industry.

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Many chemical companies stood a lot to gain by keeping

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 2>gas on the table, and if they couldn't get approval

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to keep manufacturing all wartime gases, then maybe tear gas

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 2>could still be a nice revenue streams. Where would that

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>revenue come from, Well, we've got police departments, prisons, the

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>National Guard, and private security. Ample opportunity there, And I

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 2>mean it wasn't a hard sell at all. The incorporation

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of tear gas essentially began the militarization of police in

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 2>this country. Ugh, tear gas. Yeah, tear gas was framed

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>in a positive light as the best and safest alternative

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 2>to lethal force, as though if tear gas were taken away,

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the only option would be to use lethal force against

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 2>a crowd, not non violent, non lethal de escalation techniques,

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 2>just lethal force. And so yeah, it's it's this false

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 2>dichotomy between It reduces the options down to two tear

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 2>gas or lethal.

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>For lethal force.

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Those are our only two options in dealing with crowds

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>or anyone saying anything that we don't want. We can

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>either kill you or quote unquote not harm you that

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that incapacitate incapacitate we can those are our only two options.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, it's horrific.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Tear gas lowered the threshold for deciding to use force.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 2>The development of tear gas technology reveals that the intention

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>for harm was built into the devices themselves. Tear Gas

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>shells were meant to be fired directly in someone's face

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 2>to be quote unquote effective for best efficacy fire this

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 2>into someone's face. They were desirable, written about as desirable

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 2>for their ability to cause quote unquote walloping pain. Tests

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 2>measuring the efficacy of tear gas were deployed specifically against

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 2>unarmed individuals, again demonstrating that causing injury was not a

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 2>bug but a feature. By the end of the nineteen twenties,

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 2>tear gas had been heartily embraced by many policing forces

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, and it had begun to be

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 2>used to suppress labor movements such as in the Panama

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Canal and political protests like when the Bonus Army lobbied

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 2>outside the White House to demand their overdue wartime payments.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 2>The publicity surrounding the use of tear gas served, like

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 2>in these specific instances, served as advertisements for many policing forces.

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 2>It normalized its use and it demonstrated how effective it

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>could be.

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, look how great we did with tears. How great, Yeah,

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>getting these veterans to get down.

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The tagline of lake Erie Chemical Company, which was

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 2>a there was their line of tear gas products. They

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 2>were one of the biggest manufacturers of tear gas products

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>was quote one man with chemical warfare gas can put

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 2>to flight a thousand armed men and the ear resistible

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>blast of blinding, choking pain, no permanent injury.

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>End quote no permanent injury, No permanent injury.

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>That promise did not reflect reality. Severe head injuries were

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 2>not uncommon after protests or strikes were tear gassed. And

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>this wasn't just about you know, long term effects in

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 2>terms of it. I know you're going to talk about

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 2>this being you know, effects on or damage to vision,

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 2>damage to your lungs, GI tract burns, but also the

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>canisters themselves can often cause tremendous harm. They still had

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 2>head injuries. Yes, Yeah, And even though at the time,

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 2>there were supposed to be restrictions on who could actually

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 2>buy tear gas, those were often ignored, and a committee

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 2>that was investigating the Chemical Warfare Service found that between

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirty three and nineteen thirty seven, over one point

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty five million dollars worth of old time money of

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 2>tear gases was sold in anticipation of strikes. Wow, labor

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>movements man dangerous things.

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Ooh so dangerous to demand equal pay.

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Days off, disrupting labor disputes and breaking up political protests

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 2>they were just two demonstrated uses of tear gas. The

0:32:56.280 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>weapon was also readily wielded by colonial administration, particularly in

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 2>British colonies. It didn't start out that way. Following World

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 2>War One, Britain was actually opposed to the use of

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 2>tear gas, feeling that it was uncivilized and could not

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>possibly be used against citizens when its use in war

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>was prohibited. So logical, like what yeah, But after a

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 2>few violent suppressions of colonial uprisings in which colonial authorities

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 2>killed at least four hundred and possibly fifteen hundred unarmed

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 2>people in India protesting new authoritarian legislation, and there was

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of outcry, public outcry, shame, negative public opinion

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 2>that followed this, and so they were like, you know what,

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe this blanket ban on chemical warfare it's a bit extreme.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the use of tear gas could help us out

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 2>in this way public image versus safer. I don't know.

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I was not there to but again, it's the same

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that we already talked about. It's this fullosnachotomy. Oh well,

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we accidental killed too many people. We better find a

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>way to get these people in line without killing them all.

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Killing them without changing the who's wielding the force the

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 2>weapon right without yep, oh god, yeah. And so they

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 2>began to adopt the use of tear gas in there

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in British colonies beginning in the nineteen thirties, and then

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 2>later they were used in tear gas was used in

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Northern Ireland during the troubles. And while England or the

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 2>UK did not play a big role in the manufacture

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of tear gas, unlike the US, they did do extensive

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 2>research on deployment strategies. You know, how much to use,

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 2>when to use, just like how best to gas people,

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 2>how to guide here's a pamphlet. And the US found

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 2>this extremely helpful throughout the nineteen sixties, particularly in the

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 2>later half of the decade with the civil rights movement

0:34:55.520 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 2>and anti war protests, tear gas was extensively deployed on

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 2>so many peaceful demonstrations, disrupting sit ins, marches, assemblies at

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 2>meeting halls. It was not used, as it was claimed

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 2>to be, to put a stop to violence, but rather

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:15.479
<v Speaker 2>it introduced. It forced people to run wildly and flee

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 2>in terror as they struggled to breathe. So I read

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 2>a book for this called Tear Gas by Anna Fagenbaum,

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 2>And there's a quote I'm going to read that describes

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the psychological impact of tear gas quote in escalating force

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and arousing derision from onlookers. Tear gas implicates protesters and

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 2>often bystanders in a violent and chaotic scene. It turns

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 2>civilians into criminals. End quote. Yeah, when people are bombarded

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 2>by tear gas and they begin to run in panic,

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 2>some police then might feel justified to beat them, taser them,

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 2>shoot them in order to restore the piece that they

0:35:54.760 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 2>themselves had destroyed. Right so wielded in this way, tear

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 2>gas became the grounds for police violence, a punitive weapon

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 2>to threaten what would happen if you dared to challenge

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 2>the political authority, just like we see with abolish ice

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 2>protests and Black Lives Matter marches today, if what you

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 2>stood up for was not in line with what was

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 2>deemed politically acceptable, your action, legal or peaceful though it

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 2>may be, would be deemed illegitimate or violent through the

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 2>use of tear gas. And in the nineteen sixties in

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 2>the US, things kind of came to a head in

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixty eight at the Democratic National Convention held in Chicago,

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 2>So this is where our first hand account comes from.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Ten thousand people marched on the city for civil rights

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and to put an end to the war in Vietnam.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Police deployed staggering amounts of tear gas, so much so

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 2>that it warmed its way into buildings, covered entire city blocks.

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 2>There was no escape, not from the tear gas and

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 2>not from police bing and estimated four hundred people were

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 2>treated for injuries from tear gas, but no one was killed.

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 2>No one was killed, so this event was later described

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 2>in an official report as a quote unquote police riot

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 2>due to the excessive violence, and the entire event captured

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 2>headlines across the country. It was on like so many

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 2>news reports. It was like one of the biggest demonstrations

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 2>of the excessive use of force and tear gas. The

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 2>whole world is watching. The whole world is watching, and

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 2>it didn't slow down the use of tear gas. In fact,

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't that much longer afterwards that Reagan, who was

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 2>governor of California at the time, ordered a military helicopter

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 2>to drop a bunch of tear gas on protesters at

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 2>a park in Berkeley. So there you go. And it's

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 2>just it is really interesting because the increased visibility did

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 2>it what did it? Don't? I don't know, I don't.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, I mean, it's like the same thing today where

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we have cell phones and we can capture the fact

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:07.919
<v Speaker 1>that people are just sitting at a protest, they're dressed

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 1>like frogs for goodness sake, for chickens, and there's tear

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>gas being deployed for absolutely no reason and.

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 2>It's reason reason.

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, exactly, Yeah, and yeah we can see it

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and it still is, it still is ongoing.

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is an interesting outcome, like the increased visibility

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 2>should lead to increased accountability, but it almost just like

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 2>normalizes its use in a way because if like you

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 2>see it, no one does something about it. You see

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 2>it again, no one does something about it again. You

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 2>just expect that no one will ever do something about this.

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 2>It's dangerous, yeah, and so tear gas. That is what

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 2>happened to tear gas in the nineteen sixties. It emerged

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 2>from this decade as a weapon that framed protesters as

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 2>dangerous enemies, not as citizens exercising their rights, and because

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 2>its use had become so normalized, alternatives like negotiation and

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 2>nonviolent de escalation were rarely pursued. Resources instead went into

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 2>producing more and more tear gas and better ways to

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 2>efficiently deliver it.

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>More tear gas weapons, more tear gas weapons.

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 2>With all of these resources pouring into the optimization of

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 2>tear gas, was there any leftover to look into its

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 2>helf effects? There actually was a small amount, at least

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 2>there was research carried out in the UK, but few,

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>if any, just guess worse, Of the twenty thousand military

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 2>volunteers who underwent testing at the Ministry of Defenses potting

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Down Research facility, few of these volunteers were told what

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 2>substances they were being exposed to, which included tear gas

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 2>but also the nerve agent serin, mustard gas and smoke bombs.

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, just without knowing what it is that you're

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>being exposed to cool cool, cool, and you have a

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of control over that, I'm sure, being in the military.

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 2>YEP. By the nineteen seventies, with the news reports of

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 2>tear gas being used against protesters, a renewed call for

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 2>its ban was made by many countries, and so there

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 2>was some like anger. This did incite some like hey,

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 2>wait a second, let's reconsider this. Yeah, but the US

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and the UK resisted, and in February nineteen seventy British

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Secretary Michael Stewart announced that quote CS smoke is

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 2>considered to be not significantly harmful to man in other

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 2>than a wholly exceptional circumstances, and we regard CS and

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 2>other such gases accordingly as being outside the scope of

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the Geneva Protocol. Right, so it's just like this is

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:57.800
<v Speaker 2>our We decided, this is the truth.

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>We decided that it's fine.

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 2>It's fine.

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's fine, it's fine.

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 2>It was not received well that that conclusion, that declaration

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 2>quite good, But then came the argument that not only

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 2>was tear gas not harmful, it was actually life saving,

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 2>because who knows how many people would have been killed

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 2>in protests by police if not for tear gas.

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron, that's the same thing all over again, the same thing.

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 2>The argument is still in use today, and it implies

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that we should accept police violence as inevitable, and so

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 2>it's on us to choose the lesser of two evils.

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Here you go, here are your two options. Oh, you're

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna choose gun violence. No, we don't choose.

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 1>No, it's ridiculous. That's a ridiculous argument to make. I

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>know so much is ridiculous in this world, likes utterly ridiculous.

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are your only two choices? A gun in your

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>face or a tear gun? Right?

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 2>And it's also like, this is why I was I

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 2>was trying to figure out when I was looking up

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 2>like countries that had banned tear gas, I was trying

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to be like, is there any data even to support

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 2>this argument? Yeah? And I know there's a lot of

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.280
<v Speaker 2>other factors in terms of is there an authoritarian government,

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>how much of this would be silenced just in general,

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 2>any sort of state sponsored violence. But I don't, I

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I just it's a it's a shockingly horrible argument.

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It really is. Yeah.

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 2>But going back to the medical research on tear gas,

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 2>what did they find. Many of the early reports, such

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 2>as the Hymnsworth Report, which is still referenced today, were

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 2>carried out in an official governmental capacity, and they were

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 2>largely unreliable. So, for instance, people with epilepsy who had

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 2>a seizure after exposure to tear gas, it was concluded

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 2>often that like, well, we don't really know that it

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 2>was tear gas. It's probably that they just forgot to

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 2>take their meds. We can't tell.

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>We can't tell, you can't you can't do that study, really, right,

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>So cool cool, cool, Yeah, sort of, that's just a

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:14.879
<v Speaker 1>little sample of that.

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 2>There were also there were reports like people were instructed

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 2>to follow up on reports where people had died after

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:25.280
<v Speaker 2>tear gas exposure and they found it impossible to find

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 2>any more information. The police were like, Nope, nothing to

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 2>see here, move on, there's nothing. Just don't worry about it.

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Just we swept it under the rug, under the right. Yeah.

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.399
<v Speaker 2>The incentives for downplaying the medical effects of tear gas

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 2>were just too great as a political and policing weapon.

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 2>It discouraged political protests or labor strikes, and it painted

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 2>peaceful protesters as violent dissidents. And as a product, it

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 2>was very lucrative. The United States exports both the substance

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 2>itself as well as the weapons to deploy it. So,

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 2>for instance, in nineteen eighty nine, the US exported six

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and a half million dollars worth of tear gas and

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:07.439
<v Speaker 2>tear gas weapons to Israel, where it was thrown into

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Palestinian homes and hospitals and schools and mosques. But the

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.359
<v Speaker 2>US is far from the only country to profit from

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 2>this weapon. I came across a new phrase in my

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 2>research for this, the riot control industrial complex.

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Gosh very grim, very grim, grim and specific.

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:32.240
<v Speaker 2>It is an incredibly profitable international venture of which tear

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 2>gas is a substantial part. Tear gas is manufactured in

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 2>most countries in Europe. It's manufactured in Canada, Turkey, India, Pakistan, China,

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 2>and South Korea. That's not all, There's many more. I

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 2>looked up the current projections for the tear gas market,

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:49.919
<v Speaker 2>which was projected to be in twenty twenty six one

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 2>point four five billion dollars, and guess what erin It's

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 2>predicted to experience robust growth because of increasing civil unrest.

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you serious? Yeah, that we have statistics like that,

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and I bet the economists are like, woho, right, this

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sector is growing.

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know. That's I know, dystopian isually it's the

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 2>bottom line. That's what I have written, truly dystopian.

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>That really is.

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, projected to increase because of growing civil unrest.

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:24.399
<v Speaker 1>What a great sector to be in.

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, Okay, We're almost done.

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost done.

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, I know, I mean. And this is

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing is that, like the history of tear

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 2>gas is still being written today every single day. It

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 2>is an indelible mark of protests around the world, where

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:48.399
<v Speaker 2>it is increasingly used against people exercising their legal right

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:53.439
<v Speaker 2>to assembly. What I have presented here is far from

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 2>a comprehensive history of its use, which is largely as

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a weapon of political oppression and state endorsed violence. But

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 2>there are glimmers of hope in this history as well.

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Scientists who fight for objective research on the harms of

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 2>tear gas, street medics that attend protests and have extensive

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 2>firsthand knowledge of these chemicals and how to treat them immediately,

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 2>people who design better masks or treatments, to protect from

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 2>tear gas exposure and then make that information freely available

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 2>groups that disseminate this information and pave the way for

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:31.800
<v Speaker 2>collective resistance artists turning tear gas canisters into exhibits. Cities

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 2>like Berkeley banning the use of tear gas, which happened

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 2>in June twenty twenty, although they've considered rolling it back. Today,

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 2>with the advent of social media and basically everyone carrying

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 2>a camera with them at all times, the use of

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 2>tear gas is more publicized. Just like we talked about,

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 2>these images are shared and shared again around the world

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and can act as powerful icons of unity or resistance,

0:46:56.320 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and hopefully they will be used to increase accountability and

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 2>change things for the better. The jury is out on

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 2>that one. That maybe makes me a little cynical, but

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm just like, who's ever going to be held accountable

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 2>for anything ever? Right now?

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a valid question.

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, But at the very least, what these images

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 2>do is they serve to question the status quo, the

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:28.720
<v Speaker 2>normalization of tear gas, even at a legal, peaceful protest,

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 2>and questioning is what we should be doing. We should

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 2>be asking why the threshold for tear gas deployment is

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 2>so low, who is making money off of tear gas production?

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 2>And what harm it can cause? Most of all, though,

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 2>we should be questioning the reasons that we have been

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 2>given for why tear gas is legal in this country

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 2>to use against its citizens when it is outlawed in

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 2>international warfare. And so now, Aaron, I'll turn it over

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 2>to you to tell me what we know about the

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:02.240
<v Speaker 2>health effects of tear gas.

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, let me tell you. It's a lot to cover

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:08.520
<v Speaker 1>here erin.

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I know, there's.

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Tear gas, like you mentioned, Aaron, it's one of several.

0:48:40.000 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not one thing. It is one of several riot

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>control agents. They're called or sometimes they're called harassing agents.

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of other names for them as well. And

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>there's several different types of chemicals that make up this

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 1>umbrella term tear gas. I'm going to mention three of

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 1>them by name, but then I am going to just

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:05.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of lump them all together because we can. Okay, Yeah,

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>So the three that are most common. One is called

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 1>cn or one chloro acida finone. It's also known as MACE.

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>That's brand name. It used to be probably the most

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>commonly used tear gas. But it's been largely replaced by

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a newer one called CS or o chloro benz lighten

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>mallow nitrial molono nit trial.

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Very impressed that you were able to get through that.

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I came close. I go messed it up a little.

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So the reason that CN was replaced mostly by CS

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>is because CS is far more potent, meaning at much

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.280
<v Speaker 1>lower concentrations. It has an effect.

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 2>We love an efficient weapon, don't we.

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't we? Although supposedly CN was more toxic, which means

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that someone out there admitted that CN can be toxic.

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 2>So I wonder if it was like the competition between

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:07.359
<v Speaker 2>different tear gas companies, and they're like company, really, that's

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the only time is when you just to make more

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 2>money off.

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>To make another version. In any case, mostly CN has

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>been kind of replaced by CS, and those are what

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is most most often used when people say tear gas.

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>But then there's also pepper spray, which I am going

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to lump under tear gases as well, and that is

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the fancy name is ola resin, cap saysum or oc

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 1>now pepper spray. The main ingredient in pepper spray is

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:39.799
<v Speaker 1>cap saysin, which comes from pepper plants. Is actually extracted

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>from pepper plants, same stuff that burns your tongue. But

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the Skullville units on cap saysin like pepper sprays are

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like up to two million. And it's not just cap sayson.

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:57.320
<v Speaker 1>There's like tons of active compounds that are in a

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>pepper plant that make up this pepper right, And because

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 1>like we've learned in all of our indefensive plants crossover episodes,

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not all plants are the same. There can be really

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>varying concentrations of all of the different active ingredients that

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:15.240
<v Speaker 1>are in pepper spray essentially.

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:20.439
<v Speaker 2>So, okay, so these are not artificially manufactured. These are

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 2>extra they're not synthetic. Yeah, they're not synthetic derivatives.

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah we do. There is a synthetic derivative version of it.

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But these are extracted from pepper plants. They know.

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So now you know.

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But I am going to lump all of these, including

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>pepper spray, under this tear gas umbrella. I'll probably just

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:41.840
<v Speaker 1>mostly call it tear gas or maybe riot control agents

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>going forward, because they do share more similarities than differences,

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>at least when it comes to understanding what they're doing

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and how they cause the symptoms that they cause.

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the first thing to know.

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:55.759
<v Speaker 1>And you said this already, aarin tear gas is not

0:51:55.800 --> 0:52:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a gas. Generally, these things are solids, and they're solid chemicals,

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're put into dispersal systems, either dissolved in a

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>solvent so that you end up with a liquid formulation

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can spray from a pressurized dispenser of some kind,

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like your personal pepper sprays or like pepper guns that

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>are you know, spraying pepper spray liquids, or it's a

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>powder that's put into a delivery system that includes some

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of pyrotechnic that means something like what's in a

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:32.240
<v Speaker 1>gun or a grenade, something that can cause this powder

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to be released as a smoke or a fog.

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 2>You've got the tear gas substance itself, and then you've

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 2>got all these other things that are going into the

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 2>air and your lungs and your eyes, and your GI

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 2>tract and your respiratory tract, and you sure.

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Do aarin and very often all of these other solvents

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and chemicals that are used as part of this mixture

0:52:55.760 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are also hazardous to our health. Not to mention how

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 1>dangerous the projectiles are if you get hit with them,

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and that happens all the time, all the right people

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>lose their eyes because they got hit in the face

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:13.160
<v Speaker 1>with one of these pepper balls or gas canisters or

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. And no one talks about the effect

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of all of those other chemicals when they're talking about

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the toxicities of tear gas. So just throwing that out

0:53:23.640 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there or off to a horrible start, we are in general,

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>all of these chemicals produce a similar suite of symptoms.

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 1>They all work really instantaneously, so either right away or

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:43.800
<v Speaker 1>within a matter of seconds. They're causing irritation of the eyes, nose, mouth, skin,

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and respiratory tract. And what this leads to is pain, itching, burning,

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course lachrymation. That's tear formation, and the amount

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of tears and crying can be so severe that it

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:02.800
<v Speaker 1>can result in temporary blindness because of how much tears

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you're producing, and when we inhale it, this also irritates

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>our respiratory tract, which leads to coughing sometimes the sensation

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're choking, like you cannot get air in even

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 1>though like if you checked an oxygen saturation, people might

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be technically saturating. Well, they're getting air, but it feels

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like you are choking. Yeah, right, And if the exposure

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 1>is large enough, it can also get into your GI

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>tract and then end up causing nausea, vomiting, even diarrhea.

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Direct contact with the skin can result in like rashes

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and burns, which can range from pretty mild to like

0:54:38.760 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>significant burns with like blistering like what we would consider

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like second degree. We don't really degrees anymore. Thickness is

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll get there, okay to this season will Yeah, And

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the literature says that most of these

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>symptoms will last anywhere from like twenty thirty minutes to

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 1>an hour or so, But it so depends on the

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 1>duration and the dose of exposure, so it's not uncommon

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 1>that people have much more prolonged symptoms. So we can

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about that in a bit,

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:17.719
<v Speaker 1>But I want to tell you about how these things

0:55:17.760 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 1>are actually causing the symptoms that they're causing. Yeah, Because

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 1>even though there's a lot of different chemicals then I

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't even list them all that we could consider under

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this tear gas umbrella, they all share a common mechanism

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:34.719
<v Speaker 1>even if the specific things they're binding to are a

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>little different, right, and that is that they all activate

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:41.359
<v Speaker 1>what are called our no susceptors, and these are our

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 1>pain sensory nerves. So they are literally binding to and

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>activating nerve endings in our body that are responsible for

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>sensing pain. And if we want to get more specific,

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 1>which you know I do, pepper spray activates the same

0:55:57.200 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>pain sensors that are activated by eat, like touching a

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>hot pain or getting burned by your toaster oven. And

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why when you eat a hot pepper it feels

0:56:07.320 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like your tongue is burning. Right. Yeah, CS and CN

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 1>among some of the other tear gases activate pain sensors

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that are also activated by cold burns, like think liquid

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:20.320
<v Speaker 1>nitrogen burn on your skin.

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:26.959
<v Speaker 2>This is diabolical. I know the fact that like, let's

0:56:27.120 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 2>engineer this compound to directly target pain receptors so that

0:56:32.920 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the sensation that you feel is overwhelming.

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Pain, pain, burning pain, right, and I mean a cold

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:45.040
<v Speaker 1>burn versus a hot burn. You can't really distinguish those, right,

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:50.319
<v Speaker 1>And we have these pain receptors everywhere our skin, our eyes,

0:56:50.360 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 1>our mucous membranes. Pain is a signal to our brain

0:56:55.000 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that something bad is happening. Something harmful is happening, and

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that is why activating these receptors activates these reflex loops

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that cause things like tearing, fluid production. We're trying to

0:57:12.320 --> 0:57:16.480
<v Speaker 1>our bodies are trying to clear away, wash away this

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 1>noxious stimulus.

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Do whatever it takes to stop this feeling.

0:57:20.840 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, and we see the release of a really wide

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 1>variety of neurotransmitters and other inflammatory markers that are promoting inflammation,

0:57:30.120 --> 0:57:34.439
<v Speaker 1>exacerbating pain because we know that inflammation can also exacerbate pain.

0:57:35.320 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 1>We see increases in things like vascular permeability, smooth muscle contraction.

0:57:41.320 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 1>We see fluid production which is going to then cause

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that coughing and difficulty breathing. Some of the things that

0:57:49.280 --> 0:57:51.720
<v Speaker 1>are released as part of this reflex arc are actually

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>directly involved, we think, in the pathogenesis of asthma, which

0:57:55.920 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is why we can see exacerbations of asthma and other

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:06.840
<v Speaker 1>respiratory conditions. WHOA. So that's that is how these things

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are working. And while one of the hallmarks of all

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of these tear gas agents is supposed to be that

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they have a so called wide safety margin between what

0:58:22.440 --> 0:58:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is considered an incapacitating dose that's what it's called the

0:58:26.680 --> 0:58:30.280
<v Speaker 1>irritant dose or the incapacitating dose, and what would be

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 1>considered a lethal dose.

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 2>How do they determine these different the ends of the

0:58:36.240 --> 0:58:37.040
<v Speaker 2>spectrum here.

0:58:37.000 --> 0:58:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good question. So the irritant doses were

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 1>determined either by animal models and in some cases human studies,

0:58:43.880 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>so to see like at what dosage do people detect

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this and can they not stand it? Have to leave

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the room, that sort of a thing. And then the

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:53.240
<v Speaker 1>lethal dose that LC fifties are all based on animal

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 1>studies and then you extrapolate to humans. But that does

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not mean that there can't be more severe effects, and

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea that these are completely benign not quote unquote harmful,

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is factually incorrect. In our eyes, these agents can cause

0:59:13.240 --> 0:59:16.720
<v Speaker 1>significant swelling what's called corneal edema that most of the

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>time gets better with time, but in some cases can

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be much more severe, lead to ulceration and scarring and

0:59:24.280 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 1>eventually essentially cataract formation and blindness. And especially in people

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>who wear contacts, that's an especially big risk because the

0:59:34.120 --> 0:59:38.400
<v Speaker 1>contacts can trap these chemicals on your eyes for longer,

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 1>which can then just lead to prolonged exposure and more

0:59:41.600 --> 0:59:45.000
<v Speaker 1>damage to the eye. On the skin, I already said,

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we can sometimes have really severe burns, like blistering and

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 1>really severe rashes. It's also thought that there's like a

0:59:51.880 --> 0:59:55.680
<v Speaker 1>sensitization like allergy type component, so if you're exposed once,

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you might have an even worse reaction on any subsequent encounters.

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And that is for like any of the symptoms,

1:00:02.960 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 2>whether it's respiratory, skin, anything.

1:00:05.480 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>That's more specific for skin. But in theory, yes, could

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>happen to any but we see it. It's more visible

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on the skin, I think with the severity of rashes. Okay,

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But the most common severe reactions to tear gas is

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in the respiratory system because if you think of it,

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>what tear gas is doing, like if you think what

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it's doing to your eyes right where it's causing this

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>intense degree of tear and fluid formation. If it does

1:00:33.080 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that in our lungs, it's causing this intense inflammatory response

1:00:38.400 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fluid production, and fluid in our lungs

1:00:41.840 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly dangerous. There's nowhere for it to go. So

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this can cause something called pulmonary edema, and that can

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and has been fatal in cases.

1:00:52.120 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>But it's harmless, it's humane.

1:00:54.160 --> 1:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It's harmless, it's humane. It's also been shown that it

1:00:57.960 --> 1:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>can put people at risk for secondary infection. Some people

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>who have asthma or COPD or other respiratory diseases. We

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>see that can trigger exacerbations of those diseases. And there's

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>other like that that is not all of it. There

1:01:11.840 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>have been some case reports of miscarriage associated with tear

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>gas exposure, and there is other literature that suggests there

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is not risk to pregnancy. So it's a little bit

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>like the data is not entirely clear, but I will

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>say there's a lot of survey studies that report disruption

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in people's menstrual cycles after exposure. What exactly is the

1:01:33.360 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>cause of that, we don't really know. But the other

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that's often overlooked in descriptions of the symptoms of

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tear gas exposure is the intense psychological pressure that these

1:01:46.960 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>chemicals put onto people. Huge, huge, right, the intense amount

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of discomfort that these cause because they are literally triggering

1:01:55.880 --> 1:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>your pain receptors, but in combination with the stress of

1:01:59.640 --> 1:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the suit situations that they're used in, this can cause

1:02:02.880 --> 1:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of anxiety, which can increase your blood

1:02:05.800 --> 1:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>pressure leading to other complications and putting people at risk

1:02:09.560 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for things like depression, anxiety, and PTSD after the fact.

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, these agents are not benign and I'm

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>not even done.

1:02:20.720 --> 1:02:23.000
<v Speaker 2>The impact is not even like there are people who

1:02:23.040 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>are more susceptible and people who are who yeah I

1:02:26.000 --> 1:02:29.240
<v Speaker 2>have I tend to experience more severe outcomes.

1:02:29.240 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Exposure one hundred percent children and elderly. Yeah, children, the elderly.

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Because that's the thing about the safety studies that we

1:02:35.920 --> 1:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>do have, because it's not like we have no data, right,

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we have some data on this, but the vast majority

1:02:41.280 --> 1:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of these safety studies are either in animal studies, which

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is just like to determine dosages, et cetera. Or they

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>were done in young, healthy military recruits, most of whom

1:02:51.640 --> 1:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>were white males. And again this is mostly just to

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>determine like irritant thresholds. And there's very little data that

1:02:57.920 --> 1:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we have on long term exposures. We have some data

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on like repeat exposures or like different durations of exposures,

1:03:04.960 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>but not much. And so what all of the data

1:03:08.520 --> 1:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that we have and what the like you know, thresholds

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>or like what is considered safe and things like that

1:03:15.240 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>what these short term studies don't take into account are

1:03:17.800 --> 1:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>all of the conditions under which someone might be exposed

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and the characteristics, like you said, of the people being exposed. Yeah,

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>so if you have asthma or COPD or any other

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>chronic lung condition, you are at higher risk of injury

1:03:32.680 --> 1:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>if you are a child. Kids have a completely different

1:03:36.480 --> 1:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>surface area to volume ratio than adults. Kids also breathe

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>more than twice as much air per minute than adults do.

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Wild I had no idea, and it makes sense, but

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't think.

1:03:47.920 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Because they're bathing much faster. Their faces also sit lower

1:03:52.720 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to the ground because they are small, and these chemicals

1:03:55.560 --> 1:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are heavier than air, they are not actually gases, and

1:04:00.080 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so their faces are being exposed to more of these chemicals.

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So they have a much higher risk of exposure and

1:04:08.800 --> 1:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>toxicity from exposure to these chemicals. And we are not

1:04:12.280 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>studying these on children. If you're a very old person,

1:04:16.320 --> 1:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or if these chemicals are being deployed in confined spaces

1:04:19.040 --> 1:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with no ventilation, if you were in contact lenses. The

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>effects of these chemicals is also amplified by certain conditions

1:04:26.400 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>like high heat or high humidity. So the situation in

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>which you're exposed as well as your individual characteristics are

1:04:33.520 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>also going to affect the severity of your symptoms. And

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>none of this is being studied in all of the

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>data that we have, so to say that there's no

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>long term effects, like, we don't really have data to

1:04:47.160 --> 1:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>show that there's no long term effects of these.

1:04:50.400 --> 1:04:53.919
<v Speaker 2>I have to wonder about the research incentives too. Who

1:04:54.200 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>is there funding to do studies on this? Who's funding it?

1:04:57.840 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, exactly, these are the great questions, right. There

1:05:02.920 --> 1:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>are some studies that have been done, like there was

1:05:04.800 --> 1:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>one out of Turkey that looked at people who had

1:05:07.360 --> 1:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>been repeatedly exposed to tear gases that did find higher

1:05:11.240 --> 1:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>rates of chronic respiratory illness things like COPD or asthma

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>developing after repeated exposure. But again these are like, these

1:05:18.920 --> 1:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>studies are few and far between. There are some animal

1:05:21.680 --> 1:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>studies that point to potential carcinogenicity or things on some

1:05:26.200 --> 1:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of these chemicals, but not all of them.

1:05:28.360 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Right then that's a whole separate dimension. Is like the

1:05:31.120 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>different types of.

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Chemicals yep, and the exposure and the exact level and

1:05:35.200 --> 1:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for how long, Like there's so many variables and we

1:05:37.440 --> 1:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>just we don't understand. And the thing is that these

1:05:40.400 --> 1:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>are being used in completely uncontrolled situations. Right. First of all,

1:05:48.760 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>there are no federal regulations on the use of these chemicals,

1:05:57.680 --> 1:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like there are none.

1:06:00.760 --> 1:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think of what federal regulations would look

1:06:03.680 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 2>like for this.

1:06:05.640 --> 1:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question. I don't know, and it's but

1:06:10.800 --> 1:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not, which also means like the use of these

1:06:12.560 --> 1:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is not reported, et cetera. Like there is a lot

1:06:15.280 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that goes into that, but there's not like there is

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>an up.

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 2>That's you should what okay, okay, just keep going to.

1:06:23.320 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And I mean maybe it is on a local level.

1:06:25.640 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know where you get that

1:06:27.440 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>information from. The EPA has like an exposure an acute

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>exposure guideline only for one of the tear gases, and

1:06:35.280 --> 1:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that is CS. But it's not a regulation on its use,

1:06:38.320 --> 1:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like you can't use this much of it in an

1:06:40.680 --> 1:06:44.439
<v Speaker 1>environment or anything like that. It is guidance on how

1:06:44.600 --> 1:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>much is likely to cause an effect for emergency responders

1:06:48.040 --> 1:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of if they are exposed during the

1:06:50.240 --> 1:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>course of duty. That's the only like federal level regulation

1:06:55.840 --> 1:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that exists in all of the reading that I did

1:06:58.120 --> 1:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>about any of these. And the thing is that it's

1:07:00.760 --> 1:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>not just the United States tear gases. All of the

1:07:05.640 --> 1:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>ones that we talked about and so many more are

1:07:08.160 --> 1:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>used primarily by governments against their own citizens for so

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>called crowd control across the entire globe. There's a couple

1:07:17.400 --> 1:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of really great and by great, I mean horrific maps

1:07:20.800 --> 1:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that Amnesty International put together. One that is Amnesty International

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>US that's just looking at places where tear gas was

1:07:28.200 --> 1:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>used against peaceful protesters, and not just tear gas, it's

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>other quote unquote less lethal forms of crowd control in

1:07:36.200 --> 1:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the US in just twenty twenty during Black Lives Matter protests.

1:07:40.320 --> 1:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And then there's another map that they put together that's

1:07:42.800 --> 1:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like five hundred instances of tear gas and other weapons

1:07:48.080 --> 1:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>less lethal weapons being used against protesters for no reason,

1:07:53.880 --> 1:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>no reason right there.

1:07:56.360 --> 1:07:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that a reason exists. Say whether it's very

1:07:59.000 --> 1:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>acceptable or logical or humane region reason is up for

1:08:04.320 --> 1:08:05.600
<v Speaker 2>debate exactly.

1:08:06.400 --> 1:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But they documented this across like thirty one different countries,

1:08:09.040 --> 1:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's just based on their reporting. Like I think,

1:08:12.160 --> 1:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>like we've talked about, it's harder to find places where

1:08:14.760 --> 1:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this is not allowed to be used than trying to

1:08:17.600 --> 1:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>figure out where it is used. And it's not just governments.

1:08:21.479 --> 1:08:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Tear gas is also used as an agent of terror,

1:08:24.960 --> 1:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And there was a paper that I found from twenty

1:08:26.920 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty that in the cases they were able to identify

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what agent was used. Tear gas was used in twenty

1:08:33.080 --> 1:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>one percent of chemical attacks. So it's like it's accessible,

1:08:38.200 --> 1:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and it is used across the globe.

1:08:40.439 --> 1:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, accessible, and yeah you can just oh my god, Okay,

1:08:45.120 --> 1:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>And like.

1:08:45.720 --> 1:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>We kind of already talked about, I think that being

1:08:48.360 --> 1:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>able to witness the use of this so much over

1:08:52.360 --> 1:08:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the last few years, because of our smartphones and because

1:08:55.560 --> 1:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of our access to being able to video what is

1:08:59.320 --> 1:09:03.799
<v Speaker 1>actually going on, we can see with our own eyes

1:09:03.840 --> 1:09:07.519
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances under which these weapons are being deployed against

1:09:07.640 --> 1:09:11.799
<v Speaker 1>peaceful protesters, against people trying to get aid from aid trucks,

1:09:11.920 --> 1:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>against like human beings. And I think it makes it

1:09:15.640 --> 1:09:20.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder to spin this narrative that protests are

1:09:20.720 --> 1:09:23.639
<v Speaker 1>violent and it is required that we use this kind

1:09:23.640 --> 1:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of force. It doesn't mean that the propaganda machine isn't

1:09:26.439 --> 1:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>propaganda ing.

1:09:27.320 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>But I was gonna say, yeah, like the narrative will

1:09:30.040 --> 1:09:34.599
<v Speaker 2>be spun no matter what it's just exactly endless vomit

1:09:34.760 --> 1:09:41.680
<v Speaker 2>of complete nonsense, but harmful, malicious nonsense, exactly.

1:09:42.680 --> 1:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think everyone knows at this point unless it's

1:09:45.920 --> 1:09:47.479
<v Speaker 1>your first time tuning in. This is not a medical

1:09:47.479 --> 1:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>advice podcast, and so I'm not going to give you

1:09:50.439 --> 1:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>medical advice, but.

1:09:51.840 --> 1:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>You are going to tell us.

1:09:53.000 --> 1:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I am going to tell you about Yeah, there are

1:09:56.840 --> 1:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>no treatments, yeah we have I have no specific therapeutics.

1:10:01.280 --> 1:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>There are people who are like, we need to develop therapeutics.

1:10:04.120 --> 1:10:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Because there's also a whole discussion to be had about

1:10:06.600 --> 1:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>how much medical professionals do not know about tear gases,

1:10:10.720 --> 1:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in part because when someone's exposed at a protest, we

1:10:13.760 --> 1:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have no way of knowing what they're exposed to. Right,

1:10:16.000 --> 1:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the police are like, hey, guys, just

1:10:17.960 --> 1:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>so you know today we're using pepper balls.

1:10:19.920 --> 1:10:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, everyone okay with that? Great?

1:10:22.560 --> 1:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, no, so, and so it's really it's hard

1:10:25.439 --> 1:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to know like what people are even exposed to. But

1:10:27.840 --> 1:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>all that said, there's also not as much data as

1:10:30.840 --> 1:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>there should be on the best ways to decontaminate. But

1:10:35.280 --> 1:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>many people listening might be going to protests and engaging

1:10:38.200 --> 1:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in lawful protests. And be exposed to these agents because

1:10:40.360 --> 1:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they're being used so frequently, so frequently so. Physicians for

1:10:44.640 --> 1:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Human Rights is one organization that I know of that

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:50.479
<v Speaker 1>has some really great like infographics and information sheets on

1:10:50.600 --> 1:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>ways to protect yourself as a protester, which includes preventing

1:10:55.360 --> 1:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>exposure to tear gas by having things like face masks

1:10:58.760 --> 1:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to cover your respiratory tre act goggles or glasses or

1:11:02.439 --> 1:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>something to protect your eyes, ideally not wearing contact lenses

1:11:06.240 --> 1:11:09.879
<v Speaker 1>to avoid chemicals getting trapped under your contacts, long sleeves

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and gloves to prevent skin contact. And then once exposure happens,

1:11:15.640 --> 1:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the general recommendation is that anyone who's small, like kids

1:11:21.320 --> 1:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>or things like that should be lifted to higher ground

1:11:25.160 --> 1:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to reduce exposure. Getting out of exposure as

1:11:28.680 --> 1:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>quickly as possible is important, and then removing all contaminated

1:11:32.960 --> 1:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>clothing as soon as you can after exposure. And then

1:11:36.400 --> 1:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>for direct contact with eyes or mucus membranes, the best

1:11:39.200 --> 1:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>recommendation is just to rinse it profusely for like ten

1:11:42.320 --> 1:11:45.519
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen minutes with plain water if you have it,

1:11:45.600 --> 1:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>but salty water if that's available, so like saline solutions

1:11:50.280 --> 1:11:53.479
<v Speaker 1>or some people recommend like a dilute soapy solution with

1:11:53.520 --> 1:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>something like a very gentle baby soap or something, because

1:11:56.240 --> 1:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that can help to like bind to and wash away

1:11:59.160 --> 1:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>any other chemicals that are there. But that's not based

1:12:02.760 --> 1:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>on that grade of data. But that's kind of the

1:12:04.840 --> 1:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>best that we have right now.

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Yeah, so it is. That's such a that's such

1:12:10.880 --> 1:12:14.360
<v Speaker 2>a terrifying point about like we don't know what you're

1:12:14.400 --> 1:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>being sprayed with, so it could be their treatment might

1:12:17.920 --> 1:12:21.360
<v Speaker 2>not be. That's I know, it's just a knives home

1:12:21.439 --> 1:12:24.120
<v Speaker 2>yet another horrific point in all of this.

1:12:24.600 --> 1:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's now like there's so many some of the

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the pepper balls that they're using in

1:12:28.040 --> 1:12:30.519
<v Speaker 1>the US today are mixtures and so they have both

1:12:30.640 --> 1:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>CS and pepper spray in them, and then of course

1:12:33.280 --> 1:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they're fired from a projectile which can cause damage as well. Yeah.

1:12:37.120 --> 1:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, no, it's really it's really truly horrific. Yeah,

1:12:40.560 --> 1:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really awful. And that is tear.

1:12:43.160 --> 1:12:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Gas sources sources. I have a bunch of different sources

1:12:53.360 --> 1:12:55.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna shout out too. In particular, one I already

1:12:55.720 --> 1:12:59.719
<v Speaker 2>mentioned during the episode itself tear gas by Anna Fagan

1:12:59.760 --> 1:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>bom really great overview of the entire history of tear gas.

1:13:04.040 --> 1:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a great place to start, actually start

1:13:07.320 --> 1:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and end. There's a lot more out there, but there

1:13:10.479 --> 1:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>is also so much packed into that. And then also

1:13:13.240 --> 1:13:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I found a paper from nineteen eighty nine that was

1:13:15.680 --> 1:13:20.679
<v Speaker 2>quite interesting called tear Gas Harassing Agent or Toxic Chemical

1:13:20.720 --> 1:13:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Weapon and that was by you at all and it's

1:13:23.479 --> 1:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>published in jama But there's more one that I have, Yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:13:27.680 --> 1:13:29.519
<v Speaker 1>I also had quite a number of papers for this,

1:13:29.640 --> 1:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but a couple that I think were really good overviews

1:13:33.280 --> 1:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and things. One was by Brown at all from twenty

1:13:35.920 --> 1:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty one titled Reevaluating tear Gas Toxicity and Safety from

1:13:39.720 --> 1:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the Journal Inhalationian Toxicology, and then another by Rothenberg at

1:13:43.720 --> 1:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>All from twenty sixteen called tear Gas and Epidemiological and

1:13:47.720 --> 1:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Mechanistic Reassessment, and that was from the Annals of the

1:13:50.160 --> 1:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>New York Academy of Sciences. But there was a bunch more,

1:13:53.240 --> 1:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>including I will make sure to post those links to

1:13:55.400 --> 1:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the two Amnesty International maps that I mentioned. And then

1:13:58.240 --> 1:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I also have a few in addition to journal articles,

1:14:00.920 --> 1:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>just a few like news articles and things about recent

1:14:04.040 --> 1:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>uses of to your guests in the US and abroad,

1:14:07.640 --> 1:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>so you can find all of that on our website,

1:14:09.680 --> 1:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>This podcast will Kill You dot Com under the episode

1:14:12.000 --> 1:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>step you can.

1:14:12.880 --> 1:14:16.000
<v Speaker 2>You can also find links to Bloodmobile, who thank you.

1:14:16.040 --> 1:14:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloodmobile provide the music for this episode in all of

1:14:18.840 --> 1:14:19.560
<v Speaker 2>our episodes.

1:14:19.840 --> 1:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for doing that. We so appreciate it.

1:14:22.520 --> 1:14:22.760
<v Speaker 3>We do.

1:14:23.080 --> 1:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you also to everyone at Exactly Right, especially Leana

1:14:26.960 --> 1:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and Tom and Pete and Mark and Jess and everyone.

1:14:29.960 --> 1:14:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Else, everyone, everyone, And thank you to you, Yes we do.

1:14:33.240 --> 1:14:37.400
<v Speaker 2>And thank you to you listeners. You are the reason

1:14:37.439 --> 1:14:39.439
<v Speaker 2>we do this. So thank you for tuning in.

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, and especially a shout out to our patrons.

1:14:43.439 --> 1:14:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for your support over on Patreon.

1:14:45.800 --> 1:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It really does mean the world to us.

1:14:46.960 --> 1:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>It does, It does, And until next time, wash your hands.

1:14:51.240 --> 1:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You feel the animals. Bum bumba, bumb

1:15:12.600 --> 1:15:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Bumbu.