1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

2
00:00:10,440 --> 00:00:13,840
Speaker 2: Welcome to the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner,

3
00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:18,439
Speaker 2: US Markets whipsaud on conflicting signals as to whether President

4
00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:22,320
Speaker 2: Trump was considering firing fed Share J. Powell, and in

5
00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:25,279
Speaker 2: a moment we'll look at the Trump Powell controversy with

6
00:00:25,440 --> 00:00:28,920
Speaker 2: Rich Mullen. He is the CEO at Palace Capital Advisors.

7
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:32,400
Speaker 2: But we begin this morning in the Asia Pacific. Joining

8
00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:36,519
Speaker 2: me now is Ekaterina Bigos, CIO for Asia ex Japan

9
00:00:36,960 --> 00:00:41,400
Speaker 2: Core Investments at AXA Investment Managers. Ekaterina joining from our

10
00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:43,760
Speaker 2: studios in Hong Kong. Thank you for making time to

11
00:00:43,880 --> 00:00:46,800
Speaker 2: chat with me. So we had the monthly activity data

12
00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:49,879
Speaker 2: for China earlier in the week and the figures on

13
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:53,640
Speaker 2: industrial production beat forecast. I feel like this is a

14
00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:57,800
Speaker 2: story of Chinese exports, may be a little surprising in

15
00:00:57,880 --> 00:01:00,720
Speaker 2: that I don't know how much it's a traf story.

16
00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:03,480
Speaker 2: How are you viewing the Chinese export economy right now?

17
00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:06,600
Speaker 3: Well, I mean the Chinese explorer economy has done fairly

18
00:01:06,680 --> 00:01:10,800
Speaker 3: well through the spirit of uncertainty around tires. First of all,

19
00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:13,320
Speaker 3: I mean it was the escalation and the escalation which

20
00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:16,319
Speaker 3: I think was positive, but the key one was the

21
00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:20,679
Speaker 3: redirection of the trades to Asian and a lot of

22
00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:23,759
Speaker 3: it then from Asian actually ended up to be in US,

23
00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:27,520
Speaker 3: so I think redirection, so that the escalation and the

24
00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:33,000
Speaker 3: redirection has certainly provided easing on the impact that otherwise

25
00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:36,440
Speaker 3: would have materialized if those didn't happen, right, So I

26
00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:40,240
Speaker 3: think that's ultimately led to China still driving the growth

27
00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:43,000
Speaker 3: through the external part, which is the exports.

28
00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:45,360
Speaker 2: So markets have been dealing with the reality of this

29
00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:48,800
Speaker 2: US terraff regime for a couple of months. Now. Are

30
00:01:48,840 --> 00:01:52,280
Speaker 2: you surprised at how well economies and markets seem to

31
00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:52,920
Speaker 2: be holding up?

32
00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:55,440
Speaker 3: I think they ultimately comes down to the point that

33
00:01:55,480 --> 00:01:59,160
Speaker 3: I made earlier. I think the tire of delay, the

34
00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:02,080
Speaker 3: front loading that we've seen from some of the US

35
00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:05,560
Speaker 3: as well in other markets, and the transcripment, as I said,

36
00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:09,120
Speaker 3: through other economies that part of it ended in the US,

37
00:02:10,080 --> 00:02:12,440
Speaker 3: and just a general redirection for China and to other

38
00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:16,839
Speaker 3: markets has obviously provided a relief but also has supported

39
00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:20,920
Speaker 3: the growth for US in economies. So that resilience and

40
00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:24,560
Speaker 3: redirection that we've seen and certainly has benefited the US

41
00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:27,240
Speaker 3: in economy then other theme that obviously has been present

42
00:02:27,400 --> 00:02:29,960
Speaker 3: is the tex So tech is still alive and AI

43
00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:34,120
Speaker 3: and development, which has led to increased demand for chips,

44
00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:36,800
Speaker 3: which as in again is part of that supply chain

45
00:02:36,840 --> 00:02:39,600
Speaker 3: for chips, which has provided resilience as gone to the

46
00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:42,040
Speaker 3: second part of the year. I think that element related

47
00:02:42,080 --> 00:02:46,160
Speaker 3: to tire delay, the front loading and transhipment is going

48
00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:48,280
Speaker 3: to wind down, but I think the tech team is

49
00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:50,720
Speaker 3: still going to be present. But a combination of that

50
00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:54,240
Speaker 3: with probably deceleration of the onshore demand will probably have

51
00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:57,320
Speaker 3: a weaker growth in a broader Asia, including China. So

52
00:02:57,360 --> 00:03:02,120
Speaker 3: the broader view for China and Asia is decelerating growth

53
00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:02,680
Speaker 3: from here.

54
00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:05,079
Speaker 2: Well, I'm glad you mentioned the AI story because we've

55
00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,240
Speaker 2: been getting indications that the American government has lifted certain

56
00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:12,920
Speaker 2: restrictions export restrictions to some types of AI chips to

57
00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:16,280
Speaker 2: the Chinese market. I don't know if this indicates maybe

58
00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:19,840
Speaker 2: a little bit of movement in terms of overall trade negotiations,

59
00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:22,959
Speaker 2: but what do you think it means for the technology

60
00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:24,119
Speaker 2: industry on the mainland.

61
00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:27,080
Speaker 3: I think it's positive and we've seen already the sector

62
00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:30,440
Speaker 3: taking that news in a very positive light, and I

63
00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:34,400
Speaker 3: think it just gives China more room to advance in

64
00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:39,560
Speaker 3: that technological the technological sphere, and ultimately I think is

65
00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:43,880
Speaker 3: positive as well because US is using this as a

66
00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:46,560
Speaker 3: way of negotiating and getting outcome from China to deliver

67
00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:49,960
Speaker 3: certain elements that are beneficial for the US. Again, the

68
00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:52,240
Speaker 3: level of chips or the high performance of the chips

69
00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:56,000
Speaker 3: that being allowed to be exported to China, They're not

70
00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:59,560
Speaker 3: the highest performance level of chips, which again puts them

71
00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:03,680
Speaker 3: still back and potentially advancing some sphere of that technological drive.

72
00:04:03,880 --> 00:04:06,720
Speaker 2: We heard recently from President Trump saying that he's likely

73
00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:09,360
Speaker 2: to impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals as soon as the end

74
00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:11,320
Speaker 2: of the month. Do you have a sense of the

75
00:04:11,400 --> 00:04:13,080
Speaker 2: ramifications of a move like that.

76
00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:17,600
Speaker 3: Yeah, and I think some of the company is, particularly

77
00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:22,000
Speaker 3: places like Singapore, stand to be impacted more India to

78
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:25,480
Speaker 3: a certain degree, and I think it could have ramifications

79
00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:29,920
Speaker 3: for China. I think the broader pharma and biotech sector

80
00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:33,040
Speaker 3: just as a spillover, but I think the manufacturing per se.

81
00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:35,520
Speaker 3: I think the Singapore and India, I said the less

82
00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:38,680
Speaker 3: degree are likely to be more impacted. But certainly those

83
00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:41,400
Speaker 3: victorial tires we need to get prepared for. They will come.

84
00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:44,320
Speaker 3: Is a question of how they're going to get implemented,

85
00:04:44,360 --> 00:04:47,560
Speaker 3: because the aim for the US is to reshore some

86
00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:50,640
Speaker 3: of that activity back home, and it's a strategic move

87
00:04:51,839 --> 00:04:54,320
Speaker 3: which is likely to evolve as we go into the

88
00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:55,000
Speaker 3: second part of the year.

89
00:04:55,160 --> 00:04:57,479
Speaker 2: So Trump was also saying that he's recently reached a

90
00:04:57,520 --> 00:05:01,479
Speaker 2: deal with Indonesia. Imported goods the US from Indonesia will

91
00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:04,800
Speaker 2: face a nineteen percent tearoff. That seems maybe a little

92
00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:07,159
Speaker 2: high relative to what the market may have been expecting.

93
00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:10,520
Speaker 2: I think for Trump, what's more important is that US

94
00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:13,719
Speaker 2: exports moving into the Indonesian market will not be taxed.

95
00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:15,680
Speaker 2: How would you evaluate this deal?

96
00:05:16,920 --> 00:05:21,440
Speaker 3: I think ultimately is what is the perception of Indonesia.

97
00:05:21,560 --> 00:05:25,000
Speaker 3: Did they get the good deal out of that? And

98
00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:27,960
Speaker 3: the signs at the moment is that the Indonesian are

99
00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:31,839
Speaker 3: relatively happy in how the deal was negotiated. And again,

100
00:05:31,880 --> 00:05:34,040
Speaker 3: the previous tariffs would have been higher, so obviously it's

101
00:05:34,040 --> 00:05:36,400
Speaker 3: a desceleration from that. And I think if I had

102
00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:40,720
Speaker 3: to covet and kind of broaden and canvas the trade negotiations,

103
00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:43,960
Speaker 3: I think the market expectation is by enlarge that the

104
00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:47,080
Speaker 3: tariffs that were voiced in the past, were the kind

105
00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:49,240
Speaker 3: of the upper limit of it, and the majority of

106
00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:53,159
Speaker 3: the trading partners will get a lower rate, unless, of

107
00:05:53,160 --> 00:05:57,000
Speaker 3: course they they tried to impost tier from the US

108
00:05:57,000 --> 00:05:59,599
Speaker 3: and again escalation of tit for tat, which we've seen

109
00:06:00,320 --> 00:06:03,360
Speaker 3: in case of China. But I think market is that's

110
00:06:03,400 --> 00:06:05,480
Speaker 3: a positive sign because again the level is just lower

111
00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:07,000
Speaker 3: to what it was voiced in the past.

112
00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:09,560
Speaker 2: I'm curious about the degree to which you're looking at

113
00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:12,279
Speaker 2: the behavior of the dollar recently and guiding a lot

114
00:06:12,279 --> 00:06:15,599
Speaker 2: of the decision making that you're having to confront right now.

115
00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:18,520
Speaker 2: The dollar seems to have weakened a bit. I mean,

116
00:06:18,520 --> 00:06:21,159
Speaker 2: we're strong over the last several days, but I think

117
00:06:21,240 --> 00:06:23,880
Speaker 2: generally speaking, the trend has been to the weak side here.

118
00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:25,840
Speaker 2: I mean, talk to me a little bit about how

119
00:06:25,839 --> 00:06:29,080
Speaker 2: you understand that, particularly in light of what the Fed

120
00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:30,960
Speaker 2: may be doing between now and the end of the year,

121
00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:33,200
Speaker 2: and how that's influencing your decision making.

122
00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:35,680
Speaker 3: That's certainly, I mean, if you look at the beginning

123
00:06:35,680 --> 00:06:39,120
Speaker 3: of the year and the expectations that many cell side

124
00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:43,840
Speaker 3: and by side put in place, certainly was dollar strengthening

125
00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:47,040
Speaker 3: or dollar staying kind of range bound? The dynamics of

126
00:06:47,080 --> 00:06:49,880
Speaker 3: the dollar. There's one point to highlight hasn't been uniform.

127
00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:52,160
Speaker 3: It's not just a dollar weakness across the board. Is

128
00:06:52,279 --> 00:06:57,159
Speaker 3: dollar weakness against various economies. We've seen that against the

129
00:06:57,200 --> 00:07:02,680
Speaker 3: Euro because, of course we've seen as part of the

130
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:06,920
Speaker 3: tariff's escalation is the uncertainty of US assets has been

131
00:07:07,040 --> 00:07:11,560
Speaker 3: in the spotlight, so investors looked increasingly to diversify away

132
00:07:11,600 --> 00:07:16,120
Speaker 3: from US into other markets, and Europe, despite DCB being

133
00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:18,280
Speaker 3: ahead of the FED, was a key beneficiary of that

134
00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:23,280
Speaker 3: inflows also from Asia. What we've seen a trend that

135
00:07:23,320 --> 00:07:26,480
Speaker 3: we've seen again materializing this year is that the hedging

136
00:07:26,560 --> 00:07:30,920
Speaker 3: costs for Dollar assets is still prohibitive relative to European assets,

137
00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:34,600
Speaker 3: and we've seen Asian investors starting from hedge bases and

138
00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:38,880
Speaker 3: diversification need bases to move into assets away from US

139
00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:41,559
Speaker 3: into Again, this is not a structural shift away from US,

140
00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:45,720
Speaker 3: but this is a diversification drive that is materializing.

141
00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:49,480
Speaker 2: When you look at South Asia versus the Northern Asian economist,

142
00:07:49,520 --> 00:07:53,560
Speaker 2: and I'm thinking principally of Japan and South Korea, what's

143
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:55,040
Speaker 2: the contrast here.

144
00:07:55,400 --> 00:08:00,480
Speaker 3: Yeah, the different dynamics that are driving those economy there's

145
00:08:00,520 --> 00:08:05,920
Speaker 3: some Ultimately tariffs is again impacting both economies. But one

146
00:08:05,960 --> 00:08:09,120
Speaker 3: part that is challenging for Japan at the moment, as

147
00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:12,920
Speaker 3: we've seen, is obviously policy or fiscal policy, which has

148
00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:16,720
Speaker 3: brought a lot of attention from the investors, particularly on

149
00:08:16,760 --> 00:08:20,840
Speaker 3: the thirty year jgb's fields elevating higher. And again, what

150
00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:24,720
Speaker 3: is Japan government conflicted with at the moment is economy

151
00:08:24,760 --> 00:08:28,360
Speaker 3: that is emerging out of kind of this stagnation but

152
00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:32,840
Speaker 3: is not yet thriving. It needs a support, a support

153
00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:36,000
Speaker 3: when the monetary policy is normalized and the fiscal policy

154
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:39,560
Speaker 3: does not have room, so they would have and they

155
00:08:39,640 --> 00:08:42,520
Speaker 3: should use some element of support, but again the room

156
00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:46,440
Speaker 3: is limited, and we've seen obviously the elections that are

157
00:08:46,480 --> 00:08:48,720
Speaker 3: coming up in Upper House on the twentieth of July

158
00:08:49,080 --> 00:08:51,920
Speaker 3: kind of putting a lot of pressure on the JGBS

159
00:08:51,920 --> 00:08:56,000
Speaker 3: because of that need to provide additional fiscal stimulus, which

160
00:08:56,000 --> 00:08:58,760
Speaker 3: again the room is limited. When it comes to Koreas,

161
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:03,600
Speaker 3: certainly the dynamics related to tyres. Of course, tech is

162
00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:07,000
Speaker 3: part of the theme that has kept career resilient. And

163
00:09:07,080 --> 00:09:08,960
Speaker 3: in Korea what we had is a lot of political

164
00:09:09,640 --> 00:09:14,400
Speaker 3: instability and also you can say by and large. Korea

165
00:09:14,440 --> 00:09:17,320
Speaker 3: has a lot more fiscal room unmonitored room to support

166
00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:23,599
Speaker 3: the economy, so slightly different dynamics macrodynamics between the two economies.

167
00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:26,160
Speaker 2: Ekaterina will leave it there, Thank you so very much.

168
00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:30,840
Speaker 2: Ekaterina bigos Cio for Asia ex Japan Core Investments at

169
00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:34,120
Speaker 2: Axa Investment Managers. Joining from our studios in Hong Kong.

170
00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:45,199
Speaker 2: Here on the Daybreak Asia Podcast. Welcome back to the

171
00:09:45,280 --> 00:09:49,240
Speaker 2: Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. President Trump is denying

172
00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:53,320
Speaker 2: that he intends to fire Fetcher J. Powell. Late this morning,

173
00:09:53,320 --> 00:09:56,160
Speaker 2: a White House official told us the President was likely

174
00:09:56,280 --> 00:10:00,000
Speaker 2: to oust Powell soon. However, a short while later, President

175
00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:02,200
Speaker 2: and Trump said he has no plans to fire the

176
00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:04,960
Speaker 2: FED share and he said he was only discussing it

177
00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:08,640
Speaker 2: in concept during a closed door meeting with House Republicans.

178
00:10:09,120 --> 00:10:11,880
Speaker 2: So when the dust settled, it seems as though the

179
00:10:11,880 --> 00:10:16,280
Speaker 2: market was looking through this episode as political theater. Nonetheless,

180
00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:19,319
Speaker 2: the race is on to find a successor to Powell.

181
00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:22,880
Speaker 2: We have learned that ANYC director Kevin Hassett is an

182
00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:25,959
Speaker 2: early favorite. Here is Bloomberg's and Marie hor Dern.

183
00:10:26,240 --> 00:10:29,319
Speaker 4: This is someone that he would be willing to cut rates,

184
00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:32,400
Speaker 4: and he's telling people inside and outside the administration that

185
00:10:32,520 --> 00:10:35,120
Speaker 4: he would like the job. The President also said yesterday,

186
00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,120
Speaker 4: which I thought was really interesting, that Scott Bessett is

187
00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:41,160
Speaker 4: still an option, but he's not his top option because

188
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:43,520
Speaker 4: he liked the job he's doing at Treasury. And we've

189
00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:46,240
Speaker 4: been talking about that really for weeks. If the President

190
00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:49,160
Speaker 4: was going to pull the Treasury secretary to move him

191
00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:51,760
Speaker 4: over to the FED, this would create almost another problem

192
00:10:51,760 --> 00:10:53,480
Speaker 4: and a huge hole for the president.

193
00:10:53,559 --> 00:10:56,320
Speaker 2: That is Bloomberg's and Marie hor Dern in the Washington

194
00:10:56,400 --> 00:10:58,800
Speaker 2: Let's get some reaction to all of this now from

195
00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:01,720
Speaker 2: Rich Mullen, he is founding partner and CEO at Palace

196
00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:05,120
Speaker 2: Capital Advisor's Riches on the line from just outside Boston,

197
00:11:05,440 --> 00:11:07,440
Speaker 2: thank you for making time to chat with me. What

198
00:11:07,480 --> 00:11:10,800
Speaker 2: did you make of this whole episode today, Rich, I

199
00:11:10,840 --> 00:11:11,640
Speaker 2: think we've got.

200
00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:14,160
Speaker 1: Some more gamemanship, quite frankly, I mean, we've seen this

201
00:11:14,240 --> 00:11:16,880
Speaker 1: in the behavior out of Trump and the tariffs. I

202
00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:19,560
Speaker 1: know that this is a far more dangerous game to

203
00:11:19,640 --> 00:11:23,080
Speaker 1: be playing, but I really feel it's unlikely that Trump

204
00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:25,840
Speaker 1: would fire the FED chair. I mean, we'd be extremely

205
00:11:25,880 --> 00:11:28,960
Speaker 1: destabilizing to the markets. We saw that. When the announcement

206
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:30,960
Speaker 1: was out, I think the S and P dropped forty

207
00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:35,040
Speaker 1: or fifty points. There was a spike in gold, and

208
00:11:35,080 --> 00:11:38,560
Speaker 1: then on the denial, all that kind of reverse then

209
00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:41,640
Speaker 1: seemed to the market found a little solace in it.

210
00:11:42,200 --> 00:11:45,920
Speaker 1: I think that, you know, Trump is not unaware that

211
00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:48,800
Speaker 1: this would be an extremely negative event for the markets.

212
00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:51,520
Speaker 1: You know, there's no secret that Trump follows the markets

213
00:11:51,640 --> 00:11:54,840
Speaker 1: very very closely. You know, if he were, you know,

214
00:11:54,880 --> 00:11:59,719
Speaker 1: to fire the FED chairman right now, I think you'd

215
00:11:59,760 --> 00:12:03,480
Speaker 1: see the gold sore, you'd see a massive spike in

216
00:12:03,480 --> 00:12:08,640
Speaker 1: interest rates, and obviously it would affect the equity market.

217
00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:10,760
Speaker 1: You know, I really kind of feel like this is

218
00:12:11,080 --> 00:12:13,120
Speaker 1: the game that he's playing here is we've seen the

219
00:12:13,200 --> 00:12:16,760
Speaker 1: dollar depreciate considerably. You know, there's it's kind of pick

220
00:12:16,840 --> 00:12:20,560
Speaker 1: your adventure here watching the markets respond to Fed's to

221
00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:24,760
Speaker 1: the Trump administration's policy. You know, we're seeing this depreciation

222
00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:29,720
Speaker 1: in the dollar, and Trump administrations made no bones about

223
00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:32,559
Speaker 1: it that the weaker dollar is something that they favor.

224
00:12:32,960 --> 00:12:36,000
Speaker 1: You know, is really supportive of the country's industrial fabric.

225
00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:39,480
Speaker 1: It encourages exports, it may offset some of the damage

226
00:12:39,559 --> 00:12:42,959
Speaker 1: that you know, the economy's feeling are potentially fearing, I

227
00:12:43,000 --> 00:12:45,080
Speaker 1: should say, from the tariffs. But I think it's a

228
00:12:45,240 --> 00:12:50,120
Speaker 1: it's a remote situation that the FED that Trump would

229
00:12:50,120 --> 00:12:53,120
Speaker 1: fire the FED President Powell right now, especially with ten

230
00:12:53,120 --> 00:12:54,640
Speaker 1: months left in his term.

231
00:12:55,000 --> 00:12:58,439
Speaker 2: I mentioned that a leading candidate to become the FED

232
00:12:58,480 --> 00:13:01,599
Speaker 2: share when Powell's term is over next to May, is

233
00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:05,360
Speaker 2: Kevin Hasset, one of the President's longest serving economic aids.

234
00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:09,080
Speaker 2: Are you concerned in a scenario such as that where

235
00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:12,400
Speaker 2: maybe the Fed's independence would be at risk?

236
00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:16,320
Speaker 1: I am. I mean, I think, you know, appointing a

237
00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:18,679
Speaker 1: dubbish successor, which I don't know whether you could label

238
00:13:18,760 --> 00:13:23,160
Speaker 1: the Hazzard like that. You certainly could label him as

239
00:13:23,240 --> 00:13:28,440
Speaker 1: perhaps you know, a shadow of Trump's you know, impact

240
00:13:28,480 --> 00:13:31,000
Speaker 1: on the on the FED. But I think that would

241
00:13:31,040 --> 00:13:33,520
Speaker 1: also have the same effect. It might not be as dramatic,

242
00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:36,880
Speaker 1: but it would gradually continue to weeken. The dollar, bond

243
00:13:36,920 --> 00:13:40,280
Speaker 1: prices would would I think, you know, yields would continue

244
00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:45,360
Speaker 1: to rise, and certainly gold and would would also assume

245
00:13:45,480 --> 00:13:47,600
Speaker 1: it's a cent in that scenario. So I think you

246
00:13:47,720 --> 00:13:50,240
Speaker 1: really have to be careful. I think that the the

247
00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:55,040
Speaker 1: Fed's independence is paramount here and I think you have

248
00:13:55,080 --> 00:13:56,839
Speaker 1: to rely on the fact that this is a pro

249
00:13:57,160 --> 00:14:00,400
Speaker 1: business administration, and I think there's still a lot of

250
00:14:00,440 --> 00:14:04,840
Speaker 1: gamesmanship here, So I think any sort of replacement to

251
00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:08,560
Speaker 1: Powell has to be looked at, and I believe will

252
00:14:08,559 --> 00:14:09,439
Speaker 1: be through that lens.

253
00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:12,960
Speaker 2: Nonetheless, if you look at let's say, today's PPI report,

254
00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:15,600
Speaker 2: which kind of reinforces the case for FED rate cuts

255
00:14:15,640 --> 00:14:18,960
Speaker 2: this year, I know that there's been some debate about

256
00:14:18,960 --> 00:14:21,040
Speaker 2: the impact of tariffs and whether or not they will

257
00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:24,400
Speaker 2: indeed be inflationary, But at this point where you said,

258
00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:27,040
Speaker 2: is there the risk maybe that the FED is a

259
00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:28,400
Speaker 2: little behind the curve.

260
00:14:28,920 --> 00:14:31,120
Speaker 1: I think it's a little early to tell, and I

261
00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:32,760
Speaker 1: think what we need to see is some of this

262
00:14:33,520 --> 00:14:36,200
Speaker 1: play out. I mean, we don't really know necessarily in

263
00:14:36,200 --> 00:14:39,960
Speaker 1: my opinion, with the start and stops of the tariffs.

264
00:14:40,280 --> 00:14:42,760
Speaker 1: You know, it's our opinion here that tariffs are you know,

265
00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:44,960
Speaker 1: take typically two months or so to show up in

266
00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:48,680
Speaker 1: inflation numbers, not seeing that in space certainly, and then

267
00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:50,800
Speaker 1: a quarter or two to show up in the economy.

268
00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:55,640
Speaker 1: So you're right, I mean today, yesterday's PPI was a

269
00:14:55,640 --> 00:15:00,960
Speaker 1: bit benign and certainly you know, lower than expected, but

270
00:15:01,280 --> 00:15:05,720
Speaker 1: the CPI came in a little bit hotter, you know,

271
00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:08,600
Speaker 1: at ex Food and Energy it was actually a little

272
00:15:08,600 --> 00:15:13,560
Speaker 1: bit cooler. So we're not seeing the effects of tariffs

273
00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:16,960
Speaker 1: play out, you know, certainly to the degree that people

274
00:15:16,960 --> 00:15:21,080
Speaker 1: had expected in the inflation numbers. I've been looking at

275
00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:23,280
Speaker 1: the jobs market, you know, I've been kind of looking

276
00:15:23,320 --> 00:15:26,640
Speaker 1: at We all know that this economy's consumer driven, right,

277
00:15:26,920 --> 00:15:28,560
Speaker 1: and we're starting to see a little bit of slack

278
00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:32,760
Speaker 1: and softening in the jobs market still though, you know,

279
00:15:32,800 --> 00:15:35,560
Speaker 1: you can trast that with what the banks reported today.

280
00:15:35,880 --> 00:15:39,480
Speaker 1: The consumers alive and well swiping away if you will,

281
00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:43,840
Speaker 1: at cards delinquencies and cards card balances are up, at

282
00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:46,520
Speaker 1: delinquencies aren't. So there's a you know, a bit of

283
00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:48,880
Speaker 1: a mosaic here of a lot of different moving parts,

284
00:15:48,960 --> 00:15:51,280
Speaker 1: and I think it's a little early to draw some conclusions.

285
00:15:51,600 --> 00:15:53,560
Speaker 1: You know, let's just talk about the market. You know,

286
00:15:53,640 --> 00:15:58,400
Speaker 1: while it's trading at fairly fully priced, if not rich valuations,

287
00:15:58,680 --> 00:16:01,680
Speaker 1: you still have Nvidio four trillion dollar company growing at

288
00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:04,720
Speaker 1: sixty nine percent. Somebody spending money.

289
00:16:04,440 --> 00:16:06,840
Speaker 2: Yeah, most definitely. But you mentioned the banks. I'm glad

290
00:16:06,880 --> 00:16:09,920
Speaker 2: you did, because some of this trading revenue data that

291
00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:12,920
Speaker 2: we got today from the likes of Goldman Sachs, Bank

292
00:16:12,960 --> 00:16:16,760
Speaker 2: of America, Morgan Stanley. That's very, very impressive performance.

293
00:16:17,440 --> 00:16:19,080
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean you can you could tie that right

294
00:16:19,120 --> 00:16:21,080
Speaker 1: to volatility. You know, if you think about the fact

295
00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:25,600
Speaker 1: that you know, we started the year in the market

296
00:16:25,600 --> 00:16:28,040
Speaker 1: in the s and P five hundred, you know, making

297
00:16:28,120 --> 00:16:33,200
Speaker 1: all time highs in February, followed by our Liberation Day

298
00:16:33,240 --> 00:16:37,760
Speaker 1: pullback of twenty plus percent, and then a subsequent bounce

299
00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:42,280
Speaker 1: and now sitting again at new highs. All that plays

300
00:16:42,880 --> 00:16:47,640
Speaker 1: a great music to the traders on the desk? Is

301
00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:51,640
Speaker 1: that volatility? Is it really? I think enhances an exacerbased

302
00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:52,280
Speaker 1: trading revenues.

303
00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:55,880
Speaker 2: We also had the fed's Page Book Survey today. Economic

304
00:16:55,880 --> 00:17:00,560
Speaker 2: growth activity, according to the FED, increased slightly between late

305
00:17:00,600 --> 00:17:05,560
Speaker 2: May and early June, but a level of uncertainty remained elevated,

306
00:17:05,880 --> 00:17:09,119
Speaker 2: and that is contributing to this ongoing caution on the

307
00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:11,840
Speaker 2: part of businesses. We're talking about the tariff story here.

308
00:17:12,280 --> 00:17:15,080
Speaker 2: Do you think it's an urgent matter now that the

309
00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:19,600
Speaker 2: administration really needs to resolve these trade deals before things

310
00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:24,240
Speaker 2: kind of progress further and maybe deteriorate confidence to a

311
00:17:24,240 --> 00:17:25,159
Speaker 2: greater degree.

312
00:17:25,640 --> 00:17:27,879
Speaker 1: I really do I mean, I started off the conversation

313
00:17:27,960 --> 00:17:30,200
Speaker 1: by saying that I think there's a lot of gamesmanship

314
00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:32,399
Speaker 1: going on here. You know, I think, you know, the

315
00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:35,400
Speaker 1: art of the deal right is seemingly in play every

316
00:17:35,440 --> 00:17:38,359
Speaker 1: single day with the with the current administration. But I

317
00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:41,840
Speaker 1: do think that, you know, with this heightened level of

318
00:17:41,920 --> 00:17:45,400
Speaker 1: uncertainty and corporation's failure to do any sort of long

319
00:17:45,520 --> 00:17:48,560
Speaker 1: range planning, I think the longer that that goes on,

320
00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:51,800
Speaker 1: I think it could have a you know, kind of

321
00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:54,959
Speaker 1: a deleterious effect going forward, and maybe even a negative

322
00:17:54,960 --> 00:17:57,240
Speaker 1: feedback loop. I mean, listen, we're in the midst of

323
00:17:57,280 --> 00:17:59,159
Speaker 1: earning season right now, and I think we're going to

324
00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:01,560
Speaker 1: get some clarity on that as to what these companies

325
00:18:01,600 --> 00:18:04,080
Speaker 1: are seeing, what they're able to do, how they're able

326
00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:07,439
Speaker 1: to project going forward, and maybe some insight is to

327
00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:11,640
Speaker 1: how they're kind of preparing or planning for this uncertainty.

328
00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:14,439
Speaker 2: Are you focused more on what's going on in the

329
00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:17,160
Speaker 2: States or are you looking for opportunities offshore right now?

330
00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:19,639
Speaker 2: Do you want to be diversified a little bit in

331
00:18:19,680 --> 00:18:20,480
Speaker 2: foreign markets?

332
00:18:22,720 --> 00:18:27,200
Speaker 1: We've been moving up our allocation to the international markets.

333
00:18:27,520 --> 00:18:33,399
Speaker 1: The national markets Europe in particular have had a prolific gain.

334
00:18:33,760 --> 00:18:36,160
Speaker 1: And you know, you can contribute that to a bunch

335
00:18:36,200 --> 00:18:39,600
Speaker 1: of different things, but certainly the effects of some of

336
00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:43,560
Speaker 1: the trade policy or Trump trade policies, and also the

337
00:18:43,600 --> 00:18:47,720
Speaker 1: mandate for increased defense spending that's going on over there.

338
00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:51,760
Speaker 1: But I think you're seeing some of the trade policies

339
00:18:51,760 --> 00:18:55,440
Speaker 1: and the Trump administration policies play out in Europe. I think,

340
00:18:55,880 --> 00:18:59,359
Speaker 1: you know, europe x age is up about nineteen percent,

341
00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:02,960
Speaker 1: So I mean there's a market rally over there that

342
00:19:03,920 --> 00:19:07,640
Speaker 1: we're attending to. Certainly in our allocations, we don't think

343
00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:10,160
Speaker 1: it's a blip. We think it's somewhat of a secular

344
00:19:10,240 --> 00:19:13,240
Speaker 1: move as a result of some of these policies taking

345
00:19:13,240 --> 00:19:17,320
Speaker 1: hold over there. So that is certainly I think the

346
00:19:17,320 --> 00:19:20,040
Speaker 1: focus of our portfolios right now.

347
00:19:20,119 --> 00:19:22,199
Speaker 2: Okay, Rich, well leave it there. Very good. Thank you

348
00:19:22,240 --> 00:19:24,800
Speaker 2: so much, Rich Mullin. He is founding partner also the

349
00:19:24,840 --> 00:19:28,639
Speaker 2: CEO at Palace Capital Advisors. On the line from just

350
00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:33,960
Speaker 2: outside Boston here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. Thanks for

351
00:19:34,000 --> 00:19:38,639
Speaker 2: listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast.

352
00:19:38,960 --> 00:19:42,080
Speaker 2: Each weekday, we look at the story shaping markets, finance,

353
00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:45,520
Speaker 2: and geopolitics in the Asia. Pacific. You can find us

354
00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:49,720
Speaker 2: on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere

355
00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:52,879
Speaker 2: else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for insight on

356
00:19:52,920 --> 00:19:57,040
Speaker 2: the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia.

357
00:19:57,480 --> 00:19:59,960
Speaker 2: I'm Doug Chrisner, and this is Bloomberg.

358
00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:02,840
Speaker 3: He