WEBVTT - China, Equities, ETFs, and Commodities (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news on the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast just reading on the

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg termoil right Now. Protests against china strict COVID measures

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>failed to materialize on Monday as a Chinese authorities deployed

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a heavy police presence in the capital on other major

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>cities to deter a repeat of the weekend's demonstrations. When

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw that news over the weekend, I said, we

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>need to check in with Leland Miller. He's our go

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to voice and all things China. He's the CEO of

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>China bag Book International. Leland, We I'd love to get

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>your perspective given your experience in China. What did we

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>really see over the weekend with some of these demonstrations.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>What are the takeaways? Well, clearly frustration is boiling over.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Chinese people have to deal with a

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>very draconian zero COVID policy for UH for months and

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>months and months and months and months and months now,

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and it is crushed economic activity, it's crushed travel, it's

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's torn families apart. UH. And so I think that

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a desire right now to send a message

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>that this needs to end. UH. And I think a

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of the protests UM, we're about a frustration with

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the leadership for not providing a roadmap out of this UH.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, winter is COVID spreading season. Things were never

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be opened up over the winter and there

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>and then they're still not going to be UH for

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the most part. But I think that the idea that

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>people still don't have a date on the horizon, they

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have an idea of when when their misery is

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>going to end. I think that this, this this caused

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>things to really boil over. In addition, of course to

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you've you've seen some very grizzly events recently,

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like people trapped in their houses and and uh ire

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is consuming them. So so this is this has really

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten to a point where where people had enough. Now

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure from from what we understand here in

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the West, it's incredibly dangerous to protest in China. Right,

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>My idea is that if you go out there, you're

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>literally risking your life. Um, is that really the case?

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Do people in China understand that? Because that raises really

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the bar for you know what, I'm willing to go

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>out of my house and protests against Yeah, protests in

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>China aren't uncommon, but what is very uncommon is to

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>see protests uh surging in multiple cities at the same

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>time about the same thing. Uh. This is sort of

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, not just about dissatisfaction with the

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 1>local issue or a bank that people think might be insolving.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>This is about a fundamental policy that the central government

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>has uh that that that that there's no tolerance for anymore.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>So the you know, protesting can happen, but this clearly

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>was sending a signal that it could become something much bigger,

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>which is why the authorities have moved in to try

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to stop it from from from boiling out of control

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, Leland, Does the Chinese government not

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>understand Did the Chinese people not understand that they can't

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>get to some level of herd immunity without massive vaccinations.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what the rest of the world has learned. How

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>has it spun within China? Well, the the way the

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Beijing has handled this over the past year or so,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>past two years or so has has been quite puzzling.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. The for for the first two years and one,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there were you know, there was there was there were

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>tight restrictions on on COVID, but nothing like what we've

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>seen in There was plenty of time for the leadership

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to have started a vaccine rollout, to imported mr and

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>A vaccines, to do a lot of the things that

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>China needs in order to get out of this, and

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>none of it was done. And of course the you know,

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the belief is that that she didn't want to be

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>embarrassed by importing foreign vaccines. He wanted Chinese companies to

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to do it so they could claim victory

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>domestically over the virus. But it's gotten to the point where,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're we're here on the on the cusp

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>of three. Most of the world has mostly moved on

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>from COVID, and China is looking at what could probably

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be the worst COVID outbreaks that they've seen

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in the coming months. And so the policy response has

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>been completely puzzling, and I think that's one of the

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>reasons that people are are so frustrated. Is there any

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>element of you know, the party maintains control over the

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>people by locking them down. I mean, it sounds so

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>dramatic and it's but in a sense, I can't understand

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>how that would actually work. Yeah, you hear that a lot.

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's hard to believe that this is about control.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh first and foremost. Uh. You have a situation where,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, health, health, health risks aside, the economy needs

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to be open in order to thrive, in order to

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just be able to tread water. And what's happening right

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>now is remarkable. Um, you saw very very few people

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as we entered two believing that you know, there wouldn't

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>be a second half bounce, that she wouldn't relent at

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>certain point, and nothing of the sort has happened. So

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what's likely to happen in the

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>coming months, the party has got to be responsive, look

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>at least look responsive to the people who are protesting

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. So there will be some sort of rhetorical relaxation.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>There's some policies they could target, they could talk about

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>less you know, splitting families apart, and they can talk

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>about you know, less stringent lockdowns or lockdowns for for

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>for short amounts of time, But you're about to go

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>into the winter months where COVID will spread out of

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>control if there is no sort of control mechanism. And

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so there's really no good answer right now to to

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to to the problem that the Chinese government has to solve.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They cannot functionally open up the economy and not have

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>massive COVID outbreaks, but they can't keep the population under

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>control indefinitely under a draconian COVID zero. So you're likely

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to see them try to thread the needle, try to

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>do the middle ground, and there's no guarantee that's not

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a disaster as well. Yeah, that is. It's

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>tough stuff. I don't know how they're going to manage that.

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Leland Miller, thanks so much for taking the time today.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We absolutely wanted to hear from you to get your

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>latest thoughts on China. Here, Leland Miller used to see

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of the China Basebook International. They have their own proprietary

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>data sets and data sources over in China get some great,

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>great information. Well, China seems to be one of the

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>narratives of this Monday morning trading demonstrations over the weekend

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>causing some uneasiness as it relates to that economy, Apple

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>saying they're going to be short maybe six million iPhones

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the disruptions and there plants over there in China,

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So we need to just kind of get a circle

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>around this whole thing. We'll do that with Gina Martin Adams,

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>chief equity strategist of Bloomberg Intelligence, and a Rack Ronnick.

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior tech an also Bloomberg Intelligence as well. Gina,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you, how do you factor in I

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know, China risk if you will to your market outlook. Yeah,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I think with respect to the US, China risk is

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>largely centered on the multinational securities that do have exposure

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>either import exposure or export exposure to China. UM. So

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly any sort of persistent slowdown into three, persistence of

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>these lockdown measures and the zero COVID policy is a

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>constant drag on this space in two that will continue

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>into three. For global equities, there really is a matter

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of the investment opportunity set just continually shrinking with the

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>lack of kind of the investibility of China. This recall

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>for the last more than fifteen nearly twenty years now,

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>China was anticipated to be a very strong emerging market player,

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and that was certainly reflected in its growing share of

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the market cap of the global indices over the last year,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>even closer to two years. Now that's really come under question,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and it makes pretty tremendous train tremendous sea change in

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the investibility of global markets. Not having that big player

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>as an area where you can put capital in the

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>global markets has resulted in a flight to other areas

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in emerging markets, in particular India, whereas evaluation premium for

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Indian securities is off the charts, investors have clearly tried

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to find ways to you know, leverage emerging market growth.

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>What about China? What about producers? Um, let's bring in

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>on a rag here. Um, it's fascinating what the point

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>gene is making about valuations on the stocks. But you know,

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>producers that make consumer goods like apple still seem to

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>have no problem. Um, you know, made in China, having

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>made in China stamped on their on their products and

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>consumers still buy them like crazy. Right? Is that changing

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>it all? On a rug. I don't think so, and

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>only the reason is there is no donative at this point.

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are you going to do by a

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Nokia phone? So I mean, but they could produce in

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>India for example, like investors are there instead? Right, No,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the fair point. But the thing is this is

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>unlike stocks, this supply chain took twenty years to build.

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You just can't get up and start building iPhones anywhere else.

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>They have already started to do that, but just less

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>than five percent of all iPhone assembly, and and a

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>large rationale for that is the supply chain for most

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>electronic goods is centered in China. So don't talk to

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>us about you know, what's Apple really doing day to

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>day to try to mitigate this issue? What have you seen?

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So we have already heard that they are assembling these

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>phones outside the China at this point, and I think

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take four or five years to make

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful DNT to that. The second part is going

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to be are they you know, the parts and the

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>other things that they need to actually assemble these products?

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to start sourcing them outside now? For

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that they really need to invest eggressively in areas such

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>as Mexico or other low cost regions where they can

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>manufacture some of these pots without that, you know, the

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>supply chain doesn't make any sense to um, you know,

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>just do things in isolation, because at any given time

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they are making millions of these units. It's not you know,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>something that has only a few thousands that you produced,

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, it's fascinating. So they basically can't, is what

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, move substantially, UM as quickly as investors can.

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder if that means Gina. Does that mean

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that there's an opportunity here? I mean, do you buy

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the dip in that situation knowing that it has to

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>come back by the dip in China? Is that the question? Um?

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think for investors that are willing to

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>take a tremendous amount of risk, your potential reward for

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>taking on that degree of risk is is fairly substantial, right,

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But I at this point in time, it's relatively unpredictable.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Most rational people are acting that the results of these

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 1>protests over the weekend will be more further compression and

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>economic activity more clamped down as the authorities in China

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>try to take on you know, um, these protesters. So

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>I think that the risk is tremendous right now. That said,

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the stocks are incredibly discounted. You are taking a risk

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that there is no opening coming in three Nonetheless, there

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is very little expectation for growth baked into prices. So

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that your risk reward works, right. You take

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of risk, You could get a tremendous

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>amount of reward, but it is it is a lot

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of risk. Admittedly, all right, Gina, great stuff. Appreciate checking

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in with us, Gina. Martin Adams, chief equity strategist for

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, and Anama Rana used to senior tech animals

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg Intelligence. Well he falls Apple very closely. And again,

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>investors today are just trying to parts what's going on

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in China, What does that mean for the outlook for

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>global economic growth, What does it mean for some of

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the tech companies that still like Apple, rely pretty heavily

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>on the supply chain, with lots of parts of that

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in mainland China. And you think about how this government

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is dealing with the zero COVID policy and what that

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>means for economic activity. So again that's kind of the

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>narrative of what this market is trying to digest. Let's

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>talk China. Let's talk kind of investing in emerging markets.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Because we're talking marging markets. The M S c I

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>big part of that is China. We can do that

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>today with Kevin Carter. He's the c I O and

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>founder of E m q Q Global. He joins US

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Live and our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studios, so he gets

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>an extra gold star today for being live, not phoning

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it in. Kevin, You've been doing business. So let's start

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>with the acronym. We always throw around these acronyms, and

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I guess emerging markets and then it's

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>tech tech stocks y K E m q Q. Well

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly, and it's emerging markets technology and and specifically

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's emerging market can sumer technology. It's the smartphone enabled

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>emerging market consumer that we're trying to tap into. So yes,

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>E is for emerging, M is for market in. Q Q,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>as you know, is synonymous with tech investing and also

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a sort of double and tender because the ten Cent

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>original platform that messaging was called q Q. That's right

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. So when it's an E t

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>F by the way it is Q. Yeah, then that's

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>an exchange traded fund. That's correct, exactly. I just want

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to clear this up because a lot of people driving

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>around like one cm QQ exactly, and then they don't

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>know there's an e t F. So if they like

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>what Kevin has say, can't go and buy it. If

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>they think it's hogwash, they can sell it or whatever.

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, well, the indexes are are up this year,

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so good stuff. All right, talk to us about your

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>take from China. I mean you've been doing business there

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, investing in these companies and these industries.

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>What's your takeaway. Well, look, China is the second largest

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>economy in the world at least, and a big thing,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's been the biggest part of the Emerging markets indexes,

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the broad ones over UM, and it's an important place.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>But it's different than us, and it has its own

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>challenges in its own ways of doing things, and I

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's hugely misunderstood. I think there's a lot of

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>fears about China UM that are unfounded, things like delisting,

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the so called government crackdown. So I think China's why

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>are those unfounded? I have those fears and I feel

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>like they're founded quite well. Well, um uh, I could

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>go into disappeared for a couple of months. When the

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>when the richest guy in the country just disappears for

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a few months, that's worrying. Yes, well, I think Jack's

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>doing five but um but look what we do is

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>invest in the internet and any commerce companies in emerging markets,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>including China. And the reality is that while China might

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>be an emerging market in a traditional sense, when it

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Internet and e commerce and smartphones, China

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is the most developed country on planet by far. I mean,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>China is the Jetsons and their e commerce market dwarfs

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world, and it's actually four times

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger than the other forty five emerging markets combined. So

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>China is important. It's an important part of the global

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>consumer internet story. But it's the second wave, and it's

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the third wave that's coming beyond China that I think

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>investors should be looking at. I think a fair question

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is is China even investable today? Well? I think it

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly is. There are places like Russia that are definitely

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>not investable currently in a traditional sense, but no, I

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think China is very much investable but it you know,

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a volatile place for sure, and I think

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it always will be. And well, we just had Gina

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Martin Adams on from Bloomberg Intelligence who said there's a

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of risk there, but the rewards are massive. Um,

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the third wave that you speak of, is this also

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a China play or are you talking about India? We

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about during the commercial how important India could be. Sure. So,

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>so we have a second strategy, which is the emerging

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>markets Internet companies ex China, which we called fm q

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Q and the way to think about, uh, what's happening

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on the planet, and it's happened here, but it happened

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>here so long ago. We forget that this is a

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>wave that's happening. But you have sort of three mega trends.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You have billions of new consumers and emerging markets. They're

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>getting their first computer in form of a smartphone that

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>costs eighty dollars brand new and is running on Android,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're getting access to the Internet for the first time.

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And because they don't have a computer, uh you know

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a traditional computer, they don't have a bank account,

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no target stores. These people are leap frogging traditional consumption.

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And so the first wave of consumer internet technology on

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the planet started in the US around the year two

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and we had a fifteen year S curve of growth.

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>The second wave, the China wave, started about two thousand

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>five with Ali Baba ten Cent Bai Do, which went

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>public before Google, and that wave, that S curve. You know,

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's still growing, but the steepest part of that growth

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>curve is behind us. And now you have India, Nigeria, Indonesia, Brazil,

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>all of these other five and a half billion people

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that are getting their first computer today and again it's

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>not on their desk, it's in their pocket and it

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>costs sixty dollars and they're getting the Internet for the

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>first time. And that story is just getting started. And

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>FM can QQ. So if I look at the performance

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>year to date, obviously everything's down um and and E

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>m q Q is down thirty six percent. F m

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>q Q is down fifty Is there uh, you think

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>less risk in in the frontier markets. Well, I think

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot less risk in both versions because they're

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>both down as you mentioned quite a bit. And in fact,

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the broader E m q Q is down

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>at least at one point, you know, over se as

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of weeks ago. So this is a

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>volatile place. But we're investing in companies, were investing in

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what we think are going to be the most important

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>growth businesses on the planet for the next couple of decades.

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And those are the Internet companies that are providing all

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the same things that the Fank stocks provide us, but

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they're providing those services to the five and a half

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>billion people in India, in Brazil and the places I mentioned.

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And that is if you're going to invest in emerging markets,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that's where you want to And these are actively managed.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this isn't you're not tracking an index here now,

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>these are these are rules based indexes. So we you know,

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we own every publicly traded emerging markets internet company in

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>our broader offering. And then the ex China version fm

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>q Q owns, you know, the seventy five or so

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>that are not Chinese. What's number one on your to

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>do list looking at these companies in terms of due diligence?

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Is a quality of management? Is it? Soundness of business models?

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>A balance sheet? How do you guys? Rule of law? Overall? Yes,

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Well, you know again, the world's got a

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of risk, and emerging markets have a lot of risk.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen in Russia this year, I mean

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>war and you know your stocks basically wiped out completely.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know there's no free lunch, and emerging markets

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and and and there is volatility um in terms of

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the main part of the due deligence we do is

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just identifying these companies because one of the problems, particularly

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in emerging markets, is that the database has so much power.

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And the biggest problem in the traditional indexes is that

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about a third of the companies are government owned banks

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and oil companies, state owned enterprises, which, in addition to

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>having conflicts of interest and inefficiency, there's corruption that's rampant.

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And the second problem with the indexes is most of

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the internet companies aren't included. So if you look at

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, for example, Mercado Libre, the Amazon dot Com

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and PayPal of every country in Central and South America,

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not in the index. New Bank, the largest online

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>bank in the world out of Brazil, backed by Berkshire Hathaway,

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and you on the New York Sock stage not in

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the index. So the first thing is to make sure

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that we find all these companies because the traditional approaches

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are leave being a big hole. Wow, good stuff, talk

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>about risk and hopefully return. Kevin Carter, c I O

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and founder of E m q Q Global talking about

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets here. The risk reward UH certainly front of

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>mind for a lot of investors today as we kind

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of process what's going on in China, as we've got

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.479
<v Speaker 1>another data point with Apple Computer and their production issues,

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>So front of mine for emerging market investors. W T

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a coop oil getting back lots of the losses I

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>had earlier today. We had reached a low today of

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy three dollars and sixty cents per barrel. We're now

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it's seventy five seventy five cents a barrel, off about

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>six tenths of one percent. By the way, I just

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>texted you a photo you did, and I texted Eric

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>also check it out. I was at UH. I was

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in Newark, Ohio this week. I drove by a gas

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>station called Sheets, which you may know if you're a

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>trucker or if you spend a lot of time on highways.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>They had a dollar ninety nine a gallon unladed. That

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is amazing, and I guess it's I guess it was

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>some kind of marketing thing. But my nephew at the Thanksgiving,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, gathering, when the whole extended family was there,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>he's just got his driver's license, so he went around

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the house collecting people's keys and driving out to fill

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>up at the sheets for his stuff, adding value there

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for in the of a Miller household. All right, we've

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>got global energy here, let's talk about it. Let's round table.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We can do that with Fernando Valley. He covers this

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence and Mike mcloney's our commodity strategist

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. I have no idea where these people are,

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're not in studio. I can tell you that

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Fernando talk to me about I guess you know your

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>view of crude here. Is it all hinging upon demand

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>out of China in the short term fall. I think

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that's correct. It's China, and then it is the Western

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>world as well, because if you remember we talked about

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>how you're his cartailing their demand in order to meet

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>their needs for winter, and then inflation is impacting consumers

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>on the US globally really, but in the US and

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets UH, and that will impact short term demand.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I think when we look towards the second half of

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and beyond, then supply becomes a bigger question

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>than the men. But in the short term we see

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those pressures continuing. The consumer is squeezed,

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and in China, between COVID zero and their own economic

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>walls growth UH presents a big risk for those demand Mike,

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on what what we see happening in China.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the protests have been quelled today, um, but I

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>still think it's pretty monumental that people are willing to

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>risk lives and livelihood and come out to protest. I

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's part of the micro from China. The macro

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is China incremental to mind, demand from China in terms

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of all commands have been declining for a long time.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 1>There in points of crewe I really peaked a few

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Now Fernando can speak to that more everybody.

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the the bulls have been spoken to

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the opium, but I've been pointing out this has been

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>happening for quite a while. Our Chinese strategists out of

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Agias said, the property crisis still is another more to go.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So to me, that major inclemantal source of demand in

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the world has been bad for a while. And you've

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>looked at the agend they tried. They dropped the triple

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>R rate last week. The first time they cut the

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>triple R rate was almost ten years ago, so they've

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>been they've been trying to support their counting for quite

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a while. And I like to point out what's really

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>happened in the last ten years is OPEC's largest customer

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>used to be US is now a competitor. So to me,

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the reason we're going to continue to

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>go lower and crude oil now I think now it's

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty good price, but the key thing is it got

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>too expensive. That pendulum swung too expensive, nownce the question

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of how cheap will it get, And it's almost guaranteed

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to get some form of cheapness as a world tilts

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>towards recession, as our economist model for the US recession

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is very high for next year. So to me, this

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>is just part of that pendulum sweeking back. And one

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that Crudel has been doing is just following copper

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>copper on the year. But my does doesn't OPEC come

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>in with more production cuts as the price falls responsive.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>OPEC is notorious for cutting prices in and when prices

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>drop a lot, their job is to keep prices up.

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So the mast big example is two thousand and eight,

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so OPEC will remember OPEC used to be of total

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>supply around ten years ago. Now they're less than thirty.

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>They're less and less important. The most significant thing that's

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>pressure crude oil prices. Since two thousand six, which is

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the first time we traded, the current price on the

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>screen has been US supply and Canada supply seeing demand,

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and the US demand actually peaked right around that time.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So this is a major paradigm shift. And this is

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 1>what I see is crudal is just a massive swinging

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>pendulument got too expensive, going back down, and OPEC is

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>becoming less and less significant. And yes they will cut

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>because they pointed out the Feds tighten and they see

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the demand destruction. That's the biggest factor right now. And

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Fernando even led to a demand structure and

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>now is just getting started. The question I asked, what

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>stops this process? It's not going to be fed or

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank Easy. So, Fernando, you know we're talking about

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the US shale operators. What are they telling

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you about production capacity all that kind of stuff. Well,

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they are struggling with inflation themselves, and they're struggling to

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>grow at the rates from from prior years. And so

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in the short term there is a little bit of

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>growth still left. But we we really think that US

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>shell is not going to reach the levels expected a

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>few years back of fifteen sixteen million barrels a day

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for total US production. We really think we're nearing our

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>overall peak and supply. And that's why I agree with

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike in the short term that the main is a

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>much more relevant issue, and then the pendulum swings back

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>towards the upside once we don't have enough supply and

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and Mike alluded to effect not being as important. We

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>also don't know that they have the spare capacity to

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>overcome that weakness in US shale. Uh. And then we

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>really that the inventory picture in the U S show

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is a lot dimmer than was projected even one A

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of the high quality acreage has been drilled, and

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the productivity for a well in

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>all four large US shale basines. They're weaker in two

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>than he was in So just got about thirty seconds here, Fernando, Um,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>do we start to see real drops in prices at

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the pump as well? I know that there's a big

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>mechanism that needs to, you know, be played out. But

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and I've lost all hope for diesel, But for regular

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>unletted does it continue to come down towards the sheets

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar gallon level? Yeah, I believe that's that's true. Maybe

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>less so in the northeast of the US just because

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of logistical issues. But when you look into the Mid

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>Continent Gulf Coast, you should see lower prices over for

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of the year. Uh, with Brent and w

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>T selling off, and then even the crack spreads themselves

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>are little bit weaker. So you should see some relief.

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Holiday relief, alright, good stuff for other people, Paul, Not

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for us, No, not not for us, not in New Jersey.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>For Nono Vali senior analysts Bloomberg Intelligence covering all the

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>energy space, and Mike mcgloan, he's our commodity strategist for

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, breaking down what's going on in global energy today.

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Is Cyber Monday. You're gonna click away met and make

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>some purchases here today. I I've already done it. You've

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>done it. Look at you? Because I don't know how

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>much it really matters Cyber Monday. I started to see

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>huge deals pop up like on Thursday and Friday. Alrighty, okay,

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's bringing Jen Bartasha. She's senior equity research channel.

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>She covers all the retail stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence. Jen

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about kind of what we know so

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>far during this you know, Black Friday coming into cyber

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what was it? How was it? Well, you know it

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>was it was probably a little bit better than people expected,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but it was nothing spectacular. Um. And that really shouldn't

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>be a surprise to anyone because we've got consumers who

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit more conservative, um. And we have

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>retailers who have spread out those deals, as Matt was saying,

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>over a really long period of time. Yeah, I mean

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they've already they already started to announce them before Black Friday,

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>and they seemed to last. Awhile, are retailers having a

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>problem with inventory across the board or is it just

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>specific stores that got stuck? It was really some specific

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>stores that we're having inventory issues, UM and and specific

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>categories even within certain stores. And so, you know, apparel

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>has been an issue. I think it's going to continue

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue through this holiday season. You know,

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we had our entire retail team out on Black Friday,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>coming through stores, hitting the malls, UM. And you know,

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw there were bags people were buying things, but

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't in bulk. And and apparel was one of

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>those areas where people were buying very specific things in apparel,

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't across the board. UM. So you know, I

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of a mixed a mixed result. UM.

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But the good news was that people were out and

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they were looking for deals. And if I were to

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>go shopping, and that's a big if, Jen, will I

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>find stuff on the shelves, you will UM that the

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>inventory seems to be pretty right sized. UM. You know,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there are certain certain hot items that are are out

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of stock. You know, we do an annual toy survey,

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.959
<v Speaker 1>for example in Bloomberg Intelligence. UM, and there are some

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>hot toys of the seasons that are out of stock

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>now across Walmart, Target, Amazon, But it's really very select

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>items at this point. Um, we're hoping that this means that,

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it'll be a solid season and that they

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>won't be left with too much inventory as we head

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>into January and February. Though, what what are the hot

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the tickle me Elmo of or the cabbage Patch

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>kid of the year. Well, you know, so far this

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>year it's been a lot of video games are out

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of stock, so people are definitely loving their gaming type

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of how can video games be out of stock? You

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just buy a digital copy online. A lot of them

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>still come on the little discs that you pop into

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>those those older consoles, and so you know, those those

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have been uniformly popular across all the regions. Know why because, um,

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>kids that get them want to be able to resell

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>them later. So that's that's why the existence of those

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>discs or that explains the existence continued existence of those

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>discs and the game shop brick and mortar stores coming

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>from it makes sense. Yeah, they're like trading card versions,

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but they retain value whereas you know, the digital code,

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't really pass it on. Hey, Jen, I know

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you also in your coverage cover Beyond Meat that stock

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>got downgraded by Barkley's today after the stocks down like

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, So thanks a lot Barkley's But um, what's

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the deal with that whole faux meet thing? Is that

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a flash in the pan? Is this a real sector

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>within the the food industry? How do you think about

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it now? Well, I still think of this is there's

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a there's a strong long term case to be said

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for alternative proteins UM, but the current environment and looking

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>over the next year to two years, is going to

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>be a really tough environment for those players. And and

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>really there's there's just a bunch of headwinds that they're facing.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>One is this the consumer UM people are trading down UM.

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Alternative proteins are more expensive still than conventional proteins, so UM,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if people are watching their budgets, they're they're pulling back

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>from those those alt meat products. UM. And then you

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of challenges because they're growth companies and

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>so they have not yet mastered you know, how to

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>how to build a bigger business and do things the

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>right way with regards to manufacturing or UM lining up

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>their innovation queue so that they do things in a

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>smooth and uninterrupted manner. UM. So they're growing pains that

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are happening simultaneously with external pressures as well coming from

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the consumer. And Jenna know you cover the supermarkets as well,

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and one of the areas that consumers have seen inflation

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>probably the most profound, uh, is the supermarket. Do prices

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>ever go back down or I don't know, are we

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just gonna pay these higher levels forever? Now? They actually

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>do come back down. And I will say, when I

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>look across the broad scape of root scope of retail,

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>grocery stores are some of the fastest to bring prices

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>back down. Um. And so we will we have seen

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation starting to moderate. I think you'll start to see

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>some prices come down in different categories in the store

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>slowly as we get into the middle of next year. UM.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But they will come down UM. Now then you know,

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>if there are additional pressures, they could always go back

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>up again. UM. But they tend to unlike other categories,

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily reset that bottom. They sometimes they can

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>go back to some closer to historical norms. Um. The

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>problem we have with food is that we were in

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>years of deflation UM for a long time, and people

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.239
<v Speaker 1>got very comfortable with very low food prices, especially here

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United states um. And so that makes the

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation we've had feel even more uh, you know, even

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>more challenging than than it might otherwise. Yeah, I think

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. And you know, the was reading

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a few notes about not just um beyond meat but

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>also Tyson Foods, and analysts were saying, look, it's it's

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole protein area space. Just because of the cost um,

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, investors are looking for other places. Although my

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>initial lot was you need protein anyway to survive, you can,

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't look for something else. It's true, but people

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>also aren't thinking about you know, for beef, it's a

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>multi year cycle to bring a cow to market, right,

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have other factors like there's drought, um, you know,

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>where it makes it more expensive to feed those cattle,

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>which means that ranchers have fewer head. And when they

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have fewer head and they go through that, you know,

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months cycle, there are fewer cows, which then drives

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>up cost and and you know, I don't know, I mean,

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I want they make in the same amount of chickens

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>as they always make. I don't know. Jen Bartash is

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. She breaks it down for Senior Equity Research

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Analystic covers everything's on the retail side consumer beyond meat.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>We can pretty much ask her about anything and she's

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>got some good analysis to back it up, so we

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting her time. Ye thanks for listening to the

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three and

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>on Fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio