WEBVTT - Biden Enters Make-or-Break Weekend

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Joining us right now. It's pretty good when your first

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>book out with Bob Woodward Peril launches at number one

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times Bestseller Robert Costa, of course,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>legendary at the Washington Post, has wandered over to any

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>number of jobs, and of course joins us now this

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>morning with CBS and Face the Nation. Robert Costa, within

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the frenzy in your world right now, you are a

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>calm voice. Who are you listening to into the weekend?

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Which kind of source are you listening to?

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm listening to people who really know President Biden, not

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 2>just top Democrats, not just House Democrats and Senate Democrats

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>who are on the outer perimeter of Biden's circle. People

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>who really know this guy who was elected to the

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Senate in nineteen seventy two, who has been through public

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>humiliation and public loss for a long time, And they're

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>telling me behind the scenes that he wants to stay

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>in this race. He's telling people close to him and

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>family members he's adamant he should be the nominee and

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 2>he's best positioned to be Trump. But that doesn't mean

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 2>it's quieting Democrats.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You're the only one I could say this to I

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>mean when he was in high school, prep school, Costa

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>was booking the beautiful people of Hollywood, Oh to play

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.839
<v Speaker 1>as prep school. I mean, he's on a first thing basis.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's sixteen with Maroon five. What is that about, Robert

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Costa on the Democratic Party donor class? Who are these guys?

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>To take it from?

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:44.919
<v Speaker 2>Butch Cassidy, Well, you have people like Jeffrey Katzenberg around

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>President Biden, Hollywood moguls. They just had the big Hollywood

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>fundraiser for Biden a few weeks ago, and they're so

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>motivated not by putting Biden in the presidency again, but

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>by stopping Trump. And that dynamic has to be noted

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 2>as this all plows ahead in the days to come,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>because it's really about stopping Trump for a lot of

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>these donors and Democrats not giving Biden a second term.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's so then past presidential cycles.

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>And so Robert, how do you guys set this up

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 3>for a Face Nation this Sunday morning on a CBS

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 3>television network.

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So I'm lucky enough to be guest anchor this weekend,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to talk to Jim Clyburn, And I

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 2>think he's really important because he actually has political capital.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people claim to have political capital. He

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 2>actually has it. He made Biden the nominee in twenty

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>with his endorsement. Where is he going to stand harce

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>his words carefully and listen to what he has to say.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>What's notable is that Clyiber's been talking publicly about maybe

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 2>backing Vice President Harris if Biden steps away. Does Cliburgs

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 2>start to really escalate that talk or not? Senator Bernie Sanders,

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>what's he going to do if Biden steps away? He's

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>always one of the presidency, he's eighty two. Does he run?

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Does he back Harris? Where does the progressive the left

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>wing do they stick with the Biden pick or the

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>new the Harris pick or not? Right, we're in a

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.119
<v Speaker 2>very fluid, in fragile moments.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Way, Robert Costa, I can see you doing a Dan

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Rather imitation on the floor in Chicago like nineteen sixty eight.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how close are we? Robert Costa within CBS

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting to not the certitude of a migration from the

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>president to the vice president, but an actual cohesive debate

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or sets of dialogue to get to a selection choice

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>for president and vice president in Chicago.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 2>What's stunning to me is how this kind of corporate

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>culture has fallen over the Democratic Party that so few

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>people want to take any kind of risk publicly. And

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>politics used to be about risk. As you noted, you

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>had conventions that were rough and tumble. People wanted power,

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>you had to fight for it. Democrats are averse, it

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>seems to political war, and at this point it seems

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>like Harris would be the logical choice for a lot

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 2>of them to avoid it. They would think, maybe she loses,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe she wins, but they would look ahead to twenty

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight. But look, in presidential politics, I've only covered

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>it for fifteen years. You only have one shot most

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>of the time. And this is a rare, rare opening

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>for somebody maybe to step into the vacuum. So I

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>expect somebody to maybe give Harris.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Interesting rob This is great, Robert Costa, thank you so much.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>And for Margaret Brennan Face the Nation Sunday on radio

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>at two on Bloomberg. We now turned to someone constans,

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>a young buck, you know, fifteen years in flip the numbers.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Matthew's been doing this for fifty one years. It

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>joins us with balance of power as well. Joe. I'm

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>sure you remember a given election in the cold and slush.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was a primary. I think it was William

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Well Ted Kennedy in Boston. I can't remember, but it

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was rough in tumble politics. People were swearing at Durgan

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Park trying to get a dinner, and I mean it

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>was the way it used to be. A lot of

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>idiots like me want the Romance of nineteen sixty eight

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or a rough and tumble tip on neopolitics of Boston.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Am I delusional to look forward to that?

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 4>We all do every four years.

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 5>What a contested convention is like Christmas morning a political reporter,

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 5>and then it never happens. I will remind you they've

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 5>now auctioned off all of the restaurant equipment from Durgan Park.

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't exist anymore, and I don't know if there's

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 5>a high Brent condo there or something now. But much

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 5>like the politics you describe, I'm not sure they're going

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 5>to recreate it. And there's a real worry that if

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 5>that's where we're going here, that this will be so

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 5>disruptive that it's exactly what Donald Trump is hoping for.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 5>But I don't know They've set up a week long

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 5>obstacle course for Joe Biden, and let's see if he

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 5>can clear it.

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's important to understand. I gave you good

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>just surveillance correction here, Joe Matthew never darkened the door

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>at Durgen Park. He was over at Lockover having the

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>oyster soup under a portrait that made you blush when

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you were ten years old.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 5>A Hi, Jill, you can't get cornbefitt Locko.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>That would be true.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Joe.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.799
<v Speaker 3>What's the what's the realistic time frame here for President

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Biden to make a decision here? How do we think

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>about that?

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 5>It's a great question, they seem, Paul. They seem to

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 5>have carved out a week. It starts today with the

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 5>interview being deemed as the most important interview of his

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 5>political life.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 4>And boy, that's gonna be interesting.

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm really curious to see how much time he commits

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 5>to this. If it's fifteen minutes or if it's forty

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 5>five minutes, that's gonna tell us a lot. But he's

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 5>gonna be speaking in Wisconsin, albeit with a teleprompter. He's

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 5>got NATO next week, He's got a trip to Philadelphia

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 5>as well, but NATO, I want to just go ahead

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 5>pass the interview today. Think about the stakes of that

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 5>solo news conference he's going to hold to conclude NATO.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 5>That's not a bilateral He's not gonna have Voladimir Zelenski

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 5>sitting next to him. It's not going to be two

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 5>and two for the reporters. This is the big one,

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 5>This is the big slog. He's never done this East

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 5>room primetime news conference thing, but his predecessors were pretty

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 5>good at and so is he going to be able

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 5>to take the skip gates question forty five minutes into

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 5>that exercise because they're going to be throwing curveballs at

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 5>him in real time. He's going to be tired after

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 5>all the meetings, and I'm thinking next week that news

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 5>conference is the most important thing on his schedule.

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Are the Democrats to the extent that he does decide

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>to step back here, is there an accepted process from

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 3>where the party would go from there?

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Or is it we haven't gotten to that point yet.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 4>No, we haven't gotten to that point.

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 5>But I do find it interesting that over the past

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 5>couple of days, the narrative has really turned us back

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 5>to Kamala Harris and away from this idea of wretching

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Whitmer or Gavin Newsom or somebody popping in. Look, there's

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 5>a reason why she's there. There's a reason why he

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 5>picked her. And I don't think you're going to find

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people who want to run against, frankly,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 5>somebody who could make history as the first black female president.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 5>If you're teeing up yourself for twenty eight, you're not

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 5>running against her.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Now the show quickly here, do you observe any polls?

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, let's be clearer, folks, Matthews encyclopedic

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>on this. Are there a pole that support Vice President

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Harris becoming president? Yes?

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, Look, her favorability rating in our own Bloomberg Swing

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 5>State pole with Morning Consult was on the rise, and

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 5>in fact higher than Joe Biden's in the last turn.

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 5>But CNN ran numbers and found her in a statistical

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 5>tie with Donald Trump. We all say that Joe Biden

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 5>might be the only person who can beat him. This

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 5>challenge is that and she's stronger than Biden with women

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 5>and with independence. Imagine a ticket where she's got maybe

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 5>a Democratic governor like a Shapiro or a Roy Cooper,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 5>with her, and she's got the mantle of abortion, the

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 5>moral clarity on that issue, and potentially could make history

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 5>as the first black female president. That's a story that

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 5>Democrats can get their heads around. Throwing all the pieces

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 5>up in the air and doing a mini primary like

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 5>they're talking about a series of five debates with people

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 5>who have no name recognition.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Sounds dangerous.

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Matthew, thank you so much, Bounce, That's what this

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is about, folks, Robert Costa, Joe Matthew, back to Beck.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Terry Haines joins us now to pick up the pieces

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and piece together. I guess the second week of July

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. I don't know if he's capable of doing that.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Terry Hayes with pangea, joins us, Terry right now after

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the bizarreness of this weekend, the uniqueness in American history.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>What is Terry Haynes unknown? Unknown?

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, very very simply, it's Uh, it's it's whether Biden's

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 6>up to the job or not, and whether he can

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 6>prove it or not. I mean, we've been his citizens

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 6>have been misinformed about the president's condition.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>To put it.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 6>Kindly, Uh, and much of the news media not this network,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 6>but much of the news media has has willfully ignored it.

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 6>Now they're over compensating. The question is whether he's up

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 6>to it or not. I mean, I wouldn't put a

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 6>lot of I wouldn't put a lot of money on

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 6>it in Vegas. But at the same time, you know,

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 6>you've had situations where he's he's gone out in public

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 6>a few times and just shown fire and shown the

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 6>ability to talk. And he's got Stephanopolis coming up tonight

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 6>and it may be a huge moment for the campaign

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 6>and we'll have to see that.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg, of course, will be synthesizing the questions edited and

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>edited at ABC. Terry, excuse me choking on a fifth

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>hot dog? I didn't do Nathan's budding. I got up

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>to five hot dogs. What can I say, Terry Haynes?

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>What is the probability, the likelihood the ability of the

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party to squeeze into X number of weeks a

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>diverse campaign process of four, five, six, seven candidates to

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>get to a smoke filled convention. Oh, by what you mean?

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Replaced Biden? Is that where we're going? Yeah, well, replaced Biden.

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>But to go beyond just the idea of the vice

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>president will take over.

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, you know, it depends on whether we're talking

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 6>about him leaving the presidency or leaving his candidacy or both.

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 6>And you know, that's a little more finally judged than

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 6>I think the company wanted. But the answer is, you know, yeah,

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 6>they can absolutely get a situation where this virtual nomination

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 6>process they're going to try to pull in a couple

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 6>of weeks, you know, might get short circuited by a

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 6>number of the delegates themselves, who will who may well

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 6>insist on our rewriting of the rules. You know, there's

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 6>an awful lot of dissatisfaction out there, but there's not

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 6>a lot of ability by those who are most dissatisfied

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 6>with being able to do something about it. This is

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 6>still pretty tightly controlled, and I think certainly, I think

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 6>Biden's trying to brazen it out right now.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 3>So Terry, obviously it's it's really up to President Biden

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 3>where this whole thing goes here. What's your sense of

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 3>timing when do you think that president really has to

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 3>make a decision of whether he is in it or not?

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 6>Probably between now, almost certainly, Paul, between now and the

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 6>convention in mid August. But uh, you know, but then

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 6>there's this trip wire where where the virtual convention happens

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 6>and sometime in mid July late July. So uh, you

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 6>know what they're what they're trying to do right now

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 6>is you know, we're going to wrap up the party

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 6>regulars make it all but impossible for the convention itself

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 6>to remove him, which makes it even more in his

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 6>judgment about whether he wants to continue or not.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 3>And Terry X, I guess the question for a lot

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>of folks within the Democratic Party is if he were

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 3>to say I'm going to step aside for this next election,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 3>is there any sense of what the process might be.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Would there be a series of debates among party leaders,

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 3>would it just be handed to vice president?

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 4>How how would it work out? Do you think?

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think that you know, there's a there's a

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 6>group that wants it handed to Harris. Uh. You know,

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 6>but Biden of course is using is using Harris. I

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.479
<v Speaker 6>think is Uh as a backstop for his own ambitions

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 6>to stay Uh. I think what ends up happening is

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 6>you have a you have a change to the party

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 6>rules that releases delegates from their releases delegates from their

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 6>first ballot commitment to Biden and you actually have, as

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 6>we had before nineteen seventy two, actually have an open

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 6>convention where the delegates actually get to decide who they want.

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 6>And in that situation, you'd have nominations by different people,

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 6>you'd have speeches, you'd have unruliness galore, just like you

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 6>used to have.

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Aware this is I mean, obviously you know the media

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that's exciting. I mean, we're talking our book, which is

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we want a crazy convention. But Terrians, I want you

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to take us right now to four thirty South Capitol Streets,

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Washington, d C. To the headquarters of the Democratic

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>National Party. I guess Jamie Harrison, Chris Cork, Jason Ray,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and others. Does the president, routinely any Democratic president, do

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>they just control the DNC or does the DNC have

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a vote to get to that convention we all want.

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 6>They control the DNC, particularly in the months and year

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 6>leading up to the election. That's been standard in both

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 6>parties for quite a while. And when you combine that

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 6>with the fact that the parties as party organizations have

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 6>been have been a trophying over the past several decades,

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's it's interesting to talk about it today

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 6>because I'm sitting in London. You've just had conversations about

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 6>the UK elections. The party organizations are very strong in

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 6>the UK, whereas they're very weak in the United States,

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 6>and nowhere weaker or no when weaker than the year

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 6>of a presidential election. So Jamie Harrison's taking orders from

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 6>the White.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>House to sum this up to Paul's good question, the

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States really is going to decide

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the process of his future and his party's future in

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the coming days and weeks, maybe to get to a

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Donnie Brook that gets us to Chicago. Is that right?

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I think so.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 6>You know, they've exercised huge control over this process from

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 6>day one, you know, basically making it a primary free process,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, exercising a grip on the on the party controls,

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 6>exercising a grip on the money. As people are now

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 6>starting to figure out, you know, the money gets the

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 6>Biden Harris money gets dispersed away unless it's anybody but

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 6>Biden or Harris at the top of the ticket. So

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 6>there's a lot of considerations mechanical for Democrats to go through,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 6>much less the fundamental question of whether Biden ought to

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 6>be their nominee and whether we ought to remain as president.

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing you the best

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You can also

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the Bloomberg Podcast

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>channel on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings from

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern from our Oldo headquarters in

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>or anywhere else you listen, and always on Bloomberg Radio,

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app.