1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,800 Speaker 1: Hey, Jesse Kelly, listen, nurse. It's Tucker Carlson. I'm actually 2 00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:06,200 Speaker 1: a friend, a close personal friend of Jesse Kelly's, not 3 00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:10,520 Speaker 1: to brag and more now that we're both in independent media, 4 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:13,320 Speaker 1: and in fact, there's really no media in America apart 5 00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:16,880 Speaker 1: from independent media. The other guys are just political operatives, 6 00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:20,160 Speaker 1: the praetorian guard of the ruling class. They're not only 7 00:00:20,280 --> 00:00:22,479 Speaker 1: lying to you, they hate you. If you want to 8 00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:25,080 Speaker 1: know what's actually happening, if you want to know what's true, 9 00:00:25,120 --> 00:00:27,800 Speaker 1: if you're going to have any hope of being informed, 10 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:31,920 Speaker 1: you have to get out of NBC, CNN, New York Times, 11 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:34,919 Speaker 1: Washington Post World and get into independent media. And that's 12 00:00:34,920 --> 00:00:37,159 Speaker 1: where we are now. We've been doing a show on 13 00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:39,040 Speaker 1: x for the past few months, and a bunch of 14 00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:40,840 Speaker 1: people have asked if they could listen to the show 15 00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:44,919 Speaker 1: as a podcast. Well, you can check out this sample episode. 16 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:58,960 Speaker 1: Subscribe now to the Tucker Carlson Podcast. The defining fact 17 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:01,600 Speaker 1: of the United States is freedom of speech. The extent 18 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,440 Speaker 1: this country is actually exceptional. It's because we have the 19 00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:08,600 Speaker 1: First Amendment to the Bill of Rights. We have freedom 20 00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:11,039 Speaker 1: of conscience. We can say what we really think. There's 21 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:13,959 Speaker 1: no hate speech. Exception to that is, because you hate 22 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:16,760 Speaker 1: what somebody else thinks, you cannot force that person to 23 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:21,280 Speaker 1: be quiet, because we're citizens, not slaves. But that right, 24 00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:24,520 Speaker 1: that foundational right that makes this country what it is, 25 00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:27,720 Speaker 1: that right from which all other rights flow, is going 26 00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:31,800 Speaker 1: away at high speed in the face of censorship, now 27 00:01:31,880 --> 00:01:35,920 Speaker 1: modern censorship. There's no resemblance to previous censorship regimes in 28 00:01:36,040 --> 00:01:40,480 Speaker 1: previous countries, in previous eras. Our censorship is affected on 29 00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:45,080 Speaker 1: the basis of fights against disinformation and malinformation. And the 30 00:01:45,160 --> 00:01:49,320 Speaker 1: key thing to know about these is they're everywhere, and 31 00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 1: of course they have no reference at all to whether 32 00:01:54,120 --> 00:01:56,000 Speaker 1: what you're saying is true or not. In other words, 33 00:01:56,280 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 1: you can say something that is factually accurate and consistent 34 00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:02,720 Speaker 1: with your own com unence, and in previous versions of 35 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:04,840 Speaker 1: America you wo had an absolute right to say those things. 36 00:02:05,360 --> 00:02:08,440 Speaker 1: But because someone doesn't like them, or because they're inconvenient 37 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:11,360 Speaker 1: to whatever plan the people in power have, they can 38 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:15,079 Speaker 1: be denounced as disinformation and you could be stripped of 39 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:18,119 Speaker 1: your right to express them, either in person or online. 40 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:20,800 Speaker 1: In fact, expressing these things can become a criminal act 41 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:23,320 Speaker 1: and is, and it's important to know. By the way, 42 00:02:23,360 --> 00:02:25,880 Speaker 1: that this is not just the private sector doing this. 43 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:29,200 Speaker 1: These efforts are being directed by the US government, which 44 00:02:29,240 --> 00:02:32,240 Speaker 1: you pay for and at least theoretically own. It's your government, 45 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:36,320 Speaker 1: but they're stripping your rights at very high speed. Most 46 00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:40,480 Speaker 1: people understand this intuitively, but they don't know how it happens. 47 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:43,560 Speaker 1: How does censorship happen, What are the mechanics of it. 48 00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:47,360 Speaker 1: Mike Ben's is, we can say, with some confidence, the 49 00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:51,400 Speaker 1: expert in the world on how this happens. Mike Ben's 50 00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:54,639 Speaker 1: had the cyber portfolio at the State Department. He's now 51 00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 1: executive director of Foundation for Freedom Online, and we're going 52 00:02:57,639 --> 00:02:59,560 Speaker 1: to have a conversation with him about a very specific 53 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:02,520 Speaker 1: kind of censorship. By the way, you can't recommend strongly 54 00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: enough if you want to know how this happens, Mike 55 00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:09,320 Speaker 1: Bens b n Z is the man to read. But 56 00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:11,079 Speaker 1: today we just want to talk about a specific kind 57 00:03:11,120 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 1: of censorship, and that censorship that emanates from the fabled 58 00:03:14,240 --> 00:03:18,560 Speaker 1: military industrial complex, from our defense industry and the foreign 59 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:22,120 Speaker 1: policy establishment in Washington. That's significant now because we're on 60 00:03:22,160 --> 00:03:24,120 Speaker 1: the cusp of a global war, and so you can 61 00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:28,200 Speaker 1: expect censorship to increase dramatically, and so with that. Here's 62 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:31,560 Speaker 1: Mike Ben's, executive director of Foundation for Freedom Online to Mike, 63 00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:34,320 Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining us. And I just can't 64 00:03:34,360 --> 00:03:38,120 Speaker 1: overstate to our audience how exhaustive and comprehensive your knowledge 65 00:03:38,160 --> 00:03:41,960 Speaker 1: is on this topic. It's almost it's almost unbelievable. And 66 00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 1: so if you could just walk us through how the 67 00:03:45,440 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 1: Foreign Policy Establishment and the defense contractors and the DoD 68 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:53,400 Speaker 1: and just the whole cluster, the constellation of defense related 69 00:03:53,480 --> 00:03:57,400 Speaker 1: publicly funded institutions stripped from us our freedom of speech. 70 00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:00,880 Speaker 2: Sure you know, one of the easiest ways to actually 71 00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:04,480 Speaker 2: start the story is really with the story of Internet freedom, 72 00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 2: and it switched from Internet freedom to Internet censorship because 73 00:04:08,280 --> 00:04:11,120 Speaker 2: free speech on the Internet was an instrument of state 74 00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:14,360 Speaker 2: craft almost from the outset of the privatization of the 75 00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:19,440 Speaker 2: Internet in nineteen ninety one, we quickly discovered, through the 76 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:23,240 Speaker 2: efforts of the Defense Department, the State Department, and our 77 00:04:23,279 --> 00:04:27,480 Speaker 2: intelligence services that people were using the Internet to congregate 78 00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:32,480 Speaker 2: on blogs and forums, and free speech was championed more 79 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:36,200 Speaker 2: than anybody by the Pentagon, the State Department, and our 80 00:04:36,680 --> 00:04:41,880 Speaker 2: sort of CIA cutout NGO blob architecture as a way 81 00:04:41,920 --> 00:04:45,560 Speaker 2: to support dissident groups around the world in order to 82 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:50,640 Speaker 2: help them overthrow authoritarian governments as they were sort of build. Essentially, 83 00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 2: the Internet free speech allowed kind of insta regime change 84 00:04:55,600 --> 00:05:00,840 Speaker 2: operations to be able to facilitate the foreign policy establishments 85 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:02,640 Speaker 2: State Department agenda. 86 00:05:02,720 --> 00:05:04,200 Speaker 3: Google is a great example of this. 87 00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:08,919 Speaker 2: Google began as a DARPA grant by Larry Page and 88 00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:14,039 Speaker 2: Sergey Brinn when they were Stanford PhDs, and they got 89 00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:17,800 Speaker 2: their funding as part of a joint CIA NSA program 90 00:05:18,120 --> 00:05:20,919 Speaker 2: to chart how quote birds of a feather flocked together 91 00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:25,120 Speaker 2: online through search engine aggregation. And then one year later 92 00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:29,040 Speaker 2: they launched Google and then became a military contractor. Quickly 93 00:05:29,160 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 2: thereafter they got Google Maps by purchasing a CIA satellite software. Essentially, 94 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:38,880 Speaker 2: and the ability to track to use free speech on 95 00:05:38,920 --> 00:05:42,560 Speaker 2: the Internet is a way to circumvent state control over 96 00:05:42,680 --> 00:05:47,400 Speaker 2: media over in places like Central Asia or all around 97 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:50,279 Speaker 2: the world was seen as a way to be able 98 00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:53,520 Speaker 2: to do what used to be done out of CIA 99 00:05:53,640 --> 00:05:57,000 Speaker 2: station houses or out of embassies or consulates in a 100 00:05:57,040 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 2: way that was totally urbo charged. And all of the 101 00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:05,200 Speaker 2: Internet free speech technology was initially created by our national 102 00:06:05,279 --> 00:06:09,480 Speaker 2: security state VPN's virtual private networks to hide your IP 103 00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:12,320 Speaker 2: address tour the dark web, to be able to buy 104 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:16,440 Speaker 2: and trail sell goods anonymously, and to end encrypted chats. 105 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:20,359 Speaker 2: All these things were created initially as DARPA projects or 106 00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:23,440 Speaker 2: as joint CIA NSA projects to be able to help 107 00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:29,200 Speaker 2: intelligence backed groups to overthrow governments that were causing a 108 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:32,720 Speaker 2: problem to the Clinton administration or the Bush administration of 109 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:36,599 Speaker 2: the Obama administration. And this plan worked magically from about 110 00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:41,440 Speaker 2: nineteen ninety one until about twenty fourteen, when there began 111 00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:45,120 Speaker 2: to be an about face on Internet freedom and its utility. Now, 112 00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:46,880 Speaker 2: the high water mark of the sort of Internet free 113 00:06:46,880 --> 00:06:50,760 Speaker 2: speech moment was the Arab Spring in twenty eleven twenty twelve, 114 00:06:50,760 --> 00:06:53,640 Speaker 2: when you had this one by one, all of the 115 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:58,320 Speaker 2: adversary governments of the Obama administration, Egypt, Tunisia all began 116 00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:00,040 Speaker 2: to be toppled in Facebook. 117 00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:02,480 Speaker 3: Revolution and Twitter revolutions. 118 00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:04,919 Speaker 2: And you had the State Department working very closely with 119 00:07:05,040 --> 00:07:08,760 Speaker 2: the social media companies to be able to keep social 120 00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:09,840 Speaker 2: media online. 121 00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:11,040 Speaker 3: During those periods. 122 00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:13,440 Speaker 2: There was a famous phone call from Google's Jared Cohen 123 00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 2: to Twitter to not do their scheduled maintenance so that 124 00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:21,120 Speaker 2: so that the preferred opposition group in Iran would be 125 00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:24,760 Speaker 2: able to use Twitter to win that election. So it 126 00:07:24,800 --> 00:07:27,200 Speaker 2: was an free speech was an instrument of state craft 127 00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:30,000 Speaker 2: from the national security state. To begin with, all of 128 00:07:30,040 --> 00:07:33,560 Speaker 2: that architecture, all the NGOs, the relationships between the tech 129 00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:36,640 Speaker 2: companies and the national security state had been long established 130 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:41,680 Speaker 2: for freedom. In twenty fourteen, after the coup in Ukraine, 131 00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:45,760 Speaker 2: there was an unexpected counter coup where Crimea and the 132 00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 2: don Bass broke away, and they broke away with essentially 133 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 2: a military backstop that NATA was highly unprepared for at 134 00:07:52,120 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 2: the time. They had one last Hail Mary chance, which 135 00:07:55,680 --> 00:08:01,520 Speaker 2: was the Crimea annexation vote in twenty fourteen, and when 136 00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:04,920 Speaker 2: the hearts and minds of the people of Crimea voted 137 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:09,160 Speaker 2: to join the Russian Federation, that was the last straw 138 00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:12,120 Speaker 2: for the concept of free speech on the internet in 139 00:08:12,120 --> 00:08:12,840 Speaker 2: the eyes of NATO. 140 00:08:13,400 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 3: Is they saw it. 141 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:17,280 Speaker 2: The fundamental nature of war changed at that moment, and 142 00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 2: NATO at that point declared something that they first called 143 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:23,480 Speaker 2: the Jirosimuff doctrine, which is named after this Russian military 144 00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:27,720 Speaker 2: general who they claimed made a speech that the fundamental 145 00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:29,960 Speaker 2: nature of war has changed. You don't need to win 146 00:08:30,040 --> 00:08:33,680 Speaker 2: military skirmishes to take over Central and Eastern Europe. All 147 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:35,920 Speaker 2: you need to do is control the media and the 148 00:08:35,920 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 2: social media ecosystem, because that's what controls elections. And if 149 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:43,080 Speaker 2: you simply get the right administration into power, they control 150 00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:46,520 Speaker 2: the military. So it's infinitely cheaper than conducting a military 151 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:51,040 Speaker 2: war to simply conduct an organized political influence operation over 152 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:55,200 Speaker 2: social media and legacy media. An industry had been created 153 00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:59,080 Speaker 2: that spanned the Pentagon, the British Ministry of Defense, and 154 00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:02,559 Speaker 2: Brussels into a organized. 155 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:03,920 Speaker 3: Political warfare outfit. 156 00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:08,880 Speaker 2: Essentially infrastructure that was created, initially stationed in Germany and 157 00:09:08,920 --> 00:09:12,680 Speaker 2: in central and Eastern Europe to create psychological buffer zones, 158 00:09:12,720 --> 00:09:15,720 Speaker 2: basically to create the ability to have the military work 159 00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:20,400 Speaker 2: with the social media companies to censor Russian propaganda or 160 00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:25,240 Speaker 2: to censor domestic right wing populist groups in Europe who 161 00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:27,559 Speaker 2: were rising in political power at the time because of 162 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:31,200 Speaker 2: the migrant crisis. So you had the systematic targeting by 163 00:09:31,240 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 2: our State Department, by our ic by the Pentagon of 164 00:09:34,640 --> 00:09:38,160 Speaker 2: groups like Germany's AfD, the Alternative for deutsch Land there 165 00:09:38,360 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 2: and for groups in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. Now, when bregsit 166 00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:48,120 Speaker 2: happened in twenty sixteen, that was this crisis moment where 167 00:09:48,360 --> 00:09:51,079 Speaker 2: suddenly they didn't have to worry just about central Eastern 168 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:51,680 Speaker 2: Europe anymore. 169 00:09:51,720 --> 00:09:53,800 Speaker 3: It was coming westward, this idea. 170 00:09:53,480 --> 00:09:58,959 Speaker 2: Of Russian control over hearts and minds and so breggs. 171 00:09:59,000 --> 00:09:59,960 Speaker 3: It was June twenty sixteen. 172 00:10:00,200 --> 00:10:04,560 Speaker 2: The very next month, at the Warsaw Conference, NATO formally 173 00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:06,080 Speaker 2: amended its charter to. 174 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:09,120 Speaker 3: Expressly commit to. 175 00:10:09,160 --> 00:10:13,560 Speaker 2: Hybrid warfare as this new NATO capacity. So they went 176 00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:20,000 Speaker 2: from basically seventy years of tanks to this explicit capacity 177 00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:23,040 Speaker 2: building for censoring tweets that they were deemed to be 178 00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:27,800 Speaker 2: Russian proxies. And again it's not just Russian propaganda. These 179 00:10:27,800 --> 00:10:31,720 Speaker 2: were now Brexit groups or groups like Matteo Salvini in 180 00:10:31,760 --> 00:10:35,800 Speaker 2: Italy or in Greece, or in Germany or in Spain 181 00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:38,439 Speaker 2: with the Vox Party. And now at the time NATO 182 00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:41,719 Speaker 2: was publishing white papers saying that the biggest threat to 183 00:10:41,760 --> 00:10:44,800 Speaker 2: NATO fasis is not actually a military invasion from Russia, 184 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:50,040 Speaker 2: it's losing domestic elections across Europe to all these right 185 00:10:50,080 --> 00:10:53,400 Speaker 2: wing populist groups who, because they were mostly working class movements, 186 00:10:53,679 --> 00:10:57,160 Speaker 2: were campaigning on cheap Russian energy at a time when 187 00:10:57,200 --> 00:11:01,200 Speaker 2: the US was pressuring this energy diversification policy, and so 188 00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:04,959 Speaker 2: they made the argument after Brexit, now the entire rules 189 00:11:04,960 --> 00:11:08,120 Speaker 2: based international order would collapse unless the military took control 190 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:10,880 Speaker 2: over media, because Brexit would give rise to Frexit in 191 00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:13,640 Speaker 2: France with marine leapen, just Bexit in Spain with a 192 00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:17,600 Speaker 2: box party to itall Exit in Italy, to Grexit in Germany, 193 00:11:17,640 --> 00:11:19,200 Speaker 2: to Gregxit and Greece. 194 00:11:19,200 --> 00:11:20,600 Speaker 3: The EU would come apart. 195 00:11:20,679 --> 00:11:25,679 Speaker 2: So NATO would be killed without a single bullet being fired. 196 00:11:26,040 --> 00:11:28,640 Speaker 2: And then not only that, now that NATO's gone, now 197 00:11:28,679 --> 00:11:32,440 Speaker 2: there's no enforcement arm for the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, 198 00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:33,200 Speaker 2: for the World Bank. 199 00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:34,880 Speaker 3: So now the financial. 200 00:11:34,400 --> 00:11:37,000 Speaker 2: Stakeholders who depend on the battering ram of the national 201 00:11:37,040 --> 00:11:41,240 Speaker 2: security state would basically be helpless against governments around the world. So, 202 00:11:41,400 --> 00:11:44,720 Speaker 2: from their perspective, if the military did not begin to 203 00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:49,800 Speaker 2: censor the Internet, all of the democratic institutions in infrastructure 204 00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:52,199 Speaker 2: that gave rise to the modern world after World War 205 00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:53,080 Speaker 2: Two would collapse. 206 00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 3: So you can imagine that some one of the twenty 207 00:11:57,040 --> 00:11:57,680 Speaker 3: sixteen election. 208 00:11:58,080 --> 00:12:00,319 Speaker 1: So you just told a remarkable story or that I've 209 00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:03,960 Speaker 1: never heard anybody explain as lucidly and crisply as you 210 00:12:04,040 --> 00:12:06,760 Speaker 1: just did. But did anyone at NATO or anyone at 211 00:12:06,760 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 1: the State Department, pause Rome and say, wait a second, 212 00:12:09,720 --> 00:12:13,840 Speaker 1: we've just identified our new enemy as democracy within our 213 00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:16,560 Speaker 1: own countries. I think that's what you're saying. They feared 214 00:12:17,040 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 1: that the people, the citizens of their own countries would 215 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:21,880 Speaker 1: get their way, and they went to war against that. 216 00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:25,160 Speaker 2: Yes, now, you know, there's a rich history of this 217 00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:27,080 Speaker 2: dating back to the Cold War. You know, the Cold 218 00:12:27,160 --> 00:12:31,560 Speaker 2: War in Europe was essentially a similar, a similar struggle 219 00:12:31,679 --> 00:12:34,120 Speaker 2: for hearts and minds of people, especially in Central and 220 00:12:34,120 --> 00:12:37,160 Speaker 2: Eastern Europe, you know, in these sort of you know, 221 00:12:37,200 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 2: Soviet buffer zones. And starting in nineteen forty eight, the 222 00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:44,520 Speaker 2: National Security state was really established. Then you had the 223 00:12:44,920 --> 00:12:48,200 Speaker 2: nineteen forty seven Act, which established the Central Intelligence Agency. 224 00:12:48,720 --> 00:12:52,080 Speaker 3: You had, you know, this new world order. 225 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:55,160 Speaker 2: That had been created with all these international institutions, and 226 00:12:55,360 --> 00:12:58,240 Speaker 2: you had the nineteen forty eight UN Declaration on Human Rights, 227 00:12:58,280 --> 00:13:02,680 Speaker 2: which forbid the territorial acquisition by military force. So you 228 00:13:02,679 --> 00:13:07,960 Speaker 2: can no longer run a traditional military occupation government in 229 00:13:08,000 --> 00:13:10,960 Speaker 2: the way that we could in eighteen ninety eight, for example, 230 00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:13,800 Speaker 2: when we took the Philippines, everything had to be done 231 00:13:13,880 --> 00:13:18,000 Speaker 2: through a sort of political legitimization process, whereby there's some 232 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:22,679 Speaker 2: ratification from the hearts and minds of people within the country. Now, 233 00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:26,480 Speaker 2: often that involves simply puppet politicians who are groomed as 234 00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 2: emerging leaders by our State Department. But the battle for 235 00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:32,360 Speaker 2: hearts and minds had been something that we had been 236 00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 2: giving ourselves a long moral license leash if you will, 237 00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:40,680 Speaker 2: since nineteen forty eight. One of the godfathers of the CIA, 238 00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:44,480 Speaker 2: George Kennan, twelve days after we rigged the Italian election 239 00:13:44,520 --> 00:13:47,960 Speaker 2: in nineteen forty eight by stuffing ballot boxes and working 240 00:13:48,000 --> 00:13:51,160 Speaker 2: with the mob, we published a memo called the Inauguration 241 00:13:51,240 --> 00:13:54,960 Speaker 2: of Organized Political Warfare, where he said, listen, it's a 242 00:13:55,000 --> 00:13:57,320 Speaker 2: mean old world out there. We at the CIA just 243 00:13:57,400 --> 00:13:59,480 Speaker 2: rigged the Italian election. We had to do it because 244 00:13:59,760 --> 00:14:02,199 Speaker 2: the Communist one maybe there'd never be another election in 245 00:14:02,240 --> 00:14:02,839 Speaker 2: Italy again. 246 00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:06,040 Speaker 3: But it's really effective. Guys. 247 00:14:06,440 --> 00:14:08,680 Speaker 2: We need a department of dirty tricks to be able 248 00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:11,200 Speaker 2: to do this around the world. And it's essentially a 249 00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:14,959 Speaker 2: new social contract we're constructing with the American people, because 250 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:17,640 Speaker 2: this is not the way we've conducted diplomacy before. But 251 00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:19,920 Speaker 2: we are now forbidden from using the War Department. In 252 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:22,160 Speaker 2: nineteen forty eight, they also renamed the War Department to 253 00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:23,080 Speaker 2: the Defense Department. 254 00:14:23,480 --> 00:14:24,680 Speaker 3: So again as part of. 255 00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:29,160 Speaker 2: This diplomatic onslaught for political control rather than it looking 256 00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:32,240 Speaker 2: like it's overt military control. But essentially what ended up 257 00:14:32,240 --> 00:14:36,240 Speaker 2: happening there is we created this foreign domestic firewall. We 258 00:14:36,320 --> 00:14:38,560 Speaker 2: said that we have a department of dirty tricks, to 259 00:14:38,560 --> 00:14:41,080 Speaker 2: be able to rig elections, to be able to control media, 260 00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:44,360 Speaker 2: to be able to meddle in the internal affairs of 261 00:14:44,400 --> 00:14:47,040 Speaker 2: every other plot of dirt in the country. But this 262 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:50,720 Speaker 2: sort of sacred dirt on which the American homeland sits. 263 00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:53,960 Speaker 3: They are not allowed to operate there. 264 00:14:54,000 --> 00:14:56,720 Speaker 2: The State Department, the Defense Department, and the CIA are 265 00:14:56,720 --> 00:14:59,720 Speaker 2: all expressly forbidden from operating on US soil. 266 00:15:00,240 --> 00:15:02,920 Speaker 3: This is so far from the case, it's not even funny. 267 00:15:02,960 --> 00:15:05,760 Speaker 2: But that's because of a number of laundering tricks that 268 00:15:05,800 --> 00:15:08,800 Speaker 2: they've developed over seventy years of doing this. But essentially, 269 00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:12,960 Speaker 2: there was no moral quandary at first with respect to 270 00:15:13,120 --> 00:15:16,920 Speaker 2: the creation of the censorship industry when it started out 271 00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:21,040 Speaker 2: in Germany and in Lithuania and Latvia and Estonia, and 272 00:15:21,080 --> 00:15:25,000 Speaker 2: in Sweden and Finland. There began to be a more 273 00:15:25,560 --> 00:15:30,880 Speaker 2: diplomatic debate about it after Brexit, and then it became 274 00:15:32,120 --> 00:15:35,720 Speaker 2: full throttle when Trump was elected, and what little resistance 275 00:15:35,960 --> 00:15:40,200 Speaker 2: there was was washed over by the rise and saturation 276 00:15:40,280 --> 00:15:43,520 Speaker 2: of Russia Gate, which basically allowed them to not have 277 00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:48,160 Speaker 2: to deal with the moral ambiguities of censoring your own people, 278 00:15:48,680 --> 00:15:51,320 Speaker 2: because if Trump was a Russian asset, you no longer 279 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:53,440 Speaker 2: really had a traditional free speech issue. It was a 280 00:15:53,520 --> 00:15:56,720 Speaker 2: national security issue. It was only after Russia Gate died 281 00:15:57,200 --> 00:16:01,240 Speaker 2: in July twenty nineteen, when Robert m Are basically choked 282 00:16:01,280 --> 00:16:03,600 Speaker 2: on the stand for three hours and revealed he had 283 00:16:03,600 --> 00:16:06,600 Speaker 2: absolutely nothing after two and a half years of investigation, 284 00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:10,400 Speaker 2: that the foreign to domestic switcheroo took place, where they 285 00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:15,600 Speaker 2: took all of this censorship architecture spanning DHS, the FBI, 286 00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:20,280 Speaker 2: the CIA, the DoD, the DOJ, and then the thousands 287 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:24,800 Speaker 2: of government funded NGO and private sector mercenary firms were 288 00:16:24,840 --> 00:16:29,240 Speaker 2: all basically transited from a foreign focus, from a foreign predicate, 289 00:16:29,320 --> 00:16:33,760 Speaker 2: a Russian disinformation predicate, to a democracy predicate by saying 290 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:36,200 Speaker 2: that disinformation is not just a threat when it comes 291 00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:39,720 Speaker 2: from the Russians, it's actually an intrinsic threat to democracy itself, 292 00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:42,200 Speaker 2: and so by that they were able to wander the 293 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:47,000 Speaker 2: entire democracy promotion regime change toolkit just in time for 294 00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:48,000 Speaker 2: the twenty twenty election. 295 00:16:49,360 --> 00:16:52,240 Speaker 1: I mean, it's almost beyond belief that this has happened. 296 00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:54,560 Speaker 1: I mean, my own father worked for the US government 297 00:16:54,680 --> 00:16:57,160 Speaker 1: in this business, in the information war against the Soviet 298 00:16:57,280 --> 00:17:00,960 Speaker 1: Union and was a big part of that. And the 299 00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:05,679 Speaker 1: idea that any of those tools would be turned against 300 00:17:06,240 --> 00:17:10,320 Speaker 1: American citizens by the US government was I think, I 301 00:17:10,400 --> 00:17:13,560 Speaker 1: want to think was absolutely unthinkable in say nineteen eighty eight. 302 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:17,720 Speaker 1: And you're saying that it's there really hasn't been anyone 303 00:17:17,760 --> 00:17:20,639 Speaker 1: who's raised objections, and it's just it's absolutely turned inward 304 00:17:20,720 --> 00:17:22,880 Speaker 1: to manipulate and rig our own elections as we would 305 00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:23,640 Speaker 1: in say Latvia. 306 00:17:23,800 --> 00:17:27,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, as soon as the democracy predicate was established, 307 00:17:27,440 --> 00:17:31,520 Speaker 2: you had this professional class of professional regime change artists 308 00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:34,800 Speaker 2: and operatives. That is the same people who argued that, 309 00:17:34,840 --> 00:17:37,399 Speaker 2: you know, we need to bring democracy to Yugoslavia to 310 00:17:37,400 --> 00:17:39,679 Speaker 2: get and that's the predicate for getting rid of you know, 311 00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:42,920 Speaker 2: Melosovich or any any other country around the world where 312 00:17:42,960 --> 00:17:46,800 Speaker 2: we basically overthrow governments in order to preserve democracy. 313 00:17:47,160 --> 00:17:50,080 Speaker 3: Well, if the democracy threat. 314 00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:53,960 Speaker 2: Is homegrown now, then that becomes you know, then suddenly 315 00:17:54,680 --> 00:17:57,760 Speaker 2: these people all have new jobs moving on the on 316 00:17:57,800 --> 00:17:59,600 Speaker 2: the US side. And I can go through a million 317 00:17:59,640 --> 00:18:03,160 Speaker 2: examples of that. But one thing on what you just mentioned, 318 00:18:03,640 --> 00:18:08,919 Speaker 2: which is that you know, from their perspective, they just 319 00:18:08,960 --> 00:18:12,560 Speaker 2: weren't ready for the Internet. Twenty sixteen was really the 320 00:18:12,600 --> 00:18:17,520 Speaker 2: first time that social media had reached such maturity that 321 00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:20,520 Speaker 2: it began to eclipse legacy media. I mean, this was 322 00:18:20,560 --> 00:18:23,760 Speaker 2: a long time coming. I think folks saw this building 323 00:18:24,119 --> 00:18:27,959 Speaker 2: from two thousand and six through twenty sixteen. Internet one 324 00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:30,560 Speaker 2: point zero didn't even have social media. From nineteen ninety 325 00:18:30,560 --> 00:18:33,240 Speaker 2: one to two thousand and four, there was no social 326 00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:35,520 Speaker 2: media at all. Two thousand and four, Facebook came out, 327 00:18:35,800 --> 00:18:38,320 Speaker 2: two thousand and five, Twitter, two thousand and six, YouTube 328 00:18:38,320 --> 00:18:41,359 Speaker 2: two thousand and seven, the smartphone and so and in 329 00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:45,760 Speaker 2: that initial period of social media, nobody was getting subscriberships 330 00:18:45,960 --> 00:18:50,159 Speaker 2: at the level where they actually competed with legacy news media. 331 00:18:50,600 --> 00:18:53,840 Speaker 2: But over the course of being you know, so initially, 332 00:18:53,880 --> 00:18:58,160 Speaker 2: even these dissonant voices within the US, even though they 333 00:18:58,240 --> 00:19:02,840 Speaker 2: may have been loud in moments, they never reached thirty 334 00:19:02,920 --> 00:19:08,040 Speaker 2: million followers. They never reached a billion impressions a year 335 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:14,399 Speaker 2: type thing, as a uncensored, mature ecosystem allowed citizen journalists 336 00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:19,080 Speaker 2: and independent voices to be able to outcompete legacy news media. 337 00:19:19,680 --> 00:19:23,320 Speaker 2: This induced a massive crisis both in our military and 338 00:19:23,359 --> 00:19:23,800 Speaker 2: in our. 339 00:19:23,640 --> 00:19:25,520 Speaker 3: State Department and intelligence services. 340 00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:28,600 Speaker 2: I get a great example of this in twenty nineteen 341 00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:32,680 Speaker 2: meeting of the German Marshal Fund, which is, you know, 342 00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:38,359 Speaker 2: an institution that goes back to the US basically, I 343 00:19:38,359 --> 00:19:40,840 Speaker 2: don't want to say bribe, but the essentially the soft 344 00:19:40,880 --> 00:19:44,200 Speaker 2: power economic soft power projection in Europe as part of 345 00:19:44,240 --> 00:19:47,919 Speaker 2: the reconstruction of European governments after World War Two to 346 00:19:47,960 --> 00:19:51,679 Speaker 2: be able to essentially pay them with Marshal Fund dollars 347 00:19:51,760 --> 00:19:54,920 Speaker 2: and then in return they basically were under our thumb 348 00:19:54,920 --> 00:19:59,000 Speaker 2: in terms of how they reconstructed. But the German Marshall 349 00:19:59,040 --> 00:20:01,120 Speaker 2: Fund held a meeting in twent nineteen. They held a 350 00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:04,840 Speaker 2: million of these frankly, but where they were A four 351 00:20:04,880 --> 00:20:09,159 Speaker 2: star general got up on the panel and said that 352 00:20:11,320 --> 00:20:15,600 Speaker 2: the what happens He posed the question what happens to 353 00:20:16,080 --> 00:20:19,560 Speaker 2: the US military, what happens to the national security state 354 00:20:19,880 --> 00:20:22,240 Speaker 2: when The New York Times is reduced to a medium 355 00:20:22,280 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 2: sized Facebook page? And he posed this thought experiment as 356 00:20:26,560 --> 00:20:31,600 Speaker 2: an example of we've had these gatekeepers, We've had these 357 00:20:31,680 --> 00:20:34,040 Speaker 2: bumper cars on democracy in. 358 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:35,080 Speaker 3: The form of a. 359 00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:40,800 Speaker 2: Century old relationship with legacy media institutions. I mean, our 360 00:20:40,880 --> 00:20:44,200 Speaker 2: mainstream media is not in any shape or form, even 361 00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:47,600 Speaker 2: from its outset, independent from the National Security State, from 362 00:20:47,640 --> 00:20:48,200 Speaker 2: the State. 363 00:20:48,000 --> 00:20:50,679 Speaker 3: Department, from the War Department. You know, you had the. 364 00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:56,080 Speaker 2: Initial all of the initial broadcast news companies NBC, ABC, 365 00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,680 Speaker 2: and CBS were all created by Office of War Information 366 00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:02,840 Speaker 2: bet from the War Department's effort in World War Two. 367 00:21:03,359 --> 00:21:07,159 Speaker 2: You had these Operation Mockingbird relationships from the nineteen fifties 368 00:21:07,160 --> 00:21:11,439 Speaker 2: to the nineteen seventies. Those continued through the use of 369 00:21:11,480 --> 00:21:15,679 Speaker 2: the National Endama for Democracy and the privatization of intelligence 370 00:21:15,720 --> 00:21:19,480 Speaker 2: capacities in the nineteen eighties under Reagan. There's all sorts 371 00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:22,000 Speaker 2: of CIA reading room memos you can read even on 372 00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:25,240 Speaker 2: CIA dot gov about those continued media relations throughout the 373 00:21:25,320 --> 00:21:29,560 Speaker 2: nineteen nineties. And so you always had this backdoor relationship 374 00:21:29,560 --> 00:21:32,400 Speaker 2: between the Washington Posts, the New York Times, and all 375 00:21:32,400 --> 00:21:35,960 Speaker 2: of the major broadcast media corporations. By the way, you know, 376 00:21:36,040 --> 00:21:38,440 Speaker 2: Rupert Murdoch and Fox are part of this as well. 377 00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:40,680 Speaker 2: You know, Rupert Murdoch was actually part of the National 378 00:21:40,760 --> 00:21:44,560 Speaker 2: Endowment for Democracy coalition in nineteen eighty three, when it 379 00:21:44,560 --> 00:21:48,199 Speaker 2: was formed as a way to do CIA operations in 380 00:21:48,240 --> 00:21:51,399 Speaker 2: an above board way after the Democrats were so ticked 381 00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:54,320 Speaker 2: off at the CIA for manipulating student movements in the 382 00:21:54,400 --> 00:22:00,399 Speaker 2: nineteen seventies. But essentially, there was no CIA intermediary to 383 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:05,119 Speaker 2: random citizen journalist accounts. There was no Pentagon backstop. You 384 00:22:05,160 --> 00:22:08,200 Speaker 2: couldn't get a story killed, you couldn't have this favors 385 00:22:08,200 --> 00:22:11,600 Speaker 2: for favors relationship. You couldn't promise access to some random 386 00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:14,560 Speaker 2: person with seven hundred thousand followers who's got an opinion 387 00:22:14,600 --> 00:22:18,679 Speaker 2: on Syrian gas. And so this induced and this was 388 00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:21,760 Speaker 2: not a problem for the initial period of social media 389 00:22:21,800 --> 00:22:25,120 Speaker 2: from twenty sixty to twenty fourteen, because there were never 390 00:22:25,119 --> 00:22:27,199 Speaker 2: dissioning groups that were big enough to be able to 391 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:31,439 Speaker 2: have a mature ecosystem on their own, and all of 392 00:22:31,480 --> 00:22:35,200 Speaker 2: the victories on social media had gone in the way 393 00:22:35,359 --> 00:22:37,920 Speaker 2: of where the money was, which was from the State Department, 394 00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:40,920 Speaker 2: in the Defense Department and the intelligence services. But then 395 00:22:41,160 --> 00:22:45,360 Speaker 2: as that maturity happened, you now had this situation after 396 00:22:45,440 --> 00:22:48,719 Speaker 2: the twenty sixteen election where they said, okay, now the 397 00:22:48,840 --> 00:22:53,160 Speaker 2: entire international order might come Undone. Seventy years of unified 398 00:22:53,200 --> 00:22:56,520 Speaker 2: foreign policy from Truman until Trump are now about to 399 00:22:56,560 --> 00:23:02,160 Speaker 2: be broken, and we need the same analog control systems. 400 00:23:02,160 --> 00:23:04,119 Speaker 2: We had to be able to put bumper cars on 401 00:23:04,240 --> 00:23:09,040 Speaker 2: bad stories or bad political movements through legacy media relationships 402 00:23:09,040 --> 00:23:12,760 Speaker 2: and contacts. We now need to establish and consolidate within 403 00:23:12,800 --> 00:23:15,560 Speaker 2: the social media companies. And the initial predicate for that 404 00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:18,720 Speaker 2: was Russiagate. But then after Russiagate died and they used 405 00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:22,840 Speaker 2: a simple democracy promotion predicate, then it gave rise to 406 00:23:22,880 --> 00:23:27,000 Speaker 2: this multi billion dollar censorship industry that joins together the 407 00:23:27,040 --> 00:23:31,080 Speaker 2: military industrial complex, the government, the private sector, the civil 408 00:23:31,119 --> 00:23:35,680 Speaker 2: society organizations, and then this vast cobweb of media allies 409 00:23:35,960 --> 00:23:39,760 Speaker 2: and professional fact checker groups that serve as this sort 410 00:23:39,760 --> 00:23:46,440 Speaker 2: of sentinel class that surveys everywhere on the Internet. 411 00:23:49,480 --> 00:23:52,879 Speaker 1: So, can you give us and thank you again for 412 00:23:52,920 --> 00:23:57,200 Speaker 1: this almost unbelievable explanation of why this is happening. Can 413 00:23:57,240 --> 00:24:00,399 Speaker 1: you give us an example of how it happens how 414 00:24:00,840 --> 00:24:03,679 Speaker 1: just and just pick one among I know countless examples 415 00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:08,680 Speaker 1: of how the national security state lies to the population, 416 00:24:09,119 --> 00:24:11,560 Speaker 1: censors the truth in real life. 417 00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:15,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, so you know, we have this State Department outfit 418 00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:19,199 Speaker 2: called the Global Engagement Center, which was created by a 419 00:24:19,200 --> 00:24:23,240 Speaker 2: guy named Rick Stengele, who described himself as Obama's propagandistan chief. 420 00:24:23,600 --> 00:24:26,040 Speaker 2: He was the under Secretary for Public Affairs, which is 421 00:24:26,119 --> 00:24:30,840 Speaker 2: essentially the relation, which is the liaison office role between 422 00:24:31,119 --> 00:24:33,960 Speaker 2: the State Department and the mainstream media. So this is 423 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:38,080 Speaker 2: basically the exact nexus where government talking points about war 424 00:24:38,359 --> 00:24:42,359 Speaker 2: or about diplomacy or state craft get synchronized with mainstream media. 425 00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:45,320 Speaker 1: And mean, I add somebody to that as someone I know, 426 00:24:45,400 --> 00:24:48,840 Speaker 1: Rick Stengel. He was at one pointed journalist. And Rick 427 00:24:48,880 --> 00:24:52,240 Speaker 1: Stengel has made public arguments against the First Amendment and 428 00:24:52,320 --> 00:24:53,680 Speaker 1: against free speech and. 429 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:56,000 Speaker 2: Somebody, Yeah, wrote a whole book Country and he published 430 00:24:56,000 --> 00:24:57,640 Speaker 2: an op ed in twenty nineteen. He wrote a whole 431 00:24:57,680 --> 00:24:59,960 Speaker 2: book on it. And you know, he made the argu 432 00:25:00,080 --> 00:25:02,640 Speaker 2: meant that that we just you know, went over here 433 00:25:02,720 --> 00:25:07,760 Speaker 2: that essentially the Constitution was not prepared for the Internet, 434 00:25:08,200 --> 00:25:12,000 Speaker 2: and we need to get rid of the First Amendment accordingly. 435 00:25:12,440 --> 00:25:14,920 Speaker 2: And you know, he described himself as a free speech 436 00:25:14,960 --> 00:25:17,800 Speaker 2: absolutist when he was the managing editor of Time magazine 437 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:21,040 Speaker 2: and even when he was in the State Department. Under Obama, 438 00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:25,040 Speaker 2: he started something called the Global Engagement Center, which was 439 00:25:25,080 --> 00:25:30,720 Speaker 2: the first government censorship operation within the federal government. But 440 00:25:30,760 --> 00:25:33,760 Speaker 2: it was foreign facing, so it was okay. Now the time, 441 00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:38,639 Speaker 2: they used the homegrown ISIS predicate threat for this, and 442 00:25:38,680 --> 00:25:41,480 Speaker 2: so it was very hard to argue against the idea 443 00:25:41,560 --> 00:25:46,320 Speaker 2: of the State Department having this formal coordination partnership with 444 00:25:46,440 --> 00:25:51,040 Speaker 2: every major tech platform in the US because at the 445 00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:54,520 Speaker 2: time there were these ISIS attacks that were and we 446 00:25:54,520 --> 00:25:57,200 Speaker 2: were told that ISIS was recruiting on Twitter and Facebook, 447 00:25:57,600 --> 00:26:00,840 Speaker 2: and so the Global Engagement Center was a stab essentially 448 00:26:00,920 --> 00:26:05,040 Speaker 2: to be a State department entanglement with the social media 449 00:26:05,080 --> 00:26:08,119 Speaker 2: companies to basically put bumper cars on their ability to 450 00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:13,240 Speaker 2: platform accounts. And one of the things they did is 451 00:26:13,359 --> 00:26:17,680 Speaker 2: they created a new technology which is it's called natural 452 00:26:17,720 --> 00:26:22,919 Speaker 2: language processing. It is an artificial intelligence machine learning ability 453 00:26:23,080 --> 00:26:27,359 Speaker 2: to create meaning out of words in order to map 454 00:26:27,640 --> 00:26:30,639 Speaker 2: everything that everyone says on the Internet and create this 455 00:26:30,760 --> 00:26:35,600 Speaker 2: vast topography topography of how communities are organized online, who 456 00:26:35,600 --> 00:26:38,760 Speaker 2: the major influences are, what they're talking about, what narratives 457 00:26:38,760 --> 00:26:41,119 Speaker 2: are emerging or trending, and to be able to create 458 00:26:41,160 --> 00:26:44,200 Speaker 2: this sort of network graph in order to know who 459 00:26:44,280 --> 00:26:48,560 Speaker 2: to target and how information moves through an ecosystem, and 460 00:26:48,600 --> 00:26:52,000 Speaker 2: so they began plotting the language, the prefixes, the suffixes, 461 00:26:52,160 --> 00:26:56,160 Speaker 2: the popular terms, the slogans that isis folks were talking 462 00:26:56,160 --> 00:27:00,480 Speaker 2: about on Twitter when Trump won the election in twenty sixteen, 463 00:27:02,480 --> 00:27:06,680 Speaker 2: everyone who worked at the State Department was expecting these 464 00:27:06,720 --> 00:27:10,679 Speaker 2: promotions to the White House National Security Council under Hilly Clinton, 465 00:27:10,720 --> 00:27:14,880 Speaker 2: who I should remind viewers was also Secretary of State 466 00:27:14,960 --> 00:27:17,400 Speaker 2: under Obama, actually ran the State Department. But these folks 467 00:27:17,440 --> 00:27:21,880 Speaker 2: were all expecting promotions on November eighteenth, No eight, twenty sixteen, 468 00:27:22,400 --> 00:27:26,080 Speaker 2: and were unceremoniously put out of jobs by a guy 469 00:27:26,119 --> 00:27:28,200 Speaker 2: who was a twenty to one underdog according to The 470 00:27:28,240 --> 00:27:31,040 Speaker 2: New York Times the day of the election. And when 471 00:27:31,080 --> 00:27:33,960 Speaker 2: that happened, these State Department folks took their special set 472 00:27:34,000 --> 00:27:38,480 Speaker 2: of skills coercing governments. 473 00:27:38,720 --> 00:27:39,400 Speaker 3: For sanctions. 474 00:27:39,520 --> 00:27:44,040 Speaker 2: The State Department led the effort to sanction Russia over 475 00:27:44,119 --> 00:27:46,720 Speaker 2: the Crimea annexation in twenty fourteen. 476 00:27:47,280 --> 00:27:48,680 Speaker 3: These State Department. 477 00:27:48,280 --> 00:27:52,000 Speaker 2: Diplomats did an international road show to pressure European governments 478 00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:55,760 Speaker 2: to pass censorship laws to censor the right wing populist 479 00:27:55,760 --> 00:27:59,119 Speaker 2: groups in Europe, and as a boomerang impact to censor 480 00:27:59,160 --> 00:28:02,359 Speaker 2: populist groups who were affiliated in the US. So you 481 00:28:02,400 --> 00:28:06,440 Speaker 2: had folks, You had folks who went from the State 482 00:28:06,480 --> 00:28:09,440 Speaker 2: Department directly, for example, to the Atlantic Council, which was 483 00:28:09,560 --> 00:28:14,200 Speaker 2: which is this major facilitator between the government, between government 484 00:28:14,200 --> 00:28:17,359 Speaker 2: to government censorship. The Atlantic Council is a group that 485 00:28:17,720 --> 00:28:22,479 Speaker 2: was one of Biden's biggest political backers. They build themselves 486 00:28:22,520 --> 00:28:26,560 Speaker 2: as NATO's think tank, so they represent the political census 487 00:28:27,040 --> 00:28:31,439 Speaker 2: of NATO and in many respects, when NATO has civil 488 00:28:31,480 --> 00:28:35,520 Speaker 2: society actions that they want to be coordinated to synchronize 489 00:28:35,520 --> 00:28:38,960 Speaker 2: with military action or region, the Atlantic Council essentially is 490 00:28:38,960 --> 00:28:42,680 Speaker 2: deployed to consensus build and make that political action happen 491 00:28:42,720 --> 00:28:45,760 Speaker 2: within a region of interest to NATO. Now, the Atlantic 492 00:28:45,760 --> 00:28:48,360 Speaker 2: Council is seven CIA directors on its board. A lot 493 00:28:48,400 --> 00:28:50,920 Speaker 2: of people don't even know that seven CIA directors are 494 00:28:50,960 --> 00:28:54,240 Speaker 2: still alive, let alone all concentrated on the board of 495 00:28:54,240 --> 00:28:57,000 Speaker 2: a single organization that's kind of the heavyweight in the 496 00:28:57,000 --> 00:28:59,959 Speaker 2: censorship industry. They get annual funding from the Department of Defense, 497 00:29:00,200 --> 00:29:02,520 Speaker 2: the State Department, and CIA cut outs like the National 498 00:29:02,520 --> 00:29:06,440 Speaker 2: down for Democracy. The Atlantic Council in January twenty seventeen, 499 00:29:07,000 --> 00:29:11,200 Speaker 2: moved immediately to pressure European governments to pass censorship laws 500 00:29:11,240 --> 00:29:14,840 Speaker 2: to create a transatlantic flank attank on free speech in 501 00:29:14,920 --> 00:29:18,080 Speaker 2: exactly the way that Rick Stengel essentially called for to 502 00:29:18,160 --> 00:29:20,840 Speaker 2: have US mimic European censorship laws. 503 00:29:21,080 --> 00:29:22,240 Speaker 3: One of the ways they did this. 504 00:29:22,840 --> 00:29:25,400 Speaker 2: Was by getting Germany to pass something called next DG 505 00:29:25,760 --> 00:29:30,160 Speaker 2: in August twenty seventeen, which was essentially kicked off the 506 00:29:30,200 --> 00:29:33,440 Speaker 2: era of automated. 507 00:29:33,000 --> 00:29:34,240 Speaker 3: Censorship in the US. 508 00:29:34,560 --> 00:29:38,920 Speaker 2: What next GG required was unless social media platforms wanted 509 00:29:38,920 --> 00:29:41,880 Speaker 2: to pay a fifty four million dollar fine for each 510 00:29:42,000 --> 00:29:44,760 Speaker 2: instance of speech each post left up on their platform 511 00:29:44,760 --> 00:29:47,080 Speaker 2: for more than forty eight hours that had been identified 512 00:29:47,080 --> 00:29:52,320 Speaker 2: as hate speech, they would be fined basically into bankruptcy 513 00:29:52,360 --> 00:29:55,440 Speaker 2: when you aggregate fifty four million over tens of thousands 514 00:29:55,480 --> 00:29:56,200 Speaker 2: of posts per day. 515 00:29:56,640 --> 00:29:58,200 Speaker 3: And the safe. 516 00:29:57,960 --> 00:30:02,240 Speaker 2: Haven around that was if they deployed artificial intelligence based 517 00:30:02,320 --> 00:30:06,040 Speaker 2: censorship technologies, which have been again created by DARPA to 518 00:30:06,080 --> 00:30:09,040 Speaker 2: take on isis to be able to scan and ban 519 00:30:09,200 --> 00:30:12,880 Speaker 2: speech automatically. And this gave you know, I call these 520 00:30:12,880 --> 00:30:16,440 Speaker 2: weapons of mass deletion. These are essentially the ability to 521 00:30:16,680 --> 00:30:20,040 Speaker 2: censor tens of millions of posts with just a few 522 00:30:20,080 --> 00:30:22,960 Speaker 2: lines of code. And the way this is done is 523 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:28,600 Speaker 2: by aggregating. Basically, the field of censorship science fuses together 524 00:30:28,760 --> 00:30:31,600 Speaker 2: two disparate groups of study, if you will. There's this 525 00:30:31,720 --> 00:30:35,440 Speaker 2: sort of political and social scientists who are these sort 526 00:30:35,480 --> 00:30:37,959 Speaker 2: of thought leaders of what should be censored. And then 527 00:30:38,000 --> 00:30:39,760 Speaker 2: there are the sort of quants, if you will. These 528 00:30:39,800 --> 00:30:45,080 Speaker 2: are the programmers, the computational data scientists, computational linguistics. Every university, 529 00:30:45,240 --> 00:30:48,800 Speaker 2: there's over sixty universities now who get federal government grants 530 00:30:49,040 --> 00:30:52,360 Speaker 2: to do this censorship, the censorship work and the censorship 531 00:30:52,360 --> 00:30:54,560 Speaker 2: preparation work. Where what they do is they create these 532 00:30:54,600 --> 00:30:57,360 Speaker 2: codebooks of the language that people use. The same way 533 00:30:57,360 --> 00:30:59,440 Speaker 2: they did for isis they did this, for example with COVID, 534 00:31:00,080 --> 00:31:03,800 Speaker 2: created these COVID lexicons of what dissident groups were saying 535 00:31:03,840 --> 00:31:08,880 Speaker 2: about mandates, about masks, about vaccines, about high profile individuals 536 00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:14,760 Speaker 2: like Tony Fauci or Peter Dashik or any of these 537 00:31:14,760 --> 00:31:18,120 Speaker 2: others protected VIP and individuals whose reputations had to be 538 00:31:18,120 --> 00:31:21,600 Speaker 2: protected online, and they created these code books. They broke 539 00:31:21,640 --> 00:31:24,560 Speaker 2: things down into narratives. The Atlanta Council, for example, was 540 00:31:24,600 --> 00:31:28,200 Speaker 2: a part of this government funded consortium something called the 541 00:31:28,280 --> 00:31:33,120 Speaker 2: Virality Project, which mapped sixty six different narratives that dissidents 542 00:31:33,160 --> 00:31:36,040 Speaker 2: were talking about around COVID, everything from COVID origins to 543 00:31:36,320 --> 00:31:40,160 Speaker 2: vaccine efficacy, and then they broke down these sixty six 544 00:31:40,240 --> 00:31:43,680 Speaker 2: claims into all the different factual subclaims, and then they 545 00:31:43,920 --> 00:31:47,720 Speaker 2: plugged these into these essentially machine learning models to be 546 00:31:47,800 --> 00:31:51,240 Speaker 2: able to have a constant world heat map of what 547 00:31:51,280 --> 00:31:54,160 Speaker 2: everybody was saying about COVID. And whenever something started a 548 00:31:54,200 --> 00:31:56,960 Speaker 2: trend that was bad for what the Pentagon wanted or 549 00:31:57,040 --> 00:31:59,680 Speaker 2: was bad for what Tony Fauci wanted, they were able 550 00:31:59,680 --> 00:32:02,200 Speaker 2: to take down tens of millions of posts. They did 551 00:32:02,240 --> 00:32:04,920 Speaker 2: this in the twenty twenty election with mail in ballots. 552 00:32:04,960 --> 00:32:08,440 Speaker 1: It was this wescute I'm sorry, I just gotta have 553 00:32:08,760 --> 00:32:11,680 Speaker 1: There's so much here and it's so shocking. So you're 554 00:32:11,720 --> 00:32:16,680 Speaker 1: saying the Pentagon, our Pentagon, the US Department of Defense 555 00:32:17,200 --> 00:32:22,080 Speaker 1: censored Americans during the twenty twenty election cycle. 556 00:32:22,560 --> 00:32:23,560 Speaker 3: Yes, they did this. 557 00:32:24,480 --> 00:32:27,960 Speaker 2: Oh, they did this through the So there's the two 558 00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:30,800 Speaker 2: most censored events in human history, I would argue to 559 00:32:30,880 --> 00:32:35,719 Speaker 2: date are the twenty twenty election and the COVID nineteen pandemic, 560 00:32:36,280 --> 00:32:40,320 Speaker 2: and I'll explain how I arrived there. So the twenty 561 00:32:40,360 --> 00:32:44,560 Speaker 2: twenty election was determined by mail in ballots, and I'm 562 00:32:44,560 --> 00:32:46,959 Speaker 2: not weighing into the substance of whether mal in ballots 563 00:32:47,000 --> 00:32:49,560 Speaker 2: were or were not a legitimate or safe and reliable 564 00:32:49,600 --> 00:32:54,520 Speaker 2: form of voting. That's a completely independent topic from my perspective, 565 00:32:54,520 --> 00:32:57,720 Speaker 2: and the censorship issue one. But the censorship of mail 566 00:32:57,800 --> 00:33:01,200 Speaker 2: in ballots is really one of the most extraordinary stories 567 00:33:01,640 --> 00:33:05,120 Speaker 2: in our American history. I would argue what happened was 568 00:33:05,200 --> 00:33:08,920 Speaker 2: is you had this plot within the Department of Homeland Security. 569 00:33:09,320 --> 00:33:11,560 Speaker 2: Now this gets back to what we were talking about 570 00:33:11,600 --> 00:33:14,120 Speaker 2: with the State Department's Global Engagement Center. You had this 571 00:33:14,160 --> 00:33:17,480 Speaker 2: group within the Atlanta Council and the Foreign Policy Establishment 572 00:33:17,960 --> 00:33:20,560 Speaker 2: which began arguing in twenty seventeen for the need for 573 00:33:20,640 --> 00:33:25,080 Speaker 2: a permanent domestic censorship government office to serve as a 574 00:33:25,160 --> 00:33:29,400 Speaker 2: quarterback for what they called a whole of society counter Misinformation, 575 00:33:29,800 --> 00:33:34,080 Speaker 2: counter Disinformation Alliance. That just means censorship the counter missdisinfo, 576 00:33:34,400 --> 00:33:39,640 Speaker 2: but their whole society model explicitly proposed that we need 577 00:33:39,840 --> 00:33:43,479 Speaker 2: every single asset within society to be mobilized in a 578 00:33:43,520 --> 00:33:47,360 Speaker 2: whole of society effort to stop misinformation online. 579 00:33:47,440 --> 00:33:50,080 Speaker 3: It was that much of an existential threat to democracy, and. 580 00:33:50,080 --> 00:33:54,760 Speaker 2: So they fixated in twenty seventeen that it had to 581 00:33:54,800 --> 00:33:57,520 Speaker 2: be centered within the government because only the government would 582 00:33:57,560 --> 00:34:01,480 Speaker 2: have the clout and the coercive threat powers and the 583 00:34:01,600 --> 00:34:05,120 Speaker 2: perceived authority to be able to tell the social media 584 00:34:05,160 --> 00:34:07,680 Speaker 2: companies what to do, to be able to summon an 585 00:34:08,120 --> 00:34:11,520 Speaker 2: a government funded ngosworm, to create that media surround sound, 586 00:34:11,840 --> 00:34:16,320 Speaker 2: to be able to arm an astroturfed army of fact checkers, 587 00:34:16,360 --> 00:34:18,319 Speaker 2: and to be able to liaise and connect all these 588 00:34:18,320 --> 00:34:23,040 Speaker 2: different censorship industry actors into a cohesive, unified hole. And 589 00:34:23,080 --> 00:34:26,920 Speaker 2: the Atlantic Council initially proposed with this blueprint called forward Defense. 590 00:34:27,040 --> 00:34:28,720 Speaker 2: It's not offense, it's forward defense. 591 00:34:28,760 --> 00:34:29,000 Speaker 3: Guys. 592 00:34:29,640 --> 00:34:32,279 Speaker 2: They initially proposed that running this out of the State 593 00:34:32,320 --> 00:34:35,640 Speaker 2: Department's Global Engagement Center because they had so many assets 594 00:34:35,680 --> 00:34:39,040 Speaker 2: there who were so effective at censorship under Rick Stengelsteed 595 00:34:39,400 --> 00:34:41,960 Speaker 2: and under the Obama administration. But they said, oh, we 596 00:34:42,160 --> 00:34:43,239 Speaker 2: were not going to be able to get away with 597 00:34:43,239 --> 00:34:45,280 Speaker 2: that because we don't really have a national security predicate 598 00:34:45,640 --> 00:34:47,480 Speaker 2: and it's supposed to be feign facing. We can't really 599 00:34:47,560 --> 00:34:49,400 Speaker 2: use that hook unless we have a sort of national 600 00:34:49,400 --> 00:34:53,120 Speaker 2: security one. Then they contemplated parking at the CIA, and 601 00:34:53,160 --> 00:34:55,600 Speaker 2: they said, well, actually, there's two reasons we can't do that. 602 00:34:55,760 --> 00:34:57,960 Speaker 2: The CIA is foreign facing and we can't really establish 603 00:34:58,000 --> 00:35:00,640 Speaker 2: a counter intelligence threat to bring it home domestically. Also, 604 00:35:00,680 --> 00:35:02,960 Speaker 2: we're going to need essentially tens of thousands of people 605 00:35:02,960 --> 00:35:06,279 Speaker 2: involved in this operation, spanning this whole society model. You 606 00:35:06,320 --> 00:35:09,439 Speaker 2: can't really run a clandestine operation that way. So they said, okay, 607 00:35:09,440 --> 00:35:11,360 Speaker 2: well what about the FBI. They said, well, the FBI 608 00:35:11,400 --> 00:35:13,840 Speaker 2: would be great, it's domestic. But the problem is that 609 00:35:13,920 --> 00:35:16,400 Speaker 2: the FBI is supposed to be the intelligence arm of 610 00:35:16,440 --> 00:35:20,440 Speaker 2: the Justice Department, and what we're dealing with here are 611 00:35:20,440 --> 00:35:23,440 Speaker 2: not acts of law breaking. It's basically support for Trump. 612 00:35:23,960 --> 00:35:27,040 Speaker 2: Or if left wing populace had risen to power, like 613 00:35:27,080 --> 00:35:29,480 Speaker 2: Bernie Sanders or Jeremy Corbyn, I have no doubt they 614 00:35:29,520 --> 00:35:31,200 Speaker 2: would have done in the UK, they would have done 615 00:35:31,200 --> 00:35:31,920 Speaker 2: the same thing to him. 616 00:35:31,960 --> 00:35:32,160 Speaker 3: There. 617 00:35:32,280 --> 00:35:35,600 Speaker 2: They targeted Jeremy Corbyn and other left wing populist NATO 618 00:35:35,640 --> 00:35:38,920 Speaker 2: skeptical groups in Europe, but in the US it was 619 00:35:38,960 --> 00:35:41,680 Speaker 2: all Trump. And so essentially what they said is, well, 620 00:35:42,080 --> 00:35:44,880 Speaker 2: the only other domestic intelligence equity we have in the 621 00:35:45,000 --> 00:35:48,239 Speaker 2: US besides the FBI is the DHS. So we are 622 00:35:48,239 --> 00:35:51,560 Speaker 2: going to essentially take the CIA's power to rig and 623 00:35:51,640 --> 00:35:54,920 Speaker 2: bribe foreign media organizations, which is the power they've had 624 00:35:55,000 --> 00:35:57,240 Speaker 2: since the day they were born in nineteen forty seven, 625 00:35:57,680 --> 00:36:00,680 Speaker 2: and we're going to combine that with the power with 626 00:36:00,760 --> 00:36:05,200 Speaker 2: the domestic jurisdiction of the FBI by putting it at DHS. 627 00:36:05,680 --> 00:36:10,080 Speaker 2: So DHS was basically deputized. It was empowered through this 628 00:36:10,160 --> 00:36:14,600 Speaker 2: obscure little cybersecurity agency to have the combined powers that 629 00:36:14,640 --> 00:36:17,240 Speaker 2: the CIA has abroad with the jurisdiction of the FBI 630 00:36:17,280 --> 00:36:20,120 Speaker 2: at home. And the way they did this, how did 631 00:36:20,120 --> 00:36:23,720 Speaker 2: ay and an obscure little cybersecurity agency get this power 632 00:36:24,560 --> 00:36:28,360 Speaker 2: was they did a funny little series of switcher rus 633 00:36:28,880 --> 00:36:31,440 Speaker 2: So this little thing called SISA. They didn't call it 634 00:36:31,480 --> 00:36:34,480 Speaker 2: the Disinformation Governance Board, they didn't call it the Censorship Agency. 635 00:36:34,760 --> 00:36:36,759 Speaker 2: They gave it an obscure little name that no one 636 00:36:36,760 --> 00:36:40,680 Speaker 2: would notice, called the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, who 637 00:36:40,680 --> 00:36:43,480 Speaker 2: its founder said, we just security. We care about security 638 00:36:43,520 --> 00:36:45,680 Speaker 2: so much, it's in our name. Twice everybody sort of 639 00:36:45,719 --> 00:36:48,560 Speaker 2: closed their eyes and pretended, you know, that's what it was. 640 00:36:48,880 --> 00:36:51,520 Speaker 2: But It was created by active Congress in twenty eighteen 641 00:36:52,040 --> 00:36:55,120 Speaker 2: because of the perceived threat that Russia had hacked the 642 00:36:55,160 --> 00:36:58,320 Speaker 2: twenty sixteen election, had physically hacked it, and so we 643 00:36:58,600 --> 00:37:02,600 Speaker 2: need we needed this cyber security power to be able 644 00:37:02,640 --> 00:37:05,239 Speaker 2: to be able to deal with that, and essentially on 645 00:37:05,280 --> 00:37:08,200 Speaker 2: the heels of a CIA memo on January sixth, twenty seventeen, 646 00:37:08,600 --> 00:37:11,879 Speaker 2: in a same day DHS executive order on January sixth, 647 00:37:11,920 --> 00:37:15,560 Speaker 2: twenty seventeen, arguing that Russia had interfered in the twenty 648 00:37:15,600 --> 00:37:18,839 Speaker 2: sixteen election, and a DHS mandate saying that elections are 649 00:37:18,840 --> 00:37:23,120 Speaker 2: now critical infrastructure. You had this new power within DHS 650 00:37:23,160 --> 00:37:27,719 Speaker 2: to say that cybersecurity attacks on elections are now our purview. 651 00:37:28,040 --> 00:37:29,760 Speaker 3: And then they did two cute things. 652 00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:36,440 Speaker 2: One they said they said miss dis and malinformation online 653 00:37:36,960 --> 00:37:40,040 Speaker 2: are a form of cyber security attack. They are a 654 00:37:40,080 --> 00:37:45,400 Speaker 2: cyber attack because they are happening online. And they said, well, actually, 655 00:37:45,920 --> 00:37:49,920 Speaker 2: Russian disinformation is we're actually protecting democracy and elections. 656 00:37:50,080 --> 00:37:51,360 Speaker 3: We don't need a Russian predicate. 657 00:37:51,400 --> 00:37:54,839 Speaker 2: After Russia Gate died, So just like that, you had 658 00:37:54,880 --> 00:37:58,720 Speaker 2: this cybersecurity agency be able to legally make the argument 659 00:37:59,320 --> 00:38:02,680 Speaker 2: that your wheats about mail in ballots if you undermine 660 00:38:02,719 --> 00:38:06,000 Speaker 2: public faith and confidence in them as a legitimate form 661 00:38:06,000 --> 00:38:09,320 Speaker 2: of voting. Was now you were now conducting a cyber 662 00:38:09,360 --> 00:38:14,680 Speaker 2: attack on US critical infrastructure by articulating misinformation on Twitter, 663 00:38:15,120 --> 00:38:15,920 Speaker 2: and just like that. 664 00:38:16,080 --> 00:38:17,560 Speaker 3: Now what they did then, is they. 665 00:38:17,920 --> 00:38:21,560 Speaker 1: In other words, to see it complaining about election fraud 666 00:38:21,600 --> 00:38:23,719 Speaker 1: is the same as taking down our paragrid. 667 00:38:24,400 --> 00:38:27,279 Speaker 2: Yes, you could literally be on your toilet seat at 668 00:38:27,360 --> 00:38:31,000 Speaker 2: nine point thirty on a Thursday night and tweet I 669 00:38:31,080 --> 00:38:34,719 Speaker 2: think that mail in ballots are illegitimate, and you were 670 00:38:34,840 --> 00:38:37,760 Speaker 2: essentially then caught up in the crosshairs of the Department 671 00:38:37,760 --> 00:38:42,120 Speaker 2: of Homeland Security classifying you as conducting a cyber attack 672 00:38:42,200 --> 00:38:47,480 Speaker 2: on US critical infrastructure because you were doing misinformation online 673 00:38:47,480 --> 00:38:50,560 Speaker 2: in the cyber realm, and misinformation is a cyber attack 674 00:38:50,960 --> 00:38:54,840 Speaker 2: on democracy when it undermines public faith and confidence in 675 00:38:55,760 --> 00:38:59,359 Speaker 2: our democratic elections, in our democratic institutions. 676 00:38:59,760 --> 00:39:01,040 Speaker 3: They end up going far beyond that. 677 00:39:01,080 --> 00:39:04,680 Speaker 2: They would actually define democratic institutions as being another thing 678 00:39:04,719 --> 00:39:08,040 Speaker 2: that was a cyber security attack to undermine and lo 679 00:39:08,120 --> 00:39:11,200 Speaker 2: and behold, the mainstream media is considered a democratic institution 680 00:39:11,560 --> 00:39:12,440 Speaker 2: that would come later. 681 00:39:12,880 --> 00:39:14,400 Speaker 3: What ended up happening. 682 00:39:14,080 --> 00:39:16,200 Speaker 2: Was in the dance of the twenty twenty election and 683 00:39:16,239 --> 00:39:18,719 Speaker 2: starting in April of twenty twenty, although this goes back 684 00:39:18,760 --> 00:39:24,239 Speaker 2: before you had this essentially never Trump neocon Republican DHS 685 00:39:24,960 --> 00:39:29,080 Speaker 2: working with essentially NATO on the national security side and 686 00:39:30,000 --> 00:39:30,960 Speaker 2: essentially the DNC. 687 00:39:31,120 --> 00:39:34,640 Speaker 3: If you will, to use DHS as. 688 00:39:34,560 --> 00:39:40,080 Speaker 2: The launching point for a government coordinated mass censorship campaign 689 00:39:40,560 --> 00:39:44,839 Speaker 2: spanning every single social media platform on Earth in order 690 00:39:44,960 --> 00:39:49,040 Speaker 2: to pre censor the ability to dispute the legitimacy of 691 00:39:49,040 --> 00:39:49,840 Speaker 2: mail in ballots. 692 00:39:49,960 --> 00:39:50,880 Speaker 3: And here's how they did this. 693 00:39:51,400 --> 00:39:57,680 Speaker 2: They aggregated four different institutions, Stanford University, the University of Washington, 694 00:39:58,200 --> 00:40:01,240 Speaker 2: a company called Graphica, and the Atlanta and a Council. Now, 695 00:40:01,280 --> 00:40:05,600 Speaker 2: all four of these institutions, the centers within them were 696 00:40:05,680 --> 00:40:10,439 Speaker 2: essentially Pentagon cutouts. You had at the Stanford Airnet Observatory. 697 00:40:10,520 --> 00:40:13,360 Speaker 2: It was actually run by Michael McFall. If you know 698 00:40:13,480 --> 00:40:16,360 Speaker 2: Michael McFall, he was the US Ambassador. 699 00:40:15,719 --> 00:40:16,680 Speaker 3: To Russia. 700 00:40:17,920 --> 00:40:23,600 Speaker 2: Under the Obama administration, and he personally authored a seven 701 00:40:23,680 --> 00:40:27,160 Speaker 2: step playbook for how to successfully orchestrate a color revolution, 702 00:40:27,640 --> 00:40:31,120 Speaker 2: that is, and part of that involved maintaining total control 703 00:40:31,360 --> 00:40:35,360 Speaker 2: over media and social media, juicing up the civil society outfits, 704 00:40:36,400 --> 00:40:39,640 Speaker 2: calling elections illegitimate in order to remind you all of 705 00:40:39,680 --> 00:40:43,760 Speaker 2: these people were professional Russia gators and professional election delegitimizers 706 00:40:43,760 --> 00:40:44,560 Speaker 2: in twenty sixteen. 707 00:40:45,080 --> 00:40:46,279 Speaker 3: And then I'll get that. 708 00:40:46,360 --> 00:40:50,600 Speaker 2: And second, so Stanford University of the nominally the Stanford 709 00:40:50,600 --> 00:40:53,920 Speaker 2: Air Observatory under Michael mcmcfall was run by Alex Damos, 710 00:40:54,600 --> 00:40:58,400 Speaker 2: who was formerly a Facebook executive who coordinated with OD 711 00:40:58,560 --> 00:41:03,000 Speaker 2: and I and with respect to Russia Gate, you know, 712 00:41:03,160 --> 00:41:06,960 Speaker 2: taking down Russian propaganda at Facebook. So this is another 713 00:41:07,520 --> 00:41:10,480 Speaker 2: liaison essentially to the National Security State. And under Alex 714 00:41:10,560 --> 00:41:14,520 Speaker 2: Damus at Sanford Air Observatory was Renee Aresta, who started 715 00:41:14,560 --> 00:41:17,440 Speaker 2: her career in the CIA and wrote the Senate Intelligence 716 00:41:17,440 --> 00:41:21,440 Speaker 2: Committee report on Russian disinformation. And there's a lot more 717 00:41:21,480 --> 00:41:24,239 Speaker 2: there that I'll I'll get to another time. But the 718 00:41:24,600 --> 00:41:28,840 Speaker 2: next institution was the University of Washington, which is essentially 719 00:41:28,880 --> 00:41:31,960 Speaker 2: the Bill Gates University in Seattle, who is headed by 720 00:41:32,120 --> 00:41:36,760 Speaker 2: Kate Starboard, who is basically three generations of military brass 721 00:41:36,800 --> 00:41:41,200 Speaker 2: who got our PhD in crisis informatics, essentially doing social 722 00:41:41,280 --> 00:41:45,160 Speaker 2: media surveillance for the Pentagon and getting DARPA funding and 723 00:41:46,320 --> 00:41:49,480 Speaker 2: working essentially with the National Security State. Then repurposed to 724 00:41:49,520 --> 00:41:52,439 Speaker 2: take on mail in ballots. The third firm, Graphica, got 725 00:41:52,480 --> 00:41:57,360 Speaker 2: seven million dollars in Pentagon grants and got their start 726 00:41:57,400 --> 00:42:01,040 Speaker 2: as part of the Pentagon's Minerva Initiative. Nerve Initiative is 727 00:42:01,080 --> 00:42:06,200 Speaker 2: the Psychological Warfare Research Center of the Pentagon. This group 728 00:42:06,320 --> 00:42:11,000 Speaker 2: was doing social media spying and narrative mapping for the 729 00:42:11,040 --> 00:42:13,480 Speaker 2: Pentagon until the twenty sixteen election happened. 730 00:42:13,480 --> 00:42:16,279 Speaker 3: And then we're repurposed into a partnership with the. 731 00:42:16,280 --> 00:42:20,320 Speaker 2: Department of Homeland Security to censor twenty two million Trump 732 00:42:20,360 --> 00:42:23,560 Speaker 2: tweets pro Trump tweets about mail in ballots. And then 733 00:42:23,600 --> 00:42:26,000 Speaker 2: the fourth institution, as I mentioned, was the Atlantic Council, 734 00:42:26,000 --> 00:42:28,680 Speaker 2: who's got seven CIA directors on the board. So one 735 00:42:28,719 --> 00:42:32,759 Speaker 2: after another, it is exactly what Ben Rhodes described during 736 00:42:32,760 --> 00:42:36,480 Speaker 2: the Obama era as the blob the foreign policy establishment. 737 00:42:36,560 --> 00:42:39,920 Speaker 2: It's the Defense Department of the State Department or the 738 00:42:39,960 --> 00:42:43,440 Speaker 2: CIA every single time. And of course this was because 739 00:42:44,200 --> 00:42:47,480 Speaker 2: they were threatened by Trump's foreign policy. And so while 740 00:42:48,440 --> 00:42:51,319 Speaker 2: much of the censorship looks like it's coming domestically, it's 741 00:42:51,360 --> 00:42:54,560 Speaker 2: actually by our foreign facing Department of Dirty Trick's Color 742 00:42:54,600 --> 00:42:58,520 Speaker 2: Revolution Blob, who are professional government toddlers who were then 743 00:42:58,719 --> 00:43:00,840 Speaker 2: basically descended on the twenty election. 744 00:43:01,239 --> 00:43:02,040 Speaker 3: Now they did this. 745 00:43:02,920 --> 00:43:05,840 Speaker 2: They explicitly said the head of this Election Integrity Partnership 746 00:43:06,560 --> 00:43:10,319 Speaker 2: on tape and my foundation clipped them and it's been 747 00:43:10,360 --> 00:43:12,640 Speaker 2: played before Congress and it's a. 748 00:43:12,560 --> 00:43:15,480 Speaker 3: Part of the Missouri the Biden lawsuit now. But they 749 00:43:15,680 --> 00:43:16,879 Speaker 3: explicitly said on. 750 00:43:16,960 --> 00:43:19,799 Speaker 2: Tape that they were set up to do what the 751 00:43:19,840 --> 00:43:23,680 Speaker 2: government was banned from doing itself. And then they articulated 752 00:43:23,719 --> 00:43:26,880 Speaker 2: a multi step framework in order to coerce all the 753 00:43:26,960 --> 00:43:30,239 Speaker 2: tech companies to take censorship actions they set on tape 754 00:43:30,280 --> 00:43:32,560 Speaker 2: the tech companies would not have done but for their pressure, 755 00:43:33,000 --> 00:43:35,920 Speaker 2: which involved using threats of government force. Because they were 756 00:43:35,920 --> 00:43:39,000 Speaker 2: the deputized arm of the government, they had a formal 757 00:43:39,080 --> 00:43:42,040 Speaker 2: partnership with the DHS, they were able to use DHS's 758 00:43:42,120 --> 00:43:47,160 Speaker 2: proprietary domestic disinformation switchboard to immediately talk to top brass 759 00:43:47,320 --> 00:43:47,600 Speaker 2: at all. 760 00:43:47,600 --> 00:43:49,080 Speaker 3: The tech companies for takedowns. 761 00:43:49,400 --> 00:43:51,400 Speaker 2: And they bragged on tape about how they got the 762 00:43:51,440 --> 00:43:54,680 Speaker 2: tech companies to all systematically adopt a new terms of 763 00:43:54,719 --> 00:43:59,560 Speaker 2: service speech violation band called delegitimization, which meant any tweet, 764 00:44:00,160 --> 00:44:05,200 Speaker 2: YouTube video, any Facebook post, any TikTok video, any discord posts, 765 00:44:05,320 --> 00:44:10,840 Speaker 2: any Twitch video, anything on the Internet that undermined public 766 00:44:10,880 --> 00:44:13,680 Speaker 2: faith and confidence in the use of mail in ballots 767 00:44:13,960 --> 00:44:18,440 Speaker 2: or early voting drop boxes or ballot tabulation issues on 768 00:44:18,480 --> 00:44:22,520 Speaker 2: election day was a prime of fascia terms of service 769 00:44:22,600 --> 00:44:26,920 Speaker 2: violation policy under this new delegitimization policy that they only 770 00:44:26,960 --> 00:44:30,640 Speaker 2: adopted because of pass through government pressure from the Election 771 00:44:30,680 --> 00:44:33,719 Speaker 2: Integrity Partnership, which they bragged about on tape, including the 772 00:44:33,760 --> 00:44:37,360 Speaker 2: grid that they used to do this, and simultaneously invoking 773 00:44:37,400 --> 00:44:40,880 Speaker 2: threats of government breaking them up or government stopping doing 774 00:44:40,920 --> 00:44:43,000 Speaker 2: favors for the tech companies unless they did this, as 775 00:44:43,040 --> 00:44:45,920 Speaker 2: well as inducing crisis pr by working with their media allies. 776 00:44:46,400 --> 00:44:49,000 Speaker 2: And they said the government DHS could not do that themselves, 777 00:44:49,080 --> 00:44:54,600 Speaker 2: and so they set up this basically constellation of State Department, Pentagon, 778 00:44:55,480 --> 00:45:00,000 Speaker 2: and IC Networks to run this pre censorship campaign, which 779 00:45:00,080 --> 00:45:03,200 Speaker 2: by their own math had twenty two million tweets on 780 00:45:03,239 --> 00:45:05,920 Speaker 2: Twitter alone, and mind you, they just on fifteen platforms. 781 00:45:05,960 --> 00:45:08,800 Speaker 2: This is hundreds of millions of posts which were all 782 00:45:09,200 --> 00:45:11,759 Speaker 2: scanned and banned or throttled so that they could not 783 00:45:11,840 --> 00:45:14,040 Speaker 2: be amplified, or they existed in a sort of limited 784 00:45:14,040 --> 00:45:17,560 Speaker 2: state purgatory or had these frictions affixed to them in 785 00:45:17,600 --> 00:45:20,279 Speaker 2: the form of fact checking labels, where you couldn't actually 786 00:45:20,320 --> 00:45:22,000 Speaker 2: click through the thing, or you had to it was 787 00:45:22,200 --> 00:45:23,120 Speaker 2: an inconvenience to be. 788 00:45:23,040 --> 00:45:24,400 Speaker 3: Able to share it. Now. 789 00:45:24,440 --> 00:45:27,040 Speaker 2: They did this seven months before the election because at 790 00:45:27,080 --> 00:45:30,560 Speaker 2: the time they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of 791 00:45:30,560 --> 00:45:32,839 Speaker 2: a Biden victory in the case of a so called 792 00:45:33,320 --> 00:45:37,040 Speaker 2: red mirage blue shift event. They knew the only way 793 00:45:37,040 --> 00:45:40,680 Speaker 2: that Biden would be able to would win mathematically was 794 00:45:40,719 --> 00:45:44,560 Speaker 2: through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail in ballots. They 795 00:45:44,640 --> 00:45:46,520 Speaker 2: knew there would be a crisis because it was going 796 00:45:46,560 --> 00:45:49,839 Speaker 2: to look extremely weird if Trump looked like he won 797 00:45:49,840 --> 00:45:54,320 Speaker 2: by seven states and then three days later it comes 798 00:45:54,320 --> 00:45:56,839 Speaker 2: out actually the election switch. I mean, that would put 799 00:45:56,880 --> 00:46:00,440 Speaker 2: the election crisis of the Bush Gore election on a 800 00:46:00,520 --> 00:46:03,719 Speaker 2: level of steroids that the national security state said, well, 801 00:46:03,760 --> 00:46:06,600 Speaker 2: the public will not be prepared for. So what we 802 00:46:06,680 --> 00:46:09,640 Speaker 2: need to do is we need to in advance, we 803 00:46:09,719 --> 00:46:12,920 Speaker 2: need to presensor the ability to even question the legitimacy 804 00:46:13,480 --> 00:46:14,319 Speaker 2: this took out. 805 00:46:14,400 --> 00:46:16,840 Speaker 1: Wait wait, ma, ask you a pause right there, the influences, 806 00:46:17,120 --> 00:46:21,120 Speaker 1: So what you're saying is what you're suggesting is they 807 00:46:21,200 --> 00:46:23,640 Speaker 1: knew the outcome of the election seven months before it 808 00:46:23,719 --> 00:46:24,080 Speaker 1: was held. 809 00:46:31,200 --> 00:46:34,600 Speaker 3: It looks very bad, certainly, what's it? 810 00:46:34,880 --> 00:46:40,560 Speaker 1: Yes, Mike, it does look very bad. 811 00:46:39,200 --> 00:46:40,960 Speaker 2: You know, and especially when you combine this with the 812 00:46:41,000 --> 00:46:44,200 Speaker 2: fact that this is right on the heels of the impeachment, 813 00:46:44,760 --> 00:46:47,360 Speaker 2: the Pentagon led CIA led impeachment. 814 00:46:47,719 --> 00:46:49,480 Speaker 3: You know, it was Eric. 815 00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:51,759 Speaker 2: Cimorella from the CIA, and it was the Vinments from 816 00:46:51,760 --> 00:46:55,799 Speaker 2: the Pentagon who led the impeachment of Trump in late 817 00:46:55,920 --> 00:47:00,480 Speaker 2: twenty nineteen over you know, an alleged phone call around 818 00:47:00,480 --> 00:47:05,160 Speaker 2: withholding Ukraine aid. This same network, which came straight out 819 00:47:05,200 --> 00:47:11,920 Speaker 2: of the Pentagon Hybrid Warfare military censorship network created after 820 00:47:11,960 --> 00:47:16,319 Speaker 2: the first Ukraine Crisis in twenty fourteen, were the lead 821 00:47:16,440 --> 00:47:20,279 Speaker 2: architects of the Ukraine impeachment in twenty nineteen and then 822 00:47:20,440 --> 00:47:23,400 Speaker 2: essentially came back on steroids as part of the twenty twenty. 823 00:47:23,360 --> 00:47:24,840 Speaker 3: Election censorship operation. 824 00:47:25,360 --> 00:47:29,440 Speaker 2: But from their perspective, I mean, it certainly looks like 825 00:47:29,520 --> 00:47:33,360 Speaker 2: the perfect crime. These were the people DHS at the 826 00:47:33,360 --> 00:47:37,000 Speaker 2: time had actually federalized much of the national election. 827 00:47:38,719 --> 00:47:39,399 Speaker 3: Administration. 828 00:47:39,640 --> 00:47:45,719 Speaker 2: Through this January sixth, twenty seventeen executive order from outgoing Obama, 829 00:47:46,480 --> 00:47:50,600 Speaker 2: DHS had jed Johnson, which essentially wrapped all fifty states 830 00:47:50,640 --> 00:47:53,960 Speaker 2: up into a formal DHS partnership. So DHS was simultaneously 831 00:47:53,960 --> 00:47:56,439 Speaker 2: in charge of the administration of the election in many 832 00:47:56,480 --> 00:48:00,759 Speaker 2: respects and the censorship of anyone who challenged the administration 833 00:48:01,840 --> 00:48:04,960 Speaker 2: of the election. This is like, you know, putting essentially 834 00:48:05,040 --> 00:48:09,680 Speaker 2: the defendant of a trial as the judge and jury 835 00:48:09,760 --> 00:48:10,400 Speaker 2: of the trial. 836 00:48:11,080 --> 00:48:13,759 Speaker 1: But you're not describing democracy. I mean, you're describing a 837 00:48:13,760 --> 00:48:15,640 Speaker 1: country in which democracy is impossible. 838 00:48:15,719 --> 00:48:18,960 Speaker 2: What I'm essentially describing as military rule. I mean, this 839 00:48:19,040 --> 00:48:21,239 Speaker 2: is I mean, what's happened with the rise of the 840 00:48:21,239 --> 00:48:24,840 Speaker 2: censorship industry is a total inversion of the idea of 841 00:48:24,840 --> 00:48:28,279 Speaker 2: democracy itself. You know, the democracy sort of draws its 842 00:48:28,360 --> 00:48:33,200 Speaker 2: legitimacy from the idea that it is rule by consent 843 00:48:33,800 --> 00:48:36,640 Speaker 2: of the people of the people being ruled. That is, 844 00:48:36,680 --> 00:48:39,040 Speaker 2: it's not really being ruled by an overlord, because the 845 00:48:39,040 --> 00:48:42,640 Speaker 2: government is actually just our will expressed by our consent 846 00:48:42,719 --> 00:48:46,239 Speaker 2: with who we vote for. The whole push after the 847 00:48:46,280 --> 00:48:49,840 Speaker 2: twenty sixteen election, and after bregsit and after a couple 848 00:48:49,840 --> 00:48:53,080 Speaker 2: of other you know, social media run elections that went 849 00:48:53,080 --> 00:48:55,160 Speaker 2: the wrong way from what the State Department wanted, Like 850 00:48:55,160 --> 00:48:59,919 Speaker 2: the twenty sixteen Philippines election was to completely invert every 851 00:49:00,080 --> 00:49:03,880 Speaker 2: thing that we described as being the underpinnings of a 852 00:49:03,920 --> 00:49:06,040 Speaker 2: democratic society in order to deal with the threat of 853 00:49:06,040 --> 00:49:08,800 Speaker 2: free speech on the internet. And what they essentially said 854 00:49:08,960 --> 00:49:12,319 Speaker 2: is we need to redefine democracy from being about the 855 00:49:12,320 --> 00:49:15,200 Speaker 2: will of the voters to being about the sanctity of 856 00:49:15,239 --> 00:49:16,720 Speaker 2: democratic institutions. 857 00:49:16,960 --> 00:49:18,880 Speaker 3: And who are the democratic institutions. 858 00:49:18,920 --> 00:49:21,840 Speaker 2: Oh, it's US, you know, it's the military, It's NATO, 859 00:49:22,080 --> 00:49:26,240 Speaker 2: it's the IMF and the World Bank, it's the mainstream media. 860 00:49:26,719 --> 00:49:30,840 Speaker 2: Who it is the NGOs, And of course these NGOs 861 00:49:30,840 --> 00:49:34,560 Speaker 2: are largely state department funded or IC funded. It's essentially 862 00:49:34,760 --> 00:49:39,919 Speaker 2: all of the elite establishments that were under threat from 863 00:49:40,680 --> 00:49:44,800 Speaker 2: the rise of domestic populism that declared their own consensus 864 00:49:44,880 --> 00:49:47,440 Speaker 2: to be the new definition of democracy. Because if you 865 00:49:47,640 --> 00:49:51,480 Speaker 2: define democracy as being the strength of democratic institutions rather 866 00:49:51,600 --> 00:49:54,000 Speaker 2: than a focus on the will of the voters, then 867 00:49:54,400 --> 00:49:57,920 Speaker 2: what you're left with is essentially democracy is just the 868 00:49:57,960 --> 00:50:03,279 Speaker 2: consensus building architecture with in the within the democratic institutions themselves, 869 00:50:03,440 --> 00:50:05,680 Speaker 2: and from their perspective, that takes a lot of work. 870 00:50:06,120 --> 00:50:08,960 Speaker 2: I mean, I mean the amount of work these people 871 00:50:09,000 --> 00:50:11,760 Speaker 2: do I mean. For example, we mentioned the Atlantic Council, 872 00:50:11,800 --> 00:50:15,400 Speaker 2: which is one of these big coordinating mechanisms for the 873 00:50:15,400 --> 00:50:18,200 Speaker 2: oil and gas industry in a region, for the for 874 00:50:18,280 --> 00:50:20,960 Speaker 2: the finance and the JP Morgans, and the Black Rocks 875 00:50:20,960 --> 00:50:23,080 Speaker 2: in a region, for the NGOs in the region, for 876 00:50:23,120 --> 00:50:24,960 Speaker 2: the media in the region, all of these need to 877 00:50:25,000 --> 00:50:27,799 Speaker 2: reach a consensus, and that process takes a lot of time. 878 00:50:27,880 --> 00:50:29,600 Speaker 2: It takes a lot of work and a lot of negotiation. 879 00:50:30,080 --> 00:50:34,480 Speaker 2: From their perspective, that's democracy. Democracy is getting the NGOs 880 00:50:34,520 --> 00:50:36,719 Speaker 2: to agree with Black Rock, to agree with the with 881 00:50:36,760 --> 00:50:41,160 Speaker 2: the Wall Street journal you know, to agree with the 882 00:50:41,160 --> 00:50:44,200 Speaker 2: community and activist groups who are onboarded with respect to 883 00:50:44,200 --> 00:50:48,120 Speaker 2: a particular initiative. That is the difficult vote building process. 884 00:50:48,120 --> 00:50:50,640 Speaker 2: From their perspective, at the end of the day, a 885 00:50:50,680 --> 00:50:53,600 Speaker 2: bunch of you know, populist groups decide that they like 886 00:50:53,960 --> 00:50:57,080 Speaker 2: a truck driver who's popular on TikTok more than the 887 00:50:57,400 --> 00:51:02,759 Speaker 2: you know, carefully constructed consensus of the NATO military brass Well, 888 00:51:02,800 --> 00:51:05,879 Speaker 2: then from their perspective, you know, that is now an 889 00:51:05,920 --> 00:51:07,520 Speaker 2: attack on democracy. 890 00:51:07,880 --> 00:51:09,960 Speaker 3: And this is what this whole branding effort was. 891 00:51:10,080 --> 00:51:13,160 Speaker 2: And of course democracy again has that magic regime change 892 00:51:13,160 --> 00:51:17,399 Speaker 2: predicate where democracy is our magic watchword, to be able 893 00:51:17,440 --> 00:51:20,640 Speaker 2: to overthrow governments from the ground up in a sort 894 00:51:20,640 --> 00:51:24,560 Speaker 2: of color Revolution style whole of society effort to topple 895 00:51:24,840 --> 00:51:28,160 Speaker 2: a democratically elected government from the inside. 896 00:51:28,239 --> 00:51:29,720 Speaker 3: For example, as we did in Ukraine. 897 00:51:29,800 --> 00:51:33,320 Speaker 2: Victor Yanikovich was democratically elected by the Ukrainian people. Like 898 00:51:33,680 --> 00:51:36,879 Speaker 2: him or hate them, I'm not even issuing opinion there. 899 00:51:36,880 --> 00:51:40,120 Speaker 2: But the fact is we color revolution am ount of office. 900 00:51:40,080 --> 00:51:43,120 Speaker 2: We January sixthem out of office. Actually, to be frank, 901 00:51:43,160 --> 00:51:45,960 Speaker 2: I mean with respect of the you had a state 902 00:51:46,000 --> 00:51:50,240 Speaker 2: department funded right sector thugs and you know, five billion 903 00:51:50,280 --> 00:51:52,719 Speaker 2: dollars worth of civil society money pumped into this to 904 00:51:52,840 --> 00:51:55,879 Speaker 2: overthrow a democratically elected government in the name of democracy. 905 00:51:56,440 --> 00:51:59,160 Speaker 3: And they took that special set of skills. 906 00:51:58,960 --> 00:52:04,080 Speaker 2: Home and now it's here, perhaps potentially to stay. And 907 00:52:04,120 --> 00:52:09,320 Speaker 2: this has fundamentally changed the nature of American governance because 908 00:52:09,360 --> 00:52:13,400 Speaker 2: of the threat of one small voice becoming popular on 909 00:52:13,440 --> 00:52:13,959 Speaker 2: social media. 910 00:52:14,200 --> 00:52:17,480 Speaker 1: And me ask a question, So, into that group of 911 00:52:17,560 --> 00:52:24,160 Speaker 1: institutions that you say now define democracy, the NGO's foreign policies, typics, 912 00:52:24,200 --> 00:52:29,120 Speaker 1: et cetera. You included the mainstream media. Now in twenty 913 00:52:29,160 --> 00:52:33,720 Speaker 1: twenty one, the NSA broke into my private text apps 914 00:52:34,040 --> 00:52:36,520 Speaker 1: and read them and then leaked them to the New 915 00:52:36,600 --> 00:52:39,759 Speaker 1: York Times against me. That just happened again to me 916 00:52:40,120 --> 00:52:45,160 Speaker 1: last week, and I'm wondering how common that is for 917 00:52:45,239 --> 00:52:49,319 Speaker 1: the Intel agencies to work with so called mainstream media 918 00:52:49,440 --> 00:52:52,680 Speaker 1: like the New York Times to hurt their opponents. 919 00:52:52,840 --> 00:52:57,640 Speaker 2: Well, that is the function of these interstitial government funded 920 00:52:57,760 --> 00:53:01,759 Speaker 2: non governmental organizations and tanks like For example, we mentioned 921 00:53:01,800 --> 00:53:04,359 Speaker 2: the Atlantic Council, which is you know, NATO's think tank, 922 00:53:04,400 --> 00:53:07,120 Speaker 2: but other groups like the Aspen Institute, which draws the 923 00:53:07,200 --> 00:53:10,080 Speaker 2: lion's share of its funding from the State Department and. 924 00:53:10,040 --> 00:53:11,040 Speaker 3: Other government agencies. 925 00:53:11,080 --> 00:53:13,279 Speaker 2: You know, the Aspen Institute was busted doing the same 926 00:53:13,320 --> 00:53:15,960 Speaker 2: thing with the Hunter Biden laptop censorship. You know, you 927 00:53:16,080 --> 00:53:20,520 Speaker 2: had this strange situation where the FBI had advanced knowledge 928 00:53:20,520 --> 00:53:23,600 Speaker 2: of the pending publication of the Hunter Biden laptop story, 929 00:53:24,160 --> 00:53:27,919 Speaker 2: and then magically, the Aspen Institute, which is run by 930 00:53:28,320 --> 00:53:33,319 Speaker 2: essentially former CIA, former NSA, former FBI, and then a 931 00:53:33,320 --> 00:53:37,359 Speaker 2: bunch of sort of civil society organizations all hold a 932 00:53:37,760 --> 00:53:44,520 Speaker 2: mass stakeholder simulation censorship simulation, a three day conference. 933 00:53:44,560 --> 00:53:46,480 Speaker 3: You know, this came out and your roth was there. 934 00:53:46,560 --> 00:53:48,400 Speaker 2: This is a big part of the Twitter file leagues, 935 00:53:48,440 --> 00:53:52,680 Speaker 2: and it's been mentioned in multiple congressional investigations. But somehow 936 00:53:52,840 --> 00:53:58,520 Speaker 2: the Aspen Institute, which is basically an addendum of the 937 00:53:58,600 --> 00:54:03,360 Speaker 2: National Security State, got the exact same information that the 938 00:54:03,440 --> 00:54:08,920 Speaker 2: National Security State spied on journalists and political figures to obtain, 939 00:54:09,480 --> 00:54:12,160 Speaker 2: and not only leaked it, but then basically did a 940 00:54:12,320 --> 00:54:17,800 Speaker 2: joint coordinated censorship simulator in September, two months before the election, 941 00:54:18,320 --> 00:54:20,800 Speaker 2: in order, just like with the censorship of mail in ballots, 942 00:54:20,840 --> 00:54:26,880 Speaker 2: to be in ready position to presensor anyone online, amplifying Wait, 943 00:54:26,880 --> 00:54:27,960 Speaker 2: a second story. 944 00:54:27,719 --> 00:54:31,279 Speaker 1: That had not even broken yet, the Aspen Institute. So, 945 00:54:31,440 --> 00:54:33,400 Speaker 1: I mean, which is, by the way, I've spent my 946 00:54:33,440 --> 00:54:36,480 Speaker 1: life in Washington's kind of a I mean, Walter Isaacson, 947 00:54:36,520 --> 00:54:40,080 Speaker 1: formally of Time magazine, ran it, former president of CNN. 948 00:54:41,239 --> 00:54:43,200 Speaker 1: I had no idea it was part of the National 949 00:54:43,280 --> 00:54:45,000 Speaker 1: Security State, had no idea it's funding came from the 950 00:54:45,040 --> 00:54:47,440 Speaker 1: US government. This is the first time I ever heard that. 951 00:54:48,000 --> 00:54:50,920 Speaker 1: But given assuming what you're saying is true, it's a 952 00:54:50,960 --> 00:54:55,680 Speaker 1: little weird that Walter Isaacson left Aspens to write a 953 00:54:55,760 --> 00:54:58,880 Speaker 1: biography of Elon Musk strange or yeah. 954 00:54:58,840 --> 00:55:03,480 Speaker 3: I'm you know, I don't know. I haven't read that book. 955 00:55:03,920 --> 00:55:06,719 Speaker 2: I from what I've heard from people, it's a relatively 956 00:55:06,719 --> 00:55:10,799 Speaker 2: fair treatment. I just total speculation, But I suspect that 957 00:55:10,880 --> 00:55:14,400 Speaker 2: Walter Isaacson has struggled with this issue and may not 958 00:55:14,480 --> 00:55:18,040 Speaker 2: even firmly fall in one particular place in the sense 959 00:55:18,080 --> 00:55:21,200 Speaker 2: that you know, Walter Eisensen did a series of interviews 960 00:55:21,320 --> 00:55:25,840 Speaker 2: of Rick Stangele actually with the Atlantic Council in in 961 00:55:25,920 --> 00:55:29,759 Speaker 2: other settings, where he interviewed Rick Stangle specifically on the 962 00:55:29,840 --> 00:55:34,480 Speaker 2: issue of the need to get rid of the First 963 00:55:34,520 --> 00:55:37,120 Speaker 2: Amendment and the threat that free speech on social media 964 00:55:37,200 --> 00:55:40,480 Speaker 2: poses to democracy. Now, at the time, I was very concerned. 965 00:55:40,520 --> 00:55:42,920 Speaker 2: This was between twenty seventeen and twenty nineteen, when he 966 00:55:42,960 --> 00:55:45,760 Speaker 2: did these Rick Stangle interviews. I was very concerned because 967 00:55:46,080 --> 00:55:48,960 Speaker 2: Isaacson expressed what seemed to me to be a highly 968 00:55:49,000 --> 00:55:54,080 Speaker 2: sympathetic view about the Rick Stangele, you know, perspective on 969 00:55:54,480 --> 00:55:58,160 Speaker 2: killing the First Amendment. Now, he didn't formally endorse that position, 970 00:55:58,200 --> 00:56:00,960 Speaker 2: but it left me very skittish Isaacson. But what I 971 00:56:00,960 --> 00:56:04,359 Speaker 2: should say is, at the time, I don't think very 972 00:56:04,360 --> 00:56:07,560 Speaker 2: many people, In fact, I know virtually nobody in the 973 00:56:07,600 --> 00:56:12,600 Speaker 2: country had any idea how deep the rabbit hole went 974 00:56:12,920 --> 00:56:15,880 Speaker 2: when it came to the construction of the censorship industry, 975 00:56:16,360 --> 00:56:19,960 Speaker 2: and how deep the tentacles had grown within the military 976 00:56:19,960 --> 00:56:22,680 Speaker 2: and the national security state in order to booy and 977 00:56:22,719 --> 00:56:25,799 Speaker 2: consolidate it. Much of that, frankly did not even come 978 00:56:25,880 --> 00:56:30,560 Speaker 2: to public light until even last year. Frankly, some of 979 00:56:30,600 --> 00:56:33,400 Speaker 2: that was galvanized by Elon Musk's acquisition and the Twitter 980 00:56:33,440 --> 00:56:36,200 Speaker 2: files and the Republican turnover in the House that allowed 981 00:56:36,200 --> 00:56:39,880 Speaker 2: these multiple investigations, the lawsuits like Missouri bu Biden, the 982 00:56:39,920 --> 00:56:44,480 Speaker 2: discovery process there, and multiple other things like the Disinformation 983 00:56:44,560 --> 00:56:47,120 Speaker 2: Governance Board, who, by the way, the interim head of that, 984 00:56:47,560 --> 00:56:50,960 Speaker 2: the head of that, Nina Jankovitz, got her start in 985 00:56:51,000 --> 00:56:57,040 Speaker 2: the censorship industry from this exact same clandestine intelligence community 986 00:56:57,080 --> 00:56:59,960 Speaker 2: censorship network created after the twenty fourteen PRIMEA situation. 987 00:57:00,440 --> 00:57:04,000 Speaker 3: Nina Jenkovitz. When when her name came up in twenty twenty. 988 00:57:03,840 --> 00:57:06,719 Speaker 2: Two as part of the Disinformation Disinformation Governance Board, I 989 00:57:06,719 --> 00:57:08,920 Speaker 2: almost fell out of my chair because I had been 990 00:57:08,960 --> 00:57:13,080 Speaker 2: tracking Nina's network for almost five years at that point. 991 00:57:13,120 --> 00:57:13,919 Speaker 3: When her when her. 992 00:57:13,920 --> 00:57:17,360 Speaker 2: Name came up as part of the UK intercluster cell 993 00:57:17,800 --> 00:57:21,120 Speaker 2: of a busted clandestine operation to sense of the Internet 994 00:57:21,200 --> 00:57:24,800 Speaker 2: called the Integrity Initiative, which was created by the UK 995 00:57:24,960 --> 00:57:30,000 Speaker 2: Foreign Office and was backed by NATO's Political Affairs Unit 996 00:57:30,360 --> 00:57:33,880 Speaker 2: in order to create to carry out this thing that 997 00:57:33,920 --> 00:57:36,520 Speaker 2: we talked about at the beginning of this of this dialogue, 998 00:57:36,560 --> 00:57:42,480 Speaker 2: the NATO's sort of psychological inoculation and the ability to 999 00:57:42,560 --> 00:57:46,520 Speaker 2: kill so called Russian propaganda or rising political groups who 1000 00:57:46,560 --> 00:57:50,600 Speaker 2: wanted to maintain energy relations with Russia at a time 1001 00:57:50,640 --> 00:57:52,440 Speaker 2: when the US was trying to kill the nord stream 1002 00:57:52,480 --> 00:57:56,600 Speaker 2: and other pipeline relationships. Well they did that marine the Peninfrint. 1003 00:57:57,960 --> 00:58:01,720 Speaker 2: Nina Jenkovits was a part of this. And then who 1004 00:58:01,800 --> 00:58:04,040 Speaker 2: is who is the head of it after Nina Jakovitz 1005 00:58:04,120 --> 00:58:06,680 Speaker 2: went down, It was Michael Chertoff, And Michael Chertoff was 1006 00:58:06,720 --> 00:58:09,680 Speaker 2: running the Aspen Institute cyber group, and then this and 1007 00:58:09,760 --> 00:58:12,640 Speaker 2: the Aspen then goes on to be the censorship simulator 1008 00:58:12,760 --> 00:58:14,840 Speaker 2: for the Hunter Biden laptop story. And then two years 1009 00:58:14,920 --> 00:58:18,480 Speaker 2: later Chertoff is then the head of the Disinformation Governance 1010 00:58:18,480 --> 00:58:19,920 Speaker 2: Board after Nina. 1011 00:58:19,720 --> 00:58:20,680 Speaker 3: Is forced to step down. 1012 00:58:20,760 --> 00:58:21,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, close friends, of. 1013 00:58:22,080 --> 00:58:25,960 Speaker 2: Course, Michael Chertoff was the chairman at Bay. Sorry, of course, 1014 00:58:26,320 --> 00:58:30,040 Speaker 2: Michael Chertoff was the chairman of the the largest military 1015 00:58:30,080 --> 00:58:33,920 Speaker 2: contractor in Europe be a Military. 1016 00:58:33,880 --> 00:58:37,800 Speaker 1: So, Sue, you've blown my mind so many times in 1017 00:58:37,800 --> 00:58:39,920 Speaker 1: this conversation that I'm going to need a nap directly 1018 00:58:40,040 --> 00:58:43,080 Speaker 1: after it's done. So I've just got two more questions 1019 00:58:43,080 --> 00:58:45,440 Speaker 1: for you. One short one a little longer. Short one 1020 00:58:45,520 --> 00:58:47,479 Speaker 1: is for people who've made it this far an hour 1021 00:58:47,520 --> 00:58:50,360 Speaker 1: in and want to know more about this topic. And 1022 00:58:50,440 --> 00:58:52,160 Speaker 1: by the way, I hope you will come back whenever 1023 00:58:52,200 --> 00:58:55,280 Speaker 1: you have the time to explore different threads of this story. 1024 00:58:55,760 --> 00:58:58,720 Speaker 1: But for people who want to do research on their own, 1025 00:58:59,040 --> 00:59:03,480 Speaker 1: how can your research on this be found on the internet? 1026 00:59:03,720 --> 00:59:04,360 Speaker 3: Sure so. 1027 00:59:04,480 --> 00:59:08,480 Speaker 2: Our foundation is Foundation for Freedom Online dot com. We 1028 00:59:08,920 --> 00:59:12,520 Speaker 2: publish all manner of reports on every aspect of the 1029 00:59:12,520 --> 00:59:16,080 Speaker 2: censorship industry, from what we talked about with the role 1030 00:59:16,080 --> 00:59:18,600 Speaker 2: of the military industrial complex and the national security state 1031 00:59:18,960 --> 00:59:23,120 Speaker 2: to what the universities are doing to you know I sometimes. 1032 00:59:22,720 --> 00:59:25,520 Speaker 3: Refer to as digital mk ultra. There's just the field of. 1033 00:59:25,480 --> 00:59:28,760 Speaker 2: Basically the science of censorship and how and the funding 1034 00:59:28,800 --> 00:59:33,000 Speaker 2: of these psychological manipulation methods in order to nudge people 1035 00:59:33,000 --> 00:59:35,600 Speaker 2: into different belief systems. As they did with COVID, as 1036 00:59:35,640 --> 00:59:39,440 Speaker 2: they did with energy, and every sensitive policy issue is 1037 00:59:39,480 --> 00:59:42,360 Speaker 2: what they essentially had an ambition for. But so my 1038 00:59:42,440 --> 00:59:45,280 Speaker 2: Foundation for Freedom Online dot com website is one way. 1039 00:59:45,320 --> 00:59:48,240 Speaker 2: The other way is just on X. My handle is 1040 00:59:48,320 --> 00:59:52,080 Speaker 2: at Mike ben Cyber. I'm very active there and publish 1041 00:59:52,080 --> 00:59:54,640 Speaker 2: a lot of long form video and written content on 1042 00:59:54,680 --> 00:59:56,680 Speaker 2: all of this. I think it's one of the most 1043 00:59:56,720 --> 00:59:58,040 Speaker 2: important issues in the world today. 1044 00:59:58,240 --> 01:00:00,480 Speaker 1: So it certainly is. And so that leads to directly 1045 01:00:00,600 --> 01:00:04,920 Speaker 1: and seamlessly to my final question, which is about X. 1046 01:00:05,280 --> 01:00:07,640 Speaker 1: And I'm not just saying this because I post content there, 1047 01:00:07,680 --> 01:00:10,880 Speaker 1: but I think objectively it's the last big platform that's 1048 01:00:11,120 --> 01:00:13,959 Speaker 1: free or sort of free or more free. You post 1049 01:00:14,000 --> 01:00:17,640 Speaker 1: there too. But you know, we're at the very beginning 1050 01:00:17,840 --> 01:00:21,000 Speaker 1: of an election year with a couple of different wars 1051 01:00:21,160 --> 01:00:26,280 Speaker 1: unfolding simultaneously in twenty twenty four. So do you expect 1052 01:00:26,280 --> 01:00:29,360 Speaker 1: that that platform can stay free for the duration of 1053 01:00:29,400 --> 01:00:29,760 Speaker 1: this year. 1054 01:00:30,160 --> 01:00:33,400 Speaker 2: It's under an extraordinary an extraordinary amount of pressure, and 1055 01:00:33,440 --> 01:00:36,040 Speaker 2: that pressure is going to continue to mount as the 1056 01:00:36,080 --> 01:00:41,280 Speaker 2: election approaches. Elon Musk is a very unique individual and 1057 01:00:41,640 --> 01:00:44,520 Speaker 2: he has a unique buffer, perhaps when it comes to 1058 01:00:44,520 --> 01:00:47,600 Speaker 2: the national Security State, because the National security State is 1059 01:00:47,600 --> 01:00:53,040 Speaker 2: actually quite reliant on Elon Musk properties, whether that's for 1060 01:00:53,120 --> 01:00:56,440 Speaker 2: the the electrical you know, the sort of the the 1061 01:00:56,480 --> 01:01:00,000 Speaker 2: green revolution when it comes to Tesla and the battery 1062 01:01:00,120 --> 01:01:04,200 Speaker 2: technology there. When it comes to SpaceX, the State Department 1063 01:01:04,320 --> 01:01:11,200 Speaker 2: is hugely dependent on SpaceX because of its unbelievable sort 1064 01:01:11,200 --> 01:01:14,919 Speaker 2: of pioneering and saturating presence in the field of low 1065 01:01:15,000 --> 01:01:20,640 Speaker 2: Earth orbit satellites that are basically how our telecom system runs, 1066 01:01:20,680 --> 01:01:23,800 Speaker 2: to things like Starlink. There are dependencies that the National 1067 01:01:23,800 --> 01:01:26,360 Speaker 2: security State has on Elon Musk. I'm not sure he'd 1068 01:01:26,400 --> 01:01:29,840 Speaker 2: have as much room to negotiate if he had become 1069 01:01:29,880 --> 01:01:33,640 Speaker 2: the world's richest man selling, you know, at a lemonade stand. 1070 01:01:34,200 --> 01:01:37,760 Speaker 2: So there's and if the National security State goes too 1071 01:01:37,800 --> 01:01:40,680 Speaker 2: hard on him by invoking something like Scyphius to sort 1072 01:01:40,720 --> 01:01:43,000 Speaker 2: of nationalize some of these properties, I think the shockwave 1073 01:01:43,040 --> 01:01:45,880 Speaker 2: that it would send to the international investor community would 1074 01:01:45,880 --> 01:01:48,560 Speaker 2: be irrecoverable. At a time when we're engaging in great 1075 01:01:48,560 --> 01:01:51,840 Speaker 2: power competition, so they're trying to kill, you know, they're 1076 01:01:51,840 --> 01:01:54,080 Speaker 2: trying to sort of induce a I think a sort 1077 01:01:54,080 --> 01:01:58,040 Speaker 2: of corporate regime change through a series of things involving 1078 01:01:58,080 --> 01:02:00,440 Speaker 2: a sort of death by a thousand paper cuts. I 1079 01:02:00,440 --> 01:02:04,320 Speaker 2: think there are seven or eight different Justice Department or 1080 01:02:04,480 --> 01:02:08,160 Speaker 2: SEC or FTC investigations into Elon Musk properties that all 1081 01:02:08,200 --> 01:02:12,680 Speaker 2: started after his acquisition of X. But then what they're 1082 01:02:12,720 --> 01:02:14,400 Speaker 2: trying to do right now is what I call the 1083 01:02:14,480 --> 01:02:17,320 Speaker 2: Transatlantic flank attack two point zero. You know, we talked 1084 01:02:18,200 --> 01:02:21,240 Speaker 2: in this dialogue about how the censorship industry really got 1085 01:02:21,320 --> 01:02:24,360 Speaker 2: its start when a bunch of State Department exiles who 1086 01:02:24,400 --> 01:02:27,280 Speaker 2: are expecting promotions took their special set of skills in 1087 01:02:27,320 --> 01:02:31,439 Speaker 2: coercing European countries to pass sanctions on themselves, to cut 1088 01:02:31,480 --> 01:02:34,800 Speaker 2: off their own leg despite themselves in order to pass 1089 01:02:34,920 --> 01:02:38,200 Speaker 2: sanctions on Russia. They ran back that same playbook with 1090 01:02:38,320 --> 01:02:41,200 Speaker 2: doing a road show for censorship instead for sanctions. 1091 01:02:41,440 --> 01:02:44,280 Speaker 3: We are now witnessing Transatlantic flank. 1092 01:02:44,040 --> 01:02:46,600 Speaker 2: Attack two point zero, if you will, which is because 1093 01:02:46,640 --> 01:02:50,280 Speaker 2: they have lost a lot of their federal government powers 1094 01:02:50,320 --> 01:02:52,920 Speaker 2: to do this same censorship operation they've been doing from 1095 01:02:52,960 --> 01:02:55,240 Speaker 2: twenty eighteen to twenty twenty two, in part because the 1096 01:02:55,320 --> 01:02:58,200 Speaker 2: House has totally turned on them, in part because of 1097 01:02:58,280 --> 01:03:01,160 Speaker 2: the media, in part because Missouri Iden, which won a 1098 01:03:01,200 --> 01:03:04,880 Speaker 2: slam Dunk case. Actually banning government censorship at the trial 1099 01:03:04,880 --> 01:03:08,200 Speaker 2: court and apellate court levels is now between this before 1100 01:03:08,240 --> 01:03:12,160 Speaker 2: the Supreme Court. They've now moved into two strategies. One 1101 01:03:12,200 --> 01:03:17,160 Speaker 2: of them is state level censorship laws. California just passed 1102 01:03:17,160 --> 01:03:20,040 Speaker 2: a new law which the censorship industry totally drove from 1103 01:03:20,080 --> 01:03:23,840 Speaker 2: start to finish around required They call it Transform Platform 1104 01:03:23,880 --> 01:03:28,760 Speaker 2: Accountability and Transparency, which is basically forcing you Elon Musk 1105 01:03:29,080 --> 01:03:33,520 Speaker 2: to give over the kind of narrative mapping data that 1106 01:03:33,600 --> 01:03:37,040 Speaker 2: these CIA conduits and Pentagon cutouts were using to create 1107 01:03:37,080 --> 01:03:40,280 Speaker 2: these weapons of mass deletion, these abilities to just censor 1108 01:03:40,280 --> 01:03:42,919 Speaker 2: everything at scale because they had all the internal platform data. 1109 01:03:43,160 --> 01:03:45,600 Speaker 2: Elon Musk took that away. They're using state laws like 1110 01:03:45,640 --> 01:03:47,480 Speaker 2: this new California law to crack that open. But the 1111 01:03:47,760 --> 01:03:51,080 Speaker 2: major threat right now is the threat from Europe with 1112 01:03:52,160 --> 01:03:56,800 Speaker 2: something called the EU Digital Services Act, which was cooked 1113 01:03:56,840 --> 01:04:00,280 Speaker 2: up in tandem with folks like NewsGuard, which is run 1114 01:04:00,280 --> 01:04:02,880 Speaker 2: by which has a board of Michael Hayden, head of 1115 01:04:02,920 --> 01:04:05,800 Speaker 2: the CIA. NSA four star General Rick Stangele is on 1116 01:04:05,840 --> 01:04:09,280 Speaker 2: that board, you know, from the State Department's propaganda office. 1117 01:04:09,320 --> 01:04:12,160 Speaker 2: Tom Ridge is on that board from the Department of 1118 01:04:12,200 --> 01:04:13,400 Speaker 2: Homeland Security. 1119 01:04:12,960 --> 01:04:15,000 Speaker 3: Oh and Anders faux Grassmusen is on that board. 1120 01:04:15,400 --> 01:04:18,360 Speaker 2: He was the General Secretary of NATO under the Obama 1121 01:04:18,400 --> 01:04:21,680 Speaker 2: administration see of NATO, the CIA, the NSA four star 1122 01:04:21,760 --> 01:04:25,320 Speaker 2: general DHS in the State Department, working with the EU 1123 01:04:25,600 --> 01:04:28,520 Speaker 2: to craft the censorship laws that now are the largest 1124 01:04:28,560 --> 01:04:32,480 Speaker 2: existential threat to X other than potentially X advertiser boycotts, 1125 01:04:32,480 --> 01:04:35,880 Speaker 2: because there is now disinformation is now banned as a 1126 01:04:35,880 --> 01:04:38,840 Speaker 2: matter of law in the EU, and the EU is 1127 01:04:38,840 --> 01:04:41,080 Speaker 2: a bigger market for X than the US. There's only 1128 01:04:41,200 --> 01:04:43,160 Speaker 2: three hundred million some people in the US, there's four 1129 01:04:43,200 --> 01:04:46,280 Speaker 2: hundred fifty million in Europe. X is now forced to 1130 01:04:46,320 --> 01:04:49,040 Speaker 2: comply with this brand new law that just got ratified 1131 01:04:49,080 --> 01:04:52,440 Speaker 2: this year where they either need to forfeit six percent 1132 01:04:52,480 --> 01:04:55,200 Speaker 2: of their global annual revenue to the EU to maintain 1133 01:04:55,280 --> 01:04:58,880 Speaker 2: operations there, or put in place essentially the kind of 1134 01:04:59,520 --> 01:05:01,760 Speaker 2: you know, c I a bumper cars if you will, 1135 01:05:02,120 --> 01:05:04,680 Speaker 2: that I've been describing over the course of this in 1136 01:05:04,800 --> 01:05:08,960 Speaker 2: order to have an internal mechanism to censor anything that 1137 01:05:09,080 --> 01:05:12,360 Speaker 2: the EU, which is just a proxy for NATO, deems 1138 01:05:12,360 --> 01:05:14,680 Speaker 2: to be disinformation. And you can bet with sixty five 1139 01:05:14,680 --> 01:05:17,840 Speaker 2: elections around the around the Globe this year. You can 1140 01:05:17,920 --> 01:05:19,680 Speaker 2: you can predict every single time what they're going to 1141 01:05:19,720 --> 01:05:20,919 Speaker 2: define disinformation as. 1142 01:05:21,000 --> 01:05:22,520 Speaker 3: So that's the main The main fight. 1143 01:05:22,400 --> 01:05:25,680 Speaker 2: Right now is dealing with the transatlantic flank attack from Europe. 1144 01:05:26,840 --> 01:05:28,800 Speaker 1: I've said this five times, but that's just one of 1145 01:05:28,840 --> 01:05:31,200 Speaker 1: the most remarkable stories I've ever heard, and I'm grateful 1146 01:05:31,400 --> 01:05:33,920 Speaker 1: to you for bringing it to us. Mike Ben's executive 1147 01:05:33,920 --> 01:05:37,080 Speaker 1: director of the Foundation for Freedom Online and hope we 1148 01:05:37,120 --> 01:05:37,680 Speaker 1: see you again. 1149 01:05:38,200 --> 01:05:38,760 Speaker 3: Thanks Tucker,