WEBVTT - Coronavirus Impact on Wall St. Workers & Dealmaking

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>news from the world's of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Bloomberg Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our hundred journalists and analysts more than

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You can

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show weekdays at two pm

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Eastern only on Bloomberg Radio. Six new cases of the

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>virus reported in l A. Ten Americans now have died.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>According to Vice President Mike Penn's total coronavirus cases while

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>globally topping more than I think ninety three thousands. So

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>our finance team, as we do so well here at Bloomberg,

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at the virus it's impact on the financial sector,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>specifically M and A and on Wall Street traders. Here

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>with that the Nan new and she is finance reporter

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News, along with Nabila Ahmed Emin a reporter

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News. So both of them in our Bloomberg

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker Studio. So let's start with M and A

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like, you know, Nabila, M and A

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is always import and right to kind of get an

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>understanding of, you know, stuff happening in the financial sector,

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like when it stops, it's not a

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>good thing. What are you seeing? What are you hearing? Well, Already,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>by the end of February, M and A was down

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven percent this year, and that has more to

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do that there are other issues that play here other

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>than the coronavirus. But the timing was already bad, and

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that people are pausing, hitting the paws button

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on deals. We've got an advisor who has been who

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is a confirmed Corona virus victim, so that deals on pause.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>We've got people putting the pause button on poles even

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>as their deal meetings on the plane. Billion dollar plaus

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so cultimillion, multibillion dollar deals. Yeah, and so is there

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>any sense of timing? I mean, did they just say

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll pick this up in the next quarter. We're going

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to try and do what we can buy phone. I mean,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about with Lenan yesterday about this notion

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of even with recruiting filmaking is a face to face game.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, you really are looking the other person in

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the eye in many cases to try and figure out

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>do I want to enter into this transaction? Right? So

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>how does this play out? Well? Exactly. One of the

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>ones we know that was that was postponed was that

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to go and do a site visit into China,

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and of course, you know with the travel restrictions, that's

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not possible at the moment. And I think that we

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>won't really know how it's going to play out until

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we know what's going to happen with the travel restrictions.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about putting in stricter restrictions, all right.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So M and A folks stuck at their desk, so

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to our traders, and we often hear that because traders

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>are busy, but it's taken on a whole new meeting.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Lean in that's right, stuck at the desk used to

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>me and that you're having a good busy day on

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the desk. But these days banks are looking at how

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to move traders off the desk in the event of

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>an illness, and it's really tricky to do that because

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street traders are dealing with super fast internet. I

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know how faster internet is at home, but it's

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly never fast enough when I'm trying to exactly. So

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's not fast enough for homeland, it's not fast

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>enough for high speed trading. On top of which, they

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of data all of these internal systems,

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and also they have to be recorded and monitored by clients. Right. Well,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there's that whole security element. And and there's also even

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with all the machines, there's a human element. Uh, that's

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>there as well. We we talked about that yesterday. So

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>are people sort of creating workarounds? What are they doing?

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's all happening in progress as we speak. Different

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>banks are trying to figure out, Okay, first of all,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>who are the critical employees. How do we split them

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>up into different shifts to make sure that not everyone

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gets sick all at once? Dust off the disaster recovery sides,

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>go to their places in New Jersey or wherever, and

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>dust off those machines, make sure they work. Um. And

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>but I used to say that that doesn't even become problematic, right,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on how severe the virus become. That's true. So

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of scenario planning. Right now, we

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>still don't know how it's going to play out, and

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot of thinking about different types of scenarios,

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>whether disaster sites are even affected as well. Maybe a

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>lot you know, come back in on M and A.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's say we see you're already seeing a slowdown.

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do wonder again, Jason, I talked about

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this a lot that once we have a better idea

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of how big the virus out break is going to

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be um here in the US, so really globally, until

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we start to see less cases and we get our

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hands around it, um you know, until we get to

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that point, it's hard to predict, like do all those

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>M and A deals that are maybe putting on the

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>shelf right now or on the side, do they come

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>back in the next half of the year. It's hard

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to know because it depends with the market and the

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>economic environments are There's a lot of variables out there exactly.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And also the election campaign is a big headway they see,

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and nobody wants to go into that campaign the deal

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>outstanding in front of the regulators. But I will say

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but that for some deals it's actually proving to be

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>good news. For example, Thermo Fisher bought kayajin yesterday ten

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>billion plus deal and the only reason to see you

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>told us that they were able to come to an

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>agreement was the market volatility. Uh sort of jolted the

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>share price, and he said they've allowed them to come

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to a midpoint and do that deal because they'd been

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in talks for months. I did wonder about with some

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of some of the share prices being beaten up, where

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody might say, especially if it's a stock deal, you know,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy something, it could be cheaper at that point.

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're buying with your own and

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>if he's been wanting to sell your company but you've

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.679
<v Speaker 1>been holding out for that last dollar or two dollars,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>you're probably looking at the market and saying, you know what,

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll just let it go, right, I want to get

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.559
<v Speaker 1>this done. All right? What happens next on Wall Street? Linda?

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what do you hear from people in terms

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of either is it a wait and see sort of

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>thing or people sort of moving ahead as if not

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to be too crazy about it, but like armageddon is

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>upon it? Like what do you want to know? I

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's a precautionary mode right now. So they are

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>dusting off the playbooks trying to figure out where to

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>put people if the virus should spread, um, looking at

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened in Asia. But at the same time, Asia

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is a different case because they can always kick things

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>around to London and New York. What happens if this

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes a bigger global phenomenon, where do people go? So

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of planning still being done right now,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's still very much up in the air. They're

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>also talking to regulators about this. Could we see a part,

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, a scenario where there is no trading or

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>trading volumes are reduced dramatically. I think that's possible, um,

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>But I wouldn't raise that alarm just yet. I think

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>people are still trying to plan business as usual as

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>possible cases right now. So what can we do to

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure that continuity, continuity continues And so far people

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are very focused on resilience and continuity rather than that

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>armageddon scenario. And meanwhile, we're gonna talk about this later

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on in the show with Heather Prolberg. Steve Schwartzman giving

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>an interview over in India, was like, we're in we're

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>buying here, you know, evaluations down and Carol sent sent

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>me the story this morning and it just said crisis

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>playbook totally right. Funding opportunity, especially with beaten you know,

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>beating up assets. Absolutely, and you know, even if you

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>look at Clorox, for example, that stock is up. Yeah,

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a great story, exactly. Don't touch my Clorox wixact

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they're all gone. I used them all. And Collegi's offering

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars to that half bottle of hands. We're going

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to start a bidding war here, all right, Novilla, I'm

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. M and a reporter on the

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>D team here at Bloomberg and Leninuin finance reporter for Bloomberg,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>keeping an eye on Wall Street and its reaction really

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of doing its business amid all of this

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>virus worry. And my god, I loved George Harrison's I

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just love it. Um Hey, check this out, everybody, because

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>life insurance companies are pursuing wealthy private colleges and yeah,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this is what they're doing to loan them money. So

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>what is this all about. Let's get into the details

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with Janet Lawrence. She's Endowment's reporter here at Bloomberg News

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>made her way into our interactive brokers studio. What's going

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on here, Janet? So if you think about who's borrowing money,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>colleges are very likely to do so. They've got to

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>renovate dorms, they've got to build dorms, they've got to

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>make improvements to classrooms. So why not when the money

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and they've typically go out to the public markets, you know,

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>tax exempt or taxabow bonds, but life insurance companies, you know,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to put their money to work. And you know,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>who wouldn't want to loan money to a school like

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Princeton And so literally, as you lay out in your story,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they just started calling, like literally tell us about that. Yes, Um,

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of schools said they decided to take this

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>call and it turned out to be a pretty good

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>deal for them. Um, the University of Richmond said, yet

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it was the result of a cold call and they

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>liked doing this deal because it was quicker. Um. You know,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the question is am I going to lose out on

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate that I want? And you know with

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>public deals it typically takes longer. So the question is,

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, could they have gotten a better deal? In

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the public markets if they waited. But they like the

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>ease of it. There's also a lot less disclosures, potentially

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>less fees. So you know, they seem to like it.

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So what are the what's the downside to all of this? Well,

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it could be a higher interest rate if you you know,

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't wait. Um, but they you know, they

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>seem to like it. And are these WhoSay the colleges

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and as life insurance companies, they've got to put their

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>money to work somewhere. And are these big insurance companies

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about. Are these sort of mid tier

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>life john hand And so why haven't they done this before? Um,

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's interesting. They decided that this could be

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a good new market for them and they started pursuing it.

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Priston did its first deal in two thousand and twelve. Now,

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, they're not going to go to every

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>college because you know, the schools that we mentioned in

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>this in the story are some of the richest colleges

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>out there. Right, Well, it's risk, right, you want you

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to take on too much risk your insurance

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>company especially absolutely, and they're looking to match their liabilities. Now,

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>we didn't really find these in in public schools. And

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably the reason is they have a different

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of competitive, competitive bidding structure, and you know, the

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>private schools could just do these deals. Is this not

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jason, I think about how much time we

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>spend at least salmoys to show you know, about private markets, right,

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and I do money undercover, money money undercover, But I

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>do think about it. Is this just another example of

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>being able to rather than kind of in some way

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>tap the public markets go into the private markets. Absolutely

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>financing need or financial need. Absolutely, And you know, the

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>public market deals are all very public and they're all

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and the schools have to put out a lot

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>more information. But is that good transparency? Well, um, that's

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a very good question. You know, the colleges don't have

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to disclose things um as, but they do have their

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>public debt, so it is out there what their enrollment

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers are. But if you're saying a struggling small college,

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, chances are these life insurance companies wouldn't want

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to lend you anyway. But there is less transparency. What

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>does the student deduce the returns for the for the

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies? Right? Because they're thinking about I mean, they

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>need a certain amount of return, right absolutely, And again

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>these are not you know, risky colleges that are going

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to go under, the little tiny colleges in the Northeast

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know are struggling for students. And so how

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>does this fit in last question, how does this fit

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>into sort of the broader themes that you're seeing in

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of how colleges uh rich and poor sort of

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>pay for what they need. Well, again, you're seeing a

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>dichotomy between the very rich and the very poor because

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>they can they can take advantage of these kinds of deals. Um,

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you're again you're smaller, you're less wealthy, potentially

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a bigger risk you're not going to be given these

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>types of opportunities. All right, Janet Lauren, thank you so

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>much and down supporter for Bloomberg are expert on all

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>things higher education and a really interesting story Princeton Vanderbilt

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wooed by life insurance companies literally calling up me like, hey, bro,

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to borrow some money. It's a twist in

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>turns though also I feel like of financial companies, insurance

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>companies totally, like I do wonder about exposure and transparency.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know like the risks, but as Janet mentioned,

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you know they're going after certainly well known, well financed

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and deep endowment UH colleges and universities. So fascinating

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to see. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and Jason Kelly on Bloomberg Radio. Well, a couple of

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>stories in the magazine this week that you've really got

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to know about, both timely and in the news. Once

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>about an abortion rights case coming before the Supreme Court.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk with Bloomberg US healthcare reporters Cynthia Coons

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>about that. She's on the phone in New York. The

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>other story, also in the headlines, is of course about

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic race for president Super Tuesday, and Josh Green

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>does national correspondent at Bloomberg Business Week. He's joining us

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Washington to see both stories. As

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I said in the magazine, hitting newsstands later this week

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in at Bloomberg Dot comment on the terminal, Cynthia, we

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>do want to start with you tell us about this case.

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Thanks thanks for having me so. The Supreme Court today

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>hold an abortions piece that involves the law that's around

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>requiring hospital admitting from which is for abortion providers. It's

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>an identical law, nearly identical law to one that day

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for about four years ago out of Texas. This time

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's out of Louisiana. But the reason this case is

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>really critical is that the court has agreed to hear

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in Louisiana's argument that doctors shouldn't be able to bring

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>challenges to these laws in the first place. Um. If

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana successful with that argument, not only would this law

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Abyan say did, but it would flow the play offs

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>all the other litigation going on around the country to

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>challenge laws that are specifically targeted out abortion providers. UM, Cynthia.

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that you know you've been working

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on is actually kind of a series of articles are

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on this. The first was sort of one that we

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>did also recently about abortion tax and sort of the

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the business implications that that abortion providers are facing and

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's actually even driving them, um a lot of them

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to close. And so this is obviously it looks like

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>almost like a two pronged attack on on abortion rights.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And so what what is the likelihood that this Louisiana

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>case becomes I mean, it almost supersedes the abortion tax,

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>because if the Supreme Court wigs into this, what could happen. Well,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's an excell one point. These go hand in hand.

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So the first attack is the legislative one. The statehouses

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>around the country have been passing laws that make it

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>harder for abortion providers to operate. It started since about

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and ten when Republicans took over more and

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>more state houses throughout the country. But that's also led

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to what's known as the abortion tax, and that's where

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>businesses or vendors that might work with abortion providers become

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to do so, or cancel contracts or back out

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or won't shore them, specifically over concerns that they're riskier

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>than they may actually be in real life. So running

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>an abortion clinic is particularly hard right now from both

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a business and legal perspective. But the one avenue that

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>abortion providers have had has have been the courts, and

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they've been able to challenge these laws that go after

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>their businesses. Specifically, these are laws that say an abortion

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>doctor may need hospital many privileges, but wouldn't necessarily assign

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a comparable regulation to another provider that provides some sort

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of comparable care outpatient care. So these laws are called

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>by the abortion movement, they're called abortion rights movement. They're

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>called trap laws because they're perceived to target these providers

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>specifically and back them into a corner. And so the

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>challenge here is if abortion doctors are not a out

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the ones to represent their patients in these cases,

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>then there really isn't any mechanism for these laws to

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be knocked down. It would come down to whether or

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not you could find a woman seeking an abortion willing

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to carry out a case. And that's a really challenging prospect.

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So hearings today, when do we have resolution? Likely by June.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna leave it there. Cynthia Coons, thank you so much.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>US healthcare reporter from Bloomberg joining us on the phone

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>from New York City. Let's heading down to our ninety

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and nine went studio in d C. Josh Green Is

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they're recovering from Super Tuesday. All right, we've had a

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>lot happen over the last I blacked out, Josh, what happens?

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Let the heck happen? Where are we now? Where do

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we go from here? John? I woke up this morning

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and had to pause from me and think if I

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>dreamed all that right, it actually just happened. Um, but

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but it actually did happen. The race has been completely upended.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We've gone from a world where Bernie Sanders was the

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>front runner, looked like he would amass a majority, uh,

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>if not a plurality of delegates going into the Milwaukee

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>convention in July, to all of a sudden, Joe Biden

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>comes storming back, wins ten states, has the delegate lead,

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and is now the clear favorite to emerge as the

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Democratic nominee to challenge Trump in the fall. Who would

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>have thought that a couple of weeks ago. All right,

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I think now it's okay, who potentially will

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be the first the individual who goes up against President Trump?

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you see it between Bernie? I mean, the

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>race isn't over yet in terms of the race and

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>over and there's a long way to go. In the

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>piece I did in Business Week this week points out

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that there is an eerie parallel that a lot of

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are worried about with where you have an establishment

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite who has a delegate lead, uh, and yet isn't

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>going to wrap this thing up for months and months

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and months, and is running against an insurgent in Bernie Sanders,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>whose supporters have already been jilted once. We're very unhappy

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. In now they face the same thing this

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>time around. And Joe Biden's job, should he emerge as

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the nominee, is going to be to try and un

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>by a party that is going to have to stick

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>together if they're gonna have any chance of defeating Trump

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the fall. Well, the other thing that you point

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>out so well in the article, Josh, is this existential

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>moment for the for the Democrats where one candidate sort

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>of looks like the future and one maybe speaks to

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>its past. Yeah. I mean the remarkable thing about the

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>way that the race has narrowed since last night, this

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>this is functionally a two man affair right now between

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, uh in Bernie Sanders. And if you look

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>at Biden's coalition who supported him last night, it was

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.239
<v Speaker 1>essentially a throwback to the Obama coalition where Biden one

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>senior voters, he won African Americans, and he won white

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>collar professionals in the suburbs who supported Obama and helped

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>drive Democrats mid term games two years ago whereas Sanders,

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that he's seventy eight years old, really

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>represents the young, rising generation of Democrats, not just young people,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but working class Latino. We saw that coalition in Nevada,

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a good proxy for what the future of

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>America's going to look like. The problem for Biden is

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>that the one part of the Obama coalition he hasn't

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>managed to draw is young people. They are still loyal

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to Bernie. So what we're gonna have to look for

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>over the next two three months is can he find

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a way to bring them into his coalition, unify the party,

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and have a fighting chance against And he was dismissive.

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>If I remember one of an interviews where somebody asked

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>him about the young population. He said something to the

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>effect that, well, they don't vote anyway, so yeah, yeah,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Well you know that's always the politicians move. Why doesn't

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>so and so support you? Oh, that's not important. But

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>inside inside Biden's campaign, I promise you they are acutely

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>aware of the fact that they have a real challenge

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in attracting younger voters and exciting younger voters. Hillary Clinton

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>was unable to do so in lost the race, so

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Biden is well aware that he's going to have to

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>do better. All right, So Michigan, Uh, that is front

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and center. It feels like next Tuesday. What else are

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you watching their Josh Well, I think Michigan is your point.

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna be fascinating because four years ago Bernie

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Sanders unexpectedly one Chigan. Now uh you have it looks

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>like Biden has pulled ahead and polls. I think that's

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good proxy for whether or not Biden

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>has a chance to walk away with this race if

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>he wins, or can Bernie MoU to comeback, you know

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>as delegate as vote totals rolling from California, which can

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>take weeks, Bernie's delegate totally is going to climb should

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he repeat his win in Michigan. I think then we

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>go through a whole news cycle of is Bernie coming back? Clearly,

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Bernie is sacrificing nothing. He just came out and gave

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>a very peevish press conference in which he attacked the

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>establishment in the press and everybody else. So there is

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>no sign whatsoever of the party coming together. I think

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Michigan will be the first real indicator of which way

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>things are headed. In the post Super Tuesday World. Alright, well,

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>great reporting, as I always Josh, thank you so much. Well,

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they appreciate and check out Josh's story along with Cynthia

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Coon's story. They'll be in the magazine later on this week,

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of course. Josh Green, who follows politics for us here

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Business and our thanks to Joel Weber as well,

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>writing along with us across those two stories. It's really uh,

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:09.959
<v Speaker 1>we get a snink peak. It's a great issue. So

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>as the race for the Democratic presidential nomination narrows, industries

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and companies and those of us who report on them

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about where the candidates stand on issues, and

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a big one is where they stand when it comes

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to technology. Writing about that Today's Joshua breustein Tech Writer

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>here Eppelenberg Business Week in our Interactive Broker Studio. So

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at Bernie Sanders, looking at Joe Biden, and where

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they stand when it comes to technology, So break it

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>down for us. So, I think the easiest way to

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>look at it is that Bernie Sanders is someone who

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>inspires very strong emotions. He's taken basically the anti tech

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>industry stands on any number of um issues he has

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>said he would absolutely look into breaking the big tech

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>companies up UM. He wants to ban facial recognition law enforcement.

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>UM wants much stronger lay laws UM in ways that

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>would impact the tech industry. And Joe Biden has sort

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of criticized the tech companies but hasn't been very hard

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on them one way or the other. And honestly, I

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think people were thinking about him all that much

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>until frankly last night. Yeah, until now when they really

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.719
<v Speaker 1>are UM. And part of that is he's got some

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>ties there and has raised some money from the tech world,

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>right sure, he's He's done some fundraisers from the large

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>tech companies. He hasn't raised a whole lot of money

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to some of the other candidates, and he

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly hasn't done as well in raising from tech employees.

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 1>But he has been a more conventional Democratic candidate. He

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>goes to the big bit, he goes to big businesses

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and has asked for some money. I know he did

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon UM fundraiser late last year, for instance. Well,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and I do wanted to you know, UM, because we

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>are at a juncture where I do feel like there's

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>some really big issues when it comes to technology, whether

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's privacy issue is whether or not there needs to

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>be more regulatory oversight over social media companies. But I mean,

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>how much I guess Joshua is can the president do versus?

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Does it need a Congress on its side to pass

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>rules and you know, a regulatory framework. I think that

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that is a very good point. There's there's been a desire,

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a state of desire to have some new privacy rules

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>for the better part of two years now. But the

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>fact is Congress isn't passing much of anything, and there

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>are very different ideas about how those rules would be

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>approached from the Democrats and the Republicans, and a new

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>president isn't going to come into a very different situation.

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Um So, I think it's interesting to look at kind

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 1>of the rhetorical positioning of the president's presidential candidates that

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>can have a big difference. But yeah, as you said,

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they're not necessarily going to come and get to do

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want. And fair to say, what's would I

0:22:52.720 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>do here? The relationship greatness coming President Trump the tech industry,

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It's complicated. It is complicated. Um. Trump has been quite

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>critical of the tech companies. Uh, he is loudly proclaiming

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that companies like Facebook and Google have an anti conservative bias.

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, he has um used them very

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>effectively as a megaphone. UM. His he's proven to be

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a very effective communicator, um based on using the specific

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of tech communications that happened there. Um. He's also

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, his d J is going after anti trust issues.

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So you see, um, you're seeing it from all sides

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with him, right. Well, and it's interesting. You know, there's

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>been a lot written and talked about recently about Brad Parscale,

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the campaign manager for the president's re election campaign. And

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a guy who came up through

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the digital world and so effectively used social media Facebook

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically to get the president elected. Right Absolutely, the defining

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>characteristic of the Trump campaign was a much more aggressive

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>digital strategy, or I should say one of the defining

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>characters I think, I think you could say define it.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, especially if you sort of synthesize the the

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>now president on Twitter, you think about the Facebook strategy,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you think about all the different elements and also some

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of the relationships that the president has managed to cultivate,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be it Peter til Um. You know, we and others

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>have reported that he met with Mark Zuckerberg at the

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>White House not too long ago, I believe when Zuckerberg

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>was in d C to testify on Kevin, you know,

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and again it is a it's a tortured relationship. Maybe

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the other way to I don't think that's an

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 1>option on Yeah, no, right, um Joshua. I I am

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>also curious, you know, is big tech getting smarter in

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of reading the writing on the wall and just saying, Okay,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>let's figure out how to police ourselves so that we

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>can kind of take it away from UM d C.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what they would like to do. UM.

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, they have seen a lot of public pushback,

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they haven't faced any real tangible consequences. Yeah, we'll see

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens with these antitrust investigations. I think that those

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>are a significant threat. But in terms of Congress coming

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>up with some way to put rules on them, you know,

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I privately a lot of people within the tech industry

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>say that they're not quite as concerned about that as

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it seems like they would be. One last question,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>us versus Europe. Yeah, I think Europe is a completely

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>different situation. The you really see a much more aggressive

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>stance from policymakers over there. All right, Joshua Brustine, thank

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Always good to catch up. Tootling right, Well,

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he's going to back. If you don't know what we mean,

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to go back to our Twitter and you're

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just gonna have to listen to what we did last week. Yeah, exactly,

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just listen to the you and if you don't know

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that joke, you need to lock in. Yeah, that's just

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>sad for you. Yeah, totally. Joshua Brustine, one of the

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>most read writers here. This is a great story because

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>now there are two and for all intents and purposes,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as Elizabeth and how they feel about a different a

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>matter for whether their's healthcare, whether it's big tech. I mean,

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>these are things that Americans should want to know about,

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>right and so entrenched in our daily lives as we know.

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm broc journal now. But you let me drive. No, no, no, no,

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going to drive home. Please, I'll do the right drivel.

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive, Just drive, baby, question trying. This

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is the drive to the globe. Give me thanks, We'll

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>drying us down on Bloomberg Radio. It is time for

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the clothes on this Wednesdays. You just

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>heard from Charlie Equities. We definitely have a rally underway.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We're just topping off and coming a little bit lower,

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but we're still pretty much near our highs of the session.

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>All Lance is back with us research director at lants

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Global dot Com President Alan beat Lance and associates, and

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he's joining us on the phone once again from Toledo, Ohio. Allen,

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>nice to be here with you again. Uh. Interesting week, Jason,

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I have been kidding. I feel like since Monday, we

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>keep thinking, all right, wait, tomorrow's Friday. Right now, it's

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>still just Wednesday. So tell me a little bit about

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the market activity that you've seen. We've had folks say,

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it was overdone. It's a buying opportunity.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Folks are overdoing it. Other folks who said, you know what,

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to be a little bit more cautious here.

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you see it? Well, as you know, Carol,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we we were raising cash as far as uh into

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the new highs just two weeks ago. And the way

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I see it is is that you're gonna have this

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>volatility for for a while, you know, I would be

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>buying and accumulating with limit orders below the market on

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>those um you know, multiple successive down you know, thousand

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>point days and and um you know, if you're overexposed

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>inequities or especially in check or from the high liers,

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I would be using the strength that we've had, you

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>know as far as today and and Monday to to

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to lighten up. I think you're gonna have this volatility

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in both directions. Uh uh. It's a battle of the

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty of the coronavirus, you know versus uh incredible amount

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of cash on the sidelines and interest rates so low

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.959
<v Speaker 1>that uh. I think if you're a long term investor,

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>which we are buying high quality, income producing um equities

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>here into weakness and panic selling makes a lot of sense.

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And so what are specific names that seemed to be

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>standing out to you amid all of this salon. Well,

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a wide variety of cvs uh as far as

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the healthcare area, under under sixty dollars, the yield

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is three point three uh So, so you know you

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>can have that opportunity uh uh from acid managers. You

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>can buy an invest go under fourteen dollars. It's a

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>nine percent increasing of it in UM again. Uh. You know,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where the bottom is, but I think

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying at those levels and just hold it

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>long term, it's going to be you know, like ten

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago when we were buying Apple and it became

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>an income play UM, and you're gonna have not only

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>followed incomes compared to one percent on the tenure treasury,

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 1>but you're also going to have some appreciation. Uh, as

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>long as you're looking at it from you know, to

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to to three year time frame. Allen. One thing I

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>do want to ask you. I mean, healthcare is our

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>best performing group here in the SNP five hundred among

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the major industry group, it's up about five point seven.

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And that is on the big Biden win. Uh. In

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Super Tuesday. Of course, Bernie Sanders seen as you know,

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>offering you know, medicare you know for all, health care

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for all. But there is the question and doing a

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>way with private insurance. So you know, the health care

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>sector has been weighed down as Bernie Sanders has you know,

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>moved up in the polls. That seemed to change as

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a result of last night's voting. So I do wonder

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is healthcare play do you see opportunities in that right

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>now or is it too suit it now? We like it,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we like buying high quality, you know,

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>income producing healthcare. We also like uh, you know, I

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>think the next step is financials. Uh that they've just

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>been hammered from a standpoint of lower interest rates squeezing

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>their margins and and I think there's some opportunity there

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and and that's been overdone. So so whenever you have

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>these extremes, Carol, I think it's it's a situation where

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to be on the other side. Pick up

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>quality names that you know you wouldn't get at these

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>prices otherwise, and uh, and be patient with them. What

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>are you avoiding right now? Allen? You know I would

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>not chase the high flyers. I mean, you know, we

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked about that last time. You know, Apple. I

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>love the company and we've owned it for for decades,

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, over three hundred you know, I

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be buying it. And and if you own too much,

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I would sell it as as it as it moves up. Again,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>not the whole position, but there's just so many people

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>buying the same uh stocks with with the passive investing

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and and and that was part of this dramatic sell

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>off we had last week, was just everybody's you know,

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>getting out of the door at the same time. And

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I don't I don't think that's over. I

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna see volatility in both directions. So so

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't be chasing these companies that uh,

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you know everybody loves. Uh and and again we might miss,

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the latter half of the move,

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but I think the easy money has been made on

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple and and uh, you know, it's it's it's gonna

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be an average performer almost like what errture halfway. I mean,

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he had such great performance and the last ten years

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's really you know, underperformed. And I think you're going

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to see that in some of these companies that are

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>just uh, you know, almost iconic from evaluation standpoint. Is

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this a market to load up on shorts with the

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>expectations that we're going to head down again? Yeah, you know,

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd be very careful with the shorts because you're going

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to see this volatility, you know, uh, continue at least

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for for a few months, four months, until we get

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>some some bass building. But you know, we we really

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't taken advantage of the shorts like we should. Our

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>first step was to build cash, and we did that

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and now we're redeploying that those those profits. But you know,

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I would be careful on the short side just because

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of this incredible amount of cash on the sidelines. Uh.

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if markets go back to the new

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>highs and and and they're not taking an account as

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>far as the economic slowdown with with this coronavirus, then

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, I would look at re establishing some short positions,

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but but not yet. All Right, Allen Lands, always good

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to catch up with you, Director of research at LANTS

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Global dot com, President of Allan by Lands and Associates,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Toledo, Ohio. Thanks for

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. You can subscribe to the

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You can

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show every weekday at two

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern only on Bloomberg Radio.