WEBVTT - The Fight Over A Trans Gender 7 Year-Old

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Trump fires back at impeachment,

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a nasty fight over a gender transition case for a

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>seven year old plus Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wins reelection,

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and more rich people in China than America that are

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>more coming up. This is the buck Sexton Show, where

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the mission or mission is to decode what really matters

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American great, You're a

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>great American Again the buck Sexton Show begins. Remember, no,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they're lousy politicians, but two things they have.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>They're vicious and they stick together. They don't have Mitt

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Romney in their midst. They don't have people like that.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>They stick together. You never see them break off. He

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>knew all about the whistle blow. Why didn't he say

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>he's a crooked politician? Very bad for our country. This

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is very bad for our country. In the

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>midst of that, I'm trying to get out of wars.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>We may have to get into wars too, Okay, we

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have to get into worse. We're better prepared than

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we've ever been. If a RAMDA something, they'll be hit

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>like they've never been hit before. I mean, we have

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>things that we're looking at it. But can you imagine

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I have to fight off these low lives at the

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>same time I'm negotiating these very important things that should

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have been done during Obama and Bush and even before that.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So that's where we are right now. Welcome

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to the buck Sexton the show. President Trump in our

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>press conference yesterday, that was classic Trump, pulling no punches,

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>holding back at all. It sounded a little bit there

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>like he went from talking about Romney being a fifth

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>column in the Republican Party essentially to knowing about the

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>whistle blower. The whistle blower thing was Adam shift, just

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to be clear. So he's saying on the one side

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of it, that was a little bit unclear from the

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>way we set up that intro there. But from the

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>one side, you have Romney, who's supposed to be on

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump's team to do important things for the Republican Party

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and for the United States. That's what you would expect

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>from a Republican senator when you have a Republican president.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's no question that many of the things that

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump has done are right in line with traditional GOP platform,

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>traditional GOP goals, and yet mit Romney spends most of

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>his time, it seems, just taking cheap shots at the

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>president talking about the president's character. And what's amazing is,

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>does Mitt really think that he's the only one that

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>knows that President Trump has personal and character laws. I

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>always think there's a degree of not just haughtiness, there's

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>an arrogance really to some of the never Trump cabal

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in thinking that we don't recognize that people that support

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the president's agenda are not aware that he has had

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a an imperfect past. And then I don't want to

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>cast too many aspersions because I think a lot of

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>people have imperfect pasts. I mean, we found out that

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Mit Romney thinks that he should run around on Twitter

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 1>as Pierre de Lecto. Oh and don't worry, we will

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>get to monsieur Trudeau winning re election to today or

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>last night. We'll get to that what a what a

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>slap in the face to sanity that was? That's right

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>justin Trudeau part dieu. But Trump is tired of having

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to fight battles of Democrats never do on their own side. Yeah,

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>sure there are disputes and there's pushback internally, but Democrats

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>always keep they always keep their squabbles in the family

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in House. No prominent Democrat ever went against Barack Obama.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Certainly no Democrats were trying to destroy the Obama presidency.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>That would have been unthinkable. And Trump has to do that.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And then he also has to do with shifty shift

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and this whole impeachment farce. You know, there's this new

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>CNN poll among Republicans, six percent say they support impeaching

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and removing the Republican president also known as never trumpers.

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So almost you know, let's say ninety four percent give

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>or take a couple of points of the Republican Party

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is like, this is crazy, but there are still there's

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>still that contingent. I can guarantee you that if you

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>looked back at the Obama administration, there was never a

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>point at which five percent of Democrats wanted to remove

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>from office. Now, I know the Democrats say, oh, because

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Obama never done anything bad, Really, you need to go

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>over all of that. Now, I would say that President

0:04:55.600 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Obama really did exceed his authority and broke dow Down.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Separation of power is laid out by the Constitution, but

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that those are political questions my opposition, and I'm sure

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for those of you watching or listening. Your political opposition

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to Obamba was rooted in policy. It was not an

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>effort to take this system and contort it and weaponize

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>it to get something political that I could not get

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>through the electoral process, which is all the Democrats are

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>doing here. This is the kitchen sink approach. Let's impeach

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>him after the special counsel. The special counsel wasn't enough

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of its findings to impeach him, and now

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to deal with this. So I understand the

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>president's frustration. I understand why he's looking around saying, you

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>have more people in the country right now who are

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>employed than at any time I believe in the history

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of this country. Now, Oh yeah, here we go. Can

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we play please clip twenty four. Here's the President saying

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it after American, Hispanic, Asian, American have all set records

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the lowest unemployment in the history of our country, not

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>just like for fifty years. We have fifty one years

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>for the country, and we're going to end up topping

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that number pretty soon. That'll be historic too, very soon

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>if we keep going the way we're doing, I think

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we will because the household income is so incredible. The

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>median household income. But if you look African American, Asian American,

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic American, in the history of our country, they have

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the best unemployment numbers, and they have the best employment numbers.

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Today it was announced that we have the most people

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>working in the history of our country, almost one hundred

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>and sixty million. Bab. How do you beat me in

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>a debate on those numbers. The answer is this whole

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>impeachment circus. The answer is create a perception among the

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>electorate that what's really happening in the country, what the

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>government is doing, and just as importantly, in fact, in

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>many ways more import what the government is not doing.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Should not be the discose, should not be the deciding

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>factors in voting decisions. It's what the media, the establishment,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the left wing Democrat progressive apparatus, tells you about this president.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And no level of exaggeration is too much, No hysterical

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>shrieks from Congress, all the way across the newsrooms of

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the major outlets across the country and different cable channels

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in Hollywood, that they can say the craziest stuff imaginable.

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>The President's a trader of the presidents and Nazie. The

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>president's a white nationalist, all of these things without evidence,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>as I'll like to borrow their phrase, without evidence, and

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to think that they have better judgment and

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>would do a better job running the country. Well, there's

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>even some concern among Democrats that's emerging right now that

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a front runner worthy of the name.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Who's been saying that all along. Yeah, Joe Biden's not

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>inspiring the masses. What a shock. But we'll get into

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of new entrants, including of course, how wow,

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>she's never going away. I keep telling you she's never

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>ever going away. She will haunt your dreams, America. She's

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>never leaving. But Trump, also, in his fighting back no

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>surprise here, has given the Democrats something else to work with.

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So he tweeted today and this has caused a firestorm

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning. I mean, Trump tweets can direct an entire

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>news cycle. It's pretty astonishing. This is what he wrote.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>So someday, if a Democrat becomes president and the Republicans

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>win the House, even by a tiny margin, they can

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>impeach the president without due process or fairness or any

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>legal rights. All Republicans must remember what they are witnessing

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>here a lynching, but we will win. That was what

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the president tweeted. And of course this is being used

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>as an opportunity to say the president is out of touch,

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is a race is terrible because he used the term lynching. Now,

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this is where I say, I know I know enough

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about how this president operates that he's not looking to

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>obey the dictates of the left on language. We all

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>know that. But I also feel like his point here

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is getting now all chewed up and lost because of

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the choice of this one of this one word, which

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he had to know would set people off.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I also think, however, at least it's it's clear to

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>me that the President of the United States uses certain

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>words sometimes because he is told not to that he

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>enjoys being told sorry, you know you can't do that,

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and then saying, you know what, I'm going to do

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it anyway. I think there's a defiance in him, which

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>often is a useful thing for this president because he

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>won't obey the conventional wisdom. But sometimes you a situation

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>like today where now we're going to have an all

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>day long discourse on whether or not the president or

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>anyone should be able to use the term lynching and

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in this manner, and now some of you are saying, Buck,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>what about justice? Clarence Thomas referring to a high tech

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>lynching during his confirmation battle, another vicious Democrat attempt to

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>undermine and eminently decent and qualified human being for the

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.599
<v Speaker 1>post that he had and the responses you know is

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be well, Clarence Thomas is black. There are

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>many on the left who claimed that Clarence Thomas has

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>turned his back on the black community just because he

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is a conservative. That's also part of democrat the democrat

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>talking points. But now everyone's going to focus in on

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump and the impeachment situation and specifically the usage of

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>this word. Lindsay Graham, however, agrees with Trump calling the

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>impeachment process of engine. He says, quote, this is a

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>lynching in every sense. This is un American. So Lindsay

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Graham is backing him up of this. You know, you

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>never know what you're gonna get with Lindsay Graham. Sometimes

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 1>he decides to man the bulwork alongside Trump. Sometimes he

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>just wants to invade another country. You don't really know

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>which Lindsay Graham is going to show up on any

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>given day. You know, now, we could have this discussion

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>over the fact that lynching, which is primarily affected and

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a horrible part of American history, primarily affected

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>African Americans in the South. But lynching actually was not

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was not exclusively used as an extra judicial murder tool

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>against African Americans in the South. That was also used

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in other cases and other places. But once again, the

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>media finds an opportunity to distract or to push the

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>conversation away from the core point here, which is that

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the country, by the numbers, is doing incredibly well the

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>things that are supposed to matter of the economy. Trump

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>has even managed to calm things down at the southern border.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Despite all of the objections and all the different stuff

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats have done on the hashtag resistance judiciary, he

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is doing a lot that is of benefit to the

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>American people. Household income now adjusted for inflation, I think

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I saw today it's it's fifty seven thousand is now

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>what it isn't just for inflation, compared to what it

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>was into the Clinton administration when it was in the forties.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>So household income is way up. I mean, there's so

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>much to actually celebrate in the Trump presidency. Instead, what

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>do we have impeach him, imprison him, investigate him, investigate

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>his family members. This is toxic to politics. This is

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>toxic to our ability to have discussions as adults across

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the country. And one of the most galling aspects of

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it all is that the very people that are pushing

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this toxicity, the left wing Democrats, claim to be the

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ones defending our sacred institutions. They claim to be the

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>ones that care about fairness and decency in political debates.

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>They are delusional, my friend. But that is what Trump's

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>arrangement syndrome does. It would have been great, but the

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrats went crazy, even though I would have done it free,

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>save the country a lot of money. Then they say, oh,

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but you'll get promotion. Kids. You don't think I get

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>enough promotion. I get more promotion than any human being

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>that's ever lived. I think I get I think I

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have that. I think I can say that fairly safe.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It's another part of this that you don't hear much about.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>We're always being told that the president is trying to

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>enhance his brand and enrich himself. And the president is

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>already a billionaire, and the president is already At this point,

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you could argue the most famous person on Earth.

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe there's some study that shows that it's

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it's maybe it's Barack Obama. Maybe it's

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan or Lebron James, or some sports superstar I

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Christiano Ronaldo. For those of you that watch soccer,

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which is probably very few of you, you know, maybe

0:13:59.920 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>there's someone is more recognizable. But I don't think at

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this stage of the game President Trump, what is He's

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy two years old, he really is that concerned with

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>burnishing the brand even more than he already has. But

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you can't make that argument because I'll just say Trump

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is greedy and he's not as rich as he says

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>he is. And to this, I just point out they've

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>always been unwilling to look at anything Trump does the

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>way a normal person would look at it. This is

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what the emoluments clause argument, which they're bringing up once

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>again in the G seven deal. Do we call it deralgate?

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's nearly important enough for that. But

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the G seven being hosted next year at Durral everyone's saying, well,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this is another emoluments clause. This is just shows you

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they go and they go digging in the law books

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for something, or they go digging in the Constitution, whatever

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever it is. They go digging into statutes to try

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to find something that they can claim the president is

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>doing that is a violation of them. I mean, they'll

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll stretch them desperately. Perfect example, this was the Logan

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Act violation that was used at the pretext to throw

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>General Flynn in prisident to ruin his career and almost,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if not successfully or entirely bankrupt him. But you know,

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump doesn't get credit for a lot of the

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>things that he does do for a guy who's so

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so concerned with money. For example, I mean, he he

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>pointed out and look, I'm not saying this is a

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>big thing, it's a game changer. But he does give

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>away his entire salary producer Mark, can you just let

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the president have his say on this one? Six? But

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I give away my presidential salary. They say that no

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>other president has done it. I'm surprised, to be honest

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with you. They actually say that George Washington may have

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>been the only other president into But see whether or

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>not Obama gave up his salary. See whether or not

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the other of your favorites give up this salary.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>The enters, no, they say it's the only one. They

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>think George Washington did, But they say no, So I

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>give up a lot of money, four hundred and fifty

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. So for a guy that they say can

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>be bought for the price of a diplomat buying a

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>cheeseburger a Trump hotel, isn't it Isn't it worth noting?

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it worth just taking a moment to say that

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't give away a salary. And he also claimed

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do the G seven A Darrell And

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a part of me that feels like we shouldn't

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>even have to talk about this Jarrell nonsense. But it

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just goes to show you that everything that Trump does

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is a problem for these people. And then they blame

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>us for not thinking that that must be the case.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>They blame us, and the left will say you must

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be a trump bot, you must be someone who has

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>become deluded by your worship of this Trump figure. And

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I sit around just saying no, I'm sorry. I can't

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>reach the degree of hysteria. I can't get as upset

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>about everything as liberals get about everything that President Trump does,

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>every decision he makes, every tweet, they find a way

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>anything of any consequence they find a way to make

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>into the worst thing ever. Oh and even Trump speaking

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>up for Tulse Gabbert was injuring play thirteen other trade

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>deals that we've done. We've done South Korea, which is

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic deal for US, turned out even better than

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>we thought. South Korea was a terrible deal. The person

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in charge of that particular deal, Hillary Clinton, if you've

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>heard of her, she's the one that's accusing everybody of

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>being a Russian agent, anybody that as opposed to her

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>as a Russian agent. So that's a scam that was

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty much put down. Telsey. I don't know telse, but

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>she started a Russian agent. I don't know Jill Stein.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I know she likes environment. I don't think she likes Russians.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>If she does like him, I know she's not an asset.

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 1>She called her an asset of Russian These people are

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>sick because something wrong with that. But I think that

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Tulsea Gabbert probably got helped quite a bit by Asta.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we would help because it shows for two

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and a half years we end up winning. I had

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to go through two and a half years. She would

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>have done this earlier, people would have realized what a

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>scam it is. Everybody's a Russian or a Russian agent

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or a Russian asset. I see, they've still found ways

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to make use of some of the never trumpers that

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>are out there. The Democrats are going to do everything

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they can to create the kind of internal feuding and

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>political warfare that we've seen on display with Hillary Clinton

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and Tulsea Gabbert and some others. You still have these

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>never I you know, should we give them any attention

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>or not? That's always the question. Is it worth refuting

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>their nonsense or is it better if we just accept

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that they are irrelevant, that no one cares, and that

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't have to deal with them in any capacity.

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember, I remember when Joe Walsh was a guy.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>First of all, he's a radio host, and I remember

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>when he was really too right wing for CNN, which

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't say all that much, but also too inflammatory for

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>television sometimes in what he would say about Obama. And

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>now he is mister ethics and mister Trump is a

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>bad guy. Listen to me about it. Here's alleged Republican

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>primary opponent for Trump, Joe Wallace, talking about how it's

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>not just him. A lot of Republicans hate Trump late

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. It's really important to note, though, I need

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to say this, Republicans don't like him. Republicans in Congress,

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't like him. They don't fear him, they don't

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>respect him. They do believe he's incompetent. They do believe

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a moron. Everything I say about Trump publicly, the

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of my colleagues up on Capitol Hill they

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>feel the same way about him. Privately. They don't fear Trump,

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but they fear Trump's voters. I was campaigning in Iowa

0:19:55.240 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>all weekend, and even just talking to Republican voters on

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the ground in Iowa, they were even bothered by this

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Drell thing, the g seventh thing. The best that they

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>could say was it doesn't look good. So Republicans in

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Congress stay fear Trump's voters, and Trump's voters were bothered

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>by what Trump did that will move them. This is

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>analysis that no one needs to hear, really, or perhaps

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>it's analysis that's so obvious, why is this guy on

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>TV or wherever he is saying it? But there are

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>some aspects of it that I think are worthy of

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>our attention for a moment. For example, Republicans hate Trump,

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he says, well, he means Republican elected officials and Republican

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>elected officials, members of Congress and the GOP are afraid

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of Trump's voters. Good they should be responsive to what

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican voters want. This should not be about a club

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of guys up on Capitol Hill who get to lord

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>over the rest of us, determine what is best for

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the what the real party message should be, what the

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>real gaims of the party should be. They're supposed to

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>serve the American people who voted for them. We don't

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>put them there to be our overlords. We don't put

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>them there to give us dictation from up on the mountaintop.

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>We're supposed to be watching them enact policy. They are.

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>They're the vessels of the aspirations of conservatism and the right.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>They are not the wise elder statesman that we should

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all just sit around and be lectured by all the time. Look,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of members of Congress are just not very

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>smart and not very impressive. That's shore on both sides

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans and Democrats. The best thing they can do

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is keep their promises to voters, the voters that put

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>them there, stay as honest as they can to the

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>platforms that got them elected. And as we know, a

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people go to DC and they become swamp creatures.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I just left DC. I'm still washing some of the

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>swamp off me. I was never a lobbyist or anything,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know what I'm saying, It's very easy to

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>want to be a part of the power set there.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very easy to want to be a part of

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the club that gets to make decisions and determinations about

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>what the future of the country is like and feel

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>as though you are separated from a majority, or perhaps

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the entirety, of the voters who gave you that power

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. So that Republican members of Congress

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like Trump is relevant in terms of I don't

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>care that they don't like him, but it is relevant

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in so far as it lets us know that they

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>care more, many of them, about their feelings about this

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>man than what he is doing for the Republican Party

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>and therefore for the American people, which brings you back

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 1>to my discussion yesterday. And Trump is clearly aware of this,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that there are elements within the Republican system, right within

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the Republican machinery, that aren't only up that it's not

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>They're allowed to not like anyone's allowed to hold opinion

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they want about anybody. You're allowed to not like Trump.

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, But if you're going to be a part

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican Party, you should not be working actively

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes to undermine the leader of that party.

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And I do believe there are many Republicans who are

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>doing that. I don't know how many, and I don't

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>know to what extent, but we're just aware of what

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we say. I mean. Obviously, Mitt Romney is quite open

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. There are others too, who have decided that

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>they cannot be members of the GOP and good Standing anymore.

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>They will not work to assist this president in these

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>key endeavors. Right. They'd rather talk about how the president

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>tweets mean things and says mean things and isn't nice enough.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just the people like Joe Walsh who

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>want to discuss that, because really what they're hoping is

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is to create the perception among Republican lawmakers that there's

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>enough leeway within the party faith full for some of

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 1>them to maybe go along with impeachment. I don't think

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it'll be successful, but I do believe that is what

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and their media allies, or is it the media

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and their Democrat allies, whichever way you decide, I do

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>think that is what's going on here. Senator Michael Bennett,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>for example, Okay, Michael Bennett, play a clip fifteen. If

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you would, you have a lot of private conversations with

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>your Republican colleagues. I know because you work across the

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>island the Senate. I'm not going to ask you to

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>break any confidence you would have with them, But but

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, are you hearing more private expressions of support

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>for removing this president then we hear publicly from the

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Republican side. I would not say privately that I'm yet

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>hearing private expressions of support, but I am hearing private

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>expressions of people saying they're horrified by the president's behavior,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're horrified that he invited Ukraine to interfere in

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>our elections. They're horrified that the White House Chief of

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Staff admitted that it was a quid pro quo. You're

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Horror Friday, You're Horror Fridays, this the other guide, this

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the other thing. And Ukraine, I mean, you just said

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you mightn't get the information and the guy who voted

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for this guy. That's a question that I would like answered.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And noticed the sleight of hand there. He didn't say

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what was said on the phone call, which is the

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>President asked Ukraine to be helpful in an ongoing open

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>DJ investigation of the twenty sixteen election interference, and also

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to get answers as to whether there's anything relating to

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden and Joe Biden insofar as that investigation is

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>duly constituted an ongoing Instead, he says, oh, that they

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>invited election interference. You see what you'll eventually hear and

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>whatever the Inspector General report, it's really actually the Durham

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>report out of Connecticut about the origins of the Russia collusion,

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the Russia collusion conspiracy, which is what it was. It

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>was a true against the president. When you hear that,

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you'll be told I can almost guarantee you that it

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was entirely That whole investigation is illegitimate and they've already

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>laid the groundwork for that now by saying that any

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>discussion in the open by the President or others about

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>that investigation is election interference. Meanwhile, having a foreigner Christopher Steele,

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>collect foreign subsources all over the former Soviet Union, including Ukraine,

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and run that to our own press and through our

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>own intelligence community to Obama administration appointees who use faiza

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>warrants against Trump campaign, against a Trump campaign official, that's

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all fine. You're supposed to think that that's not a

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>problem at all. These people are are laughable in their

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>lack of consistency, but we have to take them very

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>seriously in their efforts to destroy and undermine this presidency

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that much they have set their minds to, and unfortunately,

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll be far too They are far too

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>dedicated in this process to ever recognize the damage that

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they are doing to the country. Along the way here

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we have Oh I did want to get to this

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. You had Beto O'Rourke who did get a

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit. There is such a thing as too crazy,

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>even for Democrats these days. It's rare, it doesn't happen

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>all that often, but it does happen. It's pretty interesting.

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Beto O'Rourke, who has been comparing Trump to Nazi Germany

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and to Gerbel's was asked about this, and here's how

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Boto responded, Play sixteen. Please, is that not going too

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>far to make a comparison between the president of the

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>United States and the Nazis. Find me a better analogy

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of another leader of a Western democracy describing all people

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of one religion as inherently defective or disqualified or dangerous.

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's what the President has done. But you understand

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the criticism when you make any compared to the Holocaust

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Nazis, that you know that that is simply

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>at least most people say that is unacceptable. It's the

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>comparison of last resort. And that's where we are. And

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean the last resort politically or the last

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>resort in terms of defeating the president in November, but

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the last resort for this country that is descending into

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>an open racism and intolerance and violence led by the president. Now,

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>whether he said, whether it's what he said about Muslims

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>or immigrants, or the way he treats women of color

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in this country, or the fact that he described klansmen

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and Neo Nazis as very fine people. He's just a liar,

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.959
<v Speaker 1>he's just making he's just living in some alternate reality.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>The President did not describe the people at the at

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the Neo Nazis and Charleispell was very fine people. I've

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>read the transcript dozens of times. He did not do it.

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>The immedia keeps saying it because they want to talk

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>about a big lie and a repetition of a big lie.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>That is a big lie. The immedia keeps saying something

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that is demonstrably false and untrue, and they know it's untrue,

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're so desperate to make this president beyond the

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>pale you cannot support him without being a bad person,

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that they'll just lie about stuff. They will just lie.

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That is a lie. What better or work just says

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I think he knows that, but he doesn't care.

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Also what he says describing people of one religion as

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>dangerous or defective? When did the president do that? When

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>did you describe people of one religion as dangerous or defective?

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>He's never done that. This is always Democrats complain about

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.479
<v Speaker 1>what Trump says, and then they always offer us up

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>an interpretation of what Trump says instead of the actual words.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>If what the President says is so bad, why don't

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we just hear about what the president said? Why is

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it always the Democrat? So in other words, remember that

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>BBC lady with Jordan Peterson. What chord are they saying?

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>In other words, no, how about just what President Trump says.

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a desperation growing, a desperation among the Democrats because

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got to know that these candidates they have, Oh

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Warren is there? Is there Technocrat. Warren's the one who's

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to lead them to the promised land of a

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty election victory over Donald Trump. They won't, they

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>won't pull the rug out from more Joe Biden just yet,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're starting to get a little a little nervous

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. The more we look into Elizabeth Warren, the

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>more clear it is that she is quite radical. She's

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not a centrist Democrat. She's a radical left left of

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama even Democrat. That's the that's going to be the

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>unifying independent winning Ohio, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania winning candidate for

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats, Elizabeth Warren. The more we find out about

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>what she really thinks and believes. Well, a few things

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>become clear. One is that she hasn't really even thought

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>through the implications of some of the things she said

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>she wants to do to transform the country. And people

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>also now realize Bernie Sanders just had a heart attack.

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The guys, he's too old for this, his health is

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>not in good enough shape for this. So there's a

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>quiet transfer I think of aspirations on the left Elizabeth

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Warren that has been ongoing, and the media has been

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>warming up to her a little bit, and we're going

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to forget about the whole on one one twenty fourth Cherokee,

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So that means I'm a Native American. That was a

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that she did that no one made her do.

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna forget about that whole thing. But we can't

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>forget about some of the other policies and ideas that

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>she puts out there. And I think that that's also

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.479
<v Speaker 1>why you have this panic among Democrats, Well, what if

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.479
<v Speaker 1>none of the twenty candidates we started out with can

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>get it done against Trump. I think there are a

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of Democrats who do not think that they can

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>psychologically handle and I don't mean a lot, like just

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a few prominent Democrat politicians, I mean millions of Democrats

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>across the country would have some kind of a nerve

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of Trump won former years in office. I think

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the level of hysteria. And it's even someone like

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Beto Rourke talking about the this is the analogy of

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>last resort, comparing Trump to a regime that killed millions

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and millions of people, men, women and children, put them

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in gas chambers, executed them. I mean, just the worst things,

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst crimes against humanity and history. He's comparing that

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump. He's either a more hon or a psycho.

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, betto Oh my gosh, why do you say

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>such mean things? Well, because it's true. It's a bizarre

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>thing for someone to say, and someone to then double

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>down on afterwards. But that's where Beto is. This is

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>still violent portal just last year, no other country. In

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the forty thousand gun debts, he says a very large

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>number of those are actually First of all, it's not

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>forty thousand. I don't know why he keeps saying a

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>number that's not correct. A very large number of those

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are suicides. By the way, this country is still racist

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at its core, Becheo Roark says, and this is a

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>guy who was entirely a construct of the media. He

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be able to beat Ted Cruz in Texas.

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Remember that more money poured into that guy, Beto O'Rourke's

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>effort to unseat Ted Cruise in Texas than any other

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>senate race in history. They're just funneling money. This guy,

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>he's entirely a construct of the elite echelon of the

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat Party, and he just says crazy stuff. He just

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>says things that are unfair, that are unethical, that aren't

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>based in any objective reality. But it's also a really

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's also really sad. It's sad that there are so

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>many people on the left who would rather believe, they

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>would rather believe that this country is an example of

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>evil racism on the world stage, instead of a country

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>where you have tremendous diversity of religion, ethnicity, diversity of

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>every kind, and by and large we actually get along

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>very well. You start to compare us to other what's

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a country similar to America and its makeup that gets

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>along so much better than we do and where there's

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>so much less racism. I think that Democrats always take

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a little too much pride in talking down to their

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>country and downgrading their country and the way they speak

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, instead of understanding that they are so lucky

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to be here. We are all so lucky, we who

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>are Americans, to be in this country at this time

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of relative peace and booming prosperity. And Democrats, in their

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just lust for power, will lie about the United States

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of America and come up with some way to make

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it sound like this country is in a state of

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>dysfunction and despair. That is just not true, But Democrats

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to try to convince everybody that it is

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>true for the next twelve months. Why is the left

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>trying so hard to eradicate gender? Why is this campaign

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>now gaining so much momentum, so much attention, a lot

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of force behind it. Every time now you look at

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a major news website, you open a newspaper, if you

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>still read things old school like that, you see more

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and more stories that are advancing this agenda. For example, Always,

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a company that makes female sanitary products, has decided that

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to remove Venus. The symbol for women are

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>taken from the god Venus aphrodite. In Greek, Venus in

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>ancient Rome. They're going to remove that because they don't

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>want it to be feel exclusive or exclusionary of trans individuals.

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So now a company that makes a product explicitly to

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>deal with the female reproductive system wants to remove the

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>symbol of femaleness from it because of the desire for inclusiveness.

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 1>The NPR of the Weekend shared this, On average, people

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 1>who menstruate spend an estimated one hundred and fifty million

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year just on the sales tax for tampons

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and pads. To this, I responded on Twitter, is the

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>word women being canceled because there's a word for people

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>who menstruate. It's a very handy, very useful word we've

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>used for a long time, and it's quite descriptive, called women.

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But now you will see, and I'm not making this up,

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you will see propaganda online from particularly the left wing

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>journo class, where they will be shouting down people saying

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>things like men have periods. Two. This has become an

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>article of faith on the left. This has become something

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.359
<v Speaker 1>that we will hear about men have periods too. Unfortunately,

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that is scientifically false, that is inaccurate. Men do not

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>get periods, women get periods. In fact, this is one

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of the very basic biological distinctions that exists that separate

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>men from women. You've also had this week a transgender

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>cyclist named Rachel McKinnon, who is dominating female sprints cycling,

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 1>set a world record thirty seven years old, same age

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>as me, set a world record for the thirty five

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine age category in the two hundred meters sprint

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>on a cycling bike. So this is just some This

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who is biologically male, who is beating. And

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you look at look at this individual

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>is built. Yes, has has died? Oh? I don't know.

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Do I have to Am I going to run a

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 1>foul of the PC police? So I have to say her?

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>We have to let people pick their pronouns, now right,

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're always told. Am I going to get

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in trouble for this? It's a it's a hymn, it's

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a man physically can change the name. Rachel is this

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>person's name, no question, You can change your name. Do

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you get to change your pronouns? Though? Because you say so?

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 1>At some point we might be forced to bend the

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>knee at some point the corporate world may say, sorry,

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to do what is new in the English

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>language for the millennia or for the centuries. I should

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>say that it has been around in its current form.

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it is new to do this, but you better

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>do it or else you better comply, or else there

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>will be consequences. I don't I don't plan on running

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>up the side of the hill and getting you know,

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>getting struck down on this one. Someone has to let

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>me know what the real what the real rules are.

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 1>But this transgender individual is defeating everybody. And it's no

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.800
<v Speaker 1>surprise because male biology is different than female biology. And

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>we can sit around and people can say that's mean,

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>or that's insensitive, it's unfeeling. How could you? How could

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you say these things? It's just the truth. But increasingly

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you find that a lot of people do not want

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the truth. A lot of people on the left reject

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the truth. They think the truth is mean, and if

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's mean, or if it doesn't make them feel good,

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>then it should be subverted, it should be contradicted, it

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 1>should be banned, it should be outlawed. Transgender cyclist Rachel

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>McKinnon is dominating female sports because transgender individuals, if the

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>left gets its way, means the end of mail sports.

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 1>That's quite a plan for female empowerment, isn't it. Women

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 1>can no longer compete just against other women. They will

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 1>have to compete against biological males. Ten years ago, when

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this was raised during the earlier days of the transgender

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>activist movement, we would be told that this was fearmongering

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to say this. I remember because I was a part

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of those conversations. I remember debating this issue. Discussing this issue,

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we would say, Oh, but you're going to have ten

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>year olds who think that their female start to use

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the women's women's locker room and restrooms at a school.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, that won't happen. Oh actually, the Obama administration

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>mandated that it would happen in public schools or else

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>you would lose federal funding. So that's how quickly that

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.879
<v Speaker 1>turned around. Oh but you would never have someone who's

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a biological male competing and say a contact and really

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>dangerous combat sport like mixed martial arts. Oh no, that

0:40:56.200 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>happened too, What a surprise. The logical male who competes

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>against women in MMA is not only able to beat them,

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's dangerous to those women, It is truly dangerous

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to them to step into the ring with that individual.

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>So you have to wonder, well, what's left here? Oh,

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we have reached. We have reached now the latter stage

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of the transgender movements extremism. And we see this playing

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>out in the case of a seven year old boy

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, not in California, not in Massachusetts or New

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.240
<v Speaker 1>York or I'm doing this show right now in Texas,

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas, no less. Jeffrey Younger is a father in

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Dallas who is trying to stop his former partner, his

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>former I believe former wife, although I'm not even sure

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if they were officially married, but to stop his former partner,

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>doctor Anne George Alis, from transitioning their seven year old boy, James,

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>into a female, and doing so involving chemical castration and

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>hormone replacement therapy. This is child abuse. This is wrong.

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.959
<v Speaker 1>It's medically wrong, it's scientifically wrong, it is ethically wrong.

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And yet a jury has decided that doctor George Julius,

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>who does any want to guess if she's a far left,

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, pro transactivist individual. I think we all know

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the answer to that. Doctor George Alis should be able

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to continue on with this quest to transition a seven

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>year old boy. And I'm not just saying transition, as

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in speak to this boy with female pronouns and make

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>him wear dresses. And now they want a seven year

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>old boy to take hormone replacement therapy, to take puberty blockers, which,

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>as I've said to you before, nobody really knows the

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>long term effect of this, because there haven't been any

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>studies of this, because nobody would have thought twenty years

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>ago or ten years ago that the medical world would

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be so radicalized that anyone would even think about doing this.

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>But here we are. I want to tell you the

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>story of Jeffrey Younger and his battle to save his

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:39.439
<v Speaker 1>son James from transgender transgender activism at seven years old.

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So here's what we know of this case of Jeffrey Younger,

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the father who is desperately trying through the courts to

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>stop the mother of James, the young boy who they

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have joint custody of, to stop doctor Anne Georgilus from

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>transitioning him, transitioning young James into Luna. My understanding of

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this case, and I listened to a lengthy interview that

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that was done here of Jeffrey younger, where he explained

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>what had happened. Essentially, James the seven year old liked

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie Frozen, and doctor George Julius thought that it

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>would be a good thing to start affirming James as

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a female. Now there is a very clear, a very

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>clear repetition here, a very clear tendency where the only

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>people who have kids who are transitioning to female or

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they believe are trans Remember seven years old, I wanted

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to be at Tri Sarah Tops when I was seven.

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of things you think when you're

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>seven that don't or should not be should not be

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>taken seriously by adults. Adults determined that you should go

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to school, what you should eat, when you should go

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to bed. There are reasons for those things. Oh, but

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>here because this is really the last This is really

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the last vestige of what had been untouched by transactivism

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 1>up to this point. This is the final frontier. If

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you will, let's are transitioning little kids, make them transgender.

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's have affirmation as determined with court mandates behind it.

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Mind you of a seven year old, this is insane,

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>This is wrong. Any normal person, absent all the propaganda,

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>absent all the CNN tweets about how this is so

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 1>important for you know, for affirming one's identity, and transgenderism

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is a beautiful thing to be celebrated by everybody. And

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.959
<v Speaker 1>if you don't approve of this, or you even let's

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>just say this, there's a whole separate conversation to be

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>had about whether someone when they're eighteen, if they think

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:51.879
<v Speaker 1>they're transgender, or if they if they are trans Remember

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it is think. It's not a biological reality. So don't

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>ever get it mixed up with intersects. Sometimes I'll try

0:45:57.719 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to play that game. They'll move it around. Oh but

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:01.479
<v Speaker 1>what about people that are born with some reproductive organs

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of both, that's intersects. That's not what we're talking about.

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about people that have a psychological distinction that

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they think they are born in the wrong body. You know,

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>there's also a psychological this or they called gender dysphoria.

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Now it's called gender affirmation. It was called gender dysphoria.

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>There's also a psychological disorder where individuals believe fervently to

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the point of demanding surgery, that they should not have

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a certain limb, and they will demand modern medicine, they'll

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>demand that doctors will remove. You know, this arm that

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I have, I shouldn't have it. I do not want

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to have this arm. I need this arm to be removed.

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>People say, well, that's not a fair comparison. Really is

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:56.359
<v Speaker 1>destroying all of your body's hormonal balance, which, by the way,

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just putting this out there, they're gonna do this to

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a seven year old. When they do this to a adults,

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there are terrible long term health consequences and the outcomes overall,

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and everyone, oh, no, one ever, you know, I want

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this. You know, there was one doctor

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at Johns Hopkins University who was head of essentially the

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>sex change operation, which they don't call it that anymore,

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gender affirmation. He was out of the sex change

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>operation part of Johns Hopkins University Hospital in Baltimore. And

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>he's just been run out of the public square effectively.

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>He's not because he did this for twenty years. And

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>he'll he would tell people he wrote articles. I've read

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>them where he says, look, long term prognosis here for

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people who have this surgeon is not good. Very high

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>rates of depression, high rates of suicide, and the basic

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>health risks that you take you know, blood clots, and

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, just messing with all kinds of internal hormonal

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:52.399
<v Speaker 1>regulatory systems, and you know weight gain and obesity comes

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with it and all just all kinds of you know,

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I think there's the risks of disease increase in so

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 1>many ways because you're messing with the internal chemistry of

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>your body. No one really knows if this is how

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to do this properly, because you're not supposed There is

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:09.800
<v Speaker 1>no proper way to do this. You're not supposed to

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>do this. There's no way to do this in a

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>in a sense that doesn't or in a manner that

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>does not have dramatically negative and that's for adults. You're

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:23.399
<v Speaker 1>not going to do this with a seven year old.

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You start giving them puberty blockers. This is disgraceful. But

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the problem with what starts and on lefting

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>websites and what you see in the media, and you know,

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:40.879
<v Speaker 1>this show Transparent, and there's all these different efforts out

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:45.919
<v Speaker 1>there to convince people that not only is transgenderism something

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:50.839
<v Speaker 1>that should have legal protection, but it must be affirmed

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>by everybody else. It's not enough for you to say,

0:48:53.600 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, you do you I'm going to do my

0:48:55.560 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>own thing over here. No, they want they require the

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 1>leftist activists of transgender and require that you abandon your

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>religious beliefs, abandon which you think is good for your

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>own child in this case, and you have to sing

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>along with the chorus claiming that this is a fantastic thing,

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a joyous thing. We should all throw a

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>party because a seven year old is going to be

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:22.440
<v Speaker 1>affirmed in his now her they say gender. This is

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.320
<v Speaker 1>not an exaggeration. The court in Dallas, up to this

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>point has enjoined this father, Jeffrey Younger, that he is

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to dress his son in boy's clothing. Not

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed contempt of court if he does that. He's not

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed to try and convince his son that he is

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in fact a boy and will be a normal boy

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and everything is fine. Not allowed to do that. Not

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed to have the son around anybody who also tries so.

0:49:57.800 --> 0:49:59.839
<v Speaker 1>He can't have another friend or family member who says, hey,

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>young James, you're seven years old. You know you're a boy.

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Just give it some time and let's talk this through.

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Not allowed to do that. Has to use female pronouns

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:12.720
<v Speaker 1>or gender neutral pronouns in public. This is by court

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 1>order I was stunned as I was reading through this

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:20.839
<v Speaker 1>last night, stunted. This is in Dallas, Texas for those

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of you out there, and I get this. I get

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:25.400
<v Speaker 1>your emails, I get your messages. Who think, oh the

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff buck that mostly that's not going to come

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to you know, my town I live. I live in Nebraska,

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I live in Texas. You know I live in in Indiana.

0:50:36.960 --> 0:50:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Things here are a little more sane. Mm. Sorry. That's

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:44.479
<v Speaker 1>why they always go at this from the media level,

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>national level. They want federal judges to enforce this stuff.

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:50.320
<v Speaker 1>They want this to be top down. You're not allowed

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:53.759
<v Speaker 1>to have the choice. And so now we have a

0:50:53.840 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 1>circumstance where this father and I just would I'd be

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so curious to speak to people on this jury and

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just want to know how brainwashed they've been. They've given,

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>or I believe they're about to give. Today we'll find

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:12.880
<v Speaker 1>out full custody to doctor George Julius to make sure

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 1>that young James is transitioned into a female. Oh, by

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, by court order, James's father is not allowed

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to call him James has to call him Luna. Not

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed that his legal name is James. On his birth

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>certificate on any documentation now has to be called Luna

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:37.439
<v Speaker 1>because because the mom says so, mister Younger had asked

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the sole managing conservatorship of not just this boy,

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but also there's a there's a twin as well, and

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the court denied that. And they've also denied James's or

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>denied the father's efforts here to stop the puberty blockers

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and craw sex hormones that are going to happen here.

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, accord to the Mayo Clinic, this is

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a helpful list. I was trying to think of this before.

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Possible side effects of feminizing cross sex hormone therapy. This

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 1>is Remember that this is for adults, because who would

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>think you'd do this to a kid. Here are the

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>side effects for adults. Deep veined blood clot high triglycerides, gallstones,

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:23.280
<v Speaker 1>weight gain, elevated liver function, decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, infertility,

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>high blood pressure, type two diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and excessive

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:34.880
<v Speaker 1>prolactin in the blood. That's for adults. What do you

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 1>think the endocrine system of a seven year old will

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>do in reaction to this? And the court that is

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 1>going along with this should be ashamed. The judge who

0:52:46.840 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is a left wing female should be ashamed. None of

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 1>them are. In fact, the media will celebrate this. They

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>will celebrate destroying this young boy's life. You know why,

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>He's just a sacrifice for the cause. It doesn't matter

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>if this ruins his life, if he's miserable, if it

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ruins his health, mental and physical. They have to establish

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.359
<v Speaker 1>that transgenderism is just as natural and just as as

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.399
<v Speaker 1>normal as anything else that a young boy or girl

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 1>could decide to do. That's what this is about. From

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 1>coast to coast to coast, Tonight, Canadians rejected division and negativity.

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>You are sending our liberal team back to work, back

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to Ottawa with a clear mandate. We will make life

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:31.160
<v Speaker 1>more affordable. We will continue to fight climate change, we

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:34.439
<v Speaker 1>will get guns off our streets, and we will keep

0:53:34.800 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 1>investing in Canadians. And tonight we chose to move Canada forward. Tonight,

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Canadians have charted a path for the future and I

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:50.359
<v Speaker 1>know we will walk it together. Monsieur Justin Trudeau, who

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>does not sound like this, but we like to pretend

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:56.560
<v Speaker 1>here on the Bucks Extent show, he probably sounds like

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 1>me when I'm not doing any accent really if we're

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be fair, except he says, and it is

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a little more, even more polite than me, which is

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>really polite is you're justin Trudeau. He is a the

0:54:06.040 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister off Canada. Once again, there's some there's the

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:13.800
<v Speaker 1>good news and bad news that comes out of this.

0:54:14.920 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with the good news. The good news,

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 1>let's do that. Start with the good news. Is that

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be really hard, in my opinion, for Canadians

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to liberal Canadians, you know, smug left wing Canadians to

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>look down on us in the United States for having

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a president who's a little out of the mainstream, a

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>little a little different, eccentric, egocentric and eccentric, right. I

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:44.799
<v Speaker 1>think that'll be a tougher cell now for Canada, like, oh,

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we have such stuffisticated politics and Canada, look at our

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Prime minister Trudeau, he's the true statesman. M I don't

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>know about that. Do you think that it would have

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:04.400
<v Speaker 1>been possible for an American Republican probably already know Northam.

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Northam got away with this. I would say that that

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Northam's thing was a lot longer ago. Trudeau's was not

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 1>very long ago, and multiple instances of dressing in blackface.

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the one of the frustrations I think a

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:21.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of us have is we recognize if you were

0:55:21.520 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 1>an American Republican politician, not only would your career be

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ruined based on the photos that we saw of Trudeau,

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:31.840
<v Speaker 1>but it would also you'd have to be very concerned

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about whether you were employable at any kind of job

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and keeping with your skill set, you know you would

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:41.760
<v Speaker 1>be you would be probably relegated to very menial work

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and you might have to change your name. Okay, that's

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the real That would be the reality for an American

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Republican politician. For a Democrat, it would be considered a hit,

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you probably still keep your job, and

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 1>as long as you apologized and made sure that you

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>know you were on the good side of planned parenthood

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and the woke police in Hollywood, you would probably be okay. Right.

0:56:07.680 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>That's so there's there's that component of this that's annoying.

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 1>That's annoying because you know, we would like to either

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:21.440
<v Speaker 1>have greater forgiveness and less insanely harsh rules about this stuff,

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:25.360
<v Speaker 1>or everyone or everyone has to live under the same rules.

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>But what the left has managed to create is that

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the rules that the left lives under are different the

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 1>rules that the right lives under. And that's the worst scenario.

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That is the worst circumstance, right, Because that that hypocrisy

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:45.399
<v Speaker 1>then just it just festers within our political discourse. Oh

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so they can get away with stuff. Truneau can be like,

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I am going to take zaguns off the streets and

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make sure the climate change is defeated,

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the big, bad, terrible climate change. Maybe we should maybe

0:56:57.320 --> 0:56:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I should be like, let's gonna say Pierre Trudea, but

0:56:59.840 --> 0:57:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that was his dad. We'd have to come

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:06.520
<v Speaker 1>up with, you know, Jean Paul Trudeau. Justin Trudeau's alter ego,

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he's slightly more Canadian French, very tough, very strong, where's

0:57:12.760 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the lumberjack shirts, cuts down the big trees. But Trudeau

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:19.920
<v Speaker 1>has managed to win out. Another part of this I

0:57:20.000 --> 0:57:23.800
<v Speaker 1>think is interesting is that he I think, as from

0:57:23.840 --> 0:57:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what I saw last night, at least in the polls,

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:30.960
<v Speaker 1>he lost the popular vote. He got less votes in

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>total than his competitor did. And yet because of the

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:40.560
<v Speaker 1>way their parliamentary system works, he in fact has cobbled

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:43.920
<v Speaker 1>together the majority necessary to be the prime minister. Here

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times called it justin Trudeau's anemic victory,

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that he just eked out a win. Here's some of

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the background on this. Neither the Conservative Party nor the

0:57:57.960 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>New Democratic Party to the Green Party had any lead.

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>You in the hopper who seemed to be able to

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>compete with Kennedy esque mister Trudeau. Oh that's quite a description.

0:58:07.160 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Who scored photoshoots in Vogue and his own comic book cover.

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>He should have been untouchable for an election or two

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 1>at least, And yet on Monday, mister Trudeau's government was

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 1>reduced to a minority. His party lost the popular vote

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Conservatives. Canada's electoral map is now disturbingly divided

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>between the liberal dominated east of the country and the

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>conservative dominated west. Mister Trudeau will likely to pend on

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the support of other parties to keep his hold in power.

0:58:35.960 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So there you have it, my friends, This is a close,

0:58:42.400 --> 0:58:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a close one for Trudeau. But it does raise this

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 1>issue of when when do we get to say that

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to have rules where you get a

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 1>second chance, we have to have rules where you get

0:58:53.040 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a second chance. If violations of politically correct conduct in

0:58:58.600 --> 0:59:02.880
<v Speaker 1>one's back background, stretching back for years, maybe even decades.

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>If that's going to be not a disqualifier for liberals,

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>then I think we have to make sure it's not

0:59:07.880 --> 0:59:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a disqualifier for conservatives either, and that means a refusal

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to submit to the dictates of political correctness. Yeah, I

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:19.160
<v Speaker 1>mean people, obviously, people when they I always say this,

0:59:19.200 --> 0:59:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't apologize because the outrage mob comes from you.

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Apologize if you mess up, if you did something wrong.

0:59:23.560 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Trudeau clearly messed up. So people should still

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:30.520
<v Speaker 1>make amends based on their own their own actions and

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the need to have integrity and to be honorable or

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:37.000
<v Speaker 1>try to restore some honor. But we're never going to

0:59:37.080 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 1>get to a fair place, a level playing ground in

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:44.440
<v Speaker 1>politics or in public life if this is able to continue.

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know this, no Republican would have been

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 1>able to stay in public life after this photos came

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 1>out of Justin Trudeau. And yet the liberals of Cana

0:59:53.200 --> 0:59:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And I know Canada's different country from America, but come on,

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Canada's like America, Junior. Let's be serious. You know it's

0:59:58.560 --> 1:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>right there. They speak, They speak American pretty much they're

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>right there close by. Are there's some Canadians to listen

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to the show right now. They're furiously they're they're wiping

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the maple syrup off their fingers, putting aside the hockey

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>stick and furiously typing at me that how dare how

1:00:16.000 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>dare you? Sir? Eh? Compare Canada to Americans? Say it's America, junior.

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>We love Canadians. You guys are like our cousins to

1:00:23.840 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the north. But Justin Trudeau, man, we knew this was

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna have. I told you he's gonna wits. It's not

1:00:29.720 --> 1:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>even gonna matter that he's that. There's such a fraudulence. Really,

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>too much of the lecturing and the social justice posturing.

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Justin Trudeau, and I know this is

1:00:41.960 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>more just me postulating here, do you think Justin Trudeau

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>would have been someone who was forgiving and showed grace

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in response to someone else in politics having the fun? No,

1:00:56.240 --> 1:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so at all. And I think that

1:00:58.560 --> 1:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that's really part of a liberal mind, that they don't

1:01:00.720 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>see their own conduct, even when it violates their own standards,

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is somehow always more justifiable the conduct of the other, though,

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>must be destroyed. The conduct of the other must be

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>punished to the most severe degree imaginable and possible. I

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was President Trump last night did tweet out, obviously if

1:01:22.920 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I can find it real quick, he tweeted out a

1:01:25.280 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>congratulations to Justin Trudeau. There was nothing in it that

1:01:28.920 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was snarky or that looks sarcastic. But I do think

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that Trump particularly enjoyed, especially because the media in this

1:01:37.120 --> 1:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>country is always saying all these terrible things about him.

1:01:40.400 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Have they have they changed their minds about Justin Trudeau,

1:01:43.440 --> 1:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the man who dressed in blackface so many times. Megan

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Kelly was fired from her job because she said that

1:01:53.040 --> 1:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, some people would like have their

1:01:55.760 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>kids dressing up as a as a character and that

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't you know there. She tried to just get

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>into the nuance of black face as a discussion and

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was fired and the libs were all set up. Yep. Sorry,

1:02:07.800 --> 1:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, can't have anybody who doesn't understand how serious

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>black face is as an offense. Jimmy Kimmel used addressed

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in black faces Karl Malone on his show, and actually

1:02:17.480 --> 1:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it was painted his face black, painted his entire body black,

1:02:21.000 --> 1:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and no sanctions against him now again. I'm fine with

1:02:25.960 --> 1:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>people being able to say I'm sorry, you know what

1:02:28.120 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I did was inappropriate, I've moved on, I've grown, I'm better,

1:02:30.560 --> 1:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but that has to be open to all

1:02:32.640 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of us. We cannot. You know, we're gonna need a

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>divorce from liberal America soon. If they continue to think

1:02:40.360 --> 1:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that they can have one set of rules and we

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>will have another. That's gonna be a problem for us.

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It already is a problem, but it's just gonna keep

1:02:49.320 --> 1:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>getting worse and worse because they over time they embrace,

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they normalize the hypocrisy. That becomes the standard. The standard

1:02:57.520 --> 1:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is that they can be hypocritical, and that people that

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with us ideologically, you and me, even if you're

1:03:03.000 --> 1:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a private citizen, you might have to be sacrificed on

1:03:07.120 --> 1:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the funeral pyre of wokeness at some point that may

1:03:11.200 --> 1:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>happen to you. I'd rather readdress this now and understand

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that people make mistakes, people say stupid things, do stupid things.

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Contrition should be always be weighed in these in these situations,

1:03:24.960 --> 1:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we should all try to be as

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>forgiving of each other as we possibly can. Doesn't mean

1:03:30.920 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>living a life without consequence, but I mean its being forgiven,

1:03:33.360 --> 1:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>being forgiving when there's room for forgiveness, instead of this

1:03:36.760 --> 1:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>situation where Trudeau gets forgiven. Nothing Trump ever does, for example,

1:03:41.120 --> 1:03:43.439
<v Speaker 1>will be forgiven by our media or the Canadian media,

1:03:43.520 --> 1:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>which is I would note, pretty obsessed with Trump. Sometimes

1:03:47.120 --> 1:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I see what's going on in study his Canadian websites.

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You think, like Trump is a bigger deal than anything

1:03:53.040 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>going on in their own country. You know, Trump is

1:03:54.880 --> 1:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this larger than life figure next door. So Trudeau wins

1:03:58.200 --> 1:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the Prime ministership by a hair, by his perfectly quiff

1:04:02.000 --> 1:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>error because he's mister liberal, handsome man that will just

1:04:06.400 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>get away with everything going forward. Apparently, my friends, do

1:04:10.640 --> 1:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you agree then with Senator mckessie, that would have been

1:04:12.560 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate to withhold the military aid and unless this political

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>investigation was pursued, George, I'm telling you what I was

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>involved with. I'm telling you what I saw transpiring and

1:04:23.720 --> 1:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>how President Trump was working to make the evaluation about

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it was appropriate to provide this assistance. But that's

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what I'm what I'm asking is would it be appropriate

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to condition that, George, I'm not going to get into

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>hypotheticals and secondary things based on someone what someone else

1:04:37.760 --> 1:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>has said, George, you would have never done it when

1:04:39.280 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you were a spokesman. I'm not going to do it,

1:04:41.600 --> 1:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>except it's not hypothetical. We saw the chief of staff

1:04:44.120 --> 1:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the act. It is George, you just said if George,

1:04:46.320 --> 1:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you just said, if this happened, that is by definition hypothetic.

1:04:50.360 --> 1:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>The chief of staff said it did. The chief of

1:04:53.800 --> 1:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>staff meaning Mory, you asked me. The chief of staff

1:04:57.640 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>meaning Mulvaney here was trying to say that there was

1:05:03.560 --> 1:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a corruption investigation based quid pro quo component of reviewing

1:05:08.640 --> 1:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the aid that we give to Ukraine. Now, I know

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that that's a complicated way of describing it, or that

1:05:14.480 --> 1:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like a lot of words. But what the Democrats

1:05:16.600 --> 1:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>keep saying is just not true. Their version of what

1:05:23.000 --> 1:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>transpired in that conversation. They always changed the words around.

1:05:26.400 --> 1:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>They do what Adam shifted. Let me pretend that I'm

1:05:29.440 --> 1:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>telling you what was said when I'm really saying something else.

1:05:32.200 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>And what I'm saying are things that are more damaging

1:05:35.280 --> 1:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>than what the president said. This is the game that

1:05:38.080 --> 1:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they play. Now it's a very dangerous one. I would

1:05:41.560 --> 1:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>note that not only did this come up in the

1:05:46.720 --> 1:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>context of a Secretary State Pompeo talking to George's Stephanopolis,

1:05:52.480 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>but also Mitt Romney mit taking a moment to back

1:05:57.680 --> 1:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>away from Pierre de Lecto, friend of Justin Trudau. Maybe

1:06:01.640 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's who. Maybe my Justin Trudeau is actually Pierre

1:06:04.200 --> 1:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>de Lecto, internet roll and Canadian man of mystery. Remember

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that was Mitt Romney's alter ego online that we've all

1:06:13.840 --> 1:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>discovered in the last couple of days. Because when you're

1:06:16.640 --> 1:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>a sitting United States senator worth hundreds of millions of dollars, yeah,

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you need a sock puppet Twitter account to snark at

1:06:22.320 --> 1:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>people and to pump up your own reputation online. Just

1:06:25.640 --> 1:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>seems crazy to me. But secondary State Pompey was talking

1:06:31.080 --> 1:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>about the possibility of that hypothetical. Mitt Romney, meanwhile, is

1:06:36.000 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to be as unhelpful to President Trump as possible

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>play clip twenty, going on TV and saying, China, will

1:06:42.320 --> 1:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you investigate my political opponent? Is wrong? It's a mistake.

1:06:47.360 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It was shocking for the in my opinion, for the

1:06:49.600 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>president to do so, and a mistake for him to

1:06:51.720 --> 1:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>do so. I can't imagine coming to a different point

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of view. We certainly can't have presidents asking foreign countries

1:06:57.480 --> 1:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to provide something of political value that is, after all,

1:07:00.640 --> 1:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>against the law, something of political value against the law. Oh,

1:07:04.400 --> 1:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we're back to the pretense that we're gonna make this

1:07:07.200 --> 1:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a campaign finance violation there, mid Romney. That's never gonna

1:07:10.640 --> 1:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>stand up. That's never gonna work. And the request for

1:07:14.280 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>an investigation. I thought Democrats were obsessed with this. I

1:07:16.560 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>thought they loved this idea. Oh yeah, we need to

1:07:18.840 --> 1:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>investige me to get the facts. You need to find

1:07:20.440 --> 1:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>out everything that's going on here. A request for an

1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>investigation is not elicit if there's a basis for the investigation.

1:07:27.400 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>We just went through a special Council on a with

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a faulty basis, and now they're lecturing us about elicited

1:07:33.840 --> 1:07:37.439
<v Speaker 1>investigations for political purposes. Does any serious person really believe

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Special Council wasn't a giant gift to the Democrats.

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And then basis for it was was lies, the dossiers, lies,

1:07:49.200 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the way that they set up Papadopoulos and Carter Page.

1:07:51.880 --> 1:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>This was all. This is all a scam, a conspiracy

1:07:56.640 --> 1:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>hunter Biden getting a billion dollars out of China because

1:07:59.280 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>his dad was vice president. I mean, I didn't think

1:08:01.960 --> 1:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to look at that. I think people would

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>ask questions about this. I do not accept a lot

1:08:06.240 --> 1:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans that are out there saying this. I do

1:08:07.840 --> 1:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>not accept that just because a Biden does it means

1:08:10.640 --> 1:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't investigate it. And I also don't accept that

1:08:13.160 --> 1:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>just because you are an investigation that is rooted in

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:20.519
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable suspicion that would negatively affect Joe Biden, you're

1:08:20.560 --> 1:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to do that. The Obama administration was investigating

1:08:24.760 --> 1:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump while he was a candidate. There's there's no

1:08:27.960 --> 1:08:34.599
<v Speaker 1>political benefit there, I mean, are you kidding me? By

1:08:34.600 --> 1:08:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the way, speaking of quid pro quos, only have about

1:08:36.760 --> 1:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a minute for this one. But um, they had said this, Oh,

1:08:41.000 --> 1:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't have quid pro quos in foreign policy. I

1:08:42.720 --> 1:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>pointed this out yesterday. Elizabeth Warren had a quid pro

1:08:47.920 --> 1:08:51.479
<v Speaker 1>quo here that she discussed pushing around the state of Israel.

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Producer Mark, please play clip two. Actually about yeah right

1:09:00.120 --> 1:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>now says that he is going to take Israel in

1:09:07.680 --> 1:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a direction of increasing settlements that does not move US

1:09:13.040 --> 1:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>toward a two states solution. It is the official policy

1:09:16.479 --> 1:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>of the United States of America to support a two

1:09:19.560 --> 1:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>states solution. And if Israel is moving in the opposite direction,

1:09:23.400 --> 1:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>then everything is on the table, and be prepared. Everything

1:09:26.080 --> 1:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is on the table. Everything is on the table, including

1:09:30.680 --> 1:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>cutting off a day Israel. If they don't do what

1:09:33.439 --> 1:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we say, we're going to cut off eight that's right,

1:09:37.000 --> 1:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>not just to the millionaires and the billionaires, We're going

1:09:39.680 --> 1:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to cut it off to all of Israel. Okay, that

1:09:44.840 --> 1:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a quid pro quo in foreign policy to me,

1:09:47.000 --> 1:09:48.519
<v Speaker 1>do what we say or else we're gonna take away

1:09:48.560 --> 1:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>your money. So it does happen all the time. Oh,

1:09:51.280 --> 1:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we can establish that there was a quid

1:09:54.320 --> 1:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>pro quo. Yeah, happens all the time, and quid pro

1:09:57.920 --> 1:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>quos have lots of benefits for lots of people. But

1:10:00.840 --> 1:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it was fun for Democrats for a week or so

1:10:03.200 --> 1:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to act like that was unheard of. Oh, how could

1:10:05.720 --> 1:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you try to bully this foreign country into doing your

1:10:07.840 --> 1:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>bidding with our money? That's why we give them maid.

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the movie Joker. Shan't we Joker was

1:10:15.479 --> 1:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>something that we were told was going to be an

1:10:20.520 --> 1:10:25.519
<v Speaker 1>invitation to violence, that the movie Joker would be something

1:10:25.640 --> 1:10:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that as we going forward look at you know, the

1:10:29.800 --> 1:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>history of movies out there and how they could inspire violence.

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It would be one of the ones that you'd have

1:10:34.080 --> 1:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about right away. There was a lot of

1:10:37.280 --> 1:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>really fevered speculation about how this movie was going to

1:10:42.200 --> 1:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>lead to terrible stuff. Nothing happened, of course, I saw

1:10:46.320 --> 1:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the movie. I just want to share a few thoughts

1:10:48.280 --> 1:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>on this. I don't do a lot of movie reviews

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on the show. I rarely go to movies. I will

1:10:51.720 --> 1:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>say this. I went to movie theater and they had

1:10:55.240 --> 1:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a signed seats and the seats producer Mark, have you

1:10:58.240 --> 1:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have you had this experience? I grew up going to

1:11:00.600 --> 1:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>movies with my parents all the time in New York,

1:11:03.120 --> 1:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't see over the person's head in front

1:11:05.600 --> 1:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of me. You were packed in there, shoulder to shoulder,

1:11:09.080 --> 1:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not enough legro on. The seats were kind of gross,

1:11:11.560 --> 1:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>smelled like stale popcorn and twizzlers. You know. It just

1:11:15.200 --> 1:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a pleasant experience really, But you had no choice

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>if you want to see a movie in the theaters.

1:11:19.439 --> 1:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>This movie, this chair reclined, It was a signed seating.

1:11:23.280 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>This is very common now. But this is common now. Yeah,

1:11:25.400 --> 1:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this is everywhere. This is my first not as much

1:11:27.280 --> 1:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in Manhattan, though a lot of the theaters in Manhattan

1:11:30.040 --> 1:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>are still those old theaters because they're gonna sell tickets

1:11:32.160 --> 1:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. They're in the middle of the city.

1:11:34.560 --> 1:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>But there's still all the signed seats. Now. Yeah, this

1:11:36.640 --> 1:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>was my first ever experience in this new era of

1:11:40.600 --> 1:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>comfortable seats and big comfortable seats that recline and a

1:11:44.320 --> 1:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>sign seating too, because one of the things I always

1:11:46.320 --> 1:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>hated was when you walk in the theater, especially if

1:11:48.479 --> 1:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you're there with somebody or with a group of friends

1:11:50.720 --> 1:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to find a place to sit down

1:11:52.400 --> 1:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>or you can't find anywhere to sit. That's not an

1:11:53.760 --> 1:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>issue now. It's like you're at a baseball game. You

1:11:55.800 --> 1:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>go to your seat, go to you know, M fifteen

1:11:59.120 --> 1:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>can chaw up on time. You don't have to watch

1:12:00.880 --> 1:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>all the previews if you don't want to. Yes, there

1:12:03.120 --> 1:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of previews. There are. There's so many previews,

1:12:05.400 --> 1:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>too many. That was a thing recently where they were

1:12:07.280 --> 1:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about there there were too many. It was like

1:12:08.840 --> 1:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes of previous Man, I was sitting there all

1:12:10.439 --> 1:12:12.479
<v Speaker 1>day look in the previews the movies at one o'clock.

1:12:12.520 --> 1:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It's really one I can't even remember all all. I

1:12:14.200 --> 1:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>can remember those that the Star Wars preview looks terrible. Dude,

1:12:17.400 --> 1:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>looks terrible. I'm not a Star Wars guy. You're not

1:12:19.640 --> 1:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a Star Wars guy. I like the originals, but this

1:12:22.080 --> 1:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars just it's just it's just garbage, garbage anyway.

1:12:26.320 --> 1:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So so the theater was really nice. I checked that

1:12:28.320 --> 1:12:29.639
<v Speaker 1>part of it that was that was kind of cool,

1:12:29.640 --> 1:12:33.479
<v Speaker 1>although we do need somebody who stands there and doesn't

1:12:33.479 --> 1:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>allow people to talk because people get all cozy, they

1:12:36.400 --> 1:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>get in their big comfy chair, they're a signed seat,

1:12:38.479 --> 1:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and they think. The worst is that people think that

1:12:41.000 --> 1:12:43.479
<v Speaker 1>when it gets loud, that's when you really want to talk.

1:12:43.560 --> 1:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's like the soaring music comes in, or there's

1:12:46.160 --> 1:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like a really intense scene, you know, like the car

1:12:48.439 --> 1:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>chase scene, they're like, yeah, so because it's loud in here,

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna you can hear them. It's like, shut up,

1:12:55.200 --> 1:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I do not want to hear that. You know, when

1:12:58.280 --> 1:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they're doing the thing when they're talking and living room

1:13:01.000 --> 1:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>living room syndrome. Yeah, they think they're in they're living room,

1:13:03.840 --> 1:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>your living room. Say, that's not really about the Joker movie,

1:13:06.320 --> 1:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but I was because i'm somebody who I stopped going

1:13:08.760 --> 1:13:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to movies because I thought it was such a negative.

1:13:10.680 --> 1:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>It's just a bad user experience. And I love watching

1:13:14.600 --> 1:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a flat screen on my big couch. Like my couch

1:13:17.200 --> 1:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is basically half my living room. I have a giant cow.

1:13:19.080 --> 1:13:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those people's like I want a giant couch.

1:13:20.680 --> 1:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want a little fancy couch. It's like, oh,

1:13:22.800 --> 1:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna have tea on my fancy couch. No,

1:13:25.320 --> 1:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I want a big couch like I live in a

1:13:26.880 --> 1:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>suburban house, except I live in a shoebox. Big comfy couch,

1:13:29.960 --> 1:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>big comfy couch. I agree with you, Yeah, exactly, you

1:13:32.040 --> 1:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>need a big comfy couch. So the theater situation was

1:13:35.000 --> 1:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>better than thought, and then all the movie Joker itself.

1:13:38.240 --> 1:13:42.519
<v Speaker 1>I grew up liking comics, reading some comics, but definitely

1:13:42.600 --> 1:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>watching all the different comics shows. I mean, I watched

1:13:45.000 --> 1:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the old X Men cartoon that was on on Saturday

1:13:47.800 --> 1:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>mornings back in the day. I watched the Spider Man cartoons.

1:13:50.720 --> 1:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I was. I liked all that Marvel and DC Universe stuff,

1:13:53.520 --> 1:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure a lot of you do too. So

1:13:56.400 --> 1:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>for me, the way that they created a backstory for

1:14:00.200 --> 1:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a character that has already been a tremendous amount of

1:14:05.000 --> 1:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>content created around was pretty It was pretty impressive. It

1:14:08.240 --> 1:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was pretty solid. And to take on a role where

1:14:11.400 --> 1:14:14.599
<v Speaker 1>you're immediately going to be compared to Heath Ledger's Oscar

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>winning role was also, I think a pretty bold move.

1:14:18.600 --> 1:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But I was Joaquin Phoenix definitely pulled it off. Definitely

1:14:23.040 --> 1:14:25.759
<v Speaker 1>pulled it off. And what you see in the movie,

1:14:25.920 --> 1:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there are real lessons from this.

1:14:28.920 --> 1:14:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is important people to see. You

1:14:31.560 --> 1:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>see the creation in a sense of a monster, right,

1:14:38.720 --> 1:14:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not that any human being can ever fully

1:14:40.479 --> 1:14:42.559
<v Speaker 1>become a monster, but you see, you see the creation

1:14:43.400 --> 1:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of a monster through frustration, negative circumstance, in this case,

1:14:49.800 --> 1:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a big dose of dangerous mental illness. But but you

1:14:53.240 --> 1:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>see the way that he he really transitions into somebody

1:14:57.960 --> 1:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>who is a dangerous, violent maybe. And they do it.

1:15:02.760 --> 1:15:04.599
<v Speaker 1>They do it in such a way that you think

1:15:04.600 --> 1:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about it afterwards. You you wonder, you think, well, what

1:15:08.040 --> 1:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>should the joker, you know, what should this character have

1:15:10.800 --> 1:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>done in response to the circumstances of having an abuse

1:15:14.960 --> 1:15:16.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't want to give too much away.

1:15:16.520 --> 1:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Apparently we maybe read a spoiler recently on the show,

1:15:19.360 --> 1:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's not really a spoiler. If you see that movie,

1:15:21.360 --> 1:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter. I think you can see it

1:15:24.800 --> 1:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>all coming a mile away anyway. But so on the

1:15:27.840 --> 1:15:30.439
<v Speaker 1>production value side of the acting side of it, Joaquin

1:15:30.520 --> 1:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix carries the movie. He's it's just like a character study,

1:15:35.200 --> 1:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and he does a phenomenal job. I've thought he was

1:15:37.960 --> 1:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>excellent ever since he played comedist and gladiator. Why don't

1:15:43.120 --> 1:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the people love me? I will give them games. He

1:15:47.520 --> 1:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was so good. Now they look Maximus for his mercy.

1:15:51.000 --> 1:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that movie with way too many times. It's

1:15:55.880 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 1>a it's a great that's a timeless that's a timeless movie.

1:15:58.600 --> 1:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>That's one of those things that's on if Gladiators on TV,

1:16:01.640 --> 1:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>on just normal channels, whatever part of the movie, I

1:16:04.360 --> 1:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>probably will watch it. It's one of those. It's up

1:16:06.040 --> 1:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there with Tombstone, Tombstone. It could be the first twenty minutes,

1:16:08.960 --> 1:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the last ten minutes, doesn't matter. I'm watching it. I'm

1:16:11.479 --> 1:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>your huckleberry. It's the best, the best. But back to

1:16:16.640 --> 1:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the Joker film, it wasn't really that violent. It was

1:16:19.479 --> 1:16:22.479
<v Speaker 1>way less violent than I was anticipating. And what I

1:16:22.560 --> 1:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thought was so interesting. And one of the reasons I

1:16:24.000 --> 1:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about on the on the show was

1:16:26.280 --> 1:16:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the way that it was set up. It was supposed

1:16:28.439 --> 1:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. We were supposed to believe that this was

1:16:30.680 --> 1:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a insell white man rage justifying movie, and it absolutely

1:16:37.400 --> 1:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>was not that. And there's no reasonable way to go

1:16:40.920 --> 1:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>from A to B. There there's no reasonable way to

1:16:42.960 --> 1:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>look at this movie and say to yourself, yeah, that's

1:16:47.000 --> 1:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>what was going on. Yeah it was. It was about justifying,

1:16:53.240 --> 1:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, either like white nationalism or white supremacy, and

1:16:56.160 --> 1:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in cell you know, there's been some of these guys

1:16:57.720 --> 1:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>who were involuntary celibate. That's what that's what insul means. Essentially,

1:17:01.360 --> 1:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>their frustration with the opposite sex leads them or that

1:17:06.840 --> 1:17:12.599
<v Speaker 1>that's the spark in their deranged minds for becoming mass shooters.

1:17:12.720 --> 1:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>There have been a few cases of this, um but

1:17:16.320 --> 1:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not that either. This is this is a very

1:17:19.880 --> 1:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>sad and troubling story of somebody who was given a

1:17:24.160 --> 1:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>bad a bad deck of cards to start with, and

1:17:27.720 --> 1:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>then plays those hand, plays that hand poorly and makes

1:17:31.240 --> 1:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>bad makes some bad choices, makes bad decisions. And I

1:17:34.040 --> 1:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't think the violence was too extreme, but I just

1:17:36.320 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>also thought that the left wing version of this movie

1:17:41.040 --> 1:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>um shows you that they can find things. They'll they'll

1:17:44.000 --> 1:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>find narratives where they do not exist. We know that

1:17:46.400 --> 1:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>from politics, but they'll do it even in in film.

1:17:50.479 --> 1:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>If anything, the Joker movie was if Joker was a

1:17:55.080 --> 1:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>p if Joker had politics from this movie, he's a

1:17:58.960 --> 1:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a Democratic socialist. I mean the Jokers a Bernie

1:18:02.040 --> 1:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Sanders supporter. He's an Elizabeth Warren supporter. He's not a

1:18:05.520 --> 1:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump supporter, that's for sure. Trump would be like, this

1:18:09.320 --> 1:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>guy's a loser. That's what That's what Trump would say

1:18:12.040 --> 1:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>about him. And he is a loser and then he

1:18:14.360 --> 1:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>turns into a homicidal one at that. But it was

1:18:18.040 --> 1:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it was worthwhile on the way they wove in some

1:18:19.840 --> 1:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>elements of the existing DC Batman storyline into it. It

1:18:24.200 --> 1:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was very good. It was very well done. Have you

1:18:25.680 --> 1:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>seen it yet, by the way, producer Mark, not yet.

1:18:27.840 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go this weekend. Yeah, you should definitely want

1:18:30.360 --> 1:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to hear. Let us know what you think. I think

1:18:31.960 --> 1:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you'll I I give it like uh B plus a minus.

1:18:36.800 --> 1:18:38.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, how come you'd go see a Joker movie,

1:18:38.600 --> 1:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But god forbid you'd see the Avengers movies. I mean,

1:18:41.800 --> 1:18:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the Avengers movies are trash for people that they're trashed.

1:18:44.920 --> 1:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>They're not. It's just you're it's just all CGI and

1:18:48.880 --> 1:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and really bad jokes. But there was no CGI using

1:18:51.920 --> 1:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the Joker movie at all. Very little. I don't know,

1:18:55.600 --> 1:18:57.479
<v Speaker 1>come very little. I haven't seen. You know what there is.

1:18:57.640 --> 1:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty. You know, there's producer marking the Joker movie

1:19:00.080 --> 1:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that I appreciate acting. There's acting in the Marvel No,

1:19:04.080 --> 1:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty. Is the problem here is, unfortunately, audience is

1:19:07.000 --> 1:19:09.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the producer marked all the because they make

1:19:10.680 --> 1:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they make a billion dollars and blah blah whatever. The

1:19:14.240 --> 1:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>only thing that's worth watching in any of those Avengers

1:19:16.160 --> 1:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>movies is Robert Downey Jr. I'm just gonna say it,

1:19:19.040 --> 1:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Hulk smash. Come on, how many times we got to

1:19:21.479 --> 1:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>hear that? And there's always like even says Hulk Smash once. No,

1:19:25.120 --> 1:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't say that, I'm saying the other I mean

1:19:26.840 --> 1:19:30.559
<v Speaker 1>the Hulk he says that like few he does. Whatever.

1:19:31.000 --> 1:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, you've heard producer Mark likes the Avengers movie.

1:19:33.920 --> 1:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So you can light us up in the comments and

1:19:35.439 --> 1:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>let us know if you agree or disagree. I find

1:19:37.320 --> 1:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I find them. I'm watching, but and I'm somebody. I

1:19:39.400 --> 1:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like the Batman trilogy, although the third one is pre

1:19:43.200 --> 1:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>browl of Gartham. I mean the third one had there's

1:19:45.320 --> 1:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>some ridiculous stuff going on there. I like Blade. I

1:19:49.280 --> 1:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>like UMD. That's a throwback. That's I think that's among

1:19:53.320 --> 1:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Wesley Snipes's finest works. Blade. It's good flick back in

1:19:58.160 --> 1:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the day. And the original, the original Iron Man is

1:20:00.640 --> 1:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>very good. All right. I've turned this into a longer

1:20:02.680 --> 1:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>movie view than I met See The Joker. It's good,

1:20:04.520 --> 1:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's worthwhile. Makes you think about some things, and um,

1:20:08.840 --> 1:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it will it will affect you, and and it's and

1:20:11.120 --> 1:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it was not. It did not lead to any mass shootings.

1:20:13.040 --> 1:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy. This plan that you're introducing high the wealth

1:20:16.880 --> 1:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>tax is going to pay for this and other things.

1:20:18.640 --> 1:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So how is your medicare for all supposed are going

1:20:22.640 --> 1:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to be paid for though without wealth to wealth tax?

1:20:25.600 --> 1:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>So uh, As I've explained, the wealth tax will pay

1:20:28.800 --> 1:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for universal childcare all the way through canceling student loan debt.

1:20:33.200 --> 1:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It's about an investment in an entire generation. Over the

1:20:37.360 --> 1:20:39.519
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks, I'll be coming out with a plan

1:20:39.720 --> 1:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>about the costs of medicare for all and how we

1:20:44.080 --> 1:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>can pay for My friend PJ O'Rourke works with me.

1:20:49.080 --> 1:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>He's the editor in chief. I'm I make a writer

1:20:52.200 --> 1:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>for a project called American Consequences. It's free. You can

1:20:54.960 --> 1:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>sign up for it, and I hope you do. I

1:20:57.880 --> 1:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>write for I write a piece a week for them,

1:21:00.000 --> 1:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and usually a monthly feature as well. Pj's got a

1:21:03.360 --> 1:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>great pia on Elizabeth Warren, who are my wealth? Tax

1:21:07.160 --> 1:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is just going to take from the rich hed It's

1:21:09.200 --> 1:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>got to pay for all the childcare across this nation.

1:21:15.280 --> 1:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>There's some interesting stuff that PJA writes about here on

1:21:17.479 --> 1:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren's real plans for you. Here's some of my

1:21:20.720 --> 1:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>friend pg rourke writes in American Consequences. As scary words go,

1:21:26.560 --> 1:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a plan for that is right up there

1:21:28.240 --> 1:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>with hold my beer. Warren thinks we can improve our

1:21:32.040 --> 1:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>economy by returning personal and corporate income taxes to Clinton

1:21:36.479 --> 1:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>era levels. Are higher taxes good for the economy. Us

1:21:41.200 --> 1:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>gdpeeper capita adjusted for inflation forty four thousand, three hundred

1:21:45.800 --> 1:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen dollars in nineteen ninety eight fifty seven thousand,

1:21:50.280 --> 1:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is gdpeper capita, not household income. That was

1:21:52.439 --> 1:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a mistake I made before in the show fifty seven thousand,

1:21:55.040 --> 1:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and twenty one. Now. Warren also wants to

1:21:59.000 --> 1:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>impose a wealth tax on the net worth of individuals

1:22:01.439 --> 1:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>two percent, two percent on net worth above fifty million dollars,

1:22:05.680 --> 1:22:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and three percent on net worth above one billion dollars.

1:22:09.280 --> 1:22:11.559
<v Speaker 1>The current yield on two year Treasury bonds is one

1:22:11.600 --> 1:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>point five percent. For a conservatively invested billionaire, that means

1:22:16.160 --> 1:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a two hundred percent tax on income on top of

1:22:19.880 --> 1:22:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the income tax he or she is already paying in

1:22:22.720 --> 1:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>anything except politics. We'd call this stealing, but don't try

1:22:29.280 --> 1:22:31.719
<v Speaker 1>to take the money and run. Warren proposes a forty

1:22:31.760 --> 1:22:36.759
<v Speaker 1>percent exit tax on expatriation of wealth exceeding fifty million dollars.

1:22:37.760 --> 1:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>The island that Wall Streets money to will be living

1:22:39.800 --> 1:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on won't be Grand Cayman. It will be Riker's Island.

1:22:43.800 --> 1:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Warren doesn't seem to like rich people very much, never

1:22:46.400 --> 1:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>mind that, according to public financial disclosure forms, she and

1:22:49.640 --> 1:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>her husband have a net worth between four and eleven

1:22:52.800 --> 1:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. End quote PJA taking pg Rourke here my

1:22:59.240 --> 1:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>friend and college taking Elizabeth Warren two task for this,

1:23:06.280 --> 1:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the wealth tax is going to set up all kinds

1:23:10.240 --> 1:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of dislocations in the economy and create a new regime

1:23:15.280 --> 1:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>where the irs is not going to just be looking

1:23:18.320 --> 1:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>at what you make, will be looking at what you

1:23:19.920 --> 1:23:23.599
<v Speaker 1>have and assessing based on that how much you're going

1:23:23.680 --> 1:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay. The wealth tax may start at two percent,

1:23:26.160 --> 1:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but maybe then it goes up to four percent. Maybe

1:23:29.160 --> 1:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>then the idea becomes nobody And I've heard people say this.

1:23:33.160 --> 1:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>You will hear a kage progressive say this out loud.

1:23:35.640 --> 1:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody should be worth more than ten million dollars. They'll

1:23:37.960 --> 1:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>say nobody needs more than ten million dollars. You might say,

1:23:40.680 --> 1:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>why not one hundred million? Well, because they say so.

1:23:43.960 --> 1:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>The same mentality that believes that central planning by the

1:23:46.320 --> 1:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>government will lead to good outcomes thinks that we can

1:23:49.320 --> 1:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>just pull a number out of the air and that's

1:23:51.479 --> 1:23:57.479
<v Speaker 1>all you need. That's the max net worth that would

1:23:57.680 --> 1:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>appeal to people. Right, I'm sorry that would be acceptable

1:24:02.320 --> 1:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>for people that it appeals to them or not. As

1:24:03.760 --> 1:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole different matter, but Warren is in many ways

1:24:08.680 --> 1:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>quite radical. PJ goes on to talk about her plans

1:24:12.400 --> 1:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for corporations. Quote Warren has proposed that large corporations should

1:24:17.320 --> 1:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>be required to allow employees to elect forty percent of

1:24:21.479 --> 1:24:24.559
<v Speaker 1>corporate board members. And that's how somebody's brother in law,

1:24:24.640 --> 1:24:27.599
<v Speaker 1>wearing flip flops, cargo shorts and at Patriot's jersey, ends

1:24:27.680 --> 1:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>up at the board table scratching his stomach and drinking

1:24:29.840 --> 1:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a beer. You can't blame the guy from the loading

1:24:32.720 --> 1:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>dock who nominated him. His wife had been had been

1:24:35.800 --> 1:24:37.559
<v Speaker 1>on him for years to get her brother a job.

1:24:38.880 --> 1:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>She also proposes limiting the gender pay gap. PJ wrights

1:24:42.240 --> 1:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Paycheck Fairness Act legislation, and Warren thinks the

1:24:47.240 --> 1:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>federal minimum wage should be twenty two dollars an hour. Folks,

1:24:51.000 --> 1:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is all really gonna have. That would have

1:24:55.760 --> 1:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>dramatic effect. Now, I know you say buck, but she'll

1:24:57.800 --> 1:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>need the legislature to go along with her. And well,

1:25:00.360 --> 1:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what we know about Democrats is that sometimes they'll just

1:25:02.479 --> 1:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>do things by executive fiat. Sometimes there'll be a determination

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>made that they can't wait. But if you want to see,

1:25:09.640 --> 1:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to read more of Pj's essay, there

1:25:11.360 --> 1:25:14.519
<v Speaker 1>American Consequences dot com. That's that's where you can read it.

1:25:14.600 --> 1:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And I write there too, and you can sign up

1:25:17.200 --> 1:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for their newsletter. I send a newsletter out every week.

1:25:19.320 --> 1:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It's very cool, so you can check it out. Oh,

1:25:24.400 --> 1:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the concern over Elizabeth Warren, I think

1:25:27.280 --> 1:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is what has led in part to the possibility of

1:25:32.120 --> 1:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>some very late entrances getting into the race. There are

1:25:36.880 --> 1:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>people now, there are some stories out there now, like

1:25:41.120 --> 1:25:43.839
<v Speaker 1>here's one from the New York Times quote missus Clinton

1:25:44.000 --> 1:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Bloomberg have both told people privately in recent

1:25:49.240 --> 1:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks that if they could win, if they thought they

1:25:51.400 --> 1:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>could win, they would consider entering the primary. She has

1:25:57.360 --> 1:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>not given Do not believe anybody who tells you otherwise.

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Do not you know, don't let the propagandists change your

1:26:07.000 --> 1:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>mind on this one. She has not decided that she

1:26:11.960 --> 1:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to accept a future in which she will never

1:26:15.040 --> 1:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>be president. It's just not there. It has not happened.

1:26:18.880 --> 1:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Her belief, very clearly is that she did win the

1:26:22.160 --> 1:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen election, even though she didn't, and she may

1:26:27.439 --> 1:26:29.559
<v Speaker 1>be the only candidate in her mind who can fully

1:26:30.040 --> 1:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>unite the Democratic Party and defeat Trump. And therefore, in

1:26:33.560 --> 1:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton's oh my gosh, world, she is the necessary

1:26:41.160 --> 1:26:44.839
<v Speaker 1>candidate for this moment, not just a candidate, the necessary candidate.

1:26:45.880 --> 1:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't require that much thinking like a liberal to

1:26:48.640 --> 1:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>get us there. This is not a massive departure from

1:26:53.479 --> 1:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what Hillary is already saying in public and we're already seeing.

1:26:56.240 --> 1:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, The New York Times had a published a

1:26:59.400 --> 1:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>piece out Hillary about whether she's a master troll, whether

1:27:06.760 --> 1:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>she is excellent at trolling people? Now master troll question

1:27:11.960 --> 1:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>mark freed to the constraints of public office. Missus Clinton

1:27:15.000 --> 1:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to be living her best life. There are still

1:27:20.040 --> 1:27:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Hillary superfans all throughout the media. They haven't given up either.

1:27:27.560 --> 1:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's like you've heard me. I think

1:27:29.280 --> 1:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I've said ten or twenty percent. Chance Hillary andrews the race.

1:27:31.840 --> 1:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's still very much a chance. And when you see

1:27:36.120 --> 1:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden fading, Bernie Sanders is not healthy enough, nor

1:27:41.160 --> 1:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is he compelling enough really as a candidate. Elizabeth Warren

1:27:44.479 --> 1:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like big, harshly talks like this, and she looks

1:27:48.160 --> 1:27:51.559
<v Speaker 1>like someone you could sit down and have some nice

1:27:51.720 --> 1:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>camemal tea with. She's radical, and the rest of the

1:27:56.920 --> 1:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Democrat candidates aren't getting any traction. So is there a

1:28:00.640 --> 1:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>future which Hillary Clinton maybe does jump into this thing?

1:28:04.320 --> 1:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you. I can't tell you it's a no.

1:28:07.200 --> 1:28:10.559
<v Speaker 1>And more importantly, neither were Hillary Clinton. For the first time,

1:28:10.640 --> 1:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there are now more rich Chinese than rich Americans. China

1:28:16.680 --> 1:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>now counts for one hundred million of the richest ten

1:28:21.320 --> 1:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of people in the world. There are ninety nine

1:28:24.800 --> 1:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>million Americans in the same category. An interesting statistic here,

1:28:33.000 --> 1:28:36.519
<v Speaker 1>yes from CNN from their business section. And if you

1:28:36.560 --> 1:28:38.519
<v Speaker 1>look at the ten percent of the wealthiest people in

1:28:38.560 --> 1:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the world, there are more Chinese who fit into that

1:28:41.080 --> 1:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>ten percent then there are Americans. And this is the

1:28:44.880 --> 1:28:48.639
<v Speaker 1>first time that that has ever happened. The US still

1:28:48.680 --> 1:28:52.599
<v Speaker 1>has many more millionaires eighteen point six million, or forty

1:28:52.640 --> 1:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>percent of the world's total versus four point four million

1:28:55.920 --> 1:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in China, and it's adding millionaires faster. But and the

1:29:00.880 --> 1:29:03.799
<v Speaker 1>average American is still much richer than their Chinese counterparts.

1:29:03.920 --> 1:29:07.439
<v Speaker 1>US wealth per adult is four hundred and thirty two thousand,

1:29:07.439 --> 1:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty five dollars compared with fifty eight thousand,

1:29:09.920 --> 1:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and forty four in China. But China is

1:29:14.680 --> 1:29:21.559
<v Speaker 1>growing rapidly and the Chinese entry into the middle class

1:29:21.720 --> 1:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is having major impact on global markets and on geopolitics,

1:29:28.120 --> 1:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>because now you have hundreds of millions of people in

1:29:29.920 --> 1:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>China who've been lifted out of poverty and they're going

1:29:31.920 --> 1:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to have their own aspirations, goals, and yes, this will

1:29:35.800 --> 1:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>play out at the nation state level as well for China.

1:29:40.920 --> 1:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to share with you. I had a

1:29:42.160 --> 1:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation recently with a friend of mine who is a

1:29:46.360 --> 1:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>very knowledgeable China expert, speaks fluent Mandarin, and he was

1:29:52.320 --> 1:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>saying to me that things have changed in China dramatically.

1:29:58.439 --> 1:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>That it used to be the Chinese attitude, the Chinese

1:30:03.320 --> 1:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>attitude on the mainland was if you were a visiting

1:30:07.120 --> 1:30:09.519
<v Speaker 1>American and I had heard this before too, they were

1:30:09.600 --> 1:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>so happy to see you. There was such a sense

1:30:13.160 --> 1:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of such a sense of being pleased that there are

1:30:19.400 --> 1:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone's willing to even visit and go see China and

1:30:22.040 --> 1:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>experience its culture. And that was true through the nineties

1:30:24.960 --> 1:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and the early two thousands. But there's been a change

1:30:27.080 --> 1:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>now and a lot of Chinese and this is coming

1:30:30.000 --> 1:30:34.679
<v Speaker 1>from there. They have a very lockdown state propaganda media.

1:30:35.640 --> 1:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Chinese are being told that there are

1:30:37.800 --> 1:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>external forces that are trying to hold them down, that

1:30:40.439 --> 1:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>America is trying to box them in and prevent them

1:30:42.760 --> 1:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>from finding from achieving their true destiny, and that the

1:30:46.760 --> 1:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Chinese people are on a pathway to become the world

1:30:50.439 --> 1:30:54.639
<v Speaker 1>leaders and everything and everything the wealthiest, dominant military power,

1:30:54.800 --> 1:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>dominant culture, and America is the one thing that's standing

1:30:58.320 --> 1:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in their way, and that has resulted in a change

1:31:02.200 --> 1:31:06.799
<v Speaker 1>in attitudes wides were changing China to particularly in the cities,

1:31:06.840 --> 1:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the major cities in China, about Americans, even on an

1:31:10.120 --> 1:31:13.639
<v Speaker 1>individual level, that there is much it's much more likely

1:31:13.840 --> 1:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this is again there's a friend of mine who lived

1:31:15.200 --> 1:31:18.479
<v Speaker 1>in China for years saying that it's much more likely

1:31:18.560 --> 1:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that you would experience hostility from Chinese nationals now when

1:31:24.200 --> 1:31:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you visit than you would than you would before. That

1:31:26.600 --> 1:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>there's much less of a sense of wonder and excitement

1:31:29.040 --> 1:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about anything American. That our culture is considered more invasive

1:31:34.840 --> 1:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>now in many ways than something that was admirable and desirable,

1:31:39.720 --> 1:31:42.599
<v Speaker 1>even they have their own way of doing Now. I'm

1:31:42.640 --> 1:31:44.519
<v Speaker 1>not saying this is everybody. We're speaking about a country

1:31:44.520 --> 1:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with a billion people, but this is a much more prevalent,

1:31:49.240 --> 1:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>much more prevalent perception among the Chinese. And I've heard

1:31:52.360 --> 1:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this from other people. And I'll tell you, I feel

1:31:54.120 --> 1:31:55.599
<v Speaker 1>like I experienced a little bit of this as well,

1:31:55.640 --> 1:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>just when I was visiting there for a week. You

1:31:58.960 --> 1:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>come across eural Chinese visiting Beijing and they see an

1:32:03.000 --> 1:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>American and they smile. But you deal with Chinese in

1:32:06.040 --> 1:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Beijing day to day and they're they're not they're not

1:32:08.720 --> 1:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>looking to help you out. In fact, in Shanghai, you

1:32:12.880 --> 1:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>deal with a lot of people who the second they

1:32:14.640 --> 1:32:16.519
<v Speaker 1>see or Westerner, they're just trying to rip you off.

1:32:16.600 --> 1:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And that was told me by people running businesses in

1:32:19.479 --> 1:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>China that there's just a sense of if you rip

1:32:21.920 --> 1:32:24.679
<v Speaker 1>off a Westerner, a foreigner, even if it's an expat

1:32:24.680 --> 1:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>who's living in Shanghai, that's fine. You're you're just kind

1:32:29.320 --> 1:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of evening the playing field a little bit. It's it's

1:32:32.400 --> 1:32:37.839
<v Speaker 1>a it's a much more aggressive, much more nationalistic culture

1:32:37.920 --> 1:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with in China than you used to have.

1:32:41.400 --> 1:32:43.639
<v Speaker 1>And this is from people I know, and they're saying

1:32:43.680 --> 1:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that you'll just look at how they wield Chinese financial

1:32:47.479 --> 1:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>influence to shut down conversations in the NBA, and look

1:32:51.400 --> 1:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>at the way that they will harass and suppress academics

1:32:56.840 --> 1:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>who speak ill of China or who are critical of

1:33:00.479 --> 1:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese approach to anything. My friends, we have been

1:33:04.120 --> 1:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>asleep at the wheel as a country and seeing what's

1:33:06.360 --> 1:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>going on here with China and being willing to confront it.

1:33:09.000 --> 1:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know that President Trump in a lot of ways,

1:33:11.479 --> 1:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a blunt instrument, but with the China situation,

1:33:16.880 --> 1:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he was the first one who is really willing to

1:33:18.760 --> 1:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>say this has got to stop. We have a real problem.

1:33:22.240 --> 1:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>He has been ringing the alarm bell on China, not

1:33:24.680 --> 1:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just as president, but for many many years before it.

1:33:27.080 --> 1:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>He has been right. This is a country that is

1:33:30.240 --> 1:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>going to pose very serious, not just economic challenges for us,

1:33:33.880 --> 1:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but down the line it's going to be security challenges.

1:33:36.640 --> 1:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And I don't just mean stealing an intellectual property. I

1:33:38.840 --> 1:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>mean we're going to have to be worried about a

1:33:41.439 --> 1:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>China that is building bases all over the world, that's

1:33:43.680 --> 1:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>flexing it's muscles all over the world. It wants global dominance,

1:33:47.280 --> 1:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and global dominance through a system that is truly authoritarian,

1:33:51.760 --> 1:33:55.439
<v Speaker 1>really totalitarian. Wants to control your thoughts, your speech. The

1:33:55.560 --> 1:33:58.479
<v Speaker 1>social credit system that's in place that tells you whether

1:33:58.600 --> 1:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>or not you can get good dates online. I mean,

1:34:00.680 --> 1:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they have really taken this stuff to a new level,

1:34:04.640 --> 1:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't look like they're going to collapse or

1:34:06.840 --> 1:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have a massive financial reset anytime soon. It's slowed down

1:34:10.960 --> 1:34:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because the trade war with America. But

1:34:12.840 --> 1:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>if anything, the trade war that has been ongoing has

1:34:17.439 --> 1:34:20.760
<v Speaker 1>raised awareness to borrow from the left about the real

1:34:20.840 --> 1:34:23.720
<v Speaker 1>challenges that China poses to us, the real challenges that

1:34:23.760 --> 1:34:28.599
<v Speaker 1>we face from China. So when you see these statistics

1:34:28.640 --> 1:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about the percentage of the wealthiest ten percent of the

1:34:31.240 --> 1:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>world that are from China, it is a reminder that

1:34:35.720 --> 1:34:38.479
<v Speaker 1>they are gaining on us and their intentions. This is

1:34:38.560 --> 1:34:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not this is not like the EU being a bigger

1:34:41.360 --> 1:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the EU is a bigger economy than the

1:34:42.960 --> 1:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>United States. That's a lot of countries put together. That

1:34:45.880 --> 1:34:47.519
<v Speaker 1>doesn't keep us up late at night. We don't worry

1:34:47.520 --> 1:34:49.439
<v Speaker 1>about that. You know, no one thinks no one thinks

1:34:49.479 --> 1:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have to worry about the French

1:34:52.479 --> 1:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>invading us anytime soon, or the French building a blue

1:34:55.320 --> 1:34:57.639
<v Speaker 1>water navy to rival RS and then kick us out

1:34:57.680 --> 1:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of whole areas of the Those are real concerns with China,

1:35:04.000 --> 1:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and what is China going to do going forward with

1:35:05.800 --> 1:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan and what is it gonna You know, I think

1:35:08.160 --> 1:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the best strategy that we have other than recognition that

1:35:12.200 --> 1:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>China is a competitor, a true near peer competitor or

1:35:15.920 --> 1:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not some country that we just need to be strengthening

1:35:18.520 --> 1:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>ties with all the time and let do whatever, Let

1:35:20.200 --> 1:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>them do whatever they want to our economy, to our

1:35:22.040 --> 1:35:25.760
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property. We want the we want to be as

1:35:25.840 --> 1:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>close as possible. I mean, I think that the US

1:35:28.200 --> 1:35:32.519
<v Speaker 1>focus on closer ties with India should be much much more,

1:35:34.560 --> 1:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a much stronger effort, and also the US effort to

1:35:38.200 --> 1:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>build up the so called literal L I T T

1:35:42.080 --> 1:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>O R A L. I don't know why I spelled

1:35:44.080 --> 1:35:45.479
<v Speaker 1>that out for you guys all know it, but just

1:35:45.800 --> 1:35:51.519
<v Speaker 1>reminding myself states like the Japanese, the Philippines, or the

1:35:52.439 --> 1:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>South Korea. You look at all these different Malaysia, Vietnam,

1:35:56.880 --> 1:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>all countries that we want to be self sufficient, powerful

1:36:00.000 --> 1:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and a block on Chinese ambitions because we want balance

1:36:04.520 --> 1:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>in that region. We do not want one a hedgemon

1:36:07.240 --> 1:36:09.639
<v Speaker 1>that's pushing everybody around and getting its way all the time,

1:36:10.040 --> 1:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>because if that happens, there's only other there's only one hedgemon.

1:36:13.720 --> 1:36:17.240
<v Speaker 1>That they can look to beyond the near abroad and

1:36:17.320 --> 1:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be us, and we are heading for

1:36:20.880 --> 1:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a real We're heading for a showdown with China. It's

1:36:23.040 --> 1:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>just a question when it happens and how it happens.

1:36:25.400 --> 1:36:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's a greater awareness now and

1:36:27.560 --> 1:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you've either's been a change in Chinese nationalist mentality that

1:36:33.320 --> 1:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>even if you're just a tourist showing up there, you

1:36:35.160 --> 1:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>may be quite aware of it. And I've been speaking

1:36:37.200 --> 1:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to people that are telling me that's exactly what's going on. Hey,

1:36:47.680 --> 1:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Team Buck, it's time for roll call. Team at iHeartMedia

1:37:01.439 --> 1:37:06.519
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you want to send us dog, that's

1:37:06.560 --> 1:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>how we get the role call going here. Let's start

1:37:08.760 --> 1:37:13.479
<v Speaker 1>it off with my man Andrew, who rides Buck. I

1:37:13.600 --> 1:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>install the Pluto app on my Apple TV exclusively because

1:37:17.439 --> 1:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of your presence. I've been og teen Buck before it

1:37:20.880 --> 1:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was a thing. As evidence to the screen shot in

1:37:25.200 --> 1:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this email, Yes, I enjoy the show as much now

1:37:28.920 --> 1:37:30.439
<v Speaker 1>as I did when you filled in for Glenn on

1:37:30.600 --> 1:37:34.679
<v Speaker 1>July eighteenth, twenty thirteen. And I stand by my original

1:37:34.760 --> 1:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>claim that you're the legitimate heir to rush Limball Shields

1:37:38.200 --> 1:37:41.559
<v Speaker 1>high from Wo Wo Land Andrew, Well, Andrew Man, thank

1:37:41.600 --> 1:37:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you so much. That is very high praise and it's

1:37:43.760 --> 1:37:46.760
<v Speaker 1>really kind of you and appreciated. And Andrew sent me

1:37:46.840 --> 1:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a screenshot from Wow from July of twenty thirteen. I

1:37:51.640 --> 1:37:53.280
<v Speaker 1>can't believe I've been doing this as long as I have,

1:37:53.880 --> 1:37:59.519
<v Speaker 1>He wrote to Glenn, this is when I work for

1:37:59.560 --> 1:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Beck. Glenn, I'm really enjoying Buck Sex. There's a

1:38:01.680 --> 1:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>fill in host today. His points and analysis are brilliant.

1:38:03.880 --> 1:38:07.240
<v Speaker 1>He reminds me of a young Rush Limball regards Andrew, Andrew,

1:38:07.320 --> 1:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much man. You have certainly been og

1:38:09.600 --> 1:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>team Buck and we like to say oss for original

1:38:13.320 --> 1:38:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Squad, but thank you so much for writing in

1:38:16.520 --> 1:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and the kind words always are appreciated. Guys, because in

1:38:20.200 --> 1:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the media business you get a lot of people telling

1:38:22.040 --> 1:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you not good enough, not big enough, not whatever enough.

1:38:26.200 --> 1:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And the only thing that really keeps you going a

1:38:28.000 --> 1:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of days, the only thing gives me going a

1:38:29.160 --> 1:38:30.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of days, all of you who listen to watch

1:38:30.880 --> 1:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that's it, and the desire to avoid getting a real job.

1:38:36.560 --> 1:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>David writes, you do the best, Beto. I've never heard

1:38:40.920 --> 1:38:43.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody else even try to do his accent or his voice,

1:38:44.120 --> 1:38:46.360
<v Speaker 1>probably because they can't even come close to you. Gotta

1:38:46.439 --> 1:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>work on your Elizabeth Ward a little bit war ex

1:38:49.040 --> 1:38:52.760
<v Speaker 1>goose me, sir, ask producer Mark if you sound a

1:38:52.800 --> 1:38:56.599
<v Speaker 1>little like totally from south Park. I don't know who

1:38:56.680 --> 1:39:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that is. Who's totally from south Park? I don't know

1:39:00.280 --> 1:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>who that is either. Love your show. I listened to

1:39:03.000 --> 1:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk radio, and out of all of them,

1:39:04.960 --> 1:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you're the closest to Rush with your real world analysis.

1:39:08.600 --> 1:39:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Thanks David, Well, thank you so much, David. That's very

1:39:11.600 --> 1:39:14.679
<v Speaker 1>kind another Rush comparison. You guys do me great honor

1:39:14.760 --> 1:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>with that, and thank you so much for writing in

1:39:17.760 --> 1:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and saying all of the kind things. Chris, we're doing

1:39:22.080 --> 1:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>emails today because we did Facebook yesterday. If you want

1:39:24.160 --> 1:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to send Facebook messages on Facebook dot com, Slashbuck Sexton

1:39:27.640 --> 1:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and Team Bucket iHeartMedia dot com for the email address,

1:39:32.880 --> 1:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris right, Hey Buck. My daughter was invited to a

1:39:35.040 --> 1:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>three day ACLU camp. Huh. I tried to explain to

1:39:40.680 --> 1:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>her why it wasn't a great idea. But then when

1:39:42.320 --> 1:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I searched the internet, I found that I supported many

1:39:44.439 --> 1:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of their positions on free speech. I know the individual

1:39:48.120 --> 1:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>members are extremely liberal, but they are free speech advocates,

1:39:51.479 --> 1:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>even for undesirable groups like the KKK, so it doesn't

1:39:54.040 --> 1:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>seem like they play favorites. During the Reagan era, the

1:39:57.600 --> 1:40:00.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest insult in Republican circles was being a hardcaring member

1:40:00.840 --> 1:40:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of the ACLU. So is the ACLU ok Chris is

1:40:05.800 --> 1:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting question. The ACLU is a left wing

1:40:11.200 --> 1:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>organization with a left wing agenda. Does the ACLU sometimes

1:40:16.640 --> 1:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>stand on a principle of free speech that is truly

1:40:21.320 --> 1:40:24.599
<v Speaker 1>about free speech and not just about advancing the left

1:40:24.640 --> 1:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>wing agenda? Yes, indeed, But if you look at, for example,

1:40:30.000 --> 1:40:33.280
<v Speaker 1>when the Aco ac LU will and will not bring

1:40:33.320 --> 1:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a case, there's a tendency to go after Christian religious

1:40:37.640 --> 1:40:41.880
<v Speaker 1>organizations on First Amended issues and not, for example, Muslim

1:40:42.000 --> 1:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>religious organizations on First Amendment issues. Right, there's there's certainly

1:40:46.439 --> 1:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>cases where the ACLU is showing a left wing bias.

1:40:51.840 --> 1:40:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Do you see that a lot? And then there's another

1:40:53.640 --> 1:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>part of this is that the a CLU on the

1:40:56.479 --> 1:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>issue of I think it's I'd have to look at

1:40:59.080 --> 1:41:02.559
<v Speaker 1>their recent positions, but I'm pretty sure on on hate

1:41:02.600 --> 1:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>speech they're very they take the position they're getting closer

1:41:07.840 --> 1:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and closer to speech equals violence, which is the eradication

1:41:11.479 --> 1:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of the First Amendment relief if speech equals violence just

1:41:13.640 --> 1:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because you don't like certain speech. But I'd have to

1:41:16.200 --> 1:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>look at some of their more recent decisions. But what

1:41:19.840 --> 1:41:22.559
<v Speaker 1>when they bring cases and when they don't. That alone

1:41:22.600 --> 1:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>shows you the a CLU is a left wing is

1:41:25.400 --> 1:41:27.519
<v Speaker 1>a left wing group, but even left wing groups can

1:41:27.600 --> 1:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>do good things. You know, Telsea Gabert hates the president,

1:41:31.120 --> 1:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is a progressive, wants medicare for all, and believes in

1:41:33.760 --> 1:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>climate change. But I've been seeing you're saying, well, at

1:41:36.040 --> 1:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>least she doesn't want third trimester abortion and doesn't say

1:41:39.680 --> 1:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that Trump supporters are all Nazis, so she's you know,

1:41:42.640 --> 1:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>there's good things, there's bad things. Aclu IS is mostly

1:41:46.240 --> 1:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about destroying the SLU really at its cored now, has

1:41:50.080 --> 1:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>been leveraged by the left to destroy Judeo Christian culture

1:41:55.240 --> 1:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and conservatism in America. That that is the ultimate It's

1:41:59.040 --> 1:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>not protecting freedom, And I could pull some examples of

1:42:02.000 --> 1:42:03.280
<v Speaker 1>why that is, but I'd have to do a little

1:42:03.280 --> 1:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a deep dive on it. Brandon Buck, I

1:42:07.320 --> 1:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with another member of Team Buck Joker was boring

1:42:11.720 --> 1:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>story and acting were good, but pace is very slow.

1:42:16.040 --> 1:42:19.879
<v Speaker 1>And sorry but there was a spoiler of sorts. Blah blah, Brandon.

1:42:20.080 --> 1:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brandon Brandon, you, sir, are entitled to your opinion.

1:42:27.120 --> 1:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that I will say this about Joker, since

1:42:29.960 --> 1:42:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we're back on the topic. When I saw that it's

1:42:32.760 --> 1:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>two hours, this is a big mistake most movies, you

1:42:36.800 --> 1:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>really want it to be ninety minutes. You want an

1:42:40.320 --> 1:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>hour and a half, three acts, thirty minutes an act.

1:42:43.080 --> 1:42:45.639
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That's the sweet spot. Now, of course there's

1:42:45.680 --> 1:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Brave Heart, which went on for like ten years. I mean,

1:42:47.920 --> 1:42:49.880
<v Speaker 1>there's some movies that are amazing and are very long.

1:42:50.600 --> 1:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But usually I think that you could have cut twenty

1:42:54.240 --> 1:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>minutes out of Joker, for example, and made it a

1:42:57.560 --> 1:43:00.760
<v Speaker 1>better movie. If you cut twenty minutes out, it would

1:43:00.800 --> 1:43:04.400
<v Speaker 1>be a better movie. That's what I think. It was

1:43:04.479 --> 1:43:07.439
<v Speaker 1>too long, so I would agree with that. I wouldn't

1:43:07.439 --> 1:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>say it's boring, but I do think it was too long.

1:43:10.720 --> 1:43:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's see Kathy hey Buck listening to the podcast. Is

1:43:15.880 --> 1:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a time in the podcast where Betta was talking about

1:43:17.920 --> 1:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the president using Nazi tactics and you start speaking the background.

1:43:21.520 --> 1:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you meant for better to speak over you.

1:43:23.920 --> 1:43:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Just thought i'd mentioned this since this is not the

1:43:25.520 --> 1:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>first time I've heard this happen. Shields High Kathy from Georgia. Yeah, Kathy,

1:43:29.200 --> 1:43:31.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you. People brought this to my attention last night.

1:43:31.880 --> 1:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Producer Mark has a brilliant strategy for me to avoid this,

1:43:34.560 --> 1:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>called don't talk during clips. Buck. Yeah, that's a great strategy. Yeah, well,

1:43:40.400 --> 1:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also part of the new studio operations,

1:43:43.120 --> 1:43:45.679
<v Speaker 1>so I won't put all the blame on you. Thank

1:43:45.760 --> 1:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit more than just it's not just

1:43:48.000 --> 1:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>all about the Bucks are getting a little too excited.

1:43:49.840 --> 1:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, no, we will try to avoid that. Mark

1:43:52.200 --> 1:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>will wave me off now because I sometimes like to

1:43:54.040 --> 1:43:56.479
<v Speaker 1>talk while these clips are going in the past, but

1:43:56.560 --> 1:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have the set up here for that,

1:43:58.200 --> 1:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>so we'll try to avoid that for a whole bunch

1:44:02.800 --> 1:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. Oh wow, look at this, Andy writes, Hello, Buck,

1:44:08.680 --> 1:44:10.479
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to say you have a fan base in

1:44:10.680 --> 1:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand that really enjoys your show. All right, we

1:44:14.680 --> 1:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>got some Kiwi team Buck. A lot of us here

1:44:17.080 --> 1:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>closely follow American politics and relate to conservative and libertarian ideologies.

1:44:22.040 --> 1:44:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Our country has dramatically changed with the election of a

1:44:24.520 --> 1:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>far left government and following our recent terror attack, things

1:44:27.479 --> 1:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>are moving very quickly. Imagine Justin Trudeau but with venom. Anyway,

1:44:32.040 --> 1:44:34.639
<v Speaker 1>your show was always on point, and that Hans Gruber

1:44:34.720 --> 1:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>voice the other week had me in hysterics. Keep up

1:44:37.120 --> 1:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the good work, cheers Andy. Well, Andy, not quite the

1:44:41.040 --> 1:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>landown under right, that's Australia, but whatever, whatever the cool

1:44:44.040 --> 1:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>way to say New Zealand the land of of Frodo

1:44:48.840 --> 1:44:50.519
<v Speaker 1>in the Hobbits because that's where they filmed the Lord

1:44:50.520 --> 1:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Rings trilogy. Sure, yeah, just thank you to

1:44:53.840 --> 1:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Kiwi team buck Man down there in New Zealand, and

1:44:55.720 --> 1:44:57.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you for writing in. And I don't know was

1:44:57.920 --> 1:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the Hans Booby? Was it that center? Was it the

1:45:00.680 --> 1:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>British like mister Takagi. I can't remember now, but I'm

1:45:04.040 --> 1:45:06.800
<v Speaker 1>glad you enjoyed it. That's the show. Check it out

1:45:06.840 --> 1:45:09.599
<v Speaker 1>on podcast. Tell people Shields High