WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Pfizer Deal, Nobel Peace, Golden Week 

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. Straight ahead on the program,

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>and look at how tariffs on lumber and timber could

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 2>impact the US housing market. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hebge in London. What's in a prize, specifically

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the Nobel Prize Decisions.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm Dog Prisner looking at Chinese consumers during Golden Week

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 4>plus trouble with some Hong Kong real estate.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven to three year, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirias,

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>XM one twenty one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby. We begin today's

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 2>program with a new batch of tariffs announced by President

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump on imports of soft wood, timber, and lumber, as

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 2>well as levees on kitchen cabinets, vanities, and upholstered wood

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 2>products brought into the US. How will this impact the

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 2>housing market moving forward? And what about housing prices?

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 5>For more?

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence US home building Analyst. Well, Drew,

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for being here, appreciated home builders.

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Home buyers now, they've already been paying sky high prices,

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>elevated mortgage rates, they've been paying tariffs on imported kitchen appliances,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 2>washers and dryers, and now October fourteenth, they'll be paying

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>ten percent levees on softwood, lumber and timber, twenty five

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 2>percent on kitchen cabinets, vanities, other pre assembled I mean,

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>this is looking This is not good, is it?

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? Well, certainly, you know, the consumer doesn't need higher

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 6>costs when it comes to housing, given the affordability constraints

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 6>that they've been under for the last several years. Just

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 6>to take a step back on the tariffs, to put

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 6>it in perspective, the US imports about thirteen million dollars

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 6>or seven percent roughly of the goods used in new

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 6>residential construction. So at the headline level, it's not necessarily

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 6>a massive piece. But you know, there are particular areas

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 6>where tariffs will be felt perhaps more than others. If

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 6>you look at the top of three countries that we

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 6>import from, it's China. That's about twenty seven percent of imports.

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 6>From there, we're talking about things like appliance, is lighting,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 6>electrical components, hand tools. The second is Mexico and from

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 6>there we're primarily talking about gypsum products. So I think

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 6>drywall Mexico is about seventy two percent of imports there.

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 6>And then third, you know, which has really come into

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 6>focus now is Canada, which accounts for eighty five percent

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 6>of lumber imports. So when you put all this together,

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 6>the previously announced tariffs, you know, country specific fat and

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 6>on reciprocal tariffs, along with these newly announced tariffs, we

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 6>think that the costs, the total cost to a builder

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 6>will be about ten thousand dollars per home, which which

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 6>is a pretty staggering number. Now, we don't think the

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 6>builders will ultimately absorb all of these costs. I think,

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, they'll probably be spread throughout the supply chain.

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 6>And when you think about the large public builders, they're

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 6>really better positioned in this environment given you know, their

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 6>scale now in terms of their ability to pass on

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 6>to consumers. You know, I think that could be tough.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 6>And you know, you've got prices already coming down for

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 6>a lot of builders due to affordability, and then they're

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 6>still having to use an elevated degree of incentives, which

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 6>is accounted for as a reduction in salespace. So there's

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 6>a lot of moving pieces. But at the end of

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 6>the day, the point is that it becomes increasingly expensive

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 6>to build a home, and I.

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Mean this could really deter a lot of builders. Like

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 2>you said, we're not worried about the KB homes and

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the Pulties of the world, but a lot of smaller

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>ones from constructing new homes, at least initially.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 6>No, it's a good point. And you know why we

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 6>haven't seen a huge packed impact on you know, tariffs

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 6>to this point. One of the things we have heard,

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 6>and to your point, really from the smaller private builders,

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 6>is that there hasn't been a lot of certainty, so

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 6>they don't know what their costs are going to be.

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 6>When you don't know what your costs are going to be,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 6>it's hard for you to plan out into the future

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 6>and put new production into the ground. So I do

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 6>think it is definitely more challenging for the smaller names

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 6>in the group. One thing that I think that's worth

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 6>pointing out on the lumber side of this is that

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 6>prior to this announcement of a ten percent tariff on

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 6>software imports, we already had duties on lumber coming in

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 6>from Canada. If you're talking about forty five percent on

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 6>Canadian lumber imports, which again is eighty five percent of

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 6>all the lumber imported into the US.

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it sounds like some of these Canadian

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 2>lumber makers, these these manufacturers could really be struggling now

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 2>if you know, sales get hurt.

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a great point. And you know, the announcement

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 6>really came because the administration wanted to open an investigation

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 6>as to, you know, whether or not the lumber trade

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 6>was of risk to national security, which they determined that

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 6>it was. So the question becomes, well, can the US

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 6>produce enough lumber domestically to meet all the demand. And

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 6>I think the answer for now is no. And you know,

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 6>as I mentioned, we produced about seventy percent of the

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 6>lumber utilized in the US and to get that to

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 6>one hundred percent would really require a lot of time.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 6>The National Association of home builders estimates you know, somewhere

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 6>around ten years to be able to achieve this. So

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 6>certainly no small feat.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>And not only the industrial or resilience, but also Trump's

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 2>had the high quality jobs that this would create. Would

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>they really be high quality jobs?

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean that remains to be seen. And like I said,

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 6>it's will take a lot of time to add new

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 6>capacity to the industry. But you know, there are a

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 6>lot of jobs along the supply train and in terms

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 6>of you know, just the not only jobs you're creating

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 6>at the mills, but logistics and you know, getting wood

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 6>to factories to job sites and things like that. So

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 6>it would certainly help.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Now let's talk about the other tariffs, and these are big.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 2>They're twenty five percent on on kitchen bathroom, Vanity's kitchen cabinets,

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>that type of thing. We know that Ethan Allen, Lazy

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Boys source and manufacture a lot of their products in

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the US, But there are big retailers that import a

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 2>ton of goods Wayfair William soonoma our Age formerly a

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 2>restoration hardware. I mean, they may really be impacted by

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 2>these tariffs, right, you.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 6>Know, I think from from their perspective, you know, the

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 6>impact isn't going to be as great as you might expect.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 6>But if you think about the individual consumer who is

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 6>going out and making a single purchase, you know, on

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 6>a kitchen cabinet or vanity, and was looking for a

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 6>low cost option, all of a sudden to them that

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 6>becomes significantly more expensive. So there's I think there's a

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 6>big difference between how you know a home improvement retailer

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 6>can manage the situation versus individual consumer.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>A lot of challenges well our thanks to Drew Redding,

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence US home Building analyst. We move next to

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a turning point for big pharma. This past week, five

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 2>US negotiated a three year reprieve on drug import tariffs

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 2>in exchange for a promise to reduce what it charges

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Medicaid for some prescription meds, also to price future drugs

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 2>on part with what it charges other wealthy nations, and

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>to sell certain drugs at discounted prices to the public. Now,

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 2>how might this impact the pharmaceutical space, what other drug

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>makers are working on their own deals, and what does

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>it mean for consumers. For all that, we're joined by

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Madison Muller, Bloomberg Health reporter. Madison, thanks for being here.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for having me. I appreciate it.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Can you kind of detail the finer points of this

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 2>agreement with the White House? And I'm most curious about

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>trump RX. It sounds a little like his answer to Obamacare.

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 7>But yeah, it's an interesting concept, and I think we

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 7>knew that they were working on something like this. I mean,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 7>for the last few months, the administration has been talking

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 7>about direct to consumer websites and platforms. Some drug makers

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 7>had already started doing that. Eli Lilly, for example, has

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 7>Lily direct. Nova Nordisk has been doing this for some

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 7>of the real high demand drugs like GLP one weight

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 7>loss drugs, And so we knew the administration was thinking

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 7>about doing something like this, and its answer to one

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 7>of the biggest priorities in terms of healthcare is lowering

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 7>drug prices, and this is sort of one of the

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 7>one of multiple things that the administration thinks could help

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 7>address that by making a website where drug makers can

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 7>put their drugs on there and at a steep discount

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 7>to the list price and have consumers sort of directly

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 7>buy them from the manufacturers as a way to cut

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 7>drug prices. But it's an interesting concept, and cash pay

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 7>might not necessarily be super popular for other medications like

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 7>it has been for the GLP one weight loss drugs.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Is that because so many of those other medications are so.

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 7>Expensive exactly, and the insurance landscape for weight loss drugs

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 7>is quite patchy still, it's very difficult to get insurance coverage.

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 7>The drugs are expensive, so a lot of people are

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 7>willing to pay out of pocket for those medications. But

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 7>in terms of this Feiser deal, some of the medications

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 7>that we know that Pfizer will be discounting, like It's

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 7>blood thinner Eloquist, those are usually covered by insurance anyway,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 7>so people with insurance will have coverage for that. There

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 7>wouldn't really be a reason for them to buy it

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 7>directly from the manufacturer on a website like trump Orex,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 7>and those who don't have insurance, it's probably still going

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 7>to be pretty expensive for now.

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Some of the drugs that are made by Pfizer, by Lilly,

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 2>by Johnson and Johnson all made or mostly made in

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the US. Let's talk about what Trump threatened to impose

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 2>on branded drugs from outside the US. A one hundred

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 2>percent tariff. Now, that's not going to help a whole

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of consumers is.

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 7>It right exactly. I mean, that's one thing that's been

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 7>sort of in conflict with the administration's efforts to lower

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 7>drug prices is if there are tariffs on pharmaceutical products,

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 7>that could end up raising drug prices because it will

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 7>make it a lot more expensive for manufacturers to make

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 7>these medications. And like you said, all of the big

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 7>US and you know, international drug makers have plants, have

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 7>manufacturing plants in the US. They're building more in the US,

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 7>but the pharmaceutical supply chain is really complex, and they

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 7>do have some elements of their manufacturing or supply outside

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 7>of the US. ELI Lilly, for example, makes the critical

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 7>first step in their weight loss and diabetes drugs Manjarro

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 7>and zepbound in Ireland and then they ship it here

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 7>and the rest of the manufacturing process happens here. So

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 7>tariffs really had, you know, huge potential implications for this industry.

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 7>And what Peiser has been able to do is negotiate

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 7>a three year reprieve and it's the assumption that other

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 7>drug makers are going to try to follow suit with this.

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, part Offiser's deal is they made a seventy billion

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 2>dollar pledge to expand manufacturing and research and development here.

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>So what is in Peiser's plans and what are some

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 2>of the other US manufacturers doing.

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so, like we said, there are other US manufacturers

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 7>and international manufacturers that have pledged billions of dollars of investments.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 7>Over the last couple of months we've seen I mean,

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 7>I think Lily was the first one back in February,

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 7>and since then there's been a lot of other pledges

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 7>to invest. And so right now, what we're hearing is

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 7>that these negotiations are sort of on hold for the

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 7>time being in terms of this one hundred percent tariffs

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 7>that Trump had threatened. And there was also this ongoing

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 7>two thirty two investigation, which is a national security investigation

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 7>into the pharmaceutical supply chain sort of as to lay

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 7>the groundwork for eventual tariffs. So we're hearing right now,

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 7>as these sort of deals are going on, that all

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 7>of that is on pause for the time being. And

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 7>I guess it was a couple of months ago the

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 7>Trump administration sent letters to seventeen drug makers laying out

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 7>a couple of specific demands, you know, to lower drug prices,

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 7>look into direct to consumer, you know, offer discounts through medicaid,

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 7>and so what we're seeing is Pfizer follow through on

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 7>some of those demands and make promises that they will

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 7>discount a lot of their drugs on this trump are

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 7>X website, that they'll just count drugs through medicaid, which

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 7>that it's sort of Actually for the industry was a

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 7>bit of a relief because they thought it was going

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 7>to be worse than this, and it could be worse

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 7>than this if there were sweeping most favored nation policies

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 7>or tariffs implemented, and so for Pfizer, actually it was

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 7>a good thing and there was some fault, you know,

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 7>I guess follow through for the rest of the industry

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 7>that this would be a good thing too well.

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>A lot to look forward to in a lot of deals,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 2>likely in the pipeline. Our thanks to Madison Muller, Bloomberg

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Health Reporter, and coming up on Bloomberg Gay Break Weekend,

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>we'll look at the global political implications of the Nobel

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Prize decisions. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Gay Break Weekend, our global look ahead at

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.599
<v Speaker 2>Tom in New York. Up later in our program, a

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 2>look at the Golden Week holiday in China and what

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it'll mean for consumer spending. But first, a new batch

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>of recipients for the Nobel Prize, one of the world's

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 2>most prestigious accolades, established in the will of Swedish chemist

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>and inventor Alfred Nobel to honor individuals who made outstanding

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 2>contributions to humankind. The awards have become an emblem of achievement,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 2>even capturing the interest of US President Donald Trump. For more,

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 2>anchor Caroline hepger Tom.

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 3>It's no secret that President Trump has been courting the

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 3>idea of winning a Nobel Peace Prize for some time.

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 3>According to Bloomberg opinion columnist Andres Klouth, it's one of

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 3>the reasons he's been pushing so hard for a cease

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 3>far between Russia and Ukraine. Other political leaders, including the

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Congolese president, have weighed into the debate, saying Trump will

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 3>have earned the award if he can end more than

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 3>three decades of conflict between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 3>of Congo. And of course, previous US presidents have managed

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 3>to impress the Nobel Committee in the past. Prior winners

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 3>include Theodore Roosevelt, Jimmy Carter, and most recently Barack Obama

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and nine. The current president mentioned the

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 3>prize during his recent address to the United Nations General Assembly,

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>although he did remain philosophical about his chances of winning.

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 8>I didn't think of it at the time because I

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 8>was too busy working to save millions of lives, that is,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 8>the saving and stopping of these wars. But later I

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 8>realized that the United Nations wasn't there for us.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 9>They weren't there.

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 8>I thought of it really after the fact, not during

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 8>these negotiations, which were not easy. That being the case,

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 8>what is the purpose of the United Nations? The UN

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 8>has such tremendous potential. I've always said it, such tremendous,

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 8>tremendous potential. But it's not even coming close to living

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 8>up to that potential for the most part, at least

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 8>for now. All they seem to do is write a

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 8>really strongly worded letter and then never follow that letter up.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 8>It's empty words, and empty words don't solve war. The

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 8>only thing that solves war and wars is action. Now,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 8>after ending all of these wars and also earlier negotiating

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 8>the Abraham Accords, which is a very big thing for

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 8>which our country received no credit, never receives credit. Everyone

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 8>says that I should get the Nobel Peace Prize for

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 8>each one of these achievements. But for me, the real

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 8>prize will be the sons and daughters who live to

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 8>grow up with the mothers and fathers, because millions of

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 8>people are no longer being killed in endless and unglorious wars.

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>That Donald Trump speaking there at the UN General Assembly

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>in New York, so just how likely is it that

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 3>he'll walk away with Nobel recognition and how important is

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the upcoming prize giving. It's something I've been discussing with

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 3>our Nordic managing editor Katy Poyan Palo and Stockholm bureau

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 3>chief Charles Daily. Charles, can I start with you Firstie?

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>So the Nobels are obviously hugely prestigious. They are known

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 3>around the world, just in terms of the history and

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 3>where we are for this year. To tell us a

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>bit about the history of the Nobels and how they've

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 3>come about.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Yep, sure, I mean to do that. We have to

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 5>go back to eighteen ninety five and the Last Will

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 5>and Testament, of a Swedish engineer and chemist by the

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 5>name of Alfred Nobel, who is known really as well

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 5>as the Nobel Prizes, he's also known for inventing dynamite

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 5>as his claim to fame. In that will, he listed

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 5>five prizes for those who have conferred the greatest benefit

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 5>to mankind in the preceding year. And there were five

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 5>categories of prizes in the will physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 5>literature and peace, and they were first awarded in nineteen

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 5>oh one. Some years later, in nineteen sixty eight, however,

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 5>a prize was added in memory of Alfred Nobel, and

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 5>that was established by the central bank here in Sweden,

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 5>which is called the Risbank, and not surprisingly that is

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 5>called now the Economics Prize.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 3>So how important do you think it is then to

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Swedish people.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 5>I think the fact that a Nobel Prize is seen

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 5>as you know, the most prestigious award in the world

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 5>in its field is really a source of national pride

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 5>for a country that, you know, let's be honest, is

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 5>only ten point five million people on the northern edges

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 5>of Europe. I think it's worth also noting that Sweden

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 5>is a nation that looks outward beyond its borders in

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 5>many respects. So the international attention that these prizes gone

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 5>is of huge importance to the country. Nobel Day on

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 5>December tenth, which is the anniversary of Nobel's death, is

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 5>when the prizes are awarded by the King and there

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 5>is a lavish banquet in Stockholm City Hall. And it's

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 5>probably fair to say that that is the biggest academic

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 5>and cultural highlight of the year in Sweden.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 3>So deliberations normally do take place in secret. So what

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 3>do we know about the process for this year.

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the process for this year is as with other years.

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 5>So Nobel in his will listed the institutions responsible for

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 5>awarding the prize, for example the Royal Swedish Academy of

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 5>Sciences and for the Peace Prize it is a committee

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 5>of five elected by Norway's Parliament. Then there is an

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 5>approved list of nominators, for example former winners, members of

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 5>the Swedish Academy, or professors or chair people affiliated with universities,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 5>and they can then put forward a name and a

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 5>voting committee then decides on the winner or winners. There

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 5>can only be three winners per prize. Is the maximum

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 5>number of winners per prize, and disclosure about nominations is

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 5>restricted for fifty years, so very a process shrouded in secrecy.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 3>So Katy, let me turn to you the history of

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 3>awarding the Peace Prize by Norway to foreign leaders. It

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>has at times been controversial.

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, absolutely, it's been controversial. So one thing to know

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 9>about this prize is you cannot ever give it to

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 9>a person that has deceased, And so living people tend

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 9>to after being awarded, continue their careers and lives, and

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 9>sometimes they do things that don't really kind of fit

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 9>in with the spirit of why they were awarded a

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 9>peace prize. One super well known example is two thousand

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 9>and nine when Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 9>Prize just nine months after becoming US president, and he

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 9>of course went on to take a lot of US

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 9>troops into Afghanistan.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and of course we know that President Trump has

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 3>been talking about wanting to win the prize for some time,

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 3>and so again this perhaps put some pressure, adds some

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 3>pressure to these awards. When did we first find out

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 3>about his ambitions?

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 9>Trump has been talking about this for almost a decade.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 9>He keeps bringing up the fact that Obama was given

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 9>the prize and says, you know, if he were named Obama,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 9>he would have been given this prize. In ten seconds.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 9>Trump talks about having brokeered peace or helped end seven wars,

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 9>but many of these are actually a little bit questionable.

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, in terms of the political implications. Then the pressure,

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 3>I wonder whether that is being felt. And maybe also

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 3>we don't know were the US president to win, what

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 3>might be the implications in the fallout.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 9>I think the big question is what if he doesn't win.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 9>This is where the main implication is or Norway. Really

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 9>very recently, Trump declared that not winning would represent a

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 9>big insult to our country. He there sort of applied

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 9>some pressure on the Norwegians. Norwegians are really worried about this.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 9>They're bracing for what's happening if Trump doesn't win. Now,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 9>if Trump were to win, I think a lot of

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 9>people would put to question the sort of foundation of

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 9>the Nobel Peace Prize and what it's done for. But

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 9>the same question has been raised with the previous winner.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 9>As you know, Obama himself questioned his own.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 3>Victory indeed, But then, of course, the Peace Prize is

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 3>separate from the Norwegian government. So whilst there might be trepidation,

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 3>how does that factor into the kind of decision making.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 9>The committee is independent, we know that, and some of

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 9>the controversial decisions it's taken in the past were precisely

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 9>because it is independent. The Norwegian government wanted no conflict

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 9>with China in twenty ten, and yet the committee you know,

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 9>went and awarded the Chinese dissident that year.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Charles, just coming back to you in our specific sphere,

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 3>there's always lots of interest in the prize in economics,

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 3>as well as the other sciences that are awarded, in

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 3>literature and so on. Again, we don't know very much

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 3>about those awards, But what do you think might be

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 3>in the mix here for all of those of the

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>hugely important nobels.

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 5>That's a very difficult question because it really is hard

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 5>to name names. I mean, the betting odds at the

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 5>moment are really only available for the Peace and Literature prizes.

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 5>The favorites for the literature this year include the Australian

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 5>fiction writer Gerald Mernaine and also the Mexican author Christina

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Rivera Gaza. So yeah, in conclusion, it's really hard to

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 5>sort of say were we think the winners might be.

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 5>It might be worth noting though, however, in terms of

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 5>the science related awards, prizes are typically shared by multiple

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 5>scholars and they often have an affiliation to universities on

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 5>the respective research departments. The North America and Europe tend

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 5>to dominate the science related prizes as well. And I

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 5>think you know, one area that's caught a lot of

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 5>media attention rightly in recent years has been the lack

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 5>of women representation on the awards. And you know, I

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 5>don't think that necessarily reflects badly on the Nobel committee

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 5>per se, but probably is more a reflection of the

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 5>barriers that women face in working and progressing through the

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 5>scientific community.

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 3>So my thanks there to Bloomberg's Charles Daily and Katty

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 3>poyan Palo. We'll have full coverage of the Nobel Prize

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 3>ceremonies across at Bloomberg platforms. I'm Caroline Hepgar here in

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 3>London and you can catch us every weekday morning for

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Blueberg Daybreak you at beginning at six am in London,

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 3>that's one am on Wall Street.

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thank you Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend,

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll look at China's Golden Week holiday and what it

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 2>could reveal about the strength of the Chinese consumer. I'm

0:24:47.359 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 2>Break Weekend, our global look ahead of the top stories

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 2>for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 2>New York. In China, the Golden Week holiday is now underway.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>It began last Wednesday with National Day and runs through

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the mid Autumn festival, and the government is hoping Chinese

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 2>consumers will celebrate for more. Let's get to the host

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of the Daybreak Asia podcast, Doug Krisner.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Tom, Golden Week is regarded as the most important travel

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 4>period in China. Authorities are expecting two point four billion

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 4>people to travel during this eight day break, and needless

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 4>to say, the holiday represents a major opportunity for more

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 4>domestic consumption. Joining me now is Bloomberg's Catherine Lim, retail

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 4>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's on the line from Singapore.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much for making time to chat with me.

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Can you give me a sense on the extent to

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 4>which there is optimism over the outlook for consumer spending

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 4>this year?

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 10>You know, happy to be here and gen as you've

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 10>highlighted we are into the world holiday period. Over eight days,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 10>you're gonna see celebrations not just for National Day, but

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 10>also the mid Autumn festival, which is a traditional, you

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 10>know event that family and friends together. So it was

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 10>very timely seeing how some of the cities are issuing

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 10>consumption vouchers out to their consumers so that you could

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 10>stimulate a little bit more of that spending, which admittedly

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 10>had put on a dreg in August because there was

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 10>a calender shift in that very important mid autumn festival

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 10>that I've just talked about, where by family and friends gether.

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering about sentiment right now, and maybe we can

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 4>tie to the equity markets in China which have been

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 4>performing very well. Is that expected to provide some positivity

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 4>to sentiment?

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, definitely, I guess you know, when you look at

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 10>asset and asset value creation, it's either property if not.

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 10>Do you know the equity market, and I think in

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 10>the last two to three years, both of these market

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 10>hasn't been you know, in the best of shape. In

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 10>year to date, equity market the rarely definitely brings relieved

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 10>and you know, does help stimulate that centiment if you

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 10>ask me.

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 4>So, when I think of destinations in China, one of

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 4>the things that comes to mind is Macau and the casinos.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Are people feeling reasonably optimistic about casino business this year

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 4>and traffic at the big places, well.

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 10>We've also seen traffic, and I would say, you know,

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 10>the table roles, etc. Picking up in terms of our crowd,

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 10>so that is a good sign. On the other hand,

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.239
<v Speaker 10>what I'll say is that you know, a lot of

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 10>these spenders, whether your gamblers or your shoppers per se,

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 10>there is more discerning spending that we have observed, So

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure whether we should be putting that much

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 10>bet on Macau. Similarly, you know, even Hong Kong per se,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 10>I would say that, you know, after the recent typhoon

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 10>hits and we are anticipating another typhoon hitting you know,

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 10>the South over the next ten days, et cetera, it

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 10>may not actually be you know, the biggest thing for

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 10>these two autonomous regions within the country itself. I'm a

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 10>little more optimistic about domestic tourism within the country, as

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 10>you know, more of the shoppers or consumers take a

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 10>break out into you know, the suburban regions and there

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 10>are more camping sites as well as you know, areas

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 10>that consumers can take a break from the city.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned a moment ago that domestic governments in

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 4>China are handing out vouchers and coupons and things to

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of stimulate domestic consumption. Give me a sense of

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 4>how they are applied and whether we should be looking

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 4>for kind of high frequency data among retailers, whether it's

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 4>more a story about restaurants, whether it's a story about

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 4>air travel.

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 10>Right, you know, for restaurants, definitely, because you know, we

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 10>are still seeing lots of promotions ongoing for platforms like

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 10>Ali Baba, may twe and JD dot Com when it

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 10>comes to food delivery and quick commerce. You know, you

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 10>would have heard of the competition that was ongoing among

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 10>these three companies since the beginning, since the middle of

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 10>this year itself, and it continues to actually intensify as

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 10>we go into the holiday season again, you know, all

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 10>the gatherings that's going on now that will likely come

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 10>through and on a more intensified level into October and November. Doug,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 10>Let's not forget that we are now very close to

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 10>the start of the Singles Day shopping festival, which is

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 10>essentially a near two month long shopping festival, and it

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 10>will kick start sometimes on the seventh of October, which

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 10>is essentially next week itself. Once the consumers returns from

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 10>the holidays, they may actually be shopping more online. So

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 10>I would say that, going back to your earlier point

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 10>about consumption vouchers, it's definitely good to actually have an

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 10>extra vouchure on hand to spend. But we'll let's look

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 10>at the discretionary side of things itself. Those spending may

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 10>actually come through in October and November, particularly during the

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 10>Singles Day promotions.

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Catherine will leave it there. Thank you so very much,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Catherine Lim, retail analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Catherine joining

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 4>us from Singapore, So we go from the Chinese consumer

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 4>to the challenges facing some of the most wealthy families

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 4>in Hong Kong. Joining me now is Bloomberg Shirley Joo.

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Shirley and her team have been reporting on how trouble

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 4>in several high profile real estate projects is creating financial

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 4>risk for some very wealthy families in China. Shirley, thank

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 4>you for making time to chat with me before we

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 4>get to specific examples. Can you help me understand the

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 4>state of the Hong Kong real estate market right now?

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 11>So, Hong Kong's property market has been in a crisis

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 11>since COVID. It's mainly to do with the rising interest

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 11>rate globally and the slowing economy in China. A lot

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 11>of developers borrowed a lot of money before COVID and

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 11>before you know, Hong Kong sort of plunged into years

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 11>of political turmoil and the COVID isolation around the time

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 11>of twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen. That was when you know,

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 11>a lot of developers and a lot of smaller businesses

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 11>borrowed a lot of money and invested heavily into the

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 11>real estate sector. But then, you know, during COVID, people

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 11>stopped traveling and the retail businesses really did very badly.

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 11>And after COVID, China's economy started to slow down, and

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 11>that really put a lot of pressure on developers and

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 11>the businesses that sort of went on in the real

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 11>estate sector. Today, real estate prices, we have data showing

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 11>that it's about thirty percent down from the pre COVID level.

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 4>So can you give me an example of how a

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 4>wealthy family in Hong Kong made a big bet on

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 4>a major real estate project, only to see that project

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 4>underperform in a major way mis expectations wildly.

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 11>New World is one of the most high profile examples

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 11>of this. They borrowed a lot of money to invest

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 11>in developing several major projects, including a huge shopping mall

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 11>and hotel complex near Hong Kong's famous Victoria Harbor and

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 11>mega shopping mall near Hong Kong's International Airport, as well

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 11>as a sports park near Hong Kong's old Airport. And

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 11>they did that in twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen, and

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 11>they spent a lot of money, fueled by debt, and

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 11>then in twenty nineteen, Hong Kong started to enter this

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 11>prolonged period of political turmoil and COVID isolation, and after COVID,

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 11>Hong Kong's economy didn't rebound, it slowed down, so a

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 11>lot of these projects didn't really have time to materialize.

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 11>They didn't have the chance to generate cash for New

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 11>World to pay off their debt, and that's why New

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 11>World's step problem really emerged over the past two years

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 11>and it was pushed to the brink of default. And

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 11>it had to line up Hong Kong's biggest ever refinancing

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 11>with dozens of banks, and it put it off. But

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 11>then banks started to feel that they had too much

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 11>exposure on your world.

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that I think is very interesting

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 4>here in terms of context is the notion of family

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:30.919
<v Speaker 4>empires being involved here. It's not just a company. It's

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 4>almost like a dynasty, isn't it. And you mentioned in

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 4>your piece this issue which I found very interesting the

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 4>notion of self correcting. So when a family makes a mistake,

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 4>it's the dynamics of the family sometimes that can make

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 4>the correcting process even more challenging, right.

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 11>Right, Yeah, So the issue with a lot of family

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 11>owned businesses is that a lot of the decision making

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 11>is sometimes down to the personal whim of family members.

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 11>Even though they hired professional managers to run their companies,

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 11>the final decision making will be swighed by the will

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 11>of family members, and that's making management more difficult and

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 11>less professional. And in New World's case, because they expanded

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 11>so aggressively in twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen and the

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 11>timing was really bad. So now there that problem really showed,

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 11>and that's really raising an alarm bell for a lot

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 11>of other family owned businesses in Hong Kong and around

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 11>the world as well.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 4>So we know on the mainland, the government's been very

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 4>concerned about problems with the property market. How is the

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 4>local government in Hong Kong viewing this situation right now?

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Are people very concerned?

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 11>People are concerned, and that was why you would see

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 11>reports about Hong Kong's mondatary Authority actually following up on

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 11>New wor World refinancing effort. You know, there were reports

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 11>about Hong Kong Monetary Authority calling banks up to check

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 11>on the status on their refinancing arrangement with New World,

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 11>and banks felt that they didn't want to be the

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 11>one that make New World default and trigger the rippling

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.760
<v Speaker 11>effect on Hong Kong's economy. So there is this saying

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 11>that New World is too big to fail, and that

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 11>really showed during its refinancing effort with the banks and

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 11>with the involvement of Hong Kong's monetary authorities.

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 4>When I think about the residential market in Hong Kong,

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 4>I know that for years there have been challenges trying

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 4>to add to new supplies. So many restrictions on developing

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 4>land and yet here we have a situation where commercial

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 4>developers don't seem to have any problems. Can you imagine

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 4>a world where things get turned and so that perhaps

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 4>in a way, these companies begin to focus their energy,

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 4>maybe more on residential property than on commercial property.

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 11>That's exactly what New World is doing right now. So

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 11>now they are refocusing on selling and building more residential

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 11>projects and from selling apartments that will generate money for

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 11>them to pay down debt. So that's their main strategy

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 11>right now.

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 4>Shirley, we'll leave it there. Thank you so very much,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Shirley Joe in Hong Kong, and I'm Doug Chrisner.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Catch us weekdays for the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 4>wherever you get your podcast. Tom.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Doug, and that does it for this edition of

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 2>five am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 2>overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 2>business headlines are coming up right now.