WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off July 12th, 2022 (Ep. 550)

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Where will Castillo go? Let's play ball. Welcome in everybody

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Pros. This is leading off, brought to you

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>by bet MGM, the King of sports Books.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 2>It's me, Joey Pa Joe Piezapia with me today is

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 2>the Welsh, and of course it's you.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>All of our listeners are watchers on the YouTube channel

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at Fantasy Pros MLB, and of course our peanuts are

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>cracker Jacks, are Randos all over. Rowdy friends are here

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>today and on the show, we're gonna start to take

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a look at the things we got right so far,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the things we got wrong. How much time is there

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to turn things around? Or is the first half of mirage.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about the home run derby contestants, We're

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about the headlines.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>But Welsh, I want to.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Talk about Max Scherzer shutting down the Braves because I'm

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>sure Spencer Strider is gonna stick it to him tonight.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'm a little excited about that. The Max Shus

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>are saying no, no, lets get.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Me one more day. I wanted Landa.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>He is like w w E ready, he wants the

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>main event. I love that about Max.

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk about your beautiful, sexy new lighting

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and the scented candles that are probably in the back

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 3>and most likely the weekend playing. Uh as you bring

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 3>some but in you know. But we can talk about

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Max shut. We can do whatever you want. Man, it's

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 3>a baseball show, remember we got to talk about that.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I do love the new light. Yeah, no, dude, you

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 3>know that meme that's out there with everyone. Well, Zach

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Wilson is getting a lot of it right now. Wilson,

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 3>he's got that dog in him. Max has got that

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 3>dog in so.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I wish Zach Wilson had a little

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more quarterback in him.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>But you know what you gonna do, you know. But yes,

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 2>I had a we're doing a.

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Little test of some new lighting today, trying to you know,

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>sexy up the show a little bit, as if it

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>needed more.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let's be honest.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 3>You're I mean, your sex appeal is uh, it's fun.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Drip.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>The drip is real, my friend, the trip is real.

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I will have some cavasier it's some point in time

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>during the show.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we're gonna do that type. Hey lady, yeah, love

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 3>not the same loving that is not.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Come on, baby, everybody left good loving. All right, Uh,

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get after it. Let's start with the headlines. Let's

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>get away from the transition of the last I love it.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it looks cool. I like it, and it

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>looks super good on the high definition four K front

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>which was not on right now. But this is this

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>is what they work in progress and the test we're

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>doing for NFL season. So if you want to get

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a look at what we're talking about.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 3>To say, what do I need to do here?

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Just what we do in the shadows coming up next?

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to Uh.

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with a report that apparently the Dodgers and

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the Reds have talked about a Louis Castillo trade. Uh.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>The Yankees, Red Sox, Mariners, Med's Cardinals have also all

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>checked in no surprise on any of those teams. So

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>let's start putting our money where our mouth is Welsh

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion, who pulls the trigger or should I

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>say who needs to pull the trigger most? Who is

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>going to get Luis Castillo? Two different questions, not necessarily

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the same answer.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Ooh okay, So I think who needs him the most

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>are the Mariners And I don't know if it was

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>you and I or you are myself and Bogwin talking

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 3>about this. But I definitely think the Mariners, on this

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>precipice of you know, obviously just building this team and

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>trying to be a playoff contender, they need to be

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>hyper aggressive, like they need to make those moves if

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna be competitive. So I think they're the ones

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 3>that need to make this movie, because then you would

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 3>have a Robbie ray Logan, Gilbert Luis Castillo, or you know,

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>if you wanted to insert Frankie Montos. We're talking about Castillo.

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>They need to be hyper, hyper aggressive. The team that

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>I think gets this done the Dodgers. The Dodgers have

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 3>a plethora of great prospects in their system. Pitching is

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>also the big key because I would imagine I could

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 3>be wrong about this, but I would imagine the Reds

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 3>are going to move off at Luis Castillo, They're going

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 3>to want to bring a pitcher back in. Is very

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>funny because these teams have also done trades before the

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Josiah Great trade that ended up happening, and the Reds

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>had traded away you know, this really solid young pitcher

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>and Josiah Gray that went to the Dodgers and ended

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 3>up getting moved that they need to bring one back.

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 3>And the Dodgers currently have Bobby Miller, who I think

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>could be the centerpiece of a trade like this. Could

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>be Bobby Miller and one other piece. They've got guys

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 3>like Land and Nat Gavin Stone. They've got three great,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 3>great pictures, and I'm probably forgetting a couple off the

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>top of my head, plus hitting prospects Michael Bush, Miguel Vargas,

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Andy Payos. So if it costs two prospects, the Dodgers

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>can do it easier than anybody else in this entire conversation.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's the Dodgers that make it happen.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 3>I think the Mariners need to make it happen.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the Dodgers that are going to make

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it happen for the reasons you said too.

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>They have the right mix of prospects.

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's the Dodgers that need to because

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I keep looking ahead the Gonsolin's eventual fall off, which

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is just inevitable. I look at Kershaw's iffy health,

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Walker Buehler, forget it, You're a I don't know if

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I can depend on him.

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>They need more.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Their expectations are so high. To me, it's World championship

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>or bust for the Dodgers. They really need to get

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this one's.

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 3>And also, you know, like how many times? How how

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 3>many times can they strike gold with these other pictures,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Like you know, they got Tayler Anderson, they got Gonsolin.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Is it gonna be worthwhile if it's needed to put

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 3>the backs on the rest of the season on a

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 3>guy like Bobby Miller, No, probably not. And and Miller

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 3>is relatively ready as is you know, Land and Nak

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 3>these are two older, you know, high end triple A pitchers,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 3>So that that I agree with. I mean, you can

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 3>make a case for the Dodgers maybe being the top

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 3>need team of all of these because they're so good.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I just make the case, right, I mean, yeah, I

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like in for the penny, in for the pound

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they are they need to make this move because I

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think I don't think when the Dodgers get in

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a short if the Dodgers had a short series starting

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow for the playoffs, I think the Mets with the

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>gram and uh insurs are the Padres with their many

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>many aces that they could throw at you, like, I mean,

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>the the Brewer and all that frontline pitching.

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they could throw you.

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean the Dodgers will be the Dodgers will theoretically

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 3>they get Buehler back, maybe in time for the playoffs,

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 3>so they want to give theoretically.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Man, I do not feel good about getting war back.

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 2>I really do. I think that one is just like.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>This is what's like odd to me. Still, And we've

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 3>talked like briefly about trades and stuff. There are more

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>teams out there, these competitive windows are very different. Like

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>you just go all in and I and I hate

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the thought of, like if I were a Dodger fan

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 3>trading away all my good prospects, But why not, Like

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 3>you continuously replace your system. You have a great scouting department,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 3>as do teams like the Mariners and the Yankees. You

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 3>just trade to make these impactful trades. Don't allow yourself

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 3>to have a hole anywhere when you're going into the playoffs.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's why you make these moves. And pitching is

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the ultimate You know, these guys are gonna pay, These

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>guys are going to pay exponentially for relief pitching. Once

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 3>that market starts to open up, why not start the

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 3>market on all the pitching and make the big impact

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 3>trade E.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent.

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Carlson three hits yesterday and Corningworth hit a homer,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>reach base four times against the Rockies. Man Bachiado hit

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>me another home run. Hooray, yay, fish in the barrel

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>A shot them all. Corey Seger hit another home run again.

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>But boy, he's been red hot over the last week

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or so, Tigers said to recall on our favorites like

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>kil Bado. On Tuesday, Nolan Jones four runs knocked in

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>there for him again for the Guardians, and Bobby Witt

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>had four hits and stole a base a lot more.

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Witt talked to come before we get.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 2>To that Nolan Jones.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>You know when he came up, we really didn't do

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>any profile on Nolan Jones. It kind of came up

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in a busy time there. So your thoughts on Nolan

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Jones rest of season for those people who are looking

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>at him or might have him on their team already

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and re draft leagues.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is a really good spot. Nolan Jones is

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>an obp like magnet. That has always been his big thing.

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 3>He struggled ironically as like he's just a big dude.

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I've been around him a whole bunch. He's he's struggled

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>with like developing impactful power. That's something that you really

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen. In twenty twenty one, he hit the teen homers.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Year before that he had hit fifteen, so you've never

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>seen big, big stuff. But strikeout numbers are coming down.

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 3>He's already rocking an eight eighteen percent walk rate. Big

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 3>physical human being who could play over on the corners

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.239
<v Speaker 3>if needed. I'm actually here for Nolan Jones. The injuries

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 3>have really kept him just like muted over the last

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 3>couple of years, and then seeing him come back this

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 3>year in TRIPA at absolutely get back to dominating. He

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 3>was a contact hitter. He actually has it almost like

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 3>a Goldie nature to him, where he's not a forceful

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 3>power hitter. He's a good contact hitter that you're hoping

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 3>it's going to translate into power. But he's been had

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>so many injuries. I really do think he could be

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 3>a guy like that, but he's more transitioned into the outfield,

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 3>but he can play multiple spots. I actually think he's

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>a sneaky pickup right now. He wasn't someone I had

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 3>put on my radar because he lost like the whole season,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 3>the first half of the season, came up for twenty

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 3>games I think in Triple A, and then now he's

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 3>in the Major so like they were hyper aggressive with him,

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 3>but it's pretty good rate. I would be looking at

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Nolan Jones because I think he could hit near the

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 3>middle of that lineup. I think there's a.

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Big question here going around the chat from Brent Cox.

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Here are we hoping that Lance Linn makes a turnaround?

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I am. I know he doesn't look great. I know.

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Are we hope hope? You can hope in one hand?

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Are we hoping?

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Are we thinking?

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 2>But let's let's.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Dial back a little bit and let's talk about you know,

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so far going into the year, he went into the

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>year with an injury. He was completely off his normal track.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>Things have not gone well. There's been a couple of moments,

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>some spurts from lanceln I'll start here or there where

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you go, okay, well, maybe if I need a pitching

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of these guys.

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 2>In the second half after the All Star Break that

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I've actually been trying to buy on the cheap. I

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 2>really would.

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like, at least you know what good

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Lance Linn is and I mean perhaps the injury is

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>still bothering him.

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you can make that argument. I don't know.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of by low pitchers that you have

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>a track record, I don't know how many are out

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>there that are available, and I feel like this is

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a guy that fits that bill.

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I would roll the dice on Lanceln and see what happens.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Where do you stand with let Well?

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so I want him to turn around. I

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>don't know if I'm not really so sure he's going

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 3>to turn around. I'm always into these. Okay, so here's

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 3>an overchow.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is the by low. Would you buy low?

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's the quest. If it's a true low I'll

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 3>always take these type of risks because you actually laid

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 3>it out really well. It's like these guys that have

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 3>these really proven track records to be ace ish. I

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 3>will buy low on if it is a true low cost,

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 3>just because are we to really determined that the wall

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 3>was just hit? I don't necessarily know so, but I

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 3>am concerned and I would have to be really low.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 3>He's lost almost a mile and a half on his fastball.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 3>He's ditched the slider. Well, I shouldn't say ditch the slider. Fangrafts,

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 3>they designate stuff weird where they're designating what was a

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 3>slider last year is like a cutter, and then they're

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 3>saying his slider has lost some v low so but

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 3>still that's cut a little bit and he's just not

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 3>getting it quite. His curveball's actually gone up, which is

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 3>don't necessarily like to see. And he's been inconsistent across

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 3>the board the half of his starts. He's given up

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 3>five earned runs or more thirteen earned runs in his

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 3>last two starts. You know, where are the positive signs?

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>So if it's a cheat, by sure, I don't know

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 3>if there's great stuff outside of track record that's telling

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 3>us this will turn around, but I am willing to

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 3>take risks on track record.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's also a matter of you know,

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe he gets a little reset mentally at the All

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Star break too. That is something that happens when you

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>go look at splits of players every single year. You

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>see splits, you're like, man, this guy stunk in the

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 1>first half, and then look at the second half numbers.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 2>After the break.

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The pre impost is a real thing, and sometimes it's

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that mental break a little bit. It's the physical break,

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the mental break. I think this is a picture

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>who has, you know, really earned my respect over the years.

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows I'm a big fan of the physique as

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>well when it comes to Lancelin. But at the same time,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, if I'm gonna put my money on

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a bi low candidate, Lanceln's the exact kind of guy.

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>The stock is hit rock bottom. He's on a good team,

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a track record of being good. I would be

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to buy him, and what's the worst that happened?

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 2>You buy him low? It doesn't work out? Okay?

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>A couple injury notes real quick, Jesus Lozardo facing live

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>hitters today and Will Meyer starting rehab assignment today as well.

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 2>But let's talk about this today. We're gonna do mine. Tomorrow,

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna do Welsh's.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the guys that we were

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>most right and wrong about going into the season, and

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>whether or not either of these trends both good or bad.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Or sustainable. So let's talk about the el's first.

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>These are the two guys that was most wrong about

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Rodgers most wrong. I thought there was a real

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>chance this guy was gonna build on the first half

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of last year and how dominant he was.

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 2>That has not happened.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And then Brian Reynolds, who is now on the IL

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>with an oblique so you know, obviously that season has

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not been where I wanted to be. I thought he

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>was one of the best values. Those are two guys

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that was very in on coming into the season. I

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>love their ADP could not have been more wrong on both.

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna ask this question, is there any time

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>here left in the season for either of these two

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>guys to turn it around or is it just an

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>abject failure now eighty five games.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Into the season.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm over Trevor Rodgers. I'm done the Trevor Rodgers thon. Yeah,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think like the lefty.

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the big lefty mechanically steps to figure things out.

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that's what it is, you know, because

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that with Randy Johnson even back in the past.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I mean Treva Rodgers, not Randy Johnson. But

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm one of those people though I don't ever write

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 3>someone off completely like that. It's the story's completely done.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>But I'm over needing to sit around and figure out

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 3>if it happens for me this year. I just don't

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 3>need it. The strikeouts are crazy, a lovel the walks

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>are absolutely insane. It's a pretty big home run rate

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 3>for him, and this is now actually two years of

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 3>pitching to a three hundred plus Babbitt. There's about a

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 3>run differential between xt FIP and ERA, but it's still

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 3>not good. I just don't I just don't think you

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.119
<v Speaker 3>need to sit around and doctor Glenn said it perfectly

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 3>without a whole bunch of breakdown. Reynolds, Yes, Rogers, No,

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that's how I feel. Reynold's on the IL right now,

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 3>still makes solid contact. I think he's fine. It just

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I was never a big neither one of these guys.

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 3>Was I ever really that big on And it depends

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 3>what Reynolds you were buying. I think you and I

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 3>had like tons of discussions about being Reynolds in this offseason.

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I just think he's a fine hitter, mediocre power guy.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 3>He's one of those guys that's like seventy seventy run

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>RBI in my mind set, maybe seventy five to seventy

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 3>five twenty homers.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>See, I thought he was a little bit better than that,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and I thought maybe getting to another team with like

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was a get off to a good start,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>get Delta a contender, and then really, you know, the

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy five run guy becomes a ninety five run guy.

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it all sudden done if he can get

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>those last three months with a better team. But alas

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that's probably not gonna happen. Here the guys that was

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>right about ooh, I was right. I was very aggressive

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bobby Wood Junior in redraft leagues. I know it

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was a rough April, but here we stand right now

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>where Bobby Wood Junior had five hits, two runs, three

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>steals in the doubleheader yesterday. That brings him up to

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve home runs and sixteen stone bases on the season.

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you were aggressive on Bobby Wood Junior, like

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I certainly was, this is a win.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 2>And some people were not. Like some people are like, no, no,

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>it's too rich to pay for him.

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Me Nope, pump people with the with the rookies. So

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I'd say I was actually the Fantasy Pro's highest ranker

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 3>going into Bobby wit March on Bobby Wit yeah, like

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Bobman and I do. We do.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>We just had an hour right behind you. Then we

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>had Yeah, we do.

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 3>An analysis on this every single year, and there was

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 3>no human being who had submitted their ranks that was

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 3>higher than me. But I think that might have got

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 3>surpassed on the back end.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a bad one. I mean, I'm sorry. The other

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>good one for me was Christian Javier. I mean, yeah,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you love I love Tavier coming into the year. Uh

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And and remember when Oderezi came back and started pitching, Well,

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh no, this is gonna do. I said,

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, no, go out there, buy him everywhere. Anyway,

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Now that everyone's pissed off that he's getting bumped from

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the rotation again, Odoresei got hurt well a week later,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>two weeks later, whatever it was, and then he's I mean,

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't take him out of that rotation, just can't.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 2>He's been absolutely dominant. So yes, those are two things

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I will take the victory lap.

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>On tomorrow, we're gonna talk about Welsh's Uh so he's

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>going to pick out a couple of names too that

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>he was right too, that he was wrong about.

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>But let's get to the names too.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>On the h on the big board where we talk

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>about the guys who are gonna be the Home Run

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Derby participants. Now, I know we were talking about how

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to run this Welsh. I'm gonna propose this

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to you. I want to see how you think about it.

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought about this all day, all night.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I can tell. I can tell the lighting telle what

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 3>I thought.

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why I blew out all the electricity in my house.

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we should everybody should pick who they think

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to win the Home Run Derby. If you

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>get it right, you get two points. I think that's

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>what you should do. I think that is the simplest

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>way for the bot to function properly, so that everybody

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>can just go.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Ahead and make because I think two is that's nice.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 2>You get you get two.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>A bump up there if you want to make it

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>three and you want to feel sassy, okay, But I

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think two for whoever just picks the.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Guy that wins.

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, you have a finite number of choices. What do

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? Is that not exciting or sexy

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in it?

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 3>It looks like Mary's saning Wonkee As a proposal for this,

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm all good with all of that. When I was

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 3>originally say it, I hadn't even thought of it from

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 3>a macro perspective. I was literally saying, you myself and

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 3>we draft two people from the comments.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>We can still do that anyway, and we could have

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>a little personal competition you myself, Mayor and Wonky.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 2>We could do that.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 3>That'd be fun. Yeah, let's still has a plan. There

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 3>might be a little bit alteration, but I think whatever

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 3>it is, your plan makes a lot of sense for everybody,

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 3>especially if you're getting the bot into it.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Wonky, he's got a plan, which is good.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why she's in charge of things. So Wonky, you

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>send me the plan and I will talk about on

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the show. You can put in the home run channel

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and everybody can get involved in this, because I don't

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>want a night where we're not picking home runs.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 2>That seems ridiculous. I want to do that.

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Also, I want to talk about these guys who have

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>ops is under seven hundred for the year, and I

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>want to know if you think the second half is

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>going to go better for them or worse. Let's start

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Chapman was sitting two nineteen with a six

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine ops. He's got thirteen bombs, though has been

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better of late. I also want to note,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Matt Chapman, can he have a better second half or no?

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes or no?

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 3>Welsh Oh, you know, I'm gonna say he can, but

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say no because I think it's gonna be

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot like the first half. And I don't think

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 3>even if he hits two thirty, I don't think that's

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it is technically better, but I don't think

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 3>that's what you're talking about. I think when you're talking

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 3>about this, you're talking like exponential relatively exponential growth. And

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 3>then under that I'd kind of say no.

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>All right. JT.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Real Muto seven homers, thirty five ribies, two forty, batting

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>average six eighty four ops.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Better or worse.

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And he's a catcher, so I always tend to say

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>worse in the second half. So I'm gonna say worse.

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you think I'm gonna say it better? I'm

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 3>gonna say better. He he's done the old Bryce Harper

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 3>where you struggle on one side of the field and

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>you make yourself more valuable. Where Harper would do this,

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 3>where when he's not hitting for power, he steals more bases,

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 3>and Ramuto has done the same thing. When he's not

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 3>hitting for good contact and the power numbers, maybe he's

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>used to he's stealing bases. I think that turns around

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 3>in the second half. I think he improves.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Cabrian Hayes four homers who have grossed fifty batting average

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>six eighty ops, better or worse in the second half.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Ooh, this is blind faith. I'm gonna say better. I'm

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 3>gonna say better. I'm just I'm kind of a Cabrian

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Hayes guy. I really am waiting for him to click.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 3>I truly believe. I just don't know if it's gonna

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 3>be this second half. It's gonna be next year. There's

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a year where it really clicks for Kei,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Brian Hayes. Maybe maybe it's.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Post All Star Break. He could be.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Certainly those guys Nick Cassianos eight homers, two fifty one,

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>batting average six seventy three ops. Oh, his OBP is

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>two ninety seven this year. What in the world is

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>going on? I think it's gotta be better.

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Welsh, right, it has to be better. How can it

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 3>not be better?

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, those are all by Lows.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's basically what we're giving you here is

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all these Bylows. But you could do the inverse about

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>guys are doing too well. But just looking at the list,

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>those are some of the major guys. And then last

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>one Haave or Bayez two to eleven batting average on

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the year through seventy four games, nine home runs, a

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>six twenty ops. That is disgusting, Welsh better or worse

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in the second half for the same man.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 3>This is what he's built off. He's built a He's

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 3>built a mansion off of just being inconsistent and then

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 3>going bonkers. I'm gonna say he doesn't do it because

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's gonna be big. But I could

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>be wrong about this because he literally can just pull

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 3>off like six weeks of you know, number one overall

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 3>fantasy stuff. It's just I don't know, seems we don't.

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't feel like we have the same hobber bias

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>with the Tigers anymore. This seems like a different version

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 3>of the one that we've known.

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 2>It certainly does.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>The last guy who actually were slated to talk more

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>about later on, Spencer Torkosen over seven yesterday and the

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>double day up, strikeout, slashing one, two, two ninety six.

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>They got to send him down. I mean, it's it is,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>literally right now, the worst debut season ever for a

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>former number one pick. So that tells you everything that's

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>going on.

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.239
<v Speaker 3>Man, I don't disagree with you.

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely the thing crazy. Now do it now or

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 2>on the All Star break?

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 1>So he can, you know, just take a deeper breath,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 1>you can get away from Detroit a little bit. You

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>can just focus on what's gonna do. You're missing basically

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a week of games. Give him the rest of July,

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>call him back August first. That's what I would do right.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Now, you know, man, I've've actually been thinking a lot

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 3>about Spencer Torkelsen. Of all the rookie things that have

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 3>happened this year, I'm the most shocked at how unsuccessful

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 3>he is. I'm not shocked by well, I mean, the

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases by Julio is maybe actually truly number one.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 3>But like I'm not shocked by Julio's success, I'm not

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 3>shocked by Bobby WIT's success. I am shocked at how

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 3>bad Torklsen is. And there's been no adjustment whatsoever. And

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>he's played playing with a you know, a great great

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 3>leader and coach if you will, and Miguel Cabrera and

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that, and there's just no improvement whatsoever. I

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 3>don't know what they do, because I agree you should

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>send him down to get his head right, but who

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 3>are you bringing in place? And what does that really

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 3>cure for a Tigers team. I don't know they I mean,

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>they probably need to get some outside coaching help, but

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 3>hopefully Torklsen gets some like serious outside coaching help, hitting

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 3>help in the offseason, because it's bonkers and he is

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>way too talented to be.

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Here's a loaded question, and I know this is gonna

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>upset a lot of people. Is Spencer Torkosen the next

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Nick Senzel?

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely looking like that. Of all the rookies, he's

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 3>the best possibility because of name value, because there's no other.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Like Polish college hitter. Everybody thought, can't miss, fastest guy

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to rise to the big leagues. All those things were

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>there for Nick Senzel. People forget Kelnick. Maybe Kelnick may

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>be the real Nixon. Funny, you should mention Kelnick because

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>fun fact, I went, you know, I haven't looked at

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Kelenicks numbers in a while. How's he doing intrible A,

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>He's doing well. He's got ten homers in two ninety nine.

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The ops is above like nine to fifty. He's been outstanding.

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Got a couple of steels as well.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean he ar kelnil or what my favorite? Yeah? Yes,

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 3>by the way, it is. One of my favorite things

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 3>about you is when you get excited to a play

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and you turn into Jerry Seinfield, You're like, he's doing well.

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I love I love good things. Yeah. No, PCL is this.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 3>This is literally a PCL is. PCL is a crazy

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 3>high end hitting environment. What you want from a guy

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 3>like Kelnick is you want to see him hitting three seventy.

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 3>You want to see him put up what Joe Adell

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 3>stuff did uh for a time, but then Adella struggled.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 3>It is very problematic that kel Nick looks all the

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 3>part of a quad player. This is how I feel

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 3>about kell Nick. I don't think you're gonna see an

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 3>in season change from him at any point in his career.

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 3>You're just gonna see a season where it clicks. He's

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 3>a crazy hard He's really tough on himself. I think

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of like mental game that goes on

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 3>with him. When I interviewed him a long time ago,

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 3>he was talking about how him and his parents and

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 3>his agents they sat around and they would think about goal.

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember when he came up with the Remember I

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, dude, we gotta buy Hellenic merched. I

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can't wait for the I mean, there's got to be

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on clearance right now, it's got.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>To be clear.

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be a kmart. Probably find some celnic at

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 3>a good will. But like it's like, I think he

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 3>really gets into his head, and I think he works

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 3>really hard, and I think there'll be a time where

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 3>he can attempt to fix this. I just don't know

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 3>how great it will ever be. And it really doesn't

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 3>look like it's gonna happen in season because I don't

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 3>know if it's pitch recognition. Everything about him is gonna

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 3>been completely lost. And it's so funny because Kelnick was like,

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, seeing as like the bigger brother to Julio Rodriguez.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Those guys were roommates for a bit, and like this

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 3>was the guy. This was the guy, And it's it's

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>most quad a that I can recall. I mean, him

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 3>and Joey Dell. It's I'm actually shocked that both of

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 3>them have gone so quad a at this point, it's

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 3>just not gonna happen in season.

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>The second R in his name is weighing him down.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>That's according to Wonkey, that's what she says. But yeah,

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 2>there you go.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh also just for SS and g's because I'm a jerk.

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Ward last thirty days, h one home run, two

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a five batting average through a four OBP three O

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>eight slugging.

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Just wanted to throw that out six twelve ops? What's what?

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 2>What's it? What's the worst looking for? Oh? Yeah, I

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 2>told you, Sow. I told you, Oh, I told you so,

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 2>I told you Sow. Stop it all right.

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.479
<v Speaker 1>This day in baseball nineteen seventy nine, thousands of fans

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>overrun Comiskey Park Field during Disco Demolition Night, causing the

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>White Sox to forfeit the second game of a doubleheader.

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>All I could think about when I saw this was,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>could you imagine the statements that would be made? Well,

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, these fans that came over, they would be

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all this arrests and things and public statements from from

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox and security and stuff that, and all

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I could think of was in the seventies. That was

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>just like a Tuesday. It was just a Tuesday, and

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>then we just like, I guess we have to cancel

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>this game because people were on the field and they

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>went nuts.

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 2>We'll see tomorrow. It's nineteen seventy nine.

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 3>And there was no outlets to like, there's no like

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>major outlets to talk about it. So every just buddy

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 3>moved on. Probably people didn't even know about what was

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>going on either.

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, they found out like during the week, like they've

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>read it in the newspaper. Yeah, you know, came acros.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>They read about it two days later, and they're like us, that's.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 3>When the last time you picked up a newspaper, I

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Probably to kill oh I know, not to kill a bug,

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but no, I would say, pick up a newspaper. I

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>used to love, especially early fantasy man like I used

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to love having the newspaper. You peel through some of

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the stats, you could just see everything there on the

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>one page.

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Probably to light the fire.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Pit, because sometimes we get like the little newspaper things

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>sent to us and that helps to light the fireport year.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 2>This year, last year, Oh okay, let the fire pit.

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Yet you know what I actually this season, I also

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 3>picked up one. I picked probably picked up one last week,

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 3>but it was the people throwing it on my driveway

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 3>me picking up and putting it immediately in the trash.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Glenn says, my lighting today looks like breaking bad

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>films at the cartel scene.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe we shall see.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's your tribute question for the day. Who

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>owns the longest home run in home run Derby history

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>since twenty sixteen? Started to track these with stack cast,

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So this Glenn traveling distance since twenty sixteen. Who has

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the biggest of all the monster shots? If you know,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>drop it in the chat. That's what we want to do.

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Running through the stat heroes, Michaelis five k's, no walks,

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>one earned Mitch Keller same deal for him over seven innings,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>both of them. Merle Kelly's seven innings just four k's.

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But it was Max Scherzer who was all the rage

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday with his nine strikeouts. By the way it went

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>over hit that nailed it yesterday on the prop bets

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Yond Diaz three for three, Jake Morisnik two for three

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with a dinger, Leote Taveres three for four with three

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ribis and a steel Jake Cronenworth, we mentioned his big

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>day with a homer three for four, Luis Gillormey with

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a homer, two for three. Corey Dickerson is the name

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we haven't said in a long time two for three

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>with a dinger.

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Same for CJ.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Abrams two for four with a homer, Charlie Blackman two

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for four, and Vinie Pesquentino my people two for four

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with a home run. Had youtha win the stat zero's

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Lancelyn eight earned runs, nine hits not good. Aaron Nole

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>five earned seven innings. Told you yesterday was a hot mess.

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 3>He did hit the seven k's, we got the case.

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 2>He did hit the seven k's, but legit in the

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 2>seven k's.

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So again we crushed the props yesterday. And Brian Bayo

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was bad. Five earned run for case for him. Also,

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Colby Allard gave up five earned in a third of

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>an inning.

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 2>That's an accomplishment.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olsen over four to four k's, he's another one

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of these by low guys. For me, I feel like

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Olsen hasn't quite adjusted yet. I look for him for

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>I have a big second half. Goldie over four to

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>three ks. So that was the one bad one. There

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Torkosin and CJ. Crown also over four

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to three K, so hope he sold high on him.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Well she got a you got a guest here for

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>who might have the biggest of all the home runs?

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Man, you know what I was gonna say, but then

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 3>you said sixteen. I was gonna say Prince Fielder from

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 3>back to twenty sixteen. Yeah, so I don't Hobby Bias

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 3>as the person came to my mind. But I don't

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 3>even know if he's I don't remember if he's even

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>been in a home run derby. So I really.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Didn't get it right in the chat. It was five

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty feet by the way in course field

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and twenty twenty one JP on it boom wow one one.

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right baby, and Frank also got it. So there

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you go.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>So Juan Soto is the master of his remain. There

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you have it now the home run board.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was up to twenty six. I was

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>informed that is incorrect. I am still at twenty five.

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Wrong.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I could have sworn that I was at twenty five.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>After two Austin Riley's over the weekend. I kind of

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's other forces at play here, but.

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:30.719
<v Speaker 2>Now I don't know.

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there might be I think there might be

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a committee hearing about this in Congress at some point.

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But Mike Mayor is still at twenty eight, to Larry

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>See at thirty, the title Chaser at thirty, to Blum

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at thirty two, and of course Hikobi's still at the

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>top of thirty four. And we've got a lot of

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>people tied at twenty six. So we've got six people,

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe seven.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 2>If you count me. But I don't know.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been told that I am incorrect. So not the

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>first time, not the last time. Let's take a look

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at the prop beatshall we with betting pros dot Com

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit bet mgm, the King of sports books.

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Use the promo code leading off one word leading off

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>sign up today. We got the All Star game stuff,

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we got the the whole run Derby stuff. There's a

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun things to wager on. So bet ten

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars to win two hundred on any game, regardless of

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the outcome, and use that promo code leading off. Download

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the betmgm app, Go to betmgm dot com today.

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I like Chris Sale.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about a gimme on FanDuel four and a

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>half is the k prop against Tampa, Yes, I don't

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>care if it's minus one forty eight. Yes, Spencer Streider

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel seven and a half ks, Yes, I'll take

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the over on that one minus one forty six, Okay,

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Cole at BETMGM seven and a half, I'll still

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>go the over because it's Kansas City at minus one

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>ten And then you got Trout and Otani today against

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Houston plus one point fifteen plus one twenty respectively for

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the one and a half total base props. But Welsh

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got something on Otani as well today and a

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>pitcher from the Cardinals, I believe.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well also I would say I want to one correction.

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 3>It's adjusted because Spence Strader is now six and a

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 3>half and the on the over, so you can get

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 3>six and a half, which is the number one for

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 3>as well. Let me see I have it up here

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 3>seven and a half.

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they weren't getting action.

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 3>It's the lower n bet YOUNI BET's got six and

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 3>a half. Everybody else might be seven and a half.

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 2>That's where you bet with all the people have one

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 2>eyebrow bet there.

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that would be my number one. I love love

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Striter my other two you mentioned Otani, that's actually my

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 3>probably true number one. You're getting plus money one and

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 3>a half versus Houston absolutely on DraftKings and with Matthew

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Libertor strikeouts three and a half, very low number on

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the Dodgers, it's a pretty easy number to hit. Libertor

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 3>has actually been pretty solid on the season. So Libs,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Strider and Otani for me.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to take your libertore.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Make sure you take I like that sale one too.

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I would just get dicey about innings and stuff. But

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 3>you go get these dog pitchers that have come back

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 3>like Brandon Woodruff. I was like, I'm gonna bet the

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 3>under at eight and he had like nine and three innings,

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 3>So you're you're probably on percent.

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Right. It's so low, I mean, come on, I mean.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, but it's because it's Tampa. Because Tampa doesn't strike out.

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Care I care?

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Four and a half is gott says nothing. All right,

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go through the DFS slate today. Expensive pitchers, uh

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Dylan sees at nine to seven on DK to me,

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is the best value if you want to go with

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>him and Spencer Stryder. That's the best way to combine

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of fade away Garret Cole at the top.

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>If you want to go Chris Alee and do a

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>little oppo in the tournament, I'm fine with that too,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But Season Strider is what I would do. I would

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>pay up on the FanDuel side. Again, I don't think

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay all the way at the top

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of Garrett Cole at ten six. I think you can

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>go to Gosman at nine to nine and do that

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or nine point one with Stryder. Use him in tournaments.

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Your stacks tonight, Yankees, Padres, Cardinals.

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jays.

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are the four best offenses in my opinion, with

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>their matchups where they are. Uh and then of course

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>lineup builders. Matt Carpenter on DK three nine, Alex Carrol

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>off at three, Dylan Carlson three to two on FanDuel,

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Matt Chapman at two eight, Kepler two six, Dylan Carlson

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>at two three. I'm gonna take Aaron Judge, even though

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone says I'm lame.

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 2>That's right, He'll be. It's three tonight in the Great

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 2>American Small Park.

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We have Mayor taking rowdy tells whatever, and then Welsh,

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>who are you taking for your home run tonight?

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna I guess I'm going a little bit boring

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 3>like you. I'm gonna go with Otani or Toni a

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 3>little five for fifteen track record against Luis Garcia, a

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 3>couple I'm looking for a couple of bombs looking to

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 3>get going. Or I'll just watch all of you guys far.

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And I expect you to go as soon as I

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>am gone. August first. I expect you to go on

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a monumental run for the last two months of the season.

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Nice time you're overdue.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, except you're gonna be You'll be gone, and like

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Mayor will be at number one on the board. So

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 3>every day I'll be like, all right, may Pabody, I'll

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 3>just be rooting for everybody to just get above that.

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Please weel see, all right, that'll do it for us.

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But the story of the game goes on for the Welsh.

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joey p. We'll see you next time. Kids, enjoy

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 2>your baseball.

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 3>The thing that