WEBVTT - Interview With Keith Ross: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an absolutely fascinating conversation.

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>My special guest is Keith Ross. He is the current

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>CEO and chairman of p d Q Enterprises, which is

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting innovative automated trading system and dark pool

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that has a novel approach to getting X. I think

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it's novel. I don't know enough about dark pools because

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>much of them are dark but his description of how

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>they sort of put the auction process UH in an

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>inverted form to obtain the best price and execution for

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>their clients is quite fascinating. He has been in the

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>front lines of high frequency trading for a long time.

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>He used to be the CEO of get Go, sold

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for about a billion for to night Trading a couple

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, one of the biggest h f t

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>s by volume. If you are at all a student

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of market structure, if you're interested in institutional execution, dark pools,

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>h f t S algorithms, if you're a critic of

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>h f t s as well, you will find this

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to be an informative and fascinating conversation. So rather than

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>have me babil incessantly without any further ado. Here is

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Keith Ross. This is Masters in Business

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest this

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>week is Keith Ross. Here's the chairman and CEO of

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pd Q Enterprises, a trading and finance firm. Previously he

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>was CEO of get go Uh, one of the largest

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>high frequency trading shops. Keith Ross, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you very much, Barry. Pleasure to be here. So so

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>let's keep start out simple and will build in complexity

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>as we go. First off, what is high frequency algorithmic

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>trading and why should people care about it? Well, high

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>frequency trading is just regular trading by computers instead of

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>humans clicking a mouse. Computers handle everything from identifying the

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>trade to executing it precisely, and it turns out I

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>believe it's a it's a wonderful efficiency for our markets.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Trading costs and commissions have come down dramatically over the years. Um.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a lot of concern about the robots

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>taking over the world, but um, the vast majority of

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>high frequency traders are passive liquidity providers. So they are

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market virtually all the time, and we can

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about that in a little bit. But their goal

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is to capture spread the way market makers have done

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for centuries, and provide liquidity. So here's the here's the

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>pushback on liquidity as always well, they like the banku

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>who will lend you the umbrella when it's sonny out.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They provide liquidly when it's not needed. But when things

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>get very well, they just shut off the machines and

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>step away from the market. So I want to respond

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to that and say it's actually a myth. Because a

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of folks were out loud about backing away from

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the market. The guys who knew what they were doing

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>did not, And my understanding is they had very good days.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's actually an incentive for them to stay in

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the market. With all that volatility and chaos, there's a

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity um and you know, those that are

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>not as concerned about that would argue. And at other

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>times in market chaos, market makers specialists didn't pick up

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the phone. That's the same problem. So you couldn't get

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to your broker. Maybe you wanted thought you wanted to

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>do something, but you couldn't find anyone to take the

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>other side. Again, I'll take the other side. Seven day

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was really a one off down. No one could get

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>through to anybody. Let's talk about the flash crash, which

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is the modern version. So May ten, two thousand and ten,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw a seven point practically instantaneous drop. What caused that?

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people insisted on blaming five frequency traders

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for that. Well, they're going to be the scapegoat because

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>like the specialist in the old days, they're the ones

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that everyone believes are the operators in the market um

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and have that opportunity to either make the market or not.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Both cases. The macro environment was very, very bearish, and

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>so the question becomes, you know, what is the responsibility

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of the participants? Uh, they took time off and withdrew dramatically.

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>The beautiful part about the flash crash to me is

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the following flash dash after a five second pause in

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the many futures, the whole market was able to recalibrate, reassess,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was a hard event during the day,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>but it was over in an hour. It's funny because

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I was flying back from Dallas that day or somewhere

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, and I look at my screen when I landed,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, that's got to be a mistake. And it

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>was until I got in the cab and started speaking

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to my office that I found out what happened. We

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>were down a thousand points. We closed down three, explained

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. So so that that's the big criticism UM

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in general. There are other criticism will get to later,

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>but I want to set the table a little bit

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with what you currently do in some quotes of yours.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me just start asking what is p

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>d Q Enterprises and PDQ Trading actually do. So. P

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>d Q Enterprises is the parent of p d Q

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>A t S are broker dealer. We are a probably

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>considered a dark pool, even though we believe we operate

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>differently than all the others. We have a unique market structure.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>We can actually create liquidity on demand for orders, we

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>can consolidate fragmented liquidity. And the beauty of our auction process,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of the key aspect of why we

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>are different, is that we can aggregate people with different

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>time latency sensitivity. So whether the people who are either

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>very high speed or high speed or normal speed correct

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>all right, and how is PDQ different than your previous employer.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Get Go, who is not too long ago sold to

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Night Trading, and at the time I think they still

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>are one of the biggest h f T shops in

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the world. I believe they're one of the biggest traders.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>They did merge with night Um. I went from the

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>liquidity providing side, which we were doing it get Go

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>when I saw the PDQ opportunity. So the way PDQ works,

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>an order comes to us and we pause it for

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>up to twenty milliseconds. That sounds vaguely familiar, but in

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that time we do something very constructive for the order.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>What we do is we ping our liquidity providers with

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>only the symbol and effectively bring back the question that

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>used to be asked at the post of what is

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the market? So in other words, you don't say I'm

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>buying a hundred thousands of selling a hundred thousand. You say,

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>here's the symbol, what's your price, what's your best market?

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a dozen providers that are all responding. We

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>can also include institutional passive liquidity providers, and we build

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a book and once we have the book, we take

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the instructions from our client to execute the order against

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the book. So we create competition for every order, and

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in this pause we're in position to take speed out

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of the equation. I'm Barry Ridults. You're listening to Masters

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Keith Ross. He is the CEO of PQ Enterprises, a

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>rather interesting trading shop. Dark Pool goes by a number

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of different names. Keith, I want to start with a

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>quote of yours and have you comment on it, and

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it goes something like this, there is nothing wrong with

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>speed in any other industry. It's applauded. It's an efficiency

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>discuss well. UM. One of my favorite examples is your telephone.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day, we had telephone operators pulling cables

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and plugging them into the wall to connect you to

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>your call. And today we have cell phones that are

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>many computers and you can do everything on your phone.

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Incredible technology advancement proficiency. I haven't heard in the early

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>days of of UM cell phones there were connection issues,

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but those have gotten so much better. You know, it's

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>all about how many megabytes of upload and download and

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so forth. I believe the same things happened for trading,

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so spreads have gotten tighter, commissions have come down dramatically,

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the cost of execution and has never been lower. Um

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. Vanguard in two thousand and ten

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>said our portfolios due to electronic trading have a one

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>percent per annum increase in return. Given the fact that

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they're pension problems across our whole country. Anyone that's involved

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>with the retirement programmer has pension money working in the

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>marketplace is a beneficiary of a more efficient market. Jack Brennan,

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>who's now chairman emeritus of Vanguard, when we spoke with him,

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>he said something along those lines. But let me give

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>you the pushback from the other side. Hey, h f

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>T firms are taking out billions of dollars a year

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in profit. Trading is essentially a zero sum game. That

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>profit has to be coming from somewhere, and it's coming

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>from grandma's retirement account. Would actually vehemently disagree on almost all.

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I would hope you would disagree. Tell me why that

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>description is an error, and I sort of have a

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>foot in that camp that that makes some sense to me. Okay,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>first of all, let's start with the zero sum game problem.

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>The capital markets are not zero sum the capital markets

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>can create wealth and wealth can be destroyed in them.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So I have a good friend, what's a thousand shares

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of apple for each of his kids? He sold it

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and ten, he made times his money

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>wealth creation. Anyone who's bought an apple product knows apple

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>stock has gone to the moon. So that's not zero sum.

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But what happens if he goes to sell it and

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>instead of selling that at a hundred one dollars and

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty cents, he only gets a hundred one dollars and

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>five cents because someone jumped in the middle of his execution.

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So there could be that could be an issue. I

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think that it is, because in the old days

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it would have been a twenty five or fifty cent bid,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a nickel much bigger. So you're talking commission, not spread.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, the tradeoff is it used to

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be higher commissions and wider spreads, and now the spreads

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>are tighter, the commissions are smaller, and if there's an

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>execution charge that finds its way into this net net,

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it's still better for the UH traders that retail has

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>never had it better. Bill McNabb, current chairman and CEO

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard and also a former guest on Mester's business. He

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>said something very similar, and I was more vehemently questioning

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>when I keep reading and hearing about market structure, and

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>when I get a guy like McNabb saying, hey, you

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>know this has made our trading costs lower, it forced

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>me to at least rethink, well, now I have to

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>take this with a grain of salt because he's got

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>zero incentive to say anything. But what what is true

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>true for Vanguard? So let's move to the other issue

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I always hear about, which is the front running. If

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody sniffs out what my order is and rather than

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>executing that order, runs ahead of me, buys it and

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>sells it back to me for whatever, and if we're

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>petting higher cunitively, isn't that a huge drag on total

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>returns for everybody? In the end, it's incredibly small relative

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to the markets to begin with. Second of all, the

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>person doing that, the person the HFT that takes out

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the penny up offer, that's some price improvement for that guy,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's a happy guy. The seller is paying a penny,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is getting a penny more than they might have. I'm

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just saying that's certainly a possibility that's never talked about,

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's price improvement for a contra party. Certainly, the

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>sniffing ability is only an educated guess, just the way

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>people used to do in the market back in the day.

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So they can't see the order. That's a that's a myth.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And the models understand supply and demand and they're trying

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to find that balance between supply and demand all the time.

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, if there's a big demand, the

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>supply is gonna move their price higher. So, um, it's

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>much ado about nothing in my opinion. And what I'll

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do is, I'll say this, most of the people that

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about that don't understand that liquidity provision is a service. Okay,

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So there to me, there's this mythical idea that when

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a trade takes place, the buyer and seller have this

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>come bay, let's hold hands moment and exchange our whatever

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>security is at whatever the price is, which is fine

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at the moment of the trade, but one tick later

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the parties has been disadvantaged. And when I

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was on the floor, used to trade with people and

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd confirm and you'd smile, and you'd say thank you,

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and then one second later you'd say, that's of a gun,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he just picked me off, right, because the tick went

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>agains well, But that's after the fact. You know, once

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the market moves either in your favor against you. Hey,

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that transaction is done, you can't blame the guy that

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>you bought something you shouldn't or sold something too early.

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>That it's it's you know, after the transaction is done.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It's pre transaction or during the transaction that I think

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>some people are are complaining about. Certainly UM. The counter

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>argument to that was explained extremely well in Uh, a

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>book by Covic. I believe Peter Kovic uh Flashboys Not

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so Fast. It was the the antidote to Michael Lewis.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ridhults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Keith Ross. He

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is the CEO of PDQ Enterprises, a trading dark pool

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>as well as a broker dealer that Correct and Ats

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>was formally CEO get Go, which is now part of

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Night Training and is one of the largest h f

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>T s in the world. Let's talk about Michael Lewis's

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>book Flashboys, which I read on vacation and found to

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be a couple of summers ago and found to be

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>an entertaining romp that raised all sorts of questions about

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>market structure. But I have heard that you didn't think

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it was especially accurate. Well, I actually wrote a review

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of the book the day after it came out, so

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I got it on mike Kindle and read it electronically overnight.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating story. I'm a Michael Lewis fan. He writes great novels.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's a novel. So the problem, the issue that

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I have is it's the story of Brad Katsiama, which

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is a fun story, terrific guy, really another guest on

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the show, absolutely and endlessly entertaining story is as told

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>by Michael Lewis, and it helped me dramatically. There's a

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>YouTube interview between Michael um glad Well. It's not Michael Gladwell.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Gladwell and Michael was a seventy minute love fest

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>between the two of them. And what helped me the

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>most was when Michael Lewis explained what I do is

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I find a person I'm interested in and I write

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>their story, which is exactly what he did in the book.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>My issue is as a treatise on market structure, he

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>never talked to any of the exchanges, any of the

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>other a t s s, any of the high frequency traders,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>any of the electronic algorithm people that are in the business.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's one view from one person, and I don't

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's a whole picture of the marketplace. So Lewis

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and Katsuyam were on sixty minutes, came out and said

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>markets are rigged. Yes, the markets are rigged, and it

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a perfect headline. It's the perfect marketing way to

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get your book sold to hundreds of thousands of people.

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>The issue is if you listen or read the book,

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what they really said was it's possible that the execution

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of an order in the marketplace is rigged. Later on,

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>when Michael Lewis was asked you invest in the stock market,

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he says, oh, yeah, I've on dtfs for years and years.

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>My family has always been an investor. So when the

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>market is rigged, that headline screams it's a three card

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Monty game, there's no way you can win. Absolutely untrue.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>By your apple twenty years ago, you're a happy guy today.

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So that nuance is totally lost. In a sixty minutes piece,

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the world was in a tizzy. It appeared that the

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>high frequency guys were making a lot of money. They

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>had a two, but they're not making that much money anymore.

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Volumes have just completely dried up. And volumes have dried up.

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Let me share a quick story around efficiency that I

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>like to tell. If you buy or sell a house,

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>five percent commission. When you go to Starbucks and buy

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a latte with your credit card, you pay Master Carter

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>visa three percent commission on a three dollar latte, So

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that's nine cents. If you trade three shares of Starbucks

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're an electronic market maker, they make about three

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>cents per hundred, so they're gonna make the same ninth

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>sense that you're gladly play Visa for your latte. And

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>yet they're going to trade dollars worth of stock and

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>take risk while they're doing the trade. Their margins are

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so infinitesimally small. There's no other capital transaction anywhere that

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>comes close to that type of efficiency. So my colleague

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Josh Brown likes to say the people complain that high

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>frequency trading uh and the markets are rigged. His responses

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the markets have always been rigged. There's always been a specialist.

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>There's always been somebody taking the pound of flash. At

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>least today we know who would is. Again, I'll go

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>back to my comment earlier that liquidity provision is a service.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>If you want to be able to trade and transfer

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>risk whenever you want, someone needs to stand there and

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>take the other side. The way money has always been

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>made in the markets is to capture spread between the

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>bid and the ask. That's done very quickly now and

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>very scientifically. So it's not that the game has changed,

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>just the players have changed. So in the last thirty

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>seconds or so that we have what do you think

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of I e X that's the shop that Bradcotts Yam

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>opened up. What do you think of their proposal to

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>actually becommon exchange as an A T S. I applaud

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>them and appreciate their innovation as an exchange, their protected

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>quote hidden behind the delay could be very problematic. And

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>my concern is other exchanges imitate I e X if

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>they start to get market share, and we would have

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the situation of quotes that are not valid because they're

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>being canceled, but no one knows because the cancel is

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going through the speed bump. This is Masters in Business

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Barry Ridhalts. My special guest today

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is Keith Ross. He is the CEO of PDQ Enterprises

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on a T S dark Pool, And there are all

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sorts of other technical terms we can discuss. So earlier

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about how market structure has changed. One

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>of the claims about issues with high frequency trading is

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that it has introduced new systemic risk into the markets.

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>True or false, it's got to be true. Systemic risk

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is very hard to understand and know. UM. But there's

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.479
<v Speaker 1>always been systemic risk, So it's not as though it

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist before. Electronic trades just different today and it's

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>just a different fashion. UM. I think the regulators actually

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>actually after the flash crash with UH some of the

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>things they put in place limit up, limit down, UM

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>attempting to get the venues to synchronize with each other.

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>UM are certainly going to go help us move forward

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to create confidence in the market structure. UM, but systemic risk. Interestingly,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>to me, during the crash, none of the listed and

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>cleared futures options or stock exchanges had any issues. It

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>was only the over the counter trades where there wasn't

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a central counterparty. The central counterparty is the to me,

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the lynchpin of creating eliminating systemic risk, and Dodd Frank

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>all seven hundred whatever pages of it should be one page.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Everyone has to centrally clear their trades, no matter what

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>they are, through some exchange, through an exchange, or a

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>third party, because then the third party manages the risk

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and and they know where all the risk is from

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>all the participants. That's that's interesting. So let's talk a

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that structure in some um greater detail.

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>At one point in our history, the exchanges, the New

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchanged, other exchanges were really almost public utilities.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>They were not for profits. We eventually run into trouble

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>with compensation and other issues under Dick Rasso. There was

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that whole digression. What should the proper role of the

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>stock exchange be in modern trading? Well, let's it should

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>be risk transfer among consenting parties. And so besides the

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>risk transfer process, which is the matching of the trade,

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you also want to know that it's going to clear properly.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're a buyer, you're going to get your securities.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're a seller, you're gonna get your money. So

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the first step in a chain of several events

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that worked lawlessly through the financial crisis. For the list

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that exchanges, the the issue was in the over the

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>counter credit swaps and some of those issues where everyone

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>became suspicious of their counterparties required more margin, and companies

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that had tens of billions of dollars two weeks later,

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we're needing to be rescued. So when I was coming up,

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we had the AMMAX, the Nasdack, the New York Stock exchanged.

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Today there's twelve exchanges, almost fifty dark pools, maybe even more.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I have you lose track of forty is probably a

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>better Okay, so forty plus dark pools. What about this fragmentation?

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean for getting orders executed? I've spoken

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to traders who have complained they go out to buy

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>five or ten thousand shares. I don't need a hundred

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>or five hundred, and they get forty seven here and

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred twenty two there, and it takes a dozens

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of orders to get what used to be a simple

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>transaction filled. What is this fragmentation and mean for for

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>execution and structure? So too. Two parts to that answer. UM,

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>One is it actually is redundancy if you look at

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>it a different way. So a little while ago, this

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>New York socket exchange was down for four hours. No

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>one even new right, So that's actually a good thing.

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we get a start for that. Um

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty with the fragmentation. So the generic answer would

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>be innovation. Innovation has come through a t S S

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>has forced the stock exchanges to compete with each other again,

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>has driven costs down, taking a lot of people out

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of the equation. There used to be many more bodies

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>on the floor and on trading. Really it's it's going traumatically.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>It used to be like eight rooms. I think they're

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>down to one room. It's a it's a that's right,

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a television front. But here's how you

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>solve that problem. If you have a structural pause, that

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>can do good things for the order at PDQ, we

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>can consolidate orders from other venues. So let's talk about that.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So the complaint that some people have raised about I

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>X CATSI Yamas Shop is that they introduced the speed bump.

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It's eight miles of coiled fiber. Optiction is right right,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So that that introduces I'm doing the soft top of

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>my head about a three and fifty micro second delay,

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so that nobody is disadvantaged by faster speed. It's still

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>crazy fast, but that prevents what we talked about earlier,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the front running, the picking off orders. Your twenty micro second,

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it's actually millisecond. Okay, speed guys, right, So that's a

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a longer delay. In other words, all right, so

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a twenty miller as opposed to three micro

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>second delay that similarly forces is everybody uh with the

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>speed advantage, or you're going to them on the lion

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>making them compete for the order. We reverse the flow,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so I e X. All they do is it's a

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>speed bump for people to get in and out. It's

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like a turnstile at a door, right, everyone has

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>to stop and go through the turnstyle. They've made an

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>effective business out of convincing people that that's helpful. I

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>think it's more helpful if you take that pause, share

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the symbol only. This is an incredibly important part of

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the equation, not the volume, not the product, the side,

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the size, or the price, and ask that question, where

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>is the market in apple the high frequency folks, the providers,

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the institution, anyone who wants to provide liquidity then has

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to respond with a committed order. That committed orders aggregated

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>into a book, and then that book is used to

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>get to pick the best price and size exactly. That

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a really interesting innovation to deal with questions

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of of structure and fragmentation. You're actually taking advantage of

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the fragmentation. Well, we're consolidating it in this process. And

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me, I mean, I think it's somewhat ironic

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that this process replicates the way the floor used to

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>work for the way an active pit would work in Chicago.

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, so let's talk a bit about order flow.

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about the payment for order flow?

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>That's been a somewhat controversial issue. I have no issue

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>with it. And let me explain why. Uh, just over

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a year ago conference in New York, five different by side,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, five different retail brokers on the day as

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about their experience with their wholesalers to say it

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.959
<v Speaker 1>was a love fest as an understatement, every single person

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this is schwab and a merritory aid, and um, I'm

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to remember some of the other scott trade. Maybe

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't interactive brokers, but who's who of retail said,

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>here's what our wholesalers do. They help us build our infrastructure.

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>They the metrics that we track with them in terms

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of present price improvement, quality inside the spread, uh, quickness

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of response, number of trades that they don't feel to

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>get sent out to the marketplace, that met all those

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>metrics have gotten better over time. This was in I

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>believe January. They're thrilled. Payment for order flow is just

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a different way of giving that spread capture to the dealer.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Commissions have collapsed for retail folks. All you can eat

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on a trade, I mean it's virtually nothing. Go to

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a website called robin Hood and trade for free actually

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is zero cost. I assume it's built in somewhere in

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a moll. You know. Everybody will capture the spread on

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>those trades, which is fine. But to the consumer it

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>looks like a free trade, which is fine. So so

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>let's talk. I would be remiss if we did not

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>discuss spoofing, which the concept of cranking out tens of

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>thousands of what some people call phantom orts that are

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>never intended to be executed and then immediately canceling those

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>which appears to be intended to manipulate markets to some degree.

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Why in a normal market would we ever need something

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like spoofing? Why would you ever bluff in a poker hand? Well,

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you bluff once, but you don't bluff ten thousand times

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in a micro second. Seems like a lot of bluffing

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>going on. Yes, I'm being somewhat facetious. It's one person's bluff,

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe another person's brilliant move um or defensive move. But

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me that when the Commission decided to focus

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 1>on these issues, and when you say commission you mean

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the SEC. The SEC and Finrie both creating rules around

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>these types of events. They have yet to actually defined

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>spoofing or layering, But what they did define over a

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>year ago was disruptive trading. And I think that's much

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>easier to focus on because it doesn't necessarily imply intent.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So spoofing implies intent. I wasn't really meaning to trade,

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you've put those orders in, and there's so

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>many risk parameters in place for you to put those

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>orders in, meaning you've got to have enough capital in

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>case you get killed that you can do the trade.

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a matter of debate whether they're spoofing or not.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>What's the actual intent. It's really really hard to define

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and certainly going to be very hard to prosecute someone.

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So if we people who are listening are intrigued as

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I am by h F T and algorithmic trading, if

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to find out more about p d Q,

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>where's the best place for them to learn? P d

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Q A t S dot com p d Q A

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>t s dot com. We have been speaking with Keith Ross.

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>He is the chairman and CEO of p d Q Enterprises. UH.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to learn more about this, you

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>can check out the website p d Q A t

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.959
<v Speaker 1>S dot com. Be sure and check out my daily

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>column on Bloomberg View dot com or follow me on

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Riolts. I'm Barry Ridholts. You've been listening to

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. All right, welcome back

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast. Keith Keith I want to call you

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald keith Um. Thank you so much for doing this.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>This is really fascinating stuff. I know we are deep

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in the wonky weeds for the average listener, but trust

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>me when I tell you there is an intense audience

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>for this conversation. And I know I'm going to get

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of email, one half of which is gonna

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>be saying, hey, the anti h f T guys, are

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know vociferous? It was good you had a guy

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>like he threw us on. And then the other emails

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to be and by the way, the first

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>group will say, but you were a little rough on him,

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the other group are gonna say, hey, man,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you let Keith r Us just get away with murder.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>You should have asked him. So let me go over

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the questions that they're gonna they're gonna ask

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>us about. I think at this point in time, most

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>people know what co location means. The servers at the

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>various exchanges that people fight to be the closest one

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to the end of the run so that there's that

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>little speed advantage of ten ft at the speed of light.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>How important are things like co location to h f

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>T firms? Actually there, they probably created the whole idea

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of doing it electronically. Co location and position

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in the pit years ago was also incredibly important, and

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>people would get up at four am to make sure

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they had their spot next to their favorite broker so

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>they could deal with him and trade his flow. So

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not new, it's just got a different shape. And

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it fascinates me that now that orders are done and

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>completed in milliseconds and micro seconds, essentially, the world seems

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to be displaced by it. Where it used to take minutes,

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>if not hours, to get a trade done, and it

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't seem to be an issue. So we went from

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hand gestures to software right to software. Operating at high speeds,

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.719
<v Speaker 1>many of the venues measure their cables so that everyone

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>has the virtual same distance to the matching engine. So

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the CME does that, I know for sure, and it's

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>an f it's in an effort to try to level

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the playing field. If you're in the co location, well,

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're not, you're a disadvantage, which is why they

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>could charge big rents for those wrecks. And so for

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the high speed guys, the reason they need to co

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>locate is they have to compete with each other. They're

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>sho works fighting over anything that might be there, and

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they're very worried that if they're too slow, they're going

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to be the victim. This is a giant arms race

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>is what's what's actually happen. So let's let's go through

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these other favorite terms. What is packet sniffing.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>It's an attempt to decipher what's in a message in

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a network, meaning in this context, to figure out what

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 1>what might actually be the size and price of an

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>order in order to get ahead of that line. It's

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>not it's not clear to me that you can actually

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>see what the order is, but you can see that

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe an order is coming. So I was always in

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the impression that since since every once the order goes

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>into the exchange and the exchange exchange pings out to

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>see what the best prices, once that happens, the h

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>f t s have full access to it, and if

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 1>they could beat everybody else to go by the order

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and fill that at a lower rice, they're allowed to

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. They're not the broker, so they don't have

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>front running rules that apply to them. They're just a

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>liquidity provider. And they're faster and getting if this is

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>available for seven cents, and I'm going to turn around

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and flip it for eight cents. If they're faster than

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>other guys doing that, they get to pocket that penny

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>once it gets posted at the matching engine or at

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the venue. The matching engine would be actually executing a

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>match once it's posted and everyone can see it. I

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>think you know it's fair gets declared in fair game. Absolutely. Um.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I was aware that in the future's world, some folks,

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we're putting one lots into the marketplace, meaning one futures contract,

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>so the equivalent of one share of stock of order

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>or it's like twenty or thirty dollars principle amount for

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a one lot, because the futures are leveraged. And now

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>then going on the other side with the order, well,

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>know what they did was they'd leave it in the

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>marketplace until they got to fill. And at the time,

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the mechanics behind reporting the fill was quicker than changing

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the quote, so the phil would tell them that the

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>quote was changing, so in other words, they would get

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>filled before the quote would even show up and micro

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>seconds nobody actually knows this report. I believe that's been

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>sequenced so that it's everyone gets the information at the

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 1>same time. But there was an opportunity. Oh, I see

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're saying. So if you're filled before the

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>quote moves, you know, the quote's gonna move right, so

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you have an information, so you have a chance to

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>just because you were executed, and that's considered public, so

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone should have access to that. This doesn't get complicated

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>enough of it. So so we talked about spoofing. What

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>about quote stuffing, which is a term that I just love.

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>What is quote stuffing? Well, it's an attempt to overwhelm

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the quote system so that people can't really understand where

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the market is. And is that considered manipulation or is

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>there I would expect the SEC to use their disruptive

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Trading card and say you were trying to disrupt trading.

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't make sense. You know, you're fined or whatever.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>The results do we still see the sort of quote

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>stuffing that was pretty common. I'm away from being on

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the front line the way I used to be at

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>get go Um. Everyone is so fast and so on

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>top of their game, so to speak. I would think

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.879
<v Speaker 1>it would be extraordinarily difficult now. But I can't say

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't happen. I don't know for sure. You

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:44.760
<v Speaker 1>would think if someone is jamming a lot of quotes

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>in order to cause confusion in the marketplace, that does

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>make sense for the sec to want to stop that absolutely,

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and most venues, including PDQ, have limits on the number

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of orders on the same side and a given security

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that anyone client can send, so that if we see

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>more than a couple of orders in one second, same side,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 1>same price, same um customers sending the order, that's problematic.

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It pops up on our compliance and we can check

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>them out and make sure that they're not going Now

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is that going to be an automated interrupt or is

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that get kicked out with an email to somebody in

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a week later or someone So we're not the broker

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>dealer of record, so it's up to us to inform

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the broker dealer and then it's up to him to

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>decide what to do with it. So this won't be

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>stopped at the point of contact. This is Hey, this

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>person is abusing the system, and eventually they get kicked out.

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>We have the capability to turn them off. I mean

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we've are compliance systems are in sync enough that we

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>could if we needed to. UM we'd prefer to have

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the broker deal it do it because they know exactly

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>where the client is and what the clients expectation, and

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they have the compliance over sure to do that. That

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 1>that makes some sense. Um, walking away? What is walking away? Well,

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this is what we talked about earlier in terms of

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>turning off your system. UM. I'd like to share an

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>urban legend. There was a person writing a book interviewed

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a prominent high frequency trader who said, off the record,

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I recall this, I promise, off the record, we turned

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>our machines off during the flash crash. During the flash crash,

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Um the reporter decided to put it on the record.

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>The world assumed that everyone turned off their machines and

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>walked away, and we're not making a market, when in fact,

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of good firms took advantage, literally

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>took advantage of the opportunity and made a lot of money.

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Anytimes volatility, if you so. I began my career as

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a trader, and one of the things I used to

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>love to do. This is a hundred years ago and

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm sucking manually. This is brightly algorithms. I would leave

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a bid out a quarter or half a point under

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the market, and every now and then you got something,

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you get filled and it was just quick, you know,

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>with one handed flick you turn around and sell it

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>at the bid, Hey I sold a thousand shares a

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter point higher, it was free money. Now eventually that

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of nonsense stopped in the lad Or nineties, but

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I was astonished occasionally, Hey here's two for free. Um

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I had a friend who said, why don't we write

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a program to do that automatically? So they tried, and

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it made some money for about a month, and then

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that stuff just kind of dried up. So I look

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>at that as an early h f T sort of

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 1>thing and an arms race where the other side eventually

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody likes getting picked off for a quarter point constantly

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>at a certain certain point they basically say you can't

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do this, or they just figure out, let's look at

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>all the quotes and make sure that we're in the

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 1>market and not now, if it's a buck outside of

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the market, that trade gets broken, but a quarter point

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in a fast moving market, but nobody's gonna care about that,

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>so um or walk away from that. So so, given

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>all these things, given everything that we have learns um

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is it's let me ask this in an open ended question.

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of storm un drang and a

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of upset about h f T s a few

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago Certainly, as closer we get to the flash

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>crash six years ago, the more people are upset. Is

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>it that we've forgotten about the flash crash and these

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>fears have faded? Has the market structure and the oversight improved.

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Has everybody kind of figured out, Hey, this technology thing

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be here for a while. What's changed

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in the past five or six years that have kind

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of made the general outrage over h f T sort

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of settled down? I don't know if I'm asking that question.

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I get it. I mean it has dampened

0:41:56.360 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 1>down quite a bit. Um. I think several factors. One

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>is the stock markets much higher than it was five

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It's recovered dramatically, so so people look at

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>their four oh one K and they don't have to

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>jump out the window anymore. So that just in general,

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that helps a lot for people to feel better about

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the market. Um, the markets have put in some more

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 1>rules and regulations, so we expected to behave better and

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it has. Um people are becoming more comfortable.

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So five, six, seven, eight years ago, people wouldn't even

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>go online to do banking because they were anxious about security. Sure,

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>people afraid to buy from Amazon. If you go back

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>far enough, I can't I can't buy some put a

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>credit card over the internet. Now, if you don't do it,

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you know you're you're not part of the world in

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>which we live exactly. So all those things have changed. Um,

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the proper structure gotten better. Do you think the market

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>structure is less precarious, more stable, less likely to be

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>subject to another flash crash like event. I think it's

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>more resilient. That's a good word. The difficulty with those

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things is they're not going to be where

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:12.319
<v Speaker 1>you expect them. They're gonna they're gonna be in its

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:15.240
<v Speaker 1>own fash crash type of thing. That's really the wrong

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>phrase for it. But you had some really surprising movement

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in bonds, not where people expected to see that. What

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I've always thought is that there'll be people like you

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 1>used to trade in the nineties that will put some

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 1>bids in below the market because they do want to

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>own it and at a better price, they'll be happy

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 1>even in the bond market. And so one of the

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 1>issues at the moment is we have what some of

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the academics called knife point liquidity. So everyone's around the

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>market a tick or two away because they understand that's

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>where the market is now, and that's where the supply

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and demand are. But if the market moves handle for

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a point, if it doesn't kind of gradually, that's okay

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>because they can all adjust along the way. But if

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it happens quickly, they assume that there's some news out

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that they don't understand or the model doesn't understand, so

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 1>they back away, and that creates the vacuum. It is

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>going to make sense to some people to say, you

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:14.359
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm gonna bid down a half a dollar,

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>down a dollar, down a dollar and a half, and

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>down two dollars, the way the book used to be

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 1>much more like, and stay out there until you know

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they get what they need. If I get filled on

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>buying at a discount, what or if I sell it

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on the way up, I'm selling it at a premium.

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:34.439
<v Speaker 1>And there's all kinds of things you can do with that. So, yes,

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 1>we do have I still believe the structure. The structural

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 1>issue is we have to chase the liquidity rather than

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>making it come to the order. And that's where PDQ

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>is dramatically different. And it's hard for me to emphasize

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the paradigm shift. So I've got the order. I'm holding

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it here. You can't see it on the radio, but

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I've got into my hand. I want of trade ten

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand Apple. I'll tell you the size. What's your market?

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You still don't know whether I'm a buyer or seller.

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Give me your market. All the participants commit to the auction,

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so they can't run away, they can't front run, they

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>can't spoof because they don't know what it is. They

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>can't penny. They're competing with each other, so their price

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>may be a penny better than somebody else. They want

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to give their best price, but they're giving you best

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>bid and best gass simultaneously, and it's up to you

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to to to run the auction and find the best

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>price for our clients. So that is a big shift

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>from what we typically see when someone goes to execute

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>an order out in the normal. Back back when I

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>was on a level three and you'd see all the

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>market makers on each side, you saw a few cents up.

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You had no idea what the real size was, and

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:50.399
<v Speaker 1>if you were trading any sort of size, you would

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>make a rough estimate. Hey, this is gonna cost me

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>ten cents to here's two thousand, there's three thousand, there's

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>four thousand, there's five thousand. That's how I'll get ten

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen thousd and filled within a dime or so

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of the actual current bit aness price. You guys have

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>turned that on its head. So we make that flow

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.240
<v Speaker 1>come to you. If you're a natural buyer or seller,

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the question is where is the market. We gather the

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>responses and it's committed flow to you, and they have

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to commit first, so it's not like they get a

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>chance to peak and then run around. So let me

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>phrase it as slightly different fascinating. That's a fascinating business model.

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there anybody who's a competitor to you for that? Not?

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:37.400
<v Speaker 1>At the moment um? How much of that is patented trademark?

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>We have some IP protection and some patent protection some

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the venues. So Chicago Stock Exchange has introduced the

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>snap auction New York Stock Exchanges talking about a midday

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>auction for lightly traded stocks. The London Stock Exchange is

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>also now I believe, executing a midday auction, meaning why

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>mid day because they just had to pick a time.

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Are doing it once a day. It's not an on

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>demand or continuously. You're on demands. Effectively, you send us

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in order, we will create the auction for you whenever

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you want. So that stocks does that include futures. We're

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just stocks at this point, so there's technical reasons why,

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 1>but yes, it's almost on the future that you're going

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to do bonds, futures or any other trade. So structurally,

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the other markets UM have some issues that they don't

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have the A T S functionality meaning to A T

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>S for people who automated trading system created by the

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Commission SEC in I believe to promote innovative and alternative

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>ways of trading. So we act like a stock exchange

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of matching buyers and sellers, but we're only

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a broker dealer and we're technically regulated by FINRA. The

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>exchanges are directly related and regulated to the SEC. And

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this was reg I'm doing this from Emory reg NMS.

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>This was reg A t US. It was called um

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Reagan MS was two thousand and five, and that was

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a different market structure plan which actually was incredibly effective

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>achieving the goals that had set out to achieve, which

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 1>were well to make the exchanges and orders compete with

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>each other. UH and automate the marketplace. I was going

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to say, some people have said Reagan MS is what

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we're high frequency trading really exploded out of the box.

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It turns out it was very beneficial for high frequency trading.

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Little inside story. Back in the get Go days, I

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 1>was there during that period, we were actually concerned that

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that Reagan MS was going to hurt our business because

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you were going to get more competition. There would be

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 1>more competition, and the price protection and other issues would

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>make it more difficult for us to function. We had

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:00.320
<v Speaker 1>no idea. It was going to be a softball all

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>down the middle of the right and everybody feasted. So

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it looks like because that was really the wild West

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and lots and lots. Look at Citadel,

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>which started how does the hedge funds is now one

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of the larger, if not largest, liquidity providers. So how

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 1>does a shop that starts out as Ken Griffith Citadel

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:26.399
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago starts out as essentially a hedge funds? How

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>does an enterprise like that suddenly become this giant h

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 1>f T algorithmic trading shop. So one of the changes

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that we made at get Go was to understand that

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we were really a technology shop, not that happened to

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>be in the trading space, So we shifted our emphasis

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 1>dramatically to our technology people. Fortunately, all the traders that

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>were running the models understood how important the technology was.

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And what happened was that the brilliance of the technology

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>folk was was able to make UM the systems better

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and faster, and every time you got better and faster,

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you made more money. So where do you this is?

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I just was up at M I T for the

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Sloan Annual Conference last month. The whole audience were I

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>would say two thirds were students, and I very It

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>was one of the more intense rooms I've been in.

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:29.279
<v Speaker 1>And my sense is that many of these kids are

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>destined for careers at shops like yours. Where do you

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:37.360
<v Speaker 1>go out and find the talent, the staff? Where do

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you guys recruit? How do you find the wizards to do?

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>What what your stuff? Your technology actually does? So we

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:48.720
<v Speaker 1>started ten years ago and the team that we started

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>with is principally still with us UM. So we found

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:58.800
<v Speaker 1>folks are Cto has done the recruiting. Were very small shop.

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>We just grew from twenty to twenty eight people in

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the last year. So our technology staff is about a dozen.

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>We're not actively recruiting because we're not in the what

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I might term is suicidal high speed race. We're going

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to let other people do that. We have really good

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>technology and we want it to be incredibly robust, but

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the last micro second isn't critical for our process. That's

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me because you spent so you began your

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:35.719
<v Speaker 1>career on the floor, way back, run, eventually find your

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 1>way into h f T and you're there for the

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>fat part of that cycle. So you were really a

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>witness firsthands. What made you stop and say, you know,

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there might be more money if we step back and

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:54.319
<v Speaker 1>try and approach us from a different perspective. How did

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you get to that? So the founder of PDQ is

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a fellow named Christopher Keith. He's a brilliant, brilliant mind.

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Five years young. Now. He's the former CTO of the

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange. Okay, so he has some understanding

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>of how the exchange works. Perhaps he has a bit

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of a clue about how markets function um understatement of

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the year, understatement of the year. Even in two thousand

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and one he applied for a patent for the p

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>d Q idea. Really he understood that at some point

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the race for speed cycle would end, that there would be,

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:34.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, a physical limit of how fast you could

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:38.840
<v Speaker 1>go speed alight, speed alight. And even when I was

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>at get Go and we were doing better and better

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and going faster and faster, in the back of my mind,

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, you know, there's gonna be some point

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 1>where speed doesn't win. It turns out that he we

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>had a chance to meet him while I was at

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>get Go and my partners made a small investment in PDQ.

0:52:57.040 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Well it's it's doing fine, UM, but we figured at

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the time we were thinking that it might be a

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>source for us to get flow, for us to interact

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with UM. We ended up going in different directions once

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I went to PDQ. But the market structure idea has

0:53:17.280 --> 0:53:20.319
<v Speaker 1>actually been around for quite a while, and so some

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of the folks that think they've discovered new things recently,

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually they're just discovering things. Everything sold is

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>new again. You know, when you describe the time at

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.239
<v Speaker 1>get co where there's a sense that, hey, this has

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to eventually hit a limit. I just had that vision

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of Robert de Val and apocalypse now where he turns

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>to Martin Sheen and says, as if it's a bad thing,

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:52.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, son, someday this war is gonna end, and

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>then walks off, and Sheen looks at him like he

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>has two heads. But really that's a that's a fascinating

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>moment in the midst of the high frequency trading expansion,

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 1>where well, this has to bump up against the natural

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 1>limit and then what comes next that that's really an

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>insightful thought to have when everybody's making a lot of

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:17.800
<v Speaker 1>money and hey, we figured out a new way of trading,

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and well, let's let's see what this ghost. That's the

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>way Chris Keith thinks a step of two ahead of everybody,

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:28.279
<v Speaker 1>miles ahead of the rest of us. And it was

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>fun to get to understand, you know, his ideas. And

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of course the process of collecting the market aggregating the book,

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:46.840
<v Speaker 1>forcing the providers to go first was a novel idea. Um,

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but what happens I believe is that it benefits all

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:52.760
<v Speaker 1>participants and what it does it certainly sounds like it would.

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So I got excited about it as a provider because

0:54:56.320 --> 0:54:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I knew there was time to refresh the algorithm in

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 1>give my best market under circumstances that were defined over

0:55:04.160 --> 0:55:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a very short period of time, meaning milliseconds or sconds

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so than microseconds, but still faster than the human eye,

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. And I also knew that there would be

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunities where the model could provide substantial liquidity given the

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>circumstances at a particular moment. So if you're doing a

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pair's trade, if you're doing a trade of a stock

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 1>or an et F against futures, and you have a

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:34.759
<v Speaker 1>chance to assess the market, run your model. Instead of

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:36.839
<v Speaker 1>doing five chairs, you might be able to do five

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>at a given moment under prescribed circumstances. It's very interesting

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:48.759
<v Speaker 1>to understand how specific that is and how important it

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 1>is to be able to respond with size. There may

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.319
<v Speaker 1>be times when you can't make any market where the

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>futures markets. It's just that it's there, right Or you

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to trade Microsoft against Oracle, and Microsoft

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 1>arneys came out and the market's going a little cucko,

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Well we're gonna wait. But as you find the opportunity

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 1>where you can make a better market, and if you

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have multiple participants who are all going to have a

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:17.360
<v Speaker 1>different flavor of their better market, and you can aggregate

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:19.839
<v Speaker 1>them together. All of a sudden, you're gonna you're gonna

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>start to find a market that will feel like it

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 1>used to feel. So so you're a dark pool, which

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:29.160
<v Speaker 1>means you're trading pretty continuously. Do you guys trade before

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>market hours and after twenty four hours? Four? How do you?

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that timeline? Our current trading clock

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is four. We also have a routing business for our clients,

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:43.799
<v Speaker 1>so if we don't fill them during the auction, we're

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>happy to send it either through the darker to a

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>destination that they're interested in. We will route before and

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>after the close, so we can take an order any time,

0:56:53.080 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>but we don't actually execute it before and after the

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:57.759
<v Speaker 1>close at this point, and you mentioned the New York

0:56:57.760 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and London are going to do these by appointment on trades.

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.439
<v Speaker 1>We used to make fun of the illoquid stocks. It's

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's by appointment only. So from nine thirty to four,

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:12.720
<v Speaker 1>how actively executing are you? What sort of share counting

0:57:12.920 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 1>are you guys doing massive shares or is it a

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>handful of big clients and you're doing a hundred thousand

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 1>year and half. So we have about a hundred broker dealers, subscribers,

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>so they're sending us flow during the day substantial, which

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is pretty substantial. Yeah, I know, about anywhere from sixty

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five are active on a given day are

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 1>routing and executing business combines for a little bit close

0:57:35.160 --> 0:57:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to one and a half percent of the market, So

0:57:36.880 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we're doing like a hundred fifty million shares a day

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that's combined. The routing actually is the substantial part of

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the business. That's the lion share, although it may not

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>be the lion share profitability wise, but it's gonna be

0:57:49.160 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the lion share volume wise. Yes, So we're thrilled. I mean,

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 1>when we got to one percent about a year ago,

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we thought that was a great milestone, um, but that's

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:02.720
<v Speaker 1>still relatively small for some of the dark pools out

0:58:02.760 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 1>there are are huge, right, there's five and ten percent.

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>The biggest ones is that is that Well, that might

0:58:09.040 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>be a little high, maybe closer three to six. But

0:58:12.640 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other facets about our auction process after

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a trade has made our t c A reports show

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that we have very little impact on the market. So

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not moving the price, so we're not moving right.

0:58:26.080 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Institutions love that I should say, they want to be

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>able to get in or out without causing a disruption

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 1>because you never know what they have behind that they

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 1>might have another Hey, I got ten ten million more

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to go, try not to wreck the bid. So familiar

0:58:39.960 --> 0:58:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of course days right, of course. UM. One thing that

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm very proud of is when our liquidity providers respond.

0:58:48.360 --> 0:58:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Their average size is shares way above the average trade

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 1>size and in terms of larger trades. For the month

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of February, we received about thirty five thousand trades of

0:59:04.280 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 1>over five thousand shares from our initiators from the subscribers

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for liquidity, and our providers responded, this is our

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:16.480
<v Speaker 1>daily average with over a hundred and thirty five thousand

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:22.320
<v Speaker 1>blocks of over five thousand shares. A lot of it

0:59:22.480 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 1>may not have traded, but it was there and it

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was available. Um. Sometimes the providers are on the same

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:32.560
<v Speaker 1>side of the market as the order. Sometimes they're appending

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 1>your two away from the market, so they may not

0:59:35.520 --> 0:59:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they may not cross, they may not match, UM, but

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity is there, and I think that's the important thing.

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So how do you guys get paid? Is it on

0:59:44.840 --> 0:59:47.919
<v Speaker 1>a preshare basis? What do you guys judge for share

0:59:48.000 --> 0:59:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is that is that public info? Um, I'd love to

0:59:51.800 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>make it public information. And the problem is it's custom

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So everybody, depending on what they're doing, the size frequency,

1:00:00.680 --> 1:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna work out some arrangement on some sort of

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>grid for them. Even more than that. So once we

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation with our client, they're not latency sensitive,

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they've agreed after PDQ we can route through the dark

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and end up going through bats. Let's say we can

1:00:18.640 --> 1:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>actually give them a sliding scale. Because we're in a

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>t S we don't have to have one size fits

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>all pricing, which in exchange does. So if you if

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we feel you at p d Q, we can give

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you a free fill. If we go into the dark,

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we may have to charge you eight mills. It's costing

1:00:36.640 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>relatively inexpensive. Relatively inexpensive, but it might be costing US

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>four or five. We get a little mark up for

1:00:42.240 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the house because we've got to keep the lights on

1:00:45.120 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>as we go through the dark. The price gradually goes up.

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Eventually we send you to the lip market. Are active

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>traders save about of the take fee from the lip

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>market by coming to PDQ, And and that's why people

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like Vanguard and Dimensional are not really that critical of

1:01:05.360 --> 1:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>HFT because to them there's a cost saving. Absolutely that

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that makes a lot of sense. I could stay in

1:01:11.840 --> 1:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the weeds all day. I find this stuff fascinating, But

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I know I only have you for another fifteen minutes,

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>so let me get to some of my favorite questions

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh, well, we'll see where this goes. So you

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the early days you started, you were on

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the floor. Was it New York or Chicago? I started

1:01:31.080 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>on the American Stock Exchange and then went to the

1:01:33.320 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>CBO E flour And so what did you do before

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>financial services? I jumped into it right out of college.

1:01:40.160 --> 1:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>When I was in college, I actually had a house

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>painting business that I ran with ten other guys that

1:01:46.320 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>were working for me. So that was less late and

1:01:48.320 --> 1:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>seem more LATEX and that sort of stuff. I got

1:01:50.800 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it good. Um, So, who are some of your early

1:01:54.360 --> 1:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>mentors in this industry? Um Ken langn oh? Really, I

1:01:58.400 --> 1:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was actually depot Ends It was both medical center and

1:02:02.440 --> 1:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the med Associates is the name of his broke

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in the med e D. I was partners with him

1:02:11.040 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>um in the late seventies and early eighties as a

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>floor trader, and he said, I have this idea for

1:02:17.400 --> 1:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a home. I was never to offer the opportunity. It

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>turns out, I don't know whether I what I would

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>have done, but I could dream. You want to sell

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>plywood and giant warehouses, Ken, listen, stick to trade by

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, you become a multi billionaire, right that? It

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>ends up? It's a It's a great American. We should

1:02:35.480 --> 1:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have him on the air one of these days. I'd

1:02:37.200 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>love to. He's still in touch with him. No, and

1:02:40.240 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a no nonsense, a little gruff. But was he

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>always that way? Is that that's his persona, that's his persona.

1:02:49.160 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>He never he calls a spade a spade, right that?

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty pretty funny? Any other mentors worth? A trader

1:02:57.680 --> 1:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>named John Mulhern was legendary back in the day, all right,

1:03:00.840 --> 1:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I've heard the name. He was at Merrill Lynch Bar

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Wagner actually partners with is the England Or at one point.

1:03:08.400 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Um a man who just had a beautiful different perspective

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on the world. Um was a extraordinary natural trader, if

1:03:20.960 --> 1:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>there is such a thing. Back in the day when um,

1:03:25.440 --> 1:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>some people just have a feel for what's going on

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and what's about to happen? Um. I also did not

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:36.479
<v Speaker 1>know him personally, but followed the career Bob Ruben risk

1:03:36.560 --> 1:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>arb Trage from Goldman Saxon of course Secretary Treasury and

1:03:39.240 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>other things like that. So um, I enjoyed reading about

1:03:42.960 --> 1:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>people in the business. And um, so let's talk about books.

1:03:46.120 --> 1:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>What are some of your favorite books? Fiction? Non fiction,

1:03:48.880 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>finance nine finance. So I always get fascinating answers to

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this question. The one that I decided I want to

1:03:56.480 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>tout is called the Rational Optimist. Oh, of course, Matt Ridley,

1:04:01.760 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and for folks that are struggling with the world in

1:04:06.880 --> 1:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>which we live and think things are not good. Um.

1:04:11.840 --> 1:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>His argument is, we've never there's never been a better

1:04:16.640 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>time to be alive. You could look at it many metries, lifespan, healthcare,

1:04:21.640 --> 1:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of wars, amount of murders, amount of crime. Even

1:04:25.360 --> 1:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>though these things are on the headlines and we all

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>have more access to it. By the numbers, it's actually

1:04:30.720 --> 1:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>much better than it was even fifty or thirty years ago. Right,

1:04:34.760 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>So um, Warren Buffett says, the normal average person today

1:04:39.760 --> 1:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>has a much better life than Rockefeller did a hundred

1:04:42.000 --> 1:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I mean, I would agree with that completely

1:04:45.880 --> 1:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>relative to someone a hundred years ago. Sure, but at

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the time Rockefeller was he King of the health. It's

1:04:52.240 --> 1:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>always it's always uh hey, listen, Louis the sixteenth didn't

1:04:56.040 --> 1:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>have into a plumbing but four hundred servants to make

1:04:58.720 --> 1:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>his dinner. Right, That's that's exactly right. Um, so the

1:05:03.120 --> 1:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Rational Optimist, any other books you you feel like mentioning

1:05:06.680 --> 1:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to think of others that. I mean, some of

1:05:10.440 --> 1:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the market structure ideas and so forth. Those types of

1:05:14.640 --> 1:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>things tend to wander up and down. I mean, some

1:05:18.240 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of them are great, some of them are terrible. Um,

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so you kind of have to be a little selective there.

1:05:25.640 --> 1:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm involved. My wife and I have created a little

1:05:29.120 --> 1:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>foundation called the Raven Foundation. It's an education foundation that

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>has a whole um anthropology behind it, if you will.

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Some of my reading is focused in that direction. Um.

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading the biography of Peter the Great, really fascinating. UM.

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Biography comes up all the time when the show people constantly.

1:05:56.200 --> 1:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you begin to tell you how many

1:05:58.120 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>people have mentioned and um, the right Brothers body that

1:06:02.640 --> 1:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>just came in, right, I haven't got that. I know

1:06:04.520 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have have that on the kindle

1:06:06.800 --> 1:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting waiting to go. Um. So we've discussed all the

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>different things that's changed over the past thirty years. Rather

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>than reiterate that, what do you see shifting over the

1:06:18.840 --> 1:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>next decade in terms of anything involving markets and execution?

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>What is the next wave of change gonna Well, I

1:06:27.600 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>believe PDQ was part of that in terms of our

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>process of aggregating the market and creating an auction right. Um, So,

1:06:35.480 --> 1:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>innovative trading structures are going to shift the way people

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>get Excertainly that's our hope a PQ. Um. It certainly

1:06:42.680 --> 1:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>makes you should be you should be the CEO of

1:06:44.640 --> 1:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the company. Becush, you are hounding the table on it.

1:06:48.040 --> 1:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But not just your firm, I mean, but you guys

1:06:50.960 --> 1:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>have to anticipate where the market's going to go and

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>how execution is going to change. What else do you

1:06:57.560 --> 1:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>see without revealing any of these So the where do

1:07:01.240 --> 1:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you see this shifting in the future? The markets are

1:07:05.200 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>still even though we think we're global, we're always becoming

1:07:08.440 --> 1:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>more global and so you know, China sneezes and we

1:07:11.920 --> 1:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>catch a cold. Those types of intricacies are going to

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>continue to evolve. Do you guys have plans to expand overseas.

1:07:20.120 --> 1:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Yet certainly London is an option, and then Hong Kong.

1:07:23.920 --> 1:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>London and Hong Kong are obvious options. It turns out

1:07:28.480 --> 1:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that our market structure for an independent, non government firm

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to get started in a foreign country challenging, is very challenging.

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And so the beauty of Reggaets was a couple of

1:07:41.360 --> 1:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>guys with an idea could try to spin up a

1:07:44.960 --> 1:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>better matching process and if it hunts, we can make

1:07:47.960 --> 1:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a living, hopefully make the market a better place. It's very,

1:07:52.680 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>very difficult. In other countries. Most of the exchanges are

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>run by the government. Is that true? So is it

1:07:58.520 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>l and independent? And I believe the LSC is independent.

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So you you caught me on that one already. But

1:08:05.160 --> 1:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I know China and Hong Kong are just totally different animals,

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>although you would think Hong Kong would be the closest

1:08:12.320 --> 1:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>thing to a non government entity that China. I happened

1:08:15.760 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to be at a conference there a couple of summers

1:08:18.360 --> 1:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ago and gave a little presentation on market structure, and

1:08:22.000 --> 1:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the big buzzword then was kill switches. And it was

1:08:25.840 --> 1:08:28.519
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me because they had a person from the

1:08:28.560 --> 1:08:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong Exchange talking about it, and he says, kill switch.

1:08:31.920 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? Who knows what the person that

1:08:35.400 --> 1:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm turning off? What resources they have, what are the

1:08:38.040 --> 1:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>trades they have, what position they have. We're in exchange,

1:08:40.560 --> 1:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>We're not the broker dealer. We don't have the understanding

1:08:45.040 --> 1:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of their financial wherewithal we may be forcing them to

1:08:48.760 --> 1:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>take incredible losses with a kill switch. They were terrified

1:08:52.000 --> 1:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>of kill switches. Over here we're talking about everyone should

1:08:55.439 --> 1:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>have a kill switch and be able to flip at

1:08:56.760 --> 1:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>any time. You've got to be really careful with these things,

1:08:59.760 --> 1:09:04.519
<v Speaker 1>be because the unintended consequences can really be an issue.

1:09:05.120 --> 1:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>That that's that's quite fascinating. Um my favorite two questions

1:09:10.840 --> 1:09:14.639
<v Speaker 1>in the last few minutes we have. So a recent

1:09:14.760 --> 1:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>college grad, a millennial comes to you and says, I'm

1:09:17.720 --> 1:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>thinking about going into finance. I'm interested in trading. What

1:09:22.640 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of advice would you give them? So back to

1:09:27.280 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>your question about why I got involved, I thought it

1:09:30.320 --> 1:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>was going to be an easy way to make a living, right,

1:09:34.520 --> 1:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so fully understand that whatever you earn you're gonna have

1:09:38.720 --> 1:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to work very hard for even though it appears that

1:09:42.840 --> 1:09:46.759
<v Speaker 1>you can show up and be Mr Citadel and trade

1:09:46.800 --> 1:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>from your dorm and create billions of dollars. How many

1:09:49.840 --> 1:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>people get to be It's a very rare event, Kevin Griffin.

1:09:52.960 --> 1:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're talking you. It's funny because people talk

1:09:55.880 --> 1:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>about Jim Simmons, or they'll talk about um uh Stevie Cohen.

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:04.799
<v Speaker 1>These are real outliers. These are one in a hundred

1:10:04.840 --> 1:10:08.839
<v Speaker 1>million personalities. These aren't like, hey, let's all become traitors

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and become billionaires like Curry or Michael Jordan's. The odds

1:10:14.840 --> 1:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are so overwhelmingly stacked against you that unless you are

1:10:19.120 --> 1:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>unusually gifted. I did an analysis on this exact subject

1:10:24.360 --> 1:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>some years ago, looking at how many kids were high

1:10:27.200 --> 1:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>school athletes millions, and then how many of those high

1:10:30.800 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>school athletes become college athletes, which is a single digit percentage,

1:10:36.479 --> 1:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And then how many of those college athletes actually get

1:10:39.200 --> 1:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to enter the draft again a tiny, tiny percentage. And

1:10:43.320 --> 1:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>those people who go on to be in the draft,

1:10:45.439 --> 1:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>how many of them actually have a career. Forget Stephen

1:10:48.320 --> 1:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Curry and Michael Jordan's earn a living as a professional athlete.

1:10:52.600 --> 1:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So when you go back to that original pool of

1:10:55.120 --> 1:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>high school athletes. It's such an infinitessimal number, and it's

1:11:00.000 --> 1:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>turns out on the trading side, it's even smaller. The

1:11:03.160 --> 1:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simons and Steve Cohens and Kevin Griffiths are like

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:11.479
<v Speaker 1>rarer than the Stephen Carries and Michael Jordan's. It's it's amazing,

1:11:12.600 --> 1:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>agree and so so the advice to a millennial would

1:11:16.160 --> 1:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be what, Well, hopefully you're smart, Hopefully you're willing to

1:11:21.160 --> 1:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>work hard. There will always be capital transactions, there will

1:11:25.479 --> 1:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>always be mergers and acquisitions and corporations that need advice

1:11:29.439 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>around financing and currency exposure and interest rate exposure. Find

1:11:35.439 --> 1:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>an area that you really love, understand it as well

1:11:38.800 --> 1:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as you can. Probably spend some time with someone who's

1:11:43.160 --> 1:11:45.479
<v Speaker 1>doing what you think you might want to do. So

1:11:45.640 --> 1:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>have an apprenticeship if you will, get into a training program,

1:11:49.840 --> 1:11:53.639
<v Speaker 1>get a taste for it, and then decide if it's

1:11:53.640 --> 1:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>really for you, or if maybe you want to go

1:11:55.280 --> 1:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>back to business school and look at industry or something else,

1:12:00.080 --> 1:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>other other options. I tried to my son happens to

1:12:02.920 --> 1:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be in the business, actually tried to talk him out

1:12:05.400 --> 1:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>of it. He wouldn't listen. Um Anyway, it's worked out

1:12:09.600 --> 1:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for him, but it uh, it is very captivating and

1:12:13.360 --> 1:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>seductive to see the opportunity. And when you had those

1:12:16.640 --> 1:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>days where you caught a trade and you make two

1:12:18.320 --> 1:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>d fifty dollars without a lot of effort, you know

1:12:21.400 --> 1:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>that was a week of painting houses when I was

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right, right, that's exactly when I sit there

1:12:26.120 --> 1:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and go see which would I rather do. There's something

1:12:29.960 --> 1:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>about working with your hands that's satisfying, although I I

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:35.479
<v Speaker 1>prefer working in the garden once a week then painting house.

1:12:36.120 --> 1:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>My last question, and one of my favorites. What is

1:12:39.439 --> 1:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it that you know about investing, about trading, about market

1:12:43.360 --> 1:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>structure that you wish you knew forty years ago when

1:12:47.600 --> 1:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you were setting out on this career. So when I

1:12:51.840 --> 1:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>was studying in the markets, um I actually had Burton

1:12:56.120 --> 1:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Malkiel efficient market theory random Walk Down, Random Walk Down

1:13:00.920 --> 1:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street that had been published just a year or

1:13:02.760 --> 1:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>two before I took his course. UM I was a

1:13:06.479 --> 1:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>big believer of that coming out of school. Looking at

1:13:09.800 --> 1:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty years of the markets, I think he's

1:13:13.960 --> 1:13:17.519
<v Speaker 1>right there. Efficient around the edges, they're efficient because you

1:13:17.600 --> 1:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>can't necessarily pick the ones that are going to win

1:13:20.040 --> 1:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and lose, but well, the might the markets are also

1:13:25.439 --> 1:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>psychologically driven. Witness the Internet bubble, which I lived through,

1:13:31.920 --> 1:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>traded through. It was fascinating to me at one point

1:13:37.200 --> 1:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and a ninety nine early two thousand. Some of the

1:13:39.840 --> 1:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>most brilliant minds, we're totally confused. So the biggest hedge

1:13:46.040 --> 1:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>fund guys. One was a chronic short, one was a

1:13:48.120 --> 1:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>chronic long. Neither one of them knew what to do

1:13:51.080 --> 1:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>with their portfolio because prices were in this new dimension. Well,

1:13:55.360 --> 1:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it turned out there wasn't a new dimension. It was

1:13:57.920 --> 1:14:00.599
<v Speaker 1>just that we thought there might be. So there are

1:14:00.720 --> 1:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>dislocations in the market. There will be times when having

1:14:04.000 --> 1:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a level head gives you an opportunity, and the only

1:14:08.400 --> 1:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>way to really participate well with that is to not

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:15.759
<v Speaker 1>be levered. So it's leverage that has killed us, both

1:14:15.880 --> 1:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the recent crisis and in the past crises. Don't

1:14:21.840 --> 1:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>over extend yourself thinking that you've got the answer to

1:14:25.080 --> 1:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>where the market's gonna go or what's going to happen.

1:14:27.960 --> 1:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh again, Warren Buffett tells a great story. If you

1:14:30.920 --> 1:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>had invested ten thousand dollars with him, and sixty seven

1:14:35.240 --> 1:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>would be worth whatever it is, tens of millions today

1:14:38.360 --> 1:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if you had invested twenty dollars and borrowed ten, so

1:14:42.120 --> 1:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>if you did it on margin, you would have been

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:50.479
<v Speaker 1>out of business. Sometimes options and futures and all that

1:14:50.560 --> 1:14:53.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. I like to say it's for people

1:14:53.600 --> 1:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>who want to get there in a hurry, but they

1:14:56.080 --> 1:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>may not know where they're going right, so it could

1:14:58.200 --> 1:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>work out, but it also could build a lot of characters.

1:15:02.000 --> 1:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The way I used to talk about my losing trades.

1:15:03.960 --> 1:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>The Buffett quote I remember, and I'm sure i'm mangling

1:15:07.479 --> 1:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this about leverage was, you know, dumb people should never

1:15:11.280 --> 1:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>use leverage, and smart people don't need to use leverage,

1:15:14.040 --> 1:15:16.479
<v Speaker 1>so that that works that well. Keith, this has been

1:15:16.560 --> 1:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinating. I appreciate you spending um so much time

1:15:21.200 --> 1:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with us on this. We have been speaking with Keith Ross.

1:15:25.000 --> 1:15:29.679
<v Speaker 1>He is the CEO and chairman of PDQ Enterprises. If

1:15:29.720 --> 1:15:32.439
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this conversation, be sure and look up an

1:15:32.439 --> 1:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>inch or down an inch on Apple iTunes. You can

1:15:35.320 --> 1:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>see the other ninety or so of these uh conversations

1:15:39.400 --> 1:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we've had. I would be remiss if I did not

1:15:41.920 --> 1:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>thank Taylor Riggs, who was in charge of producing and

1:15:44.920 --> 1:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>booking our show. Charlie Vomer is our producer, Colin my engineer.

1:15:51.640 --> 1:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael Batnick is the head of our research who helps

1:15:55.240 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 1>put these questions together. You've been listening to Masters in

1:15:58.640 --> 1:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Business on Bloomberg, a radioh