WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Eco Data, Budgets, Elections

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>all around the world, and straight ahead on the program

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>CPI PPI Retail Sales. We've got a busy week of

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>economic data ahead. I'm Tom Busby in New York. I'm

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Caren in London, where the UK's Chancellor is facing

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a chorus of calls for tax cuts and more spending

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 1>in his budget. I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong the

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>implications of Apple supplier Home High setting up a plant

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in India. I'm Joe Matthew in Washington. We'll look ahead

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the first Republican primary on the calendar. That's all

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg eleven three,

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on New York, Bloomberg ninety nine one, Washington, DC, Bloomberg

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one oh six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco,

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one nineteen and around

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the world on Bloomberg Radio dot Com and via the

0:00:54.800 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and we've got February jobs report on Friday, and this

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>week the economic data does not slow down. We'll get CPI,

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>PPI and retail sales for February. For more, I'm joined

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>by Ira Jersey, Bloomberg Intelligence senior rate strategists, and Jess Menton,

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>she's deputy team leader for US Equities for Bloomberg News. Ira,

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to start with that February jobs report that

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we got on Friday. Another strong headline number, three hundred

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven thousand jobs added, more than forecast. The news, though,

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was mixed, the unemployment rate moving two notches higher, and

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>although wage growth did slow, it still moved up, ramping

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>up inflationary pressures. Let's hear what President Biden had to

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>say about the report. This may be the part of

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pleased me the most about the report of jobs reports.

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>People who've been staying out of the job market are

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>moving back in, beginning to move back in. Jobs are available, Okay, Ira.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>The Federal Reserve says it all the time. The decision

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>policymakers will come to on interest rates will be data driven.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>What does this data mean for the Federal Reserve. Yeah,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it means a little bit more of the same. I

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the fear that they Fed was going to

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hike fifty basis points is still on the table, but

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not not because of just this number, but because of

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>how strong the January data was. I think that the

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Fed is going to be a little bit happier with

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of the numbers within the payrolls

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>report that we received on Friday. But but I think

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>importantly this week's data, as you mentioned at the top

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of the at the top of the show, it's going

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to it's going to matter way more so the CPI

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>data on Tuesday, as well as the PPI data later

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in the week, and then retail sales of course is

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be huge as well. And keep in mind,

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we get this data right when the Federal Reserve goes

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>into their quiet period, so we're not going to hear

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reaction from members of the Federal Reserve

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>by the time we get the numbers until that we

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>actually get the release of the meeting minutes, meeting statement

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>on March twenty second. All right, the FED meets. It's

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>less than two weeks away, the twenty first, the twenty second.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Already after that February jobs report, swaps are talking about

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the chance of a fifty basis point hike now only

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>at fifty percent, so a lot of people counting on

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a smaller one. Is anybody counting on a supersized one

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>even bigger than fifty basis points? Yeah? I think that

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>given the volatility and some of the issues that we're

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>having in the financial sector right now that really affected

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>rates late in the week last week, you know, moving

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>two year yield to twenty five basis points because of

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what went on with SVB and some of the other

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions in the equity market. That seventy five is

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>at you know, almost a zero percent probability at this point,

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think. But so the question still remains fifty or

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. You know, you get somewhat slower PPI data,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhat slower retail sales data, and then you know, fifty

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>five probably becomes more likely, you know, the probability that

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that chance that you mentioned of a fifty or twenty

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>five that keeps bouncing around massively, so that the market

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is still very skittish as and and really uncertain about

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed's move is going to be, just because

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this coming week's data is so incredibly important to that decision.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And Jay Powell made that exceptionally clear over during his

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>testimony last week before the House Financial Services Committee and

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the Senate Banking Committee. And about that data good news.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>We have Jess right here, and Jess, why don't we

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about Well, first we're going to get CPI right Tuesday,

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>then PPI, and then we'll get to retail sales. But

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about those two and the difference and what

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you're looking forward to seeing. Well, the big thing, and

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>as you know, the big focus is always on consumer prices,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but producer prices might arguably just be as important. And

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the reason is when I'm talking with my sources, they

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>like to look toward that as far as what do

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you input costs look like? And they look to that

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>as far as maybe we'll see the signs of relief

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there before they start filtering into consumer prices. So I've

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>been tracking the CPI PPI spread, and this is something

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Gina Martin Adams of Bloomberg Intelligen her team crunch the

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers very frequently on in the spread actually turned positive

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in December in two years. And

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason that matters is that bodes well for corporate

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>margins and then in turn eventually also for stock prices,

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>so you are seeing those glimmers of hope there on

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the producer prices side, even though in January is data

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>we saw a tick up a bit, but if we

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>can see that trend continue. When I'm speaking with my sources,

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>they feel like that will eventually filter even more so

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>toward consumer prices. So that's going to be a big

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>focus next week as well, in addition to just the

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>headline number on CPI. And the headline number is we're

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at a four tenth of one percent increase, correct,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>and that is lower than January it is exactly, and

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>then year over year that would be at six percent.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I know we focus more on month over month to

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>see that trend. But something that also is important if

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at the past eight hiking cycles of the

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve, they didn't stop until the terminal rate was

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>above CPI, So we still have a bit of a

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gap there, but it's beginning to narrow more. So the

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>question is how much further, obviously would the Federals or

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>have to go. If you even just look at the

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>bank side of things, Citigroup and Goldman sacks they had

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>actually lifted their forecast recently that they're expecting fifty basis

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>points at this next meeting, But JP Morgan and Bank

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of America are still holding that view of twenty five

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>basis points. But a lot of that does hinge on

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>what that CPI data is going to look like next week.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to be really key to see how

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>do these banks views change potentially on what that number

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>does look like and IRA, how does that factor in

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>with your thinking on what the FED is thinking? Yeah,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's important to note that you know

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that the FED has tended to hike until quote unquote

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the federal funds rate has been positive. But keep in

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>mind that the indicator that they look at form for

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the inflation gates, their preferred measure is the PC to Flater. So,

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and the gap between CPI and PC has widened quite

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You used to be around forty five fifty

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>basis points. Now it's over one hundred basis points. So so,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>so the fact that you have this this big divide

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>between those two inflation measures UM you know, you know,

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I think is important because if if UM, if PC,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the PC deflator remains around five point four percent, then

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>if the Federal Reserve hikes another seventy five basis points.

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>They're there, whereas if if the Federal Reserve were to

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>only UM were to look at CPI, they might have

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to actually hike much higher, because you're talking about, you know,

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>six percent, a six percent CPI number this week, assuming

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that we get it now. Importantly, a lot of the

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation data that we look at, and if you look

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>at CPI on that three month rolling basis, cpis come

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>off quite a lot. And when you look at and

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>when you look at core goods in particular, they're actually

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>growing at a negative rate. So so the good sector

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation is over, it's really going to be you know,

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>where is how does the services sector inflation really ramp up?

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Particularly the what j Powell has said is kind of

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's new UM measure that they really look at,

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>which is core services excuting housing. So around forty percent

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of CPI is this core services, that services excluding energy services.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So if those data come out very strong, then the

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Fed reserved while they might only go twenty five basis points.

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember we also get the Summary of Economic Projections, which

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>includes that dot plot. So it's possible that if inflation

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to be stickier than the FED is hoping, then

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>those dots could go higher and we could see a

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>higher terminal rate being priced in. So again, like instead

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of five and a half percent, maybe it's five and

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>three quarters or six percent winds up getting placed in

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>those dot plots, and I think that the market will

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>react to any significant uptick in the dots this month.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up the dot plots because on

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the equity side of things, when I've been speaking with

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>my sources, they feel like, especially portfolio managers, they feel

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>like the equity market can withstand a potential peak terminal

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>rate of around five and a half percent, maybe even

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher. But something that spooks them is

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>more or when it gets potentially closer if it were

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to happen at six percent or higher. But they feel

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like when you're looking at where the market is trying

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure that out. At the end of January it

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>was just below five percent. Now it's those projections trying

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to figure out maybe that's around five and a half percent.

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Barclays was actually thinking that the median dot plot could

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>potentially rise from five point one percent, which it was

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in December, to potentially five point four percent so even

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>if we do see that happen with the Federal Reserve,

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the equity markets, they're arguing that

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>if that is where the Fed does go, you might

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily see some sort of sell off in the

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>broader equity markets because that's kind of what they've been

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>pricing in. But if you see sort of a dramatic

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>change there where maybe it's above five and a half percent,

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's where potentially we could see some bigger movements and

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>bigger swings to the downside in stock prices. One other

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>big data point coming out this week retail sales. Retail sales,

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the survey says point one percent month over month increase.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>At least it's an increase nothing like what we saw

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in ja January. Well, especially because that number in January

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>came in a lot stronger than expected than even in December.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Typically you would you would see that in December because

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 1>that ties into holiday sales, but that also carried over

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>into January, so some of that potentially has arguably been

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's due to seasonality factors, But if we do

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>begin to see that pull back, that could actually potentially

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 1>bode well for equity prices because they kind of want

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to see this sweet spot where obviously you want the

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending because that's more than two thirds of what's

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>pushing the economy and growing the economy, but not spending

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so much to where this is keeping the inflation equation

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a problem for the Federal Reserve. So it's pulling it

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>back enough to where you feel like what the Federal

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Reserve has been doing is beginning to filter into the economy,

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>but not so much to where you are starting to

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>worry about the economy going into a recession. I re jest.

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us. Coming up on Bloomberg

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak weekend, we had to London to preview the UK

0:10:54.080 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Chancellor's upcoming budget proposal. I'm Tom Busby and this this

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the top

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Up later in our program, Apple's partner

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Fox con plans to invest about seven hundred million dollars

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on a new plant in India, but first in the UK.

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>The Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt will unveil his tax and spending

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>plans in the coming days, with the business community calling

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on him to incentivize investment and tackle skills shortages. This

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is the UK economy narrowly avoided recession last year. For more,

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>let's head to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>anchor Stephen Carroll to Jeremy Hunt's downplayed hopes of any

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>major large ast from the UK government in this budget,

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but an improvement in the economic situation is giving him

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit more room to maneuver. He faces calls for giveaways,

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>including freezing fuel jusy improving public sector pay, something he's considering,

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>according to Bloomberg, reporting tax breaks to boost business investment

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, We've been discussing this with Tina Lee,

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Banks UK and Ireland chief executive. For me, it's

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>really around how do you create an environment that attracts

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>investment whilst at the same time dealing with some very

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>real issues that are not yet resolved. And we've seen

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the news around the FED and making sure that inflation

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 1>is something which needs to be overcome and that's true

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>here in the UK as well. So more broadly, I

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>think what I'll be looking for is what happens around

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>public sector pay, because again that will feed through into

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the inflationary numbers and ultimately set the tone I think

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for the latter half of the year because remember I

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>mean we do have a backdrop of the Northern Ireland Protocol, yes,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>and whilst that not has yet been signed, I think

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we're all optimistic that will happen. So that's Tina Lee

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>from Deutsche Bank Bloomberg's New UK kind of as Danhanson

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>with being now from more on this down looking ahead

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>then to the budgers, what source of fiscal headroom? How

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>much money does Jeremy Hunt have to play with? Yeah,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's the way to think about it

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is sort of through two lenses. One is in the

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>short term, So in the short term he's got a lot.

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So borrowing has come in significantly under what the OBR

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>was expecting, somewhere in the region of thirty to forty

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>billion pounds. So this fiscal year and next fiscal year

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we think borrowing will be around that much lower. So

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot. But what's important for his fiscal rule,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So the Chancellor wants debt to be falling as a

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>share of GDP in the final year of the forecast period,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>which is twenty twenty seven twenty eight against that target.

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>In November he had nine billion pounds. We think he

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>might have about double that this time, so an extra

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>eight nine billion pounds. And I think what's really important.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So the point is that the good news this year

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>will dissipate over the course of the forecast period and

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>there will be there'll be a little pot of money

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end. What I would say is that in

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the contexts of a three trillion pound economy, which is

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>how big the UK will be, nine million pounds is peanuts,

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So there isn't there is some months there might be

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of money there, but to really go ahead,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and we've been hearing about potential for tax cuts, but

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to really go ahead and do something meaningful, he hasn't

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>really got the headroom to do that just yet. So

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean, we'll talk about the policy he

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>might focus on, but I think, you know, I think

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a lot of it's going to

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>be around near term temporary measures that he's going to use.

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>He's going to use that near term headroom and probably

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>bank that money just and use it closer to the election.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>What's the broader economic backdrop here? We had been told

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>them in the Bank of England gave us dire forecast

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for a session in the UK. Things are looking a

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit better now, how are they looking for this year?

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're looking they're looking a lot better.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we've spoken this year and the

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>key thing that's happened, well, there are two key things

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that have and first is the data is just show

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>more momentum, more resilience. And the second thing, as we

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>all know, we've had this big fall in gas prices

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and those two things combined I think will mean that

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the OBR will predict it probably will still predict a recession,

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but a very very shallow one and probably only lasting

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of this year, with growth or

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>some very very minimal growth returning in the second half

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year. And that's obviously a very different pictures

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what they were talking about in November, which was a

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>peach trough fall in GDP of a little over two percent.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, if it wouldn't surprise me if the peach

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>troth fall in GDP was less than one percent now,

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>so cutting the side of the recession in half. So

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the news has been good on the economy, particularly in

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the near term I think the question for the public

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>finances though, isn't just about the near term picture. It's

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>about the medium term picture as well, and that feeds

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>into the questions around productivity growth, around labor force participation,

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and actually there which goes back to why we don't

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>think good news on the public finances will last. We

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think the OBI will probably take a slightly dimer view

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of the UK's medium term prospects. And what that does,

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>how that interacts with the fiscal picture is that it

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>means that tax receipts don't grow as fast, and it

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>means the fiscal picture isn't quite as rosy looking when

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the medium term, which is where his

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>fiscal target sits. So that's something to watch out when

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we get the Office for Budget Responsibilities report as well,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>which is of course the government's fiscal watch dog. Is

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>there anything then, given that context, is there I think

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chancellor can do to try and booth growth at

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this stage or is it really just only the short

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>term prospects that he can look at. He goes to again,

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I was split into two buckets. One is the near

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>term picture. We know he wants to haver inflation. We

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>know that's one of the government's goals, So that means

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to you don't want to do anything that's

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>going to put that at risk. I think as things stand,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the inflation picture has probably improved a little bit as well.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>In the UK, we've had data out that suggests it's

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit. The underlying picture is a little

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bit weaker than most to commonistferre expecting. Obviously, the falling

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gas prices has a big effect as well going through

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>the course of this year, and one thing I think

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he'll do is keep the cap on the unit cost

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of energy prices at two and a half thousand pounds

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>rather than really important for household exactly. So that's that's

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing. That's that's But he's he's he's definitely going

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to be focused, I think, at least at least at

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this point. And taking into account the fact he doesn't

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>have a huge amount of headroom to play with for

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of medium term tax cuts that affect the medium

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>term picture, I think he's just going to very much

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>be focused on shorter term if there are giveaways, ones

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>that affect the public finances in the near term but

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>don't affect the medium term picture. So as I say

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that the price cap on household energy bills, we might

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>see something around capital allowances, but again I think that

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>will likely be a temporary thing rather than a permanent thing.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And the whole point here is, and the whole sort

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of bigger political backdrop, is that you have an election

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>probably next year, and it's the point at which essentially

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he uses up all his firepower to say to the electorate, look,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this is our offering. And I think probably now is

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit early, and the fiscal picture doesn't quite

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>allow for it as well, But I think now it's

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 1>just a bit early for him to go ahead and

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. Yeah, I mean it's interesting that you talk

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>about some of those allowances because we have been reporting

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that he's considering doing something around incentivizing investment. This is

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of a long running problem within the UK economy,

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly since Bragnics are trying to get businesses to invest more.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>How how can you put that in context for us?

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>How big a problem is that? And so yeah, I

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it's a huge it's a huge problem. I mean,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the level of business investment now

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was only just about got back to its pretty pandemic level.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's it's really struggled to recover from the pandemic.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at it in the context of

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>what's happened, as you say, since the Brexit referendum, we're

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>well beneath the performance of other G seven economies the

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>UK economy, so I think there's something there is definitely

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>something to be done. The context again here though, is

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that the government has put in place a massive rising

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>corporation tax that's going to take effects from April. Yeah, exactly.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a six percentage point rise in the

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>CT rate. That's obviously a massive disincentive for investment at

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a time when interest rates are going through the roof.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So what the government is going to try and do

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is sweeten that that hit, essentially by introducing tax allowances.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.239
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that Richie soon Act toyed with

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>when he was chancellor. He introduced this temporary superdeduction and

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>this is something that's actually expiring at the end of

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at the end of March, and I think that the

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>government will want to or Hunt will want to put

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>something in place to at least temporarily replace that. Bloomberg

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Senior UK economist Dan Hansen thank you very much for

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>your insights. I'm Stephen Carroll in London. You can catch

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>us every weekday morning here for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, beginning

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at six am in London and one am on Wall Street. Tom.

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Stephen. Coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, we had

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to DC and get a look at the week ahead

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nation's capital. I'm Tom Busby, and this is

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg broadcasting live from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio in

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>New York. Bloomberg Elomon Freo to Washington, DC, Bloomberg ninety

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>nine one to Boston, Bloomberg one oh sixty one to

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty to the country, Sirius XM

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Channel one nineteen to London, DAB Digital Radio, and around

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the globe the Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot Com.

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. I'm Tom Busby in New

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>York with your global look ahead at the top stories

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the coming week. We had to Washington,

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>DC now for a look ahead at the week in politics.

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>We're joined now by Bloomberg Sound On host Joe Matthew. Joe.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Tom, We're gonna look ahead now to the first

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican primary on the calendar. That would be Iowa, the

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fifth of February twenty twenty four. The fact of the

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>matter is the candidates are not waiting Ron de Santis

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in Iowa today. We are gonna go on offense. I'm

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna find issues. I'm not just gonna sit back and

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>waited for come to me. And I sat at my

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>desk the first day as governor, I looked around the

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>office and I said, you know, I don't know what

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>soob is going to succeed me in this office, but

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I can tell I'll tell you this. They are not

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>going to have very much to do because I'm taking

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>all the meat off the bone there is and I'm

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get all this done. You wonder why he assumes

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the next governor's an s ob like what if they're friends?

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>But I digress. On his way to Iowa for the

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>first time since announcing next week, Donald Trump, you know,

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Ronda Sanctimonius head the crowd and Stadnila today, one hundred

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and thirty nine people in Satnay. We got a lot

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of people. We have one hundred and thirty nine times

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>about thirty. We got a lot of people here, but

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I always say hit your enemy a little bit early.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Some people say don't, but I say do. Okay. That

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>was back in February, almost a year to the day

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead of voting, and we're joined by Bloomberg Government Congress

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>reporter Emily Wilkins and Bloomberg Politics reporter Ryan Teak back

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with as we take a peek into the landscape of

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four and look a little bit into the

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>week ahead. Ryan, it's great to see you here. Thanks

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for coming along Iowa. Of course, we do need to

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>establish this. It's a separate calendar for Republicans and Democrats

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>this time, but we're talking the Republican field. How important

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is Iowa going to be for Donald Trump? You know,

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>he didn't win Iowa in twenty sixteen. I think that

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>he's doing better among Iowa voters now than he did then.

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>He sort of established that beachhead, So I don't think

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>losing there is killer for him. I think he could

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>he could withstand that if he's on the ropes against

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a guy named DeSantis, though, Could it be more imperative

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to start winning early? Yeah, I think that there, it's

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely the field is going to narrow much faster than

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen when he last based a competitive one

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and it was sort of dragging on about who was

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be the mysterious candidate X to find to

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>be in the final two, and I think that ultimately

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>divided the competition. So I think that there's going to

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be a push among everyone if someone shows themselves strong

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>in an early state like Iowa, to among Republicans to

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of annoint that person as that's it, this is

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the alternative to Trump and and get behind that person quickly.

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Are we assuming Ronda Santis is running here? Ryan? Yeah?

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean I this. You know, I almost corrected you

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>they there when you called him in Candida because technically

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he is not yet running, But I mean, you know,

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he's running. So that's where we're at. Emily Wilkins, what

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think Donald Trump's acting like Ronda Santis is running?

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Rhonda Santis is acting like Ronda Santis is running, but

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>he's in no hurry to win outs, right. I don't

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>think one just goes to Iowa casually and speech, especially

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when one is the governor of the state of Florida. Yeah,

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and to be to you know, to the to your question,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a great one of when he's actually going

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>to get in the race. I mean what he has

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>said and what sort of those near to him have

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have implied that he's going to wait until the Florida

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>State Legislature session is over, which makes sense in a way.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's he's already kind of a known quantity

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>out there. He's not someone who could kind of benefit

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>from getting into a race like this being one of

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the first couple to really get in and get his

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>name out there. Um. At the same point, it kind

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of makes sense for him to, you know, be able

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to focus on finishing up what's what's going on in

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the Florida State Legislature because certainly some of those things

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>will be things that he will run on when he

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>does launch his campaign. Yeah, that's right. And he's getting

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of publicity from stuff he's doing as governor.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if you're Nicki Haley, you have

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, campaigning for anyone to pay attention

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to you, because you don't have a day job, right,

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>But like he's Florida governor, and literally every bill he

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>does is something that's designed to get national media right,

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>tack all the national media, you know, and get Republican

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>voters excited. So he doesn't really need to be officially

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 1>running to get attention. He hasn't gone after Donald Trump's

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>certainly not in the way Trump has gone after him.

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But he has been asked about that, and he's he's

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>been very careful in choosing his words to react. This

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is Rhonda Santis the beginning of February. I spend my

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>time delivering results for the people of Florida and fighting

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>against Joe Biden. That's how I spend my time. Okay,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>big rout of applause on that. You know, he's not

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>here to attack other cannabis as the other Republicans, the idea,

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't spend my time trying to smear other Republicans.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>There it is so emily though at a certain point

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>he's probably gonna have to write, you can't beat Donald

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Trump without going up against Donald Trump without getting in

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the ring. Right. Absolutely, But at the same point, I think,

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent, if you are a Republican for

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>the nomination right now, you are not trying to completely

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>isolate Trump supporters. At this point, You're trying to figure

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>out a way how you can appeal to those some

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>of those supporters get them over on their side. So

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not a good idea of right out the

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bat to slam the guy too hard. But certainly, you know,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>as this continues, if DeSantis and Trump both wind up

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>continuing to be the strong nominees that they seem to

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be at this point in the game, yeah, eventually you're

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be seen a little more headbutting between

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the two of them. You know, Ryan, we mentioned the

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that the primaries and fib we've got debates way

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>before that. When does this field finally come together or

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>will we actually have some debates without a full field

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this summer. I mean, you could have people filing as

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>late as to fall if they feel like there's a

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>weak point. You know, you've seen in the when we've

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.239
<v Speaker 1>had bigger fields, and I have a story about this

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. There's in some past years they were like seven,

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>eight nine people running by this point, but there also

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>have been years where they didn't really kick and intel

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>may or June. So we're not we're not anywhere near

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the final field. We've only had one person who people

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>were watching, Larry Hogan, former Maryland governor bow out. So far,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of other people who are at least

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>keeping their names alive as potential candidates, which is sometimes

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just a ploy to get more attention for your book

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever whatever you're angling for. Yeah, so you know,

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that somebody might come in if they

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>if de Santis looks like he's not as strong against

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Trump as some of the folks who don't want Trump

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>are hoping, then there might be some late joining person.

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's also a real question of

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the debates, I mean, whether they can pull this together.

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Like Trump has not said that he will support the

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>eventual nominee. Rona McDaniel, the RNC chair, has said that

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>she wants to require all the candidates to agree to

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that before they get on stage. Of some of the

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump candidates have said that they wouldn't do that

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for if its Trump, So that's kind of messy, Um,

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's us. So just potential that you know, if

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump decides not to show up at a debate like

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>theyone gonna watch, if it's the Santist debating, like Nicki Haley,

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he could just sort of kill the whole format.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I know how how he would answer that, it's all

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>about the ratings. And now, as as Ronda Santist, Donald

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump and others head for Iowa, Joe Biden is heading

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to the West coast next week. Emily Wilkins, this is

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>all about the budget. This is the post state of

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the Union, post budget road show that now begins once

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>all the bluster is out there. Though, when do actual

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>negotiations begin between these two parties. We know the Republican

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>budget won't be out for weeks, maybe a couple of months. Yeah,

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point, they've got that going on. At the

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>same point, remember that the negotiations around the budget and

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the debt limit are still somewhat similar from the negotiations

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>around actually funding the government for the next year, and

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we expect lawmakers to really start digging

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in the White House. Releasing their budget is kind of

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the unofficial kickoff of that happening. And I think it's

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be very interesting this year. With Republicans in

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the House running the floor with only a five vote margin,

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>they have vowed to bring. You know, they've got a

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>huge government. They break it up into twelve spending bills.

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It is really difficult for them to actually bring all

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>twelve spending bills to the floor, kind of go through

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the regular process, if you will. But that is what

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are really pushing for right now. Thanks to Ryan

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Teague Beckwith and Emily Wilkins and Tom is a programming note,

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>an important one for you. Starting Monday, Balance of Power

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>moves to five pm on Bloomberg Television, now hosted by

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Anne Marie Hordern and myself will be at the intersection

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of Washington and Wall Street every weekday bringing you the

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>latest political news. Balance of Power at a new time,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>five pm Eastern on Bloomberg Television. Tom, thanks Joe, and

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>good luck on the new show. Be sure to tune

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>into Bloomberg Sound on weekdays from one to three pm.

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time here on Bloomberg Radio. Coming up on

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak weekends and Apple Supplier focuses on India, will

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>bring you the details. I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg.

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look ahead at

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby in New York. We learned this week that

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>iPhone parts maker Fox Contechnology Group plans to invest about

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred million dollars on a new plant in India

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up local production for more Now, we're joined

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>by Bloomberg Daybreak Asia anchors Doug Chrisner and Brian Curtis

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom With US China tension simmering as they are, Apple

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>supplier Houn High has confirmed that he will set up

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a new plant in India. The confirmation caused quite a

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>stir in China as it raises the prospect of Apple

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>shifting its manufacturing supply chain out of China, and indeed,

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg reported this week that Apple itself is expected to

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>increase its focus on India. On High, or fox Khon

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>as it's often called, will invest seven hundred million dollars

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>on a new plant in India's Kannataka state. One of

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the big issues for the company over the past year

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>has been the lockdowns in China. Yes, and even though

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>China has reopened, fox Kon said this week that sales

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>dropped eleven point seven percent in February from a year earlier,

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>even with the strong January, it raised a few eyebrows.

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Dug and I thought we would explore all the questions

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>raised by Foxcon making this decision to do more in India.

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech editor lad Sevof joins us, what do we

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>think is the prime reason, Flad that Foxcon is doing this.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's one that Folkscon itself is not going to say,

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>but it really is a customer demand, and Folkscon's biggest

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>customer is Apple. We will, but it is a theme

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and a trend that really transcends these two titans of

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the industry, as we might put them. Fellow Taiwanese suppliers

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>such as Wistron are also looking to expand in India.

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>We heard from a Goetech executive, a Chinese supplier that's

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>expanding in Vietnam, and he spoke perhaps most candidly out

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of any of these supply chain executives, really just saying

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>customers want this. They want us to have alternatives to

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>China now. But he's saying, take out manufacturing out of

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>China and put it elsewhere. But what customers are really

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>asking for is more geographic diversification. So that diversification, I

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>would imagine, is kind of like an insurance policy against

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>problems down the road with your supply chain. So in effect,

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not as much as an increase in capacity. It's

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>more about redundancy. Am I right or wrong in that?

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right? That's right. Now. That being said, it is interesting,

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like one of the bits of off the cuff analysis

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that you could put together is to just look at

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:07.239
<v Speaker 1>iPhone production in India in recent times. Now, Fox going

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>again is one of the leading assemblers there that doubled

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past year, and it is happening much faster

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>relative to production and assembly of iPhones in China. And

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>when you look at iPhone sales on an annual basis,

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they kind of flat. So if iPhone sales overall flat

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and India production is increasing, that kind of tends to

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>give you the suggestion that some production is moving out

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of China. We've long thought that American manufacturing might move

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to India, but one of the big problems in the

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>past has been infrastructure. They simply haven't had the same

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of supply chains are developing there that we've seen

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in China, and nor the physical attributes to get it

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>from a facility to pour it to customer. Has that

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>changed It should be changing over time, of course, nobody

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>has China's infrastructure system. The other thing we have to

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>bear in mind is that so many of the raw

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>materials and the basic supplies and basing components that go

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>into devices are they're made in China, So you're covering

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>smaller grounds, smaller distances, even if you don't have the

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>world class infrastructure that China has. Now, the other thing

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>to bear in mind is the seven hundred million dollar

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>plan that Foxscon is planning is to primarily start with

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 1>iPhone components. Down the line, it may actually assemble iPhones too,

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's what we're seeing here as well. India itself,

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>it's subsidizing companies like Foxconn set enough factories, it is

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>providing its own investment in its own infrastructure, and then

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>companies like Foxcon are building let's say, the peripheral ecosystem

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>around an iPhone factory. Lad, thanks so much for joining

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 1>us and shedding some light on this story, which speaks

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to a much bigger story down the road. Bloomberg Tech

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>editor Lad Savov and Brian Curtis, along with Doug Christener.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You can catch us every weekday here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia,

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>beginning at six am in Hong Kong and six pm

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street. Tom, thank you Brian and Doug. And

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that does it for this edition of blue Bird Daybreak Weekend.

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Join us again Monday morning at five am Wall Street

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Time for the latest on markets overseas and the news

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>you need to start your day. I'm Tom Husby. Stay

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>with us. Top stories and global business headlines are coming

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>up right now.