1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:00,440
Speaker 1: Hello.

2
00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:02,600
Speaker 2: On today's episode, there's not gonna be any spoilers. We're

3
00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:07,120
Speaker 2: just talking about news the Oscars, Star Wars, various pieces

4
00:00:07,160 --> 00:00:09,440
Speaker 2: of things that will be of interest to you and

5
00:00:09,480 --> 00:00:11,320
Speaker 2: as of interest to us.

6
00:00:12,160 --> 00:00:13,800
Speaker 1: Uh So, stay tuned.

7
00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:33,239
Speaker 2: Hello, my name is Jasconception and on Wesday Night, and

8
00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:33,839
Speaker 2: welcome back to the.

9
00:00:33,880 --> 00:00:35,920
Speaker 1: Xt revision of the podcast where we dive the video babagees.

10
00:00:37,159 --> 00:00:38,839
Speaker 1: We're coming you from our podcast.

11
00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:42,320
Speaker 2: We were bringing in three episodes a week every Tuesday, Wednesday,

12
00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:42,839
Speaker 2: and Thursday.

13
00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:46,800
Speaker 3: In today's previously on episode, we're just probably coming out

14
00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:48,479
Speaker 3: on none of those days. It is actually coming out

15
00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:52,040
Speaker 3: on Saturday. We are catching up on the biggest geek

16
00:00:52,120 --> 00:00:56,400
Speaker 3: news of the week. Brian Gosling might join the Star

17
00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:59,440
Speaker 3: Wars unibus? Is it true? Is it true? X Men

18
00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:01,360
Speaker 3: characters leek for Marvel arrivals.

19
00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:11,600
Speaker 2: That's but first news, First up. The Oscar nominees have

20
00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:15,880
Speaker 2: been released and there are some surprises there.

21
00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:17,520
Speaker 1: Let's start with first surprise.

22
00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:21,720
Speaker 2: Denzel Washington snubbed for Best Supporting Gladiator Too.

23
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:25,480
Speaker 3: Nicole Kipman snubbed the Baby Guard snub. I love that

24
00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:27,039
Speaker 3: movie too, you know what?

25
00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:31,560
Speaker 2: And those are two snubs that don't they don't get

26
00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:33,759
Speaker 2: in my they they're not stuck in my CROs.

27
00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:36,000
Speaker 3: Is that famous famous actors.

28
00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:39,399
Speaker 2: Who they're famous, famous people who have been lauded and

29
00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:43,240
Speaker 2: will be fine. And the movies were like okay, and

30
00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:46,400
Speaker 2: though they were clearly the best part of their movies.

31
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:50,400
Speaker 2: Next up, Cynthia Arrivo, she could got.

32
00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:52,640
Speaker 3: Yeah, she's pretty feels pretty likely.

33
00:01:53,960 --> 00:01:54,880
Speaker 1: It feels like a lock.

34
00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:59,520
Speaker 2: So she did win the Tony twenty sixteen Tony Best

35
00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:02,440
Speaker 2: Actress in a Musical for her role as Lee in

36
00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:05,200
Speaker 2: The Color Purple. She did win an Emmy. Now it's

37
00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:07,880
Speaker 2: a Daytime Emmy. How do we feel?

38
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:08,560
Speaker 1: Does it count?

39
00:02:08,639 --> 00:02:10,520
Speaker 3: I think I think it counts, but I would like

40
00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:13,280
Speaker 3: the idea that then it becomes like a it's like

41
00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:16,640
Speaker 3: a dead go. It's like the Daytime like.

42
00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:21,240
Speaker 2: You put like a lowercase D and then and then

43
00:02:21,280 --> 00:02:23,160
Speaker 2: the rest of the egt is it off her case?

44
00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 1: So Daytime Emmy for her performance on.

45
00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:33,520
Speaker 2: The Daytime program Today, The Today Show, also related to

46
00:02:33,600 --> 00:02:38,000
Speaker 2: The Color Purple. She won a Grammy also for The

47
00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:42,639
Speaker 2: Color Purple Best Soundtrack Musical Theater Soundtrack twenty seventeen Grammys.

48
00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:47,840
Speaker 2: It counts and here she is with her Oscar nomination

49
00:02:48,440 --> 00:02:51,440
Speaker 2: for Wicked. Let me ask you this, Rosie, which of

50
00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:56,079
Speaker 2: the awards do you think is the easiest and which

51
00:02:56,120 --> 00:02:57,119
Speaker 2: one is the hardest?

52
00:02:57,960 --> 00:02:59,400
Speaker 3: From an ego, From.

53
00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:01,480
Speaker 1: An egot perspective, which is the easiest?

54
00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:05,880
Speaker 3: Which is I think that the hardest is a Grammy

55
00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:09,480
Speaker 3: because if you can't sing, you can't sing. If you

56
00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:12,160
Speaker 3: can't do it, you just can't do it. Like the

57
00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:15,359
Speaker 3: color the music best musical with the album, you do

58
00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:18,880
Speaker 3: feel like is that a little bit of like is

59
00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:21,560
Speaker 3: that a cheat? It's not specifically you, but actually no,

60
00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:25,480
Speaker 3: you have to get into a musical that it's good

61
00:03:25,560 --> 00:03:28,639
Speaker 3: enough to have a full cast recording, aka, you need

62
00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:32,120
Speaker 3: to be talented. I think Grammy is hardest. I'm saying

63
00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:34,800
Speaker 3: Emmy is easiest only because she won it for singing

64
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:35,920
Speaker 3: a song on the Today.

65
00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:39,560
Speaker 2: Show, because I haven't, honestly, because the fact that I

66
00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:42,000
Speaker 2: have one lets you know that it's easiest.

67
00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:43,480
Speaker 1: There's several you.

68
00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:47,080
Speaker 2: Know, there's daytime, there's sports, there's a lot of easy

69
00:03:47,400 --> 00:03:48,400
Speaker 2: you are Here's.

70
00:03:48,240 --> 00:03:50,880
Speaker 3: Why I say closer to an ego though, Jason.

71
00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:54,200
Speaker 2: That's right here. Here is my hot take. Here is

72
00:03:54,240 --> 00:03:57,760
Speaker 2: my second easiest. I think the Oscar is pretty.

73
00:03:57,480 --> 00:04:02,080
Speaker 3: Well if you sorically the kind of rolls of one

74
00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:06,520
Speaker 3: an Oscar. I would agree, especially so recently there's been

75
00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:09,640
Speaker 3: a trend for like a Best Supporting Actor that's.

76
00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:13,000
Speaker 2: Only seemed like a little but you're thinking it's you're

77
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:16,320
Speaker 2: still thinking hard version thinking. I think, I think, Oscar,

78
00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:20,680
Speaker 2: you can sneak in on a technical or short in

79
00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:22,839
Speaker 2: the back door, one of the technicals or one of

80
00:04:22,839 --> 00:04:26,920
Speaker 2: the shorts, as a producer, as a direct, like as

81
00:04:26,960 --> 00:04:29,159
Speaker 2: a team, not necessarily even the person.

82
00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:31,480
Speaker 3: I think you can say, I like that. So with

83
00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:33,960
Speaker 3: the US, you're gonna get your Oscar for your ego

84
00:04:34,120 --> 00:04:37,120
Speaker 3: from doing like hair and makeup. You're gonna thud like.

85
00:04:37,360 --> 00:04:40,400
Speaker 2: Or like producing being like a producer on something I

86
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:41,320
Speaker 2: didn't even do anything.

87
00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:44,280
Speaker 3: You just got some money. I think, Yeah, I.

88
00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:46,440
Speaker 1: Think you can sneak in there. But I agree with you.

89
00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:48,400
Speaker 1: Grammy is like, that's the hardest.

90
00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:49,400
Speaker 3: You can't fake it.

91
00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:50,640
Speaker 1: Yeah, you can't freak it.

92
00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:09,440
Speaker 2: Other surprise news in what feels like a green Book situation,

93
00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:13,160
Speaker 2: Amelia Prez leading with thirteen nominations.

94
00:05:13,240 --> 00:05:15,920
Speaker 3: Now, yes, definitely taking the green Books.

95
00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:20,359
Speaker 2: Law particular example is coming to mind right now, But

96
00:05:20,480 --> 00:05:25,599
Speaker 2: there are there have been many times in which some

97
00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:31,160
Speaker 2: particular feature has led with nominations and hasn't gotten like

98
00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:34,359
Speaker 2: Stoned but didn't but one one of the you know,

99
00:05:34,400 --> 00:05:37,480
Speaker 2: one like Best Adapted or something like, did not come through,

100
00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:38,280
Speaker 2: so we'll see.

101
00:05:38,440 --> 00:05:42,400
Speaker 3: I feel like last year as well. There's definitely been

102
00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:45,560
Speaker 3: times when like a movie, a big a movie has

103
00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:48,440
Speaker 3: been nominated a lot. I think like Steven Spielkes The

104
00:05:48,480 --> 00:05:50,560
Speaker 3: Fableman's was probably no. I think that was one of

105
00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:52,479
Speaker 3: the ones that was nominated a lot that didn't win.

106
00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:55,760
Speaker 3: So you know, I'm hoping this doesn't win anything, even

107
00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:59,520
Speaker 3: though you know, I am very disappointed specifically in this

108
00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:04,440
Speaker 3: movie because the director many years ago made an absolutely

109
00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:08,520
Speaker 3: incredible French crime film called a Prophet, and it is

110
00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:14,760
Speaker 3: absolutely one of the best, most interesting, complex, thoughtful portrayals

111
00:06:14,800 --> 00:06:18,160
Speaker 3: of people in prison, of the idea of like what

112
00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:21,599
Speaker 3: is crime? How do people survive? And I just think

113
00:06:21,640 --> 00:06:24,479
Speaker 3: it's such a sad route for him to go, to

114
00:06:24,520 --> 00:06:28,080
Speaker 3: make such a thoughtless movie that many of my trans

115
00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:31,760
Speaker 3: friends and trans loved ones say is absolute trash. So

116
00:06:31,800 --> 00:06:36,520
Speaker 3: I'm hoping no nominate, no wins. Familia Perez. I don't

117
00:06:36,520 --> 00:06:37,919
Speaker 3: want to see it, I don't want to hear it.

118
00:06:37,960 --> 00:06:40,240
Speaker 3: I don't want to win in any Best Song situation,

119
00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:43,040
Speaker 3: the fact that it won Best Musical at the Golden Globes.

120
00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:46,920
Speaker 3: Have you heard the music? It's no wicked, guys, as

121
00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:50,479
Speaker 3: the Wicked Lover. Wicked did get surprise ten nominations, though

122
00:06:50,600 --> 00:06:52,920
Speaker 3: I was not expecting it tied.

123
00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:57,560
Speaker 2: With Is a Brutalist, the four hour long historical biopic. Yeah,

124
00:06:57,720 --> 00:07:00,000
Speaker 2: and it's a weird It has been a weird year

125
00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:04,239
Speaker 2: in movies, as many have noted, and it's everybody's thinking,

126
00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:05,719
Speaker 2: we'll see where this goes.

127
00:07:06,120 --> 00:07:07,120
Speaker 1: This could go anywhere.

128
00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:10,800
Speaker 3: Oh, actually we should also mention huge moment here is

129
00:07:11,160 --> 00:07:13,720
Speaker 3: Demi More getting her first ever Oscar nomination for the

130
00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:17,560
Speaker 3: Substance Best Leading Role. Big snub Margaret Quali, who plays

131
00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:20,040
Speaker 3: a very important role in that movie if you haven't

132
00:07:20,080 --> 00:07:23,320
Speaker 3: seen it, She was not nominated for Best Supporting, but

133
00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:27,440
Speaker 3: the movie was nominated for Best Picture, and Cora Lee

134
00:07:27,440 --> 00:07:31,160
Speaker 3: faire Ja, the director, was nominated for Best Director. Very

135
00:07:31,240 --> 00:07:34,200
Speaker 3: very rare for such an outrageous horror movie to come

136
00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:37,120
Speaker 3: even close to that Like that is a very gory,

137
00:07:37,360 --> 00:07:43,040
Speaker 3: very wild, very kind of old school B movie, visual

138
00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:46,240
Speaker 3: horror movie that is not more aligned with the horror

139
00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:49,720
Speaker 3: movies that usually get recognized, like Silence of the Lambs

140
00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:51,840
Speaker 3: is the biggest horror movie we've ever had get out

141
00:07:51,880 --> 00:07:54,840
Speaker 3: obviously more akin to that kind of elevated idea of

142
00:07:54,840 --> 00:07:57,160
Speaker 3: horror that people have. I'm not saying elevated horror. I'm

143
00:07:57,160 --> 00:08:01,240
Speaker 3: saying elevated idea of horror that is accept to the Oscars.

144
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:03,840
Speaker 3: It didn't win enough in my opinion, but yeah, interesting

145
00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:08,520
Speaker 3: to see that big horror movie kind of come. I think, Jason,

146
00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:10,200
Speaker 3: I think we can take this as that we were right,

147
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:13,720
Speaker 3: because I do think that once the mean More gave

148
00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:16,400
Speaker 3: that speech, I think so at the Golden Globe, she

149
00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:19,440
Speaker 3: was an absolute lock for this, and I do think

150
00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:22,400
Speaker 3: she is now the biggest competition for Cynthia.

151
00:08:22,520 --> 00:08:25,200
Speaker 2: It felt like an Oscar speech. I feel like she's

152
00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:31,080
Speaker 2: the front runner. Next up Ai Boo. It's doing stuff.

153
00:08:31,200 --> 00:08:36,200
Speaker 2: It's doing stuff. In Award movies, The Brutalist and Amelia

154
00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:41,080
Speaker 2: Perez have both, you know, various people with the productions

155
00:08:41,080 --> 00:08:50,760
Speaker 2: have admitted that they used AI both to enhance the accents.

156
00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,120
Speaker 1: Of their characters.

157
00:08:52,880 --> 00:09:00,040
Speaker 2: Amelia Perez in Spanish, the Brutalists in Hungarian and what

158
00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:04,200
Speaker 2: we think about this brutal structer Brady Corbett has said.

159
00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:09,880
Speaker 2: Brady Korbett has said, quote Adrian and Felicity Adrian Brody

160
00:09:09,920 --> 00:09:14,200
Speaker 2: and Felicity Jones. Adrian and Felicity's performances are completely their own.

161
00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:17,280
Speaker 2: They work with They work for months with dialect coach

162
00:09:17,320 --> 00:09:22,560
Speaker 2: to Nara Marshall, to their accents. Innovative respeech or technology

163
00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:28,920
Speaker 2: was used in Hungarian language dialogue editing only specifically to

164
00:09:28,960 --> 00:09:31,319
Speaker 2: refine certain vowels and letters for accuracy.

165
00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:33,199
Speaker 1: No English language was changed.

166
00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:35,959
Speaker 3: Well isn't the movie for best editing, which I think

167
00:09:36,040 --> 00:09:37,079
Speaker 3: is really funny as well.

168
00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:39,880
Speaker 2: This was a manual process done by our sound team

169
00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:42,839
Speaker 2: and respeecher in post production. The aim was to preserve

170
00:09:42,880 --> 00:09:45,640
Speaker 2: the authenticity of Adrian Felicity's performance is another language, not

171
00:09:45,720 --> 00:09:48,160
Speaker 2: to replace Our all to them and done with almost

172
00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:51,480
Speaker 2: utmost respect for their craft.

173
00:09:51,960 --> 00:09:54,720
Speaker 1: Now listen bully for them.

174
00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:57,560
Speaker 2: I haven't seen the movie, although everyone who I know

175
00:09:57,600 --> 00:10:00,520
Speaker 2: who has seen it it's four hours long, has Despite

176
00:10:00,559 --> 00:10:05,160
Speaker 2: the four hours, they were blown away. It's amazing obviously

177
00:10:05,200 --> 00:10:08,559
Speaker 2: that this should be taken into account when you're thinking

178
00:10:08,600 --> 00:10:09,400
Speaker 2: about awards.

179
00:10:09,640 --> 00:10:10,600
Speaker 1: Now do I care?

180
00:10:12,080 --> 00:10:17,240
Speaker 2: It's a It's an interesting question because they're here, you're

181
00:10:17,280 --> 00:10:20,400
Speaker 2: here as a creator as a movie maker, to make

182
00:10:20,440 --> 00:10:22,679
Speaker 2: a great movie, to make a great piece of art.

183
00:10:22,840 --> 00:10:27,480
Speaker 2: The awards stuff is secondary to me. Obviously it should be.

184
00:10:27,679 --> 00:10:31,360
Speaker 2: You should consider that AI was used to ref I

185
00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:33,800
Speaker 2: don't care what they say here, all this gobblaigoogy used

186
00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:37,680
Speaker 2: it to make the performances better, right, that's what you did.

187
00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:41,240
Speaker 2: Do I care as in terms of the piece of art? No,

188
00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:43,520
Speaker 2: do I care for awards? Yes, I think that it

189
00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:44,720
Speaker 2: should be thought of.

190
00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:47,679
Speaker 3: Also, I do think that specifically in the case of

191
00:10:47,720 --> 00:10:50,360
Speaker 3: the Brute List, they are using the fact that they

192
00:10:50,400 --> 00:10:53,800
Speaker 3: obviously use the voice AI whatever stuff, they did that

193
00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:59,360
Speaker 3: much more because actually they also use generative AI for

194
00:10:59,400 --> 00:11:01,880
Speaker 3: the r that was at the end of the movie,

195
00:11:01,920 --> 00:11:02,600
Speaker 3: And that to me.

196
00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:03,839
Speaker 1: Is what they say manual p.

197
00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:06,640
Speaker 3: Yeah, well they say they use generative AI for a

198
00:11:06,640 --> 00:11:08,600
Speaker 3: sequence at the end of the film as part of

199
00:11:08,640 --> 00:11:12,120
Speaker 3: the inspiration for a series of architectural drawings and finished

200
00:11:12,120 --> 00:11:17,080
Speaker 3: buildings supposedly designed by Brodie's character, the fictional architect laslow Top.

201
00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:20,120
Speaker 3: But I'm like, guys, just hire a production designer to

202
00:11:20,120 --> 00:11:22,080
Speaker 3: do that. You don't need to inspire you, just just

203
00:11:22,120 --> 00:11:25,000
Speaker 3: somebody who's in production can look at some art and

204
00:11:25,320 --> 00:11:28,160
Speaker 3: some old building blueprints and draw it. Also, I just

205
00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:30,480
Speaker 3: want to say, you know what, I recently found out

206
00:11:30,559 --> 00:11:33,760
Speaker 3: in the joom pod chat that Brady Koorbert, the director

207
00:11:33,800 --> 00:11:36,000
Speaker 3: of this movie, is from one of my favorite remakes

208
00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:39,440
Speaker 3: of all time, the Larson Trier remake of his own

209
00:11:39,480 --> 00:11:44,800
Speaker 3: movie Funny Games. And I absolutely love that movie. That

210
00:11:44,880 --> 00:11:48,160
Speaker 3: American version of it is very fantastic. It's not Larson Trier,

211
00:11:48,160 --> 00:11:50,280
Speaker 3: it's Michael Hannake, thank you. I just my own brain

212
00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:52,839
Speaker 3: messing me about that movie is so grim, sober. And

213
00:11:52,880 --> 00:11:55,160
Speaker 3: I found out that Brady Korbut is the non Michael

214
00:11:55,200 --> 00:11:57,800
Speaker 3: Pitt character from that movie. I'm disappointed in you, Bro,

215
00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:00,760
Speaker 3: I'm glad that you went this far. It's okay. But

216
00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:03,760
Speaker 3: I do think in but too, Oscar Winnez, I think

217
00:12:03,760 --> 00:12:04,320
Speaker 3: it's okay.

218
00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:07,760
Speaker 2: I think here's the thing. Don't get outed, come out

219
00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:11,640
Speaker 2: and say we used it. Don't let us find out.

220
00:12:11,559 --> 00:12:12,280
Speaker 1: You used it.

221
00:12:12,360 --> 00:12:13,800
Speaker 3: Be honest from the jump.

222
00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:19,200
Speaker 2: Be honest from jump, and we're in a different situation.

223
00:12:19,559 --> 00:12:19,760
Speaker 1: You know.

224
00:12:19,880 --> 00:12:22,920
Speaker 2: Again, I don't care for the movie per se. I

225
00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:26,480
Speaker 2: do think for awards, you need to think about it. Yeah,

226
00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:32,480
Speaker 2: the AI in Amelia Perez was used to tweak the

227
00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:36,240
Speaker 2: singing was to hance the singing voice of Carla Sophia Gascon.

228
00:12:38,400 --> 00:12:44,360
Speaker 2: It was apparently necessary, the film's mixer, Cyril Holt said,

229
00:12:44,920 --> 00:12:47,719
Speaker 2: to increase the range of Gascon's vocal register, and that

230
00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:50,600
Speaker 2: the production utilized respeechure to blend their singing with that

231
00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:54,880
Speaker 2: of French pop star Camille, who wrote the film score. Essentially,

232
00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:00,240
Speaker 2: Carla didn't have the vocal range to do the do

233
00:13:00,320 --> 00:13:01,600
Speaker 2: the performance, and.

234
00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:04,160
Speaker 1: So these ai.

235
00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:07,920
Speaker 2: I think this clearly feels like a more extensive use

236
00:13:07,920 --> 00:13:10,160
Speaker 2: of a high But I think again, in terms of

237
00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:13,480
Speaker 2: the movie, this is a movie I don't like, But

238
00:13:14,240 --> 00:13:16,920
Speaker 2: in terms of using it to enhance a performance in

239
00:13:16,920 --> 00:13:19,480
Speaker 2: a movie, do I care? No, I want a good movie.

240
00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:21,520
Speaker 2: Do I care when you're going up for awards?

241
00:13:21,600 --> 00:13:21,800
Speaker 1: Yes?

242
00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:24,320
Speaker 2: Obviously I think that this should be. This is a

243
00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:25,120
Speaker 2: thing that should be.

244
00:13:25,480 --> 00:13:28,000
Speaker 3: And both of these were things that other people call

245
00:13:28,520 --> 00:13:30,360
Speaker 3: and other people found it out, and I think you're

246
00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:33,200
Speaker 3: right need to just come out and say, especially with

247
00:13:33,360 --> 00:13:35,839
Speaker 3: the Brutalist, which for so long people were like, how

248
00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:38,240
Speaker 3: did you make a movie like this for ten million dollars?

249
00:13:38,280 --> 00:13:40,200
Speaker 3: How did you save all this money? How did you

250
00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:42,800
Speaker 3: do this incredible thing? And you've got to say well,

251
00:13:42,800 --> 00:13:45,199
Speaker 3: part of it was AI because that is a conversation

252
00:13:45,240 --> 00:13:47,560
Speaker 3: and we're going to be having these conversations for more

253
00:13:47,600 --> 00:13:51,240
Speaker 3: and more. And also it is you know, I think

254
00:13:51,240 --> 00:13:55,600
Speaker 3: it's right for people to be like upset, alarmed, not

255
00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:58,800
Speaker 3: care whatever your feeling is about it, because this has

256
00:13:59,160 --> 00:14:03,080
Speaker 3: become the norm in Hollywood so quickly. You know, a

257
00:14:03,120 --> 00:14:04,920
Speaker 3: couple a year ago, me and you were just talking

258
00:14:04,960 --> 00:14:07,440
Speaker 3: about like, are people gonna use AI, Like what's it

259
00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:10,000
Speaker 3: gonna look like? And now we're in a situation where

260
00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:12,480
Speaker 3: two of the biggest oscar contenders have used it, So

261
00:14:12,520 --> 00:14:14,200
Speaker 3: I think you're right. It's the same with that David

262
00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:18,000
Speaker 3: Dustmalchen movie Night with the Devil, which people loved, but

263
00:14:18,120 --> 00:14:21,240
Speaker 3: at the same time is like he didn't you know,

264
00:14:21,320 --> 00:14:23,520
Speaker 3: they didn't announce that they used AI for some of

265
00:14:23,520 --> 00:14:25,680
Speaker 3: the interstitials, and then when people found it out, they

266
00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:27,880
Speaker 3: were more upset than I think if you'd have just said, hey,

267
00:14:29,280 --> 00:14:31,200
Speaker 3: we are gonna use AI for this, and somebody would

268
00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:33,360
Speaker 3: have probably said, I can draw that for you, don't worry,

269
00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:34,760
Speaker 3: but you know what it is?

270
00:14:34,760 --> 00:14:35,200
Speaker 2: What it is.

271
00:14:35,240 --> 00:14:35,520
Speaker 1: Listen.

272
00:14:35,560 --> 00:14:38,280
Speaker 2: One of the one of the things around the Brutalists

273
00:14:38,280 --> 00:14:40,680
Speaker 2: that folks are talking about all my friends who have

274
00:14:40,720 --> 00:14:42,200
Speaker 2: seen it are like, man, how do they do this

275
00:14:42,240 --> 00:14:45,200
Speaker 2: for ten million? It looks incredible. Here's one of the ways. Obviously,

276
00:14:45,200 --> 00:14:49,120
Speaker 2: you film in Budapest in places where it's super super

277
00:14:49,160 --> 00:14:51,600
Speaker 2: super super cheap to do it. In other ways is

278
00:14:51,640 --> 00:14:55,480
Speaker 2: he use AI to generate other things that you would

279
00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:59,240
Speaker 2: have had technical people help people, your doctors with or

280
00:14:59,360 --> 00:15:03,280
Speaker 2: in the back end with. So yeah, to be continued,

281
00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:07,400
Speaker 2: next up, Star Wars, Here it comes. Sean Levy has

282
00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:10,320
Speaker 2: been developing his Star Wars feature since twenty twenty two,

283
00:15:10,360 --> 00:15:15,920
Speaker 2: and according to Vulture, it's gonna be in it.

284
00:15:16,600 --> 00:15:18,240
Speaker 1: Ryan Gosling attached.

285
00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:21,600
Speaker 3: Uh huh. Apparently. The very interesting thing about this is

286
00:15:21,640 --> 00:15:24,800
Speaker 3: this has kind of been floating around in Hollywood for

287
00:15:24,800 --> 00:15:28,040
Speaker 3: those last couple of years, and it's been unclear whether

288
00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:31,200
Speaker 3: that would be Levy's next project. He obviously most recently

289
00:15:31,360 --> 00:15:37,320
Speaker 3: directed and worked on Depor Versus Wolverine with Hugh Jackman

290
00:15:37,360 --> 00:15:41,520
Speaker 3: and Ryan Reynolds, and had allegedly, interestingly in pouring around this,

291
00:15:41,640 --> 00:15:45,800
Speaker 3: been working on a boy band comedy movie that would

292
00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:47,480
Speaker 3: have starred the two of them that was meant to

293
00:15:47,480 --> 00:15:51,000
Speaker 3: be his next project, but apparently, once Ryan Gosling started

294
00:15:51,040 --> 00:15:54,480
Speaker 3: snipping around and was like, Hey, I'm gonna be I'm

295
00:15:54,520 --> 00:15:57,960
Speaker 3: the Gods. I'm I'm here. I'm ken Like. He was like,

296
00:15:58,080 --> 00:15:59,720
Speaker 3: I'm gonna be here. I want to be in your

297
00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:02,760
Speaker 3: style movie. This is the one for me. Allegedly not

298
00:16:02,760 --> 00:16:06,400
Speaker 3: connected to the Skywalker saga. Hollywood Reporter claims it is

299
00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:09,000
Speaker 3: meant to be a standalone movie, and apparently that got

300
00:16:09,040 --> 00:16:11,120
Speaker 3: the heads at Disney being like, we haven't put out

301
00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:13,760
Speaker 3: a movie for a long time, and we're gonna put

302
00:16:13,800 --> 00:16:16,160
Speaker 3: Ryan Gosling in this movie, and you're gonna make this movie.

303
00:16:16,240 --> 00:16:18,120
Speaker 3: I would like to see it. I like Ryan Gosling.

304
00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:19,640
Speaker 1: I would like to see it. I would like to

305
00:16:19,680 --> 00:16:21,200
Speaker 1: see a Star Wars movie.

306
00:16:21,520 --> 00:16:23,880
Speaker 3: I would hear it. How long has it been said

307
00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:28,760
Speaker 3: since the Rise of Skywalker? That's the last seven years?

308
00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:29,720
Speaker 3: Seven years.

309
00:16:29,720 --> 00:16:31,120
Speaker 1: I'm guessing. I'm like guessing.

310
00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:34,800
Speaker 3: Just I mean, it really feels like it's been a

311
00:16:34,880 --> 00:16:35,480
Speaker 3: long time.

312
00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:40,600
Speaker 2: Well, we'll be back after a very short time, and

313
00:16:40,680 --> 00:16:59,280
Speaker 2: this word from our spots, and we're back. Next up

314
00:16:59,320 --> 00:17:04,480
Speaker 2: in news, Robert Eggers of The Northmen, of various other movies,

315
00:17:05,119 --> 00:17:07,960
Speaker 2: of the recent Nosferatu.

316
00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:08,680
Speaker 3: Which was a very big hit.

317
00:17:08,800 --> 00:17:12,840
Speaker 2: He saw Lee Wanald's The Wolfman and said, now, let

318
00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:13,600
Speaker 2: me make a wolf man.

319
00:17:13,880 --> 00:17:15,840
Speaker 1: Right, He's making a movie Fields.

320
00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:19,439
Speaker 3: It's gonna be called were Wolf, and it will be

321
00:17:19,680 --> 00:17:23,639
Speaker 3: set in the thirteenth century, and it's gonna be spelt

322
00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:28,320
Speaker 3: were wolf w e r e w u lf because

323
00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:33,680
Speaker 3: he's extra and he loves to set a movie well

324
00:17:33,760 --> 00:17:37,320
Speaker 3: the time that was only white people. That's like he

325
00:17:37,520 --> 00:17:40,080
Speaker 3: loves to say that. He will say this is which

326
00:17:40,119 --> 00:17:43,480
Speaker 3: is not true, Like it's not true, like vikings were

327
00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:46,280
Speaker 3: actually very diverse. I've talked about this before north Man.

328
00:17:46,440 --> 00:17:50,160
Speaker 3: But yeah, anyway, so that's a Robert Eggers one bit

329
00:17:50,200 --> 00:17:52,679
Speaker 3: of news. But there's a Robert Eggers double headed hair

330
00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:55,840
Speaker 3: for those who love Robert Eggers, and that is that

331
00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:59,920
Speaker 3: at TriStar Eggers has been greenlit to direct Elabyrinth sequel.

332
00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:02,359
Speaker 3: I don't know how I feel about that. I'm a

333
00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:06,159
Speaker 3: Jim Henson superstan. I love the original Labyrinth, but I

334
00:18:06,200 --> 00:18:11,000
Speaker 3: do feel like Afta Nosferatu made young people all over

335
00:18:11,040 --> 00:18:13,920
Speaker 3: the world twenty. He's probably a good pick because Labyrinth

336
00:18:13,960 --> 00:18:15,040
Speaker 3: is a very horny movie.

337
00:18:15,520 --> 00:18:19,560
Speaker 2: I will say, so sequel. Does this mean Jennifer Connelly

338
00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:21,720
Speaker 2: is in the sequel. She comes back and like her.

339
00:18:21,680 --> 00:18:25,080
Speaker 3: Daughter saying, is it like a legacy the Labyrinth. Please

340
00:18:25,119 --> 00:18:27,880
Speaker 3: don't bring David Bowie back by some kind of horrible

341
00:18:28,200 --> 00:18:28,680
Speaker 3: about one.

342
00:18:28,560 --> 00:18:30,040
Speaker 1: Of David Bowie's kids.

343
00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:38,600
Speaker 2: He's like, they are the god Duncan Joe movies and

344
00:18:38,760 --> 00:18:43,080
Speaker 2: get in there and be your dad's I will say,

345
00:18:43,280 --> 00:18:48,360
Speaker 2: I am Eggers. I like his movies. I do wonder

346
00:18:48,520 --> 00:18:51,119
Speaker 2: if he has the panache.

347
00:18:51,119 --> 00:18:52,680
Speaker 3: Though I don't know if he has the vis the.

348
00:18:52,640 --> 00:18:57,320
Speaker 2: Feeling like there's I except for oh my god, why

349
00:18:57,359 --> 00:19:02,119
Speaker 2: am I blanking on the two Handers house, except for

350
00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:06,440
Speaker 2: the lighthouse that's got pash, There's not a ton of

351
00:19:06,680 --> 00:19:11,960
Speaker 2: fun and color in the world of Eggers Lambyard's a

352
00:19:12,320 --> 00:19:18,480
Speaker 2: very colorful, very fun, very whimsical, fantastical movie with some

353
00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:22,560
Speaker 2: with some gravitas a lah like a wrinkle in time

354
00:19:22,680 --> 00:19:25,640
Speaker 2: that kind of like ominous but for kids.

355
00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:26,080
Speaker 1: Feeling.

356
00:19:26,920 --> 00:19:33,159
Speaker 2: Yeah, I do wonder if what it will look like,

357
00:19:33,280 --> 00:19:37,600
Speaker 2: just because you know, based on his oove, I've I

358
00:19:37,600 --> 00:19:39,960
Speaker 2: don't think I've seen anything that really comports with the

359
00:19:40,000 --> 00:19:42,320
Speaker 2: feeling of the Jim Henson classic.

360
00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:44,320
Speaker 1: But I'll be there.

361
00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:47,760
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'll watch you. I'm also interested because one of

362
00:19:47,800 --> 00:19:50,120
Speaker 3: our super producers popped in this quote, which is him

363
00:19:50,119 --> 00:19:53,000
Speaker 3: saying the idea of having to photograph a car makes

364
00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:55,679
Speaker 3: me ill. Eggs told Rotten Tomorrows when I asked if

365
00:19:55,680 --> 00:19:58,240
Speaker 3: he would make a contemporary movie, and the idea of

366
00:19:58,240 --> 00:20:01,159
Speaker 3: photographing a cell phone is death. And to make a

367
00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:04,200
Speaker 3: contemporary story, you have to photograph a cell phone. It's

368
00:20:04,280 --> 00:20:06,520
Speaker 3: just how life is. So no, he will never make

369
00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:09,600
Speaker 3: a contemporary movie, that's what he says. Okay, that's fine.

370
00:20:09,720 --> 00:20:11,159
Speaker 3: When is the sequel to Laborn?

371
00:20:11,480 --> 00:20:12,120
Speaker 1: I don't hate it.

372
00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:15,120
Speaker 3: I don't hate it, like I get it. I get that.

373
00:20:15,119 --> 00:20:18,080
Speaker 3: That's his reasoning when people are critiquing him about when

374
00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:19,760
Speaker 3: he sets his movies. But how do you do a

375
00:20:19,760 --> 00:20:20,680
Speaker 3: sequel to Labyrinth?

376
00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:20,840
Speaker 2: Then?

377
00:20:20,960 --> 00:20:23,399
Speaker 3: Is it directly just set still in the eighties, like

378
00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:27,639
Speaker 3: it's the next day? Like I'm intrigue Gode in that case,

379
00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:28,560
Speaker 3: I am.

380
00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:33,560
Speaker 2: I am intrigude about you know a guy who uses

381
00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:37,760
Speaker 2: like a Sony red Dragon six K camera and all

382
00:20:37,840 --> 00:20:41,520
Speaker 2: the various lighting rigs to film stuff from two hundred

383
00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:46,840
Speaker 2: years ago. And it's very interesting to me that the mindset.

384
00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:49,760
Speaker 2: But I will be there next up Marvel Rivals news,

385
00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:53,440
Speaker 2: more characters are coming. First of all, Nettie's has said

386
00:20:53,480 --> 00:20:56,280
Speaker 2: that they're gonna drop a new character about every month

387
00:20:56,320 --> 00:20:59,280
Speaker 2: and a half. That's what they're gonna do, which, considering

388
00:20:59,400 --> 00:21:06,399
Speaker 2: the the depth of Marvel's stable of characters, that means

389
00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:09,719
Speaker 2: new content for approximately two hundred and seventy five years.

390
00:21:09,800 --> 00:21:11,920
Speaker 1: But so the latest leaks according.

391
00:21:11,480 --> 00:21:15,919
Speaker 2: To xox Leak, so your mileage may vary, are that

392
00:21:16,080 --> 00:21:21,959
Speaker 2: the next six heroes to appear or you know sometime

393
00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:24,800
Speaker 2: in the future are Gambit x Men's Gambit who will

394
00:21:24,800 --> 00:21:27,960
Speaker 2: be a duelist that makes sense, Rogue who will be

395
00:21:28,160 --> 00:21:31,919
Speaker 2: a strategist, Metched aka a healer. I love a flying healer.

396
00:21:31,960 --> 00:21:34,399
Speaker 2: We don't have what except for Rocket, we don't have

397
00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:36,400
Speaker 2: one of those yet. I think Ultron will be the

398
00:21:36,440 --> 00:21:38,399
Speaker 2: first flying healer.

399
00:21:39,160 --> 00:21:40,200
Speaker 1: Jubilee unknown.

400
00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:41,359
Speaker 3: What's your guests?

401
00:21:42,400 --> 00:21:42,880
Speaker 1: Hopefully?

402
00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:46,840
Speaker 2: I think we need more strategists, we need more vanguards. Really,

403
00:21:47,000 --> 00:21:49,399
Speaker 2: I think it's I've heard that the tank character, the

404
00:21:49,480 --> 00:21:50,480
Speaker 2: vanguard character.

405
00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:52,240
Speaker 1: Is the least popular to be.

406
00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:54,919
Speaker 2: Played, but also like very important. Magneto has become very

407
00:21:54,920 --> 00:21:56,000
Speaker 2: important recently.

408
00:21:58,160 --> 00:21:58,520
Speaker 1: Beast.

409
00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:02,240
Speaker 2: I'm gonna guess like some kind of like highly mobile vanguard.

410
00:22:02,480 --> 00:22:05,200
Speaker 3: I can't say it feels like a vanguard like a tank,

411
00:22:05,320 --> 00:22:06,560
Speaker 3: but you can jump around.

412
00:22:06,840 --> 00:22:09,520
Speaker 2: Yeah, Nightcrawler is a duellist, which would be super fun

413
00:22:09,560 --> 00:22:13,040
Speaker 2: like that, and the Hood Shocker the Hood what as

414
00:22:13,080 --> 00:22:14,240
Speaker 2: a vanguard That.

415
00:22:14,400 --> 00:22:16,720
Speaker 3: Rby Williams show is coming out and you are gonna

416
00:22:16,760 --> 00:22:17,680
Speaker 3: know who the Hood is.

417
00:22:18,119 --> 00:22:21,080
Speaker 1: That's very that's very very true. But I've seen the

418
00:22:21,160 --> 00:22:22,680
Speaker 1: other leaks have included like.

419
00:22:24,440 --> 00:22:29,080
Speaker 2: The Trapster aka paste Pot Pete, the fact that they're

420
00:22:29,160 --> 00:22:29,800
Speaker 2: going deep.

421
00:22:29,880 --> 00:22:33,359
Speaker 3: They are definitely going like really deep, really deep.

422
00:22:33,440 --> 00:22:36,960
Speaker 2: They go like paste Pot Pete aka the Trapster for

423
00:22:37,000 --> 00:22:38,520
Speaker 2: those of you not in the know, is a character

424
00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:41,480
Speaker 2: who has like two glue guns yea and just glues

425
00:22:41,520 --> 00:22:42,480
Speaker 2: people to stuff.

426
00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:47,160
Speaker 1: Yeah, so very excited. It's a game.

427
00:22:47,160 --> 00:22:49,280
Speaker 2: I'm playing a lot to deal with stress, which is

428
00:22:49,320 --> 00:22:51,359
Speaker 2: not healthy. But like I've been playing a lot, so

429
00:22:51,359 --> 00:22:52,760
Speaker 2: I'm excited to know what got to be done.

430
00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:57,320
Speaker 1: I'm excited to I'm excited to play it. That's it

431
00:22:57,400 --> 00:22:58,120
Speaker 1: for News this week.

432
00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:00,439
Speaker 2: Next week on Extra Vision, we're diving in to our

433
00:23:00,520 --> 00:23:05,000
Speaker 2: David Lynch retrospective and the current state of Winter TV.

434
00:23:05,160 --> 00:23:07,919
Speaker 1: What are we watching? What do we like? That's in

435
00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:08,680
Speaker 1: for this episode?

436
00:23:08,760 --> 00:23:17,320
Speaker 2: Next for us Saying bye x Ray Vision is hosted

437
00:23:17,359 --> 00:23:19,959
Speaker 2: by Jason Sepcion and Rosie Knight. And is a production

438
00:23:20,040 --> 00:23:21,240
Speaker 2: of iHeart Podcasts.

439
00:23:21,440 --> 00:23:25,000
Speaker 3: Our executive producers are Joel Monique and Aaron Kaufman.

440
00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:27,280
Speaker 1: Our supervising producer is Abu Zafar.

441
00:23:27,680 --> 00:23:31,640
Speaker 3: Our producers are Common, Laurent Dean Jonathan and Fay Wag.

442
00:23:31,720 --> 00:23:34,520
Speaker 2: Our theme song is by Brian Vasquez, with alternate theme

443
00:23:34,560 --> 00:23:35,840
Speaker 2: songs by Aaron Kaufman.

444
00:23:36,040 --> 00:23:39,800
Speaker 3: Special thanks to Soul Rubin, Chris Lord, Kenny Goodman and Heidi.

445
00:23:40,080 --> 00:23:41,320
Speaker 3: Our disc called moderate, though