WEBVTT - Surveillance: EU Auto Tariffs Offer Not Good Enough, Trump Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg We're

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>watching em Currencies somewhat stable here, but as Hanky would

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>lecture at Johns Hopkins, they are log quadratic. Uh to

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>say the least, let me bring him in him without

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>further ado. After public service with President Reagan and with

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>some serious counsel to the Baltic States, Stephen Hanky has

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>done at all teaching at the Colorado School of Minds

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at Berkeley and holding corn and I really mean this,

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>folks in applied economics at Johns Hopkins. Professor Hanky owns

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>when currencies unravel, and we welcome him now to Bloomberg Surveillance. Steves,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for taking time with us today.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>First of all, his contagion clicked in, well, it's certainly

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>clicked in last night. The half big currencies are becoming

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>more big by the day. We had the paso down

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent against the greenback. Turkey's LARDN three Indian Route

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>PI record low against the us D, h Indonesian Rupe

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a three year low, and the list goes on and on,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think Tom and Pim the key question or

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is what's what's going on? And I think people are

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>just missing the boat here. The FED is tight, tight, tight.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And if we look at Milton Friedman and look at

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>our cues are quantities, we have broad money is growing

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>at a very modest pace four point seven percent year

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>over year measured on him for Center for Financial Stability

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>in New York UH. Then if we look at Bob

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Mundell's TS prices, the most important price in the world

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as a dollar euro rate, and it's at one sixteen now.

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>That's that's under my comfort zone of one forty. It's tight.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>It's tight. The dollar is very strong. Gold is hovering

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>around the low end of my comfort zone, which is

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>about twelve an ounce. It's about twelve twelve now, So

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we we have a very tight FED. That is strong

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar putting massive pressure on the emerging market countries UH

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 1>and their half big currencies. So that's that's the over

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>all seen and it's not going to get any better.

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And and it looks like the more the emerging market

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>currencies collapse, there there is an increased probability that will

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>will have some blowback in the big major markets. Professor Hanky,

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is there something intrinsic about the value of the US

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar that investors have missed over the last six to

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve months. I don't think there's anything intrinsic. I think

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you just have to follow Bob Mundel and look at prices.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And there are two big prices uh to look at,

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's a dollar er rate in gold and then

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and then beyond that you've got a lot of commodities.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all the base medals are done. Part of

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the tightness, by the way, China is extremely tight now.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>The big engine for growth in the world economy that

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the last ten to twenty years has been China. And

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the trend rate of growth and

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the money supply since too COS and three in China,

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the trend rate six for m TOO that's their broad

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>money major it's only growing at nine percent now. The

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>trend rate of growth for credit to their private sector

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in China has been sixteen percent also and it's only

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>growing at nine now. And I think President g is

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>hit the panic button. They they've they've trying to unwind

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the squeeze that they've put on and rescue things, but

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it might be too little, too late. China is very

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>tight right now. So you've got the two the two

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>big elephants in the room said, the central bank in

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>China are very tight, and that's putting pressure on all

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>these half baked currencies and and half half bag countries.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, just come and glued. These carry trades unwind

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>very fast under these conditions. All right, So let's say

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.679
<v Speaker 1>that Professor Stephen Hanky gets a call from the Central

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Turkey. What does he say? Okay, here's here's

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in Turkey. Uh. The inflation rate now

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is I measure it very accurately, is a hundred and

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>one percent on an annual basis. The official rates fifteen

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>point eight five percent. So you have massive negative real

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>yields and the carry trade in Winding and Turkey. The

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>crisis will continue for a long time, as it's done

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way in ninety four and two thousand and today.

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>The only way to stop this nightmare in Turkey is

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>to make the lira as good as gold, make it

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a clone of gold. And you do that with a

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>currency board system. You fix the liras exchange uh and

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>make it freely convertable at a fixed rate with gold,

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and you backed the lira a dent with gold reserves.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>So the la literally is good as good as gold.

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a thing I would stop the ham racking there,

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Steve Stephen Hankey, with this focus of the Johns Hopkins University,

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>were thrilled to bring him to you today. Steve, there's

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the mathematics of being log linear, a straight line on

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a percent change. Why access and then things get ugly

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and they curve, and then we go to the acclaimed

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>world of Professor Hanky, which is hyperbolas, which focuses at

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>moonshot think wheelbarrows of cash in Germany in World War Two.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Are any of these e M currencies on the edge

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of hanky hyperbola? No, I don't think so, Tom, because

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to those points, they're they're very rare. They're

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they've actually only been fifty eight in the world history

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that have gone to that hyperbola point and hit hyper

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation where yes, inflation rates per month. And we have

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>one now, of course Venezezuela I'm major with high frequency

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>data that I'm plaction rate every day and it's running

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>sixty two thousand percent year every year, and the monthly

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>rate is a hundred seventy two. So this has been

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>going on since November of two thousand and sixteen. So

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it hit, it hit your your point, Tom, and and

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the only one that steve. What's the prescription here

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>for the I m F. I mean, you're one of

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the giants in this racket, with the late Michael Moosa,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the late Rudy dorn Bush, Ken rogoff in the others

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in the angst it's out there at Global Wall Street.

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Is the institutions, particularly I m F can't come to

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the rescue this time because of the new size of

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.239
<v Speaker 1>em markets. Is that a valid worry or can leguard

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>get it done? I don't think size is the problem.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the I m F is just has wrong

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>headed thinking. I mean you look, for example, even at Venezezuela,

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about the inflation. Right, you can measure

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>hyper inflations, and you can measure them very accurately. You

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>can't forecast the course or duration Tom of a of

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a hyper inflation and the i m F just keeps

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>putting these inflation forecast out for Venezezuela. They they're a joke,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>complete complete revelation of the incompetence of the I m F.

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>They say inflation is going to be a million percent

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year in Venezuela. And of

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>course the press, like good stenographers, just repeat this nonsense.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you cannot forecast hyper inflation period, that's the

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the story. You can measure it very very accurately,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:46.239
<v Speaker 1>can't forecast it. So the solution on these exchange rate regimes,

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they're done in Argentina. Now Macree called the I m

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>F fireman in and and it's been a complete disaster.

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Everything has collapsed since the I m F has come down.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>And mac Cree doesn't realize. I don't know why he

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>called the i m F because in two thousand and one,

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>remember we had the I m F suspending the program

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to UH Argentina and this was Kohler was the manager

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>director then and and and I am at basically double

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>crossed Argentina and the complete meltdown during the crisis and

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the huge bank runds in November of two thousand one.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I m F. We're gonna run out of time. I

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta cut Steve hank you off, which is you gotta

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Brazilian I do. But we're gonna We're

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna come. We're gonna get Steve Hankey on as much

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>as we can through this interesting e M time again.

0:09:43.400 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>He is at Johns Hopkins University. President Donald Trump, of course,

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting down for an exclusive Oval Office interview with Bloomberg,

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and the President covered a variety of topics, including the

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Russia probe, as well as trade policy and when it

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to the trade talks with the European Union, the

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>President said that the European unions offered to scrap tariffs

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on US made automobiles is not enough. It's not good enough, no,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because they do a lot more auto business than we

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>will ever do. In other words, well, first of all,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not just tariffs. They also barriers up to our cars.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>They have they'll take the barriers down and they'll charge

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>us no text. But it's not good enough because they

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>will always sell more cars. Their cars, their habits, their

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer habits are to buying their cars, not to buying

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>our cars. In response, the European Commission President Jean Claude

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Junker said that the European Union will retaliate if President

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump raises tariffs on europe Pan autos, and that is

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a good time to bring in a gentleman who had

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with the president yesterday. Under the earl portrait

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of Andrew Jackson, painted in eighteen thirty five at the

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Resolute Desk are John Michael Fait in conversation with the President. John,

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>what was the energy like in the room away from

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the formal portraits, in the important comments and the president?

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>What was the backstory as you entered the Oval Office. Well,

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of energy, almost of the March energy

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>is there is with you and Pim, but it's it's

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump is I think the main thing which comes through

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the President of the moment is that he is someone

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>who's in a sense of doubling down on Donald Trump.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, he is not Other people may look at

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the Oval Office and think he's got

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>problems with the mid terms, he's got problems with Mueller.

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>He's got people resigning from his internal kind of a

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>set of advisors. From his point of view, it's almost

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. He gives himself a grade A plus. He

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>claims he has the best happened. As ever, he's forging

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead on everything. You know, he's just persuaded Mexico to

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>do well, and Canada's next. And as you said in

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the clip, you know he's now moving on to the

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>w g O and Europe. And actually, I think you

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>know there is a like all these people, many politicians

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to spin you things, think Trump genuinely believed that

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>he's achieving these things. And the better or worst, that

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is the world we live in. If we were to

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>write a Bloomberg quick take or something you helped invent

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the fourteen page wonder in the Economist magazine, what what

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we say would be the response of Europe, the response

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of China, of Canada, of Mexico to all of his trade,

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not hysteria, but just trade discourse. Do they just does

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>turn to the president and say no, Well, it's interesting

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you talk to business people and there is one bit

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of business people where most business people want him to

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>succeed a bit um. So for instance with China, you

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>talk to most European business people and they will say

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it is it would be wonderful if Donald Trump could

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>get China to open up. Um, and you might also

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to American and European people who say it would

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>be very good if there were a fewer trade barriers

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>between American Europe. But and this is a very big

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>butt at the very least, he's playing with fire with

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>these things, because most people would still say the w

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>t O is incredibly useful and having a multilateral forum

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>increases the amount of free trade all the way around

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, generally to the benefit of America as well.

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Um And obviously nobody wants the trans Atlantic trade war,

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Chinese for the moment showing every sign of

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>wanting to match Donald Trump tariff for tariff, So it

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is a slightly more nuanced picture than that either he

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>would present all for that matter, his foes and a

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of business people, I think quietly under their breath,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>were condemning the trade war whilst desperately hoping that he succeeds,

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.719
<v Speaker 1>especially with the Chinese. John michaels Wade, I want to say,

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>leave it to an Englishman to teach us about our

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>own role in history in the United States. Sometimes it

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:06.599
<v Speaker 1>takes someone from the outside to have a clear perspective.

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You've interviewed many world leaders, do you view Donald Trump

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is different? But yes, he is entirely different. Um. I

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>think there are many world leaders who will try tom

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>who will try to sort of spin things or try

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to say they're doing better. You know, Donald Trump gives

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>more impression of being a He's a sort of train

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>heading in every direction at once, and even when he's

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to restrain himself, he finds it very difficult, and

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>some cases he kind obloviates and goes past things. In

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>other cases he just says what he thinks. And I

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think that is the better or worth again to keep

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>part of his appeal to people, because I think to

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>his base he's someone who tries to say how he

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sees it, and that is that is worth something to him.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think to any extent that he tried to

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>bottle it up. Um, he's changed on that. If you

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>want an example of one area though, where he has

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>become slightly more disciplined, but you can see it in

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>his eyes that he's straining at it. It's the fed

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he has sort of accepted, after a degree

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of annoyance about the fact that he can't control the

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve. He's now accepted that that's probably a good thing.

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>That is good that presidents can't do that, and he

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was polite about j Powell, but you can sense even

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>then he wants to be able to run it. John

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Michael Twaitt with us, John, I want to switch gears here,

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and of course we're looking for an exclusive and lengthy

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>long read from John Michael Twayton Company Monday. So I

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of Alexis to Tokeville when I was thinking

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of having an Englishman talk about America. That would be

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>very good and I often have to I often have

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to endure Tom Keene talking about prisons. I think, no, no,

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to Britain right now, and I know we've

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>got a long read feature coming out five thousand words

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. Theresa made dancing her way across Africa. But

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>except for that, John, we need a Britain update. Would

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you explain to me what the incentive is for anybody

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in Europe to put up with your Brexit debate? What's

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>what's there incentive even to become engaged in this domestic

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>foolishness of your United Kingdom. Well, you've actually you're actually

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>asking the key question, because what is happening at the

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>moment as the Europeans have just let it be, There's

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a slight sign over the past kind of ten

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>days that the Europeans have moved a bit. Macrons begun

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, look, it's a bit silly if Britain just

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>crashes out of this thing. Um. It's already pretty clear

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that most of the burden of Brexit will be carried

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>by Britain, but it isn't. It's also not entirely in

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Europe's interest. In France's Britain's neighbor. A lot of its

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>trade comes through France. It's not in France's interest to

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have a complete sort of disaster on his on his doorstep.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So from business people, from politicians a bit there's at

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>least slightly more willingness to come in. But you are

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>basically right that what has happened is that from the

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>British point of view, every day is dominated by Brexit

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>headlines and what it means, and this it means. He

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>will visit the people who run France or Germany or

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Italy and it's something they think about once every two

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>months because they've been very happy leaving this with Michelle Barnier,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>who is the European Commissions negotiator. Michael's way, it's like

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a digital Maven. I'm watching Theresa May to her second

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>dance off the Independent video. Why don't we have that video?

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, thanks to the Independent for giving me background

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>briefing for it is an amazing video. I don't think

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>even I tried to work out that maybe some people

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>may feel sympathy for Theresa John does the Have we

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>lost the perspective that the balance of power in Europe

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>has changed and will change because of the exit from

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the European Union. Yes, I think what is happening is

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that there are two. If we've had a somewhat Anglo

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>anglocentric conversation said, I think there's any harm in saying

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this is I think from an Anglo centric point of view.

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>People used to talk a bit vaguely about an Anglo

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sphere where obviously America is the predominant partner and Britain

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>plays the secondary role. But together they're probably greater than

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the some of their parts. That has always helped America

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>having somebody else who's willing to stick up for roughly

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the same things. But firstly, the agenda which they're both

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>pushing things like generally free trade, opening up things. Well,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that is no longer the priority of Donald Trump. Certainly. Secondly,

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got America withdrawing from some areas of the world,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to do things. And thirdly, who've got Britain

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>coming out of its main forum to influence people, which

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>was the European Union. And so I think from the

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>point of view of that Anglo message, which is to

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>want to build out too big, I think there has

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>been a retreat. And it matters enormously that if you

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to American politicians, the most valuable thing about Britain

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>was that it was the kind of friendly to American

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>voice inside the U. I have to leave their gn Michaels,

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Congratulations on the many themes of

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>your conversation with the President of the United States. Right

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>now we speak with CBS is Margaret Brennan, who has

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a spirited face and Nation Sunday morning. Of course you'll

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>hear it on Bloomberg Radio Sunday two PM. I mean

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>that speaks to the noise of this August Margaret in

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Washington to see Christia Friedland so abruptly exit to try

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to get this discussion at done. It's not a boring August,

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>is it. No. I don't think there is such a

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>thing as a boring August with the Trump administration um

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and certainly this push to get a deal by today,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>by Friday, so that they can move forward with presenting

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to Congress some kind of proposal to overhaul NAFTA is

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>something that many, like the president son in law Jard Kushner,

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>are really pushing for. The hope is that it would

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lift from the political pressure both from Mexico ahead of

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>their inauguration of their new president and ahead of those

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>upcoming elections in Canada in twenty nineteen. It's not clear

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if they can win that gamble. There's so many themes

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, Margaret, including what we're going to see

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in an hour in fifty five minutes on Capitol Hill

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Senator from Arizona. But to stay on trade.

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You have an experience of these negotiations, and I would

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>suggest it's an experience of complexity. Does this administration do complexity? Uh?

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>They do in the sense that there is a number

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of people within the administration with varying different views as

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to how all of this should end up. But it

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like fundamentally on this issue of NAFTA UM, it

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>comes back to some of the very basics that have

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>always stuck the relationship, including, you know, coming to some

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of compromise with Canada over how their dairy farmers

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>policies are are protected UM up there, and as well

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>as this dispute mechanism that continues to be a sticking

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>point within the administration. It does appear that the President

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>has made a push, with the urging of his son

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>in law, Jared Kushner, to get the U. S. Trade

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Representative to make some move to make compromise possible on NAFTA. UH.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>The question, of course, is will the Canadians get on

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>board with what Mexico and the US have agreed to

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point, Margaret, President Donald Trump has definitely boasted

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of the performance of not only the U. S. Stock

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>market but the US economy. Do you get the sense

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>from talking to your sources in Washington that the political

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>establishment also feels that level of enthusiasm for American economic

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>power visa VI these trade negotiations. They have enthusiasm about

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the economic power, but they've got great anxiety that all

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>of that could start being damaged or dissipate, particularly towards

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of September as some of those retaliatory tariffs

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>start to bite in the heartland. Um, And there's really

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>no you know, even though you see these glimmers of

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>hope with say Europe or Canada and Mexico on potential

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>trade negotiations or even deals, the Chinese are such a

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>different group of negotiators and really I'm not hearing any

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>momentum on that front. And that is the trade dispute

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that really could bite, And so there is anxiety around that.

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>There's this urge among Republicans to say, get something done

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on trade where we can stand behind you, uh, you know,

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and stand with you against China. But so far, um,

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>there's very little hope. And you heard that from the

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>President just this week, blaming China for what he says

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>is diplomacy faltering with North Korea. Margaret tell us about

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Face the Nation Sunday mornings. We'll be tracking and continuing

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to report on these services here in Washington for Senator

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>John McCain, and we will be speaking to former Secretary

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of State and former Senator John Kerry this Sunday, who's

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>got a brand new book out. He spent a lot

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of time with John McCain, even though the two of

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>them were opposite sides of the aisle and had very

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>different perspectives. You know, John Carey rocketed to fame as

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a war protester, John McCain a prisoner of that war,

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>and the two found common cause in the nineties to say,

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>let's make peace, let's help find uh those missing in

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>action and use that toe hole to establish diplomatic relations

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>between the US and Vietnam. It's really an extraordinary story,

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and and Terry tells us about that. Michael Brennan, thank

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Of course, you can see Face a

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Nation on CBS. Do that Sunday morning. You can listen

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to Face the Nation Bloomberg Radio Sunday two PM in

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>New York, Washington, d C. And now Bloomberg one or

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>six one Boston, Newburyport. Face the Nation this Sunday at

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>two I'm Bloomberg Radio. We digress And if you go

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Point Sky website Brian Kelly's invention, you will

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>find it a wonderfully eclectic set of articles. Mike or

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Not is out moments ago with an article on how

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>they figure out what the flight path will be for

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you when you go over oceans, just as that is

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>one idea of the richness of this. Joining us here

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on a Labor Day weekend as we all traveled. Julian

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Hell who was with the points uh Guy website, Julian,

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>just congratulations on what your website does in terms of

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>eclectic travel. But I've got one arch question, when does

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this all end? There's been articles that JP Morgan is

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmed by the success of their sapphire program. I'm sure

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>there's others like JP Morgan because we're all doing this,

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>we're all reading you guys, we're all trying to be

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 1>as smart about the use of the miles. Do you

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>guys feel like this is something where at some point

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the banks are just gonna say no. You know, it's

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a It's a good question because collecting travel rewards, especially

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>through credit cards, is a bigger business than ever, and

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>consumers are more educated than ever. Just last quarter, Chase

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>actually had over three hundred million dollars in unanticipated redemptions

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>by customers were using their points wiser than they otherwise expected.

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So obviously it's partly part of the economic cycle in

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>general right now. We're at the height of it, and

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>credit card companies are doing great overall. Whether that will

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>change when things turn down, it is a possibility. But

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, consumers are just into travel, they're

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>into loyalty points. We certainly don't see the interests decreasing

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. Julian, how many miles a year do you fly?

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I personally fly over a hundred thousand miles a year. Uh,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's actually a small compared to some of my

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>colleagues at the Points Guy. Some of them fly over

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand miles a year. And I have to

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>tell you it is a lot of time on a plane,

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of times that we are flying up front,

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>if you will, because we're reviewing business class in first

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>class cabins, it is a different experience. It's when you're

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>flying up front. The the upfront cabins, while economy in

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the back has been worse than than the size, seat

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sizes are smaller than ever. Upfront, the story is very

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>different where airlines are now competing for customers based on

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>luxury and comfort. So flying in business or first especially internationally,

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is a whole different experience than it was even five

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. All right, Well, help Tom get all the

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>business class that he deserves. What kind of cards should

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he be using and does he have to use more

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>than one card? Ideally he should be using more than

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>one card. And that's because to maximize your frequent flyer

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>points and miles, you want to be using a card

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that earns bonus points on specific categories and then pick

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that the right card out of your wallets, depending on

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>where you are. So if you've got saying but none

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of the cards actually pay for tuition for tuition, it's

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a little trickier. We do actually have a few stories

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on the points go on how to maximize points when

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you're paying for tuition, So Tom, you know, we you

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>can check those out. But when you're at a restaurant,

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure you use a card that's

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>getting bonus points, and restaurants you're shopping groceries, you want

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to use the groceries card. Let's get back to one

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of the news items of the moment, which is everybody

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>wants to do longer flights, which to me screams top

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of the market. And whether it's Sydney to New York

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>or you know, you can name the long distance flight

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>did the airlines have the responsibility to not over expand

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 1>now like they've done in every other cycle before. That

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>is the question, because every other cycle, as you said,

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the airlines have gone too far, too many flights, too

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>many seats, and it ends up being an oversupply and

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>non enomb Deman. Qantas is talking about this uh new

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>possible flight from Sydney to London, which would be over

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand miles, the longest non stop in the world

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>if could happened now, the aircraft currently don't exist to

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do that distance call detailed already right here, small detail,

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but Airbus and Bowing are both working on versions of

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>their aircraft that could do it. Qantas in particular has

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>has this idea that they're going to do these ultra

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>long haul routes in an effort to when business. They

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think they have the business model for it. It is.

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of resources into these very long haul

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>flights and whether it works is yet to me. I

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>noticed Pam American, I think just took out Chicago Shanghai.

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>You know they've got three or four choices, yes, but

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they took one of them. Julian low cost carriers like

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Norwegian Wow, tell us about the way, tell us about

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>low cost carriers, because I've had several people tell me

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it works, and it works really well. You know, if

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you from a passenger perspective, as long as you know

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what you are getting into that when you book a

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>ticket on a low cost carrier, the ticket price is

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the end of the story. It may be

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a very low price on the actual air fare, but

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be aware that you may get charged extra,

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>not just for bags, but but certainly for meals, even

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on international flights. Yeah, but okay, but we're talking like

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>three d bucks. The fly from continental Europe to l A.

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It is amazing and it's it's low. The airfares right

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>now have are lower than they ever have been, especially

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to Europe, even transcon from New York to l A.

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>When Jet Blue came in with Mint, their Mint products,

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.959
<v Speaker 1>they drove the prices down, even of the first class experience.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So it is a great time from a consumer standpoint

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to fly. There is uh, there are clouds on the horizon.

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>With the price of oil being higher now than it's

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>been over the last few years, that's gonna put a

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>pinch on some of these revenues. Sorry, some of these

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>expects is for the airline. I want to see what happened.

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to circle back finally here, uh Julian to

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the success that Chase has had. Do the other banks

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>want to be like Chase? Or are they learning from

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Chase that they really don't want to go there because

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of the huge expense of redemption. You know, It's it's

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a mixed bag because Chase, of course,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>with its Chase Fire Reserve product that was extraordinarily popular

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>when it first came out, and they've had really good

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>retentions on that card, was a direct competitor to American Express,

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>who had their own Platinum card, which was a high

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>tier travel benefits card. So and and as a result

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.959
<v Speaker 1>of American Express has felt the need to improve their

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Platinum card. So there certainly is competition there. On the

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>other hand, where's Wells Fargo is an example. Yeah, Wells

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Fargo just came out with a new propel Amex card,

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's aimed at a very different segment of the market.

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a no annual fee card. So the credit card

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>issuers have had to improve their products to compete. But

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they're aiming for different segments of the market. This has

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>been wonderful. Julian and Kill thank you so much, greatly

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. With Brian Kelly over at the Points Guy website.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.