WEBVTT - Bad News is Good News, Again?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mike Creagan, and I'm a senior editor

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg and I'm val Donna, hi across asset reporter

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg. And this week on the show, while the

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>SMP fire just kept a seventh straight monthly gain, it

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>happened in the same month that Federal Reserve officials made

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it pretty clear that they're ready to start taking their

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>foot off the gas pedal. When it comes to the

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>stimulative monetary policy that's been so important for this rally,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>how much of the rally actually has been due to

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that stimilios and how much was due to the ebulent

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>investor psychology that accompanied it, and how should we think

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>about what happens now. We'll get into it with a

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer who actually helped start her own new

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>firm just about two years ago. But first, vill Dona,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>some trivia I just learned about you and this chief

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>investment officer. Neither one of you has a middle name.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>That's true, right, that's true, that's right. Yeah. Her name

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is Kim Forrest. She's the chief investment officer at Boca

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management. Kim, Welcome, to the show. Thank you, thank

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. Yeah, Kim, let's just start off

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the actual nuts and bolts of

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>your views on the market. Tell us a little bit

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>bit about this firm. I know you just started it

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in what two thousand and nineteen. UM You're based in Pittsburgh, right,

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Give us a little bit about how it all came

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>about and sort of what your strategies are. Sure, So,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I have been a uh PM for probably about I

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, sixteen years, and before that, I started this

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>career as a cell side analyst covering software stocks. Before that,

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I was a software engineer for thirteen years. And I

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>found this world because I went to an MBA program

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to become a salesman essentially of UM software and services.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And I thought I needed to get the vocabulary of business,

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>so I got an m b A and instead I

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>changed careers. It's so crazy because I found finance and

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I love it. So so that's how I got here.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I'm entrepreneurial by nature because I've always

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of been itching to do my own thing, and

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nine I finally took the leap. So I'm

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a equity analyst, and we have some strategies here that

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are based off of the core of what I believe,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's growth at a reasonable price. I believe that

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets always reward growth, but UM, you should be

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>prudent about putting your money to work. So that's kind

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of um what we do, and we do it well.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>And Kim, you and I have been talking for a

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>couple of years now. One of the things we very

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>frequently talked about is your pets and my pet So

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can touch on that a bit. But I

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>also want to ask you about UH tech. I know

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you and I have talked about tech a million times.

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you like certain chip companies. I think you

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like the five G space. Maybe one of your main

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>funds is up forming them this year. So maybe you

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>can tell us a bit more about your your strategy. Sure,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and we'll leave pets to UH in a couple of minutes.

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So so right, Probably because of my first career as

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a software engineer, I see things through the lens of

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>trying to find really good companies that use technology really well.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>What I discovered, um, when I was on the software

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>gig was that certain companies would kind of do well,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not so great things with technology that's been a whole

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. It was cool, it was cutting edge,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't do much for them as a company.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's the kind of software I try to stay

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>away from, right is. You know, just because it's cool

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it's good. So I'm looking for productivity. So

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the thread again, growth a reasonable price, but companies

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that can really deploy technology well. And I also like

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that make technology. Um. Right now, I've figured it

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>out that at the very core of any kind of

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>software is hardware that runs on a chip. So I've

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>been really investing in chips to the uh, you know,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I haven't really found a whole lot of software companies

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that I like at this point, but chips look cheap

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and um. Even though we started right running this portfolio

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>right at the beginning of covid UM, chips have really

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>performed well and they're constrained. But here's the thing. We're

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>going to need more next year and the year after

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and the year after, and I think we're under um

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>estimating how many chips we're going to need because of

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>five G bringing us Internet of Things to be finally

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a thing in the in the corporate world, and I

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>don't bring up pets just to bring up pet Mike.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've read Kim's annual reports, but

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>she she has included I think you once included a

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>picture of your chickens. Was it this past year? I

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>think so. Yes. I have four chickens and everybody works

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in this house. They lay eggs. They are all egg producing. Um.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't had to buy eggs from the store in

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, and I'm glad because my eggs

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>are golden and tasty and not like those sad, mass

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.559
<v Speaker 1>produced yellow eggs. I saw a picture of your chickens.

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm very jealous. I'm an aspiring backyard chicken farmer myself,

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but uh, my neighbors are not do not share my aspirations.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.559
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure if we could uh make that happen.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in retirement, I'll get get finally get those chickens. Um, Chem.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to unpack a little bit about your approach

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to uh looking at chip makers, um and I have

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about this, and as just my style,

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I might pack them all into like a thirty part

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>question for you, so so stand by for that. But

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but but I feel like a lot of investors get

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>intimidated with the semiconductor space because there's so much going on,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>there's so much nuance, and also there's so much sort

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of there's this like boom and bust cycle of of

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>supplying demand. Um. Obviously now we're in this still in

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>this kind of mismatched supplying to demand environment where everyone

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>needs chips. Uh, they're not making enough, you know, for

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>carmakers and other applications. But let's start first with that

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>idea of the sort of you know, the the cycle

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>for chip makers, which it doesn't seem to always be

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 1>correspond with the regular economic cycle. It kind of has

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>its mind of its own um and the share prices

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of through their own thing as well. So is it,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, do you try to time that cycle uh

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of get in and out of these names

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>along with it, or is that is is that as

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>foolish as trying to time the regular market as a whole.

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That is an excellent question with multi parts. So here

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take a shot at it. First, to

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the timing aspect um, I think we're always surprised, both

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to the upside and downside. We're rational people. We look

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>at things and we say, X, Y and Z are

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, and then ABC happens. Right, So I

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>try to take most of the timing away from any

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing other than today's price. Like I have

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a little band of maybe sixty days where I look

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at something and go, that's gonna come back down. I

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>can wait for that, right, So that's my at a

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>reasonable price. Um. That being said, in the world of chips,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there are definite pockets and you can even though you're

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>not a technologist, you can figure these things out. For example,

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>there's one um it's called Micron. It's one of the

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>names we own, the ticker symbols M you. And one

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things that they make is this stuff called

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>nand N A N D And that is a way

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it is a chip, but it is really um storage. Right.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to have electricity. You can put stuff

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on it. It's like those little cards that used to

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have for your camera or your phone. Right that that's

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that is what we're talking about. So that definitely has

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>boom and bust cycles. And it's only because only eight

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>companies make it. So when somebody brings a new line

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>or a new fab online that kind of destroys the

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>whole supply demand um curve. Right, So then the chips

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>get cheap because you know, these are unbelievably expensive fabricating plants.

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>They have to be running at full tilt the whole way,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>or nobody makes any money. So they just keep shoving

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>them out the door. And it's kind of commodity. Now

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. First, not all nanda is at

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it equals some are is getting faster, better, stronger than others. Um,

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So that is kind of adding some discrimination to your

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>ability to pick a better company from. You know, it's

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>no longer commodity. But the second thing is we are

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>so quickly moving away from older storage devices like spinning disks,

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and certainly we don't put anything on metal tape anymore.

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Remember those big tape rooms where okay, yeah, that's gone,

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>that's not a thing anymore. So because of that, I

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna kind of flatten out and we're gonna

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>have boom let cycles, not boom and bust cycles. Right So,

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>because I do think we're just we have so much

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>data that it has to go somewhere, and it's going

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on these nean devices which are now going into um uh,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, enterprise storage areas. So that's thing. One thing

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>too is you can discriminate across the makers of chips

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to high tech, which is like you're in video, right,

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>because they're doing very very fast chips for graphics cards

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for gamers, but all serve for bitcoin mining and I

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>say that with a smile, bitcoin mining and AI, so

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you know you're gonna pay a premium for those chips,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so that it is probably not gonna go in a

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>boom and bust cycle, unless well, they maybe make cyber

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>uh uh currency you know illegal that might that might

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>imbeed that, but um that's probably not your biggest worry anyhow,

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So right, so there are things that you can kind

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of try to avoid, but then again, I don't know.

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes things happen and the demand goes right back up,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I like to have always some exposure.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of the Miss America answer, right, something

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. Kim. Can I ask you how you're thinking

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>about supplying supply chain issues, because I've actually been reading

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>some reports this week, maybe over the last two weeks

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>or so, where more and more people are thinking that

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the supply chain problems are going to be

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>dragging out for longer and longer potentially, And I know

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>chips is a big, big part of this, But how

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about the big picture. Sure, well, I'm

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>going further and further out the timeline because I think

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be UM supply disruptions and a

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is because a lot of the actual

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>especially CPU chips are being made in one central location,

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is Taiwan. And I strongly believe that UM,

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>especially Taiwan Semiconductor, is just going to have to move

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>some of its production around the world to reduce its risk,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>just for no other reason. And I believe other chip

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>makers are going to kind of have to move around

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. So why is this something that we're discussing,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Because I think it gives you opportunity. You can go

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a little further away from actually owning chips to maybe

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>owning things like UM we own software that helps you

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to design chips, so you can do that. You could

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>invest in the companies that make the machines that make

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the chips right, And I encourage people to think about

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>that because I think demand is going up, but so

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is UM. You know, risk remediation. So they're gonna have

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to build these fabs away from off of Taiwan into

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>other areas of the world, and that will drive a

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of spending that you can take advantage of

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>because there's relatively few makers of the things that make chips.

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>With all the sort of nationalism sweeping the world and

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>even the supply chain issues we've seen, it seems like

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>that is something yet that you must be preparing for

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in the futures. This this kind of you know, big

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>electronic manufacturers bringing chips production in house, and and you

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>know people trying to produce their own fabrication plants, make

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>their own fabrication plants, like even in the US. That's

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that Is that a real? Is that really where the

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>industry is going, do you think? Or is it just

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of being hype that way? I think it's being

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>hyped that way. But I could see centers around the world,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like in probably tax friendly and resource friendly areas, And

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Intel's chips are still made in the US, so I

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think that is always going to stay that way, right,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but I can see it maybe moving over to I

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Ireland, because you know, they've been a friend

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>of pharma, So why not be a friend of tech.

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>They're they're just really good about allowing people to come

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in and they know how to handle that. So so

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that there could be these pockets around the

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>world of technology. And you know, it's not perfect where

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, Belgium has its own you know, chip making plant,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so does Luxembourg. I mean, I think

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that's getting kind of crazy, you know, too too small.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But I do think having all of the uh computing

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of the world being made in one area is not

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the smartest thing. And let's take geopolitical out of it.

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>They have earthquakes there. It's it's just not super smart, right, Yeah, Okay,

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>let's get to all the all the various things I

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>promised in the introduction here, which I I promise our

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>listeners you will explain with great authority, which is, you know,

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we've had this this long, ferocious rally. Now, I mean

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we call it a seven month rally. It's it's you know,

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really longer than that eighteen month rally. Just those

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>seven consecutive months, and now you know, we do sort

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of all. I've gained the confidence that the FED is

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting ready to start taping, tapering asset purchases.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I wonder you know how important was that in your

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>opinions to the rally? Uh? And does tapering matter given

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, that reopening uh trend that's going

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on with all these people with you know, swollen savings

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>accounts now to some degree or not, you know, maybe

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not fully ready to take those cruise ships, but at

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>least ready to go out and eat and maybe you know,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>do something besides sit on zoom calls and watch Netflix

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>all day? You know, is tapering a sort of a

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>boogeyman that we don't have to worry about giving all

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>those other forces in the real economy. I'm not usually

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a fan of, Oh, I don't know, collective government thought, right, Like,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm an American, I'm you know, independent, I'm a hippie,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm whatever you wanna, you know. But I think the

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Fed has done exactly the right thing in these last

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months. And we're gonna get to that answer about

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>how it's affected the markets. Right. So the thing it

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>did was bring rates down immediately back to that zero

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like sorry, quarter of basis point close enough to zero

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we call it zero interest rates, right, And then they

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>did they understood from the two thousand and eight time

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>frame that to really make sure that interest rates stay low,

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to do these bond purchases, so they've been

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>doing that now. I think what Powell's theory is this,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and this came through so clear to me, or maybe

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>he was just talking. What I believe is you have

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to get people back to work, all of them that can.

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And that is his focus, not an on not on inflation,

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but on getting people back to work. And that is

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>going to make it palatable to be weaned off of

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the bond purchases because I don't believe that interest rates

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>will shoot back up, right, And I'm talking when I

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>talk interest rates, I'm talking the tenure, So the ten

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>uere isn't going to go like a two in a

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>minute and a half after they start or start tapering. Right.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think in stock prices, we always look at

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>PE price over earnings. So right now we're at high

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>PE right where we are paying more for that stream

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of cash flows. So we have to be willing to

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>pay more for these companies. What we need to do

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is have the earnings grow so the PE follow falls,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but the price doesn't fall. Does that make sense. I'm

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to do math on radio, so it's really tough.

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>But you know, this is a division problem, and you

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to make the price change all that much

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>whenever you're raising interest rates. And I think Powell is

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to guarantee that companies will have more earnings if

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the economies back to more or less full speed. And

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's why he's been judicious about not cutting these the

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bond purchases before this, because he's seen these uh. I

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's clear voiant. He's just been overly cautious

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and been paid back with all of the variant kind

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>of noise in the system. Does that make sense? It

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, And I have I do have a follow

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>up in UH in that I've read a couple of

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>reports again reports, and I spent all my time reading

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>reports and notes, but a few of them this week

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>said that we're back in a bad news is good

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>news environment. I know the ADP number disappointed this week,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly when I started seeing some of those notes.

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>So I'm wondering if if that makes sense to you,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>if potentially we could be in another bad news is

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>good news environment. Yeah, I mean everybody loves low interest rates.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Everybody on Wall Street, let's put it that way, except

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 1>for the banks themselves, love love low interest rates. And

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>it's because it gives us the freedom to continue buying

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>those cash flows at elevated ratios. Right So, we're paying

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what thirty seven times forward earnings for Microsoft right now,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, huge, But if their earnings can

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow while interest rates fall, then their price

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't fall, you know, uh can Before we get to

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>our Craziest Things segment, I also wanted to talk just

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>briefly about UM, your sector neutral strategy, which I know

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>is doing well this year, outperforming the SMP at least UM,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>which obviously is doing well this year. Talk to me

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>about sort of what is the appeal of going sector neutral?

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my guess is that there are certain investors

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.239
<v Speaker 1>who want to be exposed to growth but don't want

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to be overloaded with tech. Maybe is that? Is that? It?

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>In a nutshell, it is, and I mean I kind

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of when I came up with it, I was trying

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to do risk remediation. Because the strategy was made UM

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we started running it for another advisor and you know,

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>doing it for their clients and Boca as a subadvisor,

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so they wanted more growth, but not like scary growth,

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and I said, sure, we can do this sector neutral

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>thing which will force my hand is a portfolio manager

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to maintain, you know, alignment with the all of the sectors.

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is this important? A lot of people who are

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>running money will say things like I hate energy, I'm

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have any energy. And then when energy does

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>really well any year, they get their clock cleaned. Right, Well,

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>who cares about the manage? Are the people who are

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>holding those assets get their clock cleaned? And you know

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that's tough. What it really is a great little way

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to take a little bit of risk off the table.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But what we're doing is this is where UM. The

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>SNP five is the benchmark. The SNP five has a

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>lot concentrated in those top five names, right, so we're

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>going further down into the market cap, you know, lower

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>market caps. And the great thing is some of the

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks I've picked have been scooped up by larger companies.

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>And it's been great so far, right because you know,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>now I have to find another smaller company for healthcare

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>because one of my UM stocks is getting taken out

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's a double in eighteen months. I'll take that

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>all day. So that's kind of reinforcing. Now you have

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a good stock picker. You have to pick

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, good stocks and you know come a needs

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that other companies want to buy. I mean, that's not

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.239
<v Speaker 1>why I'm doing it. I just said, oh, this is

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody with an unusual product line and looks poised for growth.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that gives you an opportunity to participate

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>in that cycle of smaller companies being bought by larger companies,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and so far it's working. It's it's a fascinating phenomenon

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like a lot of managers of either

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>small caps are all caps type of funds. They never

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>say they explicitly are looking for takeover targets, but that

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>always ends up being sort of a big source of

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>their their positive returns. I mean, I guess you drive

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>yourself nuts just trying to look for targets exclusively. Well

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you can't. But what I've found is if you get quality,

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like everybody's looking for the same thing, I don't care

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>if it's an investor or a company that wants to

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>grow and they say, oh, we'll do We'll buy instead

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of build Okay, I mean that's what every company is

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>doing if you can find that team of good managers

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that are made cut products that customers love. And this

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't just regular like retail customers. Corporate customers can love

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a product too, and if you're good at making that product,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you are a candidate for takeover. And yeah, and it's

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a good it's a good gig. And at another good gig, Bildonna,

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm really struggling for the segway here, but uh, let's

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>go with that. Another good gig is the crazy Things segment.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Stand clear of the craziest things we saw in markets

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this week. That's a good gig for you, of Aldonna.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>So you start us off, what's the craziest thing you

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>saw in markets this week? Well, before we get to

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>what the craziest thing I saw was, I wanted to

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>remind everybody that everybody can give us a call at

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>six four six three to four zero, leave us a

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>voicemail and we may even play it on the show.

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Another way to get your craziest thing on the show

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is to send me a Twitter message, which which somebody

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>did earlier this week. And so I want to give

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>doctor at Dr Einstein a shout out. I really hope

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm pronouncing that correctly. Of course, his real name, I'm

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>sure it is. Doctor is his first name. Einstein is

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>his second name. Uh, and I say Stein because there's

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a little underscore, a little dash between the one

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and the stein. So forgive me, but um, he and

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I have been exchanging messages on Twitter, and he and he,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>so he sent me something about some of the market.

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Mattes is that he's seen in the NFS n f

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>T space once again. I know we we covered that

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>last week, but he said there's an alternative, earlier version

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Ether Rocks contract that lets anyone meant a

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>uniquely numbered rock for free. The crazy thing is that

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone can mint basically any uniquely numbered rock, and there's

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>wild speculation on the value of those rocks, which don't

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>even have a picture or n f T token. So

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>these Ether rocks, I've been these hugely popular n f

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>T s. They're supposed to be only a hundred of them.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And so he was flagging to us that there's this code,

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>there's there's something we're going on with the code where

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you can actually I suppose make new copies. I really

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>hope I'm doing this do justice. But you can create

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>more of them, and some of them don't even have

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a picture attached to them. And these things are like

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>just like with everything else in the end of T

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>space there there, everybody's going nuts over them. Basically. I

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>think I feel like Kim hears all this and she

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>just thinks in video and video and video. No, I'm

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking back to my youth and thinking pet rocks like

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that was the thing and you can't escape it, man,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It just it mutates their time. Gosh, I think that

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was the idea behind ether rocks. It was the was

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 1>it in the seventies and the eighties? It was rocks, right,

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's the inspiration. That's pretty good anyway.

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>It's fun to cover cover this n f T stuff.

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>There's just something. There's always something going on over there.

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But I want to give Dr Einstein a shout out.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for sending that. Thank you, Dr Einstein. If that

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is in fact your real dame, All right, well what's

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>your crazy thing? Now? You can't rely completely on Dr

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Einstein here, I can't, but I try to top his

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and mine is like really far out there. So I

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>hope you like it. But it's uh, it's this story

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that I saw. It's about Flame and Hot mountain Dew.

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So PepsiCo owns Mountain Dew. They have this brand new

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>flavor for Flame and Hot Cheetos flavored mountain Dew drinks.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>It was immediately sold out, and so I think on

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the internet there's speculation over, you know, when they're going

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to restock and when people can buy this sweet and

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>sour mountain dew again. But it also made me think

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of this story that's been making its rounds sutainly. It's

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>about the guy who claims he invented hot Cheetos either

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this one. Yeah, yeah. His name is Richard montagne Is.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>He even wrote a book about it, and there's I

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think some speculation over how much he was involved with

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the creation of hot Cheetos or something. Right, and he

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>took it to the he was, yeah, that's that's the

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>name of the book. It's it's called Flame and Hot,

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>The incredible true story of one man's rise from janitor

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to top executive. Eva Longoria is making a movie about this,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so be on the lookout for that. Anyway. That's my

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>craziest thing. We have this public company involved Peptico owns

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>as I said, Mountain the Mountain Dew brand, and I

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know if i'd give it a try.

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I love hot Cheetos, but I don't know if i'd

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>give the Mountain me neither. I don't know. Maybe I

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>would probably try it, but uh, we'll see. We'll see

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>how how big of a success that that one is.

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I have my doubts on that one, but maybe I

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>can get my hands on it. We can next time

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're in the office. Do you do that? You first?

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>You first? If you if your face doesn't crinkle up,

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>then maybe maybe I'll try it. But um, I'm gonna

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>do mine really quick, just because I want to. I

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>want to get kims into But um, you know, the

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Game Stop drama never ceases. I remember us. I think

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>we joked uh last year even about well, if it

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>stays at these levels, maybe they'll add it to the

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred. Uh, and everyone chuckled, ha ha ha,

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>like it's ever gonna stay at these levels. Two's weren't that,

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>But sure enough The Journal While Street Journal has a

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>story out this week speculating on whether or not Game

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Stop could be added to the sp five hundred. It's

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>way bigger than some of the smallest members of the index,

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but doesn't uh, it doesn't meet all the criteria including, uh,

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, having profits in the last quarter, and I

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think it has to have a sort of a net

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>profit over the trailing four quarters. But we'll see. Stranger

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>things have happened. I suppose then game stop joining the

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>SMP and not. Leavan had a good argument, a good

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>column arguing, well, you know, should the committee actually keep

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this out if it meets the qualifications just because everything

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone thinks it's crazy, And he suggests a weird SMP

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>index to capture all these stocks and a normal SMP index.

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know. I think there might be something

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to that sector neutral and weirdness neutral. Kim, what do

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you think is that the next big thing? I I

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that. I would like a weird stock index.

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we I think somebody should put it together.

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>How about us three, let's get together, because you know,

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>if dal Jones can do it, we could do our

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>own thing. Right. We could just have like, what are

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the weirdest stocks in? And they could be penny stock. Um.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember years. I don't know if this will count

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is my weird thing. But years and years ago, UM,

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when I worked at the asset management firm before the

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>one I started, UM, I had to be the girl

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that answer or the person that answered all the client's

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>questions on should I invest in this? My brother in

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>law told me about this, right, we all know that

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of it was a great beat. I was

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so glad to get off of that. Okay, Anyhow, the

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>weirdest one was a company. Now this was a penny

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>stock truly, it traded like two cents or something like that.

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>It was growing plankton and then getting carbon credits for

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>releasing plankton into the ocean. Can I make this up? Now?

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I cannot, And I said, no, this is not a

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>good idea. I don't know, like I don't know who

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>would pay for it. I you know, there were no

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>carbon markets at that time or and I didn't even

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>know like they didn't explain how that the credits would work,

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like who was giving them credits and where they could be,

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know what I mean, there was a big

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.479
<v Speaker 1>missing thing. But I just think just growing plankton, I

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think that could end you up in the weird stockuments.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I would I would give a high waiting to that one,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I think for sure, regardless of the market. Yeah, big tanks,

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>like in somebody's basement. I don't know where do you

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>grow up, plankton, I think it has to be in

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a basement. Absolutely, that's where you gotta start. If not

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a garage, maybe, I don't know. Yes, no, No, that's

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that's too exposed. The plank didn't like it dark. Yeah,

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's too Silicon Valley. Yeah. Here in

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Touching we have a major krill uh Harvester has

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a has a headquarters there. Krill is a big thing

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for the fish oil tablets. So but at least that's

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a better use case. I suppose that U or

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>carbon credits for that's pretty good to Kim. I don't

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>know if that was your official craziest thing, but I

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>like that one. Thank you. And with that, I think, Philana,

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all the time we have. What do

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you think, Phil Dana? I allow you to anoint the

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>winner of this week's craziest Thing? Can I pick myself

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or not? Absolutely? Not? No, yesterday, let me think about it.

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll consider it. I'll picked myself for approximately podcasts in

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a row, so I guess you can pick yourself. You did,

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but dr Einstein again. Uh he Actually he sent me

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different topics. All of them were in

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of T space and all of them were interesting.

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So maybe maybe we can Dr Einstein it is. Although

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I like to plankton, I gotta say I'm gonna do

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a planked plankton f t S. I think it's gonna

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be my thing. I want to work on that. Kim First,

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for your time. Go take care of

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>those chickens. Thank you. What Goes Up We'll be back

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>next week. Until then, you can find us on the

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal, website and app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>We'd of it if you took the time to rate

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and review the show on Apple Podcasts so more listeners

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can find us, and you can find us on Twitter.

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Follow me at Reaganonymous. Bildonna high Rich is at Bildonna

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>high Rich. You can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts at podcasts

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and Thank you to Charlie Pelldo, Bloomberg Radio and the

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>voice of the New York City Subway System. What Goes

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Up is produced by Tofur Foreheads, head of Bloomberg podcasts

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is Francesco Levy, thanks for listening, See you next time.