WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Mars, Kellanova Deal, New Starbucks CEO

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinel and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 4>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 3>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 5>These are two.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 4>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex steel and Paul'sweenye on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 3>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 3>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 4>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Today we'll discuss a leadership shakeup at the coffee chain Starbucks.

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Plus we'll look at why the US Justice Department and

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 4>maybe considering a breakup of Alphabet's Google.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 3>But first we dive into a big deal in the

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 3>M and A space.

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 4>This year, Mars agreed to buy Calenova for nearly thirty

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 4>six billion dollars and this brings together two major food

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 4>companies and the biggest deal this year.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>And this comes as a package food industry has been

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 3>grappling with declimbing volumes, slow in growth, and a weakening

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>global consumer.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 4>For more, we are adorned by Jennifer Bartasha's Bloomberg Intelligence

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 4>senior analyst Retail, staples and packaged Food. We first asked

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Jennifer why this Mars Kelenova deal is actually happening.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of things. The first is, you know,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>from a Mars portfolio perspective, when it comes to the

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>snacking category, they are heavily exposed to chocolate and coco

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>has been a structural issue in terms of cost for

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a while and we think that's going to continue indefinitely.

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And so this helps them diversify out that snacking side

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of their portfolio, and it also helps them do a

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more in emerging markets, which is an area

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>where Kelenova has some strength.

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 4>So, okay, so is it offense or defense from that perspective,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 4>because it feels like it could be a combination both

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 4>like diverse by away from just pure cocoa but also expand.

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's a combination of the two. It's

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on the cocoa side, it's a little bit of risk mitigation,

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and helping to ease some of the costs

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling there. And you know, traditionally chocolate has held

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>up actually really well through the pandemic and after the pandemic,

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>but we're finally starting to see a little bit of

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>weakness and consumer demand for chocolate just because of food inflation,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and so diversification will will certainly help with that. And

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>then you know, on a global basis, Mars has leading

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're in the top three market share in

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>almost every region in confectionery, and so having more of

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the salty snack side and getting more into that can

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>only consolidate their market share position in a lot of

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>leading global, you know, regions.

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Jen, what makes us deal really interesting for me is

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 3>the Mars company. Because it's a private company. What do

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>we know about Mars? Maybe I don't know the size capitalization,

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 3>did they ever talk to investors.

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Very rarely, you know, but what they have disclosed, you know,

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>their annual revenue is a little over fifty billion dollars,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So definitely a sizable company. And what I think is

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>very interesting is when you break that revenue down, nearly

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of their revenue is coming from pet food.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So although everybody associates Mars with chocolate, the larger portion

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of their business is pet and so they own the

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Pedigree brand, they own the Whiskers brand, and that is

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a big powerhouse for them. That's part of the reason

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>we think there actually won't be a lot of FTC

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>pushback on this because it's a smaller port of their

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and the products are there's really no overlap between

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>what Kelenova does and what Mars does.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Amazingly, I did not know that.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I did not know that at all.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Why we love John Bartras. I mean, that would kill them,

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 4>but sure right, dogs can't have chocolate from that thing.

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 4>And so Jen, does this mean we're going to see

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot of other m and A in the space?

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 4>And if so, sort of who and where would we

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 4>see that.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a lot of a sentiment towards tuck In

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>acquisition over the last couple of years. But there are

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>some pressures that are affecting the industry. So when you

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to what all of these package food companies are

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>saying their priority for twenty twenty four and headed into

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five is regaining volume. But the problem is

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that consumers not yet in a position where they're buying

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>bigger volumes of food, and so M and A is

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a potential route to be able to better navigate the market.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>So you know, in this instance, with this deal, we're

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>expecting over a billion dollars in synergies between Mars and Kelenova,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>coming from procurement, coming from manufacturing, things like that. So

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that this deal may spark at least some

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>consideration for larger deals again in the package food space,

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as they're trying to find ways to contain costs, expand

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>their geographic and product footprint at a time when it's

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to spend to spur consumers into buying greater volumes,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So it may be an alternative for them.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>In food inflation, you cover the package good companies, you

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 3>cover the grocery stores as well. Those prices, while the

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 3>rate of inflation has slowed, those prices ain't coming down,

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 3>are they.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>They're coming down, but very very slowly. And so if

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>you look on it on a basis, you know, comparison

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>back to twenty nineteen, food prices are still almost twenty

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>percent higher than they were in twenty nineteen. In certain

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>categories where there's been relief, especially from the cost of commodities.

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So as corn has come down and soy has come down,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and wheat has come down, sugar has come down, we've seen,

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know a little bit of price relief, but it's

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>going to take some time for that to really translate

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>into something that consumers feel in their pocketbook instead of

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>just individual products being you know, either not getting increases

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>or coming down slightly in price.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 4>So which company in your space do you feel like

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 4>is doing pretty well on the margin and the top

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 4>line side, because if margins are going to get squeezed,

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 4>you need the top line to grow. But the top

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 4>line is still really struggling with consumers right now. So

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 4>who's managing that the best?

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, up until the probably the the you know,

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the last quarter or two, Mandalies has actually navigated that

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty well, you know, because the demand for suites and

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>indulgences has had held up pretty well. You know, companies

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that do have that exposure to snacking, generally speaking, are

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>doing better overall than companies that are more center store,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and I would point to Kraft Hines as an example

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of center store or Campbell's Soup as a center store type.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Is center store, I mean, I haven't heard that before.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So center store is when you're in a grocery store.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Everything that's not on the outside, so it usually is

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>like shelf stable products. So think about your canned soups,

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>your pasta, your pasta sauces, things like that. Those are

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the pantry staples that most people you know purchase. And

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>then the perimeter is of course all of your fresh food.

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Jennifer Bartasha's Bloomberg Intelligence senior retail analyst, we move.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Next to the home improvement retailer home Depot. This week,

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 4>home Deepot reported quarterly earnings and sales that top analyst expectations,

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 4>but the.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Company cautioned that sales will be weaker than expected in

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 3>the back half of the year. Home Depot cited high

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>interest rates and economic uncertainty.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 4>For more and all of this. We were joined by

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Red Brown, Bloomberg News earnings reporter, and we first asked

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Red to break down what home Depot's numbers actually mean.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 6>I think overall kind of the message that I'm sort

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 6>of taking away from the results is this seems like

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 6>they might have kind of found bottom. If we look

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 6>the last six quarters, they've seen earnings top and bottom

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 6>line shrinking, and then for the first time since twenty

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 6>twenty three, things are flattening out a little bit. So, yes,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 6>they cut the top line outlook maybe a bit of

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 6>a reset there, But I think there's a lot to

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 6>be optimistic about these results.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think I guess one of the questions that

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I had, just being a grizzled veteran having listened to

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a million conference calls, is you know, suggesting that maybe

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 3>this is a little bit temporary, that maybe these are

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 3>purchases that are being deferred in anticipation of lower rates.

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>How does that kind of stand with you? I mean,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it does.

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 6>I think I maybe I believe it a little bit

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 6>more than that. It sounds like you two might just

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 6>because the one thing that analysts are putting to a

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 6>lot is contractors backlogs. So those are you know, contracted

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 6>that they are expected to eventually fulfill. It's just a

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 6>matter of when the customers are ready to actually you know,

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 6>follow through with that and say yep, let's do it.

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 6>You know, those are long term projects to take several months,

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 6>so it's not something that people are kind of likely

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 6>to back out of their big something you probably need

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 6>to get financing for as well. So it's it's you know,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 6>it's a significant commitment for the consumer. And yeah, I

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 6>mean this deferral mindset I think is an interesting way

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 6>to spin the situation for for Home Deeper right now.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's interesting. So you have contractor backlog because customers

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 4>want to get their project in the queue, but they're

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 4>not putting down the money for it yet. So it's

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 4>always like, hmmmm, is that kind of wind the economy really turns?

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 4>What winds up happening? So I guess if we just say, okay,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 4>we're at the trough, I wonder if we have any

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 4>visibility yet into what the recovery then looks like for

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 4>a home depot.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I think, you know, if we look into

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 6>what they said the commentary around the guidance cuts, they said,

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 6>if it's going to be the same store sales, the

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 6>top end is down three percent this year. They're saying

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 6>that that will happen if things stay stable from the

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 6>first half of the year, and right now they say

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 6>all signs point to consumer demand like staying at that

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 6>same level, and they're not guiding towards the bottom end

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 6>of that range right now. So right now, that seems

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 6>to be where the company is at with some positive

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 6>outlook here as well.

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm just looking at the chart here and

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 3>just thinking back to the pandemic that stuck you know,

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 3>was up about one hundred and seventy percent from you know,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the pandemic through the end of twenty

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty one. It's come off since then. So that was

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 3>just such a moonshot for the company. What does the

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>company say about the consumer their business kind of now

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>versus pre pandemic. Did they ever put it in that

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 3>kind of context.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, the reason for that ride up, if you remember,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 6>was because of so much DIY activity. Everyone was stuck home.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I'm tired of looking at this shelf, Let

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 6>me fix it, or I hate this paint color.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 5>Whatever it was.

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 6>Now there's a little bit less of that, just because

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 6>we're spending less time at home, you know, we have

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 6>less time on our hands, and Home Depot is kind

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 6>of accepted that that they're not going to see those

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 6>levels as much anymore, and what they are focusing and

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 6>similar thing happening at Low's as well, is focusing on

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 6>that contractor business. It's a higher margin business, it's a

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 6>little bit more consistent. And we saw what their their

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 6>latest acquisition, eighteen billion dollar acquisition for SRS Distribution, and

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 6>that is part of this pivot towards can we capture

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 6>more of the market share for those contractors.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, love me some contractors working with some right

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 4>now in the Berkshires. The allowance for my kitchen island

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 4>was huge.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Are there good contractors up like in that part of

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 3>the world.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, really good? Yeah, Okay, I mean we went

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 4>to one we didn't do like comparison shopping because this

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 4>company had, like we done our roof, had did our

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 4>did our kitchens, like we'd already worked with them for

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 4>the last you know, ten fifteen years. Read when you

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 4>take a look at earnings in general, so you're your

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 4>earnings reporter, like this is as your jam. What are

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 4>some of the takeaways that we can learn from earnings

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 4>in general? Right now?

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 6>I think with home depot it's just a kind of

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 6>repetition of this same pattern in retail, which is consumers

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 6>are trading down you know, last year there was so

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 6>much were when is it happening? When is it happening?

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 6>And it's kind of been slowly trickling in quarter over

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 6>quarter more people are trading down or what that looks

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 6>like on the ground is I'm delaying some of those

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 6>bigger purchases, those bigger, high margin for the company's purchases.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm focusing on what I need. And I think Walmart

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 6>will be the kind of exemplar example of that of people.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm just looking at you know what I need.

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 6>I need food, I need groceries, I need toiletries, things

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 6>like that, and then maybe I'll delay until I get

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more clarity on when I'm going to

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 6>buy that TV.

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 3>So for our home depot, I think I just think

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 3>of walking into home depot and boyd there's a lot

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 3>of stuff. They're huge, huge stores and there's a lot

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 3>of stuff there. Talk to us about inventory. Inventory management,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I know for some of these big box retailers is huge.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 3>What are they saying these days?

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 6>So one thing to look for the inventory is actually

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 6>the transportation costs have been coming down, So I think

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 6>overall that just speaks to an easy supply chain for

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 6>home depot, so they are able to manage a little

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 6>bit better. In general, they're managing their costs quite well.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 6>That's part of the reason that they were able to

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 6>kind of flatten out the earnings trough there. And yeah,

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 6>I think overall the inventory has been shifting well and

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 6>they are, you know, they have so much stuff there,

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 6>able to manage it well and they're able to get

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 6>the products that people want in the stores.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Red Brown, Bloomberg News Earnings Reporter.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, Starbucks has a new CEO. We're going to

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 4>break down the leadership change. Next.

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 3>b I go on the terminal.

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and m Alex Steel, and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.599
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo car Playing and

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 2>broud Oto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 4>We look next to a shake up at the copy

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 4>chain Starbucks. This week, Starbucks out did its CEO and

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 4>picture otlet Mexican Real CEO Brian Nickel as its next leader.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 4>For more and all of this, we are joined by

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Jody Lori Bloomberg Intelligence credit Analysts, and we first asked

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 4>Jody for her reaction to this week's news.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 7>I think, as the credit analysts were always sort of

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 7>hesitant when there's these full scale changes that happen overnight,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 7>and when you've had a CEO that's only been there

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 7>since March of last year, so we have just only

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 7>gotten comfortable with the concept they were giving back twenty

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars and now you have two activists investors very

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 7>heavily involved, one getting a board seat and pushing out

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 7>the CEO with a new CEO. That could be a

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 7>positive for the company long term in terms of performance.

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 7>But I do also think that shareholders might make it

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 7>better than bondholders at this point.

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Why do you say that you think they're just going

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 3>to maybe start returning cash shareholders.

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 5>I think they'll get a little bit more aggressive with that, Paul.

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think you know, it could end up

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 7>being the type of thing that they look at the

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 7>company and that you sort of think about ways to

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 7>sort of boost the value, whether it be spin off

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 7>some entity or what have you. I'm not sure what

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 7>entity they could spin off to Starbucks because so much

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 7>of the non core business has already been peeled away.

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 7>That said, I mean, I think that when when you're

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 7>dealing with activists, you're always sort of hesitant because you say, Okay,

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 7>how much are they going to risk the balance sheet?

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 7>How much are they going to lever to get the

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 7>company into a different spot. Now that might be a

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 7>short term pain for long term gain, but for bond holders,

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 7>when you think about that short term pain, that's not

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 7>always necessarily the best thing. Which you know, we have

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 7>a long history of yam for for example, you know,

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 7>which which the new CEO is part of. When they

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 7>spun off their entity Young China, you know, they ended

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 7>up giving back so much of their money to shareholders.

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Which then to the point breaks a question like how

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 4>is Starbucks actually doing from a bond holder perspective.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 7>From a bond holder perspective, you know, over the past year,

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 7>they've been a little bit more volatile. Something that that's

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 7>very clear that we've been tracking is the aldi the

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg second measure data.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, okay, so.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 4>Wait, first all, what is this? Because I got to

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 4>be honest, for I've never heard of this before, and

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned it and you're going to talk about it,

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 4>and now I'm a little obsessed with it.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 7>It is pretty amazing, Alex, particularly when it comes to Starbucks,

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 7>because the R squared or you know, the sort of

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 7>predictive value of it is pretty great when it comes

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 7>to Starbucks in particular.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 5>So what it is. It's credit card and debitcard.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 7>Swipes only in the United States, and Bloomberg aggregates the data.

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 7>You can see it. You can see it both on

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 7>a year over year basis. You can see it on

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 7>an actual value basis. If you look at the year

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 7>over year where it's trending, it's actually very much down

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to sales and transactions, which is not

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 7>surprising because they've had a couple of sort of disappointing points,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 7>one of them being geopolitics, so the Astro turf effort

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 7>related to the Middle East. The other portion is obviously

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 7>China and the fact that they really went all in

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 7>on China and it's been a little bit of a disappointment.

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 7>And then you've also just had consumers pulling back in

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 7>terms of their spending on things like Starbucks, McDonald's, what

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 7>have you. And so companies have been trying to just

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 7>get people in the door. Now if you look at

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 7>it for you know, transaction value, or if you look

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 7>at you know, the PLACER data which we also have

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 7>embedded on the terminal, and the placer data is down,

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 7>so that's estimated visits. So people physically going into stores

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 7>has been down recently. And so how does the new

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 7>CEO get these people back? How does he get them

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 7>comfortable with the Starbucks that we used to know and love.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure talk.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 3>To us about China, because I know you've flagged that before.

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 3>It talks about China and what it means for Starbucks.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 7>I think China means a lot of things for a

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 7>lot of the companies in our space. I think it's

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 7>been a very common word, more so than normal when

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 7>it comes to across the consumer and leisure space.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 7>So if you listen to earning calls this quarter, anyone

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 7>from Hilton to Hyatt to you know, even the cruise

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 7>lines have been mentioning China either as an avenue for

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 7>growth or as a disappointment for an avenue for growth.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we haven't seen the value of China. We've

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 7>seen sort of.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.239
<v Speaker 5>The sluggish, slow growth of late.

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 7>And for someone like Starbucks that last year they mapped

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 7>out their plan and they said, we're going to be

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 7>building out more stores in China and that's our international

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 7>growth plan, and that's how we're getting the company back

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 7>on track. All of a sudden, you don't necessarily have that.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean that's kind of a big problem.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and when they talk about like strategic options for

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 4>that are partnerships, what does that wind up looking like?

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 4>They're not gonna spin it off, right, So it's not

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 4>gonna be a Yum and Yum brand's China kind of situation.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 4>So how do you digest that?

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it could be a Yum and China situation.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 7>Who knows what's on the table at this point. I mean,

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 7>we could fathom any sort of measures. I mean, most

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 7>of Starbucks stores are owned, but then when it comes

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 7>to international it's a little less so.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 5>And even places like you know, I mentioned the cruise lines.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 7>You know, we were on a Royal Caribbean ship a

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 7>couple months ago and they had a like in our.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Bas always like, remember at the time, I was on

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 4>that cruise and it was really awesome. Sorry continue.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 7>They did actually have a collector mug for Icond of

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 7>the Seas that I did buy, which was a Starbucks mug,

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 7>but it was Starbucks with a bunch of Icon of

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 7>the Sea stuff.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 5>I had to get it. I mean, it was two

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 5>companies I cover.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 3>I was like, I can't one shot. Well, on the

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 3>flip side of this this transaction Chipotle, what's the outlook there,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 3>what's the feeling there in the street.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 7>So Chippote is an interesting one because they don't really

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 7>have that much dead outstanding. So it's one that you know,

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 7>Mike Hallen really deeply covers. We a little less, so

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 7>we cover it from the standpoint that obviously it's a

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 7>very important player in the space. It's that fast casual

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 7>we love talking about Yalm and obviously Chipotte sort of

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 7>lines in perfectly with Yalm and it's sort of that

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 7>intersection between Yum and Darden, which we like talking about.

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 7>And so I mean, I think, you know, Chippote obviously

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 7>had a lot of negative headlines. We're talking five years ago,

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, in terms of safety for their food, which

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 7>is obviously never never a good thing. Since then, they've

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 7>turned around the company quite substantially. Now, I don't know

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 7>what this means when you have a Darling CEO jump

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 7>ship and go to another company. I'm not quite sure

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 7>what we'd expect there. I do sort of wonder what

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 7>shareholders are.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Thinking our thanks to Jody Lourie, Bloomberg Intelligence credit Anios.

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>We move next to my favorite space energy. We have

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 4>something here at Bloomberg called Bloomberg New Energy Finance. The

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 4>idea behind it is to provide data on commodities, power, transport, industries,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 4>buildings and agriculture and new technology.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 3>This week we looked at battery storage, because you can't

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 3>make a transition if you can't store the energy for more.

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 3>We're dravened by Yea yu Sakhani, head of Energy storage

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 3>research at Bloomberg, and.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 4>We first ask Yayo just how much energy storage we

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 4>realistically need going forward and how hard is it to

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 4>get there?

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 8>To give you some context, when we talk about storage,

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 8>we're talking about multiple types of technologies. You mentioned batteries specifically,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 8>we're really talking about many tarotwood hours of battery storage

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 8>capacity that's a little bit hard to make it tangible.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 8>But just to give you some context on where the

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 8>market is today, we are at about one point two

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 8>tarotwood hours of total batteries Tara what hours, Yeah, exactly, Yeah,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 8>so that's yeah, when you get to Terra's that's that's

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 8>pretty big, it's bigger.

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank okay, thank you exactly.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 8>So essentially where we're at is like we've had record

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 8>years in terms of total deployment of batteries in the world,

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 8>and the this is in the form of both evs,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 8>so batteries that go in electric vehicles, that's in the Tesla's,

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 8>the byds that you see being sold, as well as

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 8>in stationary storage markets. So that's like big grid batteries

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 8>that are installed to shift solar and wind generation to

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 8>evening hours as well as you know, some people are

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 8>installing them in their homes because they would like to

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 8>have some backup power or they have their own solar

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 8>system and they would like to shift some of that

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 8>energy to their evening consumption. So that's that's quite a

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 8>lot and definitely records still continuing to be broken.

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 3>There is the efficiency of batteries. Is that getting better?

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 3>And how does it get better?

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, good question. There, so they are they have

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 8>been getting better. So a lot of the trajectory around

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 8>batteries and improvement on technologies is very much focused around

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 8>with immine batteries. We've seen over the last decade improvement

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 8>in many aspects of the technology, so becoming more energy

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 8>dense so you can carry more energy storage capacity.

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like it's not one or two hours, maybe

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 4>it could be days.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.719
<v Speaker 8>It could be it could be days. Although today the

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 8>majority of the systems that we're seeing deployed are pretty

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 8>much two four hours. There is some extension of that

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 8>so that that means like we can shift more energy

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 8>to maybe not another like the next day, but maybe

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 8>then a day in the next week. But primarily today

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 8>the majority of the use cases are are generally two

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 8>four hours within a day.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 4>Why is it so hard to increase storage life? Like,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 4>why is it so hard to go from a couple

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 4>hours to longer?

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 8>So it's not technically hard to do, it's more about

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 8>the cost. So once you start looking at multiple hours

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 8>and multiple days, that means you have to add more

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 8>energy storage duration, more capex to that project. And if

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 8>there isn't really a mechanism for you to be paid

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 8>for that additional investment that you're adding the more batteries

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 8>for for duration, You're not really going to want to

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 8>do that as somebody who's building these batteries, and so

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 8>it's it's a lot of it is related to what

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 8>is the market paying for today and what the market

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 8>needs to day in the future. Our expectation and based

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 8>on VNIF analysis, is that we're going to see longer

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 8>duration needs and that's primarily because we're going to be

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 8>we're going to need to be shifting more solar and

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 8>more WIN generation to other hours and for longer periods.

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 8>If we're decommissioning those gas plants that are currently providing

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 8>that service.

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 3>What are the next in terms of batteries and stores,

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 3>what's the next thing that lay people like Alex and

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I and John we should be looking for thinking.

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 8>About so some exciting things aside from the market level stuff,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 8>which is like as I mentioned, record levels of battery

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 8>capacity being deployed. Probably it's more about like the evs

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 8>becoming more more affordable. So if you want to go

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 8>into the store and buy instead of buying conventional car,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 8>you want to buy an electric vehicle, actually having that

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 8>at a price point that's more accessible for your focket.

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 8>That's essentially a factor of multiple things, one of which

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 8>is the battery costs. So for the battery costs to

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 8>come down, which a big portion of an electric vehicle cost,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 8>that actually makes those.

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Big coming down.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 8>They are coming down, and that's actually a major story

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 8>for this year. It's the fact that we've seen batteries

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 8>at record low prices, especially in China, but that's starting

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 8>to have a knock on effect in other markets in

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 8>the world as well, and so there's a lot of

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 8>factors around the markets related to that. There's huge over

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 8>capacity in the battery manufacturing sector in China today, and

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 8>then there's the back of that intense competition of the

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 8>battery manufacturers in the Chinese market, and that's essentially really

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 8>putting a lot of pricing pressures downwards in that market.

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Before I let you go to subsidies help from governments

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 4>to make all this happen.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely so. I think in the context of the

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 8>US specifically, we've seen a lot of gigafactories being announced

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 8>in the US at the back of the Inflation Reduction Act.

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 8>They provide multiple types of subsidies. A major one is

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 8>for the production of batteries, battery cells and battery modules,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 8>which are the building blocks of batteries that you see

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 8>in electric cars, stationary storage. And that's a significant amounts

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 8>thirty five to forty five dollars per kilo what hour

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 8>for the production of these batteries. And so we've seen

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 8>a lot of gigod factories announced, although as of late

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 8>there's been some delays to some of those announcements because

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 8>of the slowdown around av demand growth.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Yeyu Sakhani, head of Energy storage research

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg and.

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 4>EF coming up on the program laingre retailer Victoria's Secrets,

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 4>appointing a new CEO to lead its turnaround more in details.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 3>Next, you're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 3>in research and data on two thousand companies in one

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence vmb

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I go in the terminal.

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and am Alex Deal and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Just say to play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 4>We move now to big tech and Google. This week

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 4>we heard the US Justice Department is considering breaking up

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Alphabet's Google.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 3>This comes after a landmark court ruling found that the

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 3>company monopolized the online search market.

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 2>For more.

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 4>We are joined by Jen Reeed, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior litigation Analyst.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Your first ask Jen, what exactly the DOJ is thinking

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 3>about doing when it comes to Google.

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 9>You know, now push comes to shove with this case

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 9>because it hasn't the DOJ hasn't really talked too much

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 9>about remedies. It's been working on liability in it won,

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 9>and it won pretty resoundingly. So now it has to

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 9>think about what it wants to ask the judge to

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 9>do to remedy what the judge found to be anti

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 9>competitive about what Google's been doing. And I have to

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 9>say that the idea of a structural request or a

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 9>breakoup's been around since twenty twenty because the Department of

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 9>Justice inserted it into the first complaint it filed back

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 9>in October of twenty twenty. It said, we may be

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 9>asking the judge for structural relief as necessary, and it's

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 9>something the DOJ's thinking about, and I don't think it's

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 9>a surprise. Why not go for it? You know, there's

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 9>kind of a big as bad mentality right now, and

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 9>if that's the case, then you want to break apart

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 9>these dominant firms and they have this win, why not

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 9>try to go for the gold on this?

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 4>So that's the case, though, I mean, is it one

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 4>of those things where they're going to go for it

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>but really it's going to be okay and they're not

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 4>going to do it, and they're going to do something else,

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 4>and then what's that something else instead?

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:21.959
<v Speaker 9>Look, I think they will. It's going to be up

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 9>to the judge. And my gut here is that the

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 9>judge probably would not order that kind of drastic relief.

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 9>I just think that the judge was really specific here

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 9>about finding that it's the default agreements that Google had

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 9>entered into that were anti competitive, and what was harmful

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 9>about them was that it did not allow the rivals

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 9>to gain the data they needed through searches to have

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 9>scale to be a good enough search engine. And those

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 9>are two big issues. So if those are the two

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 9>things that are anti competitive. My suspicion is the judge

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 9>will say, hey, no more default, no more payment to

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.479
<v Speaker 9>be the default search engine at these key search access points.

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 9>And by the way, maybe you need to share some

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 9>of this data you've collected over the years through all

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 9>these searches with these to give them a chance to

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 9>get better. Those are two options. And leahon Island's reporting

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 9>was great about also this AI issue and concerned about

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 9>using its dominance to get a lead in AI. And

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 9>maybe the DoD will do something there.

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Too, because the AI thing is the one that I

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 3>think has a lot of people concerned, not investors, but

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 3>just people think about AI and what it means for

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 3>privacy and all these other issues. What does it mean

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 3>for jobs and security and all these things which the

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 3>market nobody has an idea and certainly not the courts

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 3>or regulators here. But what are Google's defenses here here,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 3>given that they did lose that anti trust case.

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 9>I think one of the things Google will do will

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 9>point to language by the judge, And actually there was

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 9>quite a bit of it in the complaint about the

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 9>fact that it really has been a great innovator, that

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 9>it's been ingenius, that the fact of the matter is

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 9>it developed the best quality search engine in the world

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 9>by putting in money, by putting in innovation, by hiring

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 9>great engineers and ingenuity. The judge did say that, and

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 9>also the judge, by the way, said even though Google

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 9>had obtained a monopoly position, it continued to innovate, even

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 9>though it didn't really have to once it gained that spot.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 9>So Google will say, look, you know, you have no

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 9>guarantee that that same kind of innovative spirit will be

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 9>behind the parent of this new company. If you cleave

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 9>offf Android or cleaveoff Chrome and it's run by some

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 9>other entity, you know that might not be in that

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 9>entity's DNA. You have acknowledged that we're innovators and that

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 9>will continue to innovate, and it makes the most sense

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 9>for these assets to stay in our hands. That's what

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 9>I think Google.

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Will say, all right, our thanks to Jen Ree, she's

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence senior litigation analyst.

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 3>We'll turn out to news in the banking industry, Bank

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 3>of Nova Scotia has agreed to buy a minority stake

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 3>in the US regional bank Key Corp. For about two

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 3>point eight billion dollars.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 4>This comes a Scotia Bank makes good on its plans

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 4>to invest more capital in the US.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 3>For more on this, we were joined by Herman Chen

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence, senior analysts for US regional banks.

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 4>I first asked Herman to walk us through what Key

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Corp actually was before Scotia Bank got involved this week.

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 10>Key Corp regional bank based in Ohio, Cleveland, strong presence

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 10>in commercial ending and has a really robust investment bank

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 10>and capital markets capability for its size. On the flip side,

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 10>the bank has been really pressured by the higher interest

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 10>rate environment. It got caught off sides a little bit

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 10>by both its hedging strategy and its investments in low

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 10>yielding securities when interest rates were near zero. So it's

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 10>margin and profitability has lagged the peer group over the

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 10>past couple of years. That being said, things were improving

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 10>and didn't require any additional capital infusion. There was on

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 10>a path to self help. Margin had already reached the bottom,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 10>but now with the two point eight billion capital infusion

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 10>from Scotia Bank, they can accelerate that earnings profitability improvement story.

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 4>How long does it take to get something like this done?

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Like has this been in the works for a while

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 4>or what.

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it seems like based on both the calls that

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 10>that Key Corp and SCOO been conducted, the CEOs had

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 10>ongoing conversations about a potential investment. From what I understand,

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 10>Scotia Bank wanted to expand in the US and had

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 10>done a lot of due diligence in looking at opportunities,

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 10>and Key Corp was their top choice. So it adds

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 10>a great earning stream and exposure to the US for

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 10>Scotia Bank and for Key Corp. It really improves its

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 10>capital and liquidity and really puts them on offense rather

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 10>than playing defense for the past couple of years.

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 4>How are the banks like Key Corp doing as interest

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 4>rates may fall somewhat soon.

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I guess I would contrast it with a tumult

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 10>of March and April of last year. The banks had

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 10>largely been very defensive pretty much up to the end

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 10>of last year, reducing its lending capacity, trying to improve

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 10>its capital and liquidity ahead of both fears about deposits

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 10>leaving and also higher regulatory burden. Right now, it seems

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 10>like they're in a much stronger position. Capital has been

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 10>built up, they're back to lending the only issue is

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 10>there's not a lot of demand, and the banks are

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 10>positioned for potentially lower interest rates that can improve some

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 10>lending going forward. They've had a lot of the potential

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 10>rate decline, so they're in a fairly good position to

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 10>really prosecute the opportunity.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 4>What about deposits? Has deposit flight stopped, particularly if rates

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 4>wind up coming down. I'm just waiting for my market's

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 4>account all of a sudden started to tick lower and

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 4>yield where are we here with that?

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 10>My high savings account is already ticked down in anticipation

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 10>for Rencooks, So American Express, I'm not a big fan

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 10>of that. I would say that the posits have really stabilized.

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 10>There's no real rush to build deposits now because as

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 10>I said before, there's not a lot of demand for

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 10>the lending site, so you don't need a lot of

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 10>deposits to really fuel that muted demand appetite out there

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 10>for loans. That being said, the positle cards aren't rising either,

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 10>and they're pretty stable because the FEDS stabilized the Fed

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 10>funds rate for a bit now, and we'd expect, you know,

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 10>some stable margin. Depending on the bank, some could be

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 10>down over the next year just based on their balance sheets.

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Are there other potential targets for investments from other banks

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 4>in this kind of scenario.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, from what I understand that there's a unique way

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 10>of accounting for the Canadians. A small portion of investments

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 10>in financial institutions has as a positive capital calculation, so

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 10>it might be more focused on the Canadians in general.

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 10>But that being said that, we have seen some pickup

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 10>in traditional m and A activity in the United States.

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 10>Discover Capital one is the biggest one that we're still

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 10>waiting for regulatory approval on, and then there's some smaller

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 10>banks that have done some deals as well, So it

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 10>seems like that the activity is going to rebound even

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 10>more once we get rate cuts.

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Herman Chan and Bloomberg Intelligence senior analysts

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 3>for US regional banks.

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 4>We move next to the lingerie retailer at Victoria's Secret.

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 4>This week we got news at Victoria's Secret is poaching

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 4>the top executive from Rihanna's Lingerie brand to lead the

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 4>retailers turnaround.

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Hillary super will replace Martin Waters, who was terminated as

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 3>CEO and resigned from the board.

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 4>For more on this, we are joined by Mary Ross,

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Gilbert Bloomberg Intelligence senior equity analyst covering retail.

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Mary if this week's news is a

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>big deal for Victoria's Secret.

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 11>I think this is a big deal. Being a woman

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 11>focused brand, we think that Hillary Super And as you mentioned,

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 11>she was just the CEO at Rihanna's brand Fenti x Savage,

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 11>and that's a lingerie company. It's a teeny, teeny tiny company.

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 11>But Hillary has three decades of experience, was the chief

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 11>of the Anthropology brands more recently and prior to that,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 11>she's worked at a number of other brands, including American Eagle.

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 11>And speaking of competition to Victoria's Secret and why they've

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 11>lost share, American Eagle has a brand called Airy and

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 11>that's about, you know, one point six billion dollar business.

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 11>So Victoria's Secret has lost market share, but they have

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 11>been in a turnaround mode for the past three to

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 11>four years and we're starting to see some traction. But

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 11>we really think that with Super's understanding of the consumer,

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 11>working with multiple brands and really getting the brand heat,

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 11>we think that she could really make a difference here

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 11>at the HELM. So we think this is good news,

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 11>and of course it comes as they say that they

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 11>just beat two Q earnings. You know, they gave preliminary

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.280
<v Speaker 11>estimates for their second quarter.

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 4>When did things really fall apart for Victoria's Secret, what

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 4>was the trigger?

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, the trigger was really this sort of me too

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 11>move movement, and given that it was a brand that

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 11>was sort of focused on the perspective of what made

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 11>women sexy from a male perspective rather than from the

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 11>female consumer perspective, and that has has shifted. It used

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 11>to be part of limited brands. It was then spun off.

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 11>They've become a more inclusive brand. I mean, how many

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 11>companies out there can say that they have one hundred

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 11>percent equal pay across the business. I don't know of

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 11>any others, but they have achieved that. You know, it's

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 11>third party documented or certified, I should say. So, they've

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 11>made tremendous progress. They've really improved the lineup.

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 9>But I think kind of getting it to.

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 11>The next level and really getting that turnaround to a

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 11>point where they can get back to growth. I think

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 11>this is the right time at the moment to pivot

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 11>and bring in somebody like Hillary super So. I think

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 11>it's very, very exciting for the company at this time.

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, Mary if the industry has changed, that the lingerie

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 3>part of the business has changed. Where are success coming

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 3>from in that new world?

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, so there's a couple of things that happened.

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 11>I mean, the category had been growing for many years

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 11>and had been expected to grow, but they did experience

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 11>a slow down last year. But we're already starting to

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 11>see improvements in the category, at least in the US. Internationally,

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 11>by the way, Victoria's Secret is growing in the double digits.

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 11>I think in the last quarter international was up eleven percent.

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 11>So the category did weaken, but it looks like it's

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 11>starting to turn back up again. And really what happened

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 11>is with this sort of me too moment, it became

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 11>more inclusive, and so Victoria's Secret has adopted their brands

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 11>to be more inclusive, and you know, once again to

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 11>come from the perspective of a woman and what the

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 11>woman needs, you know, and it's a whole assortment. And

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 11>if you go into the stores, you will see a

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 11>dramatic improvement in the assortment that they have. In the

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 11>employee culture. I would say it's very positive, very exciting

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 11>environment when you go into the stores. But they do

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 11>need to remodel most of the stores. They've only been

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 11>able to touch a small percentage of the store base

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 11>so far, so there's still more to go. And then

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 11>the Pink brand is really at an earlier stage of

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 11>a turnaround, but we're already seeing fallen assortments really improve.

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 11>And they brought on Natalia Bryant as a brand ambassador,

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 11>so that's pretty exciting. We're heading in the right direction.

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to Mary ros Gilbert, Bloomberg Intelligence and your equity

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 4>analyst covering retail.

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 2>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal count