WEBVTT - Tesla Earnings and Klarna's New Product

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Colli

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Vallet and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chany. Welcome to a special edition of Bloomberg Technology

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and Emily Chang at the National Association of Broadcasters Conference

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. Coming up in the next hour.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Mixed results. Tesla falls following its earnings reports, saying battery

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>supply constraints will be the biggest hurdle going forward. We're

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have all the details. Plus Clarin Up is rolling

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.959
<v Speaker 1>out a new product to make it easier to shop

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>on the platform. But the buy now, pay later giant

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>facing headwinds with consumer confidence plummeting corner CEO with us

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>later this hour, and how has the direct consumer trends

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>survived potential recession? The co CEO of the eyewear Darling

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Warby Parker. We'll talk to us about the evolution of DTC.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't continue with Tesla now, and for that we

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>bring in Dan. I'ves of what but security. Dan is

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>so good to see. Thanks for coming down. All right,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what's your takeaway from the results we just saw old

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I think clearly the three Q deivery miss you know

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>there was an expectation that revenues could be light. I

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think margins will be a focus came in light there.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>The street was hoping ultimately for a better marginal performance,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think really the head one sticking to the

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.199
<v Speaker 1>underlying fift growth for the year in terms of delibrious.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So the conference call is going to be key in

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of are they back and away from that, clearly

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not. It shows that China growth story still continues

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to be there, and that's really gonna be the bull

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>bear to be coming out of this call. So let's

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the demand story you see and what do

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you see as the difference between the US and China.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I know there's been some concerns of about weight times

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in China shrinking, which you know, counterintuitively is maybe in

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>a not good sign. I think in China productions ram

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>three acts. So if you look at weight times, what's

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>happened there that's going to start to stabilize, but ultimately

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the production out of China continues to really increase. It. Look,

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the hearts and lungs of the Tesla bull story

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>in terms of China. Now, if you look what's happening

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>from a macro perspective. You know, clearly we're seeing softness,

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>but we believe what we're seeing in Tessa's much more

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>logistics driven rather than demand driven, and that, in my opinion,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 1>is why you know, I think this is just more

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>massive speed bumps they're navigating. But ultimately from Musk it's

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a moment of truth. I mean, this is the time

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to sort of navigate through the turbulence because investors seeing

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>white knuckles. Are you about the battery situation? Look, I'm

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>concerned about it, but ultimately, as we go into first

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>half of next year, I believe that does start to stabilize.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I still believe demand is out strip and supply for Tesla,

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it's all about ken they fulfill two

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>million units in terms of going two thousand and twenty three,

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>if they can then testas the stock that they might

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>opinion could be from these levels. But in this backdrop,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>this report, in my opinion, it's most the most important

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>conference call probably in the last two and a half

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>three years. It might also be the last conference call

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>before he buys Twitter. Right, a deal could be sealed

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in a matter of days, and we've seen test La

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>shares very much intertwined with what's happening with Twitter. Are

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you expecting a potential negative impact from that deal? Me

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and you've talked about. I mean that's where the albatross

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>around the Tesla story, because ultimately the worry is the

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>financing in this market starts to fall through a bit.

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Does he have to come up in more capital? Do

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you see form fours? Does he sell an incremental five

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars of Tesla stock to fund Twitter? And

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that's why the frustration now for the TESTSA investors is

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it feels like Musk has jogging allowed to balls. You've

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>got the Twitter situation and right now he's continuing to

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>trade cave are for two hours slice of pizza in

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of Twitter style. Are you worried about the ball juggling?

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of well, I think that's that's one

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest problems is that Musk is the key

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Tesla story. He's ultimately really the reason that

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Tessa has been able to get in this position, and

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he really needs to ultimately give investors confidence

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's there pilot on the plane and you're not

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately going to see shortfalls as we go into Q four,

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and especially as going two thousand and twenty three in

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>such a pivotal year for evs, What do you want

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to see and what do Tesla investors want to see

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his management approach to Twitter, like not

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>managing Twitter at all? Well, I think part of it

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>as a testa investor. You want to ultimately see him

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>navigate this and ultimately give the reins to social media

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>experts that could ultimately be the ones that could try

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to turn Twitter around. From Musk, the easiest thing was

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>buying Twitter. The hardest part is going to be fixing it.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be an everse like uphill battle from Musk

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>in terms of fixing Twitter. But is a testa investor

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>at such a crucial time, you need steady hands. And

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that's really why this conference call the next few quarters

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>are just so crucial. What I believe is in the

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>history of the test of story well, and it may

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>be for honestly almost every company given the macroeconomic conditions

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're facing, and you know, Musk will potentially only

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>now multiple companies that are facing these macro economic conditions.

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>What's your outlook over the next six months as we

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>potentially head into a recession and a downturn that could last.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Some people are telling me to to three years. Yeah, well,

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of disruptive technology, who are going

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to be the winners over the next two three years,

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's front and center, along with Apple and banful names

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft. When you look at Tesla as we went

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>back three years ago, look how they navigated through what

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I view is almost historic challenges. Musk the challenges, not demand,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>its logistics, and if you go China, I believe this

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>will ultimately be a period of time that Tesla is

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>able to navigate. And I do believe the multiple starts

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to re rate, you start to ultimately see margins start

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to come back. And I think we look at this

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is just a blip on the radar over and over

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and overall called five six years. Cybertruck, What do you

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>want to hear? Ok, I think you want to hear

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that's coming in two thousand and three because you got

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>all the Detroit stalwarts that are ready to get those

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>trucks out there. Also you have Rivy and others. This

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be an arms race in terms of pickup trucks.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>For e V need to make sure it doesn't keep

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>continue to get delayed. But it goes back to your

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>navigating SpaceX Tessa now Twitter, and there's you know, ultimately

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>which kid you love the most? And that's gonna be

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the issue from Musk because the Golden Child continues to

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>be Tesla. We hear so much about one shot well

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>at SpaceX. How deep is the bench at Tesla? If

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>his attentions are divided. It's so different if if Judge

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and Stanton we're not playing for the Yankees, you got

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you got a bench there. But ultimately Musk is continue

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to key to the test of story. They have navigated

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a bench. But let's just be clear.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is the biggest worry right now in

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the story. And of course Tom's taken next Friday, that's

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>when the Twitter deal is supposed to close. Otherwise Wen

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>into a game of Thrones in Delaware. All right, I'm

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna let you get away with that Yankees comparison. Just

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>because we're in New York, Dan Ives Bush, so good

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to see you here in person. Thank you looking at me,

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. I'm Emily Changing of the National Association of

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasters conference in New York, and I want to look

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>more broadly now at Investment Sentiment consumer facing investments. In particular,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Ben Lair is Lara Hippo managing partner, which manages twelve

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.679
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars and has invested in companies from All Birds

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to Warby Parker, which will be on the show later.

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Casper and more Than also had some interesting job transitions recently.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So you came back to Lara Hippo full time? Or

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>how how should how should we we talk about your kind?

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So I was doing two jobs for a long time.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I was operating and investing, and uh, we sold the

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>operating company in March and so now on full time

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and Lyric Group Media to Box. Yes, let's talk about

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the media space first and and and then we'll move

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>on because there's just so much disruption there. There's contraction there.

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, what is the future of the media business?

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Really cool? I think it's a tough market. Um, you know,

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>my perspective has changed a lot. We were very active

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>at Lara Hippo investing in media and we're the first

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>investors in BuzzFeed and Business Insider and wonder Ee and

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Axios and a lot of stuff that that did well.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>We do almost no media investing anymore. I don't really

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's a venture category, so I think there's not

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>growth to be had. I think that social media has

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>massively screwed up the industry. I think TikTok more than

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>even Facebook before. It is sucking away attention in ways

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that we never could even imagine would be the case,

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>and the advertising industry is really challenging. I think that

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be winners in the digital media space.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Fox, which acquired our company, is one of them. Um,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But uh, I don't think there's a lot of venture

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>money to fund new businesses, and I think there's going

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to be more and more consolidation. You've seen it at

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>you know in traditional media, You're going to see it

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>continue to happen in digital. Okay, so let's walk that

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit. How does that play out? Where

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>do you see the condult solidation and do you see

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>media product path to being destroyed? I don't know that

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say seeing a path to being destroyed. I

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think people want content, and I think that, you know,

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>news media is in a really particularly dark place with

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>what's happened to trust of media in the country, and

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the business model of news I think is very challenged.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a few organizations that are doing a good job,

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but one of the big problems is advertiser is don't

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>support news media. Um, it's the most important area to

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>put your dollars, but they don't want to be around

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, they don't want to be around the war

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in Russia, they don't want to be around horrible stories,

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and so you see, uh, the the industry really suffering.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And then I think entertainment media is uh generally moving

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of the creator, and so YouTube and

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and platforms that empower lots of people to create

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>reams of sort of generally lower quality and less expensive

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>content are eating up advertising dollars that used to go

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to premium content creators. And it's challenging at stake here,

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean really, I think I think on one level

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that by the way, I don't think the truth is

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at stake. I think the truth is. I think that's

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>already gone for the moment, I mean, there is it.

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>We're in a really, really, really bad situation. I have

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>little kids, and I am terrified for the way that

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get truthful information. And the problem is

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's right now not good business to invest in

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the news category and that has to change, and I

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>think it will. The pendulum always shifts. Uh, there's a

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who want to fix this problem, and so, um,

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we continue to be interested in meeting companies that are

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>doing that. So where do you think responsibility live? Is

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it advertisers? Is it with social media companies? At the

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, we live in a you know,

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>capitalist society. I think it's hard to make this about responsibility.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to find business models that make

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it that work for everyone. Uh, No one is going

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to do what's you know, some people will do it's

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>right for the world, but most people are gonna do

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>what's right for their wallet. And so uh, I think

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, the the social media companies,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge opportunity was missed twenty years ago to regulate

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies. Uh this all started. I've been sort of

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>learning more about this, how this started around in September eleven. Actually,

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>where I think there's a great opportunity to regulate some

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of these companies that didn't happen, and we're now, uh

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in a world where they've been allowed to run amuck

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're their you know their monopolies and they've made

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a really challenging so by the way, it's not too

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>late at all, and there are amazing brands that do

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>great journalism. Um, and again I will say I continue

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to be, as a Vox board member, biased but also

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>incredibly impressed with the quality of journalism, the quality of

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>these communities, the diversification of revenue that these companies are generating.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But um, it's hard when you see the you know,

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Discovery and Warner needing to consolidate and CBS and biocomp

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>needing to consolidate. Well, what is that due to smaller

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>independent brands who want to continue to be independent when

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>when the top of the food chain is joining forces

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because they're feeling that the pressure from social media. Okay,

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about capitalism. You are continuing to invest absolutely,

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>how bad is this downturn, how bad is it going

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to get? How long is it gonna last? And are

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you finding places to put your money or is it? Yeah,

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so are you just waiting on the sideline? So we're

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not absolutely not waiting on the sidelines. Our model is

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to be first money in and we're backing founders who

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>want to change the world. And there's still plenty of

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.599
<v Speaker 1>great founders that want to change the world, and so

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the companies that we back today are going

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to be raising money in the future in different markets.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>The you know, markets go up, markets go down. I

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>do think that this downturn is going to be significantly prolonged.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the public markets have experienced a lot of

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the pain, certainly not all of the pain. I think

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the private markets talk about experiencing the pain. But the

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>reality is, I think we're probably a year or two

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>years away from really seeing what this looks like once

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of companies that have raised capital start to

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>run out of money. Last year, everyone got capitalized. You know,

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>let's see what the back half of next year, even

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the next year looks like. And uh, I think it's

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be rough. So they are gonna be some casualties.

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be a lot of casualties. Good companies are

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>still going to be just fine. And in fact, I

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>think all the money that's on the sidelines is going

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to start consolidating around the better companies. And you're actually

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna see You're not gonna see the valuations go down much.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see fewer companies get funded. So where do

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you think we're going to see the wreckage and where

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>are you placing your best I think you're going to

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>see the wreckage pretty much everywhere. But but it's healthy.

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>This is healthy wreckage. And when you build companies in

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>an environment where money feels free or cheap, you build

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>companies that are not necessarily as strong with some of

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the wrong disciplines. And right now we're going to build

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a new generation of companies that are gonna get built

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the right way. And I'm incredibly optimistic about early stage investing.

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Right now. I feel frankly more excited than I ever have.

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's tons of data why well, there there's just

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's so much data that supports the idea

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that investing when times are tough produces great companies. I

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>know Neil from Warby's coming on. Neil is a founder

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>who we back as a seed investment ten years ago,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>coming right out of the financial crisis, and is a

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect example of a company that was built in a

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>tough time, that built an extraordinary business. And I think

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see a new generation of great companies

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>get built, just like you do in every downtain if

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be worse than the financial crisis, though

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, and honestly I wasn't enough of a

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>fully formed human during a crisis to really have perfect

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>context for it. But I think this is gonna be hard.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>But knowledge is still enabling unbelievable things. Just look at

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the way that we were able to weather the last

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>two years survive. If that says anything, it says that technology,

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>even while it's being used in a bunch of weird ways,

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately uh an incredible thing in a place where

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we can continue to feel good about. All Right, Well,

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that was a reality check. I say thank you for

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>having La, thank you for giving it to us. Strange

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and sugarcoat anything. Lara have Boe, managing partner of Been

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>lare going to see you again. All right? Coming up,

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the risks of speaking of social media, TikTok user data

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>leaking to China still likely even if the Biden administration

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>forges that security agreement with the video platform. We're gonna

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have details on that a new Bloomberg analysis next. This

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. Personal data for millions of US TikTok users

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>would still be at risk even if the Biden administration

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>reaches a security deal with the platform's parent Bye Dance.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the findings of a new Bloomberg News analysis. Joining

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>us now with the details Bloomberg's and bloodlow Ed explained. Yeah,

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is based on interviews with dozens of

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>experts across the fields of data security, those that have

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>negotiated these types of deals before. When it comes to lawyers,

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and as you say, the top line is this that

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in every scenario, even if it deals reached, there's runner ability.

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>A big part of it is that there's always going

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a human component. Right, this is a business

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that was built in China, and even if you separate

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>off the US assets so to speak, it's largely going

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be somebody in China and Chinese personnel that potentially

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>could fix any issue. You know, TikTok has been transparent

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>or relatively so that there are personnel in China to

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have access to public information from the platform, and even

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>if not private, but basically the range of concerns are worrying.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>And even if they do reach a deal such as

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the control of Siphius and the administration that you know,

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>even if they cannot hold TikTok's act and responsible responsibly,

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they just pull the plug on any deal. Ticktok currently

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>handle US user data. Yes, so this is a really

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>key point. Currently all user data is effectively siphoned through

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States through servers that are owned by Oracle

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.959
<v Speaker 1>and hosted in the United States. The data is housed

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>here and process the United States for US users. But again,

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the vulnerability that the concern is here is well, what

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>if something goes wrong, who is the actual human being

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in in charging, in control and able to make a fix.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is that person is probably in China.

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>What is TikTok's position on this. The position is that

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>while they won't comment in talk about talks to the

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>US government, in a statement to Bloomberg, they think they

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>can reach a deal. You know, they've tried a number

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of mechanisms over the years, including selling a stake of

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the company to reflect the US user ship to the

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>likes of Oracle and Walmart. That did not go well.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But what you see in your screen is the company's position.

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to get this done and they're hoping that

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the data management process through Oracle and ideas like supervision

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>from various US government bodies can get it done. Thanks

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for breaking that one down. This is Little Brook Technology

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and Emily Chang at the National Association of Broadcasters conference

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. By Now Pay Later, Giant Clara

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>has unveiled client Clara Spotlight, a new search tool that

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>will compare prices across thousands of retailers and even enable

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>shoppers to filter by color, size ratings. Clarna CEO Sebastian

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Schemiakovsky is with me now in person. So good to

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>see you in person, maybe for the first time. You

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>say this will usher in a new era of shopping.

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>How so good questions, Well, I think it's really exciting

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to see. One fun aspect of this is just that,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, due to the dominance of one of the

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest retailers in the world in the US, it's almost

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like put a little bit stop to development of great

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>services on the shopping side because they were so dominant,

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and in Europe that wasn't really a case. So what

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>we've taken here is a service that has been highly

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciated by consumers in Europe, which is about comparison, finding products,

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>finding prices and all this and then basically you know,

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>taking into the US markets. I'm super excited. Can you

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>give us any details, not just how successful for a

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Spotlight has been in Europe and what makes you think

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you can challenge us big US tech giants. Yeah, well

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to try to start. We'll see if we can.

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think the it's huge in the

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>sense that in a lot of the countries where the

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>service has existed, it is the starting point for people

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>shopping experience. So they go there, they start there, they

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>find the products, you know, they get, they learn about it,

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and then they go further to the retailers. So it

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is really the starting points is really really big. And

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you're also integrating shoppable video now gen z Loves. What

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think the impact of that can be? I

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>think I mean to us to be honest right now,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is the marketing side of our services has grown tremendously.

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>We actually do now business with half from the top

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>one US retailers for marketing services. And the problem we

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have is our demand is much hiris four or five

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>times higher to supply. So one of the ideas here

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is just to see how can we get the audience

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>that we already have in the thirty million Americans are

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>using the app, How can we provide it with more

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting content so that we can also grow, you know,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>offer more supply for everyone who wants to market in

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that environment. So let's take matters specifically. Obviously, they've got

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Instagram and they have some of these features

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>built into their apps. What makes you think you can

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>compete with them specifically? Well, I think there will be

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>multiple places to entertain yourself. But I think to some degree,

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at an Instagram experience, you're

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of things there, You're maybe you know,

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>watching kitten videos, You're maybe doing like following different type

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>of things. Here, it's very much more around shopping, right,

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very concentrated aroound that. So it's different experiences, But

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there would be multiple channels where people to

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>have explore content. Inflation is that record has interest rates

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>are changing. How is Karna navigating a rising rate environment?

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>How is it impacting your business model? Well, what's interesting

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about it is that we are a bank fully licensed

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, so we have deposits um that are funded

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in the European interesting rate environment where interest racing on

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Marx is so fairly low, so it actually gives us

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a fairly nice competitive advantage of some of the US

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>players from a cost perspective. But in addition to that,

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>also what we are seeing and is integrade, is it

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>actually increasing the amount of our product because if you

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>think about it, our consumers in the US have saved

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred million dollars in interest feest, late feast

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and so forth by using our products because their interestry

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. Right, So we talked about the paying

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>for the short term installment trying to products and so

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>there's more themand for that in an you know, in

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>an in an interest rate environment that's racing, so we

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>see higher demand and then we have a very efficient

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>cost structure. Exident, are you taking any action to mitigate

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>potential losses from the mp L? For sure? And we've

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>already done that, right, So we did tighten our underwriting

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>both already back in jan and a little bit more

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>additionally in April and May, because there's obviously a different

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>environment that we're going into, so you have to be

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>cautious about it. Now. At the same time, people are

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>complaining that they're purchasing power is decreasing, Can you explain

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>how you set purchasing power and how if you're reconsidering

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>how you set back given these changing conditions, Well, I

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think the big thing to remember is that when people

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>use our product, the average out stending balance is seventy

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>five dollars. On the credit cards, maybe like one five

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes dollars, right, so, and the different things. Also, a

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>credit card gives you a limit and then they push

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and push that limit into your face for you to

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>spend more than you should. Watch you know, watch Netflix

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Money explains creit cards to explain you see exactly what

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. So the difference with us, we don't do that.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>We're very mindful. Yes, you can find out about your

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>purchase power, but we're fun mindful of showing it to

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you so you don't overspend. And then in addition to that,

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we take a new decision every time you make a transaction.

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Right so, on a credit card, you just can spend

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>as much as you can. They just want you to

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>max out on your credit card because that how they

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>make money. For us, we're taking a new decision on

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>every purchase. So actually that's why our losses are below

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.719
<v Speaker 1>credit card industry standards. Do to that, now you've been

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>doing restructuring and you've been pretty upfront about this. Are

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 1>you are you doing more of that? Are you going

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to have more cuts before the end of the year.

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>How many employees will you have at the end of

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this year, and how much of that is in the

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>US where I know you were growing quickly. No, I

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>mean the big restructure that we did was back in May.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>There's always been obviously before that and after that, minor

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>changes to the organization and so forth, but that was

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the big one. And I think as much as it

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was very painful and hard and it's it's obviously a

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>very sad thing to see amazing colleagues need um, but

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>at the same point of time, what I'm what I

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think is what was good about it was we did

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it early on. We took the decision, and I'm now

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>hearing from a lot of people that like they're coming

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to those decisions now. So I'm still proud about the

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that we we we faced the fact that times

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>have changed, and we acted on it. And I think

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in the end that that agility it was is what

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>sets to your part, How are you thinking about the

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I p O potential fundraising the changing environment? To some degree?

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I got that question a year ago. Obviously, no, no, no,

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and but I think then I said, look,

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the volatility of this environment. I felt

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a hype environment that we were in, and

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>now it's a little bit different than my dream has

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>always been to I pod company, where it's in a

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>similar fashion. When Google did it into thousand five was

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a perfect market. It wasn't like overhyped, it

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't underhyped. It was like it was stable. And you also,

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we have so much growth left left in the US.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>We're still growing percent. You know, we see tremendous success

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>here and so like I want to, I feel when

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there's still that amazing upside left like Google also had. Obviously,

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we're now thinking about the I think the market cap

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>is billion dollars when they you know, so you want that.

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're getting close to that spot. So

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I won't have to ask you this question next. Okay,

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>um smashing is so great to have you, CEO of Karna.

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Good to see you here in person. Thank you for

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>having me. All right, coming up, is this bear market

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be the best opportunity to invest in crypto

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for the long term? Some banks seem to think maybe

0:25:44.840 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we will discuss next Mrs Boomberg for a quaint it's

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>about the macro, but for the rest of crypto, right

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the ethery and ecosystem and all the other you know,

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>layer one and layer two, the block chains being built

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and what'spilled on top of them. That's a march, an

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>inevitable march to starting to change how we actually operate.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And there's a tremendous amount of venture capital that continues

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to come into space. Five billion last quarter and nine

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>billion the quarter before that. If you look at from

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Citadel to JP Morgan, to Bank, the Bank of New York,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>black Rock, the biggest players in traditional finance are actually

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>making huge investments in and around this architecture. That was

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>some of Galaxy Digital Mic novograts interview earlier on Bloomberg Television.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Kavia Gupta is the founder of the Delta Blockchain Fund

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and investor in Webb three focused startups and joining me

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>now here um at the NAV conference. So do you

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>agree or disagree with Nomograts? There a pot of it it, yes, right,

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>because all these institutional money is coming into crypto. The

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>point is is it coming at the thick site? Is

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>it coming hedge fund crypto micro side. Some of the

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds are directly going only for internal dashboats. They

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>are not really contributing to build an economy as we

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>call it on the tech side. But yes, is that

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>affecting cryptoprises good and bad? Yes. But at the same time,

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>institutional banks like Jimmy Morgan or Golden Zacks, I think

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are taking dual bets. They are going both on the

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>crypto U now partnering with coin base and other platforms

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to be enable to have their private wealth managers to

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>have that asset class. But they also are investing in

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like Circle and Figure, like a bunch of other technical

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>technology companies too. So is now the time to invest?

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Should everyone? By the deep um? Is it a dip

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>though we have to me? Or maybe it's gonna go

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>further down, or maybe it's stable as this here I

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>my personal opinion, and it's a financial Yeah, it's not

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a financial advice. I want to make that very clear.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>But my personal opinion is it's not the bottom yet.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I stick to my prices, which a couple of months

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>back I said, I still find what might further ye

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>in my personal opinion, if I would be buying it

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm still holding my personal capacity. I am going to

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>go into ether somewhere between six hundred eight. I'm going

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to go into bitcoins somewhere between twelve to fourteen K

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and I still think December to March we're going to

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>see that it's not there yet. That's what we're telling

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>our investors and our investor up. Okay, so let's say

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 1>you you come in at that at those prices. How

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>long are you going to have to wait to see

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>some games? How long is this downturn gonna last? How

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>tied to the downturn is crypt out I feel like

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto is a very unique case. It does go down

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>when the whole market is going down. It also sometimes

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is the one of the first commodity or the security

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to go down. But if you look at last time

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>during COVID, it was also one of the first asset

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>class that started going up. So I do believe that

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty four is going to be good for crypto.

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see all time high maybe summer on May, June, July.

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we have to be in the dip

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for more than fourteen bounds starting from January. Okay, what

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>areas of the blockchain do you think come back first

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>or are going to be the best pats for let's

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>say next year. Infrastructure? A lot of indexing, cross chain analytics,

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hardcore institutional adoption problems. What happened to

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>blockchain and supply chain, what happened to blockchain into mortgage securities,

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Web two problems where blockchain came and said, hey,

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna revolutionize it, but then the bullish market came

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and everybody was excited about defy and n f T

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>like the whole crypto native use case, I feel like

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the dep market is where the builder's gonna come out,

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and the billion dollar institutional adoption, not with respect to crypto,

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but technology in the real infrastructure problems are going to

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>take taken care of. Looking forward, what are your biggest concerns?

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>What should investors or people who are thinking about becoming investors,

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>retail or tech investors, both crypto investors. I love saying

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>by the day, stay in the space, experiment with some

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of that crypto in the real use cases, and if

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to have an exit, have an exit. Uh.

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>For the thick investors, I would say builders are going

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to continue to build. So people who go through the

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>British market and build their product and come up in

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bullish market are the founders you want to stick to.

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very excited about this all right, Kamira Gupta,

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Delta blockchain founder, going to have you on the show

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and see you in person. Thank you for stopping by.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>With the pandemic prompting a big shift towards e commerce,

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>retail companies are rethinking everything from the customer and the

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>employee experience online and off to just how many physical

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>stores to open. That's the challenge facing Warby Parker and

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's clo ce O'Neil bluementhal with us now. So I'd

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>love to hear how your strategy is involving in a

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic world. You obviously have this thriving online business.

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>You would to close a D and twenty stores during

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, but now you've opened almost two hundred. How

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>do you find the balance of how many and how much? Yeah,

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the key is to have a

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>multi channel approach and to constantly meet customers where they

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be met. And we know that customers are

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>shopping as they live physically and digitally UM, and thankfully

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>because we're directed consumer, because we have those direct relationships

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>with our customers, were able to get feedback and hear

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>from them, and that helps us, you know, our e

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>commerce business helps us dictate where we should open up stores. Similarly, UM,

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're able to invest in I exams and

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>virtual vision tests that then make it easier for people

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy online or in in store. Enough consumers are

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>paying more for everything from gas to groceries, how are

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you evolving to meet their needs in a high intuation environment.

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>You know you talked about feedback. What feedback are you

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>getting and how are you responding to that? Yeah, we're

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>hearing from customers that value is super important, and we

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>always think about value as that price to quality ratio.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So being able to sell n glasses instead of you know,

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the four or five dollars that they would call elsewhere.

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>What we've seen is competitors UM, but also other retailers

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and other categories right over the last year or two

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>raise prices now only to you know, do heavy discounting

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as they've established a large inventories. You know, we've been

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>able to be more consistent with our customers and keep

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>pricing like as it's been over the last few years.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So that way we can have simple, unified pricing, just

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>make it easy for our customers. And we think that

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.479
<v Speaker 1>we continue to deliver exceptional value, will continue gain more

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and more and more good share. So let's talk about

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the main strategic driver of market share gates. You know,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are you going to keep focusing on the US? I

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think more broadly, so we'll continue focus on the U.

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>S will continue to open up stores, will have opened

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>forty stores this year, while investing in our online experience,

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, in particular our virtual Vision UH tests, which

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>enables people to renew their prescription online through our i

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>OS app or our virtual try on UM. We've also

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>been really investing in contacts UM and that's a business

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that's been growing over a year for us. So we're

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>finding our customers really want to come to us for

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a one stop shop for a holistic vision care experience.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about the criteria to reopen stores

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>or to open new stores, I should say, given the

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>potential for the footprint to be what, yeah, so where

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 1>are these going to be? Are they in malls? Are

0:33:55.800 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>they elsewhere? They're in malls? Their street location, transportation, and hubs.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Throughout the pandemic, right, we saw massive sort of shifts

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>in in traffic as people's routines change, and we saw

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, traffic increase in our suburban locations and big

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 1>deltas between sort of urban and suburban locations. We're seeing

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that start to narrow now, especially after Labor Day, as

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of offices have reopened and a

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks have started to return to sort of there,

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, pre pandemic routines. Um. You know, for us again,

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we're opening up stores close to our customers, so whatever

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>is easiest for them to shop at, that's where we'll

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>reports the trends. So what's a little disturbing if I

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was just visiting some stores in the Bay Area and

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we have customers coming in asking for Jeffrey Dahmer glasses

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>because of the Netflix series, which is just sick, right,

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the guy was a monster. Um, but I guess it

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>might be having you know, some fashion anything else. Let's

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>send on a happier note, people want to wear right now.

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Aside from that, I think people are looking for some

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>bright colors and just some some happiness. Over the last

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>two years, right, which has been really tougher from US Americans.

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:21.399
<v Speaker 1>So monster or bright colors that trap. Okay, Neal woman

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Thokoso Barden Parker, good to see you, Thanks for thanks

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for having me. I want to go back to Tesla now.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloombergs and Ludlow has been listening into the call, and

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what are you hearing from Ellen? Hearing a lot from Ellen.

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Apparently is going to be an epic d to the year.

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>The fourth quarter will have record breaking deliveries. But actually

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we've got some more granularity on that from CFO Zack Corker,

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Zack kirkcorn You said that actually, even if production is

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>an annual growth rate of fifty all told, by the

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>end of this year, delivery will fall just short of fifty.

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Ellen's talking about the idea of a buy back, which

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>has been really important for investors. He said at five

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to ten billion dollar buyback is possi next year, pending

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>board approval. It's something that a lot of investors have

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>been calling for. And the kind of big one that

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>jumped out out of nowhere was that Elon sees a

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>path for Tesla to have a greater market cap than

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple and in the long run twice the market cap

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that Saudi Aramco has, So that shows his confidence in

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 1>where this company is going. Quite a proclamation, even from

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>someone like Elon Musk. Are we expecting to hear anything

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>from him about the potential Twitter deal or for him

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to take questions about what this would mean for Tesla investors?

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So just like in previous quarters, Tesla started by taking

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>questions from retail investors that have voted on on the

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 1>same platform. Right, So that hasn't come up yet, but

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you would expect it, I think, not just the issue

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of whether Elon Musk has to sell Tesla stock to

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 1>fund the purchase of Twitter, but there's also this idea

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of key man risk, Right, how distracted would an Elon

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>must be? Who is CEO of Tesla SpaceX And we

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know what role he might take it Twitter, but

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's something to add to the to a very busy manner.

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Would say a number of names in the street have

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 1>come out of late to say test has become a

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty well or machine. Zach Kirk on the CFO is

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>demonstrating on this call that he has commanded the numbers

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and that he's got a pretty clear vision of what

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the head winds that tester is facing our What he

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>said so far about the supply story seems like it's

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>not so much of a demand story anywhere as it

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is a supply story. Yeah, he really actually underlined that

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the demand is there. They think they can sell every

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 1>vehicle they build, particularly in the fourth quarter. The demand

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>is there. On the supply side. One third of all

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles delivered in the third quarter came in the

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. We know about the mad scramble. They're

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to smooth that out. We should boost the cost

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>per vehicle. But this is how Elon must put it.

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>There were no boats, there were no trains, and there

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>were no carriers when they got to the end of

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the quarter, and that's why a number of vehicles were

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in transit. That's why the third quarter of delivery numbers

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>fell short of estimates. And it seems like that's why

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they missed on the top line for the first time

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>since the third quarter of last year. All Right, i'd

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 1>love low. Thanks for breaking it down. We'll continue to

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>look to you for more headlines. And that does it

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. We've got a great

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>show coming up Thursday. Arianna Huffington's will be with us

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what she calls the productivity paradox, where

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>employees work more but get less done. M and don't

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>forget to check out our podcast. Wherever you get your podcast,

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily Changing in New York. This is Bloomberg