Speaker 1: Okay, so over the weekend, New York Times ran a
Speaker 1: story about the sense of dread that civil servants are feeling.
Speaker 1: Federal employees are shaken by the Trump agenda now the
Speaker 1: e p A groups of so called scientists met last
Speaker 1: week to strategize. They're trying to figure out how to
Speaker 1: slow walk Trump's environmental orders. Former Google, Facebook, and Microsoft
Speaker 1: employees who left to join the Obama regime are plotting
Speaker 1: how to stop Trump from using their government databases to
Speaker 1: carry out his immigration policy. Now, The Times admits that
Speaker 1: most of these government bureaucrats are Democrats burrowed into every agency.
Speaker 1: Many are struggling to come to terms with working under Trump.
Speaker 1: They face a morrow dilemma, having to work for somebody
Speaker 1: they so hate. Of course, The New York Times is
Speaker 1: sympathetic to these people. If this insubordination had happened under Obama,
Speaker 1: the Times would be leading the outrage chorus and outing
Speaker 1: them and getting rid of them. Now, these unelected civil
Speaker 1: servants have been given government jobs to carry out the E. I.
Speaker 1: Coultive Branch agenda, regardless of who runs it. They don't
Speaker 1: make policy, they're supposed to implement it. Now, here's how
Speaker 1: to solve this big moral dilemma. If they don't like
Speaker 1: their jobs, they should quit. If they slow walk or
Speaker 1: sabotage or plot against the president, he should solve their
Speaker 1: moral dilemma for them in two words, you're fired. Now
Speaker 1: get out and stay out and never come back. You
Speaker 1: just screw everything up. Just do it like that. Everybody
Speaker 1: can be fine. H