WEBVTT - The Musk-Twitter Deal Finally Closes

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. Hi'm Emily Chang in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is a special edition of Bloomberg Technology. Twitter is now

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>officially owned by Elon Musk, and the news is still

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sinking in. He's already fired a few key top executives,

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>announced a new content moderation council and started restructuring. How

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>will Twitter under Musk moderate free speech? What is the

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>business strategy? Kanye's profile appears to be back? Is Donald Trump? Next?

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.959
<v Speaker 1>We have a premium lineup of guests today, including one

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the investors with inside knowledge of Musque's plans, along

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with a member of Twitter's founding team. Let's get right

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to it with gloomberg. Ed Ludler, who's been following Musk

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and his coverage of Tesla and spaces for so many

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>years and now Twitter. He joins us now outside Twitter headquarters,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>live in San Francisco. So at day one under Musk,

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened? You know, not as much as we'd hope

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, And we know the deal closed last night.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, Equity co investors were informed late night Eastern Time.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>What I'm hearing from sources actually a lot of the

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>work we've already reported is ongoing. There are Tesla engineering

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>staff inside of Twitter being buddied up or paired up

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>with Twitter engineering staff, and they're basically having meetings to

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>review the source code behind the Twitter platform. That's kind

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening minute by minute. You would have seen

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the tweet right and from Elon Musk about Content Moderation Council,

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and so the conversation seems to be moving really quickly

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>from how this deal happened and what the deal looked

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like to what does the future of Twitter as a

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>platform look like under Elon Musk? And of course content

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>moderation and the support of freedom of speech to freedom

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>expression is fast becoming what we want to talk about now.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We know last night he fired a few of the

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>key top executives Paraguagal, the CEO, Ned Siegel, the CFO Vidjigade,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>members of the legal team. We also saw people walking

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>out of Twitter today with boxes. Are those all people

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>getting fired? Yes? So, I mean on the executive departures.

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Sources tell us that for the time being, at least

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has installed himself as CEO of Twitter Private

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter under him. I know that a lot of staff

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>were really concerned, for example, by Ned Siegel's departure. Right

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>He was CFO for five years, regarded generally as a

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>very nice guy. Um. Two individuals walked out of the

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>building behind me earlier today. They claimed to be Twitter

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>employees who had been laid off. It turns out, according

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to sources, that that was a hoax, or at least

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter staff believe it was a hoax, that they were

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not Twitter employees and therefore not laid off. We phone Twitter.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>We've asked Twitter for comment and to clarify the situation.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>We've asked Musk's team to clarify who those people were,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've not heard back. All Right, Ed Ludlow outside

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter headquarters. Thanks for your reporting, and we're going to

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>get back to you a little bit later in the show.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I do want to bring in Ross Gerber right now,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>president and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki. He is an investor

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in Tesla and SpaceX and now Musk's Twitter. So Ross,

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>please clarify for us what's your role in the new

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter under Elon Musk, especially given we've talked about this

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 1>a few times this year, you weren't such a fan

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of Elon Musk owning Twitter after all. Yeah. Yeah, this

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>has been an extremely painful and difficult process for the

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>last six months, more so for Elon than me. Um,

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. So when it came down to it last week,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>they asked if we wanted to invest in, and I

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>said yes, because you know, I I stick. I stick

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>with Elon. You know, He's made me a lot of

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>money over the years, and I have great confidence in

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>his leadership and an ability to turn Twitter around and

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>make it a much better platform. But it was only

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>after I heard the business plan that I was convinced

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that this was an incredible opportunity. And and that's why

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm backing it. And and I don't really have a

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>role at this time. I'm trying to get on the

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>either the advisory board or the content moderation board in

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the sense of I think with my background and media

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and communications, and I actually studied free speech at the

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Anniberg School of Communications at Pen actually at the same

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>time Ellen was studying at PENN as well. And being

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a liberal Jewish mostly democrat, I think that people would

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>be very comforted to know that somebody like myself might

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>be involved with this type of decision making. So so

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I've made my pitch to them and we'll see what happens.

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So you've seen the business plan, you say, what's in it?

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>What are Elon Musk's plans for this company to grow it,

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to make money, et cetera. Yeah, I mean, first of all,

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there's really two parts of the plan. There's Twitter one

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>point and Twitter two point oh. And Twitter two point oh.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Ellen is fully sure how that will look,

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>but but it will involve a much bigger vision. But

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter one point oh is really fixing Twitter and making

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it a better platform, and it's around a three pronged approach. First,

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it's cleaning up the platform and creating some sort of

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>verification system so users are really people, and that will

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>make advertisers and users have a much better platform to

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>share information and ideas than the current system where bots

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, sort of attack robots go after everything

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you tweet. So by knowing who the users are and

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>creating this verification, I think the platform will be a

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>much better place for users. Secondly, it's about creating a

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>subscription model so that not all revenues derived from advertising,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>taking some of the power away from advertisers, uh and

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.239
<v Speaker 1>putting the power back into users. And this subscription will

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>include many different factors including the verification and many other

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>like small benefits like uh, maybe an edit feature kind

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of like what Twitter blue is now. And then the

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>third part is really about building the creator community. And

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a really a combination of like combining like

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the features of YouTube slash Zoom with what

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Patreon is doing, and and a company maybe like only

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Fans where where creators want to be compensated for putting

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>great content on platforms. And really YouTube is the best

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at doing this, so most of the other platforms um

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it be you know, commerce related like Instagram um

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>or just information or entertainment related like TikTok, don't really

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have great monetization for creators. And that's really a focus

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of Ellon, which is getting great creators back on the

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>platform and and a way for them to make a living.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So if they achieve all three of these things and

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a cut of transactions and the creator economy as

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>well as subscription revue on top of the ad revenue,

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this becomes a much more interesting business. Let's talk about

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>a content moderation council that he said he would form.

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>He also said there wouldn't be any big decisions until

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that happens. It does look like Kanye West or Yea

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is back on the platform. Does this mean Donald Trump

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't coming back anytime soon, isn't coming back before the

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections? Well, you know, I'm not sure where Elon

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stands with these issues other than he believes and I

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>agree as well. And I have to say, there's nobody

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>who hates Trump more than me. But I do believe

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in pre speech and I believe if he follows the

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>guidelines of the platform, he should be allowed to speak,

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>just like the Ayatola and Putin are tweeting as well.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, It's like we can't just arbitrarily decide. So

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think having transparency through a process, having better algorithms

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to identify hate and bad speech, and holding everybody accountable

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to the same standards is really what melons about, and

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>creating a great marketplace for ideas um and whether Trump

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>violates those rules or not, he'll be held accountable to

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the same rules as everybody. Now, the reason you aren't

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>excited about Ellen being involved in Twitter is because you

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are a longtime Tesla investor, you're also in SpaceX. Are

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you concerned about Tesla? Are you concerned about SpaceX and

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>his ability to keep these companies running and growing while

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he now has a third company that he has to

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>take care of. Well, I'm not really that concern about Tesla,

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX and both companies achieving enormous successes and and have

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a very clear path and business plan in front of

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>him which Ellen is guiding. Um, My bigger concern was

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>him being CEO of Twitter for any extended period of time,

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and that just there's only so much time in the day,

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and can you really achieve his goals at Twitter along

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>with all his responsibilities of going to the moon and

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>building the biggest, you know, ev tech company in the world.

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, how does one person do this? And

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a legitimate concern, And that was

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the one concern I brought up in the conversation, is

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>like how long is he really going to be CEO?

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think what he's done and all his company

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is very effectively is found great autonomous leaders that really

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>can run the business when he's running around doing other

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff and he guides people in a very specific manner.

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But I also think his engagement, obviously in different levels,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>will be limited because he had now had three businesses

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>instead of two. Well what did he tell you, I mean,

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>how long does he plan to be CEO? Well, I

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't speak to him directly about this. I spoke with

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>his right hand person, Jared Burchnell, and um, you know,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>there were so most people deal with Elon really we

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>just don't know, you know, like what will happen next,

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>which is really the beauty and horror of dealing with Elon,

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. So if you want stability, you know, this

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't the guy. But on the other hand, he's going

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to achieve great things. So so I'm not sure. And

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he's digging in now to see what kind

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>of problem he's got to solve. And and as I've

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, Milon loves trying to solve the most difficult

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>problems in the world and and this is definitely one

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of them. So so he's gonna have to put some

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>time into this one. And just the same, I think

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he's got the team in Tesla in place. Tesla has

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a great year in front of them, and I don't

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>see that being affected in any way. So let's talk

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>about the job cuts. I mean, I already you know

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>much of the executive team is gone. He had said

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>or there was reporting that he was going to fire

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of the workforce. Then he said he never said that.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So where do you think he really stands on job cuts?

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, how many jobs do you think should

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be cut or should they be cut especially right away? Well,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>I know where he stands from what I was told,

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and he I was never told. In fact, I told

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post myself that their number was incorrect and

0:10:55.720 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>they didn't think the article that said, um, there will

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>be massive job was what I was told. And and

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, half the people on Twitter are probably

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose their jobs and and the other half probably

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>will not. And what the way to really look at

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it this way is that Ellen is hiring from Twitter

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>this new team that will run Twitter and whatever it

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>will become. And he's starting with the engineering talent. There's

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talent at Twitter, and he wants to

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>retain and hire these people. And where we'll see most

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of the layoffs are at the top and in the

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>project management side, where many of the projects have not

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>come to fruition or not great ideas, and they're gonna

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>cut a lot of these projects. And so um, when

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at the job cuts that they've made already, Um,

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>he's already saved himselves. You know, probably a hundred million

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars in compensation just from firing for very overpaid Twitter executives.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So I have no love or um belief in the

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>current management team of Twitter. And I think the first

0:11:58.040 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>thing you do is you start from the top and

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you start utting. Um. So that's actually good news for

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>most of the people on Twitter, because if you're a productive,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>successful person on Twitter, you're gonna retain your job and

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you should not be worried in the least bit. You

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>should be excited about the opportunity to work for one

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of the most incredible entrepreneurs of our time. So let's

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about Twitter two point oh as

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you call it. What does it look like further out?

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it part of this X the everything app thing?

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Do some of Musk's other companies have a role. For example,

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>starlink and Starlink have some sort of role in future Twitter. Well,

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily. I think starlinking is an example of where

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they see Twitter two point oh because when they started SpaceX,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Starlink wasn't even an idea, and Starlink ended up becoming

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this amazing project out of SpaceX really, and and that's

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>where Twitter two point oh is, which was sort of

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like pitched as like, well, we're not really sure what

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it will invent, but we know it will be awesome.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of this will be the incorporate ration

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of cryptocurrencies and the digital ecosystem into the commerce, uh

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and creator element of Twitter. So when you actually start

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about trading digital goods and services and digital commerce

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>like with cryptocurrencies, and you add in that element to

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter as an overall platform for good services ideas entertainment

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>um and such um, it becomes a little bit more

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of Elon's vision of X. And really, where I see this,

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>which kind of hit me last night, is maybe he's

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>building the future operating system for Tesla as well, for

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>all the screens and the millions and millions of cars

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that will now run on this new communication social platform.

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot to this that people can put

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>together between Tesla, Twitter software, building an operating mobile system,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and building something that will be great for sharing ideas

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and commerce. Um boy, the potential is unlimited and that's

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>why I am investing. All right, Ross garber CEO, President

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of gerber Kasaki. Great to have your inside perspective with us.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll be looking to you for more information on the

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>inside track as this role is always happy to help,

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>always happy to help. Thank you, all right, thank you, Okay,

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>coming up. The deal is done, but Musk's court battles

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't over. We're going to talk to you about the

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>looming legal challenges he still faces. Next. This is Bloomberg. Well.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>After months spent in a brutal legal battle trying to

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>get out of his forty four billion dollar proposal to

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>buy Twitter, Elon, Musk still has outstanding matters in Delaware courts.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>He is scheduled to return before the same judge in

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Delaware Chancer Record in November for a separate trial over

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>his complimence compensation at Tesla, which could top fifty billion dollars.

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>For more on this, I want to bring in Lawrence Hammermash,

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Institute for Law and Economics at

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>University of Pennsylvania's Carry Law School. Larry, thank you so

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. So we're gonna talk about that,

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about what just happened. Did Elon must

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>just dodge a huge legal bullet here in closing this

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>deal for Twitter. Yeah we'll never know, will we, But

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>but it sure was looking ugly for him as the

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>as the trial approached. Um, quite apart from the fact

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that he uh avoided having his deposition taken in the case,

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>he was going to have to deal with a lot

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of frankly, would seem like contradictory statements about Twitter in

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the last several months, And I for one didn't see

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a way for him to get to the goal line

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in that case, goal line as it was at the

0:15:55.760 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>time getting out of the deal. So as much as uh,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>his turn around and saying Yep, I'm gonna go ahead

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was a shock to me, uh, it kind of made

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sense because I think he was, as we used to say,

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>cruising for a person. Do you think this will impact

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the tech m and a landscape going forward? You know,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>will this discourage potential breakups? Well? Uh, I'm not sure

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it'll do so any more than the law did before.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's been pretty clear, uh from a number

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of cases in Delaware that when push comes to shove.

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>If if your deal says you don't have a way out,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the court's going to do something and is not afraid

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to make you go through with it the specific performance

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>remedy that people talk about. So I'm not sure there's

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>new law. I'm not sure there's new guidance, but maybe

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there's new reassurance that a deal is a deal and

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be enforced. So let's talk about these

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>other issues that he's facing. What how serious are these

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Tesla other Tesla situations and how significant is it that

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>he's got to deal with the same judge who didn't

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>make so many favorable rulings on the Twitter deal leading

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>up to this. Well, Um, I don't want to puncture

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>your balloon, but I think what's left in Delaware is

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as exciting or as big as as the

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>case that we almost just had with with Twitter. But uh,

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're they're serious, and they're really two cases. H. One

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>uh that's scheduled to go to trial soon is uh

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the one involving a compensation package Ellen got from Tesla

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>back in a whole slug of stock options in in

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I think twelve tranches, uh, and they were performance based

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in other words, he didn't get the benefit of those

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>options unless Tesla met some milestone performances, which they mostly did.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. And yet what there's what's left for

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>trial is a stockholders suit claiming that that compensation, that

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>equity compensation was just way excessive in you know, in

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the billions of dollars. I don't know what it's really worth,

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's worth a lot. So how could this potentially

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>impact him given he just shelled out a lot of

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>money to buy Twitter? Well, uh it Uh, if he loses,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it could be significant. Although you know, even a couple

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of billion dollars is a lot less than than uh

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>forty four, but it would be significant if he lost. However,

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to keep in mind that when

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the judge, who has since retired, decided a motion to

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>dismiss the case, he said, Yeah, it's the plaintiff stockholder

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>who's going to have to prove unfairness in this case. Uh,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>principally because of the stockholder approval of the pay package.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Because the stockholder is gonna playing, the stockholder is going

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to have to prove unfairness. Uh. You know, it's not

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a stubble laid down hand and in fact, uh the

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>judge who decided the motion to dismiss said, you know,

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>they pleaded adequate facts to get by emotion to dismiss

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and to go to trial, but only barely. So. He

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was kind of skeptical even at the outset that even

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>if the case went to trial much would come out

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. And I haven't seen anything that's changed since then.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, this strikes me as a case that

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>would make a lot of sense to settle at a

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>much smaller level than a million dollars. All right, well,

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we will be looking out for that, among other things.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Larry Hammerash, executive director of the Institute for Law and

0:19:53.040 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Economics from the University of Pennsylvania. Not all tech companies

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>are taking a beating this earning season. Apple actually soared

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>as much as eight point one percent in New York trade,

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>closing up seven point six for its biggest one day

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>gain since July. This thanks to its revenue and profit,

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>both topping analysts estimates. In spite of disappointing sales of

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>iPhones and services. Has proved to be good enough news

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to avoid the fate of piers like Alphabet, Microsoft, even Meta,

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>who've seen their valuation plunge by hundreds of billions of

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars this season, and Amazon couldn't escape the downward trend,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with its market value dipping below one trillion dollars at

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>one point. In closing the trading day at its lowest

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 1>since June fourteen. The e commerce giant projected the slowest

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>holiday quarter growth in the company's history, while sales at

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>its web services business missed estimates. And some other news

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>In San Francisco, we want to keep you updated on

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>how speaker Nancy Pelosi's office says husband Paul Pelosi has

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>had successful skull fracture surgery. This after a man broke

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>into Pelosi's home earlier today and attacked him with a hammer.

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>The assailant confronted Paul Pelosi and shouted where is Nancy?

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Where is Nancy, before striking him in the head and body.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>According to people familiar with the investigation, police say the

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>man is now in custody and is being charged with

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>attempted homicide and other crimes. As the world's richest person

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>with corporate interests around the globe, Elon Musk is under

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>close watch by regulators. Just today, a European Commissioner reacted

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to his acquisition of Twitter by saying the company needs

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to play by the rules. Bloomberg Sarafier here with us

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>now to discuss Sarah between his work with Starlink and Ukraine,

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's presence in China now of course owning Twitter a

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>lot to keep tabs on walk us through the political

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>impact of this acquisition. I think that this is gonna

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>be one of the main things we end up talking

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>about with Elon Musk, because this this platform, it's it's

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 1>not so much UM a business problem. It does have

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>business problems, but the bigger problems are political ones. It's

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>always about fighting in every country to not share data

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>on dissidents or um not um take something down that

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a leader doesn't want to have up UM. And I

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>think having a business like Tesla operating around the world

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>UM gives world leader some leverage over Eason Musk that

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't perhaps have over prior Twitter leaders. So I

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>do think that that can be concerning long term UM.

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>What we're what we're seeing so far is that Musk

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is trying to take a sort of a measured approach

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter, maybe more measured than the thought that he

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>would at least based on his tweets today, he says

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>he wants to create a content moderation counsel to overview

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>whether people the permanent bandage to be restored, even though

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>previously he said that he doesn't believe in permanent bands.

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>He's he sold advertisers that he wants to build Twitter

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to be something good for humanity. UM that he doesn't

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>want it to become, you know, a toxic success pool.

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that he is is jumping into the

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>deep end and getting initiated with this um really complicated

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>political entity that is Twitter, which no one has really

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>been able to run in a way that satisfies the public.

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest. Do you think given that he just

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>owns or runs so many different companies. You've got Tesla

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>already under investigation. His tweet to take a private put

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>him under investigation. Will his ownership of Twitter with free

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>speech in question, take regulatory scrutiny of him to a

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>whole new level? You know what? It might? I think

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 1>that it definitely. UM is interesting too if you think

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>about the way that Elon Musk does business. He's he

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>based on the text messages that leaked earlier this year

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>in four documents. It's very personal, it's very direct to you.

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>People message him and say, you know, I need this

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or I want this from you, or I have this idea,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and and he's responding on the fly. And just imagine,

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you're owning this network that has um

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>millions of users, but a much bigger uh impact creator

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>than even that, Um, what kinds of things people are

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>already asking him for. He must just be overloaded right now.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And regulators are are no exception to that. We've already

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>seen the EU and UM, we've seen politicians around the world,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, try to to bring Twitter CEOs up to

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>testify in years past. I think they'll they'll bring up

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk as well, ask him about his content moderation plans. UM.

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now, he's he's in and favor, he says, you

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, wants in act. But I think that he's

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>going to have to draw the line some somewhere, he's said,

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is going to anger some people. We just

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know which people yet. All right, Well, excellent reporting

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>from you and your team are Bloomberg Tech editor Sarah Friar,

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>which we will continue to watch in the days and

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>weeks ahead. Joining us now to continue this conversation. Jason Goldman,

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the founding members of Twitter, former White House

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Chief Digital Officer under President Obama from for as always

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the insider outsider perspective. Jason, you have been helping us

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>make sense of this for the last several months. How

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are you feeling now that the deal is done? Yeah,

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we've arrived at actually a version

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of sense that you could you could write down, but

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>we did arrive at least at a season finale, a

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>conclusion of this particular chapter. The deal is done, and

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>now we now we get to see what sort of

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 1>eon is going to do with Twitter. So, you know,

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we've heard predictions of the death of Twitter. It's certainly

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of an era, But how much do you

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>think will actually change? So I think that for a

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>long period of time people have been predicting the death

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter, and I think it's it's unfair to say

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that something is going to change today. There's going to

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>be sort of a mass revolt, uh, and the product

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>will die tomorrow. However, you know, there's a many different

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>versions of death on the web. You know, my Space

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>still exists, it's just not a cultural institution that matters

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in the technological world or the cultural world. Um so

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take a long time, I think slower

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>than people think for product changes to roll out onto

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the platform. But the problem is that mistakes can begin

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>almost right away, whether that's you know, content moderation or

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>user safety or privacy. Even if it's not a conscious

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>change in policy, mistakes will happen because there's going to

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be tremendous brain drain, you know, your guests at the

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>top of the hour set up, and there's just gonna

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>be organizational chaos that prevents good decisions from being made.

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So the leadership team is gone. We talked about that

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the workforce may go if ross Gerber is correct. Who

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>were the winners and losers here, Well, you know, you

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about the executives to go. I would definitely start

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>by talking about the about Vigia, who's the you know,

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.479
<v Speaker 1>the chief legal person at the company ran policy for years. Uh,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Vigia was specifically targeted by Ellen in the

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>wake of this deal as someone that he didn't like,

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>his decisions, he didn't support, and then his legion of

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fans like baraged her with you know, racist and hateful

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>content and through this enduring, you know, six months odyssey,

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>she completely kept the company on track. It was a

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>game of brinksmanship in which she didn't blink. We know

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>from back channel that he tried to renegotiate the deal.

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>She kept the company on pace to close it at

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the price that was promised. And even when he was

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>doing maneuvers such as you know, ironically posing as a

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>national security threat, they kept driving the company forward to

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this close. Uh. And you know, I think that shows

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>tremendous resolve and as a tremendous victory, certainly for shareholders. Uh.

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's something that should be commend ended. Um. And

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, as we talked about before, the other winners

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly involved all the legal fees for outside counsel that

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be that we're generated from this. So congratulations,

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>congratulations to those folks in their Hampton's residences. You said,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the best that Ellen could do here was to remove

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>himself from all decision making, and now he's the CEO

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future. So what's the best thing he

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>could do now? So I think, like you know, the

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea, the thing of announcing there's going to be

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a content moderation panel is actually a smart move. He's saying, look,

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't stop dm ng me and sending me all

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of your you know, sad requests about how you don't

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have as many followers as you think you should. I

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to answer all of those requests. We're going

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to form a panel and figure that out. The problem

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is is how much do we really believe that this

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is a serious idea. First of all, Twitter already has

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>an external Trust and Safety council that they can go

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to for for first questions and support, So I guess

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>he's just layering that one beneath another committee, which is

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a classic corporate move. So a um. But then also

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.719
<v Speaker 1>this morning, as as recently as seven hours ago, he

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was replying to someone named you know whose name is

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is a is a version of cat excrement on Twitter

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>about what problems they were having with their follower graph

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and saying he was going to look into it. It

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>just seems unlikely that he's going to be able to

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>constrain himself, uh and keep himself out of of participating

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in these kind of decisions. And we know that he

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>just likes to announce things and say that things are coming,

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and that there's gonna be a super app, and the

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be digital payments, all the stuff that Ross

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up believing in UM. I just don't think that's

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>going to stop, and that he'll end up sort of

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>announcing these things that don't ultimately come to fruition. What

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>are your biggest fears and how likely do you think

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your biggest fears will be realized? So I think the

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff that Sarah was talking about is the is the

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest concern because he now exists in a world in

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>which the Chinese Communist Party has tremendous leverage over him

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>because he's building the giga factory in China. The business

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in China is incredibly important to Tesla's bottom line. Tesla

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is the source of his wealth. If China and the

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>CCP want to have information on dissidents in Taiwan and

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, he's going to have a much harder time

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>resisting those demands than any other social media company, any

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>other Internet company before, because they simply didn't exist in

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>these markets. Twitter didn't exist in China, Facebook didn't exist

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in China. Like that, they didn't have the same exposure.

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And Ellen not only has exposure in terms of business.

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>He has real on the ground assets that are at

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.719
<v Speaker 1>risk not only in China but in other authoritarian regimes

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Visual is one of the people that

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>was sort of keeping the line there and protecting users

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and those kind of mistakes are really

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>possible and really can happen. Uh And and that's where

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. You know, we like to have fun

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with is this the death of Twitter and what's going on,

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>but there's actual, real user safety and user health issues

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be at risk here. The other

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that's happening that we know is an increase in

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>hate speech, is an increase uh in you know, defamatory

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>languag on the site, which has always been a problem

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter. But we see an increase in that already

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>because people sort of sense that there's a bat signal

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>out that says it's okay to act this way on

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter now because Ellen's espoused this free speech viewpoint, and

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be difficult for people whore at risk

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. But it's also going to be difficult for

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>his business interests because advertisers simply don't want to be

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in a place that looks like a cess pit now.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>People are already being reinstated, Kanye West, for example. You know,

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Ellen has said no big decisions will be made until

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this Content Moderation Council is formed. How soon do you

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>think Donald Trump is reinstated on the platform? Is he reinstated,

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>does it happen before the mid terms? Does it affect

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms? I don't think it. I don't think

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it affects the mid terms. I think he will end

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>up doing it outside of the council's decision. I think

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 1>it would just be something he does because of you know,

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>some whim or some reason. I don't think the council

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is a super serious thing at this point. Like you know,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he will continue to preserve his prerogative to

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>make decisions like that as he sees fit. But I

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>also think that the reinstatement of Donald Trump isn't the

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>most important issue. Like like we it's easy to focus

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>on that because it's a big topic and it's something

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that gets outside attention, particularly from you know, folks with

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>my background working in politics. But the type of user

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>safety issues and the type of user harassment issues that

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>happen all the time really happened in the eaches, and

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>not in like that kind of big that kind of

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>big moment. They happen with complaints between users, people feeling threatened,

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>people's personal information being revealed, and the kind of decisions

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that folks are going to have to make it the company,

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and now they're going to have to do it without

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>senior leadership and presumably without with much fewer resources than

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they had previously. And again, I think that's not only

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>bad for the world, I think that's what's going to

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>hurt his business prospects here. I think he's going to

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>be in a situation where he's losing two billion dollars

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a year on interest payments on the debt, as well

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>as costs and running the company. And it's only going

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to create a downward spiral because he's created a place

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that just looks abandoned and neglected. So it's the clock

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to sting. Then, I mean, how long do you think

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he keeps he holds onto Twitter four. I think he

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually relinquished it with like my I don't know how long,

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think you know he's he's obviously very rich,

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>less rich than he was before he started all this nonsense.

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think he will eventually get tired of spending

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars a year out of pocket to service

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>interest at that is, half of which have floating rate. Uh.

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>That's going to end up moving off of Morgen Sandley's

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>books to some kind of you know, distressed that fund. Uh,

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>he's going to have to continue to service that that

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as paying to do all these wonderful things

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that were talked about. And imagine at the top of

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the hour, you don't just get to create an only

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>fans out of Twitter or YouTube out of Twitter. Imagine

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>digital payments out of Twitter. By bringing in a bunch

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla engineers to review the code, that takes a

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of energy and a tremendous amount of resources

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to actually pull off. You know, there's been ridiculous predictions

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>about how quickly Ellen can change the course on this.

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:56.959
<v Speaker 1>If you remember some of the all In guys were

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about in April when the deals announced that with

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>just a few test engineers, Ellen could remove the spam

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.719
<v Speaker 1>problem from Twitter over the weekend. Well, you know they

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>were on site yesterday. We'll give them the three day weekend.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if spam is still around on Monday. I'm

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>going to guess that it is, like it's not actually

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.479
<v Speaker 1>easy to change these the trajectory of these things, and

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the company moreover is going to go through this completely

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>chaotic transition where it's essentially learning how to operate from

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>day one. Except it's already a going concern with thousands

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of employees. It's it's just not going to end well

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for him in this particular scenario. Last quick question, Jason,

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>are you going to keep tweeting? Oh? Of course, yeah,

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you I will send the last tweet if need be.

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I am not I am not leaving the site. Um.

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But again, I exist in a very privileged space on

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the site, like I don't get messed with by you know,

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>by by these these ellen stands. The only time where

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I see trolls and hate, which I did see some today,

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is when I get retweeted by a woman tech reporter

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically that because then all that attracts all of these

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>all of these folks on the platform. But yeah, I'm

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep tweeting. I think that there will always be

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 1>a place for tweets in the world. In some way,

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's going to be a much diminished

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>place as a female journalist who covers tech. I appreciate

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that answer. Jason Coleman, uh founding team member at Twitter

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for more, White House chief Digital Officer, thank you so

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>much for your helping us try to make sense of

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>this journey over the last year. Joe's Coin, the cryptocurrency

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>based on a meme of a shiba inu, is soaring

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>after Musk's acquisition of Twitter. The coin, which can be

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>used to buy testless swag, is up in the last week.

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>That is fitting for a cryptocurrency that was pumped up

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>by many in the blockchain community, which of course thrives

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Bloomer Shinali Bossik here to explain. You know,

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>this is a good question, Shali. Would crypto be so

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>disruptive if it weren't for Twitter and crypto Twitter? Yeah,

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and look at the price action alone in the days

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>moving up to this deal closure. Here you do have

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Chi up almost twenty over seven day period, ten percent

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>over twenty four hour period. It's getting back down a

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit now it's essentially flat, but you've seen the

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>most of the games. You also see doge point at

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>almost forty percent over a seven day periods of even

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.439
<v Speaker 1>bigger rise there. But to your point, would it be

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>disruptive without Twitter? It's a huge place of discourse of

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>course when it comes to cryptocurrencies and communities around cryptocurrencies.

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But think about how much social media itself on other

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>platforms also have helped really fuel certain tokens and the

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>discourse around them. Everything from TikTok to read It of

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>course has played a huge role as well as Um

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>as well as Discord. I would add Discord to that

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>list of course too, although there are a lot of

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.439
<v Speaker 1>questions about the direction Discord is going to in terms

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of building crypto communities. But Emily, I think what's interesting

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>here is not just you know, the crypto community a

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>rallying around Elon Musk or even certain coins itself, but

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens to crypto from here and where where does

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>it go in terms of how it fits into the

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>broader crypto sorry, broader Twitter environment. What can Elon Musk

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do to make Twitter more crypto friendly since we know

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>how much she seems to love it. Yeah, I think

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>what's important here is it's not really just about the discourse.

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of this here. Remember Twitter really leaned into

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>crypto under Jack Dorsey, and then late last year and

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>early this year they really really focused on using the

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Lightning network and Strike to be tipping users over the

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Lightning network. Now, remember Elon Musk. It's really interesting to

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>think about what this means in terms of either what

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it means for a super app, but he also came

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>from the PayPal mafia. Here. We know he's friendly when

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to cryptocurrencies as a whole. We know that

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>he's very steeped in the payments world as well. Can

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter really be a more significant means of saying sending

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>payments cross border? And is that a priority? It's something

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:04.959
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen a whole lot of movement on since

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the initial announcements. And where does it fall in the

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>grand span of his plans here when content moderation and

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>other things for Twitter are a more immediate concerns. Indeed,

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.919
<v Speaker 1>lots of looming questions. Shali bass As always, thank you,

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>have a good weekend. Up next, we're gonna go back

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter headquarters where Ed Ludlow has been standing by.

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>What's the latest in the last hour? He will tell

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>us this is Gloomberg. Let's get back to Bloomer. Sad

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Ludlow who's been at Twitter's headquarters in San Francisco all day.

0:38:55.160 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>No elon sightings right add to this point, no no

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>elon sidings. All I know that's going on in the

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>building behind me is that senior engineers within Twitter's product

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 1>teams have been summoned to meetings, and in those meetings

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>there are other Tesla engineers. Some of the meeting appointments

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>did have Elon Mosque listed as a participant, and they've

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they actually been asked to bring print outs paper, physical

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 1>paper of the last thirty days of the source code

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they've worked on for Twitter. And my understanding, the whole

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>point of this exercise is to help under Musk understand

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>how Twitter works, the platform, how the underlying code actually

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>works for Twitter as we know it. Ellen has been tweeting.

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>He's been making what looked to be jokes, but you know,

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in typical Ellen fashion, tweeting things that are you know,

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to separate fact from fiction. Yeah, difficult separate

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fact from fiction. What we know is individuals came outside

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter's headquarters behind me. They posed as Twitter employees

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and claimed that they've been laid off sources inside Twitter,

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, images share with me of discussions on

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>internal Slack channels, said that this was a hoax. These

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>are not Twitter employees. We put multiple requests for comment

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>into Elon Musk and his teams. We've put multiple requests

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for comment into Twitter, and as his standard with Elon Musk,

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>there was no comment forthcoming. But he did tweet a meme,

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is often the case he resorted to to

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of meme and ridicule. You know, we talked to

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Russ Gerber earlier in the shows, one of the investors

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 1>in Twitter under Elon Musk, even though he didn't love

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the idea of Elon Musk owning Twitter at all, because

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 1>he's an investor in Tesla, in SpaceX, and he said,

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of you know, supporting Elon is knowing

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you are in for an unpredictable ride and and you

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>know you just have to accept that. You just don't

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>know how this is going to end. You know, for

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.720
<v Speaker 1>those who are sticking around, why are they sticking around

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and what are they preparing for? Yeah, because Ellen has

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>a good track record of products improvement and innovation. Look

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.760
<v Speaker 1>at what SpaceX has done to change the commercial space industry.

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Lots of Twitter insiders I've spoken to are excited by

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the prospect of the company being owned by Elon Musk.

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>The difficulty is that the uncertainty outweighs what they know

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>about the changes that are coming for the products and

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the company. The threat of layoffs is real, and a

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks inside Twitter that work in that building

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and have done for many years are worried for their livelihoods. So,

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think a lot of changes to come

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of days. Right now, the focus,

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm told by sources is Elon Musk under trying to

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>understand how the Twitter platform and the code that underwrites

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>all of it really works. Rosco were also said he

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>thinks the number of layoffs will be more like rather

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>than seventy five quickly. Do we have any confirmation on that?

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Know all I can tell you. According to sources earlier

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this week, Mosque denied two staff that were gathered that

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 1>he knew where that seventy layoff figure came from. Yeah,

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, mort come at Ludlow outside of Twitter headquarters.

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We're going to keep on this story, of course, in

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the days and weeks ahead. And that does it for

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the sedition of Bloomberg Technology Monday. We've got Pinterest CEO

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ready, Pinterest way up today on the back of

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 1>their results. We'll ask him why. Mrs Bloomberg