WEBVTT - Why India-China Comparisons Miss The Point

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>India is often cited as the next rising Asian power,

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>right thereafter China. Its balls say India as ascendant because

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of its growing population, tech savvy, d'aspora, and democracy, among

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>other things. Few discussions of Asia's future are complete without

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the obligatory reference to China and India, often in the

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>same sentence. Both are frequently shorthand for the future of

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. But is China really the best comparison or

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is it merely the easiest? Does the narrative about India

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>China rivalry obscure more than it enlightens. Welcome to Benchmark,

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a show about the global economy. I'm Annual Moss, columnists

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Opinion in New York, and I'm Scott Landman

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and economics editor with Bloomberg News in Washington. A more

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting way of looking at India today might be to

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>compare it to America in the late nineteenth and early

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty centuries. That was the era of the so called

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>robber barons of tycoons like Rockefeller and Morgan. And today

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in India we have tycoons that have a kind of

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a similar profile in their society. Dan tell us a

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit about our guests. Our guest is James Crabtree,

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>an associate professor at the Lee Kuan New School of

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Public Policy in Singapore. He's a former Financial Times journalist

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>who's just published The Billionaire Raj, a journey through India's

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>new guilded age. James, congratulations on the book, Thanks for

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>joining us, Thanks for having me. How different our India

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and China? And what, if anything does the shorthand link

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>between the two, miss I think that you're starting premise

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in your introduction is the right one, which is, these

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>are two very different economies. China's is state dominated. India's,

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>although it has a healthy state sector, is predominantly private sector.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Um China has a strong government that is capable of

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>doing things India, with the best wood in the world,

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>does not. And most crucially, China began its liberalization process

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a good ten years before India, maybe twenty years depending

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on how you count it, and so China is a

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>much much larger economy. This plays out in the way

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that people misread these two Asian giants, or one Asian

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>giant and one Asian giant in waiting. If you look

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>at an issue like the size and the middle class,

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>people look at them as if they're the same. But

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese middle class is vast. The number of online

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>shoppers in China now is greater than the number of

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>online shoppers in the entire of the rest of the

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>world combined. The Indian middle class is stupid tiny. I mean,

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe eighty million people out of population at one point

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>three billion would classify as the sort of middle class

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>customer that that you know, your listeners would imagine someone

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>who has a petrol driven vehicle and some savings in

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the bank and a higher education. So they're very, very

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>different economies, and so it's often not that helpful to

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>take a kind of crude comparison between the two of them. James,

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about how that plays into your book, you know,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the government's role in the economies of China

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 1>and India. China had the state sponsored economy for some

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>decades after the Communist Revolution. Subsequently, in the late nineteen

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>seventies started to step away, which allowed the flourishing of

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the kind the economy that you see today. Can you

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us about India and how the government plays a

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>role in India's economy and how that has either helped

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or held back and how that set the stage for

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the billionaire class that you talk about

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in your book. So India and China have been through

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a similar stage in their economic development, or China has

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>been through. In India is going through this early stage

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of industrialization, which comes with a number of other things,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>massive urbanization, the development of the middle class um and

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>big infrastructure development and its infrastructure, which I think is

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the most instructive comparison, because China has been through the

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>largest infrastructure investment in human history, and it was predominantly

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>driven and even directed by the states. So the government

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>decided what should be built, and the people who are

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>building it were largely state back companies, not necessarily wholly

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>stay owned, but they were controlled by the state. India

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>in the two thousands went through a similar infrastructure boom,

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and typically we view India as having fairly hopeless infrastructure.

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But actually if you go to the major Indian cities

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>now and you go to their airports, they're not the

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>airports that you think. They are. World class airports in

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>almost every case. Now every big Indian city has a

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>has a world class airport, and the most they opened

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last five to ten years and almost all

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of these were put in by big private sector conglomerates

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>run by tycoons. The same is true of the steel

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>mills and the iron ore mills, and the ports on

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the coast, and the and the toll roads between the cities.

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>And that is where the comparison with America and the

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Gilded Age sort of bears out, because these have both

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>been countries where the risk taking and industrial development has

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>predominantly been taken on by the private sector. Now in

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the Indian case, it is funded by public sector banks.

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the government plays an important role because

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't get land to build a road or or

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a steel mill without the government say so. But it's

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>really been the private sector that has taken the lead.

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's probably fair to say that the

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>investment that went into India in the two thousands was

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>probably the largest private sector investment in history since America

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>built its railways. So you know, you're you're talking about

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a very substantial role for the private sector. In the US,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>there's a strong perception that China's government and its companies

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are one that the state that is a communist party,

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>has co opted business in pursuit of national goals. Listening

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to you speak, I wonder whether the reverse is true

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in India. Companies have co opted the state. It's a

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>very nice way of putting it. I think that definitely

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was true in the middle of the two thousands. So

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>take take a step back. India became independent from Britain

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in seven and then for forty years shut itself off

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.799
<v Speaker 1>from the rest of the world and developed a socialist

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>planned economy. Your listeners may be familiar with the phrase

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the Hindu rate of growth, the sense that India was

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a basket case that couldn't really grow more than four

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>or five It opened up and began to liberalize, but

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it was really in the two thousands when things really

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>kicked off, and that was when India began to grow

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it around eight percent a year, and you also got

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a wave of corruption handles, many of them to do

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>with infrastructure investment or extractive industries or rent seeking. And

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it was at that moment that the point you make

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be true, where it really looked as if

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the large tycoons had just got the government in their pocket.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>They were bribing left, right and center, and that was

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>when you had a big public reaction against grand corruption

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>India in its pre liberalization time, We've always had corruption,

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but it was pretty small bore stuff. You know, you

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>had to play a bribe to a policeman, you had

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay a bribe to get your driving license, your

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>marriage certificate. It was only after liberalization. And this also

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>happened in different ways in China and Russia too. But

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>as the economy grew, the value of corruption grew with it,

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and so suddenly you had this grand not rather than

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>retail corruption, you had a wholesale corruption. That has tapered

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>off a little bit. So into India's people elected Randramodi,

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the current Prime Minister, won an overwhelming landslide. That was

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>partly because he stood as a pro growth, pro business candidate,

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>but he was also staunchly anti corruption. And so this

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>sense that the tycoons have the Indian government in their

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>pocket has tapered off a little bit. But I think

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly true to say that if you look at

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it the other way around, which is China. China's government

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is very strategic in the way that it directs investment,

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and presently, for instance, is trying to roll out it's

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>China Plan to develop world class advanced manufacturing in areas

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>like robotics and aeronautic manufacturing. India is much less good

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>at that at sort of the state directing industry strategically

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and enabling it so that you get the kind of

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>injuries industries you need to develop. Why don't you tell

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about one of the main figures

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in your book, Mukesh Ambani, one of the wealthiest men

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in India. Who is he? Is there anybody in the

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>United States that might be an equivalent to like Jeff

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Bezos or you know, how how did he amass not

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>just his wealth but the power. You have some pretty

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting ecdotes in your book where people don't even want

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk about him. He just has so much hidden

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>power behind the scenes. There's an Indian newspaper editor called

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Shaker Gupta. He's one of the pre eminent columnists in India.

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>On Twitter earlier this week he sent me a little

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>message saying, you know, you're quite brave to have written

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this book. And partially what he means is that people

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in India a bit careful writing about the big business people.

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Not because like Russia, you're going to end up dead

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>in a ditch. But these people, they have a lot

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of power they remember, and so people are somewhat cautious

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about about writing about them. I mean, I had left

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the country son, since I'm somewhat protected, and Ambani is

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the most sort of famous I suppose of these examples.

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's start from the beginning. The American edition of

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>my book on its front cover has a picture of

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>his house, which is called Antilia. It is a a

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy meter residential skyscraper that towers over downtown Mumbai.

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a family home for Sambani, his wife and his

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>three chill Droun and you know, it's large enough to

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be a gigantic hotel. It has all sorts of luxurious

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a coutoment from an indoor put football pitch and swimming

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>pools and all the things you'd expect, hanging gardens, roof terraces,

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and people call it the billion dollar Home. Nobody really

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>knows how much it actually cost to build. But there's

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this sense that this is really the icon of what

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I have called India's New Gilded Age, because it's one

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of the most visible buildings in Mumbai, which is the

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>financial capital and the richest city in India. But it's

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>still a city where something about half the residents live

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in slums and in a country where GDP per capital

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is about sevent d dollars. Muka Schambanni who is he?

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>It's quite difficult to compare him to an American capitalist

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>because he runs, as many Asian tycoons do, a very

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>distributed conglomerate. So he inherited it from his father, and

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>his father started out in plastics and moved into petro

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>chemicals and oil refining. Muk Shambani has recently he spent

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>an enormous amount of money thirty billion dollars launching a

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>fourth generation mobile telephone business. But he has his fingers

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in all sorts of pies. He has media, hotels, bits

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>and bobs of financial services, all sorts of things, and

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a very distributed business. Oil and gas it's a

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>big business. So they do energy exploration. And he's not

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>just the richest man in India and his personal fortune

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is forty billion dollars, so he's the richest man in

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Asia according to the most recent Forbes list. The reason

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>why he's so feared partly is the legacy of his father,

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 1>who was India's pre eminent tycoon before him. And had

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a reputation for you know, knowing how to work the

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>system to to make money. Is a ferociously competitive and

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>his son has inherited some of that as well. Chambani

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is known as a ferocious competitor who will spend whatever

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>money and you know, indulge in whatever tactic is necessary

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to get what he wants. And his investment in what's

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>called reliance Geo. This new Greenfield mobile telephone network is

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>an example of a quite tycoon like venture in the

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sense that no sensible board of a Western style company

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>would have green lit spending thirty billion dollars to build

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>a new fourth generation mobile outfit in India, which is

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly competitive mobile that mobile market in which almost

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>none of the companies make any profits because it's so competitive,

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And yet he sank more money into one company than

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the rest of the Indian telecom companies had

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.599
<v Speaker 1>spent collectively since liberalization. I mean, it was just a

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's an insanely ambitious venture. And in the book, so

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I suppose I have to say I sort of admire that.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's the point of being a tycoon if

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't take these ridiculous big bets that's sort of

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the point of building a railway between New York and

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, or you know, these huge, bold, visionary things.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>The problem in India traditionally has been that you can

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of risk as a tycoon, but you

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>don't take any of the downside of that risk because

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as you have great control over the banks, you don't

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>have to pay back your debts. It's it's almost unheard

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of for Indians to go bust. So the tycoons have

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of power. So tell us a little bit

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about your background. You were the ft bureau chief in Mumbai.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Did that mean you were the head of all FT

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>reporters in India. No, the South Asian Bureau chief sits

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in Delhi. So typically that's how it works. The Ft

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously is a much smaller operation than the giants of Broomberg.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So we had a couple of people in Mumbai and

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of people in Delhi, and so I was

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in charge of writing about banks and finance, heavy industry, tech, telecoms, cricket, Bollywood,

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>whole range of fun stuff. But it was we'll get

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to cricket in a second. If it was, it was

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning of the right from the start that

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I got there. I arrived in twenty eleven. That was

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the period of these corruption scandals, and so I sort

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of arrived on the on the turn, as it were,

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the moment when the real boom years were just beginning

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to peter out. And what then happened, which was, uh,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the tide went out and you began to

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>see who was still less standing, as it were, and

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so a number of these conglomerates, it turned out to

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have taken on far too much risk and got themselves

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>into big trouble. And this has been a theme of

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Indian economy ever since. Then. You have what's called

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the twin balance sheet problem, where there's far too much

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>debt in the corporate center and much too much bad

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>loans in the banking system. And so India has been

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>struggling to come to terms with the sort of the

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>after effects of the boom in the mid two thousands.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And did you ask to go to India or were

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you assigned? Now I've desperately wanted to go. I've been

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to India before. You know, India's a fascinating country. It's

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful place to be a journalist. It's very open.

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>If you compare South Asia, which is chaotic, to East Asia,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>which is very well organized. But but South Asia is

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>very open society. Indians love to talk. If you go

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in there, particularly if you work for a top tier

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>media organization like Bloomberg or the Wall Street Journal or

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ft, get great access. People will talk to you.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The Indian elite it's quite Western in its orientation. They

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>send their kids to American universities, their own houses in London,

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they care, they get their capital from Western capital markets.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>None of this is really true in China. That's not

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to say that the Chinese are for the kids going

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to university in the US. That's true. But and that's

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not to say that China's elite is insular. It isn't.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But the Indian elite is particularly concerned with what is

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>said about it and is very well networked into the

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>global financial sectors London and New York. And that means

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you get a peculiar insight into what's going on. And

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I also think that typically when outsiders like us right

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about India, we tend to do it from Delhi. The

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>typical book written by a foreigner about about India tends

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to look at Indian politics. And so although I've often

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>joked that it's not as if the world was crying

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>out for another book written about India by a white

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>British journalist, I think mine is at least a little

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>bit different because it was written from Mumbai, and it's

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>written through the lens of business, and that's what I

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>was interested in. I never was that interested as a

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>journalist in writing about MidCap companies in London. But what

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>captured my imagination was the sheer risk taking that has

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to go on in India at this stage in its development.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you were a journalist in America

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and eight and you're watching Cornelius Vanderbilt or Jay Gould

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>or the true robber Barons, then these are exciting people.

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>If you were either Tarbell, yeah, exactly, if you're a

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>muck breaker, these are exciting people. And they're exciting partly

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the boldness of their their capitalism, but also

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the way they're bending the rules. And so

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>there's this this sort of very enchanting combination of risk

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>taking of a sort that are more established Western PLC

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>simply is not allowed to do. Maybe if you cover

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody like Elon Musk you could say that you have

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>buccaneering tycoons of of a sort of similar quality who

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>are who are doing things that are simply the sort

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of thing you wouldn't normally get on on Wall Street,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>or it's not stretched across the entire our economy the

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>way someone like Muskies. Right, Well, I suppose that's true,

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that was that was what that was what

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>captured my imagination about India. This combination of risk taking

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and rule bending, I thought was just a fantastic story.

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Is the State of the Billionaire raj as we like

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to It's a great title for the book. By the way,

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh do you see that going on for a long time?

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.959
<v Speaker 1>And we talked a bit about at first we've alluded

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to the guilded age, you know, that era in the

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>United States, and you just have this massive inequality in India.

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Obviously these you know, a billionaire like on body who's

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>building his own billion dollar home. You know, often the

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>politics from from the outside, it seems to be kind

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of paralyzed and not really going anywhere. Is this state

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>of affairs of India's economy? Inequality? Is that likely to

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>persist for a long time? Or you know, do you

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>see this kind of working its way through the system

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know there might be a way to equalize

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that in the economy somehow. That's a great question. I mean,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I think for India it has to be that this

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>should be a passing phase and not a permanent condition,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>because if it's a permanent condition, that's problematic for a

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for a whole range of reasons. Countries that start off

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>very very unequal tend to stay that way, like Brazil

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or South Africa, and that stores up problems for later.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>It's much more difficult to reverse these trends, and very

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>unequal countries come with particular challenges. However, there's nothing particularly

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>unusual about what's going on in India at the moment.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about the American guilded age, and I think

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>if you were sitting where we are now in New

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>York as a media organization in eight and you looked

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>at the United States, you could very well say, you know,

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this is an absolutely hopeless country. It's politicians are completely venal,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it's tycoons are corrupt, its politics is disorganized. The no

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and that this is going to become a great superpower

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>looks rather fanciful. And yet over the next twenty or

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty years you had a range of things that happened.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>The middle class began to assert more control over politics.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You had the development of different types of institutions, You

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>had anti corruption campaigns. There a whole range of things

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>which meant that you know, twenty or thirty years later,

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>things look rather different. The thing that has to happen, however,

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I in the billionaire rage, I say, has these three

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>characteristics the rise of the super rich and the inequality

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that came with it, endemic chrony capitalism, and then a

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>boom and bust investment model. And I think it's difficult

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to see India moving quickly from its current position. It's

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>not really a poor country anymore. It's a sort of

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>lower middle income country through the ranks of middle income

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>status to become, you know, a rich country by some

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>time in the second half of this century, unless it

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>fixes these three problems. And we we've seen countries do this.

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the successful developing economies of East Asia

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>have all managed to do this, but they did it

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.959
<v Speaker 1>in a particular way. They were more egalitarian than India

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is now. Crucially, they also had a different economic model

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>because they were better at export focused manufacturing and India

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is not very good at that. So that's another part

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of the puzzle. But I think if India is going

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to develop successfully, it needs to act pretty quickly to

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>try and find a way of bringing this extreme inequality

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>under control. Cricket, let's talk about that. How has the

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>game developed in India and what role does it play

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:32.239
<v Speaker 1>in trying to understand the modern Indian economy. I'll just

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>back up a bit for some listeners. The game's ancestral

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>home is England. In the late nineties seventies, thanks largely

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to changes initiated by an Australian businessman called Carrie Packer,

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Australia became the financial driver of the game. Has that

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>now shifted to India? And what does that tell us?

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So cricket is a fascinating example and I think fits

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely squarely within the book. So there's a chapter in

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the book on cricket. I used to cover cricket not

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>as a sport but as the business of sports, and

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>cricket is very, very lucrative in India. And yeah, I

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.719
<v Speaker 1>mean not absolutely no question that the idea that anyone

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>other than India controls the finances of world cricket is

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>now fanciful and has been for probably ten or fifteen years,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>but the gap just gets bigger and bigger. But cricket

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is interesting for a different reason, which is there are

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>very few examples of industries in which India is the

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>world leader. There will be over time, as with China,

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>as India grows to become the It's already the third

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>largest economy by by PPP. But you know, as it

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>becomes bigger and bigger and bigger, there will be many

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>areas that India comes to dominate, but at the moment

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>there are very few, and cricket is definitely one. And

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you see, that's sort of the good and the bad

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Indian economy being reflected in the way that

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>cricket is now run. So the good, all of that

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>money has actually improved cricket a great deal. Cricket used

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>to be a rather, you know, sort of tired, uninteresting game.

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>People like you and me might have liked it, but

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it was compared to football or basketball, it's certainly lacked

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit of razzle dazzle. And India basically by pushing

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>a short term, more vibrant, more television friendly form of

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the game. Pumping it up with money has turned cricket

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>on its head, but actually made it much more palatable.

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>That's certainly true domestically in India, where you know, you

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have built lots of great stadiums and that sort of thing.

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But the dark side has come that actually the same

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>story that you had in mining or telecoms was true

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in cricket as well. You have questionable government standards, corruption scandals,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>chrony capitalism in which you had effectively the same kind

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of collusion between the politicians who ran the game and

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the business people who sponsored the game. And so cricket

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>has become an example of the new India writ large,

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's more vibrant, but it's also more corrupt. Let's talk

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>about those politics for a moment. Prime Minister Moody was

0:22:55.080 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>elected in He was widely viewed as a business can

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to person who is going to bring a very different

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of administration to India, and yet governing is always

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>tougher than it looks. How is his government doing and

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>how has the relationship with the billionaire class in India

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>evolved under Moody. On the surface, I think Moody has

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>done reasonably well India's headline growth rate is strong. It's

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the world's fastest growing major economy and has been for

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>many of the last four years. It sort of goes

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with China depending on how much juice

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are putting into their economy. The mega corruption

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>scandals have stopped, and they've introduced some broadly sensible reforms,

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly goods and services tax of value added tax. The

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>fiscal situation is broadly under control. So that's all pretty positive.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the criticism of Modi would be

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that while he's been a good administrator of the Indian economy,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been a very radical reformer of the Indian economy.

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And you can look at that across a whole range

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of areas. So we've mentioned already the twin balance sheet problem,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the huge the fact that India has had

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>almost a lost decade of industrial investment because it's companies

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have too much debt and its banks have lots of

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>bad loans. He hasn't fixed that big underlying structural problems,

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.239
<v Speaker 1>changes to how you get a hold of land, how

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the tax system works, a bunch of these structural economic reforms.

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't really managed to push through, and so I

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>think in a sense there were people who had much

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>higher hopes for what he would be able to achieve.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>What has struck you about Americans views towards Asia generally

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and India in particular. Well, I have a self interest

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in saying this, but I think everybody needs to spend

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot more time thinking about India than they do.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Now I have a book to promote. So you might say, well,

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he would say that anyway, But I think it's clear

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that in the U S and to some degree ever else,

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we we view Asia through the prism of China, and

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think actually there is a case to say that

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>India is more important China. China is clearly the path

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is almost set now it is degenerating into a kind

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>of neo Leninist autocracy. India is much more in play

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for the kind of country that it will become. And

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we we in the West, we who believe in free

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>markets and the power of business, have a great self

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>interest in India becoming a middle income parliamentary democracy with

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a broadly secular culture and liberal rights. That is probably

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the path that India will take. But you know who

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>can tell it's It's the great swing state of the

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty one century at a time in which the die

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>looks increasingly cast between the West and China. And therefore

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I think people probably pay a little bit

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>too little attention to India and could probably pay pay

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a little more. The term Indo Pacific has proliferated here

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in the US the past couple of years. What does

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that mean to you? Well, the Indo Pacific, which is

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>often called the free and open Indoor Pacific, is a

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is a new attempt to justify the current status quo,

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the American led global order. This is sometimes called the

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>rules based global order. The Indo Pacific as a particular

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>term became more prominent when President Trump went to Asia

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last year. And it's instead of

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Asia Pacific, which is the way that

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the people normally talk about that region, it's been enlarged

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to call it the Indo Pacific, with the specific aim

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of basically bringing India together with the US, Japan, and

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Australia to some degree as the sort of friends. Broadly

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the US, is this thing called the Quad. Yeah,

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the Quad, which is part of the notion of

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the free and open Indo Pacific. But it's basically an

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>attempt to try and balance Asia against the rise of

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>China and to try and draw India more firmly into this.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to say anti Chinese, but I mean,

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you could call it what it is. I mean, it's

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>certainly the reason why people are coming up with this

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is that all of these countries are worried about the

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>rise of China and what that will then mean to

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the system of rules in Asia. However, this is happening

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at a time in which America, in theory, is the

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>architect of the free and open indoor Pacific. But then

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of course President Trump is going around destroying large arts

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of that order that in a sense of America is

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>claiming to protect. And so it's very complicated situations for

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>countries like India to some degree in Japan, South Korea

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that they all quite like the status quo, but the

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>country that is meant to be leading the status quo

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>is also undermining it. And so it's a very complicated

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>situation in Asia at the moment in which people are

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty confused about American leadership. Well, we almost got through

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>an entire episode without mentioning President Donald Trump. So I

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're just going to have to end it right there.

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>My apologies, all right, James Crabtree, Arthur of the Billionaire RAJ,

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us on Benchmark. Thank you.

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Benchmark will be back next week. Until then, you can

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com or

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg App, and podcast destinations such as Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen. We love it if you took

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the time to rate and review the show so more

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>listeners can find us. You can follow O me at

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Moss Underscore Echo, I'm at scott Landman, and our guest

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is at at James Crabtree. Benchmark is produced by Tofa Foreheads.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.479
<v Speaker 1>The head of Bloomberg Podcasts is Francesca Lead. Thanks for listening.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>To see you next time.