WEBVTT - Cheney’s Bold Bet on Impeachment

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanobek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world's of business and finance,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. A lot of developments on

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine and COVID nineteen front Today Jane Jay's experimental

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>one shot COVID nineteen vaccine generating a long lasting immune

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>response in an early safety study. So we've got that

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. We've got ninety two and a half million

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>cases death surpassing one million, and as for the vaccine

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>roll out, more than thirty two point four million shots

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have been given worldwide. Let's bring in our guest, Gig Grandfall.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>She is at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Public Health, supported by Michael or Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Her background is amazing as an

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Associate Professor Senior Scholar in the Department of Environmental Health

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and Engineering, and she's an immunologist by training. Among things

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>she has authored and one is Preparing for Bioterrorism, the

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Peace Loans Foundations Leadership in Biosecurity. She's on the

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>phone in Baltimore, so let's get to it. G g Um.

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>The one thing Tim and I really want to ask

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you about is a story we just talked about about

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a New York congressman who got UH the vaccine two

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>shots and still diagnosed with COVID nine team, how do

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to kind of understand how that can happen? Yes, So,

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are not UM. They're not a like a kevlar

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>vest for for viruses. UM. They are a training program

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for your immune system and and we look at UM

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>how effective they might be. UM. So some of the

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are like effective. That means that if you and

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I were both exposed and you were vaccinated and I

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>was not, your risk of coming down with COVID is reduced.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's not zero and UM and we don't know

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of variables involved. Um, you know, how

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 1>long was it after the second shot before he came

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>down with COVID, whether or not there was some failure

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>along the way. Um, so all these things could uh

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>could interact with his his protection. But um, but yeah,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not Uh, nothing is add percent in this world.

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But um, but definitely the vaccine has been shown to

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>be protective for most people. Do you get concerned when

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you see stories like this news stories like this because

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it could give people the wrong impression about the efficacy

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of a vaccine or about the need to get vaccinated. Sure,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we were humans we love stories, right,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and um, sometimes the stories don't tell the um what

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>what it was actually true for most people statistically we

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think in terms of population. So that true, especially

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to any sort of adverse events from

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>them from a vaccine. Um. You always worry about that

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>because bad things happen to people all the time. And

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if it's connected to a vaccine and a story, Um,

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the two things might not have anything to do with

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>each other. But um, but it could be you know,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>linger in somebody's mind. And as fact, how they think

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine, does the variants that are coming out

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of COVID impact You know, even if you've

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>got a vaccine, could you get the virus? Get get

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are you more could you are you more likely to

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>get the variant versus the original COVID nineteen I guess,

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm asking. Sure, So right now, UM, we

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the vaccines are protective against these new variants

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that we've been discovered. But unfortunately, I'm I'm worried because, UM,

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, viruses mutate all the time, all the time,

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and so one of the things that we need to

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>do is to limit their opportunities to mutate. And um,

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and that means driving down but that's through vaccination for

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>masks and everything else. But UM, when we have these variants, UM,

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the vaccine will protect. But I just

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>worry about you know, the next ones that we discuss

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>go go with us. I think about all of those

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>movies that are made about you know, the virus, the

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>things that mutate and how they become you know, in

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a fictional world. UM, just difficult to kind of overcome.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>What's the worst case scenario of mutation in this virus?

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>The worst case scenario for this UH, for this virate, Well, um,

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there there are lots of different things that the virus

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do now that UM that it could do, and

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>so we want to make sure it doesn't become more severe,

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>more severe disease UM, have an expanded population that it

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>causes more severe di is in UM. But what I

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>think is the most serious concern right now is just

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>making sure that it doesn't um evolve away from the vaccine.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So we don't want it to escape from the vaccine,

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and and the quicker we can get this under control,

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the more likely we won't have to worry as much

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>about that it might be in the future that we

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>need to update the vaccine UM saying it will be

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a longer time in the future than you know than

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>these variants might suggest. Well, thanks for our producers. I

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>know that one thing that you have looked closely at

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is the politicization not just of the entire pandemic, but

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine and the administration of the vaccine. What

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>do lawmakers need to do in order to make it

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>less politicized? So we can truly round the corner here,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and we only have about forty seconds, Okay, Yeah. I

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>mean you just really need to put um everything on

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the science and make decisions based on the science and

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>admit that you know. Science changes, and so then that

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>what you know about of the disease and what you

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>can your plans that will change as well. But UM,

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>if you always stick to what you know, then you

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about about being wrong um and

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>just acknowledge that you know. Things change. But we're doing

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the best you can with the knowledge and science that

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we have available. I wanted to go to what Charlie

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was talking about with Johnson and Johnson's one shot vaccine.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it has not been a proof for emergency use authorization.

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>We are still awaiting further information and data from a

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>clinical trial. But I'm wondering just about the one shot

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>element here. How big of a deal is it that

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>this could there could be a one shot vaccine coming out? Oh,

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's such a big deal. So we only have gotten

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the phase UM one and two data for Johnson and Johnson,

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>so we are still waiting to hear about the efficacy

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>which will come in in the phase three data. So

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're still waiting for the data. So I

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get too excited. But um, it's a

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>one shot vaccine and it requires regular refrigeration. It's not

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>one of these you know, needing to have an exotic

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>minus a d degrees refrigerator, which is what you need

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for the visor and not so lesser degree than madiurnal vaccine.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So UM, it's it's very exciting from a logistics point

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of view, because, UM, this is a hard enough task

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as it without having to add these additional logistical burdens.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like it sounds to me like, you know, this

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.239
<v Speaker 1>is pretty impressive, right, yeah, I mean, and as you said,

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's early going. When do we expect to get that later? Uh?

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And key UM stage study. I've heard that we should

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>expect it in the in the next couple of weeks,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>next two or three weeks, and that plans are to

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>have late February early March at least. The last Ti've

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>i've heard UM to have them submit the data for

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>UM the process to hopefully get emergency to use authorization.

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's some weeks away. There are some concerns

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I read about how manufacturing is not quite up the

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>level that they want. UM. Hopefully they can correct whatever

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>issues they are having but um but yeah, it's it's

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in Hopefully in the next couple of months, we will

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>have another vaccine online. The vaccines that have been approved

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for emergency use authorization here in the US from MODERNA

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and from from fisor BioNTech. They use messenger RNA technology.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>How is the technology or or the the way the

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is manufactured. How's that different in the Johnson Johnson one. Yeah,

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so that is using an ad no virus vector which

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>can't UM as in the previous segment hurt. It can't

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>replicate in humans, so it's not um you don't have

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to worry. You cannot get um covid from this vaccine. UM.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But it is a different factor, a little more traditional

0:08:55.320 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>UM vector to be used for for for um different

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>types of vaccine. So um, it's it's just another product

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like the others. Um uh. It will have a few

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>side effects, so people just need to be aware that

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>they might have a headache, they might have a store arms,

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>things like that, but that you know, they can before

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>fore armed, you know, so they that they can um

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for that. I understand. It was also the

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.119
<v Speaker 1>same science that was used in Jane Jay z Bolo vaccine,

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Zekea and a few other things. Okay, I gotta ask you,

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this is something that I don't quite understand, you know,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the kind of problems we've had with the vaccine rollout.

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>What happened? Where was the breakdown? Because I feel like

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we had a ton of conversations over the summer that

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we knew it was coming, We knew the vaccine several

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked about distribution logistics. What happened do you think

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting it out to people. I think

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll learn more as the weeks go on had happened there?

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I think there were always going to be some hiccups.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But one thing is for sure, the stimulus still UM

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>included money for distribution, and that was not present before.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So the other problem is that UM that states are

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot more than UM than probably they should

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be doing. There is UH just at least been the

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>case for all aspects of UM the COVID response, where

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>UM every state is UH doing their own plan instead

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of having UM much more aggressive federal UM you know, leadership.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that that situation will change in

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the in the coming weeks and UM and so hopefully

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 1>people will get used to the logistics and laws really quickly,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>if you can in fifteen seconds, do you anticipate by

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>summer will have the majority of our population vaccinated or

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe even sooner? I hope so. And that should be

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>our goal because um, we need to get to prepare

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for these very and this vaccination is a huge way

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to get everybody going in the economy going again. Great stuff, listen,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Really appreciate your expertise. Gig Gronvill,

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Senior Scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and Associate Professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Public Health, of course, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg LP. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>So Big Business, Tim, Yeah, we've been see it backing

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>away from President Trump after the Capitol Hill riot, and

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>while that could be an opportunity for Democrats, it's likely

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>not to play out that way. So reporting for Bloomberg

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>business Week, business Week editor Peter Coy on the phone

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey along with Bloomberg Business Week Editor Joe Weber,

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he's on the access line in Brooklyn. Uh. You know,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it has been interesting to see big business, you know,

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how quickly and probably understandably, Joel that

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they've been backing away from this president. Do we have Joel?

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're having a little trouble getting Peter. I wanted, Peter,

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>do we have you? Yeah? I can answer that question.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>They have definitely backed away. I mean, what I said

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in my article is that the bridge between Trump and

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the big business was never as solid as it might

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have appeared, but now it's inflaming ruins. It's just completely destroyed,

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>probably irreparable. Of course, that's with Trump. That doesn't necessarily

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>mean the bridge between the big business and Republican Party

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>is irreparable. I think that is reparable, and that's what

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be watching for over the next few years.

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So the big question, though, Peter, is what the Republican

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Party looks like over the next few years, because there

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>are segments of the Republican Party right now that aren't

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the traditional pro business uh no, low regulation and free

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>market right correct, correct, correct, that's all right. The issue

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>is now that a big Trump is put at imprint

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party He's pulled in new sets of voters and

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:09.599
<v Speaker 1>who are more populist and are suspicious of big business.

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That elaps a big business the CEO just as much

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as their suspicious of academic and government and media elites.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They don't give big business a pass, and so that

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>makes it tough for organizations like the Business Roundtable, the

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>US Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers. Joe Weber,

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got you, now, come on in on

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. Yeah, you don't need me, though, you can

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>just stick with Peter that you know Peter the There

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is this opportunity here UM for Democrats. And we think

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about big business and it's largely historically been UM been

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>something that feels like it's drifted more towards GOP than

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>than Democrats. And yet there's this kind of a jump

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>ball moment. And what is the opportunity really for for

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrats here to take advantage of this moment? Now, they

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>have always been segments of the business community that were

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>more favorable towards the Democrats. Tech was until fairly recently

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and now, but that serve marriages on the rocks a

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit. UM. But the the opportunity the jump all

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you call it, okay, Look already we've seen that the

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>stock markets responded pretty well to the prospects of a

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden victory, and when the two Democrats won in the

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>open seats in Georgia, which gave the Democrats the Senate control,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>stock market went up on that news. So people are

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>expecting two things from Biden that are favorable for big business.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>One is that he'll probably bring on more stimulus COVID

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>relief bigger dollars, and two that he might be more

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>effective than Trump has been at arresting the coronavirus arise epidemic.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>If he succeeds in both of those, that would be

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>great for corporate profits and therefore for stock prices. So

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>what about how much of this is just big businesses

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>backing away from Trump because of of last week and

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>allonging for a GOP that it looks a lot more

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>like it did pre Trump. That's I think that's most

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. It's it's not so much that they're in

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>love with Biden. There's still a lot of suspicion of Biden,

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>especially because the Democratic Party platform is quite liberal and

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the most liberal has been in decades. Um they look

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at a lot of things that Biden wants to do

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and say, know, we don't want to go there, but

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump is you know, the obviously the breaking point was

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the invasion of the capital, which he seemed to incite.

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Um just shocked people. Organizations the National Associated Manufactors conventionally

0:15:54.760 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>fairly true true read Republican group, uh almost right wing

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in them in the past. And yet they were the

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>first ones out with the statement calling this sedition and

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>asking Biden asking, I'm sorry, Pence to uh try to

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>get the cabinet to invoke the amend but that Trump

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>re moved from office. You know what's interesting though, I

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>think for so long and but a while ago, Peter,

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that we thought, you know, business was beholden only two Republicans.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at donations and you put it

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>out your story that especially when Democrats call control Congress,

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you find groups like PE oil and gas, real estate

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>companies tend to give a lot to the Democrats. Yeah. Yeah,

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it's very much opportunistic giving by these organizations. They want

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to give to people who I think they can help

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>them with their agenda. Democrats rise up and gain a majority,

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly they want to curry favor with them. So

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very clear from the chart the tears of the story.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>And so with the Democrats controlling the White House and

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>both House of the Congress this time, I think that

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>could be strong giving to Democrats for at least the

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>next two years. Peter, what about um uh this idea

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of of you know, we're in this moment that obviously

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>has been inflamed. We're going to see what inspires of

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the next week. And I'm curious, like you know, from

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>from your reporting, does it suggest that business will just

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>stay on the sidelines for a while or will someone

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>get back in and sort of like start to to

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>angle sooner than that? You know they have they operate

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>on multiple levels in the public. You don't hear a

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>lot from them, like they don't really enjoy talking to

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>people like me because you know, ask uncomfortable questions. But

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean they're not operating. They're very much in

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>their lobbying day to day. So they're not on the

0:17:55.160 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>sidelines at all. They're pushing their agenda and that will continue.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You um, if anything will be stepped up now that

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a new UH Congress and a new president. Well,

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder Peter, does business help kind of, you know,

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>help with the reboot of the Republican Party and help

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the maybe perhaps redefinition definition of them, Like how

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>do you see it? Um? Yeah, they it's not so

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>much that they want to go in a new direction.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>They kind of want to go back to you. They

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that deregulation, low taxes. Um. But but

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's that's the caricature that the big business is not

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>um entirely against all kinds of regulation. In my article

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>details several areas in which the big business, if anything,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we melt against some of the deregulatory measures of the

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration. Well, definitely something to think about with everything

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>else that's going on into kind of how we we

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>get our way back. Peter, Um, always great. Peter Koy.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>He is Bloomberg Business Week Economics editor on the phone

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.479
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. Check out his story in the magazine

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Getitor Joe Webber joining us on the

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>access line in Brooklyn. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So all this week politics and the happenings in and

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>around the nation's capital, no doubt about it. It has

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>been our top story topped off with the second impeachment

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of President Trump, writing about it, and the one high

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>ranking House Republican who has stuck her neck out when

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this, Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming. You

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>caught up with him earlier today on Quick Take, Am

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I talking about Josh I did? Yeah, Josh Greeney's national

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>correspondent for Bloomberg Business Week, and he joins us now

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on the throne from Washington, d C. Josh, I cannot

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>get enough of this column that you wrote last night

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>about Liz Cheney's bold bet on impeachment. Did it backfire? Well?

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gonna know for a little while,

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>but but certainly her going out and making the searing

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>statement against Trump saying, there, you know, he's portrayed the

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>United States, it's violated as over the office and his

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>oath to the Constitution. UM. I think she probably expected

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to hope for a bigger following among Republicans. In the end,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>only nine other Republicans voted for her to support Trump's impeachment.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think the real asset test is going to

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>come in the months and years ahead, as you know,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump fades from the scene. A bit. Part of the

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>bet she was making is the future of the GOP

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be something more along the lines of

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what it used to be. I mean Cheney before she

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>came to Congress, Um was a very well known Neo

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Cohn who had uh serious conservative views like her father,

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>former Vice President Dick Cheney. I think part of the

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>bet here is that she can steer the party back

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in that direction. But having said that, uh, you know,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>just just in the day or so since the vote,

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in the week or so since the riots, it's pretty

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>clear from from UH polls that the majority of Republican

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>voters are sticking with Trump. So something is going to

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>have to change in order for her bet to be

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>proved to be the right one, uh politically. But but

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's probably too soon to make that judgment.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So does she accurately represent the people of Wyoming and

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the people put her in office, Well, she certainly does not.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the vote she took to impeach Trump.

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump won Wyoming last November. I think it was seventy

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>six percent, and he's one of the red estates in

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the country. So so certainly a lot of supports for

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump there. Uh And then speaking to people internoun Wyoming

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>politics for this column, they said, look, there's going to

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>be unhappiness. It is gonna ruffle a lot of feathers.

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, Cheney, you know that the Cheney

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>name has a long and story history in Wyoming politics. Um,

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know she isn't she isn't. Uh knew she has

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a serious base of support. I think there's a lot

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of good will toward her in Wyoming, just generally leaving

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>aside the issue of Trump and his impeachment. So most

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>people I talked to thought she would have no real

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>problem surviving and timing wise, this is probably good for

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>her in the sense that she was just reelected to

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>another two year House term in November, so it's gonna

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>be quite a while before she has to face voters again.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>What's the potential upside of this becoming a leader within

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the party, I mean, if she does successfully sort of

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>forged her own path away from President Trump with a

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>handful of other Republicans, what's the potential upside she faces. Well,

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think in the best possible world, you know,

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the upside she'd have is that you know, the party

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to face a reckoning after Trump, and that

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe when he's no longer in the Oval office and

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>not splashed on Fox News all the time, assuming the

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms keep him curbed, that his influence on

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Republican politics will wane um in much the same way

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Palems did ten years ago. You know, for a

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>while there she was the hottest thing Republican politics. Everyone

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>covered her endorsement, was afraid of her criticism, you know,

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>but eventually she kind of blew away and and and

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't exert any real lasting influence. Personally, I think Cheney's

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>best case hope would be the thing like that would

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>happen with Trump. The two years from now, the world

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>will have long moved on Biden, the Democrats will be

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in charge, unifying thing among Republicans will be opposed Biden,

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and that Cheney will be seen as someone who, you know,

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>bravely ventured out and broke with the trumpets at a time.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And that was a dangerous thing to do. And one

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that both her supporters and critics I talked to

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>said was that this move was absolutely a bold one

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and a risky one. It wasn't an easy political thing

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>to do. I think a lot of people give her

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 1>credit for take that step. Well, I kind of know

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the answer to this question because I've read your story.

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know what embolded her to do it? Was

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this just a politician saying, you know what's right, what's wrong? Basically.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, I got a lot of debate while reporting

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about this. I mean, on one hand, clearly this is

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a principal span that she has no love for Donald

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump and has been unhappy with him and has said

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so publicly all along, although not to the degree that

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we saw with her impeachment statement. Um that being said,

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>she is a professional politician from a family of politicians,

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and everything they do is to some extent a political bet.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I think the bet here is that long term, this

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be seen in hindsight to be the

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>right move, in the same way that a lot of

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>people who voted a lot of Republicans have voted to

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>impeach Richard Nixon. You know, that's now the first line

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in their obituary, and something that will in hindsight come

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to be seen as brave and principles and will pay

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>political benefits for the few Republicans willing to do this

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Yeah, I just wonder how long it

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>will take for for that hindsight to become clear. Is it,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, two years when she faces re election, or

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is it you know, ten years from now, or or

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>even know. It's an interesting story because I think what's

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>likelier to happen in the short time. They are already

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>petitions going around among House Republicans to oust from her

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>leadership position in the House, So she may well face

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a steep short term penalty, not in terms of losing

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>her seat in Wyoming, but I'm losing losing her leadership

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>spot in the Republican House leadership, So she could actually

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>pay a steep price before she realizes any political game.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that would come later on in the future.

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But all of this, I think, uh, certainly, her fate

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in the House is probably gonna be decided in the

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>next fifty days or so. I think we'll have a

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>sense that this is survival, not quite cancel culture. But

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think about this whole idea that you're right,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to have different perspectives. You know, Josh, You've

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>been following politics like this is something we've got to

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>figure out. That's the whole crux of what makes I

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think good politics is when you have different points of

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>view and people can discuss it and figure out what's

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a smart way forward for both. Yeah, I think that's right.

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And look, you know, in fairness to those Republicans who

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>want to cancel this, Cheney, you know, she she's the

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>number three ranking House Republican. Her vote was clearly out

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of step with the majority of her caucus. And if

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they decide the pass loution resolution to revoke it, yeah,

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>they're well within their rights to do that, and she

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>was well aware of that going into it. I think

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for her that it's a combination of principle, like I said,

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and also a belief that longer term, her brand of politics,

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>it's still one that that she and other Republicans can

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>be bullish on and that there will come a day,

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>even though it's harder vision now when Trump won't have

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>this iron grip on the Republic. I'm just gonna say

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to Dick Cheney wears a mask, and that picture is

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in Josh's story, Josh Green, and I want to say thanks, Josh,

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna talk with Adam Gentlesen a little bit

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>later on, Who's got a book out called kill Switch,

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>all about the Senate UH and the crippling of American democracy.

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So Josh, thank you because you brought us to us.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Josh actually has a story about that book. It's on

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal as well. Josh Green, National correspondent, Bloomberg

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, brom A Journal. Yeah, but you let me drive. No, no, no, honey, please,

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the right I want to drive. Just drive

0:26:52.240 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the questions, Drive to the globe, Dawn Radio. Yeah, it's

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>time for the Drive to the close. And today we're

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.959
<v Speaker 1>hearing from Wall Street Visionaries, three executives who spent their

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>careers on the cutting edge of the financial industry, who

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>shared their views on what's to come in the next

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>five to ten years. This is so important for investors,

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and they shared it all with Bloomberg News. Is Shenali Bass.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>She's Wall Street reporters, she's on the phone. She's in

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>our New York City bureau. But we believe in social distancing,

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>so she's down in our studio. Sally, this is a

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>killer story. It is among the most read, It will

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be among the most read for the week overall. So

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>tell us first of all, what you set out to

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>do and who you talk to. Thanks Carol. This is

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>something that I had been working on for a while,

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>something I will ask all industry executives. Actually, it's what

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>do they think the next big worry is for them

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>over the next five to ten years? And finally we

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>got it all down on paper this time around, in

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a global pandemic. The biggest surprise is

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>that from three financial asinaries in the middle of a

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>global pandemic, they're most concerned about the impact on technology

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on society, Technology and society. Um Chinali, We've been lucky

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to have you throughout the week join us on quick

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Take to talk about some of these interviews you did.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I'm curious about is this thread that

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>runs through them. What did these responses have in common?

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>What do these interviews have in common in terms of

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>their concerned about next big risk? Well, there are a

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of things to him. One of them was that

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our guests believe that there should be

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger role that the government plays in terms

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of reigning in some of these technology companies. Marty Chavez,

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>who was really an architect of the technology businesses within Goldman.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Sachs had said the big tech giants should be stress

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>tested similar to how the big US banks were stress

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>tested after the two financial crisis, because just like any

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>other business that has gotten very big over time, um,

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's really externalities that can come from unrestrained

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>grab to profit. I think that is such a key

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>thing considering that massive hack, and it's really been overshadowed,

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>understandably so by all the political news that we've had

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. But you know, when I

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have side conversation shinale with individuals, they're like, you know,

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we got to keep on this story. We gotta figure

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>out what happened that massive hack into US, into the

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>U S. Government, into various institutions and organizations. We kind

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of that was a really big warning sign. It certainly is.

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know the thing about it is, there's so

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>much else going on in the world right now. I

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's what makes it important that you have all

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of these executives who are not only looking at this

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>as a long term product problem, but also I'm trying

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to call on leaders to do something about this. Anyways,

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>as tired and exhausted and tied up as they are

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with all the other issues that are going on in society.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's another individual that you spoke to, Eileen Murray.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>She's former co CEO at Bridgewater Associates, And we do

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>want to share, first of all with our audience a

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>little snippet of the conversation where in this little clip

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>she talks about the need for businesses and the Biden

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>administration to come together job training and education. Check it out, everyone,

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like the current pandemic. You know, just as all

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of the companies that were producing a vaccine how to

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>work closely hand in glove with the government, businesses need

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to work closely, hand in glove with the Biden administration

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to deal with people that need to be retrained. And

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>then I think, let's let's step back to lower income people.

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm in this COVID situation. There are children that that

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>their parents can't afford a computer for them to be

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>educated online and a lot of a lot of education

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>has gone online. It breaks my heart. Uh, you know,

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>so how do we inset people to donate computers to

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to to to donate money to helping those people get educated,

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>give them a tax break? You know, I don't know

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>if that's the full solution, but the problem is getting bigger. Yeah,

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there you have it. That's Eileen Murray, she's former COCO

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of Bridgewater Associates speaking with um Shinali. The idea of

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>permanent unemployment, the idea of not just the pandemic, but

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>but people who cannot get jobs again. What is the

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>solution to that according to the people you spoke with. Yeah,

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and and remember, Kim, one thing that's terrifying about this

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is she is speaking about this issue irregardless of a

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>global pandemic. And because of this COVID nineteen crisis and

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>economic crisis, we have eighteen million people who have claimed

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>unemployment across regular and emergency program so we already have

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of joblessness. One of the things she offers

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is the idea of a tax break to companies that

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>are willing to retrain workers and help really kickstart employment

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in this new economy because it does look different with

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>u with technology than it did in the past. So

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>instead of laying people off and letting automation take over,

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>why not create jobs kind of like the Henry Ford

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>model with um you know, with cars, build technology and

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>build processes that make the economy more productive, but also

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>do it in a way that allows the people to

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>afford the goods that they are making. That's what David Siegel,

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>who was the co founder of quantitative finance Giants to

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Stigma had promote proposed. Well, that's what's interesting too, is

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that listen, you know, we constantly are talking about this

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>time of crisis and strain and stress you know, leads

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to innovation. That's the good sign. But you do wonder

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what it means for There's so many jobs that are

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>constantly being automated at this point. I mean, listen, we've

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>kidded around here, how now even stories are being written,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, by robots and automated system It's not a joke.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It's real. It's a thing, and it's so it's it's

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>areas snale that we never thought would be automated. Yet

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, It's absolutely possible. And you know, another thing

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that the two Sigma founder had said was what does

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that mean for our role as investors? Is what he said?

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>He said that for him and meant investing in places

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>like education and healthcare and places where you know you

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>can actually earn a great return on top of also

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>creating technology that could help people at the end of

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the day, there's a novel thing, right, mean, he said,

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>were really at risk here of just focusing on GDP

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for GDP's sake and not focusing on the things that

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>are harder to measure, like happiness. Um, how does one

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from a government to an investor, how do you measure happiness?

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>You just want to end with with how this came together,

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>What was the idea of the genesis for this and

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and why this question? Well, for one thing, from the

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>investor perspective, these people are paid to think about risk.

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>They sit there and they do it all day long.

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So from that respective, you know it's something that's already

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on their minds. But what did surprise me at the

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>end of this project was how much they were worried

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>about the broader society and their role in it. Because

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>guess what, tim at the end of the day, if

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>people don't sort this thing, these things out, it will

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>become a problem for companies and executives in terms of

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>how much they're paying in taxes or how much they're

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>having to get back to society. Um, at the end

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:57.719
<v Speaker 1>of the day, if they don't take care of it.

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I love that the light in your story about David's Eagles,

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>saying I don't think people are reflecting enough, and he

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>talks about in Japan how they think about, you know,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the experience a lot. We say that, we say that

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but I don't know that we're thinking about

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it and putting it into action. Shnally, you are amazing.

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Selik Well Street reporter at Bloomberg News. Joining us here

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>at our New York studios and headquarters. Check out our

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>stories on the Bloomberg. I'll put it out on Twitter again.

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It is among the most read on the Bloomberg and

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>it will be for the week overall easily. Thanks for

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.439
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News