WEBVTT - What's Driving Crypto's C-Suite 'Great Resignation'?

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I heard podcast,

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for Bloomberg.

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Mus It's Wednesday, October twelve. What do Michael Sailor, Jesse Powell,

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Morrow, Sam Trabuco, Brett Harrison and Alex Maschinski all

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>have in common? If you said there dudes in crypto,

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you'd be correct. If you said there dudes who used

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to be crypto CEOs and suddenly weren't anymore, you'd also

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>be correct. This crypto winter has seen a string of

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>high profile exits from the c suite, a mix of

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>resignations and other forms of well to coin a phrase

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>conscious and coupling. What's driving all of this activity? Is

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it Bitcoin prices falling more than is that the bankruptcy filings?

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it the SEC breathing down everyone's neck? Is it

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the wanting to spend more time with your yacht in

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas? Maybe it's all of these at once. For

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>more on this succession level crypto drama, we've got Bloomberg

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>report to U. H. Young antipoly Vias, executive search recruiter

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>at Global Consulting, firm. Corn Ferry very excited to have

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you both on the show. So that's all going on.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I thought, basically every episode of this

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>podcast with there's a lot going to own. It's always true,

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but today, more specifically, we're going to talk about the

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that, you know, roughly a dozen or more folks

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in C suite executive management, senior leadership positions at some

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the largest crypto companies in the world have in

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>recent days found themselves either out of a job or

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in a different job from what they were doing before.

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Industry turmoil happens, company upheaval happens. You know, we'll talk

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to folks and they'll say, oh, yeah, totally, this person

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to spend more time with their family. There's

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>always a narrative around these things. What we're going to

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>dive into a little bit is why we're seeing this

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>right now in crypto, what might be coming next, and

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what our listeners need to understand about corporate succession and

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you asually, I'm going to start with you, could you

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>just remind folks how many people have switched the jobs

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in the past couple of months in crypto. That's going

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a long league. What are some of the

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest names. We'll start with Michael Saylor, who let macro Strategy,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>which is the company that's been buying big Coin. And

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>then we also have Crack and CEO Jesse Pals stepping

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>down as he was the co founder of the crypto Exchange.

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And then we have a leadership shuffle at Genesis, one

0:02:54.720 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest institutional crypto brokerage, which was the biggest

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>creditor for Three Arrows cryptal hedge fund that went bankrupt.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 1>So we've seen a series of changes, I would say,

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>starting as early as August this year. As you say,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>U G, that is a fairly long list of people,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and some of those folks, you know what they've telegraphed

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is this is expected. I've been doing this for a

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>long time. I'm really interested in these other opportunities. For

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>some of them, it came as kind of more of

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to the market. Are there any common trends

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>or themes like, are there particular signs that this company

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>was about to go through some kind of leadership of people.

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I would place all these changes in the broader context

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of what the cryptal industry has been sued in the past.

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Several months. As we know, ever since the collapse of

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>cryptal prices, there has been a series of shakeout. We've

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing layoffs at big cryptal companies. There has been companies

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that fell for bankruptcies, there's been consolidations and bailouts, and

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>now we're entering a stage where some of these companies

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>are starting to change their top leaders, including the CEOs.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And I would say that the cryptal industry is fairly

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>news about ten years old. So a lot of these

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>CEOs that are being replaced are actually the original founders

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of the crypto companies, and they are oftentimes closely associated

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>with the brand name of the company, and they're able

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to amass lots of followings online and their household names.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But now they're starting to be replaced by professional managers

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>whose names are less familiar to folks in the cryptal communities,

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but who have background in traditional professional services firms and

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Probably I wanna get your perspective on this, because

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we've seen this in finance, We've seen

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>this in tech. You know, boy jenior ceo company grows

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to ten thousands, Suddenly like wow, this is really hard

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>managing all these people's less fun we're gonna switch over,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>or there's some kind of corporate crisis, or as you

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>directly points out, a an industry wide crisis from your perspective,

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>as anything about what was happening in crypto unusual or

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>different in any way. I think there's two answers to

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>that question. I think there's a yes and a no.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with the no, in that any disruptive industry

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>or any disruptive technology has its early adopters, and there's

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>an education process that the industry has to go through

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in order to adopt it. And so we've seen that

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in tech and like you said, a wonder cand and

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, these these geniuses, there is that element of it.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>The yes part of the unusual nous is that this

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is such a novel concept, but it's baked an ideology

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>as well, right, and so they want to actually reimagine

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the way money is distributed with etcetera, and even the

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>creation of a currency. I would you know, draw some

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>parallels to when you know, the euro was introduced in

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the market. And I was actually there at the London

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>School of Economics at the time and when they introduced

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this concept. As a student, I was like, this is

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>never gonna think what is this? This is never gonna happen.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>What what are you guys talking about? And there was

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>an adoption or an adoption process, and so I think

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>with the crypto space there is some big uniqueness from

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of a you know, reimagining the financial system with this,

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you're going to get a lot of

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>different perspectives. It's so interesting to hear you identify the

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of the ideology that's wrapped open crypto because that

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>has absolutely manifested in the shall we say, some of

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the larger personalities at at play here, and you know,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>cracking and coin base and a couple of other folks

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>have had their CEOs kind of go on the record

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>saying if you're not down for this cause, if you

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>are like one of those quotes unquote wokes out there,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>like we're not interested in what you have to say

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>about any of these things, like don't bring politics to work,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>or let's ask questions about whether women can be people.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. So that's such a specific way of running

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a company, and I wonder how that squares with what

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you AI is identifying of bringing in this class of

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like professional managers who are much less likely to be

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>wanting to write incendiary blog posts about who counsel as

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a person as you, And she said, there's a lot

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of founder lead and founder first firms out there which

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>they have become their own brand and personal brand in

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space, and as any industry, the maturation of

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that industry requires a lot of institutional knowledge, which is

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>why you're now seeing this new wave of leadership step in.

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Because have we gone through a crypto winter? Yes? Have

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 1>we gone through crypto winters? Yes? Have we gone through

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>really extreme market volatility? Yes? Has the regulatory bodies that

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>started to take a look at this yes. Think about

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>when the iPod first came out. When the iPod first

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>came out, people are like, what are you talking about? Like,

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're gonna have you know, five thousand songs

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in this little device, And the early adopters really geeked

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>out about it. And so the early adopters of crypto

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>really geeked out about it because of those personalities, because

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of those guys that they were and yes, they wrote

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them were guys that came out and said,

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is the next way of the financial world.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's democratize access and let's figure out what those pain

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>points are in the industry and completely obliterate everything. And

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think ideally everyone can understand that this is great,

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but the implementation of it is so hard, and I

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's what these guys are running up against. And

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly why you're going to see the succession around

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>leaders that have said, I've taken a really hard concept

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in this, you know, age old industry, and how am

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I going to execute it and implement this? And you're

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>going to need that institutional knowledge. You're going to have

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to have them navigate through the system because those guys

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that are just sitting on the other side of the

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>house saying this is what is ideal. That's great, but

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to get the others to adopt to it.

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>That's probably given that this is literally your job, right

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It is like identifying that pool of talent, but also

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>helping organizations who are going through these kinds of transitions

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>define who they want that could take on that change

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of strategy, Like what does that like look like in practice?

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Is this a short process? Is this a loan process?

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Like who gets involved? Depending on the stage which you

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>know these companies are in trouble or you know, there's

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>some event that has happened. And I think I might

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have mentioned this, uh before, is that you know, there

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 1>needs to be an adult in the room that's kind

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of been there, done that, seen it and can tell

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the story again. And so you know, oftentimes those individual

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>alls are parachuted in quite quickly together with the leadership

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>team and the board working in lockstep. Other times, you

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>know you're going to see what you're kind of seeing

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in some of the executives that might have come in

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is what we generally call organ rejection. Right, So they've

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>come in and they've had really good intentions and you

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>know they've just brought in a different perspective, but the

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>culture itself or management or however things are working on

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the inside just basically rejected them. And so while all

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>intentions were good, it just might not have worked out

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective. And sometimes the culture piece does run

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>very deep, depending on the organization, and so you can

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>get immediate sort of organ rejection and you'll see people

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>out of there within six months to a year. Colorful phrase,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely I'm gonna have to work this since at

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the title of the episodes on How Up Next, you'll

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>hear more on how the Crypto ceo reshuffle could change

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the entire landscape of the industry with Bloomberg Reports, uh

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>G Young and executive recruiter deepoly Vas. Broadly speaking, I,

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>at least other than the financial crisis, I can't remember

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>witnessing an industry where they have been like so many

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>very senior leadership transitions like this in such a short

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of time. Right, it would be like, if you know,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Bezos and Zuckerberg and Tim Cook, We're all like Tuesday,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>let's do Tuesday, and they all just quit. Like That's

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>what it sort of felt like in Crypto. What is

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>like the collective effect on the talent pool? Are there

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>people out there who are still lining up and being

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>like that seems like a really good idea for a

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>job transition. I'm going to run one of those companies.

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Or does that make it more challenging to replace these folks?

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's challenging in general. Right, So you have

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one side of the market that is looking for extreme

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial opportunities, extreme challenges. They want to roll up their sleeves,

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to get in there. And then the type

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>of talent that these crypto companies originally wanted to attract

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was this institutional knowledge that can convert themselves to a

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>more entrepreneurial mindset and come in there and help them

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>build something great. So that part of the market has certainly,

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, taken some pause and say, while I was

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>super interested, I bought into the story, I might hit

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the pause button because where I am I'm safe and

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>do I want to take on this risk in my

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>career at this time and in this particular industry. And

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>this is mainly due to the macro economic conditions. Right,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are we going into a recession? You know, is crypto

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>taking an even deeper dive? You know, there's massive consolidation.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Do I want to work for a company that's going

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to because solidated and then I'll be layered or I

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>might be out of there. So there's so many different

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>considerations that are going on. I think this shakeout has

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of taper off or level off at some point,

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and that will only be done as soon as we

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>know what is the FED doing, you know, whereas inflation?

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>What are other parts of the globe doing around the industry? Right,

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in Asia, what's happening in Europe. And then

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lastly the regulatory environment. Where do the regulatory body see

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>us as a digital asset and how are they going

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to deal with us now and in the future and

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what sort of lined up? And then how are the

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>banks and other institutions and institutional investors going to treat

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>us positively or negatively? Time will tell. Those questions are

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so hard. You're You're like, what is the fact going

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to do? What's gonna happen with regulations? I could understand

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>why somebody might be like, I'm just gonna set this

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>one out, I'm gonna be okay, But actually you actually

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to you, and then deeply

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you the same question. Are there certain

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>types of industries that the folks in crypto have been

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to recruit from? So you age you've written about

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there was like for a while, the

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of revolving door of trad fi to defy, defy

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and the other parts of crypto, And now it's like,

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I might go back to my relatively chill investment banking job.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you think that ship shaking out? Well, it wasn't.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Banking jobs are not exactly chill but it is a different,

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>very different wife from what you get at the crypto firm.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We are still occasionally writing about news of people who

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are leaving big washway firms and joining crypto. This morning,

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we just wrote about MPT at Goldman SAX who's joining

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Quin based Institutionals for their derivative's effort. So these changes

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>are still happening, but I feel like, just based on

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>our observation, is less often as I would say the

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>latter part of last year when the market was still

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>going strong. And I would also note that a lot

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of these replacement of top leaders often come within the

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>company or at least within the cryptal communities. It seems

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're the ones who already know the company inside

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>out and therefore they have an understanding of how things work,

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what are the key issues here? And then oftentimes, with

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>short notice, if you have to change your leaders, some

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of these companies will look within themselves to find the

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>next leader. And probably how common is that right where

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like a company is going through crisis and they're like, actually, Jim,

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>who's been here all along, it's gonna be it's going

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the new person in charge all the time,

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>all the time and I and it's almost as if

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they need to rely on sort of that safe, steady

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>pair of hands that have actually seen the story play

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>out and they just didn't have the opportunity to jump

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in in. But because they have all of the bird's

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>eye view or the front row seat right to what

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>has happened, that they would be an ideal candidate to

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of step in. When you think about people going

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>back to those investment banking jobs, those jobs are also

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of drying up in these specific market conditions, right

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like there's less deal flow. Goldman Sacks and other big

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>banks have come out with potential layoffs and hiring freezes, etcetera.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that's again just based on market conditions. So

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say that for me, if I was just

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of predicting future of work for those gyms that

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>are sitting in those seats right now that want to

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>take on something, I'm going to go out on the

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>limb and say, for those companies that we're keeping a

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>close eye on crypto, and I'm particularly talking about the

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>banks and funds and others, this may be an ideal

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>time for them to build something in house. Right, this

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is the time to say all right, there's talent on

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the street, there's consolidation. What can we do to set

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>ourselves up for when crypto makes a re emergence after

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>this winter? And they would be smart to do so.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Final question, you are a person who was running a company.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You spent a lot of really quality time on your yacht.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Now you're like, I want to you know, like, there's

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>only so many beautiful beaches I can spend time on.

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back and get my hands dirty again,

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but not necessarily in either you know, trad fire Wall

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Street or back into crypto. What from your perspective as

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>a recruiter, like, where would you expect to see some

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of those folks popping up? I think the next trend

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be sort of platform as a service

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and data as a service. I think that those individuals

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that have been in any part of the tech, financial services, data, crypto,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>blockchain ecosystem, it's all gonna be kind of in and

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>around there, right, So for those yacht goers that want

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to dip back in, they're huge opportunities in these data

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>related companies. Right at the end of the day, that's

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the data is going to be king amazing. Well, I

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>feel like I learned some things. I feel like this

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>is one of those episodes we should post on LinkedIn.

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, did you recently buy a yacht? Like?

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen to the Scrypto episode. Well, thank you both, so

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>so much. What a pleasure to have you on the show.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>You can find more of you. H Young is reporting

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal, on Bloomberg dot com and on Twitter.

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>She's at you underscore Young, that's why you e Q

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I underscore y e n G on the next episode

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Crypto. Of all of the regulatory priorities in

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the world, why is finding Kim Kardashian one point two

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>six million dollars at the top of anyone's list. This

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from Bloomberg and I

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. For more shows from I Heart Radio, visit

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Send us your comments, questions, or suggestions

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg dot net or

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 1>find us on Twitter. We're at Crypto. The supervising producer

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Vergelina. Our senior producer is

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Janet babin Our producer is Sharon Berrio, Associate producer is

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Thy Butler. Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original music

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>by Leo Sidrin. I'm Stacy Marie schmal We'll be back tomorrow.