1 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud 5 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,560 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. As President Trump 6 00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:25,760 Speaker 1: is demanding to meet the anonymous whistle blower who complained 7 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:30,320 Speaker 1: about Trump's request that Ukraine investigate his political opponent, how 8 00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:32,880 Speaker 1: Speaker Nancy Pelosi is calling on the White House to 9 00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:36,919 Speaker 1: cooperate with the impeachment inquiry, and at the Texas Tribune 10 00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 1: Festival in Austin Saturday, Pelosi said that she decided to 11 00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:43,760 Speaker 1: launch the inquiry into the president's call with Ukraine based 12 00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:47,200 Speaker 1: on the facts. People say, you have taken political risk 13 00:00:47,240 --> 00:00:51,960 Speaker 1: doing that. That doesn't matter. That doesn't matter because we 14 00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 1: cannot have a president of the United States undermining his 15 00:00:57,320 --> 00:01:01,080 Speaker 1: oath of office. Joining me A Brad Moss, a partner 16 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:03,760 Speaker 1: with the law firm Mark Z. The firm represents the 17 00:01:03,760 --> 00:01:07,600 Speaker 1: whistle blower, but Brad has been walled off from that matter. 18 00:01:08,280 --> 00:01:11,800 Speaker 1: So Brad, President Trump has demanded to meet the whistle 19 00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:16,920 Speaker 1: blower and provide and the people who provided him information. 20 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:22,400 Speaker 1: Is it possible to complete an impeachment inquiry without exposing 21 00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:26,320 Speaker 1: the identity of the whistle blower? Of course, And the 22 00:01:26,360 --> 00:01:30,480 Speaker 1: president here is confusing what would happen in a criminal 23 00:01:30,520 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 1: proceeding which he has been immunized from by virtue of 24 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:36,800 Speaker 1: a d o J opinion that says a sitting president 25 00:01:36,800 --> 00:01:40,440 Speaker 1: camp be indicted from what happens in the impeachment process. 26 00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:43,040 Speaker 1: There is no sixth Amendment right to confront your user 27 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:46,000 Speaker 1: in the impeachment process. And this is very much, you know, 28 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:48,720 Speaker 1: it's a standard for Donald Trump, who you know, likes 29 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:51,360 Speaker 1: to view himself as a street fighter and a counterpuncher. 30 00:01:51,440 --> 00:01:55,120 Speaker 1: He wants to try to intimidate the individuals the side 31 00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:58,320 Speaker 1: of the individual who came forward this particular whistle blower. 32 00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:02,480 Speaker 1: He also wants to intimidate whoever provided information to the whistleblower, 33 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 1: something that would be a gross abuse of his authority 34 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:08,919 Speaker 1: and power, because ultimately those individuals work for the executive branch, 35 00:02:08,919 --> 00:02:11,400 Speaker 1: and he's the head of the executive branch. The president 36 00:02:11,440 --> 00:02:12,800 Speaker 1: is going to have to learn the going to have 37 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:15,959 Speaker 1: to deal with the fact that by virtue of being president, 38 00:02:16,040 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 1: it doesn't make him into an autocrat. He has to 39 00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:21,480 Speaker 1: still comply with certain rules, and he's gonna be dealing 40 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:25,760 Speaker 1: with a separate branch of government, namely Congress. Members of 41 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:30,799 Speaker 1: the Intelligence Committee and to other committees have scheduled uh 42 00:02:30,919 --> 00:02:34,880 Speaker 1: potentially pivotal closed or interviews this week with past and 43 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:39,880 Speaker 1: present administration officials. If part of the impeachment inquiry for 44 00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 1: Democrats is to convince Americans, shouldn't they be holding all 45 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:49,640 Speaker 1: these hearings in public? So it depends on certain circumstances. 46 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:52,200 Speaker 1: There are There is context in which I can imagine 47 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:54,960 Speaker 1: some of this can't be done in public, if for 48 00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,359 Speaker 1: no other reason than there are interests of national security. 49 00:02:57,400 --> 00:03:00,280 Speaker 1: They have to be protected that the members theeople who 50 00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 1: will vote on impeachment need to know. But that can't 51 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:07,040 Speaker 1: be discussed in an open setting where other individuals beyond 52 00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 1: the American public would be able to see it. So 53 00:03:09,560 --> 00:03:11,600 Speaker 1: you think about some of the context of some of 54 00:03:11,600 --> 00:03:15,920 Speaker 1: these conversations the President had with foreign leaders, efforts to 55 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:19,360 Speaker 1: put certain information onto co word classified systems, and the 56 00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:21,880 Speaker 1: details of how that's done. Those are the kind of 57 00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:24,920 Speaker 1: things that ordinarily you can't get out of a govern 58 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:27,120 Speaker 1: agency if you were to say, sue for that information 59 00:03:27,120 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 1: on the Freedom Information Act. You can see why the 60 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:33,960 Speaker 1: ANCIS would have problems disclosing that in an open congressional hearing. 61 00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 1: I don't anticipate that to be the rule. I expect 62 00:03:36,760 --> 00:03:39,560 Speaker 1: that to be the exception in these in peace proceedings. 63 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 1: But there is some some context, some detail that might 64 00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:46,480 Speaker 1: not be allowed to be provided to the public. Now, 65 00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi has said there's a cover up of the 66 00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:55,000 Speaker 1: cover up, um. But as far as we've heard, is 67 00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:59,320 Speaker 1: there any indication that President Trump was involved in that 68 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:04,400 Speaker 1: decision to put the transcript of the call, you know, 69 00:04:04,480 --> 00:04:10,600 Speaker 1: into that secret code word access. So so at the moment, 70 00:04:10,640 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 1: we don't know the honest answers. We don't know what 71 00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:15,720 Speaker 1: we don't know. We know that the White House lawyers 72 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:19,560 Speaker 1: and then apparently National Security Council officials were so concerned 73 00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:22,720 Speaker 1: about that call with the Ukrainians, as well as previous 74 00:04:22,760 --> 00:04:25,719 Speaker 1: calls with other foreign leaders, that they had started making 75 00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:29,400 Speaker 1: this a practice in terms of putting these transcripts, which 76 00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:31,680 Speaker 1: are classified but classified at a low level like a 77 00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:35,680 Speaker 1: secret and putting them in a specialized database that is 78 00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:39,200 Speaker 1: meant for some of the nation's most sensitive uh national 79 00:04:39,279 --> 00:04:42,920 Speaker 1: security secrets. At the Coword Classified level and is largeably 80 00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:47,600 Speaker 1: an abuse of that particular system and the protections that affords. 81 00:04:47,720 --> 00:04:50,520 Speaker 1: Whether we're not the President is aware of it, or 82 00:04:50,640 --> 00:04:53,600 Speaker 1: was part of that discussion or you know, provided even 83 00:04:53,600 --> 00:04:56,240 Speaker 1: implicit guidance on that remains to be seen. But in 84 00:04:56,279 --> 00:04:59,160 Speaker 1: the end, he is still the president. They all work 85 00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 1: for him. He ultimately is responsible for the actions not 86 00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:05,520 Speaker 1: only of himself, but for those beneath him and what 87 00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:07,839 Speaker 1: they had to do to try to cover up what 88 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:12,000 Speaker 1: he was doing. Now, the Democrats have said that they're 89 00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:15,880 Speaker 1: going to try to streamline this impeachment inquiry, They're going 90 00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:17,720 Speaker 1: to try to move it quickly. They're gonna try to 91 00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:22,279 Speaker 1: keep it on on the point. But you have, for example, 92 00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:26,240 Speaker 1: two Republican senators, Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson, two senior 93 00:05:26,279 --> 00:05:30,360 Speaker 1: Republican senators, are asking the Justice Department for information about 94 00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:35,640 Speaker 1: Joe Biden's interactions with Ukraine officials and whether Ukraine work 95 00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:41,039 Speaker 1: with Democrats in sixteen to get damaging information on President 96 00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:44,839 Speaker 1: Trump's election campaign. So how difficult is it going to 97 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:49,200 Speaker 1: be to keep the lines clear for Democrats. We'll sure 98 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:51,640 Speaker 1: there's going to be a fair amount of counter political 99 00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:55,359 Speaker 1: messaging coming from Senate Republicans to say nothing of the 100 00:05:55,400 --> 00:05:57,560 Speaker 1: White House and its media allies, and you had to 101 00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,520 Speaker 1: expect that. But the Senate has no controls roll over 102 00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:05,240 Speaker 1: the initial impeachment process. That falls within the exclusive jurisdiction 103 00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:07,479 Speaker 1: of the House. And so the House is going to 104 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:10,919 Speaker 1: do with thing. They're going to run their hearings and 105 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:14,599 Speaker 1: they're going to outline the article's impeachment after that, as 106 00:06:14,720 --> 00:06:17,280 Speaker 1: the assume me as the set a majority. Leader Mitch 107 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:20,520 Speaker 1: McConnell said today, if there are articles impeachment voted on 108 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:22,839 Speaker 1: and they're approved from the House, the Senate will take 109 00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:25,480 Speaker 1: it up. The extent to which Lindsey Graham and Ron 110 00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:28,920 Speaker 1: Johnson try to run counter hearings ultimately will have no 111 00:06:29,080 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 1: impact one way or the other on what articles of 112 00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:34,320 Speaker 1: impeachment get voted out of the House. Just a minute here, 113 00:06:34,400 --> 00:06:38,320 Speaker 1: but Brad mcc Senator McConnell also said that, you know, 114 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:40,479 Speaker 1: as you said on CNBC, I have no choice but 115 00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:42,880 Speaker 1: to take it up. How long you're on it is 116 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:46,520 Speaker 1: a whole different matter. Is he signally anything there? Am 117 00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:49,480 Speaker 1: I reading too much into it? I mean, I think 118 00:06:49,520 --> 00:06:51,760 Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell is hedging his bets here to trying to 119 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:54,360 Speaker 1: see how far things go. I don't think he's going 120 00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:57,200 Speaker 1: to try to sacrifice his own political career. He you know, 121 00:06:57,279 --> 00:06:59,159 Speaker 1: his relections on the line. I think we'll have to 122 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:01,160 Speaker 1: wait as present, on which I'm gonna say, we'll wait 123 00:07:01,200 --> 00:07:04,200 Speaker 1: and see what happens. All right, Thanks so much, Brad. 124 00:07:04,200 --> 00:07:06,599 Speaker 1: We're gonna be doing a lot of waiting in the 125 00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:09,040 Speaker 1: next few months. That's Brad Moss. He's a partner at 126 00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:14,000 Speaker 1: Mark Say. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. 127 00:07:14,360 --> 00:07:18,400 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 128 00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 1: and on bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. 129 00:07:22,840 --> 00:07:24,160 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg