WEBVTT - The Mark Moss Show - Major Meltdown

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Welcome to another episode of The Markma Show, where

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we talk about bitcoin, we talk about cryptocurrencies, we talk

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about the decentralized revolution that we're living through that we're

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>witnessing right now, and it's apparent from a bunch of

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>different standpoints. It's apparent where we can see the centralization

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of governments, the centralization of money, the centralation of healthcare,

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>all of that at an all time I and at

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the same time an equal and opposite reaction. It's being

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>pushed back, it's being rejected everywhere, and we're seeing how

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>centralized finances somewhat under attack from decentralized finance, except for

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it's more like centralized finances actually attacking the decentralized finance

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. I've been talking a lot about that UM

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in some previous segments. I'm not gonna go super deep

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>into it, but we can see that this supposed decentralized

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>finances defied spaces under attack and potentially bringing down not

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just the cryptocurrency space, but a lot of the traditional

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>finance space at all. But of course it's a traditional

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>finance space that it's attacking it. UM, And there's just

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so much going on here UM because of this, Uh,

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll call it a meltdown almost if you will. I mean,

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we see some of these cryptocurrency positions are down fifty

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.279
<v Speaker 1>sixty most of the defied protocols are down over eight percent,

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and then of course the bitcoin miners, UM, the exchanges

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like coin base are getting completely hammered. We saw this week.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>UM lots of earning reports have been coming out from

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 1>all different types of companies and they're not looking good.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Most companies are losing lots of money, and one of

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>them in the cryptocurrency spaces coin Base now coin base

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>coin bas is one of the largest exchanges, one of

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the oldest exchanges. They've been helping people get into bitcoin

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>since I think about twenty sixteen, maybe earlier. If I'm wrong,

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>so apologizes I didn't look that up ahead of time.

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But they've been around a long time and they've helped

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>millions and millions and millions of people get into bitcoin.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, over the years, they started get into all

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the different cryptocurrency assets that are out there, and they're

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not really the biggest friends of bitcoin to say the least,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>which is why I typically like to UM send my

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin business over to Swan Bitcoin or River or companies

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that are more friendly just specifically to bitcoin. But coin

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Base has moved into this kind of cryptocurrency casino, if

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you will, and they have been hit very, very hard,

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe partially because they have a massive amount of

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>their money in those cryptocurrencies, as well as as prices

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have been continuing to fall. We basically have been off

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of our high since last November. UM as the market

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>has been continuing to fall, people don't want to buy

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as much, and they make their money from transactions from exchanges,

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>and if people aren't doing that, they're not making much money.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>We saw we saw that the founder, the CEO s

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>net worth has dropped from about almost fourteen billion in

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>November of last year down to about two and a

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>half billion today two point two billion today, which UM

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>two point two billions. Still a lot of money. I'm

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>sure each of us would be happy to have that

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of money, but you know, you don't understand his

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>whole situation, and losing that much could be bad, especially

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>if you were levered up against that using debt at all,

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>which I don't know if he was. I'm not using

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that speculation, but it seems like the hits on coin

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Base just continue to just continue to mount up on it. Now.

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Coin Base is a publicly traded company. It's called coin

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>c O I N. And part of their reports that

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they put out are, you know, obviously on their financials

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>um explaining how they lost all their revenues. It wasn't

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>too good, but some of the other parts that came

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out in their reports were much more alarming, to say

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the least. Now in bitcoin and probably in greater crypto

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you might hear as well, but we say, um in bitcoin,

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>not your keys, not your coins. So what does that mean? Well,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have your keys, then somebody else does.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And I mean somebody else has the keys? Who your

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>own coins? Which means if you don't have the keys,

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have the coins. Whoever has the keys

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>does um. And this is uh the information that came

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>out on coin base in regards to that specifically, it's

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad, it's pretty scary. It's been making big ripples

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>around the cryptocurrency space, and I want to bring it

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to you because it is dangerous and you need to

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>know about it now to kind of frame this up.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know what I'm talking about, what the

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>heck are keys I'm gonna give you a super high

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>level view. Okay, Um, I'm not gonna spend a lot

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>of time. There's a lot of channels and podcasts and

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>shows that go in more depth into this. But let's

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>think about it like this. The oldest problem that mankind

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>has had is how do I secure my property in

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a way that can't be stolen. That's the oldest problem

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that I know of. I guess where do I get food?

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>That's probably an older problem, But one of the oldest

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>problem that my kind has ad is how do I

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>keep my food that I've stored up from being stolen?

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>How do I protect my property from being stolen? And so,

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of course we we band together. You know, a couple

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of guys get together. We make a village, we make

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a kingdom, we make a country. The role of United

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>States is to protect the private property of its citizens.

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>That's always the role. And so money has been the

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>best store I'm sorry, gold has been the best storehold

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of wealth for thousands of thousands of years. And so

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>we'd store our wealth in gold a little bit. We

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>could bury it in that hide and the house, we

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>could bury it in the in the yard, make a

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>make a make a treasure map out to where we

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>stash that gold. If we had a lot of gold,

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we might want to build a vault, um, build walls

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>around it, higher security things like that. I've just spent

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time, effort, energy and money to secure

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that wealth, and then how would I move it? Right?

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It's very difficult. So that's one of the oldest problems

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that mankind has had, protecting my private property. Will bitcoins

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>solve that problem? Now? How big will bitcoin be in

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the future, I don't know, But when you solve the

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>oldest problem that mankind has had, it's pretty massive. It's

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big deal. I don't know all the ways

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna affect things. I have a lot of ideas

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>about that I talked about pretty regularly. But how does

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it do that? Well, it's or it protects it cryptographically

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>using cryptography. It protects it and as long as I

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>have my cryptographic key that allows me to transact with it,

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>then I can do what I want. Think about bitcoin

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>as like this digital locker system. So you have a

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>locker at the high school or the train station, airport,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and in that locker you have a public address my

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>locker c. Nineteen Hey, would you go put this envelope

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in my locker C. Nineteen That would be my public address. Well,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>then I also have a key, my private key, that

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>allows me to get in that locker and move the contents.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So what you have with bitcoin or cryptocurrency is you

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>have a public address and a private key, and having

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.799
<v Speaker 1>my private key allows me to have access to move

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>those coins as I see fit. You never actually download them,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they're living up there in the cloud. You just have

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that cryptographic key. Now, if you use a wallet on

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>your phone, like an app wallet or hardware wallet, what

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>those do is they store that key, and so by

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>using my app it uses my key to to do

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the transaction. Or if I use a hard wall and

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>I can plug it into my computer to sign that

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>transaction and then I can do whatever transfer I want

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>from there. The problem is if I use someone like

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>coin base, my coins are on coin Base, and what

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that means is they have my keys, and so we

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>say not your key is not your coin. If I

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have my key, somebody else has it. Now the

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>problem is, well, there's there's there's pros and cons. So

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if I have my own, then um, the securities on me.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>If someone hacks my phone or I lose my key,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's on me. But if coin base does it, they

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>can protect my key. But what if they decide not

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to give it back to me. What if the government

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>says freeze that account? What if something like that happens. Well, um,

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if news came out disclosure came out today that it

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>says uh in their disclosure says quote in the event

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of a bankruptcy customers. Um. Moreover, because custodio held cryptastics

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>may be considered to be the property of a bankruptcy estate.

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>In the event of a bankruptcy, the cryptiastics we hold

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in custody on behalf of our customers could be subject

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to bankruptcy proceedings, and such customers could be treated as

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>our general unsecured creditors. So what that means is that

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if they were to go through some sort of a

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy type proceeding, then your assets that you think are

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>your assets aren't actually yours. The assets that you think

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are yours are there's they owe them to you. But

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in a bankruptcy proceeding they would be included in their

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>sale and what you would get would be nothing. So

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>if the government says, hey, freeze those assets. Hey, they

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>don't allow them to withdraw anymore. Um, something like that

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>would happen, or they'd get into financial problems like not

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>having any revenue, being down something like that, and they

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>were forced into a bankruptcy. They could potentially take your assets.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>So as we say, not your keys, not your coin.

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Get your bitcoin off the exchange right now. UM. You

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>can use a hardware wallet. I'd like to use treads

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or it's probably the easiest one. Cold card is probably

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the most secure one. You can use one of those,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>or you could use a UM constant years multi sticks

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>set up like I used with unchained capital. That's what

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd recommend. But whatever you do, get your bitcoin off

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the exchanges. We've just found out that per coin bases

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>own UM statement. In the evident of bankruptcy, you could

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>lose all your bitcoin. You're listening to the Markmas Show.

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about bitcoin, cryptocurrencies and the decentralized revolution, trying

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to help you navigate this world that we're going through

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. I have a lot more news about the world,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the financial system and the risk that we are facing

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. So don't go away. I'll be right back,

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, welcome back. You are listening to another episode

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Markmas Show. We're talking about bitcoin, we're talking

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about cryptocurrencies. We're talking about the decentralized revolution, and we

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>focus on the changes that it's making too the world.

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So you can navigate this correctly and really like to

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>look at um you know these three cycles that I

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about all the time, and it's the intersection of politics, finance,

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and technology. The converging of those three things is really

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>where the change is happening. So I let's look at

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like politics as relates to finance, and finances relates to politics,

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and off course we look at technology, which of course

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to me is bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. And so um man,

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some stuff going on today. Um we we saw

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.359
<v Speaker 1>this week the government put out its new numbers on inflation.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It's trying to get a handle on inflation as fast

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>as they can. That means the way they call it

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is they're trying to get a handled on prices going up.

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>The cost of goods and services is going up so

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>fast that it's causing a real problem for people. And

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>uh hooray they got it to slow down a little bit.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>We went from an eight percent increase of inflation or

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>CPI or price inflation to eight point five and now

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>back down to eight point three. Doesn't mean prices are reversing.

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>What it means is that things are just going up

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a tad bit slower than they were before. Now what

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is the government? What is it, you know, as central bank,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve doing to try to slow down this

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>price appreciation while they're trying to slow down the financial markets.

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So the Federal Reserve has been stimulating the financial markets

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>by doing two things. One by by bonds, by buying

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>mortgage by securities, so propping up the debt markets. And

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>two by lowering interest rates so people continue to borrow

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>more and spend more money or creates more money into

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>existence through that debt. Now, what they're trying to do

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is they're trying to raise the interest rates because as

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>they raise the interest rates, less money is created. Right Well,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're telling you. And so your financial portfolios,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>your retirement accounts are melting down right now because the

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>government is trying to suck some of the stimulus out

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that they put in. I mean, this is just absurd.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So they pump a bunch of money in by lowering rates,

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>so people take on a bunch of debt and literally

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>pumping money in the markets by buying debt, and then

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it starts going too hot, so they suck it back out,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>so they cause boom bust, boom bust. They lower rates

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and buy the debt, push it up, and they raise rates,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and they suck the debt back out and they trying

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to drop it back down. The problem is these boom

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and bust cycles keep getting bigger and bigger and bigger,

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and now they're causing the entire markets to melt down.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You're watching your retirement accounts dwindle away. You're watching, um,

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>everything including your DeFi protocol is dropping. We're watching most

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies down, even bitcoins down in the last week. UM.

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>All those numbers were in the last week. And just

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>when we think that it couldn't get worse, UM, when

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the government seemingly doesn't have any money or doesn't want

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to continue to push inflation by creating more money, UM,

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we can't deal with the problems that we even have

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and so now we have all

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>types of shortage things like that. We have the FEDS

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to do or the government trying to send forty

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to Ukraine. What the heck does that mean?

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Pretty interesting story that I was reading here this week

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>talking about how Congress refuses to address our own crisiss

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>we have in the States. Um, but yet we want

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to send more money to Ukraine. As a matter of fact, Um,

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they had only asked for the President Joe Biden only

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>asked for thirty three billion. Now when I say, only

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to put that into perspective, we throw around billions and

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>trillions like it's nothing anymore. It's insane. We lose sight

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of how big that is. If we put those numbers

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>into seconds. A million seconds was eleven days ago, a

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>billion seconds it was thirty one years ago, so from

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven days to thirty one years and seconds. But a

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>trillion seconds is thirty one thousand years. So a billion

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is thirty one years, a trillions thirty one thousand years.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So to put that into perspective, they had only asked president,

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but only asked for thirty three million. But that wasn't enough.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>The U. S. House of Representatives said no, let's actually

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>give them more. Let's give them forty billion in US

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer dollars to Ukraine. Because you know taxpayers, us taxpayers,

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they're having a great time. I mean, shoot, your cost

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of living is going down, right, No, your cost of

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>living is going up. So why not just raise taxes

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to the by administration? Of course, raised taxes and let's

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>just send that money to Ukraine. Sounds like a pretty

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>good deal now, never mind the problems that we have

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>here at home, Like the Department of Homeland Security admitted

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that they've let almost one million illegal aliens in through

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the southern border this year. Now, when, uh, when we

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>tried to get four billion dollars to build the wall

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>up down there to protect this invasion of a million

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>people coming in the southern border, we couldn't find four

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in the budget. But now we can find

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>forty billion dollars to go help another country with their border.

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Pretty interesting. Um, never mind record inflation, never mind federal deficits, um,

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>never minded the AVAPT. Now this bill was quickly sent

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>over there. Um. I'm not blaming it on one party

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>or the or the other. It seems to be, um,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a unanimous decision to send all this money over there.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Question I like to have is like where does that

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>money go? Pretty interesting? And that's what I want to

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about for a minute, where does that

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>money go? Forty billion dollars sounds pretty good. UM, So

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's hr the Ukraine Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act. Forty billion dollars.

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>How much of that goes into Zelensky's pocket? Now, Zelenski, Uh,

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you may or may not be aware. First of all, Um,

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not pro putin, I'm not pro war, I'm not

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>pro death. I like peace. But Ukraine is not a

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>peaceful democracy either. They were ranked ninety on a scale

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of uh in um in a rating of how corrupt

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they are. UM. Zelensky was an actor who came to

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>power by putting his democratically elected people in prison and

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>taking over power our Um. So, just just so you

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>know that, and so we want to give them all

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>this money. Let's take a look at where this goes.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So we have, UM, let's see, we have sixty seventeen

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>billion for Department of Defense Operation and maintenance, one million

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>for army missiles. We have another another billion, another million

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for defense working capital funds, fourteen million for defense health programs,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty four million for c d C activities. Uh. I

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure nobody gets COVID over there. I

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>suppose we have a billion for administration. That sounds pretty good,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>UM ten million for Department of State Capital Investment funds.

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess we need to invest into that. I mean,

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just insane. We have forty billion dollars that's going

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>into this giant black hall to all their friends. And

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>so just remember that when they talk about UM they

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>need to destroy the markets to prevent prices from going up,

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they just want to send a billion dollars

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>over there to U crane UM. Learn to read between

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the lines. And of course I would recommend uh, if

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>you're not happy with that, If you object with your

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer dollars going into that like I do, UH, maybe

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you should do something about it. You could talk about it.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You could write your local congressmend your representatives, and let

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>them know how you feel about that. This is not

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a right or left position, in my opinion, this is

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>an American taxpayer position. I want to know where the

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>heck does my forty billion dollars go? And I can

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you that I object to where that money is going.

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So I thought you would just like to see where

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>some of that crazy amount went. UM for additional funds

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>for munitionance procurement. I mean, I could just go on

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and on and on air four billion for foreign military

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>financing programs. UM. Anyway, you listen to the Markmas Show.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about UM, this decentralized revolution. This is part

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>of the world breaking apart um, the the centralization of

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the world breaking apart of course, the United States is

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>taking money that we should be using our own country

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and given to other countries to further break this down.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty and interesting to watch. UM you listen to

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Markmas Show. I have a lot more to cover,

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so do not go away, all right, welcome back here,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Mark ma Show. We're talking about bitcoin.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the decentralized revolution. We're talking about UM,

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the intersection of politics, finance and technology, trying to navigate

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>this crazy world and make sense of it both financially.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And what I like to I like to focus on

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is UM what I call financial sovereignty. And so really

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>it's about money and it's about sovereignty UM, which you

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>can call freedom. I call sovereignty being able to direct

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>my life as I see fit. And so we use

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>money to give us that freedom. And so I like

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to look at things holistically so I can learn to

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>navigate this, protect myself my family from it. Some of

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the things that's been interesting, UM paying attention to UM.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>That's really been catching my eye all lately, and I've

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>talked about quite a bit, is UM the way the

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>entire world has been shaken up by Elon Musk's and

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>his bid or his plan and to take over Twitter.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Now it's interesting because as Twitter moved to censor and

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>delete accounts, banned people, d platform people left and right. UM.

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>When it was along with one political ideology, it was

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fine. However, when somebody else comes on and says

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>they want to open it up UM for more free speech,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they want to take a much less aggressive

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>stance on UM stopping what people say and even permanently

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>banning people, that becomes a big problem. Now I look

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>at this two ways. So Elon must says he wants

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to buy Twitter so he could open it up to

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>more free speech. Okay, that's pretty good in my opinion.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I believe in free speech. I believe in free speech

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because I believe that the truth is found through speech.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>The truth is found through discussion. I might think I

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have an idea. You might think you have an idea.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>We should openly discuss that idea. We should debate that idea.

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>We should probably bring other people in on the discussion,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and through that discussion, going back with ideas, we learned

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>from each other, and eventually we find this understanding, we

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>find what the truth is. That's why free speech is

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>so important. Free speech is is important for sharing those ideas,

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>which then leads to progress, which then leads to more creativity,

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>which the leads to more ingenuity and inventions and products

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and services and so much more. Um However, apparently some

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>people think that you're not smart enough to handle hearing

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>things that you don't like to hear, and so it

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was interesting to see how uh mainstream media seemed to

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>erupt over the fact that somebody would buy a social

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>media platform to give it free speech. Now, what was

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting is when thousands of thousands of people have been

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>d platformed, including the active sitting president of the United States,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>people said, it's fine. Twitter is a private company. They

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>can do what they want. It's not a tricky situation.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that a private business should be able

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>to do what they want. A private business is my

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>private property. I should be able to do with that

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>business what I want. If I want to serve this

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>customer or not, that should be up to me. Now,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>growing up, you would typically see like an establishment and

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>say we reserve the right to refuse service, right, and

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so they should be able to they can choose what

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they do want to do. It's private business, and so

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they'd say, hey, Twitter, consens or whoever they wanted to

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a private business. Um. I'm not gonna get super

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>deep into that, but um, as soon as Elon Must

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>wants to buy Twitter and actually take it from a

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded company to a private company, now that's a

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>big problem. And now all of a sudden, it's not

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a private company anymore, which is pretty weird. But what's

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>even weirder is so there's this uproar about freedom of speech,

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>which is very interesting to see. However, the contrast is

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that from the time that Elon Must decided to buy

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter from he announced it, um, and I haven't actually

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>looked at it for a minute. Here, let's take a

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>look and see where we're at here. If I look

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at the price of Twitter, which I mean, it's still

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>up quite a bit as a matter of fact, which

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is interesting as most of the tech stalks are way down.

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So right now, Tesla, I'm sorry. Twitter is up forty

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>eight percent from where from the time when he announced

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that he would buy it, So it's up now. This

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is up at a time when all the other um

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks are way down, which is pretty interesting. We

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>can see, for example, over that same period, we can

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>see where Facebook's at, which is about flat. It's about flat.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Um it had gone up and come back down. Facebook's down.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>We can see obviously all the big tech stalks are down,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>but Twitter is up almost fift So here's what this

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>tells me. What this tells me is that the mainstream

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>media is all up in arms about giving somebody freedom

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of speech, which is insane to me. However, the mainstream

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>media represents a very small percentage of the market. The market,

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>as represented through the financial markets are telling us something

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>completely different. Now, there's one reason why when you run

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>polls to find out who's going to be president, they're

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>typically way off. But we saw in the last presidential

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>election cycle we had betting markets where people were betting

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on who would become the eventual winner of the election.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>The betting markets were extremely close, and the and the

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>polls were way off. Why is that. Well, anybody can

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>say whatever they want to pull. But when it comes

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to putting your money where your mouth is, when you

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>have skin in the game, when you have an incentive,

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you you choose much wiser, much closer. And so that's

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>why the betting markets were different. So back to this.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Mainstream media wants to tell you it's insane, No, we

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>can't have free speech. How horrible is this? But the

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>markets are telling us that they value free speech. The

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's up. Why, well, the markets are a discounting mechanism.

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? The markets discount they you try

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy something cheaper today than you think it will

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>be worth in the future. So people were buying Twitter

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>saying it will be worth more in the future because

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>if Elon Musk can open it up for free speech,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>then we believe that will be more valuable in the future.

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And so they're buying it. And so the market, like

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a betting market, put money where their mouth was, put

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>skin in the game, and we saw the price of

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Twitter go up by more than But of course, um,

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the powers that be, if you want to call them that,

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>are certainly not a fan of that. It was only

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 1>within days or maybe a week or two after that

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was announced that then all of a sudden, the United States,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration, the Department of Homeless Security announces their

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>new Ministry of Truth. They want to tell you what's

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>true because apparently you don't know and you're not smart

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to figure out. So they want to tell you

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>what the Ministry of Truth was. And it's not just

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the United States, is a matter of fact, this is

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>kicked off a firestorm of regulators. We see social media

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>regulations expand globally. As Elon Musk plans the Twitter takeover,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he says, says there the countries are taking more steps

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to compel social media platforms to shield users, shield them.

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We gotta protect people from material that they deem harmful

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>through standards that could affect Twitter. So if the government

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>deems it to be harmful, then they need to protect you. Now.

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>One thing that's interesting about freedom of speech is that

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>if you if, if, if you take away my freedom

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of speech so I can't say what I want, they're

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>also punishing you. They're also taking away your freedom to hear.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Think about that, I may lose my right to speech.

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>You may lose your right to hear. We're both being

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>punished in that. The good thing about hearing harmful content

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is that if you don't want to hear it, you

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have to see You also have freedom to hear it.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>You also have freedom not to hear it. You can

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>mute accounts on Twitter you don't like, you can block

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>accounts on Twitter. You can you don't like, you can

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not follow them if you don't like them. It's very

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>simple to do that. We don't need the government, but

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the government here was The regulators from Australia to European Union, India,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Canada and the UK have recently introduced are or are

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>now considering new rules for policing online content. I mean,

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this is insane. Um. This is why we need bitcoin.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>We like to say bitcoin fixes this. And the reason

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>why bitcoin fixes this is because it takes away the money.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>With the with the money, with freedom of money, we

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have freedom, and so we need to have freedom of money.

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>We need to take away some of the power of

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>them to be able to print all this money so

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they can build out these large regulatory bodies like this.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>The government continues to get bigger and bigger and bigger

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>because they're able to print more and more and more

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of their money. You're listening to the Mark Marchell will

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>be right back with more. Don't go away, all right,

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>welcome back here, listening to the markma Show. We're talking

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about we're talking about this decentralized revolution the world is

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going through. We're talking about the intersection of politics, finance,

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and technology, and as the as the world goes through

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this decentralized revolution, which of course is being led by

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, it's the technology, the decentralized technology that's

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>helping the world become more decentralized. It's not easy, it's

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not smooth. The centralized powers that be, the governments don't

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>want to give up that power and control. And so

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as they start, as it starts to slip through their fingers,

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>they try to grab more harshly, and the more harshly

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they grab, the more starts to slip through their fingers.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's this um, this reflexive loop that basically happens.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what we're seeing today. So the powers

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that be, the governments of the world, started to lose

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>their narrative. What does that mean, Well, they want to

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>control the information that you read, that you see, so

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>they can control the narraive, they can control what you believe,

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what you think. The problem is, we had an Internet.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>We we had an invention called the Internet, and the

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Internet allows us to spread information and allows you to

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>hear my voice and hear what I'm saying. And through

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, Um, they've lost control. It was very easy

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when we all watched the same three news channels and

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>we all read the same couple of newspapers. When we

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>did that, it was super simple for them to control

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the narrative. It was cheap, it was easy. The returns

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on their violence were very high. The problem is, as

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet um came, it allowed all this new alternative

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>media to grow up. And now we have you know,

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>people like um, Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson and these big,

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>big channels that are getting way more views than mainstream media.

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And so they're losing the narrative on that, and so

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in order to try to regain control, they have to

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>figure out any way they can to try to control

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and regulate that, and of course they'll put laws into

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>place to do just that. Take away my right to talk,

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so they can take away you're right, to hear. Now,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you might be listening to this and saying, Mark, but look,

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>there's crazy people like Alex Jones, and Alex Jones says

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>things that are really dangerous, and we have to prevent

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>these the dangerous people from saying these really dangerous things. Okay,

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>do we You see, the truth is found through open

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>discussion and through transparency. So if we had open and

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>honest debate, Alex Jones could say something really crazy, for example,

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and other people could come out and say that's not right. Now.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but I love to see

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>debates and the reason why I love to see debates

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is because one person may say something that seems very convincing.

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>They may be very certain about what they're saying, and

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I might believe that maybe I don't have a really

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>educated opinion on that, But then I hear somebody else

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, oh wait a minute, I thought about that.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>That that right, And so through open discussion, through open debate,

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>we can find that truth. The problem is that when

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you censor that, we never find it, and so now

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>those voices are in the dark. Now they may be right,

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they may be wrong, but we may never know the

0:29:55.880 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>reason why is because censorship does the exact opposite. It

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't bring more truth or more trust. So if you've

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>ever had a business partner um that was embezzling from you,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or a friend that was, you know, stealing from you,

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or a girlfriend, boyfriend's spouse, whatever, cheating on you, you

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>know that confidence starts being lost. You start to think like, wow,

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>what are these charges showing off my bank account? And

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is my partner doing this for that? Or who's my

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>who's my significant other texting late at night? Right? And

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you start to lose confidence, start to lose trust. Now,

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if you went to your business partner said hey, could

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>we look at the bank account and look at a

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:33.959
<v Speaker 1>couple of these charges to see what they are? If

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they said yeah, sure, here's the receipts and whatever, they

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>could restore that confidence through open, honest dialogue, through transparency.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>If you look at your significant other in bed and say,

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>who the heck are you texting late at night and

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they said, oh, I'm not talking to my mom. Look

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>here's my text message, that would restore trust. If your

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>business partner said, that's nothing for you to see. You

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to know that, don't look at that.

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That would almost just confirm what you already know. And

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so whenever you take away a person's right to talk,

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it looks bad. They're saying that ripping out a man's

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>tongue does not prove him wrong. It only proves that

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you have something to hide. And so the way that

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we build trust, the way that we build trust, the

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>way that we find truth, the way that we discuss

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>ideas is through open platforms and discussion. The other thing

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, I see some people on Twitter

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>saying some insane, crazy things like they're like especially here

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in California the legislative but also all across twity. You

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>can see like there's like a whole subset of people

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that are like trying to um change the age of consent.

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>They want little kids to be able to consent to

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>sexual acts. I mean, it is absolutely insane. I can't

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>believe Twitter allows us to happen. They censor active stay

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in presidents, but they allow that to be talked about.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's in saying, however, now we see who these people are.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Now we know who they are, we know exactly what

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they want, and we can call them out for who

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they are, and we know to discount what they say,

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and so on one hand, I would like, I don't

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>want to hear it. It bothers me that there's people

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that have those views. But at least we know who

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they are and then we can combat that. We can

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about that anyway. Back to this at hand, it

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>says that, um, how content moderation rules would work at

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter under Mr Musk remains unclear. Of course, it's always unclear. Um.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>He called the move a quote morally bad decision, and

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, quote if there are tweets that are wrong

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and bad, those should be either deleted or made invisible.

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And a suspension or temporary suspension is appropriate, but not

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a permanent ban. But that's not good enough for the lawmakers.

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>The European Digital Services Act, which was agreed to buy

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers in April, would compel platforms to swiftly address illegal

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>content and offer a process for users to complain if

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they disagree with moderation decisions. So swiftly address illegal content.

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But what's illegal? What type of content would be illegal?

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>That where some of this problem starts to line up,

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it says um. A new law and Australia goes further,

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>allowing an e Safety Commission to order platforms to remove

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>certain content or face fines. What content and who's the

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>who's the safety commission, who, who's determining what's safe and

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what isn't safe? It says um. We'll be keeping a

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>close watch and making sure that Twitter and other platforms

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>are taking the steps required under Australian law to address

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>online safety issues. Now, I think there's all things that

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we could agree are not safe, like child exploitation, for example.

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's things that we could all agree to,

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is the rest becomes subjective. So we

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>want to start banning hate speech. Well, let's say that. Um,

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>let's say that I hate pineapple on pizza. I hate

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that and it grosses me out to even hear anybody

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. And I feel that it's violence because

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>speech is violence now apparently, and I hate that. Now,

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is that should that be considered hate speech? I use

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I use a ridiculous example, partly because that's how ridiculous

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>things have become. But to show you that it's subjective,

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>there's only a couple of things that we could all

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>agree on, but the rest are all subjective. Now. The

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>other thing is that we have laws against things. So

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>for example, I think we all agree that child exploitation

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is wrong, and turns out it's actually illegal too. So

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>if anybody we're actually talking about it, then there's a

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>crime and they can go do something about it. Hating

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>um somebody because they're um, dumb or ugly isn't a crime.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to choose to listen to that. We

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>also have laws against a libel and slander. We also

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>have those laws as well, so we already have laws it.

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.760
<v Speaker 1>As in the US, lawmakers have put forward multiple proposals

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>for dealing with online content, though few have advanced the

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>mid debates over freedom of expression and censorship. Canada's government

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>has also pledged to introduce legislation to address online content

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>such as hate speak. And again, what is hate speech?

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>And that is the point. We can't have these subjective things, um.

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And this just further goes to prove how the world

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is grasping to maintain power over centralization, mainly because they

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>want to control the narrative, not so much because they

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>care about you. As I said, Twitter already makes it

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 1>very easy to unfollow people, block people if I want to.

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to hear it. Um. But maybe I'm

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong I'd love to hear what you have to think.

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You can hit me up on social media at number

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>one Mark Moss, find me on Twitter, I find me

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>on on Instagram, whatever. At one Mark Moss. Send me

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a message and let me know what you think. I'm

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>here trying to help you make sense of this decentralized

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>revolution that we're living through from a political, financial, and

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a technological standpoint. If you miss some of the show,

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you can catch it on the I Heart radio network.

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Just search Mark Moss I Heart Mark Moss Podcast and

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll find it there. UM and you can catch up

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>on some of that We've covered so much today, including um,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Defy tokens, the Luna tokens, uh Defied protocol is

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>blowing up, what's happening to bitcoin. We've talked about Twitter.

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about so much and more so. If you

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>missed any of that, go ahead and check it out

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and don't miss it next time. Put a reminder on

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 1>your phone for this time this channel, and joined me

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>each and every week. It's the most important part of

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>your week, and that's what I got. Thanks so much

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 1>for listening. I'll see you next week on The Mark

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Mos Show.