WEBVTT - Bucs @ Bills Preview, Trade Deadline & Nick’s Picks

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one nine, What's right with Nick Wright

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Ton to do? Sorry for the delay today, you're having

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 2>slight technical difficulties. The technical difficulties might be continuing as

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm just seeing myself in return. I don't see any

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>of the extra boxes or the animation. Hopefully the folks

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube there there we go. Now we're seeing all

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 2>of it, and I can see Demanse, who you know,

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>is fresh off a nice Celtics win. Buddy, it was

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>touch and go there for a minute. But your new

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>look Celtics with Chris STAPs Porzengis who listen before you

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 2>even go I'm gonna go ahead and reveal to the audience.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you're gonna be bothered by this. You

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>you have not watched a ton of Kristaps Porzingis in

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>your life, because when he was like the star prospect

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>and at his apex with the Knicks, you weren't watching

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 2>a ton of NBA. When you played a lot of basketball,

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.919
<v Speaker 2>you didn't watch a lot of basketball. And then obviously

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>last year, when you were watching a ton of NBA,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 2>you weren't watching the Wizards.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>So you're familiar with him one time though, Oh really,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh I didn't know that I'm playing person when he

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 3>played against the Nets last year.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's right. Yeah, when we went to that game,

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that that's right, And so that you have so familiarity.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>But it is going to be a maddening experience for

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>you because there are nights like last night where you're like, oh,

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>my god, as our third option, this guy's unbelievable. And

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>then there are gonna be nights and that is assuming

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 2>health where he is one of the most frustrating players

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>in the league to watch, but last year he was good.

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>That actually is not the biggest NB Pardon me, I

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 2>apologize NBA Story of the Night. We will get to that.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>We have a gambling show for USh off of winning

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 2>week for me, another losing week for Demonse's teasers, which

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 2>might need to go back to the lab. They might

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>need some serious adjustment. But here's what missed the cut

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 2>for today's show, the Titans quarterback situation. Malik Willis or

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 2>will Levitz not good. Lebron only playing twenty nine minutes

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>in the Tuesday night loss, that he will play Kevin

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Durant tonight for the first time since Christmas of twenty eighteen,

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and the World Series starts Friday Rangers Diamondbacks. We might

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 2>get through the entire baseball season without talking baseball. I'm

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>not sure, but it's looking like that at least on

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>this show. Where we have to start though, is with

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>my large adult Slovenian son against everyone's favorite Frenchman Demons.

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 3>The much anticipated NBA debut for Wimby happened last night,

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 3>and he did just about what everybody thought he would.

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Was in foul trouble for majority of the time. It

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 3>was a big impact on defense. Nonetheless, it was very

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 3>impactful from perimeter. Within the three point shots. You seem

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>to come around on Wimby. You weren't super high ont

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>in before. But are you looking to adopt a new

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 3>French son or are you limited to your Slovenian son

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>in Luka Doncic, anybody but you're African American son over here.

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, no, well hold on, I mean that was

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 2>well done, sir. I have my large adult Slovenian son,

0:03:55.640 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Lukadncic will be my only fake child for the time being.

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I so here's the deal. I am not going to

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>overreact to Wimby's debut in a negative way. He got

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 2>in foul trouble. He had four turnovers, two of which

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>were offensive fouls in like a two minute stretch, which

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 2>really kind of threw off his evening because we did

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 2>see his first Summer League game, he played poorly and

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 2>then was excellent in the rest of the exhibition season.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 2>He seemed a little uneasy and in foul trouble obviously

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 2>for those first three quarters, but then he was very

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.119
<v Speaker 2>impactful late and the Spurs could have stolen that game

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 2>if not for Luka Doncic doing Lukadncich's things. Luca was sensational.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie had a couple big shots late, but Luca was

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 2>excellent throughout, so he did. Listen, if you bet wimby

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>unders yesterday, every single one of them hit his minutes,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 2>his points, his rebounds, his blocks. All of the unders

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 2>came through. And it was because he didn't have a

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 2>real impact in the first half and then in the

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 2>early second half he got in all that foul trouble.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 2>But he had a nice flurry in the fourth quarter,

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 2>a nine point flurry to get the Spurs right back

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>in the game to take the lead. Here is I'm

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 2>gonna just go out and give one over arching win

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 2>bin Yama take. That is I think going to be

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the actual story of the first decade of his career.

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:42.559
<v Speaker 2>If he becomes a knockdown three point shooter, he will

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 2>be the guy that the hype is absolutely real. Not

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 2>greatest player of all time, I'm not talking about that,

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>but the this guy's going to be a well above

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.239
<v Speaker 2>average number one overall pick, which if you're an above

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 2>average number one overall pick, you're a great, great player.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 2>If he does not become a knockdown three point shooter,

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 2>because his shot looks great, but the percentages for his

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 2>career are not good. It's like, right, at thirty percent,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>it looks like a shot that will be good, and

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 2>last night it was. If he doesn't, he is going

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 2>to be an incredibly frustrating offensive player if he doesn't

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 2>change his style, because at his size and at his length,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>he can do devastating damage with the Kevin Garnett offensive

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>game plan of shooting over guys mid range and kind

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 2>of short mid range rolling to the basket. And so

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I think the plan is and the initial plan and

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I get it will be just work on that three

0:06:55.760 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 2>point shot because it's it's truly unblockable. Kd's shot gets

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 2>blocked like four times a year, and he's five inches

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 2>taller than KD. If he becomes that, he's gonna be

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the guy that everybody says because defensively he is such

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a deterrent the way we discussed the other day, the

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>way a lockdown corner is where guys won't even throw

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to his side of the field. And so I'm not

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna overreact to Game one. I did bet Scoot to

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 2>win Rookie of the Year. Scoot didn't have a great

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Game one either, but part of that was because I

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 2>thought that I didn't know how much Wimby would play

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and how many games he would play. The other thing

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 2>is the foul trouble will be an adjustment. The rookie

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 2>last night sidebar before you go to Monsey. The rookie

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>in that game last night that was awesome was Derek

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Lively for the MAVs, which they were only able to

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 2>draft him because they threw away the final week of

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>their season so that pick didn't convey in a trade.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>They kept the pick because it was top ten protected.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 2>They drafted in with the tenth pick. Luca loved him,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 2>and Luca was of course excellent, and Luca has a

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 2>chip on his shoulder this year. Luca's got something to

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>prove in that when people say who's the best player

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>in the league, do people say Luka Ancic demonse.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 3>No you once in a while, no, no, no, no,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's the best player in the league.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 2>He is not even like in contention for that. That

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>is that has turned into a true two man race

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 2>with Jannis and Jokic. And then when you hear people

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 2>be like, okay, other than Jannis and Jokic, like give

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 2>me an MVP pick. You're hearing Tatum's name, You're hearing

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 2>Devin Booker's name. You Like, it's not that people think, oh,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Lucas no good, but he went from being in a

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Triple A lister to is what happens when you miss

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs where it's like, ah, you know what I mean,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 2>and you haven't seen you in a while, two months

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>of high leverage basketball and you weren't involved in it,

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to after the season before last, when he

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 2>carries that ragtag group to the conference finals and be like,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, lucas the MVP favorite. Like going into last year,

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people myself included, were saying Luca is

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 2>the best European in the league. He's better than Jokic.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Nobody is saying that now, and so Luca does have

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>something to prove. I will say, sneaky de demanse I

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 2>was a little concerned about the MAVs from that game,

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Wimby, like the Spurs outside of Wimby,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 2>have the least talent of any team in the league.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Wimby was a non factor for three plus quarters and

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>that's a nip and tuck game, Like, that's not great

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 2>for Dallas, but they got the win. That was good.

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 2>There were a few times there looked and by the way,

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Luca thirty three, thirteen and ten, there are a few

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 2>times there it looked like you wanted to say something

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.119
<v Speaker 2>and I just kept going, So go ahead, start my apologies.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>If you wanted to say something about Wimby, Oh no.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Any you kind of already covered it by saying that,

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Spurs aren't very talented and the Dallas

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Mavericks are barely hanging around. That was going to ask

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 3>if you were still in on, uh, Luca and Kyrie.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 3>It's obviously game one, but seems like they've got.

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Something to do there. I've never been in on that

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 2>pairing Listen, I don't think that. I just don't think

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense. That was a desperate move by a

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 2>desperate team when they traded for Kyrie, and the bet

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>was we're getting a top twenty five talent in the

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>league for pennies on the dollar. So let it wasn't

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 2>really pennies they I mean Dorian Finney Smith's valuable, like

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 2>they gave away somethings. Call it dimes on the dollar,

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 2>and so we'll roll the dice. But I don't I

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>don't love the fit now they and relying on a

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>rookie Center is incredibly risky, but Lively was good last night.

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>The other big takeaways from last night in the Association,

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>if we can just go through it quickly, we already

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the Celtics. That was an excellent game. The Celtics

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Knicks game, and that's a good win by Boston when

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 2>it looked like Jalen Brown maybe had blown it. What's

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>up demands that you look like you're in a Yeah, I'm.

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 3>Just curious to see how good the Knicks are moving forward,

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 3>because I don't It was. It was very close throughout

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 3>and there were just some stretches where they were doing

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the same stuff. I saw a lot of turnovers, dumb shots.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 3>There was like a sequence where I think the Knicks

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 3>cut the lead that they had it they were they

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 3>were down by ten and they cut that down in

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 3>like forty five seconds and it was just off of

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 3>dumb shots. Just a bad decision making. But obviously it's

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 3>only game one and the Knicks might be really good

0:11:58.160 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 3>and have a.

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 2>Good well, Listen, I don't think the Knicks are really good,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 2>but I think they are a really good regular season team,

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think they have and so I think

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 2>winning a hard fought game, right, they have the right pieces,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 2>a coach that's gonna you know, coaching maybe too hard.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I think doing all of that makes them a tough

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 2>out in the regular season. So the and Madison Square

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Garden just absolutely on fire for the first game of

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 2>the year. That's a good one.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's true.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Boston's on the road, it's first game of the year.

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 2>The Knicks got their full compliment. That's a good win.

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 2>The Rockets got thirty bold thirty bold by the Orlando

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Magic in Emo Odoka's debut with the Rockets. That's not

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 2>great at all. Dylan Brooks actually, you know, to lose

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>by thirty in the one game a month that Dylan's

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 2>gonna hit four threes is not great. So I'll just

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 2>be monitoring the Rockets. The Cavs got to win over

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the Nets. That was closer than it probably should have been.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Ben Simmons, who you know, we spent a lot of

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the offseason talking about, you know, on first things first,

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the Benaissance, because wilds things. Ben Simmons is gonna be

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 2>a real player. He was a customary two of six

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 2>from the field, four points, no free throw attempts, did

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>rebound and get did have I think ten rebounds, nine assists.

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 2>The Heat get a sneaky nice win over Detroit. When

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I say sneaky nice, I mean this Detroit Cade. Cunningham

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>was the number one pick of the draft a couple

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>of years ago, had a really nice rookie year. Cage's

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 2>rookie year. He was seventeen, you know, five and a

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 2>half and five and a half, and it was like, Okay,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 2>what's he going to be. He then essentially missed all

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 2>of last year with a shin injury, so people kind

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 2>of forgot about him. He was the number one pick

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 2>of a draft. He last night had thirty points and

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 2>nine assists, playing most of the game or I guess

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 2>thirty five thirty six minutes. As the Pistons lose to

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the Heat, the Raptors steal one from the Timberwolves. The

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Bulls lose by twenty. Shay is awesome. In that game,

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Shay Gilgess, Alexander and the Bulls have the earliest team

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>meeting of any team or a players only meeting. They

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 2>called a players only meeting after Game one. I've never

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 2>seen such a thing. The Kings light the damn beam again.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>The Pelicans Zion it took him a while to get

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>in the flow, but Zion just got all of his

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 2>buckets on the inside. He took one shot Demons outside

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 2>of four feet, and the Pelicans beat the Grizzlies. I'm

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 2>worried about the Grizzlies, not based on Game one, but

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 2>just based on no Jaw for a third of the season.

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>No Steven Adams for the whole year. That's concerning. And

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>then the Clippers annihilate the Trailblazers in the Blazer is

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the worst team in the Western Conference. So

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 2>there's a good, little kind of heavy night. One of

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the NBA recap anything you want to add their pal.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean, you're real for doing that, the little recap,

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 3>But but no, I mean I'm excited for the Celtics season.

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I won't lie. The only game that I saw last

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 3>night was the Celtics game.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Listen, how about this. I'm not gonna lie to you either.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I I had pad an incredibly long week. It's why

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I said today's show is gonna be short. But instead

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 2>we're still in the first segment. We're fifteen minutes in.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>U I went to bed in mid second quarter of

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the Spurs MAVs game, but then got up or after

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I took your sister to the bus stop this morning.

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Through the NBA package, you can rewatch the entirety of

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the game, like without the commercial breaks. So I rewatched

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 2>it all this morning. But I was, I'm not gonna

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>act like all those games that I just did.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I was.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I saw the early group of games on League Pass,

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and then the later games. I went to bed early.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh so go ahead.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 3>One thing of note that I did notice throughout the

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Celtics game was the flopping thing. There was a call

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 3>on uh, I think it was Drew Holiday. Somebody got

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 3>called for flopping. I forget who it was, but Jason

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Tatum had landed in I think it was Jalen Brunt's,

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Brunson's landing space. He fell back. They called the

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 3>flop on Jalen Brunson. When you went back and you

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>watched the replay, Jason Tatum was clearly in his landing zone.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Brunson fell and it was just like, not only

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>did they get not only did they get penalized, but

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 3>they didn't get the shots from the foul that that

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 3>was on them.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh so maybe you're coming around. You made fun of

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 2>me about being anti this new flopping rule. You were like, oh,

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the Lebron fan, of course he wants flopping. You are

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 2>in Game one, you are seeing giving the referees more

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>power through discretion usually does not end well.

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah no, And I think, yeah, yeah, it just sucks.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, but what I see like happening down

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 3>the line is like when somebody falls, it's always going

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 3>to be either a call or a flopping car. And

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be a lot of room for error.

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 2>But hey, well I'm excited to watch that. That's an

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>interesting storyline. And tonight in the NBA, this is a great,

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a great two screen night because we have only two

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 2>NBA games, both on TNT, and we have Thursday Night Football,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>a good Thursday night football game. So you've got Sixers

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Bucks Sixers first and Bucks first games of the year,

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and then Suns Lakers. As I mentioned, Lebron and Durant

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 2>playing each other for the first time in five years.

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, what's next to Monday?

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 3>All right? So the Bills look to bounce back against

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 3>Baker and the Bucks tonight. Josh Allen took accountability accountability

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 3>in saying that his recent play is bad, and he

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 3>thinks he needs to think less and just play football.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 3>But doesn't it seem like that's been the problem lately,

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, him thinking less with the mistakes that he makes.

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's so, let's let's just stay there. I He then,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>also in his defense, was like, or maybe I need

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 2>to think more. He's in shambles a bit, it would appear,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I think it's the option. I think the

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Bills would be six and one right now if Josh

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Allen just recognized we can win certain games with me

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 2>being Clark Kent and not Superman. They only lose the

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Jets game because Josh can't stop turning the ball over,

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and they lose the Patriots game. In my opinion, I

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.479
<v Speaker 2>can't prove this, but it's my opinion. When he throws

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a pick on the first play of the game against

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 2>the dead in the water Patriots team, it gave them

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 2>hope in life that now, all of a sudden, you're

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 2>in a dogfight. The whole game when I felt like

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots were ready to roll over. The only game

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 2>all year that if Josh just played within himself I

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 2>think they still would have lost was the Jags game,

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>because the Jags did like they the Jags were the

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 2>better team that game. They had been in England for

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 2>a week and a half, a lot of stuff. So

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I just I think the Bills are in a really

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 2>tricky spot tonight because if they lose this game, the

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 2>conversation shifts from is this team gonna get over the

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 2>hump and make the first Super Bowl for the franchise

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 2>in thirty years? Two? Is this team going to miss

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs? Because if they lose tonight and fall to

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 2>four and four, here's what they have after at Cincinnati,

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 2>a team that rolled them in the playoffs last year

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and in the DeMar Hambling game looked like they were

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the far better team for a quarter than home for

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos. Fine, then the Jets, who have already beaten them,

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 2>at the Eagles, at the Chiefs home for the Cowboys,

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>with still a game in Miami in the final week

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 2>of the year. If the Bills lose tonight, the Bills

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 2>miss sing the postseason becomes a very real point of contention,

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a very real one, and so it's something that needs

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to be watched. The Bucks, on the other hand, are

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 2>just trying to win that crummy a NFC South, and

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>so even if they lose, they're okay because it's the

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Saints stank and the Falcons don't have a quarterback. By

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the way, real quick, Dusty from the TV show Our

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 2>Most Loyal What's Right viewer sends this along to us.

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Drew Knicks players when guarded by Drew Holliday last night,

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>four of twenty three, Julius Randall was one of thirty

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 2>at well, no, but I'm talking about Randall Randall. This

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>is just when guarded by Drew, Julius was one of ten.

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Jalen was zero for four. RJ. Barrett was one for four.

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 2>The team as a whole was four of twenty three.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 2>So Drew Holliday box score wise didn't do much, but

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 2>as far as impact on the game, being the best

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>perimeter defender in the league, he did. He stepped up

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 2>huge in their first game.

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, thanks Dusty. Uh So, the forty nine

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 3>ers are at a really sticky situation right now. They're

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 3>coming off of two straight losses and brock party is

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 3>obviously hurt now, so Sam Donald's about to suit up again.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't you wouldn't air your party for cousins take

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 3>on here. Uh but yeah, the forty nine ers are

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 3>serious about winning Super Bowl? Is it time for them

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>to look for another quarterback? Or so they stick this

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 3>Sam Donald thing out? What should they do? It seems

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 3>like they're always looking for the fast and cheap option.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so a couple things. First of all, fair is fair.

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I should note that we now have real evidence Brock

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Party suffered. Did you see the play de moon day?

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>They think Perty suffered his concussion?

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 3>That is concussion. I have not seen it.

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 2>It was there. It was the tush push that they tried.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 2>He just gets annihilated on.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 3>The toush somebody came straight as helmet.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean it's bad first, So like a maybe

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the NFL is gonna ban the toush push for actual

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>health and safety reasons because no one can do it

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 2>without getting players maimed, but the Eagles. But also listen,

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I fair is fair. He both of his interceptions demnse

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>came after that play. So I you know, I have

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>been very consistent on what I think of Party, and yes,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>his performance at the end of that game confirmed a

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of what I had been saying. But I've gotta

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 2>be I you know, I've got a. With new information,

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>you can have new opinions. My overall opinion of him

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>doesn't change, but I give him a little more of

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>a I don't want to say pass, but it's a

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>little more understandable. But the concussions are also so weird

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 2>in this regard. He showed no ill effects after the play,

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 2>far as like stumbling anything. At the postgame press conference

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 2>he seemed totally fine, and then symptoms on set on

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 2>the flight home. So you know what, it's a week.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think understand concussions. I don't know. I don't

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 2>understand concussion science at all. But so they are now

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna go to Sam Donald, and my guess is he's

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 2>gonna look a lot like Party looks. He's gonna be

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>guys are gonna run open, He's gonna be fine, and

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 2>the Niners offense is gonna move like and folks, will

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder if that then happens, and listen, Donald

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>is worse than Party. Donald is a bad player. So

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they'll look as good as they did

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>with Purty, but I don't think it'll be this massive,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 2>massive drop off. And I do wonder if, folks, if

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Donald plays a good game and they win, or all

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden gonna be like Sam Donald must be good,

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 2>or people might come around slightly to my line of thinking.

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Now I did say party for Cousins. Who says no,

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 2>with the argument being Cousins can leave Minnesota this offseason

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and they get nothing back for him and they don't

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 2>have a contingency plan or like an air apparent quarterback.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Right now, their backup quarterback is a fifth round rookie

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Heron or I'm sorry, Jaren hall a Jalen Herron.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 2>I transposed his name Jaren Hall. So having Party with

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years left for free to have a

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>look at him for the rest of this year might

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 2>be interesting for them and for the Niners. I think

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 2>they'd become the Super Bowl favorites because here's the reality

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 2>of the Kyle Shanahan forty nine ers demonse. Thirty six

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 2>times in his coaching career with the Niners they have

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 2>trailed in the fourth quarter by eight or more. How

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 2>many of those games do you think they've won? How

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 2>many times did they have a legitimate fourth quarter comeback?

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>That is, across all the quarterbacks he's had thirty six

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>times they have trailed in the fourth quarter by eight

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 2>or more, how many of those games have they won?

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:20.479
<v Speaker 4>Give it at zero one zero zero is crowded.

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 2>So when your team is built around the idea of

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 2>we can work around our quarterbacks limitations, when that hasn't

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 2>worked through three quarters and you need to, you know,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 2>you need someone to go out there and make plays

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 2>on their own. They're oh for thirty six and that happening.

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 2>And if people are like, oh, well, Nick, what you

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 2>know games if they're down four and then a team

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 2>scores a touchdown late fourth quarter, of course they're not

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 2>coming back. They're ozer for twenty six in games when

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 2>headed into the fourth quarter, they're down more. So they

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 2>just can't come back on people. And so they do

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 2>need an upgrade at that spot. Cousins would do it,

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.479
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think the Vikings are trading him. All right,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's go on to the Cowboys, all right.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Jerry Zones said that he's not looking to initiate any trades,

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 3>but he's open to them. They obviously need to improve

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 3>in some areas. Even Michaeh. Parsons one of his podcasts,

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 3>say that the Eagles are better than them. The Eagles

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 3>already made a trade to kind of patch up their secondary.

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Is somebody who still has Dallas in the Super Bowl,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and you how aggressive do you think they need to

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 3>be with trading to make.

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 2>All I would certain The first call I would make

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 2>would be to Arizona for Hollywood Brown because Dallas clearly

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 2>believed they needed a field stretching speed receiver and they

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 2>thought they got it this offseason in Brandon Cooks. But

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Cooks has been a zero for them. A Hollywood

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Brown is a pending free agent, so you could probably

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 2>get him cheaply from Arizona. I would make that call.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 2>If that doesn't happen, I would call the Giants. If

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the Giants lose to the Jets this Sunday and their

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 2>season is dead, and the season is probably dead anyway,

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>but if they lose this Sunday and it's officially dead,

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I'd call the Giants and say, hey, the Darren Waller

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>acquisition has not worked out for you. Do you want

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 2>to get out of that deal? And for us, I don't.

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.719
<v Speaker 2>Because the Cowboys let Dalton Schultz walk, they missed the

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 2>tight end. They also let Zeke walk because they're like

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Tony Pollard can be our featured guy. Maybe Tony Pollard

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 2>is better, just real quick, maybe is better with as

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 2>a change of pace, I would call up the Giants

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 2>and say, what's the price on Saquon? What's the price

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 2>on Saquon as you know, ten week rental? And can

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 2>we do something there? Those are the kind of moves

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 2>around the edges I would think about. Go ahead, what

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 2>were you gonna ask?

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that they would trade within the division?

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you want to do that.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>So listen, some teams don't do that. I think that

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>is a dumb philosophy. In fact, I think it's you

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 2>should go the opposite, which is, if you think you're

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 2>getting the better end of a trade, you want it

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 2>to be within your division because you are then putting,

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of your major counterparts at a disadvantage.

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 2>And if the Cowboys are like, we're gonna borrow from

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the future for today, the Giants are not trying to

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 2>trade for They're not trying to plan for the future.

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry. They're not trying to plan for today. They're

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 2>trying to plan for the future. Listen, the Patriots traded

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Drew Bludsoe within the division. We saw the Vikings trade

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 2>t J. Hockinson within the division. We trades within the

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 2>division can happen. I understand that people, you know that

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 2>it is unlikely. I don't think that should be a

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 2>big piece of it. All right, go ahead, last one,

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>speaking of the trade deadline.

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, So the NFL trade deadline is becoming like

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the NBA a lot, and how exciting it is and

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the big names like last year they had Christian McCaffrey,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Bradley Chubb, TJ. Hockinson, Calvin Ridley, Rokwan Smith, Big and

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 3>your guy Tony all those guys removed. Put on your

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 3>next do Damas hat and tell us what and fill

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 3>out these categories with who you think will be buyers,

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.239
<v Speaker 3>which teams you think would be sellers, and who are

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 3>the players that you think will be traded throughout this deadline?

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So any team right now that is sitting on

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>two wins or fewer, So that's Green Bay, Tennessee, the Chargers,

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the Giants, the Bears, the Patriots, the Broncos, the Cardinals,

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the Panthers should be sellers. Now the Chargers will not

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 2>be because everyone's gonna get fired there if they don't

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 2>turn it around. I don't think the Packers will be.

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>The Titans obviously already are I think the Giants should be.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 2>The Bears were sellers last year, so maybe they won't be. Patriots, Broncos, Cardinals,

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and Panthers I think should be as far as who

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 2>should be buyers. I here, you gotta be careful with

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 2>it and that you want to do it smartly. Philly

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 2>has done it smartly in the past. The Chiefs have

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 2>done it smartly. The Niners traded a lot for Christian McCaffrey.

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 2>It has worked out in that he's a great player.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 2>But you want to make sure you're not you're not

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 2>hamstringing yourself, right. So I would think that Baltimore I

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 2>brought up Saquon before Baltimore should call about Saquon. Their

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 2>running backs are hurt, that team is in a Super

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Bowl contention mode. They have the equity to do it.

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 2>If I were them, I Baltimore should call about Saquan

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville should consider calling about Danil Hunter. He's been awesome

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 2>for Minnesota. Minnesota is not going anywhere now. Maybe Minnesota,

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 2>because they got that win and they have a soft schedule,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to trade. I would call about Danil Hunter.

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>If I were them, and then Cleveland should call people

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 2>and see if maybe, just maybe they can include a

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 2>draft pick and get someone to get take Deshaun Watson

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 2>off their hands. But that's probably not gonna happen. I mean,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 2>he's probably an untradeable player. If Cleveland also should call

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and try to get Jacoby Brissett back, because at this point,

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>nobody seems to know what's happening with Deshaun Watson other

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 2>than the fact that he's injured. His coach doesn't understand it.

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't seem to understand it. He was cleared for

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 2>YESTERDA or last week's game. They wouldn't put him back in.

0:31:56.280 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Jacoby right now is the backup quarterback in Washington. He's

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 2>better than Sam Howell, but they're not playing him. I

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 2>think Cleveland should try to bring Jacoby Brissette back and

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 2>be a real playoff team this year. All Right, I

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 2>feel really good about our bets this week. We've got

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 2>some action on Thursday Night football. We've got some action

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday Night football. Demands is going to try to

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>win a tease for the first time since before Labor Day.

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 2>We do all that next. What's right.

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Robliss, who defined every expectation

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 5>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 5>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pania, and

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back in. Put your questions or comments

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 2>in the chat. We'll get to those. Let's go ahead

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and just show our picks from last week, because we

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 2>had a couple terrible ones, yet despite that, we had

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 2>a nice winning week. Jacksonville plus a point and a

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>half at New Orleans. They went outright and really controlled

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 2>that entire game. It was closed at the end, but

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 2>it shouldn't have been. Vegas minus three at Chicago was

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 2>a disastrous, terrible bet. I bet on Brian Hoyer. It

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 2>was really terrible. I thought Tyson Bagent would give him

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the game instead. Josh McDaniels kicking field goals down eighteen.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 2>He's just so frustrating. Buffalo minus eight and a half

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 2>at New England was an even worse bet. They lose outright,

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 2>But Pittsburgh getting points at the Rams they went out right,

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota getting seven at San Francisco they win outright. So

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 2>my three underdogs all one outright. Our season record is

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 2>now a sustainable to a degree, sixteen and nineteen. Just

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 2>need one four and one or better week to be

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 2>at five hundred and as we head into the home stretch,

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 2>which is just what we would hope to do. So

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to Monsay, let's go. I said we're gonna go fast today,

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and we did a forty minute dy block. Let's go

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 2>quick on these. But I feel really good about all

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 2>five of these picks. Go.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 3>First off, you've got Tampa Bay plus nine and a

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 3>half at Buffalo.

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 2>That's tonight's game. You don't like it, tell me.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I think, I do. I do think that the Bills

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 3>are gonna win the game. I think your thought process

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 3>is roller coaster. Josh Allen, He's due to smoke Tampa

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Bay and show them who the Bills can be for

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 3>a second.

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 2>But no, that's Tampa. I have, Tampa, just the point

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 2>you do have.

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 3>That's my mistake.

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 2>That's no I have. So it's just too many points.

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 2>It's too many points on a on a short week

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Thursday night football. These Thursday night games are not well played,

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 2>they're not blowouts. And the primetime games, all of these

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 2>primetime Island games are going under which I understand this

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 2>isn't a total bet, but it's that fact that there's

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 2>not gonna be a blowout. The Bills have started so

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 2>slowly as of late, and I just I do think

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo likely wins the game, but the Buffalo needs to

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 2>just have a vanilla game plan get out of there

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>with a win. I'm getting nine and a half points

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 2>from a Bucks team that really just doesn't they don't

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 2>get blown out like that. And so the two times

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.959
<v Speaker 2>this year that they've lost by multiple scores, they've still

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 2>only allowed twenty five and twenty points, meaning so the

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Bucks defense this year has allowed seventy seventeen, twenty five, nine,

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty and thirteen. The two times this year they've lost,

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 2>they would have not covered this spread. Where against the

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Lions and against the Eagles when their offense only scored

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 2>eleven and six points, you know, respectively. But the problem

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 2>there is the Buffalo defense is so banged up that

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Mac Jones was cooking them up, and so the Bucks,

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:30.399
<v Speaker 2>coming off two straight losses, kind of gave the game

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 2>away against Atlanta. This is a big spot for them.

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I think they can keep it close. And home teams

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday Night Football are twenty and thirty two against

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 2>the spread over the last three years. Josh Allen in

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>his last five starts after facing the Patriots has yet

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 2>to cover. I just it's too many points. Tampa can

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 2>win outright, and they certainly can keep it close. I

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 2>like Tampa plus the nine and a half.

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Next Jacksonville minus two and a half at Pittsburgh.

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So two of my favorite teams to bet on,

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the Jags and Mike Tomlin. And I understand Mike Tomlin

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 2>at home getting points is a covering machine. I get that.

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I still think this line should be closer to Jacksonville

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 2>minus four. I think this is a three point Jacksonville win.

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the public refuses to acknowledge that the Jags

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 2>are a really good team. Flatly, the Jags in a

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 2>calendar year have lost five games, one bad loss to

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 2>the Texans a loss to the Lions and three losses

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 2>to the Chiefs. Trevor Lawrence over that calendar year has

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 2>been excellent. They have consistently outperformed Vegas' expectations, and they're

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:59.720
<v Speaker 2>on extended rest having played on Thursday Pittsburgh another hard

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 2>fall victory this past week Jacksonville. This feels to me

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 2>like a twenty to seventeen twenty one to seventeen Jacksonville win.

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I think Trevor's gonna play well. The Jags get to

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 2>six and two. I like the Jags minus two and

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Owen's you don't like it? That one's yeah, I

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 3>mean it's uh Tomlin. Tomlin covering and always covering as

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 3>underdog is is what it is.

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Listen, Tomlin is an all time against the spread

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>legend as a dog. I still like the Jags.

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Here next, you got Atlanta minus two and a half

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 3>at Tennessee.

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, So this is an ugly terrible game, and

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 2>I understand I'm laying points with Desmond Ritter on the road.

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I get that. Here is the counterpoint. The Titans are

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:58.320
<v Speaker 2>either playing Malik Willis, who is not an NFL player,

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:03.720
<v Speaker 2>or will Levis who despite them using a premium draft

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 2>pick on him this year. Will Levis must have looked

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 2>so bad at practice that he wasn't even the backup

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Malik Willis was. So I have seen Malik Willis play.

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 2>He's awful, awful. Will Levis somehow, Is as up to

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 2>this point has been worse than him. And so I

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>think will Levis Is probably gonna start because they don't

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 2>feel like they can start Malik Willis. Atlanta's defense has

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 2>sneaky been really good this year. Obviously, their quarterback play

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 2>has been killing them and he's been turning the ball over.

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 2>But Atlanta this year has allowed the following points ten

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, twenty twenty three, nineteen, twenty four, thirteen. That

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 2>sounds good, but not great. It is great when you

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 2>include the fact that that team has been that defense

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 2>has been consistently put on the field in negative positions

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 2>thanks to the quarterback play. Tennessee is in a selloff

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that the players in that locker room this week are like,

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 2>am I getting traded? Am I getting traded? Atlanta, meanwhile,

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 2>just got their biggest win of the year. Atlanta wins

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 2>this game on the road in Tennessee, and uh yeah,

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 2>so that's where we're at on it.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Yeah, I remember what you what happened the

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 3>last time you doubted a backup quarterback. This sounds a

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 3>lot like beartt Raiders.

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, that is true. All right, go ahead.

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh you got Indiana plus one versus New Orleans.

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've got the Cats getting a point against New Orleans.

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 2>So here are some crazy facts. Derek Carr the worst

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 2>quarterback this century against the spread as a favorite, The

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Colts the only team in the league to score at

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 2>least twenty points in every game this year. Jonathan Taylor

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 2>rounding back into form, the Colts feeling like they had

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a game stolen from them last week against the Browns

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:15.240
<v Speaker 2>thanks to the refs, Gardner Minshew playing well, and the Saints,

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, coming apart at the seams. As

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Derek Carr screams at everyone, they realize that Dennis Allen

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 2>is still Dennis Allen. He's twelve nineteen and one against

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 2>the spread against teams under five hundred. I just think

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans is worse than the Colts, and I'm getting

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 2>a point with the home team, So I'm doing that,

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 2>all right. I am betting on three ugly games Atlanta, Tennessee, Indye,

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans, and then this one.

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead Chicago plus nine at the Chargers. Yeah, this

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 3>one's just a sketchy bet, Like I don't that's a

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 3>sketchy gay man.

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 2>So I understand that it seems little flip floppy to

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 2>go from saying pagent could be Nate Peterman to now

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 2>betting on him. I understand that part of it. But

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 2>in what world do the Chargers deserve to be nine

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:20.240
<v Speaker 2>point favorites over anyone? And what have the Chargers done

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to where you're like, yep, they should be a damn

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 2>near double digit favorite. When is the last time I'm

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna look for it? When is the last the Charge? Yeah,

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 2>it hasn't been this year the Chargers as far as

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 2>winning by ten plus, like they did it at the

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 2>very end of last year against the Rams when the

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Rams were you know, on to Baker as the quarterback

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and that season was over for them and the Chargers

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 2>were playing for their playoff lives. Like this is purely

0:42:56.560 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>a fading Brandon Staley and the Chargers entire organization bet.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just too many points for a bad team that,

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 2>by the way, is not gonna have home field advantage.

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I know I say it every week, but there's Bears

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 2>fans everywhere. The Bears will have the home field advantage

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:18.359
<v Speaker 2>in this game. The Bears shockingly are averaging twenty eight

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 2>points a game their last four games. And I just

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I the Chargers don't deserve to be nine point favorites

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 2>over anybody. They flatly do not deserve it. I'm taking

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the points.

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, all right? Do you have a summary for me?

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:40.280
<v Speaker 2>There's a summary in there.

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 3>No. He is bet favorites against the two best coaches

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 3>as home dogs, Tyson Badgean Gartner, Minshew and Baker Mayfield

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 3>on a Thursday. That's what you're going on?

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 2>How you go five? And oh, that's how you go five?

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 2>And oh America? Yeah, Tampa plus nine and a half,

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville minus two and a half, Atlanta minus two and

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 2>a half, In plus one, and Chicago plus nine. The

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Bills on a short week should not be nine and

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 2>a half point favorites. The Chargers, under any circumstances should

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 2>not be nine point favorites. The Jags are gonna win

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 2>by a field goal, The Colts are gonna win out right,

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 2>and Tennessee's gonna have four turnovers out of the quarterback position.

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a five and oh week demonse. You know what,

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm locking in the parlay right now, a nice ten

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 2>to one right now, lock in the arms. Wait is

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.879
<v Speaker 2>it ten to one? No, that's a four teamer. That's

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty five to one. My bad, five and oh week.

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 2>We're hitting a five and oh week. Speaking of things

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 2>that are unlikely to happen, demanse winning a teaser demonse

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Last week, I talked you out of a good leg

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 2>of your teaser, but luckily your teaser was dead immediately

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 2>thanks to you not believing in Lamar Jackson, and so

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:58.720
<v Speaker 2>you ended up. So you have now lost five teasers

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.879
<v Speaker 2>in a row. You're one in six on the year.

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 2>So what are you gonna do here? Talk to me.

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 3>We're simplifying things. If you guys want to recap, I

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:10.400
<v Speaker 3>had Detroit versus Baltimore plus thirteen. Yeah, we're let's just

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 3>actually just want to skip straight to the teaser. We're

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna get to business exactly.

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:16.959
<v Speaker 2>We don't need to recap, right, don't. This week?

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Week AD's teaser is a three team eight and a

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 3>half point teaser.

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Half point teaser. I didn't even know exist. Yeah, Okay,

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 2>go ahead.

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 3>So we're teasing Miami down No. Minus one versus New England.

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 3>First off, man, I don't think this last week was

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:37.879
<v Speaker 3>the revival of the uh of the Patriots. I think

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:40.760
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna bring him back down to speed. Miami definitely,

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 3>just I mean, they don't have a choice but to

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 3>win that game. And then you got Minnesota plus plus

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 3>seven at green Bay. That's another game that I just

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 3>think Minnesota is gonna beat green Bay. Uh. And then

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 3>you got the Rams plus fifteen at Dallas, and I

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:56.800
<v Speaker 3>think the Rams are more than capable of hanging around

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 3>with the Cowboys. So it was so, yeah, exactly.

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 2>I see that it's minus one ten. I'm not gonna

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 2>try to talk you out anything here, and I'm rooting

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 2>for you. The leg of it that concerns me a

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 2>bit is the Rams, only because the Cowboys have shown

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 2>the ability against teams with week offensive lines to really

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 2>turn it into a blowout. If I were going to

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 2>participate in this eight and a half point teaser, I

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 2>personally would probably remove the Rams and just put the

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs down to a pick them against Denver, which seems

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 2>like a game the Chiefs can't lose, but I'm not

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna try to impact you. I give this teaser grade

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 2>an A for effort because I didn't even know you

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 2>could do an eight and a half point teaser. I

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't even know that was a thing. I've been gamming

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 2>them my whole life. I've never heard of it. I've

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 2>heard of six, seven, ten, and the rare thirteen point teezer.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know these eight and a half pointers existed.

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 2>These new the online gambling, you can just pick whatever

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 2>amount you want.

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I suppose they let you do like any point up

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 3>to like fourteen and every half day in between.

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's probably a reason for that. All right, what's

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the offer this week?

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 3>Uh? The offer this week? The producers are betting against us.

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:24.959
<v Speaker 3>So if well, if we fail to combine for five

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 3>of six on our picks, we need to wear costumes

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 3>on Tuesday show for Halloween.

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh no, I turn, If I turn, I don't even

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 2>need to know. I'm not wearing costumes. I'm not. I'm

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 2>damn near forty years old. I'm not wearing costumes. And

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 2>here's what people don't understand about the whole, like the whole, Like, oh,

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 2>do your live television show in costumes. What happens if

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 2>there's breaking news of a tragic sort, I'm dressed up

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 2>like Dracula, and I have to be like in sad

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 2>news such and such as passed away, like what are

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 2>you talking about? I'm not doing a live television or

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 2>YouTube show dressed in character when the the upside is

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 2>so small. Well, you know what, let him do it now,

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I will tell you this. With all that said, I'm

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a I'm a bit of a hypocrite

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 2>because Wilds and I did have an idea last year

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on Halloween that we were gonna tell Brew we were

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 2>doing costumes and get the reason I had Dracula in

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 2>my head was and we were gonna do a whole

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 2>thing where like Brew is a vampire with the fangs

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 2>and the makeup and everything. But then Wilds and I

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 2>come out in our regular outfits and we just that

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 2>wild and I are just dressed in suits, and who

0:48:56.920 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 2>was dressed like Dracula. But even that, if that were

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to happen and there's the breaking news thing, I said,

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 2>then all you just you just Wilds and I handle it,

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and Brew goes and gets changed. All right, quick break

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 2>answer your questions and the Chat next. What's right? All right,

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 2>welcome back in demonse. Let's answer a few of these

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 2>chat questions before we go go ahead from Michael White Pollard.

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 3>Michael Pollard asked, well, Baltimore lose this weekend since they

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 3>are the team of the week. No, they're not.

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, Listen, here's the so they are. Not only are

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 2>they the IT team, they are, they are at the Cardinals,

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 2>who are the opposite of the it team they are.

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the highest riser and the forest faller furthest

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 2>faller on kind of you know and such. Well, the

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals know they started the year off, people think they're

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 2>worst than the league, but then they were competitive the

0:49:56.680 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 2>first few weeks. They beat Dallas. But now they've kind

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 2>of you gone into who we thought they were gonna be. Yeah,

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a stay away game for me. I'm not teasing

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 2>that game. I'm not betting that game. Every single week,

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the hot team is lost every single week. Like I've

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 2>talked about, Baltimore definitely qualifies this week. The problem is

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs kind of do too so so and they're

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 2>both eight and a half point road favorites against teams

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 2>that are dead in the water.

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:32.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, Next, Casper Gaming, says Nick. If Sam Donald

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 3>beats the Bengals on Sunday, are we gonna see him

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 3>make his Mahomes Mountain debut potentially?

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean Mac Jones made the Mountain for one

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:42.720
<v Speaker 2>good game. Why couldn't Sam Donald?

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, Next, Mohammed Musa said on TV, you mentioned

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Davis for EMBIID. Does it concern you that embiide

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:51.799
<v Speaker 3>has never had a playoff run as good as twenty

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:55.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty Anthony Davis or even twenty twenty three Anthony Davis.

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, of course that concerns you. It's the biggest

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 2>question mark about Embid's career. But I just I do

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 2>think that Ad is not likely to get back to

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the level we saw him get at his first year

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 2>with the Lakers. And I do wonder if you know

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 2>EMBIID could get the play with Lebron bump that Ad got,

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:27.200
<v Speaker 2>at least temporarily. And I wonder if the Lakers right

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 2>now feel like we have the second best team in

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the West. But what does it matter because we can't

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.719
<v Speaker 2>beat the best team in the West. We cannot beat

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:38.879
<v Speaker 2>the Nuggets without a major change, all right.

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 3>Next, Jay Roaming questioned Jay roaming is a question does

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Ers Does a Chargers loss on Sunday Night result in

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the mid season firing of Staley.

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not really the Chargers style, but I mean he's

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 2>got to be getting close. Man. You played Travis Kelsey

0:51:57.560 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 2>twice a year. Your game plan every week is to

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:01.879
<v Speaker 2>every time you playim is to not guard him. If

0:52:01.920 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 2>you lose to the Bears, something's gotta change, all right.

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Last one, Zach Anderson asked what brand is Nick sweater from?

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't care if I can't afford it, great crew neck.

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh I you can. It's Scotch and Soda. A lot

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 2>of the stuff I wear is Scotch and Soda. By

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the way, if anyone from Scotch and SODA's out there watching,

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I went to the actual scott the original Scotch and

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Soda is in Amsterdam. When I was there, loved the

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:28.839
<v Speaker 2>company where a lot of their stuff feel like there

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 2>could be a great little synergy brand thing here. And

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 2>this like like a lot of Scotch and Soda stuff.

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 2>This is not that expensive. My guess is you can

0:52:36.320 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 2>afford it. I don't know it was. And now I'm

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:41.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna sound like a jerk. I don't I honestly don't

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 2>know what is and isn't expensive for clothes because I

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:47.600
<v Speaker 2>don't buy my clothes. My wife does. But no, I

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 2>mean I think I I mean, it is expensive adjacent.

0:52:51.680 --> 0:52:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I think this was probably around one hundred bucks, So

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 2>like that's a that's an expensive sweat. But it's but

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 2>you know what it's like, Uh yeah, it's I don't

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 2>think it's for a lot of people.

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 3>What'd you say, it's not Mike and Marry or nothing,

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:10.879
<v Speaker 3>like you know, our money exchange or whatever you want

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:11.319
<v Speaker 3>to call it.

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, no, HARMANI exchange is the I mean, it's

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:23.279
<v Speaker 2>cheaper than OURMANI. It's like there, you know what I mean.

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 2>It's like Jordan's versus Jordan's brand.

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 3>If that exactly you know what I mean.

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 2>Like, and so it's it's still nice stuff. Uh but yeah,

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, Scotch and Soda. I'm sure you can find

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 2>it on their website. I think it's from last year

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 2>because I've worn this on the pod once before, all right,

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 2>yeah yeah. Or or if there was a way to

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:48.439
<v Speaker 2>play the opposite of the teaser, maybe people we could

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 2>all be rich. But you can't really just fade those

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm going five and Oh, We're keeping our fingers crossed

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 2>for demons. See you guys on TV today at three

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 2>cho