WEBVTT - 2019 ACC Preview

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Solid Verbal. I'll that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for Dake Ado State? Is that whoom whoom? And Dan

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and Tye welcome back to the Solid Verbal. Boys and girls.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>My name is ty Hilda Brandt. Joining me is always

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>over there in beautiful New York City. My man, the one,

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the only Dan Rubinstein, Sir, how are you? I am

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>so good.

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I am so so so good and excited to be

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 2>doing previews.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Tyler, Oh god, it feels so good.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's just the hydration talking.

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>You've been steering into hydration speak on our Twitter account.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you're new to the show, we

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>do have a Twitter account at solid Verbal. We do

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>have a Facebook page Facebook dot com slash solid Verbal.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>We're also on Instagram, and if you're really into the

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>show or just checking it out and want to know

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>what other verballers are like, you can go to Reddit

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash r slash solid Verbal. We didn't start it.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>It was started buy some superverballers, among which is our

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>good friend Peter. He runs the sub and folks are

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>out there talking about each and every show that we do. Also,

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>before we go too much further and steer too much

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>into the acc twenty nineteen season, Dan our first preview

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for the coming year. Hell yeah, if you haven't already,

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the weekend of August the seventeenth and eighteenth, we will

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>first be starting our Solid Verbal World tour in the

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>great city of Dallas, Texas or a little bit north,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I should say, to be prettyect W. Yeah, the DFW area.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Solidverbaltickets dot com, slash Texas is where you can buy

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>tickets to the Fantasy Things Draft that we're going to

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>do on August the seventeenth at Alamo Draft House eight

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>pm Central Time. Be there, be Square. Then the very

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>next morning, August the eighteenth, hopping on the bird, flying

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>back across country to the nation's capital, doing our Fantasy

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Things Draft show at the wonderful Union Stage. Hell Yeah, DC,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that show at seven point thirty sliverbletickets dot com, Slash DC.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Get in on the ticket game if you haven't already.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>If you have, if you've got social media, please do

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>blast it out to all your friends. The more the merrier.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>We want to know who's coming to the show. We

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>want to celebrate your purchase with you, because we're excited

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>about both shows. Still tickets available in both spots, they

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>are drying up quickly. I would urge each and every

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>one of you verbalers out there who are interested, please

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do hop on in before it's too late. It's going

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to be excellent.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>We can't wait to meet you and eat tenders and

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about college football stupidity with.

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>All of you. Speaking of college football stupidity, Dan, we

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have made it officially, well sort of, we have made

0:02:59.919 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it through the long, cold off season of college football. Yes,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the summer is in the rearview mirror, at least in

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>a college football since because starting today, right here, right now,

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we are launching our twenty nineteen preview series. We're starting

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>with the ACC and, as long time listeners will know,

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.959
<v Speaker 1>over the course of time, we've evolved this format a

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>number of times. We've gone through by a division by team. Today,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to simplify this, yeo. We're going to

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>do all of the ACC. One episode might run a

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer than you and I are our custom too,

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>but that's okay. We want to make sure that we

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>have a self contained ACC show for any and all

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>who are interested. We've put an extraordinary amount of research

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>into this, and I think we're excited about the next

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>couple shows where we actually get to talk about some

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on field stuff.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, totally and completely true. The ACC kicks things off

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 2>for us because it is America's Championship conference'.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>That is the correct accent in America's.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 2>That's what it stands for, America's Championship Conference. So our

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>format is we're doing the entire conference. We've decided to

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>split things up divisionally, and we are going to ask

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 2>each other questions that we have about our own or

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the other person's division of quote unquote expertise that is correct.

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>So these are our burning questions to each other, sort

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 2>of like we had with the Q and A, where

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 2>we came up with our own cues and a's and

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 2>we're using that to discuss America's Championship Conference.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I have not written out, at least not yet, a

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>full on role playing series for the ACC or really

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>any conference, but I'm not ruling it out because, as

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, these preview episodes sometimes take a bit of

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a left turn.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to rule that out in ACC game

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 2>like a Dasio's Dungeon, So the dice.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>The way, thank you, the way that we've broken this

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>up up. You're gonna ask me questions about the ACC

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Coastal or as we know it here and love it here,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the ACC Postal. Everybody's far and far. I am going

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to ask you questions about the ACC Atlantic or the

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so called ACC Fatlantic.

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Yep, this is true, and I believe Christian Wilkins. Yeah,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, thanks to Christian Wilkins, there's something

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 2>beautiful about the Fatlantic.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So Dan, I guess we're a little bit undecided on

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what sounds we would like to use to lead into right,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>all this great information here could go breaking news, go,

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Picks of the week, could go lightning, round, shootout, murdered.

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>What are you feeling?

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Just do what anybody knew to playing Street Fighter two

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 2>would do and just mash those buttons on your soundboard.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That actually came out.

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you know what, that's not bad, and there is

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a Patriot League tie in and we'll get to it.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.119
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Wow, pretty good.

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 2>That's I mean, you could put the hypothetical one just

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>because it's a questioning sound, but I don't know if

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 2>you have.

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>That loaded up. I will find it before you put

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it in post. Put it in post. So, Daniel, I

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>want to start by asking you a very important question.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>Are we going back and forth or are we going

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>division and then the other division.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to see where the where the show

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>takes us down. Let's do it.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get in the gondola of information.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about Clemson. Okay, perhaps a bit

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of a cliche start to this show, but I refuse. Okay,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>here's what I want to know about Clemson. Yeah, I

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>want to know with all of their turnover on defense.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm Okay, we can talk three levels, all through levels.

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Does that to you, as the newfound expert on the

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>ACC Fatlantic, does that represent any kind of significant step

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>backwards in terms of production, in terms of expectations? What

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>does it mean for the twenty nineteen rendition of the

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Clemson Tigers? Define significant?

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I would define what does government mean to you? No,

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>what I would mean by significant is does it mean

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see I don't know, a twenty point

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 2>or a twenty place drop in their SMP plus defensive ratings?

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Is their defense going to get noticeably worse? Now that

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have so many new faces playing on

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that side of the ball. So are they going to

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 2>fall down to merely really really good or fall to

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>excellent instead of they are all assassins and never blink.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Instead of being the number two defense, are they now

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be number twenty two something like that? Okay,

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>which is still very good. But short answer is they

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>won't fall that far. I don't believe. No. The short

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>answers no.

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 2>The losses up front are significant, and I think it

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 2>will change how they play defense a little bit. Perhaps

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>they bring more pressure because they can't count on Cleveland

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>ferle I forget how they pronounced that officially, but and

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Austin Bryant off the edge and then you know everything

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Christian Wilkins and Dexter Lawrence did in the middle. So

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to be able to trot out a

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>team within a team in the way that they've been

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>able to do these past couple of years. But Clemson's

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 2>participation levels and rates on their defense, especially it's through

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the roof. They get in so many guys both when

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the game is on the line and not because they

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>happen to blow out a number of teams. So they

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 2>get a number of people on the field, So whether

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 2>it's I think there's two Xavier's, but Xavier Thomas is

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the big one. And then whether it's Justin Foster, whether

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, Darien Kendrick who's now switching from receiver

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to corner. Like throughout the defense, they're working in guys

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 2>who either have a ton of promise or have played

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>a ton for this defense. So I think the big

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 2>difference will be how much they trust the defensive line

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 2>to do things alone, but results wise, against the offenses

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be facing at least after Texas A

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and M and I technically before Texas A and M

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>with Georgia Tech, there will be a drop off, but

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 2>nothing noticeable to the eye. It'll be like a magic

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 2>eye drop off where you're really gonna have You're really good.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>At those, right, I'm very good at those.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're gonna have to squint, You're gonna have to

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 2>dive deep. Situationally, there's just too much talent there, you know,

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 2>there's too much continuity with the coaching staff. And we've

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 2>seen this before with Clemson. We're going into the season.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>We're like they lost ten of eleven start and like

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 2>up just as good because so much of defense is

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>effort and confidence going both ways, players being confident in

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the defensive staff and the defensive staff being confident in

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>letting their own players loose and trusting them to execute

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 2>a game plan. So with who they're facing, with how

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>they've recruited, you know, they bring in the number one, two, three,

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>defensive linemen whatever, each and every year. It's great that

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Isaiah Simmons is coming back behind the line they're leading

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 2>tach last year, even with a couple of losses that

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>linebacker behind him. The secondary is mostly intact. If you

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 2>remember the pick six against Bama with aj Terrell, there's

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot, there's a lot, Yeah, And I mean so

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't see any sort of WHOA what happened kind

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>of drop off.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And look, it was sort of a rhetorical question.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone who listens to the show totally fair

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>knows the answer already. But it's a question that frankly

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>needs to be asked. This is a team that went

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to oh last year. Of course, they won the

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>national championship, beat Notre Dame in the playoff, beat Alabama

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in very convincing fashion. In that championship game, and now

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>they bring back a lot on the offensive side of

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball. We talked here about defense, and I'll go

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>back to that in a second, but so many key

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>contributors are coming back on the offensive side of the ball.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention Trevor Lawrence potentially a Heisman front runner.

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>He into a tongue of I Loa, potentially duking it

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>out for the Heisman. They are the odds on favorite,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>at least at this early juncture in the preseason. Also

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>got Travis etn maybe the best running back in college football,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>t Higgins justin Ross they're back, and Maari Rodgers got hurt,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe back later in the year, but still has eligibility

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>so huge. The point here is that so much of

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that potential and offense is coming back that at least

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, looking at the schedule, it will definitely

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>balance out any rough spots will have in the beginning

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>with the defense. But look, replacing four guys on that

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>incredible defensive line, their top three linebackers, five of their

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.599
<v Speaker 1>top six tacklers as a whole, there's going to be

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an adjustment. I like that you bring

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>up the fact that Brent Venables is so good at

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>working in a rotation. That's part of his brilliance as

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a defensive coordinator. It's played a huge role in building depth,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in building this sustained success that we've seen now under

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Daboswiny and Brent Venables at Clemson. So I think Clemson's

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>in a great spot. The schedule's favorable. I don't know

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the schedule at all, they do.

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And I have an order of threats that I'm curious

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>your opinion about. So the three games that jump out

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to me, you got Texas A and M in week two.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You've also got a road game at South Carolina on

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>November thirtieth. The one that I'm most intrigued by, I

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's the biggest threat, but the one

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'm most intrigued by is actually in week three.

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the week after that A and M game. Everyone's

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be amped up for A and M at home,

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but then the very next week Clemson on the road

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at Syracuse. Should be a pretty good Syracuse team, And

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's going to be a letdown

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>spot there, but at least the dish juncture in late July.

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>There's some potential there.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 2>Dan, Yeah, hard to believe that there's going to be

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 2>a letdown against the team they almost lost to last

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>year and did lose to the year before. I think

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be ready. This is a not a

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 2>championship caliber team. This is a championship team. So my

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 2>order is Texas A and M Syracuse, South Carolina, though

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>I think South Carolina is better, Yes, Syracuse, I think situationally,

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Syracuse is in a better spot to win that game.

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>And then at the end, just in terms of potential,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Florida State, but that's that's pretty far after. So that's

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>my order of threats because there's not much you can

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>point to one offense. Mitch Hyatt's gone, but they've recruited

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the line really, really well, and the second half is

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty much cake until South Carolina. And I believe both

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Florida State and Clemson have buys before that game, So

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 2>the Florida State threat is pretty pretty microscopic. So that's

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>where I'm at. At worst, they're going they go eleven

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and one.

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree, you look across the board at all the

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>positional groups. Probably the best quarterback. I think he's the

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback in the league. Best running back, best wide

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>receiving core, best line, best defensive line, maybe in the

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>top two if you want to go that far. At linebacker,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>at defensive back, they're the best defensive line in the conference. Oh,

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's up there.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 2>I got I mean, certainly up there. I can't I

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 2>can't name them right now when Nina really played significant,

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>significant snaps.

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Yet it's either them or Miami. Yeah, it's one or

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the other. I think Syracuse has a couple really good.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>At Syracuse is good. We'll get this. There's a couple

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of conversations to me. The point is Clemson is still

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>very good. Still your odds on favorite for sure to

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>win their side of the conference and probably the conference

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. No, not probably full on favorite. They

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>are the favorite.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, where would you like to go next? You want

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 2>me to ask you a question? Do you want to

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>stick at Atlantic?

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Now ask me a question. Let's go post right here.

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with what I believe to be not the

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>most important, but maybe the most interesting team in the

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 2>in the postal Georgia Tech. Because this is, as you know,

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 2>because you own a hat, an Orange Bowl caliber program.

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, Jeff Collins takes over for Paul Johnson, meaning

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the option done with in Atlanta, Atlanta, is there reason

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 2>to believe Georgia Tech's offense.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Because I think the defense still is a long way.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 2>To go as well, but won't look like a group

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 2>of newborn giraffes coming together to play an organized sport

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 2>as they go dramatically away or at least a little

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 2>bit at a time away from that flex bone.

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So it's been interesting because when Paul Johnson stepped down,

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>he himself was talking to a similar point, and his

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>spin at the time was, Hey, these kids are still

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>football players. Like they didn't play this system that we

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just ran when they were in fifth grade. They were

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>recruited to a system, but there's still really good football players.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And the larger implication that he was driving towards was

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they can play in any system, right. Can somebody throw

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball forward? Can somebody throw the ball forward? Right? Yeah?

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know these things, they all sound fine, and

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they're very inspirational, and of course that's the kind of

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>thing he's going to say. But at some point, Dan,

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point, the rubber meets the road, and that's

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>when you get the real transition. Which is essentially what

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you're asking about here. How is this personnel going to

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>adapt to Dave pat Node's system on offense because he

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to achieve more balance, He's not going to run

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that option. The truth is, Dan, we've got quarterbacks recruited

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to an entirely different system. We've got inexperienced wide outs,

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got an offensive line that, frankly is used to

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>blocking for the run and not so much the pass.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The vision that I keep having in my head is,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>remember when Dennis Northcutt was playing quarterback for the Cleveland

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Browns for that brief moment in time, very vaguely, And

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't all that successful because Dennis north cut was

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, right, But damn if it wasn't interesting, Yeah,

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>damn if it was, and at least exciting enough to

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>keep you interested to watch to see what was going

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to happen with the Browns and offense.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 2>We've all rooted for teams that have put somebody under

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 2>center or in the shotgun where we've thought, I don't

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 2>know if this guy is the guy. He looks like

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a left fielder coming into the mouth, right, what's happening?

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Just like a lot of wildcat concepts that maybe somebody

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>could throw it, and if they do, we'd be interested

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in seeing seeing what happens there. I remember the Chris

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Harper era at Oregon very well. Sure I feel that

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>way about this version, this twenty nineteen version of the

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech Yellowjackets. It's going to be a transition. It's

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be ugly, okay. I So on offense,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I guess the answer to your question is that, to

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>some degree, yes, it's going to be a flaming bag

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>of you know what. But look, there are questions on

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>defense along the line as well, and they're young, but

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>it should be a pretty okay defense. Jeff Collins knows

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>how to coach at least that side of the ball.

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>There are pieces there. They're going to hold their own.

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>That's a bright spot. I don't want to focus on

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the negative so much, but I think defense is a

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>bright spot. I like what Jeff Collins has done. He's

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a guy who was born in Georgia. He's had two

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>stops at Georgia Tech. He has really steered into the

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that Georgia Tech is in Atlanta. He's gone full

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on Atlanta with the branding of this Georgia Tech.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I think waffle House Wednesdays, like on the video series

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>on their website waffle.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's doing that. He's tweeting about Big Boy right

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>like he's he's fully indoctrinated into Atlanta. And I think

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a smart move to try and just brand this

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>program a little bit differently. There are still gonna be

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>weird things, like he said, he said, Tech's not gonna

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have a depth chart. Instead, They're going to have something

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's calling the quote unquote line, which is quote

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a measure stick that will judge whether players are ready

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to play. M hmm, a little too like New Age

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Herm Edwards for my liking, but hey, he's trying to

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>start something new. The schedule certainly is not doing them

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>any favors, if you got that up. But it's not.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not doing them any favors. They open at Clemson

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>week one home against Georgia last week of the year.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Tough book in there. But the answer to your question,

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>very long windedly, is it's gonna be weird, but it

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>could be fun and there are some bright spots and

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I really like Jeff Collins.

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 2>So by the end of the season they could be

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>full on adolescent giraffes and not newborn's struggling to find

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the ground under them.

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's you mentioned the line, and I'm

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 2>gonna connect Georgia Tech to something that you have buried

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>deep within the recesses of your memory. If the line

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>for success is be better than Demetrius Jones, Notre Dame,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh God against Georgia TI trying to all of the

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 2>sudden install a new offense on the fly, is do

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 2>you think the line can be above that by mid season?

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Probably not mid season? Probably not. How many points did

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>they score in that game? Three? I blacked out? But yeah,

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, there's a lot of talent, but it's

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>just it's for a different system. And I do subscribe

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to the notion that these are still athletic kids. They

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>still know how to play football. They're football players first

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and not option players first. Rue. I mean, just there,

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it takes a while. This is not easy stuff to

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just pick up. You can't study it overnight and then

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>get all the machinations down the next day when you

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>go out for practice. It's just it's gonna take a

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>while to set in. I think Jeff Collins is a

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>good defensive coach, which is going to help pick up

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the slack for the offense. But it's just

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>going to take a while till they adjust to Dave

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Patnode's system. I want to feel old, not particularly, but

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. Georgia Tech's running back in that game to

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>shard choice. The great to shard choice is now Georgia

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Tech's running backs coach. Wow, Okay, shall we move thirty

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>three to three?

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 2>By the way, so that's the bar for success, being

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 2>able to score more than three points against the two

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 2>thousand and seven version of themselves.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>It's very incestuous. I apologize, Dan. Let's move on. Okay.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the Syracuse Orange. Let's you

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>familiar with something called the Ewing theory.

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am. I mean I for college football. I

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>like the Manning theory. The Manning theory t Martin winning

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the national championship after Peyton Manning.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So the Ewing theory is Bill Simmons thing about Patrick

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Ewing and Patrick Ewing not playing for the Knicks and

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the team got better essentially with him not on the court.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But the Manning theory I think we could apply here

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Peyton Manning leaves. What happens the very next

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>year tem Martin, Tennessee Volunteers win the BCS Championship. They're

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the first BCS champion, right yep. This year for Syracuse,

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Eric Dungee star quarterback, big kid, he's graduated. And now

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Tommy DeVito, who I'm still gonna try and call him

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in a guttada Vito.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 2>The Chris bermanization of Ty hilden Brand is complete.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not full Berman. I think it's catchy, okay, continue,

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>de Vito is taking over the Dino Babers offense. He's

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a different quarterback. He's fast, but he's not quite the

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>runner of Eric Dungee. Is Syracuse now a better team

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>on offense despite the fact that Eric Dungee, who was

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>so good for them for so long, is now officially

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>off the team.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Eric Dungee was not a great passer. I would go

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>as far as saying he was below average, but coupled

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>with his running, he was a plus at quarterback for sure.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 2>On big games with him, you know what they have.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I think both the quarterbacks played against Florida State in

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the very comfortable win last year. Tommy DeVito looked very

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 2>good against North Carolina real Roff both looked real rough

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 2>against Notre Dame.

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The reason I'm hesitant is the offensive line has questions.

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>They're okay.

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>At receiver, they lost a big piece to transfer, They're okay.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I like mo'neil some at running back. One of my

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>bigger questions is what does this offense actually look like?

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Because Eric Dungee ran the ball so much. I think

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I saw I was twelve or thirteen non sack carries

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>a game. So that's either going to a running back

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>or it's going to a running back via screen or

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>swing pass, sort of how Washington State uses their running

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 2>backs in a more wide open passing offense. I don't

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 2>think Tommy DeVito will be running in the way that

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Eric Dungee did. I like DeVito's arm talent. I like

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 2>him as a talent, but to run that system, you

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 2>got to have the bodies, you got to have the

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 2>star power. And I think they're fine. They were great

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 2>special teams which affected few position last year. There was

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot to like about Syracuse's I think they finished

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 2>nine to three in the regular season. I think they

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 2>take a step back. I think Tommy DeVito is like

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>two thirds good and a third kind of rough around

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the edges. So I have here on my little document,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 2>You have Syracuse, then I have your question and the

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 2>way I interpreted his touchdown Tommy or Tommy Defedo, and

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Proud of it.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 2>I hope we don't have to call him Tommy Defito,

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 2>but it really worked out quite well with his last name.

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think they're a step behind. I think he'll

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>be fine, but I don't think he's going to be

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the gamer that Dungee was necessarily in huge spots. So

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 2>I have them going from nine wins to about seven.

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 2>All to say, still good, still dangerous against whoever they play,

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 2>especially since Clemson's coming to Western New York. The defensive

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 2>line real nice position to ask. You mentioned this on

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the Dude episode. The pass rush should be good. There

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 2>are elements that I'm not crazy about, but Syracuse actually

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>tightened up really well last year on third downs and

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 2>in the red zone, so situationally and special teams wise,

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot to like about what they showed last

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 2>year carrying forward, so I still think they're a bowl team.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 2>I still think if they get a couple of breaks

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 2>at the end of games against you know, the ACC

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 2>is fine, but it's nothing crazy stacked. They could get

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 2>back to eight wins. I still think they're a tick

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 2>worse than they were last year.

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. You mentioned the line, I'm going to call

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>these guys out again, but Alton Robinson, Kendall Coleman, those

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>are the names to watch along the line. And Syracuse

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>actually has a ton of guys coming back who played

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as freshmen. Yeah, last year. You look at their defensive backfield,

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>mostly freshmen, really good, almost surprisingly, so they're pretty much

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>all back. Andre Cisco is the guy in the defensive backfield.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>He's a sophomore and he's already stars ballhawk back there.

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Keep your eyes and ears open for that name as

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you're watching ACC football. This year could be interesting against

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the competition, most notably Clemson very early on

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in the year. So you know, Syracuse won nine games

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the regular season, they won ten if you count the ball.

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>There is another school of thought. Of course, this was

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a breakout year for Dino Babers, and he's got a

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>lot to be excited about. There's a I guess more

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>negative school of thought around what Syracuse did in twenty eighteen,

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and that is that you should temper the results that

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the field, given the fact that it

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a down year in the ACC as

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole, you could make that case. But you still

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>got to win that last year. Yeah, I still gott

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to win the games in front of you. I like

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse to win nine again this season. I like where

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they're at. I do. I feel good about what Dino

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>is building up there. I like Tommy DeVito. Tommy Defto

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>might be a bit extreme. If in a gotta DeVito

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is eighty percent of a full Berman, that's at least

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent. That's such an old reference. Though we span

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>generations here on the show. You know that it's true.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 2>So the biggest threats outside of Clemson for Syracuse, if

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing, if I'm putting words in your mouth, are

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 2>NC State Florida State. Would agree that they're both on

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the road or some combination of their October of NC

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>State pit Florida State.

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I like Syracuse. I think they finish second in the

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Fan nine attic. Okay, fair enough, Can I ask you

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a question? Please? Boo doo dooo do do Boo doo doo.

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Another team that is certainly worth talking about. In terms

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 2>of changes at the top, It's got to be Miami.

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Caine's baby c Ans former.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 2>What Mississippi State Louis is an attack Texas Temple ESPN

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 2>coach Manny Diaz. So job number one obviously discovering a

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 2>clean burning, renewable source for swag fusion, Yes, swag fusion.

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>What is job number two?

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 2>If Miami's challenging for the postal with I think a

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 2>lot coming back on defense and not so much on offense.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Job number one is definitely the clean burning swag Yes, always, always, always, always.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Job number two is getting more consistent quarterback play. Because

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>last year they were not that far off from having

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>a much better season. They could have gotten a little

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 2>bit more at the quarterback spot. It stayed healthy out wide,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 2>it would have been a much different story. I'm being facetious.

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 2>You get the wow.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think the same holds true at quarterback this year. Now,

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what I like is that Manny Diaz brought over Dan

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Enos as the offensive coordinator and quarterback coach. Opened some

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>eyes when he came over from Alabama, but that was

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a really good move. He's been working since he got

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on campus to try and rebuild that quarterback position the

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Canes last year. Listen to this six point one yards

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>per attempt. That was one hundred and sixteenth nationally. Almost

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>as bad as Kansas, not quite right, too close for comfort,

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>point two yards better than Kansas. If you're a betting man,

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at the quarterback position this year, I

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>still think you look at Nikosey Perry wasn't great, wasn't

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>great last year, but showed flashes. He's probably your starter

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>on August twenty fourth, in week zero is what we

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>call this now, and they square off against Florida. He's

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>got the most experience. But don't forget Tate Martel came

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>down from Ohio State. He transferred in. He's immediately available.

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Also Jaron Williams, red shirt freshman. He is still in

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the mix as well. If you listen to the way

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Manny Diez tells it, I.

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Don't think Tate Martel is that good. Could well be

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be starting, but we'll see. So then

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 2>is their confidence from what you can tell in the

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 2>combination of dan Enos and a good amount of skill

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 2>talent albeit raw at Miami, and improvement at quarterback because

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 2>you were very kind, albeit I guess facetious in what

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Miami looked like near the end of the year. Offensively,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 2>it was back with getting a good yeah, getting a

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 2>good performance from their defense regardless, and still not being

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>able to pull out games.

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there reason?

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Like obviously, you know, coming out of camp and things

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>like that and press conferences and media day, But we're like, well,

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 2>let's you know, it's a new year, it's a new

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah. But it's gonna take somebody better than

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to Cocy Perry, isn't it. I would think so, or

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 2>at least a better version of to Coocy Perry. Yeah,

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>And quite frankly, there are just still a bunch of

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>unknowns about how these guys are going to look in

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>this system. I like the fact, though you mentioned the defense,

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>we have to bring that up many. Diaz has done

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple of things all right.

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Firstly, he went out and used a transfer portal, maybe

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>more so than any other college football coach, to add

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>bodies just about every position to build depth. And he

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>did so on defense where he's really going to need

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it because they're a little thin. They're good at the

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>good starters, yeah, good starters, talented on the top line,

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But a little thin defense is going to be the

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>strength of this team. Miami won of just nineteen teams

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>last year to allow fewer than twenty points per game.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>They led the nation and tackles for loss, which is

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a staple of many Diaz defense. And then they went

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>out and they hired Blake Baker away from Louisiana Tech

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to run the defense, someone who's very like minded, shares

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that same defensive mentality with Manny Diaz. Turnover loock from

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen wasn't quite there in twenty eighteen, but we

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>still know that this is an aggressive defense. They like

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to take the football away or remember the turnover chain

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>thing it gripped the nation two years ago. Didn't quite

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>carry over, but this is This is a defense that

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.479
<v Speaker 1>likes to get behind the line of scrimmage and affect

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the point of attack. So I think that as a

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bedrock for where Manny wants to take this team in

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen is important. There is talent on offense, it's

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>just about assembling the pieces, getting better quarterback play. And

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we also need to mention the offensive line.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>The offensive line is a bit of a work in progress,

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>not exactly sure which direction that's going to go. But

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>if they can get better quarterback play, if they can

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out that offensive line and feel more confident about it,

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think twenty nineteen is a successful campaign in year

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>one for many das.

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 2>You actually mentioned one more thing that you wanted to

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about about Manny Daz.

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about his hair.

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, Ty, obviously, if there's anybody who's going to

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 2>talk about a coach's hair on this show, maybe steal

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 2>that thunder.

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the best head of hair, maybe better hair than

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Bob Biaco Wow an air to the throne. See, because

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing about Manny da the diac here's the

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thing about Manny Diaz. Bob Diaco didn't use this degree

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of product in his hair, right.

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's the performance enhancing No, I'm saying

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it reveals your flaws.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You put a little too much product, It clumps together,

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look quite as thick. Manny Diaz still puts

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the product on and he's got like a full on

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>four layer mane up on top of his head. He's like, Mufasa,

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>did you go through a period of time in your

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>life where you put a lot of product in your hair,

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like high school, middle school, something like that. You know,

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I did a little in college, and it was totally inadvertent.

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize until I was in the workforce that

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I was going a little bit overboard. Little heavy, little

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul heavy, little heavy. No, not Polly d That's not

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>not that heavy.

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little bit worried about the amount of product

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 2>he uses in the Miami sun because when you create

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 2>a helmet effect like that, Yeah, yeah, it can keep

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the steam in and then you start to drench.

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's unfortunate. He's from there. He is from there.

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>He's from there, and he saw that his dad was

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the literal mayor of Miami in the early two thousands.

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>This is like welcome home Scott Frost on steroids. Yeah,

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear more about that in an upcoming show. But

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>he did go to Florida State. Yeah, he went to

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Florida State. But he's from Mia. I think he knows

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>how to handle himself in the hot, hot sun of

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>South Beach. Next question, I want to talk about Florida State.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.959
<v Speaker 1>He mentioned them briefly there with Manny Diaz. Yeah, okay,

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>so Florida State's offense kind of a mess last year?

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Am I right? M HM one and thirteenth in points

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 1>per game, one hundred and tenth in yards per play.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:57.439
<v Speaker 1>There was already after one year some chatter that Willie

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>tagger could be on the hot seat after that performance

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>five and seven didn't make a Bowl. Do you have confidence,

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Daniel that the offseason moves Willie Taggarts made are the

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>right ones for Florida State leading to a more productive

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>second season.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Is Larry Allen going to play guard or State this year?

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Because if so, now we're talking you would be held

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>retired larger state.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>You're talking yes that.

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean they can only go up from where they

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 2>were upfront offensively last year. And I don't think Walt

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Bell was a great fit necessarily for Florida State. The

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 2>running game took ahead. Everything took ahead, and it started

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.720
<v Speaker 2>with the offensive line. The injuries, the attrition, the misevaluation

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 2>going in. Everything that could have gone wrong basically went wrong.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 2>For the offensive line. They bring in Kendall Briles. I

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be saying that last name all season long.

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they bring in the Stephenville Texas offense Stephenville High,

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's an offense that has proven what we

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 2>saw at Baylor, what we saw at FAU and Houston

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 2>last year with de Eric King. It has to go upward.

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 2>I know Willie Taggart has a history with him. Offensively,

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 2>they get in, I think a couple new linemen from transfer,

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a grad transfer, Ryan Fitzpatrick. I believe James Blackman is

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 2>another year older cam Akers should be better and it

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 2>has to be better. It just had they they bring in.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Randy Clements who comes with Kendall Briles

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 2>from Houston, new offensive line coach. So yes, the the

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 2>offseason moves have to be improving this Florida State squad. Defensively,

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to be a little bit trickier.

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 2>The secondary has to be better. This is it's a

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 2>bad sign when there are two position groups going in

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 2>where you say, how could they get worse? How could

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 2>they stay on the same level? How could that possibly

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 2>happen in this universe? They they've sorted things out. I

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 2>think in the secondary, moved safeties and corners back and

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 2>forth to find the right fits. The talent is there

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the offensive line, even if the offensive line has just said,

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 2>well that's their weakness. Even if it's that matter of fact.

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Florida State will be better, even if it's not saying

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 2>it is a void with a depth that is not

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 2>seen by modern science.

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Right right, that's an improvement.

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 2>So the line seven eight wins, seven eight wins feels

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 2>like a really nice step forward.

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>The line was dreadful a year ago. It can't get

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>any worse. In twelve games, Florida State started nine different

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>combinations of linemen. Mm hmm. That was not a recipe

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for an efficient offense. No, not at all, not in

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the least bit. It can only get better along the

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. It looks like it's going to be James Blackman.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll mention him again. I caught some flack earlier in

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the off season when I said that Alex Hornybrook would

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>be a clear upgrade over James Blackman. Sounds like James

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Blackman is going to be your starter to be determined,

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to be determined, sure, I mean basically, if Kendall Briles

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>can figure out a way to get the ball creatively

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to Cam Akers and to Mary and Terry quickly that

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you're already talking about a step forward.

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Defensively, they lose their best pass rusher and Brian Burns.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I think they sort things out pretty nicely at linebacker,

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 2>and we mentioned the secondary. They've got promising guys in

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 2>the middle. Marvin Wilson, I think was a former If

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't the number one overall recruit, he was like

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 2>two or three a couple of years ago, and so

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 2>he has potential to have a breakout season. So they

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 2>should be in a pretty good place if they can

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 2>maintain health and come into this season with that full

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>reboot mentality.

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It is not the easiest schedule, though. They've got Boise

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>State in Florida to bookend their season. The Boise State

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>game is going to be really interesting right out of

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the shoot. Week one neutral site game I use neutral

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>siting quotes has played in Jacksonville to see what Florida

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>State's got right out of the shoot. In between the

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>start and finish of the season at Virginia, at Clemson

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>home against Miami, there's a Syracuse game just sort of

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>hanging out in there, which could also be interesting. So

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you seven to eight wins. It's certainly

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>not where Florida State wants to be longer term, but

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you're looking at this, you have to look

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>at this from the perspective of is our line going

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to get better? Is our offense going to feel better

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>than it did a year ago? How is that secondary

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.359
<v Speaker 1>going to look? If you see noted improvement across the board,

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>as a Florida State fan, I would be really encouraged, because,

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, Clemson is still a buzzsaw this year.

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>You want to have a good season, want to feel

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's going in a good direction. You want to

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>eventually catch Clemson. He ain't going to catch him in

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. No.

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 2>And it's, by the way, Ryan Roberts, not Ryan Fitzpatrick.

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 2>All that would be great if Ryan Fitzpatrick was playing

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 2>right tackle, sure for Florida State, be wonderful.

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, where are we going next year? Okay? Back

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to the back to the postal? Sure? Okay, Okay.

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 2>This surprised me. Maybe it's just because it's been so

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 2>many months since the season, but last year's best coastal

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 2>quarterback was and please don't look up the rest of them,

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Perkins Virginia. Yeah, he led the postal in yards

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 2>per attempt, rating, completion percentage. He was the dude, and

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, led a surprisingly fun Virginia season that fell

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 2>just short after they lost to pitt I believe in

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of muck that was like a really ugly

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 2>weather game.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Does that hold?

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Does Bryce Perkins maintain his position atop the the coastal

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 2>quarterback rankings? And please show your work, tie.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Please show me like this is a rubric? Yeah, yeah,

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the answer is I have the proof. The answer is yes, both, Okay, enthusiastically,

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.359
<v Speaker 1>because I believe it. He was really good last year

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and also simply by process of elimination. If it's not him,

0:40:55.480 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>then who Kendall Briles and James Blackman. Oh other side, right,

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>wrong side, Ricky Tricky. I guess you could make a

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>case for Ryan Willis, but that's a tough sell. We'll

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>get into Virginia Tech here, Yeah, a little bit. Perkins

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>was one of only two players last year with more

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>than twenty four hundred passing guards and eight hundred rushing guards.

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>The other guy won the Heisman Trophy and was drafted

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 1>number one overall into the NFL. Right, I'm not saying

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Perkins is Kyler Murray, but would I take him

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>over to Cosey Perry or Kenny Pickett or Sam how

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.839
<v Speaker 1>of course they would of course, Sam how sorry, Yeah, yeah, Okay,

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Virginia last year seven to five. They shut out South

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Carolina in the Bowl Game. I know I've told the

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>story before about Broncomenen Hall, but he was one of

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 1>my favorite interviews that we've ever done on this show.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>The question then.

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Always takes as a coach talking about pizza and Ty

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 2>and I are submitting it was pizza and it was

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:57.359
<v Speaker 2>his son's names.

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember has great great son names. Yeah. But the question

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>then was how is he going to acclimate to a

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>place like Virginia where he doesn't have a ton of familiarity,

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or didn't have a ton of familiarity, didn't have the

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>recruiting inroads that everyone thought he needed. R How is

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he going to adapt? And of course all that stuff helps, right,

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But what's becoming clear now is that Bronco just knows

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.879
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing. Maybe he's just a good coach. He's

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>just a good coach. Right. Yeah, they've improved each of

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>his first three seasons in Charlottesville. It stands to reason

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to improve yet again because there's a

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>lot coming back. I think a lot of twenty nineteen

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>comes down to whether the offense can create big plays

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and whether the defense can stop big plays. That was

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a thorn in their side on both fronts from a

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>year ago. But eight starters back on defense, a really

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>good secondary. They're at Notre Dame, They're at Miami right

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, right in the media part of that season.

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>But you look at this Virginia team and I think

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a ton of reason to be opt to

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>mystic here for them to take another step forward another

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>year under Bryce Perkins, Bronco menden Hall, a lot back

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on defense. I am very optimistic about the who's in

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen.

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm glad to hear it, because Virginia was hanging

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 2>around in a very strange way last year where I

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 2>think if they had beaten Pit they were either going

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:23.919
<v Speaker 2>to clinch the Coastal or would clinch the Coastal sure,

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and just just hanging around the musical chairs or sliding

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 2>out one by one was like, oh hey, hi, Virginia,

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 2>And it would have been wild if they won the

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Coastal and the basketball team wins the national Championship in

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the same year, probably could have gotten some some decent

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 2>cash on that.

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, though you look at Virginia and it's

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>been a while since his program was notable. Yeah, it

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>really has so to see them bubble up the way

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>they have now under Bronco mended Hall. There is definitely

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a tendency among fans to look at them and not

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>take them seriously, like it's some sort of flash in

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the pan. And maybe they maybe they are are the

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>beneficiary of a weak ACC. Virginia was good, they were

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>legitimately good last year. They're gonna be legitimately good again

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. And I'm excited to see what they can

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>do because Bryce Perkins, as I said, best quarterback in

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that side of the ACC.

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Barnunn shout out to Continental Divide, shout out Little John's,

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 2>shout out the Belmont all great in Charlottesville.

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm excited about Virginia this year. All right,

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>better do better, do better. D Daniel, I have a

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>question for you. I'm ready. Tell me about your experience

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>with Indochino. Oh, that is a loaded question. You went

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to get fitted, did you not? I did go to

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>get fitted.

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 2>There is a place to get fitted in Brooklyn, So

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I made the track to get fitted and it was incredible.

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Really, it was so cool.

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:56.879
<v Speaker 2>It I was going in thinking, like you know when

0:44:56.880 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 2>you get a suit altered and or you go to

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 2>a tailor and they just sort of measure you, like

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 2>tip to tip of your head.

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>They put you up on that little weird podium, right,

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind.

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Of a weird podium, and it takes a few minutes

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 2>and you're just like, all right, this is your waist,

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 2>this is your this is the distance around your chest,

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 2>this is your neck size, whatever, and then you just

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 2>move on and go grocery shopping whatever. Not with Indo Gino,

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 2>not with going to a showroom to get fitted for

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 2>a custom se.

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>So is it like getting fitted for the batsuit? What

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly is this?

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Like, I think more specific than a batsuit. It was

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the we've mentioned I think with a mattress company, we've

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 2>done spots for the natural topography or geometry.

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they were.

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 2>It was busting out pro tractors from my natural geometry.

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:47.240
<v Speaker 2>It was. It was around all leg types and different

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 2>cuts of suit types that fit my body type and

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 2>around my chest and my waist and head and every

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.320
<v Speaker 2>like everything. And I was turning to the side and

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 2>there were different angles. It took the better part of

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 2>forty five minut Okay, very important question. Then I promise

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to the actual meat of this ad. Yes,

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 2>did they use lasers?

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>They did not. They should know.

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I had a conversation about lasers. I think it was

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Jose was my guy really great service. Could not recommend

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 2>going to a showroom enough to get fitted for a

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 2>custom suit. Despite the lack of lasers. They were super nice.

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 2>They were attentive to my natural geometry. Once again, I

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 2>am very excited for this Endochino custom suit to arrive.

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 2>It's great and crazy affordable.

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Indo Chino, if you haven't gathered by now,

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 1>they make suits and shirts to your exact measurements. Maybe

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>not with lasers, but that's okay. It gives you an

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>unparalleled fit, unparalleled comfort. The process is easy. You could

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 1>do what Dan did, go to one of their forty

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>North American showrooms and have them take your measurements in

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a really cool way, or you could do it at home.

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Shop online at indochino dot com. You submit your measurements,

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>give me your design choices. Then they're going to professionally

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>tailor your suit and send it to you. Our listeners

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>can get any premium Indo chinosuit for just three hundred

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 1>and sixty nine bucks at Indo Chino dot com. That's

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>i ndocchi n O dot com Enter solid at checkout.

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>That's fifty percent off the regular price. A made to

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>measure premium suit shipping is free Indo Chino dot com.

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Promo code Solid one more time. Any premium suit three

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine free shipping. An incredible deal for a premium

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>made to measure suit. Once you go custom, you don't

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>go back, no brainer. Come on now for my actual

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>ACC question, Daniel, Yeah, let's talk about Louisville. Did you

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>read any of the coverage from ACC Media Day No?

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I definitely didn't. Oh, actually, no, I take that back.

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I read a little bit. Yes, Scott Saderfield, new coach

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>at Louisville. Louisville. He said that players weren't previously allowed

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>to walk into coaches offices. Yeah, Louisville. Which that does

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>not seem like it promotes a whole lot of trust

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>within the probram right that.

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 2>An actual cardinals with their messages into the windows to

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 2>get any point across.

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:20.760
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't think cardinals could be used in a messaging capacity,

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but they can. Mm hmm what else Daniel outside of

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:28.800
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit more of an open door situation.

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Will Scott Satterfield be doing differently at Louisville? What can

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:36.320
<v Speaker 1>fans expect that's gonna look different, feel different from what

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they saw under Bobby Patrino.

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I think they will not lose many games by seven

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand points. I think that will be a good first stets,

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 2>a good star. Difference is it's going to be culture.

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:51.319
<v Speaker 2>Initially they're not. They don't have the talent right now.

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 2>They don't have the depth right now. As they switch

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 2>systems a little bit, you know, Bobby Patrino, even though

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson was yes, very much a running quarterback who

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 2>could also throw incredibly well, they're switching systems a bit,

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 2>and they're recruiting more to what they are going to

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:09.320
<v Speaker 2>try to do offensively, which I think is going to

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 2>be more reedy with the quarterback we saw it at

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:14.719
<v Speaker 2>app State really succeed. He brings over a number of

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:17.840
<v Speaker 2>his coaches, He brings back Court Dennison, who was at

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Louisville before now comes back after a year at Oregon

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 2>coaching linebackers. So I think he's the co DC. So culturally,

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I think there is going to be a lot more

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 2>buy in and a lot more players simply liking the

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 2>coaches they play for and the head coach for which

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 2>they play than where they've been these past few years.

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 2>I also think it's going to take a good chunk

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:41.839
<v Speaker 2>of time to fully get both the culture and talent

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:45.400
<v Speaker 2>level and depth to a place that Louisville can compete

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:47.880
<v Speaker 2>just week in and week out in the ACC, just

0:49:47.920 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 2>because it's not just Bobby Petrino screwing things up at

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the end, it's how do he recruit? How did he evaluate?

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Because everywhere he goes he leaves it kind of a mess,

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of selling what he actually leaves behind. Short.

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:04.839
<v Speaker 2>So the good news is app State. As much as

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:09.720
<v Speaker 2>you have fought the Mountaineers on this, they've been a really,

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:13.800
<v Speaker 2>really good program in the Sun Belt, maybe not beating Miami.

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean when they put thirty eight on Penn State

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 2>came back and almost won that game last year in

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Happy Valley.

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:20.839
<v Speaker 1>That sound right? Sure?

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 2>So they looked app State last year like at the

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 2>very least pretty good Big ten team, right, Yeah?

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I would agree.

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Their defense, Their defense was excellent, especially against the pass,

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 2>seems helpful in the ACC if they can keep that going.

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 2>The offense was very good, especially on the ground, so

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 2>there are things to like about this year's squad. Des Fitzpatrick,

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the receivers are pretty strong. They're trying to figure out

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:45.720
<v Speaker 2>what they're going to do at quarterback. Your guy Puma

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Pass is probably in the lead to get that job

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 2>once again, but Malie Cunningham offers more of an athletic

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:53.239
<v Speaker 2>perspective if they're going to look to run a little

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 2>bit more this year. I know he brought a quarterback

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 2>commit in from who's committed to app State to Louisville,

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 2>So if they're truly horrendous once again with a little

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 2>bit of promise, maybe he starts playing by the end

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 2>of the By the end of the year. It's a

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:09.799
<v Speaker 2>rough schedule, so that's, you know, kind of the same

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 2>they have Notre Dame. They go to Florida State, Clemson,

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:16.279
<v Speaker 2>I think they're at Miami, at NC State, and they

0:51:16.320 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 2>finish at Kentucky. So it's going to be a tough go.

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:23.359
<v Speaker 2>But even if they go three and nine, four and eight,

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 2>two and ten, whatever they whatever they do, the big

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 2>difference is going to be the effort, the buy in,

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the attitude and if they happen to find themselves in

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a sixteen thirteen game, maybe that effort, attitude, buy in,

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 2>holds on or comes back whatever. Maybe they tip a

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty game because the players seem to care

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot more for four full quarters. So that's the

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 2>big difference no matter what the final record is.

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully they play some better damn defense, huh, yeah,

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that'd be nice. Last year Louliville on our show is

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a punchline love defense.

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we said what Bobby Patrino bought a yacht betting

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 2>against himself.

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>You know he could have Loulville went two and the

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>defense was atrocious. Defense at app State has been one

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of Saderfield's calling cards, in addition to running a pretty

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:12.279
<v Speaker 1>run heavy system on offense, really good defensive coach, and

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're a Woulsville fan, you'll take that

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. I don't know if you measure success in

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.879
<v Speaker 1>terms of wins and losses in year one. I think

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you just hope for a new foundation, yeah, that you

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:26.320
<v Speaker 1>can build upon in the future. That would be fourth

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a good start.

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say fourth defensive coordinator now in four

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 2>years for those upper classmen and it's.

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Not Brian Van Gorder, which is an improvement, not BVG.

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Peter Sermon not great, but third and Grantham was good

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:41.839
<v Speaker 2>for them. I'd stand by that forever and ever.

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. I am excited about Scott Saderfield. I

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:47.879
<v Speaker 1>know you were excited when he was hired. I thought

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that was a sneaky good hire. Of course, Jeff Brohm

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 1>was the name that was more closely tied to this opening.

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But Scott Saderfield coming over from app State sneaky good hire,

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a solid higher. He's going to build this program into

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, something that's a lot more sustainable than under

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the old model.

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the big thing is going to be from the administration.

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:11.879
<v Speaker 2>I think they're all on the same page that they're

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:14.399
<v Speaker 2>breaking this down to the studs and rebuilding. They can't

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 2>expect to win nine games next year. That's just you

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:20.959
<v Speaker 2>can't speed up this kind of rebuild when it's sunk

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to the depths that it did last year.

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dan, where we going next year? All right,

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about let's talk about Mack Brown. Oh boyout that. Yeah.

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 2>So North Carolina not as bad. I love this, not

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:40.760
<v Speaker 2>as bad as their record indicates. Yeah, they were. They

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 2>had chances to win games and they didn't win it.

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Well that's not great, yeah right, But they were not

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.760
<v Speaker 2>They weren't Loville. They were not truly heinous at college

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 2>football last year. So to you, if they're going to

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 2>scratch and claw and improve to threatening Bowl eligibility this year,

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, five games late November, you know a couple left,

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 2>five wins. Excuse me, what will be the reason why

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 2>they are scratching and pawing at the door of bowl eligibility.

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, interesting because they were in a lot of those games.

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 1>They were in a lot of those games. There were

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to win six seven games. The elephant in the

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 1>room is that they've got a new old coach. Yeah,

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's Mac Brown. I think I saw what twenty

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>two years since he was last there. He is the

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:33.480
<v Speaker 1>front man for this operation. He's already doing the whole

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>charm offensive thing, which I made draft for my fantasy

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:41.479
<v Speaker 1>things roster. But if if North Carolina is gonna paw

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:45.399
<v Speaker 1>at Bowl eligibility, I don't think it's because Mac Brown.

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because of Phil Longo. I think it's

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>because of Jay Bateman. Their offensive and defensive coordinators now

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>at Chapel Hill, Phil Longo. He needs to rekindle some

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of the magic that he had running the offense at

0:54:58.000 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Ole Miss. He's going to have to do it with

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:02.800
<v Speaker 1>resumably Sam Howell, who I think is the odds on

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite to be starter, and he's going to have to

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>do it with a personnel group that might be better

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:10.360
<v Speaker 1>suited for the run even though he wants to pass it.

0:55:11.800 --> 0:55:15.839
<v Speaker 1>So there's an interesting conflict there. But you know, there

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is some experience out wide. If he can find something

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>that works, if he can use space and tempo to

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:23.879
<v Speaker 1>his advantage, which we know he wants to do, then

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>UNC could at least be somewhat serviceable on offense, but

0:55:27.960 --> 0:55:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a big if. And then on the defensive side

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of the ball, they need to get better. Everyone knows

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that Jay Bateman comes in from Army. He's got this

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:41.960
<v Speaker 1>reputation for being an innovator, very innovative, right, He's going

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to need to be real innovative because opponents have literally

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.319
<v Speaker 1>no reason to try and throw against these guys. Their

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 1>run defense looks like it's going to be super porous.

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>He needs to somehow force the issue, make teams throw

0:55:56.600 --> 0:55:58.839
<v Speaker 1>into the teeth of that secondary because it actually should

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 1>be pretty good. Hm. So I think that's what needs

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to happen. We need to have Phil long Goo rekindling

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 1>some of that old miss magic. We need to have

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Jay Bateman finding some way to force teams to throw.

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 1>It is a tough draw for Mac Brown in your one.

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not easy out of the shoot. South Carolina and

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Miami Wake, Apstate, Clemson all in September. Five wins would

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be an absolute revelation.

0:56:24.640 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Wow, okay, and scratching up all eligibility seems distant.

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's out of the equation entirely. But if

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they can just look like they're building something in a

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:38.320
<v Speaker 1>better direction, that to me would be a huge improvement.

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he can do it. I know this formula

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for bringing back the old coach hasn't always been that fruitful,

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but I like mac Brown. I think he can still recruit.

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I just I need to see that everyone is rowing

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction and building towards something more.

0:56:56.360 --> 0:56:58.120
<v Speaker 2>A couple of fun things for me about this North

0:56:58.160 --> 0:57:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Carolina team. Well, first of all, you've penciled Sam howel

0:57:01.000 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 2>And as the starter, the true freshman blue chip quarterback.

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that happens. I mean, nobody really has that much

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:08.040
<v Speaker 1>experience at quarterback. No, and why is that?

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Because Chaz Sarat Sarratt Surrat is a linebacker. That's right,

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:20.280
<v Speaker 2>he is Joel Landing, maybe hopefully for North Carolina. I

0:57:20.320 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 2>always love the linebacker from quarterback, not the reverse Maryland.

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 2>But I like that storyline. I like that perhaps we

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 2>see a true freshman quarterback, if not to start the

0:57:29.680 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 2>season is probably pretty quickly.

0:57:31.360 --> 0:57:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan, this is the worst quarterback situation in all the

0:57:33.960 --> 0:57:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ACC right here, unless Sawls, unless he's really good, but yeah,

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:43.680
<v Speaker 1>without any basis, or Jase Ruter or whoever, Yeah, without

0:57:43.720 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>any basis. Otherwise, right, if I'm looking across all fourteen teams,

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I say North Carolina has has the worst situation in

0:57:52.520 --> 0:57:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the ACC. So there is certainly room to grow there.

0:57:56.840 --> 0:57:59.480
<v Speaker 1>He could be really good, but we won't know what

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Phil Long has to work with until we see him

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>out there. The other thing is the push pull, the

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 1>alley ooping that we've talked about in years pass of

0:58:07.800 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 1>past Phil Ango at offensive coordinator, playing with pace, wide

0:58:11.440 --> 0:58:14.680
<v Speaker 1>open offense. Jay Bateman's used to not to say he

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:18.960
<v Speaker 1>can't succeed at North Carolina, but he's used to coaching

0:58:19.000 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a defense on a team whose offense possesses the hell

0:58:23.480 --> 0:58:26.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the ball in Army, and he did a

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty good job for Army. If you actually break it

0:58:29.760 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>down for pace, he was sort of below average a

0:58:32.680 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 1>chunk of the time there. I'm curious to see what

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that change looks like for him in that defense, because

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the stress of an offense moving quickly and scoring, or

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:46.280
<v Speaker 1>moving quickly and going three and out on the defense

0:58:46.320 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and getting back on the field, especially when you can't

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:52.920
<v Speaker 1>stop the run you're not particularly deep anywhere, can be

0:58:53.520 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty extreme. So that push pull alley oop in a

0:58:57.160 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 1>not so good way. You've seen alley oops go wrong.

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I hope it doesn't happen.

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:05.240
<v Speaker 2>At a basketball school like North Carolina, but that's going

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 2>to be a challenge how they marry systems on both

0:59:08.880 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 2>sides of the ball.

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Just two wins last year, mcbrown taking back over. I

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 1>wish him well. Certainly he is doing his best to

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 1>put a very positive spin on this situation. He's not

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the long term answer. The guy's sixty seven,

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so he's trying to build something, get it started on

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the right course, presumably then to hand it off to

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody else who can take it from there, but Phil

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>long Ago, Jay Bateman. A lot rests on their shoulders

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and what they're able to mold with this unit.

0:59:37.760 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 2>In twenty nineteen, two wins, although I think they had

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 2>a game canceled being canceled. Game was canceled, so two

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:47.120
<v Speaker 2>to nine they would not have beaten US enough, but

0:59:47.280 --> 0:59:51.560
<v Speaker 2>they had I mean cal Virginia Tech, Syracuse I think

0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:56.760
<v Speaker 2>was doubler triple overtime Duke, NC State. These were all

0:59:56.880 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 2>winnablel games, which is not necessarily a great thing. But

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 2>also they're not Louisville. We're losing by fifty, so I

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 2>think there's some hope that there is a good amount

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.960
<v Speaker 2>of buy in from the players that even if they're losing,

1:00:13.280 --> 1:00:15.920
<v Speaker 2>they're playing hard. You know that the NC State game

1:00:16.040 --> 1:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>goes to overtime and they're a two to eight team

1:00:18.240 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 2>at that point, so they're playing hard in a rivalry game.

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that's an encouraging thing for North Carolina as

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 2>they move forward, and I think mac Brown's going to

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>recruit pretty well.

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. I don't know about what.

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>The long term coaching prognosis is, but I think they

1:00:30.720 --> 1:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>get in some blue chips in a pretty good region

1:00:32.760 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to recruit.

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Agree. I agree? Okay, Uh, Daniel hit me. Are you

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>familiar with a book, Oh the Places You'll Go?

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Not only am I familiar, I've read it to my

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>son multiple times and love that he he has tried

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>to eat that book.

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I love that book, and I know maybe it's cliche.

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I got it as a gift, I think from mom

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>h after I graduated high school. I've got it here

1:00:57.560 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in my bookshelf, in the studio, constant reminder. And I'm

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>reminded of a passage that doctor Seuss wrote about something

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>called the waiting place. Okay, waiting for the fish to bite,

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>or waiting for wind to fly a kite, or waiting

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>around for Friday night, or waiting perhaps for their uncle Jake,

1:01:20.360 --> 1:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>or a pot to boil, or a better break, or

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a string of pearls or a pair of pants, or

1:01:25.000 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a wig with curls or another chance. Everyone is just waiting.

1:01:30.400 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So my question to you is, Dan, m hm, what

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>must NC State do to finally escape the waiting place?

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>So does the waiting place mean they're pretty good in

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:42.000
<v Speaker 2>a vision? They probably won't win for a long, long, long,

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>long long time because Dabo Sweeney exists.

1:01:44.680 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. Last year they go nine and three. Yeah,

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that's good. It's good. It is good.

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Nine and three is good. They had precisely one indefensible loss.

1:01:57.440 --> 1:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>They scored like twenty points against wake Forest lost, but

1:02:01.440 --> 1:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>they got murdered by Clemson and they lost a shootout

1:02:04.440 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to Syracuse, both of whom they lost to on the road.

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Those are both okay. I can't be angry at NC State.

1:02:12.480 --> 1:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>For those results.

1:02:13.320 --> 1:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>They should be a little bit more competitive against Clemson

1:02:15.200 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>after the past couple of years where they were. But

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 2>they beat their rival, they murdered Louisville, They comfortably beat

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Florida State, they beat it decent enough Virginia team, I

1:02:26.760 --> 1:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>think they had what was I think the West Virginia

1:02:28.600 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 2>game was canceled, and their schedule wasn't particularly difficult, and

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>they looked pretty atrocious against Texas A and M. But

1:02:37.680 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 2>what's wrong with being nine and three in the ACC

1:02:39.760 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty consistently nine to three, I ask you. So you're

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>saying that they've already escaped the waiting place.

1:02:46.960 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think so.

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they could be a six and six program

1:02:49.920 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>with too much neglect at certain places. But I think

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:56.080
<v Speaker 2>they've recruited smartly. You know, he's hired really well. And

1:02:56.160 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 2>now Elaiyah Eli Drinkwitz is onto app State, the offensive

1:03:00.360 --> 1:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>coordinator who had a good deal of success in Raleigh.

1:03:04.000 --> 1:03:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Heard great things about the town of Raleigh by the way,

1:03:06.120 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>home to Chip Patterson and Will Brinson. Matt McKay is

1:03:09.920 --> 1:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>the probable starter, sort of a tall, lean red shirt sophomore.

1:03:13.520 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Bam Knight is a promising name at running back, sort

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>of an explosive potential guy. A lot of the defenses

1:03:19.920 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>back this is. It's one of those good news bad news.

1:03:23.080 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Great.

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>They they're familiar, they're experienced. They were real bad against

1:03:28.160 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the past last year. They did not get pressure. The

1:03:31.480 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>secondary was kind of a nightmare. I guess they tightened

1:03:35.480 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 2>up in the red zone, which is fine. Schedule's fine

1:03:39.920 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 2>as well. If Clemson Syracuse, North Carolina at home, they're

1:03:42.960 --> 1:03:48.720
<v Speaker 2>at West Virginia at Florida State. But I don't see

1:03:48.920 --> 1:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>even without Ryan Finley, I don't see a huge step back.

1:03:51.920 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 2>There's any talented enough places.

1:03:53.920 --> 1:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>But hold on, Yeah, they're not just without Ryan Finley.

1:03:56.760 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>They're without Reggie Gilaspie. They're without yeah, Kelvin Harmon, without

1:04:01.440 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Jakobe Myers, Tyler Jones, Trone Prescott, Garrett Bradbury, A ton

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of guys here that are walking out that door. Defense

1:04:12.360 --> 1:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>should be pretty good, but remains they were good against

1:04:15.440 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the run remains to be seen to me. How they're

1:04:18.120 --> 1:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>going to fare against this schedule, which I agree with

1:04:21.160 --> 1:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you isn't totally daunting on its face, but the road

1:04:24.320 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>trips aren't the best. And I see a bunch of

1:04:26.880 --> 1:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>one possession games in there. That's sort of the recurring

1:04:29.160 --> 1:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>theme as you look across the ACC.

1:04:31.760 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 2>So there are two and a half teams where it's

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>totally defensible that they lose to me, some combination of

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:45.800
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia, Florida State, Clemson. Those are all oh in Syracuse,

1:04:46.080 --> 1:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>those are all somewhat defensible losses. But I think they

1:04:48.680 --> 1:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>can beat Syracuse at home. I think they can beat

1:04:51.240 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Florida State on the road after what they did to

1:04:52.800 --> 1:04:54.840
<v Speaker 2>him last year. West Virginia has a first year head

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:58.960
<v Speaker 2>coach North Carolina, the rival first year head coach Georgia

1:04:59.040 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Tech on the road, yeer head coach Louisville at home

1:05:01.920 --> 1:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>a week after Clemson first year head coach rebuilding project

1:05:05.440 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>going to Wake. It's not pleasant, but it's not you know,

1:05:08.280 --> 1:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>going to the Tokyo to home at Boston College and

1:05:11.640 --> 1:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>whatever the hell Boston College is trying to do offensively,

1:05:15.600 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>If NC State is a team that's always good enough

1:05:18.120 --> 1:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>to win most of the games, if not all of

1:05:20.720 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the games, they should maybe this is a manning theory

1:05:24.640 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 2>with Ryan Finley. Okay, I just I feel much better

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>about the continuity of what Dave Dorn has done in

1:05:31.440 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Raleigh than a lot of the teams on their schedule.

1:05:34.640 --> 1:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. Where are we going next? All right, diy.

1:05:38.160 --> 1:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>My next question to you is an important one. What

1:05:41.000 --> 1:05:42.200
<v Speaker 2>do you think about Indo cheet?

1:05:42.400 --> 1:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>No? We did that, right, we do.

1:05:44.400 --> 1:05:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's talk about and I hate this, but let's

1:05:49.040 --> 1:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about Virginia Tech because I had such a good

1:05:51.560 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>time in Blacksburg and they are I don't want to

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:57.440
<v Speaker 2>say quietly because that's disrespectful. People pay attention to Virginia Tech,

1:05:57.560 --> 1:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>but they've gotten worse by a game in the ACC

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>each year of Justin Tho and Tay and don't let

1:06:06.120 --> 1:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>it get lost that now mac Brown who pronounced his

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:11.200
<v Speaker 2>name like that, and Justin Flentey are in the same division.

1:06:11.240 --> 1:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>They are.

1:06:13.000 --> 1:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>If the trend continues, of getting worse by a game

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:17.800
<v Speaker 2>each year in the ACC. They go four and four

1:06:17.880 --> 1:06:20.280
<v Speaker 2>last year, so they would potentially go three and five

1:06:20.360 --> 1:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>this year in the ACC. What's the difference for them

1:06:24.800 --> 1:06:27.920
<v Speaker 2>between going three and five and getting back to five

1:06:28.000 --> 1:06:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and three as they did in flent Day's oooh went

1:06:30.560 --> 1:06:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Day's first year.

1:06:31.560 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>The difference is twofold. First off, can a brother get

1:06:36.720 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>some stability at quarterback? Please? Oh my god? Please? Daniel okay?

1:06:43.120 --> 1:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Josh sumfortable? Josh Jackson snapped the leg last year. That

1:06:47.280 --> 1:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>had an impact. Yes, Ryan Willis came in. He was

1:06:50.760 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the fourth highest rated passer in the conference. He got

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>good experience. He's back this year. He's got a good arm.

1:06:58.480 --> 1:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>He's got good receiving targets out wide at tight end.

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>That should help the offense should be better the defense.

1:07:06.560 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>The defense has to be better. Dan got it for

1:07:09.600 --> 1:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>so long. This has been the calling card for Virginia

1:07:13.120 --> 1:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Tech and specifically Bud Foster and the lunch pail defense.

1:07:16.400 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Right last year, herb straight is heartbroken about. That has

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to be. Last season Tech gave up fifteen more points

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>per game than it did in twenty seventeen fifteen. It's

1:07:30.320 --> 1:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like two touchdowns fifteen. Yeah, it has to get better,

1:07:35.760 --> 1:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>has to get better. The season last year was underwhelming

1:07:40.280 --> 1:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Tech fan. They finished if you count

1:07:43.000 --> 1:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the bull loss to Cincinnati under five hundred, for the

1:07:46.560 --> 1:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>first time since nineteen ninety two. That is not a

1:07:51.120 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>good look for Justin Fuente. But what I like about

1:07:54.040 --> 1:07:56.439
<v Speaker 1>this team this year, why I think they get better

1:07:57.400 --> 1:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of returning production. Doesn't mean everything, but

1:08:00.800 --> 1:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a fair amount of continuity now coming back even

1:08:03.400 --> 1:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>despite the turnover that they've had via transfers and the

1:08:07.000 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>injuries they've had to deal with in the past. They're

1:08:09.320 --> 1:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>eleventh in returning production this season. And while it could

1:08:14.400 --> 1:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>go either way for Virginia Tech this year, they're tough

1:08:17.439 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to predict. I think Justin Fauente still has what it takes.

1:08:22.360 --> 1:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been bad, he just hasn't been good enough.

1:08:25.640 --> 1:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>This revolving door hopefully ends in twenty nineteen. They finally

1:08:29.479 --> 1:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>can build on something. So I am optimistic about the

1:08:31.880 --> 1:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Hokies road.

1:08:33.960 --> 1:08:36.599
<v Speaker 2>Schedule mixed because they do have Miami and Notre Dame

1:08:36.640 --> 1:08:40.080
<v Speaker 2>on the road, but otherwise it's okay. They miss Clemson,

1:08:40.400 --> 1:08:43.400
<v Speaker 2>always always great. I believe they miss Florida state as well.

1:08:43.479 --> 1:08:44.639
<v Speaker 2>So that's great.

1:08:45.160 --> 1:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I just.

1:08:47.200 --> 1:08:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Man, you'd like to see it before believing it, with

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:54.519
<v Speaker 2>how this offense has looked has looked and really how

1:08:54.560 --> 1:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the defense looked last year. So I'm hopeful that they

1:08:57.840 --> 1:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>are at least five hundred.

1:08:58.720 --> 1:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>In the ACC. They have what O you again? When

1:09:02.280 --> 1:09:04.639
<v Speaker 1>that game? Please? Oky? That was the game last year

1:09:05.280 --> 1:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jackson broke his leg and remember Virginia Tech lost

1:09:07.880 --> 1:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that game. Right.

1:09:09.000 --> 1:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>They have Rhode Islands, they have Furman there. They should

1:09:13.200 --> 1:09:15.800
<v Speaker 2>be able to pad enough. They have Wake at home,

1:09:15.880 --> 1:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>they have North Carolina at home. They should be a

1:09:17.760 --> 1:09:21.080
<v Speaker 2>bowl team. They should probably get to seven games. This

1:09:21.240 --> 1:09:24.719
<v Speaker 2>is not a terrible, terrible schedule. You know that Miami

1:09:24.800 --> 1:09:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and Notre Dame road trips aside. So I'm rooting for

1:09:27.680 --> 1:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Virginia Tech to have a comeback year.

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Willis was not bad last year. No, he's fine.

1:09:32.560 --> 1:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It was not bad. He's a sneaky choice for one

1:09:35.200 --> 1:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of the better quarterbacks in the ACC. Yeah.

1:09:38.080 --> 1:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's an indictment of the ACC

1:09:40.560 --> 1:09:41.679
<v Speaker 2>or a compliment, but yes.

1:09:41.920 --> 1:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm intending it as a compliment. Got for Ryan Willis.

1:09:45.040 --> 1:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Twenty four touchdowns, nine interceptions last year. And above average arm.

1:09:50.320 --> 1:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>A good player, a good prospect. I think he has

1:09:53.040 --> 1:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what it takes. He's got targets out wide, and that

1:09:55.000 --> 1:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>tight end it's there. It's there. Maybe not to the

1:09:59.200 --> 1:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>extent that and your tech fans want, but I think

1:10:01.920 --> 1:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a big jump forward in twenty nineteen.

1:10:05.120 --> 1:10:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Look at you, Sunshine pumping Hoky Daniel. Yeah, Steve Dazio

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>speaks to a bunch of guys being dudes. I can

1:10:20.479 --> 1:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we also have the dude remix. We're gonna have to

1:10:31.120 --> 1:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>play that one over and over when we talk about

1:10:33.680 --> 1:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Boston College this year.

1:10:34.760 --> 1:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>If anybody, if anybody from Boston College is listening, and

1:10:37.479 --> 1:10:41.960
<v Speaker 2>you want that drop for first downs or when BC

1:10:42.360 --> 1:10:44.240
<v Speaker 2>has third down on defense and you're trying to get

1:10:44.280 --> 1:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>everybody pumped, we can do that.

1:10:46.000 --> 1:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Let us know.

1:10:46.560 --> 1:10:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Just let us know.

1:10:47.160 --> 1:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We got you. CLIVERB at gmail dot com.

1:10:49.000 --> 1:10:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Steve Dazio. He has won exactly seven games in five

1:10:56.240 --> 1:11:01.519
<v Speaker 2>of his six seasons at BC. Each year a couple

1:11:01.680 --> 1:11:06.320
<v Speaker 2>names that bubble up. We have this m but are

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:08.600
<v Speaker 2>we going to see any proof in twenty nineteen that

1:11:08.720 --> 1:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>this is a program that's actually improving, striving to win

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:13.960
<v Speaker 2>more than seven games?

1:11:16.640 --> 1:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it. I don't really see it.

1:11:20.160 --> 1:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>It's it's not because they're not talented, it's not because

1:11:24.320 --> 1:11:28.000
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a good defense. I think it's all offense.

1:11:28.600 --> 1:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it's all a dull headedness about what BC's

1:11:34.280 --> 1:11:37.640
<v Speaker 2>offense should be, and it's we got a control the

1:11:37.720 --> 1:11:40.800
<v Speaker 2>line of scrimmage. We've got to run power, we got

1:11:40.840 --> 1:11:45.040
<v Speaker 2>a wind scream in the trenches, and Boston College is

1:11:45.120 --> 1:11:48.519
<v Speaker 2>not really going to have consistently the talent up front

1:11:48.720 --> 1:11:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to do so, and to have a quarterback who can

1:11:50.840 --> 1:11:53.560
<v Speaker 2>take advantage in play action. I think Boston College is

1:11:53.600 --> 1:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>a place you have to be a lot more creative

1:11:56.360 --> 1:12:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and think about running a unique system. We don't have

1:12:00.320 --> 1:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>to run the option, but you have to open things up.

1:12:02.880 --> 1:12:04.559
<v Speaker 2>You have to say, Okay, we're gonna find a bunch

1:12:04.560 --> 1:12:06.720
<v Speaker 2>of like super fast five eight dudes who are going

1:12:06.800 --> 1:12:09.519
<v Speaker 2>to be too short for Penn State in the northeast

1:12:09.600 --> 1:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>or Syracuse, but let's figure out.

1:12:11.720 --> 1:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Something to do with them. And Boston College is let's

1:12:15.560 --> 1:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just run off taracole.

1:12:17.640 --> 1:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>And they have a new offensive coordinator. It's former Butch Jones,

1:12:21.320 --> 1:12:25.440
<v Speaker 2>guy who was awesome at at Central Michigan. Mike Pajakian.

1:12:25.800 --> 1:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>He was okay at Cincinnati. I imagine Tennessee fans are

1:12:28.840 --> 1:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>not a huge fan of his. What Tennessee offense looked

1:12:32.120 --> 1:12:35.960
<v Speaker 2>like early on in Butch Jones' career there, But man,

1:12:36.400 --> 1:12:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the offenses have ranged from like average to horrid. Sometimes

1:12:41.080 --> 1:12:44.479
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of bad, which is fine. This year they'll

1:12:44.479 --> 1:12:46.639
<v Speaker 2>have a new offensive line, but I'm not terribly worried.

1:12:46.720 --> 1:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>You've got two offensive line coaches because of Adazio also

1:12:49.360 --> 1:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>serving in that role.

1:12:50.080 --> 1:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>We want to turnover up front, though Dan turnover up front.

1:12:53.040 --> 1:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought Anthony Brown.

1:12:55.720 --> 1:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>If the argument is that Bryce Perkins isn't the second

1:12:59.280 --> 1:13:03.479
<v Speaker 2>best quarterback the ACC, it might be Anthony Brown. He

1:13:03.560 --> 1:13:06.400
<v Speaker 2>got pretty good. Kobe White's pretty good out wide. AJ

1:13:06.600 --> 1:13:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Dillon has stud tendencies, which is what they said about

1:13:09.640 --> 1:13:10.559
<v Speaker 2>you in high school time.

1:13:10.760 --> 1:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>They did.

1:13:11.800 --> 1:13:15.439
<v Speaker 2>But they use him in such a way that he's

1:13:15.880 --> 1:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>getting three yards and falling forward. So I don't think

1:13:18.000 --> 1:13:19.479
<v Speaker 2>it's fully his fault. I think it's more of a

1:13:19.960 --> 1:13:22.839
<v Speaker 2>limitation by the system. It'll be a new look defense.

1:13:22.920 --> 1:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>They promoted their new defensive coordinator. The lineup front on

1:13:26.000 --> 1:13:29.360
<v Speaker 2>defense is also almost entirely new. I think they're a

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:33.439
<v Speaker 2>six and six team, I think getting anything above seven wins,

1:13:33.880 --> 1:13:36.400
<v Speaker 2>which is where they were last year, I think they

1:13:36.520 --> 1:13:37.960
<v Speaker 2>just give themselves a ceiling.

1:13:38.479 --> 1:13:41.519
<v Speaker 1>And so, yeah, they were seven and five last year.

1:13:41.640 --> 1:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>They played you'll remember those glorious thirty two plays in

1:13:44.960 --> 1:13:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the first respondible which got canceled because of the lightning.

1:13:49.600 --> 1:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>That's seven and five right on the number. I'm with you.

1:13:52.720 --> 1:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they get marginally worse this year, and I

1:13:55.439 --> 1:13:58.639
<v Speaker 1>think it's due to that defensive turnover that you just address.

1:13:58.800 --> 1:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Not just worried about that, Okay, I'm worried about it

1:14:01.680 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>because we've got turnover at defensive end the entire secondary

1:14:06.960 --> 1:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and just as a whole. The way that this program

1:14:09.760 --> 1:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>has operated is they've really relied upon that defense to

1:14:13.439 --> 1:14:15.519
<v Speaker 1>pick up for the offense because the offense has never

1:14:15.600 --> 1:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>been yeah, never been something that you can feel confident in.

1:14:20.080 --> 1:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But now if the defense is gonna get worse, I

1:14:22.160 --> 1:14:25.439
<v Speaker 1>think it makes Boston College marginally worse as well. So

1:14:25.560 --> 1:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>six and they also five and seven feels about right

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to me.

1:14:28.360 --> 1:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>They lose hamp Chievers, who was a great ballhawk for

1:14:30.920 --> 1:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>them at corner they were, and why I think it's

1:14:34.960 --> 1:14:38.479
<v Speaker 2>the offense rather than the defense is can you can

1:14:38.520 --> 1:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>get effort. I think these guys are gonna get effort.

1:14:40.080 --> 1:14:42.479
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna get stops. Offensively. They were so

1:14:42.640 --> 1:14:44.960
<v Speaker 2>they were so bad on third down, just staying ahead

1:14:44.960 --> 1:14:47.240
<v Speaker 2>of the chains, just keeping drives, going to keep If

1:14:47.240 --> 1:14:49.800
<v Speaker 2>they're going to rely on their defense, give them some resk, guys,

1:14:49.920 --> 1:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>let's go alley up here. If they're able to improve,

1:14:53.560 --> 1:14:57.639
<v Speaker 2>Like your question asks from last year, it means Mike,

1:14:57.760 --> 1:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>but Jakian game plans well, keeps them ahead of those

1:15:01.200 --> 1:15:05.800
<v Speaker 2>chains and gets a little bit creative. I just think

1:15:05.840 --> 1:15:07.639
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be hamstrung by Steve Dazio.

1:15:07.800 --> 1:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I really do.

1:15:08.520 --> 1:15:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they're going to be hamstrung by saying we

1:15:10.960 --> 1:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>want to control cool. You know, all that voice over

1:15:13.360 --> 1:15:14.759
<v Speaker 2>and over. It's a very good impression.

1:15:14.800 --> 1:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You're very good. Thank you.

1:15:16.040 --> 1:15:18.680
<v Speaker 2>They were awful in first halves in winnable games where

1:15:18.680 --> 1:15:20.479
<v Speaker 2>they had to crawl back, they had to rely on

1:15:20.560 --> 1:15:24.599
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Brown. I just they they dig their own grave

1:15:24.760 --> 1:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>too often for me to think, well, they're going the

1:15:26.880 --> 1:15:29.519
<v Speaker 2>right way. I don't think that at all all.

1:15:29.600 --> 1:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, where are we going next year?

1:15:31.000 --> 1:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the second half of their schedule they

1:15:33.400 --> 1:15:35.479
<v Speaker 2>could start five to one and still not make a bowl.

1:15:35.840 --> 1:15:39.000
<v Speaker 2>The second half of their schedule is NC State at

1:15:39.120 --> 1:15:43.799
<v Speaker 2>Clemson at Syracuse, Florida State at Notre Dame at.

1:15:43.760 --> 1:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Pitt very backloaded.

1:15:46.439 --> 1:15:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Not remember when Kansas started out six to no or

1:15:49.280 --> 1:15:51.160
<v Speaker 2>just Kansas or Baylor six to no and finished six

1:15:51.200 --> 1:15:51.519
<v Speaker 2>and six.

1:15:51.680 --> 1:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It could be that kind of year that was bing

1:15:53.280 --> 1:15:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Boston College. It was Baylor.

1:15:54.640 --> 1:16:00.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So next question, does a team have a is

1:16:00.560 --> 1:16:02.559
<v Speaker 2>it schedule of death? Group of death? In the World

1:16:02.600 --> 1:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Cup it's usually the group of death. Yes, group of death?

1:16:06.600 --> 1:16:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Does somebody have that or does somebody have like a

1:16:09.600 --> 1:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>can they just stumble into bowl eligibility because of a

1:16:11.720 --> 1:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>particularly easy schedule?

1:16:14.000 --> 1:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you're asking about the schedule of death, yeah,

1:16:17.160 --> 1:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the answer is Louisville. But we already covered Louisville. And

1:16:21.000 --> 1:16:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I know you, I know you want me to answer

1:16:22.880 --> 1:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>duke with this, hit me with some Duke, So I

1:16:25.120 --> 1:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>will stick with that. They open the year with Alabama,

1:16:28.479 --> 1:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>which is not sem optimal. Not optimal. They don't have

1:16:32.240 --> 1:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to play Clemson, which is good, but they do have

1:16:34.400 --> 1:16:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to play Notre Dame. They do have to play Miami

1:16:38.560 --> 1:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse at Virginia. That's tough in a vacuum. That is tough.

1:16:42.880 --> 1:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't care who you are. Then there's the whole

1:16:46.000 --> 1:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>thing about them turning over so much on offense. They

1:16:51.320 --> 1:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>have to navigate that schedule without Daniel Jones, who was

1:16:54.800 --> 1:16:59.519
<v Speaker 1>drafted still astoundingly sixth overall by my giants. Then they've

1:16:59.520 --> 1:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>got turned over at wide receiver as well. Again in

1:17:03.000 --> 1:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum. You look at what that typically does to

1:17:05.560 --> 1:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>numbers and efficiency, and it's a recipe for regression. You

1:17:09.360 --> 1:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>take those two things, the schedule and the turnover in

1:17:12.560 --> 1:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>tandem with one another, and that's just a tough look.

1:17:16.240 --> 1:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Tough look for twenty nineteen, Duke's been very consistent under

1:17:19.760 --> 1:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>David Cutcliffe, and that should not be under sold if

1:17:22.840 --> 1:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you're a loyal viewer of the ACC network, which of

1:17:25.439 --> 1:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>course we are. It's worth noting that twenty twenty twenty

1:17:29.080 --> 1:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty one they look much more promising for the Duke

1:17:32.000 --> 1:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Blue Devils. But I think in twenty nineteen we see

1:17:35.080 --> 1:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a step back, just because it's going

1:17:37.040 --> 1:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to take a while for them to figure out this offense.

1:17:39.720 --> 1:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>It's going to take a while for them to do

1:17:42.000 --> 1:17:43.479
<v Speaker 1>so in the face of what looks to be a

1:17:43.520 --> 1:17:50.719
<v Speaker 1>really tough schedule. Can they improve at quarterback? Can they improve? Yeah?

1:17:51.720 --> 1:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Quentin Harris? Quentin Harris looks to be

1:17:55.040 --> 1:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the new starting quarterback, very limited experience, he waited his

1:17:57.720 --> 1:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>turn behind Daniel Jones.

1:17:59.640 --> 1:18:01.559
<v Speaker 2>He's I think Daniel Jones is that good. I don't

1:18:01.560 --> 1:18:03.879
<v Speaker 2>think he's that good either. But can they improve?

1:18:04.160 --> 1:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But here's the point. Daniel Jones was there for a while,

1:18:09.120 --> 1:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of good experience, and had an experienced

1:18:12.800 --> 1:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>wide receiving core to throw to. This year, Duke has

1:18:16.640 --> 1:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a new starting quarterback and essentially a new wide receiving corps.

1:18:21.000 --> 1:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>They may not move the ball at all against Alabama.

1:18:23.040 --> 1:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It may take them a while to move the ball

1:18:24.400 --> 1:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in general. Can they improve over the long term? Maybe

1:18:27.920 --> 1:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this year? I don't think we'll see it.

1:18:29.200 --> 1:18:35.839
<v Speaker 2>There's just too much turnover, right, Yeah, Duka was depending

1:18:35.880 --> 1:18:38.599
<v Speaker 2>on the metric, you care about twelfth or thirteenth out

1:18:38.640 --> 1:18:41.640
<v Speaker 2>of fourteen teams passing the ball, whether it's rating or

1:18:41.720 --> 1:18:45.960
<v Speaker 2>yards per attempt, whatever it was. Forget the Daniel Jones

1:18:46.080 --> 1:18:46.880
<v Speaker 2>comedy of being.

1:18:46.840 --> 1:18:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Taken number six.

1:18:47.640 --> 1:18:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Overall, that's pretty stunning in a down year from a

1:18:50.800 --> 1:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>David Cutcliff experience quarterback. Sure, oh yeah, the passing offense

1:18:55.160 --> 1:18:59.639
<v Speaker 2>was that disappointing, I guess would be the most accurate word.

1:18:59.720 --> 1:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know.

1:19:00.920 --> 1:19:04.280
<v Speaker 2>They finished the season well in their bowl game against Temple, obviously,

1:19:04.439 --> 1:19:06.759
<v Speaker 2>but for them to go through their A SEC schedule

1:19:06.760 --> 1:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and I know people are beat up, whatever, but it

1:19:09.800 --> 1:19:11.519
<v Speaker 2>was it was a rough watch.

1:19:13.040 --> 1:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>One other thing here, Yeah, a lot of experience up

1:19:17.280 --> 1:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the middle on defense and on the back side of

1:19:19.880 --> 1:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the defense. They were banged up. They were young last year.

1:19:23.200 --> 1:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>They still played pretty well. They got to find a

1:19:27.320 --> 1:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>way to rush the passer this year though, that was

1:19:29.400 --> 1:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>that was the issue last year. There isn't a clear solution.

1:19:33.360 --> 1:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But I did see our friend Bill Connolly newly with ESPN.

1:19:37.880 --> 1:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He's got them projected as the thirty eighth best defense

1:19:41.160 --> 1:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>according to his smp plus. And you know, that's a

1:19:44.320 --> 1:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>significant talking point because in neither football nor basketball do

1:19:48.479 --> 1:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we look at Duke and say, hey, they played pretty

1:19:51.120 --> 1:19:51.719
<v Speaker 1>good defense.

1:19:52.600 --> 1:19:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, Thirty eighth overall in defense would be pretty good

1:19:55.160 --> 1:19:57.240
<v Speaker 2>for Duke. If they were wearing a couple of years

1:19:57.240 --> 1:19:58.559
<v Speaker 2>ago with Jim Knowles, they were.

1:19:58.600 --> 1:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>They were, they were. They've been pretty consistent again across

1:20:01.560 --> 1:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the board. So if they can get that level of

1:20:04.400 --> 1:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>production from their defense. It papers over some of the

1:20:07.760 --> 1:20:09.559
<v Speaker 1>issues that I think they're gonna have on offense. Duke

1:20:09.640 --> 1:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is still gonna be fine. I just I see some

1:20:12.439 --> 1:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>regression because of the turnover, particularly at quarterback and wide receiver.

1:20:17.840 --> 1:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>They have a co defensive coordinator. I know nothing about him,

1:20:21.800 --> 1:20:24.040
<v Speaker 2>but I'm looking at their their coaching staff right now.

1:20:26.280 --> 1:20:31.200
<v Speaker 2>He his name is Matt Gary Garyery Gary.

1:20:31.320 --> 1:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's g U E R R I

1:20:33.920 --> 1:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>E r I. Okay, Okay. He graduated college in twenty eleven.

1:20:40.560 --> 1:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Whoa uh okay, Doke.

1:20:45.400 --> 1:20:52.800
<v Speaker 2>So he's thirty thirty maybe so, I I has nothing

1:20:52.840 --> 1:20:54.800
<v Speaker 2>to do with whether or not I think Duke will

1:20:54.840 --> 1:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>be good or bad on defense.

1:20:56.080 --> 1:20:58.599
<v Speaker 1>I am just stunned. I am still just feel old,

1:20:58.640 --> 1:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is what you're saying.

1:20:59.240 --> 1:21:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I just feel very And he looks nineteen. Yeah, he

1:21:02.840 --> 1:21:05.559
<v Speaker 2>looks like he is about to serve you food at

1:21:05.680 --> 1:21:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Peta Pitt. Did you have Peta Pitt in State College?

1:21:08.960 --> 1:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>We did have a Peta But I think every college

1:21:10.360 --> 1:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>town into pet Pitt. Yeah.

1:21:12.560 --> 1:21:15.479
<v Speaker 2>So I feel okay about Duke in the long term.

1:21:15.560 --> 1:21:18.679
<v Speaker 2>But this, I mean, the schedule is rough, It's tough

1:21:19.400 --> 1:21:22.599
<v Speaker 2>s still is not great. So yeah, hopefully they can

1:21:22.640 --> 1:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>get better through the air at least.

1:21:24.439 --> 1:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>My final question for you about the acc Fatlantic, it's

1:21:29.760 --> 1:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>about Dave Clawson. Dan Okay, Dave Clawson newly extended at

1:21:35.720 --> 1:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>wake Forest through I think twenty twenty six. Congratulations to him. Great.

1:21:40.320 --> 1:21:44.599
<v Speaker 1>He said that it's taken him five years to get

1:21:44.680 --> 1:21:47.799
<v Speaker 1>wake Forest back to a point of being a quote

1:21:47.960 --> 1:21:53.719
<v Speaker 1>normal program, m M normals relative. What does that mean? Always?

1:21:54.439 --> 1:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it means better depth. I know it means

1:21:56.960 --> 1:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>better facilities. That's been one area of emphasis on the

1:22:01.120 --> 1:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>field for him. It has equated to three straight winning

1:22:05.160 --> 1:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>seasons or winning records, if you want to be particular,

1:22:08.760 --> 1:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>three straight Bowl wins. It's sort of been a slow

1:22:11.080 --> 1:22:14.599
<v Speaker 1>burn of constantly improving in the margins for wake Forest.

1:22:15.600 --> 1:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>How far off are we from a true breakout season

1:22:19.080 --> 1:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>where they finished a year with like nine wins or

1:22:21.880 --> 1:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>something crazy.

1:22:23.880 --> 1:22:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Tid Remember when the Wolford wagon was rolling at wake Forest. Yeah,

1:22:27.680 --> 1:22:35.360
<v Speaker 2>that's the breakout year. Okay, it happens. I think normal

1:22:35.960 --> 1:22:39.000
<v Speaker 2>in not even wake Forest case. But if that word

1:22:39.120 --> 1:22:41.360
<v Speaker 2>is being used, the only thing I can think it

1:22:41.439 --> 1:22:46.320
<v Speaker 2>means is not a nightmare. It's above a nightmare. That's

1:22:46.439 --> 1:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>all I think, Like, Yeah, things are operating. We have

1:22:49.760 --> 1:22:53.080
<v Speaker 2>people working in various departments. We have chairs, we have

1:22:53.200 --> 1:22:56.839
<v Speaker 2>a practice schedule, we have water for the players after practice.

1:22:57.120 --> 1:22:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Somebody vacuums the locker room.

1:22:59.280 --> 1:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I think.

1:22:59.760 --> 1:23:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Thing, They're just operating as they should and they're recruiting

1:23:04.200 --> 1:23:07.080
<v Speaker 2>on the level that they should for not necessarily a

1:23:07.280 --> 1:23:12.479
<v Speaker 2>top tier ACC team, but a respectable Bowl eligible ACC team.

1:23:12.760 --> 1:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>That's normal. That's not a nightmare.

1:23:15.720 --> 1:23:18.240
<v Speaker 2>The only way I could see Wake Forest getting to

1:23:18.400 --> 1:23:23.160
<v Speaker 2>nine wins is if whatever polluted the minds of Louisville

1:23:23.200 --> 1:23:27.160
<v Speaker 2>players last year pollutes like six teams this year in

1:23:27.280 --> 1:23:32.479
<v Speaker 2>the ACC. That or like Trevor Lawrence T Higgins, Travis

1:23:32.560 --> 1:23:36.519
<v Speaker 2>Etn and Justin Ross are like, why don't we just

1:23:36.560 --> 1:23:39.720
<v Speaker 2>transfer to wake and be legends, Why don't we just

1:23:39.840 --> 1:23:44.840
<v Speaker 2>do it, guys, let's get to Winnie Salem. Outside of that,

1:23:46.400 --> 1:23:49.360
<v Speaker 2>normal is great for Wake Forest. Getting to a bowl

1:23:49.439 --> 1:23:52.880
<v Speaker 2>game is great. Having two capable quarterbacks and Jamie Newman

1:23:53.280 --> 1:23:57.320
<v Speaker 2>teenage heart throb sounding name and Sam Hartman is wonderful

1:23:58.320 --> 1:24:00.519
<v Speaker 2>having you know, depth of positions, even though I think

1:24:00.520 --> 1:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>their defense is going to be kind of a nightmare.

1:24:02.040 --> 1:24:05.560
<v Speaker 2>This year, especially in the middle. They're a team that

1:24:05.880 --> 1:24:10.200
<v Speaker 2>they play quickly. They're coached well. They take talent that's

1:24:10.240 --> 1:24:13.600
<v Speaker 2>probably four or five win team talent and get to

1:24:13.680 --> 1:24:17.160
<v Speaker 2>six or seven. Wake is in a great place. Go Deeks,

1:24:17.600 --> 1:24:18.479
<v Speaker 2>normal is great.

1:24:18.880 --> 1:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>They're in there.

1:24:19.720 --> 1:24:23.160
<v Speaker 2>They're sailing right now. Stop being selfish and asking for

1:24:23.320 --> 1:24:26.080
<v Speaker 2>nine wins from my beautiful demon deacons.

1:24:27.520 --> 1:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I like Wake Forest, I do. Yeah. I like the

1:24:29.840 --> 1:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>job that Dave Clausin's done. I'm curious to see how

1:24:34.160 --> 1:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they replace the production of Greg Dortsch, one of my

1:24:38.200 --> 1:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite names. Torched by the doors, you know, all timer

1:24:41.200 --> 1:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a good got a good laugh out of that. One

1:24:43.040 --> 1:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five targets, eight touchdowns over a thousand

1:24:46.560 --> 1:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>yards walking out the door. They gotta find a solution,

1:24:50.120 --> 1:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>got to find a target out wide. And I do

1:24:53.640 --> 1:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>think though you called attention to the defense, I think

1:24:59.040 --> 1:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll defend the run pretty well. Okay, they didn't have

1:25:03.200 --> 1:25:05.519
<v Speaker 1>nearly enough of a pass rush. Pass last year was

1:25:05.560 --> 1:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>me last year? Yeah, so I think they got to

1:25:08.520 --> 1:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>cure the pass rush. But I think they'll be good

1:25:10.200 --> 1:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>enough against the run. And sure it might be a

1:25:12.760 --> 1:25:16.599
<v Speaker 1>bit greedy asking for nine wins, but the question needed

1:25:16.640 --> 1:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to be asked. It is a program that has consistently

1:25:18.840 --> 1:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>gotten better. He's gotten them to normal. The next logical

1:25:22.520 --> 1:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>question is can he take them above normal? So we'll see.

1:25:26.640 --> 1:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me hit you with this.

1:25:28.479 --> 1:25:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's going to happen, and it might

1:25:30.600 --> 1:25:34.000
<v Speaker 2>end in August. My question, and it's any sort of

1:25:34.080 --> 1:25:38.519
<v Speaker 2>relevance tied to it. Utah State new coach Gary Anderson,

1:25:38.880 --> 1:25:44.200
<v Speaker 2>old coach Rice North Carolina with Mack Brown Elon at

1:25:44.280 --> 1:25:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Boston College, Louisville, Okay, and bye before Louisville. How many

1:25:52.920 --> 1:25:56.479
<v Speaker 2>iterations would it take? For like, if they played the

1:25:56.520 --> 1:25:59.360
<v Speaker 2>season one hundred times, how many of those times does

1:25:59.439 --> 1:26:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Wake start six and oh with that opening nine seventeen

1:26:07.080 --> 1:26:11.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty three, three thirty three times? Yeah, so one in

1:26:11.760 --> 1:26:15.760
<v Speaker 2>three seasons that Wake Forest. If there are three identical universes,

1:26:16.520 --> 1:26:19.640
<v Speaker 2>including the one that we are presumably broadcasting in right now,

1:26:21.040 --> 1:26:24.439
<v Speaker 2>in one of those universes, we're dealing with a top

1:26:24.520 --> 1:26:30.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty Wake Forest come mid October. Yes, whoa, And then

1:26:31.320 --> 1:26:34.479
<v Speaker 2>it should be said Florida State, Etsey State, Virginia Tech

1:26:34.560 --> 1:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>on the road, Clemson on the road, Duke at Syracuse

1:26:37.640 --> 1:26:38.040
<v Speaker 2>in the Dome.

1:26:38.600 --> 1:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right. Okay, Wow, I would say it's more

1:26:42.880 --> 1:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like eleven out of one hundred. Oh ye of little faith.

1:26:46.160 --> 1:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>This is a good team. Okay, it's not a bad team.

1:26:51.240 --> 1:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Final question.

1:26:51.920 --> 1:26:54.519
<v Speaker 2>I mean they have I mean Jordan Love is very good.

1:26:54.600 --> 1:26:56.640
<v Speaker 2>So that might end before September.

1:26:56.920 --> 1:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>But okay, final question, Dan, go ahead, all right, do

1:27:01.000 --> 1:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I have one more question? You have one more question

1:27:03.000 --> 1:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>here than we've made it from all of our ACC teams.

1:27:05.960 --> 1:27:09.439
<v Speaker 2>We're already through everything everything. Okay, we're ending with the

1:27:09.760 --> 1:27:14.160
<v Speaker 2>ACC's one true team. That's right, you're Coastal champion Pitt Panthers.

1:27:14.240 --> 1:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>The pit Panthers seven to five last year regular seats

1:27:16.800 --> 1:27:21.400
<v Speaker 2>seven and five finish murdered in some of their finished

1:27:21.439 --> 1:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>seven and seven. Yeah, after the lost to Clemson and

1:27:25.120 --> 1:27:26.120
<v Speaker 2>then again in the bowl game.

1:27:26.840 --> 1:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Should they lose to Stanford? I believe, yeah, yeah, yeah Stanford.

1:27:31.760 --> 1:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>You were saying something, let me can I ask my questions?

1:27:33.680 --> 1:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, what is what is your

1:27:34.800 --> 1:27:36.519
<v Speaker 1>specific question? I have many thoughts on Pitt.

1:27:37.000 --> 1:27:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so they technically played more games, and I was

1:27:40.680 --> 1:27:45.000
<v Speaker 2>looking at Bill C's numbers where their offensive or defensive

1:27:45.040 --> 1:27:48.040
<v Speaker 2>percentile was like under fifteen percent. So they were playing

1:27:48.640 --> 1:27:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, fifteen percent of what they should be capable

1:27:52.320 --> 1:27:57.479
<v Speaker 2>of considering what their performance is. That's that's awful. That's

1:27:57.520 --> 1:28:00.320
<v Speaker 2>atrocious that they were that bad so often on one

1:28:00.400 --> 1:28:03.599
<v Speaker 2>side of the ball. Do you have hope in your

1:28:03.760 --> 1:28:11.280
<v Speaker 2>heart that Pat Nardoozy and Pitt can normalize into I

1:28:11.360 --> 1:28:16.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know, consistently not bad overall. As they know it's

1:28:16.479 --> 1:28:18.519
<v Speaker 2>Kenny Pickett is back. They lose two running backs, but

1:28:18.600 --> 1:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>as they sort of remake their offense, I.

1:28:23.479 --> 1:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I have hope, Okay, explain, I don't have confidence. What's

1:28:30.760 --> 1:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the difference. The difference is I want it to happen

1:28:33.880 --> 1:28:36.479
<v Speaker 1>versus I don't think it will. Okay, okay, heart verse

1:28:36.560 --> 1:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>head up front, the O line loses four starters. The

1:28:41.840 --> 1:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>backfield loses both Quadri Allison and Darren Hall, both of

1:28:46.479 --> 1:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>whom went over one thousand yards combined for twenty one

1:28:49.200 --> 1:28:54.439
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns. Cadre. That's putting a lot of pressure on

1:28:54.640 --> 1:28:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Pickett and to be fair on the new offensive

1:28:59.600 --> 1:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>coordinator Mark Whipple. Mm hmm. Defensively, there's talent on the

1:29:04.920 --> 1:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>top line. It gets shallow in a hurry. Voice has

1:29:06.880 --> 1:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>gone up. Your voice has gone up. I know, I know,

1:29:09.800 --> 1:29:11.519
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're in a lot of close games.

1:29:11.640 --> 1:29:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Is here again recurring theme around the ACC. The margin

1:29:16.560 --> 1:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is razor thin here. So what I'm what I'm saying,

1:29:20.240 --> 1:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>what I think I'm saying is if I am forced

1:29:23.160 --> 1:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to pick, if I am forced to put my confidence

1:29:26.400 --> 1:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>behind any scenario, I'd put more money on it all

1:29:32.520 --> 1:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>falling apart than on both sides of the ball rising

1:29:36.200 --> 1:29:38.559
<v Speaker 1>up to make this an average team across the board.

1:29:38.640 --> 1:29:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Does that make sense? Yeah, I think there's greater potential. Yeah,

1:29:43.520 --> 1:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful. I'm not rooting against Pitt. I'm not right,

1:29:46.280 --> 1:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And I know we've we've had fun with Pitt, and

1:29:48.520 --> 1:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the offense. People have written in and

1:29:50.760 --> 1:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they've they've gotten upset about that. I I have no

1:29:53.800 --> 1:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>issues with Pitt. I'm rooting for Pitt. Yeah, but I

1:29:56.960 --> 1:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think the way that this is constructed, especially upfront, especially

1:30:01.479 --> 1:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>losing the backfield, especially with Kenny Pickett, who I am

1:30:05.160 --> 1:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not terribly confident in. I have a greater degree of

1:30:07.640 --> 1:30:11.639
<v Speaker 1>confidence in it all sort of falling apart than all

1:30:11.720 --> 1:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that collectively getting better.

1:30:12.800 --> 1:30:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Their final three games of twenty eighteen, Miami on the road,

1:30:16.680 --> 1:30:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Clemson in the ACC Championship game Stanford in the it's Stanford,

1:30:21.920 --> 1:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>it must be sunball. Two combined touchdowns in those three

1:30:27.120 --> 1:30:34.200
<v Speaker 2>games they end They ended the year not enthusiastically playing

1:30:34.280 --> 1:30:38.840
<v Speaker 2>football on offense. Twenty four to three Miami, forty two

1:30:38.840 --> 1:30:41.519
<v Speaker 2>to ten Clemson fourteen thirteen Stanford. So at least that

1:30:41.640 --> 1:30:47.040
<v Speaker 2>was a game. Kenny Pickett against Clemson through not five,

1:30:47.640 --> 1:30:54.719
<v Speaker 2>not six, not seven, but for eight total yards against

1:30:54.760 --> 1:30:57.719
<v Speaker 2>the one big measuring stick in the conference.

1:30:58.640 --> 1:31:01.439
<v Speaker 1>That worries me. It is a little worrisome that, Yeah,

1:31:01.680 --> 1:31:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that worries me.

1:31:02.520 --> 1:31:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Eight yards in a big game. So I know the

1:31:05.280 --> 1:31:07.600
<v Speaker 2>weather was weird, but that's not that's not okay. That

1:31:07.640 --> 1:31:10.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't fill me with confidence. So I think Pitt is

1:31:10.360 --> 1:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>going to have.

1:31:12.520 --> 1:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Not a great year. But the thing is not feeling

1:31:14.960 --> 1:31:18.639
<v Speaker 1>good about Pitt at all. I'm not either Coastal Champ

1:31:19.000 --> 1:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, the Coastal Champ and Pat and Ardozy's just

1:31:23.280 --> 1:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>so tough to put a finger on. And maybe this

1:31:25.720 --> 1:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>whole thing with Mark Whipple will work out. Maybe he'll

1:31:28.240 --> 1:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>find some way to reinvigorate the offense. I don't know.

1:31:31.960 --> 1:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got a reputation, He's got a good reputation around

1:31:34.040 --> 1:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>college football. Maybe he can be the guy who breathes

1:31:37.439 --> 1:31:39.439
<v Speaker 1>some new life into the situation now, but they're going

1:31:39.520 --> 1:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to have to come up with something in a hurry. Here.

1:31:41.320 --> 1:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>They really are again a ton of production walking out

1:31:44.200 --> 1:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the door, and I'm just not confident that the solutions

1:31:47.479 --> 1:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>are there. That's where I'm me.

1:31:50.400 --> 1:31:54.559
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I mean that's all reasonable. But last year

1:31:54.680 --> 1:31:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Pitt's offense with I think two backs that went over

1:31:57.840 --> 1:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>a thousand yards, right, yes, and Darren Hall, yes, they

1:32:01.960 --> 1:32:05.280
<v Speaker 2>finished And I know you questioned the science tie you

1:32:05.400 --> 1:32:09.360
<v Speaker 2>are a d analytics truther. They finished eighty fourth in

1:32:09.400 --> 1:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the country in points per drive excluding garbage time, with

1:32:14.880 --> 1:32:17.679
<v Speaker 2>maybe the best combination or second best combination of backs

1:32:17.680 --> 1:32:21.040
<v Speaker 2>in the conference they finished eightieth and defensive points per

1:32:21.120 --> 1:32:24.760
<v Speaker 2>drive allowed, winning the Coastal mind you through I mean

1:32:24.840 --> 1:32:27.200
<v Speaker 2>this is also a team that played UCF and Penn State.

1:32:27.360 --> 1:32:29.240
<v Speaker 2>So this was a Penn State team that got it

1:32:29.280 --> 1:32:30.960
<v Speaker 2>together in the second half of that game in UCF,

1:32:31.040 --> 1:32:35.160
<v Speaker 2>which was enormous all season on offense when Mackenzie Milton

1:32:35.240 --> 1:32:40.679
<v Speaker 2>was healthy. Especially, I'm I am worried that pat NARDUCI

1:32:40.800 --> 1:32:44.479
<v Speaker 2>is not that good despite some of the results, despite

1:32:44.560 --> 1:32:49.479
<v Speaker 2>beating Clemson, which now looks like, Wow, what a higher end. Wow,

1:32:49.640 --> 1:32:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Matt Canada is not of somebody with a job. And

1:32:52.560 --> 1:32:55.280
<v Speaker 2>we talked about this on Twitter. It's like fifty eighth,

1:32:55.400 --> 1:32:57.800
<v Speaker 2>eighty fourth, and eighty sixth when Matt Canada is not

1:32:57.960 --> 1:33:04.360
<v Speaker 2>in Pittsburgh, when he is tenth with Nate Peterman. It's

1:33:04.439 --> 1:33:07.439
<v Speaker 2>such a weird career that pat Nardoozi has had in Pittsburgh.

1:33:07.560 --> 1:33:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to be like a four and

1:33:08.800 --> 1:33:09.519
<v Speaker 2>eight year for them.

1:33:11.280 --> 1:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>All Right, there you go. We've covered all fourteen teams.

1:33:14.720 --> 1:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Mm hm in the acc fel good to get this

1:33:18.000 --> 1:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>one under the belt. A little rusty, I felt very

1:33:21.040 --> 1:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>good about this show. A little rusty. I feel good

1:33:22.880 --> 1:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>about the show too. Yeah, feel a little rusty. I'm

1:33:26.200 --> 1:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sure there are things that we left out. I hate

1:33:29.000 --> 1:33:31.799
<v Speaker 1>to put out this call because I always get stuff

1:33:31.880 --> 1:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that I missed or left out or screwed up. Sort

1:33:36.360 --> 1:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of the nature of the beast. But right in Soliverblegmail

1:33:38.560 --> 1:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com, book us up on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, go

1:33:42.840 --> 1:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on the sub Yeah, talk to other folks, let us

1:33:45.840 --> 1:33:48.559
<v Speaker 1>know what we glossed over, what we missed, or where

1:33:48.600 --> 1:33:50.559
<v Speaker 1>you agreed as well, and.

1:33:54.280 --> 1:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Make sure you drink a bunch of water. Make sure

1:33:56.120 --> 1:33:58.000
<v Speaker 2>you drink a bunch of water, not too much water,

1:33:58.280 --> 1:33:59.880
<v Speaker 2>but make sure you stay on top of your hydration.

1:34:00.320 --> 1:34:02.639
<v Speaker 2>Do we have any official predictions for this conference?

1:34:04.080 --> 1:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

1:34:05.200 --> 1:34:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean basically, it's just the only thing is who

1:34:06.800 --> 1:34:08.680
<v Speaker 2>does Clemson play? I guess in the championship game?

1:34:10.560 --> 1:34:15.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? So who is it? Mister Coastal? Mister Coastal? Huh.

1:34:18.080 --> 1:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm tempted to say Miami. Okay, I'm very tempted to

1:34:22.720 --> 1:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>say Miami. For me, it's between Virginia and Miami, and

1:34:29.040 --> 1:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Keynes. I think they are

1:34:32.120 --> 1:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in line for a pretty big first year under me. Wows.

1:34:39.920 --> 1:34:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, I don't. I mean, I can't really question that.

1:34:41.720 --> 1:34:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's Georgia just eliminating teams. I think

1:34:44.160 --> 1:34:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Duke Georgia Tech, North Carolina, Pitt and probably Virginia.

1:34:47.600 --> 1:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Tech are out of it already. I think Virginia Tech.

1:34:50.120 --> 1:34:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Could you can make a case for Virginia Tech? Mm

1:34:53.280 --> 1:34:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I do? I didn't seem to no, I didn't say, well.

1:34:57.520 --> 1:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think they've got continuity and I think

1:35:00.960 --> 1:35:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they can only get better on defense. Yeah, so I

1:35:05.080 --> 1:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>feel better about Virginia Tech than maybe I let on.

1:35:09.640 --> 1:35:12.439
<v Speaker 2>But I've had continuity with my body for thirty six

1:35:12.560 --> 1:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>years and I still can't dunk.

1:35:15.439 --> 1:35:18.519
<v Speaker 1>It's still not happening. I'm gonna go Miami, Virginia, Virginia

1:35:18.600 --> 1:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Tech in that order, at the top three, top three

1:35:20.720 --> 1:35:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of the castle.

1:35:22.040 --> 1:35:24.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, I think I agree. I think it's Miami

1:35:24.320 --> 1:35:26.280
<v Speaker 2>of Virginia. I think I'm gonna where's that game this year?

1:35:26.400 --> 1:35:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that'll decide it. Whoever's playing at home. I'm

1:35:28.920 --> 1:35:30.400
<v Speaker 2>just going to award the coastal too.

1:35:30.520 --> 1:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Right now? The game is at Miami. The game is

1:35:34.120 --> 1:35:34.519
<v Speaker 1>at Miami.

1:35:34.520 --> 1:35:37.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, give me the cans and the hopefully not

1:35:37.479 --> 1:35:39.639
<v Speaker 2>too much product in Manny Diaz's hair.

1:35:40.960 --> 1:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, that's it, right in one more time,

1:35:44.920 --> 1:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Silverbleeginia dot com. Let us know what's on your mind.

1:35:48.160 --> 1:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We will be back next week, talk about a different conference.

1:35:52.000 --> 1:35:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Won't give too much away. I say that because we

1:35:54.720 --> 1:35:56.679
<v Speaker 1>honestly have not figured out which conference we'll be talking

1:35:56.720 --> 1:35:57.599
<v Speaker 1>about a week from tonight.

1:35:58.479 --> 1:36:02.080
<v Speaker 2>We forgot to mention the Patriot League connection that we

1:36:02.160 --> 1:36:04.240
<v Speaker 2>probably oh, right, Louisville.

1:36:04.840 --> 1:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Louisville, Louisville. I believe it.

1:36:07.680 --> 1:36:12.240
<v Speaker 2>It's TJ Nole, Yes, TJ Nole is the linebacker. Gosh,

1:36:12.560 --> 1:36:14.280
<v Speaker 2>he's not coming up on Google, so I feel like

1:36:14.320 --> 1:36:19.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm pronouncing it incorrectly. But there is a Colgate linebacker,

1:36:19.400 --> 1:36:22.880
<v Speaker 2>not just a Colgate linebacker, but a I think it

1:36:22.960 --> 1:36:28.320
<v Speaker 2>was FCS All Star All American And let me get

1:36:28.360 --> 1:36:30.240
<v Speaker 2>this Colgate linebacker Louisville.

1:36:30.479 --> 1:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm so ashamed. Yeah, TJ Hole, not TJ nole. H

1:36:33.680 --> 1:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>O l L.

1:36:34.800 --> 1:36:36.680
<v Speaker 2>He was Patriot League Defensive Player of the Year. We

1:36:36.840 --> 1:36:41.920
<v Speaker 2>saw him play in Fargo, North Dakota. He is now

1:36:42.960 --> 1:36:48.040
<v Speaker 2>playing for Louisville. So that big stanky Drummond Fife travels

1:36:48.120 --> 1:36:51.840
<v Speaker 2>to fine state of Kentucky in the acc Fatlantic. So

1:36:51.960 --> 1:36:52.800
<v Speaker 2>that's something that's fun.

1:36:53.920 --> 1:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's it. All right, Well, thank you again for listening.

1:36:57.280 --> 1:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>You know how to find us. Don't forget to get

1:36:59.439 --> 1:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>those tickets if you are ever so inclined to be

1:37:02.080 --> 1:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Fort Worth area on seventeenth, we got tickets

1:37:07.200 --> 1:37:10.760
<v Speaker 1>avail soliverbal Tickets dot com, Slash Texas and if you're

1:37:10.760 --> 1:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in d C in that metro area the

1:37:13.720 --> 1:37:16.639
<v Speaker 1>very next night, on the eighteenth of August, it's a Sunday,

1:37:17.320 --> 1:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>seven point thirty. The show starts soliverbal tickets dot Com,

1:37:20.240 --> 1:37:24.559
<v Speaker 1>slash d c if you're interested, for that guy over there,

1:37:24.640 --> 1:37:27.280
<v Speaker 1>my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself, Ty hilden Brand.

1:37:27.840 --> 1:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Longer show, catch your breath, we'll be bout having a week.

1:37:30.960 --> 1:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, enjoy the rest of your week, all

1:37:32.760 --> 1:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of your weekend, and stay solid peace,