1
00:00:01,040 --> 00:00:05,439
Speaker 1: Margaretta Vestaire, the European Unions Director at General for a Competition,

2
00:00:05,840 --> 00:00:08,039
Speaker 1: is well known in the United States for actions like

3
00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:11,039
Speaker 1: a ruling last year that Ireland had granted illegal tax

4
00:00:11,039 --> 00:00:14,680
Speaker 1: benefits to Apple, resulting in a fourteen billion dollar liability

5
00:00:14,720 --> 00:00:18,560
Speaker 1: for Apple. She says she's enforcing Europe's view of a

6
00:00:18,640 --> 00:00:22,040
Speaker 1: fair market. What we are looking at is, of course

7
00:00:22,200 --> 00:00:26,000
Speaker 1: the competition and uh, and we do want to see

8
00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:29,520
Speaker 1: that also the successful company is also going big, but

9
00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:33,680
Speaker 1: they allow for others to challenge them. But some see

10
00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:37,440
Speaker 1: an instinctive mistrust of big corporations on her part, and

11
00:00:37,479 --> 00:00:41,480
Speaker 1: the Staire's tenure has provoked anger from many large American companies.

12
00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:45,720
Speaker 1: Samath sup Supermannian as an award winning author and a

13
00:00:45,720 --> 00:00:48,600
Speaker 1: contributor to Bloomberg Business Week, and he has written a

14
00:00:48,600 --> 00:00:53,960
Speaker 1: profile of Vastaire for Bloomberg Business Week which is out now. Samantha,

15
00:00:54,240 --> 00:00:57,280
Speaker 1: thanks for being here with us. Uh. You know, she

16
00:00:57,440 --> 00:01:01,720
Speaker 1: seems to have a particular person active on matters of

17
00:01:01,800 --> 00:01:06,320
Speaker 1: competition in Europe. What is it that is her sort

18
00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:14,039
Speaker 1: of philosophy about how to approach questions of fair competition? Well,

19
00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:18,200
Speaker 1: I think her basic philosophy over here is that Europe

20
00:01:18,240 --> 00:01:22,080
Speaker 1: has a very fixed and definite view of what a

21
00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:24,600
Speaker 1: fair market is, and that view may differ from how

22
00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:27,639
Speaker 1: the Americans view to how the Chinese view it. Um.

23
00:01:27,680 --> 00:01:30,200
Speaker 1: And you know that's fine, for each market has its

24
00:01:30,240 --> 00:01:32,520
Speaker 1: own rules and its own perspective. But if you want

25
00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:34,840
Speaker 1: to play in Europe, you have to play by the

26
00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:38,440
Speaker 1: European rule book. Um. And this is uh, this is

27
00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:41,600
Speaker 1: this is this sort of a foundational philosophy of the

28
00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:44,920
Speaker 1: EU itself is that if the market is policed well

29
00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:48,840
Speaker 1: and sensibly a certain way, it sort of distributes the

30
00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:52,320
Speaker 1: widest and deepest benefits to society. So in you know,

31
00:01:52,360 --> 00:01:54,400
Speaker 1: from the from the point of view of the US,

32
00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:57,640
Speaker 1: it can often seem as if we use vision of

33
00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,760
Speaker 1: a free market is much more constricted and narrow. But

34
00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:02,200
Speaker 1: I think we have to sort of look at it

35
00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:04,320
Speaker 1: from within the EU itself and trying to see what

36
00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:07,800
Speaker 1: they're trying to achieve. You write that in late March,

37
00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:11,960
Speaker 1: the Office of the US Trade Representative reiterated its opinion

38
00:02:12,080 --> 00:02:15,840
Speaker 1: that the STAY is deviating to form far from prior

39
00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:19,320
Speaker 1: case law. And you quote one former Treasury official from

40
00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:23,000
Speaker 1: the Obama administration is saying her staff resembled a bunch

41
00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:28,000
Speaker 1: of plumbers doing electric work. Explain that is she deviating

42
00:02:28,320 --> 00:02:34,119
Speaker 1: from prior case law. Well, I mean, I don't think

43
00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:36,720
Speaker 1: he's deviating so much, a sort of pushing the envelope

44
00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:39,200
Speaker 1: a little bit. But we have to remember these are

45
00:02:39,320 --> 00:02:42,040
Speaker 1: these are very specific times we're living in, you know,

46
00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:44,399
Speaker 1: after two thousand eight, not only in Europe, but even

47
00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:47,160
Speaker 1: in the US, there's been sort of a widespread public

48
00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:50,480
Speaker 1: sentiment because there are too many corporations getting away with

49
00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:53,320
Speaker 1: too much sort of with paying two little tacks that

50
00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:56,359
Speaker 1: they can't say, sort of evading or eluding paying the

51
00:02:56,440 --> 00:02:59,280
Speaker 1: rightful amount of tax by setting up officers and attacks

52
00:02:59,320 --> 00:03:02,560
Speaker 1: haven about moving money around overseas. And this is a

53
00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:04,959
Speaker 1: sentiment that is not just prevalent in Europe but in

54
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:08,120
Speaker 1: the US as well. Uh so, so the rules that

55
00:03:08,840 --> 00:03:11,360
Speaker 1: vest Tailor and her office are playing by. The rules

56
00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,400
Speaker 1: are already there on people, they are part of the

57
00:03:14,440 --> 00:03:17,320
Speaker 1: brief of the office itself, but she's certainly being sort

58
00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:19,440
Speaker 1: of a lot more activist in the way in which

59
00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:24,840
Speaker 1: she's enforcing them. Some months. The the way that you know,

60
00:03:25,080 --> 00:03:28,040
Speaker 1: it comes across to a lot of American companies, particularly

61
00:03:28,040 --> 00:03:30,600
Speaker 1: companies like Apple, where that have been the subject of

62
00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:33,320
Speaker 1: rulings by the EU that haven't been in their favor.

63
00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:36,960
Speaker 1: Sometimes it looks to them as though she's really and

64
00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:39,840
Speaker 1: she and her her colleagues in the EU are really

65
00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:44,640
Speaker 1: targeting big American multinational companies. Is that a fair assessment

66
00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:47,600
Speaker 1: of the way that she and the EU have approached

67
00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:52,160
Speaker 1: these matters? No, I don't think it is. I mean

68
00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:54,000
Speaker 1: we have to remember that a lot of her so

69
00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:57,120
Speaker 1: calls are big American cases that she's ruling on now,

70
00:03:57,160 --> 00:04:00,480
Speaker 1: which is Apple, last year, Google, which to be later

71
00:04:00,520 --> 00:04:03,280
Speaker 1: this year. All these cases were actually opened during the

72
00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:07,480
Speaker 1: tenure of her previous of the previous Competition commissioner. You

73
00:04:08,160 --> 00:04:10,480
Speaker 1: of who's from Spain. And if you look at the

74
00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:13,440
Speaker 1: statistics of the number of cases that she has opened

75
00:04:13,480 --> 00:04:16,200
Speaker 1: during her own tenure, I mean they don't They answer

76
00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:18,880
Speaker 1: wildly off the charts in terms of how many American

77
00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:22,360
Speaker 1: companies they target. Just to give you an example, her

78
00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:27,080
Speaker 1: predecessor opened two hundred seventy six anti trust cases during

79
00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:30,440
Speaker 1: his tenure, or thirty nine of them were American investors.

80
00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:33,520
Speaker 1: Two and a half year terms. So far, eleven out

81
00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:38,039
Speaker 1: of eighty one companies have been American in the anti

82
00:04:38,120 --> 00:04:41,080
Speaker 1: trust cases she's opened. So the ratios aren't sort of

83
00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:43,960
Speaker 1: you know, you know, they aren't really they don't justify

84
00:04:44,080 --> 00:04:48,159
Speaker 1: the kind of prevalent sense that she's anti American. I

85
00:04:48,200 --> 00:04:49,919
Speaker 1: think it's just the sort of the size of the

86
00:04:49,960 --> 00:04:53,680
Speaker 1: Apple Award, combined with the particular timing of Apple and

87
00:04:53,760 --> 00:04:56,919
Speaker 1: Google and Star Wucks and Amazon, all of these cases

88
00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:00,279
Speaker 1: coming together over the course of one or two calendar years,

89
00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:03,880
Speaker 1: that's making it seem as if she's she's particularly vindictive

90
00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:06,320
Speaker 1: towards the big American cooperation. But I don't think that's

91
00:05:06,320 --> 00:05:11,440
Speaker 1: the case. You write about her discussion of competition law

92
00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:15,719
Speaker 1: in the severe moral terms of a biblical patriarch. Is

93
00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:19,320
Speaker 1: she strict by the rules and no room for compromise?

94
00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:24,000
Speaker 1: I think he is. I think there's this sort of, uh,

95
00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:27,160
Speaker 1: it's a very black and white world that that she inhabits.

96
00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:28,880
Speaker 1: I think, I mean, she used to be a politician

97
00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:31,159
Speaker 1: in Denmark, and you know the nature of being a

98
00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:34,320
Speaker 1: politician itself is you sort of compromise here and there,

99
00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:37,279
Speaker 1: you make deals. You don't automatically get sort of the

100
00:05:37,360 --> 00:05:39,880
Speaker 1: ideal vision of the world that you want. And a

101
00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:41,919
Speaker 1: lot of people who have met in Copenhagen said that

102
00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:45,280
Speaker 1: she's really come into the office that she can best inhabit,

103
00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,760
Speaker 1: the office of the of the competition commissioner, something where

104
00:05:48,760 --> 00:05:51,679
Speaker 1: you're handed a playbook or rule book and you literally

105
00:05:51,720 --> 00:05:53,760
Speaker 1: just you you could sit in a tower and make

106
00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:57,360
Speaker 1: these decisions based on what's given to you on paper.

107
00:05:57,720 --> 00:05:59,839
Speaker 1: There's no sort of there's not much room for negotiation,

108
00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,960
Speaker 1: don't have to cut deals. It's really sort of cut

109
00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:06,280
Speaker 1: and dried, and it's something that she's she has temperamentally

110
00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:10,000
Speaker 1: been suited to almost all her career. Well, speaking of

111
00:06:10,040 --> 00:06:12,320
Speaker 1: her career, well, how is it that she ended up

112
00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:17,440
Speaker 1: in this position. I mean, she was a very she

113
00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:19,840
Speaker 1: was sort of a young tyro in Danish politics. M

114
00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:23,040
Speaker 1: she joined in when she was twenty. She joined her

115
00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:26,560
Speaker 1: party in first ran for the Danish Parliament. She lost

116
00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:29,200
Speaker 1: that particular race, but she's been working with her party

117
00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:31,840
Speaker 1: ever since she was twenty years old. It's a party

118
00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:36,240
Speaker 1: that has a particular kind of fondness for policy wonkery.

119
00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:38,520
Speaker 1: I guess you could call it. Uh. They are sort

120
00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:42,000
Speaker 1: of an essentially pragmatic party where they do what's best

121
00:06:42,080 --> 00:06:45,080
Speaker 1: for the people are regardless of which part of the

122
00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:49,080
Speaker 1: ideological spectrum of solution comes from. So she rose quite fast.

123
00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:51,320
Speaker 1: And I think in sort of the mid two thousand's

124
00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:54,719
Speaker 1: she became known very quickly, uh for sort of taking

125
00:06:54,839 --> 00:06:58,000
Speaker 1: tough decisions, for taking decisions that she believed to be right,

126
00:06:58,760 --> 00:07:00,400
Speaker 1: even if it earned her a men it of fun,

127
00:07:00,400 --> 00:07:04,400
Speaker 1: popularity over top colleagues, over the people, and uh. And

128
00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:07,840
Speaker 1: she was part of a coalition government and she did

129
00:07:07,920 --> 00:07:09,680
Speaker 1: quite well over there. She was a Minister of the

130
00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:12,720
Speaker 1: economy and she as a minister of the economy, she

131
00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:15,720
Speaker 1: was working a lot within the intra u circuit of

132
00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:19,440
Speaker 1: economic and finance ministers. So I think when it came

133
00:07:19,520 --> 00:07:22,760
Speaker 1: time for Denmark to appoint somebody uh to the new

134
00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:27,480
Speaker 1: you commissionered it, they chose Westo Well. Our thanks to

135
00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:30,640
Speaker 1: Samantha Supermanian for joining us today to talk about his

136
00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:36,160
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Business Week article on Margaret Margaretta Vestaire excuse me,

137
00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:40,200
Speaker 1: the European Union Director at General for Competition. A lot

138
00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:42,640
Speaker 1: of companies around the world, not just in America, Google,

139
00:07:42,680 --> 00:07:46,000
Speaker 1: gaz prom, Apple, Fiat, Amazon, Starbucks, are going to be

140
00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:50,080
Speaker 1: affected by her actions in the upcoming couple of years.

141
00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:52,760
Speaker 1: That's it for this edition of Bloomberg Law. We'll be

142
00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:55,920
Speaker 1: back tomorrow. Thanks to our technical director Christoper Come and

143
00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:58,800
Speaker 1: our producer David Suckerman. You can find more legal news

144
00:07:58,880 --> 00:08:01,560
Speaker 1: at Bloomberg Law dot I'm in Bloomberg b NA dot com,

145
00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:04,480
Speaker 1: plus an invaluable website for the legal community at Big

146
00:08:04,600 --> 00:08:07,800
Speaker 1: Law Business dot com. Coming up on Bloomberg Radio, Bloomberg

147
00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:10,720
Speaker 1: Markets with Carol Masster and Corey Johnson. Carol, you're in Boston.

148
00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:12,840
Speaker 1: What are you gonna talk about? We are Michael Best,

149
00:08:12,960 --> 00:08:16,080
Speaker 1: Mass Robotics in Boston, and we've got the CEO of DraftKings,

150
00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:18,960
Speaker 1: the CEO a Trip Advisor, and the Patriots owner, Bob Kraft.

151
00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:22,040
Speaker 1: And a very happy birthday to you, Michael Best. Well,

152
00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:23,640
Speaker 1: thank you very much. I didn't think we were going

153
00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:25,640
Speaker 1: to talk about that today. That's our last topic on

154
00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:28,400
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law. Stay tuned for Bloomberg Markets and all of

155
00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:31,480
Speaker 1: that and more here on Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg