WEBVTT - An Insane Defense?

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>What makes a person legally insane? Can you know the

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>difference between right and wrong and still be considered insane?

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>These are some of the questions we've considered this season

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Thread exploring the insanity defense, But there are

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>still others, like how can the law keep up with

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>what we are learning from science about the human brain?

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Can any of us really control our actions? And what

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>should we do about those of us who cannot. In July,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a graduate student named James Holmes walked through the doors

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Century sixteen movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. Witnesses

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>say Holmes fired into the air and then started shooting

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>into the crowd. Holmes killed twelve people and injured fifty

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>eight others. He thought the killings would boost his own

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>quote human capital. He called this his mission, and the

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>mission was to kill as many people as possible. Holmes

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.119
<v Speaker 1>pled not guilty by reason of insanity at his trial.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>As we heard an episode one this season, there will

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be no doubt in your minds by the end of

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>this trial that Mr Holmes is severely mentally ill. None

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Holmes was mentally ill, but a Colorado jury did not

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>think he was insane under the law. After listening to

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>witnesses and psychiatric experts, they decided Holmes knew the difference

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>between right and wrong at the time he committed the crime,

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the standard for legal insanity in Colorado and many other states.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>How in the world can someone who kills twelve people

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and injures another fifty eight and leaves a terrible tragedy

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in a theater at midnight? How in the world can

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that person be viewed as sane in any reasonable sense.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Holmes was found guilty, just like the vast majority of

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>criminal defendants today who invoke the insanity defense. To understand

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>why requires a journey through history. The conviction of James

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Holmes really begins almost two centuries ago in England. At

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the time, Queen Victoria and the British House of Lords

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>could not have imagined a crime like the one committed

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>by Holmes, But if you look close enough, their fingerprints

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>are all over his fate. I'm Sean Braswell. Each season

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on The Thread, we unravel the stories behind some of

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the most important lives and events in history to discover,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially how one thing leads to another. This season, we've

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>explored the crazy history of perhaps the most controversial defense

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in the criminal law not guilty by way of insanity.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>From James Holmes to Lorraine of Bobbitt to John Hinckley Jr.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Some of history's most notorious criminal defendants are linked by

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this common thread. In the last episode, we heard about

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the first use of the temporary insanity defense in American law,

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>the case of Daniel Sickles. He was the New York

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>congressman who murdered Barton Key, the son of Francis Scott Key,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>just yards from the White House in eighteen fifty nine.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean literally, if it was an episode of House

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of Cards, you wouldn't believe it, right, but it really happened.

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, There's really nothing like it in American political history.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Sickle's legal dream team relied on an older case from

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>another country in order to save the congressman from being hanged.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, we will finish this season's thread with

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that case in England, where the modern insanity defense really began.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll also dive into whether the insanity defense really makes sense,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>especially in light of what we know about mental illness

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the human brain. Today. We'll learn how the defense

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sits uncomfortably at the intersection of law and human psychology,

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>how it challenges lawyers, judges, and juries in their pursuit

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 1>of justice, and how it speaks to things that all

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of us hold dear, such as moral responsibility, free will,

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>even our own sanity. Our story this season really begins

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in England in the nineteenth century. There are actually two

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>English cases that ushered in today's insanity defense. Both were

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>attempts to murder a British leader. The first was in

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>May of eighteen hundred, when a former soldier tried to

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>kill King George. The third, Andrea Alden, is the author

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of Disorder in the Court, Morality Myth and the Insanity Defense.

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>James Hadfield was a veteran of the Napoleonic Wars. He

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>received some sort of head injury that was documented. At

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the time. We didn't have the words traumatic brain injury,

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but that's basically what it was. Hadfield received eight blows

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to the head from a saber while fighting for his country.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>It was widely acknowledged that he came back from the

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>war not the same person that he went um. Clearly

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>what he had been through affected him and affected his

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>personality and his behavior. Hadfield was convinced that the Second

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Coming of Jesus Christ depend into upon his own death

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that he himself needed to be killed in order to

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fulfill a sacred prophecy. So his plan was to attempt

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to assassinate the king with the hopes that he would

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in the process be killed by people trying to defend

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the king, and then he could fulfill this prophecy somehow.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.559
<v Speaker 1>And so is King George the Third in his royal

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>entourage entered a theater in London on May hundred, Hadfield

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>fired a pistol at the monarch. The shots missed. The King.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Hadfield was apprehended and charged with high treason, but the

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>serious nature of Hadfield's crime meant he received a top

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>notch legal defender. He had what was really the first

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of star defense attorney in a notable insanity defense trial,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>who was Thomas Erskine Um, who really kind of set

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the bar for making arguments about the legal standards for

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>insanity that kind of changed the game going forward. Thomas

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>erskine was the son of an English lord and the the

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>most sought after criminal defense lawyer of his air. But

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time, the causes of mental illness, including the

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>delusions experienced by James Hadfield we're not well understood. So

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point we still are looking at conceptions of

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>mental illness as something either animal like or childlike, where

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the criminal either had the lack of ability to understand

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the nature of his or her actions UM, and that

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the judges would say either they had no

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>more understanding than a wild beast or than a child.

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>In other words, to be insane in nineteenth century England,

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>make you a raving mad or infantile. Hadfield's lawyer Thomas Erskine,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>set out to change that. He felt that the concept

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of having no more understanding than a child or a

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>wild beast was UM far too narrow of a construction

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of what mental illness as it pertains to criminal justice

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>UM looked like, so he argued that it needed to

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be expanded to encompass more and their experiences. At trial,

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Erskine argued that Hadfield was insane not because he acted

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like a child or a wild beast, but because he

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>was delusional at the time of the shooting he lost

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>touch with the world around him as a result of

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>his head injuries. To make his case, Erskine called twenty

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>witnesses to the stand in a trial that took just

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>six hours. These included doctors who claimed Hadfield's actions were

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the result of his brain injury. Hadfield was found to

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>be insane and not guilty of treason. Thanks to Erskine's

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>landmark defense, Hadfield was spared execution. Instead, he was ordered

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to spend the rest of his life in a psychiatric hospital.

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The Hadfield incident could have been a small footnote in history.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>The King wasn't harmed after all. Instead, it laid the

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>groundwork for an even bigger insanity case in England four

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>decades later, one that still governs how many insanity cases

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>play out today. Daniel McNaughton was a lowly Scottish woodcutter,

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>someone whose name would you usually be lost to the

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sands of history. Instead, his name is familiar to most

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>lawyers and law students today, and it's synonymous with the

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>insanity defense. And here's why. The story begins. When McNaughton

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.239
<v Speaker 1>decides to murder a British leader, even though the person

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>he shot wasn't his intended target. McNaughton um shot a

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>man named Edward Drummond in the middle of the street

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in London the middle of the day, just walked up

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>behind him and shot him. So it turned out that

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>McNaughton believed he was shooting the Prime Minister at the time,

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and Edward Drummond was actually his private secretary. McNaughton claimed

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Prime Minister and his political party were persecuting him.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>We would probably recognize Mr McNaughton as suffering from something

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>like paranoid schizophrenia if we were to get him in

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the care of a psychiatrist today, but unfortunately at the

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>time we didn't quite understand what that meant. Edward Drummond

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>died from his wounds and McNaughton was charged with murder.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>His trial began six weeks later in London before a

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>large crowd of spec taters, including the famous writer Charles Dickens.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>McNaughton's attorney followed Thomas Erskine's defense of James Hadfield from

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>four decades earlier. He argued his client was insane at

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the time of the shooting and therefore did not have

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the necessary criminal intent to be found guilty. He called

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a medical expert who examined McNaughton and testified quote the

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>defendants moral faculties were impaired by extraordinary delusion. The defense worked,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, the jury never even retired to deliberate.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>They just huddled together in the jury box and came

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>up with the decision that he could be found not

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>guilty by reason of insanity. The British public and press

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>were outraged. Essentially, the public felt that he had gotten

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>away with it, um, that he had feigned insanity um,

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and also that he was somehow um getting off scot free.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And somebody else was not too pleased with the jury's verdict.

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Queen Victoria at the time had been had recently been

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the victim of an assassination attempt by somebody who also

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pled insanity, so she was creating pissed about the whole thing.

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>A few years earlier, a deranged eighteen year old man

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>had taken a shot at the pregnant Queen just outside

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Buckingham Palace. He, like McNaughton, had been found not guilty

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>on grounds of insanity. After the McNaughton verdict, the Queen

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>reportedly asked, how could you have been found not guilty?

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>He did it, didn't he? She demanded, actually that the

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>House of Lords come together and put together some more

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>firm standards regarding mentally ill criminal defendants, which had not

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>previously existed. What the House of Lords came back with

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is what is still known to this day by lawyers

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>as the McNaughton rules, well ultimately emerged from McNaughton is

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>still really the foundation of every insanity defense UM standard

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you will see today. At the time of the crime,

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the accused has to be suffering from a mental disease

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>or defect that prevents him from knowing the difference between

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>right and wrong. The McNaughton rules put a major legal

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>stake into the ground in eighteen forty three when it

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>came to whether defendant could be considered too insane to

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>be convicted of a crime. So, over the years from

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the time that the mcdatin rules were established, UM, with

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>every new iteration of the defense, it seemed to broaden

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>slightly UM And as we learned more about mental illness,

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we started to try to expand the legal definitions to

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be more compatible with that. You can see the trickle

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>down effect of that McNaughton case in later insanity defenses

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that allowed for broader interpretations of the law. Take for example,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the story of Dan Sickles from episode five. The New

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>York Congressman murdered a U. S attorney near the White

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>House in eighteen fifty nine, but the aggrieved husband was

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>found not guilty because of the temporary insanity, the first

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>successful invocation of that defense in American history. And then

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in episode four, we told the story of Pittsburgh millionaire

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Harry Thaw, who killed the famous architects Stanford White because

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>White sexually assaulted Thaw's wife. Harry Thaw, like Dan Sickles,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was acquitted because a jury decided he was temporarily insane

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time of the kill. Then decades later, in nine,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a delusional twenty five year old loaner named John Hinckley Jr.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Fired six shots at the President of the United States.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Hinckley's acquittal, as we saw an episode three, resulted in

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a backlash against the insanity defense, and the laws in

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>several states retreated back to a narrower standard for insanity.

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Back to McNaughton Andrea Alden, but ultimately, after Hinkley, it

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>felt like we kind of sling shotted back. Um. So

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what we came back to was the only one

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we're really comfortable with was, you know, did they know

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>right from wrong at the time that they committed the act?

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>So here we are on seventy six years after the

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>case of Daniel McNaughton, and its outcome continues to influence

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>how many insanity cases play out today. Up next modern

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.359
<v Speaker 1>brain science and how it could shape future insanity defenses.

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>When it's time to make a hire for your small business,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>naturally you want to find the best person for the job.

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Odds are that person as on linked In. Here At ausy,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>where we weave each season of the thread, we depend

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on linked in jobs to help us find the right

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>person for our hiring needs to put top talent at

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>our finger tips. People come to linked in every day

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to learn and advance their careers, so linked In understands

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what they're interested in and what they're looking for, which

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>means when you use LinkedIn jobs to hire someone, your

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>matches are based on so much more than a resume.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>LinkedIn Jobs makes it easy to get matched with quality

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>candidates who make the most sense for your position. Your

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>linked in jobs matches are based not just on skills

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and background, but also on interests, activities, and passions. Matching

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>lets you quickly get a group of the most relevant

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.239
<v Speaker 1>qualified candidates. That way, you can focus on the candidates

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>you want to spend time talking to and make a

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>quality higher you're excited about. Post a job at LinkedIn

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash thread and get fifty dollars off your

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>first job post that's LinkedIn dot com slash thread. Terms

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and conditions apply. Could listening make you a better parent,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>a better leader, even a better person? Could listening inspire

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>you to start something new? There's never been a better

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>time to start listening on Audible. Audible has the largest

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>selection of audio books on the planet. With Audible, you

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>get access to an unbeatable selection of audio books, including

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>best sellers, mysteries, thrillers, and more. For listeners of the

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Thread who love history, I recommend you go to Audible

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and pick up Bearing the Cross, David Garrow's Pulitzer Prize

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>winning biography of the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. In

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Season three of The Thread, about the history of non

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>violent protest, we drew a lot from Garrow and his

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>work on Dr. King. Audible members can choose three titles

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>every month, one audio book and two Audible originals. You

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>can't hear anywhere else listen on any device, any time, anywhere.

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Audible also offers free and easy audio book exchanges. Credits,

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you can roll over for a year, and the library

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>can keep forever even if you cancel. Audible. The most

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>inspiring minds, the most compelling stories, the best place to

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>listen get started with a thirty day trial when you

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>go to audible dot com slash thread or text thread

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred five hundred. That's audible dot com slash

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>thread or text thread to five hundred five hundred and

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>listen for a change. Insanity claims are rare these days.

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>They are used in less than one percent of all

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>criminal cases, according to one study, and likely for good reason.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Richard Bonnie is a professor of law into Medicine at

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the University of Virginia. The insanity defense is always an

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>uphill battle for the defense because all of us are

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>naturally skeptical about insanity claims. It can be hard for

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a jury to put aside the horrific nature of a

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>criminal act in order to determine whether the accused was insane.

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>At the time, many consider the insanity defense away for

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>criminals to escape justice. Attitudes about the defense began to

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>change in the nineteen eighties after John Hinckley was acquitted

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of shooting President Reagan almost nine out of ten Americans

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>polled felt the insanity defense was a loophole for guilty

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>persons trying to escape punishment. Four states also abolished the

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>insanity defense, and the law in one of those states, Kansas,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>will be considered by the U. S. Supreme Court in

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>October after a challenge from a convicted murderer named Craig Kaylor.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Back in two thousand nine, a Kansas judge slapped the

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>death sentence on Craig Kaylor for the murders of four

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of his family members. Kaylor claimed he'd sunk into deep

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>depression after his marriage collapsed, a condition that led to

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>him losing touch with reality. Now, the convicted murderer who

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>did not have the option to use an insanity defense

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>gets to make his case to the nation's highest court.

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But even where insanity cases can be presented, it's not

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>easy to win them. Richard Bonnie Again, most insanity claims,

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>when they are litigated fail. We put tremendous weight on

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the skill with which the defense is presented, and it's

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>still hard to show the accused and not know the

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>difference between right and wrong, even for those with clear

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>mental illnesses like James Holmes. But just knowing right from

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong is not sufficient, says Bonnie. It doesn't capture what's

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>really governing a defendants behavior. The dominant influence on what

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they are doing is the psychotic process. And that's why

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we would say the person is not terrible, you know,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>by their knowledge of the law, because now they're being

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, driven, not by their recognition of the law

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>at all. Bonnie argues, there's a better question to ask

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to get at legal insanity, the question being does the

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>person really appreciate um, uh, you know, in an emotional sense, uh,

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the moral enormity or the moral significance of what they

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>are doing, or has their delusional belief deprived them, you know,

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of the capacity to do that, And that's the key question.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>The basis of criminal law is the premise that individual

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>humans have some measure of free will. We are rational,

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>self aware actors. We can control our choices in our

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>actions and be held responsible for them when they violate

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>social norms. On the other hand, the study of psychiatry

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and serious psychiatric disorders often focus on treating the ailments

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that prevent people from exercising choice or from controlling their actions.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>So if we're talking about retribution and deterrence on one hand,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and treatment and basically nurturing on the other. They don't

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>really work together very well Andrea Olden again, And so

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the language and the concepts used by a psychiatrist don't

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>map neatly onto the goals of the criminal justice system.

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's very hard for those two systems to communicate

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>within one another. And what it has amounted to over

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the years as kind of a territory power struggle between

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the two when it comes to insanity defense cases. In

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a world governed by laws and rational choices, what happens

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of some of us, maybe even all of us, can't

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>actually control all of our actions. What happens if our

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>own brain goes rogue on us. The way that James

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Holmes has did. The insanity defense is an attempt to

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>take into account this possibility. But as our scientific understanding

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of the brain grows, so do the challenges of accommodating

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the complexity of human psychology within the law. One of

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the reasons James Holmes wanted to be a neuroscientist was

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to better understand his own mental illness. The jury at

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>his trial got a close up look at Holmes's broken mind.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the experts at his trial performed an m

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>r I scan of Holmes's brain and compared it to

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a sample of others. She told the jury about her findings,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and there were several significant differences that were noted in

0:19:55.000 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>his brain compared to the normative sample of people los

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>leiosany disease. The jury was shown an m r I

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>image of the top right front portion of Holmes's brain,

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the part that's important to emotions, motivation, and controlling inappropriate behavior.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This part of Holmes's brain was smaller than of the population.

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.959
<v Speaker 1>In other words, Holmes had well below average brain volume

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in those areas that are important to emotions and decision making.

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>James Holmes was not the first mash shooter to realize

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>there was something physiologically wrong inside his brain. From the

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>observation room twenty six floors up, a killer terrified students

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>and others on the campus of Texas University. He was

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Charles Whitman, twenty four, an ex marine a dead shop.

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen sixty six, Charles Whitman climbed to the top

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of a tower in Austin, Texas, and open fire below.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>On ninety minutes. Nothing could be done against him. A

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>tumor on the brain drove him across the border line

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of Saturday to spread and down. Whitman killed fourteen and

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>wounded nearly forty more. Andrea Alden in his suicide note,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he said, please do a postmortem and examine my brain

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and find out what is wrong with me, because I'm

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>not myself anymore. And it turned out he had a

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>rather large lesion on the area of his brain that

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>would have controlled these terrible actions. Whitman's story was an

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>extreme case, but it highlights well the biological foundations of

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>violent antisocial behavior. Mental illness can manifest in myriad ways

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>when our brains fail to coordinate some of the billions

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>of cells they control. It is a daunting thing for

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>doctors and scientists to try to understand, and it can

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be even harder to communicate that challenge in a court

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of law. The law is kind of designed as a

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>one size fits all, just focus on the individual and

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>what they did, and that's it um And what psychology

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and neuroscience are trying to do is saying, like, no,

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a much more complex system. There's a lot

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>more you need to understand before you can make judgments

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>about people's behavior. Or their thoughts or their actions. And

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more we need to understand about our

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>mental health too. Up next, we're starting to learn more

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>about what makes psychopaths and others with severe psychiatric disorders tick,

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and how the rest of us are not as different

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>from them as we would like to believe. Hello Fresh

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is a meal kit delivery service that shops, plans, and

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>delivers step by step recipes and pre measured ingredients so

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you can just cook, eat, and enjoy. Hello Fresh makes

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>cooking enjoyable and easy. How does it work? Fresh pre

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>measured ingredients and easy to follow six step recipe cards

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>with pictures are delivered to your door each week in

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a special insulated box. Hello Fresh meals can be made

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in thirty minutes max. They call for less than two

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>pots and pans and require minimal clean up. This means

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you spend less time meal planning and grocery shopping and

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>can use that time to do more of what you love.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>My favorite Hello Fresh meal that I've tried so far

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>are the maple and rosemary glazed pork cutlets. Frankly, it's

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>not something that I would ever attempt on my own,

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>but with Hello Fresh is easy to use recipe card

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and my bag of fresh ingredients. I was able to

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>make some amazing pork cutlets together with couscous and a

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>creamy apple salad in just twenty minutes. For eighty dollars

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>off your first month of Hello Fresh. Go to Hello

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Fresh dot com backslash thread eight and enter the promo

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>code thread e D. That's Hello Fresh dot com backslash

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>thread e D in promo code thread a D. The

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>case of Jeffrey Dahmer shocked the nation in Dahmer was

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>accused of the murder and cannibalism of seventeen men and boys.

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>One long time acquaintance describes Dahmer as one weird dude.

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>A neighbor offered a similar description. In my opinion, he

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>appeared to me to be a geeky that I mean,

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a guy that stays to itself and just do weird things,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>unlike anyone else. Like suspicious. Damer played insanity at trial

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>if he claimed mental diseases behind his grizzly actions. The

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>jury in Milwaukee, Wisconsin disagreed. They found Dahmer legally, saying

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the question of legal insanity often comes up in cases

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of serial killers and psychopaths like Dahmer. James Fallon is

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a professor of psychiatry and human behavior at the University

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of California, Irvine. Now. A psychopath, or what's called a

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>primary psychopath, is somebody I described who has no sense

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of moral reasoning. They really don't consider what they're doing wrong,

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>even though they know you think it's wrong. Fallon is

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>an expert on the brains and murderous psychopaths. He's found

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that the brains of these killers share similar traits, including

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a pattern of low brain function in parts of the

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>frontal and temporal lobes of the brain, the areas associated

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>with self control and empathy. Many of them really don't

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have the capability to understand what they're doing is wrong,

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>or they have They have these urges and impulses that

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are just like somebody, Um, you know, I have the

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>self control right now not to pee in my pants,

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>but come back in six hours, I'm gonna lose that control.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna be able to do it. It's like that.

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Fallon argues that are legal and religious notions of good

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and evil are outdated when it comes to understanding such

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>urges and the brains of psychopaths and others with psychiatric disorders.

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're a neuroscientist or in psychiatry, it's hard to

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>find somebody who's truly evil. People with the psychiatric disorders

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>can't be evil, right because they either don't know what's

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong or they can't even control it. So in that case,

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it makes the insanity defense pretty you know, odd, because

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you end up with very few people were culpable or

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>capable of the of of their crimes. And the difference

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>between those with severe psychiatric disorders and the rest of

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>us is often more a matter of degree than kinds.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 1>As fallon, and he should know he's not only an

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>accomplished neuroscientist, he's also a self admitted borderline psychle a path.

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>One time, Falin included scans of his own brain and

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>those of family members into a study he was conducting.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>They were supposed to be the control group, the normal brains.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Then he made an alarming discovery. Then I got to

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the last scan and I said, okay, guys, to the

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>technician's very funny, you've slipped in one of these psychopathic

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>murderers into my family's scans. Ha ha. You know, we

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>play tricks on each other in the lab. So this

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was nothing new. They no, no, no, no, no, no no,

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this is really somebody in your family. I said, whoever

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this is shouldn't be walking around an open society. It's

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a very dangerous person because it's got a

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of brain damage and a lot of that's very

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent with a full psychopath. And so I have to

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>like peel off the name, uh, you know, responsibly. I

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>had to do that, and it peeled it back and

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>there was my name. Valin had the brain of a psychopath,

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but he did not become like the serial killers. He studies.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>There's more to our destinies than just our brain anatomy.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>He argues, often something in our environment triggers our biological predisposition.

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>The vast majority of psychopathic criminals, for example, were abused

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>as young children. Falon was not. Still, what happens in

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>your physical brain matters, and it's often not within your control,

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and whether you know the difference between right and wrong

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>might be irrelevant to the actions you take. Andrea Alden again,

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately, what it comes down to is we are

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>now reaching the point where we understand that, um, there

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is no distinction between mind and body like you are

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>your brain. Your brain is everything you know. If there

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>are injuries to specific areas of your brain, it's going

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to change the way you behave possibly make you do

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>things you never thought you would do, like commit crimes.

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>And the complex nature of the human brain remains a

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>big challenge for the law and the courts to address,

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and the current system has trouble both identifying defendants who

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>are legally insane and figuring out what to do with

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>those who are convicted. There's a common belief that most

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity are quickly released.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Like lorraina Bob it was, She's spent only a matter

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of weeks in a mental hospital after being acquitted of

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>cutting off her husband's penis. In reality, most defendants who

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>are found not guilty by reason of insanity spend more

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>time and institutions than people who are found guilty of

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the same charges. This is Dr William Read again, the

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>court appointed psychiatric expert in the James Holmes case. People

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>found not guilty by reason of insanity, they routinely spend

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>more time off the streets than people who are found

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>guilty of similar crimes, and particularly than people who have

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>bargained their played down to a lesser crime. So it's

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>very much not someone quote getting off unquote with an

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>insanity defense. The way that the system treats those who

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>plead insanity stems from a broader misunderstanding of mental illness,

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>says Andrea Alden. I think that insanity defense is so

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>controversial because people don't understand it. People don't understand mental illness.

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>People are afraid of mental illness, and the stigma attached

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to mental illness can poison how those suffering from it

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>are treated under the law. William read again, people with

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>mental illness, even severe mental illness, have a perfect right

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to be found guilty and responsible, just as they have

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a right to uh marry and have kids and hold

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs and things, unless they show that they don't have

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the ability to be found responsible. In facts as read,

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>those with mental illnesses are less likely overall to be

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>violent than people without mental illness. I am much more worried,

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think the cops are much more worried about

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>career criminals, about drunks, about crackheads, about people who are

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>simply mean and antisocial as they go along robbing people

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and mugging people and hurting people for their own gain.

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>This is not a characteristic of the mentally ill, and

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's quite unfair to stigmatize them with that. The insanity

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>defense focuses almost exclusively on the mindset of defendants, and

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that's understandable they're the ones on trial. But the determination

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of guilt or innocence in any given case, that determination

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>has to go through a number of other brains as well.

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>The brains of the investigators and prosecutors building their case,

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the brains of the attorneys marshaling an argument in the courtroom,

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the brains of the psychiatric experts making their analyzes, the

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>brain of the judge hearing the case, and most importantly,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the brains of the jurors themselves. Each of these brains

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is human, fallible, prone to unconscious bias, prejudice, and mistakes.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Operating on incomplete information and imperfect science, it's hard to

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>climb inside the brain of the accused and to understand

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>what they were thinking at the time of a crime,

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>whether they knew the difference between right and wrong. But

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it can also be difficult for lawyers, experts, judges, jurors,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of us to know the difference between

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>right and wrong, ourselves to make wise decisions about guilt

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and punishment. Given the complexities of human psychology, Richard Bonnie,

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>these are tough calls to make. We've got tough calls

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to make about the clinical questions, and then ultimately you

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>have a tough call to make about how these legal

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>formulas apply. Still, however much we improve our knowledge of

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the brain or the sophistication of our laws, it will

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>not change the past. We're all with Aurora tonight. It

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>was this night, five years ago that mother's daughters, fathers, sons,

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and friends were making plans to see a movie. Just

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>after midnight on July, residents of Aurora, Colorado, gathered to

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>hold a late night vigil for loved ones who died

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>at the hands of James Holmes five years earlier. The

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>mourners huddled together holding red roses and candles. The names

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of those who lost their lives in the shooting were

0:31:52.800 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>read aloud, and white balloons released. Jonathan Blunk, Alex Sander, Bike,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Childress, Gordon Cowden. In the end, no explanation of

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the broken brain of James Holmes or why he opened

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>fire that dark night will bring back the dead. In

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>aurora or undo what was done, and the criminal law

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is not designed to bring closure or comfort. We can

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>only do our best to prevent future auroras and to

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>challenge ourselves to take the time to remember what went before.

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Windo, let's pause for a moment of silence. The

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Threat is produced by Robert Coulos, Sofia Perpetua and me

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Sean braswell Chris Hoff engineered our show. Next week, we

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>returned with a special bonus episode that tells the story

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of how this season of The Thread connects with our

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>first season about the murder of the rock star John Lennon.

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>To learn more about The Thread, visit Aussie dot com,

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>slash the Thread all one word, and make sure to

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to The Thread on Apple podcasts, follow us on

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio or listen wherever you get your podcasts.

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Check us out at Assie dot com or on Twitter

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook. If you love surprising, engaging stories from history,

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>look no further than the flashback section of Ausi dot com.

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>That's o z Y dot com. As always, thanks for listening.