WEBVTT - The 2023 Ig Nobel Prizes, Part 1

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick. And today we're going to

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 3>be kicking off a yearly tradition, our coverage of some

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 3>of the winners of this year's Ignobel Prizes.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>That's right, We've been doing the Ignobel Prizes on the

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 2>show for many, many years now. We almost never cover

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>them right away. The awards usually drop and I think

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>this has been the case for like at least a

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>decade now. They tend to come out during September or

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>rarely earlier on I think they would come out in October.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>But any event, we're often already wrapped up in Halloween

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>stuff by that point, and we end up coming back

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to the Ignobel Prizes early November. It's kind of like

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a post Halloween detox to get away from a lot

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>of the spooky stuff and into some other topic areas.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 2>But this year is a little different. I mean, last

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>year was a little different because Joe, you're on parental leave,

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>so our former producer Seth had to pop in and

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>sort through these with me. So this year, we're back,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 2>and we welcome me back. But also this year we're

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 2>actually ahead of schedule and hitting the egg Nobels before October.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Feels good to be prompt.

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're not familiar with the ig Nobels, these are

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 2>a series of awards given out once a year by

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 2>the scientific humor journal the Annals of Improbable Research, edited

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 2>for many years now by Mark Abrahams. This this, of course,

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>is a play on the the the on the Nobel Prize.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You know the Nobel Prize in various areas physics, chemistry,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, And there's a similar organizational structure in place

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>for the ig Nobel Prizes. Their stated purpose is, quote,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>do honor achievements that first make people laugh and then

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>make them think. If you want to learn more about them,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>go to Improbable dot com. You can find out more

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 2>about the magazine. You can see they have a wonderful

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 2>list of all the winners going back to the very

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 2>beginning of the whole project.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, now, usually the prizes are given out in honor

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 3>of studies that are published in regular scientific journals but

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 3>just might have to do with some intentionally or unintentionally

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 3>funny subject matter. But occasionally it also focuses on papers

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>that are themselves like intended to be funny or satirical.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>One example that comes to mind is a study, a

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 3>quote study from several years back that was about the

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 3>raiology of cats. Raology being the study of how materials flow,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 3>and so the idea is like, you know, our cat's

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>a liquid or a solid, So you know, that is

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>a joke, but also there was some interesting stuff to

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 3>ponder in that paper, and the the pattern continues. Most

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 3>of this year's winners are regular scientific studies published in

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 3>academic journals, but the for example, my selection for today

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 3>is more of a historical interest paper that leans on

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 3>a subject that was I think intended to be selected

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 3>because it was funny.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And I think the important thing to keep

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>in mind is that, yeah, at the heart of all

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>of these there is some genuine science or a quest

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>for knowledge, some some seriousness. It's not all just complete tomfoolery.

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's ultimately what they're celebrating here. That's

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons we keep covering it is that

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>with each entry, you know, we often ask the question, well,

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>what makes this funny? Any kind of point to the obvious,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, it maybe say a study that has to

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>do with, say, you know, flatulence or something, and it's

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 2>pretty obvious why that's funny. But then there is also

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the follow up question why is it important? And in

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>all cases there's something there, there's some way to answer that,

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>like it's the study involved. You know, it may seem like,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's the pure shrimp on a treadmill territory,

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>where like this is how does this possibly benefit anything?

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 2>But it is benefiting our scientific understanding of ourselves or

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the world to some extent. And I always say, the

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>other cool thing about it is that, yeah, I mean,

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>it inevitably draws attention to some of these smaller studies

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 2>and the work of professional researchers and scientists. So it's

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 2>all good.

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 3>Now, Rob, If you're ready to get into the actual

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>winners we're going to talk about today, I think maybe

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>a good place to start would be on the maybe

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the halloweenist of all the Ignobel Prize winners I can recall.

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>That's right, we're talking about the Mechanical Engineering Prize that

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>goes to a paper that deals with necrobotics, which, if

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 2>you're not already familiar with the term, yes, it does

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>sound like it could be made up by some sort

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of a nineteen eighties science fiction film or earlier that

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 2>we were watching on weird house cinema, But no, this

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 2>is an actual term. Will explain what it means here.

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Shortly, it sounds like like a Stuart Gordon movie.

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So the paper in question is Necrobotics Biotic Materials

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>as Ready to Use Actuators by yap at All, published

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.119
<v Speaker 2>in Advanced Science volume nine, number twenty nine from twenty

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. So the entire premise of this study is

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 2>at once completely sensible and also morbidly sensational, and I

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>think that's one of the reasons it really zings. So

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the author's touch on biomemicry, which as you probably know,

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>refers to the idea of turning to nature to help

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>solve engineering problems, because why spend a few years trying

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 2>to solve a problem that nature already solved over the

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 2>course of evolutionary time.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, of course, some solutions that are engineered by evolution

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 3>are easier to reproduce or reverse engineer and reproduce in

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>inanimate technology than others are. For example, we still can't

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 3>really like recreate what's happening in a human brain. That

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 3>is a very complex bioengineering problem that we have not

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 3>fully reverse engineered yet. But there are lots of other

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of simpler biological mechanisms that we have been able

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 3>to look at and say, ah, okay, yeah, here's how

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 3>that works, and we could actually we could make technology

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 3>that does the same thing.

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 2>But the authors here point out, yeah, you know, this

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>is all well and good, but why don't you You

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>don't have to just stop at merely copying the design.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>We can actually reuse parts and materials, and this is

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 2>where we get specifically into the idea of a biohybrid robot,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>something that quote goes a step further by incorporating living

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 2>materials directly into engineered systems, so a kind of cybernetic approach. Really. Now,

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 2>it's my understanding that biohybrids in general covers a lot

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>of things that are maybe less necro in flavor, such

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>as biohybrid materials that contain both a biopolymer and a

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 2>synthetic polymer. But that's just one route. As for biohybrid robots,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 2>you can, yeah, you can think of him in general

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 2>as somewhere on the same slider with the concept of

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 2>a cyborg, except more of a robot that's made with

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>some organic materials or parts.

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Tired donating your body to scientific research, wired donating your

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 3>body to a robot's body.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in a way, I think one of our classic

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>cinematic examples of a cyborg can be very can throw

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 2>off our understanding of what these things can consist of,

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>because you think of the Terminator, right, he's essentially a robot.

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 2>He's just a robot, but he has this living tissue

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 2>on top of all of that as a disguise. But

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>he can completely lose that and he's still very functional.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>As we've discussed on the show before, the topic of

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>cybernetics is a little more complicated than that and involves

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot more. But in this particular case, this idea

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of the biohybrid robot, it's you know, imagine that it's

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 2>not so much the robot is covered in the skin,

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 2>but the robot then actually uses human skin in various places,

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 2>is to help move better, to perform its functionality better,

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 3>So they say in the movie Terminator that the living

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>tissue on the outside of the T eight hundred is

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 3>grown for the cyborgs in labs they have. But imagine

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 3>instead that maybe, say, when the Terminator gets injured, it

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>can like harvest the flesh of its enemies in order

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 3>to graft onto its own skin and become part of

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>its living encasement.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 2>There you go, it's the Terminator remake right there. You

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 2>can thank Joe McCormick for that.

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>But repurposing the dead flesh of living organisms for itself.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I like it. I think it could work. But a

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>couple of real world examples of this, at least in

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, ideas that have been explored in

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>various studies and projects. There is a twenty eighteen University

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 2>of Tokyo project that created a robotic finger using rat

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>muscle cells. There was also a twenty twelve Harvard Caltech

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 2>project that produced a silicone jellyfish, so kind of like

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 2>a jellyfish robot using rat heart muscle cells. And then

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 2>they later worked in a kind of like swimming ray

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>using some of the same technology.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, less people start getting weirded out at the idea

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 3>of using animal body parts as technology, it might be

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>worth pointing out that I think really the only novel

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 3>part here is that it is using independently moving body parts.

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I mean they stress here in a way

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that I found kind of comedic. I laughed a little

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 2>bit at this, but also it's a totally valid point.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>They point out that, like, look, humans have long used

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 2>bioderved materials in their tool use. I mean that's the

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>basic two thousand and one A Space Odyssey model, right,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, you pick up the bone and you use it.

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about this numerous times in the show in

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 2>the past, using bits and pieces of animals, using all

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>of the buffalo in some cases, to create various bits

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 2>of human ingenuity, various tools, materials, clothing, etc.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Animal hides, Yeah, are a huge part of human technology.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So there's nothing particularly weird about this. I guess

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 2>it just kind of runs counter to what some people

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 2>might think about as the trajectory of human materials and

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 2>human inventions, that as they get more futuristic, they move

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 2>further and further away from this idea of something that

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 2>we've made from the natural world and it becomes just

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 2>completely synthetic, you know, matching up with these various sci

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>fi visions. Where As on that SpongeBob app episode, everything

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 2>is chrome, you know, everything is metallic, et cetera. This

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 2>seems to run counter to that, and in some ways

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 2>because they're asking you to imagine a robot that reaches

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>out to you, not with a metal hand or even

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 2>a metal hand that is covered with like some sort

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 2>of plastic substance that is like a that is kind

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of like human skin. No, it is reaching out to

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>touch you with a hand that is a dead tarantula.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 3>It's funny that you mentioned the plastic hand though, because

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 3>if it were a metal hand, you could say, Okay,

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 3>that's never been alive. That was always just you know,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 3>mineral content in the ground that was mined. But if

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 3>it's a plastic hand that's derived from petroleum products, which

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 3>are derived from at some point life.

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>That's true and that it's interesting how we have kind

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>of a mental disconnect on that a lot of the time.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe part of it is, you know, being in denial

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 2>of our fossil fuel dependency to some extent, But the

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 2>other part is like, yeah, I mean, plastic is that

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>was made by magic, that was made by human wit

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and ingenuity. It has no connection to the natural world.

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, That plastic is the refined and reprocessed remains

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 3>of organisms. That lived millions of years ago.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 2>But the idea of the tarantula hand here is actually

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 2>key to the study. I'm exaggerating a little bit by

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 2>making it to a tarantula and making it a robot

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 2>reaching for you. But the whole paper here is about

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>the idea of repurposing a dead spider as a quote

0:11:55.800 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 2>unquote ready to use actuator. And they highlight that there's

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 2>actually fewer steps involved, like this is a shortcut. This

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 2>is not like that. This is not something where you'd

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 2>be doing it and you'd be overworking for just some

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of grotesque mechanism. No, they're saying, like you actually

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>would have to do less to take advantage of this

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>fewer steps in the production. I love this, They write,

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>quote The unique walking mechanism of spiders relying on hydraulic

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>pressure rather than antagonistic muscle pairs to extend their legs

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 2>results in a necrobotic gripper that naturally resides in its

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 2>closed state and can be opened by applying pressure. The

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 2>necrobodic gripper is capable of grasping objects with irregular geometries

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>and up to one hundred and thirty percent of its

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>own mass Furthermore, the gripper can serve as a handheld

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>device and innately camouflages in outdoor environments. Okay, the last sense,

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why that part is important. Do we

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>need a stealth hand that grab things one hundred and

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent of its own mass? I don't know, but

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 2>it does give us more horror movie ideas, I suppose.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that one seems a little bit. I don't know,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 3>but I never thought about this before. But yeah, So

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 3>they're talking about how the idea that like, when a

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 3>spider closes its legs, it's operating on a different mechanism

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 3>than how say, mammals would move their limbs. Mammals, as

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 3>it says, move their limbs with antagonistic muscle pairs, so

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, muscles contracting or relaxing in order to bend

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 3>the skeleton of the joints, whereas with spiders it has

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 3>to do with an internal hydraulic pressure state to cause

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the legs to extend. And so when the pressure is

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 3>relaxed that is when the legs close, which I guess

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 3>makes sense because when you see a dead spider, it

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 3>tends to have its legs curled up exactly.

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>They point that out. Yeah, when a spider dies, the

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 2>pressure is no longer opposing the flex or muscles, and

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>so you get that curled up appearance. This is exactly

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 2>how you find them if you start busting open dirt

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 2>dobber nests and you find them scrolled away in there

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>to feed the growing young. But they do point out

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 2>by the way, that we don't need to stop at spiders.

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>All manner of bioderived parts could be repurposed in an

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>engineered system. And again, there's nothing creepy about a spider

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>handed necrobot at all, so we shouldn't, you know, act

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>like it is. But I included images, and I imagine

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>these images can be I think the paper itself is

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 2>not behind a paywall or anything, so folks can pull

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 2>this up. You can find a link on the eight

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Nobel Prizes website, but they show exactly the steps that

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>are involved, and it involves first of all, euthanizing the

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>spider and then a fabrication, a step that requires just

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>one thing to be done, and that's quote, inserting a

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 2>needle into the prosoma region of a deceased spider and

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>fixing the needle to the spider's body. With glue to

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>form a hermatic seal.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>This is still not creepy, folks, Stop stop acting like yeah.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>So the legs grip inward and then pressure is applied

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>via the syringe that you just glued to the dead

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 2>spider to extend the legs and open the gripper and

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 2>then there you see the step. See the third step

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 2>in the illustration is just using the necrobotic gripper the

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>syringe powered effect here to open and close the spider

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>as if it were a claw.

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 3>This is truly one of my favorite Ignobel studies we

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 3>have done.

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, this one's amazing and it opens my

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>mind to this whole world that I had no idea

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>was really on the menu for the future, but there

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>it is. So why is it funny? I think it's

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 2>obvious that you know, the dead spider is now a

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 2>robot hand. A dead spider has been used well, first

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 2>of all, created, they did euthanize it, but then made

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>into this gripper device. That alone is just inherently morbidly funny.

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, if you wanted to have a cruelty free dead

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>spider robot hand, presumably you could bust up mud Wasp

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>nests and find all the dead spiders inside, you know,

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 3>get them out, and then stab needles in them and

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 3>glue those needles in place, and then use the hydraulic

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 3>pressure to make your little robot hands.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I like that idea. I certainly don't want to

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>encourage anyone to hurt and kill spiders without real need to. Here,

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder. I don't think they got into this

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in the article. Maybe they did and I missed it,

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 2>But I wonder if there might be a risk in

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 2>using an already dead spider in that the organic materials

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>might have decomposed to some degree and you wouldn't get

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the same grip.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Now then again, way, so I was joking anyway, But

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 3>now that I think about it, the spiders in the

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 3>in the wasp nest, are those technically going to be dead?

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Or are they paralyzed and still alive in order to

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 3>preserve them longer so they can be food for the young.

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember off the top of my head. I

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>know it varies with different parasitic wasps exactly how they

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 2>carry out the deed. Sometimes, you know, there's a laying

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of eggs on the hosts. Sometimes they are inserted within

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 2>it varies from species to species, and you know, depending

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>on what their their host organism happens to be. It

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 2>might also depend with the dirt dobber ness when you're

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 2>catching them. But you know, if you want a pristine

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>spider necro gripper, I think you do have to make

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the dead spider yourself. You have to make it dead yourself. Now,

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 2>why is it important this study? Well, you know again,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the idea of you know, of just necrobotics

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>in general, it's it's nothing to scoff at. You know,

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 2>we might consider a kind of post synthetic or beyond

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 2>that synthetic material science of the future. You know, well,

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 2>machines of the future will continue to have synthetic parts.

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 2>What if biotic and even repurpose tissues play on an

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 2>important role in at least key parts of the design,

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 2>particularly where you need some sort of like, you know,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>a mechanical interact to take place, and you could either,

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, you could fine tune some sort of artificial

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 2>system and gears and three D printed pieces, or you

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>could turn to pre existing structures and materials, be it

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the muscles of a rat's heart or the you know,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the fantastic limbs of a spider.

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Shake hands with spider.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I do love this idea of the tarantula hand spider. Yeah.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 2>It makes me think of the like tarantula up hand

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 2>puppets that you sometimes see. And it's one of these

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 2>things too that if we saw this in a movie

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 2>from the sixties, we would say this is ridiculous. This

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 2>is like robot Monster. They clearly just had a robot

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 2>costume and two of these spider hand puppets and they

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 2>just made it all up. But no, they actually had

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 2>had glimpsed the future had they made this movie.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>All Right, you ready for the next prize?

0:18:58.520 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? What do you have for us here?

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay? So the twenty twenty three Chemistry and Geology Prize

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 3>was awarded for a twenty seventeen article called Eating Fossils,

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 3>written for the newsletter of the Paleontological Association, a UK

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>based group that promotes the study of paleontology and publishes

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 3>multiple academic journals, and the author is Yan Zawichevich, a

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 3>geologist and stratigrapher who is an emeritus professor of paleobiology

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 3>at the University of Lester in the UK. And a

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 3>note so I said he's a geologist and a stratigrapher.

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Stratigraphy is the subdiscipline of geology that's focused on understanding

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 3>geological strata, meaning the layers of rock in Earth's crust,

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 3>how they form, how they're ordered and structured, and so forth.

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>It's also worth flagging, as I mentioned earlier, that usually

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the winners of the Ignobel Prizes are studies published in

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 3>scientific journals. This is not one of those. This is

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 3>instead a sort of historical interest feature about, as the

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 3>title says, eating fossils and congrats to Zowachevitch. Because I

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 3>loved this article, so I'm going to start just by

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 3>reading the opening passage. The rock lying by the roadside

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 3>did not look like much of interest at first, a

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 3>rather nondescript limestone with little more to show to casual

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 3>observation than a few vague blotches. Anyway, old habits die hard,

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 3>so I picked it up, licked the surface, and put

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 3>it and my hand lens to my eye. Now, okay,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 3>so half of that picture makes sense to a non expert.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 3>As a non geologist, I might expect a geologist to

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 3>pick up a rock and use a magnifying lens to

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 3>look at it. But licking the rock is that part

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 3>of the standard geology modus operandi.

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd never heard of this before.

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>It seems to some extent. Yes, yes, as Zawachevitch says,

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 3>licking the rock, of course, is part of the geologist

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and paleontologists armory of tried and much tested techniques used

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 3>to help survive in the field. Wetting the surface allows

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 3>fossil and mineral textures to stand out sharply, rather than

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 3>being lost in the blur of intersecting micro reflections and

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 3>micro refractions that come out of a dry surface. And

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 3>I thought about that for a second. I said, oh,

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 3>that is really interesting. I think many of us will

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 3>have noticed that a wet rock looks very different than

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 3>a dry rock. A wet rock has you can see

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 3>some of the textures and the grain more sharply. Some

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of the structure of the mineral is revealed. And of course,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 3>if you know, don't have like a I don't know,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 3>like a bucket of water with you, you of course

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 3>have some water in your mouth, you can lick the

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 3>rock or spit on it, put some sali on it,

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 3>and see that grain and structure with more clarity.

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I guess it allows you to put a

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 2>very control amount of moisture on the rock as well.

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Whereas you're pouring a little water from your canteen, you're

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna waste more of your water and so forth.

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 3>And Zawachevich says that it just so happened on this

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 3>day with this rock is big old slabbery tongue helped

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 3>reveal something amazing. The rock he found contained the most

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 3>remarkably preserved numbulites, which are fossil remnants of a variety

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 3>of four amniferin And I'll have more to say about

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 3>these organisms in a bit, but in this particular fossil,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 3>these ancient organisms, their shells were preserved with three dimensional structure, intact,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 3>all bound together in a chunk of calcite. So, having

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 3>established that the main purpose of licking the rock is

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 3>to be able to see it better, you still might

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 3>be wondering what does a collection of fossilized for aminifera taste,

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 3>like Zawachevich writes, quote, the taste now was likely merely

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 3>registered as generically slightly dusty and then instantly forgotten. I

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 3>had always thought it entirely superfluous to identification, but perhaps

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 3>not so as we contemporary types develop capabilities in one direction,

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 3>we might be entirely losing them in another. Go right

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 3>back to the beginnings of our science, and our ancestors

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and their senses were attuned to different settings. One could, then,

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 3>it seems, literally develop a taste for stratigraphy.

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 3>So Zawachevich goes on to talk about an important figure

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 3>in the history of his field, a man he calls

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 3>this ancestral stratigrapher, the Italian geologist Giovanni Arduino, who lived

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 3>seventeen fourteen to seventeen ninety five, who notably came up

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 3>with the idea of a geological division of Earth's history

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 3>into different periods that would correlate with strata in the crust.

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 3>These periods he called the primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary,

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 3>and these categories have been majorly revised and refined by

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 3>modern geologists, but the basic principle still sticks that you

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 3>can identify sedimentary rock layers and correlate them with different

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 3>historical periods in which they were laid down. So Sawichewitch

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 3>describes Arduino as quote a busy man who had to

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 3>be everywhere at once. This guy apparently worked as a

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 3>mining engineer and as a surveyor, but was also just

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 3>an all purpose freak for rocks and fossils. He ravenously

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 3>collected and studied them from all over the northeast of Italy,

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 3>from the Alps down to the Po River delta around Venice.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>And he called himself a mineralogist, meaning he was into

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>all different types. He was into fossils, sediments, springs and

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff, everything about the earth. Now, the interesting

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 3>thing is that despite his importance in the history of

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 3>this branch of geology, Arduino was in some sense an amateur,

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>and he did not publish his theories in books. Instead,

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 3>they appeared in letters that he sent to a friend

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of his who was a professor at the University of Padua,

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 3>who in turn published Ardueno's letters in a Venetian journal,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 3>which then filtered out to other scholars who took the

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 3>ideas and refined them further, and they ended up morphing

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 3>into the ideas we have today in stratigraphy. But here's

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 3>where we get back to the flavor of rocks and fossils.

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Zawachevich describes these letters that Arduino wrote to his friend

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the Professor, which were only translated into English and published

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 3>in full the year before this article, So I guess

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 3>that would have been twenty sixteen. And Zawachevich says that

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 3>these are fun reading, full of enthusiastic conversational style, and

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>also just full of gushing about crushing. And all of

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Arduino's crushes are rocks and minerals and mineral springs awesome.

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 3>So I want to read a passage here where Sawichevich

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 3>is setting up and quoting sections of these letters. So

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 3>this is Sawaichevitch writing it first. Quote Fossil shells in

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 3>a mud rock, for instance, and coal fragments, when burned,

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 3>leave an ash that quote. As soon as it is

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 3>placed on the tongue, it burns like fire and leaves

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 3>a flavor equally bitter and urinous. When spat out, it

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 3>leaves a certain sweetness and a skinned tongue. Springs that

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 3>emerge from a stratum full of marquesite and coal quote

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 3>have an acid, spicy flavor. Vitriolic, yes, but with a

0:26:55.840 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 3>certain pleasantness that I cannot describe, like the acidity of wine.

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 3>These waters quote made me far less nauseous than did

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 3>the waters from the same source that I have tasted

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 3>here in Vincenza and at the skio. The white and

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 3>micacious sediment from one stratum has no taste in the

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 3>raw state, he said, but one's burnt quote acquired a

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 3>flavor as well as a caustic quality from the calcining

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 3>of the spar This man loved rocks. He loved to

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 3>collect them. He wanted to understand them, and he wanted

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 3>to know which ones tasted like pea, and which ones

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 3>were spicy, and which ones tasted like a fine montepulciano.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 3>And Zawachevich says that Arduino also described in exquisite detail

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the appearance and smell of mineral specimens as they were burned, dissolved, boiled,

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 3>and so forth. And he says that Arduino was doing

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 3>something that partially kind of feels like alchemy and partially

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 3>just kind of feels like rapturous sensual pleasure at the

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 3>experience of rocks, but then in part is also very

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 3>detailed scientific analysis. You know, he's making an interesting point

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 3>that without the modern equipment that we use for chemical

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 3>analysis of minerals, information about taste and smell was actually

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.719
<v Speaker 3>very useful data to log which would maybe help us

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 3>better understand what these minerals were. In a way, the

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 3>tongue could be seen as like the chemistry lab of

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the body. I think you could argue that it exists

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 3>primarily to do fast chemical analysis on anything that is

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 3>about to enter the digestive tract. And this would be

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 3>both for screening purposes, so to reject chemicals that could

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 3>hurt us, but also for conditioning purposes to cause immediate

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 3>pleasure when we're eating something nutritionally desirable, to sort of

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 3>condition our brains to repeat the behavior that got that

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 3>substance into the mouth.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 2>This is Yeah, this is all a great point because

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very easy for human beings to think

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of like, you know, we're very visual. It's easy to

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of cut out all the other senses and only

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>focus on the visual and then the intellectual and of course,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, intellectual information that's been recorded and so forth,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>and forget that. Yeah, we do have sensory awareness in

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 2>these other realms as well, and those senses can be

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 2>used to understand and catalog the world. It reminds me

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 2>a bit of I think we talked about this in

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 2>the past when we were talking about mushroom foraging that

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 2>experienced foragers, and I want to underline that experienced foragers

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>will sometimes taste but not consume taste and then spit

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 2>out portions of fung guy that they're in the process

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 2>of identifying, and they'll utilize that additional sense data into

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 2>their identification process. Again, experts not eating the mushrooms. Don't

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 2>attempt this if you if you were not an expert,

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 2>don't eat any mushrooms because you listen to this podcast,

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. All the standard disclaimers, but examples of you

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>know this sort of you know older way of using

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>all the senses to try and understand bits of the

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 2>natural world.

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's a great point and a great

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 3>point of comparison. Likewise, I would say the same thing

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>for minerals. Don't just go tasting rocks and sediment and minerals.

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, you don't know what you're putting in your mouth,

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 3>and it could very well be dangerous. But given those

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 3>caveats about safety, especially if you don't have to do

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 3>this to the eighteenth century mineralogist trying to understand the

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 3>mineral world with a comparatively limited toolkit, tasting sediment and

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 3>rocks and fossils and spring water makes a lot of sense.

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Those flavors are potentially useful information. Yeah, all right, So

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 3>that's the first subsection of Zavachevic's essay here about eating fossils,

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 3>but there are more. He next goes on to talk

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 3>about the story of the nineteen fifty one Explorers Club

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 3>dinner at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York, which famously,

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 3>or maybe better to say, infamously, served attendees a meat

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 3>dish that the host of the event originally claimed was

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 3>the meat of Megatherium, an extinct genus of giant groundsloth.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 3>The later reports in the media, I think specifically in

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 3>the Christian Science Monitor, claimed that the meat had actually

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 3>been from a wooly mammoth. In both cases these animals,

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 3>the animals in question were long extinct. So the story

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 3>went that the meat served at this dinner had been excavated,

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 3>frozen from a site at the Aleutian Islands, and held

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 3>in stock by a man named Father Bernard Hubbard, popularly

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 3>known in the media as the Glacier Priest. This sounds

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 3>more and more like a D and D scenario to us.

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the glaciers now request that you consume the precious

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>fossil meat. Go ahead and give us a constitution check

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:07.959
<v Speaker 2>on all that.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, better have only the fighter eat at first.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, even the wooly mammoth meat. Though this is

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 2>of course, you know, we do know that that organic

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>material from wooly mammoths have been preserved in like, you know,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 2>snow and frozen environments. Is this real? Did they really

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 2>eat frozen wooly mammoth?

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Well that's what the report said originally, But in twenty

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 3>fourteen this story was finally proven to be a hoax

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 3>because apparently one member of the Explorers Club who had

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 3>been unable to attend the dinner in nineteen fifty one,

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 3>somehow got his portion of the dish to go. I

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 3>guess they gave to go contain. I don't know how

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 3>he got it, but he never ate it, and somehow

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 3>his portion of this meat dish ended up at the

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, preserved somehow. I don't

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 3>know if they packed it in formaldehyde or whatever, but

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 3>they somehow preserved it and had it there at the museum.

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't just in the fridge the whole time.

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I hope not yeah, Gary's leftovers. Yeah. In twenty fourteen,

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 3>testing of the sample revealed, despite the fact that the

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 3>meat had been cooked more than sixty years before, that

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 3>it was not mammoth and it was not sloth. But

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 3>it was actually do you want to take a guess?

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I mean you're attempted to guess something close to

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 2>a wooly mammoth like an elephant.

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, it was actually turtle meat. So I went and

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 3>looked up at zawachevitch doesn't include it. But I had

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 3>to know more, so I went and looked up the

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 3>paper in question here. This was a paper published in

0:33:54.920 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Plus one in twenty sixteen by Jessica R. Glass, Matt Davis,

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Timothy Walsh, Eric Sargius, and Adelgisa Checone. Title of the

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 3>paper was Frozen mammoth or Giant ground sloth served for

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 3>dinner at the Explorers Club. This was the year twenty sixteen.

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Just to note that it is apparently more difficult to

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 3>do DNA testing on older remains, and also more difficult

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 3>to do DNA testing on meat that has been cooked,

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 3>but they did succeed at testing it. This is from

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 3>their abstract quote. We sequenced a fragment of the mitochondrial

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 3>cytochrome B gene and studied archival material to verify its identity, which,

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 3>if genuine, would extend the range of megatherium over six

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent because if it actually came from the Aleutian

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Islands or from the Glacier, priest no idea that giant

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 3>ground sloths were living there at any point. But anyway,

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 3>they say, if it actually was genuine, it would extend

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 3>the range of megatherium over six hundred percent quote and

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 3>alter our views on groundsloth evolution. Our results indicate that

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 3>the meat was not mammoth or megatherium, but green sea

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 3>turtle Chelonia midas. The prehistoric dinner was likely an elaborate

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 3>publicity stunt, now specifically the green sea turtle. This is sad.

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I should add that this animal is considered endangered today.

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what its status was in nineteen fifty one.

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 3>But I'm so confused because if you're doing a hoax,

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 3>why would you try to pass off sea turtle as

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 3>extinct giant groundsloth meat? Why not just to use like

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 3>beef for goat or something.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 2>M I guess I guess you could argue that you

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.280
<v Speaker 2>would want to serve something that is edible, of course,

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 2>but also case different like that people are going to

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 2>try it and they're not going to say, oh, this

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.479
<v Speaker 2>tastes just like beef, or this tastes just like chicken.

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be like, what, this is a little different.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 2>This is strange. And it makes sense that it's strange

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 2>because I'm eating a creature that has been extinct for

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 2>so long. That being said, it seems like, are there

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 2>not multiple culinary methods you could use to sort of

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 2>weirden up your meat and make it taste strange, like

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 2>different marinades and so forth.

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Probably, I mean they could be people could be like, huh,

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 3>this tastes a lot like goat, but that wouldn't prove

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.439
<v Speaker 3>that it was goat. You could still continue your home.

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's just that, yeah, mammoth meat tastes like goat.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 2>This makes me think of the whole situation of mock

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 2>turtle and like trying to then replicate turtle meat by

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 2>turning to other animals, Like why is the turtle wrapped

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 2>up in this weird cycle of imitation meats?

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Okay, so there's another example of people claiming that

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 3>they were eating the meat of a quarter million year

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 3>old organism, but in fact it was just a It

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 3>was just a sea turtle for some reason. But finally,

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 3>in this essay, Zawychevic comes back around to the subject

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 3>of numulites mentioned earlier, because those were the remarkably preserved

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 3>three dimensional fossils in that rock that he told the

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 3>story about finding on the side of the road and

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 3>licking to see better. Numbulites are fascinating in their own right.

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 3>So numulites are a genus of for iminifer dating back

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 3>millions of years, notable for their disc shaped or lins

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 3>shaped shells, which are found abundantly in fossil form. The

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 3>organisms themselves are single celled protozoa and they form this

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 3>protective shell on the outside called a test. These tests

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 3>or shells have been observed since ancient times. In fact,

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 3>what's called numulitic limestone, which is that's sedimentary calcium carbonate

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 3>rock from archaic seafloors, contain huge proportions of numulite fossils.

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Numbulytic limestone was what was quarried out by the ancient

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 3>Egyptians and used to build the Pyramids of Giza. So

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the pyramids are made at least in part out of

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 3>fossil rock containing the shells of all these organisms. And

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 3>these disc shaped fossils in the pyramid blocks were noticed

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 3>by the ancients, people didn't necessarily understand that they were

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 3>fossilized shells of you know, trillions of single salt marine organisms.

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 3>I've read elsewhere that in the fifth century BCE, the

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 3>Greek historian Herodotus thought that these discs were lentils that

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 3>had turned to stone. So maybe like, ooh, the people

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 3>who built the pyramids so long ago, they spilled some

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 3>lentils all over the place while they were building them,

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 3>and now these lentils turned into rocks. But in fact

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 3>they are these protozoan shells, and these shells can grow

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:02.720
<v Speaker 3>to enormous sizes in some cases for some species, especially

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 3>for a single celled organism. Zawichevich mentions that I guess

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 3>this would be the species. I don't know how to

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 3>say this quite I think Numulitis milika put which means

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the thousand head nomulite. This can grow a shell sixteen

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 3>centimeters in diameter. That's for a single celled organism. Wow,

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 3>and these really these tough outer shells, and the size

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 3>of these organisms raise questions about like what in the

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 3>ocean could actually successfully eat them, and this leads down

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 3>another road where where Zawichevich ends up talking about a

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 3>deliciously weird obsolete thesis from a nineteenth to twentieth century

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 3>British zoologist named Randolph Randolph Kirkpatrick who worked at the

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 3>British Natural History Museum from eighteen eighty six to nineteen

0:39:55.560 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven, and in nineteen twelve Kirkpatrick published a book

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 3>that was called the Numbulosphere, An Account of the Organic

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Origin of so called igneous rocks and abyssle red clays.

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 3>And this book, while now regarded as totally wrong and

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:20.760
<v Speaker 3>based entirely on observational error and classification error in looking

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 3>at the grain of rocks, seems nevertheless to hold an

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 3>almost kind of cherished place in the hearts of many

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 3>geologists and paleontologists. In this essay he cites Stephen J.

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Gould as one of these people who, like everybody knows,

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 3>this thesis is totally wrong, but there's something about it

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 3>that they seem to find pleasant and amusing and almost

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 3>almost sweet or cute. So what did Kirkpatrick argue, Well,

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to read here from Zawichevic's summary quote. The ocean,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Kirkpatrick said, is full of organisms which efficiently extract calcium,

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 3>carbon and silica from the seawater to create myriad skeletons,

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 3>which then go on to become geological strata. Look at

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 3>thin sections of those ancient strata through a microscope and

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 3>you will see traces of those skeletons, many of them,

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 3>he went on to say, show the traces of the

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>curved shells and chambers of numulites. These were not always obvious,

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 3>but could be detected with the trained eye. That trained

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 3>eye then put other rocks under the microscope, with just

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 3>a little more training, the same shapes could be detected

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 3>in all of the specimens that Kirkpatrick looked at, including

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 3>in lavas, granites, and even meteorites. The inference was clear.

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 3>So what was that inference? It is that all the

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 3>rocks on the surface of the Earth are numbulites. The

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 3>Earth itself, Kirkpatrick thought, was essentially encased in a four

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 3>a miniferent test of its own. There was a shell

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 3>for the planet made out of rocks that were made

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:09.720
<v Speaker 3>out of the fossilized, indigestible shells of marine organisms. From million,

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 3>millions of years past, so like whatever other kind of

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 3>rock you might think it is. Kirkpatrick was like, no,

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 3>that's actually just a version of numulite shells that you know,

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 3>looks different for some.

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Reason, numulites all the way down the one.

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get to the bottom of this, but I

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 3>was wondering, wait, why did he think that about meteorites though?

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Did he also think there were noumulites in space or

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe he thought they didn't really come from space?

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Surely that I mean that also is unbelievable, but maybe

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 2>less unbelievable than like, not only this world, but all worlds.

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 2>It's numulites throughout the cosmos. Yeah, the idea that like,

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah, meteorites, that's not real. What you're looking at

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 2>is nomulites.

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 3>But I guess that connects to the eating fossils idea,

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 3>because it's like, oh, you got these organisms, you know,

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 3>candyt them, can't digest those shells. Where do they go?

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 3>They end up on the bottom of the ocean, And

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 3>in fact, they really do become a lot of you know,

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 3>a big part of these these sedimentary fossil rocks, these limestones.

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 3>But it is not the case that that all the

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 3>rocks on Earth are actually from anomulites.

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 3>So, in my opinion, big props to Yen Zawachevic for

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:22.919
<v Speaker 3>this essay, which I would say it's a bull's eye

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 3>on the motto of the Ignobel Prizes. Yes, this this

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.280
<v Speaker 3>essay has a lot of historical tidbits that are quite

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 3>funny and silly, but it also made me think in

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 3>numerous ways very interesting.

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean, we often really enjoy an incorrect

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 2>hypothesis about the natural world. You know, I instantly think

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 2>to the idea of the aquatic ape, the aquatic ape

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 2>hypothesis that we covered on the show a while back.

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 2>You know, obviously not true, but it is intriguing to

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of dive into it and think about how, you know,

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 2>people became devoted to this idea. And yeah, and then

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 2>on top of this, this whole idea of just geologists tasting rocks,

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 2>how that factors into their you know, their their analysis

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of the geology.

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 3>What is the taste of the e sn epic.

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Ask your local geologist.

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, I think we're going to have to call

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 3>it there, but we will be back next time to

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 3>talk about more of this year's Ignobel winners. And don't worry,

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 3>we are going to be talking about the nose hairs

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 3>of a dead man.

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, nose hairs. That may be where we start.

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Next time. We're going to start with the nose hair,

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 2>which makes sense. They're they're right up front, as you

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 2>have probably noticed in the mirror. So yeah, I hope

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 2>you will join us for that episode going to be

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 2>here I guess Tuesday. In the meantime, if you would

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>like to check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 2>your Mind, we'll just remind you that we're primarily a

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:51.919
<v Speaker 2>science podcast. We get into you know, little history, little philosophy,

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>a little what have you. But those core episodes are

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 2>going to come out on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Mondays

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 2>we do a listener mail that your chance to write

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 2>in and chat with us about past, current and future episodes.

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 2>On Wednesdays we do a short form artifact or monster

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.879
<v Speaker 2>fact episode unless it's being preempted by something, and then

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 2>on Fridays we set aside most serious concerns to just

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:16.919
<v Speaker 2>talk about a weird movie on Weird House Cinema.

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ posway.

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 3>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 3>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.319
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:45:45.480 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.