WEBVTT - Bloomberg’s Welch on GM: Already in the Works, Mostly Posturing

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg pm L podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p L podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. I want to learn

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>more about General motors announcement today that it was investing

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars in a US investment plan, spending on

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>models and plants that have long been in the work.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So I want to bring in David Welch, Detroit Bureau chief.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>My first question for you, David, is how much of

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this plan was already in the works and how much

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of this is new as a result of some of

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the cajoling from President elect Trump's team. It looks like

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>most of it, if not all of it. The only

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>part that we didn't really know about that that wouldn't

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have been part of their initial capital expenditures plan might

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>be the the axle jobs coming back from Mexico. But

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>even there, uh GM shift things around all the time

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>based on demand for vehicles. Uh and and that kind

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of thing you know that the White Coward jobs, which

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is the bulk of this. UH. That's five thousand workers

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>who will be doing R and D, who will be

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>doing advanced development work on autonomous vehicles, and also some

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are working for GM Financial, which is the

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lending unit. UH. None of that would have been in

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Mexico anyway, of course, but you know those are areas

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that GM has been growing and adding more people. They

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>had announced a while ago they were expanding their technical

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>center north of Detroit, so a lot of that stuff

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was already in the works. UM factories to UH down

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico. They do make a lot of small cars

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.919
<v Speaker 1>and things that are already well margin because the wages

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are cheaper, and that's the only way you can even

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>have a hope of making money on compact cars. As

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the market ships away from that stuff and they're building

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>more SUVs to meet demand, that stuff will naturally require

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>investment in the US. Well, David, you know, we got

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a chance to spend some time with you at the

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>North American International Auto Show at Cobo Hall in Detroit,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering if you could give us a little

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of a look into the detail of the auto

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>industry right now, what with the emissions scandal that plagues

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not only VW's balance sheet but certainly Vexus. Sergio Marcione

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>of Fiat Chrysler, what are the big themes right now

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that you need that you recommend people watch well. Regulations

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a big part of it, and it's been a really

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>busy a few weeks in the auto industry for a

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of reasons. You have the Obama administration leaving and

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>on their way out, they're trying to really make sure

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that things like clean air regulations are are really adhered to.

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So they they both the Justice Department and the ep

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>A really handled handed volks like and some really big

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>fines and some in dipmonds. They really went after them.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>And they're going after fid Kreisler to make sure that

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that the devices they had in their cars were not cheating.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>They haven't said their cheat devices yet. There there are

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>eight devices that changed the emissions performance of the vehicle

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>under certain conditions, all kind of have those those are legal.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>You have to tell the government they're there and they

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that, so that is uh that would warrant

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a penalty. Even if they are fine. They have to

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>be disclosed. Now, if it turns out that they were

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>done to cheat emissions tests, which is something Sergio Marchioni,

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, has denied, then then the findes can get

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>really big like they were with Volkswagen. But at the

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>moment it's not really Uh, they haven't proven that. That's

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the situation, you know, David, Just a turning back to GM.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, you know, how much of this is a

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>pup relations stunt or how much of this would have

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.839
<v Speaker 1>been done in the past with a company extolling it's

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's upcoming expenditure plan, uh, in a release like this.

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it just the media? Is it us that is

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>making a bigger deal about this because we're putting it

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>into our our pattern of trying to respond to President

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>elect Trump? Or has there been a material shift in

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>approach to how some of these car companies communicate. I

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it is the former. The General

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Motors spends nine billion dollars a year in capital expenditures,

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>and that's new cars that are coming to market the

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>next few years, and that's tooling up the factories to

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>make those new cars. Every time you have a new car,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got a new chassis line, a new paint shop,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a new line for the body panels, new stampings for

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>those bodies, and all that requires a lot of capital investment,

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>and they do it to the tune of nine billion

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year. Some of the vehicles they're coming out

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>within the next few years are support utility vehicles that

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they didn't previously have. So between for example, between now

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and Cadillac is supposed to get three new SUVs that

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't have now. Why because Cadillac is behind in

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>luxury crossover issue use, which is the sweet spot of

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the luxury market. They have one auld E BMW and

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 1>UH Mercedes have to three or four in their wind up,

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>so GM is just catching up. You're gonna need factories

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to make those, so that's gonna be a big part

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>of the investment right there. So all that stuff was

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in the work. So you're talking nine billion a year

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>between now and one billion dollars that they're announcing and

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the jobs that would assemble those and a lot of

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it has retained jobs, which means UH that had they

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not put a vehicle in that existing factory, they would

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>have laid those people off, but instead they're giving them

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>something to do so they'll keep those jobs. A lot

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of it is stuff that would have already happened. The

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>investment and autonomous vehicles and R and D would have

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>already happened. And they have already stated that they want

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to grow their lending business to make more car woons

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that already would that would have happened as well. The

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>only thing that might have happened is the four and

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty jobs. These are people making axles coming back from

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Mexico to the US, so that may have stayed down there.

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's that. But a lot of this is just uh.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And they told me this moving forward. The announcements they

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>would have made basically under pressure from Trump and in

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>order to play nice with them. Remember, the automakers have

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff they want out of the Trump administration,

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>which is maybe a little bit more relaxation on a

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>few economy standards, and also lower corporate tax rates are

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things they like that the Obama administration

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to do. We're going to leave that for

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>another time. I want to thank you very much. David

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Welch is our Detroit bureau chief for Bloomberg News. I'm

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to make sense of some of the moves in

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the Pound following Prime Minister Theresa May's comments to diplomats

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>about how Britain plans to break away from the European Union.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>For somebody with a lot more insight than I can

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>bring for this is Rob Hutton, UK Government and Polity

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>six reporter for Bloomberg, who is joining us now. Rob,

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. So what is the main takeaway

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>from the speech so far? Well, the main takeaway is

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that she does actually have a plan. And I think

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>if you'd asked me this morning, is she going to

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>say very much? I just said I'm not sure she is,

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, but we did get we got clarity on

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a number of things. We've got clarity. She wants to

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>take Britain out of the European the European Union, single market,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>all the way out. Um, we got clarity before you

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>continue with that. So what's the significance of that. Well,

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that is the basis on which I in Britain can

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>sell something to Germany on exactly the same rules that

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody in Germany can sell to somebody in Germany. She

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>wants to break from that. And now that's fantastically important

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for manufactured so you can build a car in Britain

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and sell it all the way across Europe with with

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same regulations, and does she want to replace

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it with something else? Well, what she wants to do,

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>she wants to she says. She said she wants to

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>keep access to the Stems Union. This is a slightly

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>tricky language. She wants to take Britain out of the

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Customs Union which sort of underpins that, and but still

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>but still continue trading within it. And at that point

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you then start to get into what she didn't say.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>There are interesting questions about well, let's say I build

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a car in Britain and then I want to sell

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it to Germany. But we have a regulatory dispute. Where

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are we going to resolve that? And let's say that

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Germany changes its car regulations, or did the rather the

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>European Union changes its car regulations. Britain is no longer

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>bound by those, but effectively we kind of still are

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>because if we want to sell cars here and there,

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>so we already have that going on with Fiat and

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>VW because of emissions. Well that's you know, and who

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>who actually you know takes over as the regulator. But

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in just the focus on Theresa May. For example, I'm

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand that it says that the Prime Minister

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>has a twelve point brexit plan. Uh, is there any

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and anything other than putting it to a vote at Parliament?

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>It is what else do we need? Else? Is the

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>most important thing that we need? The most important thing

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is is leaving a single market. The second most important

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is is keeping some kind of customs union access.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>That's her compromise. The vote to Parliament, I think is

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>slightly a red herring. I've got to say, and if

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what people are buying the pound on the back of,

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>then they should think about that because basically what that

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>means is in two years time, members of Parliament are asked,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want whatever deal it is I've got or

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>do you want to leave the European Union with no

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>deal at all? So so let's just undo all of

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this and not leave is unlikely to be on the table.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>The choice. The choice is going to be this deal

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>which you may not like, or no deal. I'm struggling

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to understand. I mean, people talk about hard brexit versus

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a soft brexit based on what you initially said. It

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>seems like that would be a hard breath. This is

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty hard brexit, yes, so so the soft that

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the people who wanted something softer are all slightly stunned today,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I think because because there's there's there's no concessions to

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>them at all. There was an nice bit in the

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in the speech where the Prime Minister said that we

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>all had to come together and sort of unite however

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we voted in the referendum. But to be honest, there's

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not very much for people who voted to stay to

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>unite around in this speech. I guess it's difficult to

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out in some quarters whether there's a hard boiled

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>egg or a soft boiled. This is quite a hard boil.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But you say it's a hard boiled egg, and yet

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you see that big rise in the value. Well, that's

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>what I wanted, That's what right, That's what I wanted

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to expand on because why it is, as you said,

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is this just a red red herring and someone's climbing

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>at something, And because I wonder is uh is President

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>elect Donald Trump in some way connected to well, I mean,

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, there may be, there may be other reasons

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and other things are going on. We had higher than

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>expected to expect inflation this morning, so the pound was

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>already on its way up before the speech began. The pound,

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the pound did definitely rise when she she talked about

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a vote and on the past the pound has written

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on things that made Brexit look less likely. And I

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, were trying very hard to to tell people

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>don't don't count on that vote, don't sift the sand

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for a diamond. You know that that that that vote

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is highly unlikely to reverse the decision. And in fact,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>when we tried, when when somebody asked the Prime Minister,

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and when we've asked her office, well, come on, what

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>happens if the vote goes the other way? They just

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>laugh and say the vote won't go the other way

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're right, who you know, how bad would a

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>deal have to be for you to decide? That's what

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>David Cameron said, didn't he? Yeah, well that's true. We

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>got to leave it there. Robin Huddon, UK Government and

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Politics reporter for Bloomberg joining us from London. I want

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Joe Carroll, who covers the oil industry

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for us at Bloomberg, to give a little bit more

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>color around this. Excell and Mobile purchase of of shale

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>land and they based they paid five point six billion

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars in shares for this premium basin land. And Joe,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with, was this an expected acquisition

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of XS. Well, we've known Exon is looking around this

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this region in Texas and New Mexico called the Permian Basin.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the biggest US oil field UM for for for

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>quite a while, we didn't expect a deal this gigantic

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for x On. This is the biggest deal since they

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>bought Xto and that was their first for a into

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>into North American shale, and that was back in UM.

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Not only are they paying five point six billion in shares.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>If the resources as rich as UM you know, as

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>their geologists expected to turn out to be, they'll pay

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>another billion in cash over the next fifteen years. I

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>got to imagine that somehow we're going to work in

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>former chief executive of Exxon Mobile Rex Till listen into

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. Yeah, they haven't told us, but it sure

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>appears almost certain that this was a transaction that began

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>before he left January one. These things just don't come

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>together that quickly. Well, do you think that it was

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>expedited to come out before Rex Silerson took the role

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of Secretary of State under President elect Tromp. No, I

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think the I think once once a company cut

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ties with him, Um, they cut ties with him. So um.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Right now I'm looking at X and shares there up

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit. But what could this do for X? And?

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much better of a position does this

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>put them in? Potentially this is a pretty even though

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for X on five and a half billion dollars doesn't

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>sound like a lot of money. This gives them, yeah,

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for for you know, for a company with more annual

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>sales that said, it's if at least twenty years of drilling,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it's an enormous amount of oil. It's three something billion

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of oil locked on the ground there. It's

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty low risk because because the superman folks have been

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>drilling out there for for almost a century. Um. It's

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me because it strikes me that this is

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the consolidation that a lot of oil analysts

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>have been waiting for. People said that because of the

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>drop in oil prices, that we have to see this

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>consolidation by the biggest oil companies. Do you expect there

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>to be more announcements like this from exces, rivals, from everybody.

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yesterday was was the Clayton Williams Noble deal.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Um that that Dave Wilson just referenced, And that's in

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the same area that's in this uh Delaware basin, which

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is a subrecon region of the Permian there on the

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Texas New Mexico border. It's the hottest m and A

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>play in oil anywhere in the world. Um. I think

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it attracted the quarter of about of all the oil

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>M and A dollars. That's that's from according to Wood mackenzie. Um. Yeah,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of course this is just going to keep steam rolling on.

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>At what point does the price just become too expensive,

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Because if you've got ample supply in a domestic market,

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>then you face the prospect of having more supply than

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>your needs. You mean, you're talking about the price of oil.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>As far as x sun goes there, they're confident they'll

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll get double digit returns as low you know, with

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>oil as low as forty up barrel. I believe Nobile

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>said the same thing yesterday. So forty dollars is the

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>breakpoint for when you flipped the switch to get the

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>shale out. The shale oil out well forty dollars is

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the break point where you're making you return. It can

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly go lower than that. Joe, has it gotten cheaper

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to extracate oil from shell drilling. What's happened is they've

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>yeah on a per unit basis, sure, because what they've

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>done is they just drill these sideways wells for for

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a mile for two miles. Now, it costs more to

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>drill each one of those wells, but the amount of

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>oil that comes gushing out is so much more massive

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that your per unit costs are a lot lower. Because

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the big obstacles right in the

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>U s. It's a lot more expensive to extracate oil

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>than it is, for example, in Saudi Arabia and Iran.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Correct correct um. So going forward is could any regulations

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>actually help Exxon access more of the land that they

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>just purchased. Could that have played into this at all

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>or not? Really? You know, unlike the rest of the world,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, almost everything that gets drilled for

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas is privately owned. Uh, you know, it's

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>not like working in Canada or the UK or really

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else in the world where the government or the

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>crown owns the resource, so so and and and given

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that most of the regulation comes at the

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>state level, I don't see a huge impact from from

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>from the federal situation. Well, Joe tell us about potential

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>price changes fifty three fifty two dollars a barrel. The

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>OPEC meeting is in May. You've got this confluence of

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>shale oil plus a new president, President elect Donald Trump. Uh,

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you see in the next ninety days. In

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the next ninety days, I think you continue to see

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>more deals in the Permian, more m and a UM

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as long as these companies can can lock in prices

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>by by you know, with forward hedges. Uh, they're just

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're gonna drill as much as they can, you know,

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and make their returns. UM. I think it was the

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Southeast was yesterday the day before said they don't expect

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>expect the cuts, the open cuts to last through June.

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So so I think we really see see an impact there.

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>All right. I have a feeling you're going to be

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>very busy, and we thank you for it. Joe Carroll

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is Energy America's reporter for Bloomberg, giving us some perspective

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and additional information about x On Mobile paying five point

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars to expand it's acreage in uh Western Texas.

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us about some innovation when it comes

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps to your portfolio, but it might also include some

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>healthcare stocks, is Mike Bailey. He is the chief of

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>financial Officer I beg your pardon to see f A

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and director of Research at FBB Capital Markets. Hey Mike Bailey,

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I thought you got a new title there,

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>but you didn't. Good morning morning at least thanks for

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>having me. All right, I'm gonna get some kind of

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>surprised news there, no no, no, no more surprise that

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got enough people doing surprise news. It's ok. You're

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you're managing almost a billion at FBV Capital. What are

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you telling your your client base right now to do

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>or not do well? I think as we look at

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the very short term and ideally we do next three months. Sure,

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think we are a bit concerned here. Um,

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we're we've got the uh the

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump inauguration coming up here in a few days. I

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think will probably be a good year, maybe not quite

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as good as what what are you concerned about Yeah,

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think so if we want to kind of create

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>a new word here, people love Brexit and flash crash

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and such, so Trump's secution, uh doesn't quite roll off

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the tongue. But I think we're getting to a phase

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>where investors expect Trump to execute and we're getting you know,

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the rubbers about to hit the road here Friday, and

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think our concerns are basically investors are hoping that

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going to act on some of his promises,

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether that's lower taxes, whether that's juicing up

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the economy, um. And if that doesn't happen, or if

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it happens later than investors expect, you're going to see

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>some downside. So I think for us, um, there's a

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more hope in the market right now than

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what you might expect to see in the very short term.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, also, we sort of haven't seen much

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>volatility at all really since you know, the election actually,

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think putting some of those pieces together, we

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised to see a little bit of downside

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, later this week, early next week, and then

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I think investors will will catch their breath, you will

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>see the new administrations start to roll out some policies,

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that some of those expectations will get

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>realized as we head towards the later latter part of

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. Mike, I thought that it was interesting that

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you said that you think that there's roughly upside and

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>five percent downside for the year, sort of to your

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>point that the near term perhaps downside, but over the

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>longer term upside. I thought it was also interesting that

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned industrials and healthcare as all whether sectors, particularly healthcare.

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>This was interesting to me because we've seen a lot

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of volatility in biopharmaceutical stocks and as as well as

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a hospital shares on the back of Trump's comments. So

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>why is this such a stalwart industry? You know, I

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>think when we look at healthcare, and I am a

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>bit biased, used to be a healthcare analysts, I've spent

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time looking at it. Um, I do

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think I think there are a lot of spaces within

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>healthcare where or you can do well over a number

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of years, and it may not necessarily be you know,

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the big farm of the big biotech that folks think

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>about is kind of the headlines. Uh you know, maybe

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's uh services maybe it's a managed care insurance stock,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a MidCap medical device dock. But there are

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>some companies that in our view are changing and growing

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty meaningfully over a number of years. Uh. And they've

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>got you know, they're diversified, so if the US is

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>down one year, you know, maybe they'll get helped uh

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>internationally the next year. UM. So there are some spaces

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we like. However, as you mentioned, there are certainly some

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>areas that had a great bull run or two three,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>four years and that kind of came to a screeching hall.

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So we're we're awfully cautious of some of those spaces

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>where you know, whether it's Trump's you know, drug pricing tweets,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>things like that, that where you can get in trouble

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with some of these companies. So we're trying to look

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>look across the whole space and find some pretty interesting

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the names that are growing nicely. Are you finding any

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunities outside of just the broadly traded shares just in

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of sort of the traditional US pharmaceutical stocks, are

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at other kinds of healthcare companies or just you know,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>other assets of the healthcare companies, I mean, our stocks

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the best way in yeah, good, good points. So I mean,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of generalist investment firm, we do equities,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>we do fixed income, preferred things like that, so we

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we look across the capital structure in general. For healthcare,

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we tend to favor more on the equity side,

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but we certainly owned plenty of corporate debt for for

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>healthcare companies. Um. I think though, looking at at healthcare

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>in particular, you do get some nice yields because I

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>think that it is a space if you do own it,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're overweight, you can certainly get some decent yield

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you don't have to be overweight bonds for example,

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>within healthcare. But there's some certainly some ways to play

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it on the preferred side. For example, not quite as

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>many healthcare names available there, but certainly a handful to

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>choose from. Hey, Mike, what's been the best and worst

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>call that you've that you've made over let's say, the

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months. So we can either talk about it

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>within healthcare or just broad No, no, broadly, brother, I

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>want to know, like, for example, you know, were you

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a bond bull when when everyone you know tried to

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>get out of the gate and then you got head

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>faked out of that one and got you know, bullish again. Yeah,

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and so if we look you know, across

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>all markets, I think one of the areas we did

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bit better. This goes back a little bit

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>over a year. We were a bit cautious on high

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>yield kind of heading into the UM energy junk bond

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 1>meltdown in late uh kind of early sixteen, So we

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>were so like a medium term call. Yeah, So I

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>think that that was sort of the call there, and

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>high yield, I think from a negative you know, I

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think we probably could have taken a look at our

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>treasury exposure a bit differently heading into the election. I

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's certainly in space where I think a lot

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of folks will were caught off guard, and we're probably

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there as well. But UM in general, I think we

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>try to be a bit more nimble on the equity

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>side from the on the bond from bomb perspective, we

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>tend to be a little bit more patient, I think,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 1>and and sort of realize that the bond market does

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>move a bit more slowly compared to equities, but we

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>do certainly take a look at each asset class out

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>there well, I've just want to do you have to

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>add another metric now and I'm serious here when it

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>comes to tweet volume of a of a particular company

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>or a particular industry, because uh, we have a function

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg that offers that. I'm sure there are

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>many others, but you know, certainly not like this and integrated.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>But so we're able to see this as and then

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you correlated to you know, news articles read and uh

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>so on. Do you think that that is a valid

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, a research criteria that's going to have to

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>be added into your perspective? Uh? You know, I think

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>if we get the next four years looking like last

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>suck couple of months, that that's certainly in a possibility.

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly a lot of smart investors are using

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>every data set they can, and if it turns out

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that tweets become highly correlated with you know a lot

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of you know, blue chips or big companies out there,

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is that's certainly relevant. Um. I think another point that

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that we sort of think about is just volatility in general.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you've got a lot of presidential tweets out

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.239
<v Speaker 1>there driving market volatility, that's something we want to take

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>advantage of a couple of things we're looking at is

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the for example, online brokers or some of

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the exchanges out there. I think our position pretty well

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to to to improve as you get more volatility. So

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the ways we're playing it without trying

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to to get as focused as you know, looking at

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>individual companies that may or may not have a tweet

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out that could drive it intra day. Well, thank

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Mike Bailey, CFA and

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Director of Research at FBB Capital Partners talking about why

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>over the long term, healthcare shares as well as industrials

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>will continue to do well. And Pam, I find that

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting because, particularly in the industrial sector, we saw such

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a rally last year at the end of the year

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in response to some of the potential President electro Trump policies.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>UM will now see whether you can make good on that.

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio