WEBVTT - Special Edition: 2018 Oscar Buzz

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Playback is brought to you by Warner Brothers.

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>A Star is Born. As we talk about important films

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of this past year, this one is top of mind,

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>resonating with critics and audiences for its emotional authenticity, and

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the film's director, Bradley Cooper, is being recognized for his

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>brilliant work as a filmmaker and actor, along with his

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>cast Lady Gaga and Sam Elliott for their stunning performances.

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Varieties Film critic Peter de Bruge has said Bradley Cooper's

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>directorial debut as a dazzling reminder of why we love

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>movies in the first place. In Los Angeles, Times critic

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Justin Chang said, from the first frame, it casts a spell,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the kind that lets you know immediately that you are

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in good hands. A star is born for your consideration

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in all categories. You're listening to Playback a Variety I

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio podcast. I'm your host, Variety Awards Editor Chris Tapley,

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're changing things up a little bit this week.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>We've got the lovely Janelle Riley office here today, the

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>deputy Awards and Features editor or something like this. We're

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>not really clear. It's very long and important title. Basically,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 1>we've got the band back together. Jennelle and I used

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Oscar season every week, and we're

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about the Oscar season today. Uh, you're the

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>lucky ones listening, So thank you for coming on the

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>show general. Absolutely. Um. Yeah, Like you know, late December

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>probably a good time to start talking about awards, like

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we haven't been talking about it. Yeah. Um, you know,

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought I would start by just kind of this

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is my assessment of the Best Picture category, and just

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of layout where we're at right now. We've

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>had a ton of critics give out awards, regional critics

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>across the country, which I they're not like important in

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of oh that means oscars are gonna happen for

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>these movies, But I do think it's instructive when you

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>see how such a wide variety of people period are

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>voting on these awards, and at this point, I think

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got like twenty groups of have chimed in and

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>so it just gives you an interesting data point list

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at. Also, of course, we've had the Screen

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Actors Guild released the strange nominations I mean, not completely

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>off the wall. But I sort of saw the Bohemian

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Rhapsody ensemble coming. It's a little weird, just I think

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into that. But part of that is definitely,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the merger of AFTRA with absolutely I don't

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>know who the voters are anymore. I used to be

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>able to predict the agwards perfect jockeys, and that's no disrespected,

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you're basically I don't know what. And

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>also we've had obviously the Golden Globe nominations, which is

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety four in journalists who have their own take, and

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other things. So let's just dive in

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Best Picture race. I'm still at the number

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>one in two that I've been on since August. I

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>think number one is Stars Born. I think number two

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is Roma too in you're saying just your terms of nominations, no,

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of what it's likely to get nominated. Uh,

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think those are the two at the

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>top of the heap right now. I'm so impressed with

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Roma because it has so much going against it, black

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and white, foreign film, and then the Netflix factor, which

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think is stupid, like any anybody's saying,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>like Netflix isn't really seeing real movies or you know,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't count, or something like needs to Did he

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>really say that, he said something like that. I mean

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he kind of said and I don't want to misquote him,

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but it was something like he did he didn't think

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that Netflix movie should be up for Oscars? Really And

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>did he add get off my Lawn? You might have,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't print it. But yeah, I mean, it's

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just indicative of where were things are changing. They're

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>making great movies. They're making they're making movies no one

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>else will make by the way they and you know,

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm thrilled to see how people are embracing Roma

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because you know, there is that that bubble. We live

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in several bubbles actually where I was like, of course,

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we all of it. But you know, I've been to

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.119
<v Speaker 1>some screenings, I've done some screenings and really it's it's

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's speaking to everyone absolutely. Yeah. I think it's the

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>best movie of the year. Really, yeah, I mean I

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a masterpiece. I mean also speaking to everyone's

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>stars born it's like it's kind of hard to be

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that big of entertainment and that's successful at box office

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and also be so beloved by critics, and I don't

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>thrilled for the success of it. That's why I love

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that movie so much. I mean that movie. People don't

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>really realize how difficult it is to pull off populist filmmakers.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, right, and when when it's done, you know,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I know there are people that are snarky about Argo,

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>but that movie had a nice movie, had tomato. So

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some revisionist history that happens instantly after the only

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>got snarky when Argo became an Oscar movie or Lalla

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Land for that matter. It's great filmmaking. And again, it's

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>hard to pull off and and and dude did it

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>on his first movie. I mean, Bradley Cooper has been

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on sets for a while, but like he clearly knows

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not just it's damning with fate, praise to say he

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>knows how to put a movie together. He knows how

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to truly tell story with with imagery, and that that

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>is the trick. He did a great job. And I

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody objects to a star is born. Well,

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe there are some people that, you know, I think

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it's too popular for its own good. Guess. I think

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it's winning Best picture probably. Um. I also think that

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like there's the cynicism of like, oh, Star is Born.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, people always say like this movie was created

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to win Oscars. It is the fourth iteration of a

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>story we all know starring an well an untested leading

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>woman and the lead. Like this was not you know,

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a packaged, manufactured movie. It's like it really comes from

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the heart. It's also the best version of that story,

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>which is far. Yeah, I think some people might disagree

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with that. There's a lot of Judy Garland fans out there,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but that movie felt like it was forty hours long.

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I just think this is this is an expert piece

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of filmmaking, and I think and I think that I mean,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and just in my conversations it hasn't lost really steam,

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>like people know that this is a good movie. And yeah,

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I just it's the front runner to me right now,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the one I would look out for is Black Landsman,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>And I was very curious, you're jumping ahead. Oh sorry,

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>you're jumping ahead. But that's interesting that you would go

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there next. I think number three would be Green Book.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, I don't know, I feel like it

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>really needed to they were selling it all along as

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>even if critics don't like it, it'll do great at

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the box office. And it hasn't hasn't done badly, Like

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not a flop like people say, but it hasn't

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>become the runaway hit. I feel like it needs to

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be to win it certainly. I don't think it would win.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Just in terms of nominations nomination. All of this for

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>me is like, this is the order I think it

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>would be nominated, like like on the Finalist, Let's explain this.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I find actually if I rank something, people are like,

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you think that's gonna win, And it's like, so I

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>think of me think Internet, I guess I should captain

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Cape nice that the studios page you up have each

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>other giving you. This is this list to me is

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just in order of likelihood to be nominated for Best Picture,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you know what I mean, And you disagree with

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Book at three, I do you think it would be lower?

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I do? I think Black Clansman would be third? And

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I was waiting for the SAG nominations to really have

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Black Plansman at four to be good. People love Green Book,

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that like that the stuff. You know. I have my

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>issues with the movie. The studio knows I have issues

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with the movie. Uh sorry, guys, Oh do we need

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to cut to the egg copy now? But I'll read.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that people don't that that's not registering for

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone really, and uh, people are going to like what

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they like. I'm being vague. I mean, look, there's I

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>guess there are critical points that have been made about

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the movie that it's kind of got a rose colored

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>grasp of racism in the sixties, right, and and you

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>know people have called it like driving this daisy of

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of this era, and blah blah blah, this isn't this

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't me. And whether it is or isn't, I'm not

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>even gonna touch this anymore because I'm upset people. But

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I will just say that the point being that hasn't

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>really translated to the voting populace, right, So it's it's people.

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, an Oscar winning Best Actor Oscar winner. I

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>just heard yesterday it's his favorite movie of the year.

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing that a lot people, really. I mean, herschel

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Ali is you know, so beloved. People really like vegle

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>mar is overdue as well, and he is. Yeah, but

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>number four, I would say, as Black Clansman, you think

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>that's up there too. Here's the thing, Um, I was

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hearing from so many people how much they love this movie,

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of chatter about Spike Lee being overdue,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>which you know, I guess he is um even though

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>he's not like I think everyone really respects him, but

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not cuddly you know that show not that you

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>have to be. Yeah, no, I I think he's great.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I adore him, but you know he's not um. You

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>know someone you want to throw your arms around. We

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>can see him UM. Not that you should be doing

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that with anyone, by the way, yes, without permission. But

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I was really wait to see if that translated into

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>SAG nominations. And when they got the ensemble nomination, I

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>was like, Okay, the love is there. And then as

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been predicting for weeks, if not months, and

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone was telling me I was crazy. John David Washington

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>got in Yeah, and you know, we put them on

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the cover of Actors on Actors, and I said, like,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this is like Daniel Coluga last year. It's

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>a lead actor in a breakout role of a movie

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that is really beloved, and I think he gets an

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>OSCAR nomination. H I have that spot going to Ethan

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Hawk at the moment, but we'll talk that is. Yeah,

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this gets back to what we're talking about

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about SAG and how there is a caveat here, like

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a much different organization than it was a few

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and so how does that shift how you

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>determine what their picks mean versus what the Oscar choices

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>will mean. I mean, for the longest time, if you're

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>not nominated for an ensemble, you're not going to win

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Best Picture. In Shape of Water just did it last year,

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna happen, or maybe not this year because

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I've forgot Stars Born is nominated for ensemble. But like

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the top movie, we're not the favorite.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But we were just talking about favorite, wasn't Romo wasn't

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So Mary Poppins wasn't, which actually surprised me. That's my

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>number fives returns is wonderful, frightful. I I kind of

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>felt like, I don't know if I still feel this way,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but I certainly after I saw it in an industry crowd,

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>I was like, that's the movie that feels like it

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>could be the Star is Born. Um again, I don't know.

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>If I still feel that way. The critics kind of

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like they did not embrace it as much as I

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>expected them. I've had a huge break with the critics

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.599
<v Speaker 1>this year. I'll just say that much. But yeah, and

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>who knows how that kind of thing will affect perception.

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean it's just I think Rob Marshall

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and company nailed it. I think it's a It's a

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>hugely craft heavy, beautiful film. Like below the line, everything

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>they did in that movie was like just it was sumptuous.

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>It was great, like that the whole animal and sequence.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's no one else but Emily Blunt could

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>play that role. She is so fantastic. She's perfect for it.

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And I just feel like, more so than any other movie,

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it is something different. I mean not to say that

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>these movies are all the same. They're so not, but

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>it is the one that is the feel good solved

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for our soul. That's key. It's absolutely yourself because like

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>all these movies make you feel like shit in various ways.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>If we're honest, at least at some point. Yeah, I

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>mean it's like this, That movie sends you out on

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.599
<v Speaker 1>a cloud literally with a song singing. There's nowhere to

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>go but up. So I don't know. I think that

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>that connection fires in the synapsies for some brains. You know.

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got for number six, The Favorite, which is not

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>a movie I liked, I adore, and you don't like.

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it. I saw it and tell you right,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it's would you watch it again? I would? I love

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the screenplay and I love the performances. I just like,

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>why do you not like the movie because of the filmmaker?

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you respect to Mr lathamos? I just

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>think that is it the land in too much on

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this one? Like I know he's a guy who loves

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to just put his fingerprint all over the movie, but

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>but it was it was too far for me to

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoy this film. And yeah, the camera work I thought

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>was hugely questionable. It's so interesting because I think, like

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>my biggest testament to filmmaking is when I don't notice

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>it's And I definitely was pulled out a couple of

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>times by you know, those those shots. But overall, I you,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I would not have believed this was a yorgo slam

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>from his film. Well that's all about the script a

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit, I think too. I mean it's he didn't

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>write it. Um, are you sure about that? Why? I

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know. That's what information. I don't know, No, no, no, no, no.

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I just I would assume if you wrote it, there

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>would have been arbitration and his name would be on it.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>He well, yeah, but we know how that works. We do.

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But this doesn't feel like it doesn't It doesn't mean

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the voice of it doesn't feel like him.

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I don't know anything further. But

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I should have done more diligence on this movie this year.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I should have talked to Robbie Ryan the DP and

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>been like, look, your lighting was beautiful. Why are you

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 1>doing these whippans that are totally unmitt it motivated? Why

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are you doing these fish eye lenses? That was you know,

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>there's all these modern touches, like of course the dance number?

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Did you not laugh during the dance number? I don't

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>remember the dance number? Are you serious? You're trying to

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>awake I know the elevation and tell you right, I don't.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't, honestly, I don't remember it. What is that refreshman? Oh,

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually sort of near the beginning where Joe

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Allen and Rachel Weiss are dancing together and it turns

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>into this weird modern sort of elements dance where like

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he has a high kick in the air right at

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the camera and I do not remember that. What do

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you call this movie where you go behind yourself right now?

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And actually no, I don't. I don't remember that. And

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know I saw it like five months ago, so

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know I will see it again. Any like of

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the movie does not matter, obviously, thankfully, I think people

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>would say, actually, interestingly enough, it's very rare. I like

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>all the movies on the list. Yeah, which is the favorite?

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Is more than the key thing about a movie, like

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>the favorite is below the line. I mean, it's like

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a craft heavy movie. It's going to pull people

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>from the various branches into it. Uh. You know, it's

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>doing really well with critics, one of the most critically

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>claimed movies of the year. And the performances. Again, I

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>love I love Olivia Coleman. I think she's fantastic glad

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>lead I don't know, Yeah, yeah, I do, I think

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>she could. I actually think support I have a problem

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with putting her in lead, but certainly that seems to

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>be the overwriting take is that she was supporting, but

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I I think they're all three leads personally. I don't

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that honestly, but for some reason I find

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it more to be Emma Stone story. Yeah, that's that's

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the overwriting logic. I think this is very strange. I'm

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to look up a gift of the gift of

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the favorite dance and Black Panther probably my top three

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I think some people think it's like,

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna win. Like, I think I don't have it

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on the tier that a lot of other people do

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of nominations, but I could end up wrong there.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's the Best Picture player, and I

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have for a long time. I mean, you don't make

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars in the States, which is like, wow,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't you have that, plus the critical acceptance that

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you had, and the embrace of course the cultural and

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>pop cultural crater that it's left. If this movie wasn't

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>nominated for Best Picture, it would be a blight. And

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>there's people that are like, oh, it's just a Marvel movie.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. Watch it again, bro, Like this movie

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>has way more on its mind than other Marvel movies.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It simply does. It's fantastic, it's a great story. Let's

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about the cultural significance all, you know. I interviewed

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael B. Jordan recently and we talked about all the

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>black panthers and kill mongers we saw at Halloween and

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>how exciting that was. And he was joking about he

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>saw a kill monger with like a beard drawn on

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>with a sharpie. Yeah. Yeah, I just feel like, you know,

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>someone said on Twitter, ha ha, of course, something like

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>superhero movies are made for for for teenagers and children,

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, what what about movies that are about,

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, centering a conversation about growing up with systemic

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>oppression versus growing up with like, as Michael B. Jordan

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>said to me in an interview, a tribe that encourages

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you with positivity. I mean, that's an important conversation that's

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>being had in a major movie that made seven hundred

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Who's that movie for? Yeah, obviously everyone, it's

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>such a fantastic movie, just you know, superhero or not.

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, honestly, like the only other movie that I

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>would put up there with that in terms of it

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is another superhero movie is spider Man into the Spider Verse.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh my, got so good, so good. I wish I

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>would love to have that on this list. Yeah, I

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>mean I think one of the critics groups speaking earlier,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Utah Film Critics Association, they gave it best Picture, which

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the right awesome. Yeah, number eight, I have vice

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty low here talk about the critics takings that is

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the most divisive movie I think of the year. That's

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>funny because we both really liked it. I loved it.

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but there are people that have said, with

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a straight face, it's the worst movie of the year. Oh,

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>come on, it's definitely understanding. Yeah, how can you say that?

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But I love that movie. I think it's like rich

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and just like I keep saying, I sort of stared

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>into the void afterwards, because it just talk about leaving

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you feeling like shit. I mean like this is a

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>portrait of a soulless individual and an incredibly efficient bureaucrat

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's it's you know, Adam McKay saying, hey,

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is how we got to where we are

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>well and also like what is it that they want

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>from that movie? Do we want to find out that

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like Dick Cheney is like a secretly lovable guy, or

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 1>some people think that it was being sympathetic toward him.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And I know that the filmmakers have said that they

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>found the story emotional, but to say that it's sympathetic,

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was fair to him. Yeah, I don't

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>know if that means sympathetic. Yeah, if if that reads

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic to you, then then you know, just check yourself

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit maybe. But like, also, how can you argue

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>against the artistry of a movie that you know, has

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>characters start speaking in Shakespearean verse, or does credits role

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>made film or just like just really creative original filmmaking.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's bold, Yeah, I mean, and I think it's in.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But getting back to the critics, you never know how

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a profile will affect the movie. But

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it. I've I've been in a handful of

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>gatherings full of Academy voters at the premiere, at a

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>private event for screening for the movie as well, and

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I was picking up Love and Passion, So we'll see. Then.

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I've got Anna parn his other film this year, If

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Beal Street Could Talk, which is one of my favorite

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>movies of the year. Actually, these two are back to

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>back on my top five. I love that movie. Um,

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I love Barry Jenkins. Everyone I think that listens to

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the show knows how much I love him. He's been

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on twice and I hope this movie makes it through.

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know it might not. I thought it would,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>but now you've got me worried. Yeah, you know. By

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, have you heard about this the story, um,

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>about Barry Jenkins's worst day on set. Oh, well, the

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>angriest he's ever been honest at and the biggest fit

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>he ever had happened on Beale Street and he kicked

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the box and then immediately apologized, Like everybody was laughing

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>about how like you know, you hear about directors having

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>melt downs and apparently he kicked the box and was like,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm sorry. And that's Barry Jenkins at his worst.

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I love him. It's the photography is stunning. Let me

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about below the lineup peal. The score is outrageously good.

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And I also wanted to say if any Academy members, actors,

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>branch members are are are listening, I don't know, man.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Brian Tyree Henry deserves a supporting Actor nomination

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for this fantastic. I wanted him for Widows. When I

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>first saw Widows, I thought he was so gripping in

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that movie, and the scene with Violet Davis dog terrified me.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And then I saw him in this and I was like,

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>nominate him for this. And he's in it for like

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>five ten minutes. He covers a range in this scene.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It's one scene where he's just gotten out of jail,

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the conversation between him and Stefan James

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>goes from like jovial to yeah, man, I'm I'm a

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>little damaged from this, and you hear more about that,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it's it's a stunning scene. I find

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>him so much more dessert. You know. I never like

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to say that people are snubbed if they're not nominated,

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's just people picking the five people they like.

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But I find him so much more deserving and some

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>people who seem to be sure things in that category.

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly, you know, there's a couple of ways

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you go. Obviously we just mentioned earlier, Bohemian Rhapsody is

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is kicking around. People like the movie, regardless of what

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>critics said. It's closing in on the foreign film Cold

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>War is actually a favorite, pretty beautiful, and I'm actually

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>picking Pablokowski the director as a as a nominee because

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>directors really love I think a lot of people are not.

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't say a lot, but I felt a little

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 1>bit on a limb with that. Well. I do think

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Joanna Coolig the Star any other year. This is the

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>most competitive actress race and history. I think she would

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>get in there too. She's fantastic. I've got eighth grade

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on here to people love that movie. Elsie Fisher any

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>other year. Yeah, yeah, yeah, she's gotten some love from

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>critics and globes. But Josh Hamilton as her father another

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>person I would love to see a supporting an actor.

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got Leaving No Trace as a possibility because this movie. Uh,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting that there's not a single negative review

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on Rotten Tomatoes. I mean it is worth mentioning that

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>when you've got two reviews, it's been hard for them

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to get people to watch the movie. I think the

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Film Critics Association giving Deborah Granting their Best

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Director award is the kind of thing that hopefully bubbles

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>up that screener in the pile, you know, and maybe

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll put it in because I do think that Thomas

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and Harcourt Mackenzie is one possibility for supporting actress. I

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>really do. The problem is do you think that's a

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>supporting role? Uh? Not really, But I'm not gonna I

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>will not have those debates anymore. People go off about

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>category for every year and it's like how but whatever?

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Like Thank Foster is wonderful too, I mean as shocking

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about that you have him on here for something Hell

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or high Water? Oh yeah yeah? And then Quiet Place

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is lingering because you know, a f I selected it

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>as one of his ten movies huge Box Office in April,

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>great reviews as well, and just absolutely well made. I

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>mean it's like a very well crafted piece of work.

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's you know, it has fans feel like a

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Quiet Place sort of took the slot that people thought

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Hereditary would phil because and by the way, have you

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>read the Quiet Place screenplay because they sent it out

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>It is it's just action, right, It's so well written,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.239
<v Speaker 1>like almost like a novel, like the Well it's all

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>text because there's obviously very little dialogue. It's so gripping,

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's such a it's a great read. And

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily Blunt was a surprise for Up Me Anyway, a

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>nominee for for that at the ZAG Awards. Do you

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>think that translates to Oscar nomination? Thinks so, but I

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know. No. I think she's in for Mary Poppins,

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but probably not a quiet place. I think she could

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>win for Mary Poppins. My number ten though its First

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Man and and this could be just like be done,

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>but because of box office and it just felt like

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it went away. The Critics Choice Awards nominated for ten awards,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>which was a huge boost for them, including Best Picture.

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, this ten is the ten that the that

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast Film Critics uh well, of which I am

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a member, but they always you know, that's like three

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>people voting. And this is what I'm this is the

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>point of making about critics is when you finally get

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like a big group of people voting, not some thirty

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>member forty member regional critics group on its own, when

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of analyze how these things play out

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>with a broad group of people. It's interesting. And First

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Man was in there, and I think it's one of

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the best movies of the year. I love it so much.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I love Damien Chisell the director. I think he's infuriating

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Lee talented, talented, and yeah, I think Gosling is fantastic

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>in it. It's a very quiet performance, a purposefully quiet performance.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It is such a good movie across the board, aspires

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>so much. Add too, Yeah, I don't. I can't explain

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>why it didn't off at the box office. You might

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>have better theories than I do. Um. I think it

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>was a release date. I think they needed to move it. Yeah.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I also think I also feel like I only ever

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>saw the same trailer over and over again. Yeah, I

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>mean Universal is going to think I'm like bagging on

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>them after Green Book now, But you know, whatever, what

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>happened is what happened. I still think the movie is

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a great piece of work, and I think the Academy

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>is gonna recognize that. I hope. So if anything, like

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe they'll say, like, hey, screw you for not I

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know who they're talking to when I say, hey,

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>screw you, screw you for not checking this out and

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we liked it anyway and we're putting it forward. Well,

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they do need I do think it would be a

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>statement in terms of like the whole flag controversy quote

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>unquote around the movie was such bullshit. Can we just

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>like you see the flag? You see like countless times

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like when I saw the movie, and tell you right,

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I tweeted was the fucking flag is

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>right there, like because the controversy was bubbling out of

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>venice at that point. Anyway. Uh, and if you don't

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>know what we're talking about, there's there is a lack

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of a scene depicting Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong planting

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>planting the flag. You definitely see the flag on the moon,

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>like this is a Michael Bay military commercial or something like. Anyway,

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.479
<v Speaker 1>I've just gotta pay some bills here really fast. Uh.

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Speaking earlier of A Star Is Born, you know, this

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>episode of Playback is brought to you by Warner Brothers.

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>A Star Is Born. As we talk about important films

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of this past year, this one is top of mind,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>resonating with critics and audiences for its emotional authenticity, and

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the film's director, Bradley Cooper is being recognized for his

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>brilliant work as a filmmaker and actor, along with his

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>cast Lady Gaga and Sam Elliott for their stunning performances varieties.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Film critic Peter de Bruge insert applause here, wait wait wait,

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>has said Bradley Cooper's directorial debut as a dazzling reminder

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of why we love movies in the first place. In

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Times critic Justin Chang said, from the first frame,

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it cast a spell that kind of lets you know

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>immediately that you're in good hands. Would just we love

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Justin Justin, I agree with that. That's a great way

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to put it. A star is born for your consideration

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in all categories. Oh, I just want to say I

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>totally agree with your list. I think this is the ten. Um.

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Can I just tell you that we sort of touched

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:17.959
<v Speaker 1>on eighth grade in some other movies that we'd love

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to see on this list. Um, two of my favorite

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>movies of the year. They Hate You give UM fantastic movie.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I really thought it would make a hundred million dollars.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And Russell horns being amandalist. Stenberg would be in the

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation by the way. Russell is in the conversation in

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a way you might not realize. Yeah, the critical I

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>think he's second to Richard E. Grant right now. From

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>can you ever forgive me huge, But yeah, that's notable,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So No, Box might want to wake up a little

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>bit around that. If if they I don't know what

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. Have they done a lot? I feel like

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they have. I feel like they like they did a

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>good campaign and good advertise seen and I really thought

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>word of mouth, which is and the movie is not

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a disappointment. I mean, it's just I just I only

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>recently saw it too. Well, that's part of the problem.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think every week I've been asking people like, why

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't you seen this movie? And I was really hoping

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Sag might come through because the whole it's just a star.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>She's a star. Um. The other one is as I

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>previously mentioned, I think, um, Spider Man into the Spider

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Verse might be the best movie of the year. Should

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be on this list. When did you see It's it's

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>been a little while, Yeah, but not I love that movie.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It's so good in that movie. I hope the sound

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>branch gets a listen if you will, everything about that movie.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm afraid it's going to be snubbed for animated

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>film the way that Lord and Miller's Lego movie was

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and Cloudy with a Chance of meat Boss. You know,

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen that. I mean, they were they they

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>just haven't made it in there yet. So we'll see. Uh,

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>let's do a quick kind of blast through the acting categories.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>For best Actor, I think we all agree Bradley Cooper,

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Christian Bale, Viggo Mortenson, and probably Romney Malick for Bohemian Rhapsody. Yeah,

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a lock. And then your fifth is

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>John David. I'm going with Ethan Hawk, probably the most

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>awarded performer on the critics circuit so far. Naturally, I

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that is a critics performance in so many ways

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in movie First Reformed. So you think that translates to

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I think so. Well. He also has the

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the movies now on Amazon Prime, like anyone

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>can see it. There's no excuse. Yeah, but I just I,

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think John David Washington. Um. By the way,

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised to see Ryan Gosling pop

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>up here. We had all these people on the show

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this year except for Vigo. Oh, how convenient we go

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for Captain fantastic Um. You know again, Gosling is great.

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd love for him to get some traction, but it's

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>such a passive performance. That's hard, which is like the

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>hardest thing to do to like, he's he's so good

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in it. Lucas Hedges was nominated for Boy or Raised

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Golden Globes. Uh, you know, playing a young

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>man who was forced into convert Visian therapy by his parents.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>He's he's going to have like twelve oscars in a

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:09.239
<v Speaker 1>few years. He's great. Shoutout to North Carolina school Yard. Uh.

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>John c Riley stand and Ali got the Golden Globe nomination.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Also picked up critics when um for playing Uh, which

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>one is he He's a hearty party. Yes, it's a

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>fun performance. It's a it's a nice movie. You know,

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a sony classics. Uh. It's a very sweet property

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. And you know, nothing makes us so good.

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Nothing takes me out of a movie faster than bad

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>prosthetics and a bad wig. And I don't know how

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they made him. He looked, it looked. Really it's it's eerie.

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And I've got Willem Dafoe kind of at the bottom

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of the list here. He won the Venice Prize for

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Add Trinity's Gay He plays Vincent van go Um nominee

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>last year for Florida Project nearly a winner. Uh, you know,

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hard for that kind of movie to get some trash.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It's such a you know, Julian schnab Oh. I respect

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Julian and Chinabo's work quite a bit. You know, no

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>one makes movies the way he does, certainly so, but yeah,

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>best actress. I think it's going to be the SAG five. Absolutely.

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>We've got Lady Gaga, Olivia Coleman from the Favorite, Emily Blunt,

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Mary Poppins, Molista McCarthy from Kenny Every Forgive Me, and

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank God she kind of turned on the afterburners because

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a moment where it felt like she was fading.

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I was getting nervous, it was taken over, and I

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.719
<v Speaker 1>was just like, dude, she's amazing, come on. And then

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>she started picking up some more critics awards, and she's in.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think by the way, I would I would love.

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that that movie might actually get into Best Picture.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It could. When I saw both that and Favorite, obviously

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I had my feelings on the Favorite, I tell you right,

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I kind of thought, can You ever Forgive Me? Was

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>just made more sense, It plays more broadly. I really

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>liked that movie. I love that movie. It's one of

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>my favorites. And Merial Heller is that the light head

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>her on the show. Wonderful, It's awesome, wonderful. I cannot

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:01.239
<v Speaker 1>wait for her Mr. Rogers movie. Yeah, Tom, thanks uh

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and then Glenn Close I have for number five and

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Wife, but it could go to Elsie Fisher

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>eighth grade. You know if that hasn't do you think

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth position? Wow, So you don't think she's winning?

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I never have. Well that's I know you haven't, but

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>like I thought, maybe you came to your senses recently.

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know. I think we're the fire

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for something like that. I don't sense that this is

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like Julianne Moore with that movie she won for or

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. You know, I understand she's overdue. I

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is the performance to do it though.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>That's all. Think she's a treasure and all of that.

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, coming down to Emily Blunt, Olivia Coleman,

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and Lady Gaga, if I had to guess, I would

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>say Lady Gaga. Really, I mean I would not be

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>unhappy with that. I' don't be unhappy with any of those.

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy unhappy with any of these five amazing women,

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>let me put it that way. But back to the wife,

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I kind of thought, maybe this is like sacrilege. I

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>thought Jonathan Price was better. He's fantastic and we had

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>more work with In my mind, I mean, she doesn't

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>really she she's kind of like she doesn't get a

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ton to chew on until towards the end of the movie.

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But he's really just kind of so much going on.

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I get the performance, I just I just

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's the one that would bring her the win.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, she's doing a play. I mean

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly not in a year like this. Also one for

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for performance. Maybe she wouldn't have won for in a

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>much more competitive year. That's absolutely true. Well that's also

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>like when Leonardo DiCaprio one, I mean like he was

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna win, he was overdue, but it's biggest competition that

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>he was Brian Kranston and Trumbo. Right. Uh. Then, Also,

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know Rosamond Pike got a surprise nomination from the

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Golden Globes for a Private War. I thought she might

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>break into sag really respond to that performance. It's it's uh,

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a moving movie. Again any other year. Yeah, Tony

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Collette is my personal favorite performance of the year period. Uh, hereditary.

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I wish she could get in here. I'm just like

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>fingers crossed. If the critics can push anybody in, maybe

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's her. But it's it's hard man that that that

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.719
<v Speaker 1>horror is always hard kind of gory harror is certainly

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>hard too, So I don't know if which is crazy

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>because it gives people a chance to show so much

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>range and vulnerability. And yeah, she's fantastic. I actually thought

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>by Old Davis would get in as well, but people

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>just aren't saying the reason. It's a bummer. Yeah, Liza

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Pericio from Roma, you know, the non actress of the

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch um. You know, she's they're working her hard, like

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>she's everywhere, and she's delight and she's really good in

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie, and you know, she could squeeze in. I

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely think that she is fifth or six. I think

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised to see her show up again.

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to you know, gauge how much uh the

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>love for Roma is true, But if she shows up,

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised at all. In fact, I'd

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be delighted. Nicole Kidman and Destroyer. Oh gosh, I totally forgot. Yeah,

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to believe the nomination for that, and she's

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>so good and that end boy erased, and I think

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought her best chances were with boy or raised.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you might be right, but this is just

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a hard movie for people. Destroyer it is, and she's

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>wonderful in it. Sporting actor Richard Grant is like leaving

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>everybody in his dust. Can forgive me maybe at this point? Yeah,

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>because of just I wouldn't have expected this like amount

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of uniformity around the category. Otherwise I would have said

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Sam Elliott, yeah, because it would sweep. Yeah, here we are.

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And then he didn't. He didn't get a Globe nomination,

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>did he, which I mean, I'm sorry, don't even get

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>me started. Yeah, yeah, Merchel Ali we mentioned earlier Green Book,

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Timothy Shallowman and Beautiful Boy, and Adam Driver for Black Plans,

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's the SAG lineup right. Yeah, Yeah,

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>so that's kind of what I'm thinking. Possible to jump

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in there. Sam rockwell as George W. Bush and Vice.

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>He was nominated by the Golden Globes. Michael B. Jordan

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about from Black Panthers would love to

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>see him in there. I mean it's one of those

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>things where like it's not like Heath Ledger in the

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Dark Night, but it is a complex villain character where

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the actor really chewing is chewing on it and it's like,

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it elevated the material. And again

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>getting back to what I was saying about the conversation

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that movie centers, I mean, his character is is front

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and center there. If he makes so many good arguments

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that you're like, you're actually kind of Rudy Monger was right.

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like it's it's it's interesting. You know, if

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>he hadn't like killed his girlfriend, I might be more

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on his side. But was she his girlfriend or was

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>she just a means to an end? Both Russell Lawrence

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you give you know, possible, I would love possible. I

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>would I think if if I don't know what they're

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of planning in the last push with when ballots

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>go out in January, but I would zero in on

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>him if he can, because there's something sparking there for

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>people and Daniel Kaluya and Widows Great like he was

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>such a totally different role too that I think we're

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>used to seeing him, and I feel like, because I

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>know him best from obviously Get Out but also Black Mirror,

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>where I feel like he's being victimized so much, it's

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of nice to see him kind of just like

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this quiet, like you know, Oh, he comes back for

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Cicario to No No as well Cicios Ccario Day of

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Soldado, which actually I love that movie. Noone like

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that movie, but I thought it was really well made.

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, we're kind of like at the

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the list and who it's like whatever, But

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I just threw Nicholas Holt in here for the favorite

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>people do. A lot of people love him like that's

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>s performance, and so you know, you always get these

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.760
<v Speaker 1>like out of the blue, like oh, they nominated Maggie

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Jillen Hall for Crazy Heart, which I predicted, but you know,

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>people don't see it coming, and you know, something like

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that could happen. You know, who else is wonderful? We

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>already talked about Brian Tyree Henry and a Field Street Talk,

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but Coleman Tobingo has a couple of really great scenes too.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh Man. I talked to him at the Apollo premier

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York at the after party for a while.

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Guys awesome supporting actress. I would say Regina King is

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 1>number one because she's bawling everybody away with critic wars.

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But it was where was screen Actors Guild on? Okay,

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I heard from. For some reason, I

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people on nominating committee. They did

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not get the screeners for Beal Street or a Vice.

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>They until two days after voting closed. Um now, but

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they got them during voting. The people I talked to,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean some of them, people got it after, but

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking. There was about six people I talked to

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>who were like, no, I got it two days, Like

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>to the screening. Well, that is the thing. They went

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>to the Vice screenings they did because it's big and

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>flashy and it's Christian Bale and Amy Adams. So it

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>did not affect although it might have affected it because

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought a Vice would get in flour ensemble. They

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>did not make the effort to go out for Real Street,

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, frankly on them. But we also

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>understand how hard it is. So it's so hard to

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>watch him, so hard you're gonna if you're gonna agree

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to join the nominating committee. I'm just saying, like, putt

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 1>in the diligence, that's embarrassing that well. I also don't

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>understand why screeners didn't go out in time because Bealstree

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>premiered to Toronto. Yeah, so I don't know if something

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>went wrong or they're waiting for Vice or maybe maybe

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's just it's really unfortunate because I

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that it's that that's what cost

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>her the nomination. Yep, I agree, So I can't imagine

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>any other logical reason for seeing that movie and not

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>nominating Regina King. Yeah, well she should be in. I

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>still think she wins Amy Adams and Vice playing uh

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Lynn Cheney. Yeah, for some reason, I always get Marry

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and Lynn swapped in my head. Mary's the daughter, right,

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, she's, you know, a perennial at this point,

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>she'll win one day, could be, could be. Yeah, I

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>think she's gonna win Sack Yeah, yeah, well without competition now. Yeah,

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Emma Stone and Rachel Weiss for the favorite out of

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the two of them. Rachel's my favorite, really really, she

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just yeah it was great, but like Rachel really gets

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to play with some fun stuff like yeah, you know,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>she's there where she gets carried out. My fear is

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that voters are going to say, like, you know, she's

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're seeing Emma do something totally different, you know.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But Rachel is so good at these kind of roles

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that maybe, you know, I actually think one of them

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>might not get into the final five. At Oscars, Marina

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>did Tavera for Roma. Plays the mother so wonderful, and

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>she's been a delight on the circuit. She is I

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>remember the year is showing up for though, like no, no,

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's so strange to me, um, but she's

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>someone I could see again. If this Roma love is real.

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>With the Academy, I think she might have a better

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>shot than Galicia, just because the category is also competitive.

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's so cute. And she also she's been slaying

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the red carpets. She's been like the Lapida New Yonko, know,

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like she's the one actress that's actually this is what

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 1>she does for a living. You know. I think she's

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>going to explode in the next few years at to

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this movie, if if she wants to, if she wants

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to make American movies. I kind of think that she

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 1>and my prediction for the fifth spot. Are chasing are

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of chasing the same eyeballs in a way. I

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>mean everyone's seeing Roma, but in terms of like getting

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>that vote for her, I think I feel like the

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 1>actress votes are shift, which shift to the elitza more.

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But the one I'm predicting for number five really on

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a whim because I wonder if like these this critical

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>attention has made people put the movie in the in

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the player is Thomason really? I'm just like, you could

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>see this happen, and she's wonderful and she's a discovery. Yeah,

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>so they're chasing the kind of the same vote there,

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 1>if you will, in a way. And then we have

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Emily Blunt and quiet Place. Did you know Thomason's mother,

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I believe is Nicole Kidman's acting coach. I knew that

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>her family. Like there's like some acting royalty there, something

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 1>like the Hardcourt of it All or something. I could

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>be wrong, but something like that. That's interesting though. But

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>this is why I think someone from the Favorite isn't

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>getting nominated, and it's not Olivia Coleman. I think it's

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:07.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Rachel or Emma, And I see a spot

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:12.760
<v Speaker 1>from Marina or Nicole Kidman or thomasin Uh Emily Blunt

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Possible with Quiet Place. For this she got the SAG nomination.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Margot Robbie got the SAG nomination from Mary Queen of

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 1>scott which I sort of predicted, did you I did.

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I knew that seg was responding in a big way

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to that movie, and it is like, have you seen

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it right? And it is like a very um look

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 1>she gets. She gets to be ugly. There's like actually

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a moment where like you see like a blister like

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>fall off her face, like you know, and she's great.

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So then she getmin for Best blister falling off a face.

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>She's good. The performances are fine in that movie. I

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>just was not big on the structure of the story.

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Was just kind of was It's weird to me that

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 1>we have a year with two focus movies that are

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like biography. This is something that they do so well,

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>biographies with a wonderful lead performance on the basis of

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>sex and Mary Queen of Scott's and they're not in

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the Best Picture discussion. I think they were just late. Yeah,

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of sex took some slings and arrows.

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 1>That is such a bummer to me because I love

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that movie. Well, I kept saying, I don't want to

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>hear anybody talking smack about this movie that turned around

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and rave Green Book. I really thought there was a

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>period of time where Felicity Jones would win. Yeah, I know,

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.879
<v Speaker 1>you told me yeah, And I was like, wow, she's good.

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that accent kind of comes and goes. But

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael Caine won an Academy Award Accents every Captured on Film,

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>and Army Hammer gets to play the role reversal there

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the how great is Army Hammer this year? By the way,

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>between this and Sorry to Bother You? Like, oh yeah,

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>always I forget I'm sorry to bother you. So that

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I said that Ja Door, that was very very clearly

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>what is it? Not Green? But let's get Boots in here,

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Boots here, we had Boots on the show. Claire Foy

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>for First Man. She was nominated by the Golden Globes, right, yeah,

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>she got in for First Man. She's playing Armstrong's wife, Janet,

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and she's awesome in the movie. She's fierce, she's you know,

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of a role we've seen before, like

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>from Kathleen Quinlan and Apollo thirteen or like Barbara Hershey

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and the right stuff a little bit, but she makes

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it her own and she has not been able to

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>campaign as much as I think she would have been to. Yeah,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>what's she doing? I don't actually know, but I know

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that like she wasn't able to come out for Governor's

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Awards weekend, which yeah, and then as you mentioned, Nicole

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Kiman and boy are raised as well as a possibility.

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:38.959
<v Speaker 1>So those are the acting categories. Um, we're we should

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>wrap it up. I don't know what I have to

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>say here. Critics Awards, I mentioned all of that. You know,

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about her favorite what's your favorite movie

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of the year? Probably Spiderman Into the Spiders Spiderman. It's

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 1>just it's a perfect movie. Or it's either that or

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they hate you. Give what movie have you not mentioned

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that you'd like to mention people should check out? You

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.320
<v Speaker 1>know what? Oh? Of course Blockers. Blocker was one of

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>my favorite movies. And just it's so well done and

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Leslie Man is amazing. This young cast, particularly Katherine Newton,

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 1>are so fantastic and I just rewatched it again for

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>like the seventh time the other night, and I love

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can make a raunchy comedy that is also

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>very respectful. Like, you know, I'm assuming everyone has seen

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it by now, but like the very last scene, like

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the guys keep asking for consent with the women, um,

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and then when like when a couple of them are like, no,

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do this, They're like, Okay, that's

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that's cool. That's cool, you know, and it's just it's

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it was such a pleasant surprise. I did not

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>expect to like it, let alone love it. For me,

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say Minding the Gap documentary. If you haven't

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>seen that movie, it's on Hulu. It's amazing. It would

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be my number two after Roma this year. It's uh,

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just the story of these skateboard kids growing up in

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a suburb of Chicago, and it feels like it's going

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 1>to be just that, but it becomes this fascinating sort

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of document of spousal abuse and how it's how you know,

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>how it affects across the spectrum, and it's really good.

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really one of Barry jenkins favorite movies too. You

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>can kind of turn me onto it, yes, so check

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 1>that out. Is that Crystal Mozzel's film, No, It's being

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>lou Is his name, and he's a cinematographer and and

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:23.799
<v Speaker 1>so naturally it's well shot, but it's it's a great film.

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>To check that out. To clarify, Army Hammer chastises Lakeith

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Stanfield for going through the olive door, not the jade.

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>There you go, we've had to clear that up. I

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>could remember the one. What's that color green? That door

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 1>is clearly all of them. Well, that's it. That's our

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the Oscar Race and our favorite movies of

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the year. You guys should go out and see some

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of these movies if you haven't already. Um, I think

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a good year from movies. So I think it's

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a fent plastic year. Like I was saying, there isn't

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a movie on this list that I hate, you know,

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and usually there's one movie that I'm just like, why

0:45:55.800 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>does everyone that's always nice? When that doesn't happen? So

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>go see the movies. Everyone, Happy holidays, Merry Christmas to you,

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Malik Leaky mak Are you going to Hawaii? All right?

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>That was very good? Actually I am not because it's

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>only eighty degrees Like co it's gotta be nine year

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>above to get me on the Beach Well, thanks again

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the show once again. This episode of

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Playback has been brought to you by Warner Brothers. A

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Star Is Born. As we talk about important films of

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this past year, this one is top of mind, resonating

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>with critics and audiences for its emotional authenticity, and the

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.360
<v Speaker 1>film's director, Bradley Cooper, is being recognized for his brilliant

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.719
<v Speaker 1>work as a filmmaker and actor, along with his cast

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Lady Gaga and Sam Elliott for their stunning performances varieties.

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Film critic Peter de Bruge has said Bradley Cooper's directorial

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>debut is a dazzling reminder of why we love movies

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. In Los Angeles, Times critic Justin

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Chang said, from the first frame, it cast a spell,

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the kind that lets you know immediately that you're in

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 1>good hands. A Star is born for your consideration in

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>all categories,