WEBVTT - Lakers EMBARRASSED vs. Thunder, Mahomes & Chiefs TOUGHEST TEST? AJ Brown-Eagles DRAMA | Nick Wright

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What Draveing nick Wright Episode three ninety one,

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>once again going solo as Demonse is out on paternity leave.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>This episode of What's Raight with Nick Wright has brought

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>to you but excuse me, one hell of boy to

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>start the show, Getting all Choked Up, presented to you

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>by our friends at Boost Mobile and Straight to Voicemails

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Always is brought to you by Boost Mobile and a

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>lot in straight voicemail stuff We're actually gonna hit on

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Insane Night in the Association last night. Last night, Joker

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>could have scored seventy if the Clippers had any real

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>resistance to him. Joker scores fifty five. The Clippers starters

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>scored fifty four. Joker had what right around fifty midway

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>through the third quarter as he is, I mean, listen,

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>he's been unbelievable all year long. And then also the Warriors,

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>after a little unrest in the Bay Area after their

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>previous game, Steph put the Cape on and drops forty six.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Wimby has a triple double but also eight turnovers, and

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors get a great win over the Spurs, who

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously are without Dylan Harper Harper, but do have dearon

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>fox Back. Also, I this is unrelated, but related. I

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>suppose I because we mentioned Joker and then Wimby. Somebody

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>posted a screenshot of box Score plus minus and how

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Joker is just lapping the field and that's legit. He's

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>been that good. But it also had defensive box score

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>plus minus on there, and by that metric, not only

0:01:55.720 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is Joker the best defensive defensive play in the league,

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but he is almost twice as good defensively by that

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>metric as Wimby, which put this in the same bucket

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>as my commentary on some of the PFF grades or

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the original ESPN QBR before they fixed it that had

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the greatest game ever played be a Charlie Batch game.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>If your formula spits out that Nikolajokic is twice the

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>defender as Victor Wimbin Yama, you should shuttle shutter the formula.

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You gotta be like, oh, we screwed this up. This

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>should not be a metric that is that we use

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>or even pretend is useful anymore. And I again, I

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think Joker is the best player in the world. I

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>think Joker's been the best player in the world for

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a few years now. Luca and Jannis obviously and Shay

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>are trying to say something about it, but nobody has

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>wrestled the belt from him. But some of those advanced

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>metrics are just broken, just stone broken. And where I

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>think it could matter is in fifty years when folks

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about Joker the way you know, we talk about Wilt,

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, I didn't watch him, but here's

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>what the numbers are. At least with the Wilt numbers,

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they're counting stats, not and it's things we believe. The

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy surrounding one hundred point game, notwithstanding actually did happen,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>but in same night in the NBA, and we'll get

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to Lakers Thunder in a moment. Also, Jamis is going

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the starter for the Packers. And Lamar Jackson

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>missed practice on Wednesday. I assumed this was his annual.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>The got a little chilly and I got sick, missed practice.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But the reporting is that it's something to do with

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>his knee. If he practices today, it's nothing. If he doesn't,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely something, and we're not gonna know until he practices,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't matter how optimistic the Ravens are. We

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>know the Ravens and Lamar are rarely, if ever, on

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the same page when it comes to injury stuff, So

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that's not a big deal yet, but it's something to monitor.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Reminder everybody like rate subscribe review to the podcast. We

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate that, and I do want to start with

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the defending champion Thunder annihilating the Lakers one twenty one

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>to ninety two. Wasn't even really that close as they

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>get to twelve and one, and with the Thunders starting

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve and one blowing people out. Playing at this level,

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it does beg the question of when their second best player,

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>jadub Jalen Williams comes back, who was All NBA last year,

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>who obviously fits seamlessly with Shaye last year. But when

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>they're playing this well, it makes you worry a bit

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that adding a consensus top fifteen player coming off in

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>All NBA season might screw up what they have going,

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that they might actually get worse when they add him.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>And while one wouldn't advocate that they train that player,

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and in fact they can't even trade him right now

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>because of his contract and when he signed it, you

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>do worry that it's gonna screw up this great thing

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>he's got that the thunder have gone. So that sounded

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>incredibly dumb. Right as I'm saying it, You're like, Nick,

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what the hell is wrong with you? The team is great?

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>How can adding a great player who we have seen

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>with those guys play great? How can that be bad? Yeah,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of course it's dumb, And of course it's a ridiculous opinion,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course everyone would acknowledge it's a ridiculous opinion, except,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, when it was becoming the damn near majority

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>opinion when the Lakers started seven and two and instead

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of talking about Jayalen Williams, we were talking about Lebron James. Well,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they sure have a good thing going, Luca is in control,

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves is playing awesome. Maybe, just maybe Lebron coming

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>back would screw things up. That ninety six hours ago

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>was a quite popular take. Maybe less than that. I think.

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I argued with the owner of this company on TV

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>about that forty eight hours ago, and it's just there

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 2>are so many takes out there that exist around Lebron

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 2>that if they existed around any other.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Player would be laughed out of the room. And they

0:07:55.080 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>just but people are so numb to the in conversation

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>surrounding that guy for the last quarter century that we

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>accept it. It was a legitimate talk show topic. Will

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers be better or worse when Lebron James Senior

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>comes in and starts taking some of the minutes that

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are currently going to Lebron James Junior? People talked about it.

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Will the Lakers be better or worse when some of

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the shots that are currently being taken by Jared Vanderbilt

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and Marcus Smart go to Lebron James fresh off coming

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in sixth and MVP voting and second team All NBA. Well,

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to mess up the flow with Luca,

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like we didn't see Lebron last year. Once they got

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Luca and he was healthy, seamlessly play off the ball

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>just so insane. And the the real story from last

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>night's game is right now, Lebron and Jadubb are right

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>in they live in the same neighborhood. As far as

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>overall impact on the game and quality, you know, if

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you're ranking NBA players, they're within two or three of

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>each other. And by the way, the Thunder also didn't

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have dort And so how close are the Lakers to

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder? And the answer to that question probably is

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>not close at all. And while it is incredibly hard

0:09:54.720 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to repeat in the modern NBA, the Thunder who are

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>beating teams by an average of fifteen points, and at

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this point I got, what are a coin flip to

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>win seventy with respect to the Nuggets and Joker and

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the Calves and the Knicks, and I

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>suppose I should include the Pistons because they are ten

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and two and on an eight game winning streak out East.

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>The Thunder right now seem to be in just a

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>different class than everyone else, and the goal for the

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of the West contenders legitimately probably needs to be

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>can I make sure I am a two or a

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>three seed and avoid OKAC as long as possible and

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>then see what shape they're in coming off a championship

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>once they get to Round three of the playoffs, because

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>they are right now, and again, I know Denver's been

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>awesome and it's also really weird Denver and Okac. I

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think they play till like February. They play four games.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I think in the final thirty of the regular season.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>OKAC seems to right now just be in a different

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>league than everybody else. So last night was an exciting

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>night in the Association. The Marquee game. Daniel tell me,

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't play each other until February first, right, so

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they it's gonna be a while till we get to

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>see that matchup. And so they play February first, February

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventh, March ninth, and then April tenth. So we're

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to see them a bunch in a two months,

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, two and a half month stretch, but none

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>until then. But the story of the night was Jokers performance,

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Steph's brilliance, and the thunder just putting the Lakers to

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>better early. Now, the story for this weekend in the

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>NFL is the best weekend of games we've had up

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>to this point this season. Games, excuse me, games this

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>weekend where both teams have major playoff implications Bucks Bills obviously,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Chargers Jags, which barely makes the cut, Seahawks Rams, which

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is a maybe game of the year up to this point,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs Broncos, and then Lions Eagles, and it is a

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>damn shame that none of those games were able to

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be flexed to Monday night, where we're gonna get Cowboys Raiders.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>If there was ever a time to flip out the

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>four h five Seahawks rams for Cowboys Raiders. That would

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have been it put that Monday night and put Cowboys

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Raiders at four o'clock on Sunday. But they didn't do it.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So we have an unbelievable weekend of football and I'm

0:13:54.240 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with Chiefs Broncos, where I understand the numbers are.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs have lost two of three to Denver. One

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of those games was Week eighteen last year and totally

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant to me. What is relevant to me is this,

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes has played Denver fourteen times in his career

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's thirteen and one. It's the best winning percentage

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with at least ten games played against a single opponent

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this century in the NFL. It's the fourth best in

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>NFL history, you know, not just this century. And what's

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting is they have not all or even most been

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>dominating wins or crazy stats because even back when the

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Broncos stunk and Vic Fangio was there, they had a

0:14:55.000 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>good defensive game play in Foro Kansas City, and Mahome

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>hasn't had a ton of eye popping stat games against Denver.

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>The reason He's thirteen to one. Is because whoever the

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hell Denver's quarterback has been throughout Patrick's career, They've never

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>been able to give any trouble whatsoever to that Chiefs defense,

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that continues this weekend. I think that

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos at the moment have every trademark of an

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>excellent team except for the most important by far, which

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is quality quarterback and Bonnicks in the biggest professional game

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of his life, other than the playoff game when they

0:15:53.840 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>got destroyed, going up against Steve Spagnolo's coming off a

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>bye is a mismatch, and so I do think Denver's

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>defense is going to be up to the fight. Denver's

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>defense is awesome, Nick Benito and company are great, and

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>even without pats Ertan, that's an awesome defense. There's no

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>getting around that. But you're not going to be able

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to win that game against Kansas City the way they've won,

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the way they beat the Texans eighteen to fifteen, the Giant,

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the Giant or sorry, the Jets thirteen to eleven, the

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Raiders ten to seven, even the Eagles when they had

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>three points going into the fourth quarter. That's not where

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the Titans game twenty to twelve. That's not gonna cut it.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I do have a lot of spect for

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that Denver oh line and everything that Denver defense does,

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't change the fact that you have either

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the best of the second best quarterback in the history

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of the league, fully healthy, with his full receiving corps

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>up against right now a bottom five full time starter.

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>That's enough to tilt the matchup. Now, I want to

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be clear on this. I don't think you're gonna have

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>a thirty point game from Kansas City. I think it

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a similar game plan as they

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>had against the Jags. That would have worked, but Mahomes

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>made the big mistake of the goal line, which is

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>be conservative, don't turn the ball over, don't make mistakes,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>don't give them short fields, don't let Mahomes get beat

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>up by that pass rush that is on pace to

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>break the all time NFL record in sacks, and find

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a way to win the game and rustle control back

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of the division. Because this is for the Chiefs a

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>AFC West Championship elimination ish game. It would take a

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>full blown collapse by Denver if they win this game.

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>For the Chiefs, to be able to catch them within

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the division. And that's not even mentioning the Chargers piece

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. Now. The flip side to that is, if

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs win this game, they are, in my opinion,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>right back in full control of the AFC West. Kana

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>City wins this game, with home games remaining against the

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Chargers and Broncos, plus a road game against the Raiders,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a path to going five and one in the

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>division if you win this game, and then with the

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>feeling just being Colts, Cowboys, Texans, go two and one

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in that stretch and that's how you get to twelve

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and five, five and one in the division, and that'll

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>win you the division. And so it is a must

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>win for Kansas City when it comes to their chance

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of winn the AFC West. It is not a must

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>win when it comes to their chance of making the playoffs.

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But the AFC is it's really hard to handicap right

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>now from a seeding perspective, like what will it take

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>to be the number one seed, number two seed, number

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>three seed, and are we potentially looking at a multi

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>way tie of twelve and five teams for the one

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>or the two seed. The Patriots to me are, and

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna win tonight against the Jets. Are in great shape,

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and I just believe the Pats are gonna be the

0:20:54.560 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>one seed because if you're New England, even if you

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>lose your two tough games remaining home for the Bills

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Ravens, your other games are Jets, Bengals, Giants, Jets, Dolphins.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So if the Patriots can just hold serve, they finish

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and four and with four conference losses, that should

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>be enough to be the number one seed. And so

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure exactly how all the tie breakers

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>would work for them, but well, actually no, I am.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>If they go thirteen and four, the only way they

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be the one seed is if the Chiefs run

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the table, if Denver only loses one game the rest

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of the way, or if the Colts. I'm not sure

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>how the tiebreak would work against Indy. I think it's

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>too early to see, but I don't think the Cults

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>are going thirteen to four. So the Patriots are in

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>great shape and the real fight should be for the

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>two seed, which again in the AFC this year, is

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to be any huge prize. The two seed

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in Round one likely plays either Kansas City Buffalo or

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, maybe Denver. So it's just you don't know

0:22:55.560 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>how the playoff brackets going to end up falling. What

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you do feel comfortable in is if Kansas City loses

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this game, that they they are now just trying to

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>secure a playoff berth and no longer the division. And

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>if Denver loses this game, which I think they will,

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they they then run the risk of having the end

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of season that I anticipated when I picked them to

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>miss the playoffs that they could have. They have a

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>buye and then they have a couple soft spots at

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders, which we didn't think was going to be

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a soft spot, but now you assume that's without Jayden Daniels,

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and then at the Raiders. But then the final month

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year Packers, Jags, Chiefs, Chargers, and you wonder

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>if Denver, if there is a world where Denver goes

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>from eight to two, and I think currently the two

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>seed to ten and seven and the seven seed and

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>going into the playoffs playing its worst ball again, maybe

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna be proven Stone wrong about bone Nicks

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>and this team on a seven game fraudulent winning streak.

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it, but a huge game and one of

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the bigger, the biggest regular season game, the biggest game

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that's been played in Denver in a decade, and one

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger regular season games because there haven't been

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>many of them that the Chiefs have played since Mahomes

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>has been there. Today's show is brought to you by

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>our new presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. It's that time

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of year when every day feels like a big game day.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You got Pro football, college football, NBA college hoops all happening,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and on hard Rock Bet, there's always something to bet on.

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't tried your first bet on hard Rock

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Bet yet, there's still time for you to get one

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets if you win.

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Just place a five dollars bet and if it hits,

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you get not only your winnings, but one hundred fifty

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars in extra bonus bets. And if you're not sure

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>what to place your first bet on, check out the

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet Stats Hub. It's loaded with trend streaks

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and stats to help guide your picks. Numbers don't lie,

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and neither does the data. Here's some that stood out

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for me, Kelsey has had at least forty five receiving

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>yards in seven straight games against divisional opponents. His over

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>under set under that number at forty three and a half.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks have won ten straight on the road. They

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, are underdogs in LA and maybe the game

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of the year this week and check out the stats

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>hub now get the edge and bet with confidence. The

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet sportsbook GAP is the only legal sportsbook

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>for whenever you're in Florida, and it's also live in Arizona, Ohio,

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, and Colorado, coming soon

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to more states too. Plus, hard Rock Bet offers new

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>promos every day, so whenever you're listening, just open the

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>app and check out what they've got going any day

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of the week. Download the hard Rock Bet app and

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>make your first deposit. Payable and bonus bets not a

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida. In Florida,

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital, LLC. In all other states.

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Must be twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight. Admit it in Indiana. If you are someone

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know as a gambling problem wants help, call one

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem called one

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia. All Right, Seahawks at Rams is, as I've

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 1>been saying, maybe the game of the year up to

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this point. It is wildly important. And also this sounds

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>so dumb. I hate that I'm saying this, but this

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is what I truly believe. It's wildly important and also

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe not important at all. And what I mean is

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>these might just be the two best teams in football.

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>And both of these teams have oddly been better on

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the road. They're a combined to eight and one on

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the road while being a combined six and three at home.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And these two teams are gonna play each other again

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in a few weeks. I don't know if it's a

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, but obviously they're gonna play again before the

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>end of the season. They play. Yeah, in five weeks,

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're gonna get a chance for some get back.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>What I do think is not likely but possible that

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for the NFC West to have a chance at the

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>one seed, one of these teams is gonna have to

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sweep the other because Philly their remaining schedule and their

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>division is just so soft. After again, Philly is Detroit

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this week, and Tampa We've talked all year about how

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>soft their final six weeks are. That if one, if

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Seattle or the Rams can sweep the other one, that

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>would go a super long way into one of those

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>teams potentially being the one seed. These are also arguably

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the two most well balanced teams in the league as

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>far as great defense, great offense as far as more

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>than competent running game and then dynamic passing attack. They

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>both have two very good but very different coaches. And

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's exactly what it should be. Home team favored by

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>three old school where that used to be now it's

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>two and a half really is what the home team gets,

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but where two totally equally matched teams will give the

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>home team three points. And I don't have a super

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>strong handicap on this game. I my lean is the

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Rams because it's in Los Angeles, but as I said,

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's on this insane. They haven't lost it on the

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>road this year, and I think think they were ten

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and zero or they've won ten straight on the road,

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I'm putting too much into the home field

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>advantage piece of it. The other kind of tangential storylines

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are we get to see Donald in a big spot,

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not gonna do the Pumpkin mode thing on

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald because I feel like he's been so good this

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>year that he deserves more respect than that. But it

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the concern last year was how will Sam

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>play in these big spots, And obviously at the very

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the year he played his absolute worse after

0:30:54.800 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>playing so great all year long. He also last year

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Rams in the regular season but played well,

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and then lost to the Rams in the playoffs but

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>played terribly. So there is that kind of hanging over

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the game a bit. And then there is the point

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that I have been maybe annoyingly hung up on this

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>week on TV, which is Matt Stafford cementing himself as

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a Hall of Famer by winning League MVP this year.

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Because Stafford's Hall of Fame case is going to be

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>really tricky, and that he's got no all pros, has

0:31:53.600 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>never come close to an MVP, has a five hundred record,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna finish in the top ten and closer

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to five than ten in every major passing stat The

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>eye test helps him a ton. He's been as an

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable statistical playoff resume, even if it's limited, five and

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>five playoff record and number one pick. People not necessarily

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>holding the Detroit stuff against him right now, I don't

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>think he'd get in. But if you win a super

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Bowl and you're a quarterback and you win an MVP,

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>every single one of those guys has gotten in except

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for thiseman. And Thaisman's was weird because he won his

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl in the strike year and the one is

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>MVP the year after. So point is, I think of

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Stafford wins the MVP, he punches his Hall of Fame ticket,

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think for him to win the MVP, they

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>probably have to win the division because that's just how

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the voting has gone historically. Like quarterbacks, usually it's the

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the two seed, but the very least you

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>win your division. So that is kind of a sidebar

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>story hovering over Stafford, who has just been out of

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>his mind this year, and how well he's played, particularly

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the last month when he's gone in his last three

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 1>games five touchdowns, no picks, four touchdowns, no picks, four touchdowns,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>no picks, and for this season twenty five touchdowns, two interceptions,

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a one fifteen rating, just a banana's bananas season from Stafford.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>If he can play a clean, really good game against Seattle,

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he puts a stranglehold on the

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>MVP race, but he puts himself in great, great position.

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, guys, I am going to Los Angeles to

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>see Demanse and the baby for Thanksgiving, and just like

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, the day after Thanksgiving, the Lakers have a

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>home game and I'm gonna go, So I am shouting

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>out right now. Sponsor of today's video, seat Geek twenty

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 1>eight million downloads. Seat Geek is the number one rated

0:34:54.760 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ticketing app. More than seventy thousand events listed on seat geek, concerts, festivals, more,

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>and right now, you of course can get tickets to

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFL season, which is in full swing, and the NBA.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And I've talked to you guys about using seat geek

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>before last year for this. When I went to see

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers take on the Thunder the day after Thanksgiving,

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we bought what six seven tickets, six tickets on seat Geek,

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna do the same right now, and you

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>know how it works. By the way I looked, I

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, maybe maybe I'll go true court side Seat

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Geek helps you out, and they do tell you, hey,

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>this court side seat is not a great deal. It's

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty one thousand dollars. This court side seat is a

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>great deal. It's thirteen thousand dollars. So maybe I won't

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>go seat geek. However, one row behind court side you

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>move a comma in that it's as far as the price,

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and there there's a big difference between you know, some

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>row one seats and some another row one seats, and

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 1>seat Geek lets me know what the best ones are.

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at them right now as we sit here.

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You can you can see the big green dots means

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>great deal, little red dots means stay away. And if

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you're color blind, oh, a score close to one is bad,

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a score close to ten is excellent. And they are

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all backed by their buyer guarantee. So if you guys

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>could help me out on this. Use code right ten

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Wright ten for ten percent off your next seut of

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>tickets at Seek. That's ten percent off any tickets with

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>promo code right ten. Make sure you click the link

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in the description, download the app, and have the code

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>automatically added to your account so you can use it later.

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to my friends at seat geek. All Right,

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>another one of the huge games Lions Eagles Sunday Night Football,

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and once again the Eagles cannot stay out of their

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>own way despite winning games. And I was listening to

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>my one of my favorite podcasts, NFL Daily I talk

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>about a lot with Greg Rosenthal and company, and in

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>previewing this game, his Cospatrick Claiban, you know, basically tongue

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in cheek, melted down about the media bothering Sirianni and

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>hurts about AJ Brown and about how this team won

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl last year and about how this is

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>much ado about nothing because the latest AJ Brown drama

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is him going on a Twitch stream and saying thing

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is things are not going well and drop me on

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy team, and how he and I'm sure others

0:37:53.840 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a non story. Here's why I vely disagree

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>with that. AJ Brown being happy or not might not matter.

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But the Philadelphia Eagles, with the most expensive offense in

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>NFL history, with guys who are all Pro caliber all

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>over the offensive line, multiple receivers, Saquon Jalen hurts that

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>team being this pedestrian on offense is a story. It

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>flatly is, and it's inexplicable. Their inability out of a

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>buye in a game they scored zero points in the

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>first half to get AJ Brown involved is inexplicable. Them

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>leading the lead by a huge margin on three and

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>out rate is indefensible. And so I give the Eagles

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>credit because they do find a way to win, and

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>they're champions, and the defense, particularly with the addition of

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Phillips, is rounding in the form. All of that

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is great. But AJ Brown is not wrong. He might

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>be wrong in his delivery in the way it feels

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>diva ish or selfish, all that's fine. But his concern

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>that this offense is not functioning properly is totally correct,

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>totally correct, and I don't have an answer for it.

0:39:55.640 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Petullo and Sirianni are while conservative with

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>the play calls up until they are just lunatics on

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the fourth and down at the end of the game.

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>They have the highest rate of running the ball on

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 1>third and long of any team in twenty five years,

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>which are just give up plays. Now, some of that,

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a tiny bit of that might be push push related,

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but really their give up plays. And so it feels

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>silly to concern troll the Eagles, who have won like

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty two of their last twenty four and of the

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>defending champs. But it also feels ridiculous to watch that

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>team have zero points at halftime, to see AJ Brown

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>with multiple games this year with three or fewer targets

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>after he had one game like that the previous three

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>years and act like nothing is wrong. Also, it is

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to me at this point a four gone conclusion that

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>AJ Brown is going to be gone this offseason, and

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I would be I personally would be quite surprised, Like

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>my money would be on AJ Brown is going to

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be a New England Patriot a year from now. But

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>none of that matters for this season. I almost shouldn't

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>have even brought it up because the trade deadline has passed.

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's the other part of this that is baffling

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to me, you have a buye you decide not to

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>trade AJ Brown the market for receiver. Like again, this

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is me just speculating, but if Buffalo was gonna give

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 1>up A one and a three for Jail and Waddle,

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine they would have given up something similar

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for AJ Brown. Philly didn't want to trade him, so

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>then use him. And if you're not gonna use him,

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gotta be because the offense is humming without him,

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's not Saquon the game before the buy. Notwithstanding,

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Saquan is having a brutal year, he is averaging three

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>point nine yards per carry. Saquon's yards and yards per

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>carry by game this season sixty three point three, eighty

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:55.720
<v Speaker 1>eight four point zero, forty six two point six, forty

0:42:55.800 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 1>three two point three, thirty five point oh only got

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 1>six carries and a loss to Denver fifty eight four

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>point eight forty four two point four, the game against

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the Giants one fifty ten point seven and then sixty

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for two point seven. So aside from the Giants game,

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Sekuon this year has run the ball won one hundred

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five times for four hundred and twenty nine yards.

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So what is that one thirty five for four to

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine. One thirty five times three is four oh five.

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So that is three point two yards per carry. I'm

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 1>now gonna check. I'm now gonna do that matth real

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>quick and see if I got it. I think it's

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>three point two yards per carry. So we said it

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>was four twenty nine divided by one thirty five. Yeah,

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>three point one point eight yards per carry. Aside from

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the Giants game, So feed the bald aj Brown. It's

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just baffling, and I don't think it's We can say

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:29.760
<v Speaker 1>him being upset is nothing, but the offense not working

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is not nothing. Hey guys, are you thinking about upgrading

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the all new iPhone seventeen Pro designed to be the

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>most powerful iPhone ever, but you're also thinking about the

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>potential traffic on your way to the store or transferring

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 1>all your data? Good news. When you order a new

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>phone online with boost Mobile, they will send an expert

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to your home or work to deliver your brand new

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>iPhone seventeen Pro and get you all set up on

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:58.319
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile within minutes, no hassle. Visit boosmobile dot com

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to get started delivery vail for select devices purchased at

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>boostmobile dot Com terms apply. Another huge game this week

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and Bucks Bills and vibes wise important for Tampa, but

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>not it's important for Tampa for vibes and if they

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>want to have a real shot at the one seat.

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not really that important for any other reason. We

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>talked all year about this three game stretch Patriots at

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Bills at Rams and then the six game cakewalk they

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have to end the year. So they'll be fine either way,

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>especially in that division and with the Panthers coming back

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>down to Earth the Bills vibes wise this is important,

0:45:54.800 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and also logistically wise this is important. The Bills already are,

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>according to the New York Times, down to fifteen percent

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to win their division, and if they lose this game,

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that gets cut in half. So unless they want to

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be a wild card, obviously they've got to win. But

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 1>you also would like to see Buffalo look like Buffalo

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>against a good team. And I know they just came

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>off that win against the Chiefs and that was a

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>great win, but fair or not, Buffalo's the one team.

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>The beating the Chiefs in the regular season doesn't really

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>mean anything to them because they're so used to it,

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and if they were to lose this game all of

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, They're in Houston on Thursday night, a week

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>from today, and you also feel like there's a chance

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Tampa comes into this game a little healthier than they've been.

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:20.760
<v Speaker 1>They already got their offensive lineman back, and Bucky Irving

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Godwin did return to practice. Now they were limited,

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>but they're practicing again. Buffalo meanwhile, Dalton Kinkaid did not

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>practice Wednesday and Khalil Shakir was limited. So Buffalo seems

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty banged up and seems unsteady. I I still believe

0:47:55.719 --> 0:48:03.919
<v Speaker 1>both of these teams are super dangerous come the postseason.

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But if Buffalo loses at home after losing to Miami,

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a chance for some real drama there.

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 1>It feels like amongst the fans there's already a lot

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of discontent. Some fans don't like the GM, a lot

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of fans don't like the head coach. A lot of

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>fans seem to not like Joe Brady anymore, and they

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>do all of a sudden, the Bills, who were supposed

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to have the super soft schedule but didn't take full

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it with the losses to the Falcons and

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins all of a sudden, their next handful of

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>games home for the Bucks at the Texans on Thursday,

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Steelers, and then do I have this right? Yeah?

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>The yeah, and then against Cincinnati and what should be

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a game against Joe Burrow before you go to New England. Again.

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough little stretch. So do I think like

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bills can full on steady themselves with a win

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 1>this weekend? And they should win, But you'd like to

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>see Josh Allen have an a plus clean game with

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>some big plays, and you'd like to see that defense

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to slow down the run, which they simply

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have not been able to do all year long. On

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the Buck side of things, a great Baker game and

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>a win would get him back where he was a

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>month into the year in the real thick of the

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:08.360
<v Speaker 1>MVP conversation, particularly if Stafford and the Rams lose to Seattle.

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And I don't expect Patrick to help himself in the

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:18.840
<v Speaker 1>MVP race this weekend because obviously they could lose. I

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think they will, But even if they win, I

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's gonna have a huge stats game. And

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>then the last game of the weekend that we discussed

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:41.680
<v Speaker 1>where both teams have real playoff implications is Chargers Jags

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and that is a crazy element of where the AFC

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>is right now. And this will probably surprise people. If

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jags beat the Chargers, even if Kansas City wins,

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City will still be on the outside looking in

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of the playoff picture because if the Jags beat the Chargers,

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the Jags will be six and four. Same with the Chiefs.

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So if the Chiefs beat the Broncos, and the Jags

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously have the head to head tiebreaker. So that is

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a weird spot for the current Super Bowl favorite Kansas

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs that even if they win this weekend they

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 1>might still go into Week twelve on the outside looking

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in of the playoffs for the Jags. And this is why.

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:53.799
<v Speaker 1>And this applies to the Chiefs even though I think

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll be fine. This applies to the Chargers if they

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>lose this game. And this applies to the Bills if

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>they lose to the Bucks. If the Jags win this game,

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>which full disclosure, I don't think they will. I thought

0:52:15.160 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that loss to the Texans was an abomination the way

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it happened, and since beating the Chiefs, they have one

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:28.760
<v Speaker 1>win and it came in overtime thanks to a stopped

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 1>two point conversion over the Raiders. But if the Jags

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>beat the Chargers, they get to six and four with

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>games remaining against the Cardinals, Titans, Jets, and Titans. Again, like,

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jags have a very real path even if they

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:56.520
<v Speaker 1>get swept by the Colts and lose to the Broncos,

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to somehow getting to ten wins and holding the head

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to again if they win this game, holding the head

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to head tiebreaker over the Chargers and over the Chiefs,

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:16.399
<v Speaker 1>which is which could create some very uncomfortable situations late

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:18.919
<v Speaker 1>in the season for those two teams. But I think

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers will be able to win this game. We'll

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:26.240
<v Speaker 1>see on tomorrow's show if it's one of the picks.

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And I also think the loss of Travis is just

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 1>brutal for him. And do I have hope that the

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Jags can win and we can recreate this iconic video? Sure?

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Do I think it's gonna happen? Probably not last time

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:49.839
<v Speaker 1>these two teams flighted each other, or at least the

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>last big game these two teams played against each other.

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's what happened, right, afterwards, I'm gonna tell everyone how

0:53:56.800 --> 0:54:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Nick Wright is drid. The Jaguars were four and eight,

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and somebody had the foresight to say, they're still winning

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the division. And I told you guys a month ago

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that the next time they lose was gonna be in

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Arrowhead to the chiefs in the divisional round.

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Yo, you don't say everybody laughed at me.

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, guys, man, never a doubt. I go, there's

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of doubt. The Prince comes through ndefeated

0:54:32.200 --> 0:54:34.400
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, undefeated on Saturdays.

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I forgot about that stupid take.

0:54:37.160 --> 0:54:41.280
<v Speaker 1>My had I forgot. I forgot about so much of that. Also,

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 1>my hair was a lot shorter. I'm getting a haircut today. Actually,

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:45.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should just play them that video and be like,

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I want that Jags. Look, maybe we'll give Trevor a

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>little a little juice, all right? Uh? Quick listener questions

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 1>What presents a bigger problem for Casey in the next

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>two games? Broncos deep into the cold, Steve into lu Anarumo.

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Broncos defense presents a bigger problem with the

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Colts obviously have a much, much, much more potent offense.

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Rule of halves, Why does no one at first things. First,

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>respect Jackson Dart. I think people we respect Jackson Dart.

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think anybody is uh over the

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>top about him. But I don't think people take shots

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>at Jackson Dart. And he asks, what's your minimum height

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>for an NFL quar quarterback? Six to one? Six one

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 1>is my answer? Uh, Nick, do you think Drake May

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is actually a year after your top five quarterbacks? Seems

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 1>like every year we had a rookie to this tier.

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:42.799
<v Speaker 1>I know he played last year with his first full year.

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean last year is basically a full year. I listen,

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he is gonna be in that caliber. And

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't add a rookie to that every year. Now.

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I add Caleb to that before his rookie year. But

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I pumped the breaks on c J. Stroud and I

0:55:56.840 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>pumped the breaks on Jaydon Daniels. I believe in I

0:56:03.200 --> 0:56:07.080
<v Speaker 1>believe in Drake May that he's a caliber Brandon. Can

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we please all finally agree Lamar is a better passer

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 1>than Josh Allen. No, we don't. We don't all agree

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on that. Someone asks, I need three best bets for

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, and I need a win. Tune in tomorrow.

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that'll do it for us today, like rate, subscribe,

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:29.400
<v Speaker 1>review gambling show tomorrow. Thank you to our wonderful sponsors

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:31.880
<v Speaker 1>at hard Rock, bet Boost, Seat Geek, and our friends

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>at Zen. Also shout out to Blue Dock and Volume.

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:38.480
<v Speaker 1>See guys tomorrow for our Week eleven Gambling show