WEBVTT - Netflix vs Disney and Education in the Metaverse

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where Innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Changes San Francisco and this is

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, a glimpse

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>into the future of entertainment. Netflix versus Disney, House of

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>Dragons versus Lord of the Rings and all of It

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>versus TikTok, Who wins and loses. I'll speak with former

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>TikTok CEO and top former Disney executive Kevin Meyer. Plus

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>Learning in the Metaverse Are at Tech series continues with

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a candid conversation about the future of virtual learning and

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it could tip the balance in favor of screen

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>time and lawyers for Tharanos founder Elizabeth Holmes failed in

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>along on attempt to get her fraud conviction thrown out.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna hear from our own General roles in Black,

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>who was in the courtroom for this decision. We will

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>get to all of that in a moment. Stocks ending

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>another week down on the back of a job's report

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that showed people are going back to work, but that

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>means the FED will likely stay on a talkish course.

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloom Brig Shanali Bossik here to break it all down.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Pay Shanali happy Friday. Happy Friday, Emily. If we take

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>a look not so happy of a Friday for the

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>stock market. You have the SMP down more than one percent,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>as you say, on the back of that expectation of

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a hawkish fed. But remember did try to scrape higher

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>into the day, ending the day lower than you do.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Have the NAZAC one hundred ending more than one point

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>four percent lower on the day, so the steeper decline

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>than you're seeing in the SMP five hundred. Both of

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>these indicries are down on the week pretty significantly. And

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>then you have the two year yield. Interestingly, you had

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that really rise very significantly into the week, getting well

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>above that three fifty level, really pairing some of those

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>rises that you saw on the two year yield. And

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>remember those yields have a big impact on what you're

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>going to expect on how you value a lot of

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>these high growth companies moving forward. And bitcoin Bitcoin is

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>back below twenty thousand your now at nine nine fifty nine.

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>We are watching that very closely. It hasn't broken too

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>far below these levels here, But again bitcoin trades into

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. If we flip up the board here, let's

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>look at another asset lately, very correlated to bitcoin. That

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>is that NAZAC one hundred. As I've been talking to

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you about the five day move here when I said significant,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>what I meant was a four percent drop this week.

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>That's not the biggest drop that we've seen. But again,

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>moving into September, which is a traditionally hard month for stocks,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see how this trades into next week.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We did see traders try to get back some of

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.839
<v Speaker 1>those gains, but again ending the day and the week

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>much lower. But a couple of individual movers for you

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>quickly here, Emily, I want to take a look here

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>at Starbucks because remember they had that new CEO announcement.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>On the back of that, the stock has declined two

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>point eight percent on the day to point nine percent.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>That is, of course deeper than we saw in the SMP.

0:02:57.919 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Lulu Lemon was your biggest s gainer here and that

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>now as that one d that was down on the

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>day six point seven percent higher on the back of

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>encouraging earnings. People are buying leggings Broadcom. We have also

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>one point seven percent higher on the day, shaking off

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those fears for those chip companies. Emily,

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna dig into chips a little later

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in the show, Shinali Bostek, thank you for that update. Meantime,

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>turning to streaming, Netflix is set to launch its AD

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>supported service later this year, a significant premium add a

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>significant premium compared to other streaming platforms. As far as

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we know, the streaming giant intending to roll out this

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>plan ahead of its rival, Disney Plus, which will launch

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>its own AD supported plan on December eight. Netflix hasn't

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>announced the rate for its AD supported plan. Yeah, we're

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna break all of this down with Kevin Meyer, founder

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and co CEO of Candle Media, a former top longtime

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Disney executive of course as well. Kevin, it's so great

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to have you back here on the show. So curious

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what you think of this raft of streaming news we've

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 1>gotten over the last several weeks, and especially this these

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>ADS supported tiers. How much do you think these will

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>really drive new subscribers to Netflix and Disney Plus. We're

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>great to be here, Emily, Always enjoy being on your show. Um, Look,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of promise in these as

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>supported tiers. I do think that there are very substantial

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>tail ones in the marketplace, and marketers are looking to

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>place their brand marketing dollars and high quality video environments. Uh,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>linear television has been the traditional place where they spend

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>that money, and of course that has becoming that's becoming

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>challenged from just an audience perspective as audiences moved from

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>linear television and pay TV over to streaming. That's what

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>streaming is where the audiences are. When I launched Disney Plus,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, several years ago, we had marketers trying to

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>bang down our doors to have advertising on Disney Plus.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So I know there'll be an explosion of demand. I

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>also know, having been involved with running Hulu for many years,

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that the ad supported version of Hulu was five dollars

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>less expensive for consumers but brought in and roughly eight

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half dollars worth of monthly revenue just from

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the ad loads and the ad sales that they add.

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm feeling pretty bullish about it. I do think

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that consumers do tend to like to pay less, even

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>if to put up with a small ad load. I

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think that both Netflix and Disney will be quite successful.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know how Netflix will yet price their

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>their their service with ads. Disney surprised me a little

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>bit with keeping the same price as it is today

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>add free for ads and moving the ad free price

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>up three dollars or thirty eight percent. I think that's

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty aggressive price move. It will be very interesting

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to see how much price sensitivity is in the Disney

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>plus subscriber ranks and see how that how that evolves.

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And look, you've always said Netflix and Disney can both

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and will both coexist. But over the longer term, given

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that we we've known them to face, especially

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>over the last six months, does Netflix or Disney have

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the edge? They're very different services. Um Disney is configured

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>with the core brands of the Wall Disney Company, including Inport, Disney,

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It's Help and Pixar, Marvels, Star Wars, National Geographic, and

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's meant is designed to superserve those fans, the fans

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of those brands. Now they have expanded under Bob Shapeck,

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>They've expanded the programming somewhat to have a little bit

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>more general entertainment adult programming, but still the essence of

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus is for fans of those brands, not only families,

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>because of course, if you have kids, you're more likely

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a fan of one of those brands, but

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>also for adults and single people and couples, many of

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>whom were fans of those brands as well. So that's

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the focus of Disney Plus. And if you are a

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>fan of one of those brands, you kind of have

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to have Disney Plus to satisfy, uh, spatisfy that affinity

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that you have. You can't get that programming elsewhere. So

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're you know, and the Netflix, of

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>course is much broader based too, serves uh the entire population.

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It's very much a general entertainment brand and service, so

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that has the broader footprint, and I think

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that Disney Plus is typically going to be an add

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on to Netflix. I think both are doing great. I

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>think both will be you know, quote unquote winners in

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the global battle for um for having a successful rollout,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and they already they already are, So I think both

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to go exist. And I don't know that

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>either open care one is bigger than the other. They

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>just want to service their consumers as best they can.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Streaming of course, has surpassed cable for the first time.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, with HBO's House of Dragons has been a

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>huge hit so far. Who else wins and who else

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>loses in this new future, Well, it's hard to say.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those are the best programming. I guess it's

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>an obvious thing to say that people subscribe to these

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>services to watch the programs that they love. I think,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Netflix has already been established itself as a

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>big winner. I know there's turbulence in the stock price,

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and they've hit some They've stalled out a little bit

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on growth of subscribers, but I think the add three

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>tier at a lower price will actually help them there.

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they should see some additional growth restarting with

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>with that offering. Um. Look, I think Disney Plus and

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Netflix are in arguably winners. I think that HBO Max

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with the programming that it has in its vault, and

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the and the ongoing production of HDO and discovery programming

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and even seeing enders, I expect to probably be in

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that in that service. I think that's going to be

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a global winner. I think I've been a little bit

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>positively surprised by Paramount Plus. To tell you, the truth,

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a lot of pok for it to

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be as successful as it has been. So I think

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's they're they're they're making a big play. Then

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>get the Apple and you have Amazon. They have a

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, a lot of cash, and they have

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>other strategic reasons to be in the streaming space other

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>than the direct economics of those streaming uh, the streaming

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>services themselves. So I think they're pretty well committed. So

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you have a handfull, you know, four or

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>five global winners, And of course the niches will continue

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to to to exist and then be profitable but smaller

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and those will be um, those will you know, won't

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>be competing with the big guys, but the big guys

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>I think there will be several of them. Ultimately. I'm

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing ads for Amazon's Lord of the Rings everywhere I go,

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>everywhere I click. Um. The reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, at

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>least if you look at the audience reviews not so positive.

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So are kind of rotten on Rotten Tomatoes critics have

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>been more positive. What are you making this look? I

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a chance yet to watch it. I have

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>seen the same same reviews that you've seen I would

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>pay a lot more attention to the customer reviews than

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.599
<v Speaker 1>to the critic reviews. That's where the rubber reviews the

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>road actually. But look, there's a lot of pent up

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>excitement for this, for this title, I expected to do well. Um,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be critically reviewed to be successful

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>or and rotten tomatoes only go so far by the way.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I just I expected to be to work. I expected

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to to you know, to help Amazon continue to gather

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and keep Prime subscribers. And remember, people subscribe to Prime

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>not just for video, but primarily for delivery of their

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of their goods and to and to conclude e commerce

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>transactions on on on that platform. So I do think

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's not a must win. It doesn't have to

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be one of the top shows of the year for

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it to be to prove successful and to leverage more

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>e commerce activity on Amazon, this is the old purpose

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of it, I think. So, look, you know, you've also

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about consolidation, but uh, you know, it seems like

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty optimistic about a lot of these services. If

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>consolidation happens, who who gets consolidated? It's always hard to

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>call that, Emily. Um, you know, if I knew that,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a crystal ball there. But these are

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>big brands, I guess the ones that are, you know,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhat smaller could be consolidated. No one's consolidating Apple. No

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one's consolidating Amazon. That's obvious. And then you look at

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the media companies and which one of those might be consolidated.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>There's always rumors about you know, UM Peacock and HBO

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Max coming to the other possibly, or the parent companies

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>merging Paramount and Paramount Global. The parent company is often

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>discussed as being in play, and Stars is out there too,

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, which is being separated from lions Gate.

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>That that will be brought with someone ultimately, I think

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so hard to say. Obviously, the bigger guys, if there

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>is consolidation, the bigger guys swallow the smaller guys. That's

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the way the physics of it, and that that will

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>take place here too. So you might look at you

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>might look at some of the digital giants to to

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>buy some of the smaller media companies, or you might

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>look for a merger between media companies. But I don't

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that that will happen ultimately, and not not

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the two distant future. Now, Dan Lobe a few

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago urging Disney to spin off ESPN was otherwise

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>positive of Bob Chpeck. Of course, you worked at Disney

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for so many years and oversaw ESPN. Was this ever

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 1>discussed and in your view is this ever going to happen? Well,

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a very interesting question. From time to time

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we discussed, you know, what what should be the deployment

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of all of the assets of the Walt Disney Company.

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>We had are very very um, a very high quality boarder,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and of course one of the one of the things

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that board always asks of management is to review the

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>asset portfolio that you have and understand whether or not

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>there should be some additions to the assets or some

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>subtractions should you sell something. So it is discussed, you know,

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>at various times over the years that I was there,

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was there for a very long time, so I had

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to discussed several times. Bob is a very smart guy.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I respect him all. I think he's a great uh.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>He's doing a very well good job as CEO. He'll

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>make the right call. My own observation would be that

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>ESPN was a very strategic asset for the Walt Disney

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Company when they are when PayTV was growing, and when

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>ESPN was such an important part of the bundle of

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>channels that Disney had, including ABC and the Disney Channel

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and X and all the different all the different channels

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and Nation National, Geographic, all the channels that they have.

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>As the pay TV universe continues, it's precipitous decline. I

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the channel business and also the audiences for

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>among the you know, for the programming on linear channels,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is decreasing quite substantially. The channel business, not only for

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Disney but for all these media companies, is declining in

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>strategic importance. So therefore the importance of ESPN to be

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>a bulwark in that channel distribution modality is becoming less also,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the the reason the strategic comparative

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of having a sports service like ESPN is less than

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it used to be. So I think there's more degrees

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of freedom, operating flexibility, if you will, for the for

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Bob and the management team there to make the right decision.

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't be shocked to see it um spun

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>off from Disney, but I wouldn't be shocked to see

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a state or two. Yeah, okay, okay, Well, next week

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>kicks off NFL season, and you know, there's been a

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about whether these streaming services need sports

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to take them to the next level. Is that going

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to drive the next chapter, the next era of subscriber growth.

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's not just sports, maybe it's also news. What

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think on the tournament of a big sports

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>streaming service outside the US called the Zone D A

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>c N and we stream the big most important soccer

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>leagues in Italy and Spain and in Germany, and we

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have and across the tontinent of Europe, and in Japan

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we also have a big, big presence, and in the

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>US with boxing. I think that the ultimate, the ultimate

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>way that sports will be delivered to consumers will be

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>over the top. It will be delivered via the internet,

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>on apps, on televisions, and on mobile devices, just like

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>entertainment programming is. I don't think that entertainment services need

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>to have sports, nor do I think that sport needs

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of entertainment. I think consumers are tired of paying a

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>lot for sports when they're just interested in entertainment. That's

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>what's bringing the pay TV bundle down. And I think

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that people just just want to watch for I want

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>to pay for entertainment necessarily, so I think the disaggregation

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of different programming types into and making leving consumers make

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 1>a choice of what they want to pay for. I

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>think that is the promise of the Internet. That's why

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>streaming services have have done so well. And I think

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that here sports services will be paid for

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>separately and package separately entertainment in the future. I think

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>would love an update on what you're doing at Candle Media.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Of course you bought Hello Sunshine. I want to know

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>how that's going and where your priorities are in this

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>new kind of constantly evolving world. Well, Candle Meet is

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>going great. They have a fantastic partner in Blackstone Private

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Equity Group. They've been unbelievable supporters of the Candle We

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>have bought about nine or ten companies already. The biggest

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>ones were Hello Sunshine and the company called Moonbug. Pella

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Sunshine is doing great, Reese is Restura, this spoon is

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>still highly involved with a great management team. There. We're

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>doing We're doing very well uh at Hello Sunshine, but

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>also a Moonbug where if you're a parent with small kids,

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you would under you would know of our great intellectual

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>property and characters and Mukoka Millon the most popular streaming

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the second most popular show on Netflix last year in

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the second biggest YouTube channel in the world. Slippy Little

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Baby Bomb a whole bunch of different ip that we

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't move like. That's doing very well. We have bought

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a company called Exile, which does programming in Latin America

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>under the stewardship of Isaac Lee, who was the former

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>head of content for both Televisa and Univision. He's a

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>great Latin American programmer. And that's a multi platform business

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that we acquired. Also Required Attention, which does social media

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>storytelling on TikTok and Instagram and elsewhere. That will help

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>all of our companies do. All of our brands do

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>much better in the marketplace when they need to have

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a social media footprint. So we love the fly wheel

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that we've created in traditional television content, social media storytelling

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and then related commerce opportunities. And we we're doing We're

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We're very polish on our future. I've got a three

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>year old Kevin Coco melon is huge in our house.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether to say thank you or no

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you for that, but you watch Kevin Meyer, candle

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>founder and co CEO. Always good to have you, Kevin,

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>have a great weekend. Thank you for stopping by. Twitter

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is asking a judge to order Elon Musk to turn

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>over all of his text messages from the first six months.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>The company is saying the billionaire isn't cooperating and exchanging

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>evidence ahead of the trial in this fight over that

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>forty four billion dollar deal bloom Brooks. Jeff Phely joins

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>us from Delaware More Late Friday News. Jeff, is it

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>usual to be asking for six months of test text messages?

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, should we have expected this given Elon Musk

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is witness number one? Yeah, I don't think it's an

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>unusual request. I've seen it in other cases, and I

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>suspect Mr Musk has a lot of business by text,

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so you know, so it's easily actually going to hand

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>them over. What's the likelihood Twitter is going to get these?

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the judge will ask him to hand over,

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe not all of them, but some of them,

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>if you know, have to go through and have somebody

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>look at them to see if they're relevant to the case. Maybe,

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but he's not going to be able to keep texts

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>completely out. How does one do this? I mean, I

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>mean there are hundreds thousands of texts, and there could

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of different kinds of information in those times,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>those things that might be interesting. True, But he also

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>has he liked many folks. He also has multiple phones

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and wipes his phone periodically, so you know, it gets

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of touchy, you know, trying to figure it out.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that since he filed the notice that he

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was gonna walk away from the deal though, that he's

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>been saving his texts because judges don't like here, and

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that that that kind of material has been deleted. Okay, okay. Now,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter says he hasn't been cooperating in the discovery process.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Well, and the discovery is the

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>pre trial information exchange that folks do so you can

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, get the material to put your case together.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter claims that he has not been cooperating in good faith,

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 1>acting in good faith, dragging his feet. In other words,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that the most people say, oh no, it's not us,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>has been dragging our feet. Twitter has been dragging their

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>feet and trying to hide witnesses about this whole box

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>issue again. These kind of fights are very common in

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the run up to these you know merger cases, all right,

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and we are still, of course waiting to see if

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this indeed will stay in October or if it gets

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>pushed back to November December, as Muski is asking for

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Feey in Delaware, thank you chip Stocks and focus.

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>After the US government imposed new license requirements on semiconductor

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>exports to China. Bloomberg's Ian King, of course, covers all

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>things chips Ian. What does this mean? Yeah, I mean

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a big deal first of all, for in

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>video obviously, for hundred million dollars in a quarter for

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in video that's and the ads up over a year.

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side of that, for China, this is

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a key piece of technology. These are key AI accelerators

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that really helped train these systems. So if you're in

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 1>a hyper scale you really need this if you want

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to stay up with what Google, what a ws are doing.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's really you know, could be a major blow

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to some of these Chinese customers, you know, chip companies

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>reporting it's been a lot of doom and gloom, but

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Broadcom seems to be more positive. Why is that? Yeah, No,

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they spent an hour on the phone ys

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>today with analyst saying are you shut you know, answering

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the same question, which was are you sure? Are you sure?

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's really a division between the PC

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>related companies where we've seen, you know, laptop demand has

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just gone away after the pandemic, and you know, lots

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of companies like Intel like you know, a lot weaker

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>outlook on the flip side. Don't comment saying, look, infrastructure,

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>these giant data centers people are still building. Companies are

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>still investing in their infrastructure and that's why our numbers

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>are good. Broadcom is, of course a big Apple supplier.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>What is what they had to say indicate about iPhone

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>de man, especially with the big Apple event coming up

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>next week. Yeah, no, you're you're absolutely right. That got

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of lost in the in the general mix yesterday.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>And what world Com said was like, you know, the

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>shipments for our large North American customer that everybody knows

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>who it is, It's, it's it's Apple are going to

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>be kind of what they were last at this point

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>last time, and demand this solid. So the indications at

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>least from that on a unit basis is that Apple

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is expecting the next version of the iPhone to be

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of as good as the previous one was, which

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, given you know the environment and consumer spending,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>will be seen as a positive side all right, And

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of course Bloomberg Technology will be coming to you live

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>from the Apple event Wednesday of next week, will be

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>across all of those new iPhones were expecting them to unveil.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's and King Ian thank you so much for that update.

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Emily Chang in San

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Francisco for the last installment of our a Tech series.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>This week, we want to take a look at education

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in the metaverse. With today's technology already prompting so many

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>safety concerns, how do we make sure the metaverse can

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be a safe place for all students. Let's bring in

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Kathy hirsh Passek for more on this. She's a professor

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of psychology at Temple University and a senior fellow at

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the Brookie Institution. Dr harsh Passing, thank you so much

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. What does the metaverurs look like in

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the classroom, or should I say what does the classroom

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>look like in the metamurs? Well, we're not really sure yet,

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is the curi answer to that. We're on the cusp

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of so much that's so exciting that it feels kind

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of like the dot com revolution, and I think many

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of us are trying to figure it out. But I

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>want to take you on a journey right now what

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be like. It's instead of reading paragraphs about

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>ancient Greece, you actually got to visit it, and you

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>actually got to figure out how we know so much

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>about ancient Greece given that we're living thousands of years later.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So what if students could be active and engaged as

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they were learning, as opposed to pass it when they're

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>reading or listening. You know, it's I feel like technology

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is just coming into classrooms. Were us getting kids to

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>start learning how to code? How are we going to

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>get educators and schools on board and equipped with this

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>new technology even when it is available. Well, I think

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take a little while, to be quite

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>honest with you. The affordability is a big piece, as

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, um the second big pieces right now. The

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>glasses are kind of clunky, but researchers are working on

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that technology. Folks are working on it, so quite soon.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be like wearing a pair of

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>glasses like this, and we're going to be able to

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>enter into new spaces and alternate realities. One key piece

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to add here, though, is that this is

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>not meant to be a substitute for the kind of

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>reality that we live in or for the social interactions

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we have in that reality. It's not a solo game.

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>This is meant to be a space in which we

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>can work with others and have teachers who guide us

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>into these worlds and back again. A lot of parents,

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>including myself, concerned about screen time, concerned about tech addiction.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't this make all of that worse. Well, look,

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>tech has its good sides and its bad sides. It

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>takes us to places that we could never go otherwise.

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, if we sit around by ourselves

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>just investigating tech, we kind of that the solo doesn't

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>work so well for human beings because we have a

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>socially integrated brain and that's how we learn. So I

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think what we need to move to a more collective

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>kinds of environments that prompt prompt social interaction rather than

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>taking over for it. They can't be substitutes, and that's

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be true as we go along the same

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>as nutrition, How are we going to stop our kids

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>from meeting dessert? Well, we have to set limits and say,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got to eat the roccoli. Now, what

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about concerns about privacy and protecting our our children in

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>these new worlds? Given that much of this technology is

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be deployed by big tech company, some of

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>which don't have the best records on privacy. Boy, isn't

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>that isn't that true? I think at the beginning, um,

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, will be wonderful for a lot of this

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>were through the gating of the education systems so that

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>teachers would work together to prin pick wonderful experiences that

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.239
<v Speaker 1>our kids could learn from and enjoy and that they

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>could be guides in. Um. What I don't think we

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>want to create is something that's a total free for all,

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>because I worry, like you do, that many of these

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>new technologies can get out of hand. So let's move

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>slowly this time, and let's try to think it out

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>before we just thrust it in the marketplace. I spoke

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Attorney General of New Mexico yesterday. Hector Balderis

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>who's sounded the alarm about kids privacy when it comes

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to technology in the current world. He's actually sued Google

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about how they used student data even even before the

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>pandemic ever happened. Because you know, a lot of the

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>technology that schools are using it's free software, free technology,

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of these schools are under research sourced.

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>He's very concerned about regulation and whether or not lawmakers

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>can figure out how to regulate current technologies. Take a

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>listen to what he had to say. Technology is a

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>great equalizer in terms of education outcomes, but we are

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>not regulating these companies, and we are not regulating safety

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and these safeguards within these technology products. What do you

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>think about Dr Hirst that Doctor Hirst passet given that

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously we want everyone to have the benefit

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of these technologies, but they also need to be fairly

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and appropriately regulated. But regulation is up to lawmakers who

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily understand the technology that they're trying to regulate. Well,

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to have to help train them,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's really important. I couldn't agree more

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>with what I just heard. I think it has to

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>be some regulation to make this safe for parents and

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>for children, and I think we have to deal with

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that upfront. In the same way we have to make

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that there's quality, quality experiences in the metaverse. Again,

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as is suggested to, we have to have some gate

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>keeping and a free for all that just says anything

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>goes is dangerous for children, and as a parent, I

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>would be scared too, ill with you. Then there's the

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>equity piece, and you know, so much of technic classrooms,

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>right like, so much of technic classrooms is not equitable.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Some students have access to these things, some students don't.

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have access, there can be these huge

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>learning gaps. I mean when it comes to something like

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse and technology that's you know, so advanced. Are

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you concerned this could could lead to even more, even

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>bigger sort of class divides and education. Well, as you

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>suggested in our paper, this is something we definitely have

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>to have to look at. But we're on the cusp

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of something and the classrooms aren't really ready nor the

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>schools yet for taking on the metaverse. So I think

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we had some league time here to really think about

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>how we want to introduce it. What should the school

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>classroom look like? How should we retrain in teaching, teaching

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>professional development, How do the teachers get on board so

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they help us in the training, how do we grow scientists?

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And so what we're presenting on the metaverse really is

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of high quality for children. Now in the interim, it

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>may be something like an imax, and it may be

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the communities will adopt a certain place where schools can

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.479
<v Speaker 1>take their kids on field trips and visit areas they

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>could have never visited otherwise. So I think there's tremendous potential.

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And well, I appreciate that, Um, your concentration today is

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>more on the risks and the safety and the oh nose.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to put together the oh nos

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and the oh my gosh is and see if we

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>can create an optimal product that will be safe for

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>children and will bring everyone in at a cost that

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>will be reasonable. So let's leave then on the oh

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>my gosh as. What are you most excited about and

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>where do you think we will realistically be Let's say

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>five years from now. I think five years from now

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we will have more affordable products that allow us to

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>visit the maniverse. I don't think classrooms will be quite

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>ready yet, but I do think we could set up

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>community centers that people could take field trips in, and

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the oh my gosh for me instead, a

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that were otherwise kind of boring to

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>learn for kids might then be excited. And if we

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>can bring more joy and more experience and more energy

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>into classrooms and into learning experiences, children will not only

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>learn what we're teaching them, but they will learn how

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to learn. And since the world is changing so so

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, that's the skill that everyone needs. Well, that

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is something certainly worth continuing to innovate for. Kathy Hurts Passek,

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Professor of psychology at Temple University and uh Senior Fellow

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Brookings Institution. Thank you, what a fascinating conversation.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you stopping by A hedge fund that told most

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of its crypto holdings last month, says today's jobs report

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>could have been dire for the price of bitcoin. Alpha

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Trey CEO Max Goackam, saying bitcoin could have dropped below

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand dollars or to fifteen thousand dollars if the

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>report was a major eat. You know it's Bitcoin has

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>been increasingly tied to macro sentiment joining us to discuss

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Juthaa Choe, head of OTC trading for crack in. UH,

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on this? I mean, I think there's

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>no question that bitcoin has been tied to the macro

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>markets um, and I think that's for a few reasons. So,

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in one area, bitcoin is kind of like

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a growth text stock, you know, a three hundred four

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar market cap. It's not really a macro asset.

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It does trade like a growth stock. You can think

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>about it kind of like an equity investment UM, but

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a small component. I think another piece is that

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy um, similar to signals

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like technical nowlysis. Sometimes if everybody's looking at them and

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of trading on them and believing them, you can

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>start to see that price action UM. And then I

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>think the last pieces that uh, in a lot of ways,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think investors in the crypto space are latching onto

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the macro narrative a little bit because without that, there

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really be many catalysts or many events for bitcoin.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're in a bear market. Volatility has come down.

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been sitting around twenty thousand for a while. And

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so if not for some of these macro events like

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hole and some of the jobs numbers, UM, August

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>would look a lot quieter, and so crypto investors are

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>following them. Um, I think for a number of those reasons. Well,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>speaking of events, we've got the merge coming up in

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>mid September. You know, what are you expecting uh to

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>happen around the merge? What kind of volume will there be?

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Will there be a sort of sell the news event? Well,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely seeing a wide range of speculative bets and

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>positioning and hedging that are being put on, particularly in

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the derivativist market and the options market ethereum. Open interests

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is reaching high as we're seeing a lot of volume

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>through our OTC death on ethereum, and so I think

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>investors are gearing up for something to happen. UM. I

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at the volatility surface of the

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>term structure, UH, the September sixteenth term, which is the

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>one that's kind of pricing in at least a couple

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of the merge events, UH, it's about ten points of

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the September ninth term, And so I think investors are

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>gearing up for some sort of price action in some

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of move for sure. What about cracking house cracking

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>handling the merge. Are you gonna halt trading of ether

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, we won't halt trading. Nope, So customers can

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>still trade ether. It will be available. They can trade

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at otc um. All the trading services will be available.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>There might be temporary suspension on withdrawals and deposits, so

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just at the plock chain level, but trading will still

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>be available. Congress has been questioning Cracking about your handling

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of fraud. What is it important that regulators know about

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>your security standards? Well, you know, Cracking abides by all

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the necessary KYC and transaction monitoring, and this obviously in

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>my area of expertise, but we've been doing this for

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>many years. Cracking itself has been around for more than

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a decade, and you can't be around for more than

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a decade in the crypto space unless you're abiding by

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>all the local regulations and so UM I think some

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of the inquiries might be related to just some of

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the fallout on related to cracking really from three a

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>C And Tornado and things of that nature. UM, But

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>from our point of view. This is just kind of

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>standard KYC transaction monitoring that we normally do meantime Crypto

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The story getting a lot of attention is

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>suing a woman after accidentally sending her seven million dollars

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>she was supposed to get a hundred and and and

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 1>reportedly she went on a little bit of a spending spree.

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm so curious what your reaction is to this story

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and how crack can handles these kinds of scenarios and

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>awards these kinds of errors. Well, you know, I think

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those things with that when you

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>look at bitcoin and what makes it so powerful is

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that this transaction settlement finality that you know, without any

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>intermediary you can send money seven and three, six five,

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's a gross settlement network that clears instantly, like

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>better than wire transfers. But obviously there's this downside that

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to be really careful. I'm cracking. You can

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>again imagine being a for many many years, has a

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of protections, policies, procedures, safeguards UM. Anytime funds are

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>are sent out, we have hosts of customer service representatives

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that US is send it to UM and we do

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a proof of reserves audit so that customers can also

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable that all of the funds that they have

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>on deposit are are not being sent out, either for

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.439
<v Speaker 1>affarious reasons or for errors. So all of these things

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>have really been built over time because all of the

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>powerful elements you get from being able to send money,

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, bitcoin as a method of payment on a blockchain,

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>come with some downsides too, and so we have to

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>protect against those for sure. So speaking out of downsides,

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>where do you think the bottom is, Well, you know,

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think it depends on the macro environment. I

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>mean within crypto. I think with volatility coming down, you

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>can kind of see that investors have gotten a little

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>bit comfortable around this level, which can be both a

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>good and a bad thing. A lot of the panic

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and the leverage has been wiped out of the system,

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're not as much of that um inherent kind

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of riskiness that's still in a lot of the positions

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. But I think everybody is waiting

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens with the macro markets, and once

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of resilience shown in the NAZAC

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and the SMP, then I think we'll see that altern

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>into crypto markets as well. All right, thanks for that

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>crack and head of OTC Trading Juicoo, appreciate you stopping by.

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get back to the Sara Noes trial.

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>A lot has happened since Elizabeth Holmes guilty verdict. For one,

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>she just tried to get her own fraud conviction thrown out,

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>but the judge upheld that verdict. Let's break it all

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>down with our court reporter Joel Rosenblatt, who was in

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom every day and was there for this latest decision.

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So what happened? So yesterday's hearing was a rather routine

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>hearing in which Elizabeth Holmes her lawyers argued that the

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>verdict should be set aside or thrown out for insufficient evidence,

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>so that the government really just didn't a mass or

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>martial the evidence required to convict her on on the

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>various counts that she was convicted of. Um. That was

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>quickly dismissed. H and kind of surprisingly for this judge

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>who likes to weigh and consider everything, he wasn't having it. Really,

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So what's next? I mean, does she have any other options?

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>She does, and so well there's a So we're entering

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the endgame of her legal odyssey. But there's gonna be

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a flurry of activity now. So we have left her

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sentencing next month. Uh and assuming that goes well for

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution, um, she will show up for prison six

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>days after that. However, yesterday at this hearing, she in

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>true kind of Holmes fashion, through something of a curveball,

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>hinted at a curveball. And this is a different kind

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of motion in which she's arguing for a new trial.

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So her attorneys have found something since since the conviction

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that they've decided that they've they're going to argue warrants

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>a whole new trial. So not not an acquittal as

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they argued for yesterday and looks like they failed, but

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for a whole new trial. Just three more months for trial,

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Rosen Black in the courtroom is what that means? Really though?

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>How likely is it that she's going to get a

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>new trial? All of this is unlikely. Yesterday's the chances

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday's acquittal. The acquittal she asked for very low probability,

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean extremely low. All white color criminal defendants or

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>convicts usually ask for this, but don't get it. This

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>new this new question of of of a new trial

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>based on this new evidence. Again low probability, but it's

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>just kind of so fitting with how this thing is unfolded,

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's just gonna be interesting to see what it

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>is that she's comes up with. So, in all likely

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>she's going to jail, In all likely that she's going

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to prison, I'm just like, it's just kind of unbelievable

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>after all this time. So I'm being careful. How much

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>time is she likely to serve when all is said

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and done? So this is the question I always get

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>because people always want to know. And look, there has

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 1>been a case made that her entire defense was built

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>around not winning and acquittal, but minimizing her her time served.

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>If she gets seven years, seven years, that would be

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a win for her. At this point, that would be

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a win. She's facing uh, well, legally twenty years, she's

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>likely to get eight to ten years, Okay, and at

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what point? How much longer is this drag on? For

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>her sentencing is scheduled for October, if you know, barring

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>these barring a kind of twist that we've discussed, um,

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.959
<v Speaker 1>she would be asked to show up for prison six

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>nine day after that sentencing. Uh, and she will appeal,

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's unlikely that she would have to be she

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>would have to go to prison while she appeals her conviction.

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And what's happening with Sonny Balwani? So Sonny meanwhile, yeah,

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody kind of has furgotten about Sonny um. But he

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was convicted in May on twelve counts and so in

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>other words, all the counts, including the the accounts of

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 1>patient fraud. M His sentencing is scheduled for November. Will

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 1>he serve as much time as her? Will he serve

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>four time than her? What decides? That? Very interesting? That's

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>this kind of this endgame, this phase of sentencing, right,

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>both sides will make the case that these are in

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 1>fact good people who maybe win austray all these kinds

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of arguments from family members and friends, and the judge

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>will decide, and he will compare their respective roles in

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this fraud and decide who should get what. They were

0:40:56.280 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>both convicted of conspiracy. It was a conspiracy, uh, the

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>crime of co conspirators. So I I'm thinking they're going

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to get the same sentence. I think they're both going

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to be serving eight to ten years, all right, Joel

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Rolls and Black who, of course, has lived and breathed

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>both of these cases. Thank you Joel for that update.

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate it all right. This weekend, NASA we'll try again

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Saturday to launch it's Artemis one moon rocket. The Space

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Agency tried earlier this week, but the launch was scrowed

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because of a problem with one of the rocket's engines

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and other technical issues. It is the first major flight

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in NASA's ambitious plan to go back to the Moon.

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>This mission is carrying test dummies instead of astronauts. You

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>can watch the launch Saturday on Bloomberg Television. Coverage starts

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern. And that does it for this edition

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology. I'm Emily changing in San Francisco. Tuesday,

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start a series on sports technology. That'll

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 1>be a fun one. Drafting CEO Jason Robbins will help

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>us kick that off. Have a great weekend everyone. This

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg the Big Who Day. Were up Everything