WEBVTT - The Parrotfish, Part 2

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>is Robert Lamb.

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick, and we're back with Part

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 3>two in our series on parrotfish, a group of related

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 3>fishes containing about ninety to one hundred species worldwide, notable

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 3>for their powerful beak like mouths made out of rows

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 3>of fused teeth. In the previous episode, we talked about

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 3>some basics about the biology and taxonomy of parrotfish species.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 3>We talked about their diet and feeding behavior. Parrotfish are

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 3>usually considered herbivores or something equivalent to herbivores. They survived

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 3>by grazing for algae, microorganisms, to trite us, and sometimes

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 3>invertebrate animals like coral polyps, along the surfaces of rocks

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and coral skeletons within coral reef environments. We talked about

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 3>the fact that some parrotfish species end up biting or

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 3>scraping off significant chunks of hard matter from the rocks

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 3>and coral that they scour for food, and then grinding

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 3>up these coral skeletons and minerals in their phyryngial mills.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of like horror movie machinery in the back

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 3>of their throats. I think we compared it to like

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 3>a bone transmission gear and then defecating what's left in

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the form of sand. And so as a result, parrotfish

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>are major figures in the erosion of coral reefs and

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 3>in the production of sand. So if you walk across

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>a white sandy beach in the tropics where there are

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>coral reefs nearby, there is a good chance that most

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 3>of the sand under your feet was at one point

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 3>parrotfish poop. This is true of reef islands built entirely

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 3>out of reef sediment, like the Maldives, but also true

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 3>of some white sandy beaches in places like Hawaii and

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the Caribbean. We talked also about writings on parrotfish from

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>the ancient world, how the Romans prized certain parrotfishes as

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 3>food items, and why they thought they were in first

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 3>place among the culinary uses of fish. How they developed

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 3>a range of beliefs about these fish, some of which

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 3>were fairly biologically accurate, such as the belief that these

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>fish are herbivorous grazers they sort of are, and that

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>they produce audible sounds underwater as they scrape the rocks

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 3>and coral for food. Also true, other beliefs not quite

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 3>so accurate. For example, Rob, didn't you talk about this

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 3>idea that they cooperate altruistically to save one another from traps?

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and in this became an enduring and long lasting

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 2>symbol of friendship, which doesn't really hold up to how

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>they actually behave.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>But we also talked last time about some interesting beliefs

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.679
<v Speaker 3>about parrotfishes in Hawaiian mythology, where the parrotfish is sort

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 3>of a progenitor of other sea life and enters into

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:01.119
<v Speaker 3>a pact with a Hawaiian mythical hero who can sort

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 3>of call upon his friendship with the parrotfish in order

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 3>to produce an abundance of fish catch for the people.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>And then finally, we also talked about research on parrotfish teeth,

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>which are made out of some of the hardest, stiffest,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 3>and most resilient biominerals known, even to the extent that

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 3>they are being investigated as a model for high durability

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 3>synthetic materials in the lab. So that was part one,

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>and today we're back to talk some more about parrotfish.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I just want to drive home that if

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you haven't had the opportunity to observe parrotfish in the wild,

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and you find yourself traveling to or in an area

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 2>where there are reef environments and there is some manner

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>of snorkeling going on, go check it out. Oftentimes, you know,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>there are various snorkeling companies and small businesses that are

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>very approachable. You don't have to have a lot of

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>experience to try these out. Again. These are often we're

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>talking like shallow water environments, and in these environments there's

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 2>almost always some sort of parrotfish to observe. And if

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>that's not your cup of tea, I want to add

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>that for anyone who would like to see various parrotfish

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>in action as well as other fish, I highly recommend

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>checking out Coral City Camera. That's just Coralcitycamera dot com

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>or you can look it up and search. It's an

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 2>underwater camera streaming live from an urban coral reef in Miami, Florida.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty cool and if you watch long enough, you

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 2>will see some parrotfish.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 3>In action pursuing their new career as streamers.

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, so We're going to get into parrotfish reproduction

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>here in a bit, But first up, we have this

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 2>other delightful area to look at something that I wasn't

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 2>familiar with at all concerning parrotfish. Joe, do you want

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to get into their mucus?

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Do? I?

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I'm already into their mucus. I've been

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>in it all day. So I mentioned in the previous

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 3>episode that the topic parrotfish was one that I initially

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>got interested in just by looking at pictures, you know.

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at like a photo of a parrotfish mouth,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 3>and I started thinking, what is going on with this

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 3>awesome palisade of fused together teeth? And so there is

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 3>another parrotfish subtopic that I think one could come to

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 3>in exactly the same manner, and that is their mucous cocoons.

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 3>If you look for photos of parrotfish sleeping, you will

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 3>find images of these animals nestled down into cozy little

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 3>niches in the seafloor or within the reef structure, sometimes

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of in a recess or a little heidi hole

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 3>in the reef, surrounded by what looks like some kind

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 3>of film. Sometimes it looks like the parrotfish is enclosed

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 3>within a gauzy, transparent orb covered like sometimes covered in glitter.

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 3>If you see these in motion and rob below the

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>photos here, I did attach a link to a video

0:05:58.320 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 3>in the outline that you can look at so you

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 3>can see it moving. If you see these in motion,

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 3>they will appear to undulate in the water, so they're

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of jelly like in movement and substance. In other cases,

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 3>this film looks like the fish is wrapped up inside

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 3>a huge funnel spider web that's just covered in sand.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Which funny thing about that the sand may of course

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 3>be the parrotfish's own excretion from earlier.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm looking at the video footage right now. It's

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>slimy but beautiful.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 3>So what is this gossamer bubble around a slumbering fish?

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 3>This is what's known as the parrotfish's mucous cocoon, or

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 3>sometimes in the scientific literature it's mucous envelope, described by

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 3>an author named H. E. Wynn in a scientific article

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen fifty five as a quote thin, transparent and

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>gelatinous mucoid substance which starts as a full the mouth

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 3>and progresses backwards in folds to surround the body. So

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>parrotfish are daytime animals. They sleep during the night, they

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 3>wake and feed during the day, and some species have

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>been observed to spend roughly an hour before sleep generating

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 3>this jelly like sleeping bag out of mucus from their

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 3>mouths before actually getting to sleep, so it's like a

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>bedtime routine. As night is falling, they start spitting out

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 3>the mucus and it starts to envelop their body from

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 3>front to back. So the fish are making themselves bedtime

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 3>slime sacks. But why now? First, as a side note,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to say it is normal for all

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 3>kinds of fish species, not just parrotfish or the other

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 3>related fish. Like some rasses that make these slime sacks.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 3>It is normal for all kinds of fish to be

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>covered in a thin layer of mucus on the outside

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 3>of their skin. This omnipresent slime barrier can provide a

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 3>number of benefits, one of which is osmo regulation, and

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that's maintaining the balance of internal water and solutes such

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>as electrolytes. So for example, and osmo regulation function within

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 3>our bodies. Human bodies is maintaining the right level of

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 3>salt in our body fluids. Mucous coverings on all kinds

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 3>of fish help with OSMO regulation. But these mucous coverings

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 3>on the skin also cut down on friction. So the

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>slippery layer of mucus on the fish's skin makes it

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 3>easier for the fish to swim along. It's like a

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>lubricant for the interface with the surrounding water. It's also

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 3>just physical protection of the skin from contact trauma such

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 3>as cuts and scrapes. It in some cases provides UV

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 3>radiation protection, in some cases might protect the fish from

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 3>noxious chemicals or pollutants in the water, and provides the

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 3>fish protection against drying out.

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So this is of course one of the potential issues.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 2>And just handling fish such as then like catch and

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 2>release and so forth. The slime isn't just something that's

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 2>on the fish. It's an active barrier.

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But that's all just the normal mucus coating common

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 3>to many many fish. What we're talking about here is

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 3>specifically this baggy mucus hyper sleep pod that forms around

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 3>some parrotfish and rasses through the night. So I started

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 3>looking at scientific papers about this to see what I

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 3>could find out. So first I was looking at a

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 3>marine zoology paper from the year nineteen seventy that investigated

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a few species of parrotfish to see how and under

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 3>what conditions the fish would make these cocoons. So this

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>is by John E. Byrne, who was a professor of

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 3>zoology at the University of Hawaii. The paper is called

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Mucus envelope formation in two species of Hawaiian parrotfishes, and

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the paper begins by citing previous research by Win and

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 3>co authors on parrotfish from the coral reefs of Bermuda,

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 3>which were observed to make mucus envelopes at night. So

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 3>when and a co author named Bardak argued that the

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 3>purpose of the mucus cocoon of the slimesack was to

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 3>protect the parrotfish from predators while it was sleeping. And

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 3>this is a hypothesis that I've seen repeated in a

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 3>number of sources that maybe somehow the mucus covering will

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 3>help alert the fish more quickly if a predator gets

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 3>close to it, or may in some way help mask

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the fish, maybe mask the fish is sent from predators,

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 3>or provide some kind of benefit along those lines.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So, either to some degree a cloaking system, a

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>cloaking device, if you will, or perhaps some sort of

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>like added security trip wire made out of mucus.

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 3>There you go. Now, we'll get to another explanation in

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 3>just a bit here, but we're not there quite yet.

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>First we're gonna look at like and how and when

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 3>the things form. So the author of the study, John Burn,

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 3>begins by investigating envelope formation in a couple of different

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 3>species of parrotfish. There's scas dubious, commonly known as the

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 3>regal parrotfish, and scas per pair. Oh wow, here's a word,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 3>pers bisilattis there you go, which is commonly called the

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 3>spectacled parrotfish. Both are found in the reefs around Hawaii,

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think the spectacled parrotfish may be one of

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the keyfish referred to as oohu and some of the

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Hawaiian legends that we talked about in the last episode.

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, So Burn.

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Did some experiments on these two species in his laboratory,

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>varying conditions of light and darkness within their aquaria, making

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 3>observations of behavior, and then examining the mucus producing organs.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 3>So previous field observations had found that as daylight intensities decrease.

0:11:55.880 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 3>As daylight goes down, fewer parrotfishes can be founding around

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the reefs. For the night time, these fish will disperse

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 3>their schools and go into recesses within the reef to

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 3>hide and sleep, and that's where they generate these cocoons.

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Within the lab environment, Burne found that if you shine

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 3>a constant light on these fish for twenty four hours straight,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 3>they will actually never make a mucus cocoon. You just

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 3>keep shining the light on them, at least for twenty

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>four hours't He didn't push the experiment to go that

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 3>much longer because you know, it might just end up

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>harming them overall. But for twenty four hours straight you

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 3>shine a light on them and it, you know, nothing happens.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, corp, of course, I mean there are a lot

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of things I'm not going to do of some sort

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 2>of an intelligent being from a highly advanced species shines

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>artificial light on me for twenty four hours.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So the constant light means he never make

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 3>a pod. However, when darkness was introduced, you turned the

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>lights off. This triggered twenty two of the thirty parrot

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 3>fish tested to build mucus envelopes, and it was the

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 3>same frequency in the two different species. The fish took

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 3>different amounts of time to finish building their envelopes after

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the light was turned off. The minimum was like thirty minutes,

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>maximum was two hundred and forty minutes. Average building time

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 3>was about seventy minutes. However, if you kept the fish

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 3>the parrotfish in the dark after it made its cocoon,

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 3>it did not stay in the cocoon forever. Eventually it

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 3>would emerge on its own. So what did they do

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 3>when they made these things? They would typically rest their

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 3>bodies on the floor of the tank and the seafloor

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 3>in the wild, in an upright position, almost always with

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>one side of the body resting against a vertical surface

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 3>like a rock or a coral wall, or, in the

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 3>case of the lab experiments, the aquarium wall. And then

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the cocoon begins. It begins formation at the front of

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the fish around its mouth, and folds of mucus slowly

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>move back along the length of the body toward the tail.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Though interestingly, the mucus never completely closes over the body.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 3>There is always at least a one to two centimeter

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 3>gap at the back end of the bubble, and Burn

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 3>believes this hole is to evacuate respiratory water that's forced

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 3>out of the buckle cavity, so sort of a breathing hole. Now,

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned that in a lot of these photos, the

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 3>mucus cocoon seems to sparkle as if it is covered

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 3>in glitter. Burn writes that quote fine debris adhered to

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 3>the envelope's exterior and the outline was thus more clearly defined. However,

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 3>he says this coating of sediment and debris makes the

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 3>bubble appear thin and delicate. This is how A Wind

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 3>described it in that article from the fifties. But Burn

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 3>did an experiment by injecting pigmented particles into the cocoon

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 3>and revealed that actually appearances can be deceiving here because

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the cocoon often does look very thin, it's like a

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 3>wispy spider web or this very very thin kind of

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 3>gossamer like material. But in fact he found when he

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 3>injected the pigmented particles in there, the mucus structure was

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 3>up to six centimeters thick in some places, so it's

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>not as wispy as it looks.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this would just be the case of there being

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>like a thin layer of particles on top of this

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 2>otherwise translucent or semi translucent mucous shielding. They would give

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>it the appearance of being super thin when in fact

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 2>it is probably thicker.

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So dissection of the fish revealed that the

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 3>presence of gland tissue in the buckle cavity correlated with

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 3>whether or not the fish would make a cocoon. It

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 3>was found that fish that did not have this gland

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 3>tissue in the mouth cavity, they did not form the

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 3>mucus cocoons. So that's how they're made and win. But

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>what are they for? Well, again, the burn paper mentions

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 3>this hypothesis that the mucus sleeping bag somehow protects the

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 3>fish from large predators. A commonly mentioned predator in the

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 3>reef environment would be the more eel, you know, and

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 3>it can get down there in the recesses and attack.

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 3>But apparently there's some doubt about this because, for example,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 3>when faced with reef dwelling predators such as more eels,

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 3>there is some evidence that sleeping fish within within a

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 3>cocoon are still vulnerable, like they still get eaten. But

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 3>actually I came across an interesting twenty eleven paper that

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 3>looked directly into the function of the mucus cocoon and

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 3>came to a different conclusion. So this was published in

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 3>the journal Biology Letters by Grutterer at All and the

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 3>title is this will give some of the findings away fish,

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 3>mucus cocoons the mosquito nets of the sea. This was

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 3>in the year twenty eleven. So in this paper the

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 3>authors look at another hypothesis, which is the idea that

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 3>mucus envelopes actually protect the fish inside from parasites such

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 3>as ectoparasitic nathid isopods. These are these little bloodsucking parasites

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 3>that live throughout the ocean, often compared to terrestrial mosquitoes

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 3>and ticks. Raw I attached to a little photo of

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 3>these things for you to look at. They're kind of

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 3>shrimp like in appearance. Maybe look like a cross between

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 3>a shrimp and a ticky. Yeah, And the authors point

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 3>out that during the daytime when parrotfish are swimming around,

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 3>they actually get some help, they get some protection against

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 3>blood drinking isopods from cleaner fish. You know, this is

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 3>a relationship where a smaller fish that wants to eat.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 3>These parasites will come along and help pick them off

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 3>to sort of groom the outside of the larger fish.

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 3>But how do the fish protect themselves at night? The

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 3>idea behind this experiment was that maybe the mucous cocoon

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>functions like a mosquito net to protect the sleeping fish

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 3>from these heimatophagous parasites. So they tested this hypothesis on

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the coral reef parrotfish Chlorurus sortied us. And the way

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 3>they tested it was they got some of these fish,

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 3>they separated them into groups that would sleep with and

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 3>without the benefit of cocoons in the presence of these

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 3>isopod parasites. And actually, the way they did it was

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 3>they took a subset of cocoon fish and found a

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 3>way to sort of gently push them out of their

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 3>envelopes without waking them up. So what do they find. Yes, indeed,

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 3>the fish without the mucus bag experienced way more attacks

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 3>by parasites. How much more, Well, about ninety five percent

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 3>of the fish without cocoons were attacked by isopods and

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 3>only about ten percent of the fish with cocoons were attacked,

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 3>So huge difference.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, Right, So Yeah, coming back to the mosquito

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 2>net comparison, it's like, initially we looked at it and

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 2>we're like, this mosquito net must protect the sleeper from bears,

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 2>but in reality it protects them from mosquitos and similar

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 2>insects that sort.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Of thing, or maybe even something downstream from mosquitoes in

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the analogy here, because the author is also investigated the

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 3>question of how energetically costly it is for the fish

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to make these mucus orbs, and they calculated that it

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 3>takes about two point five percent of a fish's daily

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 3>energy budget to make the mucus bag. Now, when I

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>first saw that figure, I kind of thought, oh, hey,

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 3>that seems fairly cheap, only two point five percent. But

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 3>actually I was reading some news reporting on this that

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 3>quoted the lead author, Alexandra Grutter, and she framed it

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a different way. She said, quote, the amount of effort

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 3>that goes into building these cocoons, which requires fish to

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 3>have developed very large glands about the size of a

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 3>quarter to produce the cocoons, is extraordinary. Parasites must exert

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 3>an enormous pressure on these fish in order for the

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 3>fish to have evolved such a specific way. Of avoiding

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 3>the parasites. So what could be so pressing? Is it

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>really just that you don't want to get bitten by

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 3>these isopods and have them drink some of your blood. Well,

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Grutterer mentions the possibility that the blood directly lost to

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the parasite might not be the only cost. These isopods

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 3>may also transmit a secondary endo parasite which lives in

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the fish's blood, much like how mosquitoes transmit malaria in humans.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 3>So the mosquitoes themselves are annoying and you don't like

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the mosquitoes, but the malaria is much more concerning than

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the mosquito. Malaria can be deadly. So in a similar way,

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 3>it's possible that it's worth it for these fish to

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 3>build these slimy bionets to protect themselves from blood disease. Wow,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 3>so it seems like a good trade. You spend a

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 3>little energy to weave a slime tube before bed every

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 3>night without these tiny shrimp monsters drinking your blood possibly

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 3>giving you diseases of the blood, and it all works out.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, there was one more observation from grutter

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>speaking to the media that kind of maybe there's a

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 3>strategy to recoop some of that nightly cost. So Grutterer says, quote,

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 3>I have observed on occasion a fish at dawn with

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 3>what appeared to be mucus stuffed in its mouth. And

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 3>then she goes on to say she has seen other fish,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 3>not parrotfish, but related fish that also produce mucous cocoons

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 3>pecking it at its old cocoons in the morning. So

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 3>like recooping some of that nightly cost by eating the

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 3>mucus that you created before bed.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's just it's economically sound. It's like if

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 2>humans produce, say an ectoplasm defense shield at night, you

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>would want to to recoop that cost, and that might

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 2>mean consuming all that ectoplasm again and getting all that

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 2>liquid back into your body. You know. It reminds us

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 2>of other examples we've looked at in biology, such as

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 2>various reptiles that will eat their own shed skin because

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, why waste that, you know.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 3>YEA, so may still provide some kind of benefit against

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 3>larger macroscopic predators too. Not certain about that, but it

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 3>does seem like there's a very good case that these

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 3>mucus bags help prevent against parasite attacks.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Very fascinating, all right, and so for the rest of

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the episode, we're going to turn to the world of

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>parrotfish reproduction and parrotfish sex. So, as we teach out

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>in the first episode, one of the other amazing aspects

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 2>of parrotfish biology broadly is that they change sex during

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the course of a normal lifetime. That's to say, this

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 2>is not something that occurs, you know, only when certain

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 2>environments conditions are right. It occurs as part of a

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 2>normal life cycle.

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 3>And within a fairly predictable pattern, right.

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Yeah, And they're going to be a couple

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.479
<v Speaker 2>of exceptions. Again, as we've been distressing, there are a

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 2>number of different species of parrotfish, but still the vast

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 2>majority of them do follow this example that we're going

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 2>to be discussing. So they are proto gynos that means

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 2>female first, hermaphrodites that always turn into males if they

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 2>live long enough. So they're born female, and then at

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>a certain point during their development they become male and

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 2>live out the rest of their life as a male.

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 3>And this would feed back into something we talked about

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 3>in the first episode, which is sometimes difficulty in identifying

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 3>parrotfish species because they undergo these changes, and these changes

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>come with changes to their outer appearance.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Along the way, multiple changes in colorization take place,

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>some of which have to do with just aging, some

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 2>of which have to do with changing their sex, and

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>others that have to do with diet and other factors.

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 2>This pointed out by the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation as

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>some resources about the parrotfish. I also want to point

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 2>out though, that according to NAA fishery biologist Ronald J. Saals,

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 2>gonecharism has been reported for I think three species within

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 2>the parrotfish family, which is to say, there are at

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>least three species of parrotfish where we have the more

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 2>typical scenario of male female division as opposed to what

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 2>we predominantly see in parrotfish, which again is sequential hermaphroditism,

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>in which the fish are born female and then if

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 2>they live long enough, become male, live out the rest

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 2>of their life as males. And so the basic scenario

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 2>is most parrotfish are born females, continue to grow to

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 2>reproduce externally as females, generally in the harem of a

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 2>larger protective male who also tends to a grazing territory

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 2>and in time, if that female lives long enough and

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 2>grows large enough, she transitions into a larger, terminal, reproductive male.

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 2>Now, in general, parrotfish experience what I've seen referred to

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>as moderate longevity. It's going to vary depending on the

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 2>particular specimen, and I think it even the general generalities

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 2>about how long they live is going to vary. I've

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 2>seen in general parrotfish life span sited seven to ten years.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it cited as less than twenty. I've also

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 2>seen it sited as five to six. Again, we have

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 2>a number of different species we're talking about here, and

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll throw out additional numbers for a specific species here

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.959
<v Speaker 2>in a bit. We also have to remind ourselves that

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>these are creatures living in the ocean, and so there

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 2>are a whole number of factors, from blood diseases to parasites,

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 2>to eels trying to eat them, to human fishermen and

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>so forth.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 3>It's just hard to imagine like ten straight years of

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 3>biting and scraping on rocks with your teeth.

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, literally scraping by right now. Parrotfish display what is

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 2>referred to as indeterminate growth, which means that there's not

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>a full size growth limit. They just keep growing as

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>long as they're alive, and so parrotfish just continue to

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 2>grow at a consistent rate. And this is important to

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.959
<v Speaker 2>consider in making sense of their sex changes because one of,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 2>if not the primary hypotheses for why they do this,

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 2>why they evolve to do this, does relate to their size.

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Maximum size Again, it's going to depend on the species.

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I see ranges like one to four feet. But let's

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and just talk about the biggest parrotfish just

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 2>to give us like a nice frame of reference, because

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 2>also the largest parrotfish is also pretty gnarly.

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Is this the bumphead we talked about last time?

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 2>It is the bumphead, So we have a little more

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 2>on the bump edd here. The bump head, according to

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the NOAA, reaches size as a four point two feet

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 2>long and up to one hundred pounds, so one hundred

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 2>and thirty centimeters forty six kilograms. And not only are

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 2>they the largest parrotfish, but they're among the largest reef fish.

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Period reef environments are generally shallow and tight, so you know,

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>they're not inviting places for larger fish. And their namesake

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>bump is used like a rams horns in male to

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>male competitions, though females also have smaller bumps, which, of course,

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 2>if the parrotfish lives long enough, is going to grow

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 2>in size once they have changed sexes.

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so these are fish that just keep growing even

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>though that's not necessarily the best for them in all ways,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 3>like it might limit what coral surfaces they can access

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 3>and so forth.

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, these guys are just bigger anyway. This is just.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 2>But this would I guess, seem to be like the

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 2>maximum size that seems to fit into the evolutionary economy

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of living around the reef. Okay, like I guess it

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>would be. It would be hard to argue that parrotfish

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 2>should get larger than this, because we have no living

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>parrotfish that get larger than this.

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I see.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>The market won't allow it, you know. Now, bumphead parrotfish

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 2>can live to be forty years old. I've read they

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 2>don't reach sexual maturity until five to eight years old,

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and sadly their numbers are down except in protected reef environments.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 3>So I believe, based on what I've read, these are

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 3>the ones that are classic. We talked about the different

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 3>classifications of parrotfish feeding behaviors based on like sort of

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>how hard they gouge the rock or the coral, and

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 3>these would be like the excavators, right, like they are

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 3>plowing into that stuff.

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these guys take the big bites. I was reading

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more about this on the NOAA website

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and they said that, yeah, they take out those big

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 2>bites that that also end up taking out a little

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>bit of live coral. But they stress that this is

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 2>still very healthy for the coral in all the ways

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 2>we already mentioned. I don't remember if we mentioned this.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember if we mentioned this or not. But

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 2>there's also the idea that they'll break down dead reef

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>and of course turn that into sand, dead bits and

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>branches that might otherwise break off in storms and damage

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 2>other parts of the reef.

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I see. So it's better for it to

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 3>better for this chunk to get ground up in a

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 3>parrotfish's pharyngial mill and pooped out as sand rather than

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 3>knocked off in the storm and hit some other healthy

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 3>part of the reef.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because it's one of the interesting things at about

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>reef environments, and this is something you're definitely instructed about

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 2>anytime you go out and snorkel or scuba dive. Certainly

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I imagine around these is that there is like a

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 2>hardness to them. Certainly they can also be very like

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 2>You certainly don't want to stand on them or walk

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>on them or touch them for a number reasons, because

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of times they can be quite harmful. You

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>can scrape you out, they can cut you. You don't

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>want any of that. But on top of that, they

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 2>can be actually quite delicate, and they can be easily broken.

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 2>And so this would be another case of where if

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the parrotfish are doing their thing, that limits the amount

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>of damage that they're going to sustain via their own

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 2>dead parts. I see. But anyway, back to sex changes

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 2>in parrotfish in general. So, according to Jennifer Hodge, a

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Evolution and Ecology in

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the UC Davis College of Biological Sciences in twenty twenty,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the indeterminate growth factor may in fact be key. I

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 2>was reading a couple from a couple of sources. Here.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 2>One is a UC Davis article by Andy Fell covering

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 2>her work titled male size advantage drives evolution and sex

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 2>change of sex change in refish. And then also there

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 2>is a full paper I was looking at, and this

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is by Hodge at All titled Correlated Evolution of Sex

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Allocation and Mating System in Rasses and Parrotfishes, published in

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the American Naturalist the same year.

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so how would this indeterminate growth factor affect how

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 3>sex is distributed and developed in a fish species.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 2>It basically comes down to the fact the observation that

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>reproduction among parrotfish and also some of these other fish,

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 2>but for our interests here, the parrotfish is often dominated

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 2>by large males.

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Meaning that like, a larger male has a better chance

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of mating more.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, and that and that that male large males and

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 2>this would be the terminal males in parrotfish fishes. They

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>are the ones dominating like all of the mating. So

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 2>if you are not a large male, you are just

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 2>not going to be effective at reproduction. If you are

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a small parrotfish male, your chances of passing on your

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>genes is rather slim. And remember the genetic mission is

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 2>to pass on your genes. Now, as a small parrotfish female, however,

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 2>it's less of an issue. You know, the bigger males

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 2>they have the advantage. They're going to form these harems.

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 2>If you are a small female, you can be part

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of that harem and you are doing your reproductive part

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 2>as a parrotfish. And so that's according to this hypothesis,

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>this is where the evolution of sequential hermaphrotitism evolves as

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>a strategy by which all individuals have a better shot

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 2>at participating in reproduction. So start off small and female,

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 2>you definitely get to reproduce. And then if you live

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 2>long enough and you grow big enough, you shift to

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the male sex, and then you have the size to

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 2>prove effective. You're better at controlling territory resources, harems, etc.

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting, Okay, So it gives more individuals of the

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 3>species a chance to mate more often.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, that's the way I understand it. And I

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 2>was looking again at the writings of in Oa's fishery

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>biologist Ronald J. Salce, and Salce points out that, yeah,

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the largest parrotfish are always terminal males. And he points

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 2>out that the species, the various species in the genus

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Scaas typically exhibit the following reproductive characteristics. So we see this,

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 2>first of all, there is this proto Guynus female. First hermaphrotitism.

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 2>There's there are breeding territories, there are harems, and there

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 2>is external fertilization.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, the external fertilization is a good point, because

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to give the wrong idea when I

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 3>was mentioning mating that it's like, you know, the kind

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 3>of activity you might be picturing that Instead, there's a

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 3>there's an external meeting of the game meats of these animals.

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, And I think, I don't know humans, maybe we

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.479
<v Speaker 2>have a problem imagining fish sex in general. But somehow

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 2>this makes it a little easier to sort of picture

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 2>how all this is happening. I think it's all in

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the open. So Suz points out though that in the

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 2>past and and and really maybe not in the two

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 2>distant past, we've had these other hypotheses that there might

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 2>be a social trigger for the change in sex. But apparently,

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 2>based on what he wrote, this hasn't necessarily been observed,

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 2>or at least not in all cases or in a

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 2>broad array of cases, because we have scenarios where large

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 2>terminal males are removed from a population, such as by fishing,

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and the females don't just switch over at an earlier age,

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 2>but rather have more difficulty finding a mate.

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh, okay, so it might be kind of baked in

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 3>that they need to reach a certain size.

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Seems to be the case. Now I don't, But again

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 2>we're dealing with hypotheses here. I don't think that there

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 2>that anything is like one hundred proven out here. There's

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>still a lot of work that needs to be done

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 2>because a lot of it comes down to Okay, you

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 2>can have this general idea that this practice evolved because

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 2>large males don't dominate reproduction and and it makes more

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 2>sense from a reproductive standpoint start off as female and

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 2>then become male. But then what is the trigger is it?

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Is it purely based on how big you grow? Or

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 2>are there environmental or social triggers? And ultimately the size

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 2>advantage explanation is just one hypothesis. Uh, there's an you know,

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 2>other hypotheses put more emphasis on possible social or in

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 2>mental environmental triggers, such as changes in population density, that

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing. In the same way that we see

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 2>examples and say the world of salamanders, where you know

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 2>there are too many, or you know something goes on

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 2>demographically in a collect in a certain group, then you

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 2>may have biological changes that result. But I guess broadly

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 2>if there are very if there are social or environmental

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 2>triggers that are involved in theory, we would be able

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 2>to observe them, you know, such as response to overfishing

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 2>of large males, in response to changes in the environment,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. Now there are individual species of parrotfish

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 2>where we might see some of those like social triggers.

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps I've seen discussion of the stop light parrotfish in

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 2>particular as perhaps being influenced by population density, growth and

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 2>mortality rates. So if terminal the idea here being that

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 2>it may be the case that terminal males in stop

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 2>light parrotfish populations, if they experience higher mortality rates so

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 2>more of them are dying, or if they're just smaller

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 2>overall sizes in the terminal males, then this change may

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 2>trigger earlier onset of the sex change in the female

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 2>parrotfish in that population. So, like I say, it still

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 2>would line up with this idea that this evolved because

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 2>male parrotfish, large male parrotfish dominate reproduction, but it would

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 2>maybe be a slightly different case of like what is

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 2>actually caused it based on my understanding looking at this documentation.

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 2>But I like to say, there's still I think a

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of work going on here. Two thanks. Keep in mind,

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 2>though there is no evidence that any species of parrotfish

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 2>can undergo a sex change, reversal or a second sex change.

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Like it is, it is sequential sequential hermaphroditism. So it's female,

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 2>then male. There are no known cases where a male

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 2>can then change back to female. Do to you do

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 2>to any kind of you know, social pressure, environmental or

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 2>what have you. It is female and then male and again.

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Sequential hermaphroditism of one form or another can be found

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 2>in other fish. As I mentioned the ras is. Apparently

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 2>you see some version of this in some molluscs and crustaceans. Uh.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 2>The size reproduction hypothesis is widely employed employed across the board,

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 2>but I've also seen I think the prevention of inbreeding

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 2>being brought in as another possible reason, though I'm not

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 2>sure if that really pans out, particularly with the parent fish.

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Hmm.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 2>That may just really have more to do with hermaphroditism

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 2>as a as an evolutionary trait in general.

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 3>But the sequential version you're saying, it seems that there's

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 3>a there's a similar evolutionary explanation given across these different

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 3>classes of animals, which is that it likely has to

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 3>do with a relationship between the animals size and its

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 3>likelihood of successful reproduction, yes, exactly, or specifically the size

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 3>of males and successful reproduction. Yeah, and the fact that

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 3>the animals just keep growing.

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, So it's fascinating. I yeah, this is like

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a factoid about parrotfish that I'd long heard, but I'd

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 2>never really looked into it. I guess one of the

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 2>problems is when you're in the water, it's it's really

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 2>hard to research stuff. You're just like, oh, I'm going

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 2>to take your word for it, and I'm gonna I'm

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna look at it, and then I'll try to remember

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to read about it later.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Man, you would never guess that there is so much

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 3>interesting stuff about these fish just watching them scrape the rocks.

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I mean just observing them, and I've observed

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 2>in plenty of times in the past. You know, it's

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 2>like you look at them and you're like, well, they're

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 2>a little bit goofy looking, they're beautifully colored, and then

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 2>you learn a little bit more about them, but there's still,

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, greater depths of interest there. I guess that's

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the that's the nature of most fish in the sea.

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Never take them for granted.

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 3>In between recording these two episode parts, did you end

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:34.959
<v Speaker 3>up googling more human parrotfish bites? I did. I don't

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 3>know why I did. I shouldn't have.

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Why would you do that?

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I regret it. I wish I hadn't

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 3>done it. I just did.

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 2>The only thing of that nature that I did run

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 2>across is when I was looking up pictures and looking

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 2>at articles about the big boys, the bumphead parrotfish. Yeah,

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 2>is there was an image of some coral with some big,

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 2>chunky bites taken out of it, and that was pretty impressive,

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and it did cross my mind. It's like that I

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 2>would not want those bites taken out of my own flesh.

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would not want that to be my bones. Yeah.

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 3>But to emphasize yet again as we did last time, parrotfisher,

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 3>there's no indication that they're very aggressive or looking to

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 3>bite humans. That like, these stories come from people who

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 3>were getting up in the parrotfish's business.

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah. I think I saw one account and this

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 2>is like, you know, this is I guess inherently unverified

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 2>of snorkelers or divers where someone was just sort of

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 2>casually bitten by a parrotfish. But in that thread, like

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 2>everyone was like, wow, that's weird. It's never happened to me.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know, you know, in the wild one

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 2>officer certainly possible. Who knows what that parrotfish was going

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 2>through that day?

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess any species of any fish could in

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 3>some case be aggressive, but it's not like generally thought like, oh, wow,

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.839
<v Speaker 3>you gotta be careful, like they're they're coming for.

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 2>You, right, Yeah, I don't think they're they're coming.

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm just because I'm imagining so like, you know,

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 3>the James Bond villain has a pool of piranhas that

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 3>he drops his henchman into when they make a mistake,

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 3>And I'm just thinking, like, could they have gone with

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 3>a pool of parrotfish? How would that work out? Differently?

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 2>We have Cotajo Bodhi missed a bond with a fine

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 2>layer of algae coral dust. You will now drop you

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 2>into that of parrotfish.

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 3>M No, not the bump che Okay does that do

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:32.240
<v Speaker 3>it for parrotfish?

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:33.879
<v Speaker 2>I think it does? You know they may have more

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 2>mysteries that we didn't explore, but I think we hit

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 2>all the really interesting stuff here. But hey, if you

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 2>know of other dimensions to the parrotfish or various parrotfish

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 2>species that we didn't talk about right in, because we

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 2>would love to hear from you. Just a reminder that

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow your Mind here is primarily a science

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and culture podcast, with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays,

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 2>listener mail on Mondays, short form episode on Wednesdays, and

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 2>on Fridays. We set aside mostly concerns to just talk

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.320
<v Speaker 2>about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at Stuff to Blow

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:31.399
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.