1 00:00:01,320 --> 00:00:05,680 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg business Week inside from the reporters and 2 00:00:05,840 --> 00:00:09,400 Speaker 1: editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus 3 00:00:09,480 --> 00:00:13,640 Speaker 1: global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week 4 00:00:13,680 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: Podcast with Carol Manser and Tim Stinebec from Bloomberg Radio. 5 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:20,599 Speaker 1: The first fo EB Scene meeting of the year kicks 6 00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:23,320 Speaker 1: off tomorrow. The decision comes on Wednesday. We'll also hear 7 00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:25,919 Speaker 1: from J. Powell that afternoon. Ahead of that, our own 8 00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:28,440 Speaker 1: Steve Matthews notes that FED Chief J. Powell and Wall 9 00:00:28,480 --> 00:00:31,200 Speaker 1: Street are headed for another face off this week. This 10 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:33,720 Speaker 1: is the US Central Bank seeks to slow its inflation 11 00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:37,440 Speaker 1: fighting campaign without signaling a readiness to stop f O 12 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,160 Speaker 1: m C policy and reading the Fed tea leaves both 13 00:00:40,280 --> 00:00:42,800 Speaker 1: and are not easy. With more on his most read 14 00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:45,680 Speaker 1: We've got Bloomberg News Economics reporter Steve Matthews. He's in 15 00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:52,000 Speaker 1: our Atlanta Bureau. Steve, financial conditions very important thing for 16 00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:55,840 Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve, obviously with the Fed raising rates so 17 00:00:56,000 --> 00:00:58,600 Speaker 1: much and FED policy started to make its way throughout 18 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:01,639 Speaker 1: this system off I conditions are just really tight right now, 19 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:09,360 Speaker 1: right not at all surprisingly, the financial conditions if you 20 00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:12,760 Speaker 1: look at the Bloomberg Financial Conditions index. They are the 21 00:01:12,800 --> 00:01:16,960 Speaker 1: easiest since last February. They're easier than before the Fed 22 00:01:17,080 --> 00:01:20,240 Speaker 1: started raising rates. And the Fed is not gonna be 23 00:01:20,280 --> 00:01:25,320 Speaker 1: happy about this. Uh. Monetary policy works through financial conditions, 24 00:01:25,360 --> 00:01:28,639 Speaker 1: meaning you know what's happening to mortgage rates, what's happening 25 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:32,480 Speaker 1: to corporate lending rates, what's happening stock and bond prices, 26 00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:35,680 Speaker 1: that what's happening with the dollar. And when you have 27 00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:40,520 Speaker 1: easier conditions, that supports growth. The FED is trying to 28 00:01:40,600 --> 00:01:45,200 Speaker 1: achieve below trend growth, which is going to ease, in 29 00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:48,440 Speaker 1: their view, ease pressures on the labor market and therefore 30 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 1: ease and inflationary pressures. They are not getting it. And 31 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:56,040 Speaker 1: so while they have pretty well signaled that you're gonna 32 00:01:56,040 --> 00:02:00,160 Speaker 1: get a twenty five basis point hike on Wednesday, UH, 33 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:05,280 Speaker 1: the tone of Chair Palell's comments and potentially of the 34 00:02:05,360 --> 00:02:10,359 Speaker 1: statement are going to be hawkish. Yeah, it ain't tricky, 35 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:12,799 Speaker 1: or it isn't easy being the Fed. We know that, 36 00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:15,600 Speaker 1: or maybe it is because you're saying the same thing 37 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:17,640 Speaker 1: over and over again. It's not easy being an investor 38 00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:21,000 Speaker 1: who thinks that you know financial conditions, you know, markets 39 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:22,600 Speaker 1: doing what the FED wants It to do. No, it's 40 00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:25,720 Speaker 1: a good point. And I do wonder though, right Steve, 41 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 1: if the FED is going to have to be harder 42 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 1: either in the press conference J Powell to kind of 43 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 1: really make sure investors don't get to ahead of themselves. 44 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:37,240 Speaker 1: This is the managing it has to do. Right. It 45 00:02:37,280 --> 00:02:40,280 Speaker 1: doesn't want too much enthusiasm to come back um and 46 00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 1: think about you know, financial conditions staying easy because they 47 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:45,679 Speaker 1: want things to slow down. They don't want them to 48 00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 1: pick up again. That is exactly right. And and in fact, 49 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:51,120 Speaker 1: you know, if you go back and look at the 50 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:54,919 Speaker 1: last several meetings, this will be the first basis point hike, 51 00:02:55,320 --> 00:02:59,399 Speaker 1: and I think you know after six six hikes of 52 00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:02,920 Speaker 1: of larger than that. And what they're afraid of is 53 00:03:03,280 --> 00:03:05,600 Speaker 1: if you go back to meetings, we had seventy basis 54 00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:09,200 Speaker 1: points last meeting, we had fifty basis points. This meeting, 55 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:11,840 Speaker 1: we're gonna have a quarter point. And you know, if 56 00:03:11,880 --> 00:03:13,760 Speaker 1: you just kind of do a straight line, that would 57 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:17,240 Speaker 1: suggest to the next meeting we pause. And that is 58 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:19,440 Speaker 1: not the message they want to send. They want to 59 00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:21,960 Speaker 1: send the message that they're going to be continuing to 60 00:03:22,040 --> 00:03:24,760 Speaker 1: raise rates and that they're going to be more important 61 00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:27,560 Speaker 1: than that that they're going to keep rights high for longer. 62 00:03:28,320 --> 00:03:31,640 Speaker 1: And so you know that will be the message. You know, 63 00:03:32,120 --> 00:03:35,760 Speaker 1: they go into all these press conferences with talking points, 64 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:38,040 Speaker 1: and you can be sure that that's going to be 65 00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:41,480 Speaker 1: one of the talking points that chere Paw comes out with. 66 00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:47,280 Speaker 1: Why is this so unclear to Wall Street? Well, Street's like, 67 00:03:47,320 --> 00:03:50,240 Speaker 1: we got it, Jake, Joe, you know, I mean, well, 68 00:03:51,880 --> 00:03:55,600 Speaker 1: the tricky thing is that Wall Street is reacting to 69 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 1: legitimately good news. We have had good news on inflation, 70 00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:02,400 Speaker 1: and you know, Chair Powell is going to have to 71 00:04:02,440 --> 00:04:05,280 Speaker 1: acknowledge there has been some good news, as much as 72 00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:09,320 Speaker 1: he may not want to highlight it. Uh So, you 73 00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:13,720 Speaker 1: know they're gonna have to hit the right balance that, yes, inflation, 74 00:04:13,840 --> 00:04:16,400 Speaker 1: the outlook looks better than they thought, you know, the 75 00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:20,560 Speaker 1: last meeting which is in December, but still it's not 76 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 1: headed to two percent and the goal is to get 77 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:26,480 Speaker 1: inflation down to two percent, and they believe there's not 78 00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:31,280 Speaker 1: enough tightness and Wall Street legitimately just has trouble understanding 79 00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:32,960 Speaker 1: what the Fed is saying. I mean, you saw this 80 00:04:33,040 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 1: in July when Powell made some comments and everybody said, pivot, 81 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:40,120 Speaker 1: We're on a pivot. Well, there was no pivot, and 82 00:04:40,320 --> 00:04:43,360 Speaker 1: uh so, you know, the Fed can be a little 83 00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:48,239 Speaker 1: bit mysterious to understand, and Wall Street sometimes gets it wrong. 84 00:04:48,680 --> 00:04:51,600 Speaker 1: I mean, the tricky point is if the Fed continues 85 00:04:51,640 --> 00:04:55,080 Speaker 1: steve to stick to getting inflation down to two percent, 86 00:04:55,160 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 1: then it's got to ways to go. Folks wake up 87 00:04:56,920 --> 00:05:00,080 Speaker 1: and smell the coffee, right. But if the Street and 88 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 1: everybody says NAT's more like four or five percent and 89 00:05:02,760 --> 00:05:06,679 Speaker 1: we're just gonna settle there, then the Feed is done. 90 00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:10,039 Speaker 1: So that's a big part of the disconnect. Yeah, I 91 00:05:10,080 --> 00:05:12,359 Speaker 1: think that's that is a big part of the disconnect. 92 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:16,040 Speaker 1: But also part of it is that the FED believes 93 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:18,280 Speaker 1: that the economy is resilient. I mean, we had three 94 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 1: percent growth in the fourth quarter. Uh, you know, we're 95 00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:25,360 Speaker 1: likely to have some significant growth in the first quarter. 96 00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 1: The much of Wall Street, two thirds of Wall Street 97 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:32,640 Speaker 1: maybe more than that, is predicting a recession this year. 98 00:05:33,400 --> 00:05:35,840 Speaker 1: The Feed is not predicting a recession this year. If 99 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:39,200 Speaker 1: the economy holds up better than expected, that implies that 100 00:05:39,320 --> 00:05:42,160 Speaker 1: rates are going to be higher than the Wall Street expects. 101 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:45,240 Speaker 1: So it's like, if your forecast is we're headed to 102 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:49,680 Speaker 1: recession sometime soon, you know that's not how the Fed 103 00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:52,480 Speaker 1: is looking at the world. Hey, one thing I want 104 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:54,320 Speaker 1: to ask you. We've got some new Fed mint members 105 00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:58,320 Speaker 1: right actually voting this year. Does that potentially change how 106 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:02,600 Speaker 1: it all plays out? Yeah, it is a slightly more 107 00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:08,080 Speaker 1: dubbish Fed this year. You'll you'll have googlesby the new 108 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:13,119 Speaker 1: Chicago Fed president voting. Bullard was voting last year, who's 109 00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:17,560 Speaker 1: kind of a notable hawk and he's gone. Esther George, 110 00:06:17,560 --> 00:06:21,840 Speaker 1: who's largely regarded as being hawkish, is gone. You had 111 00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:25,839 Speaker 1: a couple of new appointees from the Biden administration who 112 00:06:25,839 --> 00:06:28,960 Speaker 1: are who are viewed to be kind of centrist. So 113 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:33,159 Speaker 1: you know, incrementally you're going to have a slightly more 114 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 1: dovish voting rotation. Although the interesting thing is, if you 115 00:06:37,839 --> 00:06:41,200 Speaker 1: go back to the December dot plot, seventeen of the 116 00:06:41,320 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 1: nineteen f o MC participants, we're predicting rates over five percent, 117 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 1: which is more than what Wall Street is predicting right now. 118 00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:54,279 Speaker 1: Fifteen of the seventeen seven, I think, seventeen of nineteen. Okay, 119 00:06:54,320 --> 00:06:57,680 Speaker 1: that's pretty hawkish, right, that is hawkish. That is not 120 00:06:57,720 --> 00:06:59,960 Speaker 1: where Wall Street is. Okay, Steve, give us your best 121 00:07:00,040 --> 00:07:03,600 Speaker 1: prediction for a we hear from j Powell on Wednesday. Uh, 122 00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:06,560 Speaker 1: I think we're going to hear that rights are going 123 00:07:06,600 --> 00:07:10,240 Speaker 1: to be higher for longer. That he said in December 124 00:07:10,640 --> 00:07:12,960 Speaker 1: that there would be no cuts this year. I think 125 00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:16,040 Speaker 1: he will repeat that in the statement. I think the 126 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:20,320 Speaker 1: key question is ongoing. They've been saying, we're in the 127 00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:23,760 Speaker 1: statement we're going to see ongoing increases, And there's a 128 00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:26,960 Speaker 1: big debate on Wall Street. Does that change to say 129 00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 1: further tightening, which would at least open the door for 130 00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:33,160 Speaker 1: the possibility of a pause and you know, later this 131 00:07:33,320 --> 00:07:36,480 Speaker 1: spring and if they keep on going, that says they're 132 00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:38,000 Speaker 1: going to do at least two more hikes. I love 133 00:07:38,040 --> 00:07:42,000 Speaker 1: when we obsess about one word ongoing, hashtag ongoing. Steve Matthews, 134 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:43,640 Speaker 1: we will be looking for your coverage. I know you'll 135 00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:46,239 Speaker 1: be part of our our live blog and looking forward 136 00:07:46,240 --> 00:07:49,880 Speaker 1: to your analysis after Steve Matthews, Economics reporter at Bloomberg News. 137 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:53,960 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us 138 00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:56,640 Speaker 1: live weekdays from two to five pm East here on 139 00:07:56,760 --> 00:08:00,480 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business Avan. You do. You can 140 00:08:00,520 --> 00:08:03,840 Speaker 1: also listen live to our flagship New York station Just 141 00:08:03,920 --> 00:08:09,480 Speaker 1: say Alexa Play Bloomberg E Love and Dirty with three 142 00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:11,920 Speaker 1: D seventy five billion dollars give or take a little 143 00:08:11,960 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 1: bit in assets. It is the biggest exchange traded fund 144 00:08:15,080 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 1: on the planet. We are talking about State Streets, Spider 145 00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:20,320 Speaker 1: s and P five fund that has changed the game 146 00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:23,040 Speaker 1: of investing. And you know what, now it's facing a 147 00:08:23,080 --> 00:08:25,400 Speaker 1: lot of competition. It's not the only game in town. 148 00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:28,320 Speaker 1: This story in the upcoming new issue of Bloomberg Business Week. 149 00:08:28,320 --> 00:08:29,760 Speaker 1: It's out on news stands later this week on the 150 00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:32,400 Speaker 1: Bloomberg and online at Bloomberg dot com. Let's get to 151 00:08:32,440 --> 00:08:35,080 Speaker 1: it with Katie Greifeld, Bloomberg New Senior Market supporter here 152 00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:38,000 Speaker 1: in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio, along with the editor 153 00:08:38,040 --> 00:08:43,320 Speaker 1: of Business Week, Joel Weber. Joel, Happy birthday. Why yeah, 154 00:08:43,480 --> 00:08:47,720 Speaker 1: thirty years old. It's the biggest E t F I 155 00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:51,040 Speaker 1: know more about this than I, uh is probably would 156 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:54,360 Speaker 1: make sense, But because I co pilot the podcast Trillions, 157 00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:56,760 Speaker 1: which is all about E t f s, and I've 158 00:08:56,840 --> 00:08:58,640 Speaker 1: gotten a long on the history of et F so 159 00:08:58,679 --> 00:09:01,640 Speaker 1: I know I know a lot um But but Kate 160 00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:05,240 Speaker 1: Raifeld wrote this story, and um, Katie, what I really 161 00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:08,400 Speaker 1: want to know is how many birthdays can one em 162 00:09:08,960 --> 00:09:11,440 Speaker 1: because yes, we're talking about it right now, but lots 163 00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 1: of people we are talking about it on the twenty second, 164 00:09:13,400 --> 00:09:15,720 Speaker 1: So like, how many birthdays can spy half? It's a 165 00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:19,360 Speaker 1: great question. Actually, Bloomberg Intelligence wrote about this recently in 166 00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:22,160 Speaker 1: a research piece that you're probably not going to see 167 00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:25,320 Speaker 1: many other thirtieth birthdays for E t F. Spy in 168 00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:29,080 Speaker 1: so many ways stands alone. Obviously, it is the oldest 169 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 1: E t F out there. This is a much more 170 00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:35,200 Speaker 1: saturated market. The boom and bus cycles of new products 171 00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:38,680 Speaker 1: has shortened a lot, but Spy obviously has stood the 172 00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:43,120 Speaker 1: test of time. So this industry that it helped create 173 00:09:43,400 --> 00:09:48,160 Speaker 1: um is coming for it also, right so why could 174 00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:52,440 Speaker 1: it potentially lose this lead that it's had since it 175 00:09:52,559 --> 00:09:54,400 Speaker 1: since the very beginning. So that's the thing I mean 176 00:09:54,440 --> 00:09:57,599 Speaker 1: when you're talking about Spy, it has so many accolades 177 00:09:57,600 --> 00:09:59,040 Speaker 1: that you need to mention. But you also have to 178 00:09:59,080 --> 00:10:01,760 Speaker 1: mention the fact that what we have three hundred eight 179 00:10:01,960 --> 00:10:05,079 Speaker 1: billion dollars in assets that's currently the biggest. But if 180 00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:08,319 Speaker 1: you look at products from I shares, you look at Vanguard, 181 00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:11,040 Speaker 1: and those are the industry leaders in terms of overall assets, 182 00:10:11,400 --> 00:10:14,440 Speaker 1: their SMP five hundred funds are within a hundred billion 183 00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:17,960 Speaker 1: dollars of spy, and that, honestly in the scheme of 184 00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:21,199 Speaker 1: E T F S is not and the other thing 185 00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:22,440 Speaker 1: that they have going for it if you look at 186 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:26,320 Speaker 1: the cheaper yes, exactly, so spy it costs what ten 187 00:10:26,360 --> 00:10:29,559 Speaker 1: basis points. If you round up I, V V and 188 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:33,600 Speaker 1: VOO they cost three basis points and talk initials to me, 189 00:10:33,880 --> 00:10:37,000 Speaker 1: you know, if there's a lot of leathers. But it's 190 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:39,560 Speaker 1: not just all about the expense ratio. It's not just 191 00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:42,679 Speaker 1: about fees, which I was surprised to learn in this story, Katie. 192 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 1: It's it's also you know, that might be what long 193 00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:47,840 Speaker 1: term buy and hold investors care about and that's why 194 00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:50,400 Speaker 1: they might choose one over another. But if you're looking 195 00:10:50,400 --> 00:10:52,679 Speaker 1: to get it in out quickly, spy is what you do. 196 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:54,719 Speaker 1: That's right. So I mean, if you are a buy 197 00:10:54,760 --> 00:10:57,440 Speaker 1: and hold investor, you know, someone investing their retirement money, 198 00:10:57,480 --> 00:11:00,200 Speaker 1: you're going to be there for a few decades. Do 199 00:11:00,240 --> 00:11:03,400 Speaker 1: you really care about six spaces points that six basis 200 00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:07,240 Speaker 1: points difference. But the big advantage that SPY has is 201 00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:12,720 Speaker 1: for institutions because it has such this liquid market built 202 00:11:12,760 --> 00:11:14,280 Speaker 1: up around it. You think about the lending, you think 203 00:11:14,280 --> 00:11:17,160 Speaker 1: about the options market built up around Spy. They don't 204 00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:20,959 Speaker 1: care about the annual expense ratio. They don't ever touch that. 205 00:11:20,960 --> 00:11:23,320 Speaker 1: What they care about is how easy it is to 206 00:11:23,360 --> 00:11:26,320 Speaker 1: trade this thing, how cheap it is. That obviously feeds 207 00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:29,559 Speaker 1: in upon itself. So the fact that Spy is liquid 208 00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:32,280 Speaker 1: means that Spy is going to continue to be liquid. 209 00:11:32,760 --> 00:11:39,439 Speaker 1: So why can't Spy match its competitors with in press. 210 00:11:39,559 --> 00:11:42,199 Speaker 1: It's it's like one of those things that from the 211 00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:45,000 Speaker 1: outside you're like, well, just lower the basis points, make 212 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:47,800 Speaker 1: it cheaper. State Street like, why can't they do that? 213 00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:50,480 Speaker 1: So I don't think they want to, is the thing. 214 00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:53,160 Speaker 1: They're not the correct answer, but they don't mean they 215 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:56,120 Speaker 1: don't need to because they're earning a ton of money 216 00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:59,920 Speaker 1: charging ten basis points versus three basis points from investor 217 00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 1: is that don't super care. And again the Wall Street 218 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:07,560 Speaker 1: traders who have really it's become this existentially important product, 219 00:12:07,840 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 1: they don't need it to be cheaper. So there's not 220 00:12:09,800 --> 00:12:11,920 Speaker 1: really a lot of fee pressure on State Street here. 221 00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:17,320 Speaker 1: I feel like it's a trust right, so that the 222 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:20,600 Speaker 1: structure that created the E T F. This trust thing, 223 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:24,920 Speaker 1: uh was basically cast aside at some point, and the 224 00:12:24,920 --> 00:12:28,080 Speaker 1: trust structure is not predominant anymore in e t s, 225 00:12:28,120 --> 00:12:31,320 Speaker 1: but it was basically as a proof of concept that 226 00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:34,720 Speaker 1: was what was used. But that's also what inhibits its 227 00:12:34,760 --> 00:12:39,200 Speaker 1: ability to get any lower. So the Vanguard product, the 228 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:42,559 Speaker 1: black Rock products, those aren't trusts right, so there they 229 00:12:42,559 --> 00:12:44,960 Speaker 1: can shave away a couple of basis points that that 230 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:47,199 Speaker 1: spy can't get any lower. I do want to put 231 00:12:47,240 --> 00:12:49,559 Speaker 1: something on your calendar right now. You're talking about trust. 232 00:12:49,640 --> 00:12:51,840 Speaker 1: Reminded me that if you look at the queues, that's 233 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:57,480 Speaker 1: a trust as well that was born in So I 234 00:12:57,480 --> 00:12:58,960 Speaker 1: guess we're going to have to gear up for that 235 00:12:59,040 --> 00:13:03,280 Speaker 1: profile best go QQQ. Yeah, it's I mean it's also 236 00:13:03,400 --> 00:13:06,679 Speaker 1: huge also has a really deep market built around it 237 00:13:06,960 --> 00:13:08,679 Speaker 1: as well. Do we have to be worried as we 238 00:13:08,800 --> 00:13:13,520 Speaker 1: talk increasingly about actively managed DTF versus the passive form 239 00:13:13,559 --> 00:13:16,280 Speaker 1: of investing such as this one, I don't feel worried. 240 00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:19,560 Speaker 1: I think that if you are a new entrant to 241 00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:21,959 Speaker 1: the e t F market, a new issuer, and you're 242 00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:24,800 Speaker 1: trying to launch a product, you're maybe a little bit 243 00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:27,559 Speaker 1: worried because you look at the sort of passive index 244 00:13:28,120 --> 00:13:31,120 Speaker 1: part of the market, and there's no white space. I mean, 245 00:13:31,280 --> 00:13:34,520 Speaker 1: at this point, thirty years into the game, everything under 246 00:13:34,520 --> 00:13:37,480 Speaker 1: the sun exists. So that might force you to become 247 00:13:37,480 --> 00:13:39,480 Speaker 1: a little bit more active if you're talking about a 248 00:13:39,520 --> 00:13:44,720 Speaker 1: market structure perspective. I mean sometimes Eric Felt hates this, 249 00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 1: but people will say that, you know, e t f 250 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:49,160 Speaker 1: s are distorting the market. They're all buying the same thing, 251 00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:52,079 Speaker 1: the rise of passes and investor. Isn't he right when 252 00:13:52,080 --> 00:14:00,240 Speaker 1: you think about these massive ones don't ever as a 253 00:14:00,280 --> 00:14:02,319 Speaker 1: component of the trade. Well, I think, Look, I think 254 00:14:02,360 --> 00:14:06,480 Speaker 1: the thing that when we've written this as Bloomberg News 255 00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:09,640 Speaker 1: a lot is you know what is passive? What is active? 256 00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:11,600 Speaker 1: At this point? I mean you put five hundred stocks 257 00:14:11,640 --> 00:14:13,640 Speaker 1: in an index, that's a choice that's been made. That's 258 00:14:13,640 --> 00:14:17,000 Speaker 1: an active decision. Like sure it's five hundred, but like 259 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:19,720 Speaker 1: it's still it was an active decision about how to 260 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:23,040 Speaker 1: Why Tesla wasn't included in that for a long time, right, 261 00:14:23,080 --> 00:14:26,560 Speaker 1: Like so that there is inherent decision making that goes 262 00:14:26,600 --> 00:14:29,320 Speaker 1: into this. And didn't we interview David Blitzer together? He 263 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:31,400 Speaker 1: was he was part of that committee. But I will 264 00:14:31,440 --> 00:14:34,800 Speaker 1: also say he did. It was on trillions. I would add, though, 265 00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:37,960 Speaker 1: that a lot of these passive ETFs are being used 266 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:41,200 Speaker 1: for very active purposes. People will use them as building 267 00:14:41,280 --> 00:14:44,520 Speaker 1: blocks in their actively managed portfolios, just as a way 268 00:14:44,600 --> 00:14:48,760 Speaker 1: to get exposure in a cheap, tax efficient way. So Trivia, 269 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:54,000 Speaker 1: uh the other birthday that I would excited, I just 270 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:58,320 Speaker 1: know more than his normal I think. So we're talking 271 00:14:58,320 --> 00:15:02,080 Speaker 1: about the thirtieth anniversary. There was an event that preceded 272 00:15:02,120 --> 00:15:06,680 Speaker 1: the birth of the E t F. Anybody, anybody, anybody know? 273 00:15:06,840 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 1: It was an event. You're going, okay, black Monday. Black 274 00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:13,560 Speaker 1: Monday happened, and that in response to that, the SEC 275 00:15:13,840 --> 00:15:17,480 Speaker 1: did this white paper and effectively there's a paragraph tucked 276 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:20,520 Speaker 1: inside that paper. In this paper is like massive phone book, 277 00:15:20,920 --> 00:15:23,880 Speaker 1: multiple phone books, and they basically said, black Monday may 278 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:26,360 Speaker 1: not have happened if we if we had a product 279 00:15:26,440 --> 00:15:28,720 Speaker 1: that could do X, Y and Z. And the people 280 00:15:28,760 --> 00:15:31,840 Speaker 1: who created Spy basically read that passage and reverse engineered it. 281 00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:34,480 Speaker 1: It took them a while to get approved. But yeah, 282 00:15:34,520 --> 00:15:38,520 Speaker 1: you can listen more on trillions. We re redropped. Do 283 00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:40,960 Speaker 1: you know a lot about it? We we re dropped 284 00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:43,520 Speaker 1: the et F story, which is six episodes about the 285 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 1: history of the ETF. That's right. Be sure to check 286 00:15:45,280 --> 00:15:48,440 Speaker 1: out the Trillions podcast hosted by Joel and Eric Bautunist. 287 00:15:48,560 --> 00:15:50,880 Speaker 1: The latest episode the e t F Story six part 288 00:15:50,960 --> 00:15:54,240 Speaker 1: series Very cool Stuff, Very cool stuff. As always from 289 00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:55,680 Speaker 1: Katie gray Felt. This story is going to be in 290 00:15:55,720 --> 00:15:57,880 Speaker 1: the upcoming new issue or thanks to Joel as well. 291 00:15:58,560 --> 00:16:01,880 Speaker 1: You're listening to the bloom Bird Business Week podcast. Catch 292 00:16:01,960 --> 00:16:04,520 Speaker 1: us live week days from two to five pm Eastern 293 00:16:04,720 --> 00:16:08,360 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Radio the Bloomberg Business Band you Doo. You 294 00:16:08,480 --> 00:16:11,400 Speaker 1: can also listen live to our flagship New York station, 295 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:17,200 Speaker 1: Just Say Alexa Play Bloomberg E Love and Dirty. Something 296 00:16:17,240 --> 00:16:19,040 Speaker 1: else that we've been talking about as of late, and 297 00:16:19,200 --> 00:16:24,560 Speaker 1: that is the world increasingly pushing back stronger if you will, 298 00:16:24,600 --> 00:16:28,720 Speaker 1: against China. That includes uh, the Japanese, that includes the 299 00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:30,840 Speaker 1: United States, I mean a lot of them are pushing 300 00:16:30,880 --> 00:16:34,280 Speaker 1: back at this point, banning advanced chip technology exports to China. 301 00:16:35,440 --> 00:16:37,520 Speaker 1: This is China continues to move ahead with it's Made 302 00:16:37,520 --> 00:16:41,720 Speaker 1: in China program to dominate key technology such as semiconductors 303 00:16:41,760 --> 00:16:44,880 Speaker 1: and AI and more with US now and back with 304 00:16:45,040 --> 00:16:48,200 Speaker 1: us is Bloomberg New Economy Editorial Director Eric Shatzker here 305 00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 1: in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Eric, good to have 306 00:16:51,200 --> 00:16:54,960 Speaker 1: you with us. Welcome back to back. So it's not 307 00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:56,960 Speaker 1: just the U. S And China anymore, It's not the 308 00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:00,200 Speaker 1: US versus China anymore. This is starting to broaden out, 309 00:17:00,600 --> 00:17:05,119 Speaker 1: oh very much so. And I want to say first 310 00:17:05,200 --> 00:17:08,960 Speaker 1: off that there is Carol just for you at chat 311 00:17:09,040 --> 00:17:14,200 Speaker 1: GBT angle to this story. As you may recall, back 312 00:17:14,240 --> 00:17:17,399 Speaker 1: in October, the United States the Commerce Department moved to 313 00:17:17,520 --> 00:17:22,160 Speaker 1: ban exports of advanced chip making technology to China. Why 314 00:17:22,880 --> 00:17:28,639 Speaker 1: ostensibly to slow the development of Chinese military capabilities, especially 315 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 1: in artificial intelligence, which is now the vanguard of modern warfare. 316 00:17:34,119 --> 00:17:36,280 Speaker 1: And of course this is true. The United States does 317 00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:41,240 Speaker 1: want to constrain the Chinese military. But now, as of Friday, 318 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:44,320 Speaker 1: the United States has an agreement with the Dutch and 319 00:17:44,440 --> 00:17:50,440 Speaker 1: the Japanese to join this coalition if you will, and 320 00:17:50,640 --> 00:17:56,000 Speaker 1: so the Netherlands and Japan also will ban the export 321 00:17:56,040 --> 00:18:01,960 Speaker 1: of advanced chipmaking technology to China. It's important to mention 322 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:05,920 Speaker 1: that three of the world's most important chip making equipment 323 00:18:06,240 --> 00:18:12,640 Speaker 1: suppliers are one Dutch a s mL and to Nikon 324 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:16,680 Speaker 1: and Tokyo electron, both of which are Japanese. People tend 325 00:18:16,720 --> 00:18:19,880 Speaker 1: to think that this is an industry dominated by American companies. 326 00:18:19,880 --> 00:18:24,320 Speaker 1: Into a large degree, it is, but no one would 327 00:18:24,320 --> 00:18:27,000 Speaker 1: be able to make the world's most powerful chips without 328 00:18:27,119 --> 00:18:30,200 Speaker 1: the photo lithography equipment that comes from those three companies 329 00:18:30,280 --> 00:18:33,720 Speaker 1: that I just mentioned. So yes, on the surface, this 330 00:18:33,920 --> 00:18:38,480 Speaker 1: is about a military battleground. Quite possibly, and I know 331 00:18:38,640 --> 00:18:42,680 Speaker 1: that this is hard to process given what's going on 332 00:18:42,720 --> 00:18:48,119 Speaker 1: in Ukraine, but quite possibly the most important military battleground 333 00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:52,920 Speaker 1: in the world. But practically speaking, this coalition of the 334 00:18:53,000 --> 00:18:56,240 Speaker 1: United States, the Netherlands, and Japan banning the export of 335 00:18:56,240 --> 00:18:59,159 Speaker 1: advanced ship making technology to China is going to accomplish 336 00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:03,800 Speaker 1: three others. One, it's going to preserve the West's dominance 337 00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:07,920 Speaker 1: of this critical enabling technology it underpins almost every aspect 338 00:19:08,400 --> 00:19:11,920 Speaker 1: of modern life, to keep certain sectors of Chinese industry 339 00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:14,920 Speaker 1: from posing a competitive threat to the West. And three, 340 00:19:15,960 --> 00:19:19,879 Speaker 1: by forcing the Chinese to enter this arms race and 341 00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:24,679 Speaker 1: try to match Western capabilities, it will divert important human 342 00:19:25,119 --> 00:19:29,440 Speaker 1: and financial resources to that endeavor that might otherwise be 343 00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:33,240 Speaker 1: employed in competing with the West. So it's a multi 344 00:19:33,440 --> 00:19:37,280 Speaker 1: pronged strategy. All you'll hear from the White House and 345 00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:39,919 Speaker 1: from other authorities that this is all about national security, 346 00:19:39,960 --> 00:19:41,520 Speaker 1: and again, to a large degree, it is, but it 347 00:19:41,720 --> 00:19:44,919 Speaker 1: is very much economic and commercial. At the same time, 348 00:19:44,960 --> 00:19:47,480 Speaker 1: I wrote some notes to myself making chips equals arms race. 349 00:19:47,640 --> 00:19:51,040 Speaker 1: It's the new arms race, right in terms of you know, 350 00:19:51,119 --> 00:19:53,719 Speaker 1: we look at the world, chips are in everything. Right, 351 00:19:53,800 --> 00:19:57,960 Speaker 1: this is so important that hard, right, it's hard to 352 00:19:58,000 --> 00:20:00,040 Speaker 1: persuade the Dutch and hard to persuade the JAB and 353 00:20:00,119 --> 00:20:04,040 Speaker 1: needs to join the Americans in this effort. Why because 354 00:20:04,119 --> 00:20:07,120 Speaker 1: they sell so much of this stuff to China. It's 355 00:20:07,119 --> 00:20:10,440 Speaker 1: an it's an immensely important market and you know the 356 00:20:10,760 --> 00:20:14,119 Speaker 1: kind of it's like cutting off your arm, right, so 357 00:20:14,240 --> 00:20:18,000 Speaker 1: much potential revenue is being sacrificed in this effort. But 358 00:20:19,200 --> 00:20:22,320 Speaker 1: if we which is to say, the West, don't do this, 359 00:20:23,359 --> 00:20:28,119 Speaker 1: it threatens dominance in smartphones. It's threatens dominance in the 360 00:20:28,200 --> 00:20:30,879 Speaker 1: ability to predict things like climate change, for example, it 361 00:20:30,960 --> 00:20:35,040 Speaker 1: threatens our dominance in self driving cars, and it threatens 362 00:20:35,080 --> 00:20:41,840 Speaker 1: our dominance in artificial intelligence like chat, GBT. There it is, Carol, 363 00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:43,920 Speaker 1: I know you're waiting for that angle. Well, if we 364 00:20:43,960 --> 00:20:46,760 Speaker 1: continue this idea that it's it's an arms race. And 365 00:20:46,960 --> 00:20:50,360 Speaker 1: if we continue with that sort of historical parallel here, Eric, 366 00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:53,320 Speaker 1: is it fair to say that, given what the stakes are, 367 00:20:54,160 --> 00:20:58,280 Speaker 1: we could have some sort of I don't know, way 368 00:20:58,359 --> 00:21:01,920 Speaker 1: to keep everyone safe from war, given that it could 369 00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:05,440 Speaker 1: be mutually assured destruction if the supply chains get taken out, 370 00:21:07,560 --> 00:21:09,720 Speaker 1: taken out in which way, if there is some sort 371 00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:13,960 Speaker 1: of skirmish, if there is some sort of conflict. Let's 372 00:21:13,960 --> 00:21:17,760 Speaker 1: hope there's no skirmish in the short run, because if 373 00:21:17,880 --> 00:21:20,080 Speaker 1: there were, and what we're really talking about here, I 374 00:21:20,160 --> 00:21:22,439 Speaker 1: think is an invasion of Taiwan. If the Chinese were 375 00:21:22,520 --> 00:21:26,040 Speaker 1: to invade Taiwan, that doesn't mean that they all of 376 00:21:26,119 --> 00:21:30,680 Speaker 1: a sudden get this stuff. These are chip making at 377 00:21:30,720 --> 00:21:36,360 Speaker 1: this level is the single most complicated, demanding engineering undertaking 378 00:21:38,160 --> 00:21:42,119 Speaker 1: in human history. Nothing more complicated. And there's only one company, 379 00:21:42,200 --> 00:21:47,080 Speaker 1: t SMC Taiwan Semi Conductor Manufacturing Corporation, that has perfected 380 00:21:47,119 --> 00:21:50,600 Speaker 1: the process, and the perfection of that process has taken 381 00:21:50,640 --> 00:21:53,080 Speaker 1: place only in Taiwan. So all of the world's most 382 00:21:53,119 --> 00:21:56,000 Speaker 1: advanced simic conductors are made in Taiwan. And yes, if 383 00:21:56,040 --> 00:21:59,040 Speaker 1: the Chinese were to invade Taiwan, the world would lose 384 00:21:59,119 --> 00:22:02,760 Speaker 1: access to those chips and that technology for the time being, 385 00:22:03,520 --> 00:22:06,160 Speaker 1: but so would the Chinese. They don't have the engineers 386 00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:09,680 Speaker 1: to run these factories. One can assume, I mean, what 387 00:22:09,800 --> 00:22:12,720 Speaker 1: is an undred ten miles from mainland China to Taiwan 388 00:22:12,840 --> 00:22:16,640 Speaker 1: that there would be some warning and that the engineers 389 00:22:16,680 --> 00:22:18,880 Speaker 1: would be able to escape. The question is to where 390 00:22:19,240 --> 00:22:21,639 Speaker 1: if they make it to say the United States or Europe, 391 00:22:21,880 --> 00:22:25,640 Speaker 1: are there fabs ready to employ them? No, they're underway. 392 00:22:25,680 --> 00:22:28,640 Speaker 1: I mean Brown has been broken in Phoenix, and America 393 00:22:28,680 --> 00:22:30,440 Speaker 1: and Europe are fast trying to catch up. But this 394 00:22:30,560 --> 00:22:32,720 Speaker 1: is a very important point that you raised. There is 395 00:22:32,840 --> 00:22:39,439 Speaker 1: this period between now and whenever again. America Europe very 396 00:22:39,520 --> 00:22:46,159 Speaker 1: badly want to replicate, duplicate, uh, you know, not make redundant, 397 00:22:46,240 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 1: but at least create some redundancy in the supply chain system, 398 00:22:49,160 --> 00:22:52,480 Speaker 1: so that if there were even an earthquake in Taiwan 399 00:22:52,560 --> 00:22:54,560 Speaker 1: and those fabs were to be taken out, there would 400 00:22:54,560 --> 00:22:57,359 Speaker 1: be something to replace them. Because without those chips, all 401 00:22:57,440 --> 00:23:00,280 Speaker 1: those things that I talked about before, they just don't happen. 402 00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:03,280 Speaker 1: So I think about, you know, coming off of you know, 403 00:23:03,400 --> 00:23:06,720 Speaker 1: in Singapore, the Bloomberg New Economy, I mean, when you guys, 404 00:23:07,000 --> 00:23:10,159 Speaker 1: you obviously touched on a lot of big issues, global issues. 405 00:23:10,240 --> 00:23:13,000 Speaker 1: How much or how often did people think about what's 406 00:23:13,040 --> 00:23:16,680 Speaker 1: going on between kind of the tech race, semiconductors and 407 00:23:16,760 --> 00:23:22,160 Speaker 1: the role that's not enough, not enough, not enough. Again, 408 00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:25,520 Speaker 1: I'll go back to this idea that you know, take 409 00:23:25,640 --> 00:23:27,520 Speaker 1: Ukraine off the table for a moment, because it has 410 00:23:27,560 --> 00:23:32,440 Speaker 1: our attention, and it obviously is a very hot military conflict, 411 00:23:32,480 --> 00:23:34,399 Speaker 1: and as it has the potential to get hotter and 412 00:23:34,720 --> 00:23:38,360 Speaker 1: and possibly even go nuclear, and heaven forbid that ever happens. 413 00:23:39,119 --> 00:23:41,600 Speaker 1: That aside, this is the single most important battle ground 414 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:43,640 Speaker 1: in the world. This is going to decide the dominance 415 00:23:43,680 --> 00:23:46,760 Speaker 1: of the one and twenty second centuries period. Right, It's 416 00:23:46,760 --> 00:23:49,640 Speaker 1: the key to artificial intelligence, it's the key to virtual reality. 417 00:23:49,720 --> 00:23:53,400 Speaker 1: It's ultimately the key not just a supercomputing but quantum computing. 418 00:23:53,600 --> 00:23:57,600 Speaker 1: Whoever gets there first owns it. Right. It is a 419 00:23:57,720 --> 00:24:01,439 Speaker 1: zero sum game, period and China has made it very clear, right, 420 00:24:01,480 --> 00:24:06,000 Speaker 1: they're made to pursue kind of higher technology and no 421 00:24:06,160 --> 00:24:08,320 Speaker 1: more you know, manufacturing to the rest of the world. 422 00:24:08,320 --> 00:24:11,200 Speaker 1: They want to play on this higher plane, if you will, 423 00:24:11,359 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 1: and with access to the equipment from s mL Tookyo Electron, Nicon, 424 00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:18,560 Speaker 1: Applied Materials, LAMB Research, etcetera. Those are some of the 425 00:24:18,600 --> 00:24:21,560 Speaker 1: American companies. They might have been able to get there, 426 00:24:22,080 --> 00:24:25,360 Speaker 1: but without them they have to build this stuff from scratch. 427 00:24:25,480 --> 00:24:29,840 Speaker 1: It has taken decades, decades to perfect the photo lithography 428 00:24:29,920 --> 00:24:35,119 Speaker 1: process to manufacture semiconductors at two nanometers. Go to the 429 00:24:35,160 --> 00:24:38,160 Speaker 1: INSCL contact with Pedia Britannica and look up how small 430 00:24:38,200 --> 00:24:42,280 Speaker 1: an anometer is. In a sense, Eric, certainly the Chips 431 00:24:42,320 --> 00:24:45,280 Speaker 1: Act and the billions that are is going towards chips 432 00:24:45,320 --> 00:24:47,239 Speaker 1: here in the US is a big deal. But at 433 00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:50,040 Speaker 1: the same time, would you imagine, given how important this 434 00:24:50,400 --> 00:24:53,120 Speaker 1: this is, perhaps governments would want to do even more 435 00:24:53,280 --> 00:24:56,320 Speaker 1: and it would be a bipartisan issue. Well, it was 436 00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:00,520 Speaker 1: bipartisan inasmuch as the Chips Act was passed. Could it 437 00:25:00,560 --> 00:25:06,240 Speaker 1: become more of a bipartisan issue? You're like describing it 438 00:25:06,280 --> 00:25:09,320 Speaker 1: as like an all hands on deck situation. Almost. The 439 00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:14,560 Speaker 1: sense I get is that many, not all, of our 440 00:25:14,640 --> 00:25:18,320 Speaker 1: elected representatives in Washington do feel very passionately that it 441 00:25:18,520 --> 00:25:21,560 Speaker 1: is an important issue, and yes, we may see more 442 00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:25,959 Speaker 1: action on that front. But let's not forget that government subsidies. 443 00:25:26,720 --> 00:25:29,840 Speaker 1: You know, are a double edged sword. Right. Everybody who's 444 00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:33,439 Speaker 1: been covering these issues for long enough remembers the cylinder 445 00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:38,359 Speaker 1: debacle with solar manufacturing and the government loan million dollars 446 00:25:38,440 --> 00:25:40,040 Speaker 1: that had to be written off. That is a situation 447 00:25:40,119 --> 00:25:43,480 Speaker 1: that this administration and no subsequent administration wants to find 448 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:46,000 Speaker 1: itself in just quickly ten seconds when we look back 449 00:25:46,000 --> 00:25:48,119 Speaker 1: at this time and say, Okay, this was a smart division, 450 00:25:48,280 --> 00:25:50,920 Speaker 1: you know, decision and really change the game when it 451 00:25:50,960 --> 00:25:53,480 Speaker 1: came to China going forward, at least in terms of 452 00:25:53,560 --> 00:25:56,520 Speaker 1: business and semis. There are many people who describe this 453 00:25:56,720 --> 00:25:59,320 Speaker 1: just like the race to develop and perfect the Adam 454 00:25:59,400 --> 00:26:02,080 Speaker 1: bomb right in World War Two. It is the stake 455 00:26:02,119 --> 00:26:04,520 Speaker 1: sport that high Eric sask, thank you so much. Good 456 00:26:04,520 --> 00:26:06,640 Speaker 1: to have you back in studio, Editorial director of Bloomberg 457 00:26:06,720 --> 00:26:09,880 Speaker 1: New Economy. Here in our interactive Broker studio, you're listening 458 00:26:09,920 --> 00:26:13,679 Speaker 1: and watching Bloomberg Business Week. You're listening to the Bloomberg 459 00:26:13,720 --> 00:26:17,119 Speaker 1: Business Week podcast. Catch us live weekdays from two to 460 00:26:17,240 --> 00:26:20,920 Speaker 1: five pm Easter on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business app 461 00:26:20,960 --> 00:26:23,639 Speaker 1: band you too. You can also listen live to our 462 00:26:23,680 --> 00:26:27,720 Speaker 1: flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg e 463 00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:37,680 Speaker 1: Love and Verdi. I'm broom a journal now. But you 464 00:26:37,800 --> 00:26:42,440 Speaker 1: let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, honey, please, 465 00:26:42,560 --> 00:26:48,280 Speaker 1: I'll do the riding gravels. I want to drive. It's 466 00:26:48,359 --> 00:26:55,960 Speaker 1: good question. This is the drive to the Clothes music 467 00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:01,760 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Radio. All right, got about seventeen minutes left 468 00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:03,920 Speaker 1: in today's trading session. It's going to be a big week. 469 00:27:03,960 --> 00:27:06,359 Speaker 1: We know, lots on our mind. The fo MC meeting 470 00:27:06,440 --> 00:27:08,840 Speaker 1: they kick off, kick off that two day meeting tomorrow, 471 00:27:08,960 --> 00:27:11,080 Speaker 1: the decision on Wednesday. You've got to be a fly 472 00:27:11,160 --> 00:27:13,439 Speaker 1: on the wall, as you say all the time, Can 473 00:27:13,480 --> 00:27:15,119 Speaker 1: I just like bring in like the treats you know 474 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:18,320 Speaker 1: they just here. What do you guys think of you know, 475 00:27:18,840 --> 00:27:24,560 Speaker 1: higher for longer exactly ongoing, Gonna use it anyway. There's 476 00:27:24,640 --> 00:27:30,359 Speaker 1: that there's some big earnings Amazon Alphabet, Apple Meta D 477 00:27:30,840 --> 00:27:34,600 Speaker 1: no am D snapped tomorrow. So a lot of stuff 478 00:27:34,600 --> 00:27:36,480 Speaker 1: going on and then the jobs are put on Friday. Yeah, 479 00:27:36,520 --> 00:27:38,440 Speaker 1: really eager to get through. Our next guest. You know 480 00:27:38,560 --> 00:27:40,320 Speaker 1: his voice, you know his name because he's been on 481 00:27:40,760 --> 00:27:42,560 Speaker 1: with us quite a bit. Abbe Dish Ponde as the 482 00:27:42,560 --> 00:27:45,800 Speaker 1: founder and chief investment officer at the registered investment advisor 483 00:27:45,880 --> 00:27:49,080 Speaker 1: Centerstone Investors joining us via zoom in New York City. 484 00:27:49,640 --> 00:27:51,919 Speaker 1: I'll be good to have you with us. Global value 485 00:27:52,480 --> 00:27:55,320 Speaker 1: is what you've been talking about for a long time. Um, 486 00:27:55,600 --> 00:27:58,120 Speaker 1: before we get to your picks, I want to get 487 00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:00,920 Speaker 1: a look at from where you're standing, what you see 488 00:28:00,960 --> 00:28:07,800 Speaker 1: in well three starting off thankful a little different than two. 489 00:28:08,119 --> 00:28:11,080 Speaker 1: So far. We were talking about this the other day, 490 00:28:11,160 --> 00:28:13,240 Speaker 1: like little do we know it was about to get 491 00:28:13,320 --> 00:28:15,760 Speaker 1: unleashed all us for the full year last year, last January. 492 00:28:15,880 --> 00:28:18,760 Speaker 1: But so far this year it's it's a it's almost 493 00:28:18,760 --> 00:28:22,119 Speaker 1: on your opposite. Uh you have, I mean going region 494 00:28:22,160 --> 00:28:26,320 Speaker 1: by region. Um, you know, Europe has luck maybe fortuitously 495 00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:30,400 Speaker 1: avoided the worst case scenario with the winter. Their energy 496 00:28:30,480 --> 00:28:34,680 Speaker 1: usage has been weighed below what they were fearing. The 497 00:28:34,760 --> 00:28:37,680 Speaker 1: economies can are sort of able to maybe absorb that 498 00:28:37,720 --> 00:28:40,600 Speaker 1: a little bit. Um, that that hit, that hike cost 499 00:28:40,720 --> 00:28:43,400 Speaker 1: hit a little bit easier this year. China's of course 500 00:28:43,480 --> 00:28:48,080 Speaker 1: opening up. Um, the dollar has at least stabilized for now, 501 00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:50,400 Speaker 1: which is good for emerging markets. So a lot of 502 00:28:50,800 --> 00:28:54,160 Speaker 1: you know, if a lot of positive takeaways to start 503 00:28:54,240 --> 00:28:57,680 Speaker 1: the year. Um, you know, so so far, so good. Granted, 504 00:28:57,720 --> 00:29:00,800 Speaker 1: it's you know, January. Yeah, it's still going. But you know, 505 00:29:00,880 --> 00:29:02,680 Speaker 1: for someone, one of the reasons I love talking with 506 00:29:02,760 --> 00:29:05,560 Speaker 1: you is, you know, the global perspective, right, and we 507 00:29:05,640 --> 00:29:08,280 Speaker 1: need to think about that, certainly for all investors, and 508 00:29:09,000 --> 00:29:12,920 Speaker 1: you know what different monetary policies might mean, global risk 509 00:29:13,000 --> 00:29:15,680 Speaker 1: factors might mean for different parts of the world. Having 510 00:29:15,720 --> 00:29:18,280 Speaker 1: said that, I wonder what you mean, what you think 511 00:29:18,360 --> 00:29:20,920 Speaker 1: about and something we talked with our Eric Shatzker about 512 00:29:20,960 --> 00:29:24,560 Speaker 1: the increasing tensions with China, and there was a headline 513 00:29:24,640 --> 00:29:27,520 Speaker 1: just a few minutes ago about how the Body administration 514 00:29:27,600 --> 00:29:30,360 Speaker 1: is considering cutting off Huahwei Technologies from all of its 515 00:29:30,360 --> 00:29:34,040 Speaker 1: American suppliers, including Intel and Qualcom, as the US government 516 00:29:34,080 --> 00:29:37,760 Speaker 1: intensifies a crackdown on the Chinese technology UH sector. And 517 00:29:37,840 --> 00:29:40,800 Speaker 1: then we just had Bloomberg a few days ago talking 518 00:29:40,880 --> 00:29:44,320 Speaker 1: about how specifically the Dutch in Japanese are joining the 519 00:29:44,440 --> 00:29:48,000 Speaker 1: US and banning advanced chip technology exports to China. Are 520 00:29:48,080 --> 00:29:51,520 Speaker 1: we seeing that dividing up of the world happening that 521 00:29:51,680 --> 00:29:57,320 Speaker 1: kind of tech great wall? Yeah, I mean we have 522 00:29:57,400 --> 00:30:01,400 Speaker 1: been kind of getting people heads up on this, uh, 523 00:30:01,640 --> 00:30:05,360 Speaker 1: you know, like five six years ago. UM, and I 524 00:30:05,480 --> 00:30:08,000 Speaker 1: think that that that path still lays in front of us. 525 00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:13,000 Speaker 1: Where the you know, different countries have different diverging interests, 526 00:30:13,400 --> 00:30:17,960 Speaker 1: and one of the main diverging interests is is this 527 00:30:18,120 --> 00:30:21,800 Speaker 1: idea of intellectual property, and um, the Chinese you know, 528 00:30:22,040 --> 00:30:26,160 Speaker 1: very local use of it to to try to create 529 00:30:26,280 --> 00:30:29,800 Speaker 1: some sort of a technological military advantage for themselves. Um. 530 00:30:30,680 --> 00:30:33,840 Speaker 1: At the end of the day, though I don't believe that. Um, 531 00:30:35,120 --> 00:30:38,560 Speaker 1: it's really uh, I don't think. I don't spend much 532 00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:40,360 Speaker 1: time worrying about like a war or anything like that. 533 00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:45,280 Speaker 1: There's just it's nobody's interests right now. I think where 534 00:30:45,520 --> 00:30:51,640 Speaker 1: Peak possibly Peak kind of worry about about China versus 535 00:30:51,680 --> 00:30:53,640 Speaker 1: the United States, And just the other days in general 536 00:30:53,720 --> 00:30:55,600 Speaker 1: came out of the Air Force general came out and said, 537 00:30:55,600 --> 00:30:56,760 Speaker 1: you know, hey, we're gonna go to war with these 538 00:30:56,800 --> 00:31:01,040 Speaker 1: guys in It just doesn't seem why that to me 539 00:31:01,160 --> 00:31:03,640 Speaker 1: just seems like maybe a little bit more worried than 540 00:31:03,840 --> 00:31:06,600 Speaker 1: that than is warranted by reality. The reality is Chinese 541 00:31:06,640 --> 00:31:09,000 Speaker 1: are kind of boxed in a little bit Chinese government, 542 00:31:09,040 --> 00:31:13,280 Speaker 1: as I should say, um, by the multiple policy failures 543 00:31:13,400 --> 00:31:17,360 Speaker 1: and and you know this very chaotic COVID reopening, COVID reopening, 544 00:31:17,960 --> 00:31:21,360 Speaker 1: but it behooves no one to just box them into 545 00:31:21,360 --> 00:31:23,360 Speaker 1: a quarner and try to you know, punish them like 546 00:31:23,600 --> 00:31:26,320 Speaker 1: like you know it has been done with Russia. China's 547 00:31:26,800 --> 00:31:29,880 Speaker 1: is the largest exporter in the world. I mean, it's 548 00:31:29,880 --> 00:31:32,960 Speaker 1: a huge manufacturing center for the entire world. Without it, 549 00:31:33,600 --> 00:31:37,040 Speaker 1: a lot of the world's you know, the globalized supply chains, 550 00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:39,280 Speaker 1: they exist, they just don't exist. So I don't I 551 00:31:39,320 --> 00:31:42,600 Speaker 1: don't think that there's a reason to expect a major conflict. 552 00:31:42,680 --> 00:31:44,280 Speaker 1: We only have about ninety seconds left, and I want 553 00:31:44,280 --> 00:31:45,520 Speaker 1: to get to some of the picks that you have, 554 00:31:45,600 --> 00:31:46,960 Speaker 1: because there are a couple in here that sort of 555 00:31:47,000 --> 00:31:49,000 Speaker 1: seement opposite ed into the spectrum. I'm gonna ask you 556 00:31:49,040 --> 00:31:51,600 Speaker 1: about both of these companies at once. We got on 557 00:31:51,800 --> 00:31:56,840 Speaker 1: one hand, Ross Stores and on the other hand, Porsche. Yeah, 558 00:31:57,400 --> 00:32:01,719 Speaker 1: two different kinds of concepts. They what happened last year 559 00:32:01,760 --> 00:32:05,280 Speaker 1: We had a fairly you know, dramatic sell off in 560 00:32:05,440 --> 00:32:09,680 Speaker 1: all kinds of companies, good and poor quality in terms 561 00:32:09,720 --> 00:32:14,280 Speaker 1: of the franchises. And when that happens, you know, value investors, 562 00:32:14,360 --> 00:32:16,320 Speaker 1: it's great for us at Center. So we're value investors. 563 00:32:16,360 --> 00:32:18,240 Speaker 1: That's great for us because we're then able to just 564 00:32:18,320 --> 00:32:21,120 Speaker 1: sort of migrate interra higher quality names, things that have 565 00:32:21,280 --> 00:32:26,440 Speaker 1: franchise values UM and represent you know, a good long 566 00:32:26,560 --> 00:32:30,120 Speaker 1: term investment for our our clients. It's unusual that we 567 00:32:30,200 --> 00:32:33,520 Speaker 1: get to do that in you know, a a you know, 568 00:32:33,520 --> 00:32:36,280 Speaker 1: a very general way, which we're able to do last year, 569 00:32:36,360 --> 00:32:38,240 Speaker 1: so that if you look at our portfolio you bought 570 00:32:38,280 --> 00:32:41,200 Speaker 1: like overtend new names last year. The common element with 571 00:32:41,560 --> 00:32:43,560 Speaker 1: whether it's a Ross or Porsche or some of the 572 00:32:43,600 --> 00:32:45,880 Speaker 1: other companies we bought is that their franchises are run 573 00:32:45,960 --> 00:32:49,240 Speaker 1: by good management teams UM, and they have good balance sheets. 574 00:32:49,280 --> 00:32:52,760 Speaker 1: Like essentially the companies are on autopid they run themselves. 575 00:32:52,920 --> 00:32:55,200 Speaker 1: And beyond all of that, of course, is that they 576 00:32:55,280 --> 00:32:58,760 Speaker 1: traded you know, very attractive prices compared to their intrinsic values. 577 00:32:59,320 --> 00:33:02,240 Speaker 1: So we get every thing in one one right one 578 00:33:02,320 --> 00:33:05,400 Speaker 1: going alright, We're gonna have to leave it on that note, UM, 579 00:33:05,520 --> 00:33:07,480 Speaker 1: and we love talking names with you. Rush Stores, by 580 00:33:07,520 --> 00:33:12,040 Speaker 1: the way, is up about fift since a low in 581 00:33:12,200 --> 00:33:14,600 Speaker 1: last August, so we've certainly seen a bump up in 582 00:33:14,720 --> 00:33:17,960 Speaker 1: that one. Um Bonde, thank you so much, Founder, Chief 583 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:22,640 Speaker 1: investment officer at center Stone Investors, the registered investment advisor 584 00:33:22,720 --> 00:33:26,440 Speaker 1: joining us via zoom in New York City. This is 585 00:33:26,520 --> 00:33:30,840 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and 586 00:33:31,000 --> 00:33:34,760 Speaker 1: anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live each weekday 587 00:33:34,800 --> 00:33:37,480 Speaker 1: is starting at two pm Eastern pont Bloomberg dot Com, 588 00:33:37,720 --> 00:33:40,320 Speaker 1: the I Heart Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg 589 00:33:40,400 --> 00:33:43,320 Speaker 1: Business App. You can also watch us live every weekday 590 00:33:43,360 --> 00:33:46,440 Speaker 1: on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Term level