1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:10,080 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the 2 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:13,880 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 3 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:17,119 Speaker 1: noon and five pm Eastern on Apple, Cockley and Android 4 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,520 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever 5 00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:25,080 Speaker 1: you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:28,319 Speaker 2: Coming up as our conversation with Julia Asari. But we 7 00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:31,880 Speaker 2: do have a breaker here with what's going on in 8 00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:35,920 Speaker 2: the political world of Eric Adams. Just breaking on the 9 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 2: terminal a short time ago, as you might have heard, 10 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:42,680 Speaker 2: permanently ending the judge permanently ending corruption case against the 11 00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:45,599 Speaker 2: mayor of New York. A federal judge dismissed the charges 12 00:00:45,880 --> 00:00:49,239 Speaker 2: against Eric Adams, bringing what is a permanent end to 13 00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:51,240 Speaker 2: the case. There was a bit of an argument about 14 00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:53,960 Speaker 2: whether charges should be refiled. And we have a chance 15 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 2: to catch up quickly on this breaker with June Grosso, 16 00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:59,080 Speaker 2: host of Bloomberg Law. She's with us from world headquarters 17 00:00:59,080 --> 00:01:01,240 Speaker 2: in New York. June. What's this all about? Is this 18 00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:02,400 Speaker 2: case over or not? 19 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:06,600 Speaker 3: Cases over? The government got what it wants, what wanted 20 00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:09,039 Speaker 3: in one respect, but not in the other because the 21 00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:11,959 Speaker 3: judge slammed the government over and over and over again 22 00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:15,399 Speaker 3: in his decision. The government wanted to be able to 23 00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:18,480 Speaker 3: bring charges against Eric Adams in the future, and the 24 00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:21,559 Speaker 3: judge said, no, I'm going to dismiss this with prejudice, 25 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 3: meaning you can't bring that again. He said it wasn't 26 00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:27,160 Speaker 3: right to have leverage over the mayor of New York. 27 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:33,400 Speaker 3: But the judge also characterized this agreement as everything here 28 00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:37,160 Speaker 3: smacks of a bargain dismissal of the indictment in exchange 29 00:01:37,160 --> 00:01:41,800 Speaker 3: for immigration policy concessions. And he just took down each 30 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:44,800 Speaker 3: of the Justice Department's arguments for why they wanted to 31 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:48,360 Speaker 3: dismiss the case. For example, it was brought for political reasons. 32 00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:50,720 Speaker 3: He said, no, zero evidence that it was brought for 33 00:01:50,760 --> 00:01:54,440 Speaker 3: political reasons. Another reason, the mayor, if he has to 34 00:01:55,440 --> 00:01:57,840 Speaker 3: litigate this case, won't be able to deal with the 35 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:01,120 Speaker 3: immigration policy concerns. He said, no. Oh again, he said 36 00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:05,040 Speaker 3: the mayor dealt with immigration policy concerns right after this 37 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:08,959 Speaker 3: by letting ice into Rikers, which the judge said may 38 00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:12,680 Speaker 3: not be in compliance with New York's law. So he 39 00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:14,440 Speaker 3: had a lot to say, though he had really no 40 00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:17,760 Speaker 3: choice but to dismiss the case with this. 41 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:21,440 Speaker 2: Now less than three months before the primary election in 42 00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:24,760 Speaker 2: the New York City mayoral race. He can still run then, right, 43 00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:25,920 Speaker 2: He's a candidate. 44 00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:28,800 Speaker 3: Absolutely, and his lawyer had written yesterday asking the judge 45 00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:31,919 Speaker 3: to hand down a decision quickly because of the deadlines 46 00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:35,519 Speaker 3: coming up in that race. The judge also mentioned, however, 47 00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 3: you know, whenever something is dismissed in this case, or 48 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:40,680 Speaker 3: something happens Eric Adams or his lawyers come out and 49 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 3: say this shows that Mayor Adams is innocent of all charges. 50 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:48,440 Speaker 3: The judge said, this is not an indication of guilt 51 00:02:48,600 --> 00:02:51,480 Speaker 3: or innocence. I'm not ruling based on that. And I 52 00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:54,480 Speaker 3: think he did that deliberately because he knew that we're 53 00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:57,079 Speaker 3: going to hear choruses from the Adams camp that this 54 00:02:57,200 --> 00:03:01,520 Speaker 3: means that he was innocent or not guilty of those charges. 55 00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:04,240 Speaker 3: But yeah, he's going to run, and we'll see how 56 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:06,839 Speaker 3: much this plays in. As you know, he already has 57 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:10,320 Speaker 3: horrible approval ratings in New York City, so we'll see 58 00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:12,440 Speaker 3: how much this plays in. And his tie to the 59 00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:14,120 Speaker 3: Trump administration. 60 00:03:14,600 --> 00:03:17,639 Speaker 2: Well, pretty neat boat to put on this one. Jude Grosso, 61 00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:19,440 Speaker 2: thank you so much, Bloomberg Law. With much more to 62 00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:23,480 Speaker 2: follow this evening. A federal judge dismissing corruption charges against 63 00:03:23,560 --> 00:03:25,679 Speaker 2: Eric Adams. There you go, nice and clean, June, Thank 64 00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 2: you very much. There's nothing more dangerous than when a 65 00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:31,880 Speaker 2: journalist is looking for a trend story, and it is 66 00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:33,639 Speaker 2: exactly what I am going to do right now with 67 00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:37,320 Speaker 2: the analysis this morning coming out of Wisconsin and Florida. Hey, 68 00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:40,600 Speaker 2: first great day of the year for Democrats is the 69 00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 2: headline and the tip sheets this morning. Add Corey Booker 70 00:03:43,840 --> 00:03:46,640 Speaker 2: at twenty five hours on the Senate floor, and it's 71 00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:49,520 Speaker 2: a brand new day. I may be going a little far, 72 00:03:49,640 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 2: but what happened last evening in Florida. Of course, by 73 00:03:52,320 --> 00:03:55,160 Speaker 2: the way, Republicans won, but not by nearly as much 74 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:59,120 Speaker 2: as would have been expected. Certainly that sixth district of Florida, 75 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:02,400 Speaker 2: the Mike Waltz seat talked about a Trump win of 76 00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:06,200 Speaker 2: thirty plus points. Didn't turn out quite like that for 77 00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:09,920 Speaker 2: the Republican candidate. But those seats are preserved. Democrats may 78 00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:12,040 Speaker 2: be claiming a moral victory. We're going to point more 79 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:15,040 Speaker 2: to what happened last evening in Wisconsin, the Democratic win 80 00:04:15,080 --> 00:04:17,719 Speaker 2: the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, the one that Elon Musk 81 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:21,400 Speaker 2: invested tens of millions of dollars in making it the 82 00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 2: most expensive judicial battle in American history. Went to the 83 00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:29,920 Speaker 2: Democrat last evening a ten point spread. Judge Susan Crawford 84 00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 2: handily beat Judge Brad Shimmel in her victory speech last night, listen. 85 00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:42,719 Speaker 4: Today, wisconsinight s spended off an unprecedented attack on our democracy, 86 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 4: and Wisconsin's stood up and said loudly that justice does 87 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:52,600 Speaker 4: not have a price. Our courts are not for sale. 88 00:04:54,480 --> 00:04:57,120 Speaker 2: I don't know if Julia Azari will indulge me on 89 00:04:57,160 --> 00:05:00,560 Speaker 2: my trend story, but that's why we learn. To an 90 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:04,159 Speaker 2: expert professor of political science Marquette University, Julie, it's great 91 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:06,520 Speaker 2: to have you back on Bloomberg and good to see you. 92 00:05:06,560 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 2: Am I onto something here? Or are we making way 93 00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 2: too much about a couple of state wide races less 94 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:13,240 Speaker 2: than one hundred days you know the Trump administration. 95 00:05:14,920 --> 00:05:17,799 Speaker 5: Well, I have kind of complicated thoughts about that, and 96 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:20,400 Speaker 5: I want to echo what you had said about the 97 00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:22,640 Speaker 5: you know, kind of the significance of this race in 98 00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:26,120 Speaker 5: Wisconsin as someone who lives in Wisconsin. This morning, I've 99 00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:28,599 Speaker 5: admit was a little lonely because by ten am I 100 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 5: didn't have fifteen text messages telling me to vote. It's 101 00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:35,720 Speaker 5: been very it's been a very intense period here in Wisconsin, 102 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:39,160 Speaker 5: and it's also been, I can attest, very nationalized and 103 00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:41,880 Speaker 5: with a lot of emphasis on the race really being 104 00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:44,600 Speaker 5: about Elon Musk and Donald Trump, not so much about 105 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:49,559 Speaker 5: state level judicial issues. As far as thinking about a trend, 106 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:53,040 Speaker 5: here's here's how I would think about it. We often 107 00:05:53,160 --> 00:05:56,600 Speaker 5: see this happen in the special elections that unfold over 108 00:05:56,640 --> 00:05:59,800 Speaker 5: the course of an odd year after a presidential election. 109 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:03,520 Speaker 5: We often see the president's party lose, and that or 110 00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:05,440 Speaker 5: whatever we want to call this. With the judicial election 111 00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:10,120 Speaker 5: technically nonpartisan, it's clear what the sides were. We often 112 00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:13,520 Speaker 5: see that we often see and that sort of foreshadows 113 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:16,840 Speaker 5: the midterm losses that we often see for the president's party. 114 00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:20,279 Speaker 5: But what I want to emphasize from my perspective as 115 00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 5: someone who studies this is that it's not as automatic 116 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,240 Speaker 5: as I think the trend would have us believe, and 117 00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:31,240 Speaker 5: what it actually reflects is political mobilization and organization. And 118 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:33,560 Speaker 5: what the way I would think about this and the 119 00:06:33,640 --> 00:06:36,080 Speaker 5: what I would look for is how much does some 120 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:40,440 Speaker 5: of these results reflect that organization and mobilization on the 121 00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:43,760 Speaker 5: ground and certainly you would see that in Wisconsin, and 122 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:45,599 Speaker 5: so that would be the lens. I would also turn 123 00:06:45,640 --> 00:06:49,640 Speaker 5: to some of these other races where Republicans underperformed their 124 00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:55,280 Speaker 5: usual electoral returns. Is was that the result of kind 125 00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:59,120 Speaker 5: of voters experiencing some kind of remorse or voters responding 126 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:03,159 Speaker 5: to an administration? Wasn't also the result of real organization 127 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:06,840 Speaker 5: on the ground, mobilizing some voters and not others, emphasizing 128 00:07:06,920 --> 00:07:10,000 Speaker 5: bringing national issues into that conversation. 129 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:13,600 Speaker 2: What does this say about Elon Musk Because he not 130 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:17,200 Speaker 2: only made this the most expensive judicial race in US history, 131 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:18,760 Speaker 2: he said a lot. He was out there with the 132 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:21,360 Speaker 2: cheese head. We all saw this, given out million dollar checks. 133 00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:24,160 Speaker 2: He said this race would decide the future of America 134 00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:27,840 Speaker 2: and Western civilization. Why was he so keyed into Wisconsin? 135 00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:29,960 Speaker 1: Right? 136 00:07:30,040 --> 00:07:34,840 Speaker 5: I mean, I think who knows? But it's not wrong 137 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:37,960 Speaker 5: that this is a this is a state where a 138 00:07:38,040 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 5: lot of things end up kind of being decided, where 139 00:07:40,280 --> 00:07:42,720 Speaker 5: this is a key swing state. We have a number 140 00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:46,080 Speaker 5: of judicial issues that could come before the court, including 141 00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 5: the legislative maps and also a trigger abortion law from 142 00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:55,240 Speaker 5: eighteen forty nine. So you know, these are these are 143 00:07:55,320 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 5: really forefront issues. I think even before the twenty twenty 144 00:07:58,440 --> 00:08:01,520 Speaker 5: four election, even before this race and Elon Musk, certainly, 145 00:08:02,600 --> 00:08:04,200 Speaker 5: it was important to look at what was going on 146 00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:08,440 Speaker 5: in Wisconsin to understand national trends. As far as Musk. 147 00:08:08,680 --> 00:08:10,880 Speaker 5: One thing that that I like to say after these 148 00:08:11,080 --> 00:08:13,120 Speaker 5: off year elections is that they often kind of tell 149 00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:16,040 Speaker 5: us stories that we already know. And the story that 150 00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:18,360 Speaker 5: we already know is that Elon Musk isn't very popular, 151 00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:23,720 Speaker 5: that his sort and particularly like billionaires are not very popular. 152 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:25,880 Speaker 5: I have all sorts of survey data that it attests 153 00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:29,200 Speaker 5: to this. People are not are not crazy about the 154 00:08:29,560 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 5: power of the wealthy. Sorry, this is the wrong venue 155 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:32,400 Speaker 5: for that comment. 156 00:08:35,679 --> 00:08:35,959 Speaker 6: Musk. 157 00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:41,079 Speaker 5: You asked me to share my expert opinion, and that's 158 00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:44,040 Speaker 5: I mean. I'm looking at these open ended survey responses unbidden. 159 00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:48,760 Speaker 5: People often talk about wealth and billionaires and must didn't. 160 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:52,760 Speaker 2: Julia, There's no billionaires around here you have to worry about. 161 00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:53,360 Speaker 2: It's just us. 162 00:08:54,760 --> 00:08:58,559 Speaker 5: Okay, good, I'm safe with my fellow media content creators. 163 00:08:58,640 --> 00:09:00,400 Speaker 3: But you are. 164 00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:05,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, that's that's that's that's my takeaway is this isn't 165 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:07,559 Speaker 5: really popular. You know, Wisconsinin's are a little bit difficult 166 00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:12,599 Speaker 5: to read politically, it's very much a purple state. It 167 00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:16,280 Speaker 5: has potentially sort of shifted from being a state that's 168 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:18,360 Speaker 5: purple because there are a lot of independent swing voters 169 00:09:18,520 --> 00:09:20,040 Speaker 5: to a state that's purple because there are a lot 170 00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:22,320 Speaker 5: of passionate partisans, and so every election is a question 171 00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:25,480 Speaker 5: of which ones will show up. But whatever it is, 172 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:27,800 Speaker 5: you know, it is a state with a strong sort 173 00:09:27,840 --> 00:09:31,280 Speaker 5: of populist history and populist background, and so it's not 174 00:09:31,360 --> 00:09:33,880 Speaker 5: surprising to me that the idea that someone would come 175 00:09:33,920 --> 00:09:37,040 Speaker 5: in from out of the state and kind of flaunt 176 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:39,719 Speaker 5: their wealth as a means of political power would not 177 00:09:39,880 --> 00:09:40,600 Speaker 5: go over that well. 178 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:44,079 Speaker 2: Mm hmm. You probably heard the story or read the 179 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:47,480 Speaker 2: story of political magazine Donald Trump telling his inner circle 180 00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:50,360 Speaker 2: that Elon's going to be wrapping up soon, packing up 181 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:53,520 Speaker 2: his toys and stepping back in the coming weeks from 182 00:09:53,600 --> 00:09:57,560 Speaker 2: his current role as a governing partner. Is Donald Trump 183 00:09:57,640 --> 00:10:01,120 Speaker 2: getting a sense of what you're feeling? Or will they 184 00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:03,040 Speaker 2: say his work is done? Or both? 185 00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:07,679 Speaker 5: Yeah, this, I mean good question will find out over 186 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:11,280 Speaker 5: the over the next seple months. It's not terribly unusual 187 00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:16,000 Speaker 5: to have some staff turnover in response to these sorts 188 00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:19,559 Speaker 5: of you know, in response to a political development or 189 00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 5: in response to a policy development. And Musk's role is 190 00:10:23,080 --> 00:10:27,559 Speaker 5: very strange. You know, he occupies a kind of mentally, 191 00:10:27,720 --> 00:10:30,319 Speaker 5: I think, the role that we often attribute to a 192 00:10:30,400 --> 00:10:32,240 Speaker 5: chief of staff, but he's not playing that role at all. 193 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:36,320 Speaker 5: He is not managing the Trump White House. He's he's 194 00:10:37,559 --> 00:10:41,120 Speaker 5: you know, they won't be totally straightforward about what he's doing, 195 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:44,360 Speaker 5: but clearly he's deeply involved in this sort of policy 196 00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:48,560 Speaker 5: impact of cutting government. And I think that if there's 197 00:10:48,559 --> 00:10:51,640 Speaker 5: a sense that that's unpopular, part of Musk's strange role 198 00:10:51,800 --> 00:10:54,080 Speaker 5: is that it makes him pretty easy to get rid of. He's, 199 00:10:54,280 --> 00:10:57,240 Speaker 5: you know, he's not senate confirmed, He's not even really 200 00:10:57,280 --> 00:10:59,520 Speaker 5: in a clear and official role. So I think there 201 00:10:59,640 --> 00:11:02,280 Speaker 5: was always maybe a sentence that he would be the 202 00:11:02,360 --> 00:11:02,800 Speaker 5: fall guy. 203 00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:07,559 Speaker 2: You should come buy more often, Julia Azari, I was 204 00:11:07,640 --> 00:11:09,120 Speaker 2: excited to hear you were coming on a great to 205 00:11:09,160 --> 00:11:12,240 Speaker 2: see you, Professor of Political Science, Marquette University. As part 206 00:11:12,280 --> 00:11:15,520 Speaker 2: of our conversation today on Bloomberg, I still wonder where 207 00:11:15,520 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 2: does Elon Musk live in town? Did he get a property, 208 00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:20,360 Speaker 2: does he have an apartment, is renting a house or 209 00:11:20,400 --> 00:11:22,520 Speaker 2: has he parked at a hotel. Maybe he really is 210 00:11:22,600 --> 00:11:25,040 Speaker 2: sleeping in the office every night. I guess he can 211 00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:27,200 Speaker 2: do that for one hundred and thirty days. Look, we've 212 00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:28,959 Speaker 2: got a lot more to talk about here. We'll assemble 213 00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:30,160 Speaker 2: our panel coming up next. 214 00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:36,000 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch 215 00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:39,120 Speaker 1: us live weekdays at noon and five pm Eastern on 216 00:11:39,280 --> 00:11:42,440 Speaker 1: Apple Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. 217 00:11:42,559 --> 00:11:45,520 Speaker 1: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 218 00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:50,359 Speaker 1: flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 219 00:11:51,720 --> 00:11:53,839 Speaker 7: Just over three and a half hours to go and 220 00:11:53,920 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 7: no news two and a half hours. Yes, math can 221 00:11:57,040 --> 00:11:58,839 Speaker 7: be difficult sometimes two and a half hours to go. 222 00:11:58,920 --> 00:12:00,640 Speaker 7: We still have not heard from the White House any 223 00:12:00,679 --> 00:12:02,959 Speaker 7: kind of preview as to what exactly it is the 224 00:12:03,040 --> 00:12:05,959 Speaker 7: President will be announcing at four pm Eastern time. But 225 00:12:06,040 --> 00:12:07,679 Speaker 7: we have heard from the White House, at least via 226 00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:11,200 Speaker 7: the Press secretary. That's something that was reported in Politico 227 00:12:11,280 --> 00:12:15,400 Speaker 7: earlier is apparently, and this is quoting Caroline Levett here garbage, 228 00:12:15,559 --> 00:12:17,640 Speaker 7: It was a report that the President has told members 229 00:12:17,679 --> 00:12:20,040 Speaker 7: of his inner circle, including members of his cabinet, that 230 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:24,480 Speaker 7: Elon Musk will be leaving his forward facing role as 231 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:28,040 Speaker 7: a special government employee at the Department of Government Efficiency 232 00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:32,120 Speaker 7: or working with it fairly soon. Now whether or not 233 00:12:32,679 --> 00:12:35,480 Speaker 7: the accuracy of the story is in question here. This 234 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:37,599 Speaker 7: is political reporting. We can't speak to that, Joe, but 235 00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:40,480 Speaker 7: it is interesting that the timing of it coincides with 236 00:12:41,280 --> 00:12:45,079 Speaker 7: what was a loss for Elon Musk yesterday after an 237 00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:47,800 Speaker 7: investment not just of his own financial capital to the 238 00:12:47,880 --> 00:12:49,920 Speaker 7: tune of twenty million dollars, but also a good amount 239 00:12:49,960 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 7: of his political capital went in to the Wisconsin State 240 00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:56,200 Speaker 7: Supreme Court race. He was backing the conservative candidate, who 241 00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:59,920 Speaker 7: ultimately lost by ten points to the liberal candidate, Susan Croft. 242 00:13:01,120 --> 00:13:06,760 Speaker 4: Today, Wisconsinites spended off an unprecedented attack on our democracy, 243 00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:12,480 Speaker 4: and Wisconsin's stood up and said loudly that justice does 244 00:13:12,559 --> 00:13:16,120 Speaker 4: not have a price. Our courts are not for sale. 245 00:13:18,360 --> 00:13:21,079 Speaker 2: That's where we start with our political panel today. Jeanie 246 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 2: Shanzino are Democratic analyst and senior Democracy Fellow with the 247 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:27,600 Speaker 2: Center for the Study of the Presidency in Congress, joined 248 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:32,280 Speaker 2: today by Republican strategist Mara Gillespie Bluestack Strategies. Great to 249 00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:35,040 Speaker 2: see you both and welcome Genie. What does this mean 250 00:13:35,120 --> 00:13:37,800 Speaker 2: for Democrats, are people going a little far here? We're 251 00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:41,560 Speaker 2: hearing this was the first good day for Democrats since 252 00:13:41,600 --> 00:13:44,120 Speaker 2: the election of Donald Trump. And that may not be 253 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:46,559 Speaker 2: saying a lot to be perfectly honest, as we look 254 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:49,079 Speaker 2: back over the past couple of months here, but these 255 00:13:49,160 --> 00:13:52,000 Speaker 2: couple of statewide races Wisconsin Supreme Court and the couple 256 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:54,880 Speaker 2: of seats that we saw actually stay Republican in Florida, 257 00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:55,960 Speaker 2: mean what for Democrats? 258 00:13:57,559 --> 00:14:00,520 Speaker 8: Yeah, there is always a tendency to overread, but Joe, 259 00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:03,360 Speaker 8: we have to get Democrats something. They've had a crappy 260 00:14:03,520 --> 00:14:06,319 Speaker 8: few months, so they're out celebrating and of course Corey 261 00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:10,440 Speaker 8: Booker last night over twenty four hours helped buoy their spirits. 262 00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:13,199 Speaker 8: So yeah, this was a big win in Wisconsin. It 263 00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:16,880 Speaker 8: was also a necessary win. If Democrats had lost Wisconsin, 264 00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:20,000 Speaker 8: that would have been catastrophic for them. Likewise, and I 265 00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:23,200 Speaker 8: think Mora would agree. Had Republicans lost those Florida seats, 266 00:14:23,240 --> 00:14:27,000 Speaker 8: that would have been catastrophic for the GOP. So in 267 00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:31,000 Speaker 8: some ways this sort of reinforced the status quo. But 268 00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:34,640 Speaker 8: there was something about the Florida wins. They were able 269 00:14:34,760 --> 00:14:37,200 Speaker 8: to get those margins a little bit smaller than they 270 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:39,600 Speaker 8: were in twenty four or a lot smaller. And they 271 00:14:39,720 --> 00:14:42,720 Speaker 8: also carried a Scambia county and that was a big 272 00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:46,920 Speaker 8: upset for the GOP. So there were some bright spots 273 00:14:47,000 --> 00:14:49,400 Speaker 8: there for Democrats, but of course they have to be 274 00:14:49,520 --> 00:14:52,960 Speaker 8: careful about overreading because we've been down this road before. 275 00:14:54,480 --> 00:14:58,240 Speaker 7: Well, and Maura to Genie's points on the margins in Florida, 276 00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:00,680 Speaker 7: I see there's kind of two ways looking at it, 277 00:15:00,800 --> 00:15:04,800 Speaker 7: one being that in both districts Republicans won by double digits. 278 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:08,360 Speaker 7: The other being that those double digit margins were half 279 00:15:08,520 --> 00:15:11,680 Speaker 7: or less of what Republicans, including Donald Trump, were able 280 00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:14,120 Speaker 7: to secure in those very same districts in November. Which 281 00:15:14,160 --> 00:15:15,000 Speaker 7: side do you take on that? 282 00:15:16,560 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 6: Well, I think you could take the fact that people 283 00:15:19,600 --> 00:15:21,200 Speaker 6: just didn't go out for this vote. I mean, it's 284 00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:25,080 Speaker 6: three months after the Republican government took over, and we 285 00:15:25,160 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 6: don't always see a large turnout when it comes to 286 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:30,600 Speaker 6: these off elections, and so I think with the economy 287 00:15:30,680 --> 00:15:33,000 Speaker 6: not being great, people just didn't feel compelled to show 288 00:15:33,040 --> 00:15:34,640 Speaker 6: It doesn't mean they went out and vote for the Democrat. 289 00:15:34,720 --> 00:15:37,080 Speaker 6: It just means they didn't show up as strongly as 290 00:15:37,120 --> 00:15:39,840 Speaker 6: they have in the past four elections like for Donald 291 00:15:39,840 --> 00:15:42,000 Speaker 6: Trump or for Mike Waltz or you know, it was 292 00:15:42,040 --> 00:15:44,200 Speaker 6: held by Cliff Stearns for years and he would have 293 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 6: somewhere up to seventy plus percent of the vote back 294 00:15:46,920 --> 00:15:49,280 Speaker 6: when he was the member. So this is a very 295 00:15:49,400 --> 00:15:53,320 Speaker 6: stronghold Republican district that that wasn't as a prize. I 296 00:15:53,960 --> 00:15:57,400 Speaker 6: agree with Genie's point about Democrats looking for victory somewhere, 297 00:15:57,440 --> 00:15:59,280 Speaker 6: you know, looking to take some bright spots here, because 298 00:15:59,280 --> 00:16:02,200 Speaker 6: they've had pretty bad days leading up to now, so 299 00:16:02,760 --> 00:16:04,920 Speaker 6: they're looking at this as Okay, we have something to 300 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:08,200 Speaker 6: grasp onto and hopefully it can use this towards the 301 00:16:08,640 --> 00:16:10,960 Speaker 6: elections in November. With Virginia and New Jersey. 302 00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:14,600 Speaker 2: The money trail is pretty impressive though, when you look 303 00:16:14,640 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 2: at the way Democrats used money in all three races, 304 00:16:17,920 --> 00:16:21,320 Speaker 2: Genie out raising the Republican three to one in Florida's 305 00:16:21,360 --> 00:16:26,160 Speaker 2: first district, out raising the Republican ten to one in 306 00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:28,960 Speaker 2: Florida six in Wisconsin nearly two to one, making it 307 00:16:29,320 --> 00:16:32,760 Speaker 2: the most expensive judicial battle in US history. How much 308 00:16:32,800 --> 00:16:34,040 Speaker 2: of all of this was just about money? 309 00:16:35,480 --> 00:16:35,680 Speaker 7: Yeah? 310 00:16:35,920 --> 00:16:38,600 Speaker 8: And what's insane about that is that you see there 311 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:41,800 Speaker 8: the people who raised the most money also lost, and 312 00:16:42,040 --> 00:16:45,280 Speaker 8: so it says what we know about American politics. And 313 00:16:45,360 --> 00:16:48,640 Speaker 8: Donald Trump has said this over and over. Money is important, 314 00:16:48,840 --> 00:16:51,520 Speaker 8: but it doesn't guarantee you a victory. Is I'm sure 315 00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:55,280 Speaker 8: Elon Musk would attest to today and likewise the Democrats 316 00:16:55,280 --> 00:16:58,000 Speaker 8: who raised big money in Florida, and of course we 317 00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:01,160 Speaker 8: didn't expect them to win. But one thing I think 318 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:04,159 Speaker 8: Democrats have to be very cautious about, and you just 319 00:17:04,280 --> 00:17:07,760 Speaker 8: mentioned before the set of the political piece, Democrats have 320 00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:11,800 Speaker 8: to be cautious about running against Elon Musk because, as 321 00:17:11,920 --> 00:17:15,840 Speaker 8: Politico notes, Donald Trump could exit him off stage, and 322 00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:19,200 Speaker 8: then what do Democrats run against in the midterm election. 323 00:17:19,600 --> 00:17:22,160 Speaker 8: They have to keep their eye on the person in charge. 324 00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:26,280 Speaker 8: This is Donald Trump's government, this is the GOP's government. 325 00:17:26,520 --> 00:17:29,199 Speaker 8: It is not Elon Musk's. He's working at the behest 326 00:17:29,280 --> 00:17:32,879 Speaker 8: of the president. And so Democrats have to focus leg 327 00:17:32,920 --> 00:17:36,159 Speaker 8: a laserbeam on Donald Trump. And this announcement today at 328 00:17:36,200 --> 00:17:38,800 Speaker 8: four o'clock is a big part of what they need 329 00:17:38,840 --> 00:17:40,120 Speaker 8: to focus on the economy. 330 00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:45,160 Speaker 7: Well, what about the way Republicans should be viewing Elon Musk, now, mora, 331 00:17:45,320 --> 00:17:47,520 Speaker 7: because we have seen evidenced in the last several months 332 00:17:47,560 --> 00:17:50,880 Speaker 7: of Republicans deciding to vote a different way potentially change 333 00:17:50,920 --> 00:17:54,360 Speaker 7: their behavior due to the threat of primary challenges being 334 00:17:54,400 --> 00:17:58,240 Speaker 7: funded by Elon Musk is Wisconsin yesterday a lesson that 335 00:17:58,359 --> 00:18:00,680 Speaker 7: even if Elon Musk throws his money something, it's not 336 00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:04,000 Speaker 7: necessarily something that you actually have to worry about. Or 337 00:18:04,040 --> 00:18:09,400 Speaker 7: does his massive financial war chest the largest of course 338 00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:11,840 Speaker 7: of anyone in terms of wealth in the world, still 339 00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:13,440 Speaker 7: mean you have to keep him on side. 340 00:18:14,800 --> 00:18:16,639 Speaker 6: I do you think you're seeing that? Especially in the Senate, 341 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:18,520 Speaker 6: they have a little more wiggle room, right they have 342 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:22,000 Speaker 6: six year terms, and we saw, you know, Rand Paul 343 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:24,920 Speaker 6: is standing with Tim Kaine on this you know, bill 344 00:18:24,960 --> 00:18:28,000 Speaker 6: against tariffs for Canada. There's a couple others have joined them, 345 00:18:28,280 --> 00:18:31,280 Speaker 6: and they're not as threatened by Elon Musk's threat. You know, 346 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:34,359 Speaker 6: I'm going to be involved in all the primaries, you know. 347 00:18:34,640 --> 00:18:36,800 Speaker 6: With the DOGE thing in him leaving the White House, 348 00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:39,560 Speaker 6: it was set when DOGE was established and when it 349 00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:42,440 Speaker 6: was announced that back when it was he and Vivig Gramaswami, 350 00:18:42,800 --> 00:18:44,680 Speaker 6: it was going to be dissolved. On July fourth, twenty 351 00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:47,119 Speaker 6: twenty sixth, America's two hundred and fiftieth birthday, so it 352 00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:49,200 Speaker 6: was already set, you know, kind of in stone that 353 00:18:49,280 --> 00:18:51,760 Speaker 6: this would be dissolved by then. And that's ahead of 354 00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:55,040 Speaker 6: the midterm elections. And so to Gini's point, the Democrats 355 00:18:55,080 --> 00:18:57,440 Speaker 6: do need a new strategy. It can't be just targeting 356 00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:01,159 Speaker 6: or just standing anti Trump or anti Elon. And I 357 00:19:01,200 --> 00:19:04,119 Speaker 6: think what Republicans will do is continue to focus on 358 00:19:04,240 --> 00:19:05,840 Speaker 6: the people, and those are who they're going to be 359 00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:09,680 Speaker 6: hearing from when these tariffs come into place, because they're 360 00:19:09,680 --> 00:19:11,640 Speaker 6: going to have to see whether their constituents are willing 361 00:19:11,720 --> 00:19:14,960 Speaker 6: to play the long game and trust in Donald Trump's 362 00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:18,760 Speaker 6: plan because the short term pains, especially on farmers and 363 00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:23,240 Speaker 6: especially on those who are already hurting to afford groceries. 364 00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:25,639 Speaker 6: How long can they hold on for and how long 365 00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:28,800 Speaker 6: can those members keep their seats is to be said. 366 00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:32,600 Speaker 2: It's kind of interesting, Genie and Mora. We really haven't 367 00:19:32,640 --> 00:19:36,080 Speaker 2: seen Elon Musk since Wisconsin, have we since he donned 368 00:19:36,119 --> 00:19:39,160 Speaker 2: the cheesehead and gave out the million dollar checks. Would 369 00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:42,080 Speaker 2: it be smart, Mora for Donald Trump to not have 370 00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:44,760 Speaker 2: Elon Musk standing next to him in the Rose Garden today? 371 00:19:46,040 --> 00:19:48,720 Speaker 6: It would be smart for him to for Elon tav 372 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:51,040 Speaker 6: to take a step back and to focus on the 373 00:19:51,080 --> 00:19:53,800 Speaker 6: task at hand, which was supposed to be giving out 374 00:19:53,840 --> 00:19:57,879 Speaker 6: guidance and assessing where our fraud, waste and abuses. You know, 375 00:19:58,000 --> 00:20:01,400 Speaker 6: I think that the excessive role he has played thus 376 00:20:01,440 --> 00:20:03,840 Speaker 6: far as it necessarily a net benefit to Republicans, and 377 00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:05,639 Speaker 6: I'm sure the President and the White House have been 378 00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:09,720 Speaker 6: hearing as much. So again, you know, Donald Trump talks 379 00:20:09,720 --> 00:20:11,720 Speaker 6: about how Elon has this big job and he's doing 380 00:20:11,760 --> 00:20:13,840 Speaker 6: this out of his own goodwill. Well, then you know, 381 00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:16,760 Speaker 6: it does cause you to wonder should he go back 382 00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:19,520 Speaker 6: to that big job that he has and let those 383 00:20:19,560 --> 00:20:21,919 Speaker 6: who are elected do the job of the people who 384 00:20:21,960 --> 00:20:24,239 Speaker 6: elected them to do ask them to do. So that's 385 00:20:24,280 --> 00:20:26,159 Speaker 6: where I think his focus needs to be is on 386 00:20:26,760 --> 00:20:29,639 Speaker 6: what the people who voted for him asked him to 387 00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:32,960 Speaker 6: do in terms of the economy and safety and security. 388 00:20:34,640 --> 00:20:37,800 Speaker 7: Well, when we consider what they asked of the economy, obviously, Genie, 389 00:20:37,840 --> 00:20:39,919 Speaker 7: it was in part that they wanted to see prices 390 00:20:40,080 --> 00:20:43,560 Speaker 7: come down. Most economists would argue the tariffs he is 391 00:20:43,640 --> 00:20:46,080 Speaker 7: going to announce today at the very least threatened to 392 00:20:46,200 --> 00:20:49,840 Speaker 7: bring those prices up. Even if it's not Elon Musk 393 00:20:49,920 --> 00:20:52,359 Speaker 7: standing beside him. Does don't Trump need to kind of 394 00:20:52,800 --> 00:20:56,280 Speaker 7: allow the blame for tariffs should things not work out 395 00:20:56,320 --> 00:20:59,640 Speaker 7: in the opportune fashion. The administration is hoping it will 396 00:20:59,760 --> 00:21:03,080 Speaker 7: be pasted elsewhere, not just as him as president alone. 397 00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:08,159 Speaker 8: Yeah, I mean absolutely, But you know who else is 398 00:21:08,240 --> 00:21:11,760 Speaker 8: there to blame. We are already hearing that Howard Lutnick 399 00:21:11,880 --> 00:21:15,680 Speaker 8: may take some blame if this doesn't all work out 400 00:21:15,720 --> 00:21:19,679 Speaker 8: the way Donald Trump intends. The reality is Donald Trump 401 00:21:19,920 --> 00:21:23,760 Speaker 8: owns this start to finish, and Democrats have to focus 402 00:21:23,920 --> 00:21:26,880 Speaker 8: on him. He is the one who put Elon Musk 403 00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:29,640 Speaker 8: in charge of DOGE, He is the one who put 404 00:21:29,720 --> 00:21:32,119 Speaker 8: Howard Lutnik in Commerce and all of these folks, and 405 00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:35,400 Speaker 8: he is the one who's deeply committed, apparently to tariffs. 406 00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:38,520 Speaker 8: And the reality is his eye is off the ball. 407 00:21:39,040 --> 00:21:42,920 Speaker 8: What people elected him to do was to bring prices 408 00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:47,359 Speaker 8: down and grow their incomes. All of this craziness about 409 00:21:47,440 --> 00:21:49,960 Speaker 8: taris on and off and on and off that have 410 00:21:50,200 --> 00:21:55,280 Speaker 8: undermined the market, reduced confidence of businesses and consumers isn't 411 00:21:55,440 --> 00:21:59,240 Speaker 8: helping him. And he is doing what presidential candidates and 412 00:21:59,320 --> 00:22:04,320 Speaker 8: then presidents often do overread their election victory. He's got 413 00:22:04,440 --> 00:22:06,800 Speaker 8: to focus on what people brought in there to do, 414 00:22:07,240 --> 00:22:09,320 Speaker 8: and we'll see today whether he does that or not. 415 00:22:09,600 --> 00:22:13,639 Speaker 8: By the way, Kaylee, I forgot to say happy Happy 416 00:22:13,720 --> 00:22:14,640 Speaker 8: Liberation Day. 417 00:22:15,800 --> 00:22:24,119 Speaker 2: Oh well, I appreciate that as well. Yeah, all the 418 00:22:24,160 --> 00:22:26,399 Speaker 2: way around. I feel thank you, Genie, that's. 419 00:22:26,359 --> 00:22:30,520 Speaker 7: Very kind, Jeanie Shanzana Marrick Gillespie our political panel on 420 00:22:30,680 --> 00:22:33,480 Speaker 7: this Liberation Day. At least that's what President Trump is 421 00:22:33,600 --> 00:22:33,960 Speaker 7: calling it. 422 00:22:37,440 --> 00:22:40,920 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch 423 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:44,400 Speaker 1: us live weekdays at noon and five pm Eastern on Apple, 424 00:22:44,480 --> 00:22:47,800 Speaker 1: Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen 425 00:22:47,920 --> 00:22:50,960 Speaker 1: on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us 426 00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:52,040 Speaker 1: live on YouTube. 427 00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:56,200 Speaker 2: Donald Trump not only talking tariffs today though at the 428 00:22:56,240 --> 00:23:00,880 Speaker 2: White House, Kaylee, he's talking TikTok. Just put his finger 429 00:23:00,920 --> 00:23:01,119 Speaker 2: on it. 430 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:01,320 Speaker 6: Ye. 431 00:23:01,480 --> 00:23:03,000 Speaker 2: By the way, this is before we got the breaker 432 00:23:03,080 --> 00:23:06,280 Speaker 2: the headline about Amazon, which Bloomberg is now reporting there 433 00:23:06,359 --> 00:23:09,159 Speaker 2: was a meeting to consider a proposal for taking over 434 00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:12,879 Speaker 2: at TikTok by Oracle Blackstone and a couple of other investors. 435 00:23:13,160 --> 00:23:16,399 Speaker 2: This just got more complicated because now Amazon apparently is 436 00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:17,080 Speaker 2: going to drop the bid. 437 00:23:17,240 --> 00:23:17,400 Speaker 6: Yeah. 438 00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:20,080 Speaker 7: Although the President has been saying there were multiple bidders 439 00:23:20,160 --> 00:23:22,920 Speaker 7: interested in TikTok, But we have a lot of lingering questions, 440 00:23:22,960 --> 00:23:25,280 Speaker 7: one being which bid is seen as most attractive at 441 00:23:25,320 --> 00:23:28,080 Speaker 7: this point. The other being will that include the algorithm 442 00:23:28,200 --> 00:23:31,520 Speaker 7: or will that actually be left to Chinese control. Of course, 443 00:23:31,560 --> 00:23:33,480 Speaker 7: that was one of the main concerns of the bipartisan 444 00:23:33,600 --> 00:23:36,520 Speaker 7: legislation that passed that would see TikTok band or DIY invested. 445 00:23:36,560 --> 00:23:38,560 Speaker 2: To begin with, yes, if you're not buying the algorithm, though, 446 00:23:38,560 --> 00:23:39,640 Speaker 2: are you really buying TikTok? 447 00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:41,840 Speaker 7: Well, maybe we should ask this question to Mike Shepherd, 448 00:23:41,880 --> 00:23:44,560 Speaker 7: who of course leads our coverage of technology and strategic 449 00:23:44,600 --> 00:23:48,600 Speaker 7: industries here at Bloomberg. So obviously, Mike, there seem to 450 00:23:48,640 --> 00:23:50,520 Speaker 7: be a number of players in the game. Our reporting 451 00:23:50,560 --> 00:23:54,440 Speaker 7: indicates that Amazon's bid is not being taken that seriously, 452 00:23:54,520 --> 00:23:56,760 Speaker 7: why would it be And if it's not Amazon's. 453 00:23:56,400 --> 00:23:56,720 Speaker 6: Who is. 454 00:23:57,000 --> 00:23:59,639 Speaker 9: Well it's a great question, and we're hoping to get 455 00:23:59,640 --> 00:24:01,960 Speaker 9: a little bit more clarity from this out of the 456 00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:04,160 Speaker 9: White House this afternoon. You know, it's a full court 457 00:24:04,240 --> 00:24:06,760 Speaker 9: press trying to figure out what is going on. But 458 00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:11,240 Speaker 9: Amazon has a reputation for kicking tires in different companies 459 00:24:11,760 --> 00:24:15,240 Speaker 9: and weighing a bid and then pulling away, and it 460 00:24:15,400 --> 00:24:18,560 Speaker 9: did come a little bit later in the game compared 461 00:24:18,600 --> 00:24:20,840 Speaker 9: to say some of the others that we've seen. Even 462 00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:22,960 Speaker 9: mister Beast has thrown his hat in the ring with 463 00:24:24,200 --> 00:24:27,240 Speaker 9: And then we also have Frank McCord, who's interviewed by 464 00:24:27,280 --> 00:24:31,399 Speaker 9: our colleague Caroline Hyde earlier today on Bloomberg Television talking 465 00:24:31,480 --> 00:24:36,160 Speaker 9: about his bid from Project Liberty, and they, interestingly don't 466 00:24:36,240 --> 00:24:39,479 Speaker 9: intend to buy TikTok with the algorithm. They are content 467 00:24:40,000 --> 00:24:42,600 Speaker 9: to leave it in Chinese hands and then try to 468 00:24:42,680 --> 00:24:45,680 Speaker 9: construct it on their own. And he says they have 469 00:24:45,800 --> 00:24:47,960 Speaker 9: a way to do that. They have a price that 470 00:24:48,040 --> 00:24:51,280 Speaker 9: they're willing to pay for TikTok without the algorithm. But 471 00:24:51,359 --> 00:24:53,800 Speaker 9: I think you raised a good question, why would you 472 00:24:54,000 --> 00:24:58,680 Speaker 9: want this app without this influential recommendation feature that's powered 473 00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:00,239 Speaker 9: it so effectively. 474 00:25:00,040 --> 00:25:02,240 Speaker 2: Kind of like buying coke without the recipe. 475 00:25:02,320 --> 00:25:04,720 Speaker 9: Right, That's a great way to put it, Joe, because 476 00:25:04,840 --> 00:25:07,320 Speaker 9: it is sort of that secret sauce that makes it 477 00:25:07,520 --> 00:25:11,639 Speaker 9: work so effectively. And yet maybe in this era of AI, 478 00:25:11,840 --> 00:25:13,919 Speaker 9: there is a way to re engineer it and perhaps 479 00:25:14,000 --> 00:25:16,720 Speaker 9: do it a little bit more quickly and cost effectively. 480 00:25:16,800 --> 00:25:19,840 Speaker 7: Too, But would that be in keeping with the actual 481 00:25:20,119 --> 00:25:22,400 Speaker 7: law or does that matter if it's ultimately the Trump 482 00:25:22,400 --> 00:25:25,040 Speaker 7: administration that is the enforcement mechanism for that law. 483 00:25:25,119 --> 00:25:29,080 Speaker 9: Well, you know, this is one of the it's a conundrum. 484 00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:33,960 Speaker 9: There are so many layers to this story of TikTok, 485 00:25:34,040 --> 00:25:36,200 Speaker 9: and last year, a year ago, at this time, we 486 00:25:36,359 --> 00:25:39,760 Speaker 9: were talking about the push to see this divestor or 487 00:25:39,920 --> 00:25:44,080 Speaker 9: ban legislation get through Congress. Ultimately it did. It was 488 00:25:44,160 --> 00:25:48,760 Speaker 9: attached you'll both remember well to the Ukraine and Israel 489 00:25:48,840 --> 00:25:52,280 Speaker 9: aid package and that kind of sped it through and 490 00:25:52,440 --> 00:25:55,639 Speaker 9: people hailed its passage, and Joe Biden signed it. And 491 00:25:55,800 --> 00:25:59,840 Speaker 9: then as the time passed and they had to actually 492 00:26:00,080 --> 00:26:02,520 Speaker 9: find not only a buyer, but get byte Dance and 493 00:26:02,640 --> 00:26:05,240 Speaker 9: the Chinese government to go along, that's where it became 494 00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:08,200 Speaker 9: more difficult because byte Dance has no interest in selling 495 00:26:08,280 --> 00:26:12,280 Speaker 9: this valuable asset, and the Chinese government likewise doesn't either, 496 00:26:12,359 --> 00:26:14,880 Speaker 9: and they would need to sign off in any divestiture 497 00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:18,679 Speaker 9: involving the algorithm because it is such sensitive technology. 498 00:26:18,760 --> 00:26:20,879 Speaker 2: Thanks for popping in on this an important development here 499 00:26:20,920 --> 00:26:22,640 Speaker 2: on the way to the deadline, Mike Shepherd. Of course, 500 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:25,760 Speaker 2: with us in Washington, I'm Joe Matthew alongside Kaylee Lines. 501 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,920 Speaker 2: On this tariff day, I think we can call it. Yeah, 502 00:26:28,960 --> 00:26:30,800 Speaker 2: they say liberation Day at the White House, but of 503 00:26:30,880 --> 00:26:39,520 Speaker 2: course that's up for interpretation. Thanks for listening to the 504 00:26:39,600 --> 00:26:42,920 Speaker 2: Balance of Power podcast. Make sure to subscribe if you 505 00:26:43,000 --> 00:26:46,399 Speaker 2: haven't already, at Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts, 506 00:26:46,880 --> 00:26:49,359 Speaker 2: and you can find us live every weekday from Washington, 507 00:26:49,440 --> 00:26:52,280 Speaker 2: DC at noontime Eastern at Bloomberg dot com.