WEBVTT - Globe Braces For Trump Tariffs; Oil Outlook For 2025

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card playing Android

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Katerina Simonetti, She's at Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management. She's

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 3>a private wealth advisor over there. Katerina, again, I'd love

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 3>to hear kind of the conversations you're having with your

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 3>clients as you can close out a pretty successful twenty

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty four and think about next year. What do you guys,

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 3>how are you talking to your clients these days?

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 4>Well, Paulin and Caroline, thank you for having me on

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 4>the show. This is a really important conversation because it's

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 4>not lost on clients that we've had double digit returns

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 4>for two years in a row, and it is only

0:00:55.200 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 4>reasonable to expect that the returns in twenty five are

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 4>going to be somewhat subdued. So clients are concerned the

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 4>questions that we're having about how to capture returns in

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 4>the portfolios, how to maximize the income and the portfolios,

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 4>and most importantly, risk management in the upcoming volatility, and

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 4>to be fair, our expectations for the year are not dim.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 4>We think a lot of emphasis are on FED and

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 4>inflation and how all the other factors are going to

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 4>play out. But when it comes to the practical things

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 4>that we do before the year end, rebalancing the portfolio

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 4>and achieving maximum portfolio diversification in stocks, bonds, real assets,

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 4>and private investments is the absolute key.

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So, Katerina, I mean again, a lot of folks are standpoint.

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 3>You can you have a third year of performance in

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the equity markets and to the extent you're going to

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 3>be a little bit more cautious. Well, you can look

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>at the fixed income market. How do you think about

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 3>the fixed income trade? Do I sit there in a

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 3>two year treasury and get you four point three percent

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>from the US government or door it take some credit risk.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 4>If we are expecting then FED is not going to

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 4>have quite as many rate cuts as originally expected. It's

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 4>not necessarily the absolutely worst thing in the world for

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 4>fixed income investors. Number one, we're going to get higher

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 4>yields of cash for a little bit longer than expected.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 4>And two, if we don't think about fixed income as

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 4>per se a trade but as a whold and as

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 4>an asset that delivers that consistent income and risk management

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 4>because on the risk adjusted basis going into twenty.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>Five, we prefer bonds or stocks.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 4>We think it's going to generate yield, but quality very

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 4>much so within bonds as well as stocks is going

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 4>to be the name of the game for.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Volatility because there's so much well lack of clarity as

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 5>it currently stands, Katerina, just take us through the thought

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 5>process over at Morgan Stanley Private Wealth more broadly as

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 5>to whether or not the FED will cut more than

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 5>two times. What sort of realistic infrationary pressure will we

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 5>get from the talked about tariffs that I yet to

0:02:58.240 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 5>be imposed.

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Caroline, where do I start?

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Uncertainty about the Fed, uncertainty about inflation, uncertainty about the

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 4>teriffs and immigration. As all these headlines are going to

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 4>start coming out in early twenty five, all of this

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 4>is going to play a role, and so our expectations

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 4>for the early half of the year come with the

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 4>expectation of the higher volatility, and last couple of weeks

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 4>gave us a bit of a taste of what's to come. Now,

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 4>tell investors not to chase rallies. And this is the

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 4>other side of this coin where we have to prepare

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 4>and stay calm and make sure that we have high

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 4>quality portfolios, focus on sectors that generate yield, Focus on

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 4>the areas like financials, industrials, materials, and make sure that

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 4>we take some profits of the table and avoid higher

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 4>concentrations in the portfolios. We've had some fantastic performance, this

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 4>is the time to take some games.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 5>But the problem is you had fun state performance in

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three, and if you'd have that mindset around

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 5>and in video or the Mac seven, then boy did

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 5>you miss that rally of twenty twenty four videos up

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and eighty percent let's call it for the years.

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 5>So how do you talk some of your clients out

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 5>of that fomo feeling that a lot are going to

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 5>be feeding all over again when it comes to countum

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 5>an Ai.

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Carolin, It's only natural to feel this way, and I

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 4>think that that what we have to ask is the

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 4>are the valuations and profit expectations that are on the table,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 4>as well as the fact that FED has a lot

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 4>of pressure on them. You know, when it comes to

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 4>inflation in terms of cuts, are we going to get

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 4>as many cuts as expected.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>That is the big question for us and for them.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 4>So when investors are looking at their holdings, of course

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 4>it is natural not to be missing out on the

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 4>continued growth. So we don't advise selling out of the

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 4>entire position, but healthy profit taking and diversification into the

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.559
<v Speaker 4>other areas where a level the growth of that level

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 4>didn't occur yet and where the possibility of future growth

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 4>are significantly more substantial than they are in technology in

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 4>some of these areas that achieved remarkable growth in both

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty four and twenty three.

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Ketterine, how do you talk to your clients about alternative investments?

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Something in private equity, private credit, hedge funds, because when

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I speak to rias, I'm really surprised that the high

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>percentages they allocate to alternatives.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you guys more instantly think about it.

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, in the time where investors are so concerned about

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 4>the risk and politility and protecting the values of their portfolio,

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 4>having the asset us that could hedge risk in the

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 4>equity side of the equation, it's extremely valuable. Now it

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 4>comes with the cost, and that cost is liquidity. So

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 4>investors that are comfortable with giving up some of the

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 4>liquidity in their portfolios. Are perfectly fine using the alternative

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 4>investments because it has huge value with making sure that

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 4>we achieve consistent risk adjusted return. But with that, it's

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 4>just the piece of the puzzle where fixed income delivers income,

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 4>equities deliver growth, cash delivers liquidity, and alternative investments are

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 4>extremely effective in risk management.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have some changes to the tax policy.

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>It seems like we'll see how that plays out. Then

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>that kind of goes to the asset class of municipal bonds.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm a big fan of municipal bonds. A triple tax

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 3>free treatment is I think a good and wonderful thing.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 3>How do you guys position municipals in a typical portfolio.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, taxes are.

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 4>A major concern and inflation is a concern as well.

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 4>But when investors are looking at their portfolios and analyzing

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 4>the after tax income and after tax performance that they're receiving,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.119
<v Speaker 4>tax efficiency is something that is a part of every

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 4>single conversation that we're having with clients, and this is

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 4>where municipal bonds come into play.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Now, with municipal bonds.

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 4>You have to make sure that the tax equivalent rate

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 4>of return that we're getting on muni bonds is actually

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 4>as good or better that return that we can achieve

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 4>in corporate fixed income, because there are some amazing buying opportunities.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>On that side.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 4>But investors certainly like having that tax free cash flow

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 4>in their portfolios, especially in retirement.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 5>Taxation clarity is something that perhaps the crypto world is

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 5>potentially yearning for, girning for for twenty twenty five. How

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 5>have you thought about crypto and that particular area of

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 5>potential investment alternative investment for the twenty twenty four into

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty five, Katrina.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, Caroline, when you think about the development of crypto world,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 4>where it turned from something that we don't mention or

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 4>talk about into something that was, you know, the most

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 4>exciting part of the portfolios than the most volatile part

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 4>of the portfolios. And now we're seeing more over a

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 4>legitimization or the use of crypto in the normal portfolios,

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, with the availability of ETFs, with people feeling more

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 4>comfortable investing in this type of investments, but they can't

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 4>lose track of the fact that the volatility still remains

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 4>extremely high. So the positioning in the portfolio has to

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 4>be extremely careful, and investors that are relying on the

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 4>crypt for liquidity certainly has to have that in mind

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 4>because the volatility in equity markets at high is high,

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 4>but our expectations for volatility in the crypto world is

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 4>significantly higher than that.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, though, going back to the equity markets, where there

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 5>still govies of volatility, I'm interested in your overweights industrials, utilities,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 5>and software, and actually that software shift from hardware to software,

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 5>from chips into a paneteer or to a software application

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 5>and generative AI has been a theme we've been hearing,

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 5>but talk a little bit more about the industrials and utilities.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 5>What drives that For twenty twenty five.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Kurln, we're looking for a defensive place. We're looking for

0:08:53.960 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 4>companies that are not just delivering attractive earnings outlook, which

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 4>is something that we see across the board and of

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 4>course we'll be looking across the board for twenty five,

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 4>but also that bring to the table attractive valuations. They

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 4>didn't have that explosive growth that some of the sectors

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing. So that's where the industrials, that's where the materials,

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 4>that's where consumer stables come in. We're looking for qualities

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 4>and also for companies that are in position to make money,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 4>to be profitable in twenty five.

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, Katerina, thank you so much for joining us.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Always appreciate getting some of your time and your thoughts

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 3>on these markets. Category to Seminetti, you're listening to the

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast.

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Catch us live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just say Alexa Play.

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Coming up early for us from la Is John Gilson,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 5>who is one of the authors behind in today's Big Take,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 5>how Trump tariff threats are already roiling global trade. You

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 5>go into this deep diet of individual companies, how they're

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 5>already having to have a surge of shipments from Germany,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 5>whether it's wriestling wine or whether it's the latest maker

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 5>of wires and technology from the US in California. How

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 5>are they trying to front runs some of the tariffs

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 5>that we're expecting, John Well.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 6>Exactly, there's been a record number of containers running through

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 6>the ports of la and Long Beach the biggest North

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 6>American ports just in the last couple months. Because people

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 6>are trying to get ahead of this, but at the

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 6>same time they're balancing, like, we don't want to overorder

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 6>in the case of there's a company that has EarPods

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 6>that they supply, not Apple ones. But their concern is

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 6>technology changes very fast. If we order too much ahead

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 6>of time, we'll be stuck with all this inventory that

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 6>people won't want to buy. So they're trying to balance

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 6>all these things. Get it in while prices are cheap,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 6>beat the tariffs. At the same time, don't overorder. There

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 6>are also higher costs if you rush to get stuff

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 6>in because free costs have gone up a lot.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 3>So John, it's interesting, we don't even know what's going

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 3>to get be subject to tariffs, how much any of that,

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 3>But it appears that companies just aren't waiting, are they.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 3>They're trying to just get ahead of this anyway they can.

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's just extraordinary.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, they're trying to figure out what to do.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 6>Because the other concern is people thought, well, let's have

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 6>stuff imported via Mexico assembled in Mexico, and that way

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 6>we could get around the sort of Chinese content.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Rules on tariffs.

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 6>But now recently Trump said, well, we want to impose

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 6>tariffs on Mexico and Canada because we're concerned that they're letting,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, bad guys and fentanyl into the US.

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Look, well, we're looking at a market that is carneadis

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 5>some significant setting pressure today or off by more than

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 5>two percent, and then ask that one hundred. Is there

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 5>a flavor of which industries are bracing themselves the most,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Like I'm remporting all year on the chip sector and

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 5>how they've had to be navigating the China US relationship.

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 5>But you've already mentioned wine technology. This is so broad

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 5>in its remit auto's whoever are we seeing the most

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:17.239
<v Speaker 5>anxiety build.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would say across the board.

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean clothing is another one you mentioned or didn't mention,

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, electronics, clothing, just about anything that's made overseas,

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 6>which is most of the consumer goods that we have

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 6>in the US. Lawn furniture, I mean, it's not something

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 6>that I go, oh my god, I won't be able

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 6>to live without lawn furniture. But at the same time,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 6>there are a lot of knock on effects. As Secretary

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 6>Yellen was talking about it'll cost more ultimately to consumers,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 6>and we're not sure whether that's good for the economy

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 6>or bad.

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 3>You've got a great graphics here, like it may take stories, folks,

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>they're deeply sourced, deeply reported, and they've got great graphics,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 3>which makes it.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Just come alive. Tariff talk abounds companies.

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 3>You guys tracked how much companies talk about tariffs on

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 3>our conference calls, and holy cow, itch spiked in November

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 3>and December this year. So this is this is on

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 3>the top of minds of corporate executives, isn't it.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right exactly.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we have ways of searching texts of calls

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 6>all over the place and we use that as a tool.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 6>It's like, yes, CEOs say that's a big issue for

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 6>them going into twenty twenty five.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's uncertain too.

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's part of the deal, is we don't

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 6>know what's actually going to happen because Trump has talked

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 6>a lot, but he's not president yet.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 5>And that must be the frustration that ultimately a lot

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 5>of these business leaders know that they're having to drive

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 5>up costs, perhaps unnecessarily, but they've just got to make

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 5>a call. They've got to decide whether they're going to

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 5>front run something that's hypothetical in nature. Do we know

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 5>how much is driving up costs?

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, we don't know yet, I mean there and we

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 6>don't know how much they're going to pass on. There

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 6>are higher costs for shipping right now, and a lot

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 6>of people are using air freight instead of using ships

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 6>because they want to get it here earlier. There's stuff

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 6>that if you order it early, you have to put

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 6>it in a warehouse before you put it in stores,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 6>so that could be an extra cost too. And then

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 6>we don't know what other kind of tariffs will be

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 6>added on, so it's very hard to know how much

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 6>each unit is going to cost. How much the people

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 6>who are processing or passing on those units are going

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 6>to pass on to consumers too, because you don't want

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 6>to raise your.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Prices too fast.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 6>And then there are in the case of the German

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 6>wine maker, maybe they're just going to export to Scandinavia

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 6>instead of the US because I think I can make

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 6>money in Scandinavia. They're not a major exporter of wine.

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 6>Some of their competitors, though, they can't do without the US.

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is no joke here.

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you have some research from Oxford Economics where

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I think they pulled executives.

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>What are the biggest worries you have over the next

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>two years.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 3>We're talking Eurozone crisis, China, Taiwan, I mean, big, big issues,

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East.

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>By far, the.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Biggest one is the global trade war. So this is

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 3>on top of mind just about everybody out there, that's right.

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And as Secretary Yellen said in the previous segment,

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 6>we don't know what kind of retaliation is going to happen.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 6>They're talking about using a very blunt instrument across the board, tariffs,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 6>and so people will retaliate, and yeah, people will stop paying.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 6>We all know consumers are very unhappy about inflation. Now,

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 6>we don't know what effect hires tariffs are going to

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 6>have on inflation, but generally it raises the cost of

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 6>imported goods if you put tariffs on them.

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, John Great Reporting John Gittilson, Bloomberg LA Bureau chief,

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 3>one of the contributors to the Big Take story. Check

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 3>out the Big Take stories on the terminal. They are

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 3>fantastic reporting every single You can go to Bloomberg dot

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 3>com slash Big Take find them online as well.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cardplay and Android

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Otto with the Bloomberg Business app listener on demand wherever

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 5>Let's just dig into the geopolitical persuasion a little bit

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 5>more and indeed what the outlook for some of these

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 5>energy markets is going into twenty twenty five. Perfect personally

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 5>that Ellen Wold is with US, senior fellow at the

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.239
<v Speaker 5>Atlantic Council and author.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Of Saudi Inc.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 5>The Arabian Kingdoms Pursuit of Profit and Power. I am

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 5>so interested in your take of what the next administration

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 5>means for the relationship with Saudi, with Israel and going forward.

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 5>But just taking on where Natalia was bringing us the

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 5>supply demand dynamics around oil and just how important is

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 5>OPEK at this moment.

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 7>So I think OPEK is actually playing a fairly critical

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 7>role right now because they're keeping a fair amount of

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 7>oil off the market and they're really enabling the US

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 7>to have a role for its oil space, for its

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 7>oil market to grow. If, for example, OPEK were to decide, hey,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 7>all bets are off, we're going to just open the taps.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 7>Forget about all these cuts. We're just going to put

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 7>all of our production capacity back on the market. They

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 7>have the ability to tank prices. I think they don't

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 7>want to do that right now. But a lot in

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 7>terms of the oil market hinges on whether OPEK is

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 7>going to move forward with its very gradual plans to

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 7>put more of that oil back on the market, or

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 7>whether they're going to continue to push it off. So

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 7>I think that they're still very very relevant, just not

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 7>in quite the same way as they were, say in

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 7>the nineteen seventies.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, Ellen, I have to fully disclose here. I

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 3>am a big fan of the TV show Landman, so

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I now consider myself an expert.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>On oil and gas and all that kind of stuff.

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 3>But talk to us about the US supply because that's

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 3>really changed that dynamic in global oil and gas over

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 3>the last ten years or so. Are those guys going

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 3>to be drilling, baby drilling coming forward?

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that is a great question, and you're definitely pushing

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 7>me to start watching this show in my free time,

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 7>so thank you for that. So I think that this

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 7>is not the same oil market is in twenty sixteen

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 7>and twenty eighteen this is a different shale patch. Back then,

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 7>it really was a drill, baby, drill situation because we

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 7>had lots of companies out there. It was kind of

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 7>like the wild West in a little bit of a sense,

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 7>and they just had to keep on drilling and drilling,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 7>even if they weren't, you know, breaking, even just because

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 7>they needed to make payroll, they needed to get all

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 7>that oil out there. They were being funded with the

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 7>intent to just.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Drill, drill, drill. That time is over.

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 7>We're in a different, different oil market now, different different

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 7>shale patch where we've got a lot of consolidation. We've

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 7>got bigger, much bigger companies at the helm now, and

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 7>they they're a lot better capitalized. They're much more focused

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 7>on not necessarily just growth, but on returning value to shareholders. Coincidentally,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 7>we happen to be producing at the highest levels ever

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 7>right now, but companies are also using a lot better techniques,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 7>a lot more sophisticated techniques to find oil, to get

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 7>more oil out of each well. And so I think, yes,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 7>we still do have a lot of oil to get

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 7>out of there. We're still going to be producing at

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 7>fairly high levels. But that same mentality and the ability

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 7>to kind of predict where we're going is not there now.

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 7>It's really a different look now when it comes to

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 7>the Trump administration and drill baby drill. I think that

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 7>we're going to see that much more in the offshore

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 7>oil space because that's really an area that has suffered

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 7>greatly under the Biden administration's regulatory restrictions, and so I

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 7>think we're going to see a lot more optimism there

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 7>because that's an area where things take a lot more

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 7>capital to get going. You need a lot more time,

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 7>you've got to.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Invest a lot more.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 7>But at the same time, those wealth can last a

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 7>lot longer than what we're seeing in say the Permian

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 7>and those areas. So I think they're really looking forward

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 7>to a Trump administration to help them get the leases

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 7>they need, get the permits they need to start drilling.

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 7>And I do think that is an area where we

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 7>are going to see a more kind of drill baby

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 7>drill outlook.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 5>And the outlook under the next administration. Of relationships with

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Saudi Arabia, of relationships with Israel, and normalization with the

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 5>our world more broadly, how are you looking at that

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 5>and what it means for your markets that you are well.

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 7>I think that that's a really complicated area because I

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 7>do think that the Trump administration is much more unabashed

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 7>and its support for Israel, particularly in a military sense

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 7>and in a diplomatic sense. So I think you're going

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 7>to see a lot more very overt and very strong

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 7>support for Israel. Does that necessarily mean that's going to

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 7>put them at odds with the rest of the air world,

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 7>I don't necessarily think so. I do think that they

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 7>definitely have a much more stronger stance on Iran. It

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 7>is entirely possible that we could see them start to

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 7>enforce this the oil sanctions on Iran more forcefully, and

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 7>if that takes Irani and oil off the market, UH,

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 7>that will actually.

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Be good for Saudi Arabia.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 7>That's actually what Saudi Arabia the UA would like, because

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 7>you know, they can put more of their oil on

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 7>the market or it will help prices go up. So

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 7>I think that while there's definitely a tension in terms

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 7>of the relationship between Trump and the Saudis, I think

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 7>that the underlying aspects in terms of UH stability, in

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 7>terms of trying to UH lessen Iran's funding of terrorist groups,

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 7>I think that are all gonna bring. Maybe that that's

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 7>what the Saudis would like to see, and that's what

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 7>the Trump administration wants to see. So while you know,

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 7>they may not necessarily show that there are best buddies

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 7>in terms of US support for Israel, I do think

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 7>that there are a lot of aspects where they're going

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 7>to see a lot of synergy.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Ellen.

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 3>If I'm a proponent of green energy, how concerned should

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 3>I be about the incoming Trump administration about that process?

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 7>So I think it really depends what your approach to

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 7>green energy is. I don't think that trump Is administration

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 7>is looking to say roll back the entire IRA. I mean,

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 7>this is an administration that really also has a vested interest,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 7>really wants to say to increase the domestic lithium and

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 7>lithium battery supply chain in the United States. They may

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 7>have a slightly different reason for wanting this. They consider

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 7>it more of a national security concern than say, an

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 7>imperative to put more evs on the road. But this

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.239
<v Speaker 7>is an area where you know they definitely will have

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 7>a lot of support there and I think that there

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 7>are a lot of areas where they can work together. Now,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 7>if you're looking at, say offshore wind, I don't think

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 7>you're going to see a whole lot of support from

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 7>the Trump administration. But to be totally honest, the offshore

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 7>wind industry in the United States has got a lot

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 7>of headwinds, even you know, without President Trump kind of

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 7>putting the brakes on that. They've got issues in terms

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 7>of the turbines that they're using, collapses in the Atlantic,

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 7>problems with funding for projects, you know off of New

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 7>York and New Jersey. The Trump administration is a convenient

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 7>way to excuse perhaps a lack of interest and difficulty

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 7>getting it going, But I wouldn't say it's necessarily the

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 7>Trump administration's fault that offshore wind is having a really

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 7>difficult and slow start here.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 5>And then what about nucleia, Yes, that is.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 7>An excellent question, and I think that that is something

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 7>that the Trump administration could really make a mark on

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 7>an energy if they choose to address this. Because I

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 7>know you said on the previous segment about data centers

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 7>and these big tech companies they want to use nuclear

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 7>to power their data centers. They realize that, look, we've

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 7>got to get something.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>That's more reliable.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 7>We can't use wind and solar for this. So it's

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 7>either natural gas or nuclear or a combination, and that

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 7>is an area that the Trump administration could really push

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 7>things forward. We've got a lot of really interesting technology

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 7>in terms of small modular reactors coming up, and this

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 7>is an area where they could really push things forward

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 7>and help bring more, safer, better, more affordable nuclear technology

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 7>to the United States. We really haven't had a new

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 7>nuclear plant. It is incredibly difficult to build a.

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 4>New nuclear plant.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 7>But nuclear is a stable, great base load source of

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 7>energy that is actually incredibly safe, and so there's a

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 7>lot of things that they could do to help push

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 7>that along, bring that to fruition in safe ways that

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 7>would really also help the environment and lower emissions.

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ellen, thank you so much. We appreciate that.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 3>Ellen Wald, Atlanta Council Senior Fellow and author of the

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 3>book Saudi Inc. So one of our go to voices

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 3>on energy.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Playing and broud

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Oto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to one of the big, big businesses out there,

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 3>particularly this time of the year, and that's the movie business.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 3>When you think about the movie business, the summer is

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the big part of the season. That's where a lot

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 3>of the big movies are released, and that's where the

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 3>box office is. But the second big driver is kind

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 3>of this holiday season we're in right now. Joining us

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 3>now is Daniel Larier, editorial director at The Box Office Company.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 3>They provide data and analytics on the global film industry. Dan,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 3>thanks for joining us. How has the twenty twenty four

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 3>box office been here in North America?

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, thanks for having me, Paul. It's been a recovery year.

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 8>I think coming into this here, we all expected a

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 8>downturn because of those and writer strikes from twenty to

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 8>twenty three, right, but we really saw a rally starting

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 8>in June. So at the beginning of the year we

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 8>expected maybe a ten percent slide. By now we're expecting

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 8>to finish the year within five percent year over year,

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 8>So big recovery to finish the year.

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 5>What has won out because of late it's been well,

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 5>they've been in something for everyone.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Really.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 5>You've had gladi ETD two, you've had Wicked, you've had

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 5>the kids winning.

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Out with Moana two as well. Where have been the sweet.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 8>Spots Disney, It's that one word, and man, is it

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 8>great to have them back. This is the first year

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 8>since twenty nineteen that Disney returns to two billion dollars

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 8>in domestic box office, and this is the first year

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 8>really that we see them make the most out of

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 8>that acquisition of twentieth Century Fox a couple of years back.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 8>If you remember, we didn't know what was going to

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 8>happen with that. They have the Avatar movies, that's a guarantee.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 8>But this year we saw new franchises revive like Kingdom

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 8>of the Planet of the Apes and Alien Romulus to

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 8>get back on the map. You see other divisions like

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 8>Marvel with Deadpool and Wolverine, Walt Disney Studio's animation with Molanatu,

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 8>and Pixar with Inside Out two having huge recoveries that

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 8>they haven't seen yet since the pandemic.

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So, Dan, you mentioned the writer strike, the act the

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>actor straight strike.

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm hearing that twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 3>are gonna be full production years and it's going to

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 3>be really big for the movie business.

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>What's your expectation for the next year or two.

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 8>New benchmarks, especially in this post pandemic era. Right, so,

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 8>we are expecting the best year in the post pandemic

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 8>box office in the coming year in twenty twenty five.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 8>We're right now forecasting between nine point three and nine

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 8>point seven billion dollars domestically around the nine point five billion,

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 8>if you wanted to ask me for a sweet spot.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 8>And that's really coming from our forecasting analyst of experts

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 8>in this industry that are giving us their own insights

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 8>as to where things are going in twenty five.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk a little bit about the narratives within the

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 5>companies themselves, because, like you said, the box office was difficult,

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 5>we're also seeing a restructuring that continues to be very

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 5>difficult when you think about paramount how they're being bought

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 5>at the moment, and really that's all about Hollywood and

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 5>the box office. Where will we see M and A.

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 5>Where will we see a refocusing coming from some of

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 5>the big companies.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 8>I think the key word here, Carolyn, for next year

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 8>is spin offs, and we're seeing that with all the

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 8>TV businesses of these legacy media companies. We see Warner Brothers,

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 8>Discovery looking at how to spin off some of those

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 8>cable properties. I know Comcast is looking at something similar.

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 8>So in terms of how this impacts theatrical or the

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 8>box office, I.

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Don't see an obvious answer yet.

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 8>It's a market on the rise, granted one that took

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 8>a big hit during the pandemic, but you compare that

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 8>to where linear television is right now, cable television is

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 8>right now, that's a market in the decline. So I

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 8>think the first point of focus right now is going

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 8>to be the coming cable apocalypse that is going to

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 8>be hitting the media sector next year. Dan talk to

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 8>us about China as a market for US films. As

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 8>recently as four or five years ago, it was the

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 8>growth driver and you know, almost as big as the

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 8>US Northern North American box office, and you could not

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 8>get a franchise film green lit unless you knew it

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 8>would play in China. Is that still the case or

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 8>is this kind of cold war that's been growing over

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 8>the least several years between the US and China.

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that dampened market?

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 8>You know, I'm smiling, Paul, because ten years ago, in

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 8>my first appearance here, you asked me that very question.

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 8>And my answer then is it's crucial, it's vital, right.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 8>I think that's changed in the last ten years. It's

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 8>changed significantly because it's a lot harder making sure that

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 8>China is a consistent player when it comes to release dates.

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 8>Forget box office returns, just a simple release date. So

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 8>it's not that I think it's more of a high

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 8>potential play rather than something that you can depend on.

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 8>And right now, where the market is, we need dependency.

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 5>What about the talent and the dependency that they're seeing

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 5>ever more so on technology And look, many took to

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 5>the strike action because of a concern about generative AI

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 5>and one's likeness in the future.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 8>But how is that shaping I think that's a great question, Carolyn,

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 8>And that's exactly where we are with the AI question

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 8>in Hollywood right now. It's a labor question. We're not

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 8>to the point where it's a creative question yet. So

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 8>as soon as we can figure out how the labor

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 8>unions can embrace this or really live with it or

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 8>coexist with it, even that's when we'll really be able

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 8>to see how it looks like creatively.

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I've said this before.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 8>I think AI right now is a potential, but not

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 8>a reality in Hollywood.

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Where are we in North American box office versus pre

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 3>pandemic level. It's called twenty nineteen because I think that

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 3>was kind of the peak year and then obviously very

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 3>very tough. You're in twenty twenty now trying to rebuild.

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Where are we When do you think we'll get back

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 3>to that peak that box office of twenty nineteen.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 8>So that twenty nineteen box office and really those years

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 8>in the latter half of the twenty tens was a

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 8>benchmark of eleven billion domestically, I don't think we'll get

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 8>there until twenty twenty seven at the earliest. Like I said,

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 8>I think next year twenty five we're looking around nine

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 8>point five billion. I think the ten billion benchmark is

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 8>going to come in twenty six and in twenty seven,

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 8>once we have a couple of years of a full

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 8>movie slate from these studios, because as you mentioned earlier, Paul,

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 8>it's really the first time since twenty nineteen where Hollywood

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 8>has an uninterrupted year of production. Now that we have

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 8>these movies coming out and hitting theaters, I think we

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 8>have to wait till twenty seven to get to that

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 8>pre pandemic level.

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 5>And are they all hitting theaters? How are we seeing

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 5>Netflix in particular or some of the key streamers decide

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:38.959
<v Speaker 5>when to bring things out. I mean Amazon a bit

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a U turn on one of its

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 5>key festive movies, and it looked like it worked to

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 5>bring it out to the theaters.

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's a case by case basis when

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 8>we talk about the streamers. I don't expect Netflix to

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 8>embrace theatrical any time soon. Apple is still hot and

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 8>cold on what their strategy is. We'll see how that's

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 8>tested with a release like Foe One, the Formula one

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 8>racing drama coming out next summer.

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But then you have someone like Amazon MGM, which.

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 8>Went forward with her release like Red One the theater,

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 8>so that movie is going to make one hundred million

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 8>dollars domestically, leading into a very profitable streaming run for

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 8>that title. And they have some really really interesting smaller

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 8>movies in theaters right now, a movie like The Fire

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 8>Inside biopic on the boxer Claressa Shields and my favorite

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 8>film of the year, Nickel Boyce, two really great dramas

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 8>that are going to be part of that awards conversation.

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 8>It depends on the company on what that strategy is.

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 8>But it's definitely still evolving.

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Thirty seconds left, Dan, A billion dollar box office that's

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 3>still out there, isn't it? You can still do baffo numbers,

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 3>as the Variety magazine would say.

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I think it's the stats.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 8>Something like three of the seven highest grossing movies of

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 8>all time came out after the pandemic. So on an

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 8>individual title basis, if the movie's there, the public's going

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 8>to follow, and they're going to follow to it in

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 8>the theaters.

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 5>Daniel, So great catch out with you, Daniel Laurier. Of course,

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 5>what was your favorite movie?

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Again?

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Which one did you say? We should watch?

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 8>Nickel boy S that's out now and expanding soon from

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 8>Amazon MGM, great drama.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Highly recommend it.

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Nickel voice, go watch it is, of course at

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 5>the box office company dying all the data and analytics

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 5>around the film industry. We appreciate him. Editorial direct to them.

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Beheart Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch US live every weekday on YouTube

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal