1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store 5 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L 6 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:32,120 Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. There 7 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:35,599 Speaker 1: is a slew of stories PIM about rental car companies 8 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:40,680 Speaker 1: teaming up with big tele technology companies to manage their 9 00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:44,120 Speaker 1: driver lists car fleets. And I thought this was fascinating. 10 00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:48,520 Speaker 1: So let's bring in chrys Chrysler minivans. Maybe they'll even 11 00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:51,280 Speaker 1: put another badge on at Alphabet and their way Mo 12 00:00:51,520 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: autonomous driving division. Yeah, I want to I want to 13 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 1: get more context in this because it seems like a 14 00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:59,280 Speaker 1: pretty big significant development. I want to bring in Allen Baum, 15 00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:01,680 Speaker 1: principal at UM and associates, as well as our own 16 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:06,119 Speaker 1: a non street Astavan senior semiconductor and hardware analysts at 17 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Intelligence, and I want to start with you UM. Yesterday, 18 00:01:10,360 --> 00:01:14,679 Speaker 1: what was so significant that two agreements were reported? We 19 00:01:14,760 --> 00:01:19,319 Speaker 1: had Avis coming up with something with Weymo to possibly 20 00:01:19,360 --> 00:01:22,040 Speaker 1: manage their driver list a fleet, and then Apple and 21 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:24,679 Speaker 1: Hurts appear to be discussing some kind of similar partnership. 22 00:01:24,760 --> 00:01:28,080 Speaker 1: Why now and what what really are these partnerships? Look, 23 00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:30,360 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, these are complicated electro 24 00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:33,399 Speaker 1: mechanical machines. I think that technology companies have figured out 25 00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:36,920 Speaker 1: that they need to be um partnering with somebody who 26 00:01:36,959 --> 00:01:41,280 Speaker 1: has substantial experience in the vehicle department. So as much 27 00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 1: as driver list technical that would be a good thing. 28 00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:46,200 Speaker 1: That would be a good thing because they take space. 29 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:50,440 Speaker 1: You need to do some maintenance maintenance, whether it's an 30 00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:54,160 Speaker 1: electric vehicle fleet or a fuel injection vehicle. You need 31 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 1: regular checkups on everything from tires to fluid levels to 32 00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:02,160 Speaker 1: batteries for example. And you just can't automate the whole thing, 33 00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 1: just like you do with the server farm or a 34 00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 1: phone so much to the annoyance of people in the 35 00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:12,960 Speaker 1: technology industry significantly, so you can't. You can't put it 36 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:15,840 Speaker 1: in the cloud and forget about it. So so this 37 00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:18,080 Speaker 1: is that part of that. This is a messy part 38 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:21,280 Speaker 1: of the hardware that needs to be taken care of. Well, Ellen, 39 00:02:21,320 --> 00:02:23,680 Speaker 1: I want to bring you in here are Hurts and 40 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:27,480 Speaker 1: Eva's equipped to really manage a fleet like this. This 41 00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:30,960 Speaker 1: isn't exactly their business. Well, they're not going to be 42 00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:35,240 Speaker 1: managing the technology. They actually made pretty clear that the 43 00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:39,960 Speaker 1: WEYMO will be responsible for making sure about the hardware 44 00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:44,160 Speaker 1: and the software of the autonomous vehicle uh is functional. 45 00:02:44,639 --> 00:02:48,280 Speaker 1: But it's also about distribution. Uh you know the idea. 46 00:02:48,560 --> 00:02:52,800 Speaker 1: There's been a lot of surveys about how people view this, 47 00:02:53,000 --> 00:02:56,160 Speaker 1: how the general public views it, and it's generally pretty negative. 48 00:02:56,200 --> 00:02:59,200 Speaker 1: And the obvious reason is people don't know what they 49 00:02:59,240 --> 00:03:02,320 Speaker 1: don't know. Um and so you know, this sounds pretty 50 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:06,079 Speaker 1: creepy that your car driving your driving itself, and uh 51 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:10,240 Speaker 1: so that there's a concern about that. With distribution, as 52 00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:14,560 Speaker 1: people start to to experience it, then perhaps their their 53 00:03:14,639 --> 00:03:17,840 Speaker 1: views will become more positive. And so that's what this 54 00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:21,680 Speaker 1: is about. And this is also a very good I 55 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:24,919 Speaker 1: think for the electric vehicle industry because what it it, uh, 56 00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:28,120 Speaker 1: it's it's an example of is when you talk about 57 00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:31,960 Speaker 1: a HURTS and an AVIS being involved, the cost of 58 00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:36,920 Speaker 1: the service, of of providing the services critical and so 59 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:39,600 Speaker 1: to the extent that electric vehicles are going to be 60 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:43,200 Speaker 1: cheaper to run, I'm not really talking about cheaper to buy, 61 00:03:43,320 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 1: but cheaper to run than that's critical for these these opportunities. 62 00:03:49,200 --> 00:03:53,000 Speaker 1: And so we see the players that are good at this, 63 00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:57,160 Speaker 1: that are good at running fleets getting more involved. So 64 00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:00,480 Speaker 1: is this as much a recognition that the business model 65 00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:06,760 Speaker 1: of rental car companies such as Budget and Avis, Budget 66 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:13,000 Speaker 1: and Hurts Global, that their business model aligns financially with 67 00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:18,920 Speaker 1: the ownership and maintenance portion of these vehicles future Because 68 00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:21,800 Speaker 1: it's about scale, as you said on them, absolutely see 69 00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:26,000 Speaker 1: economic scale and technology is sort of the foundation of 70 00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:31,560 Speaker 1: which large technology shifts occur. Right, So to Mr Brown's point, 71 00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:34,040 Speaker 1: it's a great distribution channel. They know how to run 72 00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:35,919 Speaker 1: and operate cars, and they know how to run and 73 00:04:35,960 --> 00:04:39,400 Speaker 1: operate cars cheaply so and appreciate the value of those 74 00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:43,359 Speaker 1: cars the benefit of their shareholders exactly. And this allows 75 00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:49,039 Speaker 1: technology to proliferate through their fleet better, faster, more effectively. 76 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 1: That's point number one. The point number two is if 77 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,760 Speaker 1: you look at drivertive technology enhancements, one of the things 78 00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:57,760 Speaker 1: that we have written about extensively is this notion of 79 00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:02,720 Speaker 1: collecting data from UH many many, many number of points. 80 00:05:02,760 --> 00:05:07,039 Speaker 1: This is one industry which needs a large amount of 81 00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:10,720 Speaker 1: vehicles flying on the road to gather information. Who better 82 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:13,360 Speaker 1: do it from rather than than doing it one by 83 00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:17,440 Speaker 1: one by one on an ownership basis renting of cars. Well, 84 00:05:18,279 --> 00:05:20,839 Speaker 1: and this raises a question. This raises my next question, Alan, 85 00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:23,919 Speaker 1: I want to direct this at you. The significance of 86 00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:27,320 Speaker 1: this is it that we're getting closer to the reality 87 00:05:27,400 --> 00:05:32,159 Speaker 1: of a self driving fleet that will actually get implemented 88 00:05:32,279 --> 00:05:34,840 Speaker 1: in urban areas or elsewhere. I mean, are we really 89 00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:36,719 Speaker 1: see are we at the precipice of a sort of 90 00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:44,240 Speaker 1: see change in transportation. I'm a little uh cautious on that. Uh, 91 00:05:44,279 --> 00:05:47,400 Speaker 1: you know, will this work in Manhattan? Will this work 92 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:52,159 Speaker 1: in San Francisco? Yes? Um, but of course it has 93 00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:55,360 Speaker 1: to compete with the existing system well well, but beyond 94 00:05:55,440 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 1: beyond but sorry, Alan, but beyond just will it work? 95 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:01,920 Speaker 1: I mean, is it going to be experimented with at 96 00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:03,880 Speaker 1: this point? Is that the Is that the significance or not? 97 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:06,080 Speaker 1: You want to take that? Yeah, I think that. I 98 00:06:06,680 --> 00:06:09,240 Speaker 1: don't know if it's Manhattan or San Francisco urban areas 99 00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:11,479 Speaker 1: as much as it's going to I think start with 100 00:06:11,760 --> 00:06:17,320 Speaker 1: UM large fleets of trucks. It's going to start with closed, compartmentalized, 101 00:06:17,440 --> 00:06:20,560 Speaker 1: UM sort of gated communities if you may, whether it's 102 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:23,480 Speaker 1: a campus network, whether it's universities. One of the things 103 00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:26,919 Speaker 1: that we've said is university campuses may be ideal for 104 00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:29,880 Speaker 1: an experimentation with that, and particularly on the West Coast, 105 00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:35,720 Speaker 1: large urban or suburban corporate campuses would be ideal for 106 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:39,839 Speaker 1: such a fleet where, um, you could experiment with the vehicles, 107 00:06:39,839 --> 00:06:42,679 Speaker 1: you could experiment with buses, you could experiment with cars. 108 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:45,640 Speaker 1: But at the end of the day, you also need 109 00:06:46,320 --> 00:06:49,080 Speaker 1: urban data. You also need data from different parts that 110 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:51,359 Speaker 1: you need rural data. You need data from all of 111 00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: these different parts. And I think that I'm not so sure. 112 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:59,279 Speaker 1: I agree with with Mr round in that I don't 113 00:06:59,320 --> 00:07:02,680 Speaker 1: know if it's to come sooner or later. But I 114 00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:06,240 Speaker 1: think that this is we're going to try multiple different things. 115 00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:09,200 Speaker 1: I think the experimentation with the rental car companies is 116 00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:11,880 Speaker 1: a great idea. I think that we might start with 117 00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:16,240 Speaker 1: the universities, corporate campuses, etcetera. We have to experiment in 118 00:07:16,360 --> 00:07:19,720 Speaker 1: order to collect this data to make this feasible. Alan 119 00:07:19,760 --> 00:07:24,000 Speaker 1: bound you have a response. The development process is growing 120 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:27,560 Speaker 1: at at an amazing rate. I mean literally, it's two 121 00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:32,120 Speaker 1: or three items a week, um and yesterday two items 122 00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:36,080 Speaker 1: in one day where there are all these collections of 123 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:40,160 Speaker 1: major players, both in the technology and the auto space 124 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:46,040 Speaker 1: and now in distribution. Um, so we're seeing dramatic opportunities. Obviously, 125 00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:49,440 Speaker 1: not everything is gonna work, and that's what the system 126 00:07:49,520 --> 00:07:52,960 Speaker 1: is finding. I just saw a video of Tesla's new 127 00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:56,760 Speaker 1: autopilot where it was for about a twenty minute space 128 00:07:57,040 --> 00:07:59,080 Speaker 1: of where it did and did not work. But of 129 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:02,120 Speaker 1: course in restless case, they're getting one a non to 130 00:08:02,200 --> 00:08:05,560 Speaker 1: saying that data. They get the data, whether you're using 131 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:09,240 Speaker 1: autopilot or not, and that data is critical to the 132 00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:13,160 Speaker 1: development of the technology. And of course we've also got 133 00:08:13,160 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 1: the regulatory issue, which is actually being discussed in Washington today, 134 00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:21,440 Speaker 1: where the auto companies and the technology companies are saying, 135 00:08:21,440 --> 00:08:27,040 Speaker 1: we really don't want fifty states having different different policies 136 00:08:27,080 --> 00:08:29,280 Speaker 1: about this, Thanks very much. We gotta leave it there, 137 00:08:29,280 --> 00:08:33,040 Speaker 1: we gotta run Alan bound Principal Bauman associates on trin 138 00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:36,080 Speaker 1: of US and Bloomberg Intelligence. Just type b I go 139 00:08:36,240 --> 00:08:50,600 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg for more. Well, I am a little 140 00:08:50,640 --> 00:08:54,600 Speaker 1: bit perhaps confused about one issue in the exchange traded 141 00:08:54,640 --> 00:09:01,120 Speaker 1: fund universe that only one all right, fairy fam but 142 00:09:01,400 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 1: this has been the fastest growing aspect of the asset 143 00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:09,280 Speaker 1: management industry, and it is now an increasingly actively managed 144 00:09:09,320 --> 00:09:12,000 Speaker 1: industry because you have the passive e t F which 145 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:13,920 Speaker 1: account for the majority of the ass under management, but 146 00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 1: there is the fastest growing component that is smart beta. 147 00:09:16,559 --> 00:09:19,280 Speaker 1: To understand how actively managed e t f s fit 148 00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:22,640 Speaker 1: into this this universe it's known for being passive. I 149 00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:25,079 Speaker 1: want to bring in Tom Hoops, executive vice president, a 150 00:09:25,160 --> 00:09:29,760 Speaker 1: head of business development. Uh like Mason, really glad to 151 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:32,040 Speaker 1: have you here, Thank you so much, thanks for having so. 152 00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:35,280 Speaker 1: Can you explain where actively managed e t f s 153 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:38,840 Speaker 1: fit in to a universe that has gained popularity for 154 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:42,840 Speaker 1: being passive and cheap. Yeah. Sure. I think it starts 155 00:09:42,880 --> 00:09:45,520 Speaker 1: with thinking about the e t F as a vehicle 156 00:09:45,679 --> 00:09:48,520 Speaker 1: as opposed to an investment strategy and separating that. I 157 00:09:48,520 --> 00:09:51,680 Speaker 1: think the industry and the media often we get it wrong. 158 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:54,280 Speaker 1: We think about e t f s and market cap 159 00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:57,880 Speaker 1: passive as being synonymous and true, most of the volume 160 00:09:57,920 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 1: that's been in e t f s today has been 161 00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:03,640 Speaker 1: in market cap passive. But ultimately the e t F 162 00:10:03,760 --> 00:10:07,760 Speaker 1: is just a delivery vehicle for an investment strategy. Yes, 163 00:10:07,880 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 1: although part of the beauty of the e t F 164 00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:14,360 Speaker 1: is its transparency, which doesn't always work with an actively 165 00:10:14,360 --> 00:10:18,000 Speaker 1: managed fund, particularly in less liquid areas right um, as 166 00:10:18,040 --> 00:10:21,360 Speaker 1: well as it's ease of transaction. So it's sort of 167 00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:23,559 Speaker 1: uh is supposed to be a proxy for a broad 168 00:10:23,640 --> 00:10:26,160 Speaker 1: market that you can just easily access, right it doesn't 169 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:27,640 Speaker 1: have to be a proxy for a broad market. I 170 00:10:27,720 --> 00:10:29,960 Speaker 1: do think that the ease of access is important. I 171 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:33,040 Speaker 1: think transparency has been an issue and that is is 172 00:10:33,080 --> 00:10:37,640 Speaker 1: a potentially a roadblock to broader adoption of delivering active 173 00:10:37,640 --> 00:10:40,160 Speaker 1: strategies UM in an e t F. But it also 174 00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:43,400 Speaker 1: has lower overall operating expenses and gives clients a better 175 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:46,560 Speaker 1: tax outcome. So as a rapper, it's it's in many 176 00:10:46,559 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 1: ways a better mouse trap than the forty Act mutual fund. 177 00:10:49,559 --> 00:10:52,760 Speaker 1: And so you know, for clients and advisors and gatekeepers 178 00:10:52,760 --> 00:10:56,360 Speaker 1: that want to access active strategies, which they still do 179 00:10:56,960 --> 00:10:59,880 Speaker 1: in large numbers, having it in a more efficient, lower 180 00:11:00,120 --> 00:11:03,600 Speaker 1: US tax friendly rapper we think just makes sense. Does 181 00:11:03,640 --> 00:11:05,200 Speaker 1: this also have to do with the way that the 182 00:11:05,240 --> 00:11:07,920 Speaker 1: financial industry has evolved in the sense that if you 183 00:11:07,960 --> 00:11:10,400 Speaker 1: are a great money manager, you can go out and 184 00:11:10,440 --> 00:11:13,040 Speaker 1: create your own mutual fund and then people will want 185 00:11:13,080 --> 00:11:16,600 Speaker 1: to invest based on your ability to produce the returns 186 00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:19,720 Speaker 1: or the risk profile that they want. On the other hand, 187 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:22,240 Speaker 1: with an exchange traded fund, it seems to be the 188 00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:28,800 Speaker 1: vehicle that is run by the larger financial institution based 189 00:11:28,880 --> 00:11:33,520 Speaker 1: upon a desire obviously to market the investment, but also 190 00:11:33,840 --> 00:11:36,360 Speaker 1: to take advantage of whatever the strengths are of your 191 00:11:36,400 --> 00:11:40,080 Speaker 1: financial institution. Yes, so so him. Our Our strategy, like Mason, 192 00:11:40,120 --> 00:11:44,640 Speaker 1: has been to increase client choice in both investment strategies 193 00:11:44,679 --> 00:11:47,719 Speaker 1: and in products and vehicles. And so getting the right 194 00:11:47,840 --> 00:11:50,240 Speaker 1: investment strategy in front of a client or in a 195 00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:53,360 Speaker 1: client's portfolio is most important if they want to access 196 00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:57,080 Speaker 1: that strategy through a mutual fund, through separately managed account, 197 00:11:57,240 --> 00:11:59,760 Speaker 1: through an et F, through collective fund, through use it's fund, 198 00:11:59,760 --> 00:12:01,839 Speaker 1: its R That's that's all fine. We want to be 199 00:12:01,880 --> 00:12:05,439 Speaker 1: able to offer them that choice. Which asset classes are 200 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:11,520 Speaker 1: most uh conducive to active management management in ETF wrapper? 201 00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:13,160 Speaker 1: I mean, what are you looking at to sort of 202 00:12:13,200 --> 00:12:16,440 Speaker 1: expanding sure, sure so so So Back to the transparency 203 00:12:16,480 --> 00:12:18,360 Speaker 1: issue is, as you know, the E t F vehicle 204 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:23,400 Speaker 1: UM as it stands today does require UM daily transparency. UM. 205 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 1: We're certainly fine with daily transparency with clients or the 206 00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:30,000 Speaker 1: second largest SMA provider UM in the in the US, 207 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:32,920 Speaker 1: and that means we provide, of course a daily transparency 208 00:12:32,960 --> 00:12:35,080 Speaker 1: to our clients, but with an e t F, it's 209 00:12:35,160 --> 00:12:38,080 Speaker 1: daily transparency to the market and market makers, and that 210 00:12:38,160 --> 00:12:40,960 Speaker 1: can of time put your IP at risk for front 211 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:43,680 Speaker 1: running UM and and other things that could be detrimental 212 00:12:43,720 --> 00:12:46,160 Speaker 1: to the client. That is less of an issue in 213 00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:49,880 Speaker 1: fixed income, and that's why you've seen to date the 214 00:12:49,960 --> 00:12:53,160 Speaker 1: largest active ETFs have been in the fixed income space. 215 00:12:53,200 --> 00:12:55,960 Speaker 1: It's harder to front run and get ahead of of 216 00:12:55,960 --> 00:12:59,240 Speaker 1: of fixed income securities and fixed income portfolios. On the 217 00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:02,280 Speaker 1: equity side, though, that is where I think the market 218 00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:05,520 Speaker 1: is looking for some type of technology or solution to 219 00:13:05,679 --> 00:13:08,600 Speaker 1: deal with the transparency issue so that we can deliver 220 00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:12,280 Speaker 1: actively manage equity strategies UM in the advantages of the 221 00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:15,520 Speaker 1: E t F vehicle. Let's talk, if you can, about 222 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:19,440 Speaker 1: some of the results from a recent survey. This is 223 00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:23,040 Speaker 1: the fifth annual survey. I believe that you've uh that 224 00:13:23,120 --> 00:13:26,679 Speaker 1: your reference and it has to do with the attitudes 225 00:13:26,720 --> 00:13:28,920 Speaker 1: of investors, and I thought it was very interesting that 226 00:13:28,960 --> 00:13:34,280 Speaker 1: your your expectations for certain levels of return are almost 227 00:13:34,360 --> 00:13:39,880 Speaker 1: determined by your age and what you do. Yeah, I 228 00:13:39,920 --> 00:13:42,120 Speaker 1: think I think them. There were a lot of interesting 229 00:13:42,679 --> 00:13:45,800 Speaker 1: results or eye opening results when it came to investor 230 00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:51,119 Speaker 1: expectations versus versus reality, and it did vary some by generation, 231 00:13:51,800 --> 00:13:55,240 Speaker 1: varied some by whether one was was employed currently or retired. 232 00:13:55,640 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 1: At the end of the day, though there is still 233 00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:02,440 Speaker 1: a pretty sizeable gap between investors think they're gonna earn, 234 00:14:02,480 --> 00:14:06,320 Speaker 1: particularly in in income oriented investments, versus where we think 235 00:14:06,360 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 1: the world is now and where it will be going forward. Well, 236 00:14:08,840 --> 00:14:11,880 Speaker 1: it just said that the numbers fully retired. If you're 237 00:14:11,880 --> 00:14:15,840 Speaker 1: fully retired, you're looking at overall average rate of return 238 00:14:15,880 --> 00:14:18,439 Speaker 1: of six point two percent, which is a lot more 239 00:14:18,480 --> 00:14:23,440 Speaker 1: realistic than the nine percent that people who are employed 240 00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:27,000 Speaker 1: are sting. They're more uh, they're okay with investing in 241 00:14:27,080 --> 00:14:30,120 Speaker 1: safer assets that they can get a more predictable returns. 242 00:14:30,160 --> 00:14:32,520 Speaker 1: They might just be also de risking, right, or maybe 243 00:14:32,520 --> 00:14:35,160 Speaker 1: they just have everything they need. I'm sure the more 244 00:14:35,200 --> 00:14:38,400 Speaker 1: realistic they're older too. We we have seen again it's 245 00:14:38,440 --> 00:14:41,520 Speaker 1: persisted now for a few years in the survey, a 246 00:14:41,640 --> 00:14:48,920 Speaker 1: large allocation to cash um across all generations in the range. Wow, 247 00:14:49,000 --> 00:14:50,880 Speaker 1: all right, that's something to watch and thank you very 248 00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:53,520 Speaker 1: much for being with us. Tom Hoops is executive vice 249 00:14:53,560 --> 00:15:10,200 Speaker 1: president and head of business development leg Mason based in Baltimore. Well, 250 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:13,160 Speaker 1: we've all been adding up our cable and our mobile 251 00:15:13,160 --> 00:15:15,760 Speaker 1: phone bills here in the studio, and the number is 252 00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:18,720 Speaker 1: not pleasant. Here to help us understand it and the 253 00:15:18,760 --> 00:15:22,840 Speaker 1: possible combination between Sprint and Charter and Comcast as Bloomberg 254 00:15:22,880 --> 00:15:25,880 Speaker 1: Intelligence his own Josh Yatsko wits he is a media 255 00:15:25,960 --> 00:15:29,200 Speaker 1: and cable analyst, and Matthew Cantererman he is a telecom 256 00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:32,280 Speaker 1: services as well as equipment analysts, and they join us 257 00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:35,200 Speaker 1: in our studios. Gentlemen, thanks for being here. I'm not 258 00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:38,040 Speaker 1: gonna make you reveal your cable bills or you know 259 00:15:38,040 --> 00:15:39,920 Speaker 1: how much it costs for your mobile service, but we 260 00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:43,920 Speaker 1: were informally talking and realizing, my goodness, we're supporting you know, 261 00:15:43,960 --> 00:15:47,520 Speaker 1: at least three behemoth organizations. I want you to talk 262 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:51,840 Speaker 1: about some of them, Sprint, Comcast and Charter. H Matthew, 263 00:15:51,840 --> 00:15:54,440 Speaker 1: maybe you want to start off by describing what do 264 00:15:54,480 --> 00:15:57,080 Speaker 1: you think is going on here? Sure says say Sprint 265 00:15:57,120 --> 00:15:59,520 Speaker 1: for a while as underinvested in its network, they've been 266 00:15:59,520 --> 00:16:02,240 Speaker 1: concentrated aim by very high leverage, low free cash flow, 267 00:16:02,320 --> 00:16:05,400 Speaker 1: so they're looking for ways to finance network investments UM 268 00:16:05,560 --> 00:16:07,280 Speaker 1: to catch up to their rivals A, T and T, 269 00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:09,960 Speaker 1: Verizon and Tea Mobile has been the most aggressive recently. 270 00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:14,040 Speaker 1: UM an equity investment from the cable companies who Josh 271 00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:16,440 Speaker 1: can speak to about their desire to get into wireless 272 00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:19,760 Speaker 1: and offer quadruple play bundles to reduce their turn You know, 273 00:16:20,080 --> 00:16:22,280 Speaker 1: it suits all parties. It helps Sprint get cash to 274 00:16:22,360 --> 00:16:25,560 Speaker 1: accelerate their capex, and it helps the cable companies, you know, 275 00:16:25,640 --> 00:16:28,600 Speaker 1: get good, cheap access to the wireless airways that they 276 00:16:28,640 --> 00:16:32,480 Speaker 1: need to to lease to to offer those services. So, Josh, 277 00:16:32,600 --> 00:16:35,360 Speaker 1: let's bring you in how how beneficial is it for 278 00:16:35,520 --> 00:16:39,680 Speaker 1: Comcast and Charter Because theoretically, as Matt saying, you know, 279 00:16:39,720 --> 00:16:42,160 Speaker 1: it does sound like there is some kind of benefit. 280 00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:43,640 Speaker 1: And yet when you look at the share prices of 281 00:16:43,720 --> 00:16:46,480 Speaker 1: both Comcast and Charter both down. Sprint though, is up 282 00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:49,960 Speaker 1: because investors are loving the idea of a possible bailout 283 00:16:50,120 --> 00:16:54,200 Speaker 1: or extra cash. Yeah, so Charter and Comcast have actually 284 00:16:54,280 --> 00:16:57,400 Speaker 1: been having wireless ambitions for a while. Right now they 285 00:16:57,480 --> 00:16:59,640 Speaker 1: have a deal with Verizon and MV and O deal 286 00:16:59,640 --> 00:17:03,480 Speaker 1: where they can utilize the services. MBNO, you've gotta help 287 00:17:03,560 --> 00:17:06,560 Speaker 1: us m vyn O. It's basically a way for them 288 00:17:06,560 --> 00:17:09,440 Speaker 1: to utilize Verizon services without owning the network. So they're 289 00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:13,640 Speaker 1: using it as a wholesale agreement. UM. So with Sprint, 290 00:17:13,840 --> 00:17:15,879 Speaker 1: they could look into multiple options, one of which is 291 00:17:15,920 --> 00:17:18,800 Speaker 1: doing another mv and O type agreement with Sprint, maybe 292 00:17:18,800 --> 00:17:22,360 Speaker 1: getting better deal terms, or actually going out and buying Sprint. 293 00:17:22,840 --> 00:17:24,879 Speaker 1: We tend to think that an MBNO is more likely 294 00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:27,560 Speaker 1: that Comcast and Trotter are going at this little slow 295 00:17:27,840 --> 00:17:31,199 Speaker 1: We want to test the waters and also maybe help Sprint, 296 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:34,240 Speaker 1: as Matt said, Jack some cash and see where the 297 00:17:34,320 --> 00:17:37,040 Speaker 1: network goes. Just real quick, how much money is at stake? 298 00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:40,280 Speaker 1: I mean these MVNO is, these these agreements to use 299 00:17:40,440 --> 00:17:44,080 Speaker 1: the wireless network that Sprint has. How much would a 300 00:17:44,080 --> 00:17:47,520 Speaker 1: Comcast or try to pay for that? The deal terms 301 00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:50,560 Speaker 1: are not disclosed. I don't know if um Matt hasn't anything. 302 00:17:50,600 --> 00:17:53,479 Speaker 1: But you saw what Comcast is charging its customers, and 303 00:17:53,760 --> 00:17:56,800 Speaker 1: it's utils utilizing its WiFi network which has sixteen million 304 00:17:56,800 --> 00:17:58,600 Speaker 1: hot spots, so they can offload a lot of that 305 00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:01,160 Speaker 1: data traffic onto the why find network. We do still 306 00:18:01,160 --> 00:18:03,320 Speaker 1: overall costs from the NBN oh, and actually get a 307 00:18:03,960 --> 00:18:07,680 Speaker 1: positive return on that. Matthew, I want to know about Sprint. 308 00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:09,719 Speaker 1: I mean, do they need this deal? I mean they 309 00:18:09,760 --> 00:18:12,920 Speaker 1: need the cash, don't they. It seems like Massa needs 310 00:18:12,920 --> 00:18:14,800 Speaker 1: a deal because he's been trying to sell Sprint for 311 00:18:14,840 --> 00:18:17,520 Speaker 1: a while now. He's talked to Team Mobile, Joy, to Telecom, 312 00:18:17,520 --> 00:18:19,920 Speaker 1: the cable companies, He's talking to everybody. He talked to 313 00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:22,480 Speaker 1: Charlie Ergan shopping it around. He's shopping it around. Is 314 00:18:22,520 --> 00:18:24,440 Speaker 1: that the is that? Does that make sense? I mean, 315 00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:27,520 Speaker 1: is that you know it's sort of you're shopping something 316 00:18:27,560 --> 00:18:30,640 Speaker 1: around that must make it difficult to gain any kind 317 00:18:30,640 --> 00:18:33,720 Speaker 1: of leverage in any kind of It does. But but 318 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:35,320 Speaker 1: you know, he put a lot of money into it 319 00:18:35,160 --> 00:18:37,320 Speaker 1: and it didn't work out the way he wanted. You know, 320 00:18:37,440 --> 00:18:40,320 Speaker 1: Sprint's been unable to leverage the vast spectrum massets they 321 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:43,639 Speaker 1: have for all the reasons I said before. Um, you know, 322 00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:45,800 Speaker 1: that's the value he saw and they've been unable to 323 00:18:45,800 --> 00:18:48,960 Speaker 1: monetize that for him. So he's looking at ways to 324 00:18:48,640 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 1: to monetize his investment that he made in the company 325 00:18:51,240 --> 00:18:53,400 Speaker 1: a few years ago. Being the head of soft Bank 326 00:18:53,440 --> 00:18:56,639 Speaker 1: which on Sprint right exactly, sorry, and so UM, you 327 00:18:56,680 --> 00:18:59,240 Speaker 1: know what what he would you know, by shopping around. 328 00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:01,280 Speaker 1: He's trying to find the best deal. And you know, 329 00:19:01,359 --> 00:19:03,399 Speaker 1: aside from just getting cash, I think one of the 330 00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:07,159 Speaker 1: key assets the cable companies have is the deep fiber 331 00:19:07,200 --> 00:19:09,800 Speaker 1: and collaxial cable networks and in the neighborhoods if you 332 00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:12,359 Speaker 1: think about, you know, particularly in the suburbs and the 333 00:19:12,560 --> 00:19:15,120 Speaker 1: in the rural areas where they are the only provider 334 00:19:15,200 --> 00:19:17,760 Speaker 1: or one of two providers of those services deep into 335 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:20,320 Speaker 1: the neighborhoods. Um, you know, Sprint can just stick up 336 00:19:20,359 --> 00:19:24,000 Speaker 1: small cells on top of those and you know, very cheaply. UM, 337 00:19:24,040 --> 00:19:26,600 Speaker 1: you know, expand the quality and the coverage of its 338 00:19:26,600 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 1: network and really become competitive with the likes of Horizon, A, 339 00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:32,440 Speaker 1: T and T and T Mobile. I want to ask 340 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,919 Speaker 1: about whether this is anti competitive or would this trip 341 00:19:36,000 --> 00:19:42,280 Speaker 1: any anti competitive wires. Josh, it shouldn't because wireless UM, 342 00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:46,840 Speaker 1: the wireless services that Sprint offers are complimentary more to 343 00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:50,840 Speaker 1: the wireline services that UM, Comcast and Trotter offer. It's 344 00:19:50,880 --> 00:19:54,520 Speaker 1: not taking away competitor in that space, unless you argue 345 00:19:54,600 --> 00:19:57,760 Speaker 1: that the wireless services could actually compete head to head 346 00:19:57,920 --> 00:20:00,720 Speaker 1: with UM the wireline services woul we don't actually see 347 00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:02,679 Speaker 1: in the market yet. You know, you've potentially seen that 348 00:20:02,720 --> 00:20:05,520 Speaker 1: with five G on on the last mile UM, with 349 00:20:05,920 --> 00:20:09,439 Speaker 1: wireless companies coming in and using back haul and a 350 00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:12,840 Speaker 1: five G basis, But this is years out potentially, Matthew, 351 00:20:12,880 --> 00:20:15,200 Speaker 1: what is your thought and maybe just reference Verizon and 352 00:20:15,240 --> 00:20:18,320 Speaker 1: its files product because that is trying to do the 353 00:20:18,359 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 1: triple play bundle. So triple plays are very popular in 354 00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:23,840 Speaker 1: the US, but we haven't taken the step like a 355 00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:29,240 Speaker 1: lot of the internet, home phone, and and TV services UM, 356 00:20:29,280 --> 00:20:31,760 Speaker 1: but we haven't taken the step to quadruple plays, which 357 00:20:31,760 --> 00:20:34,080 Speaker 1: bundle mobile services and they're like a lot of European 358 00:20:34,119 --> 00:20:36,280 Speaker 1: countries have. I think one of the issues is the 359 00:20:36,280 --> 00:20:40,680 Speaker 1: geographic constraints. We don't have national fixed line providers. Comcast 360 00:20:40,720 --> 00:20:44,520 Speaker 1: isn't national, Charter isn't national, Files isn't national, whereas in 361 00:20:44,560 --> 00:20:47,520 Speaker 1: France or the Netherlands, much smaller countries it's easier to 362 00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:50,720 Speaker 1: have a national footprint UM and so you know, the 363 00:20:50,960 --> 00:20:53,680 Speaker 1: geographic constraints really make it difficult to offer those quad 364 00:20:53,720 --> 00:20:55,840 Speaker 1: play services on a national basis, which is why it's 365 00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:58,320 Speaker 1: really never taken off thank you so much for joining us. 366 00:20:58,320 --> 00:21:02,080 Speaker 1: Matthew Kanterman, Telecom and video game analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. 367 00:21:02,080 --> 00:21:05,840 Speaker 1: Also our thanks to Joshua yatsquits Uh Telecom, Cable and 368 00:21:05,920 --> 00:21:10,359 Speaker 1: Media analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Uh. I just have to wonder, 369 00:21:10,440 --> 00:21:12,359 Speaker 1: you know, Sprint, it's been on the table for a 370 00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:14,360 Speaker 1: while and it's been looking for some kind of bailout. 371 00:21:14,440 --> 00:21:17,720 Speaker 1: It's interesting that two big cable companies are coming to 372 00:21:17,800 --> 00:21:32,560 Speaker 1: it at the same time. You never know. Well, in 373 00:21:32,680 --> 00:21:35,560 Speaker 1: Europe we actually have had quite a big move in 374 00:21:36,200 --> 00:21:39,119 Speaker 1: government bond yield. You can see two year German yields 375 00:21:39,200 --> 00:21:42,560 Speaker 1: rising to their highest level in about a year, albeit 376 00:21:42,680 --> 00:21:45,840 Speaker 1: still negative half percentage points, so not not terribly high. 377 00:21:45,920 --> 00:21:48,760 Speaker 1: Let's just say I still haven't gotten it's all relative. 378 00:21:48,760 --> 00:21:50,320 Speaker 1: But I want to bring in Simon Ballard who has 379 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 1: a better sense on all of this and can give 380 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:55,199 Speaker 1: us some perspective on why we're seeing this move and 381 00:21:55,280 --> 00:21:59,600 Speaker 1: why we're hearing about ECB tapering. Simon Ballard is a 382 00:21:59,600 --> 00:22:02,800 Speaker 1: global it Strategies for bloom Brock News in London. Simon, 383 00:22:03,359 --> 00:22:08,200 Speaker 1: why did e CBS Mario drags speech today? Well, Mario 384 00:22:08,280 --> 00:22:12,639 Speaker 1: drag speech at the ECB Forum has addressed the tapering issue, 385 00:22:12,640 --> 00:22:14,680 Speaker 1: which has been on many people's lips and in certainly 386 00:22:14,720 --> 00:22:17,359 Speaker 1: in their minds for for many months now. The the 387 00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:20,720 Speaker 1: asset purchased program, the quantity of easing program that the 388 00:22:20,720 --> 00:22:22,920 Speaker 1: ECB has gone through over the last couple of years, 389 00:22:23,359 --> 00:22:25,520 Speaker 1: comes to a tentative end or schedule end at the 390 00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:28,080 Speaker 1: end of this year UM. And so the question now 391 00:22:28,520 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 1: really is how will the market react when the support 392 00:22:32,359 --> 00:22:35,919 Speaker 1: mechanism is tapered, is taken away, be it through asset 393 00:22:35,960 --> 00:22:39,560 Speaker 1: purchases being reduced. And you've seen that this morning. We've 394 00:22:39,560 --> 00:22:42,840 Speaker 1: had Missie of Dragg suggesting that all being well, the 395 00:22:42,840 --> 00:22:46,040 Speaker 1: the nascent recovery in Europe will allow them to taper 396 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:49,320 Speaker 1: or at least to sort of scale back accommodation between 397 00:22:49,359 --> 00:22:50,680 Speaker 1: now and the end of the year or certainly the 398 00:22:50,720 --> 00:22:52,760 Speaker 1: early part of two thousand eighteen. And that's why we've 399 00:22:52,760 --> 00:22:55,359 Speaker 1: seen this, this this rising government yours. As you say, 400 00:22:55,400 --> 00:22:57,600 Speaker 1: we're still deeply negative. We've still got major issues over 401 00:22:57,600 --> 00:23:00,520 Speaker 1: here to consider, um. But it is a move in 402 00:23:00,560 --> 00:23:02,720 Speaker 1: the right direction as far as Mr Drug is concerned. 403 00:23:02,960 --> 00:23:06,160 Speaker 1: And it's certainly moving the euro today against the dollar 404 00:23:06,280 --> 00:23:09,160 Speaker 1: one eight one right now, that's a gain of eight 405 00:23:09,160 --> 00:23:11,560 Speaker 1: tens of a percent. You know, I gotta ask you. 406 00:23:11,720 --> 00:23:13,719 Speaker 1: You know, the European Central Bank seems to be an 407 00:23:13,760 --> 00:23:16,440 Speaker 1: equal opportunity lender. In other words, they'll buy on most 408 00:23:16,480 --> 00:23:20,120 Speaker 1: any Euro Area investment grade non financial debt. I mean 409 00:23:20,440 --> 00:23:24,240 Speaker 1: it includes US debt, Swiss debt right as well as 410 00:23:24,400 --> 00:23:29,440 Speaker 1: all of this other They've added what billion euro billion 411 00:23:29,920 --> 00:23:33,280 Speaker 1: the corporate bond purchase program. The corporate purchas program, which 412 00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:35,600 Speaker 1: has been running since June of last year, has been 413 00:23:35,680 --> 00:23:38,720 Speaker 1: accumulating bonds probably about one and a half to two 414 00:23:38,720 --> 00:23:40,520 Speaker 1: billion a week. So as you say, just to just 415 00:23:40,560 --> 00:23:43,080 Speaker 1: shy of the hundred billion mark. Now, um, yes, the 416 00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:45,360 Speaker 1: restrict parameters for the for the bonds that they can 417 00:23:45,359 --> 00:23:48,840 Speaker 1: buy its investment grade, they have to be euro domiciled. Um. 418 00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:51,399 Speaker 1: But you know there are U s issuers that have 419 00:23:51,600 --> 00:23:54,920 Speaker 1: a European base whose bonds have also found their way 420 00:23:54,920 --> 00:23:57,480 Speaker 1: into the CBS portfolio. And it's had a dramatic effect 421 00:23:57,560 --> 00:23:59,760 Speaker 1: on spreads over the course of the last year. While 422 00:23:59,800 --> 00:24:03,000 Speaker 1: we've seen sort of ebbs and flows and some modest 423 00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:05,480 Speaker 1: widening through to mid two thousand and sixteen, there really 424 00:24:05,520 --> 00:24:09,760 Speaker 1: has been a consistent, consistent tightening across the credit spectrum, 425 00:24:09,800 --> 00:24:12,240 Speaker 1: not only through the bonds that the ECB has been buying, 426 00:24:12,240 --> 00:24:14,399 Speaker 1: but I'd point out perhaps many in US has been 427 00:24:14,440 --> 00:24:17,119 Speaker 1: crowded out further down the quality curve, further down the 428 00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:19,440 Speaker 1: credit curve, unable to buy the bonds because of the 429 00:24:19,600 --> 00:24:23,399 Speaker 1: CBS reduced liquidity in those sectors. So we've seen the 430 00:24:23,480 --> 00:24:25,880 Speaker 1: dramatic apt forms, even if we can't really quantify exactly 431 00:24:25,880 --> 00:24:28,120 Speaker 1: what the ECB has done. You know, Simon, I think 432 00:24:28,160 --> 00:24:31,399 Speaker 1: it's so interesting the market response to Mario drugs speech, 433 00:24:31,480 --> 00:24:34,440 Speaker 1: because first it was rather ambiguous. It wasn't like it 434 00:24:34,520 --> 00:24:37,000 Speaker 1: came out and said we're planning to discuss tapering and 435 00:24:37,080 --> 00:24:38,679 Speaker 1: two months and then get it done by the end 436 00:24:38,680 --> 00:24:40,600 Speaker 1: of the year. I mean, it was very ambiguous and 437 00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:42,640 Speaker 1: you could kind of read into it what you wanted, 438 00:24:43,080 --> 00:24:45,280 Speaker 1: but it seemed to hint at some kind of normalization. 439 00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:48,200 Speaker 1: That's number one, But number two, the response has been 440 00:24:48,200 --> 00:24:50,800 Speaker 1: pretty significant in US markets too. We saw the thirty 441 00:24:50,880 --> 00:24:53,760 Speaker 1: year yelled in the US rise the most in almost 442 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:56,080 Speaker 1: two months, and it makes me think the ECB is 443 00:24:56,119 --> 00:24:58,879 Speaker 1: absolutely the central bank that's in control right now of 444 00:24:58,880 --> 00:25:01,760 Speaker 1: global bond markets, which you agree, well, I think there's 445 00:25:01,800 --> 00:25:04,919 Speaker 1: sort of there's a very very solid link between all 446 00:25:04,920 --> 00:25:07,480 Speaker 1: global central banks, and more importantly, the rhetoric between the 447 00:25:07,560 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 1: central banks um and the fact that the ECB is 448 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:13,120 Speaker 1: even hinting at, albeit with as many caveats as you'd 449 00:25:13,119 --> 00:25:15,560 Speaker 1: like to offer, um, that they would like to move 450 00:25:15,600 --> 00:25:19,600 Speaker 1: to a tapering sort of position later this year is 451 00:25:19,640 --> 00:25:22,320 Speaker 1: positive really for for the global economy because to a 452 00:25:22,320 --> 00:25:25,600 Speaker 1: certain extent, the ECB, the eurozonees economy has been a 453 00:25:25,680 --> 00:25:27,680 Speaker 1: drag on the US has been a drag on sort 454 00:25:27,680 --> 00:25:30,840 Speaker 1: of the global growth picture. So if that starts to improve, 455 00:25:30,920 --> 00:25:33,920 Speaker 1: then we can start to take a more positive spinum 456 00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:36,919 Speaker 1: to a sentiment within the US as well. Simon, is 457 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:39,960 Speaker 1: it possible that the European Central Bank, and of course 458 00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:42,639 Speaker 1: we don't know what the Federal Reserve is going to 459 00:25:42,720 --> 00:25:46,679 Speaker 1: do specifically with its own balance sheet, but the central 460 00:25:46,680 --> 00:25:49,399 Speaker 1: banks have gone out to buy the best and have 461 00:25:49,520 --> 00:25:53,240 Speaker 1: therefore crowded everybody else in to buy the junk, when 462 00:25:53,240 --> 00:25:56,000 Speaker 1: it really should have been the other way around, because 463 00:25:56,359 --> 00:25:58,399 Speaker 1: now you have a situation where they don't know what 464 00:25:58,480 --> 00:26:00,359 Speaker 1: to do with this. They could sell it into the market, 465 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:03,280 Speaker 1: but what would that displace? You'd sell your junk, and 466 00:26:03,320 --> 00:26:06,880 Speaker 1: by this investment grade that they were selling back. Absolutely. 467 00:26:06,920 --> 00:26:08,520 Speaker 1: I mean that's the big questions to you know, when 468 00:26:08,560 --> 00:26:10,720 Speaker 1: you start tapering. And we discussed this about the Bank 469 00:26:10,760 --> 00:26:14,120 Speaker 1: of England, who's whose corporate bond purchase program ended ending 470 00:26:14,160 --> 00:26:16,879 Speaker 1: earlier this year. Um, it's what they do with the portfolio, 471 00:26:16,920 --> 00:26:18,840 Speaker 1: whether they manage, whether they actually look to sell the 472 00:26:18,840 --> 00:26:20,760 Speaker 1: bonds that they've accumulated over the last couple of years, 473 00:26:20,800 --> 00:26:22,880 Speaker 1: which I think would be disastrous for the market, and 474 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:25,240 Speaker 1: and and and send spread significantly wider as they start 475 00:26:25,280 --> 00:26:29,720 Speaker 1: to liquidate their holdings. They can they could extend the program, 476 00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:31,240 Speaker 1: of course, you know that we're talking about tapering, but 477 00:26:31,280 --> 00:26:33,320 Speaker 1: if anything happens between now and the end of the year, 478 00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:37,840 Speaker 1: some surprise shock on a macro oil commodity related aspect, 479 00:26:37,880 --> 00:26:40,240 Speaker 1: then you know there's the possibility that they extend or 480 00:26:40,280 --> 00:26:44,640 Speaker 1: they run rate of seven billion, right, seven billion euros absolutely, 481 00:26:44,680 --> 00:26:47,200 Speaker 1: if they if if the if the needs there, then 482 00:26:47,480 --> 00:26:49,639 Speaker 1: thank you very much. Well I'm sure he'll be, he'll be. 483 00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:51,640 Speaker 1: They've given us, they've they've they spent so much time 484 00:26:51,640 --> 00:26:54,320 Speaker 1: and energy getting to the position now of bringing down 485 00:26:54,320 --> 00:26:56,320 Speaker 1: funding courts for trying to and you could you could 486 00:26:56,400 --> 00:26:58,960 Speaker 1: argue that the funding mechanism wasn't broken for European corporates 487 00:26:59,000 --> 00:27:01,159 Speaker 1: before they started this, But nevertheless, funny cost have come 488 00:27:01,200 --> 00:27:03,240 Speaker 1: down so dramatically over the course of the last year 489 00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:05,480 Speaker 1: that they're certainly not going to do anything to jeopardize 490 00:27:05,480 --> 00:27:08,080 Speaker 1: the position that they've got themselves into now by tightening 491 00:27:08,119 --> 00:27:10,400 Speaker 1: too early. But at the same time, they are keen 492 00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 1: to move back to a normalization starts just as the 493 00:27:12,960 --> 00:27:15,800 Speaker 1: Federal Reserve is in the United States. Real quick, simon, 494 00:27:16,040 --> 00:27:18,119 Speaker 1: is Mario track you just responding to German pressure to 495 00:27:18,200 --> 00:27:22,159 Speaker 1: get rid of this acid purchasing program. I think at 496 00:27:22,160 --> 00:27:23,639 Speaker 1: the end of the day, he's paying lip service to 497 00:27:23,960 --> 00:27:26,080 Speaker 1: to to Chancellor Merkel. Yes, and they've been one of 498 00:27:26,119 --> 00:27:30,240 Speaker 1: the the one of the big argues against against QUI 499 00:27:30,440 --> 00:27:32,920 Speaker 1: in its current form for for many months now. So 500 00:27:33,080 --> 00:27:35,200 Speaker 1: you know, it is politics. It is it is trying 501 00:27:35,200 --> 00:27:39,400 Speaker 1: to massage the political relationships across the across the divide, 502 00:27:39,520 --> 00:27:42,159 Speaker 1: the divide within the Eurozone, should I say, But at 503 00:27:42,160 --> 00:27:44,359 Speaker 1: the same time, I think he is he's he's he 504 00:27:44,680 --> 00:27:46,560 Speaker 1: needs to recognize that. You know, the efforts of the 505 00:27:46,560 --> 00:27:49,480 Speaker 1: ECB have been positive over the last over the last year, 506 00:27:49,480 --> 00:27:52,280 Speaker 1: and so I want to thank you very much. Simon Ballard, 507 00:27:52,280 --> 00:27:56,199 Speaker 1: global credit strategist for Bloomberg, joining us from London, and 508 00:27:56,240 --> 00:27:59,120 Speaker 1: we didn't even get to talk about Brexit. Next time. 509 00:27:59,280 --> 00:28:03,040 Speaker 1: Next time. That's uh, Simon Ballard joining us really great, 510 00:28:03,320 --> 00:28:08,320 Speaker 1: great stuff. Read more about it at Bloomberg dot com. 511 00:28:08,320 --> 00:28:10,840 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. 512 00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:15,080 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 513 00:28:15,200 --> 00:28:18,680 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm 514 00:28:18,720 --> 00:28:22,240 Speaker 1: on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa 515 00:28:22,280 --> 00:28:25,399 Speaker 1: abramoids one before the podcast. You can always catch us 516 00:28:25,480 --> 00:28:27,040 Speaker 1: worldwide on Bloomberg Radio