WEBVTT - Perth Tolle on ETF Freedom Metrics

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Mesters in Business with Very Results on Bloomberg

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Radio this weekend. On the podcast, I have an extra

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>special guest somebody I know for a long time. Perth

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Toll is the founder of the Freedom et F, based

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on an index that she helped to create, using metrics

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>designed to emphasize the economic and personal freedoms of different countries.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>She'll tell us how she starts with a data set

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>up from various think tanks like Frasier and Cato that

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>rank countries based on their freedom indexes, and then proceeds

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to put them through an algorithm that she helped to create.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>And what you end up with is a list of

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the most innovative free emerging market countries in

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the world that also end up doing really well and

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>acted over the past couple of years. When you see

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>how poorly China has done, and obviously Russia's have seen

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all its stocks go to zero. Uh, those have not

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>been in her funds, and so on a relative basis,

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>her fund has done really quite splendidly. You avoid some

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of the worst countries in the world in a n

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>e M index, obviously you're gonna do well on an

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>absolute basis. They've done well. Also, just go punch in

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 1>f R d M and you can see how all

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the fund has done over the past couple of years.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It's about two hundred million dollars in assets. It's just

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>turned three years old and just became a five star

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Morning Star rank Mutual Funds. So really quite fascinating. If

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you're at all interested in ETFs, emerging markets, or innovative

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>new ways to slicenseise the world of assets, I think

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna find this to be a fascinating conversation. So,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, my interview with Perth Toll. This

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is Masters in Business with Very Results on Bluebird Radio.

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Retults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest this week is so

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>what I've known for a long time. Perth Toll is

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the founder of the Life and Liberty Indexes. She is

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>also the sponsor of the Freedom one hundred Emerging Markets

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>et F. It's a first of its kind strategy using

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>personal and economic freedom metrics as key factors in driving

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the investing process. Perth has lived in Beijing and Hong Kong.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>She currently lives in Texas. Uh and her experiences overseas

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>is what helped lead to the Freedom and Liberty Indexes.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Perth Toll, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you for having me, Barry.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I've been waiting to do your podcast for a very

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>long time and I honored to be here. I'm thrilled.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm thrilled to have you. So let's start with the

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>basic inspiration. I love the concept and it's amazing nobody

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>thought of this. But previous to you, what was the

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>inspiration shin for the Life and Liberty indexes? So the

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>seed for the idea was planted when I went back

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and lived in Hong Kong after college. I was born

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in Beijing, and I grew up in both China and

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the US, um going back and forth between the two countries.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>After college, I went and lived in Hong Kong for

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about a year, reconnecting with my dad's side of the family.

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And while I was there, I traveled to the mainland

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to Beijing, Shanghai, shen Jin, um and I saw things

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that um as a person who grew up in a

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>free society, mostly in my formative years, that shocked me

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and I realized that my life would have been very

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>different had I stayed in China for my entire childhood

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and as opposed to having come to the United States. UM.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So it made a difference in my life, and I

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>realized that it was freedom that made that difference. So

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk a little bit about both UM personal

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and economic freedom. How do you use these metrics as

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>creating an index which the e t F is based on.

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So the metrics that we use come from third party

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>think tanks, the Cato Institute and the Fraser Institute. And

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>this keeps all the all the metrics completely quantitative and independent.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So we think it's very important to have metrics that

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>are robust, that are independent, and that are quantitative. And

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>so the Cato and Fraser data set that has the

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>human Freedom metrics encompasses both personal and economic freedoms and

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>they rank a hundred and sixty five countries in the

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 1>world on these seventy nine different metrics. UM. We take

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the twenty seven country Emerging Markets UM universe and just

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>look at those countries and those scores for those countries

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>based on the seventy nine metrics. Is the primary factor

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that goes into our country waiting. All right, So you

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have twenty seven E m countries. Uh, you're looking at

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the freest ones in terms of economic freedom and personal liberty.

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And then from that list, how do you go about

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>selecting the comp nice from within each country. Yeah, so

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>let me just run down the whole process just quickly

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.119
<v Speaker 1>for you here. So, so, first we had those twenty

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>seven countries, and currently we're using the same country set

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>as m c I because most of our clients to

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>benchmark to M s I. Now we're not bound by

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that though, so in the future we may add or

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>subtract certain countries from that universe right now is the

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>same as M s I. Uh. First, after we have

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that universe, we look at which countries are actually big

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>enough and tradeable enough to be in an e t

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>F because this was always designed to be an ETF.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>So you need liquidity and volume and the ability to

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>get money in and out of the country. Yes, so,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>but mostly we're looking at the market cap of the

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>country here as a as a ratio to world market cap.

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>If you don't meet our minimum ratio, then you're out,

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>even if you're very free. So this actually eliminates very

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>free markets like Czech Republic, which is too small, um Peru,

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>which is not liquid enough, and it also eliminates some

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>very unfree markets like Egypt because of size. So we

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have those eliminations based on market cap ratios UH. And

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>just to clarify, when you say size, you mean size

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of the country, you mean size of the companies. The

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>market cap real the market cap, so you don't want

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>micro caps. So we want to keep it very liquid

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and very tradable. So once we have those countries eliminated,

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>then we have about eighteen countries left in the eligible universe,

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and these are the countries on which we apply the

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>freedom weights. It's a hundred percent freedom weighted. It's not

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a it's not a tilt, and it's not in an overlay.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why we do that is because with

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>market capitalization waiting, which is the standard for most indexes,

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>including Emerging Markets UM, you end up with a lot

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of autocracies with this universe. So the emerging markets universe

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>is filled with autocracies and countries just coming out of autocracy,

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>such as give us some examples like China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt,

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So by freedom waiting instead of market

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>cap waiting, we're seeking to solve that problem of these

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>autocracy heavy concentrations in the emerging market space. And so

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>we created this for people who want to have that

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>exposure to emerging markets, people who always have either strategic

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>allocation or just always want that emerging markets exposure. UM,

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but without funding autocracies. So there's no we've never had

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>any China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and so forth because

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of freedom waiting, not because we you know, arbitrarily excluded

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in any country, but it's just a natural result of

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that freedom waiting. So you have the set of twenty

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>seven countries in MSCI that gets reduced to eighteen by size,

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's got to be thousands of potential companies win

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>those eighteen countries. But do you select and how do

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you get there? So the most important part once we

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have those eighteen, we do freedom weight those eighteen countries.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>As part of that process, the worst offenders are excluded,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>so the lowest scores are excluded out of this in

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this process and the best of those eighteen and typically

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's between ten and eleven country are included in the index.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And that is a completely objective process. UM. That's rule space.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And I you know, my subject of opinion doesn't factor

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>into that at all. So now you're down to ten

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>or eleven countries, how do you take? How many companies

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>do you take from each of those countries? Yeah, so

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we take the top ten largest most liquid companies in

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>each country that is not a state owned enterprise. And

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the only thing that we do on the security level.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're just taking the largest most liquid companies that

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are non state owned UM. And the reason why we

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't add any additional factors so that obviously I work

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of UM factor people UM, and the

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>reason why we didn't add factors to that is because

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to isolate the freedom factor for this product.

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>It's our first e t F. It's the first Emerging

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Markets e t F in the world that uses freedom waiting,

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we wanted to see if there was a

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>market for this type of product and see how I

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>would go UM and we're very happy with the results. Yes,

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>so you end up with companies more or less, and

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what's in the t F. Yes. So currently

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>there's eleven countries and there's a hundred and ten securities

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in the e t F. In the previous two years,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>there's been a hundred securities and ten countries, and that's

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>why it was called the Freedom one hundred. And the

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>index has been outperforming pretty dramatically over the past a

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, in part because China seemed to have

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>imployed itself going after their own their own senior tech

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>people will talk about that later. And obviously Russia was

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>just a debacle. You sidestepped all of those because none

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of those countries are in the index. Yes, and again

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't arbitrarily exclude China or Russia. We didn't have

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>them in there any of this time because of the

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a natural result of that freedom waiting. So freedom

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>waiting in this case worked very well and it was

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a very effective leading indicator of some of these tail

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>risks that investors in these cap weighted index has experienced.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And if I recall, the E t F symbol is

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>f R d M for freedom. Is that right? Yes?

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting. So let's let's talk a little bit about

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the world of ETFs. First, Y and E t F

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>instead of a mutual fund. What was behind the thinking

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of going that way, especially given your background. You were

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>a fidelity for a long time, and they have been

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>giant in mutual funds for forever. Yeah. So so once

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I came back from Hong Kong, I worked at Fidelity

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Investments in the l A and Houston markets. UM, and

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I was at Fidelity for about ten years as a

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor, And you know, that's when I started noticing

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the trend of the rise of indexing and the rise

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of E t s and how beneficial the E t

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>F structure was for clients. I don't know of any

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>other investment vehicle or structure that is as beneficial tax

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>wise for clients, and so um and trade ability and everything.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>So so I was always a fan of the E

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>t F structure. And when I created this, I always

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>intended for it to be an E t F. We

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>created the index before there was an E t F,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>but I always intended, you know, it was always designed

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to be an E t F R. The old joke

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>was of mutual funds were invented today, they wouldn't be

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>able to get approved because they're so inefficient. They trade

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day and you end up

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>paying taxes on other people who sold, as opposed to

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you paying taxes when you sell the holdings. I mean

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the trading at the end of the day is not

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>as big of a problem because most of our investors

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>are long term. But UM, that tax efficiency is just

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>so hard to beat in any other type of vehicle.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>So who are your investors? Do you have any idea

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>who owns cts? So right now, UM, we have about

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>two million under assets and so it's just beginning to

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>be big enough to get noticed by institutions. We're getting

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>more institutional request at this time. We just had UM

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>a family office demand that we get approved on Morgan

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Stanley and they just approved us. UM. So we've been

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>approved on a lot more platforms lately because of the

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>size UM and also the three year track record and

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the five star morning Star rating. Now, also that's one

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of my questions for later. But since you brought it up,

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you just got a five star rating on I mean,

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this was last month. I shouldn't let you bring that up. Yeah,

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>well it's I was. It's coming up later, but since

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it, we might as well talking about now. Yeah, no,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know what Morning Star ratings come and go,

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and I, UM, that was a surprise to me because

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>well I guess it wasn't a surprise because it right,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So it just happens at three years thirty six full months,

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's based on performance, So I guess it wasn't

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that much of a surprise. But um, you know what

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate about that is that I didn't expect this,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>this uh strategy to play out, um the thesis to

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>play out this well, this quickly, and for it to

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have done that in this exact three year period of

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>time when the morning Stars come out, Um, just all

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the stars had to align for that to happen. We yeah,

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and we all know how hard it is to get

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>five star morning Star rating, and so for us to

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have that right out of the gate, I'm very grateful

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 1>for that. And I don't take much credit because a

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of that is stuff out of my control. You know,

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we can't control the market, so um, geopolitics or who's

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>going to invade what country? All these things. Sometimes you know,

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't hurt to be smart, but being lucky goes

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a long way. Yeah, I mean, I think we were

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>set up well just because freedom waiting. Obviously, it's the

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why we didn't have any China or any Russia,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and that that helped us tremendously in our investors to

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>avoid that risk. So so here's the question, and pardon

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>my naivete, but the fund has been doing really well.

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Geopolitical events have worked out perfectly um for for the

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Freedom ETF. But go back in any decade in history

0:13:52.280 --> 0:14:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and there are very similar bad actions by bad actors, autocrats, dictates,

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of um other folks. The question, and I

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's an answer to this. The question

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask is how come nobody ever thought

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of this? I mean, it's one of those ideas that

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight is like, oh, of course you pull out

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the worst players in the geopolitical world. Of course your

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>performance is going to be better. Has anyone ever explored

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this idea before? You know what I would think? So, um, actually,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know my friend Rob are not who isn't one

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of our investors, And I first I think I introduce you,

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you always say that, but on your podcast,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say I met him on the seaplane.

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right, flying into, flying into that's exactly right. So

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>when I left Idelity, and I started doing this very slowly,

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I called research affiliates and I was like, hey, you know,

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys do non cap weighted indexing. We we want

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to do non cap weighted as indexing. Do you want

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to work together? And they were like, no, please go.

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't. I couldn't get past the first gatekeeper UM.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And then when I went to to Camp Ko talk

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is because I was on a panel with David Kotok,

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Black Rock and Morning Star for a cf A Society's

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>UM forecast panel that first year. I had no idea

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what I was doing at the time. And afterwards, you know,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>David invited me to this camp and I was like,

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>what is this. It's like fifty economists that go fishing

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in the woods next to Canada for three days with

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>no WiFi. And actually my friend said you should go

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because Barry rid Holes goes to that camp. Yeah, it

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was Christian Magoon and Amplify who said Barry rid Holes

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>goes to that camp. You should go and you can

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>meet Barry. And so you are partly responsible for me

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>going that year in more than one reason. And you're

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>also responsible for Rob going that year because he lost

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the bet and he had to he went to pay

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that bet. He doesn't go every year, you know, you know,

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been back since and before that he was

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>there maybe five to seven years prior, took advantage of me.

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I was very very drunk when he when he said

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>let's make a bet, and I'm like, it was an

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>out of body experience. I watched my right hand should

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>go up and shake his hands and the back of

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>my brain was, what the hell are you doing, you idiot.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of money and he decides to show

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it with a brick of cash. It was wasn't even

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a check. It's like whack. It's pretty pretty hilarious. So yeah,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's a funny coincidence. So I vaguely remember introducing

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you to Rob out on that deck, not realizing you

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>guys flew in together. Yes, we flew in on the

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on the seaplane because I call the seaplane company the

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>day I was coming in and I was like, I'm

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>coming in from LaGuardia today. Is it too late to

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>get a seaplane? And they said, no, you can share

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with Rob or not. Here's his flight number. Just go

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>intercept him at the airport and I did, and I

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was like like that. Yeah. I was like, hey, did

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they tell you were gonna be writing together? And and

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's how we met. He heard the idea. UM, you

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>pitched him on the plane. Then it's loud and buzzy

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're literally you have those heads five feet over

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the swamp, your moose and stuff running. I believe he

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>asked what I do? So okay? So it was an

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>lf field, So he was. He was one of your

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>earliest investors, the first one he invested after camping into

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the into the company, not as an investor investor that too.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So after camp he committed to being the first investor

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in the at the time non existent fund. And then

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a while later is when I found out I would

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>have to launch the fund myself instead of just you know,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>licensing the index. And that's when he became a g

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>P LP investor. So who else when you say you

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>have to launch the fund yourself, aren't you running this

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>with another group that helps manage. Yes. So my initial

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>plan after I had the index, and this is when

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I met him and you at camp KO talk and

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a fund yet, UM was to license the index.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Who like I shares or vamp or someone UM. I

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>talked to I shares, They didn't want it. I talked

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to everyone and no one wanted it. So eventually I

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>just had to launch it on my own um and

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that's when I said, okay, I'll need to raise funds

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>because the operating costs for an e t f R

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and no, it's not in substant ential, it's it's between

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>legal and compliance and regulatory filings, and you know, it's

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a quarter million to a half a million dollars. Well,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in addition to that, in emerging markets, we actually give

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you access to local shares on local exchanges. So we

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>paid the custody costs of giving you that access to

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>give you that market um exposure, and that's one of

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the things I'm very proud of and very proud to

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>pay on behalf of my clients. So um so that

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that's even more expensive for emerging markets. So we had

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>to raise funds for that, and I ended up, you know,

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as you know, working with et F Architect prior they

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>were called alf Architect at the time, and their first

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>white label clients, West Gray and the whole crew over there,

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that that they're actually a really good group of guys

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and smartest can be. You did introduce me to West Gray,

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>as I recall, h So, alright, listen, I'm not looking

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for a commission on any of this. It was just

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I find West of stuff to be fascinating. He's an

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>interesting guy, a marine captain slash quant just such an

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>unusual background, you know, and and then do really good work.

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize they changed their name from Alpha Architect

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to EAT. No, they didn't change their name. They have

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they separated the entities. Oh, so you have E. T.

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>F Architect as one group. That makes sense in an

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Alpha Architect as a as another group. Will say say

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>hello to West for me. UM, I really like him

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and his crew. So we went over twenty seven countries

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>down to eighteen, down to ten or eleven UM and

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>ten most liquid companies within each UH within each country.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>How about rebalancing? How do you go about over the

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>course of the year keeping things in in line with

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the original balancing? And then how often do you make

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>changes in the index? Yeah, so we rebalanced once a year,

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>because the human rights data comes out once a year,

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so the Personal and Economic Freedom data UM, and it

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>comes out around the end of the year. So we

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>rebalanced the third Friday in January UM and then we

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>leave it until the next year. If something happens in between,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>we don't respond to it. Immediately and we have to

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>wait till rebalance um. There is a rule that, uh

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>if if if country falls more than five points on

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>one of our skills, that we do kick it out,

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>even if it's already in the index. But we do

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>that a rebalance time. So there's a basically it's a

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>freedom decline momentum role. And the reason why we do

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that is we found that freedom. When it increases, it

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>does so gradually, and when it decreases, it does so

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, and so we don't want to be catching

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that falling knife, so to speak. The only country that's

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ever triggered that it was Turkey, and that's before the

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>e t F existed. It was when it was just

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the index, and that was in two thousand eighteen rebalance

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>um and it was because they found more than five

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>points on the previous year's scales and they've never made

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it back into the index. Sense. So hypothetically, if pre

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>ordawan Turkey is in your holding and then someone comes

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in who's an autocrat who removes a democratic um election

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>rules and and imprisons his political opponents, they could end

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>up staying in the index for the balance of the year.

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Or if it plummets that five percent, you kick him

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>right out. They would end up staying in there until

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the rebalanced time next year. And the reason part of

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that is, yeah, there is a lag in there. But

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we found that these types of political changes do take

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>time to show up in markets, so it doesn't happen immediately.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>If you've noticed, elections are very often mispriced for this reason. UM,

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it takes a couple of years for these things to

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>show up. We I do the freedom meetings with our

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>econometricians at the think tanks every year, and one year

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>UM I was there with the Polish UH delegate from

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the Polish think tank that works with our freedom guys

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and UM and this was right before the p I

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>S government gone too power, if you'll recall um and

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>they said, okay, we're about to be like this ultra

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>right wing kind of crazy government and they're going to

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have constitutional majority probably, but it won't show up in

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the markets for a couple of years. And it happened

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>just as he said. Poland was still the best performing

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>market in two thousand seventeen. In two thousand eighteen, they

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>fell to number four from number one in our index

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>UM and they've stayed basically in the middle sense. UM.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But now you know, they're taking a lot of steps

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to support Ukraine in their in their stand for freedom.

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad they're in there. I'm glad they're one

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of the top four UM. But they did show that decline,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but not until a few years after that government came

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>into power. Because what happens is our data providers they

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>look at what's actually happening on the ground. They don't

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>just look at, okay, what we expect to happen. They're

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>not trying to predict the future. UM. We're not trying

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to predict what countries are going to have the best

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>freedom momentum upwards. UM. We catch it on the downwards,

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but not upwards, because we can't predict the future. If

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we were to do that, we would have invested in Argentina,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>if you years ago, UM, or some of the worst countries,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.239
<v Speaker 1>because they have the best kind of UM trajectory like

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>expected improvement possibilities. UM. So we don't do that. We

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>take the absolute freedom level at the time of measurement

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>UM relative to their peers, and there's no you know,

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no a hundred percent free market and there's no

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>percent on free market. Um, it's all a gray zone,

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and so it's just relative to your peers. You know.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>When we just take the freest countries, all of these

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>countries have problems, even the developed markets, even the United States.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We're not free here obviously. So all countries have their issues, um,

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and we just try to pick the ones that have

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the strongest institutions, best role of law, best individual and

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>investor protections, private property rights, intellectual property rights, things like that,

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and just make sure we're giving our our investors the

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, exposures that are the freest of that universe.

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about what's been going on

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in China and in Russia. Starting with China began cracking

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>down on some of its tech leaders and technology companies

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, and it was really surprising

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to see your government really start bashing their own economic leaders.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>When you're looking at that from a distance, you have

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking, well, I'm glad I don't have these

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>guys in my index. You know what. It's it's a

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>bittersweet thing, because yeah, it's it's a it's good that

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have them in there, but it's terrible thing.

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>What's happening because you know, being from China, I want

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>China to to succeed. I want them to be free

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>UM eventually. And I you know a lot of people

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>like myself years ago thought that we were on that

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>trajectory because China increased in their freedom levels a lot

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>UM in the last couple of decades. You know, they

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>went from abysmal policies under Mao too not so bad policies.

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>They opened up economically and UM you know, had great

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>success there and their GDP grew tremendously and that was

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>very real growth people lifting themselves, was up out of

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>poverty UM and very powerful UM growth story. But now

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>grows story of the past because they are that growth

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>story of the past. You don't think there's a lot

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of growth exactly what you just mentioned. So you know,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they're the star sectors like tech or we're being are

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>now being cracked down on UM jimping has consolidated power

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is continuing to UM DIC. Yeah there's em peripheral life

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh and yeah, there's no room for any discent.

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>You saw what happened in Hong Kong. Just the just

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea of any discent UM. What about Jack ma

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and you look at all the companies he's affiliated with.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So it all started with and Financial when that was scrapped.

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And then Jack Ma disappeared after he said something that

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't kosher and criticized you know, just you know it

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>was actually very I think, but nine what he said. Um,

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but he he criticized the government basically the way they

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>handled the financial sector. And you know here in the

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Knitted States we do that every day. Look at us

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, I mean yeah. And so so the fact

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that that even that was enough to you know, basically

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>disappear him. Him being a very visible persona in the

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly and you know, just just a very character charismatic

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and well loved, well looked up to guy. And uh,

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you know when he disappeared, I think a lot of

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>people realize, Wow, if if they could disappear your founder, um,

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you might have some risks there that we

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't account for. Um. And then following that, all the

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>other tech leaders started, the CEO started stepping down or

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>um pledging a ton of money for Common Prosperity, which

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.239
<v Speaker 1>is one of their you know, new initiatives, and uh

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>that you know that money came from shareholder pockets and

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a bribe. It's not going to common prosperity. UM,

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just to keep the government happy. And so every

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>company in China now is required to have ammunist cell

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>member and you know as part of their their company, UM,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>all the funds are now required to have UM communist leader. Uh.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Kind of it's like the old mob bosses with y hey,

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Freddy's gonna show up and he's gonna make sure everything's

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>done right. It does have that feel to it. So

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so this is very scary actually for someone who I mean,

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I roote for China. I want them to succeed. I

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>know I thought they were going to be much more

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>successful at this point. But that's you know, the one

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 1>problem is they're reversing these policies and going back to

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>very uh unfree even economically policies. Um. The the other

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>problem is the demographics. So the one child policy for

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Right by the way, there's there is

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of UM literature and analysis and even books

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>written about how China effectuated the one child policy. Yeah,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>so the one child policy led to thirty million missing

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>women in China. That's that's official Chinese think tank estimates,

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>some others have it as more than twice that um.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.239
<v Speaker 1>And this is a hard issue for me because when

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I went to China um And as I mentioned, I

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>traveled to Shanghai to Beijing. UM. I was twenty three

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and I yeah, I had a friend

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in Shanghai. Her name was Maggie. She was exact same

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>age as me, just like all of my American friends

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in every way, um, except she didn't exist on paper.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>She was one of what's called black children who um

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I went to school under a fake surname, was a

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>second child, and her parents chose to to register her

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>brother for existence. Basically so um so no school records,

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>no hospital records, no um no state benefits. So it

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>was basically you know everything else. And and that's when

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I realized, Wow, that could have been me. She was

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the exact same as me in every other way and

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>so um so that that affected me in a profound way.

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And also this policy affected our generation in a profound way.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Not only are there pretaty million missing women, there's thirty

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>million men who had no prospect of getting married or

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>finding a wife. And what do you do when you

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 1>have no prospect of ever, you know, having a family

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>join the military, and so that led to a huge

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>military build up in China as well. And so, um,

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a policy that made me realize, Okay, so

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>policies matter, governance matters, um, and these types of things

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>have a huge impact on the future of a country,

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in a society and an economy. Um. And so that's

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>actually what led me to start exploring these relationships speached

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in the market. So it's funny you said governance matters.

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I was discussing when we finally managed to book you

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for the for the podcast. I was discussing this with

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I won't mention their name, but we both know them,

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and they said, well, how is what China is doing

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to their tech sector any different than what Trump did

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>after he got elected? And I always find it weird

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>when I'm in a position of having to defend President Trump.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like, hey, you can't compare obnoxious tweets trashing a

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>company with actual government policies that forced companies to pay

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a corrupt tax, have people added to their boards by force,

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>disregard the rule of law, sanctity of contracts, sanctity of

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>private property. As as crazy as the Trump era was,

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a lot of noise at least until January six.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But I mean during the Trump administration, it was more

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>noise than actual policies such as we've seen in China. Yeah,

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a few differences there now. For first,

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who you're talking about, actually, but but

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to say they have a point in that

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>every country has these issues, and it's just a different degrees, right,

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So we may have had it. You know, we have

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>regulations that effect how our companies operate here Trump or

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>no Trump, And there's a certain degree of government interference

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in private markets everywhere. Um So, so it does happen everywhere.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we happen to be one of the least worst,

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think in the United States. Um and in China. Yeah,

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very different. One reason is you can't push back

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>against it. So here, you see any kind of policy

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>going into place that people don't like, there's a huge

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of pushback. You look at though, the protests post

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade. If that had happened,

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that if that happened China. Do you

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>think people could protest the one child policy in China? No.

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they could protest when I went to

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to child and they're like, why did you make me

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>only have one child? You know? And when I went

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to three child, no, nobody could protest that. In fact,

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it would. You would be prosecuted for protesting. You would

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>be disappeared. So I can't launch a fund like this

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. I mean I would be arrested because

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of national security law. So the institutions in place right

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>are important for pushing back. For checks and balances, it

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>has to be a plurality of political parties, there has

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a system of checks and balances, independent judiciary, UM.

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>There has to be a you know, uh, free media

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as a force to keep government accountable. And so these

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>are all things that we find in freer markets that

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't see in the less free ones. So you

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can have a crazy person in charge, but if you

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have stronger institutions, if you have some checks and balances,

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>free press, that keeps you know, power um from getting

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>out of hand. So so let's talk just for a

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>moment about Russia. Obviously they've become an anathema given the

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine, but even before that, you didn't have

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia in UM, the t F tell us the reasons

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>why a country like a Putin led Russia just doesn't

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>make it into a freedom index. Well, their their freedom

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>score from the think tanks was too low, and that's

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>why I didn't. How low is too low, so you

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>have to be higher than your peers. And our algorithm

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>assigns positive and negative weights. The negative weights are excluded,

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so they were How low were they? Is what I'm

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>really getting to. So Russia ranks a six point to

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>three out of ten UM. As a comparison, Kuwait is

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.959
<v Speaker 1>six point three four, India is six point three nine UM,

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you get into included countries Philippines six point

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>eight three, Thailand six point eight nine, and so forth.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>These are the kind of borderline countries. India is borderline

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes sometimes. Who are the top three in the bottom three?

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So top three in emerging markets are Taiwan top one UM, Chile,

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and South Korea currently, so South Korean Taiwan kind of

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>really no longer emerging markets, right, But you could say

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the same about China, right, I mean, okay, well that

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. And who are the bottom three? I can imagine, Yeah,

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>so bottom three in emerging markets Egypt, Saudi Arabia and China.

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia ranks actually lower than China on

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the overall score. It's five point one to China is

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>five point five seven um so and one fifty rank

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>out of one sixty countries in the world. So it

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>turns out that taking a bone saw to a journalist

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and making him disappear isn't good for your freedom index. No,

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they also have some women's freedom issues. Um, hey, they

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>can drive now, right, But in these kinds of markets,

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in the free markets, you have to watch rhetoric versus

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what actually happens on the correct um. A lot of

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>these reforms that NBS put into place, there was a

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of hope in that country for BS to reform,

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we had a lot of hope about

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Egypt in the Arab Spring also before that all went

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to hell and then you know, women were allowed to

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>drive all of a sudden. But at the same time

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that the women were allowed to drive, they put four

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>women who had campaign for women to drive in jail.

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>One of them just was released, some of them are

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.720
<v Speaker 1>still in jail. My friend uh manal al Sharif, who

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is has been jailed for you know, UM campaigning for

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>women to drive in the past and is now exiled

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in Australia. She did a whole women you know, women

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to drive movement here in the United States at that

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>time to protest those women being in jail. So in

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:20.720
<v Speaker 1>these countries you have to be very careful. There's always

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric and there's always a big pr push to make

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>them seem like they're reforming when actually perhaps on the ground,

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>there's less of that going on in reality. Huh really

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>quite fascinating. We mentioned that you're now a five star

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>morning Star Funds, but when you were first rolled out

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Index, was voted best New International Global E

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>t F and Index. Uh what made people so excited

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>about this theme back in Yeah, you know, that was

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.280
<v Speaker 1>very a proud moment for us because that was voted

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>by UM, people in the t F and people in

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Yeah. So first, you know, investors would put

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in their kind of nominations and then a panel of

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>judges of E t F experts UM would vote and

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so so I'm I'm very honored to have to have

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that those awards. But I think what it was is

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>that UM intuitively investors. That's just understand that, you know,

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>freer countries have more sustainable growth, they recover faster from

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>draw downs, they use their capital more efficiently, whether it's personal, human,

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>or economic capital. So you know, capital goes where is

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>welcomed and where it's well treated. And that's Walter riskin

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:38.439
<v Speaker 1>quote UM and capital is not just money, it's also

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>people and ideas. And you look at the capital outflows

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>coming from Russia right now, coming from Hong Kong UM

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the millionaire exodus. There's I believe more millionaires per capita

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Hong Kong than anywhere else at this

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>point UM and I think that just speaks to UM

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the growth potential of the freer markets UM to be

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the launch pads for growth in the next decade, so

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>especially in emerging markets where they're coming from this very

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>low base. So I think an emerging markets because there's

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>such a high concentration. And when we launched, I think

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>China weight was about and most emerging market Russia and

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia were in there. Right now, Russia's out, China's

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>down to like thirty, but it's still you know, kind

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of a high concentration. Saudi Arabia is still in the

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>top ten. You still have Turkey, Egypt and all of

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>these others um so. So there's just a high concentration

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of these autocracies. And I think people were at the

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>time saying, finally, there's a way to invest in emerging

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>markets without funding autocracies. Right. So it's not even e

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>m X China. It's e m X dictatorships. You're just

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not participating in the worst It's very different from e

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 1>m X China. So X China just access China out

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>out of a market cap weighted index. It's not anything else.

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just there is It's just an arbitrary exclusion, and

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a band aid on a much deeper problem,

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't address the root issue, which is the

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lack of freedom is the problem in China, not China itself.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So so you hinted at something with Hong Kong, and

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if you pay attention or track this in

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>any way. You mentioned the exodus of millionaires from Hong Kong.

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what sort of brain drain takes place in

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>places like Hong Kong or China or Russia when the

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>country just takes a really bad turn in the wrong

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>direction and people finally say all right, no, Moss, I'm out. Yeah,

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that's a that's a pretty high

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>level of brain drain. I think without capital controls it

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.800
<v Speaker 1>would be even higher. So these countries have those capital

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 1>controls for a reason. And how do you get capital

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>out of um countries like China or Hong Kong other

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>than buying condos in Vancouver? Very difficult? Yeah, I mean,

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I always always amazed anytime I visited

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Vancouver about the sea through apartment buildings, which was apartments

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 1>owned people in China, and it was sort of their

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 1>safety nets and other countries not just you noticed all

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the autocrats they send their children to school in the country. Yeah, absolutely,

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>What why is that they're not confident in their own

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 1>education systems? Yeah, I mean, I don't know. So you

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>wrote something I thought was kind of interesting, uh, and

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I want to get some feedback on it. Bricks are

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 1>a good example of a nonsensical e M grouping made

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>up by Wall Street, now used by autocracies as a

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 1>dog whistle for forming alliances against the free world. Explain that. Yeah,

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>so that was prompted by a tweet um that I

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.879
<v Speaker 1>saw that said Iran now wants to join the bricks Right,

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so bricks was coined by an economist at Goldman Sachs

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Um like two thousand one or something longer before that, right, Okay, Brazil, Russia, India, China,

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>South Africa. I was added laterally, Yeah, but but you know,

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>mostly Brazil, Russia, India, China, and UM. So they coined

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that phrase, you know, grouping these countries. But there's nothing

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in common among these countries except they're all emerging markets,

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so they're all coming from a low base. So it

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>really made no sense except that it made an acronym.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And Wall Street, I think sometimes doesn't realize or consciously

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>denies its own powers. And you know, we created that acronym.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And then these countries started something called the Bricks Summit, right,

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So now they're a summit, so kind of a competition

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to the G seven and so forth. And now Iran

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to join. So Sas is the guy who who

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>coined that. Okay, I'm not trying to call him out

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.240
<v Speaker 1>or anything. I'm just saying in in on Wall Street,

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we sometimes deny our own power and we create these

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>things meaninglessly just to sell product. And then the acronym

0:40:55.480 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>gets hijacked by autocrats to create alliances against the free world.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And so sometimes and that's a good example kind of

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a visualization of what happens when we invest in these

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on free markets as well, we lower the cost of

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>capital for these companies in these markets to do business.

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.280
<v Speaker 1>There is a cost to doing business in a way

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that puts state interests first. Every company in China has

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>to do that. I'm using China as an example, but

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the same thing in Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt. I mean,

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you see exppropriation in all these countries, UM, and the

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>state interests always come first. So that comes before your shareholders,

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>before yourselves, before your customers, UM. And there's a cost

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.359
<v Speaker 1>of doing business that way, and we are subsidizing that

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>cost by investing in these places, in these in these companies.

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And also these companies typically have very poor accounting standards,

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>very poor transparency. We don't know who the actual owners are,

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and so you could directly be enriching autocrats and their

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>cronies because we don't know the ownership of a lot

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>of these As long as the regulators are getting there

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a little payoff on the side, what do they care

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if the accounting is right as long as their numbers.

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And we have ourselves to blame for that. It's our

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>regulators that allowed this, our lawyers who wanted to make

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>money from this, our investment bankers, and our you know,

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street us. So we have a lot to be

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>responsible for here. And I think sometimes Wall Street, you know,

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>carelessly makes these things up like bricks. Okay, what is that?

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You know? It doesn't make any sense. And I think

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know now now people are realizing that, and it's

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty much dead as a grouping an emerging markets investing

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>at least, But now we still have the Brick Summit

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and Eyrong wants to join. So there's a lasting consequence

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to our actions. When you're in a position to direct assets,

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>whether it's your own assets or someone else's assets, that

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.399
<v Speaker 1>is a position of power and privilege, and we could

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>use that power for good or not. And in emerging

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 1>markets there is no neutral huh. Really really interesting. I

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>recall re not too long ago, and it actually might

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have been on Twitter that the A A share investors,

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>meaning the local investors in China get treated very different

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>than the B share investors. And if you were a

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>B share investor in China since nine you haven't done

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that well, whereas the A share investors did pretty good. Yeah.

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>So the n c h I Index, which is the

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:28.760
<v Speaker 1>MSCI China Index, tracks both on shore and offshore shares,

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a very complete picture of investing in China. UM since

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>its inception in it has had lower than treasury like returns,

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 1>so lower than for the B share the outside, for

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>both on shore and off shore. Really yeah, together, So

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>for thirty years of the biggest growth spirit of any

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>country on a on an extended basis, and it didn't

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>be treasuries. Correct, it's abysmal. And and now why is that?

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that because so much skim was taken off the top.

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of dilusion, there's expropriation, there's expropriation that

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so expropriation I define that as UM basically nice business

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you got there, Shame something happened to it. Yeah, so

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>so government. You know, for example, in Egypt, there was

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the largest dairy company. The government wanted to take it over.

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>The founder said no, He was put in prison. His

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:28.720
<v Speaker 1>son said no, was also put in prison with him.

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So this happens in all these unfree markets, not just China. Um,

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, I pick on China alot or seem to

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>because they're just such a great example there exhibit A

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for all of this stuff right now. So so yeah,

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know that happens in all of these countries,

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and China specifically. You see this major drag on emerging

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>markets indexes as a whole because they have such a

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>large allocation, and so emerging markets as a whole hasn't

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>done that well in the last decade or more so.

0:44:56.440 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>So that leads to the opposite question. If invest sing

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in these autocracies and on free countries help some of

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the worst leaders in the world, what is the positive

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for investing in the freer countries that respect economic freedom

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and individual liberty? Yeah, so so freer countries have a

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of benefits that are beyond even economic benefits. They

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>have higher life expectancies, they have lower infor mortality, they

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>have lower gender inequality or higher gender equality. They have

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>higher GDP growth, higher income per capita, lower poverty rates,

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>even their poorest quarter of their incomes are much wealthier

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in the top quartile freest countries than the bottom quartile

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the least free countries. So the bottom.

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:49.439
<v Speaker 1>The poorest people in the freer countries are much better

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>off just by being in a freer country. Um. So,

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>so all of these benefits of freedom are kind of nebulous.

0:45:57.160 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>They're hard to visualize. And when we try to do

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>with the f R d M Index is to be

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a scorecard of running a scorecard for freedom in the

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.320
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, because yeah, there are a lot of benefits

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>investment wise. They these are the countries that have more

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sustainable growth, recover faster from draw downs. We saw this

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in a sustainable growth, meaning you know there, it's not

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>government mandated debt driven growth, kind of like you saw

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in China again Exhibit A. You know, ever, grand we

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:26.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't know there was a problem until it was too late,

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, one of the problems with this

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of growth is that lack of transparency UM, the

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>debt driven nature of it UM and it just causes

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this problems that become too big to fix. So since

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you launched the Freedom Index, have you been back to China?

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I have not for Hong Kong, for not even Hong Kong,

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and I love Hong Kong so much and I wish

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I could go back, but because of the National security law.

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It's best that I don't you actually are concerned that

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>if you show up as the founder of this index

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong or China, you could be arrested. Uh

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to. I don't want to test that fair enough.

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So then let me ask you a subtler question. Do

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:09.919
<v Speaker 1>you ever get pushed back from countries that are left

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the indext you hear from different players? Yes,

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I do, and and that's always interesting because, um then

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I had to get used to that because you know,

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:23.879
<v Speaker 1>working at Fidelity a very conservative corporate culture. But yes,

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we never really had anything to be criticized about. And

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't like something I you know, suggested, you know,

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you blamed your in tim or whoever I was getting

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:38.879
<v Speaker 1>my research from, right. Um so, so that, by the way,

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>has a great Twitter feed, he really does. It's really

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting of all the Fidelity I have to say.

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, pushback, who who's pushed back on you? So

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because I've heard pushback from multiple countries, but

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the pushback is different depending on the country it's coming from.

0:47:56.440 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed that from Chinese investors in Hong Kong, I

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 1>get very virulent pushback, like very angry and um, hey

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know you don't. You don't. The data set you

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>work off of comes from Fraser and yeah, exactly numbers

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>get from them. I'm not even massaging the numbers. I'm

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 1>literally just putting the numbers as inputs into my algorithm. Yeah,

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and my algorithm is coming out with the inclusions. And

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.760
<v Speaker 1>so from China, I get a lot of pushback in

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a less civil way, but you know, there's there's still

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>some of them make good points, and I've taken some

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of that to to heart and and change parts of

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>our index. One of the things that I really valued

0:48:40.560 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>from that feedback in the very beginning is that somebody

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, hey, you have a South African company, Naspers,

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 1>which is all of the their entire market cap consists

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of ten cent and so you're essentially that's interesting. This

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is a quantitative strategy if the company is based in

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>South Africa, and South Africa's included, but it's really a Chinese.

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So we actually, at the rebalance of that following year

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 1>made a rule that if more than of your assets

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 1>are made up of the shares of another company, then

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in that company is in an excluded country, then you're out,

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and so so they really, you know, regardless of who

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the messenger is, the message was helpful. And but what

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I found is that in the more free or the

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, borderline countries that sometimes get included, sometimes don't.

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I was in New York a few years ago when

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Brazil was not included in the fund, and I was

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in a subway and I ran into a couple of

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Brazilian UM human rights lawyers and so we were all

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the same like late train and UM. And

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I found out they worked in human rights and I

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 1>was there for a human rights event, and so we

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>started talking and they were like, hey, it's Brazil and

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>your index. And I was like no, and they were like, yeah,

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that sounds about right. So I think countries, you know,

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>different people from different countries tend to react differently to

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>not being included. UM, India, right, I have a lot

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of Indian Um, we have a lot of Indian fans actually,

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>because you know, India tends to have a lot of

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 1>fights with China, so so they like that we don't

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 1>have China, but we also now don't have India. And

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>because India a couple of years ago, UM, increased their

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>repression of the cashmere people. They had increased um incidences

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:25.239
<v Speaker 1>of government intervention in media, and they blacked out protests

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in places that had um or blacked out the internet

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in places that we're going to have protests, the farmers protests.

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And so because of that, their score dropped, and because

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 1>their score dropped, they became excluded, and uh, they dropped

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>lower than Brazil, and Brazil got bumped up. So it's

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>all relative, right, So um, after that happened, I didn't

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hear much. But when I do, you know, personal speaking

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>in person, um, I do hear from Indian you know,

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>audience members. I say, hey, India should really be in there,

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they give me all these reasons, and

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I completely agree with you. I love India,

0:50:57.160 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. Unfortunately my subjective opinion does matter at all,

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:02.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't factor in at all. But you know, is a

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>borderline country and it could make it back in it

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>any time. You know. For a long time, it looked

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like Brazil was really going to be a very modern, democratic,

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>industrialized nation. But like so many other countries in South America,

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>they seem to have you know, faltered, stumbled a little

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of all the countries that are right in that

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>borderline zone, what do you think are the ones most

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:30.400
<v Speaker 1>likely to end up back in the index over the

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years. I do think India is very

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 1>likely to make it back in there. They have some issues, UM,

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but I think they have enough diversity of viewpoints to

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of push back and push through UM, I hope.

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>And they have very favorable or more favorable demographics since

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>some other countries, UM, so I think they they can

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>possibly make it back in. I think Malaysia is currently

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>in and it's one of those I think we'll stay

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in there making some you know, reform progress. Colombia is

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one that I thought was gonna become more

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.439
<v Speaker 1>like more likely to come in, but now they're having

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:13.320
<v Speaker 1>some issues. UM. And the reason I like to Columbia

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is because they were benefiting from the human migration from Venezuela.

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And I like these countries that are in places where, um,

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>there next to a very unfree market and they're like

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the beacon of freedom in their region, you know, like

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan or um, Columbia or in this you know right now, Poland.

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Where does Mexico fit into the It's low but it's included. Yeah,

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so so yeah, I know these are the interesting countries.

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And what I find even more interesting that we don't

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>currently you know, have a product for is frontier markets.

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:51.399
<v Speaker 1>There's some very free frontier markets still. Yeah, it's like

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>freer than the US on the rankings, much higher. It's

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like a number five US is like number fifteen, so

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's a that was four last week. Yeah, and

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and they would be they would be very offended to

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>be called a frontier market. But I'm just talking about

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>size and give me some frontier. Who else Uruguay which

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is actually not even classified as frontier I believe by

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 1>ms C. It's not not even classified. Um it's it's

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, got some very interesting fintech companies and just

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it's ranked very free. So how about any countries in

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Africa that are on the border. You know what, I

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:30.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know of any off hand in Africa that are

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on the border Nigeria. I was about to say, Yer

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and Nigeria. Where are they in your in your rankings?

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>So Nigeria actually is six point to eight out of

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 1>ten um, which is higher than you know, Russia, Cutter UAE,

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:48.319
<v Speaker 1>which are emerging markets. But it's not higher than you know,

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 1>India and so forth. So so yeah, it's still not

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>free enough. If we were to make a frontier market index,

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it still would not be free enough to be in there.

0:53:55.640 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 1>So here's the question. Are there enough large liquid companies

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in all the frontier markets to create an index? Right now?

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>We think the answer to that is no, but eventually

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it might be yeah. And there's other ways of solving

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that problem possibly. Um So, if any listeners are market makers,

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>or if you want to help us make a market

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and some of these names, please get in touch, because

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we would love to solve this problem and make something

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like an e t F that's available for all investors. Obviously,

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:27.359
<v Speaker 1>we can make a you know, hedge fund or something,

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but I would much prefer to have an ETS structure.

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So so, so, last question before I get to my

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:36.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite questions. You mentioned you miss Hong Kong a lot.

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:40.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you miss most about Hong Kong? Okay, So,

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong was like New York on speed Times one.

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>New York on steroids is how everybody describes Hong Kong's

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Really Yeah, New York just like New York Times ten,

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just massive. Yeah, I loved that about it's just the

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 1>speed and the size, the number, the sheer number of people,

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the stability of um, everything you can do there them,

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the respect for commerce, the efficiency. UM. It was just

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>such an exciting place that the lights, I mean, the

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the city at night, it's beautiful.

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It's got world class you know everything and Hong Kong.

0:55:22.440 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's a very difficult question because there's a lot

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:28.239
<v Speaker 1>of good food Hunko. It's like New York. There was

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a you know, I don't even remember all the names.

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:33.400
<v Speaker 1>There was a Tapa's place in mid Levels, which I loved.

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.879
<v Speaker 1>There was a Indian place with the most incredible non

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>m on the Peak that I loved. But I think

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:44.240
<v Speaker 1>if I had to pick one, I'm I really miss

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 1>going to this place called trey Wah and it was

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it's basically like a ihop, like it's an open twenty

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 1>four hours and it's the one we went to was

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in Central which I think it's actually closed now due

0:55:56.040 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to COVID. But um, that's where you go at night

0:56:00.239 --> 0:56:02.360
<v Speaker 1>if you stayed up too late with your friends and

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:04.279
<v Speaker 1>stayed out and you just want to go and eat.

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I just had the best memories there. I just remember

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, hanging out with friends there, you know, in

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 1>early morning hours. I'm a night person, having the best time.

0:56:13.719 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And so that's actually what I missed the most, which

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is which is like the cheapest like restaurant you could

0:56:19.080 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think of there, but it's it's where I had the

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:23.359
<v Speaker 1>best memories. So in New York that would be Woe

0:56:23.440 --> 0:56:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Hops down in Chinatown that was four hours a day.

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I remember in college, mean, Buddy's piling its three in

0:56:30.320 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the morning and it was I think they're still around

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and still open twenty four hours a day. It's just

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just not I don't even remember the food. I

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think the food was like secondary. It was like some

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:44.320
<v Speaker 1>weird toast um, you know, and tea or something. But

0:56:44.320 --> 0:56:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, no, it was it was the best memories,

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:49.400
<v Speaker 1>all right. So let's jump to our favorite questions that

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we ask all of our guests, starting with what have

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you been streaming during lockdown? Tell us what's been keeping

0:56:56.360 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw Hobbs and Shawl the other day and I

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, I have missed so many Fast and Furious movies,

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and so I started from the beginning and now I'm

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on I just I just finished six and so because

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I stopped going to those movies after college, and the

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>last one I saw was Tokyo Drift, and I have

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.400
<v Speaker 1>no memory of you know, pre like two thousand four,

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so I basically had to watch them all over again.

0:57:22.080 --> 0:57:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Were you a drift girl? Will you out in two

0:57:25.160 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 1>x is? Going sideways around tracks? You know? That's you

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:34.680
<v Speaker 1>know I didn't. Actually that's d because I know people

0:57:34.760 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>who still to this day do that. No, I did not.

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I was not part of that. It's a funny run

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of films because it's about this tiny little subculture and

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they blow it up as if it's like the only

0:57:47.760 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that really matters. But what I love about that

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is some of these quotes that they have, and I

0:57:51.480 --> 0:57:55.200
<v Speaker 1>love like badass women characters. So like Letty in the

0:57:55.280 --> 0:57:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Latest One said something like you know that after she

0:57:58.280 --> 0:57:59.920
<v Speaker 1>lost her memory, and she was like, you know what,

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I may not remember much, but I know one thing.

0:58:02.760 --> 0:58:04.439
<v Speaker 1>No one would have ever made me. And he made

0:58:04.440 --> 0:58:07.280
<v Speaker 1>me do anything I didn't want to do because somebody

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 1>else was blaming themselves for the trouble that she got into.

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And she was like, no, I wouldn't have done that

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:13.960
<v Speaker 1>if I didn't want to do it. And so I

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 1>love that and I love how UM in Tokyo drift

0:58:18.000 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Han was like, I have money, I need trust and

0:58:20.880 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 1>character around me. It's like all of these little quotes

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that it was just the sense of loyalty, and I

0:58:26.480 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just I just love the brotherhood about the movie. But

0:58:28.840 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy of fast and furious. Who knew that was UM?

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Second question, tell us about your mentors who helped to

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 1>shape your career. I mean, you hear the quote that, UM,

0:58:42.920 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're the smartest person in the room, you're in

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the wrong room, right, And I can I can say

0:58:48.360 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in this business, I have never been in the wrong room.

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I'm usually in the most right room possible.

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think it be harder to answer that question

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 1>as who who's not been a mentor at this point

0:58:59.040 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>because I have so many mentors. I mean, how many

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:04.240
<v Speaker 1>times have I called you and asked questions? Right? What

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:07.360
<v Speaker 1>should I do about this? UM? All my you know

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 1>E T F brethren who have their own products, right,

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I talked to them, I asked them questions all the time.

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:19.440
<v Speaker 1>UM West is a current mentor early on UM, you know,

0:59:19.680 --> 0:59:22.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at people like Rob who pioneered non cap weighted

0:59:22.800 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>indexing UM or not and you know before that when

0:59:29.120 --> 0:59:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I was a fidelity, my fellow advisors and my clients, right,

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:34.960
<v Speaker 1>so my clients, I learned so much from them. I

0:59:35.040 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>usually now don't get to meet with end clients very much.

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I usually talked to only advisors. You asked earlier who

0:59:41.080 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 1>most of our investors are, and I didn't fully answer

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's advisors. And um, you know I recently got

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to meet face to face family office and that was

0:59:52.640 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating experience. And just these people were so um

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>kind and generous with their time and um, you know,

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>learning about the strategy and you know, um and you know,

1:00:06.680 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>sharing with me about their family and and you know,

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I get my inspiration from these people. These are the

1:00:12.280 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>people that we created the strategy for. And um, you know,

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>these are the people that whose feedback I listened to, right,

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>people who tell me this is what we want to

1:00:21.320 --> 1:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>see next? Or um, when advisors tell me, oh my gosh,

1:00:26.520 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you should hear. How are you know our clients respond

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>when we the joy and the relief from our clients

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>when we tell them how we invested for them after

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the Russia invasion, that we had them in this freedom

1:00:39.880 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>weighted product. Um, those types of comments are or why

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm in this and and they inspire me. M really interesting.

1:00:50.360 --> 1:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about books. What are some of your favorites

1:00:52.720 --> 1:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and what are you reading right now? So right now

1:00:55.640 --> 1:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually reading, um, the book about Bogel. The book. Um,

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's about three quarters of the way through that. How

1:01:04.640 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you enjoying it? I'm enjoying it very much. I'm probably

1:01:07.640 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on chapter three. Um. I was. I was aghast reading it,

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm reading this quote and I'm nodding my head

1:01:14.880 --> 1:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in agreement with it. And then I realized, oh, I know,

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I am in agreement with that because it's you. It

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was it was pretty like, oh my god, talk about

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>confirmation bias was embarrassing. No, I love how he puts

1:01:27.440 --> 1:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>so many of our friends in there, and just like

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>so many quotes. Um, it's like reading a book with

1:01:32.960 --> 1:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>all of your friends quotes in there. So I love that. Um,

1:01:35.640 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it's so good so far. And he and he said,

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know you should read this book because you know

1:01:41.320 --> 1:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you will be inspired by how Jack Bogel also went

1:01:44.640 --> 1:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>against the grain and so um, so I love it

1:01:47.720 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so far. UM. The other book that you know, I'm

1:01:50.240 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of Bill Browder and what he's doing

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>also Red Notice, and you've read Red Notice. What's the

1:01:55.840 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I read the first one, what's the second notice? Second one?

1:01:58.400 --> 1:02:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Freezing Order? All right, I just got that. I haven't

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>read it yet. That's my next one. Yeah you so,

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>um so that's that's gonna be exciting. I think, Um,

1:02:06.120 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I heard that has a happy ending and I love

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>happy endings, and you don't. You don't think of these

1:02:10.640 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>stories as ones that would have happy endings. But I'm

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to seeing what that is. Red Notice is astonishing.

1:02:17.880 --> 1:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you read it and like, if that was fiction,

1:02:20.440 --> 1:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be believable, right, Like it has to be

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:26.439
<v Speaker 1>nonfiction because if it was a novel, you would say,

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. But

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>when you know what it actually happened, you're like, holy,

1:02:31.680 --> 1:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really astonishing. So you mentioned Eric Beltunist. We have

1:02:35.600 --> 1:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>him coming on the show in a few months, and

1:02:38.400 --> 1:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>um Bill Browder coming on the show, and really, yeah,

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so we've we have that's amazing. We have both of

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>your books tied up for uh. For I love having

1:02:47.800 --> 1:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>authors over the summer. It's a perfect time. It gives

1:02:50.760 --> 1:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>me an opportunity to sit on the beach, read a book,

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and I have I get to pretend I'm working. What'd

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you do? I worked all day Sunday? Really, what you do?

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I I sat on the beach and read Vogel Effects

1:03:02.840 --> 1:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and and that's my aska asked Bill Browder, how he

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>um thinks about emerging markets investing? And he doesn't he

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:11.439
<v Speaker 1>tell you he doesn't do it because of the lack

1:03:11.480 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of rule of law. Yeah, that makes perfect sense to me. Um,

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>So I obviously disagree with that. You should still do it,

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>because there are some very free markets in emerging markets,

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but I agree with his reasoning. So so. My wife's

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>brother used to be general counsel of Amaco, like twenty

1:03:27.360 --> 1:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago, that little Amaco BP deal. That was his thing.

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And he was never a fan of investing in Russia

1:03:34.760 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>because he always described them. Um. He always described them

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>as a criminal enterprise with a standing army attached to it.

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And that was twenty five years ago. And he turned

1:03:48.520 --> 1:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>out to be very very right. He said, every time

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he ever went to Russia to do any sort of

1:03:54.080 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>contract ordeal, the terms always changed. Even if you had

1:03:57.680 --> 1:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a sign agreement, it didn't matter. There was no respect

1:04:00.520 --> 1:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for contracts. Forget private property, your individual rights, just whatever

1:04:05.560 --> 1:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they could get away with, they could get away with,

1:04:07.400 --> 1:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and not a surprise, A didn't make it onto your list.

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Know that rule of law is so important. And Russia

1:04:14.640 --> 1:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is one of those countries. I had a client when

1:04:16.480 --> 1:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I was a fidelity, a Russian client who told me

1:04:18.600 --> 1:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to invest in Russia because it's like

1:04:20.920 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>funding terrorism. And you see how prescient that was now.

1:04:24.720 --> 1:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>But Russia is one of those countries that has both

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>poor personal freedom and poor economic freedom. So you know,

1:04:32.640 --> 1:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>personal freedom I categorized into civil and political freedom. Civil

1:04:35.800 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>freedoms are things like terrorism, trafficking, torture, disappearances, UM. Women's

1:04:40.880 --> 1:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>freedoms there's five women's freedom's proxies and then UM in

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and these are emerging markets. Women's freedoms like women's rights

1:04:48.120 --> 1:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to movement, women's rights to children after divorce, women's rights

1:04:52.240 --> 1:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to inheritance, things like that UM. And then you have

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>your political freedoms like do process, role of law, UM,

1:04:58.160 --> 1:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>civil sure, criminal procedure. And then you have you know,

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech, media expression, and so forth. And then

1:05:04.400 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you have your economic freedoms that were all familiar with UH,

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:10.439
<v Speaker 1>freedom to trade internationally, sound money right, free to fear

1:05:10.440 --> 1:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>countries actually have more sound monetary policies and lower inflation

1:05:14.520 --> 1:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>rates historically looking at inflation as a major risk going forward. Um,

1:05:18.640 --> 1:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>business regulations, taxation, um, government interference and private markets and

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>so forth. So Russia is one of those countries that rules,

1:05:28.000 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, ranks poorly on and economy. Yeah, so um

1:05:34.360 --> 1:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>those you know, China is another similar situation. So yeah,

1:05:37.600 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the country that we were never had in the index.

1:05:41.520 --> 1:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, And our final two questions, what sort of

1:05:44.200 --> 1:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>advice would you give to a recent college grad who

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>was interested in a career in either ETFs, investing or

1:05:52.200 --> 1:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. Yeah, so I think a lot of college

1:05:57.360 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>grads um these days try to go into quant and

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think quant does have its place, But I think

1:06:04.400 --> 1:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, for for new grads, I would say, look

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>at you know, look around you, and you know, just

1:06:10.560 --> 1:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>look at what's happening in the world and invests according

1:06:14.040 --> 1:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to that, right, Um, And sometimes that can work just

1:06:17.680 --> 1:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, um, But for everyone, I would say, one,

1:06:23.320 --> 1:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>start at a big firm like Fidelity or you know,

1:06:26.720 --> 1:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>a company like Bloomberg where you can learn a lot

1:06:29.800 --> 1:06:32.439
<v Speaker 1>um and they have the resources to train you. Because

1:06:32.480 --> 1:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We've had a lot of college grads come to us

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and say, can we work for you? And you know,

1:06:36.400 --> 1:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>my answer that I do not have the resources to

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>train someone just straight out of college UM as a

1:06:43.040 --> 1:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>startup right, So UM, I would much rather hire them

1:06:46.800 --> 1:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>after they've got that training. And you know, don't stay forever.

1:06:50.560 --> 1:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Do what you're passionate about. But you know, get the

1:06:53.520 --> 1:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>basic training down and these are such great training grounds,

1:06:57.000 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, maybe you'll stay for a long time. I

1:06:58.880 --> 1:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>stayed for ten years, Fidel and I loved it, UM

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was a tremendous building, you know, blog and

1:07:05.200 --> 1:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>foundation for what I do now. UM. And the second

1:07:07.760 --> 1:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>thing I would say is once you do branch out, UM,

1:07:11.000 --> 1:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're lucky enough to have a vision or a

1:07:13.400 --> 1:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>mission or something that you're passionate about, you know, UM,

1:07:17.760 --> 1:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>go for it and try to fail as big as possible.

1:07:20.840 --> 1:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Phil fail early and young recover, yes, And so when

1:07:24.480 --> 1:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you're young, you know, do do what you want. Go

1:07:26.440 --> 1:07:28.439
<v Speaker 1>for it, and don't ask yourself what is the most

1:07:28.600 --> 1:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>stable career path. I think a lot of people ask

1:07:31.560 --> 1:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that these days, but UM, but ask yourself, what is

1:07:34.680 --> 1:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>my ideal scenario? What do I want? Ideally? If I

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>could have anything, do anything I want. What would I do?

1:07:40.480 --> 1:07:44.439
<v Speaker 1>And then go that direction because you may fail, but

1:07:44.520 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know you'll be happy. That's the one thing I

1:07:47.360 --> 1:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>learned from Yen v Neck of Van Neck Funds. Actually

1:07:50.280 --> 1:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>early on I heard him speak and and somebody asked him,

1:07:52.720 --> 1:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I have an idea for an ET, I should I

1:07:54.080 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>launch it? And He's like, yeah, yeah, sure, you know

1:07:56.600 --> 1:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you make you might fail, but you'll be happy and

1:07:59.360 --> 1:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that I can tested that. So and you know, one

1:08:02.320 --> 1:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's fascinating about both Silicon Valley and

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States compared with more traditional countries is failure

1:08:11.560 --> 1:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't a red mark in the US the way it

1:08:15.600 --> 1:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is elsewhere. Oh he launched the company and failed, how terrible. Here.

1:08:19.800 --> 1:08:23.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, vcs and entrepreneurs list their failures. It's almost

1:08:23.640 --> 1:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a badge of an honor. I mean, I know that

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's a given for folks like us, but a

1:08:28.960 --> 1:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't understand how significant that is. Yeah.

1:08:31.960 --> 1:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're not failing, you're not trying enough,

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>so you're not reaching out of your comfort zone, you're

1:08:35.720 --> 1:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>not taking rich whole self out there. Yeah. Absolutely. And

1:08:39.040 --> 1:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>our final question, what do you know about the world

1:08:41.880 --> 1:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of investing today. You wish you knew twenty years or

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>so ago when you were first getting started. Yeah, So

1:08:48.200 --> 1:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>when I was first getting started, like twenty years ago.

1:08:50.479 --> 1:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>It was twenty years ago, actually, I think it is

1:08:52.320 --> 1:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>when I went to art school in Pasadena to go

1:08:54.760 --> 1:08:57.519
<v Speaker 1>into advertising design. So I was wanting to go into

1:08:57.560 --> 1:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a creative field. And what I didn't realize that that

1:09:00.040 --> 1:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>time is that finance can be very creative and for me,

1:09:04.640 --> 1:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>indexing is a form of expression. We created this for

1:09:08.680 --> 1:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>people who believe in the benefits of freedom and want

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to express that in their emerging markets allocations. Before there

1:09:16.439 --> 1:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't any way for people to express that if that's

1:09:18.800 --> 1:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted, and now there is. So we're creating

1:09:20.960 --> 1:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>an avenue for people to express their preferences in the

1:09:25.320 --> 1:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>emerging market space. Um. And that that's a that's a

1:09:29.040 --> 1:09:33.639
<v Speaker 1>creative thing, you know, using data that's not readily available

1:09:33.680 --> 1:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg or fact set insteady using freedom as a metric. Um.

1:09:38.960 --> 1:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a creative kind of outlet for me. And

1:09:41.840 --> 1:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>so this is uh, something I didn't know before that

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>finance and you know, indexing specifically could be a creative exercise.

1:09:50.560 --> 1:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Really quite fascinating. Thank you, Perth for being so generous

1:09:54.120 --> 1:09:57.519
<v Speaker 1>with your time. We have been speaking with Perth Toll.

1:09:57.880 --> 1:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>She is the founder of the Free Itom E t

1:10:00.880 --> 1:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>F and Liberty and Freedom Indexes. If you enjoy this conversation,

1:10:05.560 --> 1:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>well please check any of the previous four hundred such

1:10:08.600 --> 1:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>discussions that we've done over the past eight years. You

1:10:11.880 --> 1:10:15.519
<v Speaker 1>can find those at iTunes or Spotify or wherever you

1:10:15.560 --> 1:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>find your favorite podcasts. We love your comments, feedback and

1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg

1:10:23.520 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 1>dot net. Sign up from my daily reads at Rid

1:10:26.560 --> 1:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Halts dot com. Follow me on Twitter at Rid Halts.

1:10:29.560 --> 1:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not thank the

1:10:31.320 --> 1:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Cracks staff who helps us put these conversations together each week.

1:10:35.280 --> 1:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Justin Miller is my engineer, Paris Wald is my producer.

1:10:38.840 --> 1:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Sean Russo is my head of research. Attica val Bron

1:10:42.360 --> 1:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>is our project manager. I'm Barry Rishults. You've been listening

1:10:46.840 --> 1:10:49.639
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.