WEBVTT - Marijuana Vs. Alcohol: Which Is Worse For You?

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, we are going back on the road and

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we are super excited because we're gonna be doing brand

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>new material, which we are certainly glad for. And if

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you live in oh Denver, or Cleveland or St. Louis

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>or Boston or Washington, d C. Then you can come

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>see us. Yes, you can come see us. Specifically, if

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you're in Boston, We're gonna be at the Wilbur Theater

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>on April four, and then the next night on April five,

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be in d C at the beloved Lincoln Theater.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>We love those two places and we sure do. And

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>then on the twenty two of May, we're gonna be

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in St. Louis, Missouri for the first time ever at

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the Pageant. And then another first for us is the

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>next night May, we're gonna be in Cleveland, Ohio at

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the Ohio Theater. Dude, I'm very excited about both Cleveland

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and St. Louis because we wanted to add some new shows.

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>We had get a lot of support in Ohio that

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we know for sure, and got family there and I

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>just can't wait. But wait, wait, there's there's more. We're

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>going back to the Gothic Theater in Englewood, Colorado, a

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>k A. Right outside Denver. We're gonna be there June

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and it's going to be nuts. We're gonna have

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>a great time at all these so we want you

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to come see us. You can go to the Wilbur

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You can go to ticket fly for the

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>d C show. You can go to ticket Master for

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the St. Louis show. Search us on playhouse square dot

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>org for the Ohio Theater Cleveland show, and then lastly

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a x S dot com to search for us at

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the Gothic Theater and we will see you guys very soon.

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Clark with Charles W. Chuck Bryant and Jerry Roland. And

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this is stuff you should know because you put the

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>three of us together, roll us up in the paper,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>add a match to the mix, you've got one great podcast.

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Or throw us all in a sniffed ter okay, swirl

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>us around and then we're a an appartif that's nice?

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And why not just why why decide? Why choose one

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>over the other, right, because then we would kill each

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>other in a car. Yeah, we would, we would. Well,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>let's start. Let's start legitimately here, Chuck, first of all,

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>how are you great? Good? Okay, I am too, But

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>let's start even more legitimately than that. Let's get in

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the way back machine. Okay, I live in this thing.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Emily kicked me out, so I've been I've been living

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in the way back machine for a few weeks. Now.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>It's with your dog, just one of them. Though she

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>only gave me one of the dogs. It's kind of

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>gave me in here, you know. It is um Okay, Well,

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we're in Chuck's repurposed way back sheet and we're just

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>going just for a second, Chuck, we're going back to

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen, and we're going to go to New

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>York City and we're going to buy a New Yorker magazine. Okay,

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>now we can go back to two thous eighteen. Okay,

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna flip open this New Yorker magazine. Oh look, Chuck,

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's an interview with then President Barack Obama. Do you

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>remember him? Do so? In two thousand fourteen, Obama gave

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this interview to New Yorker, and he really kind of

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>created a bit of a stir. I mean, since he

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>first ran in two thousand and eight, everybody knew he

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>smoked pot. There are pictures of it. Like he never

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he never denied it. He admitted a smoking pot. But

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this interview in two thousand fourteen really just changed things

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>because in it, Obama said that he did not believe

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that his pot smoking was anything really worse than his

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>his bad cigarette habit, and that he he doesn't think

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>he didn't think that it was more dangerous an alcohol,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>which is really saying something because I mean, like you know,

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>as teenagers have been saying for decades and decades now,

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy that something like alcohol can be bought like

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>at any corner store, at drug stores in some states

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>stores and and that like you can drink it as

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>long as you're twenty one and get in your car

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and drive up to a certain limit. But pod is

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>totally illegal in most states. Still, um, and Obama was

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>saying kind of throwing down the gauntlet, saying, you know,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't in a very roundabout way, he was saying,

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know that that's necessarily right, that

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>pots should be illegal and you should be able to

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>buy alcohol anywhere because pot's not as bad as booze, yeah,

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>which was man, times have really changed in our you know,

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in the past like twenty years, because I remember when

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Clinton it was such a scandal that he had inhaled

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't inhale. Well he the thing came out

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and he said, well I tried to and I couldn't

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and a liar, Well, who knows that may have been true.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I just think my reaction was, well, that just means

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you're super lame. You don't know what you're doing, Bill Um.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But it was just such a scandal. And then I mean,

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>here we are now where you know, state after state

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is is legalizing recreational marijuana. Yeah, which, yeah, is really

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see that change happen, not even like medicinal

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>marijuana anymore. That was like the Gateway legislation. Now it's like,

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>straight up, you want to smoke pot to get high

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>just for fun, you can do that. And let's see, Chuck.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So it started with Washington and um Colorado, right, I

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>think were they the first two. They were back in

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen, and just since two thousand fourteen, you've

0:05:54.800 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>now got Oregon, California, Vermont, Washington, d C. Nevada, Massachusetts, Maine, Alaska,

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and Washington State. Yeah, it was the state so nice.

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I said it twice. Or maybe they just super like

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>like when you you reaffirm your wedding vowels, maybe they

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>doubled down a few as Leonard and said this is

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>so great, we just want to like legalize it again.

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they did do that in Washington. We were

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>there recently for live shows, and I can tell you

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they definitely renewed their vows with pots. Yeah, we were

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Uh, Colorado, or we're gonna be in

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Colorado and then Washington and Oregon. So and we're going

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to Massachusetts. Uh, we just need to hit Nevada and

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to d c yah, Nevada, Maine in Alaska

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and it will be the stuff you should know up

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in Smoke Tour. We need T shirts for that one.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Not that we would ever do that, no, no, but

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>we could still make T shirts that suggest it. Yeah,

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and my any joke on stage in San Francisco, we

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>were there literally the weekend that the first recreational pot

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>shops opened, and the joke was San Francisco day after

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly like San Francisco was the day before that killed

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>They loved it. So the upshide of all of this

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is that with all these states like legalizing marijuana, the

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>comparison between pot and alcohol has kind of become less

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of a like a stoner conversation, like it's actually a

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>legitimate academic discussion. Nowadays, there's a lot of different things

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that come into play. Before it was kind of like, well,

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it doesn't matter because Uncle Sam, well actually Tricky

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Dick says that it's illegal. So it's illegal, So it

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter if it's worse for you or not.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>It's way worse to be put into jail um than

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it is to to be tipsy off of alcohol and

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe risk curosis of the liver. Right, So that ended

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>all conversations there. But as that, as that conversation under

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>has kind of fallen away, the conversation has kind of

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>opened up. So I guess what we're doing here today

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is doing the best we can at putting the conversation

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to rest, even though now that we've dived into it,

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that the conversation is very far from being

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>put to rest. Yeah, and this one's gonna there are

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stats. It's very sad heavy episode, which

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is fun. But um, the first thing we should point

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>out is that in terms of marijuana, because it was illegal,

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>there's hasn't been a lot of funding throne at studies

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>over the years because, like you said, it's like, why bother,

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's illegal, We're not gonna put our resources towards studying it.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Now they kind of have to. But the long and

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>short of it is we we are still and will

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>be for many years gathering data on what pot does

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to the body, how dangerous it is. But early results

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly indicate at least in the short term, and we're

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna run the gamut here, but in the short term,

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you can start a night out having fun, drinking and

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>end up dead hours later just from the alcohol. Yeah

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying by getting in a car or jumping

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>off a building, like all those things can happen too,

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>but you can drink yourself to death in hours. Yeah,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>they're they're so. The CDC put out like a very

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>famous statistic now, um that said that every year in

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States, about eighty eight thousand people die from

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>alcohol every year, and that's all alcohol related deaths like

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>liver disease, car crashes all that, but about half of

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>those are from binge drinking, which is drinking usually for

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>men about five or more drinks, and for women, I

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's like three or more drinks within two hours

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, and then and then going on,

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and once you start to get to that point, you

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>start to run an increasing risk of alcohol poisoning. Yeah,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's your he cannot process alcohol fast enough

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like you can. You can drink past that amount, Like

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, such that, I mean you hear sad stories

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about the the kid in college who literally died from

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>drinking one night. Yep. Uh. That cannot be said of marijuana. Um, well,

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it depends. Well, it doesn't depend, No, it does. I

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's literally impossible to consume as much marijuana as

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you would have to consume over a period of hours

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to die from it. Okay, yes, yes, absolutely, you're right.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>You're right, it doesn't depend. That's that's true. Like, and

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people who point to that statistic

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>where they basically say thousand people die a year um

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>from alcohol, zero people die a year from marijuana. That's

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily true. But if you're talking about overdosing, yes, yeah, absolutely, like,

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>people don't overdose and die from marijuana. Many have tried. Sure,

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's especially Cheech and chong, but they the the amount

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of th HC you would have to ingest is so

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>um so much more than you could possibly take under

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>normal circumstances that you're just not going to So like,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>what are the numbers here to figure this out? Well,

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>your statman, I just want to set up that we

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>used High Times as a source for this episode because

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we're like, okay, so how much how much th HC

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is in pot? And how much does that break down

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to depending on whether you smoke a bowl or smoke

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a joint or eat an edible And we said, well,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>who would know more than anyone else, And it turns

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>out it's High Times. Yeah. So here's the thing with

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Pot two. It really varies according to who you are,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>how much you typically ingest, how strong the pot is.

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But are we gonna go with this? These numbers here

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>th HC, which I think is fairly average these days,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>which is per high, but that's normal. It's a normal

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>amount of I think, uh, you you that's about a

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty milligrams program of marijuana, right, And if

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>people don't know. T HC is the the active ingredient

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that gets you high in the marijuana plant. Yeah, and

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>what is the delta nine catra hydro cannab at all?

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh you just read the tattoo on your forum. It's misspelled,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>as you can see. I was wonder what that was. Uh.

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing, though, You lose th HC when it's

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>burned about uh And trust me, marijuana users have tried

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to lower that number um as much as possible for

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the and to some success, like supposedly with the vaporiors

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>or you lose a lot less because you're not actually

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>burning the THC. Right, Yeah, I mean they are all

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>manner of ways to ingest marijuana now, um, partially because

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of I mean there always were, but partially because of

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this recreational um. And I always wondered what that would

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>look like if it was legalized, because you know, I've

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>been Amsterdam and stuff, and I thought, was it going

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to be like that where you have marijuana in jars

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and like a they call them bud tenders, which is

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>so stupid, uh? Or I thought, well, no, it's America.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I bet you anything. It's gonna be like a cigarette

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>pack that's highly manufactured, but just joints, and it turns

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>out it's uh, it's sort of not either. I mean

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very on the up and up. Like I've

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>been into one of those stores just to look around,

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's, um, it's like visiting a any coffee or

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>tea shop. You know, it's all very it's it's not

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>just dudes with with a bag that they throw into

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>another bag. You know, they pull it out of their stock.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess, So, I guess it's my way of saying

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's um. The recreational pot shops that I've seen have

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>been very professional, and everything is very packaged and and

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just like any other commodity. So did you walk

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in and go are you? Are you the bud tender?

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm from I'm from Hotlanta. I'm doing a story for

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a podcast. So so okay. So, depending on how you

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>ingest the pot, especially whether you're burning it or not,

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna lose some THHC. But if you burn it,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you lose about So if you have a hundred and

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty milligram per gram th HC, it's suddenly down to

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what seventy two milligrams per gram, and if you're smoking

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a half a gram joint. Let's say you're even smoking

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a one gram joint and you're getting seventy two milligrams

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of th HC from that joint, you're still immensely shy.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And on the level of orders of magnitude different um

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of how much it would take to overdose on on

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>th HC. Yeah, I mean, I think the number in

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>here is a minimum of like a hundred and fifty

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>joints you would have to smoke by yourself over a

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very short period of time. Yeah, because so you're you're

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>getting seventy two milligrams in that joint of th HC,

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>but it would take something like at least fifteen grams

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of th HC to to overdose. So yes, you would

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>have to smoke hundreds of joints and basically a day

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to start to build up enough th HC in your

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>bloodstream that you overdose fatally. I'm trying to picture the study,

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>like the being behind the one way glass and the

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>guy p and like, well then he is this, and

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they're like and ten and he's like I can do

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. Like that's why you would not overdose. There's

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>just no way. Yeah, for sure, I would imagine you'd

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>fall asleep or get bored or forget what you were

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>doing or whatever. I think it'd be more likely that

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you would have to eat like a triple layer cake

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>made entirely of marijuana. So I'm glad you said that

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>because that definitely edibles are different, and they're different in

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of ways. One way they're different is that

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't burn. You're not burning the th HC, so

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not necessarily losing a bunch of it. Do You

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>also can eat more of it than say you're smoking

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of it as far as th HC is concerned, So

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you can still you can definitely increase like how much, um,

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>how much th HC you're getting by eating it rather

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>than smoking it. But the other thing about edibles is

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that you actually your body does something differently with them,

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and that is that when you're smoking marijuana, you're introducing

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>th HC and it's normal form from your lungs to

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>your heart to your brain. Th HC can cross that

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>blood brain barrier. But you know, it's not the greatest

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at it. It's kind of hit or miss, right when

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you ingest t HC where you eat it like an edible,

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it goes through your digestive system, and that th HC

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is metabolized. It's broken down into the um by the

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>liver and then set into the bloodstream. Well, what what

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the metabolized version does is it's much better at crossing

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the blood brain barrier. So you get a much more

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>powerful high from eating an edible, and you get a

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>higher dose of th HC even though it's this THHC metabolite.

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So eating edibles is different, and it is possible that

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it would bring you closer, statistically speaking, increase your risk

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of of coming near a fatal dose of th HC.

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>But again, still like that, the amount you would have

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to eat is ridiculously high. Yeah, And I think most

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>of the cases of UM since recreational has been introduced,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>of oh my god, I have to go to the

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>emergency room have been people that ate too too much pot. Yeah.

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And and also the other one of the other big

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>problems with edibles, well there's two of them. One is

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that people eat too much because it takes like hours

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to kick in and they're like, oh, I'm not feel anything,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>let me have four more, yeah, which is a real

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>problem with those things. And then set. And we also

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>kids tend to get into edibles more than they you know,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>find your your pot and roll a joint, which is

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>dangerous because they have lower body mass. And and I

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>would I mean they're fatal dose or whatever could cause

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>them health problems is much. It's a much lower threshold

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for a small kid, yeah for sure, which is you know, scary. Yeah,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>well yeah sure. Um. All right, well so we covered

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the O D aspect. Well do you want to take

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a break. All right, let's take a break. Let's try

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to decide. Let's take a break. We'll come right back

0:18:34.840 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>after this. All right, all right, so we covered the

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>O D thing. Like I said before the break, Um,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's settled. Now that's subtle law. So UM,

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>here's the other thing alcohol is that the way it

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>reacts and interacts with other drugs is significantly more different

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>than marijuana. UM. Most people know this. But that's why

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they on your prescription bottles they say things like don't

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>drink when you take this, because depending on what the

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>drug is, UM, whether it's pain killers or um meds

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for your mental well being, UM, you can either end

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>up having a higher dose of that or a lower

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>dose depending on what it is how much you've had

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to drink. And that's always scary because we've seen all

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>over the place people accidentally overdosing by combining prescription drugs

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and alcohol. Yeah, I mean, like if you get a

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>lower dose in its medicine you really need, that's Yeah,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just as bad. And it's it's because alcohol is

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>either exciting all the enzymes in your liver and they

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>metabolize the medicine faster than it's designed to be, so

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you get a big dose, or they hog all of

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the enzymes and the medicine just kind of passes through

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>your liver unmetabolized and you don't get the dose you're

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for. Either way, it's not good for you. Yeah.

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And like this article that you put together points out,

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>though it is you, we should mention that marijuana though,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>can impair your coordination. So there is a risk of

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, just literally getting hurt because you're uncoordinated. Um.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>You may you may trip over your coffee table and

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>fall into your couch or your papas on or your

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>lava lamp. You know, you don't want to go head

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>first into a lava lamp. No, that's bad. Um, I

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>know we're making light, but seriously that that is a

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>risk um or just you're you know, unprotected sex because

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>your inhibitions are lowered. Although what the same can be

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>said for alcohol. Yes, that's absolutely true, and I think

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>this article does say it, it's just in a different spot.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, your judgment can be impaired to which can

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>lead to all manner of indirect effects which might seem like,

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that doesn't count, but actually they very much

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>do count because you wouldn't have otherwise made those decisions

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>if you hadn't been drunk or stoned. They count for sure.

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So those are some of the short term health effects

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>from drinking, you know, death, but there's um long term

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ones too that that come on. And this is where

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the uh that literature um or the lack of literature

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>studying pot like really kind of comes into play. Because

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we've been studying alcohol and the effects of alcohol for

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so long now we have it pretty well licked that

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>alcohol is really really bad for you if you drink heavily,

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>but strangely kind of good for you if you drink

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in moderate amounts. With pot We just we just don't

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. There hasn't been enough study. And part

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of the problem, like you're saying, is it was illegal,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and since it was illegal, it was kind of difficult

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to get your hands on study participants because they, you know,

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to tell you that they smoked pot.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe have that go on any kind of permanent record

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>or something. Yeah, I mean for alcohol, the obvious physical effects,

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it's stuff on your liver, and alcoholic liver disease is

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a real thing that can progress from early stages fibrosis

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to eventual liver cancer. UM. And they don't really know

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly the mechanism for why some people can drink heavily

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>well into their old age and not have any liver

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>damage UM or you know, maybe some liver damage but

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>not die of liver cancer, and then other people are

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>much higher risk. They don't fully get that. I mean,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just gotta be genetics, right. Anytime that comes up

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, well, you know, we have no idea

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>why these people are subject to it and other people aren't.

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>It's always it's gotta be genetics. Like Keith Richards alive,

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>No medical science will never explain that he should totally

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>donate his body. Yeah, oh yeah, for sure. Um yeah,

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>he really should. Actually it's like a legitimate jokey thing

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to say, but it's true. So um, so you've got

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>alcohol messing with your liver um with pot, they're they're

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, okay, well, if you're a chronic pot user,

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what's what's the problem? Chronic pot user? Chronic chronic pot user.

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the way you would say it. So

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>with with um, a chronic pot user, And it's defined differently,

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>which I think is another thing that kind of makes

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the literature on the topic kind of difficult to study too,

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is people I don't think there's a universal this is

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what a chronic pot user is. I think each study

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>defines it for itself. But for a long time, there

0:23:55.600 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>was some literature that said that smoke pot lowers your

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>sperm count, but almost all of those were from the

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>seventies and eighties, and all these studies referred to pot

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as grass, so no one took them seriously at all, Right,

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But in two thousand and fifteen, there is a Danish

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>study that that that really kind of updated the literature,

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and they found that there was a twenty eight percent

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>decrease in sperm count among chronic pot smokers and they

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>define chronics pot smokers is um men who smoked more

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>than one joint a week, which is that's there's a

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who smoke pot smoke more than one

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>joy in a week. Okay, Okay, so there there. They

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have found a decrease in sperm production. That's definitely a thing.

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well there's the the psychological and mental health

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>issues at stake two. Um, and again, you know, not

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>as much literature as we need, like this show ten

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>years from that would be very different. I think I think,

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>well we should revisit it ten years from now. I

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>totally agree. Um. So yeah, even if we retire in

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>five years, will come back ten years from now to

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>do the marijuana one off special. It's like getting friends

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>back together. That'd be cool. I get to be Rachel. Ah,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>you're always Rachel. I've got the haircut. So um, it's funny.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The Omnibus podcast did an entire episode on the Rachel

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>so with mental health issues. Um. For a long time,

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they weren't really sure whether teenagers who had mental health

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>health issues smoked pot to deal with it or maybe, um,

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like something like bipolar doesn't really come on until your

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>mid teens. Anyway, maybe pot could trigger that or depression

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>or something if it is laying dormant inside of you.

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 1>But recently they have done a little more studying and

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they do think that it can um in your earlier

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>years exacerbate these mental health disorders. Yeah, if you are

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like predisposed, right, which is that's kind of a significant

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>finding too, Although it makes sense intuitively because like when

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you are a teenager, your brain is still developing, and

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>pot has been shown to to change your cognitive development,

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So it would make sense that if there's a a

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>biological basis for some mental health issues like depression or

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>bipolar schizophrenia, that it would it would stand a reason

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that pot could have some effect on that. And they

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>finally have said, yes, we we generally can see that

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>that pot probably makes mental health or predisposition of mental

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>health issues worse in adolescence, which is is sad. And

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's significant too because at least in the US, um

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>pot use peaks among kids who are age eighteen and

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>then it starts to taper off or tapers off fully

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>by the mid twenties and most people. Yeah, so the

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the the majority of people who smoke pot in the

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>US are teenagers, anyway, But these studies are starting to

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>show that the last people who should be smoking pot

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are teenagers because it can affect their brain development make

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>them less than sharp. Yeah, I wonder about those numbers.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Do seem dubious to me? The eighteen of eighteen and

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>taper off of mid twenty. Yeah, and I'm not just

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking of Willie Nelson. Here's the results. For sure. You

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>have to wait him differently because he smokes a lot

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of pot. That's what I hear um with Pott obviously,

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>although things are a little bit different these days with

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>like you said, vaporizing and edibles and stuff like that.

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But in the olden days when everybody just smoked it, um,

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>bronchitis obviously in just various um long air passage issues

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is sort of an obvious risk. Um. Although they are

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>now thinking that the newest data says that marijuana smoke

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>doesn't affect the body like tobacco smoke does, And they

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have no idea why now that this doesn't make sense

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to them, and they're like, well, they've started to wonder

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>if pot has some sort of protective chemical in it.

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just kind of you know, it gives the lungs

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a glass of milk and tucks them in after after

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it's done being passed through there. Well, yeah, and it's

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>also tough because to do studies, like a lot of

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>times people may also smoke cigarettes, who smoke marijuana regularly, um,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and again with the illegality, it's just it's kind of

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>tough to get good data on this, and then chuck um.

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Pregnancy is another thing. You can kind of put pot

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in um alcohol head to head with pregnancy, and apparently

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>neither one is particularly good, although the studies have are

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>much clearer on alcohol being bad for pregnant women to

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>drink than pot smoking. But there's again from the CDC,

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty famous statistic that three point three million

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>women are at risk in the US of exposing their

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>baby to alcohol. And what they're saying the point is

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is that even if you um drink just in a

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>few first few weeks of being pregnant UM, it can

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:26.719
<v Speaker 1>lead to what's called fetal alcohol spectrum disorders like cognitive, behavioral,

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>physical development disorders from drinking alcohol while you're pregnant, even

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in the first few weeks. And so that three point

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>three million women number, that's like binders full of women.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It um It basically says that is the number of

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>women in the US the CD estimates have stopped using

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:51.239
<v Speaker 1>birth control, but haven't stopped using haven't stopped drinking, So

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>those two things could conceivably cross over for a couple

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of weeks and which could lead to fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And they're saying like, despite you know what you hear that,

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you know a glass of wine isn't isn't bad for you?

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Or every once a while or something while you're pregnant.

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the literature combined says no, there's really no safe

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>level of alcohol to drink while you're pregnant. Well, here's

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the deal is they don't fully know. Like it did

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>some digging, because I know outside of the United States

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>there's is generally a more relaxed attitude, at least in

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>some countries. Um It says here that's uh. This is

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>from an NPR article UH two thousand fifteen study found

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the alcohol consumption range from UH in Australia, New Zealand,

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Ireland and the UK. UH. Sometimes it was just like

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a glass of champagne at a special event. Sometimes it

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was a glass of wine, and UH once a night

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or once a week in the third trimester. Sometimes it

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was twenty ccs of golden grain injected into their neck um.

0:30:55.120 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So this one group did uh Luisa Zukolo, he's a

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>health epidemiologist at Bristol, did a study recently and she

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>found it consuming up to thirty two grams of alcohol

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>per week two to three drinks was associated with a

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>ten percent increase risk of preterm birth. Only. Um, but

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>here's the deal is in America they basically say, listen,

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know for sure the threshold of exactly when

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and how and at what point in the pregnancy these

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>effects can occur, but we do know this, if you

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>don't drink, you have a chance of not having a

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>risk of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. And why don't we

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>all just air on the side of caution and wait

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for the nine months. Well, but that's like a ticklers

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>situation for us dudes to be in chuck because you know,

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a that's a real drag. Just just be like,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just don't drink for nine months. I'm gonna go have

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a beer, but you don't drink, Okay, So husband's quit

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>drinking as a show of support or cut I think

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that is definitely what should be done. Yeah, I

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>mean I think people should do what it works best

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>for them. But um, sure, but if your wife is

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>going to not if your wife or your sso is

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to drink um while she's pregnant, then you

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>should not either. I hear your take on that, Okay,

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make sure. I'll say it again

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end, I'll circle back up. It might take

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>his people should do it works best for them as

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple. Um. And I will also say this, when

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you adopt a kid, neither wanted, you have to stop drinking. Right.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Problems solved, just throwing it out there. Um. With marijuana

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>during pregnancy, uh, they don't know for sure, um, exactly

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>how that can affect cognitive impairment, but they do think

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that they have found some uh cognitive impairment results from

0:32:55.800 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>fetal exposure. Right. But again they don't have like thresholds. Um.

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've heard some doctors say we would rather

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a mother smoke a little pot if she has a

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of anxiety or potentially depression during her pregnancy, then

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>hopping on pills or having a drink. But again, that's

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not like some official doctor recommendation. It's very anecdotal. It's

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like an anonymous comment on from a doctor who will

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>go on named so um. I also said that some

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>some studies have found um, they have linked low birth

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>weight to marijuana use, some pregnancy to So yeah, the

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>upshot is is, what did you say the couples should

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>do with what they think is best? Well, I mean

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's my role. Your rule is everyone follow my role? Yeah, right,

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's also a big distinction between pot and

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>drinking chuck when it comes to crime, to like a

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>big one. This is probably dobably the clearest line of

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>all and kind of funny. Yeah, well not funny, but

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the predicted result is a little amusing to me because

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they did find in two thousand fourteen that the average

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>uh marijuana user, as far as partner violence intimate partner

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>violence goes UM is actually lower overall than people who

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>don't even drink or do drink. It's lower than everybody, right, right,

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So like, if you're just ignore me, a normal who

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't drink, doesn't smoke, you're like a ned Flanders type.

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Statistically speaking, in the first nine years of marriage, you're

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>more likely to commit violence against your partner than a

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>person who smokes pot regularly. It's hilarious. It is funny,

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>like you gotta look look at it a certain light

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of divorce yourself from the partner violence things.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean nothing about that. It's funny. I just picture

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like the the stone person on the couch being like, well, no,

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, I'm not gonna get mad and hit you, right,

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>why I ought to I forgot what I ought to do.

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So on the other end of the spectrum, alcohol is

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>linked to a surprising an alarming amount of crime. The

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Partner of Justice says that alcohol is a factor in

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>fort of the violent crime in the United States, and

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>there was a survey of two million convicted offenders who

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>were currently in jail at the time of the survey.

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Thirty seven percent said they were drinking at the time

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>they committed their crime. So that for partner violence too,

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a bet it's way higher. Even it is that

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was the highest. One was men drinking, but also women

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>drinking too, and they had a higher Those are believe

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>are the two highest incidences of intimate partner violence in

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the first nine years of marriage. If the show Cops

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 1>can anecdotally tell a tale is that of the home

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>visits where the husband and wife are both bombed and

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing each other around. Is uh, that's kind of like

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>every every episode of Cops. Basically, it's definitely got that one.

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I still watch that show me now, and then Emily

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>gets so upset at me. It's on all the time still,

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like Golden Girls. Sometimes sometimes I'll catch a little

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of one and just remember, like, oh, I used

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to watch this in college and think it was a hoot,

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and then part of me is like so depressing. It's

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so depressing watching it that I can't even you know,

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>watch for five minutes. Man, I was. I tweeted the

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>other day that I used to think, um, humanity was

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>on the whole like generally decent and good, and then

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I started watching a lot of forensic Files. Yeah I

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>should watch that. I don't think you should. Man, it

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>really will kind of change the way you look at

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>people that people do some really bad stuff. Yeah, it's

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>really really depressing. He's kind of losing a measure of

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>faith in humanity because the way that the show presents

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it too is still like a matter of fact, this happened,

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, this person picked up a rock and

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>beat there their friend over the head and then took

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>their five dollars. You know, stuff like that. Do you

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>want to take a break, We said, okay, let's take

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a break and we'll we'll talk about driving while intoxicated

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>right after this. All right, we're back. Um, here's the

0:37:54.960 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>deal with driving drunken stoned? Um four. Sure you shouldn't

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>be doing either. We're not endorsing either one. But the

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>statistics and studies roundly say that when you were drinking,

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 1>you are way more likely to be like, I can

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>take this curve, it's eighty Uh, I'm fine to drive.

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And people that are stone that are like, I need

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>to be super careful because I'm a little high right now,

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to be extra careful and drive even

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>slower than I should. Yeah, Like that is what the

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>studies show. Yeah, the in the differences are so pronounced

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can look at fatal accident statistics and see

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that in some in some areas, the legalization of pot

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>has actually brought the number of traffic deaths down in

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>those states. And they think that the reason why is

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>because people are drinking less and smoking pot more, and

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that when you smoke pot, you are something of a

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not a safer driver necessarily, although some studies show

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that you actually are safer than than people who aren't impaired.

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's pretty rare. But you're a safer impaired driver,

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But I think you've said something very very true.

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't be driving stoned or drunk. It's just because

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you're you're taking your own life in your hands, you're

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>also taking the lives of everybody else out on the

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>road on your hands, and shame on you for that. Yeah,

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but I found it very interesting that some of these

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>studies like roundly say that a person um stoned is

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>way more likely to say, hey, you know what, I'm stoned,

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>uh and I need to be super careful, and a

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.240
<v Speaker 1>person drinking will say, I'm fine, give me the keys,

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine. Yeah, no, for sure, for sure. So like

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that's there's two different ways that being impaired and driving

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>affect you, whether you're stoned and whether you're um drunk.

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And what tends to happen is if you're drunk and

0:39:56.200 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 1>you're you're driving, you typically act more impulsive, lee more aggressively,

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>more recklessly, which are three things that really go poorly

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>with driving. So you're going to tailgate more, you're gonna

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>pass people more, you're going to speed more. Um, you're

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>going to just be an aggressive driver, but also one

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>whose reaction times are not as good as they are

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:25.280
<v Speaker 1>normally right when you're stoned. However, the general idea among

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>scientists who are just beginning to study the stuff over

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the last few years is that you tend to overestimate

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>how impaired you are. Where you smoke some pot, you

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>feel stoned. Now you've gotten behind the wheeled car, and

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you're a little freaked out, to be frank, You're worried

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to get pulled over, that you're going

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to cause a wreck, and so you're actually overcompensating for

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>your impairment because you're overestimating the amount of impairment you have,

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and so you're going to drive slower, like much slower sometimes.

0:40:57.520 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>The one dude in the article said that the joke

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is each and Chong driving twenty on the expressway. Yeah,

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>there's the study that just is hilarious to me that

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that in driving simulators, these these people who were conducting

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the study had to remind the stone drivers to keep

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.760
<v Speaker 1>up to the speed limit, like they kept dropping below

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the speed limit. They also tend to give more distance

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>between the next car and their car, even when compared

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to nonimpaired drivers. Yeah, and the one thing, uh that

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I found remarkable was that when they did the UM

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 1>simulated experiments, people under the influence of marijuana performed worse

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>than they did in the real driving experiment. So, in

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>other words, in the room with a simulator, they might

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>have goofed up some, but when they actually got behind

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the wheel, they again turned on some switch that was like,

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>all right, gotta be super careful, right, So interesting. Yeah,

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.399
<v Speaker 1>and and even more to the point, you they if

0:41:55.440 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you take the individual things that driving were wires like coordination,

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>paying attention, reaction time. If you test those things individually

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>outside of the context of driving, people who smoke pot

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>routinely do worse UM on those things. But again, yeah,

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>when they get behind the wheel, it's like it's serious

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>time for for people who smoke pot. That So the

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>thing about that, though, is that the studies find that

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that's true up to a certain point, that when you

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pass a certain level of impairment, then all of a sudden,

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>your chances of being responsible for a fatal accident go

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>up dramatically. And what they found is that that that

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>point correlates possibly to um a a th HC content

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in your blood of about five parts per billion or

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>five nano Graham's per leader, Yes, which is very it's

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a very controversial number. It's a controversial amount well, and

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's um at this point, like a breathalyzer. We did

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a show on breathalyzers. It was Boy, that was a

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 1>tough one. Yeah, I remember how complicated those things are. Yeah,

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that was very technical and tough. But there's like a

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>magical crystal involved in them. But with a breathalyzer, like

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you can tell when someone is literally drunk at that moment.

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Um With with marijuana, you're doing blood and urine tests

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 1>that shows that you have marijuana in your system. If

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you are a heavy marijuana user, you could be stone

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>cold sober and show marijuana in your system. So they

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a full proof way of testing like

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>pulling someone off the street but from behind the wheel

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of a car and seeing if they were stoned at

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that moment. So the and that's one of the reasons

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>why some states are starting to adopt that five parts

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 1>per billion threshold because apparently studies find that if you're

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a regular smoker and you've got a bunch of THHC

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in your body that's accumulated, but you haven't smoked, we

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lee you're not gonna be over five parts per billion, okay.

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the other one is that that that statistic

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that says that your chances of being in a fatal

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 1>crash increased dramatically at five over five parts per billion.

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's why some states are adopting it, but some

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>other studies, especially once out of Europe, are like, WHOA,

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that is way too high a limit. It should be

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 1>more like one part per billion um. I think they're

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to land on the right number. They definitely are.

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Sweden is adopting a one part per billion

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:39.240
<v Speaker 1>um limit, and they're apparently famous for being really strict

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>about impaired driving, so they kind of set the trend

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on the one end of the spectrum, whereas the US

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:48.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of edges towards the other end of the spectrum.

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Like with blood alcohol content, I think the legal limit

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 1>in most states is point oh eight percent, which is

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>about I think for like a hundred and eighty pound man,

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>that like three or four drinks in an hour, and

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean three or four drinks in an hour and

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>getting behind a car that is a lot that you're

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not driving very well. It's like an arbitrarily high number

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>if you really think about it. Part of the other

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>problem too with testing for whether somebody is impaired UM

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 1>by pot or reach some sort of some limit or threshold,

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is that there's no UM there's no real reliable way

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>for testing it on the side of the road, including

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that roadside UM field sobriety test. They make you stand

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>on one foot and make you um walk, heal the

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>toe and then turn around. And I think there's a

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>third part to it too, and that's actually really good

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>at catching drunk people. It catches like percent of people

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>who are drunk at the time, but it only catches

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 1>like thirty percent of people who are stoned. So the

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>cops are starting to come up against this, these new

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>laws where you're allowed to smoke pot, but how much

0:45:57.600 --> 0:45:59.439
<v Speaker 1>is too much to get behind the wheel of a car,

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's a real guidance and they don't really have

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 1>any way of testing. And again, like you said, in

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ten years, all of this will be resolved. But UM

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:10.240
<v Speaker 1>for the time being. It's kind of like the Wild

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>West as far as driving while impaired by pot legislation

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:17.359
<v Speaker 1>is concerned. Yeah. I got pulled over coming home from

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 1>college to Atlanta one time. Uh, only time I've ever

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.359
<v Speaker 1>had like a field sobriety test done on me, and

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>he flat out asked me, He's like, Mr Bryant, have

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 1>you been smoking marijuana? After he put me through it,

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because he did the thing where you follow the finger

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with your eyeballs. Yeah, that's the third part. And I

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 1>think it's supposed I'm not sure what's supposed to happen,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like your eyeball twitches or something once it reaches the edge.

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it bounces up and down while it's going

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>left or right. Okay, well I'm not sure. All I

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 1>know is he told me, you know, keep your head

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>forward and follow with your eyes. And I turned my

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 1>head and followed his finger, and I was just I

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 1>was nothing. I was sober as a judge, and I

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was just nervous because I've never been pulled over on

0:46:57.640 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the side of the road and told to walk a line.

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And he finally just asked me, I was like, no,

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like nineteen, I was just scared yea, And eventually he

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>was like, all right, getting your VW beetle and drive home.

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you did you take the tack of um crying

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to get out of the ticket? No, I cried on

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the inside, okay, which you know I don't think you noticed.

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>This is interesting that I've never you know, that's the

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>only time in my life I've ever been pulled over

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and given that test. And it was even if you're sober,

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:28.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a little nerve wracking, sure, yeah it was. It's

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like that white coat syndrome where your blood pressure

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>goes up at the doctor's office because you're anxious for

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>being at the doctor's office. I know, I remember going

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>like in my brain, he alto he al too right.

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wait a minute, this this is no problem.

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>My balance is never a good officer when of that

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>ever works or asofer, it's always fun to throw that in,

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>but be totally sober. Just go ahead and sit in

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the back of that police car after one. Has you

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.880
<v Speaker 1>got anything else? No, I mean we should point out that,

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, another a factor with drinking and driving is

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you drink at a bar a lot of times,

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 1>whereas they think predominantly if you're smoking pot, you're probably

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>in your home, so you're not driving. Um. There are

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of other factors that that go into these big,

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>big statistical studies. But we're we're just at the the

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>eve weird mere babies as a country when it comes

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to marijuana legislation and study. Yeah, be interested to see

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>where it goes. I'll see in ten years. Yeah, I'll

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>see intent man. Okay, Well, in the meantime, Uh, you

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can look up well, there's not this article on house

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to works. You can just look at pop versus alcohol

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and it'll bring up a lot of great stuff. We

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>worked off of some stuff from Popular Science, from Slate,

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 1>from actually there's a house stuff works article now I

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>think about it, Live Science, High Times. Some good resources

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 1>out there. Just hit them up Willie Nelson dot com. Yeah. Uh.

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, since Chuck said Willie Nelson, it's

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>time for listener mail. Um, this is overlap of podcasts.

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think i've read this one yet. Hey guys,

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>my name is Neil. I enjoy listening to stuff you

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>should know and stuff you missed in history class, and

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>roller skating and long walks on the beach. Sometimes I've

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>heard the same subject get Daylight on both of your programs,

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 1>though very recently, you guys did a Mary Celeste episode,

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and if I recall, Holly and Tracey did the same

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:30.359
<v Speaker 1>story not too long ago. UM Josh mentioned a chuck

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>about the woman who painted miniature crime scenes, and so

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>did they. My question is whether or not we ever

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 1>swapped notes on subjects a cross reference eats cross reference

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>each other's work. UM, where there might be overlap, it

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>could be nice even set up different situations where each

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast looks at the same subject to a different angle. Anyway,

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it might be a good thing to introduce to the

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:58.879
<v Speaker 1>other podcasts to someone who's not listening to it. Keep

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>up the good work. That from Neil in Washington, d C. Neil,

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I think we've answered this years ago, but we well,

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say, we try not to overlap,

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but no one really pays much attention internally in it.

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It just happens sometimes. And the only time it's ever

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>been like shoot is when it's literally within like a

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>few weeks of each other. Then we might have wished

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we would have timed it differently, But we always feel

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:26.400
<v Speaker 1>like all the different shows bring different things to the table,

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and so it's really not a big deal. But we

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely don't check with each other or share notes or anything.

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>We're all on our own little bubbles. Yeah. But also,

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we are aware that one of the

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:40.360
<v Speaker 1>other podcasts has already done something like that doesn't preclude

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:42.880
<v Speaker 1>us from doing it ourselves, and we would probably mention

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it if we were aware of it, like go check

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 1>out their version of it two, because it's always so

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 1>different enough that it's usually worth listening to both, you know,

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I agreed. Okay, Well, if you want to get in

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:55.359
<v Speaker 1>touch of this, you can tweet to us. There's an

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>official Stuff you Should Know one called s Y s

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 1>K podcast. I've got my own called josh um Clark.

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I also have a website called are You Serious Clark

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Uh Chuck is on Facebook at Charles W.

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Bryant. It's Facebook dot com slash Charles W. Chuck Bryant.

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You can also hit him up on Facebook dot com

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 1>slash Stuff you Should Know. You can send all of us,

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:18.720
<v Speaker 1>including Jerry and email to Stuff Podcasts at how Stuff

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com and has always joined us at our

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>home on the web. Stuff you Should Know dot com

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:30.400
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and thousands of other topics. Is

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff Works? Dot com