WEBVTT - An Overview of Carbon Fiber

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hate there

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and Welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>are you. I'm back after my vacation and then the holiday,

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're ready to tackle some new episodes. And there

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>have been a few really big events in the news

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last few weeks that have a tech angle

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to them. There's the ongoing war in Ukraine, which was

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>punctuated by a brief but notable coup attempt in Russia.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>There's the ongoing chaos over at Reddit, which has had

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>effects far beyond Reddit itself because companies like Google have

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>struggled to deliver satisfying search results, while hundreds of popular

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>subreddits either remain dark or cluttered with memes, or some

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of them are set to not safe for work status

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.919
<v Speaker 1>and so they're not showing up properly. And then there's

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the Titan submersible, the vehicle where five people perished when

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the submersible suffered a catastrophic failure. I thought today I

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>would talk about something relating to that last story. Now

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do a full story about the

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>systems aboard the Titan submersible, because a lot of other

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>people have already done that to varying degrees. I've seen

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>some treatments that were very high level. I've seen one

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>really decent video that talked about the various systems. If

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you do want a deeper conversation about the Titan submersible,

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I will go into it. But I figure that because

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there's already all this coverage out there, and even by

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the time this episode goes out, you know, with news

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>going as fast as it does, a lot of people

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>would already say it's old news. So chances are you

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>might already know everything there is to know already. But

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if you would like me to do an episode about

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the Titan submersible and its various systems and how it worked,

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>let me know and I will be sure to tackle that.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So instead, for this episode, I thought I would focus

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on one of the primary materials, not the only one,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>but one of the big ones used in the construction

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of the Titan submersible, which is carbon fiber. I figure

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we can learn about the history of this material and

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what makes it special, and a little bit about how

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it's produced and what applications benefit from it versus ones

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps are not ideal applications of carbon fiber, because,

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, carbon fiber has a lot of

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>really good legit uses and applications, but not all of

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>them make sense necessarily. But let's start by talking about

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>carbon itself, because, as the name implies, carbon fiber is

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>made up of carbon. It is the sixth most plentiful

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>element in the universe by the number of atoms out there,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>according to Encyclopedia Britannica. That is, it trails behind hydrogen, helium, oxygen, neon,

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and nitrogen. On Earth, carbon doesn't really rank that high

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as far as elements found in the Earth's crust. In fact,

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it makes up about point zero two five percent of

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's crust. Now, despite this tiny little pathetic showing

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Earth's crust, carbon is actually part of more

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>compounds than any other element. It can make more compounds

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>than any element you can think of. In fact, it

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>forms more compounds than all the other elements put together.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Not put together in a compound, but I mean, like

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>all their various combinations that we have discovered. Now you've

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>likely heard the fray, the carbon based life form. At

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>least you have. If you've watched any science fiction, you've

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>probably heard the phrase organic compounds. Well, an organic compound

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is one that contains carbon, and any compound that does

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>not contain carbon is an inorganic compound. So why do

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>scientists associate the words life and organic with carbon. Well,

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's because of carbon's tendency to form multitudes of compounds

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>at a range of temperatures that we find here on Earth. Right,

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>not all elements will form specific compounds under Earth temperatures.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>You might have to go to extremes to create certain compounds,

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>but carbon readily forms countless compounds here on Earth just

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in regular Earth conditions. Many of those compounds are polymers.

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Polymers are large molecules that are made up of repeated

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>units that are chained together, and all living stuff on

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Earth has carbon in it. So the thinking goes that

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>carbon is just so well suited for making all these

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>different compounds at temperatures that we associate as being livable

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 1>temperatures that, at least here on Earth, it makes sense

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's a foundational element for life. Now, whether that

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is true elsewhere in the universe is hard for us

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to say. We have a sample size of one planet

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that we know to have life on it, and we

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>live on it. That's it. We don't know of any

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>other planets. It's quite possible there are maybe countless planets

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that have life on them. We don't know about them.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Carbon's utility and tendency to bind in molecular compounds seems

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to give it an edge over others. But science fiction

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>is filled with examples of, say, alien civilizations that turn

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>out to be life forms that are based on other

0:05:54.600 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>elements like silicon. It's just that carbon. Because it's such

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>an interesting element, and it does form all these compounds

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so readily under earthlike conditions, we figure this is probably

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a cornerstone for life, at least life as we understand it.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Carbon is non metallic. You know, if you burn wood

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>down into charcoal, that's carbon. That's the charcoal is carbon.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>If you squeeze it hard and hot and long enough,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>which sounds a bit racy, but if you do that,

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>then obviously you get a diamond. Carbon's really neat. Depending

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>upon its molecular arrangement, it can be soft enough to

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>use as pencil lead that would be graphite, right, Like,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that's soft enough where if you drag the lead across vapor.

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>It leaves some of it behind, right, it's just the

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure of your hand pushing the pencil against paper is

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>enough to rub some of the carbon off. That's graphite,

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>But it could also be made into a diamond, which

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>is hard enough to cut most other materials. Again, it's

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>all in that molecular structure. How are those carbon atoms arranged,

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's what really matters. How do those carbon atoms

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>form crystaline structures. That determines the features of the material

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that you end up with in aggregate, whether that's coal

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>or charcoal or diamond or anything like that. So that's

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>carbon in a nutshell. Well, obviously you could spend multiple

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>university level chemistry classes talking about it. I mean, the

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>whole branch of organic chemistry focuses on it. But for

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>our purposes we're gonna leave off from there because really

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there's not much more to say about it when we're

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about carbon fiber. So let's turn our attention there.

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, first of all, if you're in America,

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you're probably spelling fiber fiber, and if you're a brit

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you're probably spelling it fiber bray I bre Now I've

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned that carbon can form polymers, these long chain

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>molecules that have repeating structures in them. A carbon fiber

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a really really long one of these, or

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>rather a tube made up of these carbon nanotubes, by

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, kind of takes the same concept, but down

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to the nano level. Anyway, carbon fiber material ends up

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>being lightweight and strong. It can be electrically conductive. It

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can also be thermally conductive, depending upon the carbon fiber

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>used in the process you use to produce it. We'll

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>talk more about the qualities of carbon fiber in a bit,

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but before we get to that, let's talk about its

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>actual history. The story of carbon fiber is fascinating and

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it involves the inventor of the incandescent light bulb. And

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>some of y'all clever smarty pants out there already know

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm being coy because I am not talking about Thomas Edison.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Edison did not invent the incandescent light bulb. Now

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>here in America. One of Edison's many nicknames is the

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Inventor of the light bulb. But the truth is that

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Wilson swan over in the UK, beat Edison to

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the punch by a couple of decades, and he did

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it using carbon fiber as a filament, or at least

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>eventually he did use carbon fiber. So we're talking around

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty here, and before figuring out how to make

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber, Swan had started off with carbonized paper as

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the filament. So this is the stuff folks would use

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to produce copies from one document. You would have your

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>primary document and that would be on the top of

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a stack. Right below your primary document would be a

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sheet of carbonized paper that is paper coated with carbon

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>on one side the site that's face downward from the

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>top page. And then the next layer would be a

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>blank sheet of paper that would be your copy that

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd be creating. So if you wrote on the top document,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it would put enough pressure on this carbonized paper to

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>leave an imprint on the blank sheet below that, and boom,

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you get two documents for the effort of making one. Now,

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you could actually do more layers of carbonized paper than

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>blank sheets, but as you go down the layers, the

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>pressure that is being put on the paper is decreasing,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>so unless you're being super heavy handed with your writing,

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the bottom copies will be much more faint than the

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>upper ones would be, so you have a limit to

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>how many copies you can produce through this method. Anyway,

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Swan was using carbonized paper as his filament, so he

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was connecting pieces of carbonized paper to a pair of electrodes,

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and he encased the whole thing in glass and attempted

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to create a vacuum inside the glass and then zap

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the heck out of the paper using the electrodes. The

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>paper would heat up to the point of glowing, but

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the lack of oxidizers in the glass meant it wouldn't

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>catch fire, except the Swan couldn't get a perfect vacuum

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>seal in. The carbon paper didn't last very long, nor

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>did it give off much light, so it wasn't really

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a practical filament for an incandescent bulb. It worked in

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the sense that it would glow, but it wasn't bright

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>enough and it didn't last long enough for it to

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have any practical use. So Swan wanted to find something

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>else to serve as the filament in his incandescent bulb.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He was also experimenting with some other stuff like nitro cellulose.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>This stuff is highly flammable, so flammable that at one

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>time it was being used as propellant for firearms, and

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it was called gun cotton back in those days. Well,

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Swan figured out that he could push nitro cellulus through

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like a mesh with very small holes in it, and

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the nitro cellulus would form fibers as a result, kinda

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>like one of those playto playsets where you push down

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on a lever and it squeezes your play doo through

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a grid of holes, so you can make I don't know, dayglo,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>pink spaghetti or what. Well what Swan did the nitro cellulose,

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he also tried with carbon. He took carbon and in

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the form of cotton fibers. In this case, he treated

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the cotton fibers with sulfuric acid and then he pressed

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this solution through a screen with tiny holes in it,

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and on the other side of the screen he ended

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>up with carbon fibers, and he could curl those fibers

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>up to make tight spirals, which would increase the amount

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of material that he could fit between a pair of electrodes.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And the carbon fibers, when used as a filament, produced

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>better light than the carbon paper version he had been

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>relying on and his process for making carbon fiber would

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>become a standard. There are chemists and labs today who

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially use the exact same approach, though things get way

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>more complicated when you're talking about mass engineering. For you,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>big industrial uses of carbon fiber. Now we're going to

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. When we come back, we'll talk

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>more about what makes carbon fiber special, but first let's

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>hear from our sponsors. Okay. As smart as smarty pants

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Swan was, he wasn't able to see the potential mechanical

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>applications of carbon fiber. He was just using it as

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>an incandescent bulb filament. But he had no way to

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>know that his material, if woven properly and combined with

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>other stuff, could be strong, lightweight, and perfect for futuristic

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>applications like the aerospace industry. Silly Swan not to anticipate

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>all those uses back in the mid nineteenth century. Now.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.479
<v Speaker 1>In fact, carbon fiber would kind of go into hibernation

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for many decades because there just weren't any practical uses

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>for it or any real way to produce it at scale.

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>It re emerged in nineteen fifty eight when a physicist

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>named Roger Bacon produced carbon fiber and discovered that if

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>constructed properly, it would be a really stiff, really strong,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and extremely lightweight material. But it was super expensive to

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>produce due to the time and effort involved, and the

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>small amount of output you would get meant that there

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't much you could do with it, so there was

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>no commercial use for it just yet. But he was

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>showing that this material had promise and that people would

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>likewise start to pour money into improving manufacturing processes to

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>make it practical. The evolution of those processes happened mainly

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen seventies. Scientists in different parts of the

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>world found new ways to produce carbon fibers. Some of

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>those would be suitable for high heat applications, such as

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in the aerospace industry, where you might need to radiate

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>heat outward from an engine before you get to a

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>point where that's no longer your concern. Others would be

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>suitable for more terrestrial uses. The eighties and nineties proved

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a boom era for carbon fiber research and development,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as engineers recognized the material as being a good candidate

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for various applications, particularly in the space industry. Where there

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is a real need to create materials that are very strong,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>but you also want to cut way back on weight

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>as much as you can in order to reduce the

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>amount of energy you need to launch the stuff off

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>this rock in the first place. So carbon fiber would

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>become a really strong candidate for lots of space based applications. Now,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier, carbon fiber has some really cool properties.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>It is really strong and really light. In fact, it's

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>five to ten times stronger than steel, depending upon which

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>source you're reading and the method of production for carbon fibers,

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and the specific type of steel you're talking about, and

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're actually looking at. So saying it's stronger than

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>steel has really a simple answer to a complex situation,

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and it does mean that we need to spend a

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more time to talk about material strength and

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>what that actually means. So essentially, we quantify a material

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>strength by examining how much stress or strain it can

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>withstand before the structure we're looking at deforms to a

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>point that when we remove the stress, it will not

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>go back to its original shape. So, in other words,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>if you were to bend a bar and then you

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>stop applying force, to the bar and the bar stays bent,

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you have exceeded the material strength of that bar. And

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>if it pops back into its regular bar shape, then

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you did not exceed the material strength of that bar.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>There are different kinds of stresses that you can apply

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to materials, So when we say something is strong, we

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>actually have to think about in what context. So again,

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about it having a short pipe. Now it's

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>made out of whatever, it doesn't matter. We're just talking

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>about the types of stresses you could put on this pipe.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you were to grip either end

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of that pipe and you were to pull in opposite directions,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to allow lung gate the pipe. You're putting tension

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on it. This is the test for tensile strength of

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the pipe. How well does it hold up to stresses

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that attempt to elongate the material. And once you reach

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the point where you have exceeded that material strength, that

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>tensile strength of that material, does it rip apart? Does

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it shatter? What happens? Now? What if instead of pulling

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>on either end, you were pushing inward on either end

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the pipe. You're trying to compress the pipe, You're

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>squeezing the material. In other words, typically most materials have

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a high compressive strength compared to tensile strength, like a

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>higher one. There are some elements at play here that

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>can lead to other complications, Like, yes, it may be

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>that it can withstand compression and it doesn't really compress

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>beyond a certain point, but it might buckle, right, So

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>there are other elements you have to look at when

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you're testing compressive strength. Then you've got sheer strength. Now,

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not sheer as an sh ee r strength. I'm talking

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>about sh ea r strength like a pair of shears,

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>because scissors effectively put this kind of stress on a material.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>So a shear stress is one in which the stress

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on either end of the material is parallel to each other,

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're in opposite direction. So if you think of scissors,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like when the blades of scissors are coming together, one

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.959
<v Speaker 1>blade moving down, the other blade moving up, it is

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>putting that kind of pressure on the material that you're cutting. Right,

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the one blade is moving up, one blade is moving down,

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>so they are parallel to each other, but they're moving

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in opposite directions. And if you apply that kind of

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>stress to a material, you can find out how resistant

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it is to shear stresses. So this is also called

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>torsional loading. Right, You're at a torsional load to the material. Now,

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>comparing materials against each other isn't always as simple as

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>saying one is stronger than the other. One material might

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have greater tensile strength, meaning it could withstand elongation better

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>than another material could in the same sort of situation.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But maybe that first material can't hold up to the

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>same sheer stresses that material two can withstand. You know,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>like some Facebook relationship status is it's complicated? Just does

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook actually still have its complicated as a relationship status?

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Is anyone still on Facebook? Can I get a check

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>on that? Anyway? Let's get back to carbon fiber. I

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>think one way we can look at this is to

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>think of strength in comparison to some other component and

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>then compare two different materials. So in this case, we'll

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>say strength to weight ratio. How strong is something compared

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to how much which it weighs. If we do that,

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>if we look at it as strength to weight, carbon

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fiber is way stronger than steel. If you have a

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.239
<v Speaker 1>pound of carbon fiber and a pound of steel and

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they both have been made into some sort of you know, structure,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the carbon fiber is going to be technically stronger than

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the steel is, and that's because steel is a really

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>super dense material. So depending upon the application, a lightweight

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber structure might be the way to go. For example,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to create a resilient helmet for football

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>players I'm talking about American football here, well you would

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>probably want to go with carbon fiber, not with steel,

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because I'm pretty sure no football player wants to wear

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 1>a big steel helmet out on the field. But a

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>lightweight helmet made with carbon fiber, that's a different story. However,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>if we were to instead look at strength compared to volume,

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the story is different. I watched a video from Crazy

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Hydraulic Press that compared stuff like acrylic fiberglass, aluminum, or

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>aluminium if you prefer brass, titanium, steel, and carbon fiber

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to a hydraulic press test. The video has all of

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>these materials made in the same simple shape a rectangular rod,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it's like a rod, but it's squared off,

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not a circular rod, and it's the exact same

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>dimensions for every single material, same length, same with you know,

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>So that way you've got different substances, but they all

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are making rods of the exact same size from each substance.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And that means that when you put the rods next

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to each other, the carbon fiber rod is going to

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 1>weigh a lot less than the steel rod will, right,

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>because steel is way more dense, it's heavier, it's gonna

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have more mass, even though the physical dimension of the

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>two rods will otherwise be identical. Right, And if you

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.479
<v Speaker 1>put these two different rods to the test, the steel

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>one's likely to hold up better because by volume, steel

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is the stronger material. If you look at weight, carbon

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 1>fibers the stronger material. Like I said, it's complicated. And

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for the record, in the video I watched, the carbon

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>fiber rod had a mass of fifteen point two grams

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and the steel rod had a mass of seventy six

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>point eight grams. If we were to convert that to weight,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 1>and let's say we just go with pounds just to

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>make it silly, then the carbon fiber weigh just point

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 1>zero three pounds. The steel rod weighed point one seven,

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>so way way more than the carbon fiber rod. And

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in the video they set the rods lengthwise across two prongs,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>metal prongs, and they use a hydraulic press to apply

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>stress down across the length of the rod, like to

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>push down right in the middle. So it's sort of

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like if you were to take a branch and try

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to break it in half across your leg. The carbon

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>fiber rod broke when the press hit seven hundred and

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>forty kilograms of weight at that point of the rod,

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>and the steel held out till three thousand, eight hundred

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy kilograms. So again, carbon fiber seven hundred and forty,

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>steel threey, eight hundred and seventy. But the story would

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 1>be totally different if instead of volume, we were going

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>by weight. If you had fifteen point two grams of

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber and fifteen point two grams of steel, you

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>would see that the carbon fiber would hold up way

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>better because that would be a very small steel rod,

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>very thin, and it would deform much faster than the

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber would. And I'm going to talk more about

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber, but we do need to take another quick

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsors. We'll be right back to

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>talk a bit more about what carbon fiber is used

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>for and how it's used. Because it's not as simple

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>as just making a frame out of carbon fiber. But

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that in just a moment. Okay, before

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:25.479
<v Speaker 1>the break, I talked about how carbon fiber is not

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just used as pure carbon fiber and stuff. In fact,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we're usually talking about carbon fiber that is bonded to

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>some other material, and carbon fiber access kind of like

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.239
<v Speaker 1>a reinforcing layer. So I like to think of it

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>as similar to iron rebar that's inside a concrete structure,

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>because the carbon fiber is providing strength and resilience, but

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make up the totality of say the football helmet,

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, you have a binding agent in there. Typically

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you're using something like plastic and you're reinforcing it with

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>carb fiber. So, to put it in another way, steel is

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>really hard stuff. It's also really heavy, and it's challenging

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>to mold steel into complicated shapes. We can do simple

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>shapes pretty easily, but if you want to do something

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>like a really a complex curve, maybe multiple curves in

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a single panel, it's hard to get steel to take

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that shape and not have it be an exorbitantly expensive process.

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But using a technology like injection molding and a material

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like plastic, you can create all sorts of wild shapes,

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and plastic is way lighter than steel, but of course

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's nowhere near as strong. So combining plastic with carbon

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>fiber can provide the strength you want, the weight you want,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and the shape you want. Now, let's talk about what

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>happens when carbon fiber fails. That is, when you apply

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a stress that exceeds the material strength of carbon fiber,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're doing this to a structure made out of

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber. Unlike some other materials, carbon fiber will not

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>remain permanently deformed if a stress exceeds its material strength. Right,

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Like we were talking about the classic iron bars example

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of bending an iron bar, Well, you can bend an

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>iron bar and it will stay bent, but that doesn't

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>happen with carbon fiber. Instead, as dragon plate carbon fiber

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>composites puts it quote, it will fail suddenly and catastrophically

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>end quote. So in other words, once you go past

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the stress limit for carbon fiber, it's all over. You

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>don't end up with a dent that can be hammered

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>out later. You end up with shattered material or splintered material.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>To this day, carbon fiber fabrication is really expensive and

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated. When you look at a carbon fiber frame bicycle,

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 1>for example, you're not looking at something that's made out

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of pure carbon fiber. You're really looking at a compound

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>or a composite rather made out of material like plastic

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that has carbon fiber sandwiched inside of it to provide

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.959
<v Speaker 1>rigidity and strength. It wouldn't make any sense from an

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>economic standpoint to go with a pure carbon fiber frame

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to replace, like I don't know, the chassis of an automobile,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for example. You could go with a compound or composite

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that uses carbon fiber, and you would end up with

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a chassis that could be as strong as a steel chassis,

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>but much much lighter, which ends up going to it's

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>going to have a big effect on things like fuel economy,

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>right because the engine's not going to have to move

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle that's nearly as heavy if the components are

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>made from carbon fiber as opposed to steal. If you

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>did go full carbon fiber, you would run into lots

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of problems. One would be the price tag because it

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>would just be exorbitantly expensive. But also carbon fiber is

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>not the perfect solution to all challenges. It's just a

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>solution for certain engineering needs. Like there are components within

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that undergo a lot of different stress, right, not

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>just tensile or compression, but also you know rotational that

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>tortionial force can be a part of it. And in

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>some of those applications a carbon fiber composite might shatter,

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>whereas in other applications it's the carbon fiber composite is

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>a perfect solution. So yeah, you have to pick and choose.

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't have just one material that's good for everything. Now,

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this brings us up to the tragedy of the Titan submersible.

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>As we all know now, the Titan had a catastrophic

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>failure that resulted in the implosion of the vehicle deep

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Atlantic Ocean. Authorities have now salvaged some of

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the wreckage and we can expect a full investigation to

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>determine what was the point of failure, if it is

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in fact possible to determine that. Now, there's a chance

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that the culprit here is the carbon fiber hull, which

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't totally carbon fiber. The end caps were made out

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of titanium, but the body of the submersible was carbon

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fiber or a carbon fiber composite. It's possible that the

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber composite failed to hold up under the massive

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>pressure that was exerted upon it by the sea. You know,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>as you get into those depths, that's a lot of

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>weight that's pushing down on you. That pressure is incredible.

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It could also turn out that a totally different part

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of the submersible was to blame. One potential culprit could

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>be the epoxy that actually bound the carbon fibers together. Remember,

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber typically ends up being part of something else,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like sandwiched in with other materials, and the epoxy was

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>what kept the carbon fibers in their shape in the

0:29:55.600 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>proper alignment. So maybe that epoxy, after multiple and prolonged

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>exposure to sea water, degraded. We don't know yet. Still,

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the use of carbon fiber at all as a submersible

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>material made it a little confusing for me. As we

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>have covered, a big advantage of carbon fiber is its

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>strength to weight ratio, and so it's really really good

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for applications where you want to limit weight as much

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>as you can while not giving ground on strength. Right,

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you want something to be strong but light weight every

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>pound counts. So again, when we look at the space industry,

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it makes perfect sense. You want materials that are as

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>strong as they can be while still being light weight.

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Steel is strong, but steel's really heavy. So if you

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>can make it out of something else that's resilient and

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tough like steel is, but is much lighter, that can

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of sense. But when it comes to submersibles,

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>weight is not necessarily your primary concern. I mean, you

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want it to be so heavy that there's no

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>way for you to lift it back out again. But

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you want really whole integrity. That's your main concern, not

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>how heavy the submersible is. Most deep sea vehicles make

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>use of steel, titanium, and aluminum rather than carbon fiber

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to what their pressure holes are made

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>out of. Also, you know, there hasn't been that much

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>research into how carbon fiber holds up under deep sea pressure,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>which means we don't know what we don't know. We

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>have a big gap in our knowledge. And that was

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the big criticisms directed at ocean Gate, the

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>company behind the Titan submersible, that the company had rushed

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>through the process of making a submersible with a carbon

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>fiber hull without first going through really rigorous testing to

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>make certain that the carbon fiber hull was appropriate for

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the use that they had in mind for the titan

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>mainly to go down and view the wreckage of the Titanic. Now,

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we do know that titan had already made trips down

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Titanic in the past. This was not the

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Titans made in voyage where the catastrophe happened. It had

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>gone down there before, so the submersible had proven to

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>be deep sea worthy on previous trips, which means we

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>really do need to get a more definitive answer after

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>authorities have investigated the wreckage to try and figure out

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>what actually happened. Where was the failure, because right now

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it's all still a big question mark. Was it the

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>carbon fiber hull, Maybe, but maybe not. As for carbon

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>fiber itself, that's going to continue to be a really

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>important material in engineering, particularly for things like aircraft, you know,

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the aerospace industry, things like automotive industry, bicycles, anywhere where

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you want a lot of strength but you want to

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>cut down on weight. That's where it's going to make sense,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>not in every application, because again carbon fiber doesn't work

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>under every situation at the same level of reliability as

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>steel or other materials like aluminum, So it's all dependent

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>upon the specific application. This is not like one material

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>solves all problems. And the reason why I keep hammering

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on that, I know I sound like a broken record,

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but the reason I keep doing it is because I

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>find that a lot of science reporting oversimplifies and just

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>says carbon fiber is lighter and stronger than steel. And

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>while that might be true in some particular instances, it

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that carbon fiber should replace steel in everything

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that we rely upon for you know, from steel. So

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why I go on and on about this, because

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to look at it as a

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>more complicated subject than that. Otherwise you're over simplifying to

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a point where you just start to make bad decisions.

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm not saying that's what ocean Gate did in

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>this case, but based upon a lot of the criticisms

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, it sounds as if Stockton Rush, the founder

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of ocean Gate, he was aboard the Titan submersible when

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it imploded, that perhaps he was a little too gung

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>ho in forging a path forward to go through the

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>rigorous steps that are really necessary to do things like

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>make certain that the approach you're using is safe and reliable.

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Could this have tragedy have been prevented. It's hard to

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>say because the investigation hasn't been complete yet. Maybe there

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>was some wild thing that happened that we didn't anticipate,

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that couldn't have been anticipated, and it turns out that

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing we would do or have done would have changed it.

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe it turns out that this was something that

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>was avoidable. We just don't know yet. So carbon fiber

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is still really interesting material, still really useful for specific applications,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and this could also lead into a deeper discussion of

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>things like carbon nanotubes, which in itself that's a fascinating

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>technology too. When you start getting down to the nanoscale,

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you really see some very interesting features of materials, including

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>carbon and carbon nanotubes being a super cool area of technology,

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but one we've been talking about for a long time,

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and for some people it may just seem like it

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was one of those technologies that seemed like it had

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of promise but never went anywhere. That's not

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the case. It has gone places. It's just that it's

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>not as sudden as we would all like, because we

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as we know, the real way toward the future is

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>marking the passage of time and that doesn't change. That

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just keeps on creeping on, creeping on. All right, that's

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it for this episode about carbon fiber, a kind of

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>overview of carbon fiber. And I hope all of you

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>are well. I hope those of you in the United

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>States had a fun and safe Fourth of July. I

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>hope everyone to have a fun and safe Fourth of July.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>You just don't have a real reason to celebrate Fourth

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of July if you're not American, because it's related to

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>our history. So hope you're all well, and I'll talk

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production.

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.