WEBVTT - Activision CEO, First Republic, Earnings, and Stock Picks

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in some smart people here to talk rage,

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>to talk banks, to talk to you know, where things

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>are going here, Ira Jersey, He's a chief EOS interest

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>rates strategist. He's phoning it in and I love that

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>about him. From somewhere in Jersey, Herman Chan in the

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Brooker's studio. So, Ira, you know, I typed

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>in FED go into my terminal, and I see we

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>got a FED meeting on May third, give us a preview.

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 4>So, after today's GDP report, which showed, you know, slightly

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 4>higher than expected inflation data, I think that that Wednesday's

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 4>FED is definitely gonna Hi. I think that that's almost

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 4>a gift. And I think the question now is under

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 4>what circumstances might they go further? Because we still have

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 4>some of these concerns, and I'm sure we've talked about

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 4>this with Herman about credit potentially starting to contract in

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 4>a pretty meaningful way and that could have serious effects

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 4>on the economy in the second half of the year

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 4>and going into twenty four. So I do suspect that

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 4>this might be the last hike. It's not a given

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 4>that'll be the last hike, but I do think that

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 4>the FED is much closer to being done than they

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 4>are to continue hiking.

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, hermit hanging.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Can I correct myself because I was far off the

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>average US home price and immediately got a couple of

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 2>listener emails. Oh good, Okay, But so I did actually

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>put it into being and Bing tells me that the

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>average US home price varies depending on the source and

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>the type of measurement used, but the medium home median

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>home sales price, which is the middle point of all transactions,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>is reported to be between three hundred and twenty one

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>thousand and four hundred and forty thousand dollars as of

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty two.

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And then and then they gave me.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Four sources that they used, which is I love this

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 2>new chat search function.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, I just think it's cool.

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Because they give you pretty decent answers and then they

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 2>source so so I can dig in if I want

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>to know. But yeah, so between three twenty and four

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 2>forty three seventy it's still far lower than sixteen million. Yes,

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 2>it's right, it is. So I guess our good friends

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 2>on hampsons are not necessary. Let me let me ask

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Herman Chance. So, Herman, how were these mortgage products? First

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 2>of all, thank you for giving us some of your time.

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I know how in demand you are. Herman Chand covers

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>regional banks for us at Bloomberg Intelligence Inteligence and is

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 2>now the most famous person in the building. What what

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 2>were the mortgage products? I know I flubbed that as well,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 2>But was it you get interest only rate for ten

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>years and then you trip into a normal thirty year

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>fixed mortgage.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Usually it's the io period. It's just only period either

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 5>five years or ten years, and then you wouldn't go

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 5>to a normal interest rate. You would refinance that loan

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 5>again and then do another loan, maybe the same sort

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 5>of product, but then start the start the interest only

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 5>period all over again.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Herman, just looking at these banks, Paul,

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>did you get that kind of rate? When you bought

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>your I did not your lat Jersey state on the

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Jersey Shore, No I did. I did not. Unfortunately, apparently

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>so Herman, I'm done with FRC. I'm done.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, dude, Ben Emmon said said out a note

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 2>last night or two nights ago, saying that FA flight

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 2>is now a huge problem for them.

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think, what flight financial advisor flight?

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 2>So basically they lost one hundred billion dollars of assets

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>in Q one and then they said in their call

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 2>in which they took no Q and a deposit, flight

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>was only one point seven percent in April. So I thought, oh,

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that's right, that's tapering down to nothing. But I think

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>after the huge stock crash two days ago, a lot

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>of financial advisors or those who are still left, said listen,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take all my clients, all their assets, and

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>we're going to Morgan Stanley, We're going to JP Morgan,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 2>We're going to Goldmansax.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>They're leaving.

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 5>That's the risk that all the productive folks at the

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 5>Biggs now try to find greener pastures. The earnings released

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 5>earlier in the week had mentioned that of the financial

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 5>advisors that had left prior to earnings, they represented less

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 5>than twenty percent of assets in their management, but you

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 5>can presume that that number is only growing by the day.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking soccer with you. I have had enough of you two.

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're gonna have a fed on, you know,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>May third, and I'll raise twenty five basis points and

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll get you then, to read the tea leaves so

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>man City for one over arsenal John Farrell's telling me

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I had to make time on my day yesterday to

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>watch that. Of course I did not. What did you

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>take away?

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 4>I actually have not seen that. I tried to avoid

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 4>watching Manchester City.

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Really why is that?

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, evil empire kind of stuff? The because I

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 4>support a team that that is their arch enemy.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Who do you support? Who's your team?

0:04:59.200 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Why support Afton Villa in the Premier League?

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But okay, now, why do you now, as an ugly American,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>how do we pick teams to follow?

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 6>Like?

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>How did you pick Aston Villa? I couldn't pick that.

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 4>I have a well, I had a close connection. So

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 4>I did a postgraduate degree at the University of Birmingham

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 4>in the Midlands of England, and Afton Villa was the

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 4>closest Premier League team to where I was so so

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 4>this was back in nineteen ninety three, ninety four, and

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 4>when I was there, we you know, I went to

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 4>like eight or nine matches, and so I just became

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 4>a Villa supporter. People would say like, hey, Liverpool's come

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 4>into town, let's go to Villa Park to watch a match.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.239
<v Speaker 4>And I just wanted so many matches. I became a supporter.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>That's how it happens. Man. Yeah, very cool, the ugly

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>American in England. I actually heard last night.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>A very cool interview Carol Masser had on Alexis Ohanian.

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's too far off the beaten bank

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>rates path. But Alexis o'hanian, who of course made his

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>money I think originally from Reddit, but he's super rich

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 2>from other stuff. Married to married Divinus william Serena Serena Williams.

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 7>Sorry.

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 2>He he bought women's soccer team in Los Angeles, Angel City.

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I think or went in to start it right, and

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 2>he was saying the coolest the coolest part of what

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>he was saying, I should say, is that he didn't

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>do it because now he has a wife and a daughter,

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden, like he realizes the importance

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of equity equality, gender equality, but because he looked at

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 2>their Twitter following and the deals they were getting as

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 2>individual players, the popularity of these women, So many people

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 2>are interested in what they had to say and are

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>paying money for their the goods that they're selling. And

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 2>he said the collective value of the team was far

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>less than even one player. Yeah, you know, interesting. Yeah

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>for him, he said, it's a huge business opportunity. And

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>he also bought a little piece for his now five

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 2>year old daughter. She's the youngest sports own owner in America.

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I were real quick third thirty seconds, twenty

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>five basis points on the third. Are we done then?

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 4>I think we very well. Maybe, but obviously, if we

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 4>keep on getting inflation data that creeps higher and higher,

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 4>it's possible that they go another twenty five in June.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 4>But I think after that that they'll be done because

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 4>the Fed is worried about going too far and they

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 4>don't want to plunge the economy into a recession.

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ira Jersey, he's our guy on the rates.

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we'll talk to him next week. Of course,

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what this Federal Reserve is going to do again.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five basis points kind of priced in IRA Jersey,

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Chief US and straight strategist. Thank you so much, Herman

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Chan in the studio. This man does not mail it in,

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>he does not phone it in. He's at his post

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>every day and he's been very widely needed here over

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the past month and a half as we try to

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>navigate some of the turmoil, some of the stress in

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the banking system, particularly on some of these regional banks.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And we also have the credit Swiss ubs thing, so

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there's been some challenges there in the banking space and

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that's spoop the market a little bit. So we're appreciative

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of getting Herman's expertise.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the Ken's Our Line program Bloomberg Markets

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 7>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 7>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 7>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's be honest, folks. Bond Guy screwed up

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>bad last year. I mean, double digit declients everywhere across

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income space. But they're making up for it

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here. In twenty twenty three, the Bloomberg

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>u US Aggregatortal return value unheedged index whatever that is,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is up three point four to six percent year to date,

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's pretty good. So let's bring in George Bori.

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>He's a chief investment strategist covering fixed income space for

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>all Spring Global Advisors, who are located just outside of

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Lovely Milwaukee, Wisconsin, but he's based here in New York.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>He joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Study.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you coming in, George. You get a gold

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>star for showing up and not phoning it in. Talk

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to us about the difference between this year to date

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and what you guys had to do with last year.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, good morning, thanks for having me on the show.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>We're a very different.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 8>Point in the economic cycle. You know, the Fed's obviously

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 8>much more advanced in terms of rate tightening, and although

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 8>we continue to see, you know, some ongoing inflation pressures.

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 8>What we like to say is, you know, inflation's off

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 8>the boil, but it's still still pretty hot and coming down.

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So you need it to come down.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 2>So you think, then we're set up for one more

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 2>hike and then hold. I mean that's pretty much consensus.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>But if we have financial stability, assuming we don't have

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>a banking industry and crisis. I can't imagine why the

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Fed would hold at you know, still between five and

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>six percent of sticky inflation.

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 8>Now today's data makes it tricky, and you know, I

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 8>think the bias is to move to a pause, but

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, they don't have the all clear. They certainly

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 8>don't have the cover to do it without some risk.

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 8>And so you know, yes, raising rates one more time

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 8>certainly makes sense. You know, we need to see in

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 8>FED funds rate above the level of core inflation. At

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 8>that point, you know, the Fed can be a little

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 8>bit more disciplined, but we're simply not there yet, and

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 8>with core inflation showing some signs of moving up, that

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 8>may keep pressure on them.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're at four point nine percent.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>The core PCEE quarter of a quarter came in at

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 2>four point nine percent today, so we were looking for

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 2>four point seven percent. Yeah, that's going the wrong direction essentially.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, So George, I'm not sure if you

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>can't keep a job or you just like working all

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>over Wall Street JP Morgan Ubs Securities, Wells Farger. You've

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>been doing is for a long time. Where are you, guys?

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Given where we are in cycle. Given where we are

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with the FED, where are you guys at offspring thinking

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>about the best opportunities at fixed income right here?

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 8>So these were all tactical moves, just to be very

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 8>self initiated, not firm initiated, at least not yet.

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully that continues.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 8>But I think if I've learned anything over thirty plus years,

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, as a fixed income investor, income matters. You know,

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 8>that's ninety plus percent of your return as you move

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 8>through time, and your best forward looking indicator or predictor

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 8>of returns is just your simple starting yield. So beginning

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 8>of the year, yields are pretty high. You know, that

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 8>was sort of a good entry point from our perspective

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 8>to certainly make a meaningful move into fixed income. You know,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 8>as the year has unfolded, you know, with all these

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 8>sort of conflicting economic signals and really sort of the

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 8>reminder that yields are relatively high, adding duration to your

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 8>portfolio is effectively the kicker. That's really where you're gonna

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 8>get a little bit of extra return in the portfolio.

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 8>And we've seen that so far year to date. As

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 8>you mentioned the ag up, you know, let's call it

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 8>three and a half percent year to date. That's pretty

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 8>good by bond in bond terms for three months or

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 8>four months of effort. And so to the extent, you know,

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 8>expectations are that number could probably double over the course

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 8>of the year. You know, seven percent return doesn't necessarily

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 8>earn back everything from last year, but gets you, you know,

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 8>almost half of what we love. And so as we

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 8>move through time, you want to compound at the highest

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 8>rate possible, and we're doing that basically in just about

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 8>every strategy that we manage.

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>What's on your dashboard, George, when you look especially at

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the try to engage the health of corporate

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 2>America or you know, corporates globally, it seems from looking

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 2>at spreads to.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Me like they're pretty healthy.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 2>But if I look at other interest rate indications, we're

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 2>headed for a recession. So how do you what's the

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 2>data that you look at every morning to do your job?

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think what's unique about this cycle?

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's not a great surprise, but inflation is

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 8>both you know, it's it's a it's a double edged sword.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, it generates a lot of nominal income for

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 8>both individuals as well as companies, and that nominal income

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 8>is ultimately used to pay back debts. So when we

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 8>see companies that have good, solid balance sheets, ones that

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 8>are pretty well funded, not a lot of immediate borrowing needs,

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 8>and relatively low cost of debt, they're in a good

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 8>position to kind of weather a lot of economic volatility.

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 8>And that's really what we're seeing, and that kind of

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 8>moves up and down the rating spectrum. That's not just

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, the very highly rated triple A rated of

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 8>the few that exist companies in the world, but that

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 8>can kind of go all the way down kind of

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 8>the credit spectrum. And so what do I worry about.

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 8>I worry about companies and individuals that are attached to

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 8>floating rate debt costs because they've gone up, they've gone

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 8>up a lot, they've gone up quickly, and they are

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 8>now sort of working through and we're seeing it in earnings.

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 8>You're seeing you're seeing margin pressure. You're seeing now that

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 8>a reduction in capital spending and all that has to

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 8>do with the cost of capital. So that is working

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 8>its way through the system. But we don't have the

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 8>same kind of pressures in say one specific sector like

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 8>we had in eight or even in the dot com

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 8>bubble back in two thousand and so this is kind

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 8>of a long drawn out exercise, and for us as

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 8>bond investors, you know, sort of that quality that that

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 8>company analysis becomes absolutely critical. We can build good portfolios

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 8>with good companies that have very strong predictive paying power,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 8>and that's where you sort of grab today's yields. You

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 8>capture it, and you continuously compound it through time. If

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 8>you can avoid permanent impairment, you win.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>George, I know you've got a lot of experience in

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a high yield space here. You know, if I'm staring

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>down our recession, do I allocate capital incremental capital to

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the highild space or might just too worried about again

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the potential recession and credit quality and all that kind

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff.

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 8>I think that the basic, you know, sort of assumption

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 8>is avoid high yield going into a recession. You know,

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 8>it's a good rule of thumb, but it's not exclusive.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 8>And as I mentioned, you know, what's unique about this

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 8>cycle is we have a wide range of companies that

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 8>have very very well funded capital structures that includes high

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 8>yield companies. I mean, if you just simply avoided the

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 8>lowest and riskiest sectors of the market like triple c's

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 8>that that you've already taken out, like the line's share

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 8>of default risk in the universe. You haven't eliminated it,

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 8>but you've taken most of it out. And so just

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 8>moving a little bit up in quality and focusing on

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 8>say triple b's, double B single bee companies. Those are

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 8>the ones that are kind of hovering between investment create

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 8>and high yield companies that are paying six, seven, sometimes

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 8>eight percent yields and have good earnings transparency as well

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 8>as a well funded capital structure. To us that those

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 8>are very attractive opportunities, So our messages don't throw the

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 8>baby out with the bathwater, you know, be willing to

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 8>sort of look for those high quality companies regardless of

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 8>their rating, and then stick with them as you move

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 8>through time. So, you know, we like that segment of

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 8>the market. We like it in the front end of

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 8>the curve, so shorter duration, so constrain some of that

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 8>interest rate sensitivity and sort of capture that sort of

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 8>seven percent running yield and just try and compound it

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 8>and use that income to fund other parts of your strategy.

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I mean, in your high yield models,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are your analysts what are they kind of modeling in

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>here for top line? I know it varies by industry,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, are you guys, is your base case

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a recession model that you guys have had in your

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>back pocket for several years? Are you bringing that recession

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>model out? And that's my base case.

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 8>Our base case is no growth. Okay, so high nominal growth,

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 8>zero real growth. In that world, companies still make money.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 8>It's just in real terms, who has pricing power, who's

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 8>keeping pace with sort of the economic backdrop that we're seeing,

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 8>and so we're sort of seeming to be sliding in

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 8>that direction. Today's data tells us that we're in a

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 8>what we'd call kind of a slow flation world. You know,

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 8>maybe we're sliding towards stagflation, but we're not there yet.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 8>But in a world of slow flation, there are companies

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 8>that are keeping pace with kind of pricing pressures. They're

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 8>maintaining their margins and for the most part, you know,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 8>as a debt person, they don't have big borrowing needs.

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>They might have a lot of.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 8>Debt to begin with, but they don't have a lot

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 8>of borrowing needs going forward. So from that perspective, we

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 8>can find good companies, and you know those are that's

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.239
<v Speaker 8>what's in our high yield bond fund, that's what's in

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 8>our short duration high income fund. That's in kind of

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 8>our more aggressive fixed income strategies. And you know, those

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 8>prices move around, but the paying ability of those companies

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 8>is pretty strong.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, George, thanks so much for coming in. I

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>really appreciated George Borri. He is the chief investment strategist

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>covering all the fixed income stuff for Allspring Global Investments.

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:34.959
<v Speaker 7>Here.

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate them coming into the Bloomberg and Actor Broker studio.

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Just looking at the yield right here in the treasury market,

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got the ten year treasury up about seven basis

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>points three point five to one percent, a little bit

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>more action there, and movement in the two year space.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>We got it up ten basis points four point zero

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>five percent on your two years, So getting paid the

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of weight there in that short term paper that

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of gets your attention.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the Take kens Are program Bloomberg Markets

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 7>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, tune in app,

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 7>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 7>York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>We got Mara Goldstein. She's a biotech analyst at miss

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Zuho and she joined us share Mara, thanks so much

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. You really appreciate it. I know you

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>upgraded recently. Hang on, what go Mayra?

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to the world of drugs, we got

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 2>to talk about your resume.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Go Alex Brown. I love Alex Brown.

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah, yeah, you're publicly outing me. But yeah, Alex Brown.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Was that in Baltimore? Or is that was that in Baltimore,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>New York?

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 9>So I was here in New York, based in Baltimore.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Yeah, Drew Marcus was my arch competitor at

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>alex bid.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Now we're good, good buddies. It brings me back to

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>my days at Tucker Anthony. Yeah, go back, back back.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I know you upgraded Merk recently. What's the call there?

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a big company. I forgot it's

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so big, two hundred and eighty billion of market cap.

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>The stocks kind of unchanged here to date. What's your

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>call here on MERK?

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 9>So we upgraded Mark at the end of last year,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 9>and it was based on our view that so Tattertep,

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 9>which is a product that the company acquired to the

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 9>acquisition of accelera On, would be a great product. We

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 9>saw the data, the Phase three data earlier this year.

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 9>It looks like it's it looks like it's going to

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 9>be a fabulous product. That's for an indication called pulmonary

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 9>arterial hypertension. It's a rare disease and the exists in

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 9>the cardiovascular space, but opportunity to expand out from there.

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 9>And then secondarily on the basis of the potential for

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 9>the company to offset some of the key trudea loss

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 9>of exclusivity that could happen later in the decade with

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 9>a subcutaneous formulation, and that process is underway right now.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 9>Those clinical trials are underway. We only converted part of

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 9>key Trudi sales to the subcutaneous formulation in our model

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 9>in the app years, so there's definitely flexibility there. And

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 9>in general, our belief that the company would continue to

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 9>acquire and develop and have solutions, maybe not exactly dollar

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 9>for dollar, but that's already in the stock. For the

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 9>loss of the key Tete exclusivity, I mean Kytuta is

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 9>a fabulous, you know, oncology product. It's going to be

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 9>twenty you know, it's twenty billion dollars. So it's a

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 9>big you know, it's a it's a huge concentration of

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 9>revenue for the company.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Twenty billion dollars annually.

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 9>That'll be a twenty billion dollar product.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Unbelievable. Maybe they are charging too much for this stuff.

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how much did they pay for it?

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 9>So Key Trudah came to the company shoot the acquisition

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 9>of sharing Plow, and it was something that sharing Plow

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 9>wasn't working on. Mark found it in the sharing Plow

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 9>sort of back office, if you will, to sort in

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 9>the back of the lab and developed it and it

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 9>is approved in you know, many many cancer indications. It

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 9>was originally approved in late stage disease. The company is

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 9>migrating it to use an earlier state disease. Some of

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 9>the biggest indications, or where most of the sales get

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 9>generated from, are things like non small cell lung cancer,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 9>which is a very deadly disease and really allowing patients

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 9>truly to live longer lives. I mean, it's you know,

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 9>it has it's part of the handful of drugs the

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 9>im you know, oncology drugs that work by basically redirecting

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 9>the immune system in cancer, and it's been transformational for

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 9>a lot of late stage disease and now they're moving

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 9>it earlier. Just was approved in breast cancer for an

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 9>earlier form disease. So you know, there's a there's a

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 9>long way to go here, and they could continue to

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 9>see additional indications, additional combinations, things like that.

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 2>You know, every morning, I come in marat three and

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I start looking on the Bloomberg I type in most

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>space U four to see the big movers in the market,

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 2>in the pre market, and there's always a company that's

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 2>up or down, like eighty ninety percent, it's inevitably a

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 2>biotech that either yeah.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Is going to get bought or didn't get bought.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 2>What are these big companies looking for when they, you know,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 2>screen for these little biotechs that may have a one

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 2>hit wonder.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 9>Sure, I mean, companies acquire for a variety of reasons, right,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 9>and so there are some reasons that aren't particularly connected

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 9>to the company's immediate top line. Right, there's some kind

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 9>of technology that they're interested in. Maybe there's also something

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 9>that we don't readily see like an intellectual property estate

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 9>that they want access to. But the other piece of it,

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 9>and this is where you see Merk doing acquiring and

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 9>variety of other large cat pharmists, is either a product

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 9>that could be meaningful me and fills a hole in

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 9>their own portfolio, or something that can be a companion

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 9>product that can also help develop the portfolio. Like if

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 9>you look at Merk for a second, they have a

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 9>joint venture with Astrosenica and they market to Astrosenica cancer

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 9>drugs alongside their own cancer portfolio, and through that process

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 9>they've been able to expand not just those drugs, but

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 9>but Kei truda because they've done combination trials and things

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 9>like that. And so but if you look, I think

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 9>more to your point at merged acquisitions over the course

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 9>of the past you know, year two years they've bought

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 9>accele on, which had a product in phase three, so

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 9>you know reasonably the risk, you know the mechanism works

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 9>at that point, you don't know if the trial is

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 9>going to work, but you know the mechanism works. You know,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 9>you have a sense of what the activity is that

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 9>can really come into a therapeutic area and be meaningful,

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 9>or a company like a Mago, which Merk just recently

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 9>closed the acquisition on that company, and that's a pre

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 9>revenue company and has a really interesting technology developing a

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 9>drug in an area where Merk does not have, where

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 9>work does not have a huge presence in and it's

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 9>a it's a new and it's a new drug with

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 9>a new mechanism. So there's a variety of reasons why

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 9>companies do these acquisitions. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Marik, just kind of like thirty seconds left here,

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you know. I always joke that my next life I

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>want to come back as a healthcare M and a banker.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Should we expect more healthcare M and a going forward?

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a couple of things. I think absolutely

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 9>companies will continue. There is a patent cliff, you know,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 9>coming in this decade, so companies will continue to acquire.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 9>The other piece of it is that the cost to

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 9>compete is so much higher than it used to be,

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 9>and the time frame in which drugs get to and

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 9>in which competitor drugs get to market has collapsed over

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 9>the last ten years or so, so the competitive environment.

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 9>So I think, you know, you need to have the scale,

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 9>and you need to have distribution and investors also, you know,

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 9>want to see. I think we prefer that then continuing

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 9>to invest in a company, because if you have one product,

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 9>it's very hard to be profitable company.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Marek, great stuff. I really appreciate you taking

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the time. Maraeric Goldstein, she's a biotech analyst at Mizuho,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us to talk about Merk and some of the

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>other healthcare and biotech companies out there. It just seems

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>like almost every Monday we come in and there's another

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>healthcare m and a trade. So lots of our ne

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>going on in that space, but also lots of acquisitions

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to acquire drugs, different therapeutics. Really interesting, fascinating to follow.

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the team Ken's Are Live program Bloomberg

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 7>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 7>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk fixed income here, folks. John Talker,

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. A fixing of twenty twenty two

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>brutal year. I don't care. There was no place to

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>hide equities or fixed income and really not too many

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>places in the fixed income space to hide it either

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better this year. The Bloomberg Aggregate US

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>aggregatoral return value is up about three point five percent

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>this year, so they're doing a little bit better. And

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>when you want to talk fixed income, you need to

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>go talk to the folks at TCW. They're pretty big

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in that biz. Steve Kine, co CIO and Generalist portfolio

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>manager for TCW Investment Management Joints is, Steve, you guys

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>are doing a little bit better this year than last.

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>What's kind of driving or what are the areas of

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity you guys see in a fixed income space this year.

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 10>Well, we're seeing quite a bit of opportunity. Actually. First

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 10>of all, sort of getting at your general point of

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 10>returns being positive is we think we're getting towards the

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 10>end of the FED hiking cycle and the market's beginning

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 10>to anticipate that, and that means that rates are likely

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 10>to be coming down. So the first thing we like

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 10>is the overall rate market, and specifically the front end

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 10>of the market where you're getting the highest yields, and

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 10>we expect that part of the market to rally the

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 10>most going forward. And then beyond that, I think we're

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 10>rather pessimistic about the economy. We think that the reason

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 10>rates are going to be going down is because you're

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 10>going to be entering a recession sometime later this year

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 10>early next year, which means we're defensive on lower quality credit.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 10>But we like lots of areas of the high quality

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 10>parts of the fixed income market away from treasuries. You've

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 10>heard us talk at nauseum about the agency mortgage market.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 10>We think that's very attractive. That continues to lag recently.

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 10>It's lagging due to the fact that the FDIC, through

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 10>Black Rock, is selling agency mortgages that were taken over

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 10>through the SVB and signature bank takeovers, if you will,

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 10>by the FDIC. But we like that area. We're modestly

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 10>constructive on investment grade corporate credit. We think that's fair.

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 10>And then we like high quality parts of the securitized market,

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 10>including non agency residential mortgages.

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think, I mean in light of today's

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 2>inflation data, which I realize is only one point, but

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 2>core PCE quarter over quarter up to four point nine

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 2>percent from four point four percent in the last reading,

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and more than economists had estimated. We were looking at

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.959
<v Speaker 2>four point seven, so we're going back to five and

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 2>it looks like climbing. How can fed even consider lowering

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 2>rates in that type of environment.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 10>It's a really good question, and the answer in the

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 10>short tenments, they can't cut rates. As a matter of fact,

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 10>the market's pricing this in. They're likely to hike next

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 10>week at their meeting, and maybe even another time. I

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 10>think we're the view that the market's getting a little

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 10>ahead of itself in terms of expecting easing as early

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 10>as September of this year. But we do think, whether

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 10>it's one or two more hikes, that the cumulative effects

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 10>of all the tightening five five and a half percent

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 10>is ultimately going to slow the economy down. We're beginning

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 10>to see signs of it in various areas housing. Certainly,

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 10>the business investment part of the GDP report suggests that,

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, businesses are pulling back in a fairly significant way.

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 10>The last thing to go, and it's still hanging in

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 10>there is labor market, and we do think that it's

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 10>just a matter of time before you know, you start

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 10>to see bigger and bigger layoffs and loosening in the

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 10>labor market. And that's sort of the key part of

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 10>the equation that's going to get overall inflation heading towards

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 10>that two percent turn.

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we I'll just repeat the GDP numbers that

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 2>we got this morning for our listeners. We got annualized

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>GDP quarter over quarter of one point one percent. That

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 2>compares to two point six percent in the previous reading,

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 2>and we were looking for one point nine So much

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 2>worse than expected, much worse than the previous number, a

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>real decline. What happens if we get into a situation

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.479
<v Speaker 2>where GDP is coming down, unemployment is going up, and

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 2>inflation is stuck at five percent?

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that something you could imagine?

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, yeah, certainly. As a matter of fact, it's it's

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 10>very typical at the beginning of a recession because inflation

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 10>lags that you get this sort of temporary period of

0:29:55.360 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 10>stagflation where kind of economic activity is declining on it's rising,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 10>but inflation is yet to adjust to kind of adjust

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 10>with a bit of a lag. So, yeah, it's gonna

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 10>there'll be a period of time where it looks like

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 10>a real conundrum for the FED because inflation will be lagging,

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 10>and the risk is that they are too focused on

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 10>that lagging indicator stay too tight for too long and

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 10>worsen the recession instead of you know, sort of looking

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 10>forward and understanding that you know, inflation trends are heading down.

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Steve, unlike my colleague Matt Miller, I'm willing to

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>take some risk in life, and I'm willing to go

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>out to the high yield space here. You know, I'm

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>not really in that recession camp, or if it is one,

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be pretty shallow. So I'm willing to

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>take on some some credit risk here. Can you steer

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>me somewhere? Says the guy who has the bulk of

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>its well, his wealth and munis exactly.

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. Yeah, here's you know, high yield. You know, there's uh,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 10>there's a wide variety of risk within high yield. There's

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 10>you know, the double b's down to the triple c's,

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 10>things trading at par yielding, you know, seven eight percent,

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 10>things trading fifty cents on the dollar and likely to default,

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 10>so big range. I think what I would advise you, Paul,

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, is your financial advisor for the day. You

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 10>stay in the high quality parts of the high yield market.

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 10>Stay in those double b's and you know, high single bees.

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 10>The things that you know, the economy does take a downturn,

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 10>even though it sounds like you don't think it's happened happening,

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 10>that you'll be protected, you know, And that part, most

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 10>of that double bee single bee market really is fairly

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 10>default resistant. And I would say, you know, to make

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 10>a general statement about high yield is that part of

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 10>the market is pretty sound fundamentally from a leverage standpoint,

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 10>liquidity standpoint. You know that the fundamentals for the high

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 10>yield market look pretty good, you know, going into this recession.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 10>So we don't expect a huge default cycle. I think

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 10>our cautiousness is we just think you're going to get

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 10>better entry points. We just think spreads are going to widen.

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 10>Even if it's a relatively benign default cycle, we still

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 10>think spreads are going to get a couple hundred basis

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 10>points wider. So we're keeping our powder dry. But you know,

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 10>I do think that you know, if you've go outen

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 10>buy how yield today, you're you'll underwrite a little bit

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 10>of volatility, but you're certainly not going to lose money.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Steve, just real quick twenty seconds. What are your analysts,

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>what's what's a recession model look like for your analysts,

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>no revenue growth, declining growth.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 10>You mean for our credit analysts?

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what are they wrong?

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 10>Oh it's oh, it's kind of it's really industry by industry.

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the disparity of industry trends is significant, although

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 10>a lot of them are starting to shift in the

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 10>negative direction. So what we've seen thus far is relatively

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 10>decent revenue trends YEA, and very negative earning strengths, meaning

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 10>you're seeing a lot of cost pressure, mrgin pressure and

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 10>that type of thing.

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Steve, great stuff. Always appreciate getting a few minutes of

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>your time. Steve Kane Key's a co CIO generalist portfolio

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.479
<v Speaker 1>manager TCW Investment of Management. They're based in La. They

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>got like two hundred and twenty five billion massive under management.

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Not bet it's worth the trip to La.

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape. Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk industrials Industrial America. We had Caterpillar reports and numbers, say,

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we want to break that down, So we're gonna welcome

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Gielino. He covers all the largest maker of earth

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>moving equition. Isn't that cool? That is awesome? So Chris Giuliano,

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he covers those stocks. From Bloomberg Intelligency joins us on

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Princeton and brook Sutherland in our Bloomberg

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker studio. She's Bloomberg Opinion calumnists and she covers

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all things industrial. So Chris, let's start with you here.

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Catcat is a symbol. What did they tell you on

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>their earnings release?

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 6>You know, it was really an impressive print across the board. Beat,

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 6>very strong pricing again in the quarter, better than expected

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 6>sales and margins really across all segments. That being said,

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 6>there's a lot of negative sentiment out there around the name,

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 6>and I would say even just more broadly in cyclicals

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 6>in general, just giving concerns over recession. So not only that,

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 6>we saw orders decline in the period, and then dealers

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 6>also built more inventory than we expected. So if you're

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 6>in that bearish camp and you kind of believe that

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 6>we're heading into a downturn. Those are kind of two

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 6>data points out there that will certainly concern you, and

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 6>I think that's part of the reason you're seeing the

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 6>stock trade off.

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.959
<v Speaker 2>Didn't we just have a giant trillion plus dollar infrastructure deal.

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't we need this stuff to fix America?

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 6>We certainly do. And really you're just starting to see

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 6>those numbers from the Infrastructure bill come into the backlog.

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 6>You still have the IRA, you still have the Chips Act.

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 6>There's trillions of dollars of money coming into the system,

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 6>but there's just more near term concern and around commercial

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 6>construction tightening credit standards that have certainly kind of spooked

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 6>investors here. We still see, you know, a multi year

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 6>runway from a lot of these recently past legislations.

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think Bloomberg News Mats got one of

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the great headlines. Heies it relates to Caterpillar, cattle pillar drops,

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>mid worries. Quote, it's as good as it gets and

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>those things are kind of creeping in. So I think

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what we're hearing. So Hey, Brook Yet

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have a great column out recently talking about deal making

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and more. I know this Comerson caught my eye a

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. And then.

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 2>A Carrier, which is a Utex spin off buying a

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 2>German company buying Viisman climate Solutions. And when I started

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to see these deals, Honeywell announced six hundred and seventy

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 2>million dollar acquisition, the the Utex or the Carrier purchases

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 2>a thirteen billion dollar acquisition. Emerson was what was it,

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 2>eight billion? So these numbers are getting big, and I

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 2>started to you know, I was going through these stories

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 2>like now I ten pm at night, and I was thinking, Wow,

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 2>there's a pickup in M and A.

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>But then I looked on MA Go and there really

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>isn't a pickup.

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 7>In M and A.

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 11>There's not across the board. I mean, we are seeing,

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, we're in a tighter lending environment, and the

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 11>macro outlook is concerning. But I think what's interesting is

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 11>that you're seeing a revival of these industrial two industrial deals.

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 11>And actually on that front, April was the biggest month

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 11>for industrial to industrial deals outside of a couple of

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 11>outliers that were really dominated by single mega transactions in

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 11>the last couple of years. So you are seeing a

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 11>real pick up there, and I think you know, honeywell,

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 11>and it's called today. The CEO said, there's never been

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 11>a better time to be a buyer, which I think

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 11>is a really striking state.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Private equity has like two point seven trillion dollars. I

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 2>can't remember the exact number, but it's always mind blowingly high.

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 2>How come they're not competing with these industrials for these deals.

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:51.879
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think they have been the last couple of years,

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 11>but I think it's getting harder for them to do so,

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 11>just because of the you know, tighter credit environment that

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 11>we're seeing. And so I think you're seeing these industrial

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 11>companies feel a little bit like they have the advantage

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 11>again and going after some of these strategic assets, especially

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 11>if you're going to take a longer term outlook in

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 11>terms of the robustness of some of these markets in

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 11>light of all of the stimulus funding and some of

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 11>the mega project trends that we're seeing.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Chris, I'm just looking at the PGeo function PGeo

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>function for Caterpillar and it says, you know, roughly forty

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of their business is outside of the US. I'm sorry,

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of their businesses outside the US. What are

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they saying about some of their US markets versus their

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>international markets.

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, US continues to be remarkably strong. We continue

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 6>to see some of the strongest growth rates in North America,

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 6>even with that region being the most supply constraint. Still,

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Latin America continues to be quite well, and Europe is

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 6>actually holding up a little better than they anticipated. I

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 6>guess the one pocket of weakness is Asia and more

0:37:55.880 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 6>specifically China. China is the largest equipment market in the world.

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 6>You know, historically it's been you know, five ten percent

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 6>of consolidated revenue at Caterpillar. It's below five percent and

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 6>will be this year. So relatively small and the big

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 6>scheme of things. But you know, like I said, it's

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 6>it's been holding up, I think better than most had anticipated,

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 6>including Caterpillar.

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Brook in terms of you know, the boost in industrial

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 2>m and A. How much is on shoring or friend

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 2>shoring had to do with this, you know, Chris Menson

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 2>mentions China, and I just see a spate of stories about,

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, things we're no longer buying from China, Things

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 2>were no longer sending to China. So does it make

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 2>sense that industrials are trying to you know, bring back

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 2>production and then also do M and A in order

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 2>to aid that.

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 11>Sure, we haven't seen any big deals in the name

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 11>of reshoring. You've seen some sort of smaller incremental investments

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 11>of companies buying parts of their supply chains. I think sure,

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 11>when Williams bought a coating ingredients maker, Hershey bought a

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 11>pretzel factory, and so smaller things like that around the edges.

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 11>But these deals, did you.

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Brought it back from Germany? Was it Bavaria? No?

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 11>But in terms of just like building up the robustness

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 11>of their North American supply chain and being you know,

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 11>less dependent on sort of sprawling parts, networks or even

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 11>just third parties. But I do think, you know, that

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 11>some of these deals fit within some of the secular

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 11>trends we're seeing, whether that's automation, whether that's the energy

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 11>transition or positioning for you know, greater investments in industrials.

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 11>I do just want to make one point on Caterpillary,

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 11>you know, I do think it's interesting all the negativity

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 11>around their order backlock today. If you look at another company,

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 11>Rockwell Automation, which is positioned with some of the same

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 11>trends around mega projects construction spending, and you have investors

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 11>being a lot more forgiving on that front, even though

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 11>they are also talking about a similar moderation in their

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 11>orders for the vary same reasons. The Caterpillar gives that

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 11>you have a supply chain normalization and sort of a

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 11>reset of ordering patterns, and you just see a really

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 11>lopsided reaction from investors just depending on where these companies

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 11>sit in these secular themes.

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had I'm Fazelli on yesterday. He's a

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>biotech analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He lives in France on

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a farm. He just bought like a big tractor, like

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 1>not like a little tractory due to your lawn in suburbia,

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>like a tractor tractor. I mean, he's an outlier.

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 11>He's an outliers, very popular during the pandemic. Actually, hobby tractors,

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 11>We're like a huge business.

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I would love to have a tractor.

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 2>But I can imagine that's exactly the kind of spending

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that I'm going to be curtailing, soiting into this recession.

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, So Chris, Let's say, let's say I go onto

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>a Caterpillar a lot here and I want to buy

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of these big tractors for my farm. A. Do they

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have them in stock? B? Do I have to pay

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>over the MSRP like I do for an automobile?

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? Yeah, yeah. So inventories are getting better. We're still

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 6>below historical average is pretty significantly, both a new and

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 6>used equipment. Things are progressively improving though, and you've heard

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 6>that echoed in some of their commentary. Supply chain normalizing

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 6>in the quarter, but pricing continues to surprise to the upside.

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 6>We were up almost fifteen percent in the quarter, which

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 6>was an acceleration from what we saw in four Q.

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 6>So inventories are still tight and they're able to push

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 6>price because of a lot of the productivity improvements that

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 6>these new equipment. The new equipment has and you know,

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 6>underlying demand is still quite good and you have all

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 6>these infrastructure built, you know, coming through the pipe.

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, Brooke brings up rock well and in the

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 2>sense that it differs investor reaction is different from what

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 2>investors are doing with Caterpillar. Next week, I'm going to

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 2>talk to the CEO of Mac Trucks, the maker of

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Mac trucks. Right, it's a private company, but do you

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 2>think they're facing the same kind of problems as Caterpillar,

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you think I should ask him?

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 6>You know, one thing that's interesting about the truck sector

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 6>is you have this bifurcation of what the customers are

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 6>saying and what the OEMs who actually make the equipment

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 6>or saying. If you look at all the truck makers

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 6>this past quarter, complete blowouts of their early results, way

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 6>better than anyone had anticipated. As a supply chain has

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.959
<v Speaker 6>kind of loosened up, and they've got some operational efficiencies

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 6>and you know, backlocks already extended to next year. But

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 6>if you listen to the commentary coming out of any

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 6>transport company, any of the freight carriers, it's doom and gloom.

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 6>And we're heading into a freight recession. So any insight

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 6>that we could glean into twenty twenty four and how

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 6>deep of a decline we could be seeing on the

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 6>freight side, we'll have certainly have a big impact on

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 6>demand there.

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Brook do you think we're going to see more consolidation

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 2>if we had into a recession?

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that sometimes what happens.

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 11>I think we could. I mean, I think you know,

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 11>these industrial companies have been so preoccupied the last couple

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 11>of years of breaking up or buying software companies that

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 11>I think they're now starting to look back at the

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:47.479
<v Speaker 11>core of their business and you know, like I said,

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 11>with a longer term view towards this coming investment wave.

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 11>I think people are looking for opportunities. They are trying

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 11>to position themselves to better take advantage of these trends.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 11>So certainly, if you see, you know, a meaningful downdraft

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 11>and valuations, companies will take advantage of that. Most large

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 11>industrial companies are in pretty good shape as far as

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 11>their balance sheets are concerned, so even in a tinder

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 11>lending environment, they have some flexibility.

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Dude brook has her own NI ticker. Oh she's special, and.

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 2>That Bloomberg terminal that that explains.

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.280
<v Speaker 1>That explains a lot, all right, The aforementioned Brooks Sullyn

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>she covers all the industrial stuff for Bloomberg Opinion, and

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Chilian when he covers the industrials for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:29.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at the equities and the financials of those industrial companies.

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 1>We are fortunate to have both of them join us

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>here to talk about Kat and all things industrial America.

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Cat's are Live program. Bloomberg

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:44.959
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Good Day in the Market, SMP up one point two percent.

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's think bringing a professional who does this investing stuff

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>for a living, Brian Smaller, piece of CEO and principle

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of hood River Capital Management. And despite the name hood River,

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you're based in Florida, right, Brian.

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.919
<v Speaker 3>Correct, we moved here around three years ago.

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>That's such a scam, this whole Florida my grade. I've

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>had enough of it, you guy. You guys only because

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>you haven't been able to do it yourself, exactly right,

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 1>you guys, can I hope your summer is just gonna

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be sweltering and then you guys are gonna say, what

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was I think?

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, Hey, Brian, thanks for joining us. We love yeah, exactly.

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I love talking to Brian because he's a former analyst.

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>That Salomon Brothers my my place I used to work

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>way back in the day, and you got his NBA

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>some trade school alma mater. Yeah, so he went to Boston, Yeah, Boston. Yes.

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Hey, Brian, what do you make of kind

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of these markets this year? I mean kind of yes,

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 1>and P's up seven eight percent year to date. I mean,

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if you look on a trailing twelve month basis, yes,

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and p's almost flat. I mean, so a big rally

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 1>off of that October lower. Are you guys buying it?

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 3>We're constructive when you look out twelve month it's probably

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a little bit bumpy here for the next

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 3>three to six given all the macro headwinds that everyone's

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 3>talked about at nauseum. But when you get through that,

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 3>and if you just have a mild recession, then most

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 3>earnings estimates have been taken down for most companies. And

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the twenty twenty four stocks are

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty cheap. So I think that's why the market's okay here.

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't mean that there can't be some downside volatility

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 3>if you have some negative earnings revisions from lots of different.

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 2>The macro picture looks kind of like it's coming in

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 2>as expected, right. Inflation is sticky, growth is slowing down.

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we're headed for a recession, the Feds in a

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 2>tough position. What about earnings?

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Does that turning out as we expected?

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 3>We're generally in an earnings recession, I would say yes.

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I would say generally it's about as expected or a

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit better in terms of companies being able to

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 3>control margins cut cost. So if you ask me twelve

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 3>months ago, the big negative surprise was companies couldn't really

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 3>manage the cost situation very well. Now that's pretty much

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:16.879
<v Speaker 3>under control. Margins aren't really an issue in the near term.

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 3>It's really end market demand in lots of different areas,

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 3>and you're seeing softening there. But the market for the

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 3>most part, is expecting it, and that's why I think it's worse.

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 3>In the back half we be in more trouble, but

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 3>right now it's about as expected. Which letter market's acting.

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Hey, Brian, I want you to sell me on

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>small cap growth here. What's the play?

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 3>So small cap tysically trades at a premium, given that

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 3>the names usually grow faster than their large cap brethren.

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Right now they're at discount. They've been through a rough

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 3>two year past here, and usually it's risk off when

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the markets are tougher. If you think you're going into

0:46:56.320 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 3>a mild recession and the stocks at discount that for

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 3>the most part, then you're set up for griding provisions

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 3>in twenty four and a lot of multiple expansion, and

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 3>then stock pickers and small cap tend to outperform the

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 3>media manager's beaten the benchmark over most time periods, so

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 3>it makes sense to look in that area too.

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 2>How much cash do you have on hand in order

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 2>to take advantages take advantage of things like small caps?

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how did you prep and what are you

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 2>looking at?

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:30.760
<v Speaker 3>So our clients want to make the market calls, not us,

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 3>So we're typically more than ninety five percent invested. Our

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 3>job is to stock pick within the universe, in any

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 3>sort of environment and outperform. And right now we're trying

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.400
<v Speaker 3>to concentrate in names where we feel like the irving

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 3>provisions are going to be good. You can defend evaluations

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:53.879
<v Speaker 3>and they don't have a demand problem. Looking out six

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 3>to twelve months.

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Brian, I know you've got to name on your list.

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Fortress Aviation. I got my attention. FAI is the ticker.

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>It's hitting a fifty two week high today. We had

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman here earlier this week, and he's in a

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 1>business of leasing aircraft to the big airlines, and his

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>problem is he just can't get enough planes from Boeing

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and Airbus. Talk to us about Fortress Aviation and kind

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of what's driving that stock. Why you guys own that one.

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:21.280
<v Speaker 3>So they benefit from those trends. Because of the supply

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 3>chain issues that Boeing and Airbus are having, they're able

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 3>to lease out engines, that's the primary part of that business,

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 3>and then they also repair the engines and provide parts.

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 3>The utilization levels are moving up, the prices of the

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 3>engines are moving up, which is good for the underlying asset.

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Travel in general needs to still recover because of the

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 3>weakness that you've seen in Asia. In Europe, US has

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 3>been good for a while now, but worldwide we're only

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 3>about ninety percent of where we were pre pandemic. So

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 3>you layer in the demand getting better with Tigner reopening,

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:59.760
<v Speaker 3>plus the supply chain situation, someone like Fortress can actually deliver.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 3>They've had a really rough fundamental pass in COVID and

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the company has gone from being an lc C corpse.

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 3>That's good for multiple expansion. That's why the stock has

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:10.800
<v Speaker 3>been good. The reason why it stocks up today is

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 3>because they had a really good quarter and all those

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 3>demand drivers I just mentioned are intact and so and

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 3>we still like the stock here given the evaluation.

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 2>What's the what's a reason that you wouldn't convert to

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 2>an ETF? If you if I look at say the

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Hood River Small Cap Growth Fund, why not.

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Convert?

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Why not?

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 7>Why not?

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Why not convert to an ETF?

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, part of it is we don't want to have

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 3>to dispose our holdings every single day, and there's kind

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 3>of a transparency issue there, and our clients are good

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 3>in the regular mutual fund structure, so we'd rather not

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:49.839
<v Speaker 3>tell them Mark what we're doing every single day.

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>That's good good enough for me.

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, since I anchor an ETF show, I just

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 2>hear so much about these conversions, and I hear every

0:49:57.600 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 2>day arguments for why convert?

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So why not? Is ye one of the thing that's

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:03.439
<v Speaker 1>a good good answer. Hey, Brian, I missed this whole

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>energy drink thing. I mean, if I want an energy

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to drink, I get a shot of expresso like like

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>adults do. But I know it's the thing. You guys

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.240
<v Speaker 1>own this company Celsius tell us about.

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:19.440
<v Speaker 3>That so Celsius currently has about four percent share of

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:23.800
<v Speaker 3>the overall energy market. It's been growing about one hundred percent.

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:25.839
<v Speaker 3>It's going to slow down a little bit this year,

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 3>but they just partnered up with Pepsi and that gives

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 3>them around fifty percent more doors in twenty twenty three

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:37.800
<v Speaker 3>to sell in versus twenty twenty two. So the demand

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 3>is definitely there. People are going to keep buying their

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 3>energy drinks in a recession. It tastes better than the

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:44.959
<v Speaker 3>other products that are on the market. It's the better

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 3>It's generally just a healthier, better prodit product. I don't

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:49.280
<v Speaker 3>like drinking the other one that I like. It actually

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 3>like drinking Selsius, and most customers do too. And the

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 3>stock is only discounting right now around six and a

0:50:55.600 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 3>half percent market share, and we think the success for

0:51:00.239 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the product house and House designed and the partnership with

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Pepsi should allow them to eventually get to twenty percent share,

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 3>and that gives you a lot of upside in the

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 3>stock from here.

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. I just I pulled up the holder's list

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for Fortress Aviation and Celsius and hood River. They're in

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:14.759
<v Speaker 1>the top ten holders of these names. So when they

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>go into a name. Brian, you guys go into in size,

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so you got it like that, So that's conviction. Brian

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Smallocky is the CEO and principle of Hood River Capital Management.

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Like so many others, he's headed south, down to South

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Beach or down to Miami. You're just doing what all

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the cool kids do and we're stuck here in the

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>upper side. I'll stick here. I would like to be

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>down there, to be honest with you. Yeah, it's it's

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good gig for a lot of those folks.

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 1>No taxes right now, about that.

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:47.760
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:51:59.280 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.