WEBVTT - #738 Packers Unscripted: Battling the Broncos

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spofford, joined as always

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>by my partner in Crime West and Hodkoitz. We're coming

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to you hear from our studios at lambeau Field West.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Were just a couple of days away from hopping on

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>another airplane to head to the Mile High City for

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Sunday afternoon, a three twenty five pm Central Time kickoff

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>between the Packers and the Broncos. So let's take a

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>look at this Denver Broncos squad. One in five is

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the record. Kind of hard to really make out where

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this team is going. They lost their first two games

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of the season by a total of three points, a

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of very close losses. Then you have the seventy

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>points heard around the world by the Miami Dolphins and

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the game that everybody was talking about for so long,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but most recently against the defending Super Bowl champion Kansas

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs. The Broncos stayed right in the game, lost

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a tough one on a Thursday night. Nineteen to eight

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was the final score. Certainly, Mahomes and company did not

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 1>light up that Broncos defense. So where do you think

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>things stand here for Denver heading into this matchup on Sunday, a.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Game opponent, and I think that was one of the

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>big things that Matt Lafleur drilled home. I'm sure with

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the team, but definitely with the media just talking about

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>how you know, you have to look at what the

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Broncos have in terms of their arsenal of playmakers, and

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>they're there on both sides of the ball. It hasn't

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>equated to wins yet, and certainly that loss to the

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins is one that is going to be hard to escape,

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>both statistically and narratively the rest of the season. Whoever

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos play, that's going to be a topic. Certainly.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the Packers were tackling that the right way.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'll tell you what, Mike, you know, looking specific

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 2>at that defense, because the Broncos had some real difficulty

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>against Kansas City in terms of Denver's offense, but defensively,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 2>that was a really game performance. And I think when

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>you look at their defense, and we'll talk, we'll break

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 2>down everything here in a second, but they were not

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 2>intimidated by the threat of Patrick Mahomes. I don't think

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Patrick certan junior was intimidated at the perimeter weapons there.

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>They looked at that like that was a team they

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 2>should be competing with, and largely kept their football team

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 2>in the game because of that performance. So Broncos, you know,

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>they're not coming off a full by week like Green Bay,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>but they are coming off an extended mini by. Yeah,

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'm expecting, especially when you look at the injury report,

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 2>the Packers are going to get Denver's best effort on Sunday.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. These are the numbers as it relates to that

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Broncos defense. They've allowed over one thousand rushing yards through

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>six games, eight rushing touchdowns, five point six yards per carry,

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>which is just a frightening number if you're a Denver

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Broncos fan. Against the pass, seven twenty six point four

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>percent completions by opposing quarterbacks and an opposing passer rating

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of one seventeen point eight. Those are some dreadful numbers.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing is, I've been trying to figure

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>out because you know, they had a hard time stopping

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, they had a hard time stopping the Washington Commanders.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>They've given up not just the seventy points, but they've

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>had they've had other games prior to the game against

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, They've had some other games where they've really

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>struggled against offenses that haven't exactly been lighting things up.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is what I've been kind of trying to

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out. Okay, so was last week the Thursday night game?

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a short week, it's a divisional opponent,

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like familiarity and all that. Those games can get kind

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of weird Thursday night divisional games, right, So how much

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>do you really how much do you really put into that?

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I kind of

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>throw it all out the window because of something that

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafleur said on Wednesday after practice, which is that

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this game is not about the Denver Broncos. This game

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is about the Green Bay Packers in them getting their

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>own house in order. This is with where the Packers

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>have been offensively, only scoring one field goal in the

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>first half total I'm sorry, two field goals in the

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>first half total of the last three games. It does

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>not matter one with the opponent on the other side

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>here after the Packers are coming off of this bye week,

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's about It's about this offense figuring itself out and

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>getting things going earlier in games like we talked about,

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and yes, the Broncos have some ugly numbers and all that,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>but quite frankly, just that just doesn't matter because the

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Packers have to get it figured out.

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>The whole of Denver's defense I think has been the

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>weak link there. I know that's a weird way to

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>go about saying it, but I think it's the collective.

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I think they have just had too many holes in

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>different areas that have allowed teams to have success. But

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Nick Benito is right up there in sacks in the

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 2>NFL right now. He's really come on for them season.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Justin Simmons is an All Pro Kareem Jackson has been

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>doing this forever. Patrick stan Junior has been doing this

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 2>at a high level now for three seasons. Also in

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.679
<v Speaker 2>All Pro, they have people who are more than willing

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 2>to take the football away and pressure your quarterback. For

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the green Bay Packers. In addition to everything you said

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>about how it is about what Green Bay is doing

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and about being efficient and about approving in the areas

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 2>that they've struggled with in the first half of the season,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 2>first quarter of the season. But for me, it goes

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>back to the little things that they started to do

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>well against Vegas, running the football, committing themselves to the run.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Whether or not Aaron Jones is out there on Sunday,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the Packers are optimistic, hopeful that potentially he could be back.

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 2>He was practicing this week again in a limited capacity.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 2>But as you said, Mike, five point six yards per carry,

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 2>the boilerplate, the blueprint, the proto type is there for

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 2>teams beating the Denver Broncos this season. It's being able

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 2>to run the football. What did Kansas City largely struggle

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>with in that game against the Broncos. They didn't really

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 2>establish the run very well, and that created opportunities for

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the secondary to take the ball away from Patrick Mahomes.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Even though he threw for three hundred yards, there were

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 2>some interceptions there that kept the game closer than probably

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people thought it should have been. So yeah,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I agree. I think it comes out with Green Bay

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>being able to finally set the tone, being able to

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>establish the run early, regardless of who's available in the background,

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and then ultimately protecting the football because if the Denver

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Broncos take the football away, you know, you've seen it

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 2>so many times. What Russell Wilson. A very opportunistic bunch

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 2>on that side of the ball are willing to do

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and they didn't give up last week. I mean they

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>stayed with it right up until the very end, and

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>ultimately we're finally able to find the touchdown, just not

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 2>enough points to win. Yeah.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, speaking of Russell Wilson, he of course is the

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>leader at quarterback. The Packers have seen him many a

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>time as the quarterback of the Seattle Seahawks. Now it's

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>for a different West Coast team. A couple of interesting

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>statistics with regard to Wilson. For one, he's been sacked

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen times in six games, which is a pretty high number.

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>But on the flip side of it, in six games,

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he has one hundred and fifty rushing yards, And as

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned in our three Things video that we shot

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>after practice on Wednesday, you look at Russell Wilson having

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty rushing yards through six games is

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of is a hearkening back to the past almost.

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean that one hundred and fifty yards is more

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>than half of his total from all of last season,

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's more than the total of rushing yards that

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>he had two years ago. So Russell Wilson in terms

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of in terms of his mobility and getting out of

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the pocket and trying to provide that dual threat is

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>looking a little bit more like the Russell Wilson of

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, of a handful of years ago,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>rather than maybe the one whose first season in Denver

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't go so well.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>And I don't even think so much about that number

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the rushing yards. I think about the

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>number he talked about back in August, which was fifteen

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 2>fifteen pounds that he lost this offseason. I think you

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>see it in his play style. I mean, I don't

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>think it was him getting out of shape or anything.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it was more about what he was trying

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>to build himself into last year and realizing that, Okay,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I probably need to get back to more of the

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>fundamentals of the position, what I do well in order

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to thrive. And you mentioned the sack numbers. I think

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>that probably goes along with that too. He's trying to

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>extend plays more, He's trying to get outside of the pocket.

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 2>The problem for Wilson has been the inadvert the inadvice

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 2>throws in some of these interceptions, and I think it's

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 2>it's been. When you are struggling the way that the

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Broncos are struggling right now, there is no margin for error.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 2>If you have an interception, it tends to bleed. If

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>you give up seven hundred and seventy yards or whatever

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>it was against the Miami Dolphins, it tends to bleed

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>when you're giving up the explosive plays. Denver's trying to

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>hang its hat on something right now, and I think

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the basic idea of what Sean Payton's trying to do

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 2>with this offense is that the problem is they just

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>haven't been consistent enough with the run. I mean, Wilson

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>is like forty yards off of being their leading rusher

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 2>right now. And then you know, Jerry Judy's been quiet

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 2>so far this season. I think Courtland Sutton's had some

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 2>pretty solid performances. But they're trying to bridge the gap

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>between being a team that is in a rebuild mode

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 2>but yet still having a franchise quarterback that they invested

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 2>heavily into less than two years ago. But Green Bay

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>seen it. They've seen Russell Wilson at his best, and

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>they've also seen Russell Wilson at his worst. And I

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 2>think for the Green Bay Packers, a team that desperately

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 2>needs to get a victory here on the road in

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 2>what is going to be a very passionate road environment

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>from our experiences at Mile High. They have to find

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a way to contain Wilson. They have to find a

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>way to turn the ball over.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I want to get a little bit more

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>into the keys to victory, but I'll take care of

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>some sponsor business here. First West at Cousins Oh wait, sorry,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I forgot serious XM NFL Radius one first delivers hard

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hitting analysis and up to the minute NFL news that

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>true football fanatics need twenty four to seven, three sixty five.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And at Cousin Subs, we have something for everyone like

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>our Wisconsin cheese curds, mac and cheese, golden fries, and

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>creamy shakes, all paired with your favorite sub or sub

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in a bowl. Cousin Subs fifty years of better.

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 2>Can I say one last thing, yeah, before I get going,

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>one thing to keep in mind. Russell Wilson right now

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 2>fourth in the NFL and touchdown passes ninety nine passer rating,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Like people want to kind of make a joke about

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos being at one and five right now. But

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 2>they have been doing some things well. And that's one thing.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Ye yeah, And I was I was gonna say as too.

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>As much as we've talked about, you know, Packers need

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to start games better. You need to reduce that margin

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for air. You'd like to obviously be playing with a

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>lead as opposed to playing from behind the way the

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers have been on a regular basis lately. You're not

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>going to. All you have to do is look at

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that game a few weeks ago at Soldier Field, as

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>down as the Broncos may be at one in five,

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't have a victory at all when they

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>were in Chicago and they were down two touchdowns in

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the second half, and they came roaring back in the

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter and took it to the Bears and stole

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one there from Chicago. So Packers are going to have

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to be prepared for a sixty minute fight here, regardless

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of regardless of the record, regardless of how the first

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty two and a half minutes of this game go.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>So that being said, anything else with regard to the

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>keys to victory for the Packers that stands out to you.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Winning the ground game is going to be the biggest

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 2>thing here because as I talked about, you know, you

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 2>look at what Green Bay has done, and again, I

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 2>know there wasn't a big explosive run against the Las

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 2>Vegas Raiders, but even John Runny and listen to some

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>of these guys talk about in the locker room, the

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 2>basic idea was there in terms of what they look

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 2>to achieve. And you know, again it is more than

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>just one player. But I think about you know, Rob

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Demovski wrote a lot of stories about, hey, we haven't

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 2>seen Christian Watson and we haven't seen Romeo Dobbs together

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>too much. We still have really not seen Christian Watson

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 2>and Aaron Jones together too much. Too. A guy that

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>can stretch a team horizontally and vertically right, and in

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>those are the aspects that I think can really be

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>successful for a game like this for Green Bay. Because

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the stories I wrote this week and was

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 2>one of the big topics in the locker room on Wednesday,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 2>was you know, green Bay, it's funny the big narrative

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>with Matt Lafleur and with Jordan Love, everybody's talking about

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>third downs. They have to get better on third downs

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.599
<v Speaker 2>green Bay right now, is middle of the road. I

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>think they're like twelve right now on third down offense.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>But the problem is the amount of third and long

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>conversions they've had to make in order to achieve that,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>and there's been turnovers that have fallen into that as well.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 2>But when Green Bay can get themselves in third and short,

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 2>they're winning. They're sustaining drives, and that's where I really

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 2>think this game is going to be won and lost.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 2>How do you contain Williams and McLaughlin and Wilson in

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>the run game that Denver presents, and how do you

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>find a way to control the game on your side

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 2>of things, whether it is Jones, Dylan, whoever carrying the football.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 2>That's really my biggest area for this one.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what sticks out to me, And I'll say it

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>here on the show, I'm gonna say it probably when

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>we shoot final thoughts tomorrow. I'll say it at the

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Pepperelli in Denver. And it goes back to Lafleur's comment

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about this game being about the Packers and not so

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>much about the opponent, about the Broncos, and it comes

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>down to the Packers offensively. I think playing clean football,

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they've reduced the penalties. The penalties were a big issue

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>when they fell behind seventeen to nothing to the New

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints through three quarters. Over the last couple of games,

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the penalties have cleaned up a little bit, at least offensively.

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>It'd be nice to see the penalties cleaned up on

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>special teams as well. But clean football is also about

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>avoiding the negative plays, you know, the sacks that have

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>put them in some tough down and distant situations. We

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>saw what happened a sack preseeds an interception in Vegas

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>because you're in second and seven. The running plays that

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>are called not every running play is going to work magnificently,

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but if a running play is called into a bad look,

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>say can you get out of that with just a

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>zero or a one yard gain as opposed to a

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>three or four yard loss. Because second and nine doesn't

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>take you out of the running game, second and thirteen

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>or second and fourteen often does, and the defense is

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>then dictating what you're going to do. So it's avoiding

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>those it's avoiding those negative plays making the best out

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of some bad situations. As you said, then to get

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>into the third down situations where the percentage of conversion

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>goes up because because you know, when you're at third

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and three or less, the whole playbook is open. When

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you're at third and seven or more, the defense pretty

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>much knows what you're going to do, unless you're in

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of that four down territory area where

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>they might have to play you a little more honestly,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>but but yeah, it's down in distance. Is what is

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>something that Matt LeFleur focused on a lot on Wednesday

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that that has really been more than anything in the

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest downfall. And there are a lot of factors. Sometimes

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it's been the penalties, other times it's been negative runs,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or it's been sacks. The Packers just have to clean

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>up their game. They have to play clean football against

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a defense that for the most part, has struggled this year.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And if they do that, I think they'll be in

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a position to win the ballgame.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Two things. One that you can't allow the Broncos to

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>pin their ears back because that's where Benito has been

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>very successful and that's where justin Simmons is how many

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>interceptions over the last five years, you know, just being

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>an opportunistic on the back end and sure being that

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 2>ballhawk over the top if you are. And I think

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 2>that's one of the reasons why Kansas City got into

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a problem there is that Mahomes

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>was making some great throws in that game, but he

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>was asking a receiving cord that I don't think would

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 2>be confused with being the best in the National Football

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 2>League right now, to make some big catches on third

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and long. So that's going to be a big piece

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of this thing. But the other aspect of it, because

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 2>there's so much coaching that I've been doing so far,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 2>but the Packers do need to feel confident. They need

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 2>to feel like, hey, we are a team that has

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 2>given it. You know, we gave it right too the

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Chicago Bears in their stadium. We came back in some

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 2>inadverse situations against the Saints to win there, and the

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Saints are now up to three and three. We've had

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>moments where we've looked like a really good football team.

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Denver hasn't had as many of those moments. Denver is

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 2>one in five. They are going to be, you know,

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 2>dealing with, you know, some guys that are talented but

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 2>are kind of banged up. The week after this, you

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 2>have the Minnesota Vikings. The Packers need to be confident

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 2>about where they're at right now, because three of the

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>next four are at home. They have to travel again here.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 2>But you want to feel like you're a team that

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 2>can go out there and expect to win a football game.

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think having that mentality is also going to

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 2>be very important, understanding that, yeah, we have lost back

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to back games, but we still can be a team

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 2>that can be messed with and feared in the National

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Football League.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I think when you look at when you look at

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>what's gone on with the Packers the last few weeks,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things that that's been so

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>frustrating is you see how this team looks in the

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter against New Orleans. You see how this team

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>looks in the third quarter against Detroit when everything had

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>gone against them the entire first half. It's twenty seven

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to three, and all of a sudden, you get to

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter and it's twenty seven to seventeen. You've

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>given yourself a shot. The first half against Vegas on

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Monday night football was pretty ugly, but then the third

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter was some pretty darn good football. And you get

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>into when you talk about what we've been talking about

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>with offense. You see AJ Dillon carry five consecutive times

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>from the twenty nine yard line all the way in

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and power the ball in there for a touchdown. And

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>then what do they do on their first offensive play

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of the next series, play action rollout. It's a coverage

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>bus because the Raiders are all worried about just getting

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball rammed down their throat by AJ Dillon and

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson's wide opening gets a seventy seven yard game.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>That third quarter in Vegas was what you want to

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>see from the Packers. But one or every game doesn't

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's gonna give you a chance to win.

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And they've had a chance to win all these last

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>three games. Fortunately they were able to win one of them.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But playing only one quarter like that every week is

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>not gonna cut it. It's only gonna give you that chance.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And then, and then can you squeeze through that thin

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>margin for air to pull it out. You start playing

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>two or two and a half quarters of that level

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of dominant football, which is not easy to do in

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>this league. But if you start doing that, you start

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>opening up that margin for air and giving yourselves more

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to win. And the Packers have seen it. They've done.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>They've had a good stretch of football in every game.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>They just have to expand that now.

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if we'll end up coming back

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to this next Tuesday. If we do, feel free to

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 2>remind me of this. But what happens in this game?

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Do the Packers start fast in the first quarter or

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the third? If they can start fast in the first quarter,

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I really like their chances in this game because Denver,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 2>for whatever reasons, has a really hard time getting out

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>of the locker room after halftime this season. Yeah, they have,

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 2>So that's going to be a big area here for

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay. Again. I don't want to keep hammering it,

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 2>but when you think about some of those drives and

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the times they've been really successful, and Matt Lafleur as

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>their head coach, it's been going out there, driving the

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 2>ball downfield and putting up points right off the bat.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>That has to be a big staple for them in

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 2>this one.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, Well, Before we go, I want to take

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a look at some other games around the NFL that

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Packers fans may be interested in with regard to Week seven.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>The first one is the NFC North leader the Detroit

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Lions an interesting challenge here. They go on the road

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with their five to one record to face the Baltimore Ravens.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>And of course, what makes this interesting is because the

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Lions defense is playing really, really, really well. But anytime

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you go up against Lamar Jackson and a Baltimore Ravens offense,

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a different kind of ballgame. It's a different kind

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of defense you have to play. Will the Lions be

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>up to that challenge. I think that's a very intriguing

0:19:58.200 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>matchup with Baltimore playing at home.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 2>I love the way that Baltimore has built out this

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 2>team this season too, because obviously they lost Dobbins there

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that that was a big hit right off the bat,

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 2>but they seem to have found weapons that compliment Jackson

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 2>on the perimeter, and that has been a big issue

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 2>for them the last few years. Yeah, you have Mark Andrews,

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 2>but I mean Zay Flowers has had some really strong

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 2>performances for them so far this season, and he's a

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 2>guy that has been there when he has yet been needed.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's gonna be really interesting to see

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>how Detroit handles a quarterback like Lamar who's going to

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 2>not only threaten them downfield, but what he can do

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>with his legs, and sometimes it will result in a

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 2>scramble for yards. Sometimes it results in a scramble for

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 2>a downfield opportunity. The integrity of the defense is going

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>to be challenged in this one, and certainly for Detroit.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>It's another one of those litmus tests, one of those

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 2>measuring sticks to see. Okay, we've beaten some teams so

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 2>far this season, and we've beaten some good teams so

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 2>far this season. But when you take on one of

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the more consistent veteran Leyden squads in the National Football

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>League and uncommon opponent at that, yeah, can you rise

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to that occasion and meet that challenge?

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think that's a I think that's a really

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>intriguing one. Another one Packers fans might want to keep

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>an eye on, just because they are two opponents that

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the Packers will be playing within the next month. The

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers are at the Los Angeles Rams. The Rams,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I think playing better football than a lot of people

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>thought they would coming off of a rough season in

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, and the Steelers with a scary defense

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly that you wonder if they can ever find

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>some sort of consistency and reliability, you know, production wise.

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>On offense, the Pittsburgh Steelers could become a much more

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>serious threat with that defense they have. Those are two

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>teams the Packers are going to see here in the

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>very near future.

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I get the thing I love most right now

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 2>watching this is the Rams. Doesn't matter what year it is,

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the storyline is always the same. They have no running game. No,

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>there's no running thread. Darryl Henderson just got signed again

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>for I think the third time with the Rams. But

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>they're just so darn opportunistic and they have a really

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 2>good quarterback there is that is good at managing those situations.

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 2>And defensively, maybe they're not the same lockdown unit they

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 2>were a few years ago, but they've been able to

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 2>keep them in games and win games when it is needed.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I love what Pittsburgh does. I know it's maddening for

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 2>some of their fans, but this is a transitionary phase

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 2>for them still much like what the Packers are going through.

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 2>They're switching to a young quarterback, they have young weapons

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 2>around him. But I think George Pickens is a good

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna be a really good receiver in

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 2>this league. And defensively, yeah, it's probably one of the

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>better defense in the league and they have arguably the

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 2>best defensive player on their team, and that will be

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>interesting to see how that Pittsburgh defense handles a Rams

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 2>offense that has kind of been all over the place

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>this year in terms of catches, big plays, drop passes,

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and seeing what exactly unfolds.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, the biggest game I think that all NFL

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>fans will have their eyes on is Miami and that

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>high flying to a tago Aloa offense against the Philadelphia Eagles,

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>who now unexpectedly are five and one. I think everybody

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>was thinking that the Eagles would still be undefeated coming

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>into this home matchup with Miami. But really interesting cross

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>conference game here. You have a team that a lot

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of people are pegging in the AFC that is going

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>to make a serious run this year, and then the

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Eagles of course being the defending NFC champs and a

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>solid five and one record.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Miami has taken and Mike McDaniel, they have taken

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the Kyle Shanahan offense, I think sort of enhanced it

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>even further, and with such unique weapons that they have

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 2>right now, I give so much credit to the Dolphins

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 2>for how they've They've maximized that even though they've had

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>some injuries, they still much like Shanahan, whether it's Rhem

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Moster becoming re established now in this offense, or just

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.719
<v Speaker 2>the threat that Tyreek Hill presents, they build game plans

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 2>to win. But ultimately, I think this game comes down

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 2>to Jalen Hurts versus Big Fangio. And see, you know,

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 2>it's been a rough year so far for these Fangio defenses.

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, you've seen some of the stats out there

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>that those football syndicates and yeah, you know, analytic departments

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>have been putting out and Jalen Hurts is coming off

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 2>the three interception games. So that contrast is gonna be

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 2>really interesting to watch because I really feel like Jalen

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Hurts is not gonna have another down performance. But then

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 2>seeing if this ends up ultimately turning into a shootout

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 2>should be a lot of fun to loll.

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it will be a lot of fun.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>One last one to mention quickly, the Packers' next opponent

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>will be coming to Lambeufield as the Minnesota Vikings. Everybody

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>can get a look at them on Monday night, they

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>will be at home against the San Francisco forty nine ers.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>The Niners waiting to see if they're going to get

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel Christian McCaffrey back from those injuries from a

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>week ago, and Minnesota quite frankly west. They've got to

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out what to do offensively without Justin

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson because the debut of the Justin Jefferson less offense

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago was not a good one. They only scored

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown. They probably don't beat the Bears if not

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for a defensive score by Jordan Hicks, which got him

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFC Defensive Player of the Week. The Vikings only

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>put up nineteen points without Justin Jefferson and seven of

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>those are by their defense.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Vikings have a lot of bodies, but just not a

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of production right now. Now. TJ. Hockinson is probably

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to be the face of that offense moving forward.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 2>They've talked about kJ Osborne taking on more of a

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>role in Alexander Madison. Obviously they added Cam Akers as well,

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 2>but it comes down to Hawkinson and if he can

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 2>be a guy that can become a difference making tight

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 2>end on him down nine and down out. Basis Kirk

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Cousins is a good football player. Man. I was watching

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 2>that game against the Bears, and there were some moments

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 2>there where receivers weren't exactly picking him up. And you

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 2>know he makes mistakes, but I mean he does he'll

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.719
<v Speaker 2>keep you in a football game. But this is a

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 2>mountain of a challenge of that San Francisco defense and

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 2>debo if he can. He's day to day right now

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 2>with his shoulder. I don't know where things stand with McCaffrey.

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 2>But for San Francisco, they're trying to show that they

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 2>can just bounce back from this and keep on rolling.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 2>But Minnesota, these are the type of games they're ultimately

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>going to have to win. Seeing these division returning division

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>winners from last year. If they're going to be able

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 2>to salvage this season.

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think if you're the Packers, and I know

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.239
<v Speaker 1>it's one game at a time, and I know that

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as anybody, but you look at the Packers

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are coming off of their bye week, They've had a

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>chance to reset and regroup. You're going on the road

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to play a team that has been struggling, and then

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to come back home to play a team

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that will be on a short week playing on the

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Monday night, and then that is banged up without Justin Jefferson,

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>without Marcus Davenport on their defense. An opportunity here for

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the Packers to get things turned around in the other

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>direction over the next ten days or so, and they

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have to take advantage of it.

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 2>It's as favorable as it's going to get, yes, because

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh is going to be a knockdown, drag out war.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the two LA teams are both going to

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>be opponents next month. The Packers have to be able

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 2>to take your business here against Denver and then you

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 2>look at what comes after it. But Denver's reeling and

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the Packers somewhat reeling too. But this is a great opportunity,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 2>as you said, to kind of get back on track.

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so. With that, we'll call it a

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>wrap on this edition of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>follow all of our coverage of the team and everything

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>from Sunday's game in Denver. We'll have it for you

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on Packers dot Com. For Wes, I'm Mike. Thank you

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in everybody. We will see you next time.