WEBVTT - Early Look at Week 9 NFL Lines (Ep. 123)

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Crows Podcast, brought

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to you by bet MGM. I'm your host, Dan Harris.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty. We are

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>heading headfirst into Week nine of the NFL season, so

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it's time for an early look at the week nine lines.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Here to do that with me is my friend Shawn Green,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of the Sports Gambling Podcast Network co

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>host of the Sports Gambling Podcast. Find him on Twitter

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at shaunt Green. That's s e A n Sean. Thank

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>you for joining me. What's up?

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yeah, man.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Both are teams coming off wins pretty rare this season,

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 3>so I'm excited and yeah, hit a massive.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 2>Moneyline dog parlay.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Dogs are really due and I felt like we finally

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 3>got some dogs going last week.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I don't know if it's too early for us

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to buy Super Bowl tickets for the Jets for the

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Jets Eagles, but I'm in if you're in, So if

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:05.639
<v Speaker 1>you want to get yeah.

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's just buy. I'm assuming they're both gonna make it.

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good bet right now. We'll get

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>on that right after we're done with this podcast. But

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>first we're going to look at every single line from

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Week nine of the NFL. Before we do, I'll remind

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you about the latest offer from bet MGM, which is,

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>if you bet ten dollars and you win, you can

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>win two hundred dollars. Pardon me, if your team scores

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown again bet ten dollars in any NFL team,

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>win two hundred dollars in free bets if that team

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>scores a touchdown. For new users, available in New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Iowa, Washington, DC, Arizona,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and Wyoming when you use the code Juice one hundred

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>again Daily Juice. That's our daily podcast hosted by Matt Pearl.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That is the code there for new customers. Juice one

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred over at bet MGM. All right, good sir, let's

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>get into it here. We've got some interesting ones. No

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>bigger game the higher weekend and Thursday night football where

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone can enjoy and be with me here with the

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Jets getting ten and a half, the consensus line from

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the Colts in Indianapolis totals forty six and a half.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts on this one?

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, usually my default is the lean towards

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the better team. But a man, is this one's gonna

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>be interesting? I wouldn't be surprised. Well, I'd like to

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>get your take. Do you think people are gonna be

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>riding that Mike White hype coming into this game and

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 3>liking the dog or is the public just gonna go

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 3>because because the Colts are coming off a loss the

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Jets are coming off a win.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 2>If I was taking the dog, I'd almost want the

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 2>opposite there.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, this is like, this is the opposite of

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>what you want for This would ordinarily you would think

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>would be a spot to back the Jets. But such

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a tough loss here for the Colts and the Jets

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of course having that big win, I'd have to think

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that the public is going to be on the Jets

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at this one when you're over ten, right, like because

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of recency bias and Mike White. You know that his

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame bust is our prey, you know, being

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>its introduction. So I would think that it's there. I

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>think if I had to go one way or another,

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the Colts are probably gonna win

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>this game handily. We saw by the way, right what

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>happened the last time the Colts had their guts ripped out,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>which was on that Monday night football game against the Ravens.

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Then they played an inferior team the next week and

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they trounced the Texans, as they should. I think they

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>do bounce back here at home. But ten and a

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>half is just too much for me to take. So

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, I guess if I had to

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>go aside, you're give me a hook on a double

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.399
<v Speaker 1>digit spread, like I might as well take the dog,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's kind of a stay away from me, what

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>do you?

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Yeah, I think we'll see kind of where this

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>line actually goes. I mean, if it gets up to thirteen,

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>I think people are gonna pound the Jets, and kind

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>of the same if it gets down to ten. So

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna hold tight here at ten and

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>a half. Yeah, they want you to pay that.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Extra hook to get you to get you on the Jets. Probably,

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 2>so I would. I would lean Colts, but it's early.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think realistically what everyone should do is just

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the game, enjoy the watch, enjoy Thursday night, but

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the Jets and Thursday night football. So we'll see again.

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the one thing if you want to think,

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want actual sort of quote unquote analysis of

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what you want to do here, it's gonna be really

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>tough for the Jets to continue to sort of just

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>lean entirely on Michael Carter because Colts are, you know,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>best in defensive DVOA against the run, and it's kind

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, we'll see what Mike White can do.

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>You can do.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Another four hundred game performance might happen.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You never know. I mean, Corey Davis might playing this

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>one that will help. But yeah, it's just kind of

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a stay away from me. I don't expect, I like you,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect the line to move to ten. But

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna move, you know, I don't think I

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>think this is where it sits. I think it's gonna

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just kind of stay here, all right. The Vikings are

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Ravens. Ravens coming off the buy at home

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>or laying five and a half the total forty nine

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Kind of a dud here for the

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Vikings on Sunday Night Football. Obviously now a healthy Ravens team.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 3>What do you think, well, Kirk Cousins in prime time

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 3>just came up in a big way, a big collapse

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>ne g at a non conference road spot for the Vikings.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you're liking the Ravens, and that's certainly appetizing.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Under six teams have been bad off the bye week.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what it is, but I think if

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 3>any team can break it, I think it's this Ravens team.

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 3>And that felt almost like a dream crusher game for

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 3>this Vikings team that just keeps losing close games or

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe games you should say, like they lost by three

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 3>points to the Bengals. They you know, lost a game

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 3>in Arizona they could have won with the missfield goal.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 3>They certainly could have won at home against Dallas. Negative

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 3>go on the road against this Ravens team that they're

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 3>looking to bounce back. So I think anything under a touchdown,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be tough to get a ton of Vikings actions.

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>So I do think this will this may move up

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>and as the week goes on.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think if you like the Vikings you should

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>wait because I can't see it going down really. But

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing is, Sean, I don't know if

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you feel this way the Vikings and Kirk Cousins. It

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is always when you think you should bet on them,

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>they fail, right and when you want to bet against them,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they come through. And I have backed them on the

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>two games. I can't remember what the second one was,

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 1>but I back them against Arizona and they were getting

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was in that game three and a half,

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>four and a half, so they they covered the other

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>one that I went with them. But they're ugly when

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to take them. So right now, I certainly

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.119
<v Speaker 1>lean the Ravens for sure, because I think, just looking

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>at the way this game is gonna unfold, it's gotta

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>favor them. And we'll see if Justin Jefferson, by the way,

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is okay, because I know it was a little banged

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>up there at the end. But I feel like when

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I dig into this and I get to Thursday and

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about it, it's gonna be like, man, this

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is the spot where you know, Mike Zimmer and Kirk

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Cousins figure out a way to keep this game much

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>closer than they should. So the go ahead side, Oh no, I.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Was gonna say.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 3>Also, just a really really interesting game from DFS as well.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>These these non conference games can get kind of interesting

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 3>and I wouldn't be surprised if if Lamar is a

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>fun play and the Ravens have had issues on their defense,

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>for defense that's historically really good. I mean, we saw

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals put up a bunch of points against them,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>so kind of be interesting to see what happens here.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely a game I'll be watching, regardless of any

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>betting or fantasy impact. Just a fun game to watch.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, bottom line is, I think if you like

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings, it's something you can wait because I don't

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>expect this to get much worse. Browns are visiting the Bengals.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals are currently laying three total of forty seven,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but tough losses here for both teams. What do you

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>think we see here with the trade that line, by

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, we'll say we'll be honest. Recording this little

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>later this week had some scheduling issues for me, So

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>no trades, no big things here that moved. OBJ is

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 1>still with the Browns.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Is Dad's still a cutting up game film of him

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>being wide out?

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Dad is not happy, I think, but look it is.

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>It's status quo here for both these teams. So what

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think here with the Bengals leangth three in

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the divisional game.

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I mean I feel like this is you know,

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 3>if I had a guess to spread coming into it,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 3>I would have guessed three. Both pretty even teams, division matchup,

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 3>both coming off losses. I think this is just kind

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 3>of who do you like more as a team long term?

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 3>And who do you thinks to as simple as it sounds,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 3>who do you think the better team is? Do you

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 3>like this Cleveland team? And I'm still kind of out

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 3>on Cleveland with Odell and that labroom issue again, I

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>mean or sorry, not Odell Baker.

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Odell's his own issue, but.

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:21.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, Baker just doesn't look right. That offense doesn't

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 3>look right, even getting chubbed back, they just did not

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>look good. And you know, if you can't put up

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 3>more points against Pittsburgh at home, and Bengals really are

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna be jacked up for this spot.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's gonna be tough for the Browns.

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like the over, and you know, I

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>know it's a divisional game where these two and you know,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland obviously played it pretty defensive game and the Bengals

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have had a good defense all year. Long, unless, of course,

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer Mike White is there where he can

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just totally tear him up. But I do expect the

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Bengals offense is really clicking right now. You know, the

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>passing game is working well, and even if they have

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>trouble running the ball, which Cleveland you know, a very

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>tough run defense. Although Najie Harris was pretty good last week,

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the Bengals are going to be

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>able to move the ball. And I think Cleveland knows.

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Mayfield wasn't terrible last week. Their offense has

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>just seemed out of sorts the entire year, right, I

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>mean Odell and Baker obviously, as his dad knows, I

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>can't get on the same page. Landry is hit or

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>miss a little bit, but I kind of expect points

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>here to go. There's some forty six and a half

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. I feel like conventional wisdom suggests that it'll

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>be a close defensive game. But I do think actually

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that both teams are going to score. I kind of expect,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>after last week's tough game against the Steilers, where they

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't do much offensively, for the Browns to come out

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>here firing some creative plays. Be able to move the

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>ball a little bit, so I personally lean the over,

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's something. I don't think it's

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>going to move all that much from where it is.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill's continue their trend of just laying, you know, more

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown here. Fourteen and a half as they

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>visit Jacksonville. Total forty nine.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess this is about right.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 3>And it's crazy to think this spread is kind of

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 3>low for this Jags Bills team, and the Bills aren't

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 3>afraid to put it on teams.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>I know they kind of let Miami hang around.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 3>And thankfully because I was on the Bills at like

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 3>thirteen and a half, Josh Allen had that there was

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 3>like a point where like are they gonna run it

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 3>out or you know what's gonna happen. Then he took

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 3>that bootleg into the end zone and got the cover.

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 3>A bit of a sweat there, But I think it's

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna be tough to get money on the Jags, and

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I could see something similar to what we saw with

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the Houston game last week, where it starts at fourteen

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 3>and a half, creeps up as the week goes along,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 3>gets to sixteen and a half, and I'm sure everyone

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 3>saw that that ended up being a bad beat for people,

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>because the Rams ended up winning thirty eight twenty two.

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 3>So if you're gonna you know again, if you're gonna

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 3>take the favorite, generally take it early in the week.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 3>If you're gonna take the doll you can wait, because

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone's gonna be putting the bills in the

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>teas or taking the bills instinctively.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, if you like the Jags, which interesting to.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Like the Jags at any point, but I would just

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 3>hold off because you might get closer to a seventeen.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. If you like the Bills, hit it out,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>because fourteen and a half, it's actually fourteen at my

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>book DraftKings fourteen and a half. Pretty much everywhere, that's

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the best line you're going to see, I expect, so

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>because there's just you can't beck the Jaguars right now,

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>no matter what mo people who work on models and

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, and that's what they bet and the

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>syndicates like, no matter what it says like, there are teams,

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Jaguars are one of those teams

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>because of how poorly coached they are. Because of how

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>few adjustments that they make, you know, at halftime that

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>just kind of break the models to the extent where

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that there's going to be so much money

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>coming in here on the Bills, and I agree, I

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to creep up to fifteen, sixteen, sixteen

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And that's where you get a little worried.

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Like we saw with the Rams, a game that they

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>totally dominated and probably could have won by fifty five

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>points had they get their foot on the gas. So

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you like the Jags waited out, you like the Bills

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>go now.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's fourteen at DraftKings at minus one ten is

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 3>is pretty appetizing right now, Urban Meyer, he breaks a

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of models. Yeah, And I mean you this Jags team,

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 3>and granted it was a weird travel spot for them,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 3>but they led up thirty one points to Gino Smith,

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 3>a lad team, So I mean that says it all

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 3>right there for me, and I just it's gonna be

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>tough for them to slow down this Bill's offense.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I will not hear dispara dream remarks about my former

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>jet Gino Smith, but I will say that that's also

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>coming off a bye right, Like what happens when you're

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not by Yeah, and now you've got to take on right, Okay,

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Broncos visiting the Cowboys. The Cowboys are laying nine and

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a half and the total is forty nine and a half.

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say that legitimately three seconds before the word

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Broncos came out, I did see something come across the

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>wire that Noah Fant has been placed on the COVID

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen reserve list. I don't know whether or not that

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>means he's gonna miss the game necessarily, but they could

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>be down their tight end here for this game. Broncos

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>again getting nine and a half here in Dallas and

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the totals forty nine and a half? What do you think?

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? This is and again this is the classic.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Like if you like the favorite, hopefully you bet it

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 3>at the opening number, because I think this opened as

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 3>low as seven. Now, obviously the Broncos trained away von Miller,

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>and von Miller shouldn't him being playing or not shouldn't

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>really move the line, but I think it does signal

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 3>to people like kind of waving the white flag here.

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Now you have a non conference spot for this Broncos

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 3>team going up against the Cowboys who will probably play

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 3>deck again.

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 2>He looked pretty healthy. I was surprised he didn't go there.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>They played it safe.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 3>They you know, got the win with Cooper rush guy

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 3>guy looks like Carson Wentz's stunt double and they just

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 3>they just I mean, it's insane that they're seven and

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 3>zero again to spread. You think at some point this

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>is gonna run out, and maybe this Broncos team is

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the team to do it, just because Teddy Bridgewater is

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 3>a machine against the spread on the road. I think

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 3>it's as high as like seventy percent. So I had

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos as one of my locks last week. Ugly game,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 3>but they got it done. I mean, von Miller by

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 3>all accounts, him leaving kind of set some bad vibes

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 3>for this locker room. So it'll be in an interesting

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>emotional spot I think for this Broncos team with no

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 3>von Miller and the Cowboys are just in cruise control

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you see the story on that, like the reason

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>why they traded him.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 2>I heard.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I heard there was stuff about like a Halloween party

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 3>that he got really mad that some of the guys

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't chip in for the Halloween party.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you're referring.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>To that's correct, apparently, and it like infected the locker

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>room and everybody was really pissed at each other, and

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos were like, we're not resigning him anyway, so

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna shoot them out. I don't know whether

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>or not that is true. I cannot vouch for the

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>veracity of that story, but nevertheless, it's fun to talk

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>about for a second. Yeah, it feels like for me that,

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there is a ten out there, by the way,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and a couple spot points bet for example. So my

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>guess is it will probably get to ten because nobody

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to bet on the Broncos, and everybody's gonna want

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to bend the Cowboys, especially now Dak should be back.

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You're right, everything suggested he is going to come back,

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>not that they need him with you know, Cooper rush there.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that this is a spot where

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it strikes me that I want to back the Broncos

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just because they I can't figure the Broncos out, Sean,

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, like I can't get a

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>read on what they are, and they've they've been decimated

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>with injuries, you know, to their linebackers, so suddenly they

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>became very vulnerable against the run. I think Bryce Callan

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>may have been injured in this one too, so I

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>need to check on the you know, cause you're not

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to hold down all these receivers. But

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it does strike me as a spot where they's sort

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of classic, like at some point we got to sell

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, right, at some point they're not this good.

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>This feels like it might be it, but I would

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>wait because I don't think it's going to go down

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like the spread's gonna, you know, move towards seven. I think,

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>if anything, it's going to get to ten, maybe even

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>higher than that.

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, and if their teaser betters in the audience, it's

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 3>it's been a great year to be betting those teases.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, double digit favorites had won outright,

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 3>something like twenty seven and oh actually going into that

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Jets Bengals, I think there were like twenty seven to

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 3>ZH straight up. So I do think they're gonna move this,

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>of course, to ten and a half. I think similar

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 3>to what the KC line was, because then they get

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 3>teaser protection. I know because I had I had the

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs as my last leg in the tease, and I

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know why I'm still on the Chiefs. It was

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 3>more just being anti the Giants. Although the Giants just

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>keep showing up on the road for some reason. I

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 3>don't I don't understand why there's so much better on

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 3>the road than they are at home.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think you're right.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 3>It gets to at least ten, probably ten and a

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 3>half because they're protecting it and says like six p teesus.

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, that's where we're going. Texans are visiting

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins. You know, Deshaun Watson is still on the

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Texans for now. Could have been Q being for the

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>other team if you would believe the rumors early on.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins are currently laying six and a half with

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a total of forty six. This is a weird game

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for me, Sean, How do you feel about it? Yeah?

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean a one win Dolphins team, like, what are

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 3>they won in seven and they're laying six. That's to

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 3>me is just crazy. But then on the other side,

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 3>how do you talk yourself into taking the Texans at

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 3>any point? I'm still holding out hope that my boy

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Tyrod Taylor. Yeah, it sounded like he was maybe close

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>last week. But again, what are the Texans playing for? Like,

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 3>do they I mean, you know, obviously Tyrod isn't the

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 3>man of the future. Do they want to see what

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>they have with Davis Mills? I feel like we kind

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 3>of already know what we have with Davis Mills.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 2>And now Miami.

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 3>By all accounts, it seemed like they wanted to get

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 3>the trade done. The contingency was that he would have

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 3>to settle these civil lawsuits, according to reports, and for

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 3>whatever reason, that didn't happen. So now Miami's in a

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 3>weird spot because clearly, I mean, how committed can they

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 3>actually beat a Tuah?

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 2>It's clearly into his head?

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not a big to a guy by any means,

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 3>but man, this is a game where if you're betting this,

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 3>you're a brave person.

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Because I have no I have no like you can.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be I don't want to have

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 3>a ticket on either one of these teams right now.

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I will take a ticket on this game, but it

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>will probably be on the over because I think what

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see is a lot of offense in that

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>I think Miami is They're not terriball offensively once with

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Devontai Parker back with Jaylen Waddle sickne Yeah, get sicky exactly.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. I hate to mention his name, but Miles

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Gasking now without Malcolm Brown like can do some things

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in the right thing and against Houston, and I also

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>again they probably want to it probably is very motivated,

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I would assume to kind of show what you can

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>do in this and you know, the Texans, whether it's

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>garbage seim or not, like they can put up points.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And the Dolphins defense played better last week, but they've

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>been a sieve this whole year. Man. So it's only

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>forty six. It's forty six and a half for me

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>at DraftKings, but everywhere else looks like at forty six.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's actually where I go. I'm going to bet

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it as soon as we're off this podcast. But that's

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it for a side. No, I will not bet a

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>side at all on this game. I don't know what

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you do with this one, but Saints at home are

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>laying six to the Falcons and the total is a

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>minuscule forty two and a half. So we presume it's

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be Taysom Hill, who everything said suggested that

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:45.239
<v Speaker 1>he would be up if not, it's going to be

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Simeon. There's no Calvin Ridley on the other side,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So how do you break this one down?

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is this to me feels a hair high

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 3>just based on we don't know.

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Jamis Winston was a legit quarterback.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I still don't know if I'm really factoring

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 3>in modeling. Not that I'm a model guy, but that

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, I'm not really counting Taysom Hill as a

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 3>legit starting quarterback.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And I guess we'll see there often.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Certainly does seem pretty different when they have a Taysom

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Hill in there.

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 2>As far as like the stuff they're gonna run.

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 3>They do have a Kamara obviously healthy, and but six

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 3>points feels a bit high for this division game and

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 3>they're coming off that felt like.

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 2>A massive victory.

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm sure you saw that video of Jamis

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 3>dancing in the locker room with the fog machine going,

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 3>celebrating that big win. And I always like to fade

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 3>teams coming off a big win, laying a big number,

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>especially in a division spot. Again, I'm not in love

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 3>with the Falcons, but them back during this certainly is

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 3>a possibility.

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't love it either side. Man, Like I agree,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's such a letdown spot here for the Saints after

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that victory, like you said, like it really really is.

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And the Falcons looked terrible, But that's what that's when

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you buy a team. Yeah, right, you buy a team

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and they look like the worst team in the NFL, right,

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think this will end up being closer to

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 3>four than seven.

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>So I was surprised to see a six.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>So I guess if you like the Falcons, then probably

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd think you should take them now as opposed to Wait, right, Okay,

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. I don't think he gets the

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>seven just because as Giants are home where you know

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they we just talked about it not their strong side.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>They're getting I'm sorry, they're getting two and a half

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>points from the Raiders. The total is forty six and

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a half. The Raiders are coming off the bye, but

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they're traveling across country, and of course the Henry Ruggs

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>situation where the horrific accident he will I assume be

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly not playing this game, probably not play for the

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season, whatever happens. So that does impact

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>their offense of course, but they're laying two and a

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>half here off the by with the total of forty

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>six and a half.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that that rug story.

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 3>Really there's a wrench into this handicap in this this

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Raiders team. You know, between this and then the Gruden thing,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 3>they've kind of been on an emotional roller coaster.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I imagine for this team.

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Hard hard to not like the Raiders, and they they again,

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't even know what you would compare this to,

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>but they've they've already been.

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Through a lot of a lot of stuff so far

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 2>in this season.

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 3>I do like the matchups. I mean, I think the

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 3>health of Darren Waller will be big. I mean, you

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 3>know who's at Foster Morow filled in pretty well, but

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 3>I think I think Darren Waller, certainly the Giants would

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 3>have their hands full. And again, this Giants team that

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 3>was a I mean that the two minute drills they're

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>running and they're super banged up. It'll be interesting to

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 3>see what the injury report. It does feel like this

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 3>is the game probably where Saquon comes back. But yeah,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 3>so you know, two and a half point road favorite

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 3>for the Raiders sounds about right. I would be shocked

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>if it gets to three and a half for the Raiders,

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 3>especially everything that they're gonna have to deal with.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So it is, it is, I will say, I mean

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the consensus line again where a betting bro's like home,

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the consensus line is two and a half. But it's

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>basically fifty percent of the books I'm looking at or

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>two and a half and like forty nine percent or

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever are at three. So it is bouncing back between

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>two and a half and three. So I don't know

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>if that means that if you're at two and a

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>half and you like the Raiders, obviously go now because

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>there's clearly no consensus here as to where they get

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to three. We can't forget. I mean, you did mention

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think Saquan should come back at this point

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's been three games and they didn't place them

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on ir so you felt like, right, they're probably there.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Kenny Galley comes back. They're probably gonna be down

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>those Sterling Shepherd they just can't keep anyone healthy in

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that team. But again, the Giants. I'll never back the

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Giants at home.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 3>No, they're so bad against the spread at home, and

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 3>they've been sneakily okay in certain spots against the spread,

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>but it's usually on the road or in especially.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 2>In division games.

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Joe Judge has been I know as an Eagles fan,

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 3>they've been good against the number, not great straight up,

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, the two and a half kind of interesting.

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>But it's tough to talk yourself into this giant team

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 3>at home.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, two teams coming off big wins. Here, the

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are visiting the Panthers. The Pats are laying four

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>points and the total is forty one. We have question

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>marks about Sam Darnold. He's in the concussion protocol right now.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a concussion. We never know exactly how that's gonna

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>shake itself out. We don't know if Christian McCaffrey is

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>going to play. I do not think that he is personally.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're letting that factor it in, you can

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to me or not. But what do you think

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>here with the Pats laying for and that's total really

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>small forty one.

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's interesting, and there's a there's a revenge angle

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 3>as well, I think for Gilmore there and you know it,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe it is a good time to fade some of

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 3>this Patriots hype.

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know, PJ.

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 3>Walker who I loved in the XFL or AF I

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 3>forget he was fun, but he did not look good

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 3>in relief of Sam Darnold and this Panthers offense. Man

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 3>as a guy who owned Robbie a lot of shares

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 3>of Robbie Anderson in Best Ball and you know, even

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 3>some season long stuff, he has just been a colossal disappointment.

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 2>You're you're right to think Christian McCaffrey.

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you're if you're fine taking the Panthers

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 3>without McCaffrey, I think you wait.

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 2>So if he ends up being a late scratch, I wouldn't.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, could this get as high as like six?

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 3>It certainly isn't gonna hit seven, But the fact that

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 3>it's already at four is just showing a tremendous amount

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 3>of respect.

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>For this.

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Patriots team, who looked pretty good against the Chargers. Now

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>it's a back to back road spot, which is for

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 3>a young team, a young quarterback, that is a tough spot.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 2>So again, probably.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Wait if you like the Panthers, but man, yeah, you

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 3>got to see who's the quarterback and what shafe He's

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of question marks for the Panthers.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a really tough game for me, even assuming that

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Donald plays, just because I think that it's been shown

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here Sean over the last few weeks

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Darnold probably is not the long term solution

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for an NFL franchise at quarterback. I like the guy.

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I wish we hadn't ruined his career, but I think

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we probably did so. I think when you put him

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>up against a Bill Belichick defense at this point, it's

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to end well, as most recent games haven't.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers, though, are getting healthy on defense, and again

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>with Gilmour there, that's a big addition. It's a really

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>tough game. So I understand why the spread is at

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>fort like I can't take. I don't think I can

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>take the under on forty one, but I do. This

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>does strike me as like a seventeen thirteen game realistically.

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so yeah, no, it feels like it could get ugly,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of like that the game the Panthers just played.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean the Panthers Falcons. The Panthers have been.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 3>In a lot of ugly games. I mean, Eagles beat

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 3>them twenty one to eighteen. That was a super ugly game.

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, they kind of got off to that hot

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 3>start and have been flat a little bit, but again

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 3>coming off a win, a much needed win. Maybe if

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 3>McCaffrey plays, the spread gets down to.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Three and a half.

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 3>But I feel like, if anything, it could creep up

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit because I could see a lot of

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>people putting the Patriots in the tease.

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and again, you know, if you like the Panthers

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out Donald plays like at four and

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a half, he teas it up to ten and a half. Like,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind that either, just in terms of what

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see, but it is something where you gotta

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>wait a little bit. Unfortunately, because of Sam Darnald, charters

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>are visiting your Eagles here. The Eagles coming off the

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>big win, are laying a point in the consensus line.

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>There are some one and a half and the totals big,

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>it's fifty. So you know onn't knowl Sean looked like

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you figured some stuff out, which is run the ball

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. You've now got the worst rush defense

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Are we going to see a repeat

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>here for the Eagles?

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:27:55.480 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean every that Detroit Lions game was danger dangerous

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 3>for Eagles fans not because it gave us hope, but

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 3>because now we've become drunk with power because we kept

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 3>we kept telling Nick Sirianni and the Eagles just run

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the ball, run the dang ball. And then they actually

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 3>do run the dang ball, and it's a blowout victory.

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 3>So now every Eagles fan knows exactly what to do,

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 3>and we've been vindicated as fans. This is a little

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 3>interesting nugget coming in here. I mean, the Eagles haven't

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>won a game at home yet this year, usually very

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 3>good historically, even when the team's bad will kind of

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 3>show up at home. All three wins have come on

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 3>the road, So you imagine this is a get up

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 3>spot for the Eagles, but also on the other side,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 3>it's it's a get up spot for this Chargers team.

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 3>They've lost, you know, they lost bad to the Ravens,

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 3>lost a tough game at home to the Patriots. And

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 3>that's a lot of travel too, like you talk, and

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 3>there was a bye week in there, but still going

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 3>to the East coast, coming all the way back to

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the West coast. Now going back to the East Coast

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>for a non conference spot where your road favorite and

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Herbert seems to be struggling here a little bit.

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>He does, He definitely does. And you look at sort

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of his breakdown and he's either phenomenal and totally lights

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it up or he's got absolutely nothing going on whatsoever.

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is, I kind of like the Eagles defense.

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they're a little underrated here. So I don't

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>know who's gonna win this game, Like, I don't feel

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>comfortable and it's one, so it doesn't matter. Obviously. I

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of lean the under a little bit. I could

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>see this because again, the Charges are really vulnerable on

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the ground, and so I'm sure the Eagles, hopefully we'll

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>try to run it, but I think they'll probably struggle

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>through the air a little bit.

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, every fingers crossed.

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Fingers crossed, and the Chargers offense just looks again, a

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>little out of sorts at this point. You know, traveling

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.479
<v Speaker 1>cross country here Philadelphia strikes me as a low scoring

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>game a little bit. So the fact that total is fifty,

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably hit that now. It's fifty and a half

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>at a couple of spots too, So it strikes me

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>as an under type of game. This one. We all

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>want to see Packers visiting the Chiefs. The Chiefs are

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>one point favorites and the totals fifty four and a half.

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Sean any reaction here.

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah, you know it's man, I mean, what was

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 3>the My reaction is how you know the mighty have fallen?

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Because if you would have?

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the like Game of the Year

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 3>spreads those ones that come out in June when you're

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 3>when you're desperate for football numbers to break down, but

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it was. It was well north to three,

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 3>even even with the Packers coming in as a pretty

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 3>respected team.

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, Chiefs at home.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 3>It's it's crazy how how much stuff has changed. And

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the public is going to be stoked about

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 3>taking this Packers team. They got a little mini by

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 3>here and DeVante Adams I think should be coming off

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 3>the COVID list.

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 2>He missed that game and and they missed a couple

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>of their receivers.

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>So because being on the COVID list, so ideally they

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's serious issues in this Chiefs defense, but

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 3>really the turnover issues for the Chiefs offense don't seem

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 3>to be going away anytime soon. And clearly Patrick Mahomes

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 3>is pressing like if Monday night at home against the Giants.

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't a get right spot for this Chiefs team?

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Is there a get right spot for them?

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not here, That's what I can say. I don't

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>see how you avoid taking the Packers in this one.

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Like with Adams coming back, which again he's supposed to

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be on track to report on Thursday, Alan Ozard is

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>already off the COVID list ANDVS has been activated off

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of IR at least designated to return. He probably is

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>going to come back, so he got a full compliment

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of weapons here, and the Chiefs look terrible. My real

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>thing with this, Sean, is that like this is begging

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you to take the Packers. I mean, everybody was watching

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that game. The spread was ten ten points, and I

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>thought the Chiefs were going to cover that spread. And

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they looked completely out of sorts. I mean, Mahomes looks

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I made the analogy on our discord yesterday. It looks

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>like a rookie QB at times, just given the fact

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that he gets back there, he takes forever, He runs

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>around NonStop before he either makes a miraculous throw because

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he's Patrick Mahomes, or he kind of throws out about

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you know, maybe Tyreek Hill does something. But

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it just looks like there is somehow, at least for

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, a formula as to what you do on

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>defense against Patrick Mahomes and this Chiefs offense. You drop

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody deep, you take away the explosive play, and you

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>rush him. And that has been working right now. Now

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got Patrick Mahomes and you've got Andy Reid, so

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll probably figure this out. But even if they do,

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you have perhaps the worst defense in all of football

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.959
<v Speaker 1>right now against Aaron Rodgers off of mini by feeling

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>really good. I don't see how you You don't have

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to run to do it. It's a point like if

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they're favored by a point, if they're giving a point,

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter. But if this gets to one

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half somehow the public comes in the Chiefs,

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tease it up immediately for the Packers

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>getting seven and a half, like immediately, I'm going to

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>do that. But either way, I think at one sean

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>this maybe not maybe I'll take a different tune. Looks

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>like dig it to it, but is like a great bat.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. At the surface levels, it's hard to figure out

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 3>an angle for the Chiefs, which is always scary. But

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs have just been horrible against the spread, five

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 3>and fifteen against the spread in their last twenty. Now,

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 3>certainly some of those numbers were pretty inflated, you know,

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 3>as we saw against the Giants. This is more just

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 3>basically like a pick them. But if you're getting down

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 3>on those long style teasers where you're taking one or

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 3>two point dogs and teasing them up past the key

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 3>number of seven, getting it to that seven and a

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 3>half or eight, and you know, Aaron Rodgers looks dialed

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.959
<v Speaker 3>in and they seem to get enough out of their defense.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Packers' defense played pretty strong on the

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 3>road on the short week against Arizona. If they can

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 3>get another decent performance, I think they should be in

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 3>the driver's suit.

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. They look great, and I am very happy, my friend,

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that when right before Rogers signed and there are these

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.439
<v Speaker 1>rumors that he was going to retire, there were still

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>books out there offering them at plus one seventy five

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to win that division, even when it became pretty apparent

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that he was gonna report. So it's good. I don't

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>know the consensus line here, Sean. It's all over the place.

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>With the Cardinals, and the forty nine ers, because books

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are basically like hedging their bets because they don't know

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Kyler. I think they're they're taking it

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>easy with Kyler Murray. So I see it at a

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>pick at some books. I see it at one. I

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you have a book that you see

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it at, but let's assume it's basically, I don't know one.

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I assume that spread is essentially the forty nine ers

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>right now getting one again in a spot where I

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>think the books are hedging a little bit with a

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 1>total forty five. Yeah.

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Again, this is just clearly going to depend on whether

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Kyler Murray plays or whether we get.

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>More information on Kyler Murray.

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, my take, instant reaction and just the stuff

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 3>I read early on is that I do think he

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 3>will play.

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll be a little surprised.

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 3>If he doesn't end up going, especially coming off the

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Thursday rest, but I think we'll probably have a better

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 3>idea come Thursday if he's actually playing or not. And

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the line will tell you, because in the same way

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 3>for that Vikings Cowboys game where all of a sudden

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 3>the line switched from the Vikings being a you know,

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 3>two three point dog to a two three point favorite.

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 2>You knew immediately. You didn't have to wait for the

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 2>report to come out.

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 3>The people that are taking million dollar bets on this

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 3>have the early action. So if you want to know

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 3>whether or not to start Kyler Murray and your fantasy team,

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:44.479
<v Speaker 3>just keep an.

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Eye on the betting line.

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 3>But I think if you can get points with the Cardinals,

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 3>if you can find a book that offers points in

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals, I think that's a that's a fun bet

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 3>to take, especially them coming off a loss.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they played really tight that first game, and really,

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if Jimmy Garoppolo were healthy, crazy that I have to

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>say this, but if Jimmy Garoppolo were healthy for that

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>game where Trey Lance started, I think that the forty

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>nine ers might have won that game. And I think

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Mari's going to go. I think the bigger question is

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>how limited is it going to be? Because he avoids

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>more sacks than any quarterback I've ever seen in my

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>life just with how quick he is, and if his

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>mobility is limited, that really puts a tie bosh on

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit. So yeah, this is just one

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>where you gotta wait. I think to do it. Yeah.

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think either side, you like, if you

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 3>can get points, like if you yeah, I think if

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 3>you like the forty nine ers and you can get

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 3>that like plus two and a half right now for

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 3>them somehow, you know, I would take that as well.

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I keep leaning to thinking that they that Murray's going

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 3>to play. But you bring up a great point.

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Arizona does seem to struggle in Levi Stadium, and the

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers kind of have their number, and maybe

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be a situation like the Saints Bucks.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 3>Where just the Saints kind of own the Bucks for

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 3>whatever reason, especially in this short, sable sized Tom Brady era,

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 3>that certainly could be the case.

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, like, if this is if they if

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it is two and a half, because I feel like

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the look aheadline might have been two and a half.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't know, but if it is that, I

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think I want it, Like, I don't I'm not

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>going to run to take the forty nine ers or

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, but I just this doesn't strike me

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>as a game where the Cardinals, even if Murray were healthy,

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be able to just come out here

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and dominate like they the forty nine ers know how

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>to play them. They play him tough, you know. So

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just much more of it. I'm going

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch this game for fun and stay away from it.

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 2>From a interesting concept.

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Titan Ah, Yes, can you that? Yeah, it's weird. I've

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>done it. I did it one time. It was weird.

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>All odd Titans visiting the Rams. No Dereck Henry now,

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of course, And the spread now is seven and a

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>half from the Rams. Total is pretty high here at

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty three and a half potential, or at least that

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>could have been with Henry super Bowl preview here. What

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>do you think here on Sunday Night Football primetime? Seven

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half points?

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Again, this one I think opened at seven and I'm

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 3>surprised it's only moved at half point off to Derrick

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Henry news. I wouldn't this one again. I think it's

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 3>seven and a half. I wouldn't be surprised if it

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 3>creeps up closer to ten as we get closer to kickoff,

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 3>or especially if the public's down early. I think they're

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 3>just gonna look at the game and go, oh, the

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Rams at home against this Titans defense. They're gonna cruise.

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Derrick Henry isn't a part of the team. You know,

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 3>he's out for the year. He's such a big part

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of their offense and not gonna be able to move

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the ball. And you know the Rams they just traded

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 3>for Von Miller. I don't know yet if he's gonna

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 3>be able to play. Sometimes they need like a week

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 3>to figure things out. But I think with Derrick Henry

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 3>going down, and we see this all the time, I'll

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 3>love the Mike White game where a big player goes down,

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 3>and you know that week right after the team gets

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 3>up for them, you know, hey, we're bigger than just

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 3>this one player. Now, the week after the emotional get

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 3>up game, that's where you really see the impact. But

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be shocked if Tennessee really comes to play

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 3>and quietly. Tennessee's defense, which has been so horrible, has

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of been putting together some decent games.

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 3>They let up a decent amount of points against the Bills,

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 3>but they got the stops when they needed them, and

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 3>they held the Chiefs, which who knows if the Chiefs

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 3>are even good at this point right held the Chiefs

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 3>the three points at all, which seemed pretty good. So

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 3>their defense has has has gotten better here certainly.

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And again the Colts game, you know they turned the

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>ball over in their own territory early right there, they

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>were down fourteen to nothing. But really, Titans, man, I mean,

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>this is why Sean, you and I we referenced it

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>on the first time you appeared on the podcast with

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the Nick Sirianni sort of bet. That was the second

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.479
<v Speaker 1>bet I took in the props bet draft that Sean

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and I are in together. The first one I took.

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually like the odds I like the most were the

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Titans at maybe forty to one to win the Super

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And part of it is because I think that the

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>whole is better than the sum of their parts, and

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're very well coached. They find ways to stay

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in games, they don't panic when they go down, and

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that their defense lacks sort of the talent,

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I think it's taken a little while

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>to gel. But it's a very good point that they

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are playing a lot better now. We don't know if

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones is going to play here. You can't really

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>stop the Rams anyway. So frankly, fifty three and a

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>half I'm okay to go with the over, but I

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>do lean the Titans here when you're getting more than

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a field goal. It is interesting though that it didn't

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>move that much in the look aheadline. I mean, I

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>get Adrian Peterson, you know, basically exactly.

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 3>It is funny there's only I think like three or

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 3>four guys that have more rushing yards all time than

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Derrick Henry, and they ended up signing Adrian Peterson off

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the street. And quick quick fantasy note if you're looking

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 3>for a quarterback or you know, maybe an.

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Interesting DFS showdown option.

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I do think Tannehill, especially moving on in the rest

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 3>of the Sea, could be interesting because he's quietly one

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 3>of those quarterbacks that will get a couple sneaky rushing touchdowns.

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 3>So now you expect them to having to throw the

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 3>ball more and and I think who's gonna get those

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 3>goal one carries? You sure you're gonna give some to

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Adrian Peterson, but I wouldn't be surprised if some of

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 3>those touches inside the five end up going to Ryan Tannehill.

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I'lla like some bootleg stuff or some QB sneaks. So

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of an interesting season long fantasy player I

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 3>think as well.

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mentioned this the last time you were on.

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you ever want to know why, perhaps you

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>should be taking DFS advice from Sean. You can just

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>google his.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Name and DraftKings Baby, God bless.

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Him, you'll learn why. I'll last game here Monday night

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>football Bears are getting six and a half in Pittsburgh

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>against the Steelers. Total is a minuscule for Sean. I

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you. There's a very clear for me

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>time when you back Mike Tomlin led teams and time

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:01.720
<v Speaker 1>when you fade Mike Tomlin led teams and at home

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.320
<v Speaker 1>with kind of laying a big spread does not strike

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>me as a time where you back Mike Tomlin.

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Be Yeah, it's really tough to imagine this Steelers team

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 3>putting up enough points to cover any spread as a favorite, right,

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.240
<v Speaker 3>But then again, yeah, and I do think the Bears

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:25.479
<v Speaker 3>kind of figured out something offensively, now, granted they blew

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 3>some plays defensively. I would keep an eye on Khalil

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 3>max injury. I thought he was trending towards playing last week.

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Kind of one of the reasons I like the Bears there.

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 3>He ended up being a late scratch he's dealing with

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 3>a weird foot injury. But they have a team hicks back.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 3>He's a big part of their defense, and I think

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 3>their defense matches up pretty decent.

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 2>This to me is just gonna be an ugly slog

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of a game that feels like a field goal.

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 3>So if you can get more than that and four, five, six,

0:42:56.440 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 3>even if it gets up to seven, But I I

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 3>worry that they're gonna have trouble getting action on the

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 3>Steelers at six and a half. I think I think

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe the betting public is out on justin fields right now,

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 3>and Pittsburgh maybe a public team.

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 2>But have you seen Big Ben throw the ball?

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 3>That would be my question just right before you click

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 3>that Pittsburgh minus six and a half or minus seven

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 3>if it gets up there, just remember, you know, just

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 3>watch him throw the football in that in that Browns game.

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 3>And I had the Steelers yea money line because I

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 3>don't know that spot. But you're right at home laying.

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 2>This is a massive number for this team right now.

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Way too much, way too like there's just no way

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>and I don't feel comfortable, like hopefully and maybe it

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>was because there was no Matt and Neggy. They they certainly.

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>The game plan was good for Dustin Fields. It accentuated

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what he does well. He's good on the run, on

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 1>roll designed rollouts. They had four of them. They completed

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>all the passes, including the touchdown. He finally ran like

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he has use his legs more. It's okay to do that.

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>It's okay to let the guy out. Uh So it

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 1>was good to see and hopefully they do. Pittsburgh's a

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:08.320
<v Speaker 1>very strong defense obviously, so who knows if you regress

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, But you can't lay six and a

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>half points man with the Steelers, and especially in the

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>spot where they're, you know, their favorite at home in

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a game everybody thinks they're going to roll. No way.

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>This is just I'm not running to take the Bears,

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like I'm not, like, oh god, but there's no way

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I could take the Steelers like I would sooner tease

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bears up to you know, twelve and a half

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, then I would tease them down to basically

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a pick.

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And and they can't make this total low enough.

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I don't know what yeah. Yeah, I mean,

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 3>normally you don't take a lot of under forties, but

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 3>this to me, feels a lot like that, like that

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Seattle Pittsburgh game we just saw a couple of weeks

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 3>ago where it's ugly even if it gets over to.

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Or this browns the brown Yeah, Pittsburgh.

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, it could be like seventeen sixteen feels like

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 3>a very realistic score for this game.

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I agree. I lean the under as well. With that, Sean,

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>always great to talk to you and catch up. I

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:06.720
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you making time in the scheduling in a difficult

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>week for me. So just remind everybody all your good stuff,

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 1>man that you're putting out. I love your content. Just

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>mind everybody where.

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 3>They Yeah, give us a follow on Twitter at Gambling

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Podcasts or follow me at Shawn T. Green and you

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 3>can just go to Sports Gambling podcast dot com. We're

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 3>putting out podcasts every day of the week covering all

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 3>the sports. The flagship show, the Sports Gamling Podcast, I

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 3>co host with my buddy Ryan Kramer, NFL, DFS, college football, NBA,

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 3>We got an NBA show dedicated to the NBA. Just

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 3>launched our NHL pod. So so much going on.

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 2>If you like betting on sports, come hang out with us.

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot of fun sports gambling podcast dot com.

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's great stuff over there, guys. You definitely should

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>check it out. All right. In the meantime, I'm gonna

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.839
<v Speaker 1>take a little break a couple of days. Bogman will

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be back. Joe's off for the rest of the week,

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>so Bogmin will be back doing a college football preview

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>as he usually does. I'll be back on Thursday with

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>our best bets for the weekend. For the NFL, I'll

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:22.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to them m