WEBVTT - Debating Desert

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It could happen. Here is the podcast that you're listening

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to right now. I'm Robert Evans. All right, that's that's

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>my job done. What are we What are we doing?

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing today? Hey? What's up? Hey? Andrew?

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Back at it again with another podcast. UM. Today, we're

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>doing something a little bit different from the previous episodes

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that I've done. We're having a bit more of an

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>open discussion about certain book that has been passed around

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for about a decade now and as polarized UM members

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of the anarchist community. UM for it that way, UM.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Today we'll be talking about the book the infamous uh

0:00:53.040 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>polemic Desert by Anonymous. For those who uh, you know,

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>not aware of this extremely controversial text. Desert is a

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>nihilist anarchist text who is published in two thousand eleven

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that is mainly directed at other anarchists and seeks to

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:24.279
<v Speaker 1>address issues of climate collapse and revolution. It became somewhat

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of a meme to tell folks to read Dessert. I'm

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not sure when that was, but I just remember scene.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot um I think in yeah around read

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Desert became a name yeah yeah, all over Twitter and

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and Reddit, but of course, being a thing that

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>exists on the Internet, people who naturally became torn on

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the subject of it. And so there are a lot

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of perspectives and opinions and think pieces about desert, some

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>more or less accurate than others. But we are here

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the book, all personal experiences reading it, things

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we think it gets right and wrong, and what we

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>could potentially looen going forward, so I would see the

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>floor is yours, whoever wants to go first. I mean,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm a huge fan of the quote that the book

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>takes it or that the that it takes its name from,

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>which comes from you know, Tacitus, who was a dude

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>writing in the Roman period Um, and the exact quote

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that it comes from is and he's talking. Tacitus is

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Roman Empire, robbers of the world. Now

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that the earth is insufficient for their all devastating hands,

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>they probe even the sea. If their enemy is rich,

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>they are greedy. If he is poor, they thirst for dominion.

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Neither East nor West has satisfied them alone. Of mankind,

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they are equally covetous of poverty and wealth, robbery, slaughter,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and plunder. They falsely name empire, they make a desert

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and they call it peace. Huh, goodass quote. It is

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a it is a solid Yeah, And obviously I think

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>people living in the shadows of every empire that's ever

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>existed can identify with that quote. Um, it's it's a

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>powerful kind of central idea to hang your extended essay.

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what the best term to refer

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to it as. Yeah, it's it's it's it's a long essay. Yeah,

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a very long essay. As we talked about kind

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of coming into this, it's extremely two thousand tens um

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>three Arab Spring pre all the big uprisings and revolts

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we had in twenty nineteen, and Um, there's definitely some

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff that it gets very right. And I think kind

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of one of the ways in which it's had an

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>impact on me is kind of I've I've thought about

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens to sort of culture as the result of

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this kind of Hollywood engine that is heavily tied up

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>with the United States military Industrial complex UM as a

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>process of desertification of ideas and the ability to like

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>conceive of of of new futures. UM. That said, I

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't really I haven't reread it in a very

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>long time and haven't really felt um called to in

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in many ways because I do think I don't know.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an extent to which it's been kind

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of left behind. Um yeah, some of the things that

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>have happened since I think. Yeah, UM, I will say

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that as someone who really came into my owners an

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>archist in like, although I had identified with it before, um,

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>when I had read the book, Um, I think it

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>was in late late so when I read the book

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>first time, I read it and honestly, um, there was

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>some good, some add some some very outdated stuff, and

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>also some stuff that I don't know. Maybe the author

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>felt it was like groundbreak and at the time, but

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, at this present stage just feels like common

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>knowledge sense, you know, I mean it was, it was

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>groundbreaking in a way for like climate realism, right, like

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>this was this was written before you know, this is

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>written before climate levy thing. This was written before um,

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the uninhabitable Earth. This was written before a lot of

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the texts that view climate change is an

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>absolute Like this was written one year before hyper objects,

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Which is really interesting actually because you know, the whole

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 1>prepence of that book is that climate change is done,

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>like it happened, where we're like there's no turning back

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the clock. And the Desert was written even before that,

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like it was. It was one of the first things

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>now and of course it's it's it's much more niche,

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but like it was. If I if I look back

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in books that have like impacted me, it was it's

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the first books like that came out, like

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>timeline wise to take climate changes, like yeah, it's there's

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>no saving it, like there's no living in the two thousand's,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no living in the nineties. Again, it's like things

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>are like the world's not going to end, but things

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>are going to get worse, right like and that, and

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that is kind of a big, big part of the

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>book because it's it's also it's also not pro collapse

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like it it doesn't take collapse is an absolute. It

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take. It doesn't it doesn't subscribe to global collapse.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the misconceptions I think people have

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about them. Yeah, that they just assume it's like this

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>collapse dumorous like mr. Rupic kind of text, but which

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I did not read it as that. I first started

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>around this same time you did, UM, And I read

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it as a part of a lot of books I

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was reading to prep for the show when we when

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we were writing our first five episodes on like on

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>climate change and like the Crumbles. So I read it,

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>read it as a part of my kind of general

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>research and yeah, like at that point it was already

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of mimified to be like, you know, like an

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>anarcho nihilist like Dumer Manifesto. And I read it, I'm like,

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not what it's saying at all. It's actually once

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>i'd read it, I was like, I was really taking

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it back at how how easily um, popular perceptions of

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a piece of media good um, I mean honestly corrupted

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>beyond recognition. Yeah, you know, like if people are a

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people are telling you know it's that about

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is in text or whatever, you know, it's kind of shake,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it kind of shakes the opposite like actually consumed for

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>yourself and then realize, how did you all get that? Yeah,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>how did you read that out of it? It is

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because I'm not even sure if they did

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>read out of it, or if that was the perception

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they had going into it, So they read it through

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that lens, and that lens basically you know, changed the

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>text in their heads to fit that thing, because yea,

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it is really interesting how how it is so associated

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with like dumerism um. Yet if you like, engage in

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>good faith with the text, it's very much not a

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Doomer manifesto anyway, although there are aspects of it that

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I am um that I think attitude wise, that I

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>am critical of. But I think Chris was going to

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>say sometimes, yeah, so I was just like, I, I

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>really I've always not liked this book, Like I read

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it back, and I think she doesn'teen when it was

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>first sort of like coming back, yeah, And I didn't

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>like it then, and I read it this morning and

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I like it even less now than I did then,

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>And I think, I think, I actually I actually okay. So, like,

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's true that most of the text doesn't

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>do the duomer thing, but I think I understand where

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>people got it from, because you know, you have quotes

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in this like, uh, here here's one. Yet I can

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>already hear the accusations from my own camp, accusations of

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>deserting the cause of revolution, deserting the struggle for another world,

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>such accusations are correct. I would rejoin that such millinarian

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and progressive myths are at the core of the expansion

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of power. And this is this is what I really like.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think from an ecological perspective, it's sort of okay.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I strongly dislike Desert as an anarchist text because I

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's just wrong. I think, I think, I think

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>there's there there's there's there's an ingrained defeatism in it

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that is so strong that it it it just it

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like warps the author's perception of the past. Like you

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get these things where he's talking about these these kind

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of he's talking about like the you know, what you

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>call the classical anarchist movement from roughly like eighteen seventy

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>two really sort of ends with the defeat of the

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>anarchists in Spain and like seven and and he you know,

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they say things like from Spain pre nineteen thirty six

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Jewish anarchists in North America, the illegalist of France,

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Italian anarchosenty close to Argentina. The habitants of

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>anarchist counter societies were always, by definition active minorities. The

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>minorities may have gotten larger in an instructionary moments, but

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they remained at minorities always and that's just wrong. It's

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's factually wrong. Like these these movements were not minorities,

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like the like the entire like the like the largest

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>union in France was the CG like in the early

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Action hundred was the the you just see it this

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>deep that all all of the French, Spanish and Portuguese

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>country speaking countries have a they have one union that's

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>called the U G C and one union it's called

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the CG T. And I can't remember which ones which,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but like like that was that was the largest union

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in France, and it was the syndicalist union right like

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it was like and there's you know the same thing

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with Argentina, right for a like for a while was

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the largest union in Argentina. And I think and this

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of my problem with this, which is

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, this is a person who's basically like

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they talked about, like they are born in the seventies

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and they've they they're writing the steals in eleven in

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just the midst of the collapse of sort of like

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the complete and total destruction of the old anarchist movement, right,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the anarchist movement that had been born out of sort

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of like the Zapatistas and the anti globalization movements. And

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they've been beaten so badly that you know, I mean

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they were crushed, they were completely destroyed, and they've been

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>beaten so badly that they they can't they literally can't

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine winning and think that like like revolution in general,

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>like is essentially is a secular theology. They repeat this

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over again. It's like revolution is

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the theology, Revolution is a myth. And it's like and

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this is this is something that's just a product of defeat.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not a product of sort of taking seriously the

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>conditions that are emerging around them. And you know, I

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was talking about this before the recording. It's like right

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>after this is written, it's you get the movement of

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the squares and then you get occupied, and it's like

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>basically like every major city in the world goes into revolt.

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The revolts are anarchists inspired. And you know, and the desert,

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like this is why Dessert vanishes for like six or

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>seven years, because desert is a piece that's written like

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a piece that's that's only happens in

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>a in a very specific part of a revolutionary cycle,

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>which is when like every everything has been crushed, all

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>resistance has been crushed, everyone's losing hope, and then everyone

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>starts reading dessert again and then the revolutions restart, and

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and at that point, like once once once there's like,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, two thousand people in the streets again like

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>fighting the cops, it becomes less and less sort of

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>like like that, that part of its analysis becomes less

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and less relevant, until you know, inevitably everyone like there's

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a defeat and then everyone goes sort of like

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think that's why it has the

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>duomer rep because it's it's it's the text that people

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>read when you've been beaten in the streets. See, Yeah,

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's an interesting look at it because I mean,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I definitely agree with the revolution is an idea, like

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>is a thing like I I specifically within the context

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, which I believe that's what the

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>books trying to mostly focus on. They do bring up

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world and stuff, um, but it's

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely written by in a by an American like citizen

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and that that that is I mean, I mean that

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that could actually be wrong. Um. It may not be

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>written by an American, but I in terms of reading it,

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of through like a very like Western

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>lens of like revolutions not happening here. Um. And I

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely sympathize and agree with that viewpoint. And I mean

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>if if you're in a point of being like it

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was two US and eleven then occupied happened and like yeah,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but occupied in't. But that that also fits like every

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>every attempt has not succeeded in this country did to

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>get any kind of big, meaningful change that we can

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>push towards something that's like post capitalist. Um. So yeah,

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I do think I think it's it's it's

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly targeting people specifically like communists um or Marks

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Lendonist who like are just waiting around for the revolution

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to happen and then don't do anything like that. Right,

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that is that but but but but but I think

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this is this is why it's a text that's like

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not good for the moment, because our problem isn't that,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like like the problem right now isn't that there's no

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>one like there's no uprising on the horizon, Like everyone's

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>completely beaten down. No one's ever going to go into

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>his treats again. Our problem is that like there's just

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's there's periodic uprisings everywhere, and every single

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>time everyone is caught off guard, and every single time,

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>no one is able to actually sort of mobilize off

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of it. And you know, like like like no, no one,

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>no one's been able to like pivot it into something

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's actually like transformative. But but but but I think that

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a very different problem then the problem that desert

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is because desert has already abandoned the possibility that an

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>uprising can win. That's I mean, it's yeah. And then

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>let's specifically been the idea of like global revolution, right,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that is, that is the thing that specifically targeting there's

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>things smaller specific they're saying, like smaller local things actually

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>can't succeed in a lot of ways. But they're trying

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to tie this idea of global revolution is like a

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>pacifying idea, right just waiting around for this to happen

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and tying that to this at the time much more

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>niche idea. Now it's now it's way more popular. But

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea of like global collapse and how people think

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>if they can people think believing in global collapse is

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>smarter than believing in global revolution. They think it's more realistic.

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But the book saying no, this is this idea of

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>global collapse actually falls under all the same issues that

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>global revolution has. I think i'd want to um sort

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of comments here um with regard to like the defeat

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is sort of reading um in the text. I understand

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that reading um. I mean personally, I distinguished in like

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>defeatism and dumerism, and I always think, like my own

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>personality and my own perspective kind of like inoculates me

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.239
<v Speaker 1>in a way from like adopting that kind of defeatist

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>attitude towards um, you know, change. But I don't think

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the book is entirely um, you know, dismissive of like revolution. Um.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It just I think the main thrust of it is

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's critically the idea of like one global revolution,

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>one global collapse. What it really emphasizes is that, you know,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>climate change brings new possibilities for new anarchies plural to

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>develop worldwide and responds changing circumstances. But at the same time,

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some areas things are going to get

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>worse than some areas things are going to get better.

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that really one broadbrush could be applied

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to the entire earth, but I think, I mean, I

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think like this, this is another thing that they're really

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>guilty of, especially like there's an entire section in here

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>where they just keep writing about Africa and it's like well,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, and they'll get pressed on it

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be like, no, no, we mean sub Saharan Africa,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, what are you talking like. They they

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>won't name countries, they won't name movements, they won't name people.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>It's just they'll just write something about the whole of

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Sub Saharan Africa. And it's just like, well, I think

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that's evidence of the kind of of what Garrison was

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, right, And this is something you see

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>all over the place with people writing about politics, with

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>people trying to write about like particularly revolutionary politics, UM

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in a global sense, and I think it's usually a

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>mistake to do that, UM for the reasons we've kind

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of discussed. Any time I see a left wing even

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who I think is generally on point. Who

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>starts talking about, for example, like extending their theories about

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary politics to places I happen to know just a

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit about, it's always very clear like, oh you

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know shit about Syria. Oh you don't know shit

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>about Libya. Oh you don't know shit about Angle like um.

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>And that's and that's like not even a moral failing.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just that it's impost It's it's impossible really to

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have in depth knowledge of like what's actually going on

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in those racism, what's going on in those revolutions. It's

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>why people default so much to the whole. Well, whatever

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>side the US is on must be the bad side,

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and whatever side the Russians on must be the good side.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the easiest way to look at that ship. Um.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't I think that's. I think that's a worthwhile

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>critique to make, and it's a critique to make any

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>time that it happens. Um. I agree with Garrison and

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 1>with Andrew that I think the thing that is that

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>desert gets right. Um. And the thing that I've seen

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in my own life is that like the opportunities we

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>should be looking for are not suddenly that some sort

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of global revolution sweeps all of the things we don't

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>like out of power and magically institutes something better comprehensively

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>across the globe. It's it's it's room for little anarchies.

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It's what we saw in northeast Syria, right where the

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>government pulls out and people have an opportunity to do

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>something not perfect, but better. And I think that is

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of one of the things we talked about

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot on this show. That's why a mutual aid

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is valuable, It's why building these connections are valuable. It's because, um,

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>as things crumble, there will be opportunities two in local areas,

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>piecemeal institute and and push through for more just and

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and better ways of living. Um And I think that

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at kind of the broad level potentially

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>optimistic point is that when you have enough of those

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and when they spread well enough, and if communication is

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>good enough, maybe the things that work will get adopted

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on a wider uh scale. And there's always the opportunity

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that when enough, when ideas spread far enough, they have

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a tipping point and and they go viral, you know,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. But I I I don't I think

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that While there's a lot of specifics that Desert gets wrong,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think they were ahead of the curve and

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>recognizing that, and I think it's it's a more productive

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>way to look at the idea of revolutionary change. Then

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to finally have nineteen seventeen. But everywhere, you know,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>m throughout to the Africa chapter. The impression that I

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>got while reading that chapter, and I think the book

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>itself references Um Samba Um. I got the impression that

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the author had read UM Afghan Anarchism, History of a

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>movement by Sam Member and they were just kind of

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>like inspired by that, I would say, because as I

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do point out, they didn't like specify the specific cultures,

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>which is an issue considering, you know, the tendency that

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Westerners have of you know, being to Africa this large

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>brush as if it's you know, all one way or

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the other. Um. But I think what we do see now,

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 1>UM is you know, from the Horn of Africa to

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>South Africa to Nigeria too, I mean recently Sudan. I believe, Um,

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>there are Africans, smaller number organizing under the mount of anarchism,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and they are anarchic elements that continue to persist on

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 1>the continent. Yeah, I mean I think that's like, you know,

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the things that they sort of

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>got they got right, was about how like this the

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the sort of renewal the spread of

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>urban anarchism they're talking about like Chile in particular, they

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>got right, Um, Indonesia Bangladestra somewhat. But but but I

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>think I think there's there's another like my, my, my, my,

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>my biggest issue with them in terms of the way

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>they think about ecological stuff that this comes This is

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>something they talk about with like they have this thing

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>where they think that forger societies are like, Okay, they're

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're they're they're more careful than most people.

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>To frame it as like the forging soci ideas can

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be a gallitarian, but I think they wind up talking

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>about these sort of like the way that sort of

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>forging nomadic society sort of inherently defy the boundaries of

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the state, and like that's true, but you can also

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have like nomadic forging societies that have that are you know,

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>hereditary slave societies. And this is this is a problem

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>because there's a there's a lot in here about that

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's about sort of like they're they're you know,

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they're they're taking this a sort of like soft anti

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>se of right. Yeah, it has a few lids where

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it does specifically say fialization is the cause of like

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like the civilization is genocide, um, which yeah,

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and that can't silly, Yeah, by civilization genocide. Sure if

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>they're saying that they do cause genocide, if you're if

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to make the case that it seems to

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be that civilizations, Uh, well, I don't know every civilization

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>does not commit genocide, but no, but civilization gives you

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a constant Yeah, civilization gives you the framework that makes

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>genocide possible, well, like potentially intentional genocide possible. I don't

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>know that I would agree with that, because I think

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you see examples of genocide from hunter gatherer societies and

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>from from so societies, and that the obviously documentation on

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that isn't as extensive because we weren't documenting things for

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it. But you do have examples from

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>from what we know of like um, the America's of

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>their word genocides committed by societies we would call stateless.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think I might argue that like genocide is

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>a thing that human beings do, and civilization because it

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>allows us to do everything on a larger scale, allows

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>us to do way better genocides. That's definitely in our

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think my problem with it is is

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're going back into this sort of like that

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going back into the you know, there's this inherent

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>binarya between forgers and sales societies and that you know,

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and and specifically they think that that that these sorts

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that the foragers ideas are you know, inevitably gonna become

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>a gualantarian. It's like that's not true, and it's not

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>true in ways that you can see right now in

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like like they're like they're like there are lots of

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.719
<v Speaker 1>places right now where you can look at you know,

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.479
<v Speaker 1>forging anxieties that are incredibly right. Like there's there's like,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, you get sort of you get the Filani

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>joining like right wing Islamas groups, right and that like

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. I think it has a problem

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with It's the same thing as looking at indigenous societies

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and and seeing them all on one side of the

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>fight with with colonizing nations as supposed I'm reading a

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>book about the history of them a Poochay right now,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 1>which are historically like the indigenous group in Chile that

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>resisted the law, and the indigenous group really and you

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>could argue in all of Latin America that resisted the

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>longest and most effectively. But even then, when you look

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>at like the campaign to the Chilean government in the

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixties and eighteen eighties, large like significant chunks of

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the Mapoocha sided with the government against other mapoo Chay

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and like that's the like, it's it's always a mistake.

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good one of the things

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>that you get out of the dawn of everything. It's

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>always a mistake to like look at any of these groups,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>hunter gatherers, stateless societies is like one thing or another.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>They're people and some of them sucked just like yeah

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they're yeah anyway, Yeah, there's there's one thing that I

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sort of push back against. Robbert, you had

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>said that genocide is a thing that humans do. Um.

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I agree with that assessment um in

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>this sense, or at least I'd rather I would like

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to clarify um. Okay, if you an opportunity to clarify

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by that. I you know, I don't

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>know that it's just humans, but I think that genocide

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that as long as we have evidence

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in recorded history, it seems like we have done not

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>just against are not just against other humans, but against

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>other kind of hominid species. We have we have examples

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of things that it seems fair to call genocide, going

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>back further than we have any kinds of written records. Um,

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, villages in the Balkans that were you know,

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>burnt in people who like groups of people, tribes and whatnot,

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>who seem to have been killed in mass and you know,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>there's there's other theories for some of that. Some of

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>them may have been like people trying to stop a play.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't plague or whatever. Like. There's not any kind

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of comprehensive solidity. But what we do know is that

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as long as we have documentations of humans doing things,

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we have documentations of things that we could call genocide.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I see, I see, look look into that a bit more.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the glarification. Yeah, can I can I do

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>a Balkans pivot because there's a there's a there's a

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>thing like like it genuinely disturbed me reading it in

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>here about the Serbs dream read that the Bosnian genocide

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>were so that they're they're they're quoting. Its disturbing about that.

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, but this is this is a I uh okay,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So they're they're they're doing they're they're reading a quote

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>from the book Gypsies, Wars and Other Instances of the

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>wild where he's talking this is about the Boston genocide.

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>How is this possible in Europe at the end of

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century was the question that played obsessively through

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>my mind. What the war in former Yugoslavia forced us

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to suggest the fact that people proved willing to make

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a conscious and active choice to embrace regression, barbarity and

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>return to the wildness. Take the serve fighters who dreamed

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of a return to the Serbia of the epic poems

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>were quote there was no electricity, no computers, when the

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>serves were happy and had no cities, the breeding ground

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of all evil. And then this is this is the

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>next thing that's that's the text coming back and commenting

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>on it that some modern day militias reflect romantic desires,

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>while shelling towns, massacring villages, and being killed in turn

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>should neither surprise us nor necessarily fully validate romance. It does, however, suggest,

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>along with the honest expression of joy and destruction mouth

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>by some soldiers in every war, as well as many anarchists,

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that there was a coupling of some sort between a

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>generalized urge to destroy and disgusted at a complex human society.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's there's there's another part um only later on

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about ethnic diversity and autonomy will often emerge

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>both from mutual aid and community and animosity between communities.

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to think, and our history back this up,

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that self adantified anarchists will never inflict such pain as

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Serb nationalist militias, an example that shows purposely for the Repugnicans.

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But we should admit that our wish to function up

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is partly driven by the same urge to civilizational dismemberment

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that can be found in many interethnic conflicts and in

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the minds of fighters more generally. And I think that's fucked.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. That's just I think there's commenting

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a specific type of anarchist literature, which is like the

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>make total destroy thing. And yeah, I've definitely I have

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>observed that in people the same the same urge that

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you're you're so broken down by everything that the only

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>urge that is the only creative urge you have is

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to destroy the things around you. I've seen that. I

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're necessarily celebrating that, but they're pointing out

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that that urge can be there. When I think they

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>get really wrong here is that I don't think that's

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the urge that that is is like that, that's when

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>when when you're dealing with interethnic conflict, when you're dealing

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>with genocide, I don't think that's the urge that's going on.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It'sc s pratically with the Serbs, because the Serbs, like

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, okay, like when when when an anarchist is

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>doing mate total destroying right there, you know there, like there,

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a very specific set of things they're attacking

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>or they're you know, they're attacking building, the attacking the

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>physical infrastructure of the world. When the Serbs are doing

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bosnian genocide, like that, they have a very specific

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>thing they're doing, which is killing Bosnian Muslims. And I

0:29:53.840 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's extremely different urge than the sort of like

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think that's about sort of what

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it's civilizational dismemberment or whatever. That's about Islamophobia and genocide.

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a different I think the genocidal

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>impulse is a I think a very different one than

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the like the impulse to break the

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.959
<v Speaker 1>society that has harmed you. Yeah, I think it's important

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to draw a distinction between you can kill a shipload

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of people without it being a genocide, um. And I

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>think and it's also one of those things I think

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes why people I think why there's hesitation to see

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>certain acts in early history of genocide is that they're

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>not as complete as modern genocide. But but what a

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>genocide really is, and I think it's important to lay

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>this out. It's not necessarily killing every member of an

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ethnic group or a religious group or whatever kind of community. UM.

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It is stopping their ability to propagate and continue themselves.

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why things like destroying churches and destroying the cultural

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>distoral markers are part of genocide. And it's also why

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of genocides they left the women and children alive.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>They would kill all the men, and they would take

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the women in and they would breed with them. They

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>might kill the kids sometimes, but it was this The

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>goal was not necessarily where we need to kill all

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of you, it's we want to kill this, this culture,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this population. Um I think the I think, yeah, I

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>think the parallel he's trying to make here or there

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or she? Uh? Is that? Uh? That like that type

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of like genocidal cultural destruction is targeted against specific groups.

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>The difference here is with this type of like you know,

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's he's writting this for other anarchists. He's pointing out,

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like our destructive urge, our cultural urge isn't even for

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a specific group, it's just for everything, and that can

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>be unhealthy sometimes sometimes there's ways to do make total destroy.

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>That's totally fine, but that can go to unhealthy places. Now,

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he's not equating like ethnic cleansing with that. He's like

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they are like they are different. But when when your

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>total destroy urges against all of culture, then yeah, that

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that can like that's something you should probably ponder. Yeah,

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's definitely I would agree that that's the

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that's potentially problematic. Right, Like with a number of

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.479
<v Speaker 1>different desires. Uh, there's a way in which that can

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>lead to people doing really fucked up things. Yeah, it's

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's like it's pointing out that that type of

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>accelerationism not specific to ideology, but just like accelerationism in general.

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think when I when I talk about

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>things like the fact that because not every culture commits

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>genocides and every civil civilization does, um, and throughout history

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.719
<v Speaker 1>there have been more that found the idea repugnant than

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>found the idea acceptable. Um. But it is really a

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>consistent thing in history. And I think the lesson with

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that isn't necessarily that everything could end in genocide. So

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the lesson is necessarily like, oh you

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>should look at make total destroy as if you know,

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the this kind of trend in anarchist thought could lead

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to genocide. It's that people in groups are nearly always

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>capable of killing a shipload of other people for a

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>variety of reasons if applied in the proper ways, And

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>so those of us who seek mass movement should always

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>be conscious of that, because human beings in large groups

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>can do wonderful things, but there's a long history of

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>them doing really fucked up ship sometimes in ways that

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>surprised the people that got the large group of human

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>beings together in the first place. The other thing I

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to bring up this kind of more circling back

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to the dum kind of idea UM, because yeah, a

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>big part of the book is trying purposely is to

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>disolution people with this idea of global revolution and dissolution

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>people with the idea that we can save the earth

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>because we can't UM. So that's a big thing. And

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>first I think I think for some people, if you

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>stop right there and you that's how you end that thought, Yes,

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that does lead to dumorism, obviously, like that that is,

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that is, but the books, the book doesn't stop there.

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The book continues on from there. Now they continue on

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>from a nihilistic standpoint. I'm not a nihilist. I prefer absurdism.

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I prefer discordionism. But those two things are pretty caught

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>like there. They are more similar than not. UM is

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that you can be disillusioned with global revolution and the

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>idea to save the earth, but that should not change

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what we do or how we feel or operate as anarchists.

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 1>It's not that we should be disillusioned and then do

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing and step aside that we should be disillusioned, and

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>then find that disillusionment itself a form of liberation, like

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the freeing nature of being free from this idea of

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 1>revolution is that like, no, we are living our lives now.

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Don't live for a revolution. Live your life now and

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>do things now, because that's what you actually have. So

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like that type of nihilistic, absurdist discordion things. This is,

0:34:58.680 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this is, this is this is where I come back

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have a problems with it again because this this is

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>literally just there is no alternative except it's it's yeah,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's do anargy. But I mean, but that's how

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I live like that like that, I think, I think

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a bad I think that's a bad plan.

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think if if you look, if you look

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>at what happens with because you know, this, this was

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing that was really big in the American anarchist movement,

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like in you know, from about just and seventeen like

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>roughly now, and it's like people were rising too. Yeah

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that didn't succeed like that, like not really like but

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think like like this is like I think I

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>think this is like like one of the reasons it

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't work, Like, okay, this is like the thing that's important.

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>One of the things is the point of revolutions, even

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.720
<v Speaker 1>when they don't succeed, is that for a very brief window,

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you actually can like it becomes it becomes possible to

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine the other world. And what what What this entire

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is saying is don't do that. That's not that's

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>not that's that's that's that is not what it absolutely not.

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.919
<v Speaker 1>This is okay, I can I finish that sentence? Yeah,

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, okay, so what what what what? What I'm

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>saying here is that what what they've abandoned, right, the

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that they're giving up when they when they give

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>up revolution, when they're like this is a progressive myth,

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this is like uh theology. What what they've abandoned completely

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is our human capacity to actually shape a different world.

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>What they're arguing is that like the the you know,

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>essentially that the combination of ecological and social forces are

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>strong enough that humans humans no longer have the capacity

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to reshape the world into a way that is different

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>than this, and that this is now the eternal present,

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and and yeah, inside of the eternal present.

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:45.399
<v Speaker 1>They're saying, you should be fighting for the same things

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>you should be fighting for, like you know, you should.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You should be in your own sort of local domain.

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>You should be like, I mean, there are some of

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the recommendations are wild, Like I think, I think their

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>conservation stuff is sketchy given, I mean, it doesn't but

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't apply to an eternal present though, Like they

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>lay out, like the world is changing a lot and

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>will for the next fifty years, Like there will be

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>massive changes and how things are set up in the

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>next like in the next century, and we need to

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of that. We need to turn those liabilities

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>into assets and start making those little anarchies like that.

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>That that is what it's trying to do. And I

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>would add as well that as it points out the

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>situations in plastic stooke in Bangladesh, a difference in the

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>present and will be in the future. You know. What

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think is is trying to be sort of drilled

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>in here is that at least in the text and

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 1>how I read it um is that yes, things will

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be different in different parts to wood and probably maybe

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>they won't be this, you know, or as the what

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this is they won't be you know, this one global revolution.

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, Um, I think

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>what it's trying to emphasize is that we don't have

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the structures. And I think what part of what is

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to emphasize is that we don't have instructures in

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>place right now to launch an instruction we can meaningfully defend.

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And so that is the sort of thing we should

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>be focusing on. But but but they, but they, but

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this and this, this, this is going back to my

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>problem with it, going going back to the thing where

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>they go on the rant about how anarchists are like

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a permanent cultural majority and will never become a majority.

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that even even in situations where people had that

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>capacity and did it they go back, they project back

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>onto it, go no, no, no, no no, they couldn't have

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>done that. Like, it's it's not about it's it's it's

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they they have a belief and this is something that

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they do explicitly say that that anarchist will always be

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a permanent minority right there. There will always be an

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>active but permanent minority. And that is the like like

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that specifically, I think is just an actual rejection of

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the belief that we collectively can make a better future.

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Because if if, if you think our ideas that you know,

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>if being free right, if if a society, if you

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>think that that is permanently always going to be a minority,

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you are you know, you are condemning. You're condemning the

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>future to the people who don't believe that. And and

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I I understand why, especially if you know, if, if, if,

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 1>if the only thing you've ever known is fifty years

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of when the new Liberals actually did the thing right.

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>They took over the entire world, restructure of the entire

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>world economy, seized every government. Like if if that's what

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you live through, I understand why you would think that.

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think the fact that it was possible to

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>do it from the other direction is in some ways

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a sense that like, yeah, we could do it too.

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Sorry, I will stop harping on this

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>one specific point. It just extremely annoys me. I think

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not giving up the idea that the world can

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be better. It's that like, we don't need to have

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the majority of people be anarchists to make the old better.

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>We can still spread our own anarchies and people don't

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>need to self subscribe as anarchists. But as long as

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we start building those systems in the places around us,

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>people start using them, and people might start like living

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>them out, even if they don't call themselves anarchists, right, Like,

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the majority of people will probably prefer some some type

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of state or government. Right. You can even look at

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>ROSA and be like, yeah, it's still is state issue

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, but some ways not, right, Like, it's

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going We're not going to get an anarchist world.

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to happen, but we can make it

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>better through the lens of anarchy. And I think that's

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>what it's kind of trying to say. Yeah, I I

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's worth acknowledging that, Like, yeah, the majority

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of people are never going to be what anarchists are

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, which is people who comprehensively reject the systems

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they live in. Most people are always going to think

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>more like well, I want to be comfortable, I want

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to I support changes kind of that that, you know,

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>fix this thing that I've noticed as a problem or

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that thing. Most people are never going to comprehensively reject

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the system. But I do have hope that in time

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and given you know space to build things and show

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>people other ways and improve life for people. You can

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where most people believe a lot

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I think are important. Yeah, And

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what's time. I think that's sorry. I

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's what the as specificitis UM tend to advocate

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for in terms of through the process of social institution

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in these larger movements, generalizing the ideas of anarchist ideas

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, making them more common throughout the population.

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It's only trying to get each and every poost in

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the world to self identify as an anarchist, communist or whatever.

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>It's more so that you're trying to spread these ideas

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to the point where they are I suppose the common

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>sentiment the popular will Yeah, like I it's it's um.

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>That's like the point of culture jamming and and and

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>ship like that. Like it's the the idea that like

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't so much matter, like like like what matters

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>is inserting the things you think are important into the

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 1>culture and getting people to identify with them and understand them.

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 1>The terms that they specifically use aren't aren't as important,

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like that that's not really what matters. Well, Okay, I

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're arguing that though, because I mean, like

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>do they have lines like this. We cannot, however, remake

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the entire world. There are not enough of us, there

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>never will be. But then you know, they like they

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they specifically talk about the oh well, they don't have

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to all be anarchists, and you know, I mean, here's

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>their line. There was unfortunately little little evidence from history

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that the working class, never mind anyone else, is intrinically

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>predisposed to libertarian and ecological revolution. Thousands of years of

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian socialization favor of the jack boot. Neither we nor

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>anyone else could create a libertarian or global or ecological

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>global future by expanding social movements further. There is no

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>reason to think that in the absence of such a

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>vast expanse, the global transformation concurrent toward desires will ever happen.

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think think the keyword there is global, Like, yeah,

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that's they're trying to break with that, and it's important,

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like they're writing this specifically for anarchists who are kind

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of already nihilistic, kind of already anti sif right, they

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are writing this for other anarchists that this isn't a

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>book to radicalize a normy or a communist by anarchists

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for other anarchists to be like, hey, you already kind

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of think the world's kind of going to ship. Here's

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a way that we can still do things despite the

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>world being shitty. Because once you're once you're disillusioned, it's

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to be illusioned again. Like it's it's hard once

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you give up on the idea of global revolution, once

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you give up in the idea of global collapse, it's

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>hard to re enter those even if you see things

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>happening the world, like there can still be uprisings and revolts, absolutely,

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but there is a distinction of between uprising and the

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>revolts and like a global revolution right and specifically like

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the Marxist Leninist sounds. And I'd also like to um

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.839
<v Speaker 1>continue the paragraph you're reading from there. We had said

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that as anarchists, sweet he had said, or they had

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>said that, as anarchists, we are not the seed of

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the future society in the shell of the old, but

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>merely one of many elements from which the future is forming.

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 1>That's okay. When faced with such scale and complexity, there

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is value in non servile humility, even for in such Yeah,

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but this this is just this is just giving up.

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>This is this is the old. It's too complicated, it's

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>too like and like I think, I don't know, like

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's giving up on it's giving up

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on trying to do any kind of on on like

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>humans as a whole, trying to do any kind of

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>large scale like you know, like it's trying to do

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.399
<v Speaker 1>transformation of what the society. I disagree to continue that

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that coote to give up hope for global anarchists. Revolution

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is not to resign oneself to anarchy, remaining any to protest.

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Seaweed puts it well. Revolution is not everywhere or nowhere.

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Any bioregion can be liberated through a succession of events,

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and strategy is based in the conditions unique to it,

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 1>mostly as the grip of facilitation that area weakens through

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>its own volition for the efforts of its inhabitants. So

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>aization didn't succeed every at once, and so it's undoing

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>might only occur to varying degrees in different places at

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>different times. Even if an area is seemingly fully under

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the control of authority, there are always places to go

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to live in, to love in, and to resist from,

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and we can extend those spaces. The global situation may

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>seem beyond us, but the local never is. And I

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's beautiful. I think that's like a That's one

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things that keeps me alive is ideas like that, honestly.

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, I also hold the opinion

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that none of us, including this author, is a fortune teller,

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you know. The desert's picture of the future is not

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the only possibility, you know, And I think in a

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways and a lot of always I believe

0:45:54.600 --> 0:46:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that they can and have already been proven wrong, you know. Like,

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's an issue that I really take a lot

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of contention with the book. Part of the book that

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>really pisces me off is the sort of persistence of

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the overpopulation myth. Yeah, I don't remember it being so

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>consistent since I reread it um a couple of weeks ago.

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>And also this sort of nonchalance the author seems to

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have about like mass die offs and that kind of thing,

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think that that's very troubling to me.

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:30.839
<v Speaker 1>That's very specific to It's a type of anti sive

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:35.240
<v Speaker 1>literature that's like we view civilization is going to progress

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 1>towards Jenna side anyway, and the way to actually avoid

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>more deaths is to kind of help the collapse along

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>because that will end civilization quicker. So therefore less people,

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>less people will be born, and less people will have

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 1>to die. So that's the type of thinking they have.

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily agree with that, um necessarily, but like, yeah,

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that is that is very typical of this type of literature.

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So it gets because it is written mostly for other

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>anti sid anarchists, but like, yeah, it's not like pro genocide.

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.399
<v Speaker 1>It's saying genocide will happen. So the way to make

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 1>less of it is to actually kind of slowly start

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:17.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of help helping the crumbles along essentially and while

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>still you know, making people's lives better in your immediate community,

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like with that, with that very local focus. So again

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 1>not not saying I necessarily agree with that, but that's

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the that's the type of thought it's engaging with. I mean,

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true of some of it. But there

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a lot of like panic about there's going

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>to be nine billion people and like population grows. All

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the over population stuff is a little iffy. You know,

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>there is a there's a discussion to have on caring capacity,

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:51.919
<v Speaker 1>but we are not there yet. We right now we

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>way overproduced for them for the amount of people we have. Yeah,

0:47:56.280 --> 0:48:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that and that I don't know. That also fresh it

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in me immensely. They're like, yeah, we we have consider

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about carring capacity right and they're like, oh,

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we already can't. We have a billion people going hungry.

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, yeah, but that's not about the carrying capacity.

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>That's just that's that's destrition. Which was literally that and

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that idea gained more prevalence after Dessert was written. We

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of more understood, like like culturally that it is

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a distribution issue not necessarily a production issue. Now we

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>do overproduce, right because and the amount of production we

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:29.879
<v Speaker 1>have contributes this tough like climate change and that is bad.

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So we should tone down production, but we should make

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the ways that it's more sustainable and ecological. Um. Yeah,

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that does point towards the data nature of

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the text. I think Also my last like thing with

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it is I think I think it could have benefited

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot from like in an indigenous stewardship perspective, because

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the way it thinks about its particularly the way things

0:48:54.440 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>but wildness versus conservation is just very messy, and yeah,

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 1>if it falls, it falls. It does a better job

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of it than some other antis of things that I've seen,

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but it definitely falls into the like trap of like,

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>here is the wild and then any attempt to manage

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it is uh, you know, is civilization and you need

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the wild, and it's like, well,

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this is already stewarded and managed. That is the one. Yeah,

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 1>it does fall on that slope of like nature being

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:33.959
<v Speaker 1>another that is sacred, which isn't necessarily a great idea,

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>nor is it really true. Yeah, this is very two

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>ten two ten. Yeah, right, So I think the book

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is critical conceitation and that sort of binary way, and

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree that indigenous stewardship perspective was sorely needed. But

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I do think that the way

0:49:54.560 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that the book criticizes um wherever just points out um

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the sual conservation may have been and may still be

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:07.919
<v Speaker 1>new for some people. You know, the idea that these

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>sorts of government conservation projects which sort of preside over

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this sort of static vision of nature and ecology and

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff that is supposedly threatened by humanity. UM. I think

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>criticizing that approach to nature it's good. I mean the

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of romanticization of the wild that is very typical

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of anti Seve text and thought. UM is very much

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>anti Sieve. But I do believe that people should look

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>ah or should rather resist these sorts of conservation impulse.

0:50:53.920 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>As I was rereading it a couple of weeks ago,

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know, UM, what you guy's thoughts of

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the section of the book that speaks of the different

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>modern different the the idea of fourth and fifth generation

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>war Oh boy, that's a UM that has been UM

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of a contributional approach to analyzing conflict so figured

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>out as you have been in you know, actual war

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:33.080
<v Speaker 1>zoons robot that you might have a thing to see. UM.

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the kind of thing that we should

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 1>probably cover in in detail on because this is a

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of like William Lynde stuff. I think he's the

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:44.280
<v Speaker 1>guy who came up with the idea of like fourth

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>generation war less at least and it's UM. It's basically

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea. It's the idea that warfare UM today is

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:55.440
<v Speaker 1>conducted through a lot of stuff that's not conventional weaponry, right,

0:51:55.480 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So stuff like UM, like like like putting networks together

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to like push social division, you know through UM, social

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 1>media UM, or carrying out cyber attacks on infrastructure, disinformation UM,

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>all of that kind of stuff, which is I think accurate.

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been reporting on what you could call fifth generation

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>warfare since some UM. I think it's I think to

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the extent that it's relevant here. I think one thing

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:28.839
<v Speaker 1>that people on the left need to acknowledge is that

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they have UM been blindsided by the effectiveness that the

0:52:33.400 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>far right has adapted to UM the key components of

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 1>this kind of warfare. And I think nothing is more

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>key than social engineering and disinformation UM. And they've been

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:48.719
<v Speaker 1>much more successful at it over the last release in

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>twos and fifteen in particular, UM than the left hast

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 1>by basically everywhere, every single and by I think, every

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 1>single measure of of success. And I think this is

0:52:59.080 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>something we should say in depth for another day, UM.

0:53:04.120 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think that it is worth acknowledging that this

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:10.479
<v Speaker 1>is And I also think that and this is again

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>part of a bigger conversation. We talked about the concept

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of like culture jamming. When we talked about like Operation

0:53:15.360 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>mind Fuck you know, which is Discordian idea. Um, all

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of which you can see is kind of pre predecessors

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to the concepts of fifth generation warfare. I think there's

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a strong argument to be made that those efforts by

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 1>leftists in the eighties and nineties in particular, actually contributed

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to the substantial right wing victories that we're seeing right

0:53:35.560 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 1>now in this space. UM. And I think maybe it's

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a number of reasons for that, um,

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:44.800
<v Speaker 1>including some to some extent, the idea of arrogance that

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>um that what that we were just too smart, that

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they were never going to figure out how to utilize

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the same means we had, or to kind of judo

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like take the momentum for that and spin it around

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on us. But they were and they did, and um, yeah,

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that'll that'll lead into another or episode. We'll have to

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about this in more detail. That's something like Grant

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Morrison actually talks a lot about in regards to discordionism

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:10.319
<v Speaker 1>and this type of how how you know he used

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to work for a company called Disinformation back when disinformation

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was Yeah, and now it's like one of the leading

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:21.239
<v Speaker 1>castes of mass death in the world right, So he

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that is something that Morrison talks about a lot in

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of how they did have that arrogance and now

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the same forces that they used in hopes of making

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the world better and now being used to regress the

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 1>world and make it worse. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, I had

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 1>a big copy of Disinformation on my coffee table when

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I was nineteen. I just ordered good there's some fun

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>essays in their garret. Um, all right, that'll probably, I mean,

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:53.359
<v Speaker 1>did you have more to say on that? And yeah,

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to say that, you know, regardless of

0:54:57.239 --> 0:55:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the unsettent future, UM, regardless of your stands on get

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:07.280
<v Speaker 1>its message however flawed. UM here now as the minor

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 1>goods in Alice Huxley's Island so often repeat UM, we

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 1>can and should pay attention to what we can do

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to support ourselves for whatever outcome you go through, you know,

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:25.320
<v Speaker 1>projects within the spaces we inhabit. I believe that anarchism

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 1>could be the seed of the new will. I do

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that we have an impact a huge impact on

0:55:30.680 --> 0:55:35.279
<v Speaker 1>society and on politics, and I believe there are still

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:42.880
<v Speaker 1>many possibilities for liberty still. Yeah, I do as well.

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that acknowledging you know, failures both of of

0:55:46.880 --> 0:55:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of you know ideas and of methods doesn't mean giving

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 1>up hope or or ignoring the successes of those same

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:59.600
<v Speaker 1>things which which we're are also present. Um yeah, so

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, stay optimistic. Read something. Uh doesn't have

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to beat eert, but just go go read a thing.

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Go read yeah, back of your shampoo. B but especially

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 1>if it's Dr Brauner's a lot of good stuff in there. Um,

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 1>all right, that's gonna do it for us this week.

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Take care for today. At least it could happen here

0:56:26.120 --> 0:56:28.800
<v Speaker 1>as a production of cool Zone Media. For more podcasts

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:31.440
<v Speaker 1>from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool zone media

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:33.279
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or check us out on the I Heart

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You can find sources for It could Happen here, updated

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>monthly at cool zone Media dot com slash sources. Thanks

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for listening.