WEBVTT - David Harsanyi: Gun Grabbing Left Makes No Sense

0:00:11.657 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.937 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:17.977 --> 0:00:21.497
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, everybody, Welcome to the

0:00:21.537 --> 0:00:25.377
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. We have David Harsany with us now

0:00:25.577 --> 0:00:31.177
<v Speaker 1>of The Federalist. He's a phenomenal columnist and actually proofred

0:00:31.257 --> 0:00:33.697
<v Speaker 1>my first ever attempt at a column when I was

0:00:33.857 --> 0:00:36.657
<v Speaker 1>a writer at The Blaze, which he may not even

0:00:36.697 --> 0:00:39.177
<v Speaker 1>remember now, but he was very encouraging and very helpful.

0:00:39.257 --> 0:00:41.857
<v Speaker 1>Mister HARSANYI good to have you on the program, Sir,

0:00:43.657 --> 0:00:45.377
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. Just hit me how long I

0:00:45.417 --> 0:00:48.537
<v Speaker 1>know you? What's that? Fifteen years ago or something? Right? Yep,

0:00:48.697 --> 0:00:51.897
<v Speaker 1>we're going on I think thirteen years. We've known each

0:00:51.897 --> 0:00:53.897
<v Speaker 1>other for thirteen years, so you and I go way

0:00:53.937 --> 0:00:59.697
<v Speaker 1>back to the early days of the of the Blaze phenomenon.

0:00:59.857 --> 0:01:04.337
<v Speaker 1>Now tell me this, David, there's been there's all this

0:01:04.377 --> 0:01:07.057
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. Now, when people see this or listen

0:01:07.137 --> 0:01:11.177
<v Speaker 1>to this, we're both, they will already know what the

0:01:11.217 --> 0:01:16.417
<v Speaker 1>reality is of the Trump showing up in New York

0:01:16.457 --> 0:01:18.617
<v Speaker 1>City situation. As you and I talk, we're not quite

0:01:18.657 --> 0:01:20.897
<v Speaker 1>sure what that is going to look like because we're

0:01:21.537 --> 0:01:24.817
<v Speaker 1>recording in advance of it. Just everyone knows. But one

0:01:24.857 --> 0:01:27.297
<v Speaker 1>part of it that has already come out very clearly

0:01:27.417 --> 0:01:31.777
<v Speaker 1>is if you talk about Alvin Bragg as a Soros

0:01:31.857 --> 0:01:35.537
<v Speaker 1>funded DA, they go back and forth between one saying

0:01:35.577 --> 0:01:40.977
<v Speaker 1>that that's not true, which is really they're just lying basically,

0:01:40.977 --> 0:01:43.417
<v Speaker 1>but it comes to a third party that put the

0:01:43.457 --> 0:01:45.697
<v Speaker 1>money out there. But put that aside. The other part

0:01:45.737 --> 0:01:48.497
<v Speaker 1>of this is that it is anti semitic to say

0:01:48.537 --> 0:01:51.817
<v Speaker 1>that Soros is giving money to people that he gave

0:01:51.857 --> 0:01:58.217
<v Speaker 1>money to. Right, So there's two two fast as this

0:01:58.417 --> 0:02:01.617
<v Speaker 1>one is they say, well, Soros doesn't actually back them

0:02:01.977 --> 0:02:04.137
<v Speaker 1>because he gave seven million to a pack and that

0:02:04.137 --> 0:02:08.697
<v Speaker 1>pack only gave Alvin Brag one million, right or whatever. Whatever.

0:02:08.737 --> 0:02:12.417
<v Speaker 1>The number one, which is a new, completely new standard,

0:02:12.537 --> 0:02:14.857
<v Speaker 1>which you know, we would we wouldn't be able to

0:02:14.897 --> 0:02:18.817
<v Speaker 1>say that half the people out there who are funding

0:02:18.857 --> 0:02:21.497
<v Speaker 1>political causes are funding them in that way because the

0:02:21.537 --> 0:02:23.937
<v Speaker 1>money's laundered. It's not laundered, but you know what I mean,

0:02:24.017 --> 0:02:27.697
<v Speaker 1>it's it's given out by packs, not exactly by the individual.

0:02:28.897 --> 0:02:31.297
<v Speaker 1>Soros even said I never met him. Can you imagine

0:02:31.297 --> 0:02:34.017
<v Speaker 1>if that was the standard of saying someone back something,

0:02:34.217 --> 0:02:36.017
<v Speaker 1>someone you had to see them, you know, give a

0:02:36.057 --> 0:02:38.377
<v Speaker 1>bag of money to the person in a picture, you know,

0:02:38.497 --> 0:02:41.137
<v Speaker 1>shaking hands so on. So that's a ridiculous pot But

0:02:41.177 --> 0:02:44.497
<v Speaker 1>the second part is much more nefarious. It's that you

0:02:44.537 --> 0:02:48.057
<v Speaker 1>cannot talk about George Soros without being accused of being

0:02:48.137 --> 0:02:50.977
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic, as if George Soros is a stand in

0:02:51.017 --> 0:02:53.177
<v Speaker 1>for the Jewish community in some way. Well, first of all,

0:02:53.377 --> 0:02:55.737
<v Speaker 1>first of all, he doesn't care about the Jewish community

0:02:55.777 --> 0:02:58.697
<v Speaker 1>at all. He's said in a sixty minutes interview years

0:02:58.697 --> 0:03:02.297
<v Speaker 1>ago that he doesn't really even identify as a Jewish person.

0:03:02.417 --> 0:03:06.897
<v Speaker 1>A b He funds BDS through you know, his packs,

0:03:07.337 --> 0:03:10.017
<v Speaker 1>which is an anti Semitic organization. He doesn't care about Israel,

0:03:10.097 --> 0:03:13.217
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care about Jews. Is a leftist. That's his identity,

0:03:13.257 --> 0:03:17.217
<v Speaker 1>that's his religion. And but moreover, the idea that you

0:03:17.297 --> 0:03:23.777
<v Speaker 1>can't be critical of the top benefactor for hard left causes,

0:03:24.377 --> 0:03:27.097
<v Speaker 1>the top benefactor of any political causes in America. I

0:03:27.097 --> 0:03:30.017
<v Speaker 1>think he dropped like one hundred and forty million last

0:03:30.097 --> 0:03:32.497
<v Speaker 1>year and off, you know, not even in a presidential year.

0:03:32.937 --> 0:03:36.817
<v Speaker 1>It's very convenient and very ridiculous. I've always said it's

0:03:36.857 --> 0:03:41.417
<v Speaker 1>amazing how the left has plenty of billionaires, but their

0:03:41.537 --> 0:03:46.097
<v Speaker 1>billionaires are good people who we should all be thankful

0:03:46.217 --> 0:03:49.737
<v Speaker 1>or funding like media matters, and you know, funding these

0:03:50.097 --> 0:03:54.737
<v Speaker 1>trash political attack organizations all across the NGEO spectrum, and

0:03:54.857 --> 0:03:59.657
<v Speaker 1>you know, and wacko environmentalists. But those billionaires, like billionaires

0:03:59.697 --> 0:04:01.457
<v Speaker 1>with a B bill with a big B, those are

0:04:01.457 --> 0:04:04.817
<v Speaker 1>the bad billionaires, right. But we hear so much about

0:04:04.937 --> 0:04:07.857
<v Speaker 1>the the Koch brothers, and not as much these days,

0:04:07.897 --> 0:04:12.257
<v Speaker 1>I guess. But you know, there's this pretense that the

0:04:12.697 --> 0:04:17.337
<v Speaker 1>billionaire class, their money all goes to conservative politics. This

0:04:17.417 --> 0:04:19.217
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like how they also tell everybody that

0:04:19.257 --> 0:04:22.737
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is somehow republican. These are just this is

0:04:22.777 --> 0:04:26.257
<v Speaker 1>just an untrue reality that are, you know, an untrue

0:04:26.297 --> 0:04:29.817
<v Speaker 1>perception that the Democrats have entirely manufactured. I mean like

0:04:30.377 --> 0:04:34.097
<v Speaker 1>Obama and Hillary and Biden got a fast majority of

0:04:34.417 --> 0:04:39.217
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street money. Yeah, but they say dark money, they

0:04:39.217 --> 0:04:41.697
<v Speaker 1>mean dark money from Republicans. They would mean dark money

0:04:41.777 --> 0:04:45.657
<v Speaker 1>from the all the executives at all these sort of

0:04:45.697 --> 0:04:49.617
<v Speaker 1>investment firms that are I think poles show like ninety

0:04:49.657 --> 0:04:53.457
<v Speaker 1>percent of them give to Democrats, not to Republicans. I

0:04:53.497 --> 0:04:56.937
<v Speaker 1>should mention when Republicans had Sheldon Addolson, who was a

0:04:57.017 --> 0:05:01.657
<v Speaker 1>huge donor to like pro Israel politicians the Washington Post

0:05:01.737 --> 0:05:04.457
<v Speaker 1>and New York Times. They have no problem saying Sheldon

0:05:04.577 --> 0:05:08.737
<v Speaker 1>Addolson backed candidate or caused and no one accused them

0:05:08.737 --> 0:05:11.777
<v Speaker 1>of being anti Semitic for so even though those issues

0:05:11.817 --> 0:05:14.897
<v Speaker 1>actually related to Jewish causes, if you know what I mean.

0:05:16.017 --> 0:05:19.257
<v Speaker 1>But of course, again everything's Calvin Ball, everything changes, it

0:05:19.297 --> 0:05:21.537
<v Speaker 1>all depends. But you hit on a very important point.

0:05:21.577 --> 0:05:24.217
<v Speaker 1>I think they don't. It's almost as if they don't

0:05:24.257 --> 0:05:27.537
<v Speaker 1>view their causes as political. It's just common sense. It's

0:05:27.617 --> 0:05:29.657
<v Speaker 1>just the right thing to do, you know. No, it's

0:05:29.697 --> 0:05:33.377
<v Speaker 1>not let's not politicize this thing. You know, let's save

0:05:33.417 --> 0:05:37.137
<v Speaker 1>the environment, let's you know, stop guns, let you know,

0:05:37.137 --> 0:05:39.617
<v Speaker 1>whatever their causes, they view it as just common sense

0:05:39.657 --> 0:05:42.177
<v Speaker 1>and not political, whereas what you want or I want

0:05:42.377 --> 0:05:45.977
<v Speaker 1>is politicizing its culture war. It's you know, all these

0:05:45.977 --> 0:05:49.017
<v Speaker 1>sort of negative connotations to them. Do you think that

0:05:49.057 --> 0:05:53.137
<v Speaker 1>the the journalists or whatever whatever we call people now

0:05:53.177 --> 0:05:57.457
<v Speaker 1>who write for these publications that are very clearly political,

0:05:57.497 --> 0:05:59.337
<v Speaker 1>even though they pretend to just be you know, the

0:05:59.377 --> 0:06:02.137
<v Speaker 1>facts in the news. Do you think that when they

0:06:02.177 --> 0:06:06.577
<v Speaker 1>deploy the anti semitic charge about whether it's Rond de

0:06:06.617 --> 0:06:11.217
<v Speaker 1>Santist talking about Soros back da It's fascinating. Soros came

0:06:11.297 --> 0:06:13.297
<v Speaker 1>up with this whole plan that he has spoken about

0:06:13.337 --> 0:06:16.617
<v Speaker 1>at length in interviews, and there are financial records of

0:06:16.737 --> 0:06:20.337
<v Speaker 1>him realizing that there's this weak seem in the system

0:06:20.377 --> 0:06:22.497
<v Speaker 1>in a sense where you can buy a DA's race

0:06:22.537 --> 0:06:25.017
<v Speaker 1>with very little money. Because who wants to buy a

0:06:25.097 --> 0:06:27.657
<v Speaker 1>DA's race? Was that was now people all know why,

0:06:27.897 --> 0:06:30.377
<v Speaker 1>but that was the thinking, right, and so he has

0:06:30.377 --> 0:06:32.697
<v Speaker 1>this whole plan and now to talk about his plan,

0:06:33.337 --> 0:06:37.377
<v Speaker 1>they say, oh, well, that's that's anti semitic. And yet

0:06:37.897 --> 0:06:39.977
<v Speaker 1>do you think the people that are saying that, the

0:06:40.137 --> 0:06:43.577
<v Speaker 1>different chattering class individuals are saying that, do they know

0:06:43.697 --> 0:06:46.857
<v Speaker 1>it's bad faith and they just don't care, or do

0:06:46.897 --> 0:06:50.017
<v Speaker 1>you think that they really believe at some like they've

0:06:50.057 --> 0:06:54.777
<v Speaker 1>convinced themselves that in this case, talking about objective reality

0:06:54.937 --> 0:06:57.497
<v Speaker 1>just happens to be anti semitic would involve George Soros

0:06:59.257 --> 0:07:01.737
<v Speaker 1>could be both. I'm not sure. I'm sure that some

0:07:01.817 --> 0:07:05.417
<v Speaker 1>of its cynical, but you know, some of it maybe

0:07:05.457 --> 0:07:08.617
<v Speaker 1>people have convinced themselves that all, let me take a

0:07:08.617 --> 0:07:11.897
<v Speaker 1>step back, why would rot Santis, who is the governor

0:07:11.897 --> 0:07:14.657
<v Speaker 1>of Florida, which has a large Jewish community, and he's

0:07:14.697 --> 0:07:18.057
<v Speaker 1>been pro Israel, pro Jewish, he's only had good things

0:07:18.097 --> 0:07:22.857
<v Speaker 1>to say about Jews and all that start peddling anti

0:07:22.857 --> 0:07:25.657
<v Speaker 1>Semitic dog whistles. What what What would the point of

0:07:25.657 --> 0:07:27.937
<v Speaker 1>it be? In their wark mind? The point of it

0:07:28.057 --> 0:07:31.017
<v Speaker 1>is that all Republicans are basically just you know, Nazis

0:07:31.097 --> 0:07:33.377
<v Speaker 1>underneath it all, and they hate Jews underneath it all,

0:07:33.377 --> 0:07:36.577
<v Speaker 1>and they're racists and bigots. So he's appealing to that

0:07:36.937 --> 0:07:39.977
<v Speaker 1>part of it. So I think they've convinced themselves that, yes,

0:07:40.577 --> 0:07:43.497
<v Speaker 1>Jews are you know that Republicans hate Jews. They you know,

0:07:43.537 --> 0:07:46.617
<v Speaker 1>they're racist and all that, and that's why they do

0:07:46.697 --> 0:07:49.697
<v Speaker 1>the Jim Crow two point zero and all this other nonsense.

0:07:50.217 --> 0:07:51.977
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are cynical, but I think that many

0:07:52.017 --> 0:07:54.777
<v Speaker 1>of the rank and file actually believe that. They believe

0:07:54.977 --> 0:07:58.777
<v Speaker 1>they believe that about their political opposition. And that's really

0:07:58.817 --> 0:08:00.857
<v Speaker 1>a big problem in this country where we used to

0:08:00.857 --> 0:08:04.257
<v Speaker 1>sort of be able to disagree without thinking the other

0:08:04.297 --> 0:08:07.537
<v Speaker 1>side was evil or you know, was going to commit

0:08:07.577 --> 0:08:10.857
<v Speaker 1>transgenocide or hated Jews or all this other stuff that

0:08:10.897 --> 0:08:12.897
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really happen, but I think a lot of people

0:08:12.937 --> 0:08:15.617
<v Speaker 1>have convinced themselves of it. Probably, David, we come back.

0:08:15.737 --> 0:08:18.177
<v Speaker 1>You know we mentioned Ronda Santis. In a second. I

0:08:18.177 --> 0:08:21.857
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you about the the book banning story

0:08:22.017 --> 0:08:24.937
<v Speaker 1>that keeps I hear there's banning books. This has become

0:08:25.137 --> 0:08:27.497
<v Speaker 1>a meme. It's all over the place. Let's address that.

0:08:27.577 --> 0:08:29.737
<v Speaker 1>But but first we have to address how people can

0:08:29.777 --> 0:08:32.617
<v Speaker 1>get the best pillows imaginable from my friend Mike Lindell

0:08:32.857 --> 0:08:35.297
<v Speaker 1>and his team at My Pillow. They've got the two

0:08:35.337 --> 0:08:37.377
<v Speaker 1>point zero version of the product that started at all

0:08:37.417 --> 0:08:40.377
<v Speaker 1>for them nearly twenty years ago. The My Pillow two

0:08:40.377 --> 0:08:43.057
<v Speaker 1>point zero has the patented adjustable fill of the original

0:08:43.097 --> 0:08:45.897
<v Speaker 1>My Pillow, but now has brand new exclusive fabric that

0:08:45.937 --> 0:08:48.337
<v Speaker 1>has made with temperature regulating thread. You're going to find

0:08:48.337 --> 0:08:51.177
<v Speaker 1>this My Pillow to be the softest, smoothest, coolest pillow

0:08:51.497 --> 0:08:53.857
<v Speaker 1>you'll ever own. If you're tossing and turning at night

0:08:53.857 --> 0:08:56.097
<v Speaker 1>a lot, flipping your pillow over looking for that cool spot,

0:08:56.177 --> 0:08:58.777
<v Speaker 1>those nights are over. My Pillow two point zero comes

0:08:58.777 --> 0:09:01.857
<v Speaker 1>at a great deal right now. Buy one, get one

0:09:01.977 --> 0:09:04.257
<v Speaker 1>free for a limited time when you use my name

0:09:04.297 --> 0:09:06.937
<v Speaker 1>as the promo code buck. The my Pillow two point zero,

0:09:07.057 --> 0:09:09.777
<v Speaker 1>made with temperature regulating technology is one hundred percent made

0:09:09.817 --> 0:09:11.937
<v Speaker 1>in the U. I say, go to my Pillow two

0:09:11.937 --> 0:09:14.257
<v Speaker 1>point zero. I'm sorry. My pillow dot Com is the

0:09:14.257 --> 0:09:17.617
<v Speaker 1>website My pillow dot com. Click on the radio listeners

0:09:17.657 --> 0:09:21.097
<v Speaker 1>special square. Get this buy one, get one free offer

0:09:21.097 --> 0:09:23.577
<v Speaker 1>on the my Pillow two point oh promo code buck.

0:09:23.657 --> 0:09:26.337
<v Speaker 1>That's my pillow dot Com promo code buck. You'll get

0:09:26.377 --> 0:09:27.977
<v Speaker 1>buy one, get one free, Get them my pillow two

0:09:28.017 --> 0:09:29.297
<v Speaker 1>point off. I've got them here at home in the bed.

0:09:29.297 --> 0:09:33.537
<v Speaker 1>They're fantastic. All right. So they talk about book banning,

0:09:34.697 --> 0:09:36.937
<v Speaker 1>but there's a problem with that, right, which is there's

0:09:36.937 --> 0:09:42.737
<v Speaker 1>actually no books that are banned. What is going on here? Well,

0:09:42.737 --> 0:09:45.217
<v Speaker 1>the last week or maybe a little before that, I

0:09:45.257 --> 0:09:47.177
<v Speaker 1>went to a Barnes and Noble and I, you know,

0:09:47.297 --> 0:09:50.537
<v Speaker 1>I see the book band book table where you can

0:09:50.577 --> 0:09:54.137
<v Speaker 1>buy the books that are banned, right, and it hit

0:09:54.177 --> 0:09:55.937
<v Speaker 1>me that it's just a racket, you know, for the

0:09:56.297 --> 0:09:58.977
<v Speaker 1>for booksellers, it's a racket like yeah, Lord of the

0:09:58.977 --> 0:10:02.817
<v Speaker 1>Flies is banned or you know whatever book. And all

0:10:02.817 --> 0:10:06.057
<v Speaker 1>these books are bestsellers, some of them are generational best sellers.

0:10:06.057 --> 0:10:08.857
<v Speaker 1>And it just gets people buying them, probably, and for

0:10:08.897 --> 0:10:12.657
<v Speaker 1>the left politically, it's it's an ideological racket. It's it's

0:10:12.657 --> 0:10:15.777
<v Speaker 1>a way to smear people. Like after the Tennessee shooting.

0:10:16.297 --> 0:10:19.777
<v Speaker 1>In Nashville shooting, I saw a lot of leftists say

0:10:19.777 --> 0:10:23.177
<v Speaker 1>they'll ban books in Tennessee, but not you know, assault weapons.

0:10:23.737 --> 0:10:25.857
<v Speaker 1>No book is banned. I can buy any book I want.

0:10:25.897 --> 0:10:29.537
<v Speaker 1>They are curated, as leftist administrators have been doing forever.

0:10:30.337 --> 0:10:33.457
<v Speaker 1>Just because my books aren't in any school doesn't mean

0:10:33.457 --> 0:10:36.297
<v Speaker 1>that they're banned. It means that they're not appropriate for

0:10:36.417 --> 0:10:38.417
<v Speaker 1>kids to be reading, even though I think they are.

0:10:38.457 --> 0:10:41.577
<v Speaker 1>But whatever, you know what I mean. Yeah, So they're

0:10:41.617 --> 0:10:44.177
<v Speaker 1>not banned by in any sense of the word. In

0:10:44.217 --> 0:10:46.657
<v Speaker 1>the same way you can say gay in Florida without

0:10:46.657 --> 0:10:48.977
<v Speaker 1>going to jail. You know, you can say gay. You

0:10:49.017 --> 0:10:52.177
<v Speaker 1>can buy any book you want. There are laws that

0:10:52.617 --> 0:10:57.137
<v Speaker 1>basically prohibit you know, obviously they're over zealous administrators and

0:10:57.177 --> 0:10:59.937
<v Speaker 1>teachers and parents and stuff sometimes, but in general, you're

0:10:59.977 --> 0:11:04.857
<v Speaker 1>trying to keep sexually you know, explicit books or violence

0:11:05.017 --> 0:11:07.337
<v Speaker 1>or things that you don't want young people reading. And

0:11:07.337 --> 0:11:09.337
<v Speaker 1>it seems perfectly reasonable to me. If you're going to

0:11:09.377 --> 0:11:13.457
<v Speaker 1>be in a state in school. Again, I'm asking. I

0:11:13.497 --> 0:11:15.657
<v Speaker 1>guess they do a little bit of on the spot psychology,

0:11:15.697 --> 0:11:18.497
<v Speaker 1>But I just have to wonder the people who are

0:11:18.537 --> 0:11:23.457
<v Speaker 1>going around saying that these books are banned. They have

0:11:23.657 --> 0:11:27.257
<v Speaker 1>to know that that's a lie, but they say it anyway.

0:11:27.377 --> 0:11:30.177
<v Speaker 1>Is there just a cognitive dissonance here like they You know,

0:11:31.097 --> 0:11:32.977
<v Speaker 1>it's so easy, right, I mean, you were explaining how

0:11:33.017 --> 0:11:35.737
<v Speaker 1>it actually works with curation. You know, when I was

0:11:35.777 --> 0:11:39.417
<v Speaker 1>at my Jesuit high school, they made a decision which

0:11:39.457 --> 0:11:43.137
<v Speaker 1>I vehemently disagreed with. David Okay, I thought it was

0:11:43.217 --> 0:11:47.937
<v Speaker 1>really really unfair that Maxim magazine was not allowed in

0:11:48.017 --> 0:11:51.577
<v Speaker 1>school during school hours. You know, all of a sudden,

0:11:51.617 --> 0:11:55.297
<v Speaker 1>now I wasn't able to see you know, Heidi Klume

0:11:55.737 --> 0:12:00.657
<v Speaker 1>and Letitia Casta and some of the greats of that era.

0:12:00.777 --> 0:12:04.657
<v Speaker 1>As you may well recall, I was not. Now, if

0:12:04.657 --> 0:12:07.897
<v Speaker 1>I had gone outside the school and protested that there

0:12:08.017 --> 0:12:11.097
<v Speaker 1>was an all out ban on Maxim magazine, people would

0:12:11.097 --> 0:12:14.337
<v Speaker 1>have said that I was a clownish, you know, imbecile,

0:12:14.737 --> 0:12:17.617
<v Speaker 1>because they're just saying, you can't read this during school

0:12:17.657 --> 0:12:21.737
<v Speaker 1>hours in a jesuit in a Jesuit high school. So

0:12:21.777 --> 0:12:23.337
<v Speaker 1>while I disagree with it. I knew that it wasn't

0:12:23.337 --> 0:12:25.497
<v Speaker 1>a band. I just don't believe that it's possible of

0:12:25.537 --> 0:12:28.417
<v Speaker 1>these people who were talking about the book band don't

0:12:28.537 --> 0:12:30.857
<v Speaker 1>know that there's no band. So then are they just

0:12:30.937 --> 0:12:34.657
<v Speaker 1>mouthing the propaganda because it's an attack, and so it

0:12:34.657 --> 0:12:36.697
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if the attack is true. The point is

0:12:37.057 --> 0:12:41.617
<v Speaker 1>ron de santist bad. I think partly that's it, but

0:12:41.697 --> 0:12:44.617
<v Speaker 1>partly these people have convinced themselves that the state's not

0:12:44.697 --> 0:12:46.937
<v Speaker 1>giving them something, it's being banned. I give you an example.

0:12:47.377 --> 0:12:51.697
<v Speaker 1>A few years ago, we were debating birth control, and

0:12:52.177 --> 0:12:55.457
<v Speaker 1>leftists would say the Republicans want to ban birth control

0:12:55.577 --> 0:12:58.177
<v Speaker 1>or Republicans want to ban access to birth control, and

0:12:58.217 --> 0:13:00.497
<v Speaker 1>what they meant was that the taxpayers would no longer

0:13:00.577 --> 0:13:03.217
<v Speaker 1>be buying birth control and giving it to people. So

0:13:03.297 --> 0:13:06.257
<v Speaker 1>to them the state, because they view the state as

0:13:06.297 --> 0:13:09.017
<v Speaker 1>the well spring of all good things. If the state's

0:13:09.057 --> 0:13:11.657
<v Speaker 1>not doing it, it's banning it or taking it away

0:13:11.697 --> 0:13:14.657
<v Speaker 1>from someone. It's the same way, for instance, when you

0:13:14.737 --> 0:13:17.097
<v Speaker 1>let someone keep their own money who makes a lot

0:13:17.137 --> 0:13:19.697
<v Speaker 1>of money, you're taking it from someone else. That's how

0:13:20.217 --> 0:13:21.937
<v Speaker 1>this is how they see the world. I don't mean

0:13:22.137 --> 0:13:24.377
<v Speaker 1>again I'm sure there are people are very cynical about it.

0:13:24.697 --> 0:13:27.537
<v Speaker 1>I think rank and file wise they view the world

0:13:27.577 --> 0:13:29.857
<v Speaker 1>that way because they just don't understand how the world's

0:13:29.897 --> 0:13:33.937
<v Speaker 1>supposed to work. I guess you know. You're also what

0:13:34.017 --> 0:13:37.657
<v Speaker 1>was the name of your very excellent book again on firearms,

0:13:37.737 --> 0:13:43.657
<v Speaker 1>David for everybody at home? First Freedom first, freedom right through? Yeah, no,

0:13:43.777 --> 0:13:45.577
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, say the whole title. That's what you're here,

0:13:46.257 --> 0:13:48.697
<v Speaker 1>right through America's history with the gun, kind of a

0:13:48.737 --> 0:13:54.177
<v Speaker 1>cultural history. Yeah. So it's interesting me because obviously there

0:13:54.257 --> 0:13:56.817
<v Speaker 1>was just a there was a mass shooting recently at

0:13:56.817 --> 0:13:59.457
<v Speaker 1>a school, and so now there's the whole gun control argument.

0:14:00.217 --> 0:14:03.097
<v Speaker 1>It is remarkable to me how few people I hear

0:14:03.177 --> 0:14:09.937
<v Speaker 1>talking about the the problem that exists with the pistol bran.

0:14:10.377 --> 0:14:12.737
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know about this, right, the pistol brace phenomenon,

0:14:13.337 --> 0:14:16.057
<v Speaker 1>where you have tens of millions of these things have

0:14:16.137 --> 0:14:20.497
<v Speaker 1>been sold and the ATF said they're fine, and now

0:14:20.497 --> 0:14:23.537
<v Speaker 1>they were invented, if I recall by a former marine,

0:14:23.537 --> 0:14:24.977
<v Speaker 1>I think it was so that people who had a

0:14:25.017 --> 0:14:30.057
<v Speaker 1>disability could shoot, you know, could shoot effectively, even you know,

0:14:30.217 --> 0:14:32.177
<v Speaker 1>basically if they couldn't have a stock in their shoulder.

0:14:32.217 --> 0:14:34.057
<v Speaker 1>This allowed them to have a brace on their arm

0:14:34.097 --> 0:14:36.457
<v Speaker 1>and so they could still use say an AAR platform

0:14:36.457 --> 0:14:41.857
<v Speaker 1>something similar to that as of May thirtieth or thirty first, whatever,

0:14:41.857 --> 0:14:45.017
<v Speaker 1>the last day of May is. If you don't register

0:14:45.137 --> 0:14:47.257
<v Speaker 1>this thing or just give it up, you know, get

0:14:47.337 --> 0:14:51.257
<v Speaker 1>rid of it, destroy it, you're a felon. So theoretically

0:14:51.337 --> 0:14:53.497
<v Speaker 1>there will be at least hundreds of thousands, maybe even

0:14:53.537 --> 0:14:57.377
<v Speaker 1>a few million people that the Biden administration, by the

0:14:57.617 --> 0:15:02.777
<v Speaker 1>FIAT of a regulatory agency turns into a felon just

0:15:02.897 --> 0:15:06.257
<v Speaker 1>by doing what had been legal until the Bide administration

0:15:06.297 --> 0:15:09.457
<v Speaker 1>came along. I mean, to me, this is this is

0:15:09.697 --> 0:15:11.857
<v Speaker 1>a huge slap in the face to what law is

0:15:11.857 --> 0:15:15.137
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be. Yeah. I mean, it's the same guy

0:15:15.177 --> 0:15:17.177
<v Speaker 1>who signs a piece of paper and says he's going

0:15:17.257 --> 0:15:21.337
<v Speaker 1>to break contracts of people who borrow money for school

0:15:21.337 --> 0:15:23.217
<v Speaker 1>and not have to pay it back because he says so,

0:15:23.377 --> 0:15:28.017
<v Speaker 1>you know, he doesn't care. It's you know, it's interesting

0:15:28.057 --> 0:15:31.657
<v Speaker 1>with the guns because set aside all the specific stuff,

0:15:31.657 --> 0:15:34.017
<v Speaker 1>the stuff they want to ban, I think it doesn't

0:15:34.017 --> 0:15:37.057
<v Speaker 1>really matter to them. It's just incrementalism. Like if it's

0:15:37.057 --> 0:15:39.337
<v Speaker 1>a solid weapons, they'll go for that. The brace, they'll

0:15:39.377 --> 0:15:42.017
<v Speaker 1>go for that. You know, what was there was something

0:15:42.017 --> 0:15:45.137
<v Speaker 1>else they recently when you know it's just the aesthetics,

0:15:45.177 --> 0:15:48.257
<v Speaker 1>they yeah, bump stocks all right, So like it. I

0:15:48.297 --> 0:15:51.217
<v Speaker 1>think it's just moving forward. They know that are fifteens

0:15:51.217 --> 0:15:54.297
<v Speaker 1>are largely used, are rarely used in criminality. I mean,

0:15:54.337 --> 0:15:58.377
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of gun crimes are committed with handguns

0:15:58.377 --> 0:16:02.217
<v Speaker 1>of some sword. But these psychopaths who go into schools,

0:16:02.257 --> 0:16:04.817
<v Speaker 1>you know, they like the aesthetics. They think, whatever it is,

0:16:04.937 --> 0:16:07.217
<v Speaker 1>they use it. So they go after this because there's

0:16:07.217 --> 0:16:10.417
<v Speaker 1>an emotional component. All their arguments are always emotional. There's

0:16:10.457 --> 0:16:12.977
<v Speaker 1>never any reason to it. It. Constantly want to ban

0:16:13.137 --> 0:16:16.217
<v Speaker 1>things that would probably not have stopped or most cases

0:16:16.217 --> 0:16:19.297
<v Speaker 1>would not have stopped the mass shooting that they're using

0:16:19.737 --> 0:16:22.537
<v Speaker 1>again cynically to try to pass some new law. I

0:16:22.537 --> 0:16:25.577
<v Speaker 1>think I think an AAR fifteen band would be on constitutional.

0:16:25.617 --> 0:16:27.217
<v Speaker 1>At some point, someone's going to take it to the

0:16:27.297 --> 0:16:29.697
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. It is a gun in common use. It

0:16:29.777 --> 0:16:33.217
<v Speaker 1>is not a more dangerous than most other guns. Some

0:16:33.297 --> 0:16:36.577
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest mass murders have been occurred using you know,

0:16:36.697 --> 0:16:40.017
<v Speaker 1>nine millimeters or whatever, and it will be overturned, you know,

0:16:40.177 --> 0:16:42.937
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll just delegitimize the Supreme Court because it

0:16:43.057 --> 0:16:45.017
<v Speaker 1>goes from one thing to the next. It just you know,

0:16:45.017 --> 0:16:47.457
<v Speaker 1>they're constantly Yeah, I mean you mentioned the use of

0:16:47.497 --> 0:16:50.417
<v Speaker 1>pistols and mass shootings Virginia Tech, which for a while

0:16:50.457 --> 0:16:53.617
<v Speaker 1>I believe was the highest casualty school shooting of all time.

0:16:54.377 --> 0:16:59.177
<v Speaker 1>Pistols and Ford Hood where I forget the full death count,

0:16:59.177 --> 0:17:01.177
<v Speaker 1>but it was very it was high obviously that shooting.

0:17:01.177 --> 0:17:05.857
<v Speaker 1>It by that, you know, self radicalized though lunatic Alaki

0:17:06.337 --> 0:17:11.457
<v Speaker 1>onwar Alaki disciple, those use stals. But so I wanted

0:17:11.497 --> 0:17:13.617
<v Speaker 1>to pose this to I mean, this is a theory

0:17:13.657 --> 0:17:17.537
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about on radio. I think now that there

0:17:17.697 --> 0:17:21.817
<v Speaker 1>is really there are really two different two different views

0:17:21.857 --> 0:17:24.417
<v Speaker 1>within the Democrat Party about any kind of gun legislation.

0:17:24.457 --> 0:17:27.657
<v Speaker 1>To your point about incrementalism. One is the people who

0:17:27.657 --> 0:17:31.977
<v Speaker 1>are just they've been you know, there's like a phobia indoctrination, right,

0:17:31.977 --> 0:17:34.897
<v Speaker 1>they've just been so terrified. Guns are so bad, guns

0:17:34.897 --> 0:17:38.217
<v Speaker 1>are so scary. So anything we can do against the

0:17:38.257 --> 0:17:41.537
<v Speaker 1>scary thing is good, irrespective of like all the existing

0:17:41.577 --> 0:17:43.737
<v Speaker 1>laws and eying that's there. But I also think there's

0:17:43.737 --> 0:17:46.377
<v Speaker 1>a substantial portion for whom they know it will do nothing.

0:17:47.217 --> 0:17:49.017
<v Speaker 1>I think this would even be a majority of people

0:17:49.057 --> 0:17:51.577
<v Speaker 1>pushing legislation of the Democrat Party. Quite honestly, that's really

0:17:51.617 --> 0:17:53.777
<v Speaker 1>what I'm going after here. They know it won't save

0:17:53.817 --> 0:17:56.057
<v Speaker 1>any lives, they know it won't stop any violence. But

0:17:56.937 --> 0:18:02.497
<v Speaker 1>it is a thumb in the eye of predominantly, not entirely,

0:18:02.537 --> 0:18:07.297
<v Speaker 1>but predominantly you know, white male, Republican rural gun owners

0:18:07.497 --> 0:18:09.537
<v Speaker 1>who are gonna have to give this thing up or

0:18:09.577 --> 0:18:11.897
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to wait five more days they're gonna

0:18:11.897 --> 0:18:14.617
<v Speaker 1>have to go through. They know that's all that it does,

0:18:15.097 --> 0:18:19.737
<v Speaker 1>and they're happy with that. Yeah. I think that most

0:18:19.777 --> 0:18:22.097
<v Speaker 1>of these laws they reel I love. You know, after

0:18:22.137 --> 0:18:24.897
<v Speaker 1>the shooting, they were talking about permits, permits in Florida,

0:18:25.017 --> 0:18:26.617
<v Speaker 1>right like, how can we have how could people be

0:18:26.657 --> 0:18:29.257
<v Speaker 1>able to have a loaded gun without a permit? What

0:18:29.417 --> 0:18:31.257
<v Speaker 1>mass shooters like, Oh my god, I gotta go get

0:18:31.297 --> 0:18:33.577
<v Speaker 1>a permit before I go to murder fifteen people like

0:18:33.657 --> 0:18:36.137
<v Speaker 1>it is just it makes no sense. It is aimed

0:18:36.177 --> 0:18:39.417
<v Speaker 1>at law abiding citizens. Wait longer. Don't be able. You

0:18:39.417 --> 0:18:41.217
<v Speaker 1>know you're not able. They don't want you to sell

0:18:41.257 --> 0:18:43.177
<v Speaker 1>a gun to your family or give a gun to

0:18:43.217 --> 0:18:45.057
<v Speaker 1>your family member. Or sell a gun to your friend.

0:18:45.697 --> 0:18:48.097
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's why they want universal background checks. They

0:18:48.137 --> 0:18:50.097
<v Speaker 1>just want to make it harder on regular people, like

0:18:50.177 --> 0:18:52.497
<v Speaker 1>you say, who own firearms in this country, and there

0:18:52.497 --> 0:18:54.257
<v Speaker 1>are many of them. But I also want to just

0:18:54.377 --> 0:18:57.297
<v Speaker 1>quickly mention one thing on the AAR fifteen band they

0:18:57.417 --> 0:19:01.417
<v Speaker 1>keep how can I say this making the AR fifteen

0:19:01.457 --> 0:19:04.217
<v Speaker 1>into this super weapon that can kill tons of people,

0:19:04.297 --> 0:19:07.137
<v Speaker 1>that blows up inside you, you know, a kid when

0:19:07.137 --> 0:19:10.617
<v Speaker 1>you shoot them, and stuff like this. They are actually

0:19:10.657 --> 0:19:14.417
<v Speaker 1>making the guns sound, you know, like the super weapon

0:19:14.577 --> 0:19:17.617
<v Speaker 1>and then they're then they're surprised when a mass shooter

0:19:17.817 --> 0:19:20.337
<v Speaker 1>gets an AAR fifteen. And don't get me wrong, it's

0:19:20.337 --> 0:19:22.617
<v Speaker 1>a good weapon. It's used for self defense, it's easy

0:19:22.657 --> 0:19:25.537
<v Speaker 1>to shoot all that. But you know, I just think

0:19:25.537 --> 0:19:28.017
<v Speaker 1>that that maybe some of the you know, maybe they

0:19:28.017 --> 0:19:30.897
<v Speaker 1>should think about if they really cared, which sometimes I

0:19:30.937 --> 0:19:33.817
<v Speaker 1>wonder they should think about what they're doing when they

0:19:34.057 --> 0:19:37.257
<v Speaker 1>mythologize or whatever they find a gun. Have you ever

0:19:37.297 --> 0:19:40.177
<v Speaker 1>seen I mean, this is one area where to me,

0:19:40.217 --> 0:19:43.937
<v Speaker 1>this is this is almost like the people who wear

0:19:44.057 --> 0:19:46.177
<v Speaker 1>I know, these different issues, but the people who insist

0:19:46.257 --> 0:19:50.057
<v Speaker 1>on wearing masks alone in their car while driving that.

0:19:50.217 --> 0:19:53.817
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen a rational defense of that of any kind.

0:19:53.897 --> 0:19:57.697
<v Speaker 1>I've literally never read or her or anyone say this

0:19:57.817 --> 0:20:01.617
<v Speaker 1>is going to stop you from getting a virus. I

0:20:01.777 --> 0:20:05.257
<v Speaker 1>have heard people say it's not about has nothing to

0:20:05.297 --> 0:20:08.097
<v Speaker 1>do with the virus. It's showing a willingness to comply,

0:20:08.377 --> 0:20:11.937
<v Speaker 1>and it shows your desire to be a team player

0:20:11.937 --> 0:20:13.617
<v Speaker 1>in the face of the virus. Right, So it is,

0:20:13.697 --> 0:20:15.577
<v Speaker 1>which is basically a fancy way of saying it is

0:20:15.577 --> 0:20:20.497
<v Speaker 1>straight up virtue signaling gun free zones. That are schools right,

0:20:20.657 --> 0:20:23.857
<v Speaker 1>gun free zones at all schools across the country. Is

0:20:23.897 --> 0:20:27.097
<v Speaker 1>there even a defense of this policy? I mean, it's

0:20:27.137 --> 0:20:29.817
<v Speaker 1>your point about mass shooters or bad people. Bad people

0:20:29.857 --> 0:20:32.457
<v Speaker 1>criminals in general do not care that it is a

0:20:32.497 --> 0:20:35.457
<v Speaker 1>gun free zone. In fact, there's pretty ample evidence in

0:20:35.537 --> 0:20:37.337
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different cases, got a point to the

0:20:37.337 --> 0:20:41.577
<v Speaker 1>specific ones that they'll choose gun free zones as places

0:20:41.617 --> 0:20:43.897
<v Speaker 1>to go because they know that they won't be challenged

0:20:43.897 --> 0:20:46.417
<v Speaker 1>with a firearm. Is there any serious defense of that

0:20:46.497 --> 0:20:50.217
<v Speaker 1>policy that you can I'm asking you honestly that no

0:20:50.497 --> 0:20:52.617
<v Speaker 1>one answers me. I asked this question all the time.

0:20:52.657 --> 0:20:54.457
<v Speaker 1>What does a gun free zone do? It does nothing.

0:20:54.537 --> 0:20:58.417
<v Speaker 1>It disarms, people could defend themselves. It has zero purpose

0:20:58.457 --> 0:21:00.977
<v Speaker 1>other than to let people know this is a soft target.

0:21:01.497 --> 0:21:03.537
<v Speaker 1>I think the Nashville I don't know for sure about this,

0:21:03.577 --> 0:21:05.497
<v Speaker 1>but I think that Nashville shooter. Or they say that

0:21:06.897 --> 0:21:10.017
<v Speaker 1>she had another target in mind, but you know there

0:21:10.057 --> 0:21:13.097
<v Speaker 1>it had armed any I've heard this too. It is unconfirmed.

0:21:13.097 --> 0:21:15.617
<v Speaker 1>Just to be clear, but there were early reports and

0:21:15.657 --> 0:21:18.217
<v Speaker 1>as you see this or listen to this episode the

0:21:18.257 --> 0:21:20.097
<v Speaker 1>manifesto may have come out, we may know more. Just

0:21:20.137 --> 0:21:24.137
<v Speaker 1>to be very clear, but there there were early reports

0:21:24.177 --> 0:21:25.977
<v Speaker 1>that she was going to a target a different school,

0:21:26.017 --> 0:21:28.617
<v Speaker 1>but that school had an armed resource officer, and she

0:21:28.697 --> 0:21:32.817
<v Speaker 1>knew that because she actually surveyed the targets. Right. So

0:21:33.257 --> 0:21:34.817
<v Speaker 1>I get a lot of blowback when I say I

0:21:34.857 --> 0:21:37.657
<v Speaker 1>think should be armed, or rather I think teachers should

0:21:37.737 --> 0:21:40.177
<v Speaker 1>be able to arm themselves. I cannot think of a

0:21:40.257 --> 0:21:43.097
<v Speaker 1>better use of the Second Amendment than saying to a teacher,

0:21:43.137 --> 0:21:45.857
<v Speaker 1>you get to defend these children yourself, this school, in

0:21:45.857 --> 0:21:49.337
<v Speaker 1>this community. But yet people go bananas over it, like

0:21:49.377 --> 0:21:52.377
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's radical and crazy to say this. I

0:21:52.537 --> 0:21:55.697
<v Speaker 1>just to me arming schools, either with that or hiring

0:21:56.297 --> 0:21:59.057
<v Speaker 1>vets or whatever, it is, arming a school makes all

0:21:59.057 --> 0:22:02.537
<v Speaker 1>the sense in the world to me. Yeah what again,

0:22:02.657 --> 0:22:06.057
<v Speaker 1>because you write and analyze in this realm a lot.

0:22:06.817 --> 0:22:11.457
<v Speaker 1>What is the counter argument to the arm resource officer

0:22:11.937 --> 0:22:15.497
<v Speaker 1>and or ability of not you know, I don't want

0:22:15.497 --> 0:22:20.657
<v Speaker 1>a teacher with you know, horrible vision, no familiarity with firearms,

0:22:20.657 --> 0:22:22.657
<v Speaker 1>no interest in ever using a fire even in defense

0:22:22.697 --> 0:22:26.137
<v Speaker 1>of himself or herself, to carry obviously, right, But there

0:22:26.137 --> 0:22:28.097
<v Speaker 1>are teachers who spend a lot of time at the range.

0:22:28.297 --> 0:22:30.897
<v Speaker 1>They're teachers who were themselves are former law enforcement, former

0:22:30.937 --> 0:22:33.817
<v Speaker 1>military like that exists as well, you know, plenty of

0:22:33.977 --> 0:22:37.057
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there are plenty of high school football coaches,

0:22:37.097 --> 0:22:38.577
<v Speaker 1>and plenty of people in the you know, in the

0:22:38.617 --> 0:22:41.417
<v Speaker 1>academic community. More broadly, who have you know, for the

0:22:41.457 --> 0:22:43.457
<v Speaker 1>former marines? Right, if they want to carry on a

0:22:43.537 --> 0:22:49.177
<v Speaker 1>school grounds, what is the counter argument? Yeah, yeah, I

0:22:49.177 --> 0:22:51.057
<v Speaker 1>don't want to compel anyone. Like you said, I don't

0:22:51.057 --> 0:22:52.617
<v Speaker 1>want to compel people to have guns that should be

0:22:52.657 --> 0:22:56.737
<v Speaker 1>able to do to defend themselves. They always say, it's

0:22:56.897 --> 0:22:59.337
<v Speaker 1>guns are the problem. There's already too many guns. You know,

0:22:59.457 --> 0:23:02.537
<v Speaker 1>we you know, you know they will won't be trained,

0:23:02.697 --> 0:23:05.137
<v Speaker 1>so let's get them training. They you know, they won't

0:23:05.137 --> 0:23:07.657
<v Speaker 1>be you know, how many lives will they really saved.

0:23:07.777 --> 0:23:09.537
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. They don't have good arguments. They don't

0:23:09.537 --> 0:23:12.737
<v Speaker 1>even honestly, these people don't even want to debate. You're

0:23:12.937 --> 0:23:14.977
<v Speaker 1>I know it's Twitter or whatever, you're on social media.

0:23:15.097 --> 0:23:16.977
<v Speaker 1>You approach someone and you ask them a question, they

0:23:17.017 --> 0:23:18.937
<v Speaker 1>block you. You know what I mean. They don't want

0:23:18.977 --> 0:23:21.337
<v Speaker 1>to engage in any kind of debate because they have

0:23:21.337 --> 0:23:24.537
<v Speaker 1>a very emotion emotional argument. And listen, part of it

0:23:24.577 --> 0:23:29.377
<v Speaker 1>is emotional. These these events are horrible, um, but they

0:23:29.417 --> 0:23:32.177
<v Speaker 1>don't really give you straight answers to the questions you're asking.

0:23:32.177 --> 0:23:34.257
<v Speaker 1>They're very good questions. I wish someone would answer them.

0:23:34.937 --> 0:23:39.577
<v Speaker 1>It just don't see. Yeah, it just it just seems

0:23:39.617 --> 0:23:42.697
<v Speaker 1>crazy that there can be every time this sort of

0:23:42.697 --> 0:23:47.577
<v Speaker 1>thing happens, there's this push and and yet there's no

0:23:48.777 --> 0:23:51.777
<v Speaker 1>foundation for the argument that's being made, and they don't

0:23:51.777 --> 0:23:54.137
<v Speaker 1>even try, and they don't care. And if you won't

0:23:54.177 --> 0:23:57.497
<v Speaker 1>go along, they just shout louder at you. Because I

0:23:57.737 --> 0:24:00.297
<v Speaker 1>also think that ultimately, So now I'm getting really and

0:24:00.337 --> 0:24:01.977
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a little bit of like psychology at their

0:24:01.977 --> 0:24:03.817
<v Speaker 1>side here, David. But you can tell me, if you

0:24:03.817 --> 0:24:04.937
<v Speaker 1>can tell me you think this is a little bit

0:24:04.937 --> 0:24:07.897
<v Speaker 1>little too much, I think, I mean, I'll disagree with

0:24:07.897 --> 0:24:10.137
<v Speaker 1>you obviously, because I think that way. I think that

0:24:10.337 --> 0:24:15.177
<v Speaker 1>they like to believe that Republicans are so monstrous that

0:24:15.217 --> 0:24:18.017
<v Speaker 1>they don't care about kids being shot in schools. They'd

0:24:18.137 --> 0:24:21.777
<v Speaker 1>rather take NRA money, whatever that means. Like, I think

0:24:21.777 --> 0:24:24.817
<v Speaker 1>that they like that narrative. So that's part of what

0:24:24.817 --> 0:24:27.337
<v Speaker 1>this is. It's just a way of saying you're the evil,

0:24:27.377 --> 0:24:31.057
<v Speaker 1>bad people, and the argument about firearms and the Second

0:24:31.057 --> 0:24:34.897
<v Speaker 1>Amendment is irrelevant. That's not it's what you're saying is

0:24:34.897 --> 0:24:38.897
<v Speaker 1>not even debatable. Of course many of them, Yeah, I

0:24:38.937 --> 0:24:43.977
<v Speaker 1>get like, uh, you know, basically with great ease, they

0:24:44.017 --> 0:24:46.817
<v Speaker 1>will say that NRA is a terrorist organization, you care

0:24:46.857 --> 0:24:48.777
<v Speaker 1>more about guns than dead children. I mean, I get

0:24:48.817 --> 0:24:51.377
<v Speaker 1>this all the time from people. You This is not

0:24:51.577 --> 0:24:55.177
<v Speaker 1>some you don't have to be a psychiatrist to delve

0:24:55.217 --> 0:24:58.297
<v Speaker 1>deep in there. They say it, and then what they do,

0:24:58.297 --> 0:25:00.297
<v Speaker 1>which bothers me. And the reason part of the reason

0:25:00.337 --> 0:25:02.977
<v Speaker 1>I wrote that book was because then they wretch, They

0:25:03.097 --> 0:25:05.937
<v Speaker 1>go back and and write a new revisionist history of

0:25:05.937 --> 0:25:08.217
<v Speaker 1>what the Second Amendment is. How guns were you know,

0:25:08.257 --> 0:25:10.257
<v Speaker 1>how many people had guns in this country and all

0:25:10.257 --> 0:25:12.657
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. It's just all made up. They're like, oh,

0:25:12.737 --> 0:25:16.617
<v Speaker 1>well regulated, well regulated. You know, they're constantly pushing myths

0:25:16.657 --> 0:25:19.257
<v Speaker 1>about guns. If you don't like the Second Amendment, there

0:25:19.297 --> 0:25:21.737
<v Speaker 1>is a way to overturn it, if everyone agrees with you,

0:25:21.737 --> 0:25:24.777
<v Speaker 1>which they always tell me, everyone agrees with us about guns.

0:25:25.057 --> 0:25:28.257
<v Speaker 1>Overturned the Second Amendment. It can be done, and then

0:25:28.337 --> 0:25:30.017
<v Speaker 1>you can do what you like. But right now we

0:25:30.097 --> 0:25:32.057
<v Speaker 1>do have one and you can't do what you want.

0:25:32.097 --> 0:25:34.577
<v Speaker 1>You can't ban guns, and that is the long game

0:25:34.657 --> 0:25:37.657
<v Speaker 1>here for them, in my opinion, I'm gonna come back

0:25:37.697 --> 0:25:42.017
<v Speaker 1>here at a second, David, and talk about the realities

0:25:43.137 --> 0:25:46.617
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump faces here of the legal system being

0:25:46.657 --> 0:25:49.657
<v Speaker 1>i think very openly and obviously weaponized against him. We'll

0:25:49.657 --> 0:25:51.537
<v Speaker 1>get back to that in a moment. Born from the

0:25:51.537 --> 0:25:53.457
<v Speaker 1>tragedy of nine to eleven, the Tunnel of the Towers

0:25:53.497 --> 0:25:56.977
<v Speaker 1>Foundation has been honoring America's heroes ever since. The foundation

0:25:57.057 --> 0:25:59.697
<v Speaker 1>honors fallen and severely injured heroes and their families with

0:25:59.737 --> 0:26:02.897
<v Speaker 1>mortgage free homes. This year alone, hundreds of gold Star

0:26:02.937 --> 0:26:05.657
<v Speaker 1>on fallen first responder families with young children, and our

0:26:05.697 --> 0:26:09.337
<v Speaker 1>nation's most severely injured veterans and first responders are receiving homes.

0:26:09.657 --> 0:26:12.417
<v Speaker 1>More than five hundred homeless veterans received housing and services

0:26:12.497 --> 0:26:14.977
<v Speaker 1>last year, and more than fifteen hundred are receiving housing

0:26:15.017 --> 0:26:17.857
<v Speaker 1>and services this year. This coming Memorial Day, all of

0:26:17.897 --> 0:26:19.897
<v Speaker 1>the brave men and women law since nine to eleven

0:26:19.977 --> 0:26:22.377
<v Speaker 1>in the War on Terror are having their names read

0:26:22.417 --> 0:26:25.257
<v Speaker 1>aloud in a tunnet the Towers Ceremony in our nation's capital.

0:26:25.537 --> 0:26:27.897
<v Speaker 1>Through the Tunnel of the Towers nine to eleven Institute,

0:26:28.017 --> 0:26:31.777
<v Speaker 1>the foundation is educating kids in kindergarten through twelfth grade

0:26:31.777 --> 0:26:35.377
<v Speaker 1>about our nation's darkest day. Joined Talta Towers on its

0:26:35.377 --> 0:26:37.977
<v Speaker 1>mission to do good. Please help America to never forget

0:26:38.017 --> 0:26:40.537
<v Speaker 1>its greatest heroes. Join me in donating eleven dollars a

0:26:40.577 --> 0:26:42.977
<v Speaker 1>month to Tunnel the Towers at t twot dot org.

0:26:43.017 --> 0:26:46.697
<v Speaker 1>That's t the number two t dot org. So, so, David,

0:26:46.737 --> 0:26:50.937
<v Speaker 1>I've a proposition for you. I'm reminded right now this

0:26:51.017 --> 0:26:56.577
<v Speaker 1>moment in time that during the Trump administration it became

0:26:57.497 --> 0:27:01.537
<v Speaker 1>standard among journalists to say we effectively we are no

0:27:01.817 --> 0:27:05.377
<v Speaker 1>longer journalists in the sense of people that report and

0:27:05.417 --> 0:27:08.977
<v Speaker 1>bring you facts. To be a journalistist, to be anti Trump,

0:27:08.977 --> 0:27:10.857
<v Speaker 1>because that is what the truth must be. Right. Remember

0:27:10.857 --> 0:27:13.417
<v Speaker 1>there were variations on that argument. That was what twenty

0:27:13.457 --> 0:27:17.137
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to twenty twenty, they were openly saying that the

0:27:17.137 --> 0:27:19.377
<v Speaker 1>truth is anti Trump, therefore you must be anti Trump

0:27:19.377 --> 0:27:21.097
<v Speaker 1>to bring you the truth. It was just like, you know,

0:27:21.857 --> 0:27:24.337
<v Speaker 1>the circular argument that justified everything they wanted to do.

0:27:25.057 --> 0:27:27.737
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing something similar to that with prosecutors

0:27:27.737 --> 0:27:33.257
<v Speaker 1>now in the legal system. Yeah, it reminds me journalisms

0:27:33.257 --> 0:27:35.857
<v Speaker 1>are good and not any analogy. I think the whole

0:27:36.097 --> 0:27:38.657
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump movement, and again that doesn't mean you have

0:27:38.697 --> 0:27:40.617
<v Speaker 1>to be pro Trump. I mean people who are willing

0:27:40.657 --> 0:27:44.777
<v Speaker 1>to break every norm, who don't care about, you know,

0:27:44.857 --> 0:27:50.817
<v Speaker 1>the constitution, who don't care about spreading misinformation about elections

0:27:50.857 --> 0:27:57.017
<v Speaker 1>and conspiracy theories. To win, they dropped all their supposed norms.

0:27:57.017 --> 0:27:59.737
<v Speaker 1>They became worse than Trump in every way imaginable to

0:27:59.817 --> 0:28:03.057
<v Speaker 1>stop Trump. And part of that is weaponizing the legal

0:28:03.097 --> 0:28:06.777
<v Speaker 1>system going after a president over a seven year year

0:28:06.777 --> 0:28:12.417
<v Speaker 1>old campaign finance charge, this demeanor. As far as I

0:28:12.497 --> 0:28:15.297
<v Speaker 1>know right now, I haven't seen exactly what the charges are,

0:28:15.337 --> 0:28:17.857
<v Speaker 1>but that's what it seems to be about. And then

0:28:18.017 --> 0:28:21.577
<v Speaker 1>making the biggest deal imaginable, imaginable out out of it.

0:28:21.697 --> 0:28:24.337
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to be a conspiracy theorist myself,

0:28:24.337 --> 0:28:26.337
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes I think they're trying to elevate him and

0:28:26.417 --> 0:28:28.537
<v Speaker 1>make him more popular so that he'll run for a

0:28:28.537 --> 0:28:31.257
<v Speaker 1>present because they think they can beat him over to Santis.

0:28:31.297 --> 0:28:32.817
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's sort of what it looks like to me.

0:28:33.017 --> 0:28:35.657
<v Speaker 1>I doubt people are playing three D chess. Maybe it's

0:28:35.697 --> 0:28:38.257
<v Speaker 1>all in my mind. It usually is, but that's what

0:28:38.297 --> 0:28:43.897
<v Speaker 1>they're doing effectively, right, And the idea the gall to

0:28:43.937 --> 0:28:46.817
<v Speaker 1>start talking about how no one's above the law after

0:28:46.857 --> 0:28:51.017
<v Speaker 1>what we saw with Hillary Clinton, who comey let off,

0:28:51.057 --> 0:28:54.457
<v Speaker 1>where there was just a mountain of evidence showing she

0:28:54.577 --> 0:28:58.817
<v Speaker 1>was guilty of felonies, not of misdemeanors. It's just and

0:28:58.897 --> 0:29:02.297
<v Speaker 1>others as well. It's just a joke. And it also

0:29:02.337 --> 0:29:05.417
<v Speaker 1>strikes me that the Hunter Biden phenomenon, it's so funny.

0:29:05.617 --> 0:29:08.177
<v Speaker 1>You've probably seen this a few times right where people,

0:29:08.257 --> 0:29:11.857
<v Speaker 1>you know, Democrats will rush to the defense of Hunter

0:29:11.897 --> 0:29:14.977
<v Speaker 1>Biden on something's just say, you know, it's not a

0:29:15.017 --> 0:29:17.657
<v Speaker 1>crime to take money because people want to talk to

0:29:17.657 --> 0:29:19.657
<v Speaker 1>your dad, and then everyone piles on and say as well,

0:29:20.057 --> 0:29:23.897
<v Speaker 1>smoking crack and buying a handgun, wire a crack user

0:29:24.257 --> 0:29:27.897
<v Speaker 1>and taking millions of dollars that you hide in LLCs

0:29:27.937 --> 0:29:31.657
<v Speaker 1>and from the Chinese and don't declare and don't pay taxes.

0:29:31.697 --> 0:29:34.897
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a lot of crimes that Hunter Biden one

0:29:35.817 --> 0:29:38.457
<v Speaker 1>is committed and we're just supposed to think like, no

0:29:38.537 --> 0:29:42.297
<v Speaker 1>big deal, nothing's gonna happen. Also, and also, you know,

0:29:42.817 --> 0:29:45.417
<v Speaker 1>sometimes corruption isn't criminal, and there's plenty it looks like

0:29:45.457 --> 0:29:47.857
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of corruption there. But yeah, you're right. But

0:29:47.857 --> 0:29:49.737
<v Speaker 1>but do you notice how they say, you know, they

0:29:49.737 --> 0:29:52.177
<v Speaker 1>talk about Stormy Daniels, is that her name? Yeah, you

0:29:52.217 --> 0:29:55.697
<v Speaker 1>know how she was given hush money. There's nothing illegal

0:29:55.737 --> 0:30:00.137
<v Speaker 1>about signing, you know, giving someone hush money. We many

0:30:00.177 --> 0:30:01.857
<v Speaker 1>of us worked in places where we're not allowed to

0:30:01.857 --> 0:30:04.377
<v Speaker 1>talk about what goes that we signed contracts. We are

0:30:04.537 --> 0:30:06.257
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can pay people for that if you

0:30:06.297 --> 0:30:08.857
<v Speaker 1>want whatever. There's nothing wrong with that. But they create

0:30:08.857 --> 0:30:11.657
<v Speaker 1>they frame it as some kind something that is much

0:30:11.657 --> 0:30:14.417
<v Speaker 1>worse than it is now. I long before Trump have

0:30:14.497 --> 0:30:17.457
<v Speaker 1>been against these campaign finance laws completely because I think

0:30:17.497 --> 0:30:19.977
<v Speaker 1>they undermine the First Amendment in all kinds of ways.

0:30:20.337 --> 0:30:25.217
<v Speaker 1>But this basically is a is a bookkeeping a crime. Right,

0:30:25.617 --> 0:30:29.257
<v Speaker 1>it's a misdemeanor. Most people here, that's it. This is

0:30:29.297 --> 0:30:32.617
<v Speaker 1>another again, another argument where I don't you know, I

0:30:32.657 --> 0:30:35.537
<v Speaker 1>can sit here and with Democrats, like we could. I

0:30:35.577 --> 0:30:38.257
<v Speaker 1>could sit here with a Democrat and we could argue

0:30:38.417 --> 0:30:41.337
<v Speaker 1>over what the capital gains tax rate should be, right,

0:30:41.417 --> 0:30:43.417
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we could really we could have that debate.

0:30:43.417 --> 0:30:45.057
<v Speaker 1>You know, why should it be favored of it? But

0:30:45.097 --> 0:30:47.457
<v Speaker 1>it's a there's real arguments. I would have my side

0:30:47.457 --> 0:30:50.337
<v Speaker 1>that I would think is correct, but we're getting into

0:30:50.377 --> 0:30:52.257
<v Speaker 1>this realm where they're not. You know, on the on

0:30:52.297 --> 0:30:54.897
<v Speaker 1>the gun free zone school thing, for example, there's no argument.

0:30:54.937 --> 0:30:57.697
<v Speaker 1>They're all for, no argument for that. And on this one,

0:30:58.617 --> 0:31:03.617
<v Speaker 1>if Trump had done what they're prosecuting him for not doing,

0:31:04.057 --> 0:31:07.777
<v Speaker 1>which is if he had paid off Stormy Daniels with

0:31:07.977 --> 0:31:13.697
<v Speaker 1>campaign funds, that would clearly be a criminal use of

0:31:13.857 --> 0:31:17.097
<v Speaker 1>campaign funds, you know what I mean. Like, so the

0:31:17.137 --> 0:31:21.177
<v Speaker 1>thing that they're prosecuting him for not doing is illegal

0:31:21.337 --> 0:31:23.297
<v Speaker 1>the same way that the thing that they're prosecuted, or

0:31:23.417 --> 0:31:25.137
<v Speaker 1>rather that they would have been able to prosecute him

0:31:25.137 --> 0:31:27.617
<v Speaker 1>for for doing. He was damned if he did, damned

0:31:27.617 --> 0:31:29.457
<v Speaker 1>if he didn't. You see what I'm saying like, it

0:31:29.497 --> 0:31:33.057
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense that he was supposed to report this

0:31:33.177 --> 0:31:36.377
<v Speaker 1>as a campaign expense, because if it was a campaign expense,

0:31:36.777 --> 0:31:38.657
<v Speaker 1>he could have had a fundraise. You've taken money from

0:31:38.657 --> 0:31:41.177
<v Speaker 1>a fundraise your Trump between you know, twenty twenty Trump

0:31:41.177 --> 0:31:44.817
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen for president, and paid Stormy Daniels ten million

0:31:44.817 --> 0:31:49.937
<v Speaker 1>dollars with that money. Two things. One is my problem

0:31:49.937 --> 0:31:53.017
<v Speaker 1>with this, just as my problem with the press going

0:31:53.217 --> 0:31:56.177
<v Speaker 1>so hard after Trump all the time, not the lies,

0:31:56.297 --> 0:31:58.777
<v Speaker 1>just going after him hard, is that I'm not actually

0:31:58.777 --> 0:32:01.297
<v Speaker 1>opposed to that. I'm not actually posed to going after

0:32:01.337 --> 0:32:04.337
<v Speaker 1>a president on legal stuff. I'm a post to only

0:32:04.337 --> 0:32:08.297
<v Speaker 1>going after one president, only going after one party all

0:32:08.337 --> 0:32:11.577
<v Speaker 1>the time. I think all press and basically should be impeached.

0:32:11.737 --> 0:32:14.137
<v Speaker 1>But they don't do that. They go after the Republican

0:32:14.257 --> 0:32:16.337
<v Speaker 1>like you know, that's what bothers me. But moreover, I

0:32:16.337 --> 0:32:18.217
<v Speaker 1>just want to quickly say this, think about where this

0:32:18.257 --> 0:32:22.097
<v Speaker 1>all started. It started with Trump is a agent of

0:32:22.897 --> 0:32:26.497
<v Speaker 1>Putin Pot, he's a trader, and we end up with

0:32:26.537 --> 0:32:30.457
<v Speaker 1>a seven year old book keeping misdemeanor against him, and

0:32:30.497 --> 0:32:33.897
<v Speaker 1>they celebrate it like they've like they've uncovered water teet,

0:32:33.897 --> 0:32:36.137
<v Speaker 1>like this is Nixon did you see. I mean CNN

0:32:38.417 --> 0:32:41.377
<v Speaker 1>has footage or the plane landing and the plane taking off,

0:32:41.657 --> 0:32:45.017
<v Speaker 1>all of this. They need him so badly for ratings,

0:32:45.017 --> 0:32:47.257
<v Speaker 1>it's not even funny, you know, I mean they need

0:32:47.377 --> 0:32:50.897
<v Speaker 1>him so bad. So I think the same way that

0:32:50.937 --> 0:32:55.217
<v Speaker 1>they often said that Trump supporters, they always accuse Trump

0:32:55.217 --> 0:32:57.577
<v Speaker 1>supporters of being in a cult. And there are books,

0:32:57.617 --> 0:32:59.017
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of books You're the Trump cult

0:32:59.017 --> 0:33:03.177
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff. I actually do believe that there

0:33:03.297 --> 0:33:07.057
<v Speaker 1>is a cult of anti Trumpism, as in that there

0:33:07.097 --> 0:33:10.577
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people for whom everything they know

0:33:10.857 --> 0:33:13.737
<v Speaker 1>and have known their whole adult lives about politics, about

0:33:13.737 --> 0:33:17.977
<v Speaker 1>the law, about common sense, when it comes to this individual,

0:33:18.457 --> 0:33:22.137
<v Speaker 1>somehow no longer no longer applies, right, like like everything

0:33:22.177 --> 0:33:24.657
<v Speaker 1>that we would you know, it is impossible to make

0:33:24.697 --> 0:33:28.137
<v Speaker 1>a good faith argument to me that prosecuting a president

0:33:28.217 --> 0:33:32.537
<v Speaker 1>under such a flimsy pretext doesn't kick open Pandora's box

0:33:32.617 --> 0:33:37.017
<v Speaker 1>in a massive way for a future nonsense like this,

0:33:37.177 --> 0:33:41.057
<v Speaker 1>other prosecutors, other things. And yet people that you would

0:33:41.057 --> 0:33:44.577
<v Speaker 1>think are somewhat somewhat I guess reasonable or serious and

0:33:44.657 --> 0:33:46.977
<v Speaker 1>other issues are in favor of this. They're like, yeah,

0:33:47.057 --> 0:33:50.857
<v Speaker 1>go get him. Yeah, they just I don't know what

0:33:50.897 --> 0:33:54.377
<v Speaker 1>they say. I think they don't care that it'll be

0:33:54.417 --> 0:33:57.177
<v Speaker 1>turned on them. And this has gone on since Trump

0:33:57.217 --> 0:33:59.977
<v Speaker 1>first began running. They think they can do whatever they want,

0:34:00.057 --> 0:34:02.177
<v Speaker 1>and when Republicans do it, they'll just pretend it's a

0:34:02.337 --> 0:34:05.617
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's fascism. I'll give you an example,

0:34:06.057 --> 0:34:08.497
<v Speaker 1>the laws passed on the banned books and the stuff

0:34:08.497 --> 0:34:10.937
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about in the schools. The left has

0:34:10.977 --> 0:34:15.617
<v Speaker 1>you have used those laws and those that those powers forever.

0:34:15.977 --> 0:34:20.297
<v Speaker 1>That's how they set all kinds of school agendas. But

0:34:20.337 --> 0:34:23.537
<v Speaker 1>when Republicans do it, it's immediately fascism. This is how

0:34:23.657 --> 0:34:26.977
<v Speaker 1>they work. So I think they don't see it that way.

0:34:26.977 --> 0:34:29.577
<v Speaker 1>As far as the cult stuff, a thousand percent, Like,

0:34:29.817 --> 0:34:33.097
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's not as if people liberals ran

0:34:33.177 --> 0:34:35.937
<v Speaker 1>around being critical of Barack Obama or run around being

0:34:35.977 --> 0:34:37.857
<v Speaker 1>critical of Joe Biden. They're in the same kind of

0:34:37.897 --> 0:34:40.257
<v Speaker 1>cult as Trump supporters are in. You know, maybe I

0:34:40.257 --> 0:34:43.497
<v Speaker 1>think maybe Trump is because of his personality, Garners more

0:34:44.137 --> 0:34:47.257
<v Speaker 1>or did more loyalty. But look now there's a big

0:34:47.577 --> 0:34:51.577
<v Speaker 1>break within Republicans. Some support the Santists, some support Trump.

0:34:51.857 --> 0:34:53.777
<v Speaker 1>That's a kind of thing that shows that it's not

0:34:53.857 --> 0:34:56.137
<v Speaker 1>any kind of cult like you know, I mean brought

0:34:56.177 --> 0:34:59.137
<v Speaker 1>to your point, Barack Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize

0:35:00.097 --> 0:35:05.577
<v Speaker 1>for getting elected. That's a real thing, right exactly, which

0:35:05.617 --> 0:35:08.057
<v Speaker 1>is embarrassing, and then the Nobel Committee should be embarrassed

0:35:08.057 --> 0:35:10.617
<v Speaker 1>forever about although then again Arafat, there's there are some

0:35:10.697 --> 0:35:14.857
<v Speaker 1>other bad ones too. Yeah, absolutely, But you know, for

0:35:15.017 --> 0:35:18.337
<v Speaker 1>years Barack Obama, there would be these you know stories

0:35:18.337 --> 0:35:20.537
<v Speaker 1>where they put halos or you know, pictures they put

0:35:20.617 --> 0:35:22.697
<v Speaker 1>halos around them and write about them as there's some

0:35:22.897 --> 0:35:26.297
<v Speaker 1>messianic figure, you know. So, I mean, this happens with

0:35:26.377 --> 0:35:28.257
<v Speaker 1>every president. I don't like it. I don't like it

0:35:28.337 --> 0:35:32.177
<v Speaker 1>at all. But I think that within the Republican Party,

0:35:32.257 --> 0:35:35.937
<v Speaker 1>like or you know, I debate with like national conservative

0:35:35.977 --> 0:35:38.337
<v Speaker 1>types all the time. Like there there are debates on

0:35:38.417 --> 0:35:40.937
<v Speaker 1>the right, there are very few of those on the left.

0:35:40.977 --> 0:35:45.297
<v Speaker 1>The central mainstream left has moved to where the progressive

0:35:45.377 --> 0:35:48.417
<v Speaker 1>left is. They're they're just talking about how much money

0:35:48.457 --> 0:35:50.217
<v Speaker 1>they want to spend. There's a little bit off, but

0:35:50.337 --> 0:35:54.377
<v Speaker 1>their goals are exactly the same. Take abortion. It began

0:35:54.537 --> 0:35:56.577
<v Speaker 1>with the you know, there was a moderate middle of

0:35:56.577 --> 0:35:59.577
<v Speaker 1>the road position in the Democratic Party. Now it's nine months.

0:35:59.777 --> 0:36:02.297
<v Speaker 1>You know, do what you want whenever you want, and

0:36:02.977 --> 0:36:05.137
<v Speaker 1>you can go on and on issue after issues. So

0:36:05.257 --> 0:36:07.657
<v Speaker 1>I don't buy their narrative. And again I'm not a

0:36:07.697 --> 0:36:11.257
<v Speaker 1>Trump fan, but they make people defend Trump because they

0:36:11.337 --> 0:36:15.417
<v Speaker 1>act in authoritarian ways to try to bring down this supposed,

0:36:15.657 --> 0:36:19.177
<v Speaker 1>you know, dictator. He's not even president now, right, he's

0:36:19.217 --> 0:36:22.097
<v Speaker 1>not doing anything to anyone. He's running and they are

0:36:22.137 --> 0:36:24.097
<v Speaker 1>still doing this stuff. So we'll see how. You know,

0:36:24.417 --> 0:36:26.417
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be found innocent, then then what are they

0:36:26.457 --> 0:36:29.177
<v Speaker 1>going to say about about it? Right? I mean, let's

0:36:29.217 --> 0:36:31.217
<v Speaker 1>say he's found innocent of the charges. Let's say he

0:36:31.257 --> 0:36:34.217
<v Speaker 1>fights it. What are they going to say. We're gonna say, yeah,

0:36:34.257 --> 0:36:36.497
<v Speaker 1>this is what the law. The law. Obviously you said

0:36:36.537 --> 0:36:38.537
<v Speaker 1>follow the law. You said, no one's above justice and

0:36:38.657 --> 0:36:42.337
<v Speaker 1>he's innocent. Will they admit he's innocent? Of course not. Yeah,

0:36:42.377 --> 0:36:45.857
<v Speaker 1>it will never stop. And also I think that, well,

0:36:46.377 --> 0:36:49.817
<v Speaker 1>do you think that there will be other prosecutions Georgia

0:36:50.217 --> 0:36:54.977
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's Jack Smith special counsel, what do you think? Yeah?

0:36:55.017 --> 0:36:57.137
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if they're moving forward. And again I'm not

0:36:57.177 --> 0:36:59.617
<v Speaker 1>saying there's some concerted effort here. I don't know who

0:36:59.657 --> 0:37:01.737
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Bragg speaks to or doesn't speak to or if

0:37:01.777 --> 0:37:04.377
<v Speaker 1>he cares. But if they're going after him on this,

0:37:04.777 --> 0:37:07.337
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't they go after him on those Georgia charges,

0:37:07.417 --> 0:37:11.577
<v Speaker 1>which I think are kind of ridiculous as well. But yeah,

0:37:11.617 --> 0:37:14.097
<v Speaker 1>they'll keep going after him. I mean, they impeached him twice.

0:37:14.137 --> 0:37:16.297
<v Speaker 1>They'll keep going after him and after him. And if

0:37:16.337 --> 0:37:19.817
<v Speaker 1>de Santists, let's say, somehow wins the nomination, they'll go

0:37:19.897 --> 0:37:22.377
<v Speaker 1>after him the same way. You already see articles saying

0:37:22.417 --> 0:37:24.897
<v Speaker 1>how he's worse than Trump because he's smarter than Trump,

0:37:24.977 --> 0:37:28.137
<v Speaker 1>because he's you know, smoother than he's more, you know,

0:37:28.257 --> 0:37:30.417
<v Speaker 1>he knows what he's doing, you know, with government better

0:37:30.497 --> 0:37:33.257
<v Speaker 1>than Trump. I mean, so it's it's like how they

0:37:33.377 --> 0:37:37.577
<v Speaker 1>used to hate, you know, they always hate the worst Republicans,

0:37:37.617 --> 0:37:39.737
<v Speaker 1>always the newest one and the old one they'll give

0:37:39.857 --> 0:37:42.057
<v Speaker 1>brudging respect to as you move forward, you know, one

0:37:42.097 --> 0:37:43.937
<v Speaker 1>day they'll be like, ah, yeah, Trump wasn't that bad

0:37:44.017 --> 0:37:46.977
<v Speaker 1>compared to that to Santists. You know, I don't know.

0:37:47.097 --> 0:37:50.377
<v Speaker 1>That's what it seems like to me. It's absolutely the case.

0:37:50.897 --> 0:37:54.977
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that at some level do Democrats recognize

0:37:55.017 --> 0:37:57.257
<v Speaker 1>that the whole Joe Biden thing. I mean, I would

0:37:57.337 --> 0:38:00.897
<v Speaker 1>argue that Fetterman, who I know has just come out

0:38:00.937 --> 0:38:03.057
<v Speaker 1>of the hospital. He says he's been hospitalized for depression

0:38:03.137 --> 0:38:05.657
<v Speaker 1>for I don't know, almost two months or something. That

0:38:05.777 --> 0:38:07.457
<v Speaker 1>when you put somebody who had a stroke in a

0:38:07.537 --> 0:38:11.297
<v Speaker 1>serious medical condition and clearly is not medically capable of

0:38:11.977 --> 0:38:15.657
<v Speaker 1>really doing any job that requires intensive thought and serious

0:38:15.737 --> 0:38:20.217
<v Speaker 1>consideration of complex issues, that if they'll, if they'll push

0:38:20.257 --> 0:38:22.897
<v Speaker 1>Fetteran forward, and they did, then it's no problem to

0:38:22.937 --> 0:38:25.137
<v Speaker 1>push Joe Biden forward for a second term. Which is

0:38:25.177 --> 0:38:26.857
<v Speaker 1>why I thought Biden is going to be I thought

0:38:26.897 --> 0:38:29.417
<v Speaker 1>the whole time he's going to be there, their second

0:38:29.497 --> 0:38:32.497
<v Speaker 1>term guy, and he's going to run for reelection. But

0:38:32.577 --> 0:38:34.577
<v Speaker 1>do you think at some level there's a recognition of

0:38:34.777 --> 0:38:38.857
<v Speaker 1>just the the the absurdity of Joe Biden in his

0:38:38.977 --> 0:38:42.137
<v Speaker 1>best days was a not a very bright guy, a

0:38:42.257 --> 0:38:44.457
<v Speaker 1>not a very nice guy, and not a very ethical guy.

0:38:44.977 --> 0:38:47.617
<v Speaker 1>And now on top of that, he really is somebody

0:38:47.657 --> 0:38:53.097
<v Speaker 1>who like needs round the clock hare in a seniors home. Yeah.

0:38:53.177 --> 0:38:55.417
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if I think if there was some alternative

0:38:55.497 --> 0:38:58.297
<v Speaker 1>who they thought could win, they would move in that direction.

0:38:58.537 --> 0:39:00.057
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think there is one right now For

0:39:00.177 --> 0:39:03.017
<v Speaker 1>Democrats that I can think of, maybe Newsom, but I

0:39:03.097 --> 0:39:07.177
<v Speaker 1>don't I think they overestimate how that plays around the country.

0:39:07.657 --> 0:39:10.297
<v Speaker 1>So Biden's the man, And yeah, I don't know. I

0:39:10.377 --> 0:39:12.737
<v Speaker 1>think they must know. They must know that he's incompetent.

0:39:12.817 --> 0:39:14.697
<v Speaker 1>They must have known that he was a blowhard and

0:39:14.897 --> 0:39:17.577
<v Speaker 1>not very intelligent to begin you know. I just bring

0:39:17.617 --> 0:39:19.177
<v Speaker 1>it up because with a Trump thing. They hate Trump

0:39:19.257 --> 0:39:21.017
<v Speaker 1>so much, there's always this part of me wants to

0:39:21.097 --> 0:39:24.097
<v Speaker 1>point and be like and this, Joe Biden, this is

0:39:24.177 --> 0:39:26.257
<v Speaker 1>your answer, Like this is the best you guys can do.

0:39:26.617 --> 0:39:30.257
<v Speaker 1>It really is kind of mind blowing, I think because

0:39:30.417 --> 0:39:34.017
<v Speaker 1>he exudes or or maybe he's thought of as a

0:39:34.177 --> 0:39:36.457
<v Speaker 1>moderate sort of old timey because of how he you know,

0:39:36.457 --> 0:39:39.177
<v Speaker 1>because he's old and all that. But honestly, he has

0:39:39.257 --> 0:39:41.657
<v Speaker 1>no principles. There is literally and I've challenged people to

0:39:41.857 --> 0:39:46.057
<v Speaker 1>give me one issue where he's been consistent from beginning

0:39:46.097 --> 0:39:49.057
<v Speaker 1>to end in his career. What issue has he not

0:39:49.377 --> 0:39:52.497
<v Speaker 1>flipped onto wherever you know he thinks that you know

0:39:53.057 --> 0:39:55.297
<v Speaker 1>that will you know, we'll get the most Jews for

0:39:55.337 --> 0:39:59.057
<v Speaker 1>the squeezes. Yeah, totally exactly. So from a board, you know,

0:39:59.217 --> 0:40:01.417
<v Speaker 1>he was like pro one day he said he was

0:40:01.497 --> 0:40:03.857
<v Speaker 1>for what was that an amendment called the High Amendment.

0:40:04.017 --> 0:40:06.897
<v Speaker 1>Right during the election. There was some blowback on Twitter.

0:40:06.937 --> 0:40:08.417
<v Speaker 1>The next day comes out he says it's against the

0:40:08.457 --> 0:40:11.777
<v Speaker 1>High Amendment. That's like forty five years of politics that

0:40:11.897 --> 0:40:14.377
<v Speaker 1>he just threw in the garbage because he thought he

0:40:14.577 --> 0:40:17.137
<v Speaker 1>needed to say something else. So, but here's the thing

0:40:17.177 --> 0:40:19.577
<v Speaker 1>about him being old and every and I get it,

0:40:19.737 --> 0:40:22.537
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's all over, you know, all over that. But

0:40:22.657 --> 0:40:23.937
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. I don't like to give him a

0:40:23.977 --> 0:40:26.657
<v Speaker 1>pass because he was terrible before this. He was not

0:40:26.897 --> 0:40:29.897
<v Speaker 1>right before. He was a liar before this. He was

0:40:29.937 --> 0:40:34.177
<v Speaker 1>a fabuloust from the beginning. So I can't believe that

0:40:34.257 --> 0:40:37.777
<v Speaker 1>a guy who was mentored by segregationist has the gall

0:40:37.857 --> 0:40:40.897
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and talk about civil rights movement

0:40:40.977 --> 0:40:42.857
<v Speaker 1>like he does, or you know, who was basically a

0:40:42.977 --> 0:40:46.217
<v Speaker 1>social conservative gets to talk about Christians the way he does.

0:40:47.777 --> 0:40:49.777
<v Speaker 1>But that's what politics is today. I think it's all

0:40:49.777 --> 0:40:51.937
<v Speaker 1>about power and they don't really care who's there as

0:40:51.977 --> 0:40:54.697
<v Speaker 1>long as they get to run the White House. David,

0:40:54.697 --> 0:40:57.177
<v Speaker 1>where should folks go to follow you and read your

0:40:57.257 --> 0:41:01.577
<v Speaker 1>latest columns? The Federalist dot com is where most of

0:41:01.657 --> 0:41:03.937
<v Speaker 1>my stuff is and They can follow me on Twitter

0:41:04.057 --> 0:41:08.417
<v Speaker 1>at David Harsani. Hopefully you know. I hate being on there,

0:41:08.457 --> 0:41:11.497
<v Speaker 1>but I am on there. I mean, I'm, I'm, I'm

0:41:11.537 --> 0:41:13.897
<v Speaker 1>the same. It's a toxic place to be these days,

0:41:13.977 --> 0:41:17.297
<v Speaker 1>right David, a very good friend and colleague, a colleague

0:41:17.337 --> 0:41:19.537
<v Speaker 1>of mine in the business, once described David. I thought

0:41:19.577 --> 0:41:22.657
<v Speaker 1>this is a great description as gutsie in his writing,

0:41:22.857 --> 0:41:25.337
<v Speaker 1>but not showy about it, which I thought you'd appreciate,

0:41:26.817 --> 0:41:29.297
<v Speaker 1>not like trying to get, you know, undue attention, just

0:41:29.777 --> 0:41:34.537
<v Speaker 1>GUTSI and what he writes. David. Thanks, yeah, yeah, thanks

0:41:34.537 --> 0:41:36.017
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us man, appreciate it. We'll

0:41:36.017 --> 0:41:37.457
<v Speaker 1>see you soon anytime. Thank you.