WEBVTT - P&L: Trump Faces Difficulty in Forming Russia Strategy

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. I

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>am so glad that we are able to talk a

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what's going on between Russia and Turkey

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and what the potential implications are. This is something that's

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>been very much on my mind, as well as a

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people's minds. I'm pleased to bring in Richard Kahn,

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>managing partner at your Asia Advisors, who is an expert

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on Russian relations and has extensive experience kind of deciphering

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the tea leaves. So, Richard, you know, what's

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>your take on the sort of steps that have been

0:00:53.760 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>taken since the assassination of the Russian ambassador to Turkey. Well,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the reactions have to date been quite predictable.

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia and Turkey have some time ago sort of moved

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>beyond the official position that there and uh, you know,

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>basically in a state of proxy war, uh, neither the

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Syria being on opposite side. That had really changed, And

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this recent terrorist incident underscores the alliance that they have

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and which Russia basically is allowing and supporting the efforts

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of Syria to deal with sing of Turkey to deal

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with their problems on the Syrian border with Kurdish groups

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that are within Syria and which are supporting Kurdish terrorist

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>activities within Turkey. And for the perspective of Russia, Russia

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>received from this deal the support, if you will, don't

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>know Turkey in um um basically the agenda that Russia

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>has in supporting assad in Syria. So it's uh. It

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>makes um sort of uh. Scenarios that or will envisioned

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>look quite simplistic when you when you consider how the

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>official positions really do not match with what is taking

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>place on the ground, and this the terrorist activity really

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>underscores those themes. Well, Richard. One thing that's taking place

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and indeed under the sea is energy. Right.

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>The Russian government putting together a proposal and it has

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>passed to carry Russian natural gas under the Black Sea

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to Turkey. Can you explain a little bit about the

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the sort of strategy, energy strategy and the energy relationship

0:02:55.480 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>between Turkey and Russia. Well, this is in one of

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the foundations for their relationship and the reason why even

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>after they're shooting down by you know, by the urgon

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 1>regime of Russian planes a year or ago, aggression plane

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a year or so ago, that Putin nonetheless wanted to

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>find a way to move forward. There's been tremendous competition

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how Russian oil would head towards Europe,

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and certainly Turkey has you know, wanted it to pass

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>through uh their borders and and receive some compensation for that.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's been, um, it's been a relationship of practicality

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>between Putin and Urtagon, and I would expect at the

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>stage that the you know, they're going to continue to

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>signal that nothing is going to come between them. How

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>does the US factor into this? You know that President

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>elect Donald Trump is expected to have a closer relationship

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>or at least a better relationship with Vladimir put the

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Russian head of Russia than previous administrations. Um, what will

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that look like and what would be gained potentially from

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a close relationship between the nations for these of the

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>situations we're describing right now in Turkey and Syrious. I

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>think part of the challenge that the Trump team are

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have is figuring out what they really want

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to do um and how to become more relevant to

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>to the resolution of these situations. Of Trump has historically been,

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, quite critical of the Obama administration for their handling,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and so that they'll get a chance now to come

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.799
<v Speaker 1>up with a game plan. By the way, I should

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just say perhaps part of the game plan it has

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to do with Twitter, because President elect Trump did say

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>today there were terror attacks in Turkey, Switzerland, and Germany

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and it is only getting worse. The civilized world must

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>change thinking. So that was his contribution. Yes, that has

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>been his contribution. And obviously it's it's the old story.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing to be an outsider criticizing. What's always

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>challenging when you have someone actually succeed in gaining power.

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>At that point they need to govern and he's going

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to have to come up with solutions, then go further

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>than just identify problems as being terrorists related, which this

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>instant it certainly seems they are, and but to then

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:27.239
<v Speaker 1>move from there to a relationship, so particularly with Russia,

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that reflects his instincts to men's senses, and try to

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>come up come up with solutions that's going to be

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think far more complex than he you may may

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>recognize at this stage. Russia, while perhaps being willing to

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>show a little bit of leg uh you know, it

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is not is not instantly going to aband and they're

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to instantly decide, you know, to abandon all

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>long health positions. And because those positions just is hours

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are have been based on on real concerns and on

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the strategic interests and so but that doesn't mean that

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>he should not try. I certainly look forward to seeing

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>his efforts to UM utilize the prospect of lifting sanctions

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>to tackle UM in a fresh way. The problems that

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we faced was Russia and Ukraine, and obviously to see

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>if we can do some things to benefit the region

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in Syria and and you know all the refugees there,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know, these are these would be noble things

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish, and I suspect that that somewhere in his mind,

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but uh, tactically to do that is going to be

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>extremely difficult. And then coming up with an overarching strategy

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>will be even more complex, I think for for Trump

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and his advisors. Richard, the Turkish economy contracted for the

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>first time in seven years during the third quarter that

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>was revealed last week. This sputtering economy also includes a

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>collapse in private domestic consumption, dropping more than three percent

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>year over a year. What's the future of the Turkish economy,

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say the next six months, give me about thirty seconds. Well,

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks it looks awfully gloomy, doesn't it. You know,

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's as we spoke of on previous occasions. You know,

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>these these terroristic activities obviously have a dramatic impact on tourism.

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you we were planning to fly through

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>istanbul Uh within the last half year, and my wife

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly commented to me that even a connection, there was

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>something that caused her, you know, some concern, and I

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>don't blame her. Ultimately, the tourism industry drives many nations,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in Turkey is certainly among those, so I would expect

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to see an ongoing decline in tourism just because of

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>these terrorist incidents. Thanks very much. Richard Kahan is managing

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>partner at Eurasia Advisors, telling us about the relationship between

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Turkey and Russia. One of the latest nominees of President

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>elect Donald Trump to his cabinet is Representative Mick Mulvaney

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to oversee the office and charged of the US budget.

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a hot spot for debate

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and frankly for policy. I want to bring in Billy House,

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>who covers the White House, for Bloomberg, to talk a

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what this pick means for the budget

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of the United States going forward. Billy Uh. Representative Mick

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>mulvaney is not known for being a fiscally liberal on

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>any level, and yet a lot of President Elect Trump's

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>policies would really require a certain expansion of the budget.

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect there to be some kind of fight

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that's being set up ahead, Well, that's absolutely a possibility.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Mc mulvany, a South Carolina congressman, has been one of

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the most aggressive, pugilistic advocate advocates for cutting government spending,

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly military spending. And as we know, the President elect

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>has said he's going to bolster the military. So there's

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>one key area right off the back that you gotta wonder,

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>how did these two guys. Mesh mulvaney has made a

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>career out of going after military spending and uh. Uh

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so it remains to be seen how they're going to

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>get together on that. Billy. What's his relationship with the

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House of Paul Ryan. Uh, it's strained. Uh.

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Mulvaney was part of the group of outspoken fiscal conservatives

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>known as the House freedm Coccus, who basically forced the

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>previous speaker out of office, John Bayner. Um. The relationship

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>has been a little better with Paul Ryan. Paul Ryan

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>has only been Speaker for a little more than a year,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but already there had been growing streams on on some

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>of the promises that this group thought Ryan had made

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and did not see through in this early part of

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>his tenure. Uh. There's some tension there, and there'll be

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>some tension as they discussed uh financial things together as

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>now as a member of the administration and the Speaker. So, Billy,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I'm looking at is if you have

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this fiscal conservative who has come out aggressively in favor

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of cutting the budget um, and then you have President

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>elect Trump who is looking for fiscal expansion infrastructure spending.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>This is adding up to a lot of cuts and

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of difficult decisions that have to be made

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in the upcoming months. Where do you what units of

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the government do people expect to get cut the most, Well,

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the good question. Uh. And is it cuts really

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>or is it hopes that the tax cuts generate that,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, revenue that could help pay for these things. So,

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I just have to say the logic

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of tax cuts generating revenue. Uh. You know a lot

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of people wonder about that. In other words, that the

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>logic that tax cuts will be sufficient to ignite the

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>economy enough too then subsequently provide even greater tax revenues

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going forward, correct exactly. And it's dubious that that could

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>occur very fast, much less occur at all. Uh. There

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is some talk of repatriation of corporations who have located

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>outside of the country, allowing them to come back with

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>either no penalty or less penalty, and that way bringing

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>back maybe a portion of the tax money they would

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have had paid. That could help boost them. But you're right, Uh,

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Mint Mulvaney's gonna go after an agency spending and and

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>cuts and and and Paul ryan Is wants to go

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>after entitlement spending and cuts. But at the same time,

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and as you've pointed out, the President elect and said,

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't only go after entitlements like Medicare and and

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>uh social Security. So uh, it really is who gets

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to who's going to control this agenda, and nobody knows

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Well, part of that agenda has to do

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>with immigration policy, and I was reading some past notes

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>about a representative Congressman Multveney, and he has been a

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>supporter of amnesty that puts some at odds with Senator

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Sessions, who was slated to be the head of

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General, head of the Justice Department. And indeed,

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got a quote I remember he said there are

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>jobs that American citizens will not do. He says, we

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have businesses in his district that rely on migrant legal

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 1>migrant workers and a lot of them are in this state. Absolutely.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in February he even did a town hall.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>He learned Spanish to be able to do this town

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hall partly in Spanish, correct in his district. So he's

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>open to that. And and that again is another area

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>where he clashes with at least what has been you know,

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>said during the campaign by Mr Trump himself. Uh, it's

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's another wrinkle, another piece of the emerging Trump administration

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that seemed to not all fit together. And it's and

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it's representative because the executive orders that have been used

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>by President Obama on immigration policy. Uh, those are entered

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>into the federal registry. Right, that's actually correct. But Mr

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Mulvaney has also been critical though of Obama's unilaterally making

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>changes to the system. So in a functional way, he's

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>opposed some of the Obama administration efforts, even though made

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>generally he kind of agrees with the ideas. Billy, is

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this typical for an incoming administration to have so many

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>different key members of the cabinet that frankly are at

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>odds with each other. It's it's usually president reflects, cabinet

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>reflects the philosophy of the president. Here we have multi philosophies,

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>different viewpoints, and you know, maybe that's a good thing

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>when they get together. They ever do, will get together.

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's certainly confusing, and it's certainly confusing to those

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hills who will have to put the president

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in his administration's visions into actual legislation and therefore, center

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for Joey leader, Mitch McConnell, and Paul Ryan, who has

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>his own he's not a potty plant. Have to come

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to grips with what they all mean when they all

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about things. What we're gonna look forward to more

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of your reporting. Many thanks. Billy House, Congressional reporter for

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, joining us from Washington, d c our Nation's capital,

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>home to a Bloomberg one and one oh five point

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>seven h D two. All right now to give us

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a look at some of the pointees for President elect

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's future cabinet. I want to bring in Tyler Cowen.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>He is a Bloomberg View columnist. He's also professor of

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>economics at George Mason University, writes for the blog mar

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>General Revolution, and his books include Averages Overpowering America Beyond

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the Age of the Great Stagnation. Tyler Cowen, thank you

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Go ahead, set out your thoughts

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>here about the nominees, the appointees for President elect Donald

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump's cabinet and what skills they might bring to their

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>jobs that are different than the skills we may be

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>used to in these positions. Overall, I think Trump is

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>taking a lot of chances with these picks. But that's

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>based on an understanding of Washington gridlock. If in most

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>cases your agency heads don't get that much done anyway,

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>arguably you should take a lot of chances. So he's

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>picked people who have some credibility and influence with him,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>who are good communicators, who in some cases, such as

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Ben Carson, are pretty famous, and said, you know, narrow

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>expertise isn't always the main thing. So my overall assessment

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.119
<v Speaker 1>is this is actually going to end up being effective,

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you agree with Trump's use. Okay, Tyler,

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I read your column and I thought it

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>was fascinating the expect Trump's appointees to have a big impact.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why I thought it was so interesting

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is because it raises a question of what matters more

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>for a cabinet member their ability to be famous and

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to have a big persona and to be a Sylvester

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Saloon with the big name recognition and good media presence,

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>or the knowledge, experience and capability of crafting legislations or

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>legislation or policies that will be effective. Well, again, this

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is a gamble. But if the people at the top

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the agencies or appointments know that they don't know

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>all of the details, they can assign that two subordinates,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>so there's a chance they think they know more than

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they really do, and then you're in for a lot

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of trouble. But again keep in mind, in a gridlocked world,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>arguably an administration should be willing to take more chances. Well,

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it raises yet another question just about

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>whether these uh, these cabinet members will delegate. I mean,

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>do we have any sense of whether first of all,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they will be able to delegate their sort of have

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the nature to delegate some of the the tasks, and

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>also whether some of the institutional Washington crowd will stick around.

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>That's hard to assess, But keep in mind a lot

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of the picks they have more business experience and military

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>experience than It's difficult, and those are areas where you

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do have to learn to delegate to be effective. So

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>again I'm not saying you have to like Trump's ideas

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>or his picks. I'm saying, don't assume this is some

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>strategy list, you know, stabbing in the dark way to

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>approach the problem. I think it's actually pretty well thought out.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Tyler One, if you could use an example of Larry

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Cuddlow as a contender to chair the Council of Economic

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Advisors and how that fits into your perspective. Well, let

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>me first just say I know Larry, so my view

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>here may be biased, but I've seen a lot of

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>professional economists criticize him for not being a member of

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the guild in the in a proper way. Larry is

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a very smart guy. He's a very clear to sucker.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>He has tremendous television experience in terms of being both

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a communicator and someone Trump will listen to. You know,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that may end up being much more important. So I'm

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty optimistic about that pick. Is there any pick

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>that you're less optimistic about? Well, the one that worries

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>me most is Michael Flynn as National Security Advisor. The

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>notion of him controlling the flow of information to Trump

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on foreign policy. H That to me is the worst

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of the picks. Is there any criteria that you would

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>suggest has changed because we now live in a Twitter

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in chief environment. Well, most of the picks are surprises,

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't just drawing into the pool and picking

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>all the normal people from the Washington establishment. Uh So,

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Trump in general is saying, look, the whole

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>world has changed. I won that shock you all. You've

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>all got to realize that's not the last thing to

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have changed. Here's the next step of surprises. Have you

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>ever seen this type of cats in a bag approach

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>to cabinet members with lots of different views represented at

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>all sizes and kind of thrown together come up with

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a coherent policy. Not in my lifetime now, So this

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>is uh something different. Okay, good, alright, son' say Tyler,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to press you a little bit because, um,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this all sounds rhetorically, you know, great, and it knits together.

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you were going out to hire someone to

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>run one of these large government agencies and departments, wouldn't

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you want expertise previously running something like that. My personal

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>picks would be more along the line of traditional expertise.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>But keep in mind Trump views himself as a disruptor

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in a way that I personally would not endorse. I've

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>used stability as a higher priority. So given Trump's underlying

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>preference for disruption, these are what disruption picks look like.

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But what I, as a whole make the same choices? No,

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Cowen, thank you so much for joining Tell Collin

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg View columnist. He's also professor of economics at George

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Mason University and writes for the blog Marginal Revolution. Since

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the Fellow reserved A raised rates, interest rates on new

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>credit cards have increased by about a half a percentage point.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>They were previously about fifteen point eight percent. Now they

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>average more than sixteen and a quarter percent. Here to

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>tell us more about consumer credit is Needy Verma, Senior

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>director of Research and Consulting with TransUnion, joining us from Chicago. Needy,

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being with us. Tell us

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>about this consumer credit market forecast for seventeen. What does

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>it look to find? Good morning, Thanks for having me

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>here about this time of the year. We predict what

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>will happen in the marketplace in the next four quarters

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to come in two thousand seventeen, to look into credit

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>performance as well as average debt levels for US borrowers.

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And as you've already seen the rise in interest rate

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that we saw last week, um that combination of the

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>interest rate rise and more to be expected in two

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, along with what we've seen as more and

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>more subprime borrowers in the consumer learning market. We're expecting

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>those two factors are going to spur delinquency rates UM

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>spurs linquistator, it rises into doound seventeen four, specifically auto

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>loans releases as well as credit cards UM. If you

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>look at the percent of sub prime accounts who have

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a credit card UM in the US at the end

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of third quarter of tow Down sixteen, that's really the

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 1>highest level that we've seen since the end of two

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand and ten. When you look at auto finance for

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that factor, it's the highest point since the conclusion of

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen. So we believe that with these anticipated

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>further rises in prime rate, along with the combination of

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>subprime consumer participation in the market, we are going to

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>see rising delinquency rates for auto as well as credit

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>cards in two thousand seventeen. So who's going to suffer

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the losses from this? Will there be losses? I mean,

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be the captive auto lenders or

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>will it be uh, perhaps big investment firms. I think

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>from an auto finance perspective, we do believe that independent

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>lenders have the highest share of sub prime accounts, so

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely those lenders will be needed to be well prepared UM,

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to make sure their underwriting strategies are

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>maintaining a good balance between expected losses, credit access and

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>investor returns and what have you. Who are the independent

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>lenders you're talking about, who are the biggest in this space?

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>These are going to be your independent lenders who only

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>do auto finance like sentendera auto essentially outside of banks,

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>credit unions and captives, everybody else is just lending auto

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>finance in the market. Those are those are considered your

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>independent lenders. How fast will the past a long be

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for increased interest rates? We've gotten hints that the Federal

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Reserve could raise interest rates as much as three times

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>in Yeah. Well, well, I can't speak for what to

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>anticipate in terms of rate rises. What I can share

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>is that our forecast includes about a fifty basis points

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>rise between Q four two thousand sixteen, which we've already

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>seen that UM as well as two thousands seventeen UM.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And then I think importantly we do understand there's an

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>impact from primary there's also an impact from contribution of

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>subprime borrowers gaining access in the market. I think it's

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>really important to not only look at the trajectory which

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>is going to be rising. But also look at the

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>levels itself. You look at the levels of auto loan delinquencies.

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we reached the peak even at one

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>point six percent, which is quite low considering where we

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>saw saw mortgage ellinquencies. Mortgage relinquencies peaked at seven point

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>two at the beginning of two thousand and ten. We

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>never really saw those peaks in autos. So in in overall,

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think where we look at the levels for card delinquency,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>which is expected to be one point four percent at

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of two thousand seventeen, it was as high

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>as three both levels are still quite manageable despite the

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>fact there is more access available to subprime borrowers. And

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really a factor to take into a

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>pound with very positive economic forces such as your better

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>employment picture, rising median household income um, we see increasing

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in personal spending as a result of that. So those

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are some of the offsets that we do need to

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind along with the anticipated rise in prime rates. Right.

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing, as you speak media, I was

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking to myself, well, you know you talk about rates

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>rising and how that tightens credit conditions. It makes it

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>more challenging for people to UH to to refinance at

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>low rates. And on the other hand, a lot of

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>people are baking into the stock market. Certainly uh this

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of very optimistic picture of the U S economy

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the coming year. Can you square those two things, Because,

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>as you were saying, I mean, typically in a positive

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>economic backdrop, usually it will be easier for consumers to

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>pay off their loans. I mean, how much this is

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the tightening going to really matter? Yes? So overall, you know,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the decent rates rises that we've we are expecting for

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>next year need to be really balanced by that positive

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>economic picture that you talked about. While it may be

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult from a refinance market perspective for consumers to come

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and get better rates, but if you look at the

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate and the fact that people are employed and

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they have traps, and they have medium household income rising,

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that those are also positive forces that are really helping

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a very large market of US credit consumers, that is mortgage.

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Look at mortgage for example. You know we're going to

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>hit about a two point one percent of inquancy rate

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end of two thousand seventeen. That is a

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>very normal rate of delinquency that we should expect if

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be in the lending business, and

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that rate of delinquency is really supported by the fact

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that people have more confidence in their homes. Home values

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that rise, thinking a few more confident paying towards their mortgages,

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>UM law unemployment rates support those steady improvements over those

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>these several years we've seen and continued improvement in the market.

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So while it may impact your refinance activity, it is

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>going to really bolster um the purchase market is going

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to enable more first time home bars. In fact that

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we predict will be quite dominant in the market next

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>year because of those positive economic forces enabling a strong

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>foundation for our economy. Uh needed. I understand that the

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>total dollar amount of credit card debt for consumers in

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States that they're carrying is approaching a trillion dollars.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The last time we were at this level was two

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven. Does that tell you anything about where we

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are in the cycle. So just as a fact, we

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>we measured debts for every single credit active consumer in

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and we look at cards both private

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>label cards meaning your merchant cards, as as well as

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we look at general purpose card that consumers can use

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>at any location. UM. When we look at those depth levels,

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not quite at a trillion dollars. Just looking at

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>consumer debt alone, UM, I can tell you we're about

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>seven eight billion dollars in credit card debt. These are

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>balances that consumers carry on their credit card statement. UM,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that shows up in your mailbox every month. UM, that's

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>seven or eighty billion dollars. Isn't as alarming. We've seen

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>those levels in the past, and really what we've seen

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the last few years is personal spending, which has really

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>been increasing as a result of that better employment picture

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we talked about, has continued to grow. And personal spending

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.719
<v Speaker 1>does benefit card balances because people like using their cards

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for the transactional convenience. I even buy my four dollar

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>lat on a credit card, and that's the personal spending

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is benefiting the card balances. UM. So I think we

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>do have to keep in mind that balances are a

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>factor of sent as well as what consumers need for

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>their credit. We're gonna have to leave it there. Thank

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Needy Verma, Transunion's senior director of Research

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and Consulting, off to get a latte. This is Bloomberg

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg pien L podcast. You

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm out

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there on

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio