WEBVTT - In Conversation With Mark Goodwin of Bitcoin Magazine

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Mark Moss Show,

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>where we talk about the decentralized revolution. Of course, talk

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>about the way the world is changing through the lens

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of politics, finance, and technology, and technology being bitcoin the

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>decentralized protocol, of course, it's voice technology that changes the

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>world the most. Now I am joined today by Mark Goodwin.

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a director of print at the Bitcoin Magazine. He's

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>an author, and man, he's got some late breaking news

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that just got released this morning that I'm excited to

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>dig into because I haven't I haven't got a chance

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>to go through it yet. Anyway, Mark, thanks for joining me,

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Mark Man, thanks so much. Yeah, longtime listener, first time caller.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here. Yeah, tons of exciting stuff to

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about, and yeah, thanks so much for having me. Yeah. Now,

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, you're the director of the print

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>magazine over there at the Bitcoin Magazine, and you've written

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>some articles that I wanted to kind of talk about.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But you told me that there's some breaking news that

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>came out this morning about regulations, and so I do

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want to dig into that first. I am. You know,

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I went and made some bold predictions when you know,

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 1>the whole FTX collacts happened, and it wasn't so bold

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that the alt coin crowd, the crypto people didn't like

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it so much. But I basically said that I think

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the regulations are going to come down pretty hard and heavy.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And I said that I don't think there will be

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>another crypto Bowl run. And I talked about it as

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a category, like, of course assets will always just pump

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>and dump, but as a category, I don't see that.

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why I said that is because I

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>think I think regulations will be coming down hard. And

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>regulations come down hard, then the VC money kind of

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>goes away, and that was kind of my reasoning. And

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>now we're seeing a play out. So what were some

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of these new regulations. There's been a lot of them,

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>but were some of these ones that you just saw? Yeah, No, Mark,

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you're completely right about that the crypto bowl thesis,

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>especially with this news. So Yeah, the NYAG came out

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>today in a lawsuit against coucoin and stated that according

0:01:54.920 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to them, Ethereum, Luna and ust the Luna stable coin

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are all considered securities. You know, according to this lawsuit,

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Um that rule was released literally probably about forty five

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago. So I think you're to your point. I mean,

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>if they if all of those you know, ways to

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>issue a token are considered securities, which you know, I

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>think the howe you know, it's pretty black and white.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I think we can all you know, bitcoiners certainly look

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>at this ninety year old law and go, okay, pretty

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>black and white. If the New York Attorney General is

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out and saying, you know, these three methods of

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>distributing a token, you know, the ethico, uh this this

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>luna you know, pre mine, and then you know, pegging

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this to a stable coin, all three of these methods

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>are you know, considered securities. That has huge ramifications for

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, extended uh crypto space, if you will.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're gonna see a very big reckoning

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in that in that sense um with this news. So

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit fresh, the markets are still processing it,

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>but huge news absolutely. Now the New York New York

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 1>has they kind of have their own license called the

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>bit license. It's been around for the longest. Seems like

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>New York has been the harshest kind of regulatory agency

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of crack down against cryptocurrency. Although they do

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.399
<v Speaker 1>issue a license maybe Hawaii is still stricter, but let's

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>not dig into that. But New York has this kind

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of history of being the harsh system. So a lot

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of times exchanges weren't able to operate

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to New York customers, but they could still operate to

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the rest. So in the United States, we still have

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, states rights and things like that, and so

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>New York can kind of do that, but then maybe

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't apply to the rest of the United States.

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And so again Blockey, New York residents access to these things.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think that means? If New York

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General would declare something like a theorem, a pre

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>mind I'm sorry, a security, what effect would that have

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 1>on somebody in California or Texas. I mean, I would

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just say, it's that's a precedent. I mean, that's it's

0:03:55.040 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly important legal precedent, very influential offense to come

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>out in state something like that. I think it does

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have ramifications for the national regulatory regime regardless of states,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think you know, I think again, you know,

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>code is speech, and there's you know, it's not necessarily

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>we should be rooting for government regulation here, but when

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we're in within this jurisdiction and there's very clear laws,

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should really be surprised that this

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff is coming. But I do think it will have

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>ramifications nationally, and I think the US, you know, banking

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>system and the US economy is so important globally that

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>it will obviously have huge ramifications on the global economy

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, yeah, I do want to just kind

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of reiterate what you just said there. And you know,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>while I have said I think that regulations will stop this,

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there will be another crypto ball

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>run because of that, I am certainly not calling for regulations.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, I'm openly saying that I

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>think the SEC should just be shut down. I think

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they should shut down a disgrace. I think Gary Gensler

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>should be fired in disgrace. Their job is to protect consumers.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They've obviously failed at that job, and I don't believe

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>consumers need to be protected. I think if I can

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>buy a gambling a lottery ticket, or I can go

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>gamble in Vegas, I supple to buy whatever I want.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think they shut down. However, they're not. They're

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>here and so we have to kind of navigate the

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>world not as we want it to be, but as

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>it is. And so it's here, and so I do

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just want to state that a lot of people got

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>mad at me. I'm some status, you know, and I

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>want this to happen. It's like, no, I'm not a status.

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to happen. But but but it's here, right,

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've exactly heard that. You've heard that as well,

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think to your point, like it sets a precedent,

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so like law sort of builds on top of itself

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and they want to cite other case laws. So I

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>think to your point, it can certainly do that. What

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about I want to dig into the et ethereum one

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but what about on the I don't

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>know if you're following, and if you're not, that's fine.

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But obviously the big, big, big case, it seems like,

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>is the XRP ripple case. And I saw I didn't

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>get a dig into it, and if you did, no worries.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>But uh, something about some you know, preliminary judgment and

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they're saying maybe they might say some of the pre

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>mind might have been but you know, maybe not I

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know have you have you looked at that at all?

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean a little bit. I I definitely agree. I

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's like, you know, that case will really be

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the landmark case. I think that sort of sets um,

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, really you know, the regulatory clarity. Um. So

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>I agree, it's definitely a case to watch. I haven't

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>actually looked at. It's really hard to tell because the

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ripple marketing you know machine has has has a way

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of turning any you know, legal you know, legal output

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>into into something very bullish and very distorted and hard

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to tell what's going on there. Um, So it's a

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit hard to follow. Um. But no, I haven't.

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I haven't dug in too much recently. But um, I

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>think we're supposed to hear somewhat soon. Um. And I

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>think whenever that drops, these could be a very related

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know shoes about the fall mark. You know, I

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>think the New York AG thing is very big and obviously,

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>whenever we get clarity on the on the Ripple case, um,

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the US regulatory regime will have

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>will have made itself you know, very well well known. Yeah,

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have to think, I mean New York

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is probably the most influential state, at least in regards

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to financial situations, and so to your point, it carries

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weight. Um. The ramifications of Ethereum being

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>labeled a security, I mean, think about that, right. So

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to your point, there's a for the listeners. There's one

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred year old Howie test which was developed for put

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>together for citrus grove. So I don't know how citrus

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>trees kind of compared to this, but it's not so

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bad actually. I mean, if you look at the four ways,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>given money as an investment hoping for a return to

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a common enterprise UM, a common enterprise that has control

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>over how good the investment does things like that, UM

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>have expectation of profit. I think that's the way, Yeah,

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>an expectation of profit. What I know what they're doing.

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I had an SEC attorney on Security's attorney on a

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>few months ago and he said, actually, what what Ripple's

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is they're trying to get these consumers

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to come in and say, we didn't buy it for

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>an investment and if you and if you regulate it,

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you're going to cause us irreparable harm. And so anyway

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to kind of build that case. We didn't

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>buy it for an investment, like, yeah, right, what would

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you buy it for it? Because you can't do anything

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>with it, you know. But I want to talk about

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about a theory, but let's talk about the

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>broader implications of these companies trying to actually go along

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>with securities regulations. If they're able to do that. I

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of interesting conversation. And then, of course

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we're bitcoin people. We want to talk about bitcoin. I

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>like to think that the price is the least kind

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of interesting piece, and I like to look at the

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>development happening on it. And so I know you just

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>recently wrote a paper talking about the development on bitcoin.

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about that, and then and then

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll jump into some bigger stuff about money and stuff

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like that. If you're just tuning in you're listening to

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the Mark mos Show. We're talking about, of course, the

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>decentralized revolution. We're talking about bitcoin and the cryptocurrency market overall.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by a special guest, Mark Goodwin. He is

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the director of print editorial at Bitcoin Magazine. He's an author.

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>You can find him at Bitcoin magazine dot com. Just

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>go to the author section and check out Mark Goodwin.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna be back talking about securities, regulations, the

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>development on the bitcoin blockchain, and money from a bigger perspective.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with that and more in a minute.

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Don't go away, We'll be right back. All right, Welcome back.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>If you just tune in, you are listening to the

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Mark Mass Show. I'm joined by Mark Goodwin. He's the

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>director of print editorial Bitcoin magazine. And Mark, we are

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, this news from the New York

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>ag coming out with etherem being a security one thing

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that I had talked about and I'm just curious your

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>take on this that you know, I think it was

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>actually Jack Mollers who called this like regulatory arbitrage, right,

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>like you're trying to avoid these regulatory sanctions and they're

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of playing in that middle, and they're able to

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of make that difference because if they had to

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>file a security that's a long process. It's a very

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>expensive process. But most importantly the problem that I see,

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, these companies have a lot of money because

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they did the pre mind but if they had to

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>do full disclosures, Vitallic would have to say how many

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum he got, and how much Joseph Lubin has and

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>what the Ethereum Foundation has and what their involvement is

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and how much they control. I mean, like could they

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>even do that? And even if they even if they

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>could and they did, what would people think? Yeah, I

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>mean I highly doubt we'll ever ever ever see that,

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but uh yeah, I mean that is sort of you know,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>that's how you if you want to deal in the US,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction got to play ball and uh you know the

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Howie test is yeah, ninety years old. Um, and so

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>uh you know these folks, I think, you know, the

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>US regulatory regime you know, is not doing anything to

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>make to make the water warm to come into the

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>US right now and try to uh you know make money, right.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's they're threatening raising capital gains tax from

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent to forty percent, you know, huge billionaire tax

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is coming. All of this this big talk about you know,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to try to service this debt um

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and so what that's really going to do is just

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>further offshore you know, uh, you know investment capital in

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Uh. So I think we will see

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictional arbitrage. I mean, we've definitely already seen it. I

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>think the lack of clarity over the last you know,

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>handful of years has driven a lot of these banks

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to Bahamian Bermuda banks, you know, driven

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>them off shore, driven them to Asia. I think we'll

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to see that. That said, I think when we

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>do get some regulatory clarity, which it looks like we

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>are getting, whether or not it's what the industry at

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 1>large wants to see. Getting that clarity, I think will

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, be attractive to businesses if they have very

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>clear you know, filing disclosure, all those practices are very clear.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they will come back. So it would be

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. Now Gary Gensler, the head of the SEC,

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in the previous head of the SEC, J Clayton, we're

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>both very clear to say that bitcoin is a commodity,

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and Gary Gensler has kind of come out again saying

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is a commodity. It's the only one I'm gonna

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>say pretty much. They are all those security so they've

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of said that. So bitcoin is a is a commodity.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it doesn't have a central issue. Everybody has the

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>same opportunity to go get it. It's all fungible and

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>those are kind of the main thing. So if you

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>just stick with bitcoin, you don't have to worry about

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>all that regulatory stuff. So, UM, it's a good point. Now.

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I just got back. I was in Jackson Hole, Wyoming

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Bitcoin ski Week. Amanda Calvary put together about

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>two hundred bitcoinners came together and it was amazing. UM.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Got to spend a couple of days on the mountain

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, and it was really cool to talk about

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the development that's happening on bitcoin. And

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I know you just recently wrote a paper, UM talking

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>about that, talking about these ordinals. Now, at first glance,

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>or maybe the initial buzz was that, oh NFTs on bitcoin. UM,

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>give us, give us kind of a high level on

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>on these ordinals. What you're thinking about that? Yeah, totally. UM.

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Well it's a really interesting project. UM. It's definitely super controversial,

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>which I totally understand why. UM. But more or less

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it breaks down into, you know, kind of two parts.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>It's created by another Bay Area bitcoiner out here, Casey

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote a more there's kind of two parts to the project. UM.

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>The sort of this idea of ordinal theory of sort

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of like uh, you know, looking at satoshi's on an

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>individual issuance level, like a serial number, um, arbitrarily uh

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you know, imbuing value to it based

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>on a sentimental reason of some reaction to the number

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>or you know when it was found, when that block

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 1>was mined, you know, when this setoshi was issued. So

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of part of it is this this sort

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of arbitrary index of looking at how setoshi's are issued

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and then distributed within a transaction. So it's just kind

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of an interesting way to look at the at the network.

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And then the second part of it, which I think

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is kind of more of the controversial part, is the inscriptions.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's this new tooling that takes advantage of the

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>witness data. With the block sized increase in twenty seventeen

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was segment and then tap root came out a couple

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of years ago and increased some standardness bounds, so basically

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed you know, this tooling to exist where you can

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>inscribe arbitrary data into a Bitcoin transaction. That data is

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>stored in the witness data, not in the actual transaction

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>action data. UM and uh, yeah, it allows people to

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>create basically immutable data, um, if they want to pay

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for it, if they want to pay the fee. So yes,

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>some people are using it to put monkey JPEGs on

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the chain, which is you know, it's either a valid

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>transaction or an invalid transaction. That's bitcoin, right, UM, not

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the use case I would necessarily use it for. Right.

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But then you are seeing people storing you know, bannable files.

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>We have STL files, three D printing files. We got

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the Yankee Google out in there. We're seeing text, bannable texts.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The Bible was inscribed to King James version, the whole.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of interesting use cases in that arbitrary

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>data beyond the traditional kind of NFT wash trading stuff

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen from kind of the the ethereum ecosystem. So

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they can put the whole Bible on there, oh yeah, wow,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of I think they split it up into

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think five parts. But yeah, you know you could

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>store up to four megabytes, um, you know, up to

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the full block size. UM. So you can fit a

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of text in four megabytes. Yeah, I mean that's incredible.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I you know, at first it was like the j

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the jpeg thing, right, and which which never made sense

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to me in the first place, because it doesn't make

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>sense to take a physical object and then try to

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>match it to something digital. You know. Um, of course

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't make sense to me. But there is information,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>digital information that is very valuable that does need to

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>be protected. Um. It makes me think of that movie

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Fahrenheit I think four fifty one, right where they went

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>around and burned all the books, yeah, which which sounds

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>actually very similar to where we're at, where the whole

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>world had the civil war, and so to prevent the

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>war from a civil war from ever happening again, they

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>got rid of all the information. There was just one

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>arbitrare of truth and everyone just believed the same thing.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>There would be no war, which sounds sort of like

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>where we're going, and so we can see it sounds

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like where we are, my friend, I think we've been

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>there for a bit, where we're burning books and banning

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>platforms and deep platforming everybody left and right. Um, so

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's an absolute need for immutable truth. Uh.

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, bitcoin is a database, you know, we

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>love it as this economic force, and of course it

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is that, and that will always be its main you know,

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it's main principle. It's a main it's main function, but

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it is a database. And uh, you know, if someone

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>wants to pay uh, and they think imbuing this data

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's notes for eternity, um, you know is worth

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>is worth the fee then uh, you know, that's their

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>right to do it. And you know, I think we'll

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>see some interesting use cases. I think it's been there's

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>been a lack of creativity at the immediate We sort

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of there was a big just copying of this culture

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that existed before. Um. I'm excited to see new culture

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>arise from it. Um. It's interesting. Yeah, yeah, yeah, man,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to dig into some of some of this.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple questions here. But if you're just

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show. Of course,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about each and every week the decentralized revolution,

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and I am joined by Mark Goodwin. He's the director

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of print editorial at Bitcoin Magazine, and we are talking

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>about this new development on the bitcoin blockchain that's not

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>just money, it's a database. As he said, we're gonna

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about the good, the bad, and where this goes

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and the bigger topic of money. So we'll be back

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with all that and more in a minute. You don't

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>want to go in away. This is going to be

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>an important conversation. We'll be right back. All right, Welcome back.

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>If you're just tuning in, you are listening to the

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark Moss Show. We're talking about bitcoin. We're talking about

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the development on bitcoin, and I'm joined by Mark Goodwin,

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the director of print editorial at Bitcoin Magazine. And you know,

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one thing I was thinking of when you were talking

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and when I first saw the ordinals Mark, was that

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>my first thought. I kind of had this like knee

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>jerk reaction, which is, like, why don't we just leave

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin alone? You see what happened? You put the tap

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>root in and then the law of unintended consequences kicks

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in and now we have this thing going on. And

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of my knee jerk reaction to it. It, um,

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then I'm starting to think, well, I

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>guess let's just see how the the free market, you know,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>works itself out. What were your thoughts or where are

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you at with it? You know? And yeah, I think

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm with you, Um, you know, uh, I

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously I'm you know, I'm a believer in censorship resistant money. UM.

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm also a believer in the consensus and rules of bitcoin.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm a bitcoiner. Uh. None of those things

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have been violated UM by this new tooling UM. But

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I think there has been a

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>really big knee dric reaction to it. UM, you know,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>because this ultimately isn't the main you know, purpose of

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin UM. But I think the the you know, the

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>free market, or maybe more more specifically, the fee market

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>UM is ultimately going to uh you know sort of

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, be the curator of of what comes next. UM.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.479
<v Speaker 1>And And just when you look at it from an

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>economic standpoint, this idea of you know, it's like anyone

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.239
<v Speaker 1>could always have spammed the blockchain forever and bought up

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>every block, and you know, of course someone wants to

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>waste all their bitcoin doing that. You know, of course,

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>go for it. Sure that block space was always available

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>to be purchased. But when you're doing inscriptions, UH, you know,

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to buy a full block, you want to

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you want to inscribe a substantial amount of data, you know,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>above like three megabytes or something, UM, that gets incredibly expensive.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>And when there's a dynamic fee market. You know, a

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>ten x and fees when you're paying fifty cents for

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a transaction, is you know, that's not that's okay. You

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>know you can kind of handle that when you're paying

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars to buy a whole block. You know,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a ten x increase, one hundred x increase and a

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>dynamic fee uh you know sat per v byte UM

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that becomes incredibly you know, it just doesn't scale at all. Um.

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no economic reason incentive to do that. Um. And

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>so this fear I think of, you know, bloating or

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>spamming the blockchain, I think just really doesn't economically play out.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So but you know, we'll see, we'll see how it goes.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>The men pool has been insane lately. You know, we've

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten almost like half a gig up there today, so

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of transactions, like fifty thousand transactions

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 1>in the men pool. So, you know, we'll see how

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it all plays out. But I think in the long

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>term it's very unsustainable. Yeah. Now, one thing I like

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to think about in terms of Bitcoin I talk about

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>all the time is is a technological revolution are different

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>than technologies the technology like an iPhone, you took a

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>phone and computer, you put them together. Cool technological revolutions

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>change the course of humanity. So we had five right

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Industrial revolution, steam engines and the railways, electricity and steel, oil, automobiles,

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the microprocessor. And what I think about when

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I think about those, I think about each one of

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>those gave us new sets of building blocks that allowed

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>us to build new things that we had no idea

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because we had no idea because we didn't have the

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>building blocks. So like steel, for example, or let's say,

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like electricity, there's a first killer application. So the light

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>bulb was the first killer application of electricity. So it

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was designed, it was invented, it was created to give

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>us electricity, but of course it became used for way

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>more than that. And so like steel was so we

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>can get a higher we could build a higher building,

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>right or a bridge. We didn't know we'd have space

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>shuttle one day. And so when I think about bitcoin,

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like obviously Satoshi Nakamoto in the Bitcoin white Paper said

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's a peer to peer electronic cash, and that's

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what it was designed for. But it's a new set

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of building blocks that allows us to build all types

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of new things that maybe aren't what the original creator

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>intended them for, right, And so we have this censorship

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>resistant database, you know if you call it that, a

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>time chains as he called it. And what can we

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>do with that? Well, certainly money is the killer application,

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>but like what Jack Dorsey's kind of Web five, we're

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like hashing a decentralized identifier I D into it. Well,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's interesting. We didn't think about that now, like

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>an ordinal subscription, which to your point of NFT seems

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of silly, but certainly throughout history putting a Bible

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in there could have been very beneficial. Or three D

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>printed guns would be very powerful in a country where

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you need it. So do you kind of look at

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>it like that? Like maybe it grows out of you know,

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>money being the first killer application, but now it's like

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>building block we can build all these new things on.

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean one hundred percent, yeah, absolutely, I mean it's

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the Internet of money. It is a database, it is

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>an economic you know, unbelievable force, and that is it's

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know again major principle layer one. But yeah,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's so many applications you can build when

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a you know, a database system that economically

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>incentivizes you to retain the immutability of the chain and

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>propagate it to everybody and propagate transactions. You know, there's

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>an economic incentive of storing those gigabytes on your node,

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, there's an that's an interesting

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>angle to the ordinal story is that it's sort of

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a psy op to get all of these coiners to

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>run full nodes right here they are. They have economic

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>incentive to never prune the witness data because that's where

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>all their precious JPEGs are. So you know, we've seen

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>thousands of nodes spin up in the last six weeks

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because of tooling. Yeah, we're seeing a huge increase in

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>node count. And again, all of these people are economically

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>incentivized to store that data forever. So it's an interesting wrinkle.

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, bitcoin teaches us so much, we're all

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of I like to look at it as a database,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, but also, you know a game. You know,

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's this big economic game playing out everywhere. Nation states

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are playing, central banks are playing an individuals, sovereign individuals

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>alike or playing and it really it's these rules are

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>just as much playing us as we're playing them. And

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is just another interesting wrinkle where the

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>protocol has evolved via tooling UM. And now we have

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole different set of users that are upholding this

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>system that we all want to see the world uphold

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for you know, sound economic reasons, and they're doing it

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>for a completely different reason, um, but they're achieving the

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>same goal of you know, network security. UM. So yeah,

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is a is a living thing, uh, and it's

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>really not about us, and it's use case will always

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>be determined by the market. And right now there's a

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>market for that stuff, um, and an economic incentive to

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, do do what's best for the network. So

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>also I also think about you know being you know,

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the first killer at being money. But then what is money? Right?

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Robert Breedlove as a podcast all he does talk about

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>what is money? Right, Like what is money? And everyone

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>thinks they understand, Oh, you know, I got my wallet

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>right here, I got a dollar bill in there, I

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>got money in my bank, and we think we know

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 1>what money is. But really what is money is a

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>very deep and profound question to ask. And if you

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>were to say, well, money is just communication, money communicates value, right, well,

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>then so would the Bible or three D printed gun

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>schematics be value as well. So if all money does, right,

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>if you boil it down, like if you think about it, well,

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>instead of having a dollar bill, I have a sat

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>or you know, a fraction of a bitcoin and I

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>transfer that to make payment. But if you think about

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>it from a bigger angle where money is actually just

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>communication and there's all different types. And if you think

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>about that, like think about how even communication has changed.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine if you went back to the eighties, Well, information,

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, I guess there's books, you know,

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I have the library. I can go to the library

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>and I get there's you know, three nightly news channels

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and two morning new paper newspapers. That's information Today. A

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>kid on a beach and VG can post a picture

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and I get all that information of what the weather's like,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>what the waves are like. Right, And so even what

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we know is information change. So I think what we

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>think of communication and value is going to change. And

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>so it's fun to think about. Although humans are no

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>good at imagine in the future, because all we can

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think about is better versions of what we have today.

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Without those building blocks, we don't know where those things

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 1>will go. I want to get into a little bit

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of a bigger conversation. We'll get into the dollar itself

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and what we consider money as today. Anyway, if you're

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moshow. Of course,

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the decentralized revolution, talking about how the

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>world is changing mostly through the lens of politics, finance,

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and technology, and the technology is bitcoin. I'm joined by

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Goodwin, director of print editorial at Bitcoin Magazine, and

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we are going to come back and we'll talk from

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>a higher level. We'll talk about the bitcoin and the

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar and what the future holds with that. So it's

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a fun conversation. You don't want to miss it.

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with that and more in a minute.

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't go away, We'll be right back. All right, Welcome back.

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>If you just tune in, you are listening to the

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Mark Moss Show talking about bitcoin with Mark Goodwin. He

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is the director of print editorial Bitcoin magazine. You should

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely check it out Bitcoin magazine dot com and uh man,

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>We've covered a lot. If you've missed any of it,

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna go back and repeat it, but you

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>can catch it on the podcast. Just search the Mark

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Mos show on the podcast or go to the Market

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Disruptors YouTube channel and you can watch it on demand

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>over there. Um, you know, Mark, I know, you wrote

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>another article albeit a while ago, talking about, um, you know,

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin dollar as you called it, and you were

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>referencing it kind of in reference to the Petro dollar,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>where the dollar has been backed by you know, by

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia and the petro or the oil that they have,

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they're basically pricing everything in dollars, and I think you

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>were kind of comparing that to like this bitcoin dollar.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you frame that up for a little bit. Yeah, no,

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you did a great job. Yeah, it's it's

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of an allegory to the petro dollars. So this

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>idea that you know, the US, in order to fight

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>inflationary effects of an increased monetary supply from the Nixon

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Shock at seventy one going off the gold standard, they

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, did a whole bunch of military imperialism in

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East and established an economic monopoly on petrol

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and oil and basically created a a you know, a

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>furnace to shove all of this you know, dollar demand.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Because all of these industrial nations in Asia and Europe,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, needed needed oil, so they were able to

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of offshore their debt and inflationary effects. M. And

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so the argument now, this kind of this thesis, and

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I've expanded it actually into a book that's coming out

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>called the Bitcoin Dollar, sort of this idea that the

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>US government is actually incentivized due to this runaway debt

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>service you know, inflation that's happening, UM to find a

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>demand elastic commodity and energy commodity uh to to peg

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>itself too. And so we're seeing right now sort of

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a recreation of that mechanism of on ramps and off

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ramps to bitcoin being predominantly US dollar denominated, huge USD pairings,

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, huge volume on these USD pairings for bitcoin UM.

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, strong majority of of of volume is coming

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>from you know KYC, you know dollar account inputs. UM.

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's sort of the argument that, you know, there's

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>an economic incentive for you know, the US to tether

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>themselves uh to uh to bitcoin UM. And I think

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing now with this regulatory regime and this

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>post FTX sort of stable coin war, UM. You know,

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the kingmakers being made. Um, we're seeing the

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>regulatory regime sort of choosing who gets to be the

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>issuers of these, you know, the oncoming billions and billions,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>if not trillions of stable coins that will be issued

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>when you know, private banks start buying US treasuries and

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>start issuing stable coins. So I really think the dollar

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin are going to be the huge players, certainly,

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the rest of the year and probably

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the decade, and possibly even even

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than that. Um, So I'm really

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the dollar, learning a lot about it, and yeah,

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think bitcoin and the dollar are just very strange bedfellows.

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And uh yeah, there's a lot, a lot to dig

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>into there for sure. Yeah, it's interesting. I covered earlier

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the story that you know, everybody kind of in the

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin community is kind of freaking out because the US

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, is potentially looks like they're about to go

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>dump a bunch of bitcoin into the market. They trend

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they had a billion dollars worth of bitcoin that they

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>transferred over to uh coin base coin base wallets and

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the government wallets as well, and so investors

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are thinking that they're probably gonna go dump that, which

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>historically they haven't done that. They've sold it off in

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>auctions and no smart seller whatever go just dump that

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>into the market anyway, unless they potentially wanted to come down.

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's probably not the case. But then I was

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>looking up some of the but you know, we don't

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>know for sure, but some of the government other government's

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>holdings of bitcoin, and the US government has quite a

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of bitcoin on the books, but some nations like

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>China look like they have like two hundred thousand bitcoin

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on their books, and it's sort of like kind of like, uh, well,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Jason Laurie has been talking about, you know, the strategic

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>interests of a nation to acquire bitcoin. I think he's

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about it more from a mining standpoint, but that's

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>more of a on its books. I saw Bitcoin Magazine

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>had Bitcoin Magazine on Twitter had put out something about

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the by dead Men proposing a thirty percent tax on

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>electricity used for bitcoin mining. So I don't know which

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>way they want to go here. It's like, on one hand,

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it would make sense to have it control it even

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe if there's a small chance it takes off,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should kind of have it. But I mean

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>if they put a thirty percent tax on it, I mean,

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to go overseas again somewhere, right. I

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the economic interest, right or it or it

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>allows you know them to create uh, you know, loopholes

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the companies and personnel and DC interest.

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You know. Again, this is the US dollar system is

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all about retaining purchasing economy and making as much money

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for the contillionaires as possible. I mean, that's we've seen

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this time and time again anytime there's debt issues or

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation issues up up pops of war, uprises, taxes, uh,

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, And here we are, and we're at actually

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of an economic breaking point where now are just

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the interest on our debt service in a year is

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>now actually over our military spending. So we're actually spending

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>more money to pay for our dollar than we are

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay for the military. That's you know, holding up

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the dollar theoretically. So we're in sort of uncharted territories.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>We're a road runner that's run off the cliff. So yeah,

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll see who gets made king and who gets to

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of run the retail CBDC. I guess, yeah, I

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really thought about it like that. I mean, and

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously I should have, but I mean to your point, right,

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's king making you said that earlier, picking and choosing winners.

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So everybody has to pay a thirty percent tax except

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for you guys over here. You don't have to or

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to sort of a thing, so that

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that could be interesting, you know. But to the point

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that you made too about running kind of the government

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>off the cliff, it's like the FED is trying to well,

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>not trying to do. They have raised rates higher and

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>faster than in time in history, trying to crush inflation.

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But they haven't been able to crush inflation, but they

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have managed to crush the government, and the government's broke.

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:55.919
<v Speaker 1>And of the thirty one and a half tillion dollars

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of debt, thirty percent of that has to be refinanced

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in the next year at the new rates. Fifty percent

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of it has to be refinanced in the next three

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>years at the new rate, and so that's going to

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>push the interest payments up. You know, who knows in

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the in the it's right now an average of one

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent that would put it. You know, it's

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>different different rates at different maturities, but it pushes it

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>between a three and a half to a five and

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>a half percent number, which could potentially take us from

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>about a nine hundred trillion dollars I'm sorry, nine hundred

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of interest expense to one point eight trillion

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>yep an interest expense. And that's a big problem, yep.

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, we're bitcoiners, you know, compounding annual

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 1>growth rate, you know, a little kgar. You don't want

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that running running wild and your debt, you know, so,

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly what's happening. So yeah, to your point,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know we're gonna have to deal with

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that mathematical reality. Um, I don't know when that will happen,

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.959
<v Speaker 1>but obviously we will need to create money to pay

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that debt. There's no way we can make enough off

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 1>tax receipts. Even with the insanity of the capital gains

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>threats that they're saying in the last couple of days,

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they won't even come close. So printing will have to

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.240
<v Speaker 1>come at some point. You know, we'll see what happens

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>till we get there, but it's going to be a

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>hell of a red Yeah. Well, and the other problem

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the expense column is going up, right, the

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>interest on the DAD is going up. The spending is

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>also going up, but the tax receipts are going down.

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So to your point, they want to put in all

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>these new tax things because the tax treets are going

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 1>down because the FED is crushing demand by making everybody poor,

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and then everyone's poor, so then there's no taxes and

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>then the tax So in California corporate tax shereets are

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>down twenty percent. Statewide is down forty percent. In the

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>US it's down nine percent. That's a big drop. And

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>then I saw this chart last week I was looking

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>at and it showed no matter what the tax rate is,

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the government typically gets the taxes to come out to

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>about nineteen percent of GDP. So tax rates up, tax

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>rates down, the share is about the same. So the

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>goal should try to be to get the GDP bigger,

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>not just the taxhare bigger. But it's going to be

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see how that plays out. If you're just

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>tune in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, of

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>course each and every week, talking about the decentralized Revolution.

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking to Mark Goodwin, he's the director of

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Print editorial at Bitcoin Magazine. Definitely check that out Bitcoin

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>magazine dot com. Give him a follow on Twitter at

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Goodwin Underscore I n of course I'm at one,

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Mark Moss. That's what we got for today. Hopefully enjoyed

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it shoot as much. Let me know thanks for listening.