WEBVTT - US Mortgage Rates Fall Again, Israel Widens War

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple CarPlay and then broid Auto with the

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>And let's get more on housing store Paul us Economists

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>with Bloomberg Economics. It joins us now. So those mortgage apps,

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>let's start there for a second, up eleven percent. So

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 2>talk to about the refinancing that we saw here, because

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say refinancing with a six handle. That does

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 2>surprise me. I thought we would have waited until we

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>got a lease down to the fives.

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting. So there are folks who just had to

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 3>buy homes, they had to make moves for jobs, They

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 3>had to end up taking out mortgages over seven percent,

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>and those folks now have the opportunity to refly, right,

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, mortgage rates are now down about one hundred

0:00:55.920 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 3>and fifty basis points from the high post COVID even

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 3>just in the last month, or down about thirty basis points.

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>So for folks who bought a home because they had

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 3>to post COVID, there is some more enthusiasm about refinancing

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>if you unpack mortgage backed securities. Though overall, and this

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 3>is totally to your points, Alex, the average rate being

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 3>paid on existing homes, the average rate being paid by

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 3>homeowners is still a touch under four percent, so there

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>is still more room to run for refinancing. This I

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>think is probably, you know, just a little bit of

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 3>enthusiasm for folks who had to take out those long

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 3>term mortgages when rates were significantly higher than they are today.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting because we were just talking about KB Home.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Even though it's down today. Xhb's the ETF that tracks

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 4>the home building index, it's still up trading around records,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 4>up around twenty eight percent year to date to outpacing

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 4>the broader SMP five hundred. But Bank of America actually

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 4>was talking about how in the three months before and

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 4>after the Fed cuts rates, homebuilder stocks have outperformed the

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 4>S and P five hundred and three of the last

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 4>five period. So wondering what particular level when it comes

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>to say mortgage rates, when you're because you're obviously covering

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 4>this very closely, do you feel like you'll see more

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 4>consumers come back in to try to refinance.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's a little bit tricky when you're thinking about

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 3>home builders versus when you're thinking about refinancing, right, because

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>you have a few different dynamics that are at play.

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>For people like people like Alex or people like me

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 3>who have low mortgage rates that are locked in, you're

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>not gonna end up seeing a rush to refinancing.

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, we saw a rate to move is quite high.

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Your hurdle rate, well, your hurdle rate to move is

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 3>like close to four yeah, right, So there's still a

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 3>a there's still a ton of room to run if

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>you think about home builders though, because nobody's rushing to refinance,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>because nobody's rushing to move if they're an existing homeowner

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 3>because they've locked in that low rate, there is room

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 3>for home builders to sort of fill the gap for

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 3>new households that are being formed, young people who are

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>trying to buy their first home.

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 4>And like lack of inventory that was such a big

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 4>problem even before COVID, but then was exacerbated so much

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 4>that obviously that they were able to pick up that

0:02:59.600 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 4>side of it.

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Extraordinary lack of inventory, especially for existing homes for sale.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 3>The thing that I find shocking, and you'll probably have

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 3>more color on this. For home builders in particular, there

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 3>is still just a massive inventory of new homes new

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 3>construction and units that are currently under construction that are

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 3>available for sale. I mean levels unseen since early two

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>thousand and eight, when housing was obviously frothy. So that's

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 3>one thing that we have. These two forces that are

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>diverging for new homebuilders. One is just this earth of

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 3>existing homes for sale, but you do have this mounting

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>inventory of new homes for sale that I think is

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>going to keep home prices new home prices under pressure

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>for quite some time.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Which also spakes a question like the transmission policy mechanism

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>from the FED, when you have sort of these structural

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 2>issues that have nothing to do with what the FED

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>actually does, and that's an interesting sort of dynamic.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 3>There was an early there was a question, maybe it

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 3>was in the March press conference JPL March press conference

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>following the FOMC meeting, where somebody asked, they said, look,

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 3>you cut rates to the bone during COVID, everybody refines

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>sub four percent, and now the transmission of monetary policy

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 3>while you're trying to tighten rates is really really slow.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you regret doing that? And he basically said, no regrets,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, I mean interest rate policy has been moving

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>very very slowly through the real economy. Housing is the

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 3>number one sector for monetary policy and rates policy to

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 3>move into the real economy. Instead, you're seeing communication tools

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 3>moving into financial markets actually really quickly. The second somebody

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 3>shows their hand just a little bit, you see a

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>monster move in two your eelds, for example. So different

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>policy tools moving at different speeds into different parts of

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>the economy.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting. All right, Thank you so much, Stewart,

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. Stuart Paul Us economists with Bloomberg Economics.

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 4>On that.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am EAS. You're on applecar Play and

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>androuid Otto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to take a moment here and get dive

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 2>into geopolitics to take a look at what's happening with

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Israel and Hesbela. Israel stepping up its heaviest air attacks

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 2>on Hesbela targets in Lebanon since two thousand and six,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 2>after shooting down the first missile ever fired by the

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>militant group at Tel Aviv. Joining us now in studio

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 2>is Bobby Gosh, Bloomberg News Senior editor. Bobby, can you

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 2>walk us through the sequence of events in the recent

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>week that got us here and what things you're looking

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 2>at over the next day forty eight twenty four hours.

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it started, you remember with those those pages that

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 5>went off, the thousands of pages exploded, most of them

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 5>belonging to hesbe law operatives and fighters. The suspicion is

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 5>that Israel was responsible for them. Israel as neither confirmed

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 5>nor denied it, which is there very much in the

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 5>Israeli m A. The following day there was a whole

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 5>bunch of walkie talkies, again many of them belonging to

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Hisbellah commanders and fighters, that went off. Israel also then

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 5>began targeted attacks against top level Hisbella commanders, the types

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 5>of people who would be very important in the event

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 5>of an all out war between Hesbellah and Israel. Simultaneously,

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Israel has been essentially attacking targets across its borders with Lebanon,

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 5>specifically targeting missile bases, rocket launching facilities. It's all designed

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 5>to reduce Hisbellah's ability to strike at Israeli targets. Israel

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 5>says that the objective is to allow Israelis who had

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 5>been living close to the border and who for many

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 5>months now were forced to leave their homes. It's that

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 5>this entire campaign is designed to allow those Israelis to

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 5>go back to their homes and live in relative peace.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 5>But depending on how you want to look at it,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 5>this can also seem like an attempt to soften up

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Hezbelah for a larger campaign by Israel, whether that is

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 5>a ground campaign or a campaign from the air. It

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 5>can't give that impression.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 4>What has the Biden administration said about these latest earstrikes?

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Because I know that Joe Biden just gave his final

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 4>address to the UN General Assembly this week.

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, the Biden administration for months and months now has

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 5>been saying pretty much the same thing. On the one hand,

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 5>it continuously repeats the chiboulette that Israel has a right

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 5>to defend itself as it does, but at the same

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 5>time it says that Israel should not escalate tensions in

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 5>the region with its neighbors, and it has been warning

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 5>against the risk of a larger war that will draw

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 5>in Iran, which is Hisbella's main patron, which might draw

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 5>in the United States. The problem is, of course, that

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 5>all of that rhetoric from the Biden administration does not

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 5>seem to be moving the needle. Prime Minister Natanya, who

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 5>of Israel, seems to be operating on his own agenda,

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 5>pursuing his own interests and paying almost no heed at

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 5>all to the American president, which is not a good

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 5>look for the United States.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I thought it was so interesting because as we

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 2>were President Biden was speaking yesterday at the UN, we

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>were also getting headlines on the terminal about Netanyahu and

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>some things saying he was saying that was not peace

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and unity and ending the.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 4>War in Gaza.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>So it was very striking. What do you think, how

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.599
<v Speaker 2>do you think the election impacts this in terms of

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 2>what Hesbal and Israel are thinking with six weeks to

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of go.

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a school of thought in Israel and in

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 5>some quarters in this country that Bibi Natnia was holding

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 5>out for the election, that he's not going to change

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 5>tech until there's an election. Until there's a new president

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 5>in the United States. And according to this school of thought,

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 5>he's betting on Donald Trump to return to the to

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 5>the presidency on the assumption that Donald Trump will be

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 5>more permissive and allow him a freer hand. I don't

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 5>buy that, for one thing, more permissive than what It's

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 5>not like Biden has really been restraining that Yahoo, There's

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 5>only been rhetorical attempts at restraining him. That that's not working.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 5>And also I don't think necessarily that Donald Trump wants

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 5>to come to the office with a major conflict in

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 5>the Middle East to deal with. Remember, the big part

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 5>of his message to his voter base is America first.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 5>The United States should not get involved too much in

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 5>foreign affairs, should get out of the old conflicts, particularly

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 5>in the Middle East. So if that is indeed bb

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Netniaho's calculus that Donald Trump would be better for him

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 5>than Biden, I think he may have to calculate again.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Such a pleasure to talk to you. You are always

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 2>such a great reporter and you definitely help paint a

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>picture for us. Bobby Goes Bloomberg, new senior editor, joining

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>us on the latest between Hesbula Israel, as well as Goza.

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on fo Cardplay and then

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>broyd Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Alex d alongside Jun Tuck Gerndis Menon. Paul Sweeni

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 2>is off today. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio and we

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 2>are broadcasting to live from Interactive Broker Studio right here

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 2>in Midtown Manhattan where Gridlock reigns. Want to get a

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 2>take on the market.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Nothing's going on, so it's a good time to kind

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 2>of recalibrate. What do you do as yields kind of

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>come down the back end, though still stays a little

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 2>bit higher. How do you position yourself for that when

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>tech also is still outperforming. Nancy Dowd, a private wealth

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>advisor at Americpriz Financial and CEO of Opus, joins us

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 2>now to discuss her take on the markets. Nancy, we've

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of gotten through a seminal moment with the Fed.

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>How do you need to rethink what your portfolio looks like?

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 6>So it was a big surprise.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 7>We all bet on a quarter of a point cut,

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 7>but I guess the FED decided to frontload the rate cuts,

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 7>although overall the plan is still the same is to

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 7>you know, to get to a certain target or by

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 7>three percent by midyear twenty twenty six. So it was

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 7>a bit of an enigma as to why they front

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 7>loaded this rate cut, But in digging deeper in the details,

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 7>the justification really had to do largely with the inflation

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 7>numbers not being quite where they really want them to be,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 7>at least two out of the three that they watch,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 7>and also the employment numbers are weakening, and that gave

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of concern to the FED, so they

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 7>just cut more aggressively. So now this is what we're

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 7>dealing with. And I think the biggest impact was mortgage

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 7>mortgage applications. I think that's probably the biggest impact in

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 7>the last two weeks.

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 4>So what do you think the playbook is as far

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 4>as what you're advising clients to buy, what you're advising

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 4>them to sell, because traditionally, I mean, every rate cutting

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 4>cycle can be very different, but normally you would see

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 4>safe for instance, bond proxy sectors like utilities outperform and

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 4>tech underperform. The first six months after rate cut. But

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 4>you've already had sectors like utilities taking off a lot

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 4>of that's tied to the AI store and this sector

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 4>is the second best performer in the S and P

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 4>five hundred so far this year. So where do you

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 4>put your money.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, if you're fully invested, clearly stay the course. But

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 7>I think that the reaction over the last six weeks

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 7>and certainly over the last two weeks is way overdone

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 7>in the stock market, and I would err on the

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 7>side of caution that I think we are probably due

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 7>for a pullback or even a correction or more. It

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 7>wouldn't be so unreasonable at this time because it's this

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 7>is just overdone.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 4>So would you use them to add to you know,

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:09.119
<v Speaker 4>use that as a buying opportunity.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 7>Well, yeah, absolutely, that's the best time because longer term

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 7>prospects obviously are very good. So if there is this

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 7>correction or pull back, it's a grand opportunity to buy

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 7>in or rebalanced, reconsolidate how you're allocated according to your

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 7>timeframe and your risk tolerance. But certainly the sectors that

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 7>you mentioned are very attractive. You know, defensive stocks will

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 7>be a good play right now, such as materials, industrials, utilities.

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 7>The big enigma really is energy. You know, I still

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 7>look into energy, but the big enigma has been why,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 7>with all the geopolitical risk that we are experiencing, and

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 7>more and more so in the last week or so,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 7>why energy is down. That's a enigma, but I would

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:02.599
<v Speaker 7>I would still buy it.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 2>When you take a look at, say, if you don't

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 2>get the draw down, one part of that story is like, hey,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 2>there's over six million dollars sitting in money market funds

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 2>that belong somewhere. Does it go into the equity market,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 2>does it go into the bond market? Do you think

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>that that is part of this story that we're going

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 2>to see?

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, clearly, broader diversification is highly indicated at this time.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 7>When you're too concentrated in one sector, you feel the

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 7>volatility and the pullback will be felt significantly more, especially

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 7>in the technology sector because that tends to be significantly

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 7>more volatile. But diversification is very good right now, especially

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 7>in the fixed income side, still maintaining shorter durations because

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 7>it's still very iffy with the rate cuts. And I

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 7>do believe that the geopolitical risk is just being ignored

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 7>and is not factored into the market, and when that

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 7>does happen, it could be significant.

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 4>I know that you've previously used a four percent inflation

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 4>assumption in your financial plans the past few decades. I'm

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 4>sure just given where the dynamic inflation was prior to COVID,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 4>maybe your clients didn't appreciate it as fully until recent years.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 4>But with inflation have been closer to that two percent target.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 4>How does that impact how you construct your portfolio models.

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Is that something that you'll still include or are you

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 4>going to adjust that now?

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 7>No, I will not be adjusting it because by using

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 7>a more conservative inflation rate it has really helped my

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 7>clients achieve their outcomes much better. Because remember, you know,

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 7>the overall inflation rate is not the same as the

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 7>day to day inflation rate. I'm talking about food, gas, electricity,

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 7>and heat, which is these are the non negotiables of

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 7>everyday living. You may give up buying, going to go

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 7>around out to eat, to travel, or discretionary spending, but

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 7>you're never going to give up food, gas, and electricity.

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 7>So these are the things that matter the most, and

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 7>in fact, those are the things that go up the

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 7>most over the last three to four decades that I've

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 7>been advising clients.

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, thank you very much, and see we really

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>appreciate Nancy Dawd joining US private wealth advisor at Maryripri's

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Financial and CEO of Opus. On the markets.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We cover all the top

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>news in business, economics and finance. And right now in

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 2>New York City, what's happening is you have the You

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 2>and General Assembly, and you have Climate Week. So the

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 2>benefit is we get a lot of companies now coming

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>in that are involved in the energy transition. Then we

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>get to talk to them about the really cool stuff

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>that they're doing. And one of them is a company

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 2>called a MSc. Now you just look at a chart

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 2>of its market cap. Over the last five years, it

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 2>went for about two hundred million dollars to now almost

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a billion dollars. It's been a tremendous rise.

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 4>It stocks up one hundred and sixteen percent year to date.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 2>What does it do? I'm not really sure. It's called

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 2>American Superconductor Corporation or CEO is here to break it

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 2>all down for us. Dan McGann joining us. All right, Daniel,

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 2>what do you guys do? Break it down?

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 8>We basically provide resiliency equipment for the grid. Today, we

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 8>help bring more renewables onto the grid and we have

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 8>a nascent business that's starting to grow pretty rapidly supporting

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 8>ships in the fleet to protect them from harm's way.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 2>So do you like make the stuff that helps a

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 2>solar farm plug into the grid?

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 8>Are you like we're the big equipment that sits on

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 8>the grid that allows that power to be able to

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 8>come on and make sure it harmonizes with the grid

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 8>in the way that the grid can accept it and

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 8>take it.

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 2>There's been a shortage of this stuff, right, like a

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 2>huge backlog and shortage of the stuff that you make.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we just had a record quarter where we delivered

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 8>new orders about one hundred and twenty seven million. Just

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 8>to put it in context, we're about one hundred and

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 8>forty six for the entire year. We grew last quarter

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 8>thirty percent versus the year ago period, and we just

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 8>guide it for thirty percent growth quarter on quarter, so

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 8>we're kind of hitting it out of the park on

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 8>all levels right now.

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 4>And you've also made some recent acquisitions. I read about

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 4>how and WL. It's a private company based in New

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Jersey that provides power supplies in industrial and military customers.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 4>But then also you're getting into the wind turbine electrical

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 4>control systems with some recent deals as well. So how

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 4>much do you expect those types of deals to help

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 4>bolster your revenue growth moving forward?

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we think that the backlog continues to grow. I

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 8>think we went up from about one forty last quarter

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 8>to about one sixty for the twelve month backlog. Total

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 8>backlog for all time is even higher than probably two

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 8>hundred or so, so we're in well positioned to kind

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 8>of grow quarter on quarter here. That's what we just

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 8>updated our guidance for the current quarter, which we'll end

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 8>here in a week or so, and we think we're

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 8>well positioned. I mean, the past year has been fantastic

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 8>for us. We went from being really excited about reaching

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 8>thirty million per quarter on a revenue basis to now

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 8>we just goid it to fifty, So the business is

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 8>really taking off. It's very healthy, and then the backlog

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 8>is very deep along all product lines.

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 2>What's the biggest constraint that you have in delivering the

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>key product that everyone needs to then connect.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 3>To the grid.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 8>I think if you'd asked me that question a couple

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 8>of years ago, I would say supply chain was part

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 8>of it, just to be able to deal with the speed.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 8>Now it's really we're scaling, we're scaling production, we're hiring,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 8>So it's really typical type business challenges on how do

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 8>you manage that growth and how do you remain effective

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 8>for your customers as you grow?

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 4>And what are some of the top questions or concerns

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 4>you're actually hearing from your customers at this point. What

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 4>do you think that tells us about the direction of

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 4>the economy.

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 8>I think the good signs we've seen as we've seen

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 8>lead times on our pum drop, so our lead times

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.959
<v Speaker 8>at one point we're approaching eighteen months on some products,

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 8>and now we have stuff today we're delivered in four

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 8>or five six months. So wow, the demand is growing

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 8>and the demand for products sooner is growing as well,

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 8>and that's really a competitive vantage for us. In the market.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a better way to move electrons? I

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 4>mean the name implies, you know, superconductors.

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 8>So at the heart of what we do, particularly on

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 8>the ship business, is about superconductors. So we move electricity

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 8>in a much better way.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 4>But you've got to keep that really cold.

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 8>For super cold. Yeah, we do that as well. So

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 8>that's part of our scope and what we that's very cool.

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 8>We do a fully integrated system for the US Navy

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 8>and we just got a contract nexcess to seventy five

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 8>million dollars for the Royal Canadian Navy, so we're going

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 8>to be on Canadian ships as well, and that's all superconductor.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 4>So with better lead times, is that just due to

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 4>the supply constraints with the chain just they're not as

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 4>bad as they would have been.

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 8>Because they're not as bad, we've done more to be

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 8>able to plan what we're seeing as customers not buying

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 8>a few, but buying many, which allows us to be

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 8>able to better plan our production and be able to

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 8>plan our supply. So part of our growth has been

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 8>larger projects, larger orders, and multiple units of the same type,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 8>which has been great for us for our business.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So let's Broughden out for a second. We've had a

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 2>couple of AI data centers and energy deals. Amazon went

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the way of like, here's my own little power center

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 2>that I'm going to use and connect directly to it.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft went more of the way, Hey, we're going to

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 2>buy contracts from Constellation Energy. Constellation Energy is going to

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 2>re up at one of its nuclear facilities and connect

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 2>that to the grid. How do you foresee these partnerships

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 2>moving forward and how does that affect you guys?

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 8>I think it affects us because the rising tide lifts

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 8>all boats. There's a huge investment in making the grid

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 8>more resilient. There's more demand, be it from data, be

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 8>it from AI. We see a huge potential boom coming

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 8>for us because we provide power control solutions for semiconductor fabs.

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 8>There's a huge move in our country to reshore that capability.

0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 8>Each of the chip makers I think individually of an

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 8>so at least twenty billion dollars a capital investment in

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 8>new fabs, and that's all going to benefit for us

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 8>as well, because we're building the substation level equipment. These

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 8>are big pieces of equipment. They're ten twenty some cases

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 8>sixty tons they're like big mobile home type size, which

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 8>we love.

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 2>A little confidence it all gets built because even Intel

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 2>had to pair back some of those plans.

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, they build a fraction of it. It's going to

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 8>be a home run for us. So I know, you

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 8>know what people talked about. We have a play in

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 8>electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles because we supply the power

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 8>control equipment for the people that make the feedstocks that

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 8>go into those. I think that if we're even able

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 8>to get to a fraction and what people hope and desire,

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 8>I think it's a It's a big deal for our business.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 2>So what's next?

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 4>Any other potential acquisitions you want to maybe tell us

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 4>about it.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 8>We have a lot of people that approach us. We've

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 8>done over a few year period here, we've done a

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 8>number of acquisitions. They've all worked really, really well. You know,

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 8>we focus on good people with a good product, so

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, we find that there's a lot of inbound

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 8>traffic our ways. You know, would this be a good

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 8>fit for where we are. We think we can continue

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 8>to grow organically and in organically the business. We have

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 8>a wonderful platform globally to be able to sell. We

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 8>have a great brand in the market and we want

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 8>to continue to leverage that. Really, at the end of

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 8>the day, we want to serve what our customers need

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 8>and try to be there ahead of them before they

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 8>really need it.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, Daniel, we really appreciate it. Thank you so

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>much for stopping by. Daniel McGahn amsc CEO joining US

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 2>American super Conductor. It's a great name, it is.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 4>I was looking at the A in our function in

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 4>the terminal there's three buys A zero hold zero cells

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:33.239
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you have the broader thesis, it's hard

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>to kind of find ourselves there at the end of

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the day. I think it just depends also on where

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 2>we go, say with the presidential election. That's obviously a

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>conversation that percolates right now during Climate Week. If we

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>get a different administration, like a Trump administration, does all

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 2>of this wind up changing. I mean, many are going

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to say no, because the jobs are already in Republican states.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 2>For example, there's a great piece out from Jennifer Dooley

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>that sort of looks at that shows that a lot

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 2>of the jobs at of from clean energy are in

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Republican states.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's really fascinating to see kind of where this

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 4>is headed. But what a run for the stock, over

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent gain here to date.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, let's get more on this nep and

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 2>market here. Alex Steel just mentioned John Tucker Bloomberg Intelligence

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Radio Michael Kugino as president and portfolio manager at the

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Permanent Portfolio family of funds, to discuss the latest on

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the market. So there's really nothing happening today under the hood.

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 2>There's some fun stuff. You are seeing a sell off

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 2>in the bond market, so this is a great time

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the individual stocks. Michael, that float your boat.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 9>He good morning, Alex. We're pretty diversified with respect to

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 9>our equity holdings. I mean, when you look at the

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 9>stock market, the S and P five hundred today, it's

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 9>rating about what twenty one twenty two times earnings earnings

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 9>yield about four and a half, four and three quarters

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 9>percent as compared to the Fed funds rate right now

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 9>with the Feds move last week of roughly four seventy.

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 6>Five five percent.

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 9>So you have this rough earnings yield equivalent, and it

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 9>becomes a question of what kind of an investor are you.

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 9>Are you growth oriented in which case it's a reasonable

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 9>return for equities plus you get the growth kicker, or

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 9>if you're more conservative, you want to take that sort

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 9>of interest yield and not take on a lot of risks.

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 9>So for us, we actually own both. We're in bonds

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 9>and we're in stocks. On the equity side, we have

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 9>a diversified approach. Like I mentioned, names that come to

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 9>mind would be a Lockheed Martin and aerospace and defense,

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 9>a costco in terms of retail, Freeport Macmaran in terms

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 9>of copper and natural resources, and a mix of energy

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 9>which has been beaten down lately with Chevron and Exxon

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 9>on the integrated side, and then some smaller, uh, you know,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.719
<v Speaker 9>producers as well. Then we do have technology. We're an investor,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 9>you know, we're an investor in video and meta and

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 9>so you can see that's not one theme playing there.

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned stocks and bonds. Another area that I know

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 4>that you had exposure to you earlier this year was

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 4>gold and it's had a banner year if you looked

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 4>at those spot prices up more than twenty percent. So

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 4>obviously on the back of those record highs there with

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 4>ray cup bets and a week er dollar. Earlier this year,

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 4>you had around twenty percent target weight in gold. Do

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 4>you still have a weight like that and what's your

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 4>highest asset class as far as what your current holding is.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, our weighting right now, our target remains around twenty percent,

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 9>but were slightly overweight our target. We're probably a little

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 9>less than almost twenty three percent gold, and that speaks

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 9>to again being diversified. We see the gold market as

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:59.719
<v Speaker 9>being a long term positive. Even with the run up

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 9>all the I would say there may be some profit

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 9>taking and consolidation. Investors may want to wait for a

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 9>better entry point. However, if you're a long term investor,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 9>when you look at the landscape out there right now,

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 9>the FED being done and cutting on the interest rate cycle,

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 9>likely that's better for real returns and it reduces the

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 9>opportunity cost of investing in gold versus earnings yielding investments.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 6>You look at geopolitical risk all over the world.

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 9>You look at the development of alternative currency payment systems

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.479
<v Speaker 9>around the world to the US dollar. You look at

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 9>the US dollar declining after almost really multi decade highs,

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 9>and you look at a general fear or malaise with

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 9>respect to economic growth worldwide, and all these things add

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 9>up to a good environment for an investor to have

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 9>something in gold as a portfolio enhancer or a protector.

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 2>When you talked about the portfolio and the mix and

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 2>all that, is there still value in just ta bill

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>and chill and when does that narrative change.

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, for our cash and cash equivalents, that's

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 9>exactly what we're doing. There are opportunities with gyields coming

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 9>with rates coming down, there.

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 6>Are opportunities to incrus duration.

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 9>We're doing that very selectively in our portfolio, but for

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 9>our shorter term cash needs for liquidity and even as

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 9>part of our diversified approach, we're still taking that. You know,

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 9>now it's five percent versus five and a half, and

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 9>it may them down a little bit further, but you're

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 9>still talking, you know, risk free earnings.

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 6>I don't think the Fed's gonna cut that drastically, you.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 9>Know, in the next year, year and a half or

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 9>so all the way down to you know, three percent,

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 9>three and a half percent the terminal rate.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 6>I think they ought to maintain a sort of.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 9>Slight tight bias personally, so you're still getting risk free

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 9>money for your cash, you know, at worse three and

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 9>a half percent, maybe in the fours, maybe closer to five.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 9>And so as part of a diversified approach, it makes

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 9>sense for us if you're an if you're an investor,

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 9>that that's the only thing you're doing. I think you

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 9>may be selling yourself short unless you're very, very risk urse.

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 9>I think you can make more by being more broadly

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 9>diversified in a number of different areas.

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 4>What about when it comes to the reed side of

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 4>things in the equity market, when you have reads coming down,

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 4>what's your broader outlook for real estate and do you

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 4>own those corner of the market with those stocks.

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we do own some reads, and I probably should

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 9>have mentioned that is one of our asset classes that

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 9>we focus on. And you are right that with rates

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 9>coming down, reads generally are attractive in that environment, and

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 9>so I see that as being a good long term

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 9>area as well. And we're spread out among a number

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 9>of different industry subsectors within real estate, and so I

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 9>think the one thing you do have to be careful

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 9>of a little bit here in reachs would be the

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 9>balance sheets. Even though it appears that the markets may

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 9>have sidestepped the big credit crisis due to a major

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 9>refinancing of some of the debt at these higher yielding

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 9>debt deals, especially if rates are coming down, I think

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 9>you still need to focus on the balance sheet to

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 9>make sure your companies are not unduly exposed.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 6>To credit risk. That you know, so asset quality is

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 6>something you always look at.

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 9>It reads anyway, So no nothing new here, but investors

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 9>should be careful in that part of the red sector.

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Michael, super appreciate it. Thank you so much. Michael Cougino,

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 2>President portfolio Manager, Permanent Portfolio Family of Funds.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Play and

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing bloom eleven thirty.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 4>One.

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Other story that really caught my eye today was about

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 2>colleges and how basic other some higher education systems here

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 2>in the US. It is crazy, right, like Kinston so expensive,

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 2>they compete Harvard the whole thing. But apparently other universities

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 2>now like Northeastern, are trying to tap a Wall Street

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 2>playbook so they can rival Ivy's on admissions. This obviously

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 2>caught everybody's eye. It's one of the top reading stories

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 2>on the Bloomberg terminal. Francesca Maglione is personal finance and

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 2>higher education reporter and she joins us now in the

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Interactive broker's studio. Okay, can you just walk us

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 2>through the premise here?

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. So, Northeastern University has been known for years as

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 10>a commuter school mostly attended by local students, and since

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 10>twenty eleven they've kind of been expanding their brand. They

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 10>now have fourteen campuses across the world, with three campuses abroad.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 10>What we thought was interesting is that since twenty nineteen

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 10>they've been buying up other strugglings schools, kind of tapping

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 10>in that private equity playbook and m and a. Yeah,

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 10>like they've been merging with They've merged with three different

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 10>schools so far and kind of embedded the Northeastern brand

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 10>on these schools. And now can offer to students like, hey,

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 10>you can study for a semester in California, you can

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 10>do a semester in New York. And this is very

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 10>different from those schools like Princeton and Harvard, which just

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 10>want to stay small and delete. They want to expand

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 10>their brand as much as they can.

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 4>Because there's a lot of schools, especially in the South

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 4>where I'm from, where you had a lot of magnet

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 4>schools and then satellite schools, whether it was like the

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 4>University of Texas or Texas A and M, so you'd

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 4>have not just the main campuses, say in Austin, Texas,

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 4>you had ones in SA Dallas and outside of that.

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 4>So I'm wondering, is this is there a particular playbook

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to kind of like them and a

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 4>type of feel it comes to something like this, or

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 4>is there different not apples and apples.

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 10>I guess yeah, I guess. What's interesting with the Northeastern

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 10>is that Higher rid is going through a very hard time.

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of smaller schools that are closing all

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 10>over the US, and so Northeastern is growing at a

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 10>time when all these other college are shrinking. Colleges are

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 10>competing for students. The number of students across the US

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 10>is going to drop by ten percent, the number of

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 10>students going.

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 4>To college, and so why what's the driver there?

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 10>It's just a demographic cliff and the costs and it's

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 10>extremely expensive as well. COVID was really bad for the

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 10>college enrollment numbers as well. And so Northeastern is kind

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 10>of growing at a time when all these other schools

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 10>are shrinking. And when looking for schools, they want valuable

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 10>real estate. The latest acquisition that they have is in

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 10>New York. Now they have three buildings in Manhattan.

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Did they buy Marymount or was this part of Yes.

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 10>They don't call it buying because.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Still has its own brand.

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 10>They just like swallow their liabilities and their assets. There's

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 10>no exchange of money that changes hands.

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it working? Like, yeah, is this playbook actually helping Northeastern? Yeah,

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 2>it's working.

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 10>Northeastern last year had almost one hundred thousand students apply

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.959
<v Speaker 10>to their university. They've seen their enrollment increase by fifteen

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 10>percent since twenty nineteen, and they've gone from being just

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 10>a local, little known brand to being known worldwide.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 7>Does it.

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Does it help? But part of the college thing is

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 2>like the experience, right, Like you go there and you

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 2>live there, like maybe you take a semester abroad or something,

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 2>but like you stay there and it feels a little

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 2>weird and disjointed, and then all of a sudden be

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 2>like you're here, and then you're there, and then you're there.

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, for sure. That's one of the things that Northeastern

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 10>will say is changing within higher ed and that's why

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 10>they've been successful in this moment. They think that students

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 10>no longer or some students no longer want to, you know,

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 10>spend four years in one place with a small community,

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 10>and they're looking to get new experiences and be more

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 10>practical in terms of their four years. How can this

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 10>translate into career after college and things like that. So

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 10>that's another way that they're different from other colleges.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 4>Are there other potential universities or colleges that are eyeing

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 4>this type of model and they may try to do

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 4>and replicate something similar.

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, for sure. Northeastern told us that they've heard from

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 10>almost fifty schools that have reached out kind of interesting

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 10>and either merging with them or learning about their business model.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 10>We saw that Vanderbilt has now a campus in Florida.

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.399
<v Speaker 10>That's kind of a school that's trying to do something

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 10>a little similar, not at the scale that Northeastern is

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 10>doing it, but there's a lot of schools watching what

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 10>they're doing right now.

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so is what they're doing also though different from

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 2>that Marymount thing, Like I can still go to Marymount here,

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 2>say in New York City versus Northeastern, and then I

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 2>go spend a semester in California.

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 10>Yes, so the Merrymount is part of their whole plan.

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that that is part Right now, they're.

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 10>Still Marymount because the merger was just announced, but eventually

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 10>it'll be Marymount at Northeastern or whatever brand they decide

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 10>to go with.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Ye, so then I can go to Northeastern and then

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 2>be like I'm gonna spend a year in New York

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 2>going in to Marymount. Yes, okay, yeah, yeah, that's just

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 2>so interesting. It's just such a different college like experience.

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I would think that you go to college, you learn

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 2>how to like be by yourself, do laundry by yourself,

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 2>debt by yourself, to brink beer by yourself, and then

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 2>like that's it, not like jet setting off to different locations,

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, Frantessca, thanks that it was a really great piece,

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 2>really appreciated. Francesca Maglione, personal finance and higher education reporter

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 2>at Joining Us.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal